1
|
Divard G, Aubert O, Debiais-Deschamp C, Raynaud M, Goutaudier V, Sablik M, Sayeg C, Legendre C, Obert J, Anglicheau D, Lefaucheur C, Loupy A. Long-Term Outcomes after Conversion to a Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:628-637. [PMID: 38265815 PMCID: PMC11108246 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conversion to a belatacept-based immunosuppression is currently used as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy when the CNI-based standard-of-care immunosuppression is not tolerated after kidney transplantation. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit and safety after conversion to belatacept. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 311 kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2020 from two referral centers, converted from CNI to belatacept after transplant according to a prespecified protocol. Patients were matched at the time of conversion to patients maintained with CNIs, using optimal matching. The primary end point was death-censored allograft survival at 7 years. The secondary end points were patient survival, eGFR, and safety outcomes, including serious viral infections, immune-related complications, antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibody, de novo diabetes, cardiovascular events, and oncologic complications. RESULTS A total of 243 patients converted to belatacept (belatacept group) were matched to 243 patients maintained on CNIs (CNI control group). All recipient, transplant, functional, histologic, and immunologic parameters were well balanced between the two groups with a standardized mean difference below 0.05. At 7 years post-conversion to belatacept, allograft survival was 78% compared with 63% in the CNI control group ( P < 0.001 for log-rank test). The safety outcomes showed a similar rate of patient death (28% in the belatacept group versus 36% in the CNI control group), active antibody-mediated rejection (6% versus 7%), T-cell-mediated rejection (4% versus 4%), major adverse cardiovascular events, and cancer occurrence (9% versus 11%). A significantly higher rate of de novo proteinuria was observed in the belatacept group as compared with the CNI control group (37% versus 21%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This real-world evidence study shows that conversion to belatacept post-transplant was associated with lower risk of graft failure and acceptable safety outcomes compared with patients maintained on CNIs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER Long-term Outcomes after Conversion to Belatacept, NCT04733131 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Divard
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Charlotte Debiais-Deschamp
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marc Raynaud
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marta Sablik
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Sayeg
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Julie Obert
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM U1151, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- INSERM U970 PARCC, Pa`ris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heeger PS, Haro MC, Jordan S. Translating B cell immunology to the treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection. Nat Rev Nephrol 2024; 20:218-232. [PMID: 38168662 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-023-00791-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), including chronic AMR (cAMR), causes ~50% of kidney allograft losses each year. Despite attempts to develop well-tolerated and effective therapeutics for the management of AMR, to date, none has obtained FDA approval, thereby highlighting an urgent unmet medical need. Discoveries over the past decade from basic, translational and clinical studies of transplant recipients have provided a foundation for developing novel therapeutic approaches to preventing and treating AMR and cAMR. These interventions are aimed at reducing donor-specific antibody levels, decreasing graft injury and fibrosis, and preserving kidney function. Innovative approaches emerging from basic science findings include targeting interactions between alloreactive T cells and B cells, and depleting alloreactive memory B cells, as well as donor-specific antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells. Therapies aimed at reducing the cytotoxic antibody effector functions mediated by natural killer cells and the complement system, and their associated pro-inflammatory cytokines, are also undergoing evaluation. The complexity of the pathogenesis of AMR and cAMR suggest that multiple approaches will probably be required to treat these disease processes effectively. Definitive answers await results from large, double-blind, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Heeger
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maria Carrera Haro
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Stanley Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kitchens WH, Larsen CP, Badell IR. Costimulatory Blockade and Solid Organ Transplantation: The Past, Present, and Future. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:2529-2545. [PMID: 38106575 PMCID: PMC10719580 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent clinically approved for transplant immunosuppression. Although more than 10 years of study have demonstrated that belatacept offers superior long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression regimens, the clinical adoption of belatacept has continued to lag because of concerns of an early risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and various logistical barriers to its administration. In this review, the history of the clinical development of belatacept is examined, along with the findings of the seminal BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials culminating in the clinical approval of belatacept. Recent efforts to incorporate belatacept into novel CNI-free immunosuppression regimens are reviewed, as well as the experience of the Emory Transplant Center in using a tapered course of low-dose tacrolimus in belatacept-treated renal allograft patients to garner the long-term outcome benefits of belatacept without the short-term increased risks of ACR. Potential avenues to increase the clinical adoption of belatacept in the future are explored, including surmounting the logistical barriers of belatacept administration through subcutaneous administration or more infrequent belatacept dosing. In addition, belatacept conversion strategies and potential expanded clinical indications of belatacept are discussed for pediatric transplant recipients, extrarenal transplant recipients, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and in patients with failed renal allografts. Finally, we discuss the novel immunosuppressive drugs currently in the development pipeline that may aid in the expansion of costimulation blockade utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Kitchens
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Christian P. Larsen
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - I. Raul Badell
