1
|
Mohamad NA, Galarza TE, Martín GA. H2 antihistamines: May be useful for combination therapies in cancer? Biochem Pharmacol 2024; 223:116164. [PMID: 38531422 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Cancer morbimortality is still a great concern despite advances in research and therapies. Histamine and its receptors' ligands can modulate different biological responses according to the cell type and the receptor subtype involved. Besides the wide variety of histamine functions in normal tissues, diverse roles in the acquisition of hallmarks of cancer such as sustained proliferative signaling, resistance to cell death, angiogenesis, metastasis, altered immunity and modified microenvironment have been described. This review summarizes the present knowledge of the various roles of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) ligands in neoplasias. A bioinformatic analysis of human tumors showed dissimilar results in the expression of the H2R gene according to tumor type when comparing malignant versus normal tissues. As well, the relationship between patients' survival parameters and H2R gene expression levels also varied, signaling important divergences in the role of H2R in neoplastic progression in different cancer types. Revised experimental evidence showed multiple effects of H2R antihistamines on several of the cited hallmarks of cancer. Interventional and retrospective clinical studies evaluated different H2R antihistamines in cancer patients with two main adjuvant uses: improving antitumor efficacy (which includes regulation of immune response) and preventing toxic adverse effects produced by chemo or radiotherapy. While there is a long path to go, research on H2R antihistamines may provide new opportunities for developing more refined combination therapeutic strategies for certain cancer types to improve patients' survival and health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora A Mohamad
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Laboratorio de Radioisótopos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Tamara E Galarza
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Laboratorio de Radioisótopos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela A Martín
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Laboratorio de Radioisótopos, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman JK, del Mazo J, Hogstrand C, (Ron) Hoogenboom L, Leblanc J, Nebbia CS, Nielsen E, Ntzani E, Petersen A, Sand S, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Wallace H, Romualdo B, Cristina F, Stephen H, Marco I, Mosbach‐Schulz O, Riolo F, Christodoulidou A, Grasl‐Kraupp B. Risk assessment of N-nitrosamines in food. EFSA J 2023; 21:e07884. [PMID: 36999063 PMCID: PMC10043641 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
EFSA was asked for a scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of N-nitrosamines (N-NAs) in food. The risk assessment was confined to those 10 carcinogenic N-NAs occurring in food (TCNAs), i.e. NDMA, NMEA, NDEA, NDPA, NDBA, NMA, NSAR, NMOR, NPIP and NPYR. N-NAs are genotoxic and induce liver tumours in rodents. The in vivo data available to derive potency factors are limited, and therefore, equal potency of TCNAs was assumed. The lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose at 10% (BMDL10) was 10 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day, derived from the incidence of rat liver tumours (benign and malignant) induced by NDEA and used in a margin of exposure (MOE) approach. Analytical results on the occurrence of N-NAs were extracted from the EFSA occurrence database (n = 2,817) and the literature (n = 4,003). Occurrence data were available for five food categories across TCNAs. Dietary exposure was assessed for two scenarios, excluding (scenario 1) and including (scenario 2) cooked unprocessed meat and fish. TCNAs exposure ranged from 0 to 208.9 ng/kg bw per day across surveys, age groups and scenarios. 'Meat and meat products' is the main food category contributing to TCNA exposure. MOEs ranged from 3,337 to 48 at the P95 exposure excluding some infant surveys with P95 exposure equal to zero. Two major uncertainties were (i) the high number of left censored data and (ii) the lack of data on important food categories. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the MOE for TCNAs at the P95 exposure is highly likely (98-100% certain) to be less than 10,000 for all age groups, which raises a health concern.
