Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department: an interrupted time series quality improvement study

Effectiveness of Multimodal Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Collection in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction and methods Blood culturing has become one of the backbone investigations for septicemia, fever of unknown origin, etc. This study was conducted to test the effect of multimodal interventions on the practical skills of healthcare workers (HCWs), raise awareness regarding the importance of aseptic blood culture collection practices, and increase compliance with the specific steps to be followed. Hence, this current interventional study was aimed at comparing the rate of isolation of contaminants grown among the blood culture specimens, assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of HCWs collecting the blood culture specimen on various aspects of sample collection, educating the nursing staff regarding blood sample collection using a structured, pre-formed checklist, and emphasizing best practices for blood culture collection. All of the study's objectives were successfully met within the time frame specified. Using a pre-formed checklist and a Google form for KAP analysis eased the calculation. Results On analysis, the blood culture contamination rate in the pre-interventional phase dropped drastically from 6.16% to 3.03% in the post-interventional phase. The educational sessions conducted are a paramount reason for the reduction in the contamination rate. The HCWs were the least compliant towards the eighth step in the checklist (regarding palpation of skin); however, that too increased from 66.93% and 64.51% to a whopping 82.25% and 83.06%, respectively, with a chi-square value of 0.03 and a p-value of 0.85 (not significant). Conclusion Implementation of interventional studies as an audit like this in tertiary care hospitals can result in a significant reduction in blood culture contamination rates and can also improve the compliance of HCWs with blood culture protocols. This, in turn, can overall improve the effectiveness of blood culture (BC) testing and reduce mortality and morbidity in tertiary care hospitals. Further research can be conducted to brainstorm more methods to increase the compliance of HCWs. Better monitoring strategies can also be set to ensure low contamination rates. Additionally, some other methods can be derived to locate the source of contamination within the hospital environment and thus eliminate it. Similar interventions can be conducted for a longer duration of time to further reduce the blood culture contamination rate below 3% (as per the recommendations).

Next-Generation Sequencing in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Rapid pathogen identification and appropriate antimicrobial therapy are crucial in critically ill COVID-19 patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and potential therapeutic benefit of additional next-generation sequencing (NGS) of microbial DNA from plasma in these patients.

METHODS

This monocentric descriptive retrospective study reviewed clinical data and pathogen diagnostics in COVID-19 ICU patients. NGS (DISQVER^®) and blood culture (BC) samples were obtained on suspicion of BSIs. Data were reviewed regarding the adjustment of antimicrobial therapy and diagnostic procedures seven days after sampling and analyzed using the Chi²-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases with simultaneous NGS and BC sampling were assessed. The NGS positivity rate was 52% (13/25) with the detection of 23 pathogens (14 bacteria, 1 fungus, 8 viruses), and the BC positivity rate was 28% (7/25, 8 bacteria; p = 0.083). The NGS-positive patients were older (75 vs. 59.5 years; p = 0.03) with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (77% vs. 33%; p = 0.03). These NGS results led to diagnostic procedures in four cases and to the commencement of four antimicrobial therapies in three cases. Empirical treatment was considered appropriate and continued in three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In COVID-19 patients with suspected BSIs, NGS may provide a higher positivity rate than BC and enable new therapeutic approaches.

Changes in Use of Blood Cultures in a COVID-19-Dedicated Tertiary Hospital

Blood cultures should be collected within an hour in the setting of sepsis/septic shock. The contamination rate should be below 3%. Worldwide reports have described an increase in blood contamination rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective analysis of the blood cultures collected during a 10-month period (March−December 2020) at NIID “Prof. Dr. Matei Balș”. The results were compared with data from the pre-pandemic period (March−December 2016) and with the existing data in the literature. During the pandemic, there was a significant decrease in the number of blood cultures collected (1274 blood cultures in 2020 vs. 5399 in 2016). The contamination rate was higher in 2020 (11.7%) compared to 2016 (8.2%), p < 0.001. The rate of infectious episodes in which the etiological agent was identified was constant: 11% in 2020 versus 11.9% in 2016, p = 0.479, but there were fewer invasive bacterial/fungal infections: 0.95/1000 patient days in 2020 vs. 2.39/1000 patient days in 2016, p < 0.001. We observed a change in the species distribution. The Gram-negative isolate’s proportion increased from 50.6% to 63.1% and the gram-positive isolate’s proportion decreased from 31.8% to 19%. Collection of a low number of blood cultures and a high contamination rate was identified in our clinic. In order to improve the usefulness of blood cultures as a diagnostic method, at least two sets should be collected in aseptic conditions.

Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study

In the event of blood culture contamination (BCC), blood culture (BC) needs to be repeated. This may delay appropriate treatment, prolong hospitalization and, consequently, increase its costs. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of BCC and associated factors in a general hospital in Poland based on reports of BC in samples submitted for laboratory testing in 2019−2020. BCC is recognized when bacteria (especially those belonging to natural human microbiota) are isolated from a single sample and no clinical signs indicated infection. True positive BC is confirmed by the growth of bacteria in more than one set of blood samples with the corresponding clinical signs present. The structure of BC sets, microorganisms, and laboratory costs of BCC were analyzed. Out of 2274 total BC cases, 11.5% were true positive BC and 9.5% were BCC. Of all the BCC identified in the entire hospital, 72% was from Internal Medicine (IM) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) combined. When single sets for BC were used in IM in 2020, the use increased to 85% compared with 2019 (p < 0.05). The predominant isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (84%). The estimated extra laboratory costs of BCC exceeded EUR 268,000. The BCC was a more serious problem than expected, including non-recommended using of single BC sets. Compliance with the BC collection procedure should be increased in order to reduce BCC and thus extra hospital costs.

