Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors lower the risk of autoimmune disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nationwide population-based cohort study

DrugRep-HeSiaGraph: when heterogenous siamese neural network meets knowledge graphs for drug repurposing

BACKGROUND

Drug repurposing is an approach that holds promise for identifying new therapeutic uses for existing drugs. Recently, knowledge graphs have emerged as significant tools for addressing the challenges of drug repurposing. However, there are still major issues with constructing and embedding knowledge graphs.

RESULTS

This study proposes a two-step method called DrugRep-HeSiaGraph to address these challenges. The method integrates the drug-disease knowledge graph with the application of a heterogeneous siamese neural network. In the first step, a drug-disease knowledge graph named DDKG-V1 is constructed by defining new relationship types, and then numerical vector representations for the nodes are created using the distributional learning method. In the second step, a heterogeneous siamese neural network called HeSiaNet is applied to enrich the embedding of drugs and diseases by bringing them closer in a new unified latent space. Then, it predicts potential drug candidates for diseases. DrugRep-HeSiaGraph achieves impressive performance metrics, including an AUC-ROC of 91.16%, an AUC-PR of 90.32%, an accuracy of 84.63%, a BS of 0.119, and an MCC of 69.31%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in identifying potential drugs for COVID-19 as a case study. In addition, this study shows the role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) as a potential receptor for SARS-CoV-2 and the effectiveness of DPP-4 inhibitors in facing COVID-19. This highlights the practical application of the model in addressing real-world challenges in the field of drug repurposing. The code and data for DrugRep-HeSiaGraph are publicly available at https://github.com/CBRC-lab/DrugRep-HeSiaGraph .

DPP-4 Inhibitors as a savior for COVID-19 patients with diabetes

Diabetic patients are at particular risk of severe COVID-19. Human dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a membrane-bound aminopeptidase that regulates insulin release by inactivating incretin. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are therefore used as oral anti-diabetic drugs to restore normal insulin levels. These molecules also have anti-inflammatory and anti-hypertension effects. Recent studies on the interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and DPP-4 predict a possible entry route for SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, DPP-4is could be effective at reducing the virus-induced 'cytokine storm', thereby ceasing inflammatory injury to vital organs. Moreover, DPP-4is may interfere with viral entry into host cells. Herein, we have reviewed the efficacy of DPP-4is as potential repurposed drugs to reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with diabetes.

The many facets of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase 4 and its inhibitors in disorders of the CNS - a critical overview

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a serine protease that cleaves X-proline or X-alanine in the penultimate position. Natural substrates of the enzyme are glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon inhibiting peptide, glucagon, neuropeptide Y, secretin, substance P, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, endorphins, endomorphins, brain natriuretic peptide, beta-melanocyte stimulating hormone and amyloid peptides as well as some cytokines and chemokines. The enzyme is involved in the maintenance of blood glucose homeostasis and regulation of the immune system. It is expressed in many organs including the brain. DPP4 activity may be effectively depressed by DPP4 inhibitors. Apart from enzyme activity, DPP4 acts as a cell surface (co)receptor, associates with adeosine deaminase, interacts with extracellular matrix, and controls cell migration and differentiation. This review aims at revealing the impact of DPP4 and DPP4 inhibitors for several brain diseases (virus infections affecting the brain, tumours of the CNS, neurological and psychiatric disorders). Special emphasis is given to a possible involvement of DPP4 expressed in the brain.While prominent contributions of extracerebral DPP4 are evident for a majority of diseases discussed herein; a possible role of "brain" DPP4 is restricted to brain cancers and Alzheimer disease. For a number of diseases (Covid-19 infection, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson disease, Huntington disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and epilepsy), use of DPP4 inhibitors has been shown to have a disease-mitigating effect. However, these beneficial effects should mostly be attributed to the depression of "peripheral" DPP4, since currently used DPP4 inhibitors are not able to pass through the intact blood-brain barrier.

