Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism after pelvic uro-oncologic surgery--a single center experience

Risk factors for incident venous thromboembolism in patients with renal tumor and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a principal cause of mortality and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with renal tumor and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (RT-IVCTT). However, the preoperative thrombotic risk factors in these patients remain not fully characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative thrombotic risk factors in patients with RT-IVCTT.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive postsurgical patients with RT-IVCTT aged 18-86 years were enrolled between January 2008 and September 2022. Clinicopathological variables were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed. Preoperative hemoglobin, neutrophils, and serum albumin levels were analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables.

RESULTS

VTE was identified in 63 patients (24.5%). On both continuously and categorically coded variables, advanced IVC thrombus (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4-7.0; OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-6.1), renal sinus fat invasion (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.0; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.8-7.7), IVC wall invasion (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.6-7.9; OR 4.3, 95% CI: 1.9-10.0), IVC blockage status of greater than 75% (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7-15.8; OR 6.1, 95% CI: 1.9-19.7), and higher neutrophils (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) were significantly associated with increased VTE risk in patients with RT-IVCTT. Except hemoglobin, categorically coded serum albumin (OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.75) was validated as an independent risk factor for VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an insight of risk factors contributing to preoperative VTE in patients with RT-IVCTT, which may be beneficial for optimizing strategies to manage VTE in clinical practice.

Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in non-oncological urological inpatients: A single center experience

Objective

To determine incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development of in-hospital VTE in urological inpatients who underwent non-oncological surgery in a tertiary hospital in China.

Methods

Consecutive 1453 inpatients who were admitted to a non-oncological urological ward in the tertiary hospital from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled in the study, and the VTE events were diagnosed by ultrasound or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Patients' occurrence of VTE and characteristics which may contribute to the development of VTE were collected and analyzed as incidence and risk factors.

Results

The incidence of VTE in non-oncological urological inpatients is 2.3%. In our cohort, patients who experienced previous VTE (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 14.272, 95% CI 3.620-56.275), taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission (aOR 10.181, 95% CI 2.453-42.256), D-dimer (max) ≥1 μg/mL (aOR 22.456, 95% CI 6.468-77.967), lower extremity swelling (aOR 10.264, 95% CI 2.242-46.994), chest symptoms (aOR 79.182, 95% CI 7.132-879.076), operation time of more than or equal to 180 min (aOR 10.690, 95% CI 1.356-84.300), and Caprini score (max) of more than or equal to 5 (aOR 34.241, 95% CI 1.831-640.235) were considered as risk factors for VTE.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that the incidence of VTE in non-oncological surgery was about 2.3%, which was higher than some previous studies. Risk factors could be used for early detection and diagnosis of VTE.

Establishment of Prediction Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Non-Oncological Urological Inpatients - A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), which can lead to death. VTE is an insidious disease with no specific symptoms and overlooked readily. We aimed to establish prediction models for VTE in non-oncological urological inpatients to aid urologists to better identify VTE patients.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 1453 inpatients was carried out. The risk factors for VTE had been clarified in our previous study. A stepwise regression method was used to screen the relevant influencing factors for VTE and construct a logistic regression prediction model to predict VTE. To validate the accuracy of the model, data from 291 patients from another cohort were used for external validation.

Results

A total of 1453 inpatients were enrolled. Five potential risk factors (previous VTE; treatment with anticoagulants or anti-platelet agents before hospital admission; D-dimer ≥0.89 μg/mL; lower-extremity swelling; chest symptoms) were selected by multivariable analysis with p < 0.05. These five risk factors were used to build a logistic regression prediction model. When p < 0.1 in the multivariable logistic regression model, two additional risk factors were added: Caprini score ≥5 and complications, and all seven risk factors were used to build another prediction model. Internal verification showed the cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity of the two models to be 0.02474, 0.941, 0.816 (model 1) and 0.03824, 0.941, and 0.820 (model 2), respectively. Both models had good predictive ability, but prediction accuracy was 43.0% for both when using the data of the additional 291 inpatients in the two models.

Conclusion

Two novel prediction models were built to predict VTE in non-oncological urological inpatients. This is a new method for VTE screening, and internal validation showed a good performance. External validation results were suboptimal but may provide clues for subsequent VTE screening.

