Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for CRRT in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of RCTS

Citrate and low-dose heparin combined anticoagulation in pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy

There remains no optimal anticoagulation protocol for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in pediatric patients with elevated D-dimer levels. We aimed to assess the effects of different anticoagulation strategies on the risk of CRRT filter clotting in these patients. Pediatric patients undergoing CRRT were retrospectively grouped based on pre-CRRT D-dimer levels and anticoagulant: D-RCA group (normal D-dimer, RCA only, n = 22), D+ RCA group (elevated D-dimer, RCA only, n = 50), and D+ RCA+ systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA) group (elevated D-dimer, RCA combined with SHA, n = 55). The risk of filter clotting and incidence of bleeding were compared among the groups. Among the groups, the D+ RCA+ SHA group had the longest filter lifespan; further, the incidence of bleeding was not increased by concurrent use of low-dose heparin for anticoagulation. Moreover, concurrent heparin anticoagulation was associated with a decreased risk of filter clotting. Contrastingly, high pre-CRRT hemoglobin and D-dimer levels and post-filter ionized calcium level > 0.4 mmol/L were associated with an increased risk of filter clotting. RCA combined with low-dose heparin anticoagulation could reduce the risk of filter clotting and prolong filter lifespan without increasing the risk of bleeding in patients with elevated D-dimer levels undergoing CRRT.

Continuous renal replacement therapy in neonates and children: what does the pediatrician need to know? An overview from the Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred method for renal support in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) as it allows for gentle removal of fluids and solutes. The most frequent indications for CRRT include acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload (FO) as well as non-renal indications such as removal of toxic metabolites in acute liver failure, inborn errors of metabolism, and intoxications and removal of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. AKI and/or FO are common in critically ill children and their presence is associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, early recognition of AKI and FO is important and timely transfer of patients who might require CRRT to a center with institutional expertise should be considered. Although CRRT has been increasingly used in the critical care setting, due to the lack of standardized recommendations, wide practice variations exist regarding the main aspects of CRRT application in critically ill children.     Conclusion: In this review, from the Critical Care Nephrology section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC), we summarize the key aspects of CRRT delivery and highlight the importance of adequate follow up among AKI survivors which might be of relevance for the general pediatric community. What is Known: • CRRT is the preferred method of renal support in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable children in the PICU as it allows for gentle removal of fluids and solutes. • Although CRRT has become an important and integral part of modern pediatric critical care, wide practice variations exist in all aspects of CRRT. What is New: • Given the lack of literature on guidance for a general pediatrician on when to refer a child for CRRT, we recommend timely transfer to a center with institutional expertise in CRRT, as both worsening AKI and FO have been associated with increased mortality. • Adequate follow-up of PICU patients with AKI and CRRT is highlighted as recent findings demonstrate that these children are at increased risk for adverse long-term outcomes.

Metabolic disturbances potentially attributable to clogging during continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Clogging is characterized by a progressive impairment of transmembrane patency in renal replacement devices and occurs due to obstruction of pores by unknown molecules. If citrate-based anti-coagulation is used, clogging can manifest as a metabolic alkalosis accompanied by hypernatremia and hypercalcemia, primarily a consequence of Na3Citrate infusion. An increased incidence of clogging has been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, precise factors contributing to the formation remain uncertain. This investigation aimed to analyze its incidence and assessed time-varying trajectories of associated factors in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center data analysis, we evaluated COVID-19 patients undergoing CRRT and admitted to critical care between March 2020 and December 2021. We assessed the proportional incidence of clogging surrogates in the overall population and subgroups based on the specific CRRT devices employed at our institution, including multiFiltrate (Fresenius Medical Care) and Prismaflex System (Baxter). Moderate and severe clogging were defined as Na > 145 or ≥ 150 mmol/l and HCO3- > 28.0 or ≥ 30 mmol/l, respectively, with a total albumin-corrected calcium > 2.54 mmol/l. A mixed effect model was introduced to investigate factors associated with development of clogging.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with 240 CRRT runs were analyzed. Moderate and severe clogging occurred in 15% (8/53) and 19% (10/53) of patients, respectively. Twenty-seven percent (37/136) of CRRTs conducted with a multiFiltrate device met the criteria for clogging, whereas no clogging could be observed in patients dialyzed with the Prismaflex System. Occurrence of clogging was associated with elevated triglyceride plasma levels at filter start (p = 0.013), amount of enteral nutrition (p = 0.002) and an increasing white blood cell count over time (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Clogging seems to be a frequently observed phenomenon in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The presence of hypertriglyceridemia, combined with systemic inflammation, may facilitate the development of an impermeable secondary membrane within filters, thereby contributing to compromised membrane patency.

