1
|
Al Ammary F, Adeyemo S, Lentine KL, Muzaale AD. Evolution of Biologically Related Living Kidney Donation in the United States from 1988 to 2022. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:1104-1106. [PMID: 38809617 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Simeon Adeyemo
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim E, Sung HC, Kaplow K, Bendersky V, Sidoti C, Muzaale AD, Akhtar J, Levan M, Esayed S, Khan A, Mejia C, Al Ammary F. Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:2453-2461. [PMID: 39156145 PMCID: PMC11328557 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling. Methods We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions). Conclusion Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hannah C. Sung
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Katya Kaplow
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Victoria Bendersky
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Carolyn Sidoti
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abimereki D. Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jasmine Akhtar
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Macey Levan
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Suad Esayed
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA
| | - Amir Khan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christina Mejia
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lum EL, Bunnapradist S, Wiseman AC, Gurakar A, Ferrey A, Reddy U, Al Ammary F. Novel indications for referral and care for simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2024; 33:354-360. [PMID: 38345405 PMCID: PMC10990015 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Kidney dysfunction is challenging in liver transplant candidates to determine whether it is reversible or not. This review focuses on the pertinent data on how to best approach liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction in the current era after implementing the simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) allocation policy and safety net. RECENT FINDINGS The implementation of the SLK policy inverted the steady rise in SLK transplants and improved the utilization of high-quality kidneys. Access to kidney transplantation following liver transplant alone (LTA) increased with favorable outcomes. Estimating GFR in liver transplant candidates remains challenging, and innovative methods are needed. SLK provided superior patient and graft survival compared to LTA only for patients with advanced CKD and dialysis at least 3 months. SLK can provide immunological protection against kidney rejection in highly sensitized candidates. Post-SLK transplant care is complex, with an increased risk of complications and hospitalization. SUMMARY The SLK policy improved kidney access and utilization. Transplant centers are encouraged, under the safety net, to reserve SLK for liver transplant candidates with advanced CKD or dialysis at least 3 months while allowing lower thresholds for highly sensitized patients. Herein, we propose a practical approach to liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik L. Lum
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Antoney Ferrey
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Uttam Reddy
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verbesey J, Thomas AG, Waterman AD, Karhadkar S, Cassell VR, Segev DL, Hogan J, Cooper M. Unrecognized opportunities: The landscape of pediatric kidney-paired donation in the United States. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14657. [PMID: 38317337 PMCID: PMC10857737 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric (age < 18 years) kidney transplant (KT) candidates face increasingly complex choices. The 2014 kidney allocation system nearly doubled wait times for pediatric recipients. Given longer wait times and new ways to optimize compatibility, more pediatric candidates may consider kidney-paired donation (KPD). Motivated by this shift and the potential impact of innovations in KPD practice, we studied pediatric KPD procedures in the US from 2008 to 2021. METHODS We describe the characteristics and outcomes of pediatric KPD recipients with comparison to pediatric non-KPD living donor kidney transplants (LDKT), pediatric LDKT recipients, and pediatric deceased donor (DDKT) recipients. RESULTS Our study cohort includes 4987 pediatric DDKTs, 3447 pediatric non-KPD LDKTs, and 258 pediatric KPD transplants. Fewer centers conducted at least one pediatric KPD procedure compared to those that conducted at least one pediatric LDKT or DDKT procedure (67, 136, and 155 centers, respectively). Five centers performed 31% of the pediatric KPD transplants. After adjustment, there were no differences in graft failure or mortality comparing KPD recipients to non-KPD LDKT, LDKT, or DDKT recipients. DISCUSSION We did not observe differences in transplant outcomes comparing pediatric KPD recipients to controls. Considering these results, KPD may be underutilized for pediatric recipients. Pediatric KT centers should consider including KPD in KT candidate education. Further research will be necessary to develop tools that could aid clinicians and families considering the time horizon for future KT procedures, candidate disease and histocompatibility characteristics, and other factors including logistics and donor protections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alvin G Thomas
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy D Waterman
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sunil Karhadkar
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Julien Hogan
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, UMR-S970, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France
