1
|
Chang JH, King KL, Ali Husain S, Dube GK, Rodica Vasilescu E, Patel S, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE, Mohan S, John Crew R. Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Outcomes After the 2014 Kidney Allocation System Change. Prog Transplant 2024:15269248241268697. [PMID: 39090844 DOI: 10.1177/15269248241268697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented by United Network for Organ Sharing in 2014 to reduce allocation disparities. Research Questions: Outcomes of highly sensitized patients (calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 97%) before and after KAS were compared to low-risk recipients (cPRA <10%) in the post-KAS era were examined. The impact on racial disparities was determined. Design: This was a retrospective study of national registry data. Two cohorts of adult candidates waitlisted for deceased donor transplantation during 3-year periods before and after KAS were identified. Results: Highly sensitized patients (N = 1238 and 4687) received a deceased donor kidney transplant between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 and between January 1, 2015 and December, 31, 2017. Racial disparity for highly sensitized patients improved, yet remained significant (P < 0.001), with Black patients comprising 40% and 41% of the highly sensitized candidates and 28% and 34% of the recipients pre- and post-KAS. While posttransplant death-censored graft failure for highly sensitized recipients was similar overall, post-KAS was associated with improved graft survival in the first year after transplant (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78). When compared to contemporaneous lowrisk recipients, both death-censored and all-cause graft failure were similar for highly sensitized recipients and was associated with increased risk for death-censored graft failure beyond the first year (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11-1.73). Conclusion: The allocation system led to an increase in transplantation in highly sensitized candidates without compromising outcomes. Although KAS has led to more balanced transplant rates between highly sensitized Black and White patients, racial inequalities persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Hyung Chang
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey K Dube
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - E Rodica Vasilescu
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shefali Patel
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - David J Cohen
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - R John Crew
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ishaque T, Beckett J, Gentry S, Garonzik-Wang J, Karhadkar S, Lonze BE, Halazun KJ, Segev D, Massie AB. Waitlist Outcomes for Exception and Non-exception Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States Following Implementation of the Median MELD at Transplant (MMaT)/250-mile Policy. Transplantation 2024; 108:e170-e180. [PMID: 38548691 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since February 2020, exception points have been allocated equivalent to the median model for end-stage liver disease at transplant within 250 nautical miles of the transplant center (MMaT/250). We compared transplant rate and waitlist mortality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exception, non-HCC exception, and non-exception candidates to determine whether MMaT/250 advantages (or disadvantages) exception candidates. METHODS Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 23 686 adult, first-time, active, deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) candidates between February 4, 2020, and February 3, 2022. We compared DDLT rates using Cox regression, and waitlist mortality/dropout using competing risks regression in non-exception versus HCC versus non-HCC candidates. RESULTS Within 24 mo of study entry, 58.4% of non-exception candidates received DDLT, compared with 57.8% for HCC candidates and 70.5% for non-HCC candidates. After adjustment, HCC candidates had 27% lower DDLT rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.68 0.73 0.77 ) compared with non-exception candidates. However, waitlist mortality for HCC was comparable to non-exception candidates (adjusted subhazard ratio [asHR] = 0.93 1.03 1.15 ). Non-HCC candidates with pulmonary complications of cirrhosis or cholangiocarcinoma had substantially higher risk of waitlist mortality compared with non-exception candidates (asHR = 1.27 1.70 2.29 for pulmonary complications of cirrhosis, 1.35 2.04 3.07 for cholangiocarcinoma). The same was not true of non-HCC candidates with exceptions for other reasons (asHR = 0.54 0.88 1.44 ). CONCLUSIONS Under MMaT/250, HCC, and non-exception candidates have comparable risks of dying before receiving liver transplant, despite lower transplant rates for HCC. However, non-HCC candidates with pulmonary complications of cirrhosis or cholangiocarcinoma have substantially higher risk of dying before receiving liver transplant; these candidates may merit increased allocation priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanveen Ishaque
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - James Beckett
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sommer Gentry
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Sunil Karhadkar
- Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bonnie E Lonze
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Karim J Halazun
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Dorry Segev
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Noble J, Cabezas L, Truffot A, Dumolard L, Jouve T, Malvezzi P, Rostaing L, Dard C, Saas P, Cravedi P, Macek-Jilkova Z. Glycolysis Changes in Alloreactive Memory B Cells in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergonig Desensitization Therapy. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13029. [PMID: 39081904 PMCID: PMC11287219 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Despite the growing use of desensitization strategies, hyperimmune patients remain at high risk of antibody-mediated rejection suggesting that, even when donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are effectively depleted, anti-donor specific B cells persist. We included 10 highly sensitized recipients that underwent desensitization with plasmapheresis and B cell depletion prior to kidney transplantation. We quantified changes in DSA (luminex), total B-cell subsets (flow cytometry), anti-donor HLA B cells (fluorospot), and single-cell metabolism in serially collected samples before desensitization, at the time of transplant, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Desensitization was associated with a decrease in DSA and total memory B cell and naive B cell percentage, while plasma cells and memory anti-donor HLA circulating B cells persisted up to 12 months after transplant. At 12-month post-transplantation, memory B cells increased their glycolytic capacity, while proliferative KI67+ plasma cells modified their metabolism by increasing fatty acid and amino acid oxidation capacity and decreasing their glucose dependence. Despite effective DSA depletion, anti-donor B cells persist in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the reliance of these cells on glycolysis, glycolysis-targeting therapies might represent a valuable treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lara Cabezas
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Aurelie Truffot
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- Virology Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Lucile Dumolard
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation, Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Dard
- EFS, Recherche et Développement, Grenoble, France
| | - Philippe Saas
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- EFS, Recherche et Développement, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Zuzana Macek-Jilkova
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santos AH, Mehta R, Alquadan K, Ibrahim H, Leghrouz MA, Belal A, Wen X. Age-modified risk factors for mortality of non-elderly adult kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective database analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s11255-024-04132-3. [PMID: 38922533 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04132-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the role of the recipient's age strata in modifying the associations between risk factors and mortality in non-elderly adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients (KTR). METHODS We stratified 108,695 adult KTRs between 2000 and 2016 with conditional 1-year survival after KT into cohorts based on age at transplant: 18-49 years and 50-64 years. We excluded KTRs aged < 18 years or > / = 65 years. KTRs were observed for 5 years during the 2nd through 6th years post-KT for the outcome, all-cause mortality. RESULTS Increasing recipient age strata (18-49-year-old and 50-64-year-old) correlated with decreasing 6-year post-KT survival rates conditional on 1-year survival (79% and 57%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Middle adult age stratum was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality than young adult age stratum in KTRs of Hispanic/Latino and other races [HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04-1.45 and HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.16-1.97, respectively] and with a primary native renal diagnosis of hypertension or glomerulonephritis [HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.12-1.55 and HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10-151, respectively]. When compared with the young adult age stratum, the middle adult age stratum had a mitigating effect on the higher risk of mortality associated with sirolimus-mycophenolate or sirolimus-tacrolimus than the standard calcineurin inhibitor-mycophenolate regimen [HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57-0.99 and HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57-0.89, respectively]. CONCLUSION Among adult non-elderly KTRs, the age strata, 18-49 years, and 50-64 years, have varying modifying effects on the strength and direction of associations between some specific risk factors and all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso H Santos
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| | - Rohan Mehta
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Kawther Alquadan
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Hisham Ibrahim
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Muhannad A Leghrouz
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Amer Belal
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Medical Science Bldg., Room NG-4, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Xuerong Wen
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cutrone AM, Rega SA, Feurer ID, Karp SJ. Effects of the March 2021 Allocation Policy Change on Key Deceased-donor Kidney Transplant Metrics. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00779. [PMID: 38831485 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A major change to deceased-donor kidney allocation in the United States, Kidney Allocation System 250 (KAS250), was implemented on March 15, 2021. Evaluating the consequences of this policy on critical system performance metrics is critical to determining its success. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of critical performance measures of the kidney transplant system by reviewing all organs procured during a 4-y period in the United States. To mitigate against possible effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records were stratified into 2 pre- and 2 post-KAS250 eras: (1) 2019; (2) January 1, 2020-March14, 2021; (3) March 15, 2021-December 31, 2021; and (4) 2022. Between-era differences in rates of key metrics were analyzed using chi-square tests with pairwise z-tests. Multivariable logistic regression and analysis of variations methods were used to evaluate the effects of the policy on rural and urban centers. RESULTS Over the period examined, among kidneys recovered for transplant, nonuse increased from 19.7% to 26.4% (all between-era P < 0.05) and among all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata. Cold ischemia times increased (P < 0.001); however, the distance between donor and recipient hospitals decreased (P < 0.05). Kidneys from small-metropolitan or nonmetropolitan hospitals were more likely to not be used over all times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of KAS250 was associated with increased nonuse rates across all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata, increased cold ischemic times, and shorter distance traveled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa M Cutrone