Collapse
|
3
|
Piovani D, Tsantes AG, Schünemann HJ, Bonovas S. Meta-analysis: Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of gastric cancer in patients requiring gastric acid suppression. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 57:653-665. [PMID: 36585832 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are suspected to increase the risk of gastric cancer. AIM To assess the risk of gastric cancer associated with the use of PPIs. METHODS We systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases (until June 1, 2022) for randomised and non-randomised studies (NRS) of the association between PPIs and gastric cancer having considered Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) users as controls. We chose this comparison to minimise confounding by indication, and focus on patients requiring gastric acid suppression. Two authors independently extracted study data and assessed each study's risk of bias. Maximally-adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates were extracted. Heterogeneity and small-study effect were examined, and summary estimates were calculated using random- and fixed-effect models. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were employed to explore heterogeneity. We used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS Of 8375 records, 12 NRS (>6 million patients; 11,554 gastric cancers) and two randomised clinical trials (498 patients; 1 gastric cancer) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Randomised evidence was very imprecise and provided very-low certainty evidence. Meta-analysis of six NRS providing a comprehensive adjustment for confounding (2.5 million patients; 7372 gastric cancers) did not show any association between PPIs and gastric cancer (RRrandom = 1.07, 0.97-1.19; RRfixed = 1.05, 0.98-1.12). The certainty of the evidence was low. No convincing evidence of dose-response, or increased risk with long-term use, was found. Lack of or minimal adjustment for confounding was associated with larger effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS We found no association between PPIs and gastric cancer in NRS having adequately controlled for confounding. Published studies may suffer residual confounding. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION CRD42022335971.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andreas G Tsantes
- Laboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Microbiology Department, "Saint Savvas" Oncology Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ku M, Je NK. Prescription changes in patients with gastrointestinal disorders after withdrawal of ranitidine: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:197-203. [PMID: 36519289 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2159147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ranitidine products contain unacceptable levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine. This study aimed to investigate changes in the treatment regimen and their influencing factors after the ranitidine recall. METHODS This retrospective study used data from nationwide Korean claims from 2019. Patients with gastrointestinal disorders treated with ranitidine for at least a month on 25 September 2019, were selected for this study. Other histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), and prostaglandin E1 analogs were administered as alternatives to ranitidine. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to gauge the time until switching to alternative drugs and assess the influencing factors. RESULTS In total, 7502 patients were included in this study, among which 5164 (68.8%) switched from ranitidine to an alternative drug. The most prescribed alternative drugs were H2RAs, followed by PPIs, PCABs, and prostaglandin E1 analogs. Increasing age; Medical Aid insurance (MedAid); and a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, and osteoarthritis were associated with a higher probability of switching treatments. Patients with concomitant gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers were more likely to switch to alternative drugs than patients with gastritis. CONCLUSIONS Approximately two-thirds of patients with gastrointestinal disorders switched from ranitidine to alternative drugs within 3 months after ranitidine withdrawal. The Cox regression analysis showed that age (>55 years); insurance type (MedAid); comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, and osteoarthritis, and gastrointestinal disorder severity influenced the switch from ranitidine to alternative drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhee Ku
- College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pharmacy, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Kyung Je
- College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim S, Lee S, Hong J, Ko I, Kim JY, Kim DK. Effect of Ranitidine Intake on the Risk of Gastric Cancer Development. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9081071. [PMID: 34442208 PMCID: PMC8394213 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9081071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers globally, with high mortality, particularly in East Asia. Certain ranitidine products contain potentially carcinogenic N-nitrosodimethylamine. We investigated the potential association between gastric cancer risk and ranitidine intake using a nationwide cohort, extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. In this longitudinal study, we employed a 1:1 propensity score matching according to sociodemographic factors. A total of 40,887 subjects were enrolled, of which 906 developed gastric cancer during the follow-up period. We investigated gastric cancer events during the follow-up period using the survival analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate incidence, survival rate, and hazard ratio. The incidence of gastric cancer was 67,422; 67,470; and 67,444 person-years in the control, other histamine-2 blockers, and ranitidine groups, respectively. Because the adjusted hazard ratio of gastric cancer was 0.98 and 1.01 in the other histamine-2 blockers and ranitidine groups, respectively, we could not calculate the likelihood of gastric cancer development in the ranitidine group. Ranitidine intake did not significantly increase the incidence of gastric cancer. Therefore, the relative risk of gastric cancer may be low in patients taking ranitidine products in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SunMoon Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea;
| | - Suehyun Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea; (S.L.); (I.K.)
| | - JeeYoung Hong
- Biomedical Research Institute, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon 35365, Korea;
| | - Inseok Ko
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea; (S.L.); (I.K.)
| | - Jong-Yeup Kim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea; (S.L.); (I.K.)
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.-Y.K.); (D.-K.K.); Tel.: +82-33-240-5180 (J.-Y.K.); +82-42-600-8679 (D.-K.K.); Fax: +82-33-241-2909 (J.-Y.K.); +82-42-543-8959 (D.-K.K.)
| | - Dong-Kyu Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
- Institute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.-Y.K.); (D.-K.K.); Tel.: +82-33-240-5180 (J.-Y.K.); +82-42-600-8679 (D.-K.K.); Fax: +82-33-241-2909 (J.-Y.K.); +82-42-543-8959 (D.-K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|