1
|
Di Battista S. 'She is failing; he is learning': Gender-differentiated attributions for girls' and boys' errors. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2025; 95:55-72. [PMID: 38369383 DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to gender-differentiated attributions of failure in the STEM field, errors tend to be attributed to internal factors more to girls than to boys. AIMS This experimental study explored factors influencing gender-differentiated teachers' internal attributions of girls' and boys' errors and the consequent likelihood of teachers' hesitancy to offer educational robotics (ER) courses to them. The predictions were as follows: (1) the likelihood of teachers' hesitancy would be related to gender-differentiated internal attributions of errors based on expectations of a low natural aptitude for girls; and (2) teachers with high levels of gender stereotypes would be more hesitant about offering ER to girls than to boys via the mediation of internal attributions of errors as being due to girls' low levels of natural aptitude for ER. SAMPLE AND METHODS In this experimental study, 155 Italian teachers (M = 38.59 years, SD = 8.20) responded to a questionnaire at the end of a course on ER in 2022. Teachers randomly read one of two vignettes describing a girl's or a boy's error during an ER course. RESULTS Results of multiple regression and moderated mediation analyses confirmed both predictions. CONCLUSIONS In order to reduce the gender STEM gap, the tendency to attribute girls' errors to internal and natural causes should be better inspected.
Collapse
|
2
|
Benneker IMB, Lee NC, de Swart F, van Atteveldt NM. Similarities in mindset between adolescents' friends and cooperation partners. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2025; 28:67. [PMID: 39981198 PMCID: PMC11836159 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-025-10028-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
Peers, in terms of both friends and cooperation partners, are a very important aspect of the social context of adolescents. They may affect adolescents' intelligence mindsets and therefore their school motivation and success. Being friends or cooperating with a peer with a similar mindset might either enhance (in case of a growth mindset) or hinder (in case of a fixed mindset) adolescents' motivation to learn. In this cross-sectional social network study, we first examined whether friendship networks and cooperation partners networks within school classes differ from each other. Second, we investigated whether adolescents' friends and cooperation partners have similarities in mindsets. We analysed peer nominations and intelligence mindsets within 26 Dutch classes of early and mid-adolescents (N = 558) using the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP). Our data showed that three unique networks could be distinguished: a friendship only network, a combined friends and cooperation partners network and a cooperation only network. Multiple regression quadratic assignment procedures (MRQAP) indicated no evidence for similarity in mindset in all the three networks. However, we did find that adolescents with a growth mindset select more peers to cooperate with than adolescents with a fixed mindset. This latter finding shows that mindset influences social interactions in the context of cooperation between adolescents. It might be valuable to take the social context into consideration in the development of new mindset interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona M. B. Benneker
- Section of Clinical Developmental Psychology & LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Mencia de Mendozalyceum, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki C. Lee
- Section of Clinical Developmental Psychology & LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fanny de Swart
- Section of Clinical Developmental Psychology & LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke M. van Atteveldt
- Section of Clinical Developmental Psychology & LEARN! Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan J, Li H, Zhang P, Hirsh DA. Formed in context: A mixed-methods study of medical students' mindsets in an Eastern culture. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2025; 59:210-225. [PMID: 39166728 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mindsets have become an important focus in the fields of social and cognitive psychology. When holding a growth mindset, people appear more likely to engage in hard work and effort to foster success, seeing setbacks as necessary for learning. When holding a fixed mindset, in contrast, people tend to believe success comes from innate ability, seeing setbacks as evidence of inability. As such, mindsets affect students' learning, resilience and personal development. There is little empirical evidence, however, regarding how medical students perceive mindsets and the fundamental determinants of mindset formation, especially in non-Western contexts. This study investigated medical students' mindsets and perceptions of mindset formation with the aim of broadening the cross-cultural understanding of self-theories. METHODS Using a convergent mixed-methods approach at a medical school in China, the authors conducted a survey and four focus groups with medical students in first to third years. Quantitatively, we used the Dweck Mindset Scale to describe medical students' mindsets in the domains of intelligence and talent. Qualitatively, we analysed focus group data using a grounded theory approach to develop a descriptive model. RESULTS Survey results included 464 responses for quantitative analysis. Multivariable regression found that Year 3 students had more fixed mindsets for intelligence and talent (p < 0.05) compared with Year 1 students. Rural students reported a more mixed mindset for intelligence compared to urban students (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis of focus group data yielded four major categories: beliefs about mindsets, conceptualization of mindsets, achievement motivation and source of mindset formation. We developed a Mindset Basis Model to depict connections among the factors students perceived to influence mindset formation-intra- and interindividual factors; contextual factors; and micro-, meso- and macro-system factors-and students' motivation regarding achievement. CONCLUSION The study describes medical students' mindsets for the domains of intelligence and talent and explores how they conceptualised these mindsets. The findings indicate that factors influencing mindsets do not operate in isolation but through intricate interactions among multilevel factors embedded within a context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxi Tan