Bacteremia in Adults Admitted from the Emergency Department with Laboratory-Confirmed Respiratory Syncytial Virus

BACKGROUND

Collecting blood cultures from patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory infection (ARI) is common, but the rate of secondary bacteremia in adult patients admitted from the ED with ARI associated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is unknown. Indiscriminate collection of blood cultures can be associated with contaminated blood cultures and increased inappropriate antimicrobial use and health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine the rate and etiology of secondary bacteremia, factors associated with secondary bacteremia, and factors associated with collecting blood cultures in the ED, in adults hospitalized with RSV.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective substudy using data from a prospective study of adults admitted with RSV infections during two respiratory seasons (October 2017 to April 2018 and October 2018 to April 2019). Blood cultures were collected at the discretion of ED providers. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics among those with and without secondary bacteremia and among those with and without blood cultures collected using multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 365 hospitalized RSV-positive patients (mean age 68.8 years), 269 (73.7%) had blood cultures collected in the ED and 18 (6.7%) patients had secondary bacteremia, most commonly from a nonrespiratory source (n = 13). Patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly less likely to have secondary bacteremia. Patients who were immunocompromised, met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, or had pneumonia described on chest x-ray reports were more likely to have blood cultures collected.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 6.7% of adults hospitalized with RSV infections had secondary bacteremia, more commonly from nonrespiratory sources.

Effectiveness of multimodal intervention to improve blood culture collection in the emergency department

Introduction:

The blood culture (BC) contamination was a significant problem in our hospital, especially in the emergency department (ED). The study, therefore, was undertaken to improve the BC collection in the ED.

Methods:

The study was conducted for 1 year divided into two phases of 6 months each: Preintervention phase and intervention phase (regular and phlebotomist groups). The interventions comprised implementing standard protocol for BC collection and conducting educational sessions. In preintervention and regular groups, the BCs were collected by interns and technicians, while dedicated phlebotomist did so in the phlebotomist group. Data were analyzed and interpreted for the contamination rate as well as compliance in adequate filling of the requisition form. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. A value of P < 0.005 was considered statistically significant, and P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

In the preintervention group, 13.7% of specimens were reported as contaminated which was reduced to 4.2% and 3.2% in the regular and phlebotomist group, respectively, after intervention. Compliance of health-care workers to various elements of BC collection protocol was also found to be significantly improved in the intervention phase compared to the preintervention phase (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Implementation of this multimodal intervention resulted in a drastic reduction in BC contamination and improvement in compliance to BC collection protocol and filling of various parameters in the BC requisition form, thus improving the overall effectiveness of BC testing. It was also noted that the contamination rate was further reduced by implementing dedicated phlebotomist.

Impact of sterile gloves on blood-culture contamination rates: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Reducing the blood-culture contamination rate is a constant challenge for health services. This study aimed to analyze whether blood-culture (BC) collection using sterile gloves reduces the contamination rate when compared to the non-sterile gloves, and to compare baseline and intervention periods.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial, performed in an intensive care unit in Brazil and paired in two groups: sterile (BCs obtained with modified sterile technique: only sterile gloves; no fenestrated drape or dedicated sterile collection kit) and clean (clean technique: usual care with non-sterile gloves). Two paired blood samples were obtained from each patient by trained and calibrated nurses. BCs were processed by conventional microbiological methods and the results were issued by blinded microbiologists.

RESULTS

There was no difference (P = 1.00) in the contamination rate of BC between the sterile (1%) and clean (1%) groups. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.05; relative risk: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.70) in the contamination rate between baseline (6.1%; 20/330) and intervention (1%; 2/200).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the aseptic care provided in obtaining samples is more important than the sterile technique itself, and highlights the value of standardizing the practices, qualification and calibration of phlebotomists.

Use of a Sterile Collection Process to Reduce Contaminated Peripheral Blood Cultures

BACKGROUND

Contaminated blood cultures pose a significant burden by subjecting children to unnecessary testing, procedures, and antibiotics and increasing health care costs. The aim of our quality improvement (QI) initiative was to decrease the percentage of contaminated peripheral blood cultures in our pediatric emergency department (ED) from an average of 6.7% to <3% over a 16-month period.

METHODS

The QI initiative was implemented in the pediatric ED of a tertiary care children's hospital. Interventions included change of the peripheral blood culture collection from a clean to a sterile process, nursing education, and individualized feedback. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of contaminated peripheral blood cultures. The process measure was the percentage of nurses who completed 75% to 100% of the steps of the sterile collection process, as measured by self-reporting in audit cards. The balancing measures were time from antibiotic ordering to time of administration and ED length of stay.

RESULTS

We decreased the percentage of contaminated peripheral blood cultures threefold from a baseline (June 2, 2018, to December 31, 2018) of 6.7% to 2.1% during the intervention period (January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020). Ninety-eight percent of nurses who completed audit cards reported performing 75% to 100% of the steps of the new sterile process. There was no significant difference in the average time from antibiotic ordering to antibiotic administration or ED length of stay between the baseline and intervention periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a sterile blood culture collection process, in addition to nursing education and individualized feedback, is an effective method to decrease peripheral blood culture contamination rates in a pediatric ED.

Blood culture contamination rates at different level healthcare institutions in the Western Cape, South Africa

Sterile blood culture (BC) collection procedures are important to prevent the consequences of contamination, namely, prolonged patient hospitalisation, unnecessary antimicrobial exposure and an increase in hospital costs. Blood culture contamination rates were determined at different hospitals in the Cape Metropole over a 3-year period. Study findings showed that contaminated BCs have a financial impact on the healthcare system and contamination rates remain above accepted international standards, except in the presence of a phlebotomist team. High BC contamination rates might be reduced by the implementation of cost-effective educational intervention programmes, which reminds healthcare workers to collect BC samples aseptically.

More than Just Contaminants: Frequency and Characterization of Polymicrobial Blood Cultures from a Central Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Serving a Large Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Polymicrobial blood stream infection is often considered uncommon, and corresponding cultures may be assumed to represent contamination. Here we characterized the prevalence and epidemiology of these cultures submitted to a central clinical microbiology laboratory.

