1
|
Keene CM, Dickinson S, Naidoo R, Andersen-Waine B, Ferguson-Lewis A, Polner A, Amswych M, White L, Molyneux S, Wanat M. Decision to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e084437. [PMID: 38553081 PMCID: PMC10982762 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Testing for COVID-19 was a key component of the UK's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy relied on positive individuals self-isolating to reduce transmission, making isolation the lynchpin in the public health approach. Therefore, we scoped evidence to systematically identify and categorise barriers and facilitators to compliance with self-isolation guidance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, to inform public health strategies in future pandemics. DESIGN A rapid scoping review was conducted. SEARCH STRATEGY Key terms were used to search literature databases (PubMed, Scopus and the WHO COVID-19 Research Database, on 7 November 2022), Google Scholar and stakeholder-identified manuscripts, ultimately including evidence published in English from UK-based studies conducted between 2020 and 2022. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted and synthesised into themes, organised broadly into capability, opportunity and motivation, and reviewed with key stakeholders from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). RESULTS We included 105 sources, with 63 identified from UKHSA and used to inform their decision-making during the pandemic. Influences on the decision to comply with isolation guidance were categorised into six themes: perceived ability to isolate; information and guidance; logistics; social influences, including trust; perceived value; and perceived consequences. Individuals continuously assessed these factors in deciding whether or not to comply with guidance and self-isolate. CONCLUSIONS Decisions to self-isolate after a positive test were influenced by multiple factors, including individuals' beliefs, concerns, priorities and personal circumstances. Future testing strategies must facilitate meaningful financial, practical and mental health support to allow individuals to overcome the perceived and actual negative consequences of isolating. Clear, consistent communication of the purpose and procedures of isolating will also be critical to support compliance with self-isolation guidance, and should leverage people's perceived value in protecting others. Building public trust is also essential, but requires investment before the next pandemic starts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marriott Keene
- Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sophie Dickinson
- UKI Health Sciences and Wellness, Ernst & Young (EY), London, UK
| | - Reshania Naidoo
- Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- UKI Health Sciences and Wellness, Ernst & Young (EY), London, UK
| | | | | | - Anastasia Polner
- UKI Health Sciences and Wellness, Ernst & Young (EY), London, UK
| | - Ma'ayan Amswych
- UKI Health Sciences and Wellness, Ernst & Young (EY), London, UK
| | - Lisa White
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Centre for Global Health Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ray D, Dhami R, Lecouturier J, McGowan LJ, Mukherjee A, Vlaev I, Kelly MP, Sniehotta FF. Falsification of home rapid antigen lateral flow tests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3322. [PMID: 38336852 PMCID: PMC10858045 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53383-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, lateral flow tests (LFTs) were used to regulate access to work, education, social activities, and travel. However, falsification of home LFT results was a concern. Falsification of test results during an ongoing pandemic is a sensitive issue. Consequently, respondents may not answer truthfully to questions about LFT falsification behaviours (FBs) when asked directly. Indirect questioning techniques such as the Extended Crosswise model (ECWM) can provide more reliable prevalence estimates of sensitive behaviors than direct questioning. Here we report the prevalence of LFT FBs in a representative sample in England (n = 1577) using direct questioning (DQ) and the ECWM. We examine the role of demographic and psychological variables as predictors of LFT FBs. We show that the prevalence estimates of the FBs in the DQ condition were significantly lower than the ECWM estimates, e.g., reporting a negative result without conducting a test: 5.7% DQ vs 18.4% ECWM. Moral norms, subjective norms, anticipated regret, perception of risk to self, and trust in government predicted some of the FBs. Indirect questioning techniques can help provide more realistic and higher quality data about compliance with behavioural regulations to government and public health agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devashish Ray
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Raenhha Dhami
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jan Lecouturier
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura J McGowan
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aritra Mukherjee
- Biostatistics Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Michael P Kelly
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
| | - Falko F Sniehotta
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science-Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Public Health, Preventive and Social Medicine, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Wuerttemberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith LE, West R, Potts HWW, Amlôt R, Fear NT, Rubin GJ, Michie S. Factors associated with wearing a facemask in shops in England following removal of a legal requirement to do so during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol 2024; 29:3-19. [PMID: 37537895 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify psychological factors associated with the use of facemasks in shops in England following removal of legal requirements to do so, and to compare associations with and without legal restrictions. DESIGN Repeated cross-sectional online surveys (n ≈ 2000 adults) between August 2020 and April 2022 (68,716 responses from 45,682 participants) using quota sampling. METHODS The outcome measure was whether those who had visited a shop for essentials in the previous seven days reported always having worn a facemask versus