Management of anlotinib-related adverse events in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Experiences in ALTER-0303

Off-label use of anlotinib in malignancies' treatment: efficacy and management of adverse reactions

Anlotinib is a novel small-molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) independently developed in China, it possesses the functions of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and suppressing tumor growth. Anlotinib has achieved notable therapeutic effects in approved indications for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, small cell lung cancer, and medullary thyroid carcinoma. Additionally, with unanimous expert consensus, it has been used off-label in various other tumors, yielding favorable outcomes. This article reviews the efficacy and common adverse reactions, as well as their management, of off-label use of anlotinib in various malignant tumors.

Development and validation of a risk-prediction model for adverse drug reactions in real-world cancer patients treated with anlotinib

Background

The risk factors related to the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anlotinib have been rarely investigated. In addition, a corresponding risk prediction model has not been established in China pertaining to anlotinib-related ADRs.

Objectives

To manage ADRs more efficiently and improve the prognosis of patients administered anlotinib.

Design

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the medical records of patients diagnosed with cancer who were administered anlotinib after hospitalization between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023.

Methods

We performed a combination of univariate analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to identify significant factors that can accurately predict ADRs. Model fitting was performed using forward selection. The accuracy of the prediction model was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The final ADR risk model was validated.

Results

In this study, 300 patients who were administered anlotinib were included. Among them, 238 (79.33%) patients experienced at least one ADR. Diagnosis, combination treatment, distant metastasis, treatment lines, and cumulative dose were independent risk factors for the ADRs of anlotinib. The AUC and the concordance index of the nomogram constructed from the above five factors were 0.790 and 0.789, respectively. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the model was a good fit (p = 0.811). In addition, the decision curve analysis demonstrated a significantly higher net benefit of the model. The external validation indicated that the prediction nomogram was reliable.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a simple model to use the ADR risk score in patients who were administered anlotinib. This risk prediction model was well-calibrated and discriminative. It can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. It has clinical significance for preventing ADRs, improving the prognosis of patients, and providing support for the rational use of drugs.

Establishment and application of a rapid method for the determination of both total and unbound anlotinib concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

The unbound concentration of anlotinib is closely associated with its therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions. In this study, we established an accurate and rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the detection of total and unbound concentrations of anlotinib, which was subsequently applied to clinical samples. The separation of unbound and protein-bound anlotinib was achieved through filtration-ultrafiltration (CF-UF). Anlotinib-d5 served as the internal standard, and protein precipitation was utilized for sample preparation. The final method was thoroughly validated over a concentration range of 0.5-200 ng/mL according to related regulatory guidelines. Additionally, we demonstrated the clinical value of this method by analyzing blood samples from 39 lung cancer patients to quantify both total and unbound anlotinib concentrations. This method provides a foundation for further research into the relationship between anlotinib concentrations, therapeutic efficacy, and adverse reactions, ultimately facilitating the optimization of treatment strategies for patients.

Difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of axillary malignant triton tumors: A case report

Malignant triton tumor (MTT), a subtype of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma with a difficult diagnosis and poor prognosis. The course of MTT progression is rapid and the degree of malignancy is high. Patients with MTT can be treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; however, treatment results are still poor. The present study describes a case of MTT of the axilla, which was diagnosed using histopathology with immunohistochemical staining and gene mutation detection. Complete surgical excision of the left axillary mass was performed in September 2023. Postoperative therapeutics included radiation therapy and deep hyperthermia; nine-field intensity-modulated radiation was delivered to the left axilla (46 Gy in 23 fractions over 5 weeks) and concurrent deep hyperthermia was performed three times per week for 5 weeks. In February 2024, the patient received oral anlotinib at a dose of 10 mg daily (before breakfast) for 2 weeks. It was demonstrated that a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, deep hyperthermia and targeted therapy may improve the survival of patients with MTT. After 1 month of comprehensive treatment, the patient's tumor had disappeared upon reexamination. As of the latest follow-up in October 2024, the patient had achieved a disease-free survival period of ~7 months, the patient was stable and remained on anlotinib treatment with good tolerance. With no standardized treatment recommendations available, the present study demonstrated that the combination of surgery, radiation therapy, deep hyperthermia and targeted therapy may provide a new strategy for the clinical treatment of MTT.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with vinorelbine as second‑line treatment for elderly patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma: A retrospective cohort

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with vinorelbine (NVB) as a second-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC). The present retrospective analysis included 48 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with advanced SqCLC who received anlotinib in combination with NVB as a second-line therapy between January 2021 and December 2023. The primary endpoints assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. The median PFS and OS for the cohort was found to be 5.0 and 9.5 months, respectively. By contrast, the ORR and DCR were found to be 29.17 and 70.83%. Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients who experienced specific adverse events (AEs), such as hypertension, proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome during treatment, generally had superior efficacy compared with those who did not experience these AEs (mPFS, 6.0 vs. 4.0 months; mOS, 11.0 vs. 8.5 months). In addition, apart from promising efficacy, patients who experienced common AEs also experienced decreased appetite (35.42%), fatigue (29.17%), hypertension (25%) and hand-foot syndrome (27.08%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in <30% of patients, the majority of which was alleviated through corresponding support care. These results suggest that the combination of anlotinib and NVB as second-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced SqCLC demonstrated promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile. Such regimen may be a viable treatment option for this patient population. However, further prospective studies are required to validate these findings and optimize the dosing schedule for improved therapeutic outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib and PD-1/L1 Inhibitors as Maintenance Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients who Have Achieved Stable-Disease After First-Line Treatment with Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To develop personalized treatment strategies for maintenance therapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from ES-SCLC patients who achieved stable disease (SD) following initial chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. These patients subsequently received maintenance therapy (MT) with a combination of anlotinib and PD-1/L1 inhibitors. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Preliminary findings suggest that this regimen is highly effective, with a median PFS of 6 months and OS of 13.5 months, alongside a DCR exceeding 60%. Subgroup analysis revealed enhanced efficacy in patients with fewer than three metastatic sites and those who experienced hypertension, proteinuria, or hand-foot syndrome during MT. Mechanistic studies showed a notable increase in the proportion of CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood post-MT, correlating with improved outcomes. These findings imply that the therapeutic effect of MT may be partly due to the direct activation of CD8+ T cells, producing a synergistic anti-tumor response. Despite the prevalence of AEs, AEs were generally manageable, underscoring anlotinib's potential in this context.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and PD-1/L1 inhibitors offers promising efficacy and manageable AEs in MT, making it a viable option for ES-SCLC patients who achieve SD post-initial therapy. These results justify further prospective studies to validate this approach.

