Association between antidepressant medication use and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Antidepressant use and ovarian cancer risk: Evidence from nationwide studies with >14,000 cases from Denmark and Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Given that the evidence regarding the link between antidepressant use and ovarian cancer risk is equivocal, we investigated this research question by conducting two nationwide nested case-control studies among the Danish and Swedish populations.

METHODS

Altogether, 14,121 women with epithelial ovarian cancer (30-84 years old) (Denmark: 8976 diagnosed 2000-2019, Sweden: 5145 diagnosed 2010-2018) were randomly age-matched with 564,840 female controls (359,040 from Denmark, and 205,800 from Sweden) using risk set sampling. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and combined the estimates based on the fixed-effect assumption. We also investigated potential effect modification by well-established risk factors for ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Antidepressant use was associated with an overall reduced risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.88-0.96), and that reduction was more pronounced in postmenopausal women and long-term users. The effect was most pronounced for serous ovarian tumors (OR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.86-0.95) but was also observed in other subtypes, although not statistically significant. Among different types of antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in general and citalopram in particular exhibited a noteworthy reduction in ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96). Additionally, use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy individually modified the association between antidepressant use and ovarian cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an antidepressant was associated with a slight, but statistically significant, decrease in ovarian cancer risk. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian cancer, and increasing use of antidepressants, these findings may be of significance to cancer prevention and should be studied in more detail mechanistically.

Associations between depression and cancer risk among patients with diabetes mellitus: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The co-occurrence of depression and diabetes mellitus has been linked to an increased risk of developing cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether depression further amplifies the risk of cancer among individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

This population-based matched cohort study utilized Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database. A total of 85,489 newly diagnosed diabetic patients with depressive disorders were selected, along with 427,445 comparison subjects. The matching process involved age, sex, and the calendar year of diabetes onset. The average follow-up duration for the two cohorts was 6.4 and 6.5 years, respectively. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of overall cancer or cancer at specific anatomical sites.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratios for overall cancer incidence were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05-1.11). For site-specific cancers, depression exhibited significant associations with oropharyngeal, esophageal, liver, gynecological, prostate, kidney, and hematologic malignancies among patients with diabetes. Notably, a severity-response relationship was observed, indicating that patients with recurrent episodes of major depressive disorders exhibited a higher incidence of cancer compared to those diagnosed with dysthymia or depressive disorder not otherwise specified. Furthermore, the strength of the association between depression and cancer risk was more pronounced among younger patients with diabetes as opposed to older adults. However, no significant relationship was observed between adherence to antidepressant treatment and cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate a significant association between depression and an elevated risk of cancer among individuals diagnosed with diabetes. Future investigations should replicate our findings, explore the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments on cancer risk, and identify the underlying mechanisms.

Multiple types of distress are prospectively associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Few modifiable risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer have been identified. We and other investigators have found that individual psychosocial factors related to distress are associated with higher risk of ovarian cancer. The present study examined whether co-occurring distress-related factors are associated with ovarian cancer risk.

METHODS

Five distress-related factors were measured repeatedly over 21 years of follow-up: depression, anxiety, social isolation, widowhood, and, in a subset or women, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cox proportional hazards models estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ovarian cancer for a time-updated count of distress-related factors, in age-adjusted models, then further adjusted for ovarian cancer risk factors and behavior-related health risk factors.

RESULTS

Across 1,193,927 person-years of follow-up, 526 incident ovarian cancers occurred. Women with ≥3 versus no distress-related psychosocial factors demonstrated increased ovarian cancer risk (HRage-adjusted  = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.16, 2.52). No significant difference in ovarian cancer risk was observed in women with one or two versus no distress-related psychosocial factors. In the subsample with PTSD assessed, ≥3 versus no distress-related psychosocial factors was associated with twofold greater ovarian cancer risk (HRage-adjusted  = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.01, 4.29). Further analysis suggested that women at highest ovarian cancer risk had PTSD co-occurring with any other distress-related factor (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.20, 4.01). Adjusting for cancer risk factors and health behaviors minimally impacted risk estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of multiple indicators of distress was associated with risk of ovarian cancer. When including PTSD as an indicator of distress, the association was strengthened.

