Association Between Maternal Comorbidities and Emergency Department Use Among a National Sample of Commercially Insured Pregnant Women

Recent Immigrants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Have Significant Healthcare Utilization From Preconception to Postpartum: A Population Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Immigrants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may have increased healthcare utilization during pregnancy compared with non-immigrants, although this remains to be confirmed. We aimed to characterize this between these groups.

METHODS

We accessed administrative databases to identify women (aged 18-55 years) with IBD with a singleton pregnancy between 2003 and 2018. Immigration status was defined as recent (<5 years of the date of conception), remote (≥5 years since the date of conception), and none. Differences in ambulatory, emergency department, hospitalization, endoscopic, and prenatal visits during 12 months preconception, pregnancy, and 12 months postpartum were characterized. Region of immigration origin was ascertained. Multivariable negative binomial regression was performed for adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 8,880 pregnancies were included, 8,304 in non-immigrants, 96 in recent immigrants, 480 in remote immigrants. Compared with non-immigrants, recent immigrants had the highest rates of IBD-specific ambulatory visits during preconception (aIRR 3.06, 95% CI 1.93-4.85), pregnancy (aIRR 2.15, 95% CI 1.35-3.42), and postpartum (aIRR 2.21, 1.37-3.57) and the highest rates of endoscopy visits during preconception (aIRR 2.69, 95% CI 1.64-4.41) and postpartum (aIRR 2.01, 95% CI 1.09-3.70). There were no differences in emergency department and hospitalization visits between groups, although those arriving from the Americas were the most likely to be hospitalized for any reason. All immigrants with IBD were less likely to have a first trimester prenatal visit.

DISCUSSION

Recent immigrants were more likely to have IBD-specific ambulatory care but less likely to receive adequate prenatal care during pregnancy.

Antepartum Emergency Department Use and Associations with Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Large Hospital System

Objectives

Prenatal care in the United States has remained unchanged for decades, with pregnant patients often experiencing high rates of hospital emergency department (ED) visits. It is unknown how many of these ED visits are potentially preventable with better access to timely and effective outpatient or home prenatal care. This multihospital health system quality improvement study was undertaken to analyze patient risk factors for acute antepartum hospital use as well as associations with adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record and administrative data on ED visits in the 270 days before a delivery admission for alive, singleton births at nine system hospitals over 52 months. We use logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of hospital use by patient demographic and clinical characteristics and present the association of acute antepartum hospital use with maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Results

Overall, 17.5% of 68,200 patients had antepartum ED visits, including 248 inpatient admissions, with significant variation between hospitals. As compared to non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic and especially non-Hispanic Black and Medicaid patients had significantly higher odds of acute antepartum hospital use as did patients with preexisting conditions. Birth outcomes were significantly (p < 0.01) worse among individuals with antepartum hospital utilization.

Conclusion

Acute antepartum hospital use was concentrated among lower income, minority patients, and those with chronic conditions with significant variation across system hospitals. There is a need for research into innovations in prenatal care that are best at reaching our most vulnerable patients, reducing preventable hospital utilization, and improving birth outcomes.

Pregnancy and Emergency Department Utilization in North Carolina, 2016-2021: A Population-Based Surveillance Study

Introduction

Pregnancy-associated complaints are a common reason for emergency department visits for women of reproductive age. Emergency department utilization during pregnancy is associated with worse birth outcomes for both mothers and infants. We used statewide North Carolina emergency department surveillance data between 2016 and 2021 to describe the sociodemographic factors associated with the use of emergency department for pregnancy-associated problems and subsequent hospital admission.

Methods

North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool is a syndromic surveillance system that includes all emergency department encounters at civilian acute-care facilities in North Carolina. We analyzed all emergency department visits between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 for female patients aged 15-44 years residing in North Carolina with at least 1 ICD-10-CM code (analysis occurred in July 2021-October 2022). Each emergency department visit was categorized as pregnancy-associated if assigned ICD-10-CM code(s) indicated pregnancy. We stratified visits by age, race, ethnicity, county of residence, and insurance and compared them with estimated pregnant population proportions using 1-sample t-tests. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine whether pregnancy-associated visits were more likely to be associated with hospital admission and then to determine sociodemographic predictors of admission among pregnancy-associated emergency department visits.