A phase II study of anlotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy for patients with NSCLC with multiple brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with multiple brain metastases (BMs); however, the BRAIN study showed that the efficacy of WBRT is unsatisfactory. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with anlotinib, a novel anti-angiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with multiple BMs (>3) from advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC with multiple BMs who had received two or more lines of treatment were eligible for enrolment into this study. All patients were treated with anlotinib (8-12 mg, QD, on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) combined with WBRT (DT 30 Gy/12 F), followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint of this study was the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), overall survival (OS) and treatment safety.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and January 2021, 28 patients were enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The median age was 57.7 years, and 46.4% were male. Twenty-five patients had adenocarcinoma (89.3%), six had EGFR mutations (21.4%) and two had ALK mutations (7.1%). The median iPFS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4-16.8 months) and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 5.2-21.6 months). The iORR was 71.4% (six complete responses + 14 partial responses). The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (71.4%), fatigue (64.3%), anorexia (46.4%), and foot and hand skin reactions (25.0%). No patients developed ≥ grade 4 AEs. No intracranial haemorrhages occurred during treatment. Dose adjustment due to AEs occurred in 17.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with WBRT is effective and well-tolerated in patients with NSCLC with multiple BMs.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer achieving SD post first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in patients who exhibit stable disease (SD) following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy in this patient cohort. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who showed SD after receiving a combination of first-line chemo-immunotherapy for 4 cycles, then add anlotinib to subsequent standard maintenance therapy, continuing treatment until disease progression or the occurrence of intolerable toxic side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (P FS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. A total of 52 patients were enrolled, the median P FS and OS was 5.0m and 10.0m, respectively. The ORR and DCR was 28.85% and 67.31%. subgroup analysis indicated that its efficacy correlate with certain Adverse Effects (AEs, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome). Further mechanistic analysis suggests that this regimen may likely reduce immune suppression by depleting Tregs, thereby further activating the immune system to exert synergistic anti-tumor effects. Besides promising efficacy, the toxicity can be tolerated. Anlotinib demonstrates promising efficacy as a maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who have achieved SD following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The manageable safety profile and the observed extension in P FS and OS suggest that Anlotinib could be a valuable therapeutic option for this challenging patient population. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection and management strategies.

Combination of anlotinib and second-line chemotherapy as surrogate to reduce immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

To study the clinical effects of anlotinib combined with second-line chemotherapy (SLC) on immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

In this retrospective study, the medical records of 106 patients with advanced NSCLC admitted to the Lianyungang First People's Hospital from November 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Amongst 106 patients, 53 patients received second-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens (SLC group), and 53 patients received anlotinib combined with SLC (ASLC group). Prognosis, levels of immune cells and inflammatory cytokine, and adverse reactions were analyzed.

Results

Clinical efficacy of the ASLC group was significantly higher than the SLC group (p<0.05). After treatment, patients in the ASLC group exhibited significantly higher levels of CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+ compared to those in the SLC group (p<0.05), while the difference in CD8+ level between the two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). After treatment, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the ASLC group were lower compared to the SLC group (p<0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with advanced NSCLC, anlotinib combined with SLC is associated with higher levels of immune cells and reduced inflammatory factors. This treatment regimen, thus, can reduce immunosuppression and improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

A retrospective study of anlotinib in patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial cancer

Background

The prognosis of persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial cancer is poor. Anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer need to be evaluated.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial cancers between March 2020 and June 2023. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.

Results

The overall ORR and DCR were 24.14% and 55.17% respectively. The ORR and DCR in patients with cervical cancer were 25.00% and 56.25%; the ORR and DCR in patients with endometrial cancer were 23.08% and 53.85%. The patients received anlotinib plus immunotherapy had significantly higher rate of clinical benefit than those receiving anlotinnb alone (P=0.04). The DCR was significantly higher in patients receiving anlotinib combined with immunotherapy (DCR: 75.00% vs. 30.76%) than those without immunotherapy. The overall median PFS and OS were 12.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.6-17.8] and 22.3 months (95% CI: 20.9-23.7), respectively. The patients receiving anlotinib plus immunotherapy had significantly longer OS than those without immunotherapy [not reached vs. 12.5 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.32 (95% CI: 0.1-0.99); P=0.04]. The most common AEs was fatigue (41.4%).

Conclusions

Anlotinib might be a promising agent for persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical and endometrial cancers with good tolerability. Moreover, anlotinib combined with immunotherapy showed synergistic antitumor effect.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis based on updated literature and research to compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science databases to perform a systematic literature search based on random control trials. In these articles, EGFR-TKIs were compared with placebos, chemotherapy, or whole-brain irradiation as treatments for NSCLC. In this research, a meta-analysis of the literature was performed to produce a combined risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The data were synthesized with Review Manager 5.3 software, which was used to manage the process.

RESULTS

There were 15 random control trials included in the study, involving 4249 patients in total. There was evidence that EGFR-TKIs can significantly prolong OS (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1) and PFS (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in NSCLC patients. There was an increase in the incidence of adverse events after treatment with EGFR-TKI, including diarrhea (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26), infection (RR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.16), and rash (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been shown that EGFR-TKIs prolong OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC. NSCLC patients may benefit from EGFR-TKIs as an important treatment option in order to prolong their survival.

Anlotinib plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who failed first-line treatment: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Given the modest efficacy of docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study assesses the therapeutic potential and safety profile of anlotinib in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel monotherapy as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing failure with first-line platinum-based regimens were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either anlotinib plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were randomized. The combination of anlotinib and docetaxel significantly extended median PFS to 4.4 months compared to 1.6 months for docetaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P = 0.0002), and also demonstrated superior ORR (32.5 % vs. 9.3 %, P = 0.0089) and DCR (87.5 % vs. 53.5 %, P = 0.0007). Median OS was observed at 12.0 months in the combination group vs. 10.9 months in the monotherapy group (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.47-1.43, P = 0.4803). For patients previously treated with immunotherapy, the median PFS was notably longer at 7.8 vs. 1.7 months (HR = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.51, P = 0.0290). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, predominantly leukopenia (15.0 % vs. 7.0 %) and neutropenia (10.0 % vs. 5.0 %), was manageable across both groups.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus docetaxel offers a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line platinum-based treatments.

Radiotherapy plus temozolomide with or without anlotinib in H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Besides the hallmark of H3K27M mutation, aberrant amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are commonly observed in diffuse midline glioma (DMG), a highly malignant brain tumor with dismal prognosis. Here, we intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multitarget RTK inhibitor anlotinib in patients with H3K27M-DMG.

