1
|
Mulvihill MS, Samy KP, Gao QA, Schmitz R, Davis RP, Ezekian B, Leopardi F, Song M, How T, Williams K, Barbas A, Collins B, Kirk AD. Secondary lymphoid tissue and costimulation-blockade resistant rejection: A nonhuman primate renal transplant study. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2350-2357. [PMID: 30891931 PMCID: PMC6658331 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Naïve T cell activation requires antigen presentation combined with costimulation through CD28, both of which optimally occur in secondary lymphoid tissues such as lymph nodes and the spleen. Belatacept impairs CD28 costimulation by binding its ligands, CD80 and CD86, and in doing so, impairs de novo alloimmune responses. However, in most patients belatacept is ineffective in preventing allograft rejection when used as a monotherapy, and adjuvant therapy is required for control of costimulation-blockade resistant rejection (CoBRR). In rodent models, impaired access to secondary lymphoid tissues has been demonstrated to reduce alloimmune responses to vascularized allografts. Here we show that surgical maneuvers, lymphatic ligation, and splenectomy, designed to anatomically limit access to secondary lymphoid tissues, control CoBRR and facilitate belatacept monotherapy in a nonhuman primate model of kidney transplantation without adjuvant immunotherapy. We further demonstrate that animals sustained on belatacept monotherapy progressively develop an increasingly naïve T and B cell repertoire, an effect that is accelerated by splenectomy and lost at the time of belatacept withdrawal and rejection. These pilot data inform the role of secondary lymphoid tissues on the development of CoBRR and the use of costimulation molecule-focused therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Mulvihill
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kannan P Samy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Qimeng A Gao
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert P Davis
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Francis Leopardi
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mingqing Song
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tam How
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kyha Williams
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bradley Collins
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knechtle SJ, Shaw JM, Hering BJ, Kraemer K, Madsen JC. Translational impact of NIH-funded nonhuman primate research in transplantation. Sci Transl Med 2019; 11:eaau0143. [PMID: 31292263 PMCID: PMC7197021 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has long supported using nonhuman primate (NHP) models for research on kidney, pancreatic islet, heart, and lung transplantation. The primary purpose of this research has been to develop new treatments for down-modulating or preventing deleterious immune responses after transplantation in human patients. Here, we discuss NIH-funded NHP studies of immune cell depletion, costimulation blockade, regulatory cell therapy, desensitization, and mixed hematopoietic chimerism that either preceded clinical trials or prevented the human application of therapies that were toxic or ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Julia M Shaw
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Bernhard J Hering
- Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Kristy Kraemer
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Joren C Madsen
- Center for Transplantation Sciences and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fitch Z, Schmitz R, Kwun J, Hering B, Madsen J, Knechtle SJ. Transplant research in nonhuman primates to evaluate clinically relevant immune strategies in organ transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:115-129. [PMID: 31027947 PMCID: PMC6599548 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Research in transplant immunology using non-human primate (NHP) species to evaluate immunologic strategies to prevent rejection and prolong allograft survival has yielded results that have translated successfully into human organ transplant patient management. Other therapies have not proceeded to human translation due to failure in NHP testing, arguably sparing humans the futility and risk of such testing. The NHP transplant models are ethically necessary for drug development in this field and provide the closest analogue to human transplant patients available. The refinement of this resource with respect to colony MHC typing, reagent and assay development, and availability to the research community has greatly enhanced knowledge about transplant immunology and drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Center for Transplantation Sciences, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 510c, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Bernhard Hering
- Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Joren Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anderson DJ, Lo DJ, Leopardi F, Song M, Strobert EA, Jenkins JB, Larsen CP, Kirk AD. Corticosteroids and methotrexate as adjuvants to costimulation blockade in non-human primate renal transplantation. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13568. [PMID: 31006146 PMCID: PMC6597274 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Belatacept, the CD28-B7 costimulation pathway inhibitor, has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in kidney transplantation. Although costimulation blockade (CoB) allows for CNI avoidance, it is associated with increased rates of early rejection, prompting a search for agents to pair with belatacept. Methotrexate (MTX) is an antimetabolite that has been found to be complimentary with abatacept, a lower affinity CD28-B7-specific analogue of belatacept, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether this synergy would extend to prevention of kidney allograft rejection. Rhesus macaques underwent kidney transplantation treated with abatacept maintenance therapy with either a steroid taper, MTX, or both. The combination of abatacept maintenance with steroids prolonged graft survival compared to untreated historical controls and previous reports of abatacept monotherapy. The addition of MTX did not provide additional benefit. These data demonstrate that abatacept with adjuvant therapy may delay the onset of acute rejection, but fail to show synergy between abatacept and MTX beyond that of steroids. These findings indicate that MTX is unlikely to be a suitable adjuvant to CoB in kidney transplantation, but also suggest that with further modification, a CoB regimen used for advanced RA may suffice for RA patients requiring kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Denise J. Lo
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Joe B. Jenkins
- Yerkes National Primate Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Allan D. Kirk
