The reliability of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) among dermatologists, rheumatologists and neurologists

Updates in Dermatomyositis: Newer Treatment Options and Outcome Measures From Dermatologic Perspectives

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with characteristic skin manifestations and possible muscle involvement. Recent advances in classification system to include skin-predominant subtypes, understanding underlying pathogenic mechanisms and the relationship between clinical phenotypes and myositis-specific autoantibodies have led to development of novel therapeutic options. This corresponds with efforts to develop better outcome measures to accurately catch the patients' current disease status and treatment-induced improvements. This report will review the updates in newer treatments and outcome measures of DM, specifically from a dermatologic point of view.

Current evidence for janus kinase inhibitors in adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and key comparisons

INTRODUCTION

Adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) are rare autoimmune diseases with characteristic skin rashes, weakness, and other systemic features. Upregulated interferon signaling has been consistently described in both adult and juvenile DM which makes janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) an attractive therapeutic agent that has a targeted mechanism of action.

AREAS COVERED

Herein is a review of the growing literature of jakinib use in adult and juvenile DM, including reports on specific disease features and safety of jakinibs in this population and a comparison between adult and juvenile DM. We performed a literature review using PubMed including all English-language publications before 1 February 2024 and abstracts from key recent rheumatology conferences.

EXPERT OPINION

Jakinibs are an exciting and promising treatment in both adult and juvenile DM. Current Phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials of jakinibs in both adult and JDM will provide significant insights into the efficacy of this class of medication as a potentially more mechanistically targeted treatment of both skin and muscle disease. In fact, these results will likely inform the treatment paradigm of dermatomyositis in that it may even be considered as first or second line. The next five years in the therapeutic landscape of both juvenile and adult DM is an exciting time for both patients and medical providers.

Development of the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Investigator Global Assessment (CDM-IGA): A De Novo IGA of Cutaneous Manifestations of Dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a distinctive debilitating skin rash and skeletal muscle weakness. It is unclear if existing clinical outcome assessment (COA) measures include the concepts of priority to patients and those necessary to fully capture improvements in the active cutaneous manifestations of DM. This study aimed to develop the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Investigator Global Assessment (CDM-IGA), a de novo IGA, for use in clinical trials of adult DM.

METHODS

Eight DM clinical experts participated in 60-min qualitative interviews consisting of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing methodologies. Concept elicitation comprised open-ended questions with follow-up probes to explore clinicians' experiences of treating patients with DM, the impact of symptoms on patients' quality of life, and the severity levels of disease characteristics to explore DM progression. Cognitive debriefing required the clinical experts to perform a review of the CDM-IGA, designed to assess the severity of cutaneous disease activity of DM. After the interviews, a consensus meeting with three clinical experts was held to agree on any outstanding issues relating to the CDM-IGA.

RESULTS

The CDM-IGA was iteratively developed using the opinions of nine clinical experts. Feedback provided by all clinicians agreed that erythema was the main active cutaneous manifestation of DM and should be the primary characteristic on the CDM-IGA, split by erythema color and extent. To determine cutaneous disease severity, experts suggested adding a metric called secondary changes, which combined erosion/ulceration and lichenification, which could modify the patient's final score. Three clinical experts suggested that a photo-guide to support assessments of erythema across different skin tones could be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel CDM-IGA was developed for use with adult patients with DM in clinical trials, based on an iterative development process that combined qualitative feedback from clinical experts of DM and importantly adult patients living with DM.

Narrowband Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Refractory Facial Rash Associated with Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis is an inflammatory myopathy characterized by typical skin findings. Cutaneous findings of DM include heliotrope eruption, Gottron papules, Gottron sign, poikiloderma, periorbital edema, facial swelling. The unique cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis are often resistant to conventional treatments. Narrowband intense pulsed light is a novel treatment that may reduce vasodilation. Furthermore, it may have a role in regulating inflammation associated with dermatomyositis. We present a case of cutaneous dermatomyositis that was successfully treated with narrowband intense pulsed light.

Improvement in Disease Activity in Refractory Juvenile Dermatomyositis Following Abatacept Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, 24-week study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with refractory juvenile dermatomyositis (DM).

METHODS

Ten patients ≥7 years of age with moderate disease activity were enrolled in a 24-week study to examine the safety of subcutaneous abatacept and patient responses to the treatment. The primary endpoint was the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) group Definition Of Improvement (DOI). Secondary endpoints included safety, changes in the core set activity measures (CSMs) of the IMACS group and the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization, and improvements in disease activity based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR response criteria for juvenile DM. Radiologists blinded with regard to participant data assessed magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of patient thigh muscles. Interferon (IFN)-regulated gene score was performed on whole-blood RNA samples using a NanoString assay, and cytokines were assessed using a Luminex assay.

