COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter

An Offline SPE-LC-MS/MS Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine A, Kynurenine, Tryptophan, and Creatinine Using Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Device Mitra

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants is critical in balancing insufficient immunosuppression due to underdosing, and severe adverse effects due to overdosage. For a more comprehensive therapeutic drug monitoring and follow-up of transplant patients, the aim was to develop a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, tryptophan, kynurenine, and creatinine using a volumetric absorptive microsampling device.

METHODS

Venous and capillary blood samples were simultaneously collected using a volumetric absorptive microsampling device called Mitra. The method involved protein precipitation followed by offline solid-phase extraction using a positive pressure manifold. Chromatographic separation was achieved by a formic acid-ammonium formate-methanol gradient on a Synergi Polar reversed-phase column. Multiple reaction monitoring in the positive ion mode and stable isotope-labeled internal standards were used for quantification. Validation was performed according to the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Validation was successful, meeting European Medicines Agency and FDA guidelines. Investigation of selectivity, accuracy, and precision met the required criteria of a deviation <15%. Internal standards successfully compensated potential matrix effects. A comparison of 26 anonymized samples from transplant patients on Mitra with venous blood controls demonstrated the method's suitability.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we herein describe a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, tryptophan, kynurenine, and creatinine on Mitra. Self-collection of samples may facilitate therapeutic monitoring. Simultaneous determination of creatinine may help monitor kidney function, while tryptophan and kynurenine may serve as a biomarker for early detection of transplant rejection.

Early combined therapy for COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: a promising approach against viral persistence and drug resistance

Immunocompromised (IC) patients face significant challenges in managing COVID-19 due to their heightened susceptibility to severe illness, persistent infections, and the potential development of drug resistance. Studies indicate that IC patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies (HM), hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTR), or solid organ transplants (SOTR), experience higher mortality rates and worse outcomes compared to the general population, even post-vaccination. The persistence of the virus in these patients, combined with its rapid mutation, further complicates treatment. Recent evidence supports the use of combined neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) as a more effective approach to viral clearance, reducing mortality, and preventing relapses. However, the rise of resistant variants, especially to mAbs, and concerns about the safety of prolonged or intensive therapies pose ongoing challenges. Monotherapies often fail short to address these issues, highlighting the need for early combined therapy (ECT) with mAbs and DAAs. ECT has shown promise in managing COVID-19 in IC individuals by targeting multiple stages of the viral lifecycle, reducing viral load, and clearing infections at earlier stages, which helps mitigate the risks of severe disease and drug resistance. Continued research is essential to refine these treatment protocols, especially as the virus evolves. Although further studies are needed, current findings suggest that ECT may become the standard of care for managing COVID-19 in severely IC patients, offering better clinical outcomes and hindering viral persistence.

Risk factors for mortality among kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has profoundly impacted global health, leading to over 74 million confirmed cases and 1.67 million deaths by December 2020. In Saudi Arabia, extensive measures were implemented to mitigate the spread of the virus. Kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppressed status, are particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19 outcomes. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with mortality in COVID-19-infected kidney transplant patients in Saudi Arabia. The primary objective is to identify mortality risk factors among COVID-19-infected kidney transplant patients. The secondary objective is to compare clinical management and outcomes between deceased and recovered patients.

METHODOLOGY

This case-control study matched 82 deceased kidney transplant patients (cases) with 151 survivors (controls). Data were collected from the National Registry for COVID-19 Mortality and King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) for patients diagnosed between March 2020 and January 2021. Key variables included demographic information, comorbidities, clinical symptoms, and treatment details. Statistical analyses involved chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to assess associations with mortality.

RESULTS

Among cases, 93.9% required ICU admission, and 95.1% were intubated. Males constituted 73.2% of cases, with 53.7% aged over 60. Cardiovascular comorbidities were more prevalent among cases (97% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.01). and presented more frequently with fever, cough, and respiratory distress. In multivariable analysis, fever, shortness of breath, and desaturation were associated with increased mortality odds. Notably, patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy had higher mortality odds (OR = 63.2, p = 0.083), whereas those who held or adjusted their therapy had significantly lower odds (OR = 0.1, p = 0.042; OR = 0.0, p = 0.007). Bacterial infections also increased mortality risk (OR = 56.6, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

This study identifies critical risk factors for mortality among kidney transplant patients infected with COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. The findings underscore the need for tailored clinical management strategies to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population. Further research is warranted to explore long-term implications and effective treatment protocols.

Altered baseline immunological state and impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in lung transplant recipients

The effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is diminished in organ transplant patients. Using a multi-omics approach, we investigate the immunological state of lung transplant (LTX) recipients at baseline and after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination compared to healthy controls (HCs). LTX patients exhibit a baseline immune profile resembling severe COVID-19 and sepsis, characterized by elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., EN-RAGE [also known as S100A12], interleukin [IL]-6), reduced human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression on monocytes and dendritic cells, impaired cytokine production, and increased plasma microbial products. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies an enriched monocyte cluster in LTX patients marked by high S100A family expression and reduced cytokine and antigen presentation genes. Post vaccination, LTX patients show diminished antibody, B cell, and T cell responses, along with blunted innate immune signatures. Integrative analysis links these altered baseline immunological features to impaired vaccine responses. These findings provide critical insights into the immunosuppressed condition of LTX recipients and their reduced vaccine-induced adaptive and innate immune responses.

mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine induces CD4+ T-cell responses among solid organ transplant recipients

Background

Cell-mediated immunity may provide durable protection against severe COVID-19, including among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). This exploratory analysis in the open-label phase 3b trial evaluated cell-mediated immunity of mRNA-1273 in a subset of participants (59 kidney and 33 liver SOTRs; 12 immunocompetent participants).

Methods

In Part A, SOTRs received three 100-µg doses of mRNA-1273; immunocompetent participants received two doses. In Part B, an additional 100-µg dose was offered ≥4 months after the primary series. SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein-specific T-cell responses were measured by intracellular cytokine staining and polyfunctionality analyses.

Results

The primary series and additional dose of mRNA-1273 induced S protein-specific CD4+ T-cell responses exhibiting a Th-1-biased profile in both SOTRs and immunocompetent participants; however, response rates and magnitudes were lower among SOTRs. S protein-specific Th-2 CD4+ T-cell responses were below those observed for Th-1; CD8+ T-cell responses were not as robust among SOTRs compared with immunocompetent participants. Kidney SOTRs received multiple immunosuppressants and had lower cell-mediated immunity responses than liver SOTRs. Polyfunctional responses exhibited Th-1 cytokine signatures with ≤5 functional markers reported in SOTRs and immunocompetent participants.

Conclusion

Overall, a three-dose mRNA-1273 primary series elicited Th-1-biased CD4+ T-cell responses among SOTRs that were improved with an additional dose.

Clinical trial registration

https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04860297?term=NCT04860297%20&rank=1, identifier NCT04860297.