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Scott A Rega
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Seth J Karp
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim D, Choi JO, Cho YH, Sung K, Oh J, Cho HJ, Jung SH, Lee HY, Park JJ, Choi DJ, Kang SM, Kim MS, Kim JJ. Impacts of Pre-transplant Panel-Reactive Antibody on Post-transplantation Outcomes: A Study of Nationwide Heart Transplant Registry Data. Korean Circ J 2024; 54:325-335. [PMID: 38767440 PMCID: PMC11169906 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The number of sensitized heart failure patients on waiting lists for heart transplantation (HTx) is increasing. Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY), a nationwide multicenter database, we investigated the prevalence and clinical impact of calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) in patients undergoing HTx. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 813 patients who underwent HTx between 2014 and 2021. Patients were grouped according to peak PRA level as group A: patients with cPRA ≤10% (n= 492); group B: patients with cPRA >10%, <50% (n=160); group C patients with cPRA ≥50% (n=161). Post-HTx outcomes were freedom from antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cellular rejection, coronary allograft vasculopathy, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 44 (19-72) months. Female sex, re-transplantation, and pre-HTx renal replacement therapy were independently associated with an increased risk of sensitization (cPRA ≥50%). Group C patients were more likely to have longer hospital stays and to use anti-thymocyte globulin as an induction agent compared to groups A and B. Significantly more patients in group C had positive flow cytometric crossmatch and had a higher incidence of preformed donor-specific antibody (DSA) compared to groups A and B. During follow-up, group C had a significantly higher rate of AMR, but the overall survival rate was comparable to that of groups A and B. In a subgroup analysis of group C, post-transplant survival was comparable despite higher preformed DSA in a desensitized group compared to the non-desensitized group. CONCLUSIONS Patients with cPRA ≥50% had significantly higher incidence of preformed DSA and lower freedom from AMR, but post-HTx survival rates were similar to those with cPRA <50%. Our findings suggest that sensitized patients can attain comparable post-transplant survival to non-sensitized patients when treated with optimal desensitization treatment and therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Oh Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Yang Hyun Cho
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kiick Sung
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaewon Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jai Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Ho Jung
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hae-Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Joo Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong-Ju Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Joong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García-Jiménez S, Paz-Artal E, Trujillo H, Polanco N, Castro MJ, Del Rey MJ, Alfocea Á, Morales E, González E, Andrés A, Mancebo E. A personalised delisting strategy enables successful kidney transplantation in highly sensitised patients with preformed donor-specific anti HLA antibodies. HLA 2024; 103:e15572. [PMID: 38923242 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
This study investigates kidney transplant outcomes in highly sensitised patients after implementing a delisting strategy aimed at enabling transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antibodies (preDSA), with the goal of reducing acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR) risk. Fifty-three sensitised recipients underwent kidney transplant after delisting prohibited HLA antigens, focusing initially in low MFI antibodies (<5000), except for anti-HLA-DQ. If insufficient, higher MFI antibodies were permitted, especially for those without an immunogenic eplet pattern assigned. Delisting of Complement-fixing antibodies (C1q+) was consistently avoided. Comparison cohorts included 53 sensitised recipients without DSA (SwoDSA) and 53 non-sensitised (NS). The average waiting time prior to delisting was 4.4 ± 1.8 years, with a reduction in cPRA from 99.7 ± 0.5 to 98.1 ± 0.7, followed by transplantation within 7.2 ± 8.0 months (analysed in 34 patients). Rejection rates were similar among preDSA, SwoDSA, and NS groups (16%, 8%, and 11%, respectively; p = 0.46). However, aAMR was higher in the preDSA group (12%, 4%, and 2%, respectively; p = 0.073), only presented in recipients with DSA of MFI >5000. The highest MFI DSA were against HLA-DP (Median: 10796 MFI), with 50% of preDSA aAMR cases due to anti-DP antibodies (n = 3). Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years in preDSA group were 94%, and 67%, comparable to SwoDSA (94%, and 70%; p = 0.69), being significantly higher in the NS group (p = 0.002). The five-year recipient survival rate was 89%, comparable to SwoDSA and NS groups (p = 0.79). A delisting strategy enables safe kidney transplant in highly sensitised patients with preDSA, with a slight increase in aAMR and comparable graft and patient survivals to non-DSA cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra García-Jiménez
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz-Artal
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hernando Trujillo
- Nephrology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Polanco
- Nephrology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - María J Castro
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel J Del Rey
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Alfocea
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Morales
- School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Nephrology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Amado Andrés
- School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Nephrology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Immunology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute Hospital 12 Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schold JD, Tambur AR, Mohan S, Kaplan B. Calibration of Priority Points for Sensitization Status of Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:767-777. [PMID: 38509037 PMCID: PMC11168827 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Key Points There are multiple factors associated with high sensitization levels among kidney transplant candidates, which differ by candidate sex. Since the initiation of the kidney allocation system, candidates with higher sensitization have higher rates of deceased donor transplantation. Priority points assigned to candidates associated with sensitization have led to inequities in access to deceased donor transplantation. Background A primary change to the national organ allocation system in 2014 for deceased donor kidney offers was to weight candidate priority on the basis of sensitization (i.e ., calculated panel reactive antibody percentage [cPRA%]) using a sliding scale. Increased priority for sensitized patients could improve equity in access to transplantation for disadvantaged candidates. We sought to evaluate the effect of these weights using a contemporary cohort of adult US kidney transplant candidates. Methods We used the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate factors associated with sensitization using multivariable logistic models and rates of deceased donor transplantation using cumulative incidence models accounting for competing risks and multivariable Cox models. Results We examined 270,912 adult candidates placed on the waiting list between January 2016 and September 2023. Six-year cumulative incidence of deceased donor transplantation for candidates with cPRA%=80–85 and 90–95 was 48% and 53%, respectively, as compared with 37% for candidates with cPRA%=0–20. In multivariable models, candidates with high cPRA% had the highest adjusted hazards for deceased donor transplantation. There was significant effect modification such that the association of high cPRA% with adjusted rates of deceased donor transplantation varied by region of the country, sex, race and ethnicity, prior dialysis time, and blood type. Conclusions The results indicate that the weighting algorithm for highly sensitized candidates may overinflate the need for prioritization and lead to higher rates of transplantation. Findings suggest recalibration of priority weights for allocation is needed to facilitate overall equity in access to transplantation for prospective kidney transplant candidates. However, priority points should also account for subgroups of candidates who are disadvantaged for access to donor offers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jarmi T, Luo Y, Attieh RM, Qie Y, Gadd ME, Hundal T, Mao S, Murthy HS, Taner BC, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Qin H. CAR T-cell therapy-paving the way for sensitized kidney transplant patients. Kidney Int 2024; 105:1124-1129. [PMID: 38573274 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tambi Jarmi
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
| | - Yan Luo
- Regenerative Immunotherapy and CAR-T Translational Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Rose Mary Attieh
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Yaqing Qie
- Regenerative Immunotherapy and CAR-T Translational Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Martha E Gadd
- Regenerative Immunotherapy and CAR-T Translational Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Tanya Hundal
- Regenerative Immunotherapy and CAR-T Translational Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Shennen Mao
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Hemant S Murthy
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Burcin C Taner
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Hong Qin
- Regenerative Immunotherapy and CAR-T Translational Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Comins-Boo A, Irure-Ventura J, Valentin MO, Belmar-Vega L, López Del Moral Cuesta C, Valero San Cecilio R, Rodrigo Calabia E, Renuncio-García M, Castro Hernández C, Mikhalkovich D, Mota Pérez N, Ruiz San Millán JC, López-Hoyos M, San Segundo D. Low-risk delisting strategy in highly sensitized patients without donor offers included in exchange donation programs. One single-center experience. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110806. [PMID: 38664156 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Comins-Boo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Maria O Valentin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Lara Belmar-Vega
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Covadonga López Del Moral Cuesta
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo Calabia
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Mónica Renuncio-García
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Carolina Castro Hernández
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Dzmitry Mikhalkovich