RESULTS

Five patients achieved DOI at week 12, and 9 patients achieved DOI at week 24, including 2 patients with minimal, 4 patients with moderate, and 3 patients with major improvement by the 2016 ACR/EULAR response criteria for juvenile DM when patients were assessed using the CSMs of the IMACS Group. Improvements from baseline were seen in all CSMs at weeks 12 and 24, except in muscle enzymes. Daily glucocorticoid doses decreased from a mean of 16.7 mg at baseline to 10.2 mg at week 24 (P = 0.002). Average MRI muscle edema scores decreased from a mean baseline score of 5.3 to 2.3 at week 24 (P = 0.01). Six patients had down-trending IFN-regulated gene scores and galectin-9 expression at week 24. Decreases in IFN-regulated gene scores and in levels of interferon-γ-inducible protein 10kDa, galectin-9, and interleukin-2 correlated with improvements in disease activity and in muscle edema shown on MRI. Eleven grade 2 or 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

This open-label study demonstrated that abatacept may be beneficial for patients with treatment-refractory juvenile DM.

Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment options are limited for skin disease in dermatomyositis. Lenabasum is a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist that triggers the resolution of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenabasum in patients with refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis.

DESIGN

This study was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study conducted from July 2015 to August 2017.

POPULATION

The population included subjects aged ≥18 years with at least moderately active dermatomyositis skin activity by Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity ≥ 14 and failure or intolerance to hydroxychloroquine.

INTERVENTION

Participants received 20 mg lenabasum daily for 28 days and then 20 mg twice per day for 56 days or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a change in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity. Safety and other secondary efficacy assessments were performed till day 113.

RESULTS

A total of 22 subjects were randomized to lenabasum (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11). No serious or severe adverse events were related to lenabasum, and no participants discontinued the study. The adjusted least-squares mean for Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity decreased more for lenabasum, and the difference was significant on day 113 (least-squares mean [standard error] difference = ‒6.5 [3.1], P = 0.038). Numerically greater improvements were seen in multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and biomarkers with lenabasum.

CONCLUSION

Lenabasum treatment was well tolerated and was associated with greater improvement in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity and multiple efficacy outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02466243.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Dermatomyositis: Utilizing Assessment Tools for Treatment Efficacy

There have been important developments in defining cutaneous lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. The skin manifestations of these two diseases have a profound impact on QOL, with both emotional and symptomatic impacts that are important to address. The proliferation of potential therapeutic targets has made it important to make sure that these diseases are defined in a way that they can be included in translational and clinical studies of both localized and systemic forms of the diseases. There are now validated disease tools and QOL studies that are facilitating current and future scientific and therapeutic developments.

Importance of collaboration of dermatology and rheumatology to advance the field for lupus and dermatomyositis

There have been a number of advances in the clinical and translational understanding of cutaneous lupus and dermatomyositis, which both disproportionately affect women. These advances have involved ongoing collaborations between dermatology and rheumatology that highlight the importance of the skin in these disorders, with improvement in the education of trainees and clinical management of these complex multisystem diseases. In addition, a new disease classification has allowed inclusion of patients with skin-predominant dermatomyositis, frequently associated with systemic findings, in the spectrum of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Validated outcome measures allow translational research and facilitate progress toward better and more targeted therapeutics. Clinical trials using disease severity tools, such as the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Area and Severity Index and the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index, allow measurement of improvement in the skin. Recent results of phase 2 and 3 trials clearly show that patients will benefit from collaborative interactions and studies between dermatology and rheumatology.

Clinical and laboratory parameters predicting cancer in dermatomyositis patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic acquired autoimmune disorder strongly associated with cancer development. Until now, identifying predictive markers indicating a high risk of cancer has challenged clinicians. Although anti-TIF1γ antibody is a major serological indicator for cancer-associated DM, many anti-TIF1γ antibody-positive DM patients lack malignancy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinical and laboratory parameters that support cancer prediction in anti-TIF1γ antibody-positive DM patients.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were collected from cancer-associated and unassociated DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies. Serum cytokine concentrations were measured with a cytokine array assay. The values of inflammatory cytokines in cancer prognosis were determined with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The cancer group had a significantly higher frequency of males, older mean age and higher anti-TIF1γ antibody levels. Some inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor superfamilies, had increased levels in sera that were correlated with myositis markers, cutaneous severity and DM disease activity. Moreover, these cytokines had an area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.8 and high sensitivity and specificity at their specific cut-off, even higher than anti-TIF1γ levels in cancer prediction in our DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a close pathophysiological relationship among myositis, cancer and skin involvements in DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies and the potential clinical significance of anti-TIF1γ antibody levels in evaluating disease severity and prognosis in DM patients. Some inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies including BAFF, sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2, may support cancer prediction in DM patients with anti-TIF1γ antibodies.