Antidepressant Use and Lung Cancer Risk and Survival: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Recent preclinical studies have linked antidepressants (AD) to their potential anticancer effects in multiple cancers, but the impact on lung cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis examined the associations between ADs and lung cancer incidence and survival. The Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched to identify eligible studies published by June 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to compare the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in those treated with or without ADs. Heterogeneity was examined using Cochran Q test and inconsistency I² statistics. The methodologic quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Our analysis, including 11 publications involving 1,200,885 participants, showed that AD use increased lung cancer risk by 11% (RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.02-1.20; I² = 65.03%; n = 6) but was not associated with overall survival (RR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.75-1.45; I² = 83.40%; n = 4). One study examined cancer-specific survival. Subgroup analysis showed that serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were associated with an increased lung cancer risk by 38% (RR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.07-1.78; n = 2). The quality of selected studies was good (n = 5) to fair (n = 6). Our data analysis suggests that SNRIs were associated with an elevated risk of lung cancer, raising concerns regarding the use of AD treatment in patients vulnerable to lung cancer. The effects of ADs-particularly SNRIs-and their interplay with cigarette use and lung cancer risk in vulnerable patients merits further study.

Significance

In this meta-analysis of 11 observational studies, we found evidence of a statistically significant association between the use of certain ADs and lung cancer risk. This effect merits further study, particularly as it relates to known environmental and behavioral drivers of lung cancer risk, such as air pollution and cigarette smoke.

The incidence risk of breast and gynecological cancer by antidepressant use: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies involving 160,727 patients

Background and objective

Antidepressants are widely prescribed to treat depression and anxiety disorders that may become chronic conditions among women. Epidemiological studies have yielded inconsistent results on the correlation between antidepressant use and the incidence risk of female breast and gynecological cancer, along with uncertain dose–response relationship. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis to investigate the association.

Methods

Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were systematically searched in January 2022, with no language limits. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals between studies. Linear and non-linear dose–response analyses were performed to evaluate the dose or duration of antidepressant use affecting the incidence risk of female breast and gynecological cancer. Further subgroup analyses were systematically performed by stratifying almost all study characteristics and important potential confounders, in order to further clarify and validate the important potential hypotheses regarding the biological mechanism underlying this association.

Results

Based on a systematic literature search, 34 eligible studies (27 case–control studies and 7 cohort studies) involving 160,727 female breast and gynecological cancer patients found that antidepressant use did not increase the incidence risk of female breast and gynecological cancer (pooled OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.04, I² = 71.5%, p < 0.001), and even decreased the incidence risk of ovarian cancer (pooled OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83, 1, I² = 17.4%, p = 0.293). There were a non-linear dose–response relationship (p non-linearity < 0.05) between the duration of antidepressant use and incidence risk of female breast cancer, and an inverse linear dose–response relationship between antidepressant use and the incidence risk of gynecological cancer, specifically with an increase of cumulative defined daily dose or duration to a high level, like 25,550 doses (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85–0.98, p linearity < 0.05) or 4,380 days (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.7, 0.96, p linearity < 0.05), compared to never antidepressant users.

Conclusion

This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis found that antidepressant use did not increase the incidence risk of female breast and gynecological cancer and even decreased the incidence risk of ovarian cancer, along with a non-linear or linear dose–response relationship.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=313364, identifier CRD42022313364.