Venous Thromboembolism Rate in Patients With Bladder Cancer According to the Type of Treatment: A Systematic Review

Bladder cancer (BC) is classified as a high-risk tumour type for venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE presents an extra challenge in the management of patients with cancer, given the increase in morbidity and mortality on having both conditions. To summarise the contemporary evidence on the VTE rate in patients with BC according to the stage, type of anti-cancer treatment and highlight VTE rate in the UK and other countries. A systematic review was carried out, and an electronic search for publications between January 2000 and November 2021 was done. Studies recording VTE in BC patients were included, whilst paediatric patients, case reports, studies reporting on a mix of arterial and venous thrombosis, studies reporting DVT or PE only and recorded hospitalised VTE only were excluded. The rate of VTE, country of origin, risk factors and thromboprophylaxis duration for VTE in BC patients were identified. A total of 38 papers met the search criteria. All publications were original research papers (cohort studies). The overall VTE rate in patients with BC was estimated at 1.9% to 4.7%. For those patients undergoing cystectomy, the VTE rate ranged from 3% to 17.6%; however, the VTE rate in the metastatic stage of BC patients ranged from 3.1% to 5.1%. The rates of VTE in BC patients are high, further increased by interventions such as surgery and chemotherapy. Thromboprophylaxis measures should be optimised. This review highlighted the fact that the VTE rate in BC varies between studies due to the heterogeneity of risk factors reported.

Extended thromboprophylaxis following major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Many guidelines recommend the use of extended duration postoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis, although the evidence for its overall safety and efficacy is unclear.

AIMS

We sought to assess the 30-day postoperative rates of VTE and bleeding complications following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery and to explore the potential risks and benefits of extended duration thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in such setting.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Observational studies and RCTs of adult patients that underwent abdominopelvic cancer surgery were included. Pooled proportions for the outcome measures and pooled relative risks for the extended duration thromboprophylaxis analyses were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 68 studies (1,631,118 patients) were included in the analysis. The 30-day postoperative rate of VTE was 1.7% (95%CI: 1.5 to 1.9, I² = 98%). The postoperative rate of clinically-relevant bleeding complications was 3.5% (95%CI: 1.6 to 6.1, I² = 99%). Extended duration thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of clinical VTE (1.0% vs 2.1%; Risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.74; I² = 0), without a significant increase in clinically-relevant bleeding (4.0% vs. 4.9%; RR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.5, I² = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of symptomatic VTE within 30 days of surgery was relatively low. Extended LMWH thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery was associated with a reduced incidence of clinical VTE without an increase in clinically-relevant bleeding.

Overview of risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with cancer

A B S T R A C T Important progress has been made in the development of risk assessment models (RAM) for the identification of outpatients on anticancer treatment at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since the breakthrough publication of the original Khorana risk score (KRS) more than 10 years ago, a new generation of KRS-based scores have been developed, including the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study, PROTECHT, CONKO, ONCOTEV, TicOnco and the CATS/MICA score. Among these the CATS/MICA score showed that a simplified score composed of only two calibrated predictors, the type of cancer and the D-dimer levels, offers a user-friendly tool for the evaluation of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) risk. The COMPASS-CAT score is the first that introduced a more synthetic approach of risk evaluation by combining cancer-related predictors with patient comorbidity in a score which is designed for the types of cancer frequently seen in the community (i.e. breast, lung colon or ovarian cancers) and has been externally validated in independent studies. The Throly score is registered as part of the same group as it has a similar structure to the COMPASS-CAT score and is applicable in patients with lymphoma. The incorporation of specific biomarkers of hypercoagulability to the RAM for CAT offers the possibility to perform a precision medicine approach in the prevention of CAT. The improvement of RAM for CAT with artificial intelligence methodologies and deep learning techniques is the challenge in the near future.