- Pediatric Nephrology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Matt Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crespo MM, Samra M, Korsun A, Butler L, Byford H, Tietjen A, Stillion L, Ohler L, Mehta S. Collaborative leadership in transplantation: Blending clinical, business, and regulatory roles. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15126. [PMID: 37747969 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Transplantation is a high-risk, high-cost treatment for end-stage diseases and is the most strictly regulated area of healthcare in the United States. Thus, achieving success for patients and the program requires skillful and collaborative leadership. Various factors, such as outcomes, volume, and financial health, may measure the success of a transplant program. Strong collaboration between clinical and administrative leaders is key to achieving and maintaining success in those three categories. Clinical leaders of adult programs, such as medical and surgical directors, bear the primary responsibility for a program's volume, outcomes, and patient safety, while administrative directors are focused on business intelligence and regulatory compliance. This paper aims to provide readers with insights into the critical role of collaborative leadership in running a successful program, with a focus on clinical, business, and regulatory perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria M Crespo
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Manpreet Samra
- Kidney Transplant Program, Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Tietjen
- Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Linda Ohler
- George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Shikha Mehta
- Kidney Transplant Program, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Durand CM, Martinez N, Neumann K, Benedict RC, Baker AW, Wolfe CR, Stosor V, Shetty A, Dietch ZC, Goudy L, Callegari MA, Massie AB, Brown D, Cochran W, Muzaale A, Fine D, Tobian AA, Winkler CA, Al Ammary F, Segev DL. Living kidney donors with HIV: experience and outcomes from a case series by the HOPE in Action Consortium. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2023; 24:100553. [PMID: 37600163 PMCID: PMC10435840 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Living kidney donation is possible for people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States within research studies under the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act. There are concerns that donor nephrectomy may have an increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in PLWH due to HIV-associated kidney disease and antiretroviral therapy (ART) nephrotoxicity. Here we report the first 3 cases of living kidney donors with HIV under the HOPE Act in the United States. Methods Within the HOPE in Action Multicenter Consortium, we conducted a prospective study of living kidney donors with HIV. Pre-donation, we estimated the 9-year cumulative incidence of ESRD, performed genetic testing of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), excluding individuals with high-risk variants, and performed pre-donation kidney biopsies (HOPE Act requirement). The primary endpoint was ≥grade 3 nephrectomy-related adverse events (AEs) in year one. Post-donation, we monitored glomerular filtration rate (measured by iohexol/Tc-99m DTPA [mGFR] or estimated with serum creatinine [eGFR]), HIV RNA, CD4 count, and ART. Findings There were three donors with two-four years of follow-up: a 35 year-old female, a 52 year-old male, and a 47 year-old male. Pre-donation 9-year estimated cumulative incidence of ESRD was 3.01, 8.01, and 7.76 per 10,000 persons, respectively. In two donors with APOL1 testing, no high-risk variants were detected. Biopsies from all three donors showed no kidney disease. Post-donation, two donors developed nephrectomy-related ≥grade 3 AEs: a medically-managed ileus and a laparoscopically-repaired incisional hernia. GFR declined from 103 to 84 mL/min/1.73 m2 at four years (mGFR) in donor 1, from 77 to 52 mL/min/1.73 m2 at three years (eGFR) in donor 2, and from 65 to 39 mL/min/1.73 m2 at two years (eGFR) in donor 3. HIV RNA remained <20 copies/mL and CD4 count remained stable in all donors. Interpretation The first three living kidney donors with HIV under the HOPE Act in the United States have had promising outcomes at two-four years, providing proof-of-concept to support living donation from PLWH to recipients with HIV. Funding National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M. Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Arthur W. Baker
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cameron R. Wolfe
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Valentina Stosor
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aneesha Shetty
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zachary C. Dietch
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leah Goudy
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michelle A. Callegari
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allan B. Massie
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diane Brown
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Willa Cochran
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abimereki Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Derek Fine
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aaron A.R. Tobian
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cheryl A. Winkler
- Cancer Innovation Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, NCI and Basic Research Program, Frederick National Laboratories for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daw J. The ties that transplant: The social capital determinants of the living kidney donor relationship distribution. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH 2023; 113:102888. [PMID: 37230706 PMCID: PMC10249952 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The network perspective on social capital decomposes it into ego's network size, alters' relevant resources, and social factors moderating access to alters' resources, but rarely examines how it is distributed across relationship types. Using this approach, I investigate the situationally-relevant social capital relationship distribution and its association with health-related social support, with an application to the living kidney donor relationship distribution. Analyzing an original survey of transplant candidates (N = 72) and their reports on their family and friends (N = 1548), I compare the tie count, donation-relevant biomedical resource, and tie strength relationship distributions to administrative data on the national distribution of living kidney donor relationships. I find that the tie strength relationship distribution matches the completed living kidney donor relationship distribution far better than the tie count and donation-relevant biomedical resource relationship distributions. These conclusions are upheld in race- and gender-stratified analyses and are robust across alternative approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Daw
