Variants of RhD - current testing and clinical consequences

Clinical Performance of Cell-Free DNA for Fetal RhD Detection in RhD-Negative Pregnant Individuals in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assay that uses next-generation sequencing with quantitative counting templates for the clinical detection of the fetal RHD genotype in a diverse RhD-negative pregnant population in the United States.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in four U.S. health care centers. The same next-generation sequencing quantitative counting template cfDNA fetal RhD assay was offered to nonalloimmunized RhD-negative pregnant individuals as part of clinical care. Rh immune globulin (RhIG) was administered at the discretion of the clinician. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay were calculated considering the neonatal RhD serology results.

RESULTS

A total of 401 nonalloimmunized RhD-negative pregnant individuals who received clinical care in the period from August 2020 to November 2023 were included in the analysis. The D antigen cfDNA result was 100% concordant with the neonatal serology, resulting in 100% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value (95% CI, 98.6-100% for both), 100% specificity, and 100% negative predictive value (95% CI, 97.4-100% for both). There were 10 pregnant individuals in whom the cfDNA analysis identified a non-RHD gene deletion, including RhDΨ (n=5) and RHD-CE-D hybrid variants (n=5). Rh immune globulin was administered antenatally to 93.1% of pregnant individuals, with cfDNA results indicating an RhD-positive fetus compared with 75.0% of pregnant individuals with cfDNA results indicating an RhD-negative fetus, signifying that clinicians were using the cfDNA results to guide pregnancy management.

CONCLUSION

This next-generation sequencing with quantitative counting templates cfDNA analysis for detecting fetal RhD status is highly accurate with no false-positive or false-negative results in 401 racially and ethnically diverse pregnant individuals with 100% follow-up of all live births. This study and prior studies of this assay support a recommendation to offer cfDNA screening for fetal Rh status as an alternative option to prophylactic RhIG for all nonalloimmunized RhD-negative individuals, which will result in more efficient and targeted prenatal care with administration of RhIG only when medically indicated.

Clinical Validation of a Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Test for Fetal RHD in a Large U.S. Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To present a large U.S. clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based, noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD .

METHODS

This clinical validation study assessed the performance of a commercially available, next-generation sequencing-based cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD status. Samples that passed quality metrics were included if the patient had a previously reported cell-free DNA result for fetal aneuploidy, maternal RhD-negative serology, newborn RhD serology, and maternal RHD deletion or RHD-CE-D hybrid(r's) genotype. Dizygotic twin pregnancies were excluded. Maternal and fetal RHD genotypes were evaluated with prospective cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing analysis. At the time of analysis, investigators were blinded to fetal RhD status.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 655 pregnant patients with serologic results for RhD antigen. Patient demographics included a representative distribution of race and ethnicities in the RhD-negative U.S. population (74.0% White, 13.7% Hispanic, 7.0% Black, and 2.1% Asian). Cell-free DNA fetal RHD was not reported in two cases. There were zero false-negative cases; 356 of 356 fetuses were correctly identified as fetal RhD positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI, 98.9-100%). Of the 297 RhD-negative fetuses, 295 were correctly identified as RhD negative (specificity 99.3%, 95% CI, 97.6-99.8%). Of the fetuses with a negative RhD phenotype, the cell-free DNA test accurately identified three with the fetal RHD pseudogene ( RHDΨ) genotype.

CONCLUSION

Validation of this test in this large U.S. cohort of RhD-negative patients provides data on early and accurate noninvasive prenatal identification of fetal RHD genotype at 9 weeks of gestation or more. This test has the potential to assist patients and clinicians in the prevention and management of RhD alloimmunization.

Alloantibody Identification: The Importance of Temperature, Strength Reaction and Enzymes-A Practical Approach

Red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization and antibodies formation against non-self antigens on red cells may occur after blood transfusion, pregnancies or other exposures. The RBC alloimmunization rate varies from 2% to 6% according to recent studies. The antibody screen is performed to identify or confirm the presence of antibodies in patient's serum or plasma, as a preoperative or pretransfusion test. The antibody identification process and major crossmatch are critical steps of risk management in transfusion medicine. The aim of this article is to describe a flow chart of the antibody identification. I report three educational examples of case studies associated with the negative direct antiglobulin test and clinically significant single and multiple alloantibodies using the gel method, Anti-M, Anti-c and Anti-E, Anti-Jka and Anti-s. Furthermore, I provide a critical analysis of the current literature on the topic. The flow chart of the antibody identification may simplify the process and possibly reduce errors in routine workflow.

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results

Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by RHD genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors carrying variant RHD alleles were tested at immediate spin (IS) and/or by the indirect antiglobuin test (IAT) using conventional test tube and/or column agglutination technology. Reaction strength at IS and IAT was reviewed to determine whether a pattern of reactivity could be correlated with a specific D variant. Agglutination results from each sample with each Anti-D reagent were combined to assess overall reactivity. The sample set consisted of 21 D variants, based on prior RHD genotyping. Of these variants, nine categories had three or more samples used for analysis (N = 102); 25 RHD*01W.1, 15 RHD*01W.2, 14 RHD*01W.3, 17 RHD*09.01, 14 RHD*09.03, 4 RHD*01W.4, 23 RHD*07, 4 RHD*10.05, and 6 reference allele RHD*01. As expected, IS showed more negative or weak reactions, and IAT produced more positive reactions with 3+/4+ agglutination strength. RHD*01W.3 samples showed strongest reactivity at IS and IAT. Greatest variation in reactivity was observed with RHD*01W.2, showing weakest overall reactivity at IS. All weak D types had at least one sample that yielded a negative result and one sample with 4+ agglutination at IS. Although there were general patterns of reactivity for each variant tested, no one pattern defined all samples carrying the same RHD allele. This study demonstrated that even with 20 different Anti-D reagents, serologic testing alone is insufficient to define weak or partial D types, characterize the risk for alloanti-D, or determine candidacy for Rh immune globulin. The results illustrate how multiple Anti-D reagents can be used to identify samples that should be reflexed to molecular testing.

Serological Weak Expression of D Antigen: A Retrospective Study of Blood Donors and Patients at a Teaching Hospital in Eastern India

Background and objective RhD variants show altered D antigen expression, affecting their serological detection. Proper identification is crucial due to potential anti-D antibody formation. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the frequency and characteristics of D variant cases encountered during RhD typing in both blood donors and recipients and the transfusion implications. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the D variant involving all the donors and patients whose samples were tested for blood grouping. RhD typing was done using monoclonal anti-D reagents via conventional tube technique (CTT) and column agglutination technique (CAT). Weak reactions (≤ 2+) were retested with different antisera. Weak D (Du) testing was conducted on serologically negative RhD results in donors. D variants were suspected based on discrepancies between CTT and CAT, weak reactions with different antisera, positive Du testing in RhD-negative donors, or anti-D alloimmunization in RhD-positive individuals. Data are presented in numbers and percentages. The odds ratio (OR) determining the association between different blood groups and age groups with the D variant in the donor population was calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results D variants were found in 0.11% of donors and 0.039% of patients, with 21.7% being females. In the patient population, all the D variant cases were from surgical patients with transfusion requests; three received RhD-negative units, while seven did not require transfusions. D variants were more common in adult donors (25-44 years), with an 8.5 times higher occurrence in the AB group compared to the A group. Conclusions The D variant has a high prevalence in eastern India. Regional centers should be equipped to accurately identify and differentiate D variants, enabling improved management and effective conservation of RhD-negative units.