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iida S, Miyairi S, Su CA, Abe T, Abe R, Tanabe K, Dvorina N, Baldwin WM, Fairchild RL. Peritransplant VLA-4 blockade inhibits endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into high-risk cardiac allografts and CTLA-4Ig resistant rejection. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:998-1010. [PMID: 30372587 PMCID: PMC6433496 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Recipient endogenous memory CD8 T cells expressing reactivity to donor class I MHC infiltrate MHC-mismatched cardiac allografts within 24 hours after reperfusion and express effector functions mediating graft injury. The current study tested the efficacy of Very Late Antigen-4 (VLA-4) blockade to inhibit endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into cardiac allografts and attenuate early posttransplant inflammation. Peritransplant anti-VLA-4 mAb given to C57BL6 (H-2b ) recipients of AJ (H-2a ) heart allografts completely inhibited endogenous memory CD4 and CD8 T cell infiltration with significant decrease in macrophage, but not neutrophil, infiltration into allografts subjected to either minimal or prolonged cold ischemic storage (CIS) prior to transplant, reduced intra-allograft IFN-γ-induced gene expression and prolonged survival of allografts subjected to prolonged CIS in CTLA-4Ig treated recipients. Anti-VLA-4 mAb also inhibited priming of donor-specific T cells producing IFN-γ until at least day 7 posttransplant. Peritransplant anti-VLA plus anti-CD154 mAb treatment similarly prolonged survival of allografts subjected to minimal or increased CIS prior to transplant. Overall, these data indicate that peritransplant anti-VLA-4 mAb inhibits early infiltration memory CD8 T cell infiltration into allografts with a marked reduction in early graft inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate negative effects of heterologous alloimmunity in recipients of higher risk grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichi Iida
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Miyairi
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Charles A. Su
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Toyofumi Abe
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Urology, Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryo Abe
- Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Nina Dvorina
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Robert L. Fairchild
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Pilat N, Sabler P, Klaus C, Mahr B, Unger L, Hock K, Wiletel M, Schwarz C, Kristo I, Regele H, Wekerle T. Blockade of adhesion molecule lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 improves long-term heart allograft survival in mixed chimeras. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018; 37:1119-1130. [PMID: 29699851 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mixed chimerism approach for intentional induction of donor-specific tolerance was shown to be successful in various models from mice to humans. For transplant patients, the approach would obviate the need for long-term immunosuppression and associated side effects; moreover, it would preclude the risk of late graft loss due to chronic rejection. Widespread clinical application is hindered by toxicities related to recipient pre-conditioning. Herein we aimed to investigate a clinically relevant protocol for tolerance induction to cardiac allografts, sparing CD40 blockade or T-cell depletion. METHODS B6 mice were conditioned with non-myeloablative total body irradiation, fully mismatched BALB/c bone marrow cells, and short-term therapy, based on either anti- lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (anti-LFA-1) or anti-CD40L. Multilineage chimerism was followed by flow-cytometric analysis, tolerance was assessed with skin and heart allografts from fully or major histocompatibility complex-mismatched donors. Mechanisms of tolerance were investigated by analysis of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays, and deletion of donor-reactive T cells. RESULTS We found that the combination of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig) and rapamycin with LFA-1 blockade enhanced bone marrow engraftment and led to more efficient T-cell engraftment and subsequent tolerization. Although fully mismatched skin grafts were chronically rejected, primarily vascularized heart allografts survived indefinitely and without signs of chronic rejection, independent of minor antigen mismatches. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstarted a robust protocol for the induction of tolerance for cardiac allografts in the absence of CD40 blockade. Our findings demonstrate the potential of a clinically relevant minimal conditioning protocol designed to induce lifelong immunologic tolerance toward cardiac allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Pilat
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Philipp Sabler
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Klaus
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Mahr
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Unger
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Hock
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mario Wiletel
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivan Kristo
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinz Regele
- Institute of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Wekerle
- Section of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although elusive for many decades, transplantation tolerance can now be achieved in the clinic. This has prompted follow-up investigations into its stability and longevity, as well as into barriers to its induction, which include memory T and B cells. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical observations reveal that transplantation tolerance can be induced in adult recipients and that even episodes of acute rejection do not preclude successful weaning from immunosuppression to reveal tolerance. These observations appear to conflict with the currently accepted notion that adult transplant recipients harbor high frequencies of memory human leukocyte antigen-specific T cells that are a barrier to transplantation tolerance. We discuss how these observations may be rationalized, by proposing the generation of helpless effector CD8 T cells that cannot develop into memory, and by highlighting recent findings on the ability of transplantation tolerance to be spontaneously restored after rejection. We speculate that in individuals who develop tolerance while on immunosuppression and then experience rejection, it is this restored tolerance that is revealed upon successful weaning of immunosuppression. SUMMARY We have reviewed clinical and experimental data to explain how transplantation tolerance may be achieved in individuals who have experienced allograft rejection.