Therapeutic Perspectives of CD26 Inhibitors in Imune-Mediated Diseases

The enzymatic activity of CD26/DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4/DPP4) is highlighted in multiple studies to play a vital role in glucose metabolism by cleaving and inactivating the incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP) and gastric inhibitory protein (GIP). A large number of studies demonstrate that CD26 also plays an integral role in the immune system, particularly in T cell activation. CD26 is extensively expressed in immune cells, such as T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. The enzymatic activity of CD26 cleaves and regulates numerous chomokines and cytokines. CD26 inhibitors have been widely used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus, while it is still under investigation as a therapy for immune-mediated diseases. In addition, CD26’s involvement in cancer immunology was also described. The review aims to summarize the therapeutic effects of CD26 inhibitors on immune-mediated diseases, as well as the mechanisms that underpin them.

Case Report: Appearance of Various Disease-Specific Antibodies After the Onset of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor-Associated Bullous Pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare autoimmune blistering disease, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is relatively high in subjects with BP. It is known that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), one kind of antidiabetic drugs, can cause BP, although precise mechanism of DPP-4i-related BP remains unclear. In this report, we showed a case with appearance of various disease-specific antibodies after the onset of DPP-4i-related BP. Furthermore, various disease-specific antibodies became positive and showed high titers two years after the onset of DPP-4i-related BP and discontinuation of DPP-4i. These data showed that it is possible for immune tolerance to be broken after the onset of DPP-4i-related BP, and it may be important to check autoimmune antibodies in DPP-4i-related BP subjects even when BP symptoms are improved.

Emerging Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 in Autoimmune Disease

Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP4), originally identified as an aminopeptidase in 1960s, is an ubiquitously expressed protease presented as either a membrane-bound or soluble form. DPP4 cleaves dipeptide off from the N-terminal of its substrates, altering the bioactivity of its substrates. Subsequent studies reveal that DPP4 is also involved in various cellular processes by directly binding to a number of ligands, including adenosine deaminase, CD45, fibronectin, plasminogen, and caveolin-1. In recent years, many novel functions of DPP4, such as promoting fibrosis and mediating virus entry, have been discovered. Due to its implication in fibrotic response and immunoregulation, increasing studies are focusing on the potential role of DPP4 in inflammatory disorders. As a moonlighting protein, DPP4 possesses multiple functions in different types of cells, including both enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions. However, most of the review articles on the role of DPP4 in autoimmune disease were focused on the association between DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors and the risk of autoimmune disease. An updated comprehensive summary of DPP4’s immunoregulatory actions including both enzymatic dependent and independent functions is needed. In this article, we will review the recent advances of DPP4 in immune regulation and autoimmune rheumatic disease.

Explore comorbidities associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a total population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Because of the increasing incidence and overall burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), efforts have been made to identify the factors that contribute to SLE onset and progression.

AIM

We conducted a total population-based case-control study to explore the prior comorbidities associated with SLE.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Newly diagnosed SLE patients from 1 January 2010, to 31 December 2013 (n = 2847), were exactly matched at a 1:4 ratio for gender, age, residence and insurance premium to form a non-SLE group. Multivariate conditional logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to find the prior-associated comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 38 prior comorbidities were associated with SLE incidence (32 positive and 6 negative associations). Positively associated comorbidities could be categorized as autoimmune-related inflammation of multiple organs including skin, blood, liver, tooth, thyroid, musculoskeletal and connective tissue. Among them, diffuse diseases of connective tissue (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification 710) exhibited the most robust association (OR = 5.68, 95% CI = 4.02-8.03, P < 0.001) in the 5 years before the index date. Negatively associated comorbidities could be attributed to diabetes mellitus and pregnancy related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results supported that increased awareness of SLE may be warranted for patients with autoimmune-related comorbidities of multiple organs. However, diabetes mellitus and pregnancy related symptoms were negatively associated with SLE incidence in this study. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the possible underlying mechanism and for better understanding the pathogenesis of SLE.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, associated therapies and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incident risk of RA in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to explore the role of glycaemic control and associated therapeutic use in the onset of RA.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study using patients derived from the IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK) database between 1995 and 2019. A total of 224 551 newly diagnosed patients with T2DM were matched to 449 101 patients without T2DM and followed up to assess their risk of RA. Further analyses investigated the effect of glycaemic control, statin use and anti-diabetic drugs on the relationship between T2DM and RA using a time-dependent Cox regression model.

