Circadian-regulated transcription of the psbD light-responsive promoter in wheat chloroplasts

The circadian night depression of photosynthesis analyzed in a herb, Pulmonaria vallarsae. Day/night quantitative relationships

Although many photosynthesis related processes are known to be controlled by the circadian system, consequent changes in photosynthetic activities are poorly understood. Photosynthesis was investigated during the daily cycle by chlorophyll fluorescence using a PAM fluorometer in Pulmonaria vallarsae subsp. apennina, an understory herb. A standard test consists of a light induction pretreatment followed by light response curve (LRC). Comparison of the major diagnostic parameters collected during day and night showed a nocturnal drop of photosynthetic responses, more evident in water-limited plants and consisting of: (i) strong reduction of flash-induced fluorescence peaks (FIP), maximum linear electron transport rate (Jmax, ETR_EM) and effective PSII quantum yield (Φ_PSII); (ii) strong enhancement of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) and (iii) little or no change in photochemical quenching qP, maximum quantum yield of linear electron transport (Φ), and shape of LRC (θ). A remarkable feature of day/night LRCs at moderate to high irradiance was their linear-parallel course in double-reciprocal plots. Photosynthesis was also monitored in plants subjected to 2-3 days of continuous darkness ("long night"). In such conditions, plants exhibited high but declining peaks of photosynthetic activity during subjective days and a low, constant value with elevated NPQ during subjective night tests. The photosynthetic parameters recorded in subjective days in artificial darkness resembled those under natural day conditions. On the basis of the evidence, we suggest a circadian component and a biochemical feedback inhibition to explain the night depression of photosynthesis in P. vallarsae.

Genome-wide analysis of PRR gene family uncovers their roles in circadian rhythmic changes and response to drought stress in Gossypium hirsutum L

BACKGROUND

The circadian clock not only participates in regulating various stages of plant growth, development and metabolism, but confers plant environmental adaptability to stress such as drought. Pseudo-Response Regulators (PRRs) are important component of the central oscillator (the core of circadian clock) and play a significant role in plant photoperiod pathway. However, no systematical study about this gene family has been performed in cotton.

METHODS

PRR genes were identified in diploid and tetraploid cotton using bioinformatics methods to investigate their homology, duplication and evolution relationship. Differential gene expression, KEGG enrichment analysis and qRT-PCR were conducted to analyze PRR gene expression patterns under diurnal changes and their response to drought stress.

RESULTS

A total of 44 PRR family members were identified in four Gossypium species, with 16 in G. hirsutum, 10 in G. raimondii, and nine in G. barbadense as well as in G. arboreum. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that PRR proteins were divided into five subfamilies and whole genome duplication or segmental duplication contributed to the expansion of Gossypium PRR gene family. Gene structure analysis revealed that members in the same clade are similar, and multiple cis-elements related to light and drought stress response were enriched in the promoters of GhPRR genes. qRT-PCR results showed that GhPRR genes transcripts presented four expression peaks (6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 15 h) during 24 h and form obvious rhythmic expression trend. Transcriptome data with PEG treatment, along with qRT-PCR verification suggested that members of clade III (GhPRR5a, b, d) and clade V (GhPRR3a and GhPRR3c) may be involved in drought response. This study provides an insight into understanding the function of PRR genes in circadian rhythm and in response to drought stress in cotton.

Selective Activation of Chloroplast psbD Light-Responsive Promoter and psaA/B Promoter in Transplastomic Tobacco Plants Overexpressing Arabidopsis Sigma Factor AtSIG5

BACKGROUND

Plastid-encoded eubacterial-type RNA polymerase (PEP) plays a critical role in the transcription of photosynthesis genes in chloroplasts. Notably, some of the reaction center genes, including psaA, psaB, psbA, and psbD genes, are differentially transcribed by PEP in mature chloroplasts. However, the molecular mechanism of promoter selection in the reaction center gene transcription by PEP is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

Sigma factor proteins direct promoter selection by a core PEP in chloroplasts as well as bacteria. AtSIG5 is a unique chloroplast sigma factor essential for psbD light-responsive promoter (psbD LRP) activity. To analyze the role of AtSIG5 in chloroplast transcription in more detail, we assessed the effect of AtSIG5 hyper-expression on the transcription of plastid-encoded genes in chloroplast transgenic plants.

RESULTS

The chloroplast transgenic tobacco (CpOX-AtSIG5) accumulates AtSIG5 protein at extremely high levels in chloroplasts. Due to the extremely high-level expression of recombinant AtSIG5, most PEP holoenzymes are most likely to include the recombinant AtSIG5 in the CpOXAtSIG5 chloroplasts. Thus, we can assess the promoter preference of AtSIG5 in vivo. The overexpression of AtSIG5 significantly increased the expression of psbD LRP transcripts encoding PSII reaction center D2 protein and psaA/B operon transcripts encoding PSI core proteins. Furthermore, run-on transcription analyses revealed that AtSIG5 preferentially recognizes the psaA/B promoter, as well as the psbD LRP. Moreover, we found that psbD LRP is constitutively active in CpOX-AtSIG5 plants irrespective of light and dark.

CONCLUSION

AtSIG5 probably plays a significant role in differential transcription of reaction center genes in mature chloroplasts.

Field-grown soybean transcriptome shows diurnal patterns in photosynthesis-related processes

Many plant physiological processes have diurnal patterns regulated by diurnal environmental changes and circadian rhythms, but the transcriptional underpinnings of many of these cycles have not been studied in major crop species under field conditions. Here, we monitored the transcriptome of field-grown soybean (Glycine max) during daylight hours in the middle of the growing season with RNA-seq. The analysis revealed 21% of soybean genes were differentially expressed over the course of the day. Expression of some circadian-related genes in field-grown soybean differed from previously reported expression patterns measured in controlled environments. Many genes in functional groups contributing to and/or depending on photosynthesis showed differential expression, with patterns particularly evident in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway. Gene regulatory network inference also revealed seven diurnally sensitive gene nodes involved with circadian rhythm, transcription regulation, cellular processes, and water transport. This study provides a diurnal overview of the transcriptome for an economically important field-grown crop and a basis for identifying pathways that could eventually be tailored to optimize diurnal regulation of carbon gain.