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van den Broek DAJ, Meziyerh S, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Cozzi E, Bertrand D, López del Moral C, Dorling A, Emonds MP, Naesens M, de Vries APJ. The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11321. [PMID: 37560072 PMCID: PMC10408721 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moein M, Gao SX, Martin SJ, Farkouh KM, Li BW, Ball AS, Dvorai RH, Saidi RF. Conversion to Belatacept in kidney transplant recipients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Transpl Immunol 2023; 76:101737. [PMID: 36379374 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The costimulatory inhibitor Belatacept (Bela) has been shown to be an effective alternative in several clinical situations, including chronic antibody-mediated rejection, calcineurin toxicity, and de novo alloantibody formation. To further explore the usefulness of Belatacept under various clinical scenarios, we performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all recipients who had a BPAR diagnosis of CAMR and were converted to a Belatacept maintenance immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHOD We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all kidney transplants adult patients at SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2021. Our inclusion criteria were the patients who have been diagnosed with CAMR according to their renal biopsy based on the 2013 Banff criteria. The primary objective was to compare the kidney viability and function using GFR between the two interest groups and finally compare the outcomes. RESULTS A total of 48 patients met our inclusion criteria based on the kidney biopsy result, which showed chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (CAMR). Nineteen patients (39.6%) were converted to the Belatacept, and we continued the previous immunosuppression regimen in 29 patients (60.4%). The mean time from the transplant date to the diagnosis of CAMR was 1385 days in the Belatacept group and 914 days for the non-Belatacept group (P = 0.15). The mean GFR comparison at each time point between the groups did not show a significant difference, and Belatacept did not show superiority compared to the standard immunosuppression regimen in terms of kidney function preservation. 1 (5.2%) patient from the Belatacept group and 1 (3.4%) patient from the non-Belatacept group had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) after CAMR confirmation, and it was comparable (P = 0.76). De novo synthesis of the DSA rate was 12.5% in the Belatacept group and 15% In the non-Belatacept group, which was comparable. (P = 0.90). The patient survival rate was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that compared to the standard Tacrolimus/MMF/Prednisone regimen, Belatacept did not significantly benefit in preserving the GFR in long-term follow-ups and stabilizing the DSA production, which is one of the main factors resulting in chronic graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoudreza Moein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Shuqi X Gao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Samuel J Martin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Katie M Farkouh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Benson W Li
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Angela S Ball
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Reut Hod Dvorai
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Reza F Saidi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kervella D, Blancho G. New immunosuppressive agents in transplantation. Presse Med 2022; 51:104142. [PMID: 36252821 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2022.104142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunosuppressive agents have enabled the development of allogenic transplantation during the last 40 years, allowing considerable improvement in graft survival. However, several issues remain such as the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors, the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens and/or the higher risk of opportunistic infections and cancers. Most immunosuppressive agents target T cell activation and may not be efficient enough to prevent allo-immunization in the long term. Finally, antibody mediated rejection due to donor specific antibodies strongly affects allograft survival. Many drugs have been tested in the last decades, but very few have come to clinical use. The most recent one is CTLA4-Ig (belatacept), a costimulation blockade molecule that targets the second signal of T cell activation and is associated with a better long term kidney function than calcineurin inhibitors, despite an increased risk of acute cellular rejection. The research of new maintenance long-term immunosuppressive agents focuses on costimulation blockade. Agents inhibiting CD40-CD40 ligand interaction may enable a good control of both T cells and B cells responses. Anti-CD28 antibodies may promote regulatory T cells. Agents targeting this costimulation pathways are currently evaluated in clinical trials. Immunosuppressive agents for ABMR treatment are scarce since anti-CD20 agent rituximab and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have failed to demonstrate an interest in ABMR. New drugs focusing on antibodies removal (imlifidase), B cell and plasmablasts (anti-IL-6/IL-6R, anti-CD38…) and complement inhibition are in the pipeline, with the challenge of their evaluation in such a heterogeneous pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Kervella
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Service de Néphrologie et d'immunologie clinique, ITUN, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Service de Néphrologie et d'immunologie clinique, ITUN, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Inserm, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, UMR 1064, ITUN, F-44000 Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yue W, Liu J, Li X, Wang L, Li J. Memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells in AMR. Ren Fail 2022; 44:1604-1614. [PMID: 36190837 PMCID: PMC9542532 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2022.2128374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has a strongly negative impact on long-term renal allograft survival. Currently, no recognized effective treatments are available, especially for chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) secreted by long-lived plasma cells and memory B cells are acknowledged as biomarkers of AMR. Nevertheless, it may be too late for the DSA routine examination production since DSAs may have binded to graft vascular endothelial cells through complement-dependent or complement-independent pathways. Therefore, methods to effectively monitor memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells and subsequently prevent DSA production are key to reducing the adverse effects of AMR. Therefore, this review mainly summarizes the production pathways of memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells and provides suggestions for the prevention of AMR after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Yue