RESULTS

During the study period, the incidence of RA was 8.1 and 10.6 per 10 000 person-years in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67, 0.79). In patients who had not used statins in their lifetime, the aHR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.69, 1.14). When quantifying the effects of glycaemic control, anti-diabetic drugs and statins using time-varying analyses, there was no association with glycaemic control [aHR 1.00 (95% CI 0.99, 1.00)], use of metformin [aHR 1.00 (95% CI 0.82, 1.22)], dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP4is; aHR 0.94 (95% CI 0.71, 1.24)] and the development of RA. However, statins demonstrated a protective effect for progression of RA in those with T2DM [aHR 0.76 (95% CI 0.66, 0.88)], with evidence of a duration-response relationship.

CONCLUSION

There is a reduced risk of RA in patients with T2DM that may be attributable to the use of statins.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-induced autoimmune diseases: Current evidence

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have an important place in the management of type 2 diabetes. The DPP-4 enzyme is ubiquitously distributed throughout the human body and has multiple substrates through which it regulates several important physiological functions. DPP-4 regulates several immune functions, including T-cell activation, macrophage function, and secretion of cytokines. Studies have reported an increase in autoimmune diseases like bullous pemphigoid, inflammatory bowel disease, and arthritis with DPP-4i use. The relationship of DPP-4i and autoimmune diseases is a complex one and warrants further research into the effect of DPP-4 inhibition on the immune system to understand the pathogenesis more clearly. Whether a particular cluster of autoimmune diseases is associated with DPP-4i use remains an important contentious issue. Nevertheless, a heightened awareness from the clinicians is required to identify and treat any such diseases. Through this review, we explore the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of this association in light of recent evidence.

Risk factors for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: A set of parallel case-control studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare potential risk factors for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Four parallel case-control studies were conducted within The Health Improvement Network using data between 1994 and 2015. Patients with PsA, psoriasis, RA, or AS were identified using validated code lists and matched to controls on age, sex, practice, and year. Risk factors were selected in the time prior to diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed for each disease using automated stepwise regression to test potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Patients with incident PsA (N=7,594), psoriasis (N=111,375), RA (N=28,341), and AS (N=3, 253) were identified and matched to 75,930, 1,113,345, 282,226, and 32,530 controls, respectively. Median diagnosis age was 48 (IQR 38-59), 41 (31-54), 43 (31-54), and 60 (48-71), respectively. In multivariable models, there were some shared and some differing risk factors across all 4 diseases: PsA was associated with obesity, pharyngitis, and skin infections; PsA and psoriasis were associated with obesity and moderate alcohol intake; PsA and AS were associated with uveitis; and PsA and RA were associated with preceding gout. Both RA and AS were associated with current smoking, former moderate drinking, anemia, osteoporosis, and inflammatory bowel disease. All shared former or current smoking as a risk factor; statin use was inversely associated with all 4 diseases.

CONCLUSION

Shared and different risk factors for PsA, psoriasis, RA, and AS were identified. Statin use was inversely associated with all 4 conditions.

Insulin Signaling in Arthritis

Inflammatory arthritis is burdened by an increased risk of metabolic disorders. Cytokines and other mediators in inflammatory diseases lead to insulin resistance, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. Accumulating evidence in the field of immunometabolism suggests that the cause-effect relationship between arthritis and metabolic abnormalities might be bidirectional. Indeed, the immune response can be modulated by various factors such as environmental agents, bacterial products and hormones. Insulin is produced by pancreatic cells and regulates glucose, fat metabolism and cell growth. The action of insulin is mediated through the insulin receptor (IR), localized on the cellular membrane of hepatocytes, myocytes and adipocytes but also on the surface of T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells. In murine models, the absence of IR in T-cells coincided with reduced cytokine production, proliferation, and migration. In macrophages, defective insulin signaling resulted in enhanced glycolysis affecting the responses to pathogens. In this review, we focalize on the bidirectional cause-effect relationship between impaired insulin signaling and arthritis analyzing how insulin signaling may be involved in the aberrant immune response implicated in arthritis and how inflammatory mediators affect insulin signaling. Finally, the effect of glucose-lowering agents on arthritis was summarized.