Evaluation of the LightCycler® PRO Instrument as a Platform for Rhesus D Typing

Rapid and reliable Rhesus D typing is crucial for blood donation centers. In instances of massive blood transfusion or reduced antigen expression, DNA-based phenotype prediction becomes mandatory. Our molecular RHD typing approach involves an initial real-time PCR for the most common aberrant RHD types in our region, RHD*01W.1 (weak D type 1), RHD*01W.2 (weak D type 2), RHD*01W.3 (weak D type 3), and RHD*07.01 (DVII). For comprehensive coverage, Sanger sequencing of RHD coding regions is performed in the case of PCR target-negative results. We evaluated the specificity and accuracy of these methods using the recently launched LightCycler® PRO real-time platform. All findings demonstrated remarkable accuracy. Notably, the LightCycler® PRO instrument offers a distinct advantage in data interpretation and integration via the HL7 interface. This study underlines the importance of including advanced molecular techniques in blood typing protocols, especially in scenarios where conventional serological methods may be insufficient.

A Bioinformatically Initiated Approach to Evaluate GATA1 Regulatory Regions in Samples with Weak D, Del, or D- Phenotypes Despite Normal RHD Exons

Introduction

With over 360 blood group antigens in systems recognized, there are antigens, such as RhD, which demonstrate a quantitative reduction in antigen expression due to nucleotide variants in the non-coding region of the gene that result in aberrant splicing or a regulatory mechanism. This study aimed to evaluate bioinformatically predicted GATA1-binding regulatory motifs in the RHD gene for samples presenting with weak or apparently negative RhD antigen expression but showing normal RHD exons.

Methods

Publicly available open chromatin region data were overlayed with GATA1 motif candidates in RHD. Genomic DNA from weak D, Del or D- samples with normal RHD exons (n = 13) was used to confirm RHD zygosity by quantitative PCR. Then, RHD promoter, intron 1, and intron 2 regions were amplified for Sanger sequencing to detect potential disruptions in the GATA1 motif candidates. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed to assess GATA1-binding. Luciferase assays were used to assess transcriptional activity.

Results

Bioinformatic analysis identified five of six GATA1 motif candidates in the promoter, intron 1 and intron 2 for investigation in the samples. Luciferase assays showed an enhancement in transcription for GATA1 motifs in intron 1 and for intron 2 only when the R 2 haplotype variant (rs675072G>A) was present. GATA1 motifs were intact in 12 of 13 samples. For one sample with a Del phenotype, a novel RHD c.1-110A>C variant disrupted the GATA1 motif in the promoter which was supported by a lack of a GATA1 supershift in the EMSA and 73% transcriptional activity in the luciferase assay. Two samples were D+/D- chimeras.

Conclusion

The bioinformatic predictions enabled the identification of a novel DEL allele, RHD c.1-110A>C, which disrupted the GATA1 motif in the proximal promoter. Although the majority of the samples investigated here remain unexplained, we provide GATA1 targets which may benefit future RHD regulatory investigations.

Serological comparison of weak D versus weakly reacting D by four different methods

INTRODUCTION

Weak D red cells were defined as having a reduced amount of D antigen (formerly called "Du") that required an indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for detection. Weakly reacting D is those which give <2+ reactions on routine methods. The present study is sharing our experience on weak D and weakly positive anti-D in various methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the blood sample of patients and blood donor, which were RhD negative, were included in the study. Furthermore, RhD positive sample <2+ was included. We repeated blood grouping of all these samples by gel card (Tulip), tube method (two different antisera), slide method, and Solid Phase Red Cell Adherence (SPRCA) (Immucore, USA).

RESULTS

A total number of samples were 27,245. RhD negative found out to be 945 (3.46%). Out of all, 929 (98.3%) samples were Rh D negative in gel card and IAT negative, while 16 (1.7%) were weak D positive. Rh D typing with these samples by different antisera at four platforms showed that 14 were weakly positive (<2+) in any of the four platforms. Similarly, out of 26,300 Rh D Positive samples, 21 samples (0.079%) were serologically weak (<2+). Repeat Rh D typing was done with different antisera in all four platforms. Result showed more than 50% were Rh D negative in any of four platforms.

CONCLUSION

Above observation showed that serological tests at various platforms failed to distinguish weak D from weakly reacting D. Thus, we propose that weakly reacting D should be treated equal as weak D unless they are distinguished by genotyping.

Guide to Rho(D) Immune Globulin in Women With Molecularly Defined Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A)

Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a potential risk for D-negative mothers who produce anti-D during pregnancy, which can lead to morbidity and mortality in subsequent pregnancies. To prevent this hemolytic disease, Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) is generally administered to D-negative mothers without anti-D at 28 weeks of gestation and shortly after delivery. However, current guidelines suggest that pregnant mothers with molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1 do not need RhIG as they are unlikely to produce alloanti-D when exposed to fetuses with D-positive red cells. This issue and the necessity of RHD genotyping have been extensively discussed in Western countries, where these variants are relatively common. Recent evidence indicates that women with Asian-type DEL (c.1227G>A) also do not form alloanti-D when exposed to D-positive red cells. We report that mothers with molecularly defined Asian-type DEL, similar to those with weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, and 4.1, do not require RhIG before and after delivery. Collectively, this review could pave the way for the revision of international guidelines to include the selective use of RhIG based on specific genotypes, particularly in women with the Asian-type DEL.

Red Cell Alloimmunisation Among Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia Patients Following Rh- and K-Matched Red Cell Transfusion in Southwestern Saudi Arabia: A Multicenter Study

Background

Alloimmunisation remains a major consequence of blood transfusion among sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia patients due to the exposure to non-self-red blood cell (RBC) antigen. The complication is associated with transfusion reactions and delayed transfusion procedure because of the difficulty of finding compatible blood. This study aims to determine the prevalence of alloimmunisation to RBC and alloantibody specificities among SCD and thalassemia patients in, an endemic area of SCD and thalassemia, Jazan province of Saudi Arabia, from three major hospitals.

Methods

This is a retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional study conducted on 1027 patients with SCD and thalassemia, which received Rh/K matched transfusions in 2019 in the three centers. Demographic data and medical records of participants from three transfusion institutions were collected and analysed.

Results

A total of 1027 were enrolled in the cohort; 906 (88.2%) and 121 (11.8%) patients with SCD and thalassemia, respectively. There were 483 (47%) males and 544 (53%) females with median age of 15 (range 1-48). Among the studied population, 78 were alloimmunised with an overall alloimmunisation rate of 7.6%. These patients developed a total of 108 alloantibodies, and anti-E was the most detected antibody (25.9%) followed by anti-K (24.1%).

Conclusion

The overall rate of alloimmunisation to RBC antigen among the studied population in Jazan was low compared to other areas in the country. Most alloantibodies detected were against E and K antigens. The knowledge of most encountered alloantibodies in our population will aid in selecting the most appropriate antigen-negative red cells. Further research, however, is needed to explore factors associated with residual risk of alloimmunisation in these patients.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Characterization of Novel RHD Allele Variants and Their Implications for Routine Blood Group Diagnostics

The Rh system, including the highly immunogenic D antigen, is one of the clinically most important blood group systems in transfusion medicine. Numerous alleles of the RHD gene are associated with variant RhD phenotypes. In case of Rh incompatibility, some of them can induce hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Thus, accurate blood group diagnostics are critical for safe transfusion therapy. We characterized phenotypes of four individuals revealing weakened D expression during routine pre-transfusion testing. Standard gel card matrix techniques with monoclonal and polyclonal anti-D antibodies were used for serological typing, complemented using D epitope and antigen density analysis. Genotyping employing PCR with sequence-specific primers, genomic and allele-specific Sanger sequencing and in silico protein analysis were performed. Four novel RHD alleles associated with weak D or partial D phenotypes were identified. One of the mutations is predicted to disrupt the terminal stop codon and result in an elongated translation of the mutant D protein that phenotypically exhibits a loss of D epitopes. Furthermore, a hybrid gene formed with the homologue RHCE gene is described. The presented data enhances the understanding of the Rh system and may contribute to continued advances in blood group diagnostics.

