1
|
Broschard MB, Kim J, Love BC, Halverson HE, Freeman JH. Disrupting dorsal hippocampus impairs category learning in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2024; 212:107941. [PMID: 38768684 DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2024.107941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Categorization requires a balance of mechanisms that can generalize across common features and discriminate against specific details. A growing literature suggests that the hippocampus may accomplish these mechanisms by using fundamental mechanisms like pattern separation, pattern completion, and memory integration. Here, we assessed the role of the rodent dorsal hippocampus (HPC) in category learning by combining inhibitory DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) and simulations using a neural network model. Using touchscreens, we trained rats to categorize distributions of visual stimuli containing black and white gratings that varied along two continuous dimensions. Inactivating the dorsal HPC impaired category learning and generalization, suggesting that the rodent HPC plays an important role during categorization. Hippocampal inactivation had no effect on a control discrimination task that used identical trial procedures as the categorization tasks, suggesting that the impairments were specific to categorization. Model simulations were conducted with variants of a neural network to assess the impact of selective deficits on category learning. The hippocampal inactivation groups were best explained by a model that injected random noise into the computation that compared the similarity between category stimuli and existing memory representations. This model is akin to a deficit in mechanisms of pattern completion, which retrieves similar memory representations using partial information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Broschard
- The Picower Institute of Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jangjin Kim
- Department of Psychology, Kyungpool National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology and The Alan Turing Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hunter E Halverson
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - John H Freeman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levi A, Aviv N, Stark E. Learning to learn: Single session acquisition of new rules by freely moving mice. PNAS NEXUS 2024; 3:pgae203. [PMID: 38818240 PMCID: PMC11138122 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Learning from examples and adapting to new circumstances are fundamental attributes of human cognition. However, it is unclear what conditions allow for fast and successful learning, especially in nonhuman subjects. To determine how rapidly freely moving mice can learn a new discrimination criterion (DC), we design a two-alternative forced-choice visual discrimination paradigm in which the DCs governing the task can change between sessions. We find that experienced animals can learn a new DC after being exposed to only five training and three testing trials. The propensity for single session learning improves over time and is accurately predicted based on animal experience and criterion difficulty. After establishing the procedural learning of a paradigm, mice continuously improve their performance in new circumstances. Thus, mice learn to learn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Levi
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Noam Aviv
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Eran Stark
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Sagol Department of Neurobiology, Haifa University, Haifa 3103301, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White SR, Preston MW, Swanson K, Laubach M. Learning to Choose: Behavioral Dynamics Underlying the Initial Acquisition of Decision-Making. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0142-24.2024. [PMID: 38724267 PMCID: PMC11103646 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0142-24.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Current theories of decision-making propose that decisions arise through competition between choice options. Computational models of the decision process estimate how quickly information about choice options is integrated and how much information is needed to trigger a choice. Experiments using this approach typically report data from well-trained participants. As such, we do not know how the decision process evolves as a decision-making task is learned for the first time. To address this gap, we used a behavioral design separating learning the value of choice options from learning to make choices. We trained male rats to respond to single visual stimuli with different reward values. Then, we trained them to make choices between pairs of stimuli. Initially, the rats responded more slowly when presented with choices. However, as they gained experience in making choices, this slowing reduced. Response slowing on choice trials persisted throughout the testing period. We found that it was specifically associated with increased exponential variability when the rats chose the higher value stimulus. Additionally, our analysis using drift diffusion modeling revealed that the rats required less information to make choices over time. These reductions in the decision threshold occurred after just a single session of choice learning. These findings provide new insights into the learning process of decision-making tasks. They suggest that the value of choice options and the ability to make choices are learned separately and that experience plays a crucial role in improving decision-making performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha R White