Integration of light and circadian signals that regulate chloroplast transcription by a nuclear-encoded sigma factor

We investigated the signalling pathways that regulate chloroplast transcription in response to environmental signals. One mechanism controlling plastid transcription involves nuclear-encoded sigma subunits of plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerase. Transcripts encoding the sigma factor SIG5 are regulated by light and the circadian clock. However, the extent to which a chloroplast target of SIG5 is regulated by light-induced changes in SIG5 expression is unknown. Moreover, the photoreceptor signalling pathways underlying the circadian regulation of chloroplast transcription by SIG5 are unidentified. We monitored the regulation of chloroplast transcription in photoreceptor and sigma factor mutants under controlled light regimes in Arabidopsis thaliana. We established that a chloroplast transcriptional response to light intensity was mediated by SIG5; a chloroplast transcriptional response to the relative proportions of red and far red light was regulated by SIG5 through phytochrome and photosynthetic signals; and the circadian regulation of chloroplast transcription by SIG5 was predominantly dependent on blue light and cryptochrome. Our experiments reveal the extensive integration of signals concerning the light environment by a single sigma factor to regulate chloroplast transcription. This may originate from an evolutionarily ancient mechanism that protects photosynthetic bacteria from high light stress, which subsequently became integrated with higher plant phototransduction networks.

Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast psbD Promoters in Terrestrial Plants

The transcription of photosynthesis genes encoded by the plastid genome is mainly mediated by a prokaryotic-type RNA polymerase called plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerase (PEP). Standard PEP-dependent promoters resemble bacterial sigma-70-type promoters containing the so-called -10 and -35 elements. On the other hand, an unusual light- and stress-responsive promoter (psbD LRP) that is regulated by a 19-bp AAG-box immediately upstream of the -35 element has been mapped upstream of the psbD-psbC operon in some angiosperms. However, the occurrence of the AAG-box containing psbD LRP in plant evolution remains elusive. We have mapped the psbD promoters in eleven embryophytes at different evolutionary stages from liverworts to angiosperms. The psbD promoters were mostly mapped around 500-900 bp upstream of the psbD translational start sites, indicating that the psbD mRNAs have unusually long 5'-UTR extensions in common. The -10 elements of the psbD promoter are well-conserved in all embryophytes, but not the -35 elements. We found that the AAG-box sequences are highly conserved in angiosperms and gymnosperms except for gnetaceae plants. Furthermore, partial AAG-box-like sequences have been identified in the psbD promoters of some basal embryophytes such as moss, hornwort, and lycophyte, whereas liverwort has the standard PEP promoter without the AAG-box. These results suggest that the AAG-box sequences of the psbD LRP may have evolved from a primitive type of AAG-box of basal embryophytes. On the other hand, monilophytes (ferns) use another type of psbD promoter composed of a distinct cis-element upstream of the potential -35 element. Furthermore, we found that psbD expression is not regulated by light in gymnosperms or basal angiosperms, although they have the well-conserved AAG-box sequences. Thus, it is unlikely that acquisition of the AAG-box containing psbD promoter is directly associated with light-induced transcription of the psbD-psbC operon. Light- and stress-induced transcription may have evolved independently and multiple times during terrestrial plant evolution.

The circadian regulation of photosynthesis

Correct circadian regulation increases plant productivity, and photosynthesis is circadian-regulated. Here, we discuss the regulatory basis for the circadian control of photosynthesis. We discuss candidate mechanisms underpinning circadian oscillations of light harvesting and consider how the circadian clock modulates CO2 fixation by Rubisco. We show that new techniques may provide a platform to better understand the signalling pathways that couple the circadian clock with the photosynthetic apparatus. Finally, we discuss how understanding circadian regulation in model systems is underpinning research into the impact of circadian regulation in crop species.

Transcript patterns of chloroplast-encoded genes in cultured Symbiodinium spp. (Dinophyceae): testing the influence of a light shift and diel periodicity

Microalgae possess numerous cellular mechanisms specifically employed for acclimating the photosynthetic pathways to changes in the physical environment. Despite the importance of coral-dinoflagellate symbioses, little focus has been given as to how the symbiotic algae (Symbiodinium spp.) regulate the expression of their photosynthetic genes. This study used real-time PCR to investigate the transcript abundance of the plastid-encoded genes, psbA (encoding the D1 protein of photosystem II) and psaA (encoding the P700 protein in photosystem I), within the cultured Symbiodinium ITS-2 (internal transcribed spacer region) types A20 and A13. Transcript abundance was monitored during a low to high-light shift, as well as over a full diel light cycle. In addition, psaA was characterized in three isolates (A20, A13, and D4-5) and noted as another example of a dinoflagellate plastid gene encoded on a minicircle. In general, the overall incongruence of transcript patterns for both psbA and psaA between the Symbiodinium isolates and other models of transcriptionally controlled chloroplast gene expression (e.g., Pisum sativum [pea], Sinapis alba [mustard seedling], and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [cyanobacteria]) suggests that Symbiodinium is reliant on posttranscriptional mechanisms for homeostatic regulation of its photosynthetic proteins.