A third COVID-19 vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients induces antibody response to vaccine and Omicron variants but shows limited Ig subclass switching

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) suffer more frequent and more severe infections due to their compromised immune responses resulting from immunosuppressive treatments designed to prevent organ rejection. Pharmacological immunosuppression can adversely affect immune responses to vaccination. A cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) received their third dose of ancestral, monovalent COVID-19 vaccine in the context of a clinical trial and antibody responses to the vaccine strain, as well as two Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.5 were investigated and compared with healthy controls who also received a third dose of mRNA vaccine (HCs). Total IgG and live virus neutralizing antibody titers were reduced in KTRs compared with controls for all variants. KTRs displayed altered IgG subclass switching, with significantly lower IgG3 antibodies. Responses in KTRs were also very heterogeneous, with some individuals showing strong responses but a significant number showing no Omicron-specific neutralizing antibodies. Taken together, immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination in KTRs were not only lower than HCs but highly variable, indicating that simply increasing the number of vaccine doses alone may not be sufficient to provide greater protection in this population. These findings underscore the need for tailored vaccination strategies for immunosuppressed populations, such as KTRs. Alternative formulations and doses of COVID-19 vaccines should be considered for people with severely compromised immune systems, as more frequent vaccinations may not significantly improve the response, especially regarding neutralizing antibodies.IMPORTANCEThis study addresses the challenges faced by kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in mounting effective immune responses against COVID-19. By evaluating the antibody responses to a third dose of monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and its effectiveness against Omicron subvariants (BA.1 and BA.5), this study reveals significant reductions in both binding and neutralizing antibodies in KTRs compared with healthy controls. The research highlights altered IgG subclass switching and heterogeneous responses within the KTR population. Reduced recognition of variants, coupled with differences in IgG subclasses, decreases both the quality and quantity of protective antibodies after vaccination in KTRs. These findings underscore the need for tailored vaccination strategies for immunosuppressed populations, such as KTRs. Alternative formulations and doses of COVID-19 vaccines should be considered for people with severely compromised immune systems, as more frequent vaccinations may not significantly improve the response, especially regarding neutralizing antibodies.

COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant in lung transplant recipients: a single center case series

Background

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is no longer classified as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by World Health Organization, its global impact persists. Data on its impact in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) from China remain limited. This study aims to share clinical experiences and provide insights into managing LTRs with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Methods

We conducted a study on LTRs with COVID-19 caused by the Omicron variant from November 17, 2022, to May 1, 2023. Clinical information was gathered retrospectively through electronic medical records, questionnaires, or follow-up telephone calls.

Results

A total of 227 LTRs were reviewed for infection with Omicron variant. After excluding 49 cases without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, this left a final cohort of 178 infected LTRs, accounting for an infection rate of 78.4% (178/227). Of the patients, 50% (89/178) required hospitalization, with an average hospital stay of 16 days [interquartile range (IQR): 9.5-25.5 days]. Of the 89 hospitalized patients, 41.6% (37/89) eventually progressed to severe or critical disease, forming the severe/critical group (S/C group), while the remaining 58.4% (52/89) had mild or moderate disease (M/M group). In comparison to the M/M group, the S/C group had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (59.6 vs. 16.8 mg/L, P<0.001), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (45.5 vs. 22.5 mm/h, P=0.005) and D-dimer level (1.09 vs. 0.65 mg/L, P=0.01), but lower CD4+ T lymphocytes count (217 vs. 427 cells/µL, P=0.004). The S/C group had significantly higher rates of combined pulmonary bacterial infection (67.6% vs. 38.5%, P=0.006) and pulmonary fungal infection (73.0% vs. 38.5%, P=0.001) during the course of COVID-19, nearly double that of the M/M group. In a multivariate logistic analysis, elevated CRP (>41.8 mg/L), combined pulmonary fungal infection, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) as primary disease emerged as high-risk factors for developing the severe disease phenotype following Omicron variant infection in LTRs, with respective odds ORs values of 4.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68-11.23], 4.76 (95% CI: 1.59-15.64), and 5.13 (95% CI: 1.19-29.17). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that CD4+ T lymphocyte count may be a strong marker for predicting death. At a cutoff of 404 cells/µL, sensitivity was 0.509, specificity 0.999, and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.678-0.934). Ultimately, 13 recipients succumbed to COVID-19 related respiratory failure or secondary multiple organ dysfunction, resulting in an overall mortality rate of 7.3% (13/178).

Conclusions

LTRs are at high risk of secondary lung infections after Omicron. Key risk factors for severe disease include CRP >41.8 mg/L, ILD as primary disease, and pulmonary fungal infection. CD4+ T lymphocyte count may predict mortality risk in LTRs with COVID-19.

Patient outcomes: One-stage vs. two-stage lumbar surgery for symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis: A quality outcomes database study

OBJECTIVE

Controversy exists regarding treatment of symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis (LGS). Both one- and two-stage fusions are commonly performed, but it is unclear if one approach is superior. We aim to compare the satisfaction rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with LGS undergoing one- versus two-stage lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients with Grades I and II spondylolisthesis who underwent one- (n = 3223) or two-stage (n = 325), 1-2 level lumbar fusion. Demographics, comorbidities, symptom burden, and PROs were extracted and compared. Outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY), and satisfaction index. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, and QALY were 1.6, 1.7, 14.3, and 0.2, respectively. Patients with pre-existing scoliosis or kyphosis, missing data, and revision procedures were excluded. Categorical variables were compared with a Chi-square test; continuous variables were assessed for normality with a Shapiro Wilk test and compared with a Mann-Whitney U or Student's t-test.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted for baseline characteristics, except for a lower mean age, percentage of female patients, and prevalence of osteoporosis in the two-stage cohort (58 ± 12.4 vs 62 ± 11.6 years; 50 % vs 62 %; 3.0 % vs 7.1 %, respectively; p < 0.01). The average surgery length was longer in the two-stage cohort (p < 0.01). A significantly higher percentage of patients returned to baseline activities within 3 months postoperatively following one-stage procedures (43 % vs. 29 %, p < 0.01), irrespective of whether they had Grade 1 or Grade 2 spondylolisthesis. Comparable proportions of patients achieved the MCID for PROs, with no significant differences in satisfaction indices observed at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, regardless of preoperative spondylolisthesis grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving one and two-stage procedures for symptomatic LGS had similar rates of satisfaction and PROs. More research is necessary to define the benefits of two-stage approaches given their increased time, cost, and risk profile.

Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 infection in liver transplant recipients based on vaccination status

Background

COVID-19 disease burden has been mitigated by vaccination; however, concerns persist regarding weakened immune responses in liver transplant (LT) recipients. This study investigates COVID-19 outcomes in LT recipients based on vaccination status.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study identified LT recipients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection from 03/01/2020 to 07/31/2023. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for age, race, co-morbidities, number of immunosuppressive agents, and infection date.

Results

Of 1,787 registered LT recipients, 361 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Of those, 136 were unvaccinated and 225 were vaccinated. 13% had 1 vaccine dose, 31% had 2 vaccine doses, and 56% had 3 vaccine doses prior to infection. Logistic regression found higher mortality (p = 0.001) and hospitalization (p = 0.016) rates for older recipients, while those with 3 or more vaccine doses had lower mortality (p = 0.039) and hospitalization (p = 0.008) rates. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increased risk of hospitalization (p < 0.001). Adjusting for the date when the Omicron variant became locally predominant, the protective effect from 3 or more vaccine doses declined to an OR (95% CI) of 0.58 (0.15-2.23), p = 0.39.

Conclusions

Three or more COVID-19 vaccine doses could decrease mortality for LT recipients, particularly older recipients and those with CKD. These individuals may benefit from vaccination and other interventions.

Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subsets and antibodies in COVID-19-infected kidney transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

Peripheral lymphocyte subsets play vital roles in various disease conditions. However, the roles of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) are still unclear. In this research, we investigated the predictive value of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets on the severity of KTRs with COVID-19 and the correlation between antibodies and lymphocyte levels.

METHODS

84 patients with kidney transplantation combined with COVID-19 admitted from December 2022 to February 2023 were included. On the basis of the severity of COVID-19, they were categorized into a mild (n = 49) and a severe group (n = 35). The logistic regression method was utilized to build the critical risk prediction model for KTRs complicated with COVID-19. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), calibration plot and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the discrimination, calibration and clinical application value of this model. The Spearman correlation test was applied to examine the connection between antibodies and various immune indexes.