METHODS

Blood cultures from 2017 to 2018 (n = 104 547) were evaluated. Polymicrobial blood cultures were defined by the presence of more than one organism in a blood culture set (set = one aerobic and one anaerobic bottle). Data were stratified by patient location and characteristics of the microbiota detected.

RESULTS

Of all blood culture sets, 14 600 (14.0%) were positive. Among these, 1651 sets (11.3% of positive cultures; 1.6% of total cultures) were polymicrobial. Most cultures (85.2%) grew two microorganisms; the greatest number of microorganisms in a culture was 6. The most common microorganism pairs were (a) two coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), (b) Corynebacterium and CoNS, and (c) S. aureus and CoNS. Microorganisms in polymicrobial cultures represented microbiota from skin (46.1%), the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (33.9%), strict anaerobes (1.4%), and "other" microorganisms (18.6%). Most cultures with GI microbiota originated from an adult academic medical center compared to community or pediatric settings (40.5% of polymicrobial cultures vs 27.2% and 25.8%, P < 0.0001). Within the academic medical center, patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) or who had bone marrow transplants (BMT) had more cultures suggestive of GI microbiota compared to those from the emergency department (ED) (50.8% and 52.8% vs 31.2%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymicrobial blood cultures are common in a variety of healthcare settings and the recovered microorganisms can be clinically relevant.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination in the Neonatal Unit

Peripheral blood culture contamination (BCC) can lead to an initiation of unnecessary antimicrobial treatment, further laboratory tests, increased length of stay, and increased costs. This study describes a 12-month quality improvement (QI) program to reduce the BCC rate in a neonatal unit by 50%.

Methods

The QI team focused on standardizing processes to align with best practices using process mapping and cause and effect diagrams. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) 1: inoculation of blood culture bottles with the introduction of transfer device; PDSA 2: preparation of the skin for peripheral intravenous cannula insertion; PDSA 3: aseptic technique education package; and PDSA 4: optimizing blood volume of blood collected for culture. The team used statistical process control methodology to detect special cause variation.

Results

Compliance with the standard processes as part of PSDA 1 improved from a mean level of 50% to 100% and for PDSA 2 improved from a mean level of 50% to 95%. After implementation of PDSA 3, scores on a relevant knowledge test increased from a mean of 39% (pretraining test; n = 10) to 92% (posttraining test; n = 10) (P < 0.001). Postimplementation of the processes for PDSA 4, a minimum of 1 mL was collected in 94% of blood culture collection events (n = 450) (mean 1.1 mL; range 0.5-3.5 mL). Special cause variation occurred after the implementation of the PDSA cycles. During the baseline period, the BCC rate was 2.0% and decreased to 1.0% postinterventions implementation.

Conclusions

Interventions focused on standardizing practices around collection of blood cultures in neonates were associated with fewer contaminants.This study is reported according to the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.

Sites of blood collection and topical antiseptics associated with contaminated cultures: prospective observational study

We aimed to determine whether puncture sites for blood sampling and topical disinfectants are associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution. This single-center, prospective observational study of 249 consecutive patients aged ≥ 20 years proceeded in the ED of a university hospital in Japan during 6 months. Pairs of blood samples were collected for aerobic and anaerobic culture from all patients in the ED. Physicians selected puncture sites and topical disinfectants according to their personal preference. We found 50 (20.1%) patients with potentially contaminated blood cultures. Fifty-six (22.5%) patients were true bacteremia and 143 (57.4%) patients were true negatives. Multivariate analysis associated more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine than with alcohol/chlorhexidine (adjusted risk difference, 12.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8–16.9; P < 0.001). Sites of blood collection were also associated with contamination. Femoral and central venous with other sites were associated with contamination more frequently than venous sites (adjusted risk difference), 13.1% (95% CI 8.2–17.9; P < 0.001]) vs. 17.3% (95% CI 3.6–31.0; P = 0.013). Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly higher when blood was collected from femoral sites and when povidone-iodine was the topical antiseptic.

Asynchronous Testing of 2 Specimen-Diversion Devices to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination: A Single-Site Product Supply Quality Improvement Project

OBJECTIVE

Blood culture contamination above the national threshold has been a consistent clinical issue in the ED setting. Two commercially available devices were examined that divert an initial small volume of the specimen before the collection of blood culture to reduce skin contamination.

METHODS

Prospectively, 2 different blood culture-diversion devices were made available in the unit supplies to ED clinicians at a single site during 2 different periods of time as a follow-up strategy to an ongoing quality improvement project. Blood samples were collected in the emergency department over a period of 16 months. A retrospective record review study was conducted comparing the use of the 2 specimen-diversion devices with no device (control group) for blood culture contamination rates. The main outcome of monthly blood culture contamination per device was tested using a Bayesian Poisson multilevel regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 4030 blood samples were collected and analyzed from November 2017 to February 2019. The model estimated that the mean incidence of contaminated blood draws in the device A group was 0.29 (0.14-0.55) times the incidence of contaminated draws in the control group. The mean incidence of contaminated blood draws in the device B group was 0.23 (0.13-0.37) times the incidence of contaminated draws in the control group, suggesting that initial-diversion methods reduced blood culture contamination.

CONCLUSION

Initial specimen-diversion devices supplement present standard phlebotomy protocols to bring down the blood culture contamination rate.

Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department

Given the large number of patients seen in the emergency department (ED) and concerns with antibiotic overprescribing, the ED is an important setting to target for antimicrobial stewardship (AS) initiatives. The ED is positioned between ambulatory and inpatient settings, making AS collaboration with clinicians and other health care providers in the hospital, long-term care facilities, and ambulatory settings critical to success. This article details ED-focused AS strategies on empiric antimicrobial selection, prompt administration, preventing ED return and readmissions, suggested collaborations between ED AS leadership and other key partners, and potential future strategies for expansion.