Update on dermatomyositis in adults

Dermatomyositis (DM) in adults has a prevalence of 6-7 per 100,000 population per year. This dedicated compact overview was prepared due to an increasing incidence as well as an often underestimated systemic involvement and new developments in myositis-specific antibodies (MSA). The spectrum of clinical dermatological and systemic symptoms is described. Related diagnostic procedures are depicted, and therapeutic regimens based on the German S2k guidelines and the current literature are presented. The urgency of an early diagnosis is emphasized as about 30 % of patients with DM manifest a tumor. Etiopathology is often associated with pulmonary fibrosis, and inflammation of myositis can cause irreversible muscle damage. Clinical signs and correct interpretation of serological markers can deliver valuable information on the extent of DM, and provide an indication for further diagnostic procedures, prognosis and choice of therapy.

The validity and utility of the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) as a clinical outcome instrument in dermatomyositis: A comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

Validated outcome measures are paramount in the assessment of disease progression and evaluation of new therapeutics in clinical trials. Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease that is frequently refractory to current therapies and warrants the development of new treatments. The Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) was developed in 2008 in response to a need for a reliable, validated measure of skin disease activity and damage for use in clinical trials and longitudinal monitoring of disease progression.

METHODS

The literature was searched for all studies validating and utilizing the CDASI between 2008 and October 2018 using searches in PubMed. Studies pertaining to validation of the CDASI, correlation with quality of life, use in the evaluation of current therapies and ongoing trials, as well as relationships to biomarkers were included in this review.

RESULTS

The CDASI was found to have intra- and inter-rater reliability, validity, reproducibility, sensitivity to clinical changes, and ease of use. It has been shown to correlate with quality of life as measured by the Skindex-29 outcome measure. The CDASI activity score has additionally been shown to correlate significantly with IFN-β, a key cytokine in DM pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

The CDASI is a validated measure of dermatomyositis disease and has been shown to be an effective outcome instrument in clinical trials.

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) in paediatric cutaneous lupus among paediatric dermatologists and rheumatologists

BACKGROUND

The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) is a reliable outcome measure for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in adults used in clinical trials. However, it has not been validated in children, limiting clinical trials for paediatric CLE.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to validate the CLASI in paediatrics.

METHODS

Eleven paediatric patients with CLE, six dermatologists and six rheumatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the CLASI and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and individually rated all patients using both tools. Each physician reassessed two randomly selected patients. Within each physician group, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of each measure.

RESULTS

CLASI activity scores demonstrated excellent inter- and intrarater reliability (ICC > 0·90), while the PGA activity scores had good inter-rater reliability (ICC 0·73-0·77) among both specialties. PGA activity scores showed excellent (ICC 0·89) and good intrarater reliability (ICC 0·76) for dermatologists and rheumatologists, respectively. Limitations of this study include the small sample size of patients and potential recall bias during the physician rerating session.

CONCLUSIONS

CLASI activity measurement showed excellent inter- and intrarater reliability in paediatric CLE and superiority over the PGA. These results demonstrate that the CLASI is a reliable and valid outcome instrument for paediatric CLE.

Cutaneous dermatomyositis disease course followed over time using the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index

BACKGROUND

Limited studies describe the longitudinal course of cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize disease course in treated cutaneous DM by using the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), a validated outcome instrument.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort included patients with DM who had their CDASI activity subscore recorded for at least 2 years. Disease progression was classified as improved, worsened, or stable, and disease course was classified as monophasic, polyphasic, or chronic. Subjects were divided into groups with disease of mild (n = 16) and moderate-to-severe (n = 24) baseline severity.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with DM met inclusion criteria. The majority demonstrated improvement in disease activity (n = 21 [52.5%]) rather than worsening (n = 7 [17.5%]) and stable (n = 12 [30.0%]) disease. Most patients with mild disease remained stable (n = 10 [62.5%]), whereas most with moderate-to-severe disease improved (n = 19 [79.2%]). A polyphasic course (n = 33 [82.5%]) predominated over monophasic (n = 5 [12.5%]) and chronic (n = 2 [5%]) courses. The average number of flares per year per number of years of follow-up was independent of baseline disease activity.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design, potential referral bias, and cutoff values in classification criteria are limitations.

CONCLUSION

Baseline CDASI activity score is associated with particular patterns of disease course and progression in cutaneous DM.