RESULTS

Except for the increase of CD4+HLA-DR+ T cells, the number of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell subsets in severe was lower than that in mild (P < 0.05). IL-6 in severe was higher than mild (P < 0.05). After screening variables, we established a regression equation prediction model, logit (P) = 4.965+ (-0.038) × (CD3+/lymphocytes (%)) + 0.064× (CD4+HLA-DR+/ CD4+ T cells (%)) + (-0.040) × (CD14+HLA-DR+/monocytes (%)). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.779 (95 % CI 0.679-0.879, P = 0.001). The cut-off value was 0.308, with a prediction sensitivity of 0.829 (95 % CI 0.657-0.928) and a specificity of 0.653 (95 % CI 0.503-0.779). Logistic regression analysis showed the increase in the percentage of CD4+HLA-DR+ T cells among CD4+ T cells was a risk factor for COVID-19 severity among kidney transplant recipients, while the increase in the percentage of CD3+ T cells among lymphocytes and CD14+HLA-DR+ monocytes among CD14+ monocytes acted as protective factors. COVID-19 antibodies were negatively correlated with CD8+CD45RA+CD27- (Terminally Differentiated Effector Memory T Cells, TEMRA), CD8+CD28-, CD8+CD38+ and CD4+CD38+ T cells, while positively correlated with CD8+CD45RA-CD27- (Effector Memory T cells, T8EM), CD8+CD45RA-CD27+ (Central Memory T cells, T8CM) and CD8+CD28+ T cells.

CONCLUSION

A predictive model was developed and validated for predicting the severe form of COVID-19 in KTRs. The model showed good predictive ability, concordance, and potential clinical utility.

Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The impact of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains unclear. This systematic review and network meta-analysis sought to assess the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in SOT recipients. We searched 6 databases from inception to March 1, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating different COVID-19 vaccination strategies in SOT recipients. Based on patient-important outcomes, we performed frequentist random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, separating RCTs and nonrandomized evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess our certainty in the evidence. We included 6 RCTs (N = 814) and 43 observational studies (N = 125 199). Overall, there is a paucity of randomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. The nonrandomized evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccination strategies patient-important outcomes, including COVID-19 infection, mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, and rejection, demonstrated low to very low certainty due to the included studies' risk of bias. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians and SOT recipients worked with minimal, very low-quality evidence in relation to COVID-19 vaccines in this population. In the instance of future public health emergencies, clinicians and researchers should collaborate closely with patient partners to ensure there is sufficient evidence in the transplant population on patient-important outcomes.

Clinical outcomes of Omicron infection and vaccine acceptance among pediatric liver transplant recipients: insights from a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to explore the clinical characteristics of Omicron infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients (PLTRs), after the national COVID-19 outbreak. Additionally, we will investigate changes in vaccine coverage and parental attitudes towards vaccinating their children after this current outbreak.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey to gather information on Omicron infection, vaccination status, and guardian attitude among PLTRs. Besides, utilized valid questionnaire and long-term follow-up information processing techniques, and performed statistical analysis of relevant parameters.

RESULTS

528 valid questionnaires were collected, among which, 251 responses replied Omicron infection status. The Omicron infection rate in Chinese PLTRs was 56.2% (141/251), similar to the report in the normal population (around 60%). 99.3% of infected PLTRs presented mild symptoms, mostly with fever (78.0%), followed by Cough (76.6%), with a mean RTPCR conversion time of 7 days; the overall PLTRs' vaccination rate in this study was 13.3%, similar to that of our previous study (9.4%). Besides, we found no significant differences of either infection rate or clinical symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Moreover, the study showed 61.6% of guardians supported COVID-19 inoculation despite the outbreak of Omicron status.

CONCLUSIONS

The symptoms of Omicron infection in Chinese PLTRs were relatively mild, vaccine immunization had a limited effect on PLTRs' defense against Omicron infection, besides, their guardians supported the inoculation policy with a caution.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn , identifier ChiCTR2200055968.

Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

Previous studies evaluating the differences in COVID-19 mortality rates between immunocompromised patients and other patient groups have shown conflicting findings. This research aimed to compare the mortality rates of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients during the Omicron-dominant period of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to identify factors associated with prognosis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1085 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia to the China-Japan Friendship Hospital between December 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. We assessed the prevalence of comorbidities, incidence of co-infections and nosocomial infections, and 30-day mortality.

Results

Among the 1085 patients, 254 were immunocompromised, and 831 were immunocompetent. Immunocompromised patients had higher rates of non-invasive ventilation use (30.3 % vs. 21.1 %), invasive ventilation (12.2 % vs. 5.3 %), and 30-day mortality (19.7 % vs. 13.7 %) compared to immunocompetent patients. However, overall mortality rates did not significantly differ based on immunocompromised status. Cox regression analysis identified that elevated troponin T (≥0.15 ng/mL), respiratory failure, high lactate dehydrogenase (≥272.5 U/L), elevated D-dimer (≥1.295 mg/L), increased C-reactive protein (≥90 mg/L), elevated interleukin-6 (>11.67 ng/L), high peripheral blood neutrophil count (>9.84 × 10⁹/L), and immunocompromised status were independent predictors of poor COVID-19 prognosis. In the immunocompetent group, current smoking and a history of interstitial lung disease were related to a worse prognosis.

Conclusions

COVID-19 pneumonia due to the Omicron variant may lead to worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients. In immunocompetent patients, careful monitoring is essential for those with respiratory failure, smoking history, or interstitial lung disease to prevent adverse outcomes.

The Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Over Waves of the Pandemic

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are at increased risk from COVID-19. Over time, the absolute risk of adverse outcomes after COVID-19 has decreased in both the non-immunosuppressed/immunocompromised (non-ISC) general population, and amongst SOTR. Using the N3C, we examined the absolute risk of mortality, major adverse renal or cardiac events, and hospitalization after COVID-19 diagnosis amongst non-ISC and SOTR populations over five waves of the pandemic (Wave 1: Ancestral COVID; Wave 2: Alpha; Wave 3: Delta; Wave 4: Omicron; Wave 5: Omicron). Within each wave, we determined the relative risk of each outcome for SOTR versus the non-ISC population based on crude event rates, and then used multivariable cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression to determine the adjusted risk of each outcome based on SOT status. Throughout the pandemic, including during the Omicron wave (Wave 5), SOTR were at greater absolute risk for each outcome than non-ISC patients (p-values all <0.001). The adjusted risk of SOT status for each outcome was relatively stable over time (aHR 1.28-1.61 for mortality; aHR 1.31-1.47 for MACE; aHR 1.72-1.90 for MARCE; aHR 1.75-2.07 for AKI; and aOR 1.53-1.81 for hospitalization). Despite a reduction in the absolute risk of COVID-19 complications, the relative risk for SOTR versus the non-ISC population has not improved.

Characterization of the Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in COVID-19 Transplant versus Nontransplant Recipients by Ig-MS

Solid organ transplant recipients with immunosuppressant regimens to prevent rejection are less able to mount effective immune responses to pathogenic infection. Here, we apply a recently reported mass spectrometry-based serological approach known as Ig-MS to characterize immune responses against infection with SARS-CoV-2 in cohorts of transplant recipients and immunocompetent controls, both at a single early time point following COVID-19 diagnosis as well as over the course of one-month postdiagnosis. We found that the antibody repertoires generated by transplant recipients against SARS-CoV-2 do not differ significantly compared to immunocompetent individuals with regard to repertoire titer, clonality, or glycan composition. Importantly, our study is the first to characterize the evolution of antibody glycan profiles in transplant recipients with COVID-19 disease, presenting evidence that the evolution of glycan composition in these immunocompromised individuals is similar to that in immunocompetent people.

A Third COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Kidney Transplant Recipients Induces Antibody Response to Vaccine and Omicron Variants but Shows Limited Ig Subclass Switching

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) suffer more frequent and more severe infections due to their compromised immune responses resulting from immunosuppressive treatments designed to prevent organ rejection. Pharmacological immunosuppression can adversely affect immune responses to vaccination. A cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) received their third dose of ancestral, monovalent COVID-19 vaccine in the context of a clinical trial and antibody responses to the vaccine strain, as well as to Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.5 were investigated and compared with healthy controls. Total IgG and live virus neutralizing antibody titers were reduced in KTRs compared to controls for all variants. KTRs displayed altered IgG subclass switching, with significantly lower IgG3 antibodies. Responses in KTRs were also very heterogeneous, with some individuals showing strong responses but a significant number showing no Omicron-specific neutralizing antibodies. Taken together, immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination in KTRs were not only lower than healthy controls but highly variable, indicating that simply increasing the number of vaccine doses alone may not be sufficient to provide greater protection in this population.