METHODS

A total of 40 newly diagnosed H3K27M-DMG patients including 15 with anlotinib and 25 without anlotinib treatment were retrospectively enrolled in this cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

The median PFS and OS of all patients in this cohort were 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.5-11.3) and 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.6-17.1), respectively. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, the disease control rate in the anlotinib group [93.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 70.2-98.8] was significantly higher than those without anlotinib (64%, 95% CI: 40.5-79.8, p = 0.039). The median PFS of patients with and without anlotinib was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.8-14.3) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.3), respectively. Both the median PFS and OS of DMG patients treated with anlotinib were longer than those without anlotinib in the infratentorial patients (PFS: 10.3 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.006; OS: 16.6 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis also indicated anlotinib (HR: 0.243, 95% CI: 0.066-0.896, p = 0.034) was an independent prognosticator for longer OS in the infratentorial subgroup. In addition, the adverse events of anlotinib administration were tolerable in the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study first reported that anlotinib combined with Stupp regimen is a safe and feasible regimen for newly diagnosed patients with H3K27M-DMG. Further, anlotinib showed significant efficacy for H3K27M-DMG located in the infratentorial region.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

Research Progress on Mechanism and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions of Anlotinib

Anti-angiogenesis therapy plays a vital role in the treatment of tumors, with anlotinib as its representative targeted drug. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with inhibitory effects on tumor growth tumor angiogenesis. In Phase III clinical trials, anlotinib demonstrated better overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and was approved for the first time as a third-line treatment for refractory advanced NSCLC. Going far beyond that, anlotinib has shown encouraging results in a variety of malignancies, including medullary thyroid carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, anlotinib has been subject to some controversy in terms of adverse events due to its widespread use. In this review, the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse reactions in clinical use and management of anlotinib were summarized.

Case report of severe pneumothorax due to lung cancer treated with anlotinib

Anlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor for the treatment of lung cancer. Pneumothorax is a rare complication of anlotinib treatment. Here, the case of a male patient in his early seventies, with lung cancer combined with emphysema, who developed a pneumothorax during treatment with anlotinib, is described. The patient was admitted to hospital mainly for dyspnoea and was diagnosed with pneumothorax after digital radiography of the chest. The patient's symptoms improved significantly after closed chest drainage, and a repeat chest digital radiography showed a more resolved pneumothorax. The patient had no previous history of pneumothorax. After discontinuation of anlotinib, the latest follow-up chest computed tomography assessment in August 2023 showed no recurrence of pneumothorax, thus, the pneumothorax is presumed to have been associated with anlotinib in this patient. In addition, the authors speculate that emphysema may be a cause of pneumothorax in patients with lung cancer receiving anlotinib treatment. Therefore, clinicians should be alert to the risk of pneumothorax occurrence in patients with emphysema combined with lung cancer who are treated with anlotinib.

Treatment of neurofibromatosis type II with anlotinib: a case report and literature review

Patients with neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) usually require surgical treatment, but the probability of tumor recurrence remains high after surgical resection. Moreover, because most of NF2 lesions involve the facial nerve, the risk of facial nerve injury during the surgery is high. Stereotactic radiotherapy can be used to treat some cases of NF2. However, it is not recommended for treatment of multiple or large tumors, and surgical resection may be more difficult after radiotherapy. Few systemic treatments are available. At present, bevacizumab is considered the first-line drug treatment for fast-growing NF2. However, bevacizumab requires long-term administration, and tumor growth will resume after drug withdrawal. Here, we present a case of NF2 that developed exacerbations after multiple treatments with gamma knife and surgery, and achieved good results after later treatment with anlotinib. Accordingly, we propose that anlotinib may be a valuable treatment option for NF2.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib-Containing Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

Anlotinib is widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib-containing regimens.

Patients and Methods

Confirmed advanced NSCLC patients who had received anlotinib alone or in combination were enrolled. An overall analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib was performed in all patients, and then subgroup analysis was used to further compare the efficacy between anlotinib monotherapy and combination therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were ADR, ORR, and DCR.

Results

A total of 240 patients were included. The overall median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.9 months). Anlotinib treatment regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) and whether they received previous antiangiogenesis were associated with PFS. Anlotinib plus immunotherapy achieved longer PFS than anlotinib monotherapy (median PFS: 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.007). Stratification analysis showed the PFS of anlotinib plus immunotherapy was significantly longer in male, adenocarcinoma, <=65 years old, patients stage IV, EGFR wild type, with extrathoracic metastasis, performance status scores ≥2, the first-line treatment, patients with a history of hypertension and no previous antiangiogenesis than anlotinib monotherapy. The median PFS of anlotinib plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy was slightly longer than anlotinib alone (respectively, 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.095; 9.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.177). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and acceptable, with hypertension being the most common.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy combination with anlotinib significantly improved PFS. The efficacy of anlotinib may be impaired by previous antiangiogenic therapy, which can be investigated in further studies.

Effectiveness and safety of anlotinib with or without S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population: a prospective, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib (ANL) alone or combined with S-1 in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with untreated advanced HCC who could not be resected were randomly divided into the ANL group (n = 27) and ANL+S-1 group (n = 27). The ANL group was given 10 mg ANL orally once a day for 14 consecutive days, stopped for 1 week, and repeated every 21 days. The ANL+S-1 group was given 10 mg ANL once a day orally and 40 mg S-1 twice a day orally for 14 consecutive days, stopped for 1 week, repeated every 21 days. All patients were treated until the disease progressed or toxicity became unacceptable. For patients who could not tolerate adverse reactions, the ANL dose should be reduced to 8 mg per day. CT or MRI was reviewed every 6 weeks to evaluate the efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included in the results analysis, including 22 patients in the ANL group and 22 patients in the ANL+S-1 group. In the ANL group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 4.5% (1/22), the disease control rate (DCR) was 77.3% (17/22), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.0) and the median overall survival (mOS) was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.0). In the ANL+S-1 group, the ORR was 18.2% (4/22), the DCR was 59.1% (13/22), the median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-5.4) and the mOS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.5-7.4). There was no significant difference in ORR (p = 0.345) or DCR (p = 0.195) between the two groups. Adverse reactions were mainly hypertension, anorexia, fatigue, liver transaminase heightened and hand and foot skin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

ANL monotherapy was effective in the treatment of advanced HCC, and adverse reactions have been able to tolerated.

Case report: a successful treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with severe dermatologic toxicities in a patient with double primary malignancies

Dermatological toxicities are well-recognized immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use. Corticosteroids are considered the first-line therapy for grade 3 or grade 4 skin irAEs, but long-term usage of corticosteroids may abolish the effect of ICIs. Multiple antitumor therapies might be an influencing factor in an increased incidence of skin irAEs. The safety and prognostic value in resuming ICIs after irAEs has been inconsistently reported, especially the severe skin irAE. We report a case of a 75-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prostate cancer with a Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)-like eruption. The severe rash might have been induced by resuming pembrolizumab was successfully treated with a combination of corticosteroids, gamma globulin, and immunosuppressants. Early detection of dermatologic toxicity is crucial, especially for patients receiving multiple antitumor treatments. We should treat ICI resumption seriously after skin irAE.

Association between anlotinib trough plasma concentration and treatment outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Efficacy and toxicities of anlotinib (ANL) show large inter-patient variation, which may partly be explained by differences in ANL exposure. Exposure-response/toxicities relationship have not been investigated for ANL. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the association between the trough plasma concentration (C_trough) of ANL and treatment outcomes in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC who started third-line or further ANL alone therapy between January 2021 and October 2022. This study examined the ANL C_trough and clinical response evaluation at day 43 after initiation of ANL treatment. We evaluated the association between the ANL C_trough and clinical efficacy and toxicities. Additionally, this study defined patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) as responder. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve combined with Youden index was identify the potential threshold value of ANL C_trough for the responder.