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Michael W Preston
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Kyra Swanson
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Mark Laubach
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang LY, Parker DA, Ethridge LE, Hamm JP, Keedy SS, Tamminga CA, Pearlson GD, Keshavan MS, Hill SK, Sweeney JA, McDowell JE, Clementz BA. Double dissociation between P300 components and task switch error type in healthy but not psychosis participants. Schizophr Res 2023; 261:161-169. [PMID: 37776647 PMCID: PMC11015813 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Event-related potentials (ERPs) during oddball tasks and the behavioral performance on the Penn Conditional Exclusion Task (PCET) measure context-appropriate responding: P300 ERPs to oddball targets reflect detection of input changes and context updating in working memory, and PCET performance indexes detection, adherence, and maintenance of mental set changes. More specifically, PCET variables quantify cognitive functions including inductive reasoning (set 1 completion), mental flexibility (perseverative errors), and working memory maintenance (regressive errors). Past research showed that both P300 ERPs and PCET performance are disrupted in psychosis. This study probed the possible neural correlates of 3 PCET abnormalities that occur in participants with psychosis via the overlapping cognitive demands of the two study paradigms. In a two-tiered analysis, psychosis (n = 492) and healthy participants (n = 244) were first divided based on completion of set 1 - which measures subjects' ability to use inductive reasoning to arrive at the correct set. Results showed that participants who failed set 1 produced lower parietal P300, independent of clinical status. In the second tier of analysis, a double dissociation was found among healthy set 1 completers: frontal P300 amplitudes were negatively associated with perseverative errors, and parietal P300 was negatively associated with regressive errors. In contrast, psychosis participants showed global P300 reductions regardless of PCET performance. From this we conclude that in psychosis, overall activations evoked by the oddball task are reduced while the cognitive functions required by PCET are still somewhat supported, showing some level of independence or compensatory physiology in psychosis between neural activities underlying the two tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Yu Huang
- Departments of Psychology & Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - David A Parker
- Departments of Psychology & Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Lauren E Ethridge
- Department of Psychology and Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Jordan P Hamm
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah S Keedy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Carol A Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - S Kristian Hill
- Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John A Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer E McDowell
- Departments of Psychology & Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Brett A Clementz
- Departments of Psychology & Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chasse RY, Perrino PA, McLeod RM, Altmann GTM, Fitch RH. A novel approach to the assessment of higher-order rule learning in male mice. Learn Mem 2023; 30:271-277. [PMID: 37802548 PMCID: PMC10561631 DOI: 10.1101/lm.053771.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Historically, the development of valid and reliable methods for assessing higher-order cognitive abilities (e.g., rule learning and transfer) has been difficult in rodent models. To date, limited evidence supports the existence of higher cognitive abilities such as rule generation and complex decision-making in mice, rats, and rabbits. To this end, we sought to develop a task that would require mice to learn and transfer a rule. We trained mice to visually discriminate a series of images (image set, six total) of increasing complexity following three stages: (1) learn a visual target, (2) learn a rule (ignore any new images around the target), and finally (3) apply this rule in abstract form to a comparable but new image set. To evaluate learning for each stage, we measured (1) days (and performance by day) to discriminate the original target at criterion, (2) days (and performance by day) to get back to criterion when images in the set were altered by the introduction of distractors (rule learning), and (3) overall days (and performance by day) to criterion when experienced versus naïve cohorts of mice were tested on the same image set (rule transfer). Twenty-seven wild-type male C57 mice were tested using Bussey-Saksida touchscreen operant conditioning boxes (Lafayette Instruments). Two comparable black-white image sets were delivered sequentially (counterbalanced for order) to two identical cohorts of mice. Results showed that all mice were able to effectively learn their initial target image and could recall it >80 d later. We also found that mice were able to quickly learn and apply a "rule" : Ignore new distractors and continue to identify their visual target embedded in more complex images. The presence of rule learning was supported because performance criterion thresholds were regained much faster than initial learning when distractors were introduced. On the other hand, mice appeared unable to transfer this rule to a new set of stimuli. This is supported because visual discrimination curves for a new image set were no better than an initial (naïve) learning by a matched cohort of mice. Overall results have important implications for phenotyping research and particularly for the modeling of complex disorders in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Y Chasse