- Kidney Transplantation Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Dietetics Teaching and Research Section, Henan Medical College, Xinzheng, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Li
- Kidney Transplantation Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Luman Wang
- Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinfeng Li
- Kidney Transplantation Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaufmann YL, von Moos S, Spitznagel T, Matter LS, Mueller TF, Schachtner T. Collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant centre ensures good outcomes in post-transplant care. Clin Kidney J 2022; 16:331-341. [PMID: 36755830 PMCID: PMC9900581 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite substantial improvements in short-term kidney allograft survival, median long-term survival remains at a standstill. It is unclear whether and to what extent a transplant centre's post-transplant care influences long-term outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analysed 501 single kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent transplantation between 2009 and 2018 and did not develop rejection or de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) within the first post-transplant year. After that, KTRs were either followed exclusively every 3 months by the transplant centre (n = 197) or every 3 months by local nephrologists (n = 304) with only yearly follow-up by the transplant centre. We analysed kidney allograft outcomes regarding estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, proteinuria, development of dnDSA and rejection. Results No differences between the two groups were observed in the baseline characteristics and the characteristics at the end of the first post-transplant year (P > .05). KTRs followed by local nephrologists were comparable to KTRs followed by the transplant centre concerning patient survival (P = .541), kidney allograft survival (P = .385), eGFR decline (P = .488), progression of proteinuria (P > .05), the development of dnDSA (P = .335) and T-cell-mediated rejection (P = .480). KTRs followed by the transplant centre were more likely to undergo indication biopsies in case of allograft dysfunction and dnDSA (P < .001). Antibody-mediated rejection was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P = .059), recurrent glomerulonephritis was diagnosed earlier and more frequently (P = .026) and immunosuppression was modified earlier and more frequently in response to histological findings (P = .038). Conclusions Our findings suggest that close collaboration between local nephrologists and the transplant centre ensures good allograft outcomes independent of the caregiver. Greater biopsy activity in the transplant centre allows for earlier diagnosis of allograft dysfunction as the basis for novel treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tahm Spitznagel
- University Hospital Zurich, Division of Nephrology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laurenz S Matter
- University Hospital Zurich, Division of Nephrology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F Mueller
- University Hospital Zurich, Division of Nephrology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schaenman J, Rossetti M, Pickering H, Sunga G, Wilhalme H, Elashoff D, Zhang Q, Hickey M, Reddy U, Danovitch G, Reed EF, Bunnapradist S. Preservation of Antiviral Immunologic Efficacy Without Alloimmunity After Switch to Belatacept in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Patients. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 8:126-140. [PMID: 36644348 PMCID: PMC9832066 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Belatacept has shown potential for prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation, given its demonstration of reduced nephrotoxicity in combination with absence of significant incidence of rejection. However, concerns have been raised regarding increased risk of viral infection. Methods We set out to explore the impact of the switch to belatacept on alloimmune and antiviral immunity through the study of patients switched from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept within 3 months of kidney transplantation compared with a matched cohort of control patients on a CNI-based regimen. Results After the switch to belatacept, immune phenotyping demonstrated a decrease in naive and an increase in terminally differentiated effector memory (TMRA) T cells, with no significant difference compared with control patients. Donor-specific immune response, measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), did not change significantly either by single or double cytokine secretion, but it was associated with the appearance of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the control but not the belatacept cohort (P = 0.039 for naive and P = 0.002 for TMRA subtypes). Increased incidence of de novo DSA development was observed in the control group (P = 0.035). Virus-specific immune response, as measured by ICS in response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), was similar in both groups and stable over time. Conclusion We found that belatacept use was associated with an absence of alloreactivity without impact on immune phenotype, while preserving the antiviral immune response, for patients switched from a CNI-based regimen. In parallel, the antiviral immune response against CMV and EBV was preserved after the belatacept switch (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01953120).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Schaenman
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maura Rossetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Harry Pickering
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gemalene Sunga
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Holly Wilhalme
- Department of Medicine Biostatistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Biostatistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Uttam Reddy
- Division of Kidney Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Danovitch