Evaluation and analysis of incidence and risk factors of lower extremity venous thrombosis after urologic surgeries: A prospective two-center cohort study using LASSO-logistic regression

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is among the most frequent complications of surgery. This study aimed to analyse the incidence and risk factors of lower extremity venous thrombosis after urologic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective two-centre study was conducted from August 2019 to January 2020. Patients who underwent urological procedures were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the detection of asymptomatic or symptomatic DVT of the lower extremity within 7 days after surgery. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six of 1011 patients developed DVT. In the univariate analysis, Barthel Index ≤40, d-dimer level ≥0.5 mg/L and age ≥60 years (p < 0.001) were identified as the most significant risk factors. The LASSO logistic regression model identified nine factors: age, history of DVT, lymph node dissection, perioperative steroid use, Caprini score, Barthel Index, D-dimer level, cystectomy, and prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Our study used the LASSO logistic regression model to provide reliable data on the risk factors for DVT after comprehensive urologic surgery. The incidence of DVT in this group was 5.54%. This might facilitate individualised anticoagulant management in patients undergoing urological procedures.

Venous thromboembolism and prostate cancer: what about genetic markers?

Aim & methods: To review the existing literature concerning the relationship between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prostate cancer (PC) and explore the putative biological and clinical implications of VTE genetic markers on PC patients by screening the PubMed database. Results: Considering the roles of VTE genome-wide association studies-identified genetic determinants in disease development in the general population, these variants might also underlie the susceptibility for PC-related VTE. Therefore, they could help to identify those with a positive benefit-to-harm ratio for thromboprophylaxis approaches during cancer therapy management, thereby improving patient's prognosis. Conclusion: Future studies are mandatory to explore the relationship between VTE and PC and dissect the predictive value of VTE genome-wide association studies-identified genetic determinants in PC patients, given their clinical implications.

Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and risk factors of the venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 896 consecutive cases receiving PCNL between July 2018 and August 2020 in our institution. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of VTE, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was further performed to determine the independent risk factors. Furthermore, the corresponding nomogram was conducted to establish a predicted model for VTE.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of VTE was 2.8%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that discontinued anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies (OR 4.505, 95% CI 1.410-14.401), increased postoperative 12-h D-dimer (OR 11.162, 95% CI 2.370-52.574), hydronephrosis (OR 3.303, 95% CI 1.303-8.375), higher Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) score (OR 3.233, 95% CI 1.207-8.659) and postoperative sepsis or septic shock (OR 3.784, 95% CI 1.163-12.306) were independent risk factors of VTE following PCNL. Moreover, the area under the curve of postoperative 12-h D-dimer, hydronephrosis and Caprini RAM score was 0.826, 0.621 and 0.660, respectively. Based on the identified independent risk factors, the well-calibrated nomogram showed a moderate discriminative ability with concordance index 0.731.

CONCLUSIONS

2.8% of patients developed VTE following PCNL. Regarding those patients who have independent risk factors in this study, due attention should be paid to the effective thromboprophylaxis and the early detection of VTE.

Risk for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Advanced Urinary Tract Cancer Treated With First-Line Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) frequently occur in cancer patients. Risk assessment models (RAMs) for cancer-associated thrombosis have been proposed. However, advanced urinary tract cancer (aUTC) was not adequately represented in these models. We studied the incidence of VTEs, the risk factors, and the applicability of recently described RAMs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 335 patients with aUTC treated with chemotherapy between April 1995 and September 2015 in a single institution were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 95.2% received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Twenty-nine patients (8.7%) experienced VTEs. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month VTE incidence was 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-10.6), 8.1% (95% CI, 5.4-11.5) and 9.4% (95% CI, 6.4-13.1), respectively. No significant association of VTE incidence with the Khorana risk score was observed. History of vascular event (VTE and/or arterial thromboembolic event) was significantly associated with the development of VTE. Patients with such history had a 6-, 12-, and 24-month VTE incidence of 16.2% (95% CI, 6.6-29.7), 19.2% (95% CI, 8.4-33.3), and 25.2% (95% CI, 12.5-40.1) compared to 6.2% (95% CI, 3.7-9.4), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.1-10), and 7.1% (95% CI, 4.4-10.6) of those who did not. The discriminatory ability of this factor adjusted for leucocyte count, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and type of chemotherapy reached 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87) compared to the 0.58 (95% CI, 0.49-0.66) for the Khorana risk score.