Sertraline inhibits stress-induced tumor growth through regulating CD8+ T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity

Chronic stress has been reported to be associated with tumor initiation and progression. But the underlying mechanism and the specific role of tumor immunity in this process are still unknown. Herein, we applied the repeated restrain stress model in C57BL/6J mice and found that the tumor growth in stressed mice was accelerated compared with that in control mice. In addition, serotonin, also called 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), in the serum of stressed mice was also elevated. Sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used in the clinic, can restore the serum 5-HT level in stressed mice and restrain tumor growth. We further explored the distribution of major immune cells, including B lymphocytes cells, T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and regulatory T cells (Treg). We found that the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) decreased significantly in stressed mice. And the extra 5-HT treatment could further decrease the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in the TME. The expression of IFN-γ and Granular enzyme B (GzmB) in CD8+ T cells were also dropped in the stressed mice group, whereas the expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on CD8+ T cells was increased. The T cell deficiency induced by stress can be reversed by sertraline, indicating its promising role in strengthening the efficacy of anti-PDL1/PD-1 immunotherapy. The present study provides new mechanistic insights into the impact of chronic stress on antitumor immunity and implicates a novel combined immunotherapy strategy for cancer patients with chronic stress.

Epidemiological study about the mental state of patients after a pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis event

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs frequently and represents a serious threat to patient health. However, its effects on mental health have not been studied sufficiently. The objective of this study was to investigate whether VTE alters the patients' mental state. We gathered questionnaire data on 100 patients (59 men, 41 women; age ranging from 24 to 85 years) concerning psychological symptoms and body image. Our results show that after a VTE, patients develop psychological symptoms, some of which persist for more than 2 years. Examples of those symptoms include depression, intrusion, and increased scrutiny of the body. Intrusion (flashbacks, nightmares, and other traumatic sensations of reliving the thrombotic event) affected 69% of patients and may lead to social isolation, occasionally including loss of employment. Depression affected more than 50% of patients. Productivity typically decreases, and body functionality and feeling of health changed in 34-76% of patients. However, anxiety, disordered impulse control, and maladjustment were less frequent (40% or less), and patients' emotional attitude to their bodies (liking their bodies or being angry with their bodies, feelings of shame and attractiveness) tended not to change over time. Nevertheless, we feel it may be advisable to identify patients with relevant psychological changes after VTE by means of a short evidence-based questionnaire and to offer them psychological treatment in order to improve management and quality of life of these patients. The goal is, therefore, to develop diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations.

Antitumoral Effects of Tricyclic Antidepressants: Beyond Neuropathic Pain Treatment

Simple Summary

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are old and known therapeutic agents whose good safety profile makes them good candidates for drug repurposing. As the relevance of nerves in cancer development and progression is being unveiled, attention now turns to the use of nerve-targeting drugs, such as TCAs, as an interesting approach to combat cancer. In this review, we discuss current evidence about the safety of TCAs, their application to treat neuropathic pain in cancer patients, and in vitro and in vivo demonstrations of the antitumoral effects of TCAs. Finally, the results of ongoing clinical trials and future directions are discussed.

Abstract

Growing evidence shows that nerves play an active role in cancer development and progression by altering crucial molecular pathways and cell functions. Conversely, the use of neurotropic drugs, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), may modulate these molecular signals with a therapeutic purpose based on a direct antitumoral effect and beyond the TCA use to treat neuropathic pain in oncology patients. In this review, we discuss the TCAs’ safety and their central effects against neuropathic pain in cancer, and the antitumoral effects of TCAs in in vitro and preclinical studies, as well as in the clinical setting. The current evidence points out that TCAs are safe and beneficial to treat neuropathic pain associated with cancer and chemotherapy, and they block different molecular pathways used by cancer cells from different locations for tumor growth and promotion. Likewise, ongoing clinical trials evaluating the antineoplastic effects of TCAs are discussed. TCAs are very biologically active compounds, and their repurposing as antitumoral drugs is a promising and straightforward approach to treat specific cancer subtypes and to further define their molecular targets, as well as an interesting starting point to design analogues with increased antitumoral activity.