- Department of Sociology and Demography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 702 Oswald Tower, PA, 16802, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lentine KL, Amanda M, Xiao H, Wisniewski A, Levan M, Al Ammary F, Sharfuddin A, Axelrod DA, Waterman AD, Kasiske B. Factors enabling transplant program participation in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Living Donor Collective: A national survey. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14908. [PMID: 36622257 PMCID: PMC10423496 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Living Donor Collective (LDC), the first effort to create a lifetime registry for living donor candidates in the United States, requires transplant programs to register donor candidates while the SRTR conducts follow-up. METHODS To better understand facilitators and barriers to program participation, we conducted a brief electronic survey of U.S. transplant program staff from October 26, 2021 to December 17, 2021. RESULTS We received 132 responses, with at least one response from 87 living donor programs (46 kidney programs, 33 kidney and liver programs, and eight liver programs alone). We found 86% of program representatives strongly agreed or agreed that funding adequate to cover the cost of data collection would facilitate LDC participation, 92% agreed or strongly agreed with importance of electronic data submission options, and 74% reported that elimination of requirements to submit duplicative pre-operative information to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) would be helpful. Other potentially enabling factors include reduction in duration of OPTN postdonation follow-up requirements, ease-of-use, protection from data use for regulation, adequate data security, and equity in data access. CONCLUSION This survey identifies potential targets to strengthen participation in the effort to create a national living donor registry in the United States. Collaboration and investment to overcome barriers to LDC participation among transplant programs are vital to generate long-term data on living donation for donor candidates, donors, and patients in need of transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L. Lentine
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis Univeristy Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Huiling Xiao
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis Univeristy Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Addie Wisniewski
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis Univeristy Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al Ammary F, Muzaale AD, Tantisattamoa E, Hanna RM, Reddy UG, Bunnapradist S, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Changing landscape of living kidney donation and the role of telemedicine. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2023; 32:81-88. [PMID: 36444666 PMCID: PMC9713599 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There has been a decline in living kidney donation over the last two decades. Donors from low-income families or racial/ethnic minorities face greater disproportionate geographic, financial, and logistical barriers to completing lengthy and complex evaluations. This has contributed to the decreased proportion of these subgroups. The authors view telemedicine as a potential solution to this problem. RECENT FINDINGS Since the initial decline of donors in 2005, biologically related donors have experienced a lack of growth across race/ethnicity. Conversely, unrelated donors have emerged as the majority of donors in recent years across race/ethnicity, except for unrelated black donors. Disparities in access to living kidney donation persist. Telemedicine using live-video visits can overcome barriers to access transplant centers and facilitate care coordination. In a U.S. survey, nephrologists, surgeons, coordinators, social workers, and psychologists/psychologists across transplant centers are favorably disposed to use telemedicine for donor evaluation/follow-up beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, with the waning of relaxed telemedicine regulations under the Public Health Emergency, providers perceive payor policy and out-of-state licensing as major factors hindering telemedicine growth prospects. SUMMARY Permanent federal and state policies that support telemedicine services for living kidney donation can enhance access to transplant centers and help overcome barriers to donor evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abimereki D. Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Ramy M. Hanna
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Uttam G. Reddy
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Many a Slip Twixt the Intake Form and the Living Donation. Transplantation 2022; 107:818-819. [PMID: 36476542 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
11
|