CONCLUSION

Development of tumor-specific algorithms for the risk of VTEs is advisable. Patients with aUTC and a history of vascular events are at high risk for VTE development, and prophylaxis should be prospectively studied in this group.

Venous thromboprophylaxis in urological cancer surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major complication of cancer and its treatment, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The appropriate choice of thromboprophylaxis method and duration is, therefore, of utmost importance. We conducted an extensive review of the literature concerning VTE in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancers. Special attention was paid to risk factors, different types of surgery (transurethral, pelvic, abdominal-open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted) and different medications used (heparins, vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants). Original papers, reviews and guidelines were identified in Medline database. The available data were then summarised for the purpose of this article. Venous thromboprophylaxis is obligatory in urological cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Unless individual contraindications are recognised, the available guidelines should be followed. The variety of clinical scenarios and patients' comorbidities necessitate cooperation with other specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, etc.) in choosing the optimal management. Thrombosis risk must be carefully weighed against bleeding risk.

Anaesthetic challenges for pelvic reconstruction with custom three-dimensional-printed titanium implants: A retrospective cohort study

Custom 3D printed titanium implant pelvic reconstructive surgery was implemented as a novel technique at our institutions in the last five years. It provided an option for pelvic bone malignancy patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for re-implantation of irradiated resected bone segments, as well as in revision total hip arthroplasty associated with excessive acetabular bone loss. A retrospective cohort study of the anaesthetic management of patients who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery using custom 3D printed titanium implants from August 2013 to July 2018 was conducted. Twenty-seven patients were included in the study; 23 patients completed single-stage procedures with a mean (standard deviation) duration of surgery of 7.5 (3.3) hours (median 6.8, range 3.0–15.8 hours), and mean intraoperative blood loss of 5400 (3100) mL (median 6000, range 1400–10,000 mL). Surgery involving the sacrum ( n = 7) was associated with longer intensive care stay, longer total length of hospital stay and, in three cases, unplanned two-stage procedures. The twenty procedures not involving the sacrum were successfully completed in a single stage.

The major anaesthetic challenges included massive blood loss, prolonged surgery, interventions to prevent calf compartment syndrome, and perioperative thromboembolism. Preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, malignant tumours, and procedures involving the sacrum were associated with massive intraoperative blood loss and more prolonged surgery.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism after oncologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk and prognosis of VTE associated with oncologic surgery need to be quantified to guide patient management. We aimed to examine the availability of data and to report the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients after surgery, as well as the clinical outcomes of VTE following oncologic surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for terms related to VTE after oncologic surgery from inception to November 1, 2017. A random-effects meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled incidence of VTE.

RESULTS

Of the 8611 citations identified, 136 studies including 1,481,659 patients met the eligibility criteria. The overall incidence of VTE was estimated to be 2.3% (95% CI 2.1-2.5). Bone and soft tissue cancer (10.6%, 95% CI 2.9-18.2) and lung cancer (8.1%, 95% CI 3.7-12.6) were associated with the highest and second highest risk of postoperative VTE, respectively. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.53; I² = 93.8%), radiation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62; I² = 34.6%), transfusion (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.48-2.59; I² = 57.0%), and operative time (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.16; I² = 100%) were possible risk factors for postoperative VTE. Patients with VTE versus those without had increased odds of all-cause fatal events (11.15, 95% CI 4.07-30.56; I² = 92.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTE after oncologic surgery remains high, and this risk varied according to the cancer type, study region, surgical location, and thromboprophylactic strategy. VTE is associated with increased mortality at the early stage of cancer surgery.

Postoperative D-dimer predicts venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing urologic tumor surgery