Factors affecting continuous renal replacement therapy duration in critically ill patients: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) duration in critically ill patients and provide a reference for clinical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We divided patients into regional citrate anti-coagulation (RCA) and low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) groups according to the anti-coagulation method and collected the relevant data, to analyze the factors associated with CRRT time.

RESULTS

Compared with the LMWH group, the RCA group had a longer mean treatment time (55.36 ± 22.57 vs. 37.65 ± 27.09 h, p < 0.001), lower transmembrane pressure, and lower filter pressure, regardless of vascular access site. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between anti-coagulation patterns, filter pressure at CRRT discontinuation, nurses' level of intensive care unit experience, pre-machine fibrinogen level, and CRRT time.

CONCLUSION

Anti-coagulation is the most important factor affecting CRRT duration. Filter pressure, nurses' level of intensive care unit experience, and fibrinogen level also affecting CRRT duration.

Association of anticoagulation use during continuous kidney replacement therapy and 90-day outcomes: A multicentre study

Introduction

Anticoagulation is recommended during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) to prolong the filter lifespan for optimal filter performance. We aimed to evaluate the effect of anticoagulation during CKRT on dialysis dependence and mortality within 90 days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Method

Our retrospective observational study evaluated the first CKRT session in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) in Singapore from April to September 2017. The primary outcome was a composite of dialysis dependence or death within 90 days of ICU admission; the main exposure variable was anticoagulation use (regional citrate anticoagulation [RCA] or systemic heparin). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for possible confounders: age, female sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, liver dysfunction, coagulopathy (international normalised ratio[INR] >1.5) and platelet counts of less than 100,000/uL).

Results

The study cohort included 276 patients from 14 participating adult ICUs, of whom 176 (63.8%) experienced dialysis dependence or death within 90 days of ICU admission (19 dialysis dependence, 157 death). Anticoagulation significantly reduced the odds of the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.83, P=0.009). Logistic regression analysis using anticoagulation as a 3-level indicator variable demonstrated that RCA was associated with mortality reduction (AOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83, P=0.011), with heparin having a consistent trend (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.14, P=0.102).

Conclusion

Among critically ill patients with AKI, anticoagulation use during CKRT was associated with reduced dialysis or death at 90 days post-ICU admission, which was statistically significant for regional citrate anticoagulation and trended in the same direction of benefit for systemic heparin anticoagulation. Anticoagulation during CKRT should be considered whenever possible.

Anticoagulation options for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a widely used standard therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Despite its effectiveness, treatment is often interrupted due to clot formation in the extracorporeal circuits. Anticoagulation is a crucial strategy for preventing extracorporeal circuit clotting during CRRT. While various anticoagulation options are available, there were still no studies synthetically comparing the efficacy and safety of these anticoagulation options.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database) were searched from inception to October 31, 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the following outcomes were included: filter lifespan, all-cause mortality, length of stay, duration of CRRT, recovery of kidney function, adverse events and costs.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven RCTs from 38 articles, comprising 2648 participants with 14 comparisons, were included in this network meta-analysis (NMA). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) are the most frequently used anticoagulants. Compared to UFH, RCA was found to be more effective in prolonging filter lifespan (MD 12.0, 95% CI 3.8 to 20.2) and reducing the risk of bleeding. Regional-UFH plus Prostaglandin I2 (Regional-UFH + PGI2) appeared to outperform RCA (MD 37.0, 95% CI 12.0 to 62.0), LMWH (MD 41.3, 95% CI 15.6 to 67.0), and other evaluated anticoagulation options in prolonging filter lifespan. However, only a single included RCT with 46 participants had evaluated Regional-UFH + PGI2. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of length of ICU stay, all-cause mortality, duration of CRRT, recovery of kidney function, and adverse events among most evaluated anticoagulation options.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to UFH, RCA is the preferred anticoagulant for critically ill patients requiring CRRT. The SUCRA analysis and forest plot of Regional-UFH + PGI2 are limited, as only a single study was included. Additional high-quality studies are necessary before any recommendation of Regional-UFH + PGI2. Further larger high-quality RCTs are desirable to strengthen the evidence on the best choice of anticoagulation options to reduce all-cause mortality and adverse events and promote the recovery of kidney function. Trial registration The protocol of this network meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42022360263 ). Registered 26 September 2022.