Use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors is associated with a lower risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Case reports have described occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after initiation of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP4i), suggesting a possible adverse effect of the medications. However, the findings from subsequent cohort studies suggest the opposite as they indicate that T2DM patients who used DPP4i tended to have a lower risk of RA. We aimed to investigate the association between use of DPP4i and incident RA in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Potentially eligible studies were identified from Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to May 2020 using search strategy that comprised of terms for "Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor" and "Rheumatoid arthritis". Eligible study must be cohort study consisting of one cohort of patients with T2DM who were DPP4i users and another cohort of comparators with T2DM who did not receive DPP4i. Then, the study must report effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) comparing incident RA between DPP4i users versus comparators. Point estimates with standard errors retrieved from each study were combined together using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

A total of 709 articles were identified. After systematic review, four retrospective cohort studies met the eligibility criteria and were included into the meta-analysis. DPP4i users had a significantly lower risk of incident RA compared with comparators with the pooled hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.96; I² 75%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between DPP4i use and a lower risk of incident RA.

DPP4 inhibition: Preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or progression of COVID-19?

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), also known as cluster of differentiation 26 (CD26), is a serine exopeptidase expressed ubiquitously in several tissues, including but not limited to lung, kidney, liver, gut, and immune cells. The question has been raised on whether DPP4 modulation or inhibition may prevent infection and/or progression of the COVID-19. A docked complex model of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and DPP4 has been proposed, showing a large interface between the proteins and proposing close similarity with other coronaviruses using DPP4 as functional receptor. In absence of experimental validation, these data should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, this observation may rise the question on whether DPP4 is directly involved in SARS-CoV-2 cell adhesion/virulence, and whether DPP4 inhibition might be a therapeutic strategy for preventing infection. Although a direct involvement of DPP4 in SARS-CoV-2 infection needs to be clarified, there is also evidence suggesting that DPP4 inhibitors modulate inflammation and exert anti-fibrotic activity. These properties may be of potential use for halting progression to the hyperinflammatory state associated with severe COVID-19. Taken together these findings may suggest a potential role for DPP4 inhibition or modulation in one or more steps of COVID-19 immunopathogenesis.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risks of autoimmune diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study

AIMS

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4, a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in various cell types, serves as a co-stimulator molecule to influence immune response. This study aimed to investigate associations between DPP-4 inhibitors and risk of autoimmune disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwan.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the nationwide data from the diabetes subsection of Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to compare the risk of autoimmune disorders and the subgroup analyses between the DPP-4i and DPP-4i-naïve groups.

RESULTS

A total of 774,198 type 2 diabetic patients were identified. The adjusted HR of the incidence for composite autoimmune disorders in DPP-4i group was 0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.60; P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the younger patients (aged 20-40 years: HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.61; aged 41-60 years: HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.55; aged 61-80 years: HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.68, P = 0.0004) and the lesser duration of diabetes diagnosed (0-5 years: HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.44-0.52; 6-10 years: HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.43-0.53; ≧ 10 years: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, P < 0.0001), the more significant the inverse association of DPP-4 inhibitors with the incidence of composite autoimmune diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with lower risk of autoimmune disorders in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Taiwan, especially for the younger patients and the lesser duration of diabetes diagnosed. The significant difference was found between the four types of DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of autoimmune diseases. This study provides clinicians with useful information regarding the use of DPP-4 inhibitors for treating diabetic patients.

Can phytotherapy with polyphenols serve as a powerful approach for the prevention and therapy tool of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

