Organ procurement center allows for daytime liver transplantation with less resource utilization: May address burnout, pipeline, and safety for field of transplantation

Characterizing proximity and transfers of deceased organ donors to donor care units in the United States

Some United States organ procurement organizations transfer deceased organ donors to donor care units (DCUs) for recovery procedures. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, from April 2017 to June 2021, to describe the proximity of adult deceased donors after brain death to DCUs and understand the impact of donor service area (DSA) boundaries on transfer efficiency. Among 19 109 donors (56.1% of the cohort) in 25 DSAs with DCUs, a majority (14 593 [76.4%]) were in hospitals within a 2-hour drive. In areas with DCUs detectable in the study data set, a minority of donors (3582 of 11 532 [31.1%]) were transferred to a DCU; transfer rates varied between DSAs (median, 27.7%, range, 4.0%-96.5%). Median hospital-to-DCU driving times were not meaningfully shorter among transferred donors (50 vs 51 minutes for not transferred, P < .001). When DSA boundaries were ignored, 3241 cohort donors (9.5%) without current DCU access were managed in hospitals within 2 hours of a DCU and thus potentially eligible for transfer. In summary, approximately half of United States deceased donors after brain death are managed in hospitals in DSAs with a DCU. Transfer of donors between DSAs may increase DCU utilization and improve system efficiency.

Is Time Scheduling Important? An Analysis of Donor Heart Cross-clamp Times During Heart Transplantation

Background

Outcomes in heart transplantation are affected by a variety of variables and patient factors. However, the impact of circadian rhythms, gene expression, and transcription remain underexplored. We thus evaluated the potential role of donor heart cross-clamp times on short-term and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

Methods

A total of 31 713 heart transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were first stratified on the basis of time of donor procurement: 12 am to 12 pm or 12 pm to 12 am. To evaluate a possible effect of circadian rhythms, donor time was further divided into 5 groups based on preclinical data: 4 am to 8 am; 8 am to 11 am; 11 am to 5 pm; 5 pm to 10 pm; 10 pm to 4 am. Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Patients who received hearts recovered between 12 am and 12 pm had significantly higher survival than those who received hearts recovered between 12 pm and 12 am. This survival difference was observed in both unadjusted (P = 0.002) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97; P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, the survival difference among the 5 groups was insignificant (P = 0.07). Following adjustment, the periods of 11 am to 5 pm (HR: 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.012), 5 pm to 10 pm (HR: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002), and 10 pm to 4 am (HR: 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = 0.034), were all independently associated with increased long-term mortality. Notably, the time of 8 am to 11 am was not associated with a change in survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.14; P = 0.3).

Conclusions

Given the independent association of donor timing and survival after adjustment in a large national cohort, further investigation into the role of donor circadian rhythm and donor procurement time is warranted in preclinical and clinical studies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of this observation could potentially lead to the development of effective treatments and donor procurement processes that prepare the organs for transplantation in a better condition.

The effect of an organ procurement organization surgeon on pediatric organ utilization

INTRODUCTION

Organ procurement organizations (OPO) have started to employ transplant-trained surgeons dedicated to organ procurement with the aim to increase allograft utilization and enhance the use of procured organs. We investigated the effects of an OPO-employed surgeon on the procurement and utilization of organs from pediatric donors within the Southwestern Transplant Alliance OPO.

METHODS

OPO data were obtained for all procurements that were performed between 2014 and 2019. The analysis was performed to see if the presence of an OPO donor surgeon impacted the utilization of pediatric livers. Donor and recipient demographic data were examined between allografts procured with the presence of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Present) and those without an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). A p-value of <.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 149 pediatric procurements, 91 included an OPO-donor surgeon. In procurements with OPO-Present, donors were younger (8.2 vs. 11.2, p < .05) and had longer distances to travel to the recipient center (334 vs. 175 miles p < .05), but had comparable cold ischemic times. In terms of organ share type, more OPO-Present livers were shared nationally and there was no difference in discard rate between OPO-Present and OPO-Absent procurements. Finally, OPO-Present livers were more likely to be transplanted to pediatric recipients compared to OPO-Absent (47.3% vs. 24.1% p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of an OPO surgeon has impacted organ utilization, leading to increased transplantation of pediatric livers in pediatric recipients, and has expanded the geographical share of pediatric livers.