sometimes or not at all. Psychological predictor variables included worry, perceived risk and severity of COVID-19 and the perceived effectiveness of facemasks. Socio-demographic variables and measures of clinical vulnerability were also measured. For the period following removal of legal restrictions, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between the primary outcome variable and predictors adjusting for socio-demographic and clinical vulnerability measures. The analysis was repeated including interactions between psychological predictors and presence versus absence of legal restrictions. RESULTS Worry about COVID-19, beliefs about risks and severity of COVID-19 and effectiveness of facemasks were substantially and independently associated with the use of facemasks. Removal of legal obligations to wear facemasks was associated with a 25% decrease in wearing facemasks and stronger associations between psychological predictors and wearing facemasks. CONCLUSIONS Legal obligations increase rates of wearing a facemask. Psychological factors associated with wearing a facemask could be targets for interventions aiming to alter rates of wearing a facemask. These interventions may be more effective when there are no legal obligations to wear a face covering in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise E Smith
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Henry W W Potts
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Amlôt
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Nicola T Fear
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- King's Centre for Military Health Research and Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - G James Rubin
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, London, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benny L, Smith C, Barnard M, Wolstenholme E, Panjwani M, Ionescu M, Aitken T, Davies J, Austin P, Watson L, Amlôt R. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of support visits on self-isolation compliance: The Havering winter/spring support trial. Br J Health Psychol 2024; 29:221-253. [PMID: 38105036 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Limited evidence exists on the policies to increase self-isolation compliance, with no experimental evidence. This trial aimed to evaluate the effect of a home visiting intervention in the London Borough of Havering on compliance with self-isolation guidance, relative to positive COVID-19 cases who received no home visits. DESIGN Mixed method evaluation involving a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an implementation and process evaluation. METHODS A total of 3878 cases who tested positive for COVID-19 were randomly allocated with equal probability to receive home visits from Havering outreach team staff (n = 1946) or to a control group (n = 1932) who did not receive home visits. Randomization was implemented through a spreadsheet consisting of random numbers generated online that was used to randomly allocate cases to treatment and control. Check-in calls were conducted by a separate blinded contact tracing team on day six of isolation to measure successful self-isolation compliance. The primary intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted on 3860 cases as 18 patients were excluded from analysis because of the missing outcome data. For the implementation and process evaluation, qualitative, semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted with trial participants in the treatment arm of the RCT (n = 15) and stakeholders within the London Borough of Havering's Adult Social Care and Health Team (n = 8). Qualitative data was analysed thematically using a framework approach. RESULTS Positive cases who were allocated to receive the home visiting intervention (n = 1933) were more likely to report successful self-isolation compared to those allocated to the control group (n = 1927), an effect that was statistically significant (odds ratio 1.204 [95% CI: 1.052, 1.377]; absolute probability difference: 4.1 percentage points [95% CI: 1.2-6.9]). The implementation and process evaluation found that a key driver of compliance was altruistic motivation based on its perceived importance for protecting the community with some participants also reporting the potential of being caught not complying as a driving factor. Participants also reported that the intervention helped them 'feel supported', provided them with information about practical and financial support, and clarified their understanding or increased their awareness of self-isolation and COVID-19 guidance. No harms were reported from this trial. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN10030612. CONCLUSIONS A home-visiting intervention conducted between January and March 2022 increased the self-isolation compliance of positive COVID-19 cases allocated to receive home visits. The implementation and process evaluation highlighted that the intervention increased individuals' motivation to comply with guidance, and addressed some barriers associated with opportunity and capability to comply. This trial provides much-needed evidence to inform the policy and intervention design to support public health and social measures in future outbreak scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza Benny
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Cameron Smith
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Matthew Barnard
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Emily Wolstenholme
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Mehr Panjwani
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Maria Ionescu
- Evaluation and Social Research Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Richard Amlôt