The transcription machineries of plant mitochondria and chloroplasts: Composition, function, and regulation

Although genomes of mitochondria and plastids are very small compared to those of their bacterial ancestors, the transcription machineries of these organelles are of surprising complexity. With respect to the number of different RNA polymerases per organelle, the extremes are represented on one hand by chloroplasts of eudicots which use one bacterial-type RNA polymerase and two phage-type RNA polymerases to transcribe their genes, and on the other hand by Physcomitrella possessing three mitochondrial RNA polymerases of the phage type. Transcription of genes/operons is often driven by multiple promoters in both organelles. This review describes the principle components of the transcription machineries (RNA polymerases, transcription factors, promoters) and the division of labor between the different RNA polymerases. While regulation of transcription in mitochondria seems to be only of limited importance, the plastid genes of higher plants respond to exogenous and endogenous cues rather individually by altering their transcriptional activities.

Light induction of Arabidopsis SIG1 and SIG5 transcripts in mature leaves: differential roles of cryptochrome 1 and cryptochrome 2 and dual function of SIG5 in the recognition of plastid promoters

In higher plants, multiple nuclear-encoded sigma factors activate select subsets of plastid gene promoters in a partially redundant manner. We analysed the light induction profiles of transcripts from six Arabidopsis sigma factor (AtSIG) genes in mature leaves, focusing on the effects of wavelength and intensity. Red-light illumination (660 nm) of dark-adapted plants strongly induced AtSIG1 transcripts, while blue-light illumination (470 nm) caused strong and rapid induction of AtSIG1 and AtSIG5 transcripts. The fluence response differed in blue-light-responsive rapid induction in AtSIG1 and AtSIG5. AtSIG1 transcripts increased to plateau with a threshold of 2 micromol m(-2) sec(-1) under all fluences examined (1-50 micromol m(-2) sec(-1)), and AtSIG5 transcripts were induced with a distinct two-phase profile, with the lower-fluence induction similar to that of AtSIG1 and further enhancement with increasing fluences greater than 10 micromol m(-2) sec(-1). Blue-light-receptor mutational analysis revealed that AtSIG5-specific two-phase induction is mediated through cryptochrome 1 and cryptochrome 2 at lower fluences and more significantly through cryptochrome 1 at higher fluences. In mature chloroplasts, the promoters of psbA and psbD are predominantly recognized by AtSIG5 among six sigma factors. Using a protoplast transient expression assay with AtSIG5-AtSIG1 chimeric genes, we present evidence that AtSIG5 contains determinants for activating the psbD blue-light-responsive promoter (BLRP) in region 4.2 rather than region 2.4. Amino acid scanning within AtSIG5 region 4.2 revealed that Asn484, but not Arg493, functions as a key residue for psbD BLRP activation. Arginine 493 may be involved in psbA promoter recognition.

Plant sigma factors and their role in plastid transcription

Plant sigma factors determine the promoter specificity of the major RNA polymerase of plastids and thus regulate the first level of plastome gene expression. In plants, sigma factors are encoded by a small family of nuclear genes, and it is not yet clear if the family members are functionally redundant or each paralog plays a particular role. The review presents the analysis of the information on plant sigma factors obtained since their discovery a decade ago and focuses on similarities and differences in structure and functions of various paralogs. Special attention is paid to their interaction with promoters, the regulation of their expression, and their role in the development of a whole plant. The analysis suggests that though plant sigma factors are basically similar, at least some of them perform distinct functions. Finally, the work presents the scheme of this gene family evolution in higher plants.

Real-time monitoring of chloroplast gene expression by a luciferase reporter: evidence for nuclear regulation of chloroplast circadian period

Chloroplast-encoded genes, like nucleus-encoded genes, exhibit circadian expression. How the circadian clock exerts its control over chloroplast gene expression, however, is poorly understood. To facilitate the study of chloroplast circadian gene expression, we developed a codon-optimized firefly luciferase gene for the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a real-time bioluminescence reporter and introduced it into the chloroplast genome. The bioluminescence of the reporter strain correlated well with the circadian expression pattern of the introduced gene and satisfied all three criteria for circadian rhythms. Moreover, the period of the rhythm was lengthened in per mutants, which are phototactic rhythm mutants carrying a long-period gene in their nuclear genome. These results demonstrate that chloroplast gene expression rhythm is a bona fide circadian rhythm and that the nucleus-encoded circadian oscillator determines the period length of the chloroplast rhythm. Our reporter strains can serve as a powerful tool not only for analysis of the circadian regulation mechanisms of chloroplast gene expression but also for a genetic approach to the molecular oscillator of the algal circadian clock.

Specific function of a plastid sigma factor for ndhF gene transcription

The complexity of the plastid transcriptional apparatus (two or three different RNA polymerases and numerous regulatory proteins) makes it very difficult to attribute specific function(s) to its individual components. We have characterized an Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion line disrupting the nuclear gene coding for one of the six plastid sigma factors (SIG4) that regulate the activity of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase PEP. This mutant shows a specific diminution of transcription of the plastid ndhF gene, coding for a subunit of the plastid NDH [NAD(P)H dehydrogenase] complex. The absence of another NDH subunit, i.e. NDHH, and the absence of a chlorophyll fluorescence transient previously attributed to the activity of the plastid NDH complex indicate a strong down-regulation of NDH activity in the mutant plants. Results suggest that plastid NDH activity is regulated on the transcriptional level by an ndhF-specific plastid sigma factor, SIG4.

Microarray profiling of plastid gene expression in a unicellular red alga, Cyanidioschyzon merolae

Plastid genomes of red algae contain more genes than those of green plant lineages, and it is of special interest that four transcription factors derived from ancestral cyanobacteria are encoded therein. However, little is known about transcriptional regulation of the red algal plastid genome. In this study, we constructed a red algal plastid DNA microarray of Cyanidioschyzon merolae covering almost all protein coding genes, and found that plastid genes are differentially activated by illumination. Run-on transcription assays using isolated plastids confirmed that activation takes place at the transcriptional level. In bacteria and plants, sigma factors determine the genes that are to be transcribed, and four plastid sigma factors (Cm_SIG1-4) encoded in the nuclear genome of C. merolae may be responsible for differential gene expression of the plastid genome. We found that transcripts for all Cm_SIG genes accumulated transiently after a shift from dark to light, whereas only the Cm_SIG2 transcript was increased after a shift from low to high light, suggesting that Cm_SIG2 is a sigma factor that responds to high light. Phylogenetic analysis of plastid sigma factors suggested that sigma factors of red and green algal plastids and the group 1 sigma factors of cyanobacteria form a monophyletic group.