PURPOSE

We examined the incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) in patients who underwent urologic tumor surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative D-dimer for prediction of venous thromboembolism events (VTE), as well as to identify other risk factors associated with the occurrence of thromboembolisms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study, which included 1,269 patients who underwent major urologic tumor surgery, from August 2015 to February 2017, at our center. Data comprising age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, type of surgery, Caprini score, postoperative D-dimer levels, and other laboratory tests were collected for analyses. Lower limb venous ultrasound was performed before surgery and the day before hospital discharge to measure DVT. Computerized tomography or ventilation/perfusion lung scan was applied to detect PE.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of VTE was 2.4% (31 cases) in 1,269 patients, consisting of 23 PE events and 9 DVT events. Patients undergoing radical cystectomy were most likely to suffer VTE (4.3%). The optimal cutoff value for postoperative D-dimer was 0.98μg/ml, according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 83.9%, and a specificity of 80.0%. On multivariate analysis, hypertension (odds ratio, OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-5.7; P = 0.026), Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2 (OR = 5.6, 95% CI: 2.2-14.6; P<0.001), and D-dimer lever ≥ 1μg/ml on postoperative day 1 (OR = 12.52, 95% CI: 4.6-35.2; P<0.001) were independently associated with VTE after urologic tumor surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of urologic-tumor-surgery-associated VTE in an Asian population is similar to those reported in European and North American series. Elevated D-dimer early after operation is an independent predictor of VTE in patients undergoing urologic tumor surgery. In addition, hypertension and the Charlson comorbidity index are both important clinical risk factors. The Caprini score recommended by the guideline is inadequate in this study population. The postoperative D-dimer plasma level is a more reliable marker for identifying patients at high-risk of developing venous thromboembolisms.

Perioperative venous thromboembolism in urologic oncology procedures, risk factors, and prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication during the perioperative period for major urologic oncology operations. The present review focuses on the risk factors, the mechanisms of hypercoagulability in this patient population, and the timing and prevention of VTE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the vast majority of patients undergoing major urologic oncology operations do not develop VTEs, when they do develop they can be fatal. The risk factors for VTEs are important to identify in this patient population. The timing of VTE events are also essential to understanding their prevention. Prevention focused around the perioperative period is the best way to reduce fatal complications secondary to a VTE event.

SUMMARY

VTEs are common and can potentially be fatal. Prevention in high-risk patients during the most vulnerable perioperative time period should be the focus of clinical efforts to reduce VTE complications and the associated morbidity and mortality.

Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in bilateral breast reduction surgery: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction surgery remains unknown. This study aimed to determine VTE incidence and risk factors in this patient cohort.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2010-2014) was used to identify women undergoing bilateral breast reduction. Demographic factors, comorbidities, and incidence of postoperative VTE were evaluated. Bivariate and risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine factors associated with the development of postoperative VTE.

RESULTS

A total of 5371 cases were identified. The mean age was 43.7 years (SD ± 13.9 years). The rate of VTE was 0.22%, with 0.17% rate of pulmonary embolism and 0.07% rate of deep venous thrombosis requiring treatment. Patients who suffered VTE were older (52.4 ± 12.8 vs. 43.7 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.05), had longer length of stay (1.7 ± 2.9 vs. 0.4 ± 2.1 days, p < 0.05), and had higher rates of blood transfusion (8.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.01) and reoperation (16.7% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.01). Risk-adjusted multivariate analysis demonstrated that older age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10), postoperative blood transfusion (OR 12.1, 95% CI 1.3-112.0) and unplanned return to the operating room (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.3-34.8) were independent risk factors for developing postoperative VTE.

CONCLUSION

In bilateral breast reduction surgery, older patients, patients requiring blood transfusion, and patients who have unplanned return to the operating room are at an increased risk of developing postoperative VTE. These factors can be considered for patient risk-stratification and perioperative decision-making regarding VTE prevention.

A Predictive Score for Thrombosis Associated with Breast, Colorectal, Lung, or Ovarian Cancer: The Prospective COMPASS-Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Study

The COMPASS‐CAT study was undertaken in outpatients with breast, colon, lung, or ovarian cancer. The aim of the study was to identify the most relevat risk factors for symptomatic thromboembolism and to develop a risk assessment model applicable to patients after the initiation of anticancer treatment.

Background.

The stratification of outpatients on chemotherapy for breast, colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancers at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an unmet clinical need. The derivation of a risk assessment model (RAM) for VTE in these patients was the aim of the study “Prospective Comparison of Methods for thromboembolic risk assessment with clinical Perceptions and AwareneSS in real life patients–Cancer Associated Thrombosis” (COMPASS–CAT).

Patients and Methods.

The derivation cohort consisted of 1,023 outpatients. Patients on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis were excluded. Documented symptomatic VTE was the endpoint of the study.