Results

52 patients were evaluated for analyses. The median ANL C_trough was 11.45ng/ml (range, 3.69-26.36 ng/ml). The ANL C_trough values in the PR group (n=6, 15.51 ng/ml (range, 8.19-17.37 ng/ml)) was significantly higher than in the PD group (n=8, 7.44 ng/ml (range, 5.41-14.69 ng/ml), p=0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC_ROC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.93; p=0.022) and threshold value of ANL C_trough predicting responder was 10.29 ng/ml (sensitivity 65.9% and specificity 87.5%, the best Youden index was 0.53). The disease control rate (DCR) was 84.6%, and DCR was significantly higher in the high-exposure group (≥10.29ng/ml) than low-exposure group (<10.29ng/ml) (96.67% vs 68.18%, p=0.005). Although there was no significant difference in ANL C_trough between grade ≥ 3 and grade ≤2 toxicities, the incidence of any grade hand-foot syndrome (70.0% vs 36.36%, p=0.016) and thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation (53.33% vs 22.73%, p =0.026) was significantly higher in the high-exposure group compared with the low-exposure group.

Conclusions

Considering these results, we propose that maintaining ANL C_trough ≥ 10.29ng/ml was important for achieving the response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ANL.

Pneumothorax in lung cancer following anlotinib treatment: A case report

RATIONALE

Anlotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer who had received at least 2 previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase targeted therapy regimens. Pneumothorax is a rare adverse reaction of this drug. Here, we present a case of pneumothorax following anlotinib treatment in a patient with lung cancer.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year-old Asian male long-term smoker was admitted to the hospital in November 2019 with sputum production and dyspnea.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with right lung adenocarcinoma with mediastinal and rib metastases, combined with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary bullous disease.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated with oral administration of anlotinib. The patient had a recurrent pneumothorax that improved after drug withdrawal and was free of recurrence. Therefore, pneumothorax caused by rupture of the pulmonary bullous due to anlotinib was considered.

OUTCOMES

After discontinuing anlotinib, the patient has not developed pneumothorax to date.

LESSONS

Pneumothorax may occur when VEGF is inhibited, which can promote the proliferation and repair of alveolar wall substances, leading to alveolar rupture. With respect to pneumothorax, it is necessary to be aware of the risk of pulmonary bullous rupture during antitumor treatment with small-molecule tyrosine kinase drugs.

The continuum of care of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non thyroid tumors: time for an intimate collaboration between oncologists and endocrinologists

INTRODUCTION

Hypothyroidism is a common adverse event of various anticancer treatment modalities, constituting a notable paradigm of the integration of the endocrine perspective into precision oncology.

AREAS COVERED

The present narrative review provides a comprehensive and updated overview of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid tumors. A study search was conducted on the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus.com, ClinicalTrials.gov, and European Union Clinical Trials Register from 2011 until August 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with solid non-thyroid tumors, hypothyroidism is a common adverse event of radiotherapy, high dose interleukin 2 (HD IL-2), interferon alpha (IFN-α), bexarotene, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while chemotherapy may induce hypothyroidism more often than initially considered. The path forward for the management of anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid tumors is an integrated approach grounded on 5 pillars: prevention, vigilance, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Current challenges concerning anticancer treatment-induced hypothyroidism await counteraction, namely awareness of the growing list of related anticancer treatments, identification of predictive factors, counteraction of diagnostic pitfalls, tuning of thyroid hormone replacement, and elucidation of its prognostic significance. Close collaboration of oncologists with endocrinologists will provide optimal patient care.

The Clinical Relevance of Hypothyroidism in Patients with Solid Non-Thyroid Cancer: A Tantalizing Conundrum

Hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid cancer is a tantalizing entity, integrating an intriguing thyroid hormones (THs)-cancer association with the complexity of hypothyroidism itself. The present narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical relevance of hypothyroidism in solid non-thyroid cancer. Hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid cancer is reminiscent of hypothyroidism in the general population, yet also poses distinct challenges due to the dual role of THs in cancer: promoting versus inhibitory. Close collaboration between oncologists and endocrinologists will enable the prompt and personalized diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism in patients with solid non-thyroid cancer. Clinical data indicate that hypothyroidism is a predictor of a decreased or increased risk of solid non-thyroid cancer and is a prognostic factor of favorable or unfavorable prognosis in solid non-thyroid cancer. However, the impact of hypothyroidism with respect to the risk and/or prognosis of solid non-thyroid cancer is not a consistent finding. To harness hypothyroidism, or THs replacement, as a personalized anticancer strategy for solid non-thyroid cancer, four prerequisites need to be fulfilled, namely: (i) deciphering the dual THs actions in cancer; (ii) identifying interventions in THs status and developing agents that block tumor-promoting THs actions and/or mimic anticancer THs actions; (iii) appropriate patient selection; and (iv) counteracting current methodological limitations.

Etiology and Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients With Cancer

Patients with cancer are now living longer than ever before due to the growth and expansion of highly effective antineoplastic therapies. Many of these patients face additional health challenges, of which cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading contributor to morbidity and mortality. CVD and cancer share common biological mechanisms and risk factors, including lipid abnormalities. A better understanding of the relationship between lipid metabolism and cancer can reveal strategies for cancer prevention and CVD risk reduction. Several anticancer treatments adversely affect lipid levels, increasing triglycerides and/or LDL-cholesterol. The traditional CVD risk assessment tools do not include cancer-specific parameters and may underestimate the true long-term CVD risk in this patient population. Statins are the mainstay of therapy in both primary and secondary CVD prevention. The role of non-statin therapies, including ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid and icosapent ethyl in the management of lipid disorders in patients with cancer remains largely unknown. A contemporary cancer patient needs a personalized comprehensive cardiovascular assessment, management of lipid abnormalities, and prevention of late CVD to achieve optimal overall outcomes.

Predictive value of microvascular density for response to anlotinib in advanced NSCLC

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. This study aimed to categorize the microvessels in advanced NSCLC and determine the relationship between intratumoral microvascular density (MVD) and the efficacy of anlotinib for NSCLC.The clinical data of 68 patients receiving anlotinib as third-line treatment or beyond for advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected. Microvessels were stained for CD31 and CD34 by using immunohistochemical staining and were classified as undifferentiated (CD31+ CD34-) and differentiated vessels (CD31+ CD34+). The relationship between MVD and anlotinib efficacy and patient prognosis was analyzed.Patients were divided into the high or low MVD groups according to the median MVD of differentiated (9.4 vessels/field) and undifferentiated microvessels (6.5 vessels/field). There were significantly more patients with high undifferentiated-vessel MVD in the disease control group than in the disease progression group (72.7% vs 16.7%, P < .001). Patients with high undifferentiated-vessel MVD had significantly longer median progression-free survival than those with low undifferentiated-vessel MVD (7.1 vs 3.7 months, P < .001).Anlotinib as third- or beyond line therapy is safe and effective for advanced NSCLC. Patients with a higher density of undifferentiated microvessels have better response to anlotinib and longer progression-free survival.