Results

More than 6.4 million emergency department visits were included (N=6,471,197); 10.1% (n=655,476) were pregnancy-associated, significantly higher than the proportion of women estimated to be pregnant at any given time in North Carolina (4.6%, p<0.0001) and increased over time (8.6% in 2016 vs 11.1% in 2021, p<0.0001). Pregnancy-associated visits were lower than expected for ages 25-44 years and higher than expected for those aged 15-24 years, for those of Black race, and for patients residing in rural or suburban areas. The proportion admitted was higher for pregnancy-associated emergency department visits than for nonpregnancy associated (15.6% vs 7.0%, AOR=3.06 [95% CI=3.03, 3.09]). Pregnancy-associated emergency department visits for patients of Black race had 0.58 times (95% CI=0.57, 0.59) the odds of admission compared with White patients.

Conclusions

Emergency department utilization during pregnancy is common. The proportion of pregnancy-associated emergency department visits among reproductive-age women is increasing, as are inpatient admissions from the emergency department for pregnancy-associated diagnoses. Use of public health surveillance databases such as the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool may help identify opportunities for improving disparities in maternal health care, especially related to access to care.

Disparities in Perinatal and Emergency Care Receipt Among Women With Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder in Medicaid, 2007 to 2012

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to better understand receipt of perinatal and emergency care among women with perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) and explore variation by race/ethnicity.

METHODS

We used 2007-2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia to examine 6,823,471 deliveries for women 18 to 44 years old. Logistic regressions modeled the association between (1) OUD status and receipt of perinatal and emergency care, and (2) receipt of perinatal and emergency care and race/ethnicity, conditional on OUD diagnosis and controlling for patient and county characteristics. We used robust SEs, clustered at the individual level, and included state and year fixed effects.

RESULTS

Women with perinatal OUD were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.46) and attend the postpartum visit (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.45-0.47) and more likely to seek emergency care (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.45-1.51) than women without perinatal OUD. Among women with perinatal OUD, Black, Hispanic, and American Indian and Alaskan Native (AI/AN) women were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.64-0.72]; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.92]; aOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.64-0.79]) and attend the postpartum visit (aOR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.91]; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.93]; aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.94]) relative to non-Hispanic White women. Black and AI/AN women were also more likely to receive emergency care (aOR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.20]; aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.26]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that women with perinatal OUD, in particular Black, Hispanic, and AI/AN women, may be missing opportunities for preventive care and comprehensive management of their physical and behavioral health during pregnancy.

Association Between the Use of a Digital Health Platform During Pregnancy and Helping Users Avoid Emergency and In-Person Care: Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Almost one-third of pregnant people visit the emergency room during pregnancy. Although some emergency care is necessary, gaps in patient education and inaccessibility of preventive services have been identified as key reasons for high-cost, low-value care in pregnancy. Digital platforms present a promising solution for providing resources to supplement routine prenatal care, thereby reducing the use of low-value in-person services.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the relationship between the use of Maven and in-person care avoidance (emergency room or office visits) during pregnancy. Maven is a digital prenatal health platform that supplements routine prenatal care. Maven offers educational content (articles, videos, and classes), care coordination (through a care advocate), and provider services (web-based appointments and communication with providers) designed to complement prenatal care. Specifically, the aims of this study were to examine whether the use of Maven is associated with in-person care avoidance overall and whether improvements in pregnancy-related knowledge facilitate in-person care avoidance. To assess aim 2, we tested if the use of Maven is associated with improvements in self-reported understanding of warning signs and medically accurate information and if self-reported understanding of medically accurate information and warning signs is associated with in-person care avoidance in a population of Maven users.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we used adjusted logistic regression to examine the relationship between digital platform use, avoidance of in-person care, and the platform's influence on pregnancy-related knowledge (learning medically accurate information and recognizing warning signs). Demographics, medical history, and in-person care avoidance were self-reported.

RESULTS

Of the 5263 users, 280 (5.32%) reported that Maven helped them avoid in-person care during pregnancy. More users who reported avoiding in-person care also reported that the digital platform helped them understand warning signs (231/280, 82.5%) and learned medically accurate information (185/280, 66.1%). In the adjusted models, all modes of digital service use (assessed as quartiles) were associated with avoiding in-person care in a dose-response manner (eg, web-based provider appointments: Q2 adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.41; Q3 aOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.72-3.72; Q4 aOR 5.26, 95% CI 3.76-7.42). Users were more likely to avoid in-person care if they reported that Maven helped them recognize warning signs (aOR 3.55, 95% CI 2.60-4.94) or learn medically accurate information (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.59-2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that digital platforms can be effective in helping patients to avoid in-person care. The educational pathway suggests that digital platforms can be particularly effective in helping patients recognize warning signs and learn medically accurate information, which may help them avoid in-person care by recognizing when in-person care is medically appropriate. Future work is needed to assess other pathways through which digital resources can support pregnant people and improve perinatal care use.