Collapse
|
9
|
The Role of Costimulation Blockade in Solid Organ and Islet Xenotransplantation. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017:8415205. [PMID: 29159187 PMCID: PMC5660816 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8415205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pig-to-human xenotransplantation offers a potential bridge to the growing disparity between patients with end-stage organ failure and graft availability. Early studies attempting to overcome cross-species barriers demonstrated robust humoral immune responses to discordant xenoantigens. Recent advances have led to highly efficient and targeted genomic editing, drastically altering the playing field towards rapid production of less immunogenic porcine tissues and even the discussion of human xenotransplantation trials. However, as these humoral immune barriers to cross-species transplantation are overcome with advanced transgenics, cellular immunity to these novel xenografts remains an outstanding issue. Therefore, understanding and optimizing immunomodulation will be paramount for successful clinical xenotransplantation. Costimulation blockade agents have been introduced in xenotransplantation research in 2000 with anti-CD154mAb. Most recently, prolonged survival has been achieved in solid organ (kidney xenograft survival > 400 days with anti-CD154mAb, heart xenograft survival > 900 days, and liver xenograft survival 29 days with anti-CD40mAb) and islet xenotransplantation (>600 days with anti-CD154mAb) with the use of these potent experimental agents. As the development of novel genetic modifications and costimulation blocking agents converges, we review their impact thus far on preclinical xenotransplantation and the potential for future application.
Collapse
|
10
|
Itell HL, Kaur A, Deere JD, Barry PA, Permar SR. Rhesus monkeys for a nonhuman primate model of cytomegalovirus infections. Curr Opin Virol 2017; 25:126-133. [PMID: 28888133 DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the leading opportunistic viral infection in solid organ transplant patients and is the most common congenitally transmitted pathogen worldwide. Despite the significant burden of disease HCMV causes in immunosuppressed patients and infected newborns, there are no licensed preventative vaccines or effective immunotherapeutic treatments for HCMV, largely due to our incomplete understanding of the immune correlates of protection against HCMV infection and disease. Though CMV species-specificity imposes an additional challenge in defining a suitable animal model for HCMV, nonhuman primate (NHP) CMVs are the most genetically related to HCMV. In this review, we discuss the advantages and applicability of rhesus monkey models for studying HCMV infections and pathogenesis and ultimately informing vaccine development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Itell
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amitinder Kaur
- Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University, Covington, LA, USA
| | - Jesse D Deere
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Barry
- Center for Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Sallie R Permar
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Crosstalk between B and T cells in transplantation is increasingly recognized as being important in the alloimmune response. T cell activation of B cells occurs by a 3-stage pathway, culminating with costimulation signals. We review the distinct T cell subtypes required for B-cell activation and discuss the formation of the germinal center (GC) after transplantation, with particular reference to the repopulation of the GC after depletional induction, and the subsequent effect of immunosuppressive manipulation of T cell-B cell interactions. In addition, ectopic GCs are seen in transplantation, but their role is not fully understood. Therapeutic options to target T cell-B cell interactions are of considerable interest, both as immunosuppressive tools, and to aid in the further understanding of these important alloimmune mechanisms.