- Institute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Honghe Li
- Institute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Pingmei Zhang
- Institute of Health Professions Education Assessment and Reform, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - David A Hirsh
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He WJ, Zhang K. The Moderating Effect of Cultural Orientation on the Relationship Between Growth Mindset and Learning Self-Efficacy: A Dimension-Specific Pattern. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:1155. [PMID: 39767296 PMCID: PMC11673442 DOI: 10.3390/bs14121155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Building on the theoretical perspectives of mindset theory and cultural orientation framework, this study explores the moderating role of cultural orientation in the relationship between individuals' growth mindset and learning self-efficacy, addressing the contextual dependency of mindset theory. A total of 307 Chinese undergraduates (61% female; age range = 18-22 years) from a university in Hong Kong were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Cultural orientation, growth mindset, and learning self-efficacy were assessed via the Chinese version of the Cultural Values Scale (CVScale), Growth Mindset Inventory (GMI), and Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (LSES), respectively. Linear multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the hypothesized moderation effects. The results revealed an interesting dimension-specific pattern among the five dimensions of cultural orientation. While one dimension (i.e., long-term orientation) had a positive moderating effect on the relationship between growth mindset and learning self-efficacy, two dimensions (i.e., power distance and uncertainty avoidance) had negative moderating effects on that relationship. The two remaining cultural dimensions (i.e., individualism/collectivism and motivation towards achievement and success) did not exhibit any significant moderating effects. These findings underscore the interplay between a growth mindset, cultural orientation, and learning self-efficacy, emphasizing the influence of cultural factors on the outcomes of mindset interventions. This study highlights the need for culturally tailored educational practices and interventions to maximize the effectiveness of growth mindset theories in diverse contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Special Education and Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wolff B, Glasson EJ, Pestell CF. "Broken fragments or a breathtaking mosaic": A mixed methods study of self-reported attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE 2024; 34:1005-1017. [PMID: 38824445 DOI: 10.1111/jora.12981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Siblings of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs) experience distinct challenges and have unique strengths compared to siblings of individuals without NDCs. The present study examined attributes and aspirations of siblings of individuals with and without neurodevelopmental conditions, and analyzed the association between qualitative responses and quantitative measures of growth mindset, positive and negative valence, and mental health diagnoses. A novel mixed methods thematic analysis was employed to explore the experiences of 166 siblings (75 NDC and 91 controls, aged 14-26, 66.27% female) completing an online survey as part of a larger study on sibling mental health. The overarching theme described The Process of Self-Actualization and Integration, reflecting the journey siblings undergo in seeking to understand themselves and others amidst psychological challenges. It encompassed three subthemes: Personal Growth and Identity Formation; Connection and Belonginess; and Societal Perspective and Global Consciousness. Qualitative responses were analyzed within a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, and associations between phenomenology and mental health diagnoses examined. NDC siblings had higher negative valence and lower positive valence embedded in their responses, and quantitatively lower self-reported growth mindset (i.e., beliefs about the capacity for personal growth), compared to control siblings, which correlated with self-reported mental health diagnoses. Findings suggest clinical practice may focus on optimizing self-identified strengths and offer opportunities for self-actualization of hopes and ambitions, while providing support for families to attenuate bioecological factors impacting mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Wolff
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Emma J Glasson
- Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Carmela F Pestell
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Li LMW. Relationships between parental involvement in homework and learning outcomes among elementary school students: The moderating role of societal collectivism-individualism. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2024; 94:881-896. [PMID: 38750620 DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents are often involved in their child's homework with the goal of improving their child's academic achievement. However, mixed findings were observed for the role of parental involvement in homework in shaping students' learning outcomes. AIMS The present study examined whether and how the effect of parental involvement in homework on students' performance in science and math varies across sociocultural contexts by considering the degrees of societal collectivism-individualism. METHODS The present study used a large-scale dataset, consisting of participants from 43 countries/regions, to test whether societal collectivism-individualism would moderate the relationship between three types of parental involvement (asking, helping and checking) in homework and elementary school students' academic performance in math and science. RESULTS The multi-level analyses revealed diverse effects of different parental involvement behaviours for homework. Helping and checking behaviours were generally negatively associated with elementary school students' academic achievement, but asking behaviours were positively associated with their academic achievement. Importantly, the positive effect of asking behaviours was stronger, while the negative effect of helping behaviours was weaker in collectivistic societies than in individualistic societies. CONCLUSIONS The present study highlights the importance of considering the multifaceted nature of parental homework involvement and the sociocultural contexts that vary in collectivism-individualism when evaluating the role of parents in elementary school students' learning in math and science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiheng Wang