Predictors of Mother and Infant Emergency Department Attendance and Admission: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the predictors of emergency department attendance and admission for mothers and their infants.

METHODS

Self-reported emergency department (ED) attendance and admission, sociodemographic, mental health, and other measures were recorded at baseline and at 12 months at 4 sites in England between May 2017 and March 2020.

RESULTS

Infants' gestational age (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88, p = 0.001), mothers' mental health (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.41, p = 0.005) and mothers' attendance at ED (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.84, p = 0.022) predicted infant ED attendance. Frequency of attendance was predicted by ED site (IRR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.73, p = 0.001) and mothers' age (IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.00, p = 0.028). Infant hospital admissions were predominantly for respiratory (40%) and other infectious diseases (21%) and were predicted by previous health problems (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.76 to 6.01, p < 0.001). Mothers' ED attendance was predicted by mixed or multiple ethnic origin (OR 9.62, 95% CI 2.19 to 42.27, p = 0.003), having a male infant (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.20, p = 0.042), and previous hospitalisation (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.81 to 9.56, p = 0.001). Hospital admission was largely for reproductive health issues (61%) with frequency predicted by having attended the ED at least once (IRR 3.39, 95% CI 1.66 to 6.93, p = 0.001), and being anxious or depressed (IRR 3.10, 95% CI 1.14 to 8.45, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Improving the reproductive and mental health of mothers may help to avoid poor maternal and infant health outcomes and reduce emergency service utilisation and hospitalisation.

Emergency Department Visits During Pregnancy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Pregnant women often seek care in an emergency department (ED). We sought to describe the frequency, characteristics, and factors associated with increased ED visits during pregnancy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data of all pregnancies resulting in a live birth at 20 or more weeks of gestation in Alberta, Canada, from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any ED visit during pregnancy. The secondary outcomes were ED visit characteristics and discharge disposition. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and increased ED visits during pregnancy using random-effect negative binomial regression adjusting for multiple pregnancies per person during the study period.

RESULTS

We included 255,929 pregnancies from 193,965 women. Of all the pregnancy episodes followed, 37.3% (95% CI 37.1 to 37.5) had at least 1 ED visit, resulting in a total of 226,811 ED visits and an overall ED visit rate of 94.0 visits per 100 pregnancies (95% CI 93.6 to 94.3). Most visits were nonobstetric (46.4%) and resulted in ED discharge (85.3%). Increased ED visits were associated with living in remote (RR 6.9; 95 %CI 6.7 to 7.1) or rural (RR 3.4; 95% CI 3.4 to 3.5) areas, younger age (RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8 to 2.0), intensive prenatal care (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.5), major/moderate health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.6), mental health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.6), and high antepartum risk score (RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 3 women in our sample visited the ED during pregnancy. A higher number of visits occurred in those with rural/remote residence, younger maternal age, and concomitant health conditions.

Refusal of the hospitalization: a distressed dilemma in obstetric practice

Background

Pregnant women are a special population in which hospitalizations are more recommended due to physiological changes mimicking pathologies and medico-legal concerns.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the obstetric outcomes of expectant mothers who were admitted to the obstetrics emergency outpatient clinic and declined the hospitalization advised by doctors. Additionally, we examined the appropriateness of physicians' recommendations.

Design

We have retrospectively evaluated the patients admitted to the 'Obstetric Emergency Outpatient Clinic' and refused hospitalization between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019.

Methods

Cases were classified into three groups based on the trimester, considering the substantial variation between complaints and complications in each trimester. The complaints of pregnant women were categorized as psychosocial causes, obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor. We evaluated the compatibility of the hospitalization decision with the pregnancy outcome of patients.

Results

A total of 958 pregnant women were included in the study. Leading causes for admissions were obstetric complications, maternal systemic complaints, and suspicion of labor in first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Psychosocial causes were mostly observed in the second trimester. Readmission to the hospital within a week was highest in the third trimester group. According to pregnancy outcomes, 12.5% (94/753) of our recommendations were appropriate in all trimesters.