Almubark RA, Alghonaim M, BinDhim NF, Attar B, Abaalkhail F, Ammary FA, Alqahtani SA. Attitudes Toward Organ Donation in an Arab-Based Population. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:2063-2068. [PMID: 36195496 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Commitment to organ donation may vary among willing younger and older adults. We aimed to understand attitudes toward organ donation among Arab adults. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of adults from 13 regions in Saudi Arabia between February 12, 2021, and March 14, 2021. We stratified the analyses by individuals' age (younger, 18 to 39 years old; older, ≥40 years old). RESULTS Of 4217 individuals contacted, 3120 respondents (1846 younger and 1274 older) completed the survey, with a response rate of 74%. We found that 54% of younger and 47% of older respondents expressed support for organ transplantation, and 49% of younger and 35% of older respondents wanted to donate their organs. However, only 4% of younger and 3% of older respondents had registered in the national donor database. Knowledge sources that most likely to influence attitudes toward organ donation for younger and older respondents, respectively, were physician/health care worker (58% and 55%), family member (29% and 26%), scientist/researcher (29% and 22%), and religious scholar (16% and 23%). CONCLUSION Though many younger and older adults express a willingness to donate, few are registered to be a donor. Our findings highlight the influential sources of knowledge that can be implemented in future interventions to increase commitment to organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha A Almubark
- Scientific Department, Sharik Association for Health Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Alghonaim
- Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser F BinDhim
- Scientific Department, Sharik Association for Health Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; CEO Office, Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Besher Attar
- Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Abaalkhail
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Saleh A Alqahtani
- Liver Transplant Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Al Ammary F, Motter JD, Sung HC, Lentine KL, Sharfuddin A, Kumar V, Yadav A, Doshi MD, Virmani S, Concepcion BP, Grace T, Sidoti CN, Yahya Jan M, Muzaale AD, Wolf J. Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2041-2051. [PMID: 35575439 PMCID: PMC9543040 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Individuals considering living kidney donation face geographic, financial, and logistical challenges. Telemedicine can facilitate healthcare access/care coordination. Yet difficulties exist in telemedicine implementation and sustainability. We sought to examine centers' practices and providers' attitudes toward telemedicine to improve services for donors. We surveyed multidisciplinary providers from 194 active adult US living donor kidney transplant centers; 293 providers from 128 unique centers responded to the survey (center representation rate = 66.0%), reflecting 83.9% of practice by donor volume and 91.5% of US states/territories. Most centers (70.3%) plan to continue using telemedicine beyond the pandemic for donor evaluation/follow-up. Video was mostly used by nephrologists, surgeons, and psychiatrists/psychologists. Telephone and video were mostly used by social workers, while video or telephone was equally used by coordinators. Half of respondent nephrologists and surgeons were willing to accept a remote completion of physical exam; 68.3% of respondent psychiatrists/psychologists and social workers were willing to accept a remote completion of mental status exam. Providers strongly agreed that telemedicine was convenient for donors and would improve the likelihood of completing donor evaluation. However, providers (65.5%) perceived out-of-state licensing as a key policy/regulatory barrier. These findings help inform practice and underscore the instigation of policies to remove barriers using telemedicine to increase living kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | - Hannah C. Sung
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | - Asif Sharfuddin
- Department of MedicineIndiana UniversityIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of MedicineUniversity of AlabamaBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | - Anju Yadav
- Department of MedicineThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Mona D. Doshi
- Department of MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Sarthak Virmani
- Department of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | | | - Terry Grace
- Department of MedicineWake Forest Baptist HealthWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | | | - Joshua Wolf
- Piedmont Transplant InstituteAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alvarado F, Cervantes CE, Crews DC, Blanck J, Al Ammary F, Ng DK, Purnell TS. Examining post-donation outcomes in Hispanic/Latinx living kidney donors in the United States: A systematic review. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1737-1753. [PMID: 35258164 PMCID: PMC9546009 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review to assess outcomes in Hispanic donors and explore how Hispanic ethnicity was characterized. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus through October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened study titles, abstracts, and full texts; they also qualitatively synthesized results and independently assessed quality of included studies. Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Study sample sizes ranged from 4007 to 143,750 donors and mean age ranged from 37 to 54 years. Maximum follow-up time of studies varied from a perioperative donor nephrectomy period to 30 years post-donation. Hispanic donors ranged between 6% and 21% of the donor populations across studies. Most studies reported Hispanic ethnicity under race or a combined race and ethnicity category. Compared to non-Hispanic White donors, Hispanic donors were not at increased risk for post-donation mortality, end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, non-pregnancy-related hospitalizations, or overall perioperative surgical complications. Compared to non-Hispanic White donors, most studies showed Hispanic donors were at higher risk for diabetes mellitus following nephrectomy; however, mixed findings were seen regarding the risk for post-donation chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Future studies should evaluate cultural, socioeconomic, and geographic differences within the heterogeneous Hispanic donor population, which may further explain variation in health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flor Alvarado
- Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisina, USA
| | - Carmen Elena Cervantes
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Deidra C Crews
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jamie Blanck
- Johns Hopkins Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Derek K Ng
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tanjala S Purnell
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Factors Associated with the Willingness to Become a Living Kidney Donor: A National Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19031313. [PMID: 35162337 PMCID: PMC8835691 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Living donor kidney transplantation is the preferred method of treating kidney failure. The donor agrees to undergo an elective procedure for the benefit of the recipient. Aim: To assess the attitude toward living kidney donation and to investigate the factors that contribute to kidney donation willingness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out between December 2020 and February 2021. The study covered a representative group of 953 Poles aged 18−77, living in all Polish voivodships. The relationship between sociodemographic factors, personal values (Personal Values List), the total score of life satisfaction (Satisfaction with Life Scale) and the willingness to donate a kidney to another human was assessed using a logistic regression model. Results: The most frequently chosen personal values were: good health; physical and mental fitness; love and friendship; knowledge and wisdom. The most frequently chosen symbols of happiness were: good health, successful family life, being needed by others. The median satisfaction with life for the entire group was 20 [16; 24]. Voluntary donation of a kidney to another human being i.e., family, friends, strangers were more often declared by women (OR = 1.21; Cl95%: 1.03−1.42), for whom the most important symbol of happiness was a life full of adventures, travels (OR = 1.39; Cl95%: 1.06−1.82) and the most important personal value was goodness and tenderness (OR = 1.21; Cl95%: 1.05−1.40). Total scores of The Satisfaction with Life Scale correlated positively with the willingness to voluntarily donate a kidney (OR = 1.03; Cl95%: 1.003−1.06), while age correlated negatively (OR = 0.99; Cl95%: 0.98−0.99). Conclusions: Respondents who declare their willingness to be a living kidney donor are mainly female, for which the most important symbol of happiness is a life full of adventures and travel, and the most important values are personal goodness and tenderness. The desire to donate a kidney to another person decreases with age and grows with life satisfaction. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04789122).
Collapse
|
15
|
Al Ammary F, Concepcion BP, Yadav A. The Scope of Telemedicine in Kidney Transplantation: Access and Outreach Services. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:542-547. [PMID: 35367022 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Access to transplant centers is a key barrier for kidney transplant evaluation and follow-up care for both the recipient and donor. Potential kidney transplant recipients and living kidney donors may face geographic, financial, and logistical challenges in engaging with a transplant center and maintaining post-transplant continuity of care. Telemedicine via synchronous video visits has the potential to overcome the access barrier to transplant centers. Transplant centers can start the evaluation process for potential recipients and donors via telemedicine, especially for those who have challenges to come for an in-person visit or when there are restrictions on clinic capacities, such as during a pandemic. Similarly, transplant centers can use telemedicine to sustain post-transplant follow-up care while avoiding the burden of travel and its associated costs. However, expansion to telemedicine-based kidney transplant services is substantially dependent on telemedicine infrastructure, insurer policy, and state regulations. In this review, we discuss the practice of telemedicine in kidney transplantation and its implications for expanding access to kidney transplant services and outreach from pretransplant evaluation to post-transplant follow-up care for the recipient and donor.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Living organ donation provides improved access to transplantation, thereby shortening transplant wait times and allowing for more deceased organ transplants. However, disparity in access to living donation has resulted in decreased rates of living donor transplants for some populations of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Though there have been marked improvements in deceased donor equity, there are still challenges as it relates to gender, racial/ethnic, and socio-economic disparity. Improvements in living donation rates in Hispanic and Asian populations are tempered by challenges in African American rates of organ donation. Socio-economic disparity may drive gender disparities in organ donation resulting in disproportionate female living donors. Tailored approaches relating to language-specific interventions as well as directed educational efforts have helped mitigate disparity. Additionally, the use of apolipoprotein1 testing and modifications of glomerular filtration rate calculators may improve rates of African American donation. This review will evaluate recent data in living donor disparity as well as highlight successes in mitigating disparity. SUMMARY Though there are still challenges in living donor disparity, many efforts at tailoring education and access as well as modifying living donor evaluation and identifying systemic policy changes may result in improvements in living donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reynold I Lopez-Soler