Importance

This study addresses the challenges faced by kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in mounting effective immune responses against COVID-19. By evaluating the antibody responses to a third dose of monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and its effectiveness against Omicron subvariants (BA.1 and BA.5), this study reveals significant reductions in both binding and neutralizing antibodies in KTRs compared to healthy controls. The research highlights altered IgG subclass switching and heterogeneous responses within the KTR population. Reduced recognition of variants, coupled with differences in IgG subclasses, decreases both the quality and quantity of protective antibodies after vaccination in KTRs. These findings underscore the need for tailored vaccination strategies for immunosuppressed populations such as KTRs. Alternative formulations and doses of COVID-19 vaccines should be considered for people with severely compromised immune systems, as more frequent vaccinations may not significantly improve the response, especially regarding neutralizing antibodies.

Augmented humoral response to third and fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Since lung transplant recipients (LTRs) exhibit low immunogenicity after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, optimal vaccine strategies for SARS-CoV-2 are required in LTRs. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the third and fourth doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in LTRs.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center study of 73 LTRs and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Participants received two-to-four doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The LTRs were divided into three groups based on the number of vaccine dose. IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured, and adverse events were assessed. Factors associated with humoral response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The Dose 4 group (n = 27) had a higher humoral response rate (P = 0.018) and higher levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody (P = 0.04) than the Dose 2 group (n = 14). The Dose 3 group (n = 32) had lower humoral response rates (P = 0.005) and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody (P = 0.0005) than the HCs (n = 23) even after the same dose. Systemic adverse events were milder in the LTRs than in the HCs (P < 0.05). Increased number of vaccine dose was identified as a predictor of positive humoral response (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines may enhance humoral response with mild adverse events in LTRs. Repeated vaccination might be warranted for LTRs to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Kidney Transplantation - A 2024 Update

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has led to the death of about 7 million people worldwide. When infected, older individuals and those with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and compromised immune system are at higher risk for unfavorable outcomes. These comorbidities are prevalent in kidney transplant candidates and recipients making them inherently vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hence, the significant burden the pandemic has exerted on kidney transplant programs. With the swift discovery and wide-scale availability of vaccines and therapeutics against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the pandemic is currently behind us allowing transplant programs to relieve their restrictions and resume normal pre-COVID-19 operations. In the aftermath of the pandemic, we discuss the implications for immunosuppression and vaccination, COVID-19-induced kidney injury phenotypes and long COVID-19 symptoms. We also discuss some of the operational aspects the pandemic brought about - mainly the utilization of telemedicine - that are now here to stay.

Recent advances in COVID-19-induced liver injury: causes, diagnosis, and management

Since the start of the pandemic, considerable advancements have been made in our understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the associated COVID-19 on the hepatic system. There is a broad range of clinical symptoms for COVID-19. It affects multiple systems and has a dominant lung illness depending on complications. The progression of COVID-19 in people with pre-existing chronic liver disease (CLD) has also been studied in large multinational groups. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a higher risk of hepatic decompensation and death in patients with cirrhosis. In this review, the source, composition, mechanisms, transmission characteristics, clinical characteristics, therapy, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 were clarified and discussed, as well as the evolution and variations of the virus. This review briefly discusses the causes and effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with CLD. As part of COVID-19, In addition, we assess the potential of liver biochemistry as a diagnostic tool examine the data on direct viral infection of liver cells, and investigate potential pathways driving SARS-CoV-2-related liver damage. Finally, we explore how the pandemic has had a significant impact on patient behaviors and hepatology services, which may increase the prevalence and severity of liver disease in the future. The topics encompassed in this review encompass the intricate relationships between SARS-CoV-2, liver health, and broader health management strategies, providing valuable insights for both current clinical practice and future research directions.

Influence of ensitrelvir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on tacrolimus clearance in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND

Among the oral antivirals used for treating patients with mild-to-moderate novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/RTV) and ensitrelvir (ESV) are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and therefore, can cause drug-drug interactions with concomitant medications. Tacrolimus (TAC), a substrate of CYP3A4/5, is administered for a long period to prevent rejection after kidney transplantation. TAC should be discontinued while using NMV/RTV because blood TAC levels significantly increase when these drugs are concomitantly administered. However, the influence of ESV on blood TAC levels has not yet been reported, and the management of TAC doses during the use of ESV remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

We experienced three kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19, whose blood trough levels of TAC increased by the concomitant use of NMV/RTV or ESV. In two patients administering NMV/RTV, blood trough levels of TAC increased more than tenfold after combination therapy, whereas in one patient administering ESV, TAC level increased approximately threefold.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases suggest that TAC administration should be discontinued during NMV/RTV treatment to maintain blood TAC levels within the therapeutic range, and a reduced TAC dose is sufficient during ESV treatment.

Longitudinal outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients from 2020 to 2023

Data regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) across severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) waves, including the impact of different measures, are lacking. This cohort study, conducted from March 2020 to May 2023 in Toronto, Canada, aimed to analyze COVID-19 outcomes in 1975 SOTr across various SARS-CoV-2 waves and assess the impact of preventive and treatment measures. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as requiring supplemental oxygen, with secondary outcomes including hospitalization, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. SARS-CoV-2 waves were categorized as Wildtype/Alpha/Delta (318 cases, 16.1%), Omicron BA.1 (268, 26.2%), Omicron BA.2 (268, 13.6%), Omicron BA.5 (561, 28.4%), Omicron BQ.1.1 (188, 9.5%), and Omicron XBB.1.5 (123, 6.2%). Severe COVID-19 rate was highest during the Wildtype/Alpha/Delta wave (44.6%), and lower in Omicron waves (5.7%-16.1%). Lung transplantation was associated with severe COVID-19 (OR: 4.62, 95% CI: 2.71-7.89), along with rituximab treatment (OR: 4.24, 95% CI: 1.04-17.3), long-term corticosteroid use (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.46-6.62), older age (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.30-1.76), chronic lung disease (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.36-3.30), chronic kidney disease (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.17-4.07), and diabetes (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.37-2.83). Early treatment and ≥3 vaccine doses were associated with reduced severity (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.19-0.46, and 0.35, 95% CI: 0.21-0.60, respectively). Tixagevimab/cilgavimab and bivalent boosters did not show a significant impact. The study concludes that COVID-19 severity decreased across different variants in SOTr. Lung transplantation was associated with worse outcomes and may benefit more from preventive and early therapeutic interventions.

The Spread Pattern of New Practice in Liver Transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Introducing new liver transplantation (LT) practices, like unconventional donor use, incurs higher costs, making evaluation of their prognostic justification crucial. This study reexamines the spread pattern of new LT practices and its prognosis across the United States.

METHODS

The study investigated the spread pattern of new practices using the UNOS database (2014-2023). Practices included LT for hepatitis B/C (HBV/HCV) nonviremic recipients with viremic donors, LT for COVID-19-positive recipients, and LT using onsite machine perfusion (OMP). One year post-LT patient and graft survival were also evaluated.

RESULTS

LTs using HBV/HCV donors were common in the East, while LTs for COVID-19 recipients and those using OMP started predominantly in California, Arizona, Texas, and the Northeast. K-means cluster analysis identified three adoption groups: facilities with rapid, slow, and minimal adoption rates. Rapid adoption occurred mainly in high-volume centers, followed by a gradual increase in middle-volume centers, with little increase in low-volume centers. The current spread patterns did not significantly affect patient survival. Specifically, for LTs with HCV donors or COVID-19 recipients, patient and graft survivals in the rapid-increasing group was comparable to others. In LTs involving OMP, the rapid- or slow-increasing groups tended to have better patient survival (p = 0.05) and significantly improved graft survival rates (p = 0.02). Facilities adopting new practices often overlap across different practices.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis revealed three distinct adoption groups across all practices, correlating the adoption aggressiveness with LT volume in centers. Aggressive adoption of new practices did not compromise patient and graft survivals, supporting the current strategy. Understanding historical trends could predict the rise in future LT cases with new practices, aiding in resource distribution.