A nuclear-encoded sigma factor, Arabidopsis SIG6, recognizes sigma-70 type chloroplast promoters and regulates early chloroplast development in cotyledons

Eubacterial-type multi-subunit plastid RNA polymerase (PEP) is responsible for the principal transcription activity in chloroplasts. PEP is composed of plastid-encoded core subunits and one of multiple nuclear-encoded sigma factors that confer promoter specificity on PEP. Thus, the replacement of sigma factors associated with PEP has been assumed to be a major mechanism for the switching of transcription patterns during chloroplast development. The null mutant (sig6-1) of plastid sigma factor gene AtSIG6 exhibited a cotyledon-specific pale green phenotype. Light-dependent chloroplast development was significantly delayed in the sig6-1 mutant. Genetic complementation of the mutant phenotype by the AtSIG6 cDNA demonstrated that AtSIG6 plays a key role in light-dependent chloroplast development. Northern and array-based global analyses for plastid transcripts revealed that the transcript levels of most PEP-dependent genes were greatly reduced in the sig6-1 mutant, but that the accumulation of nuclear-encoded RNA polymerase (NEP)-dependent transcripts generally increased. As the PEP alpha subunit and PEP-dependent trnV accumulated at normal levels in the sig6-1 mutant, the AtSIG6 knockout mutant probably retained functional PEP, and the transcriptional defects are likely to have been directly caused by AtSIG6 deficiency. Most of the AtSIG6-dependent genes are preceded by sigma70-type promoters comprised of conserved -35/-10 elements. Thus, AtSIG6 may act as a major general sigma factor in chloroplasts during early plant development. On the other hand, the mutant phenotype was restored in older seedlings. Arabidopsis probably contains another late general sigma factor, the promoter specificity of which widely overlaps with that of AtSIG6.

Plastid RNA polymerases, promoters, and transcription regulators in higher plants

Plastids are semiautonomous plant organelles exhibiting their own transcription-translation systems that originated from a cyanobacteria-related endosymbiotic prokaryote. As a consequence of massive gene transfer to nuclei and gene disappearance during evolution, the extant plastid genome is a small circular DNA encoding only ca. 120 genes (less than 5% of cyanobacterial genes). Therefore, it was assumed that plastids have a simple transcription-regulatory system. Later, however, it was revealed that plastid transcription is a multistep gene regulation system and plays a crucial role in developmental and environmental regulation of plastid gene expression. Recent molecular and genetic approaches have identified several new players involved in transcriptional regulation in plastids, such as multiple RNA polymerases, plastid sigma factors, transcription regulators, nucleoid proteins, and various signaling factors. They have provided novel insights into the molecular basis of plastid transcription in higher plants. This review summarizes state-of-the-art knowledge of molecular mechanisms that regulate plastid transcription in higher plants.

Differential expression on a daily basis of plastid sigma factor genes from the moss Physcomitrella patens. Regulatory interactions among PpSig5, the circadian clock, and blue light signaling mediated by cryptochromes

The nuclear-encoded plastid sigma factors are supposed to be a regulatory subunit of the multisubunit bacteria-type plastid RNA polymerase. We studied here whether or not three genes, PpSig1, PpSig2, and PpSig5 encoding plastid sigma factors, are controlled by the circadian clock and/or by blue light signaling in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Among the three PpSig genes, only PpSig5 was clearly controlled by the circadian clock. In contrast to the differential regulation on a daily timescale, a pulse of blue light induced the expression of all the three PpSig genes. This induction was significantly reduced in a knockout mutant that lacked the blue light photoreceptor cryptochromes PpCRY1a and PpCRY1b, indicating that PpCRY1a and/or PpCRY1b mediate the blue light signal that induces the expression of the PpSig genes. In a daily cycle of 12-h blue light/12-h dark, the timing of peak expression of PpSig5 and a chloroplast gene psbD, encoding the D2 subunit of photosystem II, advanced in the cryptochrome mutant relative to those in the wild type, suggesting the presence of regulatory interactions among the expression of PpSig5 and psbD, the circadian clock, and the blue light signaling mediated by the cryptochrome(s).

Two independent light signals cooperate in the activation of the plastid psbD blue light-responsive promoter in Arabidopsis

The psbD blue light-responsive promoter (BLRP), whose activation has been considered to require strong blue light, is recognized only by SIG5 among six sigma factors of plastid RNA polymerase in Arabidopsis. We found SIG5 transcript accumulation was rapidly induced after a 30-min induction time by blue light (470 nm) with an intensity threshold of 5 micromol m(-2)s(-1) through cryptochromes. Besides this weak blue light, the psbD BLRP activation required the stronger light such as 50 micromol m(-2)s(-1) irrespective of blue or red light (660 nm). Thus, the two independent light signalings, the cryptochrome-mediated signaling to induce SIG5 transcription and the stronger light-dependent signaling, cooperate to activate the psbD BLRP.

Transcription, translation, degradation, and circadian clock

Synthesis and degradation of mRNA together with synthesis and degradation of corresponding protein, this four-step-expression confers great fitness to all organisms. Transcription rate and mRNA stability both are essential for circadian expression of clock genes. In many cases, transcription rates and half-lives of mRNAs and corresponding proteins are not necessarily tightly linked with each other. The methods for measuring four-step-expression should be carefully selected and the experimental conditions should be strictly controlled.