Risk Factors for Ovarian Cancer: An Umbrella Review of the Literature

Several non-genetic factors have been associated with ovarian cancer incidence or mortality. To evaluate the strength and validity of the evidence we conducted an umbrella review of the literature that included systematic reviews/meta-analyses that evaluated the link between non-genetic risk factors and ovarian cancer incidence and mortality. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and performed a manual screening of references. Evidence was graded into strong, highly suggestive, suggestive or weak based on statistical significance of the random effects summary estimate and the largest study in a meta-analysis, the number of cases, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction intervals, small study effects, and presence of excess significance bias. We identified 212 meta-analyses, investigating 55 non-genetic risk factors for ovarian cancer. Risk factors were grouped in eight broad categories: anthropometric indices, dietary intake, physical activity, pre-existing medical conditions, past drug history, biochemical markers, past gynaecological history and smoking. Of the 174 meta-analyses of cohort studies assessing 44 factors, six associations were graded with strong evidence. Greater height (RR per 10 cm 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.20), body mass index (BMI) (RR ≥ 30 kg/m² versus normal 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38) and three exposures of varying preparations and usage related to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use increased the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Use of oral contraceptive pill reduced the risk (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69-0.80). Refining the significance of genuine risk factors for the development of ovarian cancer may potentially increase awareness in women at risk, aid prevention and early detection.

Use of antidepressants and endometrial-cancer risk: a nationwide nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have suggested that antidepressant drugs may possess antineoplastic properties. In a nationwide case-control study, we examined the association between use of antidepressants and endometrial-cancer risk with a particular focus on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

METHODS

From the Danish Cancer Registry, we identified all women with a histologically verified diagnosis of endometrial cancer between 2000 and 2016, and, for each woman, 15 age-matched controls. We obtained information on use of SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and other antidepressants based on records of filled prescriptions from the National Prescription Register. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between use of antidepressants and endometrial-cancer risk compared with non-use. In active comparator analyses, SSRI use was compared with TCA use.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 8164 cases and 122 432 controls. Compared with non-use, SSRI use was associated with an OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.96) for endometrial cancer, whereas the association with TCA use was close to unity (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22). Use of other antidepressants yielded an OR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-1.03). We observed no apparent trends in associations according to cumulative amount. The inverse association with SSRI use persisted when compared with TCA use (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SSRIs was associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer, whereas no inverse association appeared with use of TCAs. The antineoplastic potential of SSRIs should be investigated in future studies.

Neoplasm Reports in Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Following Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Recalls

BACKGROUND

A worldwide voluntary recall of valsartan in July 2018 due to the potential carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine received extensive media and public attention. This was followed by more Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalls regarding other contaminated ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) products. Our study investigated the association between the FDA recalls and ARB neoplasm adverse events (AEs) reported to the FDA adverse event reporting system.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, data were retrospectively collected from the FDA adverse event reporting system database from January 2015 to December 2019. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were estimated to detect signals of association between ARBs (valsartan, irbesartan, and losartan) and reported neoplasm AEs using negative (amoxicillin and sertraline) and positive (omeprazole and ranitidine) control exposures. The χ² was used to compare categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2 181 524 AEs, including 10 461 nonmetastatic neoplasm AEs were analyzed. Monthly RORs (95% CI) of valsartan-associated neoplasms versus controls (ROR*: valsartan/negative exposures; ROR†: valsartan/omeprazole; and ROR‡: valsartan/ranitidine) showed the highest signals after the recall date in July 2018 (7.64 [4.78-12.19]*; 4.77 [3.36-6.79]†; 4.13 [2.50-6.84]‡) and August 2018 (7.87 [5.19-11.94]*; 5.65 [4.12-7.75]†; and 7.20 [4.46-11.63]‡). In contrast, the highest cancer signals for the irbesartan and losartan recalls detected in March 2019 (4.80*; 4.06†; and 3.38‡) and April 2019 (3.63*; 3.69†; and 2.52‡) respectively, were lower. One-year postrecall reported neoplasm AEs were ≈2-fold higher for valsartan than irbesartan (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.47-2.13], P<0.0001) and losartan (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.85-2.32], P<0.0001). Although all ARBs had the same nitrosamine contamination, we found 1-year postrecall versus prerecall cancer signals for valsartan were 3-fold higher versus control exposures, while the changes in RORs for irbesartan and losartan were only 20-30% higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly more postrecall neoplasms were reported for valsartan, with higher valsartan-associated cancer signals compared with irbesartan and losartan, although they all contained the same carcinogenic contaminant. Extensive media coverage of the FDA valsartan recall may have alarmed patients and generated these abrupt, biologically infeasible cancer signals.