- Section of Renal Transplantation, Edward Hines VA Jr. Hospital, Hines
- Department of Surgery, Division of Intra-Abdominal Transplantation, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Raquel Garcia-Roca
- Department of Surgery, Division of Intra-Abdominal Transplantation, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - David D Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Intra-Abdominal Transplantation, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morales-Buenrostro LE, Sánchez-Cárdenas M, Cohen-Bucay A. Is it time to homogenize the living kidney donation informed consent? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:1557-1558. [PMID: 34125910 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luis E Morales-Buenrostro
- Transplant Nephrology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Abraham Cohen-Bucay
- Renal Division and Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Al Ammary F, Yu S, Muzaale AD, Segev DL, Liyanage L, Crews DC, Brennan DC, El-Meanawy A, Alqahtani S, Atta MG, Levan ML, Caffo BS, Welling PA, Massie AB. Long-term kidney function and survival in recipients of allografts from living kidney donors with hypertension: a national cohort study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1530-1541. [PMID: 34129713 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Allografts from living kidney donors with hypertension may carry subclinical kidney disease from the donor to the recipient and, thus, lead to adverse recipient outcomes. We examined eGFR trajectories and all-cause allograft failure in recipients from donors with versus without hypertension, using mixed-linear and Cox regression models stratified by donor age. We studied a US cohort from 1/1/2005 to 6/30/2017; 49 990 recipients of allografts from younger (<50 years old) donors including 597 with donor hypertension and 21 130 recipients of allografts from older (≥50 years old) donors including 1441 with donor hypertension. Donor hypertension was defined as documented predonation use of antihypertensive therapy. Among recipients from younger donors with versus without hypertension, the annual eGFR decline was -1.03 versus -0.53 ml/min/m2 (P = 0.002); 13-year allograft survival was 49.7% vs. 59.0% (adjusted allograft failure hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23; 95% CI 1.05-1.43; P = 0.009). Among recipients from older donors with versus without hypertension, the annual eGFR decline was -0.67 versus -0.66 ml/min/m2 (P = 0.9); 13-year allograft survival was 48.6% versus 52.6% (aHR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94-1.17; P = 0.4). In secondary analyses, our inferences remained similar for risk of death-censored allograft failure and mortality. Hypertension in younger, but not older, living kidney donors is associated with worse recipient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sile Yu
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abimereki D Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Luckmini Liyanage
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Deidra C Crews
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel C Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashraf El-Meanawy
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Saleh Alqahtani
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohamed G Atta
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Macey L Levan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brian S Caffo
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul A Welling
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harper KC, Salameh JP, Akhlaq N, McInnes MDF, Ivankovic V, Beydoun MH, Clark EG, Zeng W, Blew BDM, Burns KD, Sood MM, Bugeja A. The impact of measuring split kidney function on post-donation kidney function: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253609. [PMID: 34214103 PMCID: PMC8253423 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies have reported agreement between computed tomography (CT) and renography for the determination of split kidney function. However, their correlation with post-donation kidney function remains unclear. We compared CT measurements with renography in assessment of split kidney function (SKF) and their correlations with post-donation kidney function. Methods A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of 248 donors from January 1, 2009-July 31, 2019 were assessed. Pearson correlations were used to assess post-donation kidney function with renography and CT-based measurements. Furthermore, we examined high risk groups with SKF difference greater than 10% on renography and donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Results 62% of donors were women with a mean (standard deviation) pre-donation eGFR 99 (20) and post-donation eGFR 67 (22) mL/min/1.73m2 at 31 months of follow-up. Post-donation kidney function was poorly correlated with both CT-based measurements and renography, including the subgroup of donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (r less than 0.4 for all). There was agreement between CT-based measurements and renography for SKF determination (Bland-Altman agreement [bias, 95% limits of agreement] for renography vs: CT volume, 0.76%, -7.60–9.15%; modified ellipsoid,1.01%, -8.38–10.42%; CC dimension, 0.44%, -7.06–7.94); however, CT missed SKF greater than 10% found by renography in 20 out 26 (77%) of donors. Conclusions In a single centre study of 248 living donors, we found no correlation between CT or renography and post-donation eGFR. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways to predict remaining kidney function after donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly C. Harper
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Salameh
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha Akhlaq
