Antibody arrests γ-herpesvirus olfactory super-infection independently of neutralization

Olfactory immunology: the missing piece in airway and CNS defence

The olfactory mucosa is a component of the nasal airway that mediates the sense of smell. Recent studies point to an important role for the olfactory mucosa as a barrier to both respiratory pathogens and to neuroinvasive pathogens that hijack the olfactory nerve and invade the CNS. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that the olfactory mucosa is an integral part of a heterogeneous nasal mucosal barrier critical to upper airway immunity. However, our insufficient knowledge of olfactory mucosal immunity hinders attempts to protect this tissue from infection and other diseases. This Review summarizes the state of olfactory immunology by highlighting the unique immunologically relevant anatomy of the olfactory mucosa, describing what is known of olfactory immune cells, and considering the impact of common infectious diseases and inflammatory disorders at this site. We will offer our perspective on the future of the field and the many unresolved questions pertaining to olfactory immunity.

Mucosal plasma cells are required to protect the upper airway and brain from infection

While blood antibodies mediate protective immunity in most organs, whether they protect nasal surfaces in the upper airway is unclear. Using multiple viral infection models in mice, we found that blood-borne antibodies could not defend the olfactory epithelium. Despite high serum antibody titers, pathogens infected nasal turbinates, and neurotropic microbes invaded the brain. Using passive antibody transfers and parabiosis, we identified a restrictive blood-endothelial barrier that excluded circulating antibodies from the olfactory mucosa. Plasma cell depletions demonstrated that plasma cells must reside within olfactory tissue to achieve sterilizing immunity. Antibody blockade and genetically deficient models revealed that this local immunity required CD4+ T cells and CXCR3. Many vaccine adjuvants failed to generate olfactory plasma cells, but mucosal immunizations established humoral protection of the olfactory surface. Our identification of a blood-olfactory barrier and the requirement for tissue-derived antibody has implications for vaccinology, respiratory and CNS pathogen transmission, and B cell fate decisions.

KSHV (HHV8) vaccine: promises and potential pitfalls for a new anti-cancer vaccine

Seven viruses cause at least 15% of the total cancer burden. Viral cancers have been described as the "low-hanging fruit" that can be potentially prevented or treated by new vaccines that would alter the course of global human cancer. Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8) is the sole cause of Kaposi sarcoma, which primarily afflicts resource-poor and socially marginalized populations. This review summarizes a recent NIH-sponsored workshop's findings on the epidemiology and biology of KSHV as an overlooked but potentially vaccine-preventable infection. The unique epidemiology of this virus provides opportunities to prevent its cancers if an effective, inexpensive, and well-tolerated vaccine can be developed and delivered.

Olfactory Entry Promotes Herpesvirus Recombination

Herpesvirus genomes show abundant evidence of past recombination. Its functional importance is unknown. A key question is whether recombinant viruses can outpace the immunity induced by their parents to reach higher loads. We tested this by coinfecting mice with attenuated mutants of murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV-4). Infection by the natural olfactory route routinely allowed mutant viruses to reconstitute wild-type genotypes and reach normal viral loads. Lung coinfections rescued much less well. Attenuated murine cytomegalovirus mutants similarly showed recombinational rescue via the nose but not the lungs. These infections spread similarly, so route-specific rescue implied that recombination occurred close to the olfactory entry site. Rescue of replication-deficient MuHV-4 confirmed this, showing that coinfection occurred in the first encountered olfactory cells. This worked even with asynchronous inoculation, implying that a defective virus can wait here for later rescue. Virions entering the nose get caught on respiratory mucus, which the respiratory epithelial cilia push back toward the olfactory surface. Early infection was correspondingly focused on the anterior olfactory edge. Thus, by concentrating incoming infection into a small area, olfactory entry seems to promote functionally significant recombination. IMPORTANCE All organisms depend on genetic diversity to cope with environmental change. Small viruses rely on frequent point mutations. This is harder for herpesviruses because they have larger genomes. Recombination provides another means of genetic optimization. Human herpesviruses often coinfect, and they show evidence of past recombination, but whether this is rare and incidental or functionally important is unknown. We showed that herpesviruses entering mice via the natural olfactory route meet reliably enough for recombination routinely to repair crippling mutations and restore normal viral loads. It appeared to occur in the first encountered olfactory cells and reflected a concentration of infection at the anterior olfactory edge. Thus, natural host entry incorporates a significant capacity for herpesvirus recombination.