Reasons for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Patients Listed for Solid Organ Transplants

BACKGROUND

Patients listed for solid organ transplants (LSOTP) are at high risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Despite national guidelines recommending COVID-19 vaccination for LSOTP, vaccine hesitancy and underuse are reported in this population; however, reasons for this finding have not been examined thoroughly.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective survey analysis aimed to characterize reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among 110 heart, liver, and kidney patients LSOTP who had not received all the recommended vaccine doses at the time of the study. Survey questions also investigated experiences with influenza vaccination.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (49.1%) responded to the telephone survey. The most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were perceived lack of research in vaccine development (31%), fear of vaccine-related side effects (22%), and belief that the vaccine was unnecessary (20%). Of the respondents, 35% reported changing their vaccine perception after being listed for a transplant, most commonly attributing this to a perception that the COVID-19 vaccine is not safe for transplant recipients (32%). Gender differences in hesitancy reasons were observed, with males more likely to delay vaccination until after transplantation, although this difference was not significant (P = .07). Despite these findings, 54% of all respondents reported receiving annual influenza vaccines consistently.

CONCLUSION

Despite their risk, patients LSOTP show significant hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines owing to perceived safety and necessity issues. The results of this study can inform targeted educational efforts to address and rectify misconceptions and concerns about COVID-19 vaccination among patients LSOTP. Future studies focused on larger, more diverse cohorts are needed to expand our understanding of and address vaccination hesitancy among this vulnerable patient population.

D-SPIN constructs gene regulatory network models from multiplexed scRNA-seq data revealing organizing principles of cellular perturbation response

Gene regulatory networks within cells modulate the expression of the genome in response to signals and changing environmental conditions. Reconstructions of gene regulatory networks can reveal the information processing and control principles used by cells to maintain homeostasis and execute cell-state transitions. Here, we introduce a computational framework, D-SPIN, that generates quantitative models of gene regulatory networks from single-cell mRNA-seq datasets collected across thousands of distinct perturbation conditions. D-SPIN models the cell as a collection of interacting gene-expression programs, and constructs a probabilistic model to infer regulatory interactions between gene-expression programs and external perturbations. Using large Perturb-seq and drug-response datasets, we demonstrate that D-SPIN models reveal the organization of cellular pathways, sub-functions of macromolecular complexes, and the logic of cellular regulation of transcription, translation, metabolism, and protein degradation in response to gene knockdown perturbations. D-SPIN can also be applied to dissect drug response mechanisms in heterogeneous cell populations, elucidating how combinations of immunomodulatory drugs can induce novel cell states through additive recruitment of gene expression programs. D-SPIN provides a computational framework for constructing interpretable models of gene-regulatory networks to reveal principles of cellular information processing and physiological control.

Impaired immune responses and prolonged viral replication in lung allograft recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the early phase after transplantation

PURPOSE

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe disease following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) due to high-dose immunosuppressive drugs and the lung is the main organ affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Several studies have confirmed increased SARS-CoV-2-related mortality and morbidity in patients living with lung allografts; however, detailed immunological studies of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early phase following transplantation remain scarce.

METHODS

We investigated patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the early phase (18-103 days) after receiving double-lung allografts (n = 4, LuTx) in comparison to immunocompetent patients who had not received solid organ transplants (n = 88, noTx). We analyzed SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA), and immunoblot assays. T cell responses were investigated using Elispot assays.

RESULTS

One LuTx patient suffered from persistent infection with fatal outcome 122 days post-infection despite multiple interventions including remdesivir, convalescent plasma, and the monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab. Two patients experienced clinically mild disease with prolonged viral shedding (47 and 79 days), and one patient remained asymptomatic. Antibody and T cell responses were significantly reduced or undetectable in all LuTx patients compared to noTx patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the early phase following lung allograft transplantation are vulnerable to infection with SARS-CoV-2 due to impaired immune responses. This patient population should be vaccinated before LuTx, protected from infection post-LuTx, and in case of infection treated generously with currently available interventions.

Abnormally Elevated Blood Tacrolimus Level Following the Concomitant Use of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir With Extended-Release Tacrolimus in a Post-lung Transplant Patient: A Case Report and a Literature Review

Although nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) reportedly increases blood levels of tacrolimus (TAC) due to CYP3A4 inhibition and other factors, reports on the use of NMV/r in combination with tacrolimus hydrate extended-release capsules (TAC-ER) in lung transplant patients are limited. Herein, we present a case with post-lung transplantation of elevated blood trough levels of TAC after concomitant use of NMV/r. A woman in her 60s had undergone lung transplantation. She had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and was co-administered NMV/r and TAC-ER, with the trough level controlled at approximately 4 μg/mL. Upon the co-administration of NMV/r and TAC-ER, the patient developed diarrhea and vomiting and was hospitalized. TAC-ER was discontinued on day 6, and TAC level was measured on day 8 and had risen above 100 ng/mL. This level gradually decreased to 17.8 ng/mL on day 11 and 2.4 ng/mL on day 15; therefore, TAC-ER was resumed at 2.5 mg/day. On day 18, the TAC level was 5.2 ng/mL, which was within the target range, and the patient was discharged on day 19. This is the first report of a post-lung transplant patient co-administered TAC-ER with NMV/r, who showed abnormally high blood TAC levels above the detection limit. In patients using TAC-ER after lung transplantation, it may be useful to confirm that the TAC blood level is below the effective therapeutic range before resuming TAC-ER safely.

Clinical Features and Prognostic Predictors in Patients with Renal Transplant Complicated by SARS-CoV-2 Infection, a Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background

This study examines the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients. Given their immunosuppressed status, these patients are at higher risk of severe complications from COVID-19. The study aims to provide healthcare professionals with critical insights for diagnosing and managing this vulnerable population.

Patients and methods

This retrospective cohort study included adult renal transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. Data on demographics, medical history, laboratory results, and patient outcomes were analyzed to identify clinical characteristics and prognostic factors.

Results

This study included 115 renal transplant recipients with COVID-19, predominantly male, with a mortality rate of 10.4% (12 deaths). The overall vaccination rate was 20%. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in initial serum creatinine levels, and percentages of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, along with CRP levels on day 3. Additionally, CRP levels, hemoglobin, and platelet counts on day 7 also differed significantly. Multivariate analysis identified CRP levels on days 3 and 7, day 7 hemoglobin and platelet counts, and concurrent bacterial infections as independent risk factors for mortality.

Conclusion

Elevated CRP levels, renal impairment, and bacterial co-infections play a significant role in the outcomes of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. This study highlights the importance of monitoring these factors for early identification and management of high-risk patients.

Infections in lung transplanted patients: A review

Lung transplantation can improve the survival of patients with severe chronic pulmonary disorders. However, the short- and long-term risk of infections can increase morbidity and mortality rates. A non-systematic review was performed to provide the most updated information on pathogen, host, and environment-related factors associated with the occurrence of bacterial, fungal, and viral infections as well as the most appropriate therapeutic options. Bacterial infections account for about 50% of all infectious diseases in lung transplanted patients, while viruses represent the second cause of infection accounting for one third of all infections. Almost 10% of patients develop invasive fungal infections during the first year after lung transplant. Pre-transplantation comorbidities, disruption of physical barriers during the surgery, and exposure to nosocomial pathogens during the hospital stay are directly associated with the occurrence of life-threatening infections. Empiric antimicrobial treatment after the assessment of individual risk factors, local epidemiology of drug-resistant pathogens and possible drug-drug interactions can improve the clinical outcomes.