- Division of Kidney Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elaine F. Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Division of Kidney Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA,Correspondence: Suuphamai Bunnapradist, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 565, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Manook M, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Olaso D, Yoon J, Bae Y, Shaw BI, Song M, Kuchibhatla M, Farris AB, Kirk A, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression Controls the Post-Transplant Humoral Immune Response in Highly Sensitized Nonhuman Primates. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:2116-2130. [PMID: 36591367 PMCID: PMC9802566 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0001732022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to MHC antigens increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized transplant recipients and reduces graft survival. Pretransplant desensitization with costimulation blockade and proteasome inhibition has facilitated transplantation in our preclinical nonhuman primate (NHP) model. However, long-term graft survival is limited by rebound of DSA after transplantation. In this study, we performed kidney transplants between highly sensitized, maximally MHC-mismatched NHPs (n=14). At kidney transplantation, primates received T cell depletion with rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin (rhATG; n=10) or monoclonal anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies (n=4). Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of belatacept and tacrolimus (n=5) or belatacept and rapamycin (n=9) with steroids. Rebound of DSA post-kidney transplantation was significantly reduced compared with maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Protocol lymph node biopsy specimens showed a decrease in germinal center activity, with low frequencies of T follicular helper cells and class-switched B cells after kidney transplantation. Combined belatacept and rapamycin was superior in controlling viral reactivation, enabling weaning of ganciclovir prophylaxis. Tacrolimus was associated with increased morbidity that included cytomegalovirus and parvovirus viremia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. All primates in the tacrolimus/belatacept group failed discontinuation of antiviral therapy. Overall, belatacept-based immunosuppression increased AMR-free graft survival by controlling post-transplant humoral responses in highly sensitized NHP recipients and should be further investigated in a human clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary W. Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Miriam Manook
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul M. Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashley Y. Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Danae Olaso
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian I. Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mingqing Song
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maragatha Kuchibhatla
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allan Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Al Jurdi A, Konvalinka A, Riella LV. Antibody-mediated rejection: prevention, monitoring and treatment dilemmas. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:405-414. [PMID: 35950887 PMCID: PMC9475491 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as the leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Donor-specific antibodies are an independent risk factor for AMR and graft loss. However, not all donor-specific antibodies are pathogenic. AMR treatment is heterogeneous due to the lack of robust trials to support clinical decisions. This review provides an overview and comments on practical but relevant dilemmas physicians experience in managing kidney transplant recipients with AMR. RECENT FINDINGS Active AMR with donor-specific antibodies may be treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids with additional therapies considered on a case-by-case basis. On the contrary, no treatment has been shown to be effective against chronic active AMR. Various biomarkers and prediction models to assess the individual risk of graft failure and response to rejection treatment show promise. SUMMARY The ability to personalize management for a given kidney transplant recipient and identify treatments that will improve their long-term outcome remains a critical unmet need. Earlier identification of AMR with noninvasive biomarkers and prediction models to assess the individual risk of graft failure should be considered. Enrolling patients with AMR in clinical trials to assess novel therapeutic agents is highly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Rodriguez-Ramirez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ayman Al Jurdi
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ana Konvalinka
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonardo V. Riella
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Nattes T, Lebourg L, Etienne I, Laurent C, Lemoine M, Dumont A, Guerrot D, Jacquot S, Candon S, Bertrand D. CD86 occupancy in belatacept-treated kidney transplant patients is not associated with clinical and infectious outcomes. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1691-1698. [PMID: 35181996 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The CD86 occupancy assay has been developed to measure the number of CD86 molecules unbound to belatacept, but its association with clinical outcomes has not been assessed yet. All kidney transplant patients switched to belatacept in our center between 2016 and 2018 were included. Blood samples were collected before each infusion for 1 year to assess CD86 occupancy by CD86 antibody cytometry staining on the surface of CD14+ monocytes. Results were expressed as the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) value of CD86 staining. At each infusion, the MFIDay of infusion /MFIDay 0 ratio was calculated. Forty-one patients were consecutively included. After every 2-week infusion period, CD86 MFI ratio dropped from 1.00 to 0.73 [0.57-0.98], p = .07. However, this ratio progressively increased to 0.78 [0.53-1.13] at 1 year, which was not statistically different from pre-switch ratio, p = .4. Over the first year, the MFI ratio coefficient of variation was 31.58% [23.75-38.31]. MFI ratio was not different between patients with or without opportunistic infections: 0.73 [0.60-0.88] versus 0.80 [0.71-1.00], p = .2, or between patients with or without EBV DNAemia, p = .2. Despite previous in vitro results, the CD86 occupancy assay suffers from a high intra-individual variability and does not appear to be relevant to clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan de Nattes
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.,Department of Immunology, and Biotherapies, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1234, Normandy University, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Ludivine Lebourg
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Isabelle Etienne
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Charlotte Laurent
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Mathilde Lemoine
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Audrey Dumont
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Dominique Guerrot
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Serge Jacquot
- Department of Immunology, and Biotherapies, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1234, Normandy University, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Sophie Candon