Clinical analysis of anlotinib as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma without driver gene mutations

This retrospective study was conducted to explore the effects of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 60 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, admitted to the Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital between August 2018 and December 2019. We calculated and recorded the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse reactions, quality of life assessment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for each group. We applied χ2, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistical methods as appropriate to analyze the data. We found no statistically significant differences in either ORR (17.5 vs. 15%) or DCR (67.5 vs. 65.5%) between the anlotinib and pemetrexed groups (P > 0.05). The adverse reactions graded ≥3 in the anlotinib group were fatigue and diarrhea and they accounted for 5% of all the adverse reactions in the group. The patients in the anlotinib group presented better physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functions than those in the pemetrexed group (P < 0.05). The symptoms of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and constipation in the anlotinib group were significantly less frequent than those in the pemetrexed group (P < 0.05). We found similar median PFSs (3.0 vs. 2.8 months) and median OSs (7.0 vs. 7.0 months) in both treatment groups (P > 0.05). The choice of anlotinib as first-line chemotherapy for treating elderly patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma was effective, safe; the treatment was better than other drugs at improving the patients' quality of life.

The Intriguing Thyroid Hormones-Lung Cancer Association as Exemplification of the Thyroid Hormones-Cancer Association: Three Decades of Evolving Research

Exemplifying the long-pursued thyroid hormones (TH)-cancer association, the TH-lung cancer association is a compelling, yet elusive, issue. The present narrative review provides background knowledge on the molecular aspects of TH actions, with focus on the contribution of TH to hallmarks of cancer. Then, it provides a comprehensive overview of data pertinent to the TH-lung cancer association garnered over the last three decades and identifies obstacles that need to be overcome to enable harnessing this association in the clinical setting. TH contribute to all hallmarks of cancer through integration of diverse actions, currently classified according to molecular background. Despite the increasingly recognized implication of TH in lung cancer, three pending queries need to be resolved to empower a tailored approach: (1) How to stratify patients with TH-sensitive lung tumors? (2) How is determined whether TH promote or inhibit lung cancer progression? (3) How to mimic the antitumor and/or abrogate the tumor-promoting TH actions in lung cancer? To address these queries, research should prioritize the elucidation of the crosstalk between TH signaling and oncogenic signaling implicated in lung cancer initiation and progression, and the development of efficient, safe, and feasible strategies leveraging this crosstalk in therapeutics.

Anlotinib for patients with small cell lung cancer and baseline liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Liver metastasis is common in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is no evidence-proven treatment beyond the second line in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis. This study aimed to investigate survival in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis treated with anlotinib compared with placebo. This study was a post hoc analysis of the phase II ALTER 1202 trial, including patients who had liver metastasis at baseline. The participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either 12 mg/day anlotinib (anlotinib group) or placebo (placebo group). Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. In the original trial, there were 39 participants with liver metastasis at baseline, including 27 and 12 in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively. The objective response rate was 3.7% and 0% in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.9999). An elevated disease control rate was found in the anlotinib group (44.4%) compared with the placebo group (8.3%, p = 0.0173). The median PFS was 1.51 vs. 0.71 months in favor of anlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.78; p = 0.0064), with no marked difference in median OS (3.29 vs. 1.91 months; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-1.16; p = 0.0996). The most common AEs in the anlotinib group were hypertension (40.7%), fatigue (29.6%), loss of appetite (22.2%), and weight loss (22.2%). There were no grade 5 AE. In conclusion, anlotinib increased PFS compared with placebo in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis.

Effect and safety of anlotinib combined with S-1 for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy

This study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of anlotinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.This study retrospectively reviewed 22 recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy between June 1, 2018 and February 28, 2019. All patients did not previously receive anlotinib or S-1.Of 22 patients, 20 patients had squamous cell cancer. Seventeen patients received at least 2 cycles of anlotinib plus S-1. The objective response rate (ORR) was 35.3%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months. In the first-line treatment subgroup, the ORR was 50%, the DCR was 80%, the median PFS was 4.5 months, and the median OS was 5.8 months. In the second-line and above treatment subgroup, the ORR was 14.3%, the DCR was 85.7%, the median PFS was 3.0 months, and the median OS was 3.7 months. The main adverse events (AEs) of anlotinib combined with S-1 were fatigue (58.8%), hypertension (47.1%), hemoptysis (29.4%), anemia (29.4%), nausea (23.5%), liver function damage (23.5%), albuminuria (17.6%), abdominal pain (17.6%), leukopenia (17.6%), neutropenia (11.8%), fever (11.8%), and hand-foot syndrome (11.8%). Grade 3 AEs included nausea (5.9%) and hypertension (5.9%), and no grade 4 or more AEs were reported.Anlotinib combined with S-1 achieved promising disease control and satisfactory survival with tolerable safety in recurrent metastatic esophageal cancer who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

Effects of I-125 seeds combined with anlotinib on tumor growth and bone metabolism in A549 tumor-bearing mice

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of tumor suppression and mechanism for different implantation modes of iodine-125 (I-125) seeds irradiation in a mice xenograft model, and its skeletal complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 mice carrying A549 lung tumor-derived xenografts were randomly assigned to four groups, including non-radioactive (sham) seeds implantation, I-125 seeds fractional implantation, I-125 seeds single implantation and I-125 seeds single implantation combined with anlotinib. Ki67 immunohistochemistry, TUNEL immunofluorescence and CD31 morphometric analysis were used to determine the proliferation index, rate of apoptotic cells and microvessel density, respectively. Additionally, the side effects on the skeletal system in mice treated with I-125 seeds implantation were evaluated by histomorphometric staining with tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRAP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression in femur, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) levels in serum were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The I-125 seeds single and fractionated implantation had similar therapeutic effects and complications when the total number of I-125 seeds was the same. A single implantation of I-125 seeds with or without anlotinib could analogously inhibit the tumor growth in xenografts mice, while the single implantation combined with anlotinib had more effective in tumor inhibition. The results of Ki67, TUNEL and CD31 staining confirmed an evident reduction in tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis, as well as an increase in apoptosis. A relatively integrated bone metabolism was indicated after I-125 seeds single implantation with or without anlotinib, and the results were similar in I-125 seeds fractional implantation, including a reduction in the number of TRAP-positive cells and an increase in ALP expression level. Additionally, the serum TRACP-5b activity was decreased and the serum PINP concentration was increased following I-125 seeds implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Single and fractionated implantation pattern of I-125 radioactive seeds had similar therapeutic efficacy against tumor growth, while brachytherapy with I-125 seeds implantation may be an effective and safe treatment strategy for its potential protection against cancer treatment-induced bone loss.