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
- Murine Behavioral Neurogenetics Facility, Institute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - Peter A Perrino
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
- Murine Behavioral Neurogenetics Facility, Institute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - Ruth M McLeod
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
- Murine Behavioral Neurogenetics Facility, Institute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - Gerry T M Altmann
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - R Holly Fitch
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
- Murine Behavioral Neurogenetics Facility, Institute of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Broschard MB, Kim J, Love BC, Freeman JH. Dorsomedial striatum, but not dorsolateral striatum, is necessary for rat category learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2023; 199:107732. [PMID: 36764646 DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Categorization is an adaptive cognitive function that allows us to generalize knowledge to novel situations. Converging evidence from neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological studies suggest that categorization is mediated by the basal ganglia; however, there is debate regarding the necessity of each subregion of the basal ganglia and their respective functions. The current experiment examined the roles of the dorsomedial striatum (DMS; homologous to the head of the caudate nucleus) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS; homologous to the body and tail of the caudate nucleus) in category learning by combining selective lesions with computational modeling. Using a touchscreen apparatus, rats were trained to categorize distributions of visual stimuli that varied along two continuous dimensions (i.e., spatial frequency and orientation). The tasks either required attention to one stimulus dimension (spatial frequency or orientation; 1D tasks) or both stimulus dimensions (spatial frequency and orientation; 2D tasks). Rats with NMDA lesions of the DMS were impaired on both the 1D tasks and 2D tasks, whereas rats with DLS lesions showed no impairments. The lesions did not affect performance on a discrimination task that had the same trial structure as the categorization tasks, suggesting that the category impairments effected processes relevant to categorization. Model simulations were conducted using a neural network to assess the effect of the DMS lesions on category learning. Together, the results suggest that the DMS is critical to map category representations to appropriate behavioral responses, whereas the DLS is not necessary for categorization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Broschard
- The Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jangjin Kim
- Department of Psychology, Kyungpool National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology and The Alan Turing Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - John H Freeman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Corte BJ, Farley SJ, Heslin KA, Parker KL, Freeman JH. The dorsal hippocampus' role in context-based timing in rodents. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2022; 194:107673. [PMID: 35985617 DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
To act proactively, we must predict when future events will occur. Individuals generate temporal predictions using cues that indicate an event will happen after a certain duration elapses. Neural models of timing focus on how the brain represents these cue-duration associations. However, these models often overlook the fact that situational factors frequently modulate temporal expectations. For example, in realistic environments, the intervals associated with different cues will often covary due to a common underlying cause. According to the 'common cause hypothesis,' observers anticipate this covariance such that, when one cue's interval changes, temporal expectations for other cues shift in the same direction. Furthermore, as conditions will often differ across environments, the same cue can mean different things in different contexts. Therefore, updates to temporal expectations should be context-specific. Behavioral work supports these predictions, yet their underlying neural mechanisms are unclear. Here, we asked whether the dorsal hippocampus mediates context-based timing, given its broad role in context-conditioning. Specifically, we trained rats with either hippocampal or sham lesions that two cues predicted reward after either a short or long duration elapsed (e.g., tone-8 s/light-16 s). Then, we moved rats to a new context and extended the long cue's interval (e.g., light-32 s). This caused rats to respond later to the short cue, despite never being trained to do so. Importantly, when returned to the initial training context, sham rats shifted back toward both cues' original intervals. In contrast, lesion rats continued to respond at the long cue's newer interval. Surprisingly, they still showed contextual modulation for the short cue, responding earlier like shams. These data suggest the hippocampus only mediates context-based timing if a cue is explicitly paired and/or rewarded across distinct contexts. Furthermore, as lesions did not impact timing measures at baseline or acquisition for the long cue's new interval, our data suggests that the hippocampus only modulates timing when context is relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J De Corte
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean J Farley
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kelsey A Heslin