- Department of Immunology, and Biotherapies, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1234, Normandy University, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Nephrology - Kidney Transplant Unit, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Louis K, Macedo C, Metes D. Targeting T Follicular Helper Cells to Control Humoral Allogeneic Immunity. Transplantation 2021; 105:e168-e180. [PMID: 33909968 PMCID: PMC8484368 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Humoral allogeneic immunity driven by anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly impede prolonged survival of organ allografts after transplantation. Although the importance of T follicular helper (TFH) cells in controlling antibody responses has been long established, their role in directing donor-specific antibody generation leading to AMR was only recently appreciated in the clinical setting of organ transplantation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge on the biology of human TFH cells as well as their circulating counterparts and describe their pivotal role in driving humoral alloimmunity. In addition, we discuss the intrinsic effects of current induction therapies and maintenance immunosuppressive drugs as well as of biotherapies on TFH cells and provide future directions and novel opportunities of biotherapeutic targeting of TFH cells that have the potential of bringing the prophylactic and curative treatments of AMR toward personalized and precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Louis
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Human Immunology and Immunopathology, Inserm UMR 976, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Camila Macedo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Diana Metes
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163656. [PMID: 34441950 PMCID: PMC8396983 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Chronic-active Antibody-mediated Rejection: To Belatacept or Not, That Is the HOT Question. Transplantation 2021; 105:478-479. [PMID: 32732617 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
16
|
Switch from calcineurin inhibitors to belatacept in kidney transplant patients with chronic-active antibody mediated rejection results in lower decline in kidney function at three years. J Nephrol 2021; 34:2159-2162. [PMID: 34181198 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-021-01099-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
17
|
Choi AY, Manook M, Olaso D, Ezekian B, Park J, Freischlag K, Jackson A, Knechtle S, Kwun J. Emerging New Approaches in Desensitization: Targeted Therapies for HLA Sensitization. Front Immunol 2021; 12:694763. [PMID: 34177960 PMCID: PMC8226120 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.694763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an urgent need for therapeutic interventions for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized patients with preformed or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). The risk of AMR and allograft loss in sensitized patients is increased due to preformed DSA detected at time of transplant or the reactivation of HLA memory after transplantation, causing acute and chronic AMR. Alternatively, de novo DSA that develops post-transplant due to inadequate immunosuppression and again may lead to acute and chronic AMR or even allograft loss. Circulating antibody, the final product of the humoral immune response, has been the primary target of desensitization and AMR treatment. However, in many cases these protocols fail to achieve efficient removal of all DSA and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent DSA are far worse when compared to non-sensitized patients. We believe that targeting multiple components of humoral immunity will lead to improved outcomes for such patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss conventional desensitization methods targeting antibody or B cell removal and then present a mechanistically designed desensitization regimen targeting plasma cells and the humoral response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mayer KA, Doberer K, Eskandary F, Halloran PF, Böhmig GA. New concepts in chronic antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection: prevention and treatment. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:97-105. [PMID: 33315763 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a cardinal cause of transplant failure, with currently no proven effective prevention or treatment. The present review will focus on new therapeutic concepts currently under clinical evaluation. RECENT FINDINGS One interesting treatment approach may be interference with interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling to modulate B-cell immunity and donor-specific antibody (DSA) production. Currently, a large phase III randomized controlled trial is underway to clarify the safety and efficacy of clazakizumab, a high-affinity anti-IL-6 antibody, in chronic AMR. A prevention/treatment strategy may be costimulation blockade using belatacept to interfere with germinal center responses and DSA formation. In a recent uncontrolled study, belatacept conversion was shown to stabilize renal function and dampen AMR activity. Moreover, preliminary clinical results suggest efficacy of CD38 antibodies to deplete plasma and natural killer cells to treat AMR, with anecdotal reports demonstrating at least transient resolution of active rejection. SUMMARY There are promising concepts on the horizon for the prevention and treatment of chronic AMR. The design of adequately powered placebo-controlled trials to clarify the safety and efficacy of such new therapies, however, remains a big challenge, and will rely on the definition of precise surrogate endpoints predicting long-term allograft survival. Mapping the natural history of AMR would greatly help the understanding of who would derive benefits from treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre (ATAGC), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
La Muraglia GM, Zeng S, Crichton ES, Wagener ME, Ford ML, Badell IR. Superior inhibition of alloantibody responses with selective CD28 blockade is CTLA-4 dependent and T follicular helper cell specific. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:73-86. [PMID: 32406182 PMCID: PMC7665991 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Anti-donor antibodies cause immunologic injury in transplantation. CD28 blockade with CTLA-4-Ig has the ability to reduce the incidence of these donor-specific antibodies (DSA), but its mechanism is suboptimal for the inhibition of alloimmunity in that CTLA-4-Ig blocks both CD28 costimulation and CTLA-4 coinhibition. Thus selective CD28 blockade that spares CTLA-4 has potential to result in improved inhibition of humoral alloimmunity. To test this possibility, we utilized a full allogeneic mismatch murine transplant model and T follicular helper (Tfh):B cell co-culture system. We observed that selective blockade with an anti-CD28 domain antibody (dAb) compared to CTLA-4-Ig led to superior inhibition of Tfh cell, germinal center, and DSA responses in vivo and better control of B cell responses in vitro. CTLA-4 blockade enhanced the humoral alloresponse and, in combination with anti-CD28 dAb, abrogated the effects of selective blockade. This CTLA-4-dependent inhibition was Tfh cell specific in that CTLA-4 expression by Tfh cells was necessary and sufficient for the improved humoral inhibition observed with selective CD28 blockade. As CD28 blockade attracts interest for control of alloantibodies in the clinic, these data support selective CD28 blockade as a superior strategy to address DSA via the sparing of CTLA-4 and more potent targeting of Tfh cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Zeng
- Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
El Sakhawi K, Melica G, Scemla A, Bertrand D, Garrouste C, Malvezzi P, Rémy P, Moktefi A, Ingels A, Champy C, Lelièvre JD, Kheav D, Morel A, Mokrani D, Attias P, Grimbert P, Matignon M. Belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients. Clin Kidney J 2020; 14:1908-1914. [PMID: 34345414 PMCID: PMC8323145 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney allograft survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients is lower than that in the general population. Belatacept increases long-term patient and allograft survival rates when compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Its use in HIV-positive recipients remains poorly documented. Methods We retrospectively report a French cohort of HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients who were switched from CNI to belatacept, between June 2012 and December 2018. Patient and allograft survival rates, HIV immunovirological and clinical outcomes, acute rejection, opportunistic infections (OIs) and HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were analysed at 3 and 12 months, and at the end of follow-up (last clinical visit attended after transplantation). Results were compared with HIV-positive recipients group treated with CNI. Results Twelve patients were switched to belatacept 10 (2–25) months after transplantation. One year after belatacept therapy, patient and allograft survival rates scored 92% for both, two (17%) HIV virological rebounds occurred due to antiretroviral therapy non-compliance, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts remained stable over time. Serious adverse events included two (17%) acute steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated rejections and three (25%) OIs. Kidney allograft function significantly increased over the 12 post-switch months (P = 0.009), and DSAs remained stable at 12 months after treatment. The control group showed similar results in terms of patient and kidney allograft survival rates, DSA characteristics and proteinuria Conclusions Switch from CNI to belatacept can be considered safe and may increase long-term kidney allograft survival in HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim El Sakhawi
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Giovanna Melica
- Department of Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Anne Scemla
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adulte, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Immunology Department, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Cyril Garrouste
- Department of Nephrology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Philippe Rémy
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Anissa Moktefi
- Department of Pathology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Cécile Champy
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Daniel Lelièvre
- Department of Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France.,Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France
| | - David Kheav
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Laboratoire Régional d' Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Morel
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - David Mokrani
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Attias
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France.,Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Université Paris-Est-Créteil (UPEC), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation (IFRNT), Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France.,Département Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Université Paris-Est-Créteil (UPEC), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Suchanek O, Clatworthy MR. Novel strategies to target the humoral alloimmune response. HLA 2020; 96:667-680. [PMID: 33022883 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) represents a major cause of late allograft loss in solid organ transplantation worldwide. This process is driven by donor-specific antibodies (DSA), which develop either de-novo or, in sensitized patients, are preformed at the time of transplantation. Effective targeting of ABMR has been hampered by a lack of robust randomized controlled trials (RCT), required for the regulatory approval of new therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the evidence behind the present "standard" of care and recent progress in the development of novel strategies targeting different aspects of the alloimmune humoral response, including naïve and memory B-cell activation, the germinal centre reaction, plasma cell survival and antibody effector functions. In particular, we focus on co-stimulation blockade and its combination with next-generation proteasome inhibitors, new depleting monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD19, anti-BCMA, anti-CD38, anti-CD138), interleukin-6 blockade, complement inhibition and DSA degradation. These treatment modalities, when used in the appropriate clinical context and combination, have the potential to finally improve long-term allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Suchanek
- Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Menna R Clatworthy
- Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarises recent developments in monitoring and immunosuppressive management in kidney transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Long-term kidney allograft outcomes have not changed substantially mainly as a result of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Several groups have recently attempted to determine peripheral molecular fingerprints of ongoing rejection. But while this research is promising, it is not generalised for further spreading among different cohorts. Measurements of donor-derived cell-free DNA levels in recent studies have revealed better predictive values for antibody-mediated rejection. The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System for assessing kidney graft biopsies has been gradually introduced within clinical practice, especially in complicated cases aimed at improving histological diagnostics. Molecular studies on accommodation in ABO-incompatible transplantation have shown increased complement regulation and lower expression of epithelial transporters and class 1 metallothioneins. Additionally, in clinical studies of sensitised patients, imlifidase has been shown to enable transplantation across significant immunological barriers, while the co-stimulation blockade has been tested to prevent donor specific antibodies development. In low-risk patients, everolimus/tacrolimus-based regimens have also proven their antiviral effects in large clinical trials. SUMMARY Recent developments in non-invasive monitoring have paved the way for the introduction of future larger clinical trials with multiple patient cohorts.