Intratumoral injection of anlotinib hydrogel enhances antitumor effects and reduces toxicity in mouse model of lung cancer

This study was conducted to determine the antitumor effects and ability of an anlotinib (AL) hydrogel (AL–HA–Tyr) to reduce toxicity in a mouse model of Lewis lung cancer (LLC). We constructed a drug carrier system for AL, verified its effectiveness and systemic safety, and provided a preliminary experimental foundation for clinical carrier transformation. AL–HA–Tyr was prepared by encapsulating AL with hyaluronic acid–tyramine (HA–Tyr) conjugates. Colony and tube formation assays showed that AL–HA–Tyr restrained the proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and LLC cells, respectively, in vitro, and that AL exerted significant anti-angiogenesis and anti-tumor effects. The invasion and migration of HUVECs and LLC cells were efficiently suppressed by AL according to transwell assays. HUVEC and LLC cell-cycle and apoptosis analysis clarified the direct anti-tumor effects of AL–HA–Tyr. Mice engrafted with LLC cells in vivo were administered oral saline, oral AL, or an intratumoral injection of HA–Tyr or AL–HA–Tyr. The results showed that AL–HA–Tyr obviously reduced visceral toxicity and decreased Ki67 and VEGF-A expression in tumor cells compared with AL. Furthermore, AL–HA–Tyr significantly prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice. Overall, AL–HA–Tyr enhanced antitumor effects and reduced toxicity in the LLC model. It provided a foundation for the clinical transformation of drug carrier systems.

Anlotinib Combined with Cranial Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis: A Retrospectively, Control Study

Introduction

Cranial radiotherapy (CRT) is the main treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis (BM) and non-EGFR/ALK/ROS1-TKIs indication, and anlotinib can improve overall prognosis. However, the clinical effects of CRT combined with anlotinib for the treatment of NSCLC with BM remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical effects of anlotinib + CRT versus CRT alone in NSCLC patients with BM and non-EGFR/ALK/ROS1-TKIs indication from September 2016 to June 2020. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of anlotinib + CRT versus CRT alone were analyzed. After evaluation of the clinical characteristics to generate a baseline, the independent prognostic factors for intracranial PFS (iPFS) and OS were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis. Finally, subgroup analysis for iPFS and OS was performed to assess treatment effects using randomized stratification factors and stratified Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

This study included data for 73 patients with BM at baseline. Of the 73 patients, 45 patients received CRT alone, and 28 patients received CRT + anlotinib. There was no significant difference in clinical features between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the CRT group, the combined group had longer iPFS (median iPFS [miPFS]: 3.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = 0.048). However, there were no significant differences in OS, extracranial PFS, and systemic PFS. For clinical features, univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the plus anlotinib treatment was an independent advantage predictor of iPFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.95; P = 0.04), and age ≥57 years (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08, P = 0.014) and KPS score ≤80 (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08, P = 0.014) were independent disadvantage predictors of OS (P < 0.05). In addition, although this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), the patients with the anlotinib + local CRT (LCRT) treatment had the longest iPFS (miPFS: 27.0 months) and OS (median OS [mOS]: 36 months). The miPFS and mOS values for the LCRT group were 11 months and 18 months, respectively, with shorter values for whole-brain RT (WBRT) + anlotinib group, WBRT + LCRT + anlotinib group, WBRT, and WBRT + LCRT.

Conclusion

Anlotinib can improve the intracranial lesion control and survival prognosis of NSCLC patients with CRT.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone as third-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone to provide guidance for clinical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients & methods: The records of 139 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received at least one dose of ICIs plus anlotinib (IA group) or single-agent anlotinib (AA group) were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of the treatments, survival outcomes and adverse events were analyzed. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Result: The IA group had a significantly prolonged median PFS (mPFS: 5.8 vs 4.2 months; p = 0.022) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97). In patients with brain metastases, the IA group exhibited improved efficacy (mPFS: 6.0 vs 3.8 months; p = 0.034) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23-1.05). Conclusion: ICIs plus anlotinib significantly improved efficacy compared with anlotinib alone and showed substantial potential for the control of intracranial lesions.

Fingerprint loss during combination therapy using osimertinib and anlotinib: A case report

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Recent studies prove that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors combined with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are more effective than EGFR TKI monotherapy for treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the adverse effects associated with this treatment require further investigation. We report a case of fingerprint loss secondary to combination therapy using osimertinib (an EGFR TKI that targets mutated EGFR kinases) and anlotinib (a TKI that acts on multiple targets including mutated VEGFR kinases).

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old man with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR L858R mutation received a 5-month course of platinum-based chemotherapy and icotinib. This regimen was subsequently switched to osimertinib plus anlotinib to achieve a better tumour response. This therapy led to fingerprint loss, which recovered following discontinuation of anlotinib treatment but subsequently recurred.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report that describes fingerprint loss during combination therapy using osimertinib and anlotinib.

Anlotinib Monotherapy for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial (ALTER0703)

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were limited. Anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. ALTER0703 study was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of anlotinib for patients with refractory mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial involving 33 hospitals in China. Patients had taken at least two lines of therapies were 2:1 randomized to receive oral anlotinib (12 mg/day; days 1-14; 21 days per cycle) or placebo, plus best supportive care. Randomization was stratified by previous VEGF-targeting treatments and time from diagnosis to metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients (anlotinib: 282; placebo: 137) were treated from December 2014 to August 2016. The median PFS was improved in anlotinib group (4.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-4.5) over placebo group (1.5 months; 95% CI, 1.4-1.5), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.27-0.43; p < .0001). However, median OS was similar between two groups (8.6 months; 95% CI, 7.8-9.7 vs. 7.2 months; 95% CI, 6.2-8.8; HR, 1.02; p = .870). Improvements of ORR and DCR were observed in anlotinib over placebo. The most common grade ≥ 3 anlotinib related adverse events were hypertension (20.92%), increased γ-GT (7.09%), and hand-foot skin reaction (6.38%).

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib was tolerated in Chinese patients with refractory mCRC. Although OS did not reach significant difference, anlotinib still provided clinical benefits by substantially prolonged PFS in these patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this randomized clinical trial that included 419 patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, substantial prolonged in progression-free survival was noted in patients who received anlotinib compared with those given placebo. Improvements on objective response rate and disease control rate was also observed in anlotinib group. However, overall survival was similar between the two groups. In a word, in third-line or above treatment of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, anlotinib provided clinical benefit by significantly prolonged progression-free survival.