- Department of Neuroscience and the Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Krystal L Parker
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - John H Freeman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kovacs P, Ashby FG. On what it means to automatize a rule. Cognition 2022; 226:105168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
9
|
The Lords of the Rings: People and pigeons take different paths mastering the concentric-rings categorization task. Cognition 2022; 218:104920. [PMID: 34619516 PMCID: PMC8639790 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
COVIS (COmpetition between Verbal and Implicit Systems; Ashby, Alfonso-Reese, & Waldron, 1998) is a prominent model of categorization which hypothesizes that humans have two independent categorization systems - one declarative, one associative - that can be recruited to solve category learning tasks. To date, most COVIS-related research has focused on just two experimental tasks: linear rule-based (RB) tasks, which purportedly encourage declarative rule use, and linear information-integration (II) tasks, which purportedly require associative learning mechanisms. We introduce and investigate a novel alternative: the concentric-rings task, a nonlinear category structure that both humans and pigeons can successfully learn and transfer to untrained exemplars. Yet, despite their broad behavioral similarities, humans and pigeons achieve their successful learning through decidedly different means. As predicted by COVIS, pigeons appear to rely solely on associative learning mechanisms, whereas humans appear to initially test but subsequently reject unidimensional rules. We discuss how variants of our concentric-rings task might yield further insights into which category-learning mechanisms are shared across species, as well as how categorization strategies might change throughout training.
Collapse
|
10
|
Broschard MB, Kim J, Love BC, Wasserman EA, Freeman JH. Prelimbic cortex maintains attention to category-relevant information and flexibly updates category representations. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2021; 185:107524. [PMID: 34560284 PMCID: PMC8633767 DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Category learning groups stimuli according to similarity or function. This involves finding and attending to stimulus features that reliably inform category membership. Although many of the neural mechanisms underlying categorization remain elusive, models of human category learning posit that prefrontal cortex plays a substantial role. Here, we investigated the role of the prelimbic cortex (PL) in rat visual category learning by administering excitotoxic lesions before category training and then evaluating the effects of the lesions with computational modeling. Using a touchscreen apparatus, rats (female and male) learned to categorize distributions of category stimuli that varied along two continuous dimensions. For some rats, categorizing the stimuli encouraged selective attention towards a single stimulus dimension (i.e., 1D tasks). For other rats, categorizing the stimuli required divided attention towards both stimulus dimensions (i.e., 2D tasks). Testing sessions then examined generalization to novel exemplars. PL lesions impaired learning and generalization for the 1D tasks, but not the 2D tasks. Then, a neural network was fit to the behavioral data to examine how the lesions affected categorization. The results suggest that the PL facilitates category learning by maintaining attention to category-relevant information and updating category representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Broschard
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| | - Jangjin Kim
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology and The Alan Turing Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Edward A Wasserman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - John H Freeman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Swanson K, White SR, Preston MW, Wilson J, Mitchell M, Laubach M. An Open Source Platform for Presenting Dynamic Visual Stimuli. eNeuro 2021; 8:ENEURO.0563-20.2021. [PMID: 33811085 PMCID: PMC8205497 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0563-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Operant behavior procedures often rely on visual stimuli to cue the initiation or secession of a response, and to provide a means for discriminating between two or more simultaneously available responses. While primate and human studies typically use Liquid-Crystal Display (LCD) or Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) monitors and touch screens, rodent studies use a variety of methods to present visual cues ranging from traditional incandescent light bulbs, single LEDs, and, more recently, touch screen monitors. Commercially available systems for visual stimulus presentation are costly, challenging to customize, and are typically closed source. We developed an open-source, highly-modifiable visual stimulus presentation platform that can be combined with a 3D-printed operant response device. The device uses an 8 × 8 matrix of LEDs, and can be expanded to control much larger LED matrices. Implementing the platform is low-cost (<$70 USD per device in the year 2020). Using the platform, we trained rats to make nosepoke responses and discriminate between two distinct visual cues in a location-independent manner. This visual stimulus presentation platform is a cost-effective way to implement complex visually-guided operant behavior, including the use of moving or dynamically changing visual stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyra Swanson
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Samantha R White