Low prevalence of bloodstream infection and high blood culture contamination rates in patients with COVID-19

PURPOSE

In the management of COVID-19, knowledge is lacking on the frequency of secondary bacterial infections and on how empirical antibiotic therapy should be used. In the present study, we aimed to compare blood culture (BC) results of a COVID-19 patient cohort with two cohorts of patients without detected COVID-19.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort study design of patients subjected to BC in six tertiary care hospitals, SARS-CoV-2 positive patients from March 1 to April 30 in 2020 (COVID-19 group) were compared to patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 during the same period (control group-2020) and with patients sampled March 1 to April 30 in 2019 (control group-2019). The outcomes studied were proportion of BC positivity, clinically relevant growth, and contaminant growth.

RESULTS

In total 15,103 patients and 17,865 BC episodes were studied. Clinically relevant growth was detected in 197/3,027 (6.5%) BC episodes in the COVID-19 group compared to 717/6,663 (10.8%) in control group-2020 (p<0.0001) and 850/8,175 (10.4%) in control group-2019 (p<0.0001). Contamination was present in 255/3,027 (8.4%) BC episodes in the COVID-19 group compared to 330/6,663 (5.0%) in control group-2020 (p<0.0001) and 354/8,175 (4.3%) in control group-2019 (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of bloodstream bacterial infection is low and the contamination rate of BC is high. This knowledge should influence guidelines regarding blood culture sampling and empirical antibiotic therapy in COVID-19 patients.

Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Experiences of Four Hospital Systems

INTRODUCTION

Blood cultures (BCs) frequently become contaminated during the pre-analytic phase of collection leading to downstream ramifications. We present a summary of performance improvement (PI) interventions provided by four hospital systems and common factors that contributed to decreased blood culture contamination (BCC) rates.

METHODS

Each hospital independently formed a multidisciplinary team and action plan for implementation of their intervention, focusing on the use of educational and training tools. Their goal was to significantly decrease their BCC rates. Pre- and post-intervention data were compared during the sustainment period to determine their success.

RESULTS

All hospitals met their goals of post-intervention BCC rates and with most achieving and sustaining BCC rates ≤ 1.0-2.0%.

CONCLUSION

Our report highlights how four hospitals independently achieved their objective to decrease their BCC rate with the support of a multidisciplinary team. We propose a benchmark for BCC rates of 1.5 to < 2.0% as achievable and sustainable.

Improving adherence to facility protocol and reducing blood culture contamination in an intensive care unit: A quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

Blood culture contamination (BCC) is a safety and quality indicator for intensive care units (ICUs). BCC rates in our ICU ranged from 2.90% to 6.70% in 2017.

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement project aimed to reduce the contamination rate from a mean of 4.52% to <3.0% in 1 year by improving the adherence of nurses to the facility protocol during blood collection.

METHODS

This project used a before-after design. It was conducted by a leadership team in a 32-bed ICU where approximately 4000 cultures are drawn annually. We observed the performance of ICU nurses during blood collection, interviewed them regarding the difficulties they encountered with protocol adherence, and conducted a cause-and-effect analysis to identify the main problems. Based on a literature review, we developed and implemented a countermeasure protocol, including a standardised medical order, an online learning program, a weekly departmental report and individual feedback routine, and phlebotomy training to address these problems in 2 months.

RESULTS

The interview results indicated that blood contamination resulted from the environment, difficult phlebotomy, and the inadequate knowledge and skill of the nurses. The countermeasure protocol reduced the average BCC rate from 4.52% to 2.59% during the intervention period and to 0.59% during the 10-month postintervention period. Nursing adherence to the standard protocol for blood culture collection also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

BCC in ICUs is multifactorial. By optimising the work environment, offering skill training, and reinforcing education and individualised feedback, we successfully reduced BCC in our unit to a sustainable low rate.

Blood culture contamination in the emergency department: An integrative review of strategies to prevent blood culture contamination

BACKGROUND

Blood culture collection remains the gold standard to diagnose bacteraemia. Current evidence suggests that the emergency department (ED) often has blood culture contamination (BCC) rates above the recommended 3%, contributing to increased hospital length of stay, unnecessary or inappropriate antimicrobial treatment, and increased economic burden. The aim of this review is to identify effective strategies to improve blood culture collection in EDs to decrease contamination rates and improve patient safety.

METHODS

An integrative literature review methodology was utilised to conduct a structured search of contemporary literature using CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Pubmed and Scopus databases. All eligible literature was screened with those included in the final review collated and appraised using a quality assessment tool.

RESULTS

Eleven reports were included in the final review, which identified bundled approaches, education and feedback, equipment and technique, and stakeholder engagement as strategies that improve BCC rates in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS

All studies reported a reduction in BCC rates regardless of the strategies implemented. A bundled approach yielded the most significant results and was identified to be practical, inexpensive, and adaptable. Further research focusing on specific aspects of a bundled approach may be beneficial to understand which strategies are most effective.

Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

In this review, we present a comprehensive discussion of matters related to the problem of blood culture contamination. Issues addressed include the scope and magnitude of the problem, the bacteria most often recognized as contaminants, the impact of blood culture contamination on clinical microbiology laboratory function, the economic and clinical ramifications of contamination, and, perhaps most importantly, a systematic discussion of solutions to the problem. We conclude by providing a series of unanswered questions that pertain to this important issue.

Successful Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination in an Emergency Department by Monitoring and Feedback

Background:

Blood Culture (BC) contamination is a common problem in the Emergency Department (ED) and is associated with prolonged length of patient stay and excess costs.

Objective:

The study aimed to investigate the impact of monthly monitoring and feedback of BC results on contamination rates.

Methods:

Data from a previous study showed that the contamination rate in the ED consistently exceeded the recommended level. This triggered an ad hoc Quality Improvement team to develop and implement a corrective action plan. In 2017, BC contamination rates were reported to the ED on a monthly basis. In response to this, ED staff conducted intensified educational workshops, followed by private counselling and competency assessment of nurses who collected contaminated BCs.