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu Y, Jiao K, Zhang Y, Huang S, Zhou J, Li Y, Xiao Y, Ma W, He L, Ren X, Dai Z, Sun J, Li Q, Cheng F, Liang W, Luo S. Behavioral intentions of self-isolation and informing close contacts after developing mpox-related symptoms among young men who have sex with men in China. J Med Virol 2024; 96:e29470. [PMID: 38362933 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak raised public concern globally. Self-isolation and informing close contacts after developing mpox-related symptoms are critical measures in controlling the outbreak. This study investigated behavioral intentions of self-isolation and informing close contacts after developing mpox-related symptoms and associated factors among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) aged 18-29 years in China. The cross-sectional study was conducted among 2493 YMSM in six provincial regions in China from September 10th to 30th, 2022. Descriptive and logistic analyses were applied, using the intentions of self-isolation and informing close contacts after developing mpox-related symptoms as binary outcomes. The mean age of the participants was 24.6 (SD = 2.9) years. The prevalence of having intentions of self-isolation and informing close contacts after developing mpox-related symptoms was 88.6% (95% CI: 87.3%-89.9%) and 84.9% (95% CI: 83.5%-86.3%). Participants who were employed (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.474, 95% CI: 1.035-2.097; AOR = 1.371, 95% CI:1.002, 1.876), had higher mpox knowledge scores (AOR = 1.474, 95% CI: 1.035-2.097; AOR = 1.371, 95% CI: 1.002-1.876), and had higher perceived threats of mpox (AOR = 1.079, 95% CI: 1.030-1.130; AOR = 1.045, 95% CI: 1.002-1.090) were more likely to intend to self-isolate and inform close contacts. Participants who had MSM in-person gatherings in the past 6 months were more likely to intend to self-isolate (AOR = 1.392, 95% CI: 1.066-1.208). Participants with higher depression scores (AOR = 0.968, 95% CI: 0.948-0.989) and self-stigma (AOR = 0.975, 95% CI: 0.954-0.997) were less likely to intend to self-isolate and inform close contacts, respectively. Self-isolation and informing close contacts when developing disease-related symptoms are acceptable measures in response to mpox in China. Strengthening targeted risk communication and self-efficacy, raising disease knowledge, providing mental support, and reducing stigma toward the affected community are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutong Xu
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Kedi Jiao
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhang Zhang
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Siwen Huang
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jingtao Zhou
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongkang Xiao
- Department of Acute Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention, Anhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wei Ma
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Lin He
- Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xianlong Ren
- Department of AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Dai
- Department of AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chengdu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiaruo Sun
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Qingyu Li
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Cheng
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Wannian Liang
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Sitong Luo
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
May T, Towler L, Smith LE, Horwood J, Denford S, Rubin GJ, Hickman M, Amlôt R, Oliver I, Yardley L. Mpox knowledge, behaviours and barriers to public health measures among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK: a qualitative study to inform public health guidance and messaging. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2265. [PMID: 37978506 PMCID: PMC10655366 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17196-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2022-23 mpox epidemic is the first-time sustained community transmission had been reported in countries without epidemiological links to endemic areas. During that period, the outbreak almost exclusively affected sexual networks of gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and people living with HIV. In efforts to control transmission, multiple public health measures were implemented, including vaccination, contact tracing and isolation. This study examines knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of mpox among a sample of GBMSM during the 2022-23 outbreak in the UK, including facilitators for and barriers to the uptake of public health measures. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 44 GBMSM between May and December 2022. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Positive and negative comments pertaining to public health measures were collated in a modified version of a 'table of changes' to inform optimisations to public health messages and guidance. RESULTS Most interviewees were well informed about mpox transmission mechanisms and were either willing to or currently adhering to public health measures, despite low perceptions of mpox severity. Measures that aligned with existing sexual health practices and norms were considered most acceptable. Connections to GBMSM networks and social media channels were found to increase exposure to sexual health information and norms influencing protective behaviours. Those excluded or marginalized from these networks found some measures challenging to perform or adhere to. Although social media was a key mode of information sharing, there were preferences for timely information from official sources to dispel exaggerated or misleading information. CONCLUSIONS There are differential needs, preferences, and experiences of GBMSM that limit the acceptability of some mitigation and prevention measures. Future public health interventions and campaigns should be co-designed in consultation with key groups and communities to ensure greater acceptability and credibility in different contexts and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom May
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Lauren Towler
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Louise E Smith
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Denford
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - G James Rubin
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Hickman
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Amlôt
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, UK
- United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Chief Scientific Officer's Group, London, UK
| | - Isabel Oliver
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Chief Scientific Officer's Group, London, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brooks SK, Greenberg N. The Well-Being of Companion Animal Caregivers and Their Companion Animals during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:3294. [PMID: 37894018 PMCID: PMC10604194 DOI: 10.3390/ani13203294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