Genotype analysis to clarify RhD variants in discrepant samples of Chilean population

Introduction

The D antigen variants are classified as weak, partial, and extremely weak (DEL) and can be differentiated using molecular tests. In Chile, the laboratories of local blood centers do not identify variants of the D antigen, referring them for study to the Reference Laboratory of the Public Health Institute of Chile. So, our aim was to talk about the results of the molecular analysis of variants of the D antigen in samples that had different results in the serological classification.

Methods

In the D antigen classification of the Rh system, 479 samples with serological discrepant results were sent for molecular analysis. The Rh phenotype was performed with monoclonal anti-C, anti-c, anti-E, and anti-e antisera by direct agglutination. To find the D antigen, researchers used direct agglutination with monoclonal antisera and indirect antiglobulin testing with the column (gel) agglutination method. Molecular analysis was performed with a polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (SSP-PCR) and sequencing.

Results and discussion

The presence of D antigen variants was confirmed in 332 samples (69.3%), with an initial discrepancy in serological classification. In this group of discrepant samples, the frequency of weak RhD variants was 66% (219/332), that of extremely weak RhD was 28% (93/332), and that of partial RhD was 6% (20/332). The weak variants type 2 (27.4%), type 3 (8.4%), type 48 (8.4%), and type 1 (8.1%) were the next most prevalent variants after RHD*DEL43 (28%). The ccEe (R2r) phenotype was the most frequently detected (38.4%) and is present in 87% of the RHD*DEL43 samples. The E antigen is associated with the presence of this variant. Our analyses give the first description of D antigen variants in Chile. The most common variants are DEL type (RHD*DEL43) and weak (weak type 2), which are linked to the ccDEe (R2r) phenotype. These findings allow us to characterize the variants of the D antigen in Chile and, according to the obtained data, to design strategies for the management of donors, patients, and pregnant women.

Polymorphisms in the promoter regions of RHD and RHCE genes in the Chinese Han population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Rh blood group system is the most polymorphic human blood group system. Previous studies have investigated variants in the RHD and RHCE promoter. The relevance of these variants to the Chinese Han population is further clarified in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 317 donors (223 Rh D-positive [D+], including 20 Del and 94 Rh D-negative [D-]) were randomly selected. The promoter regions and exon 1 of RHD and RHCE were amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) whose products were directly sequenced using forward and reverse primers.

RESULTS

Expected PCR products of the RHD promoter and exon 1 were amplified in 223 D+ individuals, including 20 Del individuals, and were absent in 81 of 94 D- individuals. Expected PCR products of RHCE were observed in all donors. Two single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were observed in the RHD promoter region. Moreover, 11 SNVs were observed in the promoter and exon 1 of RHCE. rs4649082, rs2375313, rs2281179, rs2072933, rs2072932, rs2072931 and rs586178 with strong linkage disequilibria were significantly different between the D+ and D- groups. [A;C] was the most common haplotype in the RHD promoter (NC_000001.11:g.[-1033A>G;-831C>T]). [G;T;T;A;T;A;C;G;A;C;G] was the most predominant haplotype in both total and D- groups. In D+ individuals, [A;C;T;G;C;G;C;G;C;C;C] was the most frequent haplotype in the RHCE promoter (NC_000001.11:g.[-1080A>G;-958C>T;-390T>C;-378G>A;-369C>T;-296G>A;-144C>G;-132G>A;-122C>A;28C>T;48C>G]).

CONCLUSION

We speculate that the SNVs/haplotypes found in this article cannot significantly affect gene expression. The present study findings should help elucidate the molecular basis of the polymorphic expression of RHD and RHCE promoter regions.

Standardization of a multiplex assay to identify weak D types in a mixed-race Brazilian population

RH allele variability is caused by several types of variants, resulting in altered RhD and RhCE phenotypes. Most of the weak D phenotypes in European-derived populations are weak D types 1, 2, or 3, which are not involved in alloimmunization episodes. However, the Brazilian population is racially diverse, and the accuracy of molecular and serologic tests developed in recent years has allowed for the identification of other RH variants, that are common in the Brazilian population, such as weak D type 38 or weak partial 11, the latter involved in alloimmunization cases. Furthermore, patients with these two weak D variants must be transfused with D- red blood cell units, as do patients with weak D type 4 or DAR, which are also common D variants in Brazil. Weak D type 38 and weak partial 11 can be serologically misclassified as weak D types 1, 2, or 3 in patients, based on European experience, or as D- in donors. Additionally, pregnant women may unnecessarily be identified as requiring Rh immune globulin. RhCE phenotypes are reliable indicators of RhD variants. For individuals with the Dce phenotype, the preferred approach is to specifically search for RHD*DAR. However, when encountering DCe or DcE phenotypes, we currently lack a developed method that assists us in rapidly identifying and determining the appropriate course of action for the patient or pregnant woman. Two multiplex assays were proposed: one for the identification of RHD*weak partial 11, RHD*weak D type 38, and RHD*weak D type 3 and another for RHD*weak D type 2 and RHD*weak D type 5. The multiplex assays were considered valid if the obtained results were equivalent to those obtained from sequencing. Expected results were obtained for all tested samples. The proposed multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assays can be used in the molecular investigation of women of childbearing age, patients, and blood donors presenting a weak D phenotype with DCe or DcE haplotypes in a mixed-race population, such as Brazil.

Validation of a non-invasive prenatal test for fetal RhD, C, c, E, K and Fya antigens

We developed and validated a next generation sequencing-(NGS) based NIPT assay using quantitative counting template (QCT) technology to detect RhD, C, c, E, K (Kell), and Fya (Duffy) fetal antigen genotypes from maternal blood samples in the ethnically diverse U.S. population. Quantitative counting template (QCT) technology is utilized to enable quantification and detection of paternally derived fetal antigen alleles in cell-free DNA with high sensitivity and specificity. In an analytical validation, fetal antigen status was determined for 1061 preclinical samples with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%). Independent analysis of two duplicate plasma samples was conducted for 1683 clinical samples, demonstrating precision of 99.9%. Importantly, in clinical practice the no-results rate was 0% for 711 RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant people and 0.1% for 769 alloimmunized pregnancies. In a clinical validation, NIPT results were 100% concordant with corresponding neonatal antigen genotype/serology for 23 RhD-negative pregnant individuals and 93 antigen evaluations in 30 alloimmunized pregnancies. Overall, this NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT assay had high performance that was comparable to invasive diagnostic assays in a validation study of a diverse U.S. population as early as 10 weeks of gestation, without the need for a sample from the biological partner. These results suggest that NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT may identify more fetuses at risk for hemolytic disease than current clinical practice, which relies on paternal genotyping and invasive diagnostics and therefore is limited by adherence rates and incorrect results due to non-paternity. Clinical adoption of NIPT for the detection of fetal antigens for both alloimmunized and RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant individuals may streamline care and reduce unnecessary treatment, monitoring, and patient anxiety.