Alginic acid inhibits non-small cell lung cancer-induced angiogenesis via activating miR-506 expression

Angiogenesis is a key event in non-small cell lung cancer progression. Alginic acid (AA), a kind of naturally occurring polyuronic acid, is generally enriched in edible brown algae. Recent studies have uncovered its anti-anaphylactic and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the effects of AA on human malignancies remain unknown. Herein, efficient inhibition of AA on NSCLC-induced angiogenesis was observed with tube formation and xenograft models. Subsequent results indicated that AA downregulated the expression of VEGF-A, a key angiogenesis-inducing cytokine. In addition, AA downregulated STAT3, a transcriptional inducer of VEGF-A and increased non-coding RNA miR-506 expression, respectively. Furthermore, miR-506 directly modulated STAT3 relying on base pairing the 3'-UTR in STAT3 mRNA. We also found that abrogation of miR-506 abolished the inhibitory effect of AA on VEGF-A expression and NSCLC-induced angiogenesis. Finally, xenografts experiments also showed that oral administration of AA could significantly attenuate NSCLC angiogenesis, indicated by decreased micro-vessel density (MVD) and the MVD marker CD31 expression in xenografts tissues. Correspondingly, AA treatment also downregulated VEGF-A, STAT3 and increased miR-506 expression in xenografts samples, respectively. Taken together, these results suggested that AA could suppress NSCLC-induced angiogenesis via miR-506/STAT3/VEGF-A axis. .

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Associated With Anlotinib: A Case Report and Literature Review

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a relatively rare clinical disease, characterized by reversible subcortical vasogenic edema. Here, we present the first reported case of PRES induced by anlotinib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A 56-year-old female patient with lung adenocarcinoma and bone metastasis experienced hypertension and mental confusion when she received anti-angiogenesis treatment. PRES was diagnosed after magnetic resonance of the patient's brain revealed hyperintensities bilaterally around the cerebellum, pons, fronto-parieto-occipital areas, and corona radiate. Diffusion-weighted imaging showed hyperintensities bilaterally in the parieto-occipital cortical regions. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with PRES, and remission was achieved with anti-hypertensive drugs. Six cases of rare adverse effects induced by anlotinib were reviewed in the literature. Since anlotinib has been widely applied as a novel third-line treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, the association between PRES and anlotinib would benefit neurologists and oncologists in future diagnoses and treatment.

Case Report: Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Tumor Origin in a Female Patient With Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis mainly originates from lung cancer. Napsin A and TTF-1 factors have frequently been detected in lung adenocarcinoma cases. Brain metastasis tumors with napsin A and TTF-1 positive are easily classified as lung adenocarcinoma origin. However, some thyroid cancers also exhibit these clinical features. Besides, lung is the most common metastasis of undifferential thyroid cancer. Therefore, it requires development of novel diagnostic tools to aid in distinguishing between pulmonary and thyroid origin.

PATIENT FINDINGS

We reported a case that was initially diagnosed as brain metastatic lung cancer based on immunohistochemistry results. Analysis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from the brain lesion revealed that the cancer may have originated from the thyroid. We detected combo mutations in TERT promoter mutation, RET fusion and TP53, which are common in undifferential thyroid cancer (UTC), but rare for lung cancer. These results, coupled with identification of PAX8, indicated that this patient had UTC. Additionally, her three sons, despite being asymptomatic, were all diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

SUMMARY

The patient received anlotinib treatment and showed good clinical outcomes. One month after anlotinib treatment, the pulmonary nodules were found to be controlled, and the thyroid tumor drastically reduced, and tracheal compression relieved. She continued anlotinib treatment for the following two months, but died one month later because the treatment stopped owing to financial reasons. All her sons underwent total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although NGS has been reported to assist in diagnosis of the origin of some tumors, this is the first evidence of NGS for the determination of the origin of thyroid tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a combination of multiple mutations has been used to help determine the origin of a tumor, compared with the previous single mutant gene. Moreover, this is the first evidence on the use of anlotinib for treatment of UTC with distant metastasis. Besides, all three sons of the patient had thyroid carcinoma in subsequent examinations, indicating high-risk for familial non-medullary thyroid cancer in UTC patients and necessity for performing thyroid ultrasound testing in other family members.

Anlotinib as a post-third-line therapy for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

There is no standard treatment strategy for the third-line and above treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the effects of anlotinib in patients with NSCLC. Data was collected from a group of advanced lung cancer patients who received anlotinib as a third-line or post-third-line treatment between 2017 and 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS) of these lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Forest plot was used for subgroup analysis.Our study included 44 patients. Oral anlotinib was used as a third-line treatment to treat 26 patients, and as a fourth-line or multiline treatment in 18 patients. The objective control rate was 5%, the disease control rate was 89%, and the median PFS was 4.0 months with a 95% confidence interval. Common toxicities included anorexia, hypertension, and fatigue. Anlotinib demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated with controlled toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Avapritinib, a novel inhibitor of KIT/PDGFRA, is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of adults with PDGFRA exon 18-mutant unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (U/M GISTs). We assessed the safety of avapritinib and provide evidence-based guidance on management of avapritinib-associated adverse events (AEs), including cognitive effects and intracranial bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a two-part, single-arm dose escalation/expansion phase I study (NAVIGATOR; NCT02508532) in patients with U/M GISTs treated with oral avapritinib 30-600 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; the impact of dose modification (interruption and/or reduction) on progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were limited to patients who started avapritinib at 300 mg (approved dose).

RESULTS

Of 250 patients enrolled in the study, 74.0% presented with KIT mutation and 24.8% presented with PDGFRA exon 18-mutation; 66.8% started avapritinib at 300 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs (any grade) were nausea (59.2%), fatigue (50.0%), periorbital edema (42.0%), anemia (39.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), vomiting (36.0%), and increased lacrimation (30.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 167 patients starting on 300 mg avapritinib, all-cause cognitive effects rate (grade 1-2) was 37.0% in all patients and 52.0% in patients ≥65 years. Cognitive effects improved to a lower grade more quickly with dose modification (1.3-3.1 weeks) than without (4.9-7.6 weeks). Median PFS was 11.4 months with dose modification and 7.2 months without.

CONCLUSION

Tolerability-guided dose modification of avapritinib is an effective strategy for managing AEs in patients with GISTs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Early recognition of adverse events and tailored dose modification appear to be effective approaches for managing treatment-related adverse events and maintaining patients on avapritinib. Dose reduction does not appear to result in reduced efficacy. Patients' cognitive function should be assessed at baseline and monitored carefully throughout treatment with avapritinib for the onset of cognitive adverse events. Dose interruption is recommended at the first sign of any cognitive effect, including grade 1 events.

The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined With PD-1 Antibody for Third-Line or Further-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Both anlotinib and programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) have been approved for the third line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the combination of these two standard therapies has not been investigated in third-line or further-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We reviewed 22 patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib combined with PD-1 mAb therapy from July 2018 to October 2019 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Based on the baseline characteristics, PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy by RESIST 1.1 and CTCAE 5.0.