Results:

A total of 12 educational workshops were conducted in February and March, 2017. The intervention resulted in >60% reduction in the contamination rate, from 8.6% baseline level to less than 3%. Of the 2660 BC sets drawn in 2017 from 1318 patients, 128 (4.8%) were contaminated, accounting for 39.5% of the total number of positive cultures. Sixty percent of the contaminated BCs grew Coagulase-negativeStaphylococcusspecies; other contaminants includedCorynebacteriumspp.,Micrococcusspp.,Propionibacteriumspp.,viridansStreptococcus, andNeisseriaspp.

Conclusion:

Continuous monitoring and feedback of contamination rates reduced BC contamination.

The effectiveness of an online training program in a nursing unit: extraction of blood cultures

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of an online training platform for procedures among nurses in an internal medicine unit to reduce the number of contaminated blood cultures.

METHOD

This was a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention parallel group study. The sample consisted of internal medicine nurses in a tertiary hospital who participated in an online training program about blood culture extraction technique. Knowledge about the technique was measured pre- and post-intervention. Additionally, the study compared the number of blood cultures taken 6 months before and 3 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

Forty-eight nurses participated. Pre-intervention knowledge was homogeneous among both groups, improving significantly after the online training program (p=0.0001). The blood cultures taken prior to the training showed contamination levels above international standards; post-intervention, contamination levels fell by up to 3% in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

The educational intervention using the digital platform increased knowledge about the procedure and its application in clinical practice.

Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling

This document provides a joint recommendation for venous blood sampling of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) and Latin American Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE-LATAM) of the Latin America Confederation of Clinical Biochemistry (COLABIOCLI). It offers guidance on the requirements for ensuring that blood collection is a safe and patient-centered procedure and provides practical guidance on how to successfully overcome potential barriers and obstacles to its widespread implementation. The target audience for this recommendation are healthcare staff members directly involved in blood collection. This recommendation applies to the use of a closed blood collection system and does not provide guidance for the blood collection with an open needle and syringe and catheter collections. Moreover, this document neither addresses patient consent, test ordering, sample handling and transport nor collection from children and unconscious patients. The recommended procedure is based on the best available evidence. Each step was graded using a system that scores the quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendation. The process of grading was done at several face-to-face meetings involving the same mixture of stakeholders stated previously. The main parts of this recommendation are: 1) Pre-sampling procedures, 2) Sampling procedure, 3) Post-sampling procedures and 4) Implementation. A first draft of the recommendation was circulated to EFLM members for public consultation. WG-PRE-LATAM was also invited to comment the document. A revised version has been sent for voting on to all EFLM and COLABIOCLI members and has been officially endorsed by 33/40 EFLM and 21/21 COLABIOCLI members. We encourage professionals throughout Europe and Latin America to adopt and implement this recommendation to improve the quality of blood collection practices and increase patient and workers safety.

Critical factors in the recovery of pathogenic microorganisms in blood

BACKGROUND

The critical factors for optimal recovery of microbial pathogens from blood are not only the basis for how we perform blood cultures on a daily basis, but are also important for development of all current blood-culture systems. Because much of this research was conducted and published between 1975 and 2010 there is a general sense that many physicians and scientists may not be familiar with it, but it is critical for performing and interpreting blood cultures.

OBJECTIVES

To review the critical factors in the laboratory recovery and isolation of pathogenic microorganisms in blood.

SOURCES

Literature review of published papers, select reviews and updated guidelines.

CONTENT

This review focuses on the critical factors that affect the recovery isolation of pathogenic microorganisms from individuals with bloodstream infections. Contemporary blood-culture systems, and current methods for blood-culture collection, have been designed to incorporate these critical factors so as to optimize recovery and isolation of pathogens while minimizing contamination.

IMPLICATIONS

It is important for microbiologists and practitioners to understand how and why these critical factors affect current blood-culture practices to improve patient management. Future research should emphasize which of these critical factors will still play a role in the era of molecular diagnostic tests, which will no longer be relevant, and which new critical factors have yet to be defined.

Antisepsis for blood culture extraction. Blood culture contamination rate

Blood cultures are the gold standard for the etiological diagnosis of bacteremia, though false-positive results are relatively frequent primarily due to contamination from skin flora during sample extraction. Correct skin antisepsis is important for reducing the bacterial load and opportunities for contamination. However, there is currently no solid consensus on the best antiseptic method. Alcohol has a potent immediate bactericidal effect, and there is some scientific evidence in favor of its combination with chlorhexidine, but most studies on this issue are heterogeneous and with inconclusive results. Some authors even suggest that the chosen antiseptic is irrelevant to the contamination rate, provided the blood culture extraction method is adequate and is performed by a trained professional. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

A Quality Improvement Initiative: Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in a Children's Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Blood culture contamination is a safety and quality concern in children's hospitals; it leads to increased unnecessary testing, admissions, antibiotic exposure, and cost. The standard benchmark for blood culture contamination is 3%. Our aim with the quality improvement project was to reduce the contamination rate at our children's hospital from a mean of 2.85% to <1.5% in 2 years.

METHODS

After initial unit-specific efforts, we formed a multidisciplinary team, created a process map and a cause-and-effect analysis, sent out surveys to nurses, and created observation sheets used to identify problem areas and record the most common deviations during the collection process. We also standardized the blood culture collection protocol and reemphasized nurse education in person and with online modules. During our project, we noted that nurses were collecting 1 to 3 mL of blood on all children regardless of weight. We developed optimal weight-based blood volumes and, after educating ordering providers, we updated our electronic medical record to reflect appropriate volumes in the order.

RESULTS

Despite a steady increase in the number of blood cultures collected at our children's hospital, we were able to decrease the average contamination rate from 2.85% to 1.54%, saving the hospital an estimated average of $49 998 per month.

CONCLUSIONS

By standardizing blood culture collection methods, optimizing blood volume, creating checklists, and reinforcing nurse education, we were able to develop a best practice for pediatric blood culture collection and reduce blood culture contamination to a sustainable low rate at our children's hospital.