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew D. F. McInnes
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mahdi H. Beydoun
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward G. Clark
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wanzhen Zeng
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian D. M. Blew
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin D. Burns
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manish M. Sood
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann Bugeja
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Al Ammary F, Sidoti C, Segev DL, Henderson ML. Health Care Policy and Regulatory Challenges for Adoption of Telemedicine in Kidney Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 77:773-776. [PMID: 33171215 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Carolyn Sidoti
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lentine KL, Motter JD, Henderson ML, Hays RE, Shukhman E, Hunt J, Al Ammary F, Kumar V, LaPointe Rudow D, Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Nishio-Lucar AG, Schaefer HM, Cooper M, Mandelbrot DA. Care of international living kidney donor candidates in the United States: A survey of contemporary experience, practice, and challenges. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14064. [PMID: 32808320 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The evaluation and care of non-US citizen, non-US residents who wish to come to the United States to serve as international living kidney donors (ILKDs) can pose unique challenges. We surveyed US transplant programs to better understand practices related to ILKD care. We distributed the survey by email and professional society list-servs (Fall 2018, assessing 2017 experience). Eighty-five programs responded (36.8% program response rate), of which 80 considered ILKD candidates. Only 18 programs had written protocols for ILKD evaluation. Programs had a median of 3 (range: 0,75) ILKD candidates who initiated contact during the year, from origin countries spanning 6 continents. Fewer (median: 1, range: 0,25) were approved for donation. Program-reported reasons for not completing ILKD evaluations included visa barriers (58.6%), inability to complete evaluation (34.3%), concerns regarding follow-up (31.4%) or other healthcare access (28.6%), and financial impacts (21.4%). Programs that did not evaluate ILKDs reported similar concerns. Staff time required to evaluate ILKDs was estimated as 1.5-to-3-times (47.9%) or >3-times (32.9%) that needed for domestic candidates. Among programs accepting ILKDs, on average 55% reported successful completion of 1-year follow-up. ILKD evaluation is a resource-intensive process with variable outcomes. Planning and commitment are necessary to care for this unique candidate group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jennifer D Motter
- Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Transplant Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Transplant Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca E Hays
- University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ellen Shukhman
- Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Julia Hunt
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Transplant Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- University of Alabama Comprehensive Transplant Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Cooper
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abuzeineh M, Muzaale AD, Crews DC, Avery RK, Brotman DJ, Brennan DC, Segev DL, Al Ammary F. Telemedicine in the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Case Reports. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:2620-2625. [PMID: 32798002 PMCID: PMC7365092 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients who develop symptoms consistent with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are bringing unique challenges to health care professionals. Telemedicine has surged dramatically since the pandemic in effort to maintain patient care and reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure to patients, health care workers, and the public. Herein we present reports of 3 kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 who were managed using telemedicine via synchronous video visits integrated with an electronic medical record system, from home to inpatient settings. We demonstrate how telemedicine helped assess, diagnose, triage, and treat patients with COVID-19 while avoiding a visit to an emergency department or outpatient clinic. While there is limited information about the duration of viral shedding for immunosuppressed patients, our findings underscore the importance of using telemedicine in the follow-up care for kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 who have recovered from symptoms but might have persistently positive nucleic acid tests. Our experience emphasizes the opportunities of telemedicine in the management of kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 and in the maintenance of uninterrupted follow-up care for such immunosuppressed patients with prolonged viral shedding. Telemedicine may help increase access to care for kidney transplant recipients during and beyond the pandemic as it offers a prompt, safe, and convenient platform in the delivery of care for these patients. Yet, to advance the practice of telemedicine in the field of kidney transplantation, barriers to increasing the widespread implementation of telemedicine should be removed, and research studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of telemedicine in the care of kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abuzeineh
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abimereki D Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Deidra C Crews
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robin K Avery
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel J Brotman
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel C Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|