A Live Olfactory Mouse Cytomegalovirus Vaccine, Attenuated for Systemic Spread, Protects against Superinfection

Vaccination against the betaherpesvirus, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a public health goal. However, HCMV has proved difficult to vaccinate against. Vaccination against single HCMV determinants has not worked, suggesting that immunity to a wider antigenic profile may be required. Live attenuated vaccines provide the best prospects for protection, but the question remains as to how to balance vaccine virulence with safety. Animal models of HCMV infection provide insights into identifying targets for virus attenuation and understanding how host immunity blocks natural, mucosal infection. Here, we evaluated the vaccine potential of a mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) vaccine deleted of a viral G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), designated M33, that renders it attenuated for systemic spread. A single noninvasive olfactory ΔM33 MCMV vaccine replicated locally, but as a result of the loss of the M33 GPCR, it failed to spread systemically and was attenuated for latent infection. Vaccination did not prevent host entry of a superinfecting MCMV but spread from the mucosa was blocked. This approach to vaccine design may provide a viable alternative for a safe and effective betaherpesvirus vaccine. IMPORTANCE Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the most common cause of congenital infection for which a vaccine is not yet available. Subunit vaccine candidates have failed to achieve licensure. A live HCMV vaccine may prove more efficacious, but it faces safety hurdles which include its propensity to persist and to establish latency. Understanding how pathogens infect guide rational vaccine design. However, HCMV infections are asymptomatic and thus difficult to capture. Animal models of experimental infection provide insight. Here, we investigated the vaccine potential of a mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) attenuated for systemic spread and latency. We used olfactory vaccination and virus challenge to mimic its natural acquisition. We provide proof of concept that a single olfactory MCMV that is deficient in systemic spread can protect against wild-type MCMV superinfection and dissemination. This approach of deleting functional counterpart genes in HCMV may provide safe and effective vaccination against congenital HCMV disease.

Conquering the Host: Determinants of Pathogenesis Learned from Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68

Gammaherpesviruses are an important class of oncogenic pathogens that are exquisitely evolved to their respective hosts. As such, the human gammaherpesviruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) do not naturally infect nonhuman primates or rodents. There is a clear need to fully explore mechanisms of gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis, host control, and immune evasion in the host. A gammaherpesvirus pathogen isolated from murid rodents was first reported in 1980; 40 years later, murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68, MuHV-4, γHV68) infection of laboratory mice is a well-established pathogenesis system recognized for its utility in applying state-of-the-art approaches to investigate virus-host interactions ranging from the whole host to the individual cell. Here, we highlight recent advancements in our understanding of the processes by which MHV68 colonizes the host and drives disease. Lessons that inform KSHV and EBV pathogenesis and provide future avenues for novel interventions against infection and virus-associated cancers are emphasized.

Membrane association of a model CD4+ T-cell vaccine antigen confers enhanced yet incomplete protection against murid herpesvirus-4 infection

Vaccination against γ-herpesviruses has proved difficult. CD4⁺ T cells are essential to contain infection, but how best to prime them and whether this can reduce viral loads remain unclear. To address these questions, we used ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen, delivering it with murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) to protect mice against OVA-expressing murine herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4). Membrane-associated OVA (mOVA) was more effective than soluble OVA, both to prime CD4⁺ T cells and as an effector target. It was also a better target than an OVA epitope limited to infected cells, suggesting that protective CD4⁺ T cells recognize infected cell debris rather than infected cells themselves. While MCMV-mOVA protected acutely against MuHV-4-mOVA, long-term protection was incomplete, even when OVA-specific CD8⁺ T cells and B cells were also primed. Thus, even optimized single-target vaccines may poorly reduce long-term γ-herpesvirus infections.