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Michael W Preston
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Joshua Wilson
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Meagan Mitchell
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| | - Mark Laubach
- Department of Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reinert S, Hübener M, Bonhoeffer T, Goltstein PM. Mouse prefrontal cortex represents learned rules for categorization. Nature 2021; 593:411-417. [PMID: 33883745 PMCID: PMC8131197 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03452-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The ability to categorize sensory stimuli is crucial for an animal’s survival in a complex environment. Memorizing categories instead of individual exemplars enables greater behavioural flexibility and is computationally advantageous. Neurons that show category selectivity have been found in several areas of the mammalian neocortex1–4, but the prefrontal cortex seems to have a prominent role4,5 in this context. Specifically, in primates that are extensively trained on a categorization task, neurons in the prefrontal cortex rapidly and flexibly represent learned categories6,7. However, how these representations first emerge in naive animals remains unexplored, leaving it unclear whether flexible representations are gradually built up as part of semantic memory or assigned more or less instantly during task execution8,9. Here we investigate the formation of a neuronal category representation throughout the entire learning process by repeatedly imaging individual cells in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex. We show that mice readily learn rule-based categorization and generalize to novel stimuli. Over the course of learning, neurons in the prefrontal cortex display distinct dynamics in acquiring category selectivity and are differentially engaged during a later switch in rules. A subset of neurons selectively and uniquely respond to categories and reflect generalization behaviour. Thus, a category representation in the mouse prefrontal cortex is gradually acquired during learning rather than recruited ad hoc. This gradual process suggests that neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex are part of a specific semantic memory for visual categories. Neurons in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex acquire category-selective responses with learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Reinert
- Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.,Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Mark Hübener
- Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith JD, Church BA. A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2021; 37:13-18. [PMID: 34124319 PMCID: PMC8192071 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive, comparative, and developmental psychologists have long been interested in humans' and animals' ability to respond to abstract relations. Cross-species research has used relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) tasks in which participants try to find stimulus pairs that "match" because they express the same abstract relation (same or different). Researchers seek to understand the cognitive processes that underlie successful matching, and the cognitive constraints that create species differences in these tasks. Here we describe a dissociative framework drawn from cognitive neuroscience. It has strong potential to illuminate the area of same-different conceptualization. It has already influenced comparative research on categorization and metacognition. This dissociative framework also shows that species differences in same-different conceptualization have resonance with species differences in other comparative domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. David Smith
- Language Research Center, Georgia State University
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University
| | - Barbara A. Church
- Language Research Center, Georgia State University
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goltstein PM, Reinert S, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Mouse visual cortex areas represent perceptual and semantic features of learned visual categories. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:1441-1451. [PMID: 34545249 PMCID: PMC8481127 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-021-00914-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Associative memories are stored in distributed networks extending across multiple brain regions. However, it is unclear to what extent sensory cortical areas are part of these networks. Using a paradigm for visual category learning in mice, we investigated whether perceptual and semantic features of learned category associations are already represented at the first stages of visual information processing in the neocortex. Mice learned categorizing visual stimuli, discriminating between categories and generalizing within categories. Inactivation experiments showed that categorization performance was contingent on neuronal activity in the visual cortex. Long-term calcium imaging in nine areas of the visual cortex identified changes in feature tuning and category tuning that occurred during this learning process, most prominently in the postrhinal area (POR). These results provide evidence for the view that associative memories form a brain-wide distributed network, with learning in early stages shaping perceptual representations and supporting semantic content downstream.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter M. Goltstein
- grid.429510.b0000 0004 0491 8548Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sandra Reinert