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Nerea Mota Pérez
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz San Millán
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Molecular Biology Department, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - David San Segundo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:104-120. [PMID: 38088373 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%. RECENT FINDINGS Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization. SUMMARY Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lan JH. Assessment of Novel Therapeutics to Improve Access to Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in a Shifting Clinical Landscape. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:259-260. [PMID: 38303118 PMCID: PMC10962892 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James H Lan
- British Columbia Provincial Immunology Laboratory, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valentin MO, Crespo M, Fernandez C, Muro M, Vega R, Palou E, Ruiz JC, Diekman F, Padilla M, Mancebo E, Perez I, Andres A, Ontañon J, Dominguez-Gil B. Improving the Access of Highly Sensitized Patients to Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors: The Spanish PATHI Program With Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch. Transplantation 2024; 108:787-801. [PMID: 37867239 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2015, the Spanish National Transplant Organization developed a prioritization system (Program for Access to Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients [PATHI]) to increase transplant options for patients with calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRAs) ≥98%, based on virtual crossmatch. We describe the experience with the implementation of PATHI and assess its efficacy. METHODS PATHI registry was used to collect characteristics of donors and patients between June 15, 2015, and March 1, 2018. One-year graft and patient survival and acute rejection were also measured. A Cox model was used to identify factors related to patient death and graft loss and logistical regression for those associated with rejection. RESULTS One thousand eighty-nine patients were included, and 272 (25%) were transplanted. Transplant rate by cPRA was 54.9%, 40.5%, and 12.8% in patients with cPRA98%, cPRA99%, and cPRA100%, respectively. One-year patient survival was 92.5%. Recipient age ≥60, time under dialysis >7 y, and delayed graft function were mortality risk factors. One-year graft survival was 88.7%. The factor related to graft loss was delayed graft function. The rejection rate was 22%. Factors related to rejection were sex, older recipients, and posttransplant donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS A prioritization approach increases transplant options for highly sensitized patients with appropriate short-term postransplant outcomes. Along with other programs, PATHI may inspire other countries to adopt strategies to meet transplant needs of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria O Valentin
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital De Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Constantino Fernandez
- Nephrology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Manuel Muro
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rocio Vega
- Transplant Coordination Department, Organización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekman
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Padilla
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Immunology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Perez
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amado Andres
- Nephrology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Ontañon
- Immunology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Beatriz Dominguez-Gil
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee JH, Koo TY, Lee JE, Oh KH, Kim BS, Yang J. Impact of sensitization and ABO blood types on the opportunity of deceased-donor kidney transplantation with prolonged waiting time. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2635. [PMID: 38302674 PMCID: PMC10834527 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The waiting time to deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) is long in Asian countries. We investigated the impact of sensitization and ABO blood type (ABO) on DDKT opportunity using two Korean cohorts: a hospital cohort from two centers and a national database. The impact of panel reactive antibody (PRA) based on the maximal PRA% and ABO on DDKT accessibility was analyzed using a competing risks regression model. In the hospital cohort (n = 4722), 88.2%, 8.7%, and 3.1% of patients belonged to < 80%, 80-99%, and ≥ 99% PRA groups, respectively, and 61.1%, 11.6%, and 27.3% belonged to A or B, AB, and O blood types, respectively. When PRA and ABO were combined, PRA < 80%/A or B and 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/AB had fewer DDKT opportunities (median, 12 years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.71) compared with PRA < 80%/AB (median, 11 years). Also, PRA < 80%/O, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/A or B, and PRA ≥ 99%/AB had a much lower DDKT opportunity (median, 13 years; sHR, 0.49). Furthermore, 80 ≤ PRA < 99%/O and PRA ≥ 99%/non-AB had the lowest DDKT opportunity (sHR, 0.28). We found similar results in the national cohort (n = 18,974). In conclusion, an integrated priority system for PRA and ABO is needed to reduce the inequity in DDKT opportunities, particularly in areas with prolonged waiting times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hyeog Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Tai Yeon Koo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Eun Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook Hwan Oh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Weerd AE, Roelen DL, van de Wetering J, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Reinders MEJ. Imlifidase Desensitization in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Finding the Sweet Spot. Transplantation 2024; 108:335-345. [PMID: 37340532 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase, derived from a Streptococcus pyogenes enzyme, cleaves the entire immunoglobulin G pool within hours after administration in fully cleaved antigen-binding and crystallizable fragments. These cleaved fragments can no longer exert their antibody-dependent cytotoxic functions, thereby creating a window to permit HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation. Imlifidase is labeled, in Europe only, for deceased donor kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients, whose chances for an HLA-compatible transplant are negligible. This review discusses outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies on imlifidase and describes the phase III desensitization trials that are currently enrolling patients. A comparison is made with other desensitization methods. The review discusses the immunological work-up of imlifidase candidates and especially the "delisting strategy" of antigens that shift from unacceptable to acceptable with imlifidase desensitization. Other considerations for clinical implementation, such as adaptation of induction protocols, are also discussed. Imlifidase cleaves most of the currently used induction agents except for horse antithymocyte globulin, and rebound of donor-specific antibodies should be managed. Another consideration is the timing and interpretation of (virtual) crossmatches when bringing this novel desensitization agent into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E de Weerd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yeung MY, Murakami N, Kafetzi ML, Simmons DP, Wood I, Macaskill P, Towle M, DellaGatta J, Stevens J, Comeau E, Baronas J, Mohsin N, Chen M, Lee JH, Lane WJ, Milford EL, Guleria I. Impact of allele-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen class I antibodies on organ allocation. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1388-1400. [PMID: 37257653 PMCID: PMC10756661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Technological advances in the field of histocompatibility have allowed us to define anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificity at the allelic level. However, how allele-specific antibodies affect organ allocation is poorly studied. We examined allelic specificities of class I HLA antibodies in 6726 consecutive serum samples from 2953 transplant candidates and evaluated their impact on the corresponding crossmatch and organ allocation. Out of 17 class I HLA antigens represented by >1 allele in the LABScreen single antigen bead assay, 12 had potential allele-specific reactivity. Taking advantage of our unbiased cohort of deceased donor-candidate testing (123,135 complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches between 2014 and 2017), we estimated that the presence of allele-specific antibody detected using a single antigen bead assay (median fluorescence intensity, >3000) against only the rare allele was a poor predictor of a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, with a positive predictive value of 0% to 7%, compared with 52.5% in allele-concordant class I HLA antibodies against A or B locus antigens. Further, we confirmed allele-specific reactivity using flow crossmatch in 3 scenarios: A11:01/A11:02, A68:01/A68:02, and B44:02/B44:03. Our results suggest that allele-specific antibodies may unnecessarily exclude transplant candidates (up to 10%) from organ offers by overcalling unacceptable antigens; incorporation of selective reactivity pattern in allocation may promote precision matching and more equitable allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Y Yeung
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maria L Kafetzi
- Biochemistry and Endocrinology Laboratory, Children's Hospital P&A Kyriakou, Athens, Greece
| | - Daimon P Simmons
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Isabelle Wood
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Macaskill
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Towle
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jamie DellaGatta
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Stevens
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward Comeau
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jane Baronas
- Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nabil Mohsin
- College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Mike Chen
- Division of Thermo Fisher Scientific, One Lambda Inc, West Hills, California, USA
| | - Jar-How Lee
- Division of Thermo Fisher Scientific, One Lambda Inc, West Hills, California, USA
| | - William J Lane
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edgar L Milford
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Indira Guleria