Conclusion

Obstetricians seem overcautious in managing obstetric patients and willing to offer hospitalization more often than the actual requirements.

Performance of single serum progesterone in the evaluation of symptomatic first-trimester pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Pain and bleeding complicate 30% of pregnancies, raising concerns for viability. The objective is to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of a single serum progesterone level in assessing pregnancy viability among symptomatic patients.

METHODS

We conducted a predefined literature search in MEDLINE, Embase (OVID), CINAHL and Cochrane databases for studies that enrolled patients in first trimester with miscarriage symptoms, measured progesterone and reported pregnancy viability, from inception to July 2020. We extracted data for 2 × 2 tables, progesterone threshold levels and viability. We obtained summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR), and predictive values at given prevalence rates.

RESULTS

We identified 54 publications. There was a total of 15,878 patients enrolled, of whom 7864 patients (49.5%) were confirmed to have a viable pregnancy and 8014 patients (50.5%) were confirmed to have a non-viable pregnancy. The cut-off value of progesterone ranged from 3.2 to 25 ng/mL (20.034-79.5 nmol/L). We evaluated the performance of the following progesterone cut-off categories: < 6.3, 6.3-12.6, 12.7-19.9, and 20-25 ng/mL. To detect non-viable pregnancy, progesterone with cut-off < 6.3 ng/mL had sensitivity 73.1%, specificity 99.2% and DOR 322.0 (PPV 0.91, 0.97 and 0.99 at prevalences 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, respectively, indicating higher likelihood of non-viable pregnancy), and cut-off category 20-25 ng/mL had sensitivity 91.3%, specificity 75% and DOR 31.4 (NPV 0.99, 0.96 and 0.89 at the prevalences above indicating higher likelihood of viable pregnancy).

CONCLUSION

A single progesterone level provides a clinically useful prognostic information on pregnancy viability. More than nine out of ten patients with a level < 6.3 ng/mL (< 20.034 nmol/L) will be diagnosed with a non-viable pregnancy, and more than 90% of patients with a level ≥ 20-25 ng/mL (63.6-79.5 nmol/L) will have a viable pregnancy confirmed.

Racial inequities in emergency department wait times for pregnancy-related concerns

OBJECTIVE

Emergency department care is common among US pregnant women. Given the increased likelihood of serious and life-threatening pregnancy-related health conditions among Black mothers, timeliness of emergency department care is vital. The objective of this study was to evaluate racial/ethnic variations in emergency department wait times for receiving obstetrical care among a nationally representative population.

METHODS

The study used pooled 2016-2018 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative sample of emergency department visits. Regression models were estimated to determine whether emergency department wait time was associated with the race/ethnicity of the perinatal patient. Adjusted models controlled for age, obesity status, insurance type, whether the patient arrived by ambulance, triage status, presence of a patient dashboard, and region.

RESULTS

There were a total of 821 reported pregnancy-related visits in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey sample of emergency department visits. Of those 821 visits, 40.6% were among White women, 27.7% among Black women, and 27.5% among Hispanic women. Mean wait times differed substantially by race/ethnicity. After adjusting for potential confounders, Black women waited 46% longer than White women with emergency department visits for pregnancy problems (p < .05). Those reporting another race waited 95% longer for pregnancy problems in the emergency department than White women (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study document significant racial/ethnic differences in wait times for perinatal emergency department care. Although inequities in wait times may emerge across the spectrum of care, documenting the factors influencing racial disparities in wait times are critical to promoting equitable perinatal health outcomes.

Delivery Complications and Postpartum Hospital Use in California

INTRODUCTION

Research on maternal birth outcomes rarely includes postpartum complications with longitudinally linked patient data. We analyze characteristics associated with delivery complications and postpartum hospital use.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study is based on administrative data from California. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to categorize the incidence of severe maternal morbidity and other route-specific delivery complications as well as preexisting and pregnancy-related conditions and principal diagnoses for postpartum hospital visits. Postpartum hospital use is a composite outcome defined as emergency department visit or hospital readmission within 90 days of birth admission discharge. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate the association of patient-level and hospital-level characteristics with the likelihood of postpartum hospital use.