- grid.429510.b0000 0004 0491 8548Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany ,grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XGraduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Tobias Bonhoeffer
- grid.429510.b0000 0004 0491 8548Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Mark Hübener
- grid.429510.b0000 0004 0491 8548Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Church BA, Jackson BN, Smith JD. Exploring Explicit Learning Strategies: A Dissociative Framework for Research. NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 60:100817. [PMID: 34121802 PMCID: PMC8192072 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
To explain learning, comparative researchers invoke an associative construct by which immediate reinforcement strengthens animal's adaptive responses. In contrast, cognitive researchers freely acknowledge humans' explicit-learning capability to test and confirm hypotheses even lacking direct reinforcement. We describe a new dissociative framework that may stretch animals' learning toward the explicit pole of cognition. We discuss the neuroscience of reinforcement-based learning and suggest the possibility of disabling a dominant form of reinforcement-based discrimination learning. In that vacuum, researchers may have an opportunity to observe animals' explicit learning strategies (i.e., hypotheses, rules, task self-construals). We review initial research using this framework showing explicit learning by humans and perhaps by monkeys. Finally, we consider why complementary explicit and reinforcement-based learning systems might promote evolutionary and ecological fitness. Illuminating the evolution of parallel learning systems may also tell part of the story of the emergence of humans' extraordinary capacity for explicit-declarative cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A. Church
- Language Research Center, Georgia State University
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University
| | - Brooke N. Jackson
- Language Research Center, Georgia State University
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University
| | - J. David Smith
- Language Research Center, Georgia State University
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cross FR, Carvell GE, Jackson RR, Grace RC. Arthropod Intelligence? The Case for Portia. Front Psychol 2020; 11:568049. [PMID: 33154726 PMCID: PMC7591756 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Macphail’s “null hypothesis,” that there are no differences in intelligence, qualitative, or quantitative, between non-human vertebrates has been controversial. This controversy can be useful if it encourages interest in acquiring a detailed understanding of how non-human animals express flexible problem-solving capacity (“intelligence”), but limiting the discussion to vertebrates is too arbitrary. As an example, we focus here on Portia, a spider with an especially intricate predatory strategy and a preference for other spiders as prey. We review research on pre-planned detours, expectancy violation, and a capacity to solve confinement problems where, in each of these three contexts, there is experimental evidence of innate cognitive capacities and reliance on internal representation. These cognitive capacities are related to, but not identical to, intelligence. When discussing intelligence, as when discussing cognition, it is more useful to envisage a continuum instead of something that is simply present or not; in other words, a continuum pertaining to flexible problem-solving capacity for “intelligence” and a continuum pertaining to reliance on internal representation for “cognition.” When envisaging a continuum pertaining to intelligence, Daniel Dennett’s notion of four Creatures (Darwinian, Skinnerian, Popperian, and Gregorian) is of interest, with the distinction between Skinnerian and Popperian Creatures being especially relevant when considering Portia. When we consider these distinctions, a case can be made for Portia being a Popperian Creature. Like Skinnerian Creatures, Popperian Creatures express flexible problem solving capacity, but the manner in which this capacity is expressed by Popperian Creatures is more distinctively cognitive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona R Cross
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.,International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Mbita Point, Kenya
| | - Georgina E Carvell
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Robert R Jackson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.,International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Mbita Point, Kenya
| | - Randolph C Grace
- School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Broschard MB, Kim J, Love BC, Freeman JH. Category learning in rodents using touchscreen‐based tasks. GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR 2020; 20:e12665. [DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B. Broschard
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
| | - Jangjin Kim
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
| | - Bradley C. Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology and The Alan Turing Institute University College London London UK