- Department of Applied Psychology, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Liman Man Wai Li
- Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He WJ, Chiang TW. From growth and fixed creative mindsets to creative thinking: an investigation of the mediating role of creativity motivation. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1353271. [PMID: 38966737 PMCID: PMC11223648 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Studies documenting and seeking to understand the mindset effect have yielded mixed and inconclusive findings. The present study sought to address the research question pertaining to the mindset effect on creative thinking and its underlying mechanism from the perspectives of social cognitive theory and mindset theory, which postulate a motivational mechanism underlying the mindset-creativity link. Specifically, this study aimed to examine the mediating role of creativity motivation in the effects of growth and fixed creative mindsets on creative thinking. A convenience sample of 948 college students from three universities in Hong Kong participated in the study. Creative mindset, creativity motivation, and creative thinking were assessed using the Chinese version of the Creative Mindset Scale, the Creativity Motivation Scale, and the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP), respectively. Lending support to the perspectives of social cognitive and mindset theories, the results of mediation analyses conducted using Preacher and Hayes's bootstrapping approach indicated that creativity motivation had partial mediating effects on the positive and negative roles of growth and fixed mindsets, respectively, in creative thinking. Enriching the research on the motivation mechanism underlying the impacts of creative mindsets on creative thinking, the results further illustrated that creativity motivation has a stronger mediating effect on the impact of growth creative mindset on creative thinking than on that of fixed creative mindset. The possible theoretical and educational implications of the findings of this research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu-jing He
- Department of Special Education & Counselling, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoferichter F, Raufelder D. Mind, brain and education-Neuromechanisms during child development. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2024. [PMID: 38886131 DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Educational neuroscience has emerged as an interdisciplinary field aimed at elucidating the neurobiological underpinnings of learning and educational outcomes. By synthesizing findings from diverse research endeavours, this Editorial aims to delineate the intricate interplay between neural processes and educational experiences, shedding light on the factors that shape cognitive development and learning trajectories in children. RESULTS This Editorial highlights significant advancements, spanning investigations into neural mechanisms, cognitive development and educational interventions on the basis of four exemplary topics and their effects on academic learning and achievement: student's academic self-concept, (cyber-)bullying, reading skills/dyslexia and a growth mindset intervention. Summaries of the four empirical contributions in this special issue are presented and discussed in relation to how they provide insight into the dynamic interplay between neural mechanisms and environmental influences, underscoring the role of early experiences in sculpting brain development and shaping educational outcomes. Furthermore, the integration of neuroscientific techniques (e.g., fMRI, eye-tracking) with educational research methodologies has provided novel insights into the neural correlates of learning processes, executive functions and socio-emotional development during childhood. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the pivotal role of Educational Neuroscience in bridging the gap between neuroscience and education is highlighted. By elucidating the neurobiological foundations of learning, this interdisciplinary field offers valuable insights for informing evidence-based educational practices and interventions tailored to individual learning profiles. Moving forward, continued collaboration between researchers, educators and policymakers is essential to harnessing the full potential of Educational Neuroscience in promoting cognitive growth and academic success across diverse learner populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Hoferichter
- Institute of Educational Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Diana Raufelder