Misclassification of RhD variants among pregnant women: a systematic review

The D antigen of the Rh blood group is considered clinically significant due to its ability to cause hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn. This systematic review discusses the prevalence of RhD variants among pregnant women and the importance of including RhD genotyping for prenatal testing to detect RhD variants and prevent anti-D alloimmunization. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using scientific search engines, including PubMed and MEDLINE databases, with the keywords 'anti-D alloimmunization', 'RhD variant', and 'pregnant women.' The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc version 20. A significance level of p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant for all two-tailed tests. The meta-analysis included four articles that met the inclusion criteria. The total prevalence of RhD positivity (RhD+) was 61% (95% CI:34%-85%). The prevalence ranged from 22% to 82%, indicating a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=98.71%, p<0.0001). The overall prevalence of D variants was 15% (95% CI, 9%-23%) with a prevalence of 0.05% to 100%, showing a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2=99.89%, p<0.0001). Anti-D alloimmunization could occur in pregnant women with some types of RhD variants. All four studies focused on molecular testing of samples showing inconsistent or weak results with at least two anti-D antibodies using serological methods.

Variant RHD alleles and Rh immunization in patients with sickle cell disease

RH diversity among patients and donors contributes to Rh immunization despite serologic Rh-matched red cell transfusions. Anti-D can occur in D+ patients with RHD variants that encode partial D antigens. Anti-D has also been reported in patients with conventional RHD transfused primarily with units from Black donors who frequently have variant RHD. We report 48 anti-D in 690 D+ transfused individuals with sickle cell disease, categorized here as expressing conventional D, partial D or D antigen encoded by RHD*DAU0. Anti-D formed in a greater proportion of individuals with partial D, occurred after fewer D+ unit exposures, and remained detectable for longer than for those in the other categories. Among all anti-D, 13 had clinical or laboratory evidence of poor transfused red cell survival. Most individuals with anti-D were chronically transfused, including 32 with conventional RHD who required an average of 62 D- units/year following anti-D. Our findings suggest that patients with partial D may benefit from prophylactic D- or RH genotype-matched transfusions to prevent anti-D. Future studies should investigate whether RH genotype-matched transfusions can improve use of valuable donations from Black donors, reduce D immunization and minimize transfusion of D- units to D+ individuals with conventional RHD or DAU0 alleles.

Molecular and serological analysis of the D variant in the Chinese population and identification of seven novel RHD alleles

BACKGROUND

The molecular basis of the D variant phenotype in the Chinese differs greatly from that of the Caucasian. Adapting a specific D typing strategy to the spectrum of prevalent RHD variant alleles is necessary.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Blood samples with ambiguous D phenotypes were collected in the Southern Chinese population. A special three-step typing strategy was applied. First, the common DVI type 3 was identified from epitope profiles of D antigen. Then, another common weak D type 15 (RHD*845A) was identified by epitope profiles of D antigen and Sanger sequencing of RHD exon 6. Finally, the remaining D variants were genotyped mainly by Sanger sequencing. For the novel RHD alleles in the coding region and exon-intron junction, in vitro transfection and minigene splicing assays were performed, respectively. The anti-D investigation was performed.

RESULTS

DVI type 3 (65/253, 25.7%) and weak D type 15 (62/253, 24.5%) were common Chinese D variants, and RHD*960A, DFR, RHD*weak D type 25, 72, and 136 were frequent variant RHD alleles. Besides, twenty-two sporadic and seven novel RHD alleles (RHD*188A; RHD*688C; RHD*782 T; RHD*1181C; RHD*165 T, 993A; RHD*148 + 3G > T and RHD*1227 + 5G > C) were identified. The deleterious effect of the novel RHD alleles on D antigen or mRNA expression was confirmed. Anti-D was detected in two DVI type 3 pregnant women.

DISCUSSION

The three-step typing strategy provides an effective approach for Chinese D variant typing. It can be anticipated that commercially available RHD genotyping kits have limitations for testing Chinese D variants, as some of the frequent variants are not interrogated.

Transfusion management of Africans with RHD variants in China

The presence of D variant among minorities could produce a higher rate of alloimmunization observed in patients from this group. This is partly due to the ethnic and racial specificity of RHD variants and the limited availability of Rh-matched blood donors. Approximately half a million African migrants in China carrying distinct Rh blood type composition have presented to the health care system with an imperative safety requirement of blood transfusion among 1.3 billion Chinese individuals. We depict the clinically significant RHD alleles among African migrants living in China and identify the genetic similarities and disparities to Chinese. We discussed practical strategies to manage the unique transfusion needs of African migrants in China.

Serological and molecular characterisation of the most prevalent weak D variants in Croatian population

INTRODUCTION

Existence of hundreds of RHD gene variants contributes to variable D antigen expression and inconsistencies in reporting the RHD results. The aim of the study was to determine the serological and molecular characteristics of the most prevalent RHD alleles encoding serologically weak D variants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Blood donors (n = 145 924) were typed for D antigen using the direct serologic micromethod. Nonreactive samples were analysed in IAT method with the IgM/IgG anti-D monoclonal blend, and 0,2% (n = 263) confirmed weak D antigen expression. After genomic DNA extraction (Qiaqen, Germany), RHD genotyping was performed using in house reagents and PCR-SSP kits (Inno-Train, Germany).

RESULTS

The prevalence of serologically weak D in blood donor population was 0.2% (n = 263). RHD genotyping confirmed weak D allele in 92.4% and partial D allele in 7.6%. The most common was weak D type 1 (49.7%) followed by weak D type 3 (24.7%) and type 2 (9.5%). Relatively high frequency was detected for weak D type 14 (4.6%) and type 64 (2.3%). In the category of partial D phenotypes, only DVI variant was found. Direct typing has shown great variability in the strength of reactions with different clones of anti-D reagents.

CONCLUSION

Weak D type 1 is the most common weak D variant in Croatian blood donor population. The frequency of D variants and distribution of Rh phenotypes in our study was in concordance with other studies. It has been shown that serological methods and the combination of clones used, cannot distinguish variant D types, which justifies the use of molecular methods.

Rh Immune Globulin After the Transfusion of RhD-Positive Blood in a Patient with a Partial D Antigen

BACKGROUND

Patients with a serologic weak D phenotype may demonstrate variable RhD expression. We present a case in which clinical management would have been simplified if RHD genotyping had been performed previously.

CASE

A 33-year-old patient, G11P4155, presented with an incomplete miscarriage and was transfused RhD-positive packed red blood cells after typing RhD-positive. The patient had been historically typed RhD-negative by a different testing methodology. Indirect antiglobulin testing was performed, which revealed a serologic weak D phenotype. The patient was given 9,600 micrograms of Rh immune globulin. Molecular testing revealed a partial D antigen, which was originally thought to be at risk for alloimmunization; however, this has since been disproven.

CONCLUSION

Although not yet universal practice, prenatal RHD genotyping for partial D antigen could have prevented the characterization of this patient as RhD-positive at the time of transfusion.

Using Whole Genome Sequencing to Characterize Clinically Significant Blood Groups Among Healthy Older Australians

There have been no comprehensive studies of a full range of blood group polymorphisms within the Australian population. This problem is compounded by the absence of any databases carrying genomic information on chronically transfused patients and low frequency blood group antigens in Australia. Here, we use RBCeq, a web server–based blood group genotyping software, to identify unique blood group variants among Australians and compare the variation detected vs global data. Whole-genome sequencing data were analyzed for 2796 healthy older Australians from the Medical Genome Reference Bank and compared with data from 1000 Genomes phase 3 (1KGP3) databases comprising 661 African, 347 American, 503 European, 504 East Asian, and 489 South Asian participants. There were 661 rare variants detected in this Australian sample population, including 9 variants that had clinical associations. Notably, we identified 80 variants that were computationally predicted to be novel and deleterious. No clinically significant rare or novel variants were found associated with the genetically complex ABO blood group system. For the Rh blood group system, 2 novel and 15 rare variants were found. Our detailed blood group profiling results provide a starting point for the creation of an Australian blood group variant database.

Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery

INTRODUCTION

In September 2016, a nationwide targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis program was implemented in Norway. The prophylaxis (anti-D immunoglobulin) aims to cover the whole third trimester and is administered in gestational week 28 to RhD-negative women who carry RhD-positive fetuses. However, in many women, antibody screening at delivery does not detect anti-D immunoglobulin. The goal of this study was to investigate the presumable role of dose and timing of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin administration in non-detectable prophylaxis at the time of delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, RhD-negative pregnant women who gave birth at Oslo University Hospital and Akershus University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed. Women who received antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin (1500 IU at Oslo University Hospital and 1250 IU at Akershus University Hospital) when fetal RHD genotyping at gestational week 24 predicted an RhD-positive fetus were included if an antibody screen at delivery was available. Data from the blood bank, maternity information systems, and electronic patient records were used.

RESULTS

Analysis of the 984 RhD-negative women at the two hospitals revealed that 45.4% had non-detectable anti-D at delivery. A significant difference between the two hospitals was observed: 40.5% at Oslo University Hospital (n = 509) and 50.7% at Akershus University Hospital (n = 475) (p = 0.001). The proportion with non-detectable anti-D increased to 56.0 and 75.3%, respectively (p = 0.008) in the group of women who gave birth 12 weeks after routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Significantly fewer women had detectable anti-D at delivery when the lower anti-D immunoglobulin dose (1250 IU) was administered antenatally. Multiple logistic regression indicated that the time interval between routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and delivery, in addition to anti-D dose, were significantly associated with detectable anti-D at delivery (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We do not know which RhD-negative pregnant women, despite antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, are at risk of RhD alloimmunization, when antibody screening is negative at delivery. Administration of antenatal prophylaxis should probably be moved closer to delivery, since the risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage is higher during the last weeks of the third trimester.

RhD alloimmunization by DEL variant missed in donor testing

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to normal or variably expressed RhD antigens in an antigen-negative individual can elicit an immune response and lead to the formation of clinically significant anti-D alloantibodies. We present the case of anti-D alloimmunization by DEL variant missed in routine blood donor screening.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Blood donors were typed for D antigen using the direct serologic micromethod. Nonreactive samples were confirmed in the indirect antiglobulin method with an IgM/IgG anti-D monoclonal reagent. Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit on the QIAcube device (Qiaqen, Germany). RHD genotyping was performed using the PCR-SSP genotyping kits- Ready Gene D weak, Ready Gene D weak screen, Ready Gene CDE, and Ready Gene D AddOn (Inno-Train, Germany). Unidentified alleles were sent for DNA genome sequencing.

RESULTS

After identifying DEL positive blood units in RhD negative blood donor pool, a look-back study was performed to determine if their previous donations caused alloimmunization in recipients. Out of 40 D negative recipients, one developed anti-D alloantibody after 45 days. The patient did not receive other RhD positive blood products. Blood donor typed D negative in direct and indirect agglutination method. RHD screening was positive, but RHD genotyping and DNA sequencing showed no mutation indicating the normal genotype.

CONCLUSION

Currently used methods in RHD genotyping are insufficient to identify many variant alleles, especially intronic variations. We suggest additional gene investigation including yet unexplored regions of regulation and intron regions to justify our serological finding.

Immunohematology testing using umbilical cord blood: review of the literature, survey of practice and guidance development

BACKGROUND

Following delivery, blood tests are performed on umbilical cord blood (CB) to avoid neonatal venipuncture. Despite widespread and longstanding CB testing, no guidelines exist to suggest which immunohematology tests should be performed on CB.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a scoping review, surveyed national practice, and developed guidance statements concerning CB testing. Database searches identified relevant articles. A survey was sent to all Canadian hospitals and transfusion laboratories that perform perinatal testing. A national panel of experts was convened to develop guidance statements.

RESULTS

A total of 116 articles met the inclusion criteria and were summarized. Literature on CB testing is limited; few studies have investigated laboratory testing methodologies or validated CB test results with peripheral samples. The survey was completed by 580/597 institutions (97%); 85% were community hospitals and 16% had a neonatal intensive care unit. There is diversity in the types of CB tests performed and variability in practice. While most centers order appropriately, some laboratories routinely perform CB tests that are not clinically indicated (e.g., direct antiglobulin testing for all neonates) and other do not perform CB tests when results would be beneficial (e.g., phenotype on CB when mother has a clinically significant antibody). Fifteen guidance statements were developed.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights variability in CB testing, likely reflecting evidence gaps, methodology differences between studies, and lack of guidelines. CB tests should only be performed when indicated and validated on this sample type. The presented guidance statements aim to standardize practice and encourage judicious CB sampling.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Updated Evaluation of RhD Status Among Women of Child-Bearing Age in Detroit, Michigan

OBJECTIVES

The Rh blood group system is one of the most important and immunogenic blood group systems after the ABO blood group system and, like other blood group antigens, it follows ethnic and racial trends. However, when it comes to D variants-partial D and weak D-most of the cohorts studied in the literature have been of European descent. This study aimed to discover the variant D trends in Detroit, Michigan, with an emphasis on Black communities.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2018, there were 102 patients (women of childbearing potential: < 50 years) at Henry Ford Hospital that had serologic D discrepant testing. These patients were sent out for molecular RHD determination.

RESULTS

In total, 12.7% of patients were characterized as RhD positive and 87.3% of patients were characterized as RhD variants (nominated as RhD negative at our institution).

CONCLUSIONS

Our predominantly Black cohort sheds light on the diversity of the RhD antigen. The majority of Blacks were classified as RhD variants (RhD negative nomination at our institution). Therefore, molecular testing for this patient population with serologic RhD discrepancies is paramount to properly manage their obstetric care.

The role of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal blood group typing in Australia

Maternal alloimmunisation against red blood cell antigens can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Although most frequently caused by anti-D, since the implementation of rhesus D (RhD) immunoglobulin prophylaxis, other alloantibodies have become more prevalent in HDFN. Recent advances in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) have allowed early prediction of HDFN risk in alloimmunised pregnancies and allow clinicians to focus health resources on those pregnancies that require intervention. This article aims to provide updates on the current status of NIPT in Australia as both a diagnostic and screening tool in pregnancy.

RHD Genotyping of Rh-Negative and Weak D Phenotype among Blood Donors in Southeast Iran

Background: The D antigen is a subset of Rh blood group antigens involved in the hemolytic disease of the newborn [HDFN] and hemolytic transfusion reaction [HTR]. The hybrid Rhesus box that was created after RH gene deletion, was known as a mechanism of the Rh-negative phenotype. Hybrid marker identification is used to confirm the deletion of the RHD gene and to determine zygosity. This study aims to detect this marker in Rh-negative and weak D phenotype blood donors of the southeast of Iran.

Materials and Methods: The molecular analysis of the hybrid Rhesus box was performed on the 200 Rh-negative blood donors in Sistan and Baluchestan province, southeast Iran. The presence of alleles responsible for the D variants was assessed by DNA sequencing in 26 weak D phenotype donors.

Results: Of the 200 Rh-negative blood samples, 198 samples were homozygous (99%), and two samples were heterozygous (1%). Heterozygous samples had RHD*01N.73 allele and the RHD*01N.18 allele. Of the 26 samples with weak D phenotype, 16 partial DLO (61%), 4 partial DBT1 (15.3%), 2 partial DV type 2 (7.7%), 1 weak D type 1, 1 weak D type 4.2.3, 1weak D type 105 and 1 RHD (S103P) (4%) were determined.