[Assessment of an educational intervention regarding blood cultures as process indicators in an emergency department in Argentina]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe 2 process indicators related to taking blood cultures (BC) in an Adult Emergency Department of a tertiary university hospital in Buenos Aires,and to describe the changes after a series of educational activities for health professionals was implemented during May 2016 as regards the appropriate indication of BC and the proper collection technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was designed to assess its effectiveness, which consecutively included all patients admitted during 2015-2016. The BC request rate was used as a process indicator, and the percentage of contaminated BCs and the true positives rate were used as quality indicators. Both were measured monthly and prospectively during the period of study.

RESULTS

The annual adjusted rate of BC requests was 4.9% (95% CI 4.8-5) in 2015 and 2.9% (95% CI 2.8-2.9) in 2016. The rate of false positive (contaminated) BCs was 4.5% in 2015 and 4.3% after the educational intervention. The true positive BCs were 8.3% in 2015 and 12% post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings prove how important and effective the educational interventions are.

Decreasing Blood Culture Contaminants in a Pediatric Emergency Department: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

INTRODUCTION

High peripheral blood culture contamination rates (BCCR) in the emergency department (ED) contribute to overuse and harm. This study describes 2 years of quality improvement (QI) interventions that aimed to decrease a high BCCR in a pediatric ED.

METHODS

The QI team created a Key Driver Diagram with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA interventions included a venipuncture sterility checklist (PDSA1), phlebotomist feedback system (PDSA2), and physician ordering guidelines (PDSA3). The specific aim was to decrease the BCCR by 50% within 24 months. The secondary aim was to decrease the peripheral blood culture ordering rate (BCOR) by 10% within 24 months. The balancing measure was the proportion of pathogenic bacteremia cases at ED return visits before and after PDSA3 implementation. A financial measure estimated the savings in charges between the observed and expected contaminants in PDSA3. An interrupted time series design applied statistical process control methodology to detect special cause variations.

RESULTS

The BCCR in the baseline, PDSA1, PDSA2, and PDSA3 periods were 3.02%, 2.30%, 1.58%, and 1.17%, respectively. The BCOR in the baseline, PDSA1, PDSA2, and PDSA3 periods was 4.80%, 4.26%, 3.82%, and 3.49%, respectively. Special cause variations occurred after PDSA cycle implementations for both BCCR and BCOR. There was no change in the balancing measure. The interventions were associated with an annual prevention of 95 contaminants and savings of $300,070.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions that focused on improving venipuncture technique and limiting unnecessary blood cultures were associated with fewer contaminants and the achievement of the QI team's project aims.

Adverse Economic Impact Associated With Blood Culture Contamination in a Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Blood culture contamination (BCC) leads to unnecessary interventions including hospitalization, antibiotic administration and additional laboratory tests. Previous studies in adults revealed that BCC was associated with unnecessary financial expenditures. However, information pertaining to the pediatric population is limited. Therefore, we investigated the details of the adverse economic impact associated with BCC in a pediatric emergency department (ED) in Japan.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, observational study. We collected data on blood cultures performed in patients 18 years of age in a pediatric ED. Medical records of patients with positive blood cultures were reviewed, and the information regarding adverse events related to BCC was extracted. Medical costs related to BCC were estimated from the data.

RESULTS

In total, 13,139 sets of blood cultures were performed from April 2013 to June 2016, and 141 cases (1.1%) of BCC were identified. Among these, 106 patients (75%) experienced at least 1 adverse event associated with BCC. The total medical cost due to BCC was 4,076,713 Japanese yen. Multifaceted approaches targeting ED physicians including lectures on optimal blood collection methods and monthly feedback on BCC rates were effective in reducing the BCC rate and its related costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions associated with BCC were common and accounted for significant adverse economic impact on pediatric patients. Regular education and monitoring were effective in reducing BCC and its related costs.

Consequences of Implementing a "Better" Blood Culture System

BACKGROUND

Blood cultures (BCx) are the gold standard for diagnosing blood stream infections. However, contamination remains a challenge and can increase cost, hospital days, and unnecessary antibiotic use. National goals are to keep overall BCx contamination rates to ≤3%. Our healthcare system recently moved to a BCx system with better organism recovery, especially for gram-negative, fastidious, and anaerobic bacteria. The study objectives were to determine the benefits/consequences of implementing a more sensitive blood culture system, specifically on contamination rates.

METHODS

The electronic health record was queried for all BCx obtained within our tertiary-care health system from April 2015 to October 2016. Cultures were divided into those obtained 12 months before and six months after the new system was introduced. A positive BCx was defined as one with any growth. Contaminated BCx were defined as those showing coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Bacillus, Micrococcus, or Propionibacterium acnes. Cultures with Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Escherichia coli were said to contain a true pathogen. Results based on hospital location of blood drawing also were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 20,978 blood cultures were included, 13,292 before and 7,686 after the new system was introduced. With the new system, positive BCx rates increased from 7.5% to 15.7% (p < 0.001). Contaminants increased from 2.3% to 5.4% (p < 0.001), and pathogens increased from 2.5% to 5.8% (p < 0.001). Contaminated BCx increased significantly in the surgical/trauma intensive care unit (STICU), emergency department (ED), and medical ICU (MICU), while pathogen BCx increased on the surgical floor, ED, and MICU.

CONCLUSIONS

A new blood culture system resulted in significant increases in the rates of positive, contaminated, and pathogen BCx. After the new system, multiple hospital units had contamination rates >3%. These data suggest that a "better" BCx system may not be superior regarding overall infection rates. More research is needed to determine the impact of identifying more contaminants and pathogens with the new system.

Reduction in Blood Culture Contamination Through Use of Initial Specimen Diversion Device

Background

Blood culture contamination is a clinically significant problem that results in patient harm and excess cost.

Methods

In a prospective, controlled trial at an academic center Emergency Department, a device that diverts and sequesters the initial 1.5-2 mL portion of blood (which presumably carries contaminating skin cells and microbes) was tested against standard phlebotomy procedures in patients requiring blood cultures due to clinical suspicion of serious infection.