Deceased Organ Donor Management and Organ Distribution From Organ Procurement Organization-Based Recovery Facilities Versus Acute-Care Hospitals

Introduction: Organ recovery facilities address the logistical challenges of hospital-based deceased organ donor management. While more organs are transplanted from donors in facilities, differences in donor management and donation processes are not fully characterized. Research Question: Does deceased donor management and organ transport distance differ between organ procurement organization (OPO)-based recovery facilities versus hospitals? Design: Retrospective analysis of Organ Procurement and Transplant Network data, including adults after brain death in 10 procurement regions (April 2017-June 2021). The primary outcomes were ischemic times of transplanted hearts, kidneys, livers, and lungs. Secondary outcomes included transport distances (between the facility or hospital and the transplant program) for each transplanted organ. Results: Among 5010 deceased donors, 51.7% underwent recovery in an OPO-based recovery facility. After adjustment for recipient and system factors, mean differences in ischemic times of any transplanted organ were not significantly different between donors in facilities and hospitals. Transplanted hearts recovered from donors in facilities were transported further than hearts from hospital donors (median 255 mi [IQR 27, 475] versus 174 [IQR 42, 365], P = .002); transport distances for livers and kidneys were significantly shorter (P < .001 for both). Conclusion: Organ recovery procedures performed in OPO-based recovery facilities were not associated with differences in ischemic times in transplanted organs from organs recovered in hospitals, but differences in organ transport distances exist. Further work is needed to determine whether other observed differences in donor management and organ distribution meaningfully impact donation and transplantation outcomes.

No Stone Left Unturned: Utilization of an Organ Procurement Organization Donor Surgeon at Procurement Reduces Discards of Marginal Liver Allografts

BACKGROUND

The recent trend of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) employing independent surgeons for organ procurement has been developed with the goal of improving the supply of suitable organs for transplantation. We investigated the effects that the addition of an OPO-employed, organ-procurement specialist has on liver allograft discard rate, marginal organ utilization, and graft survival.

METHODS

Organ Procurement and Transplant Network and OPO data were retrospectively studied between April 1, 2014' and July 31, 2019' within the Southwest Transplant Alliance donor service area. Liver procurements with an OPO-surgeon present (OPO-Present) were compared to those without the involvement of an OPO surgeon (OPO-Absent). Donor and recipient characteristics as well as outcomes were analyzed across groups using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

In total 869 OPO-Present liver allografts had similar rates of discard (5.2%) compared to 771 OPO-Absent livers (5.8%). However, after adjusting for donor risk, OPO-Present livers had a lower propensity of discard compared to OPO-Absent (3.4% versus 7.6%, P < 0.05). OPO-Present livers were more likely to be shared nationally (11.0% versus 4.8%, P < 0.001). Outcome analysis showed allograft survival of OPO-Present livers at 5 y was comparable to OPO-Absent livers (79.5% versus 80%, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an OPO surgeon was associated with decreased liver allograft discard and increased utilization of marginal donor organs. The OPO surgeon's presence represents a potential strategy to increase organ utilization nationally.

Achieving Equity in Organ Transplantation: Recommendations for Action Based on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report

The United States organ transplantation system has recently reached a historic milestone of a cumulative 1 million transplants. Despite this considerable success in providing life-saving organ transplants to patients with end organ failure, there are ample opportunities for improvement, particularly with regard to achieving equity. Recognizing this, Congress directed the National Institutes of Health to fund the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in conducting a study on deceased donor organ procurement, allocation, and distribution, recommending ways to improve equity and accountability. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study committee's report, Realizing the Promise of Equity in the Organ Transplantation System , reached multiple conclusions and agreed on 14 recommendations for action that can be grouped into 3 areas: (1) achieving equity, (2) improving system performance, and (3) increasing the utilization of available organs. Here, we review overarching areas for improvement, highlighting key recommendations, and suggest implementing actions.