Conclusion: Since RHD gene deletion is the main mechanism of the Rh-negativity in Sistan and Baluchestan provinces, a hybrid Rhesus box marker can be used in resolving RhD typing discrepancies by RHD genotyping methods.

Variable reactivity of Rh D antigen and its serological characterization

Background: Variation in the reactivity on Rh D typing may pose challenges in interpretation and ambiguity in further patient management.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the department of transfusion medicine for a period of 18 months. Blood grouping was performed by fully automated equipment employing column agglutination technique. All the samples with Rh D negative or discrepant reactions were subjected to weak D testing by the antihuman globulin testing method. Samples that tested positive were categorized as serological weak D type or Variant D and were further phenotyped with Partial D typing set with 6 monoclonal anti D antisera.Results: A total of 82,824 samples were tested for Rh D type during the study period. Of the study population, 65.7% were males. On Rh D type majority were Rh D positive (93%), 6.9% were negative, and the result was discrepant in 0.1% (70) samples. The overall prevalence of variant D was 1.28% (75) of the Rh D negative population and 0.09% of the total study population. The detection rate of variant D phenotype was significantly higher by the Column agglutination technique. Upon testing with Partial D kit, the partial D variant in the majority reacted wil all the 6 antisera and hence we could not rule out DIII(60%), in rest it was inconclusive. In 43% of subjects with Rh D discrepancy 'C' antigen was found in a homozygous state.Conclusion: The introduction of partial D typing kit alone may not help in the absolute characterization of variant D. Extended serological testing and selective integration of molecular testing is the need of the hour.

Systematic RHD genotyping in Brazilians reveals a high frequency of partial D in transfused patients serologically typed as weak D

BACKGROUND

The discrimination between weak D types and partial D can be of clinical importance because carriers of partial D antigen may develop anti-D when transfused with D-positive red blood cell units. The aim of this study was to determine by molecular analysis the type of D variants among Brazilian patients requiring transfusions with serologic weak D phenotypes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples from 87 patients (53 with sickle cell disease, 10 with thalassemia and 24 with myelodysplastic syndrome), serologic typed as weak D by manual tube indirect antiglobulin test or gel test were first RHD genotyped by using the RHD BeadChip Kit (BioArray, Immucor). Sanger sequencing was performed when necessary.

RESULTS

RHD molecular analysis revealed 32 (36.8 %) variant RHD alleles encoding weak D phenotypes and 55 (63.2 %) alleles encoding partial D antigens. RHD variant alleles were present in the homozygous state or as a single RHD allele, one variant RHD allele associated with the RHDΨ allele, or two different variant RHD alleles in compound heterozygosity with each other in 70 patients, 4 patients and 13 patients, respectively. Alloanti-D was found in 9 (16.4 %) cases with RHD alleles predicting a partial D.

DISCUSSION

The frequency of partial D was higher than weak D types in Brazilian patients serologically typed as weak D, showing the importance to differentiate weak D types and partial D in transfused patients to establish a transfusion policy recommendation.

Molecular Characteristics of the Serological Weak D Phenotype in Koreans

Serological weak D is a reaction of 2+ or less to anti-D reagent and includes weak D and partial D phenotypes. Although identifying the RhD subtype is important for transfusion safety, serological tests are insufficient for defining the RhD subtype, and molecular tests are needed. To analyze the molecular characteristics of D variants in Koreans to facilitate the formulation of individualized transfusion strategies, molecular tests such as RhD genotyping using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and partial-D and/or weak-D sequence-specific amplification (SSP) were performed on 105 Korean Rare Blood Program (KRBP) patients exhibiting serological weak D. In total, 58 out of 68 serologically determined weak D KRBP patients were typed as having weak D or partial D phenotypes via RhD genotyping. In detail, eight (13.8%) were typed as partial DVa or DBS, nine (15.5%) as weak D type 15, and four others (6.8%) as partial DVI, partial DVII, weak D type 2, or weak D type 41 or 45, whereas the rest (n = 37, 63.8%) was typed as having either weak D or partial D. This suggests that serological weak D Koreans who require transfusion should be treated as D-negative.

Molecular characterization of RhD variant phenotypes among blood donors: A study from the coastal region of India

BACKGROUND

RhD expression varies with population and ethnicity. Accurate typing of RhD antigen among blood donors is important to prevent development of anti-D among recipients of blood transfusion. We aimed to screen blood donors for variant D phenotypes and accurately characterize them by genotyping.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have done prospective study on blood donors by performing RhD typing using three different commercial monoclonal anti-D reagents by both column agglutination and conventional tube techniques. Samples that showed ambiguous results were further screened with the Bio-Rad Partial RhD typing kit. Minor phenotyping for C, c, E, e antigens was performed. Multiplex PCR and Sequencing of all RHD exons with Sanger's sequencing was performed for molecular characterization of variant D.

RESULTS

A total of 16,974 blood donors were screened during the study period. Among them, 31 (0.18 %) donors were found to have a RhD variant phenotype. The male to female ratio was 10:1. The presence of 'C' antigen was noted among all RhD variant samples. Serological typing identified two samples as DV phenotype and the rest could not be characterized. Molecular genotyping characterized 90.3 % of the samples as Indian specific weak D type 150 variants. Three samples were subjected to Sangers sequencing and showed wild type pattern.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the most common variant in this population was Weak D type 150. This study highlights that serological methods may serve as a screening tool, however, molecular techniques are essential for characterization of RhD variants.

Frequency and characterization of RHD variant alleles in a population of blood donors from southeastern Brazil: Comparison with other populations

BACKGROUND

The correct determination of D antigen could help to avoid alloimmunization in pregnant women and patients receiving blood transfusions. However, there are limitations in the identification of D variants as the partial and weak D phenotypes make the determination of D antigen a great challenge in the transfusion routine.'

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The molecular characterization of D variants was performed on blood donors from southeastern Brazil with atypical D typing. Furthermore, the serological profile of all RHD variant alleles identified was analyzed using different Anti-D clones. The prevalence of RHD alleles and genotypes found was compared with those described in other countries and in other regions from Brazil.

RESULTS

Atypical serologic D typing occurred in 0.79 % of blood donors. The majority of RHD variant alleles (88 %) were first characterized by multiplex PCR and PCR-SSP as RHD*weak partial 4 (47 %), followed by RHD*weak D type 3 (29.9 %), RHD*weak D type 2 (3.9 %) and RHD*weak D type 1 (3.1 %). Genomic DNA sequencing characterized the RHD*weak partial 4 variants found in RHD*DAR1.2 (weak 4.2.2) (22 %), RHD*DAR3 (weak 4.0.1) (2.4 %), RHD*DAR3.1 (weak 4.0) (22 %) and RHD*DAR4 (weak 4.1) (0.8 %). RHD variant alleles associated with partial D, such as, RHD*DAU-4 (1.6 %), RHD*DAU-5 (2.4 %), RHD*DAU-6 (1.6 %), RHD* DIII type 8 (1.6 %), RHD*DVII (3.9 %) and RHD* DMH (0.8 %) were also observed.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of RHD variant alleles observed in this cohort differ from those found in other populations, including Brazilians from other regions. RHD allele distribution in specific regions should be considered for implementation of algorithms and genotyping strategies aiming at a more effective and safe transfusion.

Optimization of diagnostic strategy for non-invasive cell-free foetal RHD determination from maternal plasma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to optimize routine non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal RHD gene from plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women (the median of gestational age was 25 weeks, range 10-38) to detect RhD materno-fetal incompatibility and to avoid the redundant immunoprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially only one exon of RHD gene (exon 10) was investigated in 281 plasma samples (144 verified after delivery), in the second phase three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) were analyzed in 246 samples of plasma and maternal genomic DNA (204 verified) by real-time PCR method. Detection of Y-chromosomal sequence DYS-14 and five X-chromosomal insertion/deletion polymorphisms was used to confirm the fetal cfDNA detectability in plasma. Specific polymorphisms in RHD gene were detected by sequence-specific primer PCR in nine samples.