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Clinical Laboratory Division, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bureau C, Rafat C, Taupin JL, Malard S, Mesnard L, François H, Petit-Hoang C, Ouali N, Hertig A, Jamme M, Buob D, Rondeau E, Galichon P, Luque Y. Immunoadsorption-Based HLA Desensitization in Patients Awaiting Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: An Interventional, Non-Randomised, Single Cohort Study. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11212. [PMID: 37680645 PMCID: PMC10481532 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Whether immunoadsorption (IADS) as part of desensitization protocols could facilitate deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) in highly sensitized (HS) patients remains to be proven. We retrospectively analyzed our IADS based desensitization protocol for deceased donor KTs between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen HS patients (age 52 years [40-56]) were included. Waiting time before IADS was 6 years [5-10] and the interval between IADS initiation and KT was 5 months [1-12] for the 14 transplanted patients. Nine patients had prior KT. Calculated panel reactive antibody decreased significantly during the protocol (99.3% [92.5-99.9] vs. 79.4% [56.7-81.9]; p = 0.004). Death-censored graft survival was 85.7% at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. One-year median plasma creatinine level was 135 µmol/L [111-202]. Six developed active antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) at 1 year, with a median delay of 13 days [11-26]. Eight patients developed severe infections, including two fatal outcomes. Finally, compared to 93% of patients who received desensitization receiving a KT, only 43% of a control with similar characteristics underwent transplantation. However, no difference was found in overall probability of being alive with a functioning graft at the end of follow-up. The results indicate that our IADS-based desensitization strategy was not effective due to a high rate of ABMR and severe infectious complications which pose a challenge to its universalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Côme Bureau
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Cédric Rafat
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Jean Luc Taupin
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire Régional d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Malard
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire Régional d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Mesnard
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Hélène François
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Camille Petit-Hoang
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Nacera Ouali
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hertig
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Jamme
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - David Buob
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d’Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Eric Rondeau
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Galichon
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Yosu Luque
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Santos E, Spensley K, Gunby N, Clarke C, Anand A, Roufosse C, Willicombe M. Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11056. [PMID: 37334011 PMCID: PMC10272412 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Santos
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Spensley
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Gunby
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Candice Clarke
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arthi Anand
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Histopathology, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manook M, Olaso D, Anwar IJ, Yoon J, Delaura I, Bae Y, Moris D, Shaw B, Song M, Farris AB, Jackson A, Kwun J, Knechtle S. Desensitization and belatacept-based maintenance therapy in pregnancy-sensitized monkeys receiving a kidney transplant. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadg1448. [PMID: 37205758 PMCID: PMC10198638 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Among sensitized patients awaiting a transplant, females are disproportionately represented, partly because of pregnancy-induced sensitization. Using female NHPs sensitized by pregnancy alone, we examined the efficacy of costimulation blockade and proteasome inhibition for desensitization. Three animals received no desensitization (control), and seven animals received weekly carfilzomib (27 mg/m2) and belatacept (20 mg/kg) before kidney transplantation. All animals received renal allografts from crossmatch-positive/maximally MHC-mismatched donors. Controls and three desensitized animals received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Four desensitized animals received additional belatacept with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Multiparous females had less circulating donor-specific antibody when compared to skin-sensitized males before transplantation. While females receiving desensitization showed only a marginal survival benefit over control females (MST = 11 days versus 63 days), additional belatacept to posttransplant maintenance significantly prolonged graft survival (MST > 164 days) and suppressed posttransplant DSA and circulating follicular helper T-like cells. This combination of therapies demonstrates great potential to reduce antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Danae Olaso
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Imran J. Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Isabel Delaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Brian Shaw
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Mingqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Cocco P, Gaitonde S, Spaggiari M, Fratti A, Alvarez JA, Petrochenkov E, Valdenepas BT, Gupta P, Benedetti E, Tzvetanov I. Desensitizing With Temporary Donor Splenic Transplant: Hope for the Sensitized Patients on Pancreas and Kidney -Pancreas Transplant Waitlist. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:295-302. [PMID: 36801174 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensitized patients on a waitlist with donor specific antibodies (DSA) or positive flow cytometry cross match (FXM) to deceased donor organ have few pretransplant desensitization options due to increasing graft cold ischemia time. Herein, sensitized simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients received temporary splenic transplant from the same donor under the hypothesis that spleen would function as a DSA graveyard and provide a safe immunologic window for transplant. METHODS We analyzed presplenic and postsplenic transplant FXM and DSA results of 8 sensitized patients who underwent simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with temporary deceased donor spleen between November 2020 and January 2022. RESULTS Pre-splenic transplant, 4 sensitized patients were both T-cell and B-cell FXM positive; one was only B-cell FXM positive and 3 were DSA positive/FXM negative. Post-splenic transplant, all were FXM negative. Pre-splenic transplant class I and class II DSA were detected in 3 patients, only class I DSA in 4 patients, and only class II DSA in 1 patient. Postsplenic transplant, class I DSA was eliminated in all patients. Class II DSA persisted in 3 patients; all showed a marked decrease in DSA mean fluorescence index. Class II DSA was eliminated in one patient. CONCLUSION Donor spleen functions as a DSA graveyard and provides an immunologically safe window for kidney-pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sujata Gaitonde
- Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alberto Fratti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Bentio T Valdenepas
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Priyanka Gupta
- Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sethi S, Jordan SC. Novel therapies for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:29-35. [PMID: 36579683 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We aim to discuss current literature on novel therapies for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplantation with a focus on chronic AMR. RECENT FINDINGS IL-6/IL-6 receptor blockers appear promising in the treatment of chronic AMR. Blocking this pathway was shown to reduce human leucocyte antigen-antibodies, improve histologic inflammation and increase T-regulatory cells. Based on experience in desensitization, IgG degrading endopeptidase, imlifidase, could be effective in AMR. There have been case reports describing the successful use of plasma cell/natural killer-cell-directed anti-CD38 antibody in the treatment of AMR. Off-target effects have been noted and strategies to mitigate these will be needed when using these agents. Complement inhibitors could be an effective add-on strategy to antibody-depleting therapies but their role in AMR needs to be better defined. Combining proteasome inhibitors and costimulation blockers has shown encouraging results in the prevention of AMR in animal models and is now being investigated in humans. Other novel strategies such as Fc neonatal receptor blockers which inhibit the recycling of pathogenic IgG and bispecific antibodies against B-cell maturation antigen/CD3+ T cells warrant further investigation. SUMMARY There are now a number of emerging therapies with varied targets and mechanism(s) of action that hold promise in the management of AMR and improving allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supreet Sethi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stewart D, Mupfudze T, Klassen D. Does anybody really know what (the kidney median waiting) time is? Am J Transplant 2023; 23:223-231. [PMID: 36695688 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The median waiting time (MWT) to deceased donor kidney transplant is of interest to patients, clinicians, and the media but remains elusive due to both methodological and philosophical challenges. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from January 2003 to March 2022 to estimate MWTs using various methods and timescales, applied overall, by era, and by candidate demographics. After rising for a decade, the overall MWT fell to 5.19 years between 2015 and 2018 and declined again to 4.05 years (April 2021 to March 2022), based on the Kaplan-Meier method applied to period-prevalent cohorts. MWTs differed markedly by blood type, donor service area, and pediatric vs adult status, but to a lesser degree by race/ethnicity. Choice of methodology affected the magnitude of these differences. Instead of waiting years for an answer, reliable kidney MWT estimates can be obtained shortly after a policy is implemented using the period-prevalent Kaplan-Meier approach, a theoretical but useful construct for which we found no evidence of bias compared with using incident cohorts. We recommend this method be used complementary to the competing risks approach, under which MWT is often inestimable, to fill the present information void concerning the seemingly simple question of how long it takes to get a kidney transplant in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Klassen
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, United Network for Organ Sharing
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wu Y, Lv K, Hao X, Lv C, Lai W, Xia X, Pang A, Yuan Q, Song T. Waiting-List and early posttransplant prognosis among ethnoracial groups: Data from the organ procurement and transplantation network. Front Surg 2023; 10:1045363. [PMID: 36793312 PMCID: PMC9923172 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1045363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Racial/ethnic disparity in waiting-list mortality among candidates listed for kidney transplantation (KT) in the United States remains unclear. We aimed to assess racial/ethnic disparity in waiting-list prognosis among patients listed for KT in the United States in the current era. Methods We compared waiting-list and early posttransplant in-hospital mortality or primary nonfunction (PNF) among adult (age ≥18 years) white, black, Hispanic, and Asian patients listed for only KT in the United States between July 1, 2004 and March 31, 2020. Results Of the 516,451 participants, 45.6%, 29.8%, 17.5%, and 7.1% were white, black, Hispanic, and Asian, respectively. Mortality on the 3-year waiting list (including patients who were removed for deterioration) was 23.2%, 16.6%, 16.2%, and 13.8% in white, black, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of posttransplant in-hospital death or PNF after KT was 3.3%, 2.5%, 2.4%, and 2.2% in black, white, Hispanic, and Asian patients,respectively. White candidates had the highest mortality risk on the waiting list or of becoming too sick for a transplant, while black (adjusted hazard ratio, [95% confidence interval, CI], 0.67 [0.66-0.68]), Hispanic (0.59 [0.58-0.60]), and Asian (0.54 [0.52-0.55]) candidates had a lower risk. Black KT recipients (odds ratio, [95% CI] 1.29 [1.21-1.38]) had a higher risk of PNF or death before discharge than white patients. After controlling confounders, black recipients (0.99 [0.92-1.07]) had a similar higher risk of posttransplant in-hospital mortality or PNF as white patients than Hispanic and Asian counterparts. Conclusions Despite having a better socioeconomic status and being allocated better kidneys, white patients had the worst prognosis during the waiting periods. Black recipients and white recipients have higher posttransplant in-hospital mortality or PNF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Wu