Limited protection against γ-herpesvirus infection by replication-deficient virus particles

The γ-herpesviruses have proved hard to vaccination against, with no convincing protection against long-term latent infection by recombinant viral subunits. In experimental settings, whole-virus vaccines have proved more effective, even when the vaccine virus itself establishes latent infection poorly. The main alternative is replication-deficient virus particles. Here high-dose, replication-deficient murid herpesvirus-4 only protected mice partially against wild-type infection. By contrast, latency-deficient but replication-competent vaccine protected mice strongly, even when delivered non-invasively to the olfactory epithelium. Thus, this approach seems to provide the best chance of a safe and effective γ-herpesvirus vaccine.

A CD4+ T Cell-NK Cell Axis of Gammaherpesvirus Control

CD4⁺ T cells are essential to control herpesviruses. Murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV-4)-driven lung disease in CD4⁺ T-cell-deficient mice provides a well-studied example. Protective CD4⁺ T cells have been hypothesized to kill infected cells directly. However, removing major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) from LysM⁺ or CD11c⁺ cells increased MuHV-4 replication not in those cells but in type 1 alveolar epithelial cells, which lack MHCII, LysM, or CD11c. Disruption of MHCII in infected cells had no effect. Therefore, CD4⁺ T cells engaged uninfected presenting cells and protected indirectly. Mice lacking MHCII in LysM⁺ or CD11c⁺ cells maintained systemic antiviral CD4⁺ T cell responses, but recruited fewer CD4⁺ T cells into infected lungs. NK cell infiltration was also reduced, and NK cell depletion normalized infection between MHCII-deficient and control mice. Therefore, NK cell recruitment seemed to be an important component of CD4⁺ T-cell-dependent protection. Disruption of viral CD8⁺ T cell evasion made this defense redundant, suggesting that it is important mainly to control CD8-evasive pathogens.IMPORTANCE Gammaherpesviruses are widespread and cause cancers. CD4⁺ T cells are a key defense. We found that they defend indirectly, engaging uninfected presenting cells and recruiting innate immune cells to attack infected targets. This segregation of CD4⁺ T cells from immediate contact with infection helps the immune system to cope with viral evasion. Priming this defense by vaccination offers a way to protect against gammaherpesvirus-induced cancers.

Vaccine protection against murid herpesvirus-4 is maintained when the priming virus lacks known latency genes

γ-Herpesviruses establish latent infections of lymphocytes and drive their proliferation, causing cancers and motivating a search for vaccines. Effective vaccination against murid herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4)-driven lymphoproliferation by latency-impaired mutant viruses suggests that lytic access to the latency reservoir is a viable target for control. However, the vaccines retained the immunogenic MuHV-4 M2 latency gene. Here, a strong reduction in challenge virus load was maintained when the challenge virus lacked the main latency-associated CD8⁺ T-cell epitope of M2, or when the vaccine virus lacked M2 entirely. This protection was maintained also when the vaccine virus lacked both episome maintenance and the genomic region encompassing M1, M2, M3, M4 and ORF4. Therefore, protection did not require immunity to known MuHV-4 latency genes. As the remaining vaccine virus genes have clear homologs in human γ-herpesviruses, this approach of deleting viral latency genes could also be applied to them, to generate safe and effective vaccines against human disease.

Immune Control of γ-Herpesviruses

Vaccination against γ-herpesviruses has been hampered by our limited understanding of their normal control. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B cells are killed by viral latency antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells in vitro, but attempts to block B cell infection with antibody or to prime anti-viral CD8⁺ T cells have protected poorly in vivo. The Doherty laboratory used Murid Herpesvirus-4 (MuHV-4) to analyze γ-herpesvirus control in mice and found CD4⁺ T cell dependence, with viral evasion limiting CD8⁺ T cell function. MuHV-4 colonizes germinal center (GC) B cells via lytic transfer from myeloid cells, and CD4⁺ T cells control myeloid infection. GC colonization and protective, lytic antigen-specific CD4⁺ T cells are now evident also for EBV. Subunit vaccines have protected only transiently against MuHV-4, but whole virus vaccines give long-term protection, via CD4⁺ T cells and antibody. They block infection transfer to B cells, and need include no known viral latency gene, nor any MuHV-4-specific gene. Thus, the Doherty approach of in vivo murine analysis has led to a plausible vaccine strategy for EBV and, perhaps, some insight into what CD8⁺ T cells really do.