RESULTS

When only the RHD exon 10 was tested, 2·8% of verified samples were false positive and 3·5% false negative. With three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) and maternal genomic DNA testing, only one case was false negative (0·5%). Nine samples were inconclusive due to RHD-positive results in maternal genomic DNA. These samples were analyzed for specific mutations in RHD gene. Combination of both methods for fetal cfDNA verification succeeded in 75% of tested group.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of analysis of three RHD exons and maternal genomic DNA to routine practice lowers dramatically the ratio of false positive and negative results. This method enables more accurate determination of fetal RHD status with the reduction of unnecessary medical care and RhD immunoprophylaxis.

Frequency of RHD variants in serologically weak D Turkish blood donors

BACKGROUND

RhD typing has remained of primary importance, as being the leading cause of hemolytic disease of the newborn. Among Rh system's 55 blood group antigens, RhD is the most immunogenic. We aimed with this study to determine weak D/partial D variant frequency in blood donors who were admitted to our blood center and have serologically designated blood group weak D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We screened blood donors who admitted between 2011 and 2017 to our blood center. Sixty-seven serologically weak D phenotyped donors have participated in the study. These donors' samples were studied further by Polymerase Chain Reaction Sequence- Specific Primers (PCR-SSP) for determining D variants.

RESULTS

Weak D phenotype was detected in 228(0.12 %) out of 177,554 donors. Sixty-seven of them agreed to take part in the study. The frequency of weak D and partial D was 68.7 % (n = 46), and 22.4 % (n = 15), in order. The most encountered weak D and partial D variant was type 15 and DFR type, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of serologically weak D phenotypes varies by race and ethnicity. Turkey is a country covering a mixture of European and Asian DNA with different ethnic groups. Thus, our research as giving the overall distribution of RHD variants from the largest city of Turkey, which may reflect the general ethnic background of the country, would help to the establishment of a databank for blood banking. This paper is the first molecular study on RHD variants in Turkey. New molecular research would be more reliable and precise.

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles

BACKGROUND

Reduced D antigen on red blood cells (RBCs) may be due to "partial" D phenotypes associated with loss of epitope(s) and risk for alloimmunization or "weak" D phenotypes that do not lack major epitopes with absence of clinical complications. Genotyping of samples with weak and discrepant D typing is recommended to guide transfusion and RhIG prophylaxis. The goal was to compare the impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in two centers serving different populations.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-seven samples from Denmark and 353 from the United States with weak or discrepant D typing were genotyped. RBC typing was by multiple methods and reagents. DNA isolated from white blood cells was tested with RBC-Ready Gene D weak or CDE in Denmark or RHD BeadChip in the United States. RHD was sequenced for those unresolved.

RESULTS

Of Caucasian samples from Denmark, 90% (n = 51) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3; two had other weak D, two partial D, and two new alleles. In diverse ethnic U.S. samples, 44% (n = 155) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3 and 56% (n = 198) had other alleles: uncommon weak D (n = 13), weak 4.0 (n = 62), partial D (n = 107), no RHD (n = 9), and new alleles (n = 7).

CONCLUSION

Most samples with weak or variable D typing from Denmark had alleles without risk for anti-D. In U.S. samples, 48% could safely be treated as D+, 18% may require consideration if pregnancy possible, and 34% could potentially benefit from being treated as D-. Black and multiracial ethnicities were overrepresented relative to population.

RHD genotyping of serological weak D phenotypes in the Iranian blood donors and patients

BACKGROUND

Most prevalent weak D types in the Caucasians molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2 or 3 and can be managed safely as RhD-positive, conserving limited supplies of RhD-negative RBCs. Therefore, identification of RHD alleles prevalence in each population could improve the policies related to accuracy of RhD typing. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of RHD variant alleles among donors and patients for the first time in Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RHD genotyping was performed on 100 blood donor and patient samples with weak D phenotype. PCR-SSP and DNA sequencing were used to identify the RHD alleles.

RESULTS

Molecular analysis showed only 15 samples were RHD*weak D 1(n = 13) and RHD*weak D 3(n = 2), and no cases of RHD*weak D 2 were detected. RHD*weak 15 (n = 43) was determined as the most prevalent D variants in our population and the other weak D types follows: RHD*weak 4, 5, 80 and one case of each one: RHD*weak 8, 11, 14, 100 and 105. Partial D variants also was identified in 18 samples as follows: RHD*partial DLO, DBT1, DV2, DHK and DAU-1.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study highlight the specific pattern of RHD status in the Iranian population. The weak D types 15 was the most common weak D type in the Iranian population. However, the screening for weak D types 1, 2 and 3 with 15 % frequency is also necessary for accurate RhD typing and developing clinical strategy of blood transfusion in weak D patients.

RHD and RHCE molecular analysis in weak D blood donors and in patients with Rh antibodies against their own corresponding Rh antigen

BACKGROUND

The Rh system is the largest and most polymorphic blood group system. The existence of a large number of RH alleles results in variant phenotypes that often complicate blood donor phenotyping and the distinction between auto- and allo-antibodies in recipients who have anti-Rh antibodies in the presence of their own corresponding Rh antigen. Knowledge of these variants is necessary in order to make blood transfusion safer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples from 48 blood donors with serological weak D and from 29 patients who had anti-Rh antibody in the presence of their own corresponding Rh antigen were evaluated molecularly for RHD and RHCE alleles using a blood-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay and Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Rh variants were found in 45 of the 48 blood donors: 24/45 (53%) were weak D, 2/45 (4%) partial D and 19/45 (42%) were weak and partial D. The remaining three donors (6%) did not show a mutation in the RHD allele. Among the 29 patients, 13/29 had anti-e, of whom 4/13 had genotypes that predicted a partial e antigen; 11/29 had anti-D, with 6/11 being identified as partial D; 2/29 had anti-c, of whom 1/2 was predicted to express partial c antigen; 4/29 who had anti-E and 4/29 who had anti-C did not show mutations in RHCE*C or RHCE*E.

DISCUSSION

It was possible to find individuals with clinically significant Rh phenotypes due to the weak reactivity of the D antigen, detected through serological tests in blood donors. In patients, when found with the anti-Rh antibody in the presence of the same Rh antigen, it is difficult to distinguish an auto-antibody from an allo-antibody by serological tests; in these cases, molecular methods (genotyping) can help us to determine whether there are changes in the RH alleles and to discover the nature of the antibody (allo or auto).

Molecular characterisation of RhD variants in North Indian blood donor population

OBJECTIVES

A molecular analysis of serologically RhD variant samples was conducted to find the incidence of various D variants in our blood donor population.

BACKGROUND

Determining a blood donor's RhD phenotype and genotype is important as transfusion of units with a weak D or partial D phenotype can result in immunisation of the recipients.

METHODS

Samples with discrepant D and weak D phenotypes identified on testing with at least five different monoclonal anti-D antisera were considered serological RhD variant and subjected to molecular testing (Massarray kit, Agena Bioscience, San Diego) for variant RHD gene.