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Kaikai Lv
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowei Hao
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Chao Lv
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Wenhui Lai
- Graduate School, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China
| | - Xinze Xia
- Graduate School, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Aibo Pang
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
| | - Qing Yuan
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China,Correspondence: Tao Song Qing Yuan
| | - Tao Song
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China,Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China,Correspondence: Tao Song Qing Yuan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Puttarajappa CM, Hariharan S, Zhang X, Tevar A, Mehta R, Gunabushanam V, Sood P, Hoffman W, Mohan S. Early Effect of the Circular Model of Kidney Allocation in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:26-39. [PMID: 36302599 PMCID: PMC10101588 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2022040471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In March 2021, the United States implemented a new kidney allocation system (KAS250) for deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), which eliminated the donation service area-based allocation and replaced it with a system on the basis of distance from donor hospital to transplant center within/outside a radius of 250 nautical miles. The effect of this policy on kidney discards and logistics is unknown. METHODS We examined discards, donor-recipient characteristics, cold ischemia time (CIT), and delayed graft function (DGF) during the first 9 months of KAS250 compared with a pre-KAS250 cohort from the preceding 2 years. Changes in discards and CIT after the onset of COVID-19 and the implementation of KAS250 were evaluated using an interrupted time-series model. Changes in allocation practices (biopsy, machine perfusion, and virtual cross-match) were also evaluated. RESULTS Post-KAS250 saw a two-fold increase in kidneys imported from nonlocal organ procurement organizations (OPO) and a higher proportion of recipients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 81%-98% (12% versus 8%; P <0.001) and those with >5 years of pretransplant dialysis (35% versus 33%; P <0.001). CIT increased (mean 2 hours), including among local OPO kidneys. DGF was similar on adjusted analysis. Discards after KAS250 did not immediately change, but we observed a statistically significant increase over time that was independent of donor quality. Machine perfusion use decreased, whereas reliance on virtual cross-match increased, which was associated with shorter CIT. CONCLUSIONS Early trends after KAS250 show an increase in transplant access to patients with cPRA>80% and those with longer dialysis duration, but this was accompanied by an increase in CIT and a suggestion of worsening kidney discards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan M. Puttarajappa
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xingyu Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amit Tevar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Rajil Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vikraman Gunabushanam
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - William Hoffman
- Transplant Nephrology, UPMC Pinnacle, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Medicine, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gragert L, Kadatz M, Alcorn J, Stewart D, Chang D, Gill J, Liwski R, Gebel HM, Gill J, Lan JH. ABO-adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA): A unified metric for immunologic compatibility in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3093-3100. [PMID: 35975734 PMCID: PMC10087664 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Implementation of the kidney allocation system in 2014 greatly reduced access disparity due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. To address persistent disparity related to candidate ABO blood groups, herein we propose a novel metric termed "ABO-adjusted cPRA," which simultaneously considers the impact of candidate HLA and ABO sensitization on the same scale. An ethnic-weighted ABO-adjusted cPRA value was computed for 190 467 candidates on the kidney waitlist by combining candidate's conventional HLA cPRA with the remaining fraction of HLA-compatible donors that are ABO-incompatible. Consideration of ABO sensitization resulted in higher ABO-adjusted cPRA relative to conventional cPRA by HLA alone, except for AB candidates since they are not ABO-sensitized. Within cPRA Point Group = 99%, 43% of the candidates moved up to ABO-adjusted cPRA Point Group = 100%, though this proportion varied substantially by candidate blood group. Nearly all O and most B candidates would have elevated ABO-adjusted cPRA values above this policy threshold for allocation priority, but relatively few A candidates displayed this shift. Overall, ABO-adjusted cPRA more accurately measures the proportion of immune-compatible donors compared with conventional HLA cPRA, especially for highly sensitized candidates. Implementation of this novel metric could enable the development of allocation policies permitting more ABO-compatible transplants without compromising equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Matthew Kadatz
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James Alcorn
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Doris Chang
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Liwski
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - John Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - James H Lan
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Low Incidence of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection after HLA Desensitization in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12121993. [PMID: 36556358 PMCID: PMC9781496 DOI: 10.3390/life12121993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Desensitization allows the performance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible transplants. However, the incidence of acute rejection (AR) is high. This study aims to analyze the incidence of AR after transplantation with HLA-incompatible living donors in patients who underwent desensitization. Patients were immunosuppressed with tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid derivatives, and steroids after being desensitized with rituximab, plasma exchange, and/or immunoadsorption with specific cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins. A negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity or flow cytometry crossmatch and a donor-specific antibody titer < 1000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were used to determine desensitization efficacy. A total of 36 patients underwent desensitization, and 27 (75%) were transplanted. After a follow-up of 58 ± 58 months (Min−Max: 0.13−169.5), five episodes of AR occurred: two antibody-mediated and three T-cell-mediated. No differences were found in baseline calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRA), class I or II MFI, number of antibodies, or Relative Intensity Scale (RIS) between AR and non-AR patients. Patients with antibody-mediated AR had higher cPRA (NS), MFI class I (p = 0.07) and class II (p = 0.006), and RIS (p = 0.01). The two patients with antibody-mediated AR and one patient with T-cell-mediated AR lost their grafts. In conclusion, the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection after desensitization was 7.4%, which occurred early post-transplantation in patients with high MFI and was associated with early graft loss.
Collapse
|
27
|
Durlik M. New approach to desensitization in solid organ transplantation-imlifidase. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2022; 1:951360. [PMID: 38994389 PMCID: PMC11235339 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2022.951360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes is a recombinant cysteine protease of S. pyogenes produced in Escherichia coli that cleaves all four human subclasses of IgG with strict specificity. The proteolytic activity on IgG molecules prevents the occurrence of IgG-mediated antibody-dependent, cellular cytotoxicity and complement-mediated cytotoxicity, two processes that are critical for antibody rejection. The results from phase II studies demonstrated that desensitization with imlifidase represents a therapeutic strategy that can operationalize desensitization, allowing life-saving transplants from deceased donors (DD) and living donors (LD) to proceed in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates with low risk of hyperacute rejection. Its action onset is rapid, allowing kidney transplantation from a deceased donor. Disadvantages of imlifidase include a quick reappearance of DSAs, which poses a risk of antibody-mediated rejection, the quick development of anti-Ides antibodies, which rules out repeated use of imlifidase and its IgG-degrading potential, limiting the use of therapeutic antibodies. Imlifdase received conditional approval on 26 August 2020 in the EU for desensitization treatment of highly sensitized adult kidney transplant patients with positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Durlik
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cron DC, Husain SA, Adler JT. The New Distance-Based Kidney Allocation System: Implications for Patients, Transplant Centers, and Organ Procurement Organizations. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022; 9:302-307. [PMID: 36254174 PMCID: PMC9558035 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00384-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The goal of deceased donor kidney allocation policy is to provide objective prioritization for donated kidneys, and policy has undergone a series of revisions in the past decade in attempt to achieve equity and utility in access to kidney transplantation. Most recently, to address geographic disparities in access to kidney transplantation, the Kidney Allocation System changed to a distance-based allocation system—colloquially termed “KAS 250”—moving away from donor service areas as the geographic basis of allocation. We review the early impact of this policy change on access to transplant for patients, and on complexity of organ allocation and transplantation for transplant centers and organ procurement organizations. Recent Findings Broader sharing of kidneys has increased complexity of the allocation system, as transplant centers and OPOs now interact in larger networks. The increased competition resulting from this system, and the increased operational burden on centers and OPOs resulting from greater numbers of organ offers, may adversely affect organ utilization. Preliminary results suggest an increase in transplant rate overall but a trend toward higher kidney discard and increased cold ischemia time. Summary The KAS 250 allocation policy changed the geographic basis of deceased donor kidney distribution in a manner that is intended to reduce geographic disparities in access to kidney transplantation. Close monitoring of this policy’s impact on patients, transplant center behavior, and process measures is critical to the aim of maximizing access to transplant while achieving transplant equity.