Results

The combination treatment of anlotinib and PD-1 mAb in 22 NSCLC patients gained a median PFS of 6.8 months and a median OS of 17.3 months. The disease control rate (DCR) was 90.9%, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 36.4%, where 1 (4.6%) patient achieved complete response (CR) and 7 (31.8%) patients achieved partial response (PR). The median time to response was 3.9 months, and the median duration of the response was 6.8 months. The common grades 1–2 adverse events were fatigue 10/22 (45.5%), decreased appetite 9/22 (40.9%), hypertension 10/22 (45.5%); the common grades 3–4 adverse events were hypertension 2/22 (9.1%) and mouth ulceration 2/22 (9.1%).

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with PD-1 mAb showed promising efficacy in third-line or further-line treatment of NSCLC, and its adverse effects is tolerable.

Anlotinib as a molecular targeted therapy for tumors

Angiogenesis has an essential role in tumor growth and metastasis, and blocking this pathway has been a successfully utilized strategy in the clinical treatment of cancer. Anlotinib (AL3818) is a novel oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and 3, fibroblast growth factor 1-4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α and β, c-Kit and Ret. Anlotinib exerts inhibitory effects on tumor growth and angiogenesis and received its first approval as a third-line treatment for refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in May 2018 and its second approval as a second-line treatment for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in June 2019 in the People's Republic of China. Anlotinib has encouraging efficacy and a manageable and tolerable safety profile in a broad range of malignancies, including medullary thyroid cancer, renal cell cancer, gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In the present review, the preclinical and clinical trials of anlotinib were summarized with a focus on safety evaluation and adverse event management.

Hand-foot syndrome and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of data from the ALTER 0303 study

BACKGROUND

The ALTER 0303 study showed that anlotinib can significantly improve overall survival (OS) compared with the placebo in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common anlotinib-related adverse event. The aim of this study was to assess the association of HFS with clinical benefit.

METHODS

A subgroup analysis of patients treated with anlotinib from the ALTER 0303 study was performed. Our analysis assessed if the appearance of anlotinib-related HFS in the first 42 days (second-cycle HFS) and at any time could produce better clinical benefits.

RESULTS

In this study, 294 patients were treated with anlotinib. Of which, 129 patients had HFS at any time, and 76 patients developed HFS in the first 2 cycles. Patients who received anlotinib and developed HFS had significantly prolonged OS, progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who did not develop HFS in the first 2 cycles (13.5 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.89), p = 0.009; 5.8 vs 4.5 months, p = 0.001; adjusted HR, 0.59 [0.43-0.81], p = 0.001). The significant OS and PFS benefits for patients with HFS versus without were seen at any time (14.5 vs 7.3 months, p = 0.000; adjusted HR, 0.50 [0.36-0.67], p = 0.000; 5.8 vs 4.2 months, p = 0.000; adjusted HR, 0.49 [0.37-0.65], p = 0.000). In addition, the grade of severity of HFS was strongly correlated with OS (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Presence of HFS may be a potential clinical marker for the treatment of NSCLC with anlotinib.

Anlotinib can overcome acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs via FGFR1 signaling in non-small cell lung cancer without harboring EGFR T790M mutation

Background

Although many studies have defined mechanisms of resistance to EGFR‐TKIs, acquired resistance remains the major limitation of monotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs.

Methods

Cell viability was analyzed using a Cell Counting Kit‐8 (CCK‐8) assay. EGFR T790M mutation was sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 platform. mRNAs from HCC827 and HCC827 gefitinib‐resistant (GR) cells were analyzed by genome analyzer‐based deep sequencing. The effect of anlotinib on apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of HCC827 GR was detected by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. A mouse xenograft model was used to assess the effect of anlotinib on HCC827 GR cells.

Results

The T790M mutation was found in the PC‐9 GR cell line but not in the HCC827 GR cell line. Anlotinib could suppress the growth of HCC827 GR cells by inhibiting FGFR1 in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model. Moreover, FGFR1 was overexpressed in HCC827 GR cells, and the knockdown of FGFR1 reversed gefitinib resistance in HCC827 GR cells. Furthermore, anlotinib induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in HCC827 GR cells by increasing the activity of Caspase‐3.

Conclusions

FGFR1 overexpression could be the mechanism of EGFR‐TKI acquired resistance and anlotinib can suppresse the growth of EGFR‐TKI‐resistant NSCLC cells without T790M mutation.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

The ALTER0303 trial showed that anlotinib, a novel antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, administered as third-line or further treatment prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in real-world settings.

Patients and Methods

Medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anlotinib as third-line or further treatment were collected, and survival curves were derived using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed by log-rank testing. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the significance of factors obtained from the univariate analysis.

Results

Fifty-two patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The objective response rate was 16%, and the disease control rate was 80%. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6–5.4), and the median OS was 9 months (95% CI: 6.5–11.5). Univariate analysis revealed that the group of patients with longer PFS and OS included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1, ≤2 distant metastases, no liver metastases, ≤3 previous treatment lines, and ≤2 previous chemotherapy lines. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that only patients with ECOG PS ≤1 or no liver metastases had longer PFS and OS. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 14% of the patients, but no life-threatening adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Anlotinib was well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC in real-world conditions. Patients with ECOG PS ≤1 or no liver metastases have longer PFS and OS.

Anlotinib is effective in patients with advanced oral cancer?

Oral cancer patients with recurrence or distant metastasis often present poor prognosis. Majority of advanced oral cancer patients suffer from treat-related adverse events and drug resistance. For those patients, the survival time and quality of life are urgent to be improved. Anlotinib, as a multi-targets tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been demonstrated to be effective in many refractory tumors by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and partial functions of tumor cells. In this paper, we performed CCK-8 assay, wound healing assay and transwell assay to explore the effect of anlotinib on human tongue squamous carcinoma Tca8113 cell line. Preliminary data indicated that anlotinib significantly inhibited Tca8113 cells proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro. Together, we proposed a hypothesis that anlotinib might be effective in prolonging survival time of patients with advanced oral cancer.

miR-596 suppresses the expression of Survivin and enhances the sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells to the molecular targeting agent anlotinib

Background

Osteosarcoma (OSA), the most common primary bone malignancy, is characterized by a wide spectrum of complicated pathologies and frequent distal metastasis and causes death in adolescents and young adults worldwide. Antitumor drug treatment strategies include various cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs, while molecular targeted therapy for OSA is currently less used. The present work revealed the role played by the miR-596/Survivin axis in affecting the sensitivity of OSA cells to anlotinib, a novel molecular targeting agent.

Methods

By virtual screening, we found that miR-596 might target Survivin by using an online tool (miRDB). RNA levels of miR-596 and Survivin in clinical specimens were examined with qPCR. The effect of miR-596 on anlotinib’s antitumor effect was examined with MTT experiments, the subcutaneous tumor model, or the intramuscular tumor model.

Results

Overexpression of miR-596 via lentiviral particles repressed the protein level of Survivin in U2OS cells. Transfection of miR-596 enhanced the antitumor effect of anlotinib on U2OS cells or five cell lines derived from OSA patients.

Conclusion

miR-596 targets Survivin and enhances the antitumor effect of anlotinib on OSA cells.