Treatment of Patients After Lung Transplantation With Covid Infection During Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing lung transplantation are routinely managed with lifelong immunosuppression, which is associated with a heightened risk for infections. This study delves into the therapeutic challenges and strategies for managing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) infected with COVID-19 during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The was a case series analysis, among which nonstandard therapies consisting of targeted antibody treatment, antiviral drugs, or anti-interleukin-6 drugs were applied in patients after lung transplantation. Additional analysis of laboratory test results for systemic inflammation and imaging studies was also carried out. The study was limited to a dedicated COVID-19 center, commonly known as a temporary hospital, and included patients infected with COVID-19 in the late post-lung transplant period (home-related infection).

RESULTS

Fifteen post-lung transplantation patients with current COVID-19 infection were treated with antibodies such as tocilizumab, casirivimab, imdevimab, and regdanvimab. Of these patients, 1 was given tocilizumab (7%), 8 casirivimab and imdevimab (53%), and 2 regdanvimab (13%). Of the 15 lung transplant recipients studied, 8 presented COVID-19-associated lung changes in computed tomography scans (53%). Common clinical manifestations included dyspnea, fever, and fatigue. Antiviral agents, like remdesivir, were employed in the remaining 4 cases (27%), and adjunctive therapies, such as corticosteroids and anticoagulants, were used selectively. All treated patients survived the infection without complications; the treatment proved effective and safe.

Occurrence of COVID-19 in cystic fibrosis patients: a review

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic ailment caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. This autosomal recessive disorder is characterized by diverse pathobiological abnormalities, such as the disorder of CFTR channels in mucosal surfaces, caused by inadequate clearance of mucus and sputum, in addition to the malfunctioning of mucous organs. However, the primary motive of mortality in CF patients is pulmonary failure, which is attributed to the colonization of opportunistic microorganisms, formation of resistant biofilms, and a subsequent decline in lung characteristics. In December 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of the radical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a worldwide public health crisis, which unexpectedly spread not only within China but also globally. Given that the respiration system is the primary target of the COVID-19 virus, it is crucial to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the pathogenesis and mortality of CF patients, mainly in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Therefore, the goal of this review is to comprehensively review the present literature on the relationship between cystic fibrosis, COVID-19 contamination, and development of ARDS. Several investigations performed during the early stages of the virus outbreak have discovered unexpected findings regarding the occurrence and effectiveness of COVID-19 in individuals with CF. Contrary to initial expectancies, the rate of infection and the effectiveness of the virus in CF patients are lower than those in the overall population. This finding may be attributed to different factors, including the presence of thick mucus, social avoidance, using remedies that include azithromycin, the fairly younger age of CF patients, decreased presence of ACE-2 receptors, and the effect of CFTR channel disorder on the replication cycle and infectivity of the virus. However, it is important to notice that certain situations, which include undergoing a transplant, can also doubtlessly boost the susceptibility of CF patients to COVID-19. Furthermore, with an increase in age in CF patients, it is vital to take into account the prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in this population. Therefore, ordinary surveillance of CF patients is vital to evaluate and save the population from the capability of transmission of the virus given the various factors that contribute to the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in this precise organization.

Designing and analyzing studies of coronavirus disease 2019 and post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 among immunocompromised individuals

Observational studies of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among transplant candidates and recipients remain important as immunocompromised patients formed a very small proportion of patients included in COVID-19 trials and large database analyses. We discuss methods that have been used in such analyses to evaluate the impact of vaccination on the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 in such patients and on the probability of developing post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 after the onset of infection. We also propose future directions for research and discuss the methods that will be useful to conduct such investigations. The study design and analytical issues that we consider have the potential to be helpful not only for COVID-19 research but also for other infections as well.

Outcome of lung transplantation in patients with pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis in the era of COVID-19 infection

Lung transplant recipients are at higher risk of developing COVID-19 infection compared to other solid organ transplants. The risk further increases in the unvaccinated patients. We present a case of a 43-year-old male who underwent bilateral sequential lung transplantation for pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis (PAM) and had an uneventful recovery. However, two years post-transplantation, the patient developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and two episodes of COVID-19 infection. During the second episode of COVID-19 infection, the patient developed sepsis and multi-organ dysfunction ultimately resulting in death. Our case report highlights the increased susceptibility of PAM patients' post-lung transplant to COVID-19 infection. Continuous follow-up of PAM patients' post-lung transplantation is necessary to prevent unfavorable outcomes.

Single-center Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With SARS-CoV-2-Positive Donors: An Argument for Increased Utilization

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in SARS-CoV-2-test positive potential organ donors. The benefits of life-saving liver transplantation (LT) must be balanced against the potential risk of donor-derived viral transmission. Although emerging evidence suggests that the use of COVID-19-positive donor organs may be safe, granular series thoroughly evaluating safety are still needed. Results of 29 consecutive LTs from COVID-19-positive donors at a single center are presented here.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between April 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Differences between recipients of COVID-19-positive (n = 29 total; 25 index, 4 redo) and COVID-19-negative (n = 472 total; 454 index, 18 redo) deceased donor liver grafts were compared.

Results

COVID-19-positive donors were significantly younger (P = 0.04) and had lower kidney donor profile indices (P = 0.04) than COVID-19-negative donors. Recipients of COVID-19-positive donor grafts were older (P = 0.04) but otherwise similar to recipients of negative donors. Donor SARS-CoV-2 infection status was not associated with a overall survival of recipients (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-5.04; P = 0.89). There were 3 deaths among recipients of liver grafts from COVID-19-positive donors. No death seemed virally mediated because there was no qualitative association with peri-LT antispike antibody titers, post-LT prophylaxis, or SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Conclusions

The utilization of liver grafts from COVID-19-positive donors was not associated with a decreased overall survival of recipients. There was no suggestion of viral transmission from donor to recipient. The results from this large single-center study suggest that COVID-19-positive donors may be used safely to expand the deceased donor pool.

Preexisting renal graft dysfunction as a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant pneumonia: A postinfection cross-sectional study of 312 immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia poses significant challenges to health systems worldwide, particularly, in severe and critical cases. Immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients appear to be at a particularly high risk for severe or critical COVID-19 illness. However, few studies elucidated the risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in renal transplant recipients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A postinfection cross-sectional survey was conducted in 312 renal transplant recipients and 503 age- and sex-matched controls to explore risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The results showed that renal transplant recipients had a much higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (48.1%) after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant than controls (5.6%). The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis identified older age, lower creatinine clearance before infection, and higher dose of prednisone before infection as risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Preexisting renal dysfunction was a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, with an odds ratio of 3.27 (1.01-10.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Preexisting renal graft dysfunction was a major risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant pneumonia. It is suggested that high-risk renal transplant recipients should undergo computed tomography scanning within 14 days after infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Viral presence and immunopathology in a kidney transplant recipient with fatal COVID-19: a clinical autopsy report

COVID-19 is of special concern to immunocompromised individuals, including organ transplant recipients. However, the exact implications of COVID-19 for the immunocompromised host remain unclear. Existing theories regarding this matter are controversial and mainly based on clinical observations. Here, the postmortem histopathology, immunopathology, and viral presence in various tissues of a kidney transplant recipient with COVID-19 were compared to those of 2 nontransplanted patients with COVID-19 matched for age, sex, length of intensive care unit stay, and admission period in the pandemic. None of the tissues of the kidney transplant recipient demonstrated the presence of SARS-CoV-2. In lung tissues of both controls, some samples showed viral positivity with high Ct values with quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The lungs of the kidney transplant recipient and controls demonstrated similar pathology, consisting of acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia with thrombosis and an inflammatory response with T cells, B cells, and macrophages. The kidney allograft and control kidneys showed a similar pattern of interstitial lymphoplasmacytic infiltration. No myocarditis could be observed in the hearts of the kidney transplant recipient and controls, although all cases contained scattered lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the myocardium, pericardium, and atria. The brainstems of the kidney transplant recipient and controls showed a similar pattern of lymphocytic inflammation with microgliosis. This research report highlights the possibility that, based on the results obtained from this single case, at time of death, the immune response in kidney transplant recipients with long-term antirejection immunosuppression use prior to severe illness is similar to nontransplanted deceased COVID-19 patients.