RESULTS

In 2017, 457,498 birth admissions occurred in California-licensed hospitals, of which 348,828 index births with linked data were analyzed. Among linked births, 34,825 (10.0%) had an inpatient admission (4,206 [1.2%]) or an emergency department visit (30,371 [9.2%]) within 90 days of birth admission discharge. Birth complications included a 1.7% severe maternal morbidity rate, 7.9% rate of vaginal birth complications, 10.0% rate of cesarean birth complications, and 2.9% frequency of long lengths of stay, all of which were significantly associated with postpartum hospital use. Other significant risk factors for postpartum hospital use were preexisting and pregnancy-related conditions, undergoing cesarean birth, being younger than 18 years old, being non-Hispanic Black, living in a high poverty ZIP code, and having Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

One in 10 birthing persons had a hospital visit within 90 days postpartum. Improving postpartum care is an urgent public health priority.

Group Prenatal Care and Emergency Room Utilization

Pregnancy-related complaints are a significant driver of emergency room (ER) utilization among women. Because of additional time for patient education and provider relationships, group prenatal care may reduce ER visits among pregnant women by helping them identify appropriate care settings, improving understanding of common pregnancy discomforts, and reducing risky health behaviors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, utilizing Medicaid claims and birth certificate data from a statewide expansion of group care, to compare ER utilization between pregnant women participating in group prenatal care and individual prenatal care. Using propensity score matching methods, we found that group care was associated with a significant reduction in the likelihood of having any ER utilization (-5.9% among women receiving any group care and -6.0% among women attending at least five group care sessions). These findings suggest that group care may reduce ER utilization among pregnant women and encourage appropriate health care utilization during pregnancy.

Healthcare spending in U.S. emergency departments by health condition, 2006-2016

BACKGROUND

Healthcare spending in the emergency department (ED) setting has received intense focus from policymakers in the United States (U.S.). Relatively few studies have systematically evaluated ED spending over time or disaggregated ED spending by policy-relevant groups, including health condition, age, sex, and payer to inform these discussions. This study's objective is to estimate ED spending trends in the U.S. from 2006 to 2016, by age, sex, payer, and across 154 health conditions and assess ED spending per visit over time.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This observational study utilized the National Emergency Department Sample, a nationally representative sample of hospital-based ED visits in the U.S. to measure healthcare spending for ED care. All spending estimates were adjusted for inflation and presented in 2016 U.S. Dollars. Overall ED spending was $79.2 billion (CI, $79.2 billion-$79.2 billion) in 2006 and grew to $136.6 billion (CI, $136.6 billion-$136.6 billion) in 2016, representing a population-adjusted annualized rate of change of 4.4% (CI, 4.4%-4.5%) as compared to total healthcare spending (1.4% [CI, 1.4%-1.4%]) during that same ten-year period. The percentage of U.S. health spending attributable to the ED has increased from 3.9% (CI, 3.9%-3.9%) in 2006 to 5.0% (CI, 5.0%-5.0%) in 2016. Nearly equal parts of ED spending in 2016 was paid by private payers (49.3% [CI, 49.3%-49.3%]) and public payers (46.9% [CI, 46.9%-46.9%]), with the remainder attributable to out-of-pocket spending (3.9% [CI, 3.9%-3.9%]). In terms of key groups, the majority of ED spending was allocated among females (versus males) and treat-and-release patients (versus those hospitalized); those between age 20-44 accounted for a plurality of ED spending. Road injuries, falls, and urinary diseases witnessed the highest levels of ED spending, accounting for 14.1% (CI, 13.1%-15.1%) of total ED spending in 2016. ED spending per visit also increased over time from $660.0 (CI, $655.1-$665.2) in 2006 to $943.2 (CI, $934.3-$951.6) in 2016, or at an annualized rate of 3.4% (CI, 3.3%-3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Though ED spending accounts for a relatively small portion of total health system spending in the U.S., ED spending is sizable and growing. Understanding which diseases are driving this spending is helpful for informing value-based reforms that can impact overall health care costs.

Identifying urban built environment factors in pregnancy care and maternal mental health outcomes

Backgrounds

Risk factors related to the built environment have been associated with women’s mental health and preventive care. This study sought to identify built environment factors that are associated with variations in prenatal care and subsequent pregnancy-related outcomes in an urban setting.