Collapse
|
23
|
Prevention of acute rejection after rescue with Belatacept by association of low-dose Tacrolimus maintenance in medically complex kidney transplant recipients with early or late graft dysfunction. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240335. [PMID: 33057374 PMCID: PMC7561183 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increased acute rejection risk in rescue protocols with Belatacept may limit its use particularly in medically complex patients where preexisting increased risk of rejection couples with CNI toxicity. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in 19 KTs shifted to a Belatacept-based immunosuppression with low-dose Tacrolimus (2–3 ng/mL) after evidence of allograft disfunction, including patients with primary non-function (PNF), chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR), history of previous KTs and/or other concomitant transplants (liver, pancreas). Evaluation of CD28+ CD4+ effector memory T cell (TEM) before conversion was performed in 10/19. Results Kidney function significantly improved (median eGFR 16.5 ml/min/1.73m2 before vs 25 ml/min after; p = 0.001) at a median time after conversion of 12.5 months (9.1–17.8). Overall graft and patient survival were 89.5% and 100% respectively. Definitive weaning from dialysis in 5/5 KTs with PNF was observed, whereas 7/8 patients lost their graft within first year in a control group. eGFR significantly ameliorated in re-trasplants (p = 0.001) and stabilized in KTs with other organ transplants or cAMR. No acute rejection episodes occurred, despite the significant risk suggested by high frequency of CD28+ CD4+ TEM in most patients. Opportunistic infections were limited and most common in early vs late-converted. Conclusions Rescue association of Belatacept with low-dose Tacrolimus in medically complex KTs is a feasible option that allows prevention of acute rejection and amelioration of graft function.
Collapse
|
24
|
Choi M, Bachmann F, Wu K, Lachmann N, Schmidt D, Brakemeier S, Duerr M, Kahl A, Eckardt KU, Budde K, Nickel P. Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:354. [PMID: 32819287 PMCID: PMC7439694 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01992-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation. Methods We analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment. Results Patient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of − 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min). Conclusion Rescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kaiyin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Danilo Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Brakemeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Duerr
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kahl
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Nickel
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Louis K, Macedo C, Bailly E, Lau L, Ramaswami B, Marrari M, Landsittel D, Chang A, Chandran U, Fadakar P, Yamada M, Chalasani G, Randhawa P, Zeevi A, Singh H, Lefaucheur C, Metes D. Coordinated Circulating T Follicular Helper and Activated B Cell Responses Underlie the Onset of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2457-2474. [PMID: 32723838 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020030320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has been long recognized as a leading cause of allograft failure after kidney transplantation, the cellular and molecular processes underlying the induction of deleterious donor-specific antibody (DSA) responses remain poorly understood. METHODS Using high-dimensional flow cytometry, in vitro assays, and RNA sequencing, we concomitantly investigated the role of T follicular helper (TFH) cells and B cells during ABMR in 105 kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS There were 54 patients without DSAs; of those with DSAs, ABMR emerged in 20 patients, but not in 31 patients. We identified proliferating populations of circulating TFH cells and activated B cells emerging in blood of patients undergoing ABMR. Although these circulating TFH cells comprised heterogeneous phenotypes, they were dominated by activated (ICOS+PD-1+) and early memory precursor (CCR7+CD127+) subsets, and were enriched for the transcription factors IRF4 and c-Maf. These circulating TFH cells produced large amounts of IL-21 upon stimulation with donor antigen and induced B cells to differentiate into antibody-secreting cells that produced DSAs. Combined analysis of the matched circulating TFH cell and activated B cell RNA-sequencing profiles identified highly coordinated transcriptional programs in circulating TFH cells and B cells among patients with ABMR, which markedly differed from those of patients who did not develop DSAs or ABMR. The timing of expansion of the distinctive circulating TFH cells and activated B cells paralleled emergence of DSAs in blood, and their magnitude was predictive of IgG3 DSA generation, more severe allograft injury, and higher rate of allograft loss. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing ABMR may benefit from monitoring and therapeutic targeting of TFH cell-B cell interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Louis
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Human Immunology and Immunopathology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche 976, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Camila Macedo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elodie Bailly
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Human Immunology and Immunopathology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche 976, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Louis Lau
- Center for Systems Immunology, Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bala Ramaswami
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marilyn Marrari
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Douglas Landsittel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Chang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Uma Chandran
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul Fadakar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Masaki Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Geetha Chalasani
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Harinder Singh
- Center for Systems Immunology, Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Inserm UMR S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Diana Metes
- Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania .,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Banham GD. A Cautionary Tale: Declining Renal Function Following Acute Rejection Post Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor to Belatacept in HLA-sensitized Individuals in the First Posttransplant Year. Transplantation 2020; 104:1322-1323. [PMID: 32569003 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma D Banham
- The Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.