Antidepressant use and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality: A dose-response meta analysis

The risk of colorectal cancer associated to antidepressant use remains unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the risk of colorectal cancer associated to antidepressant use.Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database were accessed from the dates of their establishment to October 2018, to collect study of antidepressant use and colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Then a meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0 software.A total of 11 publications involving 109,506 participants were included. The meta-analysis showed that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer morbidity (relevant risk (RR): 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.01) and mortality (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.99-1.17). Subgroup analysis showed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96-1.03) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.86-1.26) were not associated with colorectal cancer risk; however, TCA was associated with colorectal cancer risk decrement (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98). Furthermore, the results also showed that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer risk in Europe and North America (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92-1.02) and Asia (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26). Additionally, a dose-response showed per 1 year of duration of antidepressant use incremental increase was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.87-1.09).Evidence suggests that antidepressant use was not associated with colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. The cumulative duration of antidepressant use did not utilized played critical roles.

Apoptotic effect of fluoxetine through the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in the human gastric cancer cell line AGS

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the world. Fluoxetine (FLX), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, can inhibit the growth of cancer cells by inducing apoptotic cell death through various signaling pathways. This study was aimed to determine the mechanism of apoptotic cell death induced by FLX in AGS cells. MTT assay for cell viability test and colony forming assay was performed for detection of cell proliferation. Western blot analysis was conducted for protein expression. Increased fluorescence intensity and chromatin condensation were observed using DAPI staining. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured by DCFDA assay. AGS cell proliferation was remarkedly inhibited by FLX in a dose-dependent manner starting at a concentration of 20 μM. The expression of death receptors was increased, which resulted in elevated expression of activated caspases and cleaved PARP, leading to FLX-induced apoptosis. Moreover, FLX significantly increased production of ROS, and N-acetyl cysteine, which scavenges ROS, attenuated the cytotoxic effects of FLX. In addition, treatment with FLX increased the expression of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress marker, CHOP. P53 protein expression in AGS cells also decreased significantly with FLX treatment. Inhibition of ER stress significantly decreased the expressions of death receptor 5 (DR5), cleaved caspase 3, and cleaved PARP, but not to control levels. FLX-induced apoptosis in AGS involved upregulation of death receptors, ROS generation, and activation of ER stress.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Is Associated with Increased Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective and Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer. Chronic stress accelerates tumor growth in animal models of ovarian cancer. We therefore postulated that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer. We used data from the Nurses' Health Study II, a longitudinal cohort study with 26 years of follow-up, conducted from 1989 to 2015 with 54,710 subjects. Lifetime PTSD symptoms were measured in 2008. Self-reported ovarian cancer was validated with medical records. Risk of ovarian cancer was estimated with Cox proportional hazards models and further adjusted for known ovarian cancer risk factors (e.g., hormonal factors) and health risk factors (e.g., smoking). Fully prospective secondary analyses examined incident ovarian cancer occurring after PTSD assessment in 2008. In addition, we examined associations by menopausal status. During follow-up, 110 ovarian cancers were identified. Women with high PTSD symptoms had 2-fold greater risk of ovarian cancer versus women with no trauma exposure [age-adjusted HR = 2.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-3.95]. Adjustment for health and ovarian cancer risk factors moderately attenuated this association (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 0.98-3.51). Associations were similar or moderately stronger in fully prospective analyses (age-adjusted HR = 2.38; 95% CI, 0.98-5.76, N cases = 50) and in premenopausal women (HR = 3.42; 95% CI, 1.08-10.85). In conclusion, we show that PTSD symptoms are associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer. Better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms could lead to interventions that reduce ovarian cancer risk in women with PTSD and other stress-related mental disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: PTSD is associated with ovarian cancer risk, particularly in premenopausal women. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms will aid in formulating ways to reduce ovarian cancer risk associated with chronic stress.