Methods

In a retrospective observational study, we characterized the types and frequency of prenatal care events that are associated with the various built environment factors of the patients’ residing neighborhoods. In comparison to women living in higher-quality built environments, we hypothesize that women who reside in lower-quality built environments experience different patterns of clinical events that may increase the risk for adverse outcomes. Using machine learning, we performed pattern detection to characterize the variability in prenatal care concerning encounter types, clinical problems, and medication prescriptions. Structural equation modeling was used to test the associations among built environment, prenatal care variation, and pregnancy outcome. The main outcome is postpartum depression (PPD) diagnosis within 1 year following childbirth. The exposures were the quality of the built environment in the patients’ residing neighborhoods. Electronic health records (EHR) data of pregnant women (n = 8,949) who had live delivery at an urban academic medical center from 2015 to 2017 were included in the study.

Results

We discovered prenatal care patterns that were summarized into three common types. Women who experienced the prenatal care pattern with the highest rates of PPD were more likely to reside in neighborhoods with homogeneous land use, lower walkability, lower air pollutant concentration, and lower retail floor ratios after adjusting for age, neighborhood average education level, marital status, and income inequality.

Conclusions

In an urban setting, multi-purpose and walkable communities were found to be associated with a lower risk of PPD. Findings may inform urban design policies and provide awareness for care providers on the association of patients’ residing neighborhoods and healthy pregnancy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04056-1.

Antepartum hospital use and delivery outcomes in California

BACKGROUND

There are few population-based studies of antepartum emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations and their implications for delivery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to analyze the likelihood of pregnant patients's antepartum hospital use using population-based hospital discharge data for births in California. The study analyzed associations between antepartum hospital use and the likelihood of maternal delivery complications and postpartum hospital use.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of individuals with live births in state-licensed hospitals in California in 2017. Delivery admissions data were linked to antepartum hospital visits within 280 days of a delivery admission and 90 days after a delivery discharge. The most common principal or primary International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-coded diagnoses for antepartum emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations were identified and Poisson regression estimates were used to determine the likelihood of antepartum hospital use by maternal demographic and clinical characteristics. Complicated deliveries were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-coded severe maternal morbidity, vaginal or cesarean delivery complications, or long length of stay after delivery (>4 days for a vaginal delivery and >5 days for a cesarean delivery). Associations between specific types of antepartum visits, complicated deliveries, and postpartum hospital use were analyzed by chi-square tests. Logistic regression estimates were used to determine the significance of associations between antepartum hospital use and likelihood of a complicated delivery.

RESULTS

Of 348,848 deliveries at 246 hospitals in California, in 2017, with linkable data, almost one-third of the patients (30.4% with emergency department visits and 1.2% with inpatient hospital stays) experienced antepartum hospital use. Those who were younger, identified as a racial or ethnic minority, and with a low income, were the most likely to have antepartum hospital use. The most common primary diagnoses for antepartum emergency department visits were threatened abortions (19.6%), urinary tract infections (11.2%), and hemorrhage (9.3%). The most common principal diagnoses for antepartum hospitalizations were preterm labor (14.3%), pyelonephritis (10.2%), and hyperemesis gravidarum (6.3%). Patients with any antepartum hospital use were significantly more likely to experience a delivery complication, even after controlling for conditions coded during the delivery admission. Although having an antepartum emergency department visit was associated with only modestly increased adjusted odds (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08) of a complicated delivery, patients with any antepartum hospitalizations, especially those with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, hypertension, diabetes, or hemorrhage, were at higher risk (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.47).

CONCLUSION

Antepartum hospital use is frequent and is associated with patient clinical and demographic factors. Addressing the high prevalence of antepartum hospital use should be a part of future quality improvement and health equity efforts focused on improving care for patients with the greatest medical and social needs.

Emergency department use by pregnant women in Ontario: a retrospective population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Peripregnancy emergency department use may be common, but data specific to health care systems like that in Canada are lacking. As prior research was limited to livebirths, omitting pregnancies ending in miscarriage or induced abortion, the current study quantified and characterized emergency department use among women in Ontario with a recognized pregnancy.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study included all recognized pregnancies among Ontario residents aged 10-55 years with an estimated date of conception between Apr. 1, 2002, and Mar. 31, 2017. We defined peripregnancy emergency department use as any emergency department visit during pregnancy or within 42 days after pregnancy. We used modified Poisson regression with a robust error variance to generate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcome of any peripregnancy emergency department use in association with maternal age, parity, residential income quintile, location of residence, immigrant status, antenatal care provider and number of comorbidities within 120 days before the clinical start of the pregnancy (expressed as total number of Aggregated Diagnosis Groups [ADGs] obtained with the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group System). All RRs, except for number of comorbidities, were further adjusted for number of ADGs.