Collapse
|
29
|
Rennie TJW, Battle RK, Abel AA, McConnell S, McLaren R, Phelan PJ, Geddes C, Padmanabhan N, Clancy MJ, Little AM, Turner DM. Comparison of kidney transplant outcomes in HLA compatible and incompatible transplantation: a national cohort study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:962-972. [PMID: 36028988 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports of HLA incompatible (HLAi) kidney transplant outcomes are inconclusive, especially in the context of lower level Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA). METHODS Multi-centre national cohort study of HLAi kidney transplant recipients matched in 1:2 ratio with HLA compatible (HLAc) kidney transplant recipients. HLAi defined as DSA identified by Luminex. Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and transplant-survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare recipient and transplant survival between groups. RESULTS We included 61 HLAi and 122 HLAc recipients; mean age 46 years; 60% female. MFIT0 : 3327 (IQR 1352 - 6458), 23 (38%) were Flow cytometry crossmatch positive (FC-XMPOS) . DSAPOS /FC-XMPOS transplantation carried an increased risk of AMR at 1 year (52%) compared to DSAPOS /FC-XMNEG (27%) and HLAc (0%). Unadjusted death censored graft loss at 3 years was 13% (HLAi) and 8% (HLAc). Three-year patient survival was 95% in HLAc, 84% in DSAPOS /FC-XMNEG and 69% in DSAPOS /FC-XMPOS recipients; 58% of HLAi deaths were infection-related. HLA incompatibility was associated with a decreased 3-year survival in our PS-matched cohort. CONCLUSION In kidney transplantation, DSA and positive FC-XM carries an increased risk of AMR. Despite inferior transplant and survival outcomes compared to HLAc transplantation, it remains a realistic option for highly sensitised patients facing prolonged waiting times and reduced survival on dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trijntje J W Rennie
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 8 North Platt Crescent, Ratho, United Kingdom
| | - Richard K Battle
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Angela A Abel
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sylvia McConnell
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul J Phelan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Geddes
- Department of Renal and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Padmanabhan
- Department of Renal Transplantation, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde - Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Marc J Clancy
- Department of Renal Transplantation, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde - Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ann-Margaret Little
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow.,Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David M Turner
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bockermann R, Järnum S, Runström A, Lorant T, Winstedt L, Palmqvist N, Kjellman C. Imlifidase-generated Single-cleaved IgG: Implications for Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1485-1496. [PMID: 34966107 PMCID: PMC9213077 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imlifidase is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-specific protease conditionally approved in the EU for desensitization in highly sensitized crossmatch positive kidney transplant patients. Imlifidase efficiently cleaves both heavy chains of IgG in a 2-step process. However, low levels of the intermediate cleavage product, single-cleaved IgG (scIgG), may persist in the circulation. The study objective was to investigate Fc-mediated effector functions of scIgG and its potential impact on common clinical immunologic assays used to assess transplant eligibility. METHODS Imlifidase-generated scIgG, obtained by in vitro cleavage of HLA-sensitized patient serum or selected antibodies, was investigated in different complement- and FcγR-dependent assays and models, including clinical tests used to evaluate HLA-specific antibodies. RESULTS ScIgG had significantly reduced Fc-mediated effector function compared with intact IgG, although some degree of activity in complement- and FcγR-dependent models was still detectable. A preparation of concentrated scIgG generated from a highly HLA-sensitized individual gave rise to a positive signal in the anti-HLA IgG LABScreen, which uses anti-Fc detection, but was entirely negative in the C1qScreen. The same high-concentration HLA-binding scIgG preparation also generated positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity responses against 80%-100% of donor T and B cells, although follow-up titrations demonstrated a much lower intrinsic activity than for intact anti-HLA IgG. CONCLUSIONS ScIgG has a significantly reduced capacity to mediate Fc-dependent effector functions. However, remaining HLA-reactive scIgG in plasma after imlifidase treatment can cause positive assay results equivalent to intact IgG in clinical assays. Therefore, complete IgG cleavage after imlifidase treatment is essential to allow correct decision-making in relation to transplant eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Transplantation Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Transplantation is a life-saving medical intervention that unfortunately is constrained by scarcity of available organs. An ideal system for allocating organs should seek to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It also must be fair and not disadvantage certain populations. However, policies aimed at reducing disparities also must be balanced with considerations of utility (graft outcomes), cost, efficiency, and any adverse effects on organ utilization. Here, we discuss the ethical challenges of creating a fair and equitable organ allocation system, focusing on the principles governing deceased donor kidney transplant waitlists around the world. The kidney organ allocation systems in the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong are used as illustrations.
Collapse
|
33
|
Bestard O, Thaunat O, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Claas F, Couzi L, Furian L, Heemann U, Mamode N, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, Naesens M. Alloimmune Risk Stratification for Kidney Transplant Rejection. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10138. [PMID: 35669972 PMCID: PMC9163827 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Different types of kidney transplantations are performed worldwide, including biologically diverse donor/recipient combinations, which entail distinct patient/graft outcomes. Thus, proper immunological and non-immunological risk stratification should be considered, especially for patients included in interventional randomized clinical trials. This paper was prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation, which submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) relating to clinical trial endpoints in kidney transplantation. After collaborative interactions, the EMA sent its final response in December 2020, highlighting the following: 1) transplantations performed between human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors and recipients carry significantly lower immunological risk than those from HLA-mismatched donors; 2) for the same allogeneic molecular HLA mismatch load, kidney grafts from living donors carry significantly lower immunological risk because they are better preserved and therefore less immunogenic than grafts from deceased donors; 3) single-antigen bead testing is the gold standard to establish the repertoire of serological sensitization and is used to define the presence of a recipient's circulating donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA); 4) molecular HLA mismatch analysis should help to further improve organ allocation compatibility and stratify immunological risk for primary alloimmune activation, but without consensus regarding which algorithm and cut-off to use it is difficult to integrate information into clinical practice/study design; 5) further clinical validation of other immune assays, such as those measuring anti-donor cellular memory (T/B cell ELISpot assays) and non-HLA-DSA, is needed; 6) routine clinical tests that reliably measure innate immune alloreactivity are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology, and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Georg A Böhmig
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frans Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Dialysis, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant, and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1179-1188. [PMID: 35685330 PMCID: PMC9171621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are the primary determinants of alloimmunity. A crossmatch test is a test that determines the immunologic risk of a recipient with a potential donor by ensuring that there are no transplant-relevant circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against donor antigens. Physical crossmatch (PXM) tests, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), require mixing of patient serum and donor cells, are labor intensive, and are logistically challenging. Virtual crossmatch (VXM) test assesses immunologic compatibility between recipient and potential donor by analyzing the results of 2 independently done physical laboratory tests—patient anti-HLA antibody and donor HLA typing. The goal of VXM is pretransplant risk stratification—though there is no consensus on whether such risk assessment involves predicting the PXM result or the posttransplant outcome. Although the concept of VXM is not new, the advent of solid-phase assays for detecting circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against individual HLA and DNA-based methods for typing donor HLA specificities at a higher resolution makes the routine use of VXM a reality. Accordingly, VXM may be applied at different scenarios—both for sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Implementation of VXM-based approach has resulted in statistically significant reduction in cold ischemia time without an increase in hyperacute rejection episodes. Though there are considerable challenges, VXM is expected to be used more often in the future, depending on the transplant center’s tolerance of immunologic risk.
Collapse
|
35
|
Stewart D. Moving Toward Continuous Organ Distribution. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00352-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
36
|
Sethi S, Ammerman N, Vo A, Jordan SC. Approach to Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates and a Positive Crossmatch. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:587-595. [PMID: 35367027 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation offers survival benefit compared with ongoing dialysis. There have been considerable advances in the last decade to allow for increased access to transplant for the HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. These include increased priority in the kidney allocation system, kidney paired donation, and novel desensitization strategies. A better understanding of the role of B cells, plasma cells, and complement and inflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of HLA antibody-mediated allograft injury has led to the use of novel therapeutics for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Here we discuss current approaches to kidney transplantation in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.
Collapse
|
37
|
Perosa M, Ferreira GF, Modelli LG, Medeiros MP, Neto SR, Moreira F, Zampieri FG, de Marco R, Bortoluzzo AB, Venezuela MK. Disparity in the access to kidney transplantation for sensitized patients in the state of Sao Paulo-Brazil. Transpl Immunol 2021; 68:101441. [PMID: 34358637 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Highly sensitized (HS) patients accumulate on deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) waitlists worldwide due to matching difficulty and inequity of allocation policies. Current situation of HS patients on KT waitlist in Brazil has not been published. All patients enrolled on the KT waitlist of the State of São Paulo from 2002 to 2017 were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into eight groups according to their degree of sensitization, PRA of 0%, >0-40%, >40-80%, >80-85%, >85-90%, >90-95%, >95-98% and > 98%. Cumulative incidence curves for transplantation or mortality/removal from waitlist were estimated by competing risk. Among 50,249 waitlisted candidates, 1247 prioritized, 2467 with age < 18 or > 75 years and 4152 submitted to living-donor KT were excluded from the analysis, remaining 42,383 patients. There were 29,664(70%) PRA 0%, 5611(13.2%) PRA > 0-40%, 3442(8.2%) PRA > 40-80%, 507(1.2%) PRA > 80-85%, 564(1.3%) PRA > 85-90%, 825(1.9%) PRA >90-95%, 859(2%) PRA > 95-98% and 911(2.2%) PRA > 98%. There was a progressive increase in the need of prioritization, waiting time for KT or on waitlist and time on dialysis as PRA increased (p < 0.001). Probability of DDKT clearly increased as PRA decreased so that PRA 0% candidates were much more likely to be transplanted compared to PRA > 98% patients(HR:13.02, p < 0.001). Waiting list mortality/removal was higher among PRA > 0-40%(HR1.05,p = 0.03), PRA > 90-95%(HR:1.10,p = 0.05), PRA > 95-98%(HR:1.26,p < 0.001) and PRA > 98%(HR:1.09,p = 0.05) patients compared to PRA zero candidates. HS patients in Sao Paulo-Brazil required greater prioritization due to lack of venous access, longer dialysis and waitlist times, lower probability of DDKT and higher rates of waitlist mortality/removal. We confirmed the disparity of access to KT among HS patients in Sao Paulo-Brazil, indicating the need of new strategies that optimize transplantation for this subcategory of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Perosa
- Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation Service of Leforte and Oswaldo Cruz Hospitals, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Gustavo F Ferreira
- Kidney Transplantation Service, Santa Casa Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Luis G Modelli
- Kidney Transplantation Service, UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Renato de Marco
- Immunogenetic Institute and Research Incentive Funding Association, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Maria K Venezuela
- Insper Institute of Education and Research, Statistics and Data Science, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Imlifidase Shows Promise for the Most Disadvantaged Sensitized Transplant Candidates. Transplantation 2021; 105:1660-1661. [PMID: 33093402 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
39
|
Jordan SC, Legendre C, Desai NM, Lorant T, Bengtsson M, Lonze BE, Vo AA, Runström A, Laxmyr L, Sjöholm K, Schiött Å, Sonesson E, Wood K, Winstedt L, Kjellman C, Montgomery RA. Imlifidase Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive, Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of an International Phase 2 Trial (Highdes). Transplantation 2021; 105:1808-1817. [PMID: 33093408 PMCID: PMC8294837 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highly HLA sensitized patients have limited access to life-saving kidney transplantation because of a paucity of immunologically suitable donors. Imlifidase is a cysteine protease that cleaves IgG leading to a rapid decrease in antibody level and inhibition of IgG-mediated injury. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of imlifidase in converting a positive crossmatch test to negative, allowing highly sensitized patients to be transplanted with a living or deceased donor kidney. METHODS This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at 5 transplant centers, evaluated the ability of imlifidase to create a negative crossmatch test within 24 h. Secondary endpoints included postimlifidase donor-specific antibody levels compared with predose levels, renal function, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. Safety endpoints included adverse events and immunogenicity profile. RESULTS Of the transplanted patients, 89.5% demonstrated conversion of baseline positive crossmatch to negative within 24 h after imlifidase treatment. Donor-specific antibodies most often rebounded 3-14 d postimlifidase dose, with substantial interpatient variability. Patient survival was 100% with graft survival of 88.9% at 6 mo. With this, 38.9% had early biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection with onset 2-19 d posttransplantation. Serum IgG levels began to normalize after ~3-7 d posttransplantation. Antidrug antibody levels were consistent with previous studies. Seven adverse events in 6 patients were classified as possibly or probably related to treatment and were mild-moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS Imlifidase was well tolerated, converted positive crossmatches to negative, and enabled patients with a median calculated panel-reactive antibody of 99.83% to undergo kidney transplantation resulting in good kidney function and graft survival at 6 mo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Hansa Biopharma AB, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Heidt S, Haasnoot GW, van der Linden-van Oevelen MJH, Claas FHJ. Highly Sensitized Patients Are Well Served by Receiving a Compatible Organ Offer Based on Acceptable Mismatches. Front Immunol 2021; 12:687254. [PMID: 34248971 PMCID: PMC8267476 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Highly sensitized kidney patients accrue on the transplant waiting list due to their broad immunization against non-self Human Leucocyte Antigens (HLA). Although challenging, the best option for highly sensitized patients is transplantation with a crossmatch negative donor without any additional therapeutic intervention. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch (AM) program was initiated more than 30 years ago with the intention to increase the chance for highly sensitized patients to be transplanted with such a compatible donor. The AM program allows for enhanced transplantation to this difficult to transplant patient group by allocating deceased donor kidneys on the basis of a match with the recipient’s own HLA antigens in combination with predefined acceptable antigens. Acceptable antigens are those HLA antigens towards which the patients has never formed antibodies, as determined by extensive laboratory testing. By using this extended HLA phenotype for allocation and giving priority whenever a compatible donor organ becomes available, organ offers are made for roughly 80% of patients in this program. Up till now, more than 1700 highly sensitized patients have been transplanted through the AM program. Recent studies have shown that the concept of acceptable mismatches being truly immunologically acceptable holds true for both rejection rates and long-term graft survival. Patients that were transplanted through the AM program had a similar rejection incidence and long-term graft survival rates identical to non-sensitized patients transplanted through regular allocation. However, a subset of patients included in the AM program does not receive an organ offer within a reasonable time frame. As these are often patients with a rare HLA phenotype in comparison to the Eurotransplant donor population, extension of the donor pool for these specific patients through further European collaboration would significantly increase their chances of being transplanted. For those patients that will not benefit from such strategy, desensitization is the ultimate solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan Heidt
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Geert W Haasnoot
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Frans H J Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sypek MP, Kausman JY, Watson N, Wyburn K, Holt SG, Hughes P, Clayton PA. The Introduction of cPRA and Its Impact on Access to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in Australia. Transplantation 2021; 105:1317-1325. [PMID: 34019363 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In March 2016, Australia's deceased donor kidney allocation program introduced calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) based on antibody exclusions using multiplex assays to define sensitization for waitlisted candidates. We aimed to assess the impact of this change and review access to transplantation for highly sensitized patients under the current allocation rules. METHODS Registry data were used to reconstruct changes in panel reactive antibody (PRA)/cPRA for all patients active on the waiting list between 2013 and 2018. A multilevel, mixed-effects negative binomial regression model was used to determine the association between sensitization and transplantation rate in the cPRA era. RESULTS Following the introduction of cPRA, there was an increase in the percentage of the waiting list classified as highly sensitized (PRA/cPRA ≥80%) from 7.2% to 27.8% and very highly sensitized (PRA/cPRA ≥99%) from 2.7% to 15.3%. Any degree of sensitization was associated with a decreased rate of transplantation with a marked reduction for those with cPRA 95%-98% (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.36 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.47], P < 0.001) and cPRA ≥99% (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.12], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The proportion of the waiting list classified as highly sensitized increased substantially following the introduction of cPRA, and despite current prioritization, very highly sensitized patients have markedly reduced access to deceased donor transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Sypek
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joshua Y Kausman
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Paediatrics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Narelle Watson
- Transplantation and Immunogenetics Services, Australian RedCross Lifeblood, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate Wyburn
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen G Holt
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Hughes
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip A Clayton
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Central and Northern Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Adler JT, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Greater complexity and monitoring of the new Kidney Allocation System: Implications and unintended consequences of concentric circle kidney allocation on network complexity. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2007-2013. [PMID: 33314637 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The deceased donor kidney allocation system in the United States has undergone several rounds of iterative changes, but these changes were not explicitly designed to address the geographic variation in access to transplantation. The new allocation system, expected to start in December 2020, changes the definition of "local allocation" from the Donation Service Area to 250 nautical mile circles originating from the donor hospital. While other solid organs have adopted a similar approach, the larger number of both kidney transplant centers and transplant candidates is likely to have different consequences. Here, we discuss the incredible increase in complexity in allocation, discuss some of the likely intended and unintended consequences, and propose metrics to monitor the new system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Syed A Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schinstock C, Tambur A, Stegall M. Current Approaches to Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:686271. [PMID: 34046044 PMCID: PMC8144637 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Major advancements in the development of HLA antibody detection techniques and our understanding of the outcomes of solid organ transplant in the context of HLA antibody have occurred since the relevance of sensitization was first recognized nearly 50 years ago. Additionally, kidney paired donation programs (KPD) have become widespread, deceased donor allocation policies have changed, and several new therapeutic options have become available with promise to reduce HLA antibody. In this overview we aim to provide thoughtful guidance about when desensitization in kidney transplantation should be considered taking into account the outcomes of HLA incompatible transplantation. Novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future study will also be discussed. While most of our understanding about desensitization comes from studying kidney transplant candidates and recipients, many of the concepts discussed can be easily applied to desensitization in all of solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Schinstock
- William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Anat Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Mark Stegall
- William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Puttarajappa CM, Schinstock CA, Wu CM, Leca N, Kumar V, Vasudev BS, Hariharan S. KDOQI US Commentary on the 2020 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77:833-856. [PMID: 33745779 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of patients for kidney transplant candidacy is a comprehensive process that involves a detailed assessment of medical and surgical issues, psychosocial factors, and patients' physical and cognitive abilities with an aim of balancing the benefits of transplantation and potential risks of surgery and long-term immunosuppression. There is considerable variability among transplant centers in their approach to evaluation and decision-making regarding transplant candidacy. The 2020 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Guidelines Outcome) clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation provides practice recommendations that can serve as a useful reference guide to transplant professionals. The guideline, covering a broad range of topics, was developed by an international group of experts from transplant and nephrology through a review of literature published until May 2019. A work group of US transplant nephrologists convened by NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Quality Initiative) chose key topics for this commentary with a goal of presenting a broad discussion to the US transplant community. Each section of this article has a summary of the key KDIGO guideline recommendations, followed by a brief commentary on the recommendations, their clinical utility, and potential implementation challenges. The KDOQI work group agrees broadly with the KDIGO recommendations but also recognizes and highlights the decision-making challenges that arise from lack of high-quality evidence and the need to balance equity with utility of organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan M Puttarajappa