Management of regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: guideline recommendations from Chinese emergency medical doctor consensus

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely used for treating critically-ill patients in the emergency department in China. Anticoagulant therapy is needed to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circulation during CRRT. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been shown to potentially be safer and more effective and is now recommended as the preferred anticoagulant method for CRRT. However, there is still a lack of unified standards for RCA management in the world, and there are many problems in using this method in clinical practice. The Emergency Medical Doctor Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) organized a panel of domestic emergency medicine experts and international experts of CRRT to discuss RCA-related issues, including the advantages and disadvantages of RCA in CRRT anticoagulation, the principle of RCA, parameter settings for RCA, monitoring of RCA (mainly metabolic acid-base disorders), and special issues during RCA. Based on the latest available research evidence as well as the paneled experts' clinical experience, considering the generalizability, suitability, and potential resource utilization, while also balancing clinical advantages and disadvantages, a total of 16 guideline recommendations were formed from the experts' consensus.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Is Metabolic Fear the Enemy of Logic? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation is recommended to maintain the patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, anticoagulation-associated complications can occur. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of citrate anticoagulation to heparin anticoagulation in critically ill patients treated with CRRT.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the safety and efficacy of citrate anticoagulation and heparin in CRRT were included. Articles not describing the incidence of metabolic and/or electrolyte disturbances induced by the anticoagulation strategy were excluded. The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched. The last search was performed on 18 February 2022.

RESULTS

Twelve articles comprising 1592 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between the groups in the development of metabolic alkalosis (RR = 1.46; (95% CI (0.52-4.11); p = 0.470)) or metabolic acidosis (RR = 1.71, (95% CI (0.99-2.93); p = 0.054)). Patients in the citrate group developed hypocalcaemia more frequently (RR = 3.81; 95% CI (1.67-8.66); p = 0.001). Bleeding complications in patients randomised to the citrate group were significantly lower than those in the heparin group (RR 0.32 (95% CI (0.22-0.47); p < 0.0001)). Citrate showed a significantly longer filter lifespan of 14.52 h (95% CI (7.22-21.83); p < 0.0001), compared to heparin. There was no significant difference between the groups for 28-day mortality (RR = 1.08 (95% CI (0.89-1.31); p = 0.424) or 90-day mortality (RR 0.9 (95% CI (0.8-1.02); p = 0.110).

CONCLUSION

regional citrate anticoagulation is a safe anticoagulant for critically ill patients who require CRRT, as no significant differences were found in metabolic complications between the groups. Additionally, citrate has a lower risk of bleeding and circuit loss than heparin.

Regional citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous kidney replacement therapy in intensive care

PURPOSE

Many intensive care units (ICUs) have transitioned from systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA) to regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). We evaluated the clinical and health economic impacts of ICU transition to RCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed all adult general ICUs in England and Wales to identify transition dates and conducted a micro-costing study in eight ICUs. We then conducted an interrupted time-series analysis of linked, routinely collected health records.

RESULTS

In 69,001 patients who received CKRT (8585 RCA, 60,416 SHA) in 181 ICUs between 2009 and 2017, transition to RCA was not associated with a change in 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.08) but was associated with step-increases in duration of kidney support (0.53 days, 95% CI 0.28-0.79), advanced cardiovascular support (0.23 days, 95% CI 0.09-0.38) and ICU length of stay (0.86 days, 95% CI 0.24-1.49). The estimated one-year incremental net monetary benefit per patient was £ - 2376 (95% CI £ - 3841-£ - 911), with an estimated likelihood of cost-effectiveness of <0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transition to RCA was associated with significant increases in healthcare resource use, without corresponding clinical benefit, and is highly unlikely to be cost-effective over a one-year time horizon.

Analysis of the extracorporeal anticoagulation effect of modified citrate infusion during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

To analyze the anticoagulation effect of different local infusion methods of citrate underwent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The study adopted a single-centre retrospective design. Critically ill patients were divided into conventional group and modified group based on the infusion methods of citrate.

RESULTS

The modified group had a longer mean treatment time (67.67 ± 18.69  hours vs. 52.11 ± 24.26 hours, p = 0.007), a lower transmembrane pressure (147.77 ± 66.85 cm H₂ O vs. 200.63 ± 118.66 cm H₂ O, p = 0.038), fewer citrate bag replacements (1.43 ± 0.50 times vs. 10.60 ± 3.19 times, p < 0.001), and more steady ionized calcium at the venous end (0.35 ± 0.06 mmol/L vs. 0.40 ± 0.05 mmol/L, p = 0.006) compared to the conventional group patients, with statistically significant differences. The incidences of citrate accumulation and tubing coagulation were marginally lower in the modified group.

CONCLUSION

The modified local citrate infusion method can prolong treatment time, while reducing both the nursing workload and the occurrence of citrate accumulation.