Preoperative anemia as a prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies

The evidence of current epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between preoperative anemia and progression of lung cancer (LC) patients remains controversial. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched by two independent authors to identify related epidemiological studies from inception through January 31, 2019. Similarly, two researchers separately extracted data and any differences were resolved by discussion. Summarized hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were summarized with inverse variance weighted random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I² statistic. Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. As compared with LC patients without anemia, those with pre-operative anemia were at a 1.6-fold greater risk of death (summarized HR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.44-1.75), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 53.1%). Funnel plot and statistical analyses showed no evidence of publication bias. Associations between pre-operative anemia and OS were broadly consistent across numerous subgroups analyses stratified by the study design, geographic location, number of cases, tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, histology, quality, and adjustment for potential confounders (age, sex, body mass index, TNM stage, histology, performance status, surgery, blood transfusion, and systemic inflammatory response markers). Similar patterns were observed in the sensitivity analyses. The results of meta-regression analysis suggested no evidence of significant heterogeneity between subgroups. In conclusion, pre-operative anemia was associated with poorer overall survival among LC patients.

Is Autophagy Involved in the Diverse Effects of Antidepressants?

Autophagy has received increased attention as a conserved process governing cellular energy and protein homeostasis that is thus relevant in a range of physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Recently, autophagy has also been linked to depression, mainly through its involvement in the action of antidepressants. Some antidepressant drugs and psychotropic medication have been reported to exert beneficial effects in other diseases, for example, in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. This review collates the evidence for the hypothesis that autophagy contributes to the effects of antidepressants beyond depression treatment.

Impact of postdiagnostic statin use on ovarian cancer mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

AIMS

To comprehensively evaluate the association between postdiagnostic statin use and mortality of ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

METHODS

Using a comprehensive strategy, multiple databases (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) were systematically searched to identify observational studies that examined the correlation between statin use and OC mortality up to 31 December 2017. The studies were independently reviewed and selected based on predetermined selection criteria. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality were summarized with a profile likelihood random effects model.

RESULTS

Of 269 studies, eight cohort studies of 19 904 OC patients met the inclusion criteria. Postdiagnostic statin use was inversely associated with all-cause mortality/overall survival (summarized HR = 0.74; 95%CI = 0.63-0.87; I²  = 55%; n = 7) and cancer-specific mortality (summarized HR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.80-0.95; I²  = 0%; n = 3) of OC patients. These findings were consistent by subgroup analyses stratified by study and patient characteristics as well as adjustments made for potential confounders. A meta-regression analysis found no effect of modification by these variables. Of note, similar significant inverse effects were also observed when increasing the intensity (highest vs. lowest) of postdiagnostic statin use (summarized HR = 0.84; 95%CI = 0.74-0.96; I²  = 0%; n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Postdiagnostic statin use can improve the survival of patients with OC. Further prospective cohort and randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the therapeutic role of statin use on the outcome of OC.

Association between antidepressant medication use and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

AIM

The aim of this paper is to clarify the inconsistent findings in the association between antidepressant use and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

This study is a meta-analysis of observational studies retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases prior to August 15, 2017. Two researchers independently screened studies and extracted study characteristics and risk estimates. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of EOC risk were summarized using an inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I² statistic.

RESULTS

Eight case-control studies involving 7878 EOC cases and 73 913 controls were identified. Compared with non-use, use of antidepressants was not significantly associated with EOC risk (summarized OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.91-1.32, I²  = 74.4%). Similar null results were also observed in the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.80-1.35), tricyclic antidepressants (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.79-1.30), and other antidepressant drugs (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.74-1.12). Subgroup analyses of study characteristics, stratified by the type of control subjects, geographic location, exposure assessment, number of cases, and adjustment for potential confounders, showed that the ORs were broadly consistent across strata. The OR per 1 year-increment of duration was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.94-1.05, I²  = 40.0%, P = 0.154). Additionally, the OR for the greatest intensity of antidepressant use compared with never use was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-0.98, I²  = 0%, P = 0.489). Furthermore, no evidence of publication bias was detected through Funnel plots as well as Egger's and Begg's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no association between antidepressant use and EOC risk. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.