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Carrie A Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Christine M Wu
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Brahm S Vasudev
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tambur AR, Schinstock C, Maguire C, Lowe D, Smith B, Stegall M. Estimating alloantibody levels in highly sensitized renal allograft candidates: Using serial dilutions to demonstrate a treatment effect in clinical trials. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1278-1284. [PMID: 33078553 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Small reductions in calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) are associated with increased kidney transplantation in 100% cPRA patients. However, the high level of antibody in these patients is such that desensitization may reduce antibody but not cPRA, thus the cPRA change on undiluted serum with desensitization is an insensitive measure of effectiveness. We evaluated cPRA reduction, calculated per antibody titer, as a desensitization trial endpoint. To accomplish this, two serum samples from 20 kidney transplant candidates with cPRA ≥99.9% (100%) were obtained and serially diluted in triplicate to determine the titer of individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities. CPRA was computed per dilution to identify the titer at which cPRA drops below 98%. Inter- and intra-assay variability and changes overtime were determined. The dilution needed to reach a cPRA <98% was within 1 titer for replicates from the same sample, with 90% (36/40) concordance. This indicates that only changes >2 titers can be deemed clinically meaningful. The median (IQR) titer difference was 0 (0-1) from baseline to follow-up within 12 months. The cPRA per titer also risk-stratified candidates for trial inclusion. In conclusion, determining the cPRA per titer is a reliable approach to simplify complex antibody data and an ideal endpoint for desensitization trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David Lowe
- One Lambda, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
West-Thielke PM, Ipema HJ, Campbell-Lee S, Benedetti E, Kaplan B, Thielke JJ. Removal of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin by Plasma Exchange in ABO-Incompatible and Positive Crossmatch Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:1548-1553. [PMID: 33573819 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recipients of ABO-incompatible (ABOI) and positive crossmatch (PXM) kidney transplants are at high risk for antibody-mediated acute rejection. Despite aggressive immunosuppression in high-risk patients, the incidence of acute rejection remains considerably higher than in other groups. No published studies have examined plasma concentrations of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in patients undergoing plasma exchange. The objectives of this study were to compare plasma ATG concentrations before and after plasma exchange in ABOI and PXM kidney transplant patients to determine the amount removed. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective pharmacokinetic evaluation enrolled 10 patients undergoing ABOI or PXM kidney transplant at an academic medical center. Blood and waste plasma samples from 5 patients were assayed for total and active ATG concentrations. Patient records were monitored for renal function and rejection rates in the first 6 months post-transplant. RESULTS Total ATG concentrations decreased a mean of 59.78 ± 13.91% after each plasma exchange session, and active ATG levels decreased a mean of 56.8 ± 17.08%. Mean daily concentrations reflect a lack of expected ATG accumulation. Only 1 of 4 patients had detectable ATG concentrations after 30 days. After 6 months, the incidence of acute rejection in this sample was 44% and graft survival was 89%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to show that plasma exchange removes a substantial amount of ATG in high-risk kidney transplant patients. Based on these results, we believe these high-risk patients have been traditionally underdosed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather J Ipema
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sally Campbell-Lee
- University of Illinois Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- University of Illinois Medical Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- University of Illinois Medical Center, Division of Transplant Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James J Thielke
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kransdorf EP, Pando MJ, Stewart D, Lindblad K, Bray R, Murphey C, Kaur N, Patel JK, Kim I, Zhang X, Maiers M, Kobashigawa JA, Gragert L. Stem cell donor HLA typing improves CPRA in kidney allocation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:138-147. [PMID: 32558252 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Kidney Allocation System provides a priority to sensitized candidates based on the calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) value. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype reference panel used for calculation of the CPRA by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the OPTN contractor, has limitations. We derived a novel panel from the National Marrow Donor Program HLA haplotype data set and compared the accuracy of CPRA values generated with this panel (NMDP-CPRA) to those generated from the UNOS panel (UNOS-CPRA), using predicted and actual deceased donor kidney offers for a cohort of 24 282 candidates. The overall accuracy for kidney offers was similar using NMDP-CPRA and UNOS-CPRA. Accuracy was slightly higher for NMDP-CPRA than UNOS-CPRA for candidates in several highly sensitized CPRA categories, with deviations in linkage disequilibrium for Caucasians and the smaller size of the UNOS panel as contributing factors. HLA data derived from stem cell donors yields CPRA values that are comparable to those derived from deceased kidney donors while improving upon several problems with the current reference panel. Consideration should be given to using stem cell donors as the reference panel for calculation of CPRA to improve equity in kidney transplant allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan P Kransdorf
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marcelo J Pando
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelsi Lindblad
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Robert Bray
- HLA Laboratory, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cathi Murphey
- HLA Laboratory, Southwest Immunodiagnostics, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Navchetan Kaur
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Jignesh K Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martin Maiers
- National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Loren Gragert
- Department of Pathology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.,National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens has long posed an obstacle to organ transplantation. With desensitization protocol refinement, new drug development, and organ allocation policy changes, access to transplant for sensitized patients has never been greater. Yet in spite of these advances the problem of donor-specific antibody remains incompletely solved, and many patients remain poorly served by the therapies that do exist. Area covered: Imlifidase is a new drug with a mechanism of action that enables it to transiently yet efficiently eliminate donor-specific antibody over a much more rapid time course than any heretofore existing therapy. This unique property suggests that imlifidase may have far-reaching potential for patients in whom donor-specific antibodies may preclude successful transplantation. Below follows a review of the clinical experience with imlifidase to date as well as a discussion of the transplant applications that eagerly await the availability of this novel agent. Expert opinion: Imlifidase is a first-in-class pharmaceutical agent that safely and efficiently cleaves IgG, and holds promise to be a game-changer for sensitized patients in need of lifesaving organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie E Lonze
- Vice Chair for Research, NYU Langone Health, Transplant Institute , New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lockridge J, Roberts D, Olyaei A, Noble BN, Langewisch E, Rehman S, Stack M, Scott D, Orloff S, Shaut C, Gardner B, Bennett W, Norman D. Cytomegalovirus serologic matching in deceased donor kidney allocation optimizes high- and low-risk (D+R- and D-R-) profiles and does not adversely affect transplant rates. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:3502-3508. [PMID: 32372499 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of infection-related morbidity and mortality in kidney transplantation. The most significant risk for developing CMV infection after transplant depends upon donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serostatus. In 2012, our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) began a novel pretransplant CMV prevention strategy via matching deceased kidney donors and recipients by CMV serostatus. Prior to the matching protocol, our distribution of seropositive and seronegative donors and recipients was similar to the United States at large. After the matching protocol, high-risk D+R- were reduced from 18.5% to 2.9%, whereas low-risk D-R- were increased from 13.5% to 24%. There was no adverse effect on transplant rates and no differential effect on waiting times for R+ vs R- after the protocol was implemented. This protocol could be implemented on a regional or national level to optimize low and high-risk CMV seroprofiles and potentially improve CMV-related outcomes in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Lockridge
- Division of Nephrology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Section of Nephrology, VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Roberts
- Division of Nephrology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ali Olyaei
- School of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, OSU College of Pharmacy, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brie N Noble
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, OSU College of Pharmacy, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Eric Langewisch
- Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shehzad Rehman
- Division of Nephrology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Section of Nephrology, VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Megan Stack
- Division of Nephrology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - David Scott
- Division of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Susan Orloff
- Division of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Carley Shaut
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brent Gardner
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - William Bennett
- Legacy Transplant Service, Legacy Health, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Doug Norman
- Division of Nephrology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Section of Nephrology, VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Posttransplant Outcomes for cPRA-100% Recipients Under the New Kidney Allocation System. Transplantation 2020; 104:1456-1461. [PMID: 31577673 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is concern in the transplant community that outcomes for the most highly sensitized recipients might be poor under Kidney Allocation System (KAS) high prioritization. METHODS To study this, we compared posttransplant outcomes of 525 pre-KAS (December 4, 2009, to December 3, 2014) calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRA)-100% recipients to 3026 post-KAS (December 4, 2014, to December 3, 2017) cPRA-100% recipients using SRTR data. We compared mortality and death-censored graft survival using Cox regression, acute rejection, and delayed graft function (DGF) using logistic regression, and length of stay (LOS) using negative binomial regression. RESULTS Compared with pre-KAS recipients, post-KAS recipients were allocated kidneys with lower Kidney Donor Profile Index (median 30% versus 35%, P < 0.001) but longer cold ischemic time (CIT) (median 21.0 h versus 18.6 h, P < 0.001). Compared with pre-KAS cPRA-100% recipients, those post-KAS had higher 3-year patient survival (93.6% versus 91.4%, P = 0.04) and 3-year death-censored graft survival (93.7% versus 90.6%, P = 0.005). The incidence of DGF (29.3% versus 29.2%, P = 0.9), acute rejection (11.2% versus 11.7%, P = 0.8), and median LOS (5 d versus 5d, P = 0.2) were similar between pre-KAS and post-KAS recipients. After accounting for secular trends and adjusting for recipient characteristics, post-KAS recipients had no difference in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.861.623.06, P = 0.1), death-censored graft failure (aHR: 0.521.001.91, P > 0.9), DGF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.580.861.27, P = 0.4), acute rejection (aOR: 0.610.941.43, P = 0.8), and LOS (adjusted LOS ratio: 0.981.161.36, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS We did not find any statistically significant worsening of outcomes for cPRA-100% recipients under KAS, although longer-term monitoring of posttransplant mortality is warranted.
Collapse
|