| | - John H. Freeman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dumont JR, Salewski R, Beraldo F. Critical mass: The rise of a touchscreen technology community for rodent cognitive testing. GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR 2020; 20:e12650. [PMID: 32141694 DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The rise in the number of users and institutions utilizing the rodent touchscreen technology for cognitive testing over the past decade has prompted the need for knowledge mobilization and community building. To address the needs of the growing touchscreen community, the first international touchscreen symposium was hosted at Western University. Attendees from around the world attended talks from expert neuroscientists using touchscreens to examine a vast array of questions regarding cognition and the nervous system. In addition to the symposium, a subset of attendees was invited to partake in a hands-on training course where they received touchscreen training covering both hardware and software components. Beyond the two touchscreen events, virtual platforms have been developed to further support touchscreen users: (a) Mousebytes.ca, which includes a data repository of rodent touchscreen tasks, and (b) Touchscreencognition.org, an online community with numerous training and community resources, perhaps most notably a forum where members can ask and answer questions. The advantages of the rodent touchscreen technology for cognitive neuroscience research has allowed neuroscientists from diverse backgrounds to test specific cognitive processes using well-validated and standardized apparatus, contributing to its rise in popularity and its relevance to modern neuroscience research. The commitment of the touchscreen community to data, task development and information sharing not only ensures an expansive future of the use of rodent touchscreen technology but additionally, quality research that will increase translation from preclinical studies to clinical successes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R Dumont
- BrainsCAN, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Salewski
- BrainsCAN, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Flavio Beraldo
- BrainsCAN, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li C, Li R, Zhou C. Memory Traces Diminished by Exercise Affect New Learning as Proactive Facilitation. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:189. [PMID: 32210755 PMCID: PMC7076129 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Exercise enhances cognitive function through increased neurogenesis but can also cause neurogenesis-induced forgetting. It remains unclear whether the diminished memory traces are completely forgotten. Our goals were to determine whether spatial memory is diminished by exercise, and if so, whether the memory is completely gone or whether only the local details disappear but not the acquired strategy. Two-month-old male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a spatial memory task using the Morris water maze and tested to determine that they had learned the platform location. Another mouse group received no training. Half the mice in each group then exercised on a running wheel, while the other half remained sedentary in home cages. After 4 weeks of this, previously trained mice were tested for their retention of the platform location. All mice were then subjected to the task, but the platform was located in a different position (reversal learning for previously trained mice). We found that exercise significantly facilitated the forgetting of the first platform location (i.e., diminished spatial memory) but also significantly enhanced reversal learning. Compared with mice that received no pre-exercise training, mice that had been previously trained, even those in the exercise group that had decreased recall, showed significantly better performance in the reversal learning test. Activation of new adult-born neurons was also examined. Although newborn neuron activation between groups that had or had not received prior task training was not different, activation was significantly higher in exercise groups than in sedentary groups after the probe test for reversal learning. These results indicated that the experience of pre-exercise training equally facilitated new learning in the sedentary and exercise groups, even though significantly lower memory retention was found in the exercise group, suggesting rule-based learning in mice. Furthermore, newborn neurons equally participated in similar and novel memory acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuicui Li
- Department of Sport Psychology, School of Sport Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Rena Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chenglin Zhou
- Department of Sport Psychology, School of Sport Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dissociations between rule-based and information-integration categorization are not caused by differences in task difficulty. Mem Cognit 2019; 48:541-552. [PMID: 31845188 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00988-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In rule-based (RB) category-learning tasks, the optimal strategy is a simple explicit rule, whereas in information-integration (II) tasks, the optimal strategy is impossible to describe verbally. Many studies have reported qualitative dissociations between training and performance in RB and II tasks. Virtually all of these studies were testing predictions of the dual-systems model of category learning called COVIS. The most prominent alternative account to COVIS is that humans have one learning system that is used in all tasks, and that the observed dissociations occur because the II task is more difficult than the RB task. This article describes the first attempt to test this difficulty hypothesis against anything more than a single set of data. First, two novel predictions are derived that discriminate between the difficulty and multiple-systems hypotheses. Next, these predictions are tested against a wide variety of published categorization data. Overall, the results overwhelmingly reject the difficulty hypothesis and instead strongly favor the multiple-systems account of the many RB versus II dissociations.
Collapse
|