The 20-year paradigm shift toward organ recovery centers: 2500 donors at Mid-America Transplant and broader adoption across the United States

On March 1, 2001, Mid-America Transplant, the organ procurement organization (OPO) located in St Louis, Missouri, performed the first organ recovery of a brain-dead donor in a hospital-independent, free-standing, organ recovery center (ORC), with successful transplantation of a liver. This was the inception of a paradigm shift in donor management and organ procurement, moving away from the traditional method of using the donor hospital. In the last 20 years, many advances have occurred in the ORC. Brain-dead donors are moved within hours of authorization to fully equipped intensive care units. Some ORCs are equipped with computed tomography scanners, portable radiography, laboratory facilities, bronchoscopy, and a cardiac catheterization laboratory. ORCs have dedicated surgical suites, and operating time is frequently during the day and is rarely delayed. Donor management in an ORC is more consistent, efficient, and effective than that in a donor hospital, and studies have demonstrated increased organ yield. Multiple studies have demonstrated a cost benefit of an ORC as well as providing an ideal environment for donor research studies. Currently, there are 24 of 57 OPOs that are using an independent or hospital-based ORC to manage their donors. We review the history and describe the current state of ORCs.

Centralized Organ Recovery and Reconditioning Centers

An increased focus on improving efficiency and decreasing costs has resulted in alternative models of donor management and organ recovery. The specialized donor care facility model provides highly efficient and cost-effective donor care at a free-standing facility, resulting in improved organ yield, shorter ischemic times, decreased travel, and fewer nighttime operations. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) improves utilization of extended criteria donor lungs, and centralized EVLP facilities have the potential to increase transplant volumes for smaller transplant programs in specified geographic regions. These alternative models are increasingly being used in the United States to improve waitlist mortality and combat the ongoing donor organ shortage.

Do Organizational Characteristics of Lung Procurement Operations Matter: The Association Between Transplant Center Centrality and Volume With Total Ischemic Time

BACKGROUND

To understand the association of 2 organizational characteristics of transplant center (TXC), volume and closeness centrality, with total ischemic time for deceased donor lung transplants in conjunction with the removal of donation service area (DSA) lung allocation policy. The organization of donor procurements has received increased attention since DSA was removed from allocation policy. Consistent with network theories of organization, organizational characteristics of a TXC could affect procurement efficiency, as volume and closeness centrality (measuring how connected a TXC is within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) could be associated with total ischemic time. These associations could have changed because of the removal of DSA from allocation policy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, pooled cross-sectional study of total ischemic time for nonperfused deceased donor lung transplants (n = 9281) between 2015 and 2019, using within-between regression.

RESULTS

Higher volume TXCs exhibited lower total ischemic times after the removal of DSA from lung allocation policy (P = 0.011); however, all TXCs that had increased volumes, after the removal of DSA from lung allocation policy, exhibited higher levels of total ischemic time (P ≤ 0.001). Before the removal of DSA, TXCs that had increased volumes exhibited lower levels of ischemic time (P ≤ 0.001). Both within and between closeness centrality exhibited u-shaped associations with total ischemic time (P = 0.012; P = 0.006) and the effect of closeness centrality on total ischemic time was different after DSA removal (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational characteristics were associated with the efficiency of deceased organ procurements. The effects on total ischemic time were dependent on whether DSA was used for lung allocation.

Advanced considerations in organ donors

The rising need for lung transplantation over recent years has not paralleled the availability of suitable lung allografts. The number of lung transplantations performed each year in the United States remains limited by an inadequate supply of suitable donors as well as low donor utilization rates. While several methods have been proposed for increasing the donor pool, there is considerable disparity between acceptance and utilization of these practices among transplant centers. In this review article, we explore various approaches for enhancing donor selection and expanding the donor pool. We discuss the use of “extended criteria” donors including high risk groups such as drug overdose donors, and we examine the role of techniques in donor assessment and selection such as the use of computed tomography for accurate size matching. We review topics in donor management such as the establishment of specialized donor care facilities and the implementation of lung-focused resuscitation protocols, and we discuss advancements in donor procurement such as the utilization of local procurement teams. We also review barriers to donation, such as variability in organ procurement organization (OPO) consent practices, as well as patient-specific factors such as religious or cultural beliefs. Addressing these aspects of donor evaluation, management, and accessibility is essential in maximizing the number of lungs available for transplantation within the existing donor pool.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion for extended criteria donor allografts-Preliminary experience with extended organ preservation times in the setting of organ reallocation