Results.

Patients had breast (61%), colorectal (17%), lung (13%), or ovarian cancer (8.6%) at localized (30%) or advanced stage (70%). In 64% of patients, cancer was diagnosed within the last 6 months prior to inclusion. Most of them were on chemotherapy when assessed. Symptomatic VTE occurred in 8.5% of patients. The COMPASS–CAT RAM includes the following variables: (a) anthracycline or anti‐hormonal therapy, (b) time since cancer diagnosis, (c) central venous catheter, (d) stage of cancer, (e) presence of cardiovascular risk factors, (f) recent hospitalization for acute medical illness, (g) personal history of VTE, and (h) platelet count. At 6 months, patients stratified at low/intermediate and high‐risk groups had VTE rates of 1.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics analysis was 0.85. The sensitivity and specificity of the RAM were 88% and 52%, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of the RAM were 98% and 13%, respectively.

Conclusion.

The COMPASS–CAT RAM includes reliable and easily collected VTE risk predictors and, in contrast to the Khorana score, it is applicable after the initiation of anticancer treatment in patients with common solid tumors. Its robustness for stratification of patients at high and low/intermediate VTE risk needs to be externally validated.

Implications for Practice.

The Prospective Comparison of Methods for thromboembolic risk assessment with clinical Perceptions and AwareneSS in real life patients–Cancer Associated Thrombosis (COMPASS–CAT) study provides a new risk assessment model (RAM) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) applicable in outpatients with breast, colorectal, lung or ovarian cancer. The COMPASS–CAT RAM is robust, applicable during chemotherapy and determines the need for VTE prévention by including reliable and easily collected VTE predictors associated with cancer status, its treatment as well as with patients' characteristics and comorbidities. An independent external validation of the RAM is indicated before its use in clinical practice.

A preliminary oncologic outcome and postoperative complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Initial experience

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was originally intended to replace open radical cystectomy (ORC) as a minimally invasive surgery for patients with invasive bladder cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robotic surgery, comparing perioperative and oncologic outcomes between RARC and ORC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2012 and August 2016, 49 bladder cancer patients were given a radical cystectomy, 21 robotically and 28 by open procedure. We compared the clinical variables between the RARC and ORC groups.

RESULTS

In the RARC group, the median estimated blood loss (EBL) during cystectomy, total EBL, operative time during cystectomy, and total operative time were 0 mL, 457.5 mL, 199 minutes, and 561 minutes, respectively. EBL during cystectomy (p<0.001), total EBL (p<0.001), and operative time during cystectomy (p=0.003) in the RARC group were significantly lower compared with the ORC group. Time to resumption of a regular diet (p<0.001) and length of stay (p=0.017) were also significantly shorter compared with the ORC group. However, total operative time in the RARC group (median, 561 minutes) was significantly longer compared with the ORC group (median, 492.5 minutes; p=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This Japanese study presented evidence that RARC yields benefits in terms of BL and time to regular diet, while consuming greater total operative time. RARC may be a minimally invasive surgical alternative to ORC with less EBL and shorter length of stay.

[Risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: Reality, actuality and perspectives]

Cancer is a leading cause of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and vice versa. Pulmonary embolism is the second cause of death in cancer patients. Tumor progression is associated with coagulation activation. The pathogenesis of thrombosis during cancer is particularly complex stemming from multiple connections of this disease with both systems of inflammation and hemostasis. The risk of VTE depends on cancer type and the stage of the disease, the anticancer treatments and the time since cancer diagnosis as well as on the presence of patient-related risk factors (i.e. age, obesity, previous history of VTE, underlying diseases…). The presence of other precipitating factors and the duration of the exposure to them are also key elements in the assessment of such a thrombotic risk. It is therefore important to identify all the VTE risk factors to identify patients at high vascular risk and to determine the period during which this risk is significantly increased. The integration of biomarkers of hypercoagulability in proposed risk assessment models for VTE will improve their capacity to identify patients eligible for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. In this review, we report the current status of knowledge on the connection between cancer and hypercoagulability, the numerous risk factors for VTE must be identified in cancer patients and the best methodology to build a more accurate assessment of this vascular risk in such a complex medical context.