Results

In sum, 971 subjects granted informed consent and were enrolled resulting in 904 nonduplicative subjects with 1808 blood cultures. Blood culture contamination was significantly reduced through use of the initial specimen diversion device™ (ISDD) compared to standard procedure: (2/904 [0.22%] ISDD vs 16/904 [1.78%] standard practice, P = .001). Sensitivity was not compromised: true bacteremia was noted in 65/904 (7.2%) ISDD vs 69/904 (7.6%) standard procedure, P = .41. No needlestick injuries or potential bloodborne pathogen exposures were reported. The monthly rate of blood culture contamination for all nurse-drawn and phlebotomist-drawn blood cultures was modeled using Poisson regression to compare the 12-month intervention period to the 6 month before and after periods. Phlebotomists (used the ISDD) experienced a significant decrease in blood culture contamination while the nurses (did not use the ISDD) did not. In sum, 73% of phlebotomists completed a post-study anonymous survey and widespread user satisfaction was noted.

Conclusions

Use of the ISDD was associated with a significant decrease in blood culture contamination in patients undergoing blood cultures in an Emergency Department setting.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02102087.

Impact of bacteremia prediction rule in CAP: Before and after study

OBJECTIVE

In cases of community acquired pneumonia (CAP), it has been known that blood cultures have low yields and rarely affect clinical outcomes. Despite many studies predicting the likelihood of bacteremia in CAP patients, those results have been rarely implemented in clinical practice, and use of blood culture in CAP is still increasing. This study evaluated impact of implementing a previously derived and validated bacteremia prediction rule.

METHODS

In this registry-based before and after study, we used piecewise regression analysis to compare the blood culture rate before and after implementation of the prediction rule. We also compared 30-day mortality, emergency department (ED) length of stay, time-interval to initial antibiotics after ED arrival, and any changes to the antibiotics regimen as results of the blood cultures. In subgroup analysis, we compared two groups (with or without the use of the prediction rule) after implementation period, using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Following the implementation, the blood culture rate declined from 85.5% to 78.1% (P=0.003) without significant changes in 30-day mortality and antibiotics regimen. The interval to initial antibiotics (231min vs. 221min, P=0.362) and length of stay (1019min vs. 954min, P=0.354) were not significantly changed. In subgroup analysis, the group that use the prediction rule showed 25min faster antibiotics initiation (P=0.002) and 48min shorter length of stay (P=0.007) than the group that did not use the rule.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the bacteremia prediction rule in CAP patients reduced the blood culture rate without affecting the 30-day mortality and antibiotics regimen.

A national survey of interventions and practices in the prevention of blood culture contamination and associated adverse health care events

The scientific literature indicates that blood culture contamination often leads to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment, adverse patient occurrences, and potential reporting of false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections. The findings of a national infection prevention survey of blood culture practices and related interventions in hospitals support the need for infection preventionists to expand their participation in the review of topics related to the ordering and collection of blood for culture.

Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the United States: Changing Epidemiology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges, and Areas for Future Research

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common serious infections in childhood. This review focuses on pediatric CAP in the United States and other industrialized nations, specifically highlighting the changing epidemiology of CAP, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and areas for further research.

Impact of a National Guideline on Antibiotic Selection for Hospitalized Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of the 2011 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America pneumonia guideline and hospital-level implementation efforts on antibiotic prescribing for children hospitalized with pneumonia.

METHODS

We assessed inpatient antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia at 28 children's hospitals between August 2009 and March 2015. Each hospital was also surveyed regarding local implementation efforts targeting antibiotic prescribing and organizational readiness to adopt guideline recommendations. To estimate guideline impact, we used segmented linear regression to compare the proportion of children receiving penicillins in March 2015 with the expected proportion at this same time point had the guideline not been published based on a projection of a preguideline trend. A similar approach was used to estimate the short-term (6-month) impact of local implementation efforts. The correlations between organizational readiness and the impact of the guideline were estimated by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Before guideline publication, penicillin prescribing was rare (<10%). After publication, an absolute increase in penicillin use was observed (27.6% [95% confidence interval: 23.7%-31.5%]) by March 2015. Among hospitals with local implementation efforts (n = 20, 71%), the median increase was 29.5% (interquartile range: 19.6%-39.1%) compared with 20.1% (interquartile rage: 9.5%-44.5%) among hospitals without such activities (P = .51). The independent, short-term impact of local implementation efforts was similar in magnitude to that of the national guideline. Organizational readiness was not correlated with prescribing changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The publication of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline was associated with sustained increases in the use of penicillins for children hospitalized with pneumonia. Local implementation efforts may have enhanced guideline adoption and appeared more relevant than hospitals' organizational readiness to change.

Procalcitonin levels predict to identify bacterial strains in blood cultures of septic patients

BACKGROUND

We examined whether the values obtained from principal component analysis (PCA) on laboratory tests can be used to predict bacterial infections and identify bacterial strains in blood culture (BC).

METHOD

This study is a single-center retrospective analysis of 315 patients suspected of having sepsis. We applied PCA on procalcitonin (PCT) and laboratory test biomarkers, namely, platelet (PLT), white blood cell, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as well as BC.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis showed that PCT, CRP, and PLT contributions to component 1 were associated with bacterial infection. The number of patients who had BC-negative results, gram-positive cocci (GPC), and gram-negative rods (GNRs) were 124, 28, and 19, respectively. The mean value of component 1 in GNR-positive patients was 1.58±1.41 and was significantly higher than that in GPC-positive patients (0.28±0.87; P<.0001). Furthermore, the mean values of component 1 in both GNR- and GPC-positive patients were significantly higher than that in BC-negative patients (-0.31±0.65; P<.0001 and P<.002, respectively). One certain range showing higher value more than 2.00 for component 1 and -1.00 for component 2 only included GNR-positive patients. There were no BC-positive patients who showed less than -1.00 for component 1.

CONCLUSION

The present results obtained by PCA on laboratory tests involving PCT, PLT, white blood cell, and CRP suggest the potential of PCA-obtained values to not only predict bloodstream infection but also identify bacterial strains. This provides some clinical significance in the management of sepsis in acute care.