BACKGROUND

In times of critical organ shortage, poor organ pool utilization and increased use of extended-criteria donor (ECD) allografts remain a major problem. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) has emerged as a promising and feasible strategy in ECD liver transplantation (LT). However, potential safety limits regarding the duration of perfusion are yet to be explored. Besides marginal allograft quality (steatosis), prolonged cold ischemia time remains the most important factor for a high number of liver allografts being declined for transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two ECD-allografts were each allocated to two recipients, who proved to be unsuitable to receive the assigned allograft upon arrival at the transplant center. The organs were reallocated by Eurotransplant and accepted by our center for two different backup patients. During that time, HOPE was commenced and continued until the recipient hepatectomy was completed. Postoperative allograft function was assessed by serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, and International Normalized Ratio. Incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

HOPE was applied for 4 h 35 min and 4 h 20 min, resulting in a total cold preservation time of 17 h 29 min and 15 h 20 min, respectively. Both recipients displayed decreasing serum transaminases and bilirubin levels postoperatively. No EAD or major postoperative complications occurred in either patient. Serum ALT and AST levels were within the normal range at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended HOPE enables the safe extension of preservation time for up to 18 h in human LT. End-ischemic HOPE may significantly improve organ pool utilization, while simultaneously facilitating operating room logistics and preventing organ injury.

Specialized Donor Care Facility Model and Advances in Management of Thoracic Organ Donors

BACKGROUND

Donor hearts and lungs are more susceptible to the inflammatory physiologic changes that occur after brain death. Prior investigations have shown that protocolized management of potential organ donors can rehabilitate donor organs that are initially deemed unacceptable. In this review we discuss advances in donor management models with particular attention to the specialized donor care facility model. In addition we review specific strategies to optimize donor thoracic organs and improve organ yield in thoracic transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a literature review by searching the PubMed database for medical subject heading terms associated with organ donor management models. We also communicated with our local organ procurement organization to gather published and unpublished information first-hand.

RESULTS

The specialized donor care facility model has been shown to improve the efficiency of organ donor management and procurement while reducing costs and minimizing travel and its associated risks. Lung protective ventilation, recruitment of atelectatic lung, and hormone therapy (eg, glucocorticoids and triiodothyronine/thyroxine) are associated with improved lung utilization rates. Stroke volume-based resuscitation is associated with improved heart utilization rates, whereas studies evaluating hormone therapy (eg, glucocorticoids and triiodothyronine/thyroxine) have shown variable results.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of high-quality prospective evidence results in conflicting practices across organ procurement organizations, and best practices remain controversial. Future studies should focus on prospective, randomized investigations to evaluate donor management strategies. The specialized donor care facility model fosters a collaborative environment that encourages academic inquiry and is an ideal setting for these investigations.

Extinguishing burnout: National analysis of predictors and effects of burnout in abdominal transplant surgery fellows

Burnout among surgeons has been attributed to increased workload and decreased autonomy. Although prior studies have examined burnout among transplant surgeons, no studies have evaluated burnout in abdominal transplant surgery fellows. The objective of our study was to identify predictors of burnout and understand its impact on personal and patient care during fellowship. A survey was sent to all abdominal transplant surgery fellows in an American Society of Transplant Surgeons-accredited fellowship. The response rate was 59.2% (n = 77) and 22.7% (n = 17) of fellows met criteria for burnout. Fellows with lower grit scores were more likely to exhibit burnout compared with fellows with higher scores (3.6 vs 4.0, P = .026). Those with burnout were more likely to work >100 hours per week (58.8% vs 27.6%, P = .023), have severe work-related stress (58.8% vs 22.4%, P = .010), consider quitting fellowship (94.1% vs 20.7%, P < .001), or make a medical error (35.3% vs 5.2%, P = .003). This national analysis of abdominal transplant fellows found that burnout rates are relatively low, but few fellows engage in self-care. Personal and program-related factors attribute to burnout and it has unacceptable effects on patient care. Transplant societies and fellowship programs should develop interventions to give fellows tools to prevent and combat burnout.

Economic evaluation of the specialized donor care facility for thoracic organ donor management

Background

Over the last decade two alternative models of donor care have emerged in the United States: the conventional model, whereby donors are managed at the hospital where brain death occurs, and the specialized donor care facility (SDCF), in which brain dead donors are transferred to a SDCF for medical optimization and organ procurement. Despite increasing use of the SDCF model, its cost-effectiveness in comparison to the conventional model remains unknown.