- Institute of Educational Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tandon T, Piccolo M, Ledermann K, McNally RJ, Gupta R, Morina N, Martin-Soelch C. Mental health markers and protective factors in students with symptoms of physical pain across WEIRD and non-WEIRD samples - a network analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:318. [PMID: 38658915 PMCID: PMC11044470 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05767-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies conducted in Western societies have identified variables associated with chronic pain, but few have done so across cultures. Our study aimed to clarify the relationship between specific mental health markers (i.e., depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD], perceived stress) as well as specific protective factors (i.e., social support and self-efficacy) related to physical pain among university students across non-WEIRD and WEIRD samples. METHOD A total of 188 university students (131 women and 57 men) were included in the study. We used network analysis to ascertain mental health markers especially central to the experience of physical pain. RESULTS No statistically significant difference was found between mental health markers (i.e., depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and PTSD) and protective factors (i.e., social support and self-efficacy) associated with physical pain symptoms for Swiss students versus Indian students (M = 0.325, p = .11). In addition, networks for Swiss versus Indian students did not differ in global strength (S = 0.29, p = .803). Anxiety was the most central mental health marker, and social support was the most important protective factor related to physical pain in both countries. However, for Swiss students, perceived stress, and for Indian students, PTSD symptoms were central mental health markers related to physical pain. CONCLUSION Our results identify factors that may serve as important treatment targets for pain interventions among students of both countries before it becomes chronic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Tandon
- Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Fribourg, Rue de Faucigny 2, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
| | - Mayron Piccolo
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
| | - Katharina Ledermann
- Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Fribourg, Rue de Faucigny 2, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Rashmi Gupta
- Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Humanities and Social, Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
| | - Naser Morina
- Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Martin-Soelch
- Unit of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Fribourg, Rue de Faucigny 2, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bluemke M, Engel L, Grüning DJ, Lechner CM. Measuring Intellectual Curiosity across Cultures: Validity and Comparability of a New Scale in Six Languages. J Pers Assess 2024; 106:156-173. [PMID: 37125763 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2199863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Intellectual curiosity-the tendency to seek out and engage in opportunities for effortful cognitive activity-is a crucial construct in educational research and beyond. Measures of intellectual curiosity vary widely in psychometric quality, and few measures have demonstrated validity and comparability of scores across multiple languages. We analyzed a novel, six-item intellectual curiosity scale (ICS) originally developed for cross-national comparisons in the context of the OECD's Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Samples from six countries representing six national languages (U.S. Germany, France, Spain, Poland, and Japan; total N = 5,557) confirmed that the ICS possesses very good psychometric properties. The scale is essentially unidimensional and showed excellent reliability estimates. On top of factorial validity, the scale demonstrated strict measurement invariance across demographic segments (gender, age groups, and educational strata) and at least partial scalar invariance across countries. As per its convergent and divergent associations with a broad range of constructs (e.g., Open-Mindedness and other Big Five traits, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Job Orientations, and Vocational Interests), it also showed convincing construct validity. Given its internal and external relationships, we recommend the ICS for assessing intellectual curiosity, especially in cross-cultural research applications, yet we also point out future research areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Bluemke
- GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lukas Engel
- GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
- University of Magdeburg, Germany
| | - David J Grüning
- GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
- University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens M Lechner
- GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee YK, Yue Y, Perez T, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Dweck's Social-Cognitive Model of Achievement Motivation in Science. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2024; 110:102410. [PMID: 38405100 PMCID: PMC10887275 DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Dweck's social-cognitive model has long been used as a basis for achievement motivation research. However, few studies have examined the comprehensive model with interactions between perceived ability and achievement goals, and even fewer studies have focused on this model in a science academic context. With a sample of undergraduates (n = 1,036), the relations among mindsets, science academic self-efficacy, achievement goals, and achievement-related outcomes in science were examined. Fixed mindset related to performance goals. Growth mindset related to mastery goals and the number of courses completed. There was a significant indirect effect of growth mindset on interest value via mastery goals. Contrary to Dweck's model, the relation of performance goals to outcomes did not vary as a function of science academic self-efficacy. The findings provide empirical evidence for a more nuanced understanding of Dweck's model. They provide practical insights for how to support undergraduate students who are pursuing science-related career.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-kyung Lee
- Department of Education, Sookmyung Women’s University
| | - Yuanyuan Yue
- Educational Foundations and Leadership, Old Dominion University
| | - Tony Perez
- Educational Foundations and Leadership, Old Dominion University
| | - Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University
- Department of Education and the Brain & Motivation Research Institute (bMRI), Korea University
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
How do growth mindsets contribute to academic engagement in L2 classes? The mediating and moderating roles of the L2 motivational self system. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11218-022-09744-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|