RESULTS

A total of 39 samples, including 19 RhD discrepant samples and 20 weak D samples, were identified as serological RhD variant from a total of 4386 samples. Thirteen (13/39) samples carried variants leading to weak D phenotype, and eight samples had variants leading to partial D categories. Seven samples (7) could not be characterised, whereas 11 samples were identified as Rh negative (RHD*01N.01) after molecular testing. Overall incidence of D variants in the study population was 0.48%. RHD*weak D type 1(5, 0.1%) and RHD*DFR1 (5, 1%) were the most common variants identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Few samples with weak reaction on serological testing were found to be partial D variant and vice versa. Donor centres should develop a protocol for genotyping of samples with aberrant results on serological testing for assessing the actual RhD status of an individual as results of serological testing may be misleading.

A multi-centre study on the performance of the molecular genotyping platform ID RHD XT for resolving serological weak RhD phenotype in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is concern regarding the lack of prevention of unnecessary transfusion of RhD negative red cells and unnecessary administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIG) to pregnant women. In this study, performance of ID RHD XT, a genotyping assay for identification of six RHD allelic variants and human platelet antigens HPA-1a/1b was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Whole blood samples presenting weak, discrepant or inconclusive D phenotype results were genotyped with ID RHD XT and compared to reference molecular tests. Candidacy for RhIG prophylaxis was determined by analysing samples from pregnant women. Hands-on time to complete the procedures was measured.

RESULTS

Overall, 167 samples were tested (55 donors, 56 patients, 52 pregnant women and four newborns). Agreement between ID RHD XT and the reference method was 100% (51% weak D type 1, 2 or 3; 35·5% weak D Types 1, 2 or 3 not detected; 4% RHD deletion; 1% RHD*Pseudogene; 1% RHD*DIIIa-CE(3-7)-D; and 4% no amplification variant detected for RHD genotype; and 64% HPA-1a/a; 30% HPA-1a/b; and 3% HPA-1b/b for HPA-1 genotype). Call rate was 98·2%. ID RHD XT identified 40% of the pregnant women that would not have required RhIG prophylaxis. Overall hands-on time was 25-45 min to process a batch of 24 samples, and four hours for total assay time.

CONCLUSION

ID RHD XT yielded reproducible results for RHD typing in serologically weak D phenotype individuals. ID RHD XT was proven useful for the correct management of patients with RhD serological discrepancies and the rational use of RhIG in pregnancy.

Severe haemolytic disease of a newborn with variant D mimicking blocked-D phenomenon

Anti-D is still the most common antibody causing severe haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In a mother with a very high titer of anti-D, antibodies can coat and block the D antigens on the red blood cells of the newborn. This blocking phenomenon prevents agglutination of the D-positive red cells with the IgM anti-D typing reagent, giving false negative results. Here, we report the case of a newborn with variant D phenotype and severe HDFN, which mimicked the blocked-D phenomenon, which, at the first instance, confused both the treating clinicians and the transfusion service personnel.

Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Blood Group and Platelet Antigens from Cell-Free Plasma DNA Using Digital PCR

Background

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal antigens is a common standard for targeted immune prophylaxis in RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, and is most frequently done by quantitative PCR (qPCR). A similar approach is considered for other blood group and human platelet alloantigens (HPA). Because of a higher sensitivity compared to qPCR for rare molecule detection, we established and validated digital PCR (dPCR) assays for the detection of RHD exons 3, 5 and 7, KEL1, HPA-1a, and HPA-5b from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. The dPCR assays for the Y-chromosomal marker amelogenin and autosomal SNPs were implemented as controls for the proof of fetal DNA.

Methods

Validation was performed on dilution series of mixed plasma samples from volunteer donors with known genotypes. After preamplification of the target loci, two-color (FAM and VIC) TaqMan^TM probe chemistry and chip-based dPCR were applied. The assays for RHD included GAPDH as an internal control. For the diallelic markers KEL1/2, HPA-1a/b, HPA-5a/b, and AMEL-X/Y and 3 autosomal SNPs, the probes enabled allelic discrimination in the two fluorescence channels. The dPCR protocol for NIPT was applied to plasma samples from pregnant women.

Results

The RHD exon 5 assay allowed the detection of a 0.05% RHD target in an RhD-negative background, whereas the exon 7 assay required at least a 0.25% target. The exon 3 assay showed the highest background and required at least a 2.5% RHD target for reliable detection. The dPCR assays for the diallelic markers revealed similar sensitivity and enabled the detection of at least a 0.5% target allele. The HPA-1a assay was the most sensitive and allowed target detection in plasma mixtures containing only 0.05% HPA-1a. The plasma samples from 13 pregnant women at different gestational ages showed unambiguous positive and negative results for the analyzed targets.

Conclusion

Analysis of cfDNA from maternal plasma using dPCR is suitable for the detection of fetal alleles. Because of the high sensitivity of the assays, the NIPT protocol for RhD, KEL1, and HPA can also be applied to earlier stages of pregnancy.

Molecular and computational analysis of 45 samples with a serologic weak D phenotype detected among 132,479 blood donors in northeast China

Background

RH1 is one of the most clinically important blood group antigens in the field of transfusion and in the prevention of fetal incompatibility. The molecular analysis and characterization of serologic weak D phenotypes is essential to ensuring transfusion safety.

Methods

Blood samples from a northeastern Chinese population were randomly screened for a serologic weak D phenotype. The nucleotide sequences of all 10 exons, adjacent flanking intronic regions, and partial 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) were detected for RHD genes. Predicted deleterious structural changes in missense mutations of serologicl weak D phenotypes were analyzed using SIFT, PROVEAN and PolyPhen2 software. The protein structure of serologic weak D phenotypes was predicted using Swiss-PdbViewer 4.0.1.

Results

A serologic weak D phenotype was found in 45 individuals (0.03%) among 132,479 blood donors. Seventeen distinct RHD mutation alleles were detected, with 11 weak D, four partial D and two DEL alleles. Further analyses resulted in the identification of two novel alleles (RHD weak D 1102A and 399C). The prediction of a three-dimensional structure showed that the protein conformation was disrupted in 16 serologic weak D phenotypes.

Conclusions

Two novel and 15 rare RHD alleles were identified. Weak D type 15, DVI Type 3, and RHD1227A were the most prevalent D variant alleles in a northeastern Chinese population. Although the frequencies of the D variant alleles presented herein were low, their phenotypic and genotypic descriptions add to the repertoire of reported RHD alleles. Bioinformatics analysis on RhD protein can give us more interpretation of missense variants of RHD gene.

Serologic strategy in detecting RHD altered alleles in Brazilian blood donors

Background

We evaluated different technological approaches and anti-D clones to propose the most appropriate serologic strategy in detecting the largest numbers of D variants in blood donors.

Methods

We selected 101 samples from Brazilian blood donors with different expressions of D in our donor routine. The tests were performed in immediate spin (IS) with eleven commercially available anti-D reagents in a tube and microplate. The D confirmatory tests for the presence of weak D included the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) in a tube, gel and solid-phase red blood cell adherence (SPRCA). All DNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood and the D variants were classified using different molecular assays.

Results

The RHD variants identified by molecular analysis included weak D types (1, 2, 3, 11 and 38) and partial Ds (DAR1.2, DAR1, DAR3.1, DAU0, DAU2, DAU4, DAU5, DAU6, DMH and DVII). The monoclonal-monoclonal blend RUM-1/MS26 was the best anti-D reagent used in detecting the D antigen in the IS phase in a tube, reacting with 83.2% of the D variants, while the anti-D blend D175 + 415 was the best monoclonal antibody (MoAb) used in a microplate to minimize the need for an IAT, reacting with 83.2% of the D variants. The D confirmatory tests using SPRCA showed a reactivity (3 - 4+) with 100% of the D variant samples tested.

Conclusion

Our results show that, even using sensitive methods and MoAbs to ensure the accurate assignment of the D antigen, at least 17% of our donor samples need a confirmatory D test in order to avoid alloimmunization in D-negative patients.