Collapse
|
28
|
Jordan SC, Ammerman N, Choi J, Huang E, Peng A, Sethi S, Najjar R, Kim I, Toyoda M, Kumar S, Lim K, Vo A. The role of novel therapeutic approaches for prevention of allosensitization and antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2020; 20 Suppl 4:42-56. [PMID: 32538536 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Modification of pathogenic antibodies and their effector functions in autoimmune diseases or use of B cell/plasma cell-directed anticancer therapies have illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells (PCs), and pathogenic antibodies and complement in alloimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines that drive dysfunctional immune responses. Current methods to reduce alloantibodies are only modestly successful. Rituximab is used for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) treatment by targeting CD20 found on B-lymphocytes. However, PCs do not express CD20, likely explaining the limited success of this approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis (PLEX) have limited success due to antibody rebound. Despite attempts to develop tolerable therapeutics for management of AMR, none, to date, have been universally accepted or obtained Food and Drug Administration approval. Lack of approved therapeutics often results in patients having a much shorter graft survival due to AMR. Repurposing drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has rapidly yielded important advancements in the care of AMR patients. Here we discuss emerging therapeutics aimed at prevention and treatment of AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Noriko Ammerman
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jua Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Edmund Huang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alice Peng
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Supreet Sethi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Reiad Najjar
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Irene Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mieko Toyoda
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kathlyn Lim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thongprayoon C, Hansrivijit P, Leeaphorn N, Acharya P, Torres-Ortiz A, Kaewput W, Kovvuru K, Kanduri SR, Bathini T, Cheungpasitporn W. Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041193. [PMID: 32331309 PMCID: PMC7230851 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in surgical, immunosuppressive and monitoring protocols have led to the significant improvement of overall one-year kidney allograft outcomes. Nonetheless, there has not been a significant change in long-term kidney allograft outcomes. In fact, chronic and acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation, including multiple incidences of primary kidney disease, as well as complications such as cardiovascular diseases, infections, and malignancy are the major factors that have contributed to the failure of kidney allografts. The use of molecular techniques to enhance histological diagnostics and noninvasive surveillance are what the latest studies in the field of clinical kidney transplant seem to mainly focus upon. Increasingly innovative approaches are being used to discover immunosuppressive methods to overcome critical sensitization, prevent the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, treat chronic active ABMR, and reduce non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation, such as the recurrence of primary kidney disease and other complications, such as cardiovascular diseases, infections, and malignancy. In the present era of utilizing electronic health records (EHRs), it is strongly believed that big data and artificial intelligence will reshape the research done on kidney transplantation in the near future. In addition, the utilization of telemedicine is increasing, providing benefits such as reaching out to kidney transplant patients in remote areas and helping to make scarce healthcare resources more accessible for kidney transplantation. In this article, we discuss the recent research developments in kidney transplants that may affect long-term allografts, as well as the survival of the patient. The latest developments in living kidney donation are also explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17105, USA;
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Department of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA;
| | - Prakrati Acharya
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX 79905, USA;
| | - Aldo Torres-Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA;
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Karthik Kovvuru
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
| | - Swetha R. Kanduri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-601-984-5670; Fax: +1-601-984-5765
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parsons RF, Larsen CP, Pearson TC, Badell IR. Belatacept and CD28 Costimulation Blockade: Preventing and Reducing Alloantibodies over the Long Term. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2019; 6:277-284. [PMID: 32158639 PMCID: PMC7063534 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-019-00260-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Highlight developments in T and B cell biology that are helping elucidate the mechanisms underlying CD28 pathway blockade-mediated inhibition of alloantibodies in transplantation, and discuss recent clinical observations on the impact of belatacept on de novo and established HLA antibodies. Recent Findings The identification of T follicular helper cells as the CD4+ T cell subset required for optimal humoral immunity, along with newly identified roles for CD28 and the B7 molecules on B cell lineage cells has begun to pave the way for improved understanding and discovery of the mechanisms of CD28 costimulation blockade-mediated antibody inhibition. There has been resurgent clinical interest in the ability of belatacept to attenuate alloantibody responses. New reports have continued to document its ability to prevent de novo antibody responses, and more recent studies have surfaced exploring its potential to control nascent or pre-existing HLA antibodies. Summary A growing understanding of the mechanisms of anti-CD28-mediated alloantibody inhibition and continued clinical successes will guide the clinical optimization of belatacept and next generation CD28 blockers to prevent and reduce alloantibodies over the long-term.
Collapse
|
31
|
Outcomes of Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor to Belatacept-based Immunosuppression in HLA-sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2019; 104:1500-1507. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|