Early pandemic in-hospital outcomes and mortality risk factors in COVID-19 solid organ transplant patients

Background

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of mortality than those without COVID-19. However, it is unclear how SOT patient outcomes compare to the general population without SOT who contract COVID-19.

Methods

We used the National Inpatient Sample from January to December 2020 to investigate inpatient outcomes seen in SOT recipients after contracting COVID-19 compared to nontransplant patients. We identified our study sample using ICD-10 CM and excluded those <18 years of age and those with dual organ transplants. Inpatient outcomes were compared in SOT and non-SOT COVID cohorts, and we further evaluated predictors of mortality in the SOT with COVID population.

Results

Out of the 1,416,445 COVID-19 admissions included in the study, 8315 (0.59%) were single SOT recipients. Our analysis that adjusted for multiple baseline characteristics and comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19 in SOT patients was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-3.02, P < 0.01), lower rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, P < 0.01), and similar rates of cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, circulatory shock, cerebrovascular events, and in-hospital mortality. Age >65 was associated with mortality in SOT patients.

Conclusion

In this nationally representative sample, SOT patients presenting with COVID-19 experienced similar rates of mortality compared to those without SOT. SOT patients were more likely to develop acute kidney injury. Further research is needed to understand the complex relationship between transplant patient outcomes and COVID-19.

Emergency department evaluation of transplanted children with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Children usually have an asymptomatic or mild course of SARS-CoV-2 infection, studies in immunocompromised patients have shown a different evolution. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical, laboratory, and radiologic manifestations of pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective, observational descriptive study was conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in Madrid (Spain) between March 2020 and December 2022. Consecutive patients aged 0-18 attending the corresponding pediatric emergency departments with a positive result in the real-time polymerase chain reaction test or antigenic test to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharyngeal sample were included.

RESULTS

A total of 31 children were included in the study. Sixteen (51.6%) were patients with HSCT and 15 (48.3) were patients with SOT. The median time from transplantation to COVID-19 was 1.2 years (IQR:0.5-5.1). The SOT cohort included liver (n = 4, 12.9%), kidney (n = 4, 12.9%), heart (n = 3, 9.7%), multivisceral (n = 3, 9.7%), and lung (n = 1, 3.2%). Of the 31 patients, only one was asymptomatic. The most common symptom on presentation was fever (76.7%). Abnormalities were seen on chest X-ray in 8 (66.6%) of the 12 patients. There was no significant difference in clinical manifestations, lymphopenia and radiological findings regardless of the type of transplantation or immunosuppression status. Thirteen patients (41.9%) were hospitalized. There were no patient deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that the clinical course and outcome of SOT and HSCT pediatric patients with COVID-19 were generally favorable.

Monitored COVID-19 vaccine humoral response in immunocompromised solid organ transplant recipients

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in rapid research and vaccine development to help curtail unchecked transmission. However, these studies cannot be applied as easily among every population, such as immunocompromised individuals. In this study, we observed the humoral response of 70 total heart and renal transplant patients to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations to help further understand the effectiveness of vaccination in post-transplant patients following second or booster vaccinations. Antibodies were measured by bead technology to detect IgG, as well as IgG/IgM Rapid Cassette tests for confirmation. Immunocompromised patients had a noticeably lower humoral response than non-immunocompromised populations, with an even lower response among Black patients. Our findings also show for the first time various antibody responses to different motifs of the virus, with the lowest being against the S2 motif. A potential link between the duration of immunosuppression and vaccine response was also observed, where patients on immunosuppressants for longer had a stronger response to vaccination compared to recent transplant patients in our study. In addition, younger transplant recipients had a better humoral response to vaccination, and vaccine effectiveness was disproportionate between races. This finding reinforces the continuation of the guidelines for accelerated vaccination schedules for immunocompromised patients.

Humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in immunosuppressed liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) are at a high risk of severe COVID-19 owing to immunosuppression and comorbidities. LTRs are less responsive to mRNA vaccines than healthy donors (HDs) or other immunosuppressed patients. However, the disruption mechanism in humoral and cellular immune memory responses is unclear.

METHODS

We longitudinally collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells and plasma samples from HDs (n = 44) and LTRs (n = 54) who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines. We measured the levels of anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies and spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses.

RESULTS

Here, we show that the induction of anti-RBD IgG was weaker in LTRs than in HDs. The use of multiple immunosuppressive drugs is associated with lower antibody titers than only calcineurin inhibitor, and limits the induction of CD4+ T-cell responses. However, spike-specific CD4+ T-cell and antibody responses improved with a third vaccination. Furthermore, mRNA vaccine-induced spike-specific CD8+ T cells are quantitatively, but not qualitatively, limited to LTRs. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells react to omicron sublineages, regardless of the presence in HDs or LTRs. However, there is no boosting effect of spike-specific memory CD8+ T-cell responses after a third vaccination in HDs or LTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The third mRNA vaccination improves both humoral responses and spike-specific CD4+ T-cell responses in LTRs but provides no booster effect for spike-specific memory CD8+ T-cell responses. A third mRNA vaccination could be helpful in LTRs to prevent severe COVID-19, although further investigation is required to elicit CD8+ T-cell responses in LTRs and HDs.

Management of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and tacrolimus interaction in kidney transplant recipients infected by COVID-19: a three-case series

OBJECTIVES

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir may cause a clinically relevant drug-drug interaction (DDI) with immunosuppressive drugs, such as tacrolimus, which may condition the use of this antiviral in transplant patients. We aimed to describe the management of this interaction.

METHODS

Descriptive study in which renal transplant patients in treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and tacrolimus were included. They suspended tacrolimus the day before starting the antiviral treatment, and the decision to restart it was made based on their tacrolimus blood levels. Main variables studied to measure this DDI were tacrolimus blood concentration, dose adjustment and serum creatinine.

RESULTS

Three patients were included. During the study, tacrolimus levels elevation did not have repercussion in the serum creatinine, that remained stable in all patients. No patient required hospitalisation or showed signs of rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience provides further evidence that this interaction should not be a contraindication to treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and can be managed with close monitoring of tacrolimus levels.

Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes after COVID-19 infection unique to solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are not published. We describe outcomes including readmission, allograft rejection, allograft dysfunction, allograft failure, and death.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mostly unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19 from March 2020 to November 2021. Disease severity was assigned by NIH criteria. Data included demographics, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes and are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (range).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight SOTR were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a median of 5 (IQR 3-8) years post-transplant with a mean age of 57 ± 12 years at diagnosis. Forty-one recovered at home; 97 were admitted. 12/32 (37.5%) SOTR with critical disease expired during initial admission. Among those who recovered, 48/126 (38.0%) had asymptomatic or mild infection, 31/126 (24.6%) had moderate, 27/126 (21.4%) severe, and 20/126 (15.9%) critical infection. 38/85 (44.7%) of SOTR who survived initial admission had 74 readmissions within 180 days (Figure 1). The 6-month mortality rate among those who survived infection was 4/126 (3.2%). The mean time from initial infection to death was 32 ± 66 days in inpatient deaths and 95 ± 39 days in those who were discharged or never admitted. Six-month graft dysfunction occurred in 18/125 (14.4%) and graft failure in 9/126 (7.2%); five failures were deaths with function.

CONCLUSION

Readmissions after COVID-19 infection were frequent after the index admission. Rejection was relatively infrequent; graft dysfunction at 6 months post-infection was more common than rejection. Six-month mortality following COVID-19 recovery in SOTR was significant; close follow-up of patients is warranted.