The Multiple-Stress Responsive Plastid Sigma Factor, SIG5, Directs Activation of the psbD Blue Light-Responsive Promoter (BLRP) in Arabidopsis thaliana

Transcription in higher plant plastids is performed by two types of RNA polymerases called NEP and PEP, and expression of photosynthesis genes in chloroplasts is largely dependent on PEP, a eubacteria-type multi-subunit enzyme. The transcription specificity of PEP is modulated by six nuclear-encoded sigma factors (SIG1 to SIG6) in Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, we show that one of the six sigma factors, SIG5, is induced under various stress conditions, such as high light, low temperature, high salt and high osmotic conditions. Interestingly, transcription from the psbD blue light-responsive promoter (psbD-BLRP) was activated by not only light but also various stresses, and the transcription and the transcriptional activation of psbD-BLRP were abolished in a sig5-2 mutant. This suggests that the PEP holoenzyme containing SIG5 transcribes the psbD-BLRP in response to multiple stresses. Since the seed germination under saline conditions and recovery from damage to the PSII induced by high light were delayed in the sig5-2 mutant, we postulate that SIG5 protects plants from stresses by enhancing repair of the PSII reaction center.

Blue light-induced transcription of plastid-encoded psbD gene is mediated by a nuclear-encoded transcription initiation factor, AtSig5

Light is one of the most important environmental factors regulating expression of photosynthesis genes. The plastid psbD gene encoding the photosystem II reaction center protein D2 is under the control of a unique blue light responsive promoter (BLRP) that is transcribed by a bacterial-type plastid RNA polymerase (PEP). Promoter recognition of PEP is mediated by one of the six nuclear-encoded sigma factors in Arabidopsis. The replacement of the plastid sigma factor associated with PEP may be the major mechanism for switching of plastid transcription pattern in response to environmental and developmental signals. This study demonstrates that AtSig5 is a unique sigma factor that is essential for psbD BLRP activity. A T-DNA insertional mutant with reduced AtSIG5 expression resulted in loss of primary transcripts from the psbD BLRP. Furthermore, transient overexpression of AtSig5 in dark-adapted protoplasts specifically elevated psbD and psbA transcription activities. On the other hand, overproduction of AtSig2 enhanced the transcription of psbA gene and trnE operon, but not psbD transcription. The AtSIG5 gene is phylogenetically distinct from other plastid sigma factors, and its expression is induced exclusively by blue light. We propose that AtSig5 acts as a mediator of blue light signaling that specifically activates the psbD BLRP in response to blue light in Arabidopsis.

Blue light specific and differential expression of a plastid sigma factor, Sig5 in Arabidopsis thaliana

The transcription of plastid gene psbD is under the control of the BLRP (blue-light-responsive promoter) recognized by plastid-encoded RNA polymerase, in which nuclear-encoded sigma factors play a crucial role in the promoter recognition. We examined the effects of light on mRNA levels of six different SIG genes in Arabidopsis and found that blue light extensively induced the accumulation of SIG5 transcripts, but red light did not. The blue light specificity was not observed in the accumulations of remaining five SIG genes. The blue light dependency of the SIG5 expression well explains the light-dependent behavior of the psbD BLRP.

The Arabidopsis circadian system

Rhythms with periods of approximately 24 hr are widespread in nature. Those that persist in constant conditions are termed circadian rhythms and reflect the activity of an endogenous biological clock. Plants, including Arabidopsis, are richly rhythmic. Expression analysis, most recently on a genomic scale, indicates that the Arabidopsis circadian clock regulates a number of key metabolic pathways and stress responses. A number of sensitive and high-throughput assays have been developed to monitor the Arabidopsis clock. These assays have facilitated the identification of components of plant circadian systems through genetic and molecular biological studies. Although much remains to be learned, the framework of the Arabidopsis circadian system is coming into focus.DedicationThis review is dedicated to the memory of DeLill Nasser, a wonderful mentor and an unwavering advocate of both Arabidopsis and circadian rhythms research.

Novel nuclear-encoded proteins interacting with a plastid sigma factor, Sig1, in Arabidopsis thaliana

Sigma factor binding proteins are involved in modifying the promoter preferences of the RNA polymerase in bacteria. We found the nuclear encoded protein (SibI) that is transported into chloroplasts and interacts specifically with the region 4 of Sig1 in Arabidopsis. SibI and its homologue, T3K9.5 are novel proteins, which are not homologous to any protein of known function. The expression of sibI was tissue specific, light dependent, and developmentally timed. We suggest the transcriptional regulation by sigma factor binding proteins to function in the plastids of higher plant.

Assessing the relative importance of light and the circadian clock in controlling chloroplast translation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Previous work has shown that transcription of a number of chloroplast-encoded genes, including those for photosynthesis, are under circadian clock control in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. However, some of these genes encode long-lived mRNAs that are also subject to translational control. Rates of synthesis of the major chloroplast translation products vary dramatically (10-20-fold) during light-dark (LD) cycles, peaking in the light period. To determine whether this pattern reflects circadian clock control, LD-grown cells were shifted to continuous light (LL) and chloroplast protein synthesis monitored by periodic pulse-labeling in the presence of cycloheximide; chloroplast protein synthesis in LD was also examined for comparison. The LD patterns of synthesis of the major polypeptides (including D1, D2, and the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (LS)) were similar to those obtained previously in the absence of cycloheximide. In the LL condition, rates of synthesis of the major chloroplast translation products were high throughout the period examined ( approximately 36 h), fluctuating > 3-fold, although they were generally higher in the subjective light period. LD-grown cells were also shifted to continuous dark (DD) and chloroplast protein synthesis analyzed for approximately 24 h starting from the mid-dark period. There was a gradual decline in synthesis of the major proteins during the first subjective light period, which was followed by a very small peak in synthesis around the second subjective dark --> light transition. RNA blot analysis showed that the mRNAs for D1, D2 and LS were present at high levels during the period of declining translation. These results indicate that with photoautotrophic growth in LD cycles, the illumination conditions per se are more important than the clock in determining chloroplast translation, but the clock may contribute to this regulation. The advantages of controlling translation by a direct light response and transcription primarily by the circadian clock are discussed. Finally, evidence of translational control of elongation factor Tu synthesis was obtained.

Cryptochrome 1, cryptochrome 2, and phytochrome a co-activate the chloroplast psbD blue light-responsive promoter

The reaction center core of photosystem II is composed of two chlorophyll binding proteins, D1 and D2, that are encoded by the chloroplast genes psbA and psbD. These chlorophyll binding proteins are damaged during photochemistry, especially under high irradiance. Photosystem II function is maintained under these conditions through turnover and resynthesis of D1 and D2. Blue light-activated transcription of psbD from a special light-responsive promoter is part of the repair system. In this study, light-activated chloroplast and psbD transcription were studied after dark adaptation of 21-day-old light-grown Arabidopsis plants. Illumination of dark-adapted plants with red light increased chloroplast transcription activity and transcription from the psbD light-responsive promoter. Blue light further increased chloroplast transcription activity and stimulated differential transcription from the psbD light-responsive promoter. Photoreceptor mutants showed that blue light-specific activation of chloroplast transcription and the psbD light-responsive promoter involve cryptochrome 1 (cry1) or cryptochrome 2 (cry2) and phytochrome A (phyA). Blue light-induced activation of the psbD light-responsive promoter was normal in det2-1 and hy5-1 but attenuated in det3-1. Therefore, cry1/cry2/phyA-mediated blue light activation of the psbD light-responsive promoter in 21-day-old Arabidopsis plants does not involve hy5, a transcription factor that mediates other phyA and blue light-induced responses.

Cryptochrome 1, cryptochrome 2, and phytochrome a co-activate the chloroplast psbD blue light-responsive promoter

The reaction center core of photosystem II is composed of two chlorophyll binding proteins, D1 and D2, that are encoded by the chloroplast genes psbA and psbD. These chlorophyll binding proteins are damaged during photochemistry, especially under high irradiance. Photosystem II function is maintained under these conditions through turnover and resynthesis of D1 and D2. Blue light-activated transcription of psbD from a special light-responsive promoter is part of the repair system. In this study, light-activated chloroplast and psbD transcription were studied after dark adaptation of 21-day-old light-grown Arabidopsis plants. Illumination of dark-adapted plants with red light increased chloroplast transcription activity and transcription from the psbD light-responsive promoter. Blue light further increased chloroplast transcription activity and stimulated differential transcription from the psbD light-responsive promoter. Photoreceptor mutants showed that blue light-specific activation of chloroplast transcription and the psbD light-responsive promoter involve cryptochrome 1 (cry1) or cryptochrome 2 (cry2) and phytochrome A (phyA). Blue light-induced activation of the psbD light-responsive promoter was normal in det2-1 and hy5-1 but attenuated in det3-1. Therefore, cry1/cry2/phyA-mediated blue light activation of the psbD light-responsive promoter in 21-day-old Arabidopsis plants does not involve hy5, a transcription factor that mediates other phyA and blue light-induced responses.

Analysis of barley chloroplast psbD light-responsive promoter elements in transplastomic tobacco

The plastid gene psbD encodes D2, a photosystem II reaction center chlorophyll-binding protein. psbD is transcribed from a conserved chloroplast promoter that is activated by blue, white, or UV-A light. In this study, various forms of the barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) chloroplast psbD-LRP were fused to the uidA reporter gene and introduced into the tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) plastid genome through homologous recombination. Primer extension analysis of transcripts from the psbD-LRP-uidA construct showed that the barley psbD-LRP was activated in tobacco by blue or white light. Transcription from this construct was also regulated by circadian cycling indicating that the barley psbD-LRP could respond to light modulated regulatory pathways in tobacco. Mutation of the psbD-LRP prokaryotic -10 promoter element reduced transcription to very low levels in all light regimes. In contrast, mutation of a prokaryotic -35 promoter element had no effect on transcription from the psbD-LRP. Deletion or mutation of an upstream activating element, the AAG-box (-36 to -64), also reduced transcription from the construct to very low levels. In contrast, deletion of the upstream PGT-box (-71 to -100) did not alter promoter activation by blue light, or responsiveness to circadian cycling. These in vivo studies confirm the importance of the psbD-LRP -10 promoter element and AAG-box in light regulation and demonstrate that these elements are sufficient to mediate circadian cycling of the barley psbD promoter.

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN PLANTS

Circadian rhythms, endogenous rhythms with periods of approximately 24 h, are widespread in nature. Although plants have provided many examples of rhythmic outputs and our understanding of photoreceptors of circadian input pathways is well advanced, studies with plants have lagged in the identification of components of the central circadian oscillator. Nonetheless, genetic and molecular biological studies, primarily in Arabidopsis, have begun to identify the components of plant circadian systems at an accelerating pace. There also is accumulating evidence that plants and other organisms house multiple circadian clocks both in different tissues and, quite probably, within individual cells, providing unanticipated complexity in circadian systems.

Phytochrome A mediates blue light and UV-A-dependent chloroplast gene transcription in green leaves

We characterized the photobiology of light-activated chloroplast transcription and transcript abundance in mature primary leaves by using the following two systems: transplastomic promoter-reporter gene fusions in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and phytochrome (phyA, phyB, and hy2) and cryptochrome (cry1) mutants of Arabidopsis. In both dicots, blue light and UV-A radiation were the major signals that activated total chloroplast and psbA, rbcL, and 16S rrn transcription. In contrast, transcription activities in plants exposed to red and far-red light were 30% to 85% less than in blue light/UV-A, depending on the gene and plant species. Total chloroplast, psbA, and 16S rrn transcription were 60% to 80% less in the Arabidopsis phyA mutant exposed to blue light/UV-A relative to wild type, thus definitively linking phyA signaling to these photoresponses. To our knowledge, the major role of phyA in mediating the blue light/UV-A photoresponses is a new function for phyA in chloroplast biogenesis at this stage of leaf development. Although rbcL expression in plants exposed to UV-A was 50% less in the phyA mutant relative to wild type, blue light-induced rbcL expression was not significantly affected in the phyA, phyB, and cry1 mutants. However, rbcL expression in blue light was 60% less in the phytochrome chromophore mutant, hy2, relative to wild type, indicating that another phytochrome species (phyC, D, or E) was involved in blue light-induced rbcL transcription. Therefore, at least two different phytochromes, as well as phytochrome-independent photosensory pathways, mediated blue light/UV-A-induced transcription of chloroplast genes in mature leaves.

Involvement of a nuclear-encoded basic helix-loop-helix protein in transcription of the light-responsive promoter of psbD

In the chloroplast psbD light-responsive promoter (LRP), a highly conserved sequence exists upstream from the bacterial -10/-35 elements. Multiple sequence-specific DNA binding proteins are predicted to bind to the conserved sequence as transcription factors. Using yeast one-hybrid screening of an Arabidopsis cDNA library, a possible DNA binding protein of the psbD LRP upstream sequence was identified. The protein, designated PTF1, is a novel protein of 355 amino acids (estimated molecular weight of 39.6) that contains a basic helix-loop-helix DNA binding motif in the predicted N-terminal region of the mature protein. Transient expression assay of PTF1-GFP fusion protein showed that PTF1 was localized in chloroplasts. Using the modified DNA sequence in the one-hybrid system, the ACC repeat was shown to be essential for PTF1 binding. The rate of psbD LRP mRNA accumulation was reduced in a T-DNA-inserted Arabidopsis ptf1 mutant. Compared with wild-type plants, the mutant had pale green cotyledons and its growth was inhibited under short-day conditions. These results suggest that PTF1 is a trans-acting factor of the psbD LRP.

Characterization of two plastid sigma factors, SigA1 and SigA2, that mainly function in matured chloroplasts in Nicotiana tabacum

We have isolated and characterized two genes from Nicotiana tabacum, whose products function as putative sigma factors for plastid RNA polymerase. Since the amino acid sequence deduced from the DNA sequences of both genes showed highly similar to that of the SigA protein of Arabidopsis thaliana, we termed the corresponding genes sigA1 and sigA2, respectively. Transient expression assay using a green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion construct indicated that the N-terminal region of the sigA2 gene product could function as a transit peptide for import into chloroplasts. The gel-blot analysis of RNAs revealed that the sum of the sigA1 and sigA2 transcripts fluctuated apparently with an endogenous rhythm after 12-h-light, 12-h-dark entrainment in photomixotrophically cultured tobacco cells. RT-PCR based northern analysis revealed that the sigA1 and sigA2 transcripts increased along with the cell growth in cultured cells, and were most abundant in mature leaves and shoot meristems with very young leaves in tobacco plants. Immunoblot analysis of the cell extracts of tobacco plants also supports this notion. These results suggest that the sigma factors encoded by sigA1 and sigA2 play a role in chloroplast development and regulation of gene expression in matured chloroplasts.

Requirement for cytoplasmic protein synthesis during circadian peaks of transcription of chloroplast-encoded genes in Chlamydomonas

Cycloheximide, an inhibitor of cytoplasmic translation, induced a rapid reduction of 70-80% in levels of mRNA for the chloroplast elongation factor Tu (tufA) in asynchronously growing Chlamydomonas. This effect was shown to be mainly transcriptional, and not restricted to tufA, as transcription of other chloroplast-encoded genes were cycloheximide-sensitive, although not all equally (psbA showed no more than 40% inhibition). Confirmatory evidence that the inhibition of chloroplast transcription was mainly due to blocking cytoplasmic translation was obtained with the cycloheximide-resistant mutant act1, and by using another translation inhibitor, anisomycin. In synchronously growing Chlamydomonas, chloroplast transcription is regulated by the circadian clock, with the daily peak occurring during the early light period. When cycloheximide was added during this period, transcription was inhibited, but not when it was added during the trough period (late light to early dark). Moreover, in synchronized cells switched to continuous light, the drug blocked the scheduled increase in tufA mRNA, but did not remove the pre-existing mRNA. These experiments define two functionally different types of chloroplast transcription in Chlamydomonas, basal (cycloheximide-insensitive) and clock-induced (cycloheximide-sensitive), and indicate that the relative contribution of each type to the overall transcription of a given gene are not identical for all genes. The results also provide evidence for nuclear regulation of chloroplast transcription, thereby obviating the need for an organellar clock, at least for these rhythms.

The current state and problems of circadian clock studies in cyanobacteria

Circadian rhythms have been observed in innumerable physiological processes in most of organisms. Recent molecular and genetic studies on circadian clocks in many organisms have identified and characterized several molecular regulatory factors that contribute to generation of such rhythms. The cyanobacterium is the simplest organism known to harbor circadian clocks, and it has become one of most successful model organisms for circadian biology. In this review, we will briefly summarize physiological observations and consideration of circadian rhythms in cyanobacteria, molecular genetics of the clock using Synechococcus, and current knowledge of the input and output pathways that support the cellular circadian system. Finally, we will document some current problems in the studies on the cyanobacterial circadian clock.

Complementary expression of two plastid-localized sigma-like factors in maize

The eubacterial-like RNA polymerase of plastids is composed of organelle-encoded core subunits and nuclear-encoded sigma-factors. Families of sigma-like factors (SLFs) have been identified in several plants, including maize (Zea mays) and Arabidopsis. In vitro import assays determined that at least two of the maize sigma-like proteins have functional chloroplast transit peptides and thus are likely candidates for chloroplast transcriptional regulators. However, the roles of individual SLFs in chloroplast transcription remain to be determined. We have raised antibodies against the unique amino-terminal domains of two maize SLFs, ZmSig1 and ZmSig3, and have used these specific probes to examine the accumulation of each protein in different maize tissues and during chloroplast development. The expression of ZmSig1 is tissue specific and parallels the light-activated chloroplast development program in maize seedling leaves. Its accumulation in mature chloroplasts however, is not affected by subsequent changes in the light regime. It is interesting that the expression profile of ZmSig3 is complementary to that of ZmSig1. It accumulates in non-green tissues, including roots, etiolated seedling leaves, and the basal region of greening seedling leaves. The nonoverlapping expression patterns of these two plastid-localized SLFs suggest that they may direct differential expression of plastid genes during chloroplast development.

The role of sigma factors in plastid transcription

Expression of plastid genes is controlled at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels in response to developmental and environmental signals. In many cases this regulation is mediated by nuclear-encoded proteins acting in concert with the endogenous plastid gene expression machinery. Transcription in plastids is accomplished by two distinct RNA polymerase enzymes, one of which resembles eubacterial RNA polymerases in both subunit structure and promoter recognition properties. The holoenzyme contains a catalytic core composed of plastid-encoded subunits, assembled with a nuclear-encoded promoter-specificity factor, sigma. Based on examples of transcriptional regulation in bacteria, it is proposed that differential activation of sigma factors may provide the nucleus with a mechanism to control expression of groups of plastid genes. Hence, much effort has focused on identifying and characterizing sigma-like factors in plants. While fractionation studies had identified several candidate sigma factors in purified RNA polymerase preparations, it was only 4 years ago that the first sigma factor genes were cloned from two photosynthetic eukaryotes, both of which were red algae. More recently this achievement has extended to the identification of families of sigma-like factor genes from several species of vascular plants. Now, efforts in the field are directed at understanding the roles in plastid transcription of each member of the rapidly expanding plant sigma factor gene family. Recent results suggest that accumulation of individual sigma-like factors is controlled by light, by plastid type and/or by a particular stage of chloroplast development. These data mesh nicely with accumulating evidence that the core sigma-binding regions of plastid promoters mediate regulated transcription in response to light-regime and plastid type or developmental state. In this review I will outline progress made to date in identifying and characterizing the sigma-like factors of plants, and in dissecting their potential roles in chloroplast gene expression.

Microbial circadian oscillatory systems in Neurospora and Synechococcus: models for cellular clocks

Common regulatory patterns have emerged among the feedback loops lying within circadian systems. Significant progress in dissecting the mechanism of clock resetting by temperature and the role of the WC proteins in the Neurospora light response has accompanied documentation of the importance of nuclear localization and phosphorylation-induced turnover of FRQ to this circadian cycle. The long-awaited molecular description of a transcription/translation loop in the Synechococcus circadian system represents a quantal step forward, followed by the identification of additional important proteins and interactions. Finally, the adaptive significance of rhythms in Synechococcus and by extension in all clocks nicely ties up an extraordinary year.

Circadian-regulated expression of a nuclear-encoded plastid sigma factor gene (sigA) in wheat seedlings

The activity of a light-responsive psbD promoter in plastids is known to be regulated by a circadian clock. However, the mechanism of the circadian regulation of the psbD light-responsive promotor, which is recognized by an Escherichia coli-type RNA polymerase, is not yet known. We examined the time course of mRNA accumulation of two E. coli-type RNA polymerase subunit genes, sigA and rpoA, under a continuous light condition after 12 h light/12 h dark entrainment. Accumulation of the sigA mRNA was found to be regulated by a circadian clock, while rpoA mRNA did not show any significant oscillation throughout the experiment.

Developmental stage-specific multi-subunit plastid RNA polymerases (PEP) in wheat

Most photosystem I and II plastid genes are transcribed by a plastid encoded Escherichia coli-like RNA polymerase (PEP). In this study, we show that both promoter selectivity and light-dependency of PEP change dramatically during development in wheat leaves. In the leaf tip, psbA and psbD promoter activities are light induced, whilst psbC, psbE and 16S rRNA promoters do not function efficiently irrespective of light conditions. In contrast to the leaf tip, in the basal portion all PEP promoters studied function in the dark as well as the light, except for psbD. Using in vitro transcription, we found that PEP in the illuminated leaf tip can initiate transcription from the -35 destructed psbA promoter, but the -35 element is essential for transcription in the basal portion. There is an extended -10 element in the psbA promoter, recognized by the PEP in the illuminated leaf tip or purified sigma 70-type Escherichia coli RNA polymerase but not by the PEP in the leaf base. These results suggest that during wheat leaf development, PEP in the leaf base that is functional for most PEP promoters even in the dark is replaced by the light-dependent PEP selectively transcribing the psbA and psbD promoters.

Tissue-specific and light-dependent expression within a family of nuclear-encoded sigma-like factors from Zea mays

The principal transcription machinery functioning in chloroplasts of higher plants is encoded in two subcellular compartments. Subunits of the RNA polymerase catalytic core are plastid encoded, while sigma factors required for promoter recognition are encoded in the nucleus. We have isolated nuclear-encoded cDNAs, sig1, sig2, and sig3, specifying three sigma factors from maize (Zea mays). The three deduced polypeptides have extensive sequence identity with the principal sigma factors of eubacteria. Two of the maize cDNAs, sig1 and sig3, encode NH2-terminal transit peptides which direct the uptake of a heterologous protein into chloroplasts in vitro. Transcripts for the sig3 gene were more abundant in green leaves than in roots and in light-treated seedlings than in dark-grown seedlings. In contrast, sig1 transcripts were readily detectable in all tissues examined. Thus, at least two promoter-selectivity factors function with the maize chloroplast RNA polymerase, one of which is constitutively expressed and the other is light activated.