Much more serious than the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks, the novel SARS-CoV-2 infection has spread speedily, affecting 213 countries and causing ∼17,300,000 cases and ∼672,000 (∼+1,500/day) deaths globally (as of July 31, 2020). The potentially fatal coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by air droplets and airborne as the main transmission modes, clearly induces a spectrum of respiratory clinical manifestations, but it also affects the immune, gastrointestinal, hematological, nervous, and renal systems. The dramatic scale of disorders and complications arises from the inadequacy of current treatments and absence of a vaccine and specific anti-COVID-19 drugs to suppress viral replication, inflammation, and additional pathogenic conditions. This highlights the importance of understanding the SARS-CoV-2 mechanisms of actions and the urgent need of prospecting for new or alternative treatment options. The main objective of the present review is to discuss the challenging issue relative to the clinical utility of plants-derived polyphenols in fighting viral infections. Not only is the strong capacity of polyphenols highlighted in magnifying health benefits, but the underlying mechanisms are also stressed. Finally, emphasis is placed on the potential ability of polyphenols to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection via the regulation of its molecular targets of human cellular binding and replication, as well as through the resulting host inflammation, oxidative stress, and signaling pathways.

Is DPP4 inhibition a comrade or adversary in COVID-19 infection

Hypertension and Diabetes are the most common comorbid conditions in patients with COVID-19 and has been shown to adversely impact prognosis globally. It has been shown that hyperglycemia is one of the factors that increases the risk of poor outcomes in these patients. These patients are usually on multiple medications and recently a series of discussion on how Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) may be beneficial in these patients has been presented. This commentary presents a nuanced debateon why the DPP4i may not bebeneficial in COVID-19 and that caution needs to be addressed in making any judgementsuntil real world data is available.

Potential Benefits and Harms of Novel Antidiabetic Drugs During COVID-19 Crisis

Patients with diabetes have been reported to have enhanced susceptibility to severe or fatal COVID-19 infections, including a high risk of being admitted to intensive care units with respiratory failure and septic complications. Given the global prevalence of diabetes, affecting over 450 million people worldwide and still on the rise, the emerging COVID-19 crisis poses a serious threat to an extremely large vulnerable population. However, the broad heterogeneity and complexity of this dysmetabolic condition, with reference to etiologic mechanisms, degree of glycemic derangement and comorbid associations, along with the extensive sexual dimorphism in immune responses, can hamper any patient generalization. Even more relevant, and irrespective of glucose-lowering activities, DPP4 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists may have a favorable impact on the modulation of viral entry and overproduction of inflammatory cytokines during COVID-19 infection, although current evidence is limited and not univocal. Conversely, SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the likelihood of COVID-19-related ketoacidosis decompensation among patients with severe insulin deficiency. Mindful of their widespread popularity in the management of diabetes, addressing potential benefits and harms of novel antidiabetic drugs to clinical prognosis at the time of a COVID-19 pandemic deserves careful consideration.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and their potential immune modulatory functions

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors (DPP4is) are oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) through inhibiting the degradation of incretin peptides. Numerous investigations have been focused on the effects of DPP4is on glucose homeostasis. However, there are limited evidences demonstrating their Potential modulatory functions in the immune system. DPP4, originally known as the lymphocyte cell surface protein CD26, is widely expressed in many types of immune cells including CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages; and regulate the functions of these cells. In addition, DPP4 is capable of modulating plenty of cytokines, chemokines and peptide hormones. Accordingly, DPP4/CD26 is speculated to be involved in various immune/inflammatory diseases and DPP4is may become a new drug class applied in these diseases. This review focuses on the regulatory effects of DPP4is on immune functions and their possible underlying mechanisms. Further clinical studies will be necessitated to fully evaluate the administration of DPP4is in diabetic patients with or without immune diseases.

Decreased shedding dipeptidyl peptidase 4 from membrane in Hashimoto's thyroiditis

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the concentration and enzymatic activity of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and to explore the potential mechanism of the abnormal DPP4 in HT development.

METHODS

A total of 33 newly diagnosed HT patients and 31 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Clinical characteristics and thyroid function data were collected for all participants. Serum DPP4 and kallikrein-related peptidase 5 (KLK5) concentrations were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. DPP4 enzymatic activities in serum and PBMCs were determined by enzymatic assay. DPP4, KLK5 and interferon (IFN)-γ mRNA expression levels in PBMCs were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Serum DPP4 level and activity were significantly lower in the HT group compared with the control group. However, DPP4 mRNA expression was significantly increased and both serum KLK5 concentration and KLK5 mRNA expression in PBMCs were significantly decreased in HT patients. Correlation analyses revealed that DPP4 concentration was positively correlated with DPP4 enzymatic activity in serum. No significant difference in DPP4 activity was found in PBMCs. DPP4 enzymatic activity in PBMCs was negatively correlated with DPP4 enzymatic activity in serum. IFN-γ mRNA expression in PBMCs was significantly increased in HT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP4 is involved in the development and pathological process of HT. Decreased cleavage of membrane-anchored DPP4 by KLK5 may be responsible for the decreased serum DPP4 levels in HT patients.