Methods

We performed an economic evaluation of the SDCF and conventional model of donor care from the perspective of U.S. transplant centers over a 2-year study period. In this analysis, we utilized nationwide data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and controlled for donor characteristics and patterns of organ sharing across the nation’s organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Subgroup analysis was performed to determine the impact of the SDCF model on thoracic organ transplants.

Results

A total of 38,944 organ transplants were performed in the U.S. during the study period from 13,539 donors with an observed total organ cost of $1.36 billion. If every OPO assumed the cost and effectiveness of the SDCF model, a predicted 39,155 organ transplants (+211) would have been performed with a predicted total organ cost of $1.26 billion (−$100 million). Subgroup analysis of thoracic organs revealed that the SDCF model would lead to a predicted 156 additional transplants with a cost saving of $24.6 million.

Conclusions

The U.S. SDCF model may be a less costly and more effective means of multi-organ donor management, particularly for thoracic organ donors, compared to the conventional hospital-based model.

Improving safety in organ recovery transportation: Report from the ASTS/UNOS/AST/AOPO transportation safety summit

Despite the passage of a decade since the tragic loss of an organ recovery team from the University of Michigan, there are currently no national standards governing air and ground transportation of organ recovery personnel. Consequently, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, and the United Network for Organ Sharing jointly convened a transportation summit to review and update recommendations for national transportation standards. Expanded air transport quality assurance protocols, including a requirement for two engine turbine-powered aircraft piloted by two qualified pilots certified through onsite inspections was recommended. Ground transportation providers must ensure adequate safety restraints are available, ambulance avoided if possible, and the use of lights and sirens minimized. Finally, adequate insurance coverage for all team members, including trainees should be provided and should not rely on carrier liability insurance policies. The summit participants have committed the support of their organizations to promote and enact these regulations nationally.

A Survey of Current Procurement Travel Practices, Accident Frequency, and Perceptions of Safety

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

In 2018, 81% of the 36, 529 solid organs transplanted in the United States came from deceased donors. These organs were recovered through widespread use of aeromedical and emergency ground transportation systems. Urgently scheduled travel to remote hospitals at night and in varied weather conditions carries risk for the transplant professionals involved. A landmark survey conducted in 2007 demonstrated that 80% of respondents had experienced a “near-miss” event while on a procurement trip, and 15% had been involved in at least 1 accident. One decade later, we sought to revisit the issue of procurement related travel safety.

Chest computed tomography imaging improves potential lung donor assessment

OBJECTIVE

Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging is being increasingly used for potential lung donor assessment. However, the efficacy of CT imaging in this setting remains unknown. We hypothesize that chest CT imaging independently affects the decision-making process in donor lung utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult donation after brain death donors managed through our local organ procurement organization from June 2011 to November 2016. An experienced thoracic radiologist independently reviewed donor chest CT and chest x-ray images in a blinded, standardized manner to determine the presence of structural lung disease (eg, emphysema, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) and acute abnormalities (eg, traumatic lung injury [TLI]). Distinct models of lung utilization were fit to groups with initial partial pressure of oxygen (iPaO₂) ≤300 mm Hg (suboptimal) and iPaO₂ >300 mm Hg (optimal).

RESULTS

The organ procurement organization managed 753 donors during the study period, with a lung utilization rate ([lung donors/all organ donors] × 100) of 36.5% (275 of 753). Four hundred forty-five (59.1%) donors received chest CT imaging, revealing emphysema (13.7%), ILD (2.5%), and TLI (7.2%). In univariate analysis, findings of TLI (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-4.61) were positively associated with lung utilization, whereas findings of emphysema (OR, 0.18; CI, 0.08-0.40) were negatively associated with utilization. In multivariate analysis, CT findings of emphysema (OR, 0.21; CI 0.08-0.54) remained negatively associated with utilization. No potential donors with CT findings of ILD became lung donors. After controlling for chest x-ray findings, chest CT imaging findings of structural lung disease remained negatively associated with utilization (P = .0001). Lung utilization rate in the suboptimal and optimal iPaO₂ populations was 35.1% and 41.4%, respectively, and CT findings of emphysema had a significant association with nonutilization in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the evaluation of potential lung donors, chest CT imaging findings of structural lung disease, such as emphysema and ILD, have a significant negative association with lung utilization. Our findings suggest that chest CT imaging might be an important adjunct to conventional lung donor assessment criteria.