It is important to understand the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on animal caregivers and their companion animals in order to inform responses to future crises. Prior research is inconsistent, with the benefits of animal companionship believed to be overstated. In this scoping review, we searched four electronic databases and hand-searched reference lists of included studies. Over 4000 citations were found, and 122 were included in the review. Reflecting on the pre-COVID literature, quantitative evidence of the association between psychological well-being and animal companionship during the pandemic was mixed, with numerous positive, negative, and null findings reported. Studies highlighted the benefits of animal companionship during the pandemic, with animals reported to provide their caregivers with a routine, a sense of greater purpose, a positive distraction from COVID-19, companionship, and emotional support. However, participants also reported concerns about meeting animals' needs, fears of animals catching or spreading the virus, and financial worries. Concerns about what would happen to animals if caregivers were hospitalized led some to delay COVID-19 testing or treatment. Animals also experienced benefits (such as increased companionship and calmer mood) and negative impacts (such as increased clinginess and separation anxiety). Companion animals should be a key consideration in emergency preparedness plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha K. Brooks
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yardley L, Denford S, Kamal A, May T, Kesten JM, French CE, Weston D, Rubin GJ, Horwood J, Hickman M, Amlôt R, Oliver I. The Agile Co-production and Evaluation framework for developing public health interventions, messaging and guidance. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1094753. [PMID: 37435513 PMCID: PMC10331616 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A lesson identified from the COVID-19 pandemic is that we need to extend existing best practice for intervention development. In particular, we need to integrate (a) state-of-the-art methods of rapidly coproducing public health interventions and messaging to support all population groups to protect themselves and their communities with (b) methods of rapidly evaluating co-produced interventions to determine which are acceptable and effective. This paper describes the Agile Co-production and Evaluation (ACE) framework, which is intended to provide a focus for investigating new ways of rapidly developing effective interventions and messaging by combining co-production methods with large-scale testing and/or real-world evaluation. We briefly review some of the participatory, qualitative and quantitative methods that could potentially be combined and propose a research agenda to further develop, refine and validate packages of methods in a variety of public health contexts to determine which combinations are feasible, cost-effective and achieve the goal of improving health and reducing health inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Yardley
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Denford
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Atiya Kamal
- School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tom May
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jo M. Kesten
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Clare E French
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Dale Weston
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. James Rubin
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Hickman
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Amlôt
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Oliver
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith LE, Potts HWW, Amlȏt R, Fear NT, Michie S, Rubin GJ. Patterns of social mixing in England changed in line with restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to April 2022). Sci Rep 2022; 12:10436. [PMID: 35729196 PMCID: PMC9212204 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14431-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Social mixing contributes to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We developed a composite measure for risky social mixing, investigating changes during the pandemic and factors associated with risky mixing. Forty-five waves of online cross-sectional surveys were used (n = 78,917 responses; 14 September 2020 to 13 April 2022). We investigated socio-demographic, contextual and psychological factors associated with engaging in highest risk social mixing in England at seven timepoints. Patterns of social mixing varied over time, broadly in line with changes in restrictions. Engaging in highest risk social mixing was associated with being younger, less worried about COVID-19, perceiving a lower risk of COVID-19, perceiving COVID-19 to be a less severe illness, thinking the risks of COVID-19 were being exaggerated, not agreeing that one’s personal behaviour had an impact on how COVID-19 spreads, and not agreeing that information from the UK Government about COVID-19 can be trusted. Our composite measure for risky social mixing varied in line with restrictions in place at the time of data collection, providing some validation of the measure. While messages targeting psychological factors may reduce higher risk social mixing, achieving a large change in risky social mixing in a short space of time may necessitate a reimposition of restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise E Smith
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. .,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. .,Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
| | - Henry W W Potts
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Richard Amlȏt
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.,Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Wiltshire, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Nicola T Fear
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,King's Centre for Military Health Research and Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - G James Rubin
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|