Collapse
|
12
|
Samy KP, Anderson DA, Lo DJ, Mulvihill MS, Song M, Farris AB, Parker BS, MacDonald AL, Lu C, Springer TA, Kachlany SC, Reimann KA, How T, Leopardi FV, Franke KS, Williams KD, Collins BH, Kirk AD. Selective Targeting of High-Affinity LFA-1 Does Not Augment Costimulation Blockade in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Transplantation Model. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:1193-1203. [PMID: 27888551 PMCID: PMC5409867 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2016] [Revised: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Costimulation blockade (CoB) via belatacept is a lower-morbidity alternative to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. However, it has higher rates of early acute rejection. These early rejections are mediated in part by memory T cells, which have reduced dependence on the pathway targeted by belatacept and increased adhesion molecule expression. One such molecule is leukocyte function antigen (LFA)-1. LFA-1 exists in two forms: a commonly expressed, low-affinity form and a transient, high-affinity form, expressed only during activation. We have shown that antibodies reactive with LFA-1 regardless of its configuration are effective in eliminating memory T cells but at the cost of impaired protective immunity. Here we test two novel agents, leukotoxin A and AL-579, each of which targets the high-affinity form of LFA-1, to determine whether this more precise targeting prevents belatacept-resistant rejection. Despite evidence of ex vivo and in vivo ligand-specific activity, neither agent when combined with belatacept proved superior to belatacept monotherapy. Leukotoxin A approached a ceiling of toxicity before efficacy, while AL-579 failed to significantly alter the peripheral immune response. These data, and prior studies, suggest that LFA-1 blockade may not be a suitable adjuvant agent for CoB-resistant rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KP Samy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - DA Anderson
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - DJ Lo
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - MS Mulvihill
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - M Song
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - AB Farris
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - BS Parker
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - AL MacDonald
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - C Lu
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - TA Springer
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - SC Kachlany
- Rutgers University, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ 07103,Actinobac Biomed, Inc., Kendall Park, NJ 08824
| | - KA Reimann
- Mass-Biologics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA 02126
| | - T How
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - FV Leopardi
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - KS Franke
- Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710
| | - KD Williams
- Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710
| | - BH Collins
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710
| | - AD Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710,Emory Transplant Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kean LS, Turka LA, Blazar BR. Advances in targeting co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory pathways in transplantation settings: the Yin to the Yang of cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 2017; 276:192-212. [PMID: 28258702 PMCID: PMC5338458 DOI: 10.1111/imr.12523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the past decade, the power of harnessing T-cell co-signaling pathways has become increasingly understood to have significant clinical importance. In cancer immunotherapy, the field has concentrated on two related modalities: First, targeting cancer antigens through highly activated chimeric antigen T cells (CAR-Ts) and second, re-animating endogenous quiescent T cells through checkpoint blockade. In each of these strategies, the therapeutic goal is to re-ignite T-cell immunity, in order to eradicate tumors. In transplantation, there is also great interest in targeting T-cell co-signaling, but with the opposite goal: in this field, we seek the Yin to cancer immunotherapy's Yang, and focus on manipulating T-cell co-signaling to induce tolerance rather than activation. In this review, we discuss the major T-cell signaling pathways that are being investigated for tolerance induction, detailing preclinical studies and the path to the clinic for many of these molecules. These include blockade of co-stimulation pathways and agonism of coinhibitory pathways, in order to achieve the delicate state of balance that is transplant tolerance: a state which guarantees lifelong transplant acceptance without ongoing immunosuppression, and with preservation of protective immune responses. In the context of the clinical translation of immune tolerance strategies, we discuss the significant challenge that is embodied by the fact that targeted pathway modulators may have opposing effects on tolerance based on their impact on effector vs regulatory T-cell biology. Achieving this delicate balance holds the key to the major challenge of transplantation: lifelong control of alloreactivity while maintaining an otherwise intact immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie S Kean
- Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Laurence A Turka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Immune Tolerance Network, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruce R Blazar
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics and the Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Antigen-experienced T cells, also known as memory T cells, are functionally and phenotypically distinct from naive T cells. Their enhanced expression of adhesion molecules and reduced requirement for co-stimulation enables them to mount potent and rapid recall responses to subsequent antigen encounters. Memory T cells generated in response to prior antigen exposures can cross-react with other nonidentical, but similar, antigens. This heterologous cross-reactivity not only enhances protective immune responses, but also engenders de novo alloimmunity. This latter characteristic is increasingly recognized as a potential barrier to allograft acceptance that is worthy of immunotherapeutic intervention, and several approaches have been investigated. Calcineurin inhibition effectively controls memory T-cell responses to allografts, but this benefit comes at the expense of increased infectious morbidity. Lymphocyte depletion eliminates allospecific T cells but spares memory T cells to some extent, such that patients do not completely lose protective immunity. Co-stimulation blockade is associated with reduced adverse-effect profiles and improved graft function relative to calcineurin inhibition, but lacks efficacy in controlling memory T-cell responses. Targeting the adhesion molecules that are upregulated on memory T cells might offer additional means to control co-stimulation-blockade-resistant memory T-cell responses.
Collapse
|