RESULTS

Peripregnancy emergency department use occurred in 1 075 991 (39.4%) of 2 728 236 recognized pregnancies, including 35.8% of livebirths, 47.3% of stillbirths, 73.7% of miscarriages and 84.8% of threatened abortions. A peripregnancy emergency department visit was more likely among women who were less than 25 years of age (adjusted RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.16-1.17), were nulliparous (adjusted RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.13-1.13), resided in the lowest income quintile area (adjusted RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15-1.16) or in a rural area (adjusted RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.50-1.51), were Canadian-born (adjusted RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.22-1.23), were not seen by an obstetrician (adjusted RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.54-1.80) or had a greater number of ADGs. Emergency department use peaked in the first trimester and in the first week postpartum. Compared to women residing in urban areas, those residing in rural areas had an odds ratio (OR) of 3.44 (95% CI 3.39-3.49) for 3 or more emergency department visits. Women with 3-4 (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.97-2.01), 5-6 (OR 3.55, 95% CI 3.49-3.61), or 7 or more (OR 7.59, 95% CI 7.39-7.78) prepregnancy comorbidities were more likely to have 3 or more peripregnancy emergency department visits than were those with 2 or fewer comorbidities.

INTERPRETATION

Peripregnancy emergency department use occurred in nearly 40% of pregnancies, notably in the first trimester and early in the postpartum period. Efforts are needed to streamline rapid access to ambulatory obstetric care during these peak periods, when women are susceptible to miscarriage or a complication after a livebirth.

The emergency department experience of patients with early pregnancy complications: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of care of women treated for early pregnancy complications in a Canadian emergency department (ED) and early pregnancy clinic (EPC).

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study to understand the perceptions, meanings, and perspectives of women of 18 years and older who presented to the ED or EPC of an urban, tertiary care hospital with early pregnancy complications or loss. Using a semi-structured interview guide, a 45- to 60-minute telephone interview was conducted by a trained qualitative interviewer at 4 to 6 weeks after the ED visit. All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Data analysis occurred in conjunction with data collection in order to continuously monitor emerging themes and general areas for further exploration. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation had occurred.

RESULTS

Interviews were completed with 30 women between June and August 2018. Three key themes arose: disconnect of the ED's role in the provision of care, normalization of a chaotic healthcare experience, and finding connection through the institution's EPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Perspectives of women with early pregnancy complications highlight the ways in which ED care often does not meet the expectations or needs of patients and their families. The emotional complexity of this medical situation is often overlooked by ED staff and can produce encounters that are distressing. However, negative experiences were often mitigated by follow-up care in the institution's EPC.

Emergency Care Utilization Among Pregnant Medicaid Recipients in North Carolina: An Analysis Using Linked Claims and Birth Records

Objectives To estimate the rate of pregnancy-associated emergency care visits and identify maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with high utilization of emergency care among pregnant Medicaid recipients in North Carolina. Methods A retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid hospital claims and birth records of 107,207 pregnant Medicaid recipients who delivered a live-born infant in North Carolina between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Rates were estimated per 1000 member months of Medicaid coverage. High utilization was defined as ≥ 4 visits. Emergency care visits included encounters in the emergency department or obstetric triage unit during pregnancy that did not result in hospital admission. Results During the study period, 57.5% of pregnant Medicaid recipients sought emergency care at least once during pregnancy. There were 171,909 emergency care visits with an overall rate of 202.3 visits per 1000 member months. Among the subset of pregnant women with Medicaid coverage for the majority of their pregnancy (n = 75,157), 18.1% were high utilizers. High emergency care utilization was associated with young age, black race, lower education, tobacco use, late preterm delivery, multifetal gestation, and having ≥ 1 comorbidity. Threatened labor and abdominal pain were the leading indications for visits. Conclusion Utilization of hospital-based emergency care services was common in this cohort of pregnant Medicaid recipients. Additional research is needed to assess the drivers for accessing care through the emergency department, and to examine differences in pregnancy outcomes and health care costs between high and low utilizers.