Adherence to metformin and the onset of rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study

Objective: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine whether adherence to metformin treatment may be associated with lower onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Method: Using the computerized databases of a 2.3-million state-mandated health services organization in Israel, we identified incident RA cases among a cohort of 113 749 adult patients who initiated metformin therapy between 1998 and 2014. Adherence was assessed by calculating the mean proportion of follow-up days covered (PDC) with metformin.Results: During the 18 year study period, there were 558 incident RA cases (61 per 100 000 person-years). Adherence to metformin treatment was associated with a lower risk of developing RA, with the lowest risk recorded among patients with a PDC of 40-59% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.84] compared with non-adherent patients (PDC < 20%). A mean daily metformin dose of 2550 mg or more was also associated with a lower risk of developing RA (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84) compared to a daily dose of 850 mg or less. In stratified analyses by gender, the negative association between adherence and the risk of RA was limited to women alone.Conclusions: Adherence to metformin treatment is associated with a reduced risk of developing RA in women. Further studies are needed to assess the effect of metformin on RA development in other patient populations.

Cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population-based cohort followed over 10 years

AIMS

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin (ILAHI) for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

Individual-level analyses were conducted within a longitudinal population-based cohort of 540 propensity score-matched T1D patients (LAIAs, n = 270; ILAHI, n = 270) with over 10 years of follow-up using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 2004-2013, from third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives. The study outcomes included the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of clinical events (eg, hypoglycaemia, diabetes-related complications), medical costs, and cost per case of events prevented. Cost estimates are presented in 2013 British pounds (GBP, £).

RESULTS

The NNTs using LAIAs vs ILAHI to avoid one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia and any diabetes-related complications were 12, 9 and 10 for mean follow-up periods of 5.84, 6.02 and 3.62 years, respectively. From third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives, using LAIAs instead of ILAHI saved GBP6924-GBP7116 per case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance prevented, GBP5346-GBP5508 per case of outpatient hypoglycaemia prevented, and GBP3570-GBP3680 per case of any diabetes-related complications prevented. Sensitivity analyses considering sampling uncertainty showed that using LAIAs over ILAHI yields at least a 76% probability of cost-saving for avoiding one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia or any diabetes-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world evidence reveals that compared with ILAHI, the greater pharmaceutical costs associated with LAIAs for patients with T1D could be substantially offset by savings from averted hypoglycaemia or diabetes-related complications.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors lower the risk of autoimmune disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nationwide population-based cohort study

AIMS

To evaluate the real-world effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) on the incidence of autoimmune diseases (AD), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel diseases, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

We identified new users of DPP4i (n = 497 619) or non-DPP4i (n = 643 165) oral combination therapy between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2015 among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Korean national health insurance claims database. Patients were followed from the date of initiation of combination therapy until AD outcome, censoring for treatment discontinuation or switching, death or end of study (31 August 2016). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for RA, inflammatory bowel diseases, other AD (multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus), and the composite of all outcomes were estimated using propensity score (PS)-adjusted Cox model.

RESULTS

In the PS-weighted and PS-matched analysis, the risk of incident RA was decreased for DPP4i initiators compared with non-DPP4i initiators (aHR 0.67 [95% CI 0.49-0.92] and aHR 0.72 [95% CI 0.51-1.01], respectively). In both analyses, the risk of incident composite AD was also decreased for DPP4i initiators compared with non-DPP4i initiators (aHR 0.82 [95% CI 0.68-0.99] and aHR 0.76 [95% CI 0.62-0.93], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based cohort study, upfront DPP4i combination therapy was associated with a lower risk of composite AD compared with initial non-DPP4i combination therapy.