Diagnostic Yield of Timing Blood Culture Collection Relative to Fever

BACKGROUND

Conventional practice involves obtaining a blood culture during or immediately after a fever to increase diagnostic yield. There are no data to support this practice in children.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center case-control study of children (0-18 years) who had blood cultures performed as part of routine care. Cases had an a priori defined pathogen isolated from blood culture (n = 410) and were age-matched with contemporaneous controls with a sterile blood culture (n = 410). The predictive value of fever (before and after blood culture), C-reactive protein and hematologic indices were analyzed by multivariate regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) in neonatal, general pediatric and pediatric oncology patients.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred seventy-two (6.7%) of 17,607 blood cultures were positive, of which 410 (35%) cultured pathogen(s). Three hundred and twenty four (79%) cases and 275 (67.1%) controls had a fever (≥37.5°C) during the 12 hours pre- or post-collection. Fever 2-6 hours before a blood culture was neither sensitive nor specific for predicting bacteremia in neonatal or pediatric patients and marginally predictive in oncology patients (AUC 0.59-0.63). Cultures obtained 2-6 hours before fever were nonpredictive in neonates (AUC 0.56-0.59), marginally predictive in pediatric patients (AUC 0.64-0.67) and moderately predictive in oncology patients (AUC 0.70). C-reactive protein was marginally predictive in neonates (AUC 0.60). Hematologic indices were nonpredictive in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fever before obtaining blood culture was neither sensitive nor specific for culture positivity; timing of pediatric blood cultures relative to fever is unimportant. Bacteremia precedes a fever, but this is of limited clinical applicability.

A change of culture: reducing blood culture contamination rates in an Emergency Department

Blood cultures are an important investigation to help tailor effective management for patients with severe sepsis. Frequent contaminated samples increase laboratory workload and can delay or cause incorrect changes to patient management. This can prolong patient hospitalisation, increase the risk of harm and increase cost to health boards. Current guidelines advocate a contamination rate of 2-3%. From January 2013 to November 2014 inclusive, the contamination rate was 4.74% in our Emergency Department, responsible for initial management and investigation of over 40 cases of sepsis per month. A Quality Improvement team was created to try to reduce contamination rates to the recommended target. An initial baseline survey of local staff showed good understanding of when to obtain a blood culture but there was variability in the methods and equipment used. A project was then conducted which focused on rationalising and standardising equipment and technique for blood culture sampling along with staff education to support this change. A simple department target of 30 days free from a contaminated blood culture was created which, if achieved, would ensure a contamination rate of less than 3%. This was supported by ongoing surveillance of contamination rates and investigation of contaminated sample cases. We were able to then identify high risk patients and factors which increased the chance of blood culture contamination. This allowed us to formulate solutions to help reduce the risks of contamination. Department achievements and learning points to help prevent further contamination were fed back positively to all staff. This project operated for 12-months and successfully reduced local contamination rates to 2.0%.

A Perspective on the Principles of Integrity in Infectious Disease Research

The medical literature is prone to overstating results, a condition not thoroughly recognized among policymakers. This article sets forth examples of potential problems with research integrity in the infectious disease literature. We describe articles that may be spun, categories lumped together in hopes of creating a significant effect (and sometimes an insignificant one), changes in metrics, and how trials may fail because of suboptimal interventions. When examined together, the examples show that the problems are widespread and illustrate the difficulty associated with interpreting medical research. The state of the current medical literature makes it of utmost importance that all sections of the manuscript are read, including associated letters to the editors and information on ClinicalTrials.gov before authors' recommendations are accepted.

Multidisciplinary team review of best practices for collection and handling of blood cultures to determine effective interventions for increasing the yield of true-positive bacteremias, reducing contamination, and eliminating false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND

A literature search was conducted using keywords for articles published in English from January 1990 to March 2015. Using criteria related to blood culture collection and handling, the search yielded 101 articles. References used also included Microbiology Laboratory standards, guidelines, and textbook information.

RESULTS

The literature identified diverse and complex issues surrounding blood culture practices, including the impact of false-positive results, laboratory definition of contamination, effect on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) reporting, indications for collecting blood cultures, drawing from venipuncture sites versus intravascular catheters, selection of antiseptics, use of needleless connectors, inoculation of blood culture bottles, and optimizing program management in emergency departments, education, and implementation of bundled practice initiatives.

CONCLUSION

Hospitals should optimize best practice in the collection, handling, and management of blood culture specimens, an often overlooked but essential component in providing optimal care of patients in all settings and populations, reducing financial burdens, and increasing the accuracy of reportable CLABSI. Although universal concepts exist in blood culture practices, some issues require further research to determine benefit. Institutions undertaking a review of their blood culture programs are encouraged to use a checklist that addresses elements that encompass the research contained in this review.

Risk Factors for Neonatal Sepsis and Method for Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination

BACKGROUND

False-positive blood cultures findings may lead to a falsely increased morbidity and increased hospital costs.

METHOD

The survey was conducted as retrospective - prospective study and included 239 preterm infants (born before 37 weeks of gestation) who were treated in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Institute for Child and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina during one year (January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2012). The retrospective part of the study focused on examination of incidence of neonatal sepsis and determination of risk factors. In the prospective part of the study infants were sub-divided into two groups: Group 1- infants hospitalized in NICU during the first 6 months of the study; blood cultures were taken by the "clean technique" and checklists for this procedure were not taken. Group 2- neonates hospitalized in NICU during last 6 months of the study; blood cultures were taken by "sterile technique" and checklists for this procedure were taken.

RESULTS

The main risk factors for sepsis were prelabor rupture of membranes, low gestational age, low birth weight, mechanical ventilation, umbilical venous catheter placement, and abdominal drainage. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus were the most frequently isolated microorganisms in false-positive blood samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Education of employees, use of checklists and sterile sets for blood sampling, permanent control of false positive blood cultures, as well as regular and routine monthly reports are crucial for successful reduction of contamination rates.