An Overview of Liver Transplantation: Current Status, Recent Techniques, and Challenges-Perspectives From a Center in China

Liver transplantation is the best way to treat end-stage liver disease.With benefits from enhanced techniques, refined management, and advanced medications, liver transplant boasts a commendable 5-year survival rate for recipients. Nevertheless, acquiring the perioperative management and surgical skills essential for liver transplant is a time-consuming process for new surgeons. In addition, COVID-19 has also affected the field. Based on our actual situation in China, we have provided an overview of donor evaluation,recipient selection,transplant procedures, postoperative complications and management, longterm management, and pandemic strategies to guide new clinical surgeons in the field.

Humoral and cellular immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination of lung transplant recipients and patients on the waiting list: a 6-month follow-up

Background

Data on cellular response and the decay of antibodies and T cells in time are scarce in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Additionally, the development and durability of humoral and cellular immune responses have not been investigated in patients on the waitlist for lung transplantation (WLs). Here, we report our 6-month follow-up of humoral and cellular immune responses of LTRs and WLs, compared with controls.

Methods

Humoral responses to two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccination were assessed by determining spike (S)-specific IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies. Cellular responses were investigated by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) and IFN-γ ELISpot assay at 28 days and 6 months after the second vaccination.

Results

In LTRs, the level of antibodies and T-cell responses was significantly lower at 28 days after the second vaccination. Also, WLs had lower antibody titers and lower T-cell responses compared with controls. Six months after the second vaccination, all groups showed a decrease in antibody titers and T-cell responses. In WLs, the rate of decline of neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses was significantly higher than in controls.

Conclusion

Our results show that humoral and cellular responses in LTRs, if they develop, decrease at rates comparable with controls. In contrast, the inferior cellular responses and the rapid decay of both humoral and cellular responses in the WL groups imply that WLs may not be protected adequately by two vaccinations and repeat boostering may be necessary to induce protection that lasts beyond the months immediately post-transplantation.

Molecular Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 and Clinical Manifestations among Organ Transplant Recipients with COVID-19

RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, rely on genetic mutation as a major evolutionary mechanism, leading to the emergence of variants. Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) may be particularly vulnerable to such mutations, making it crucial to monitor the spread and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in this population. This cohort study investigated the molecular epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 by comparing the SARS-CoV-2 whole genome, demographic characteristics, clinical conditions, and outcomes of COVID-19 illness among OTRs (n = 19) and non-OTRs with (n = 38) or without (n = 30) comorbid conditions. Most patients without comorbidities were female, whereas most OTRs were male. Age varied significantly among the three groups: patients with comorbidities were the oldest, and patients without comorbidities were the youngest. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that OTRs with mild disease had higher numbers of unusual mutations than patients in the other two groups. Additionally, OTRs who died had similar spike monoclonal antibody resistance mutations and 3CLpro mutations, which may confer resistance to nirmatrelvir, ensitrelvir, and GC37 therapy. The presence of those unusual mutations may impact the severity of COVID-19 illness in OTRs by affecting the virus's ability to evade the immune system or respond to treatment. The higher mutation rate in OTRs may also increase the risk of the emergence of new virus variants. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring the genetic makeup of SARS-CoV-2 in all immunocompromised populations and patients with comorbidity.

Disparities in telemedicine utilization among kidney transplant patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Barriers and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for the rapid implementation of telemedicine for kidney transplant patients; however, widespread adoption may worsen existing health care inequities among vulnerable populations. This study aimed to characterize telemedicine utilization by kidney transplant patients during the early pandemic with particular attention to healthcare equity.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of kidney transplant patients interacting with telemedicine was performed. Patient demographic data and distance to the transplant center were obtained. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and Brokamp Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) score were used to characterize patients' counties of residence. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between patient and community characteristics and the likelihood of an encounter being telemedicine.

RESULTS

This study included 1033 patients who participated in 3727 encounters from March 11 through October 2020. Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of telemedicine use were increased age (OR = .993; 95% CI = .986-.999, P = .022), non-White vs. White race (OR = .826, 95% CI = .697-.979; P = .028), male vs. female sex (OR = .746, 95% CI = .632-.880; P < .001), and a higher Brokamp Neighborhood Deprivation Index score (OR = .159; 95% CI = .029-.873; P = .034). The effect of distance to the transplant center on the likelihood of a telemedicine encounter differed by NCHS Urban-Rural designation (interaction P = .018), with its likelihood increasing by 2%-3% with each 10-mile increment among persons residing in medium-, small-, and non-metropolitan counties compared to those residing in the most rural counties.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine visits were less often completed by patients of older age, non-white race, male sex, and those residing in counties having higher NDI scores. While telemedicine has the potential to improve healthcare access and decrease costs, proactive efforts need to be taken to mitigate disparities in vulnerable populations.

Clinical Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients Admitted with COVID-19 Infection in 2020: A Nationwide Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by infection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has impacted morbidity and mortality through widespread cytokine release and aberrant immunity; the mainstay of management has been immunosuppression. The aim of our retrospective study is to determine the effects of solid-organ transplantation (SOT) on COVID-19 admissions using data from the 2020 nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). After multivariate adjustment, we found COVID-19 admission with SOT had no difference in mortality (11.5% vs 11.1%, adjusted OR: 0.99 [95% CI 0.84-1.19, P = 0.99], no difference in need for vasopressor use (2.6% vs 1.8%, adjusted OR: 1.02 [95% CI 0.73-1.44, P = 0.88]), lower odds of requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) (13.7% vs 14.8%, adjusted OR: 0.83 [95% CI 0.71-0.97, P = 0.02]), lower odds of MV within 24 hours of admission (adjusted OR: 0.60 [95% CI 0.47-0.78, P < 0.01]), increased odds of mechanical circulatory support needs (adjusted OR 3.7 [95% CI 1.2-11.7, P = 0.025]), increased odds of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (adjusted OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.29-2.15, P < 0.01]), decreased mean length of stay (7.45 days vs 7.48 days, adjusted difference: 0.8 days less, P <0.01), and no difference in mean total hospitalization charges ($91,316 vs $79,100, adjusted difference: -$2,667, P = 0.57) compared to COVID-19 admissions without SOT.

Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Kidney Transplant Recipients According to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination

We reviewed 24 kidney transplantat recipients (KTRs) who had radiologically confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Enrolled KTRs were divided into a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-vaccination (+) group (n = 18) and a vaccination (-) group (n = 6). Clinical outcomes of the two groups including death, pulmonary outcome, and renal outcome were compared. COVID-19 pneumonia was worse in vaccination (-) KTRs. Two out of six vaccination (-) KTRs needed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and mechanical ventilator (MV) and expired. In contrast, only one KTR expired and required CRRT and MV out of 18 vaccination (+) KTRs. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination attenuates severity of COVID-19 pneumonia in KTRs.

Engineering immunosuppressive drug-resistant armored (IDRA) SARS-CoV-2 T cells for cell therapy

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receive immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) and are susceptible to developing severe COVID-19. Here, we analyze the Spike-specific T-cell response after 3 doses of mRNA vaccine in a group of SOT patients (n = 136) treated with different ISDs. We demonstrate that a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (Pred) treatment regimen strongly suppressed the mRNA vaccine-induced Spike-specific cellular response. Such defects have clinical consequences because the magnitude of vaccine-induced Spike-specific T cells was directly proportional to the ability of SOT patients to rapidly clear SARS-CoV-2 after breakthrough infection. To then compensate for the T-cell defects induced by immunosuppressive treatment and to develop an alternative therapeutic strategy for SOT patients, we describe production of 6 distinct SARS-CoV-2 epitope-specific ISD-resistant T-cell receptor (TCR)-T cells engineered using the mRNA electroporation method with reactivity minimally affected by mutations occurring in Beta, Delta, Gamma, and Omicron variants. This strategy with transient expression characteristics marks an improvement in the immunotherapeutic field and provides an attractive and novel therapeutic possibility for immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients.