1
|
Urabe F. Re: Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis. BJU Int 2024; 134:504. [PMID: 38482777 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yumioka T, Morizane S, Muraoka K, Oono H, Isoyama T, Sakaridani N, Ono K, Sejima T, Kadowaki H, Hikita K, Honda M, Takenaka A. The Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Require at Least Three Cycles. Yonago Acta Med 2024; 67:183-190. [PMID: 39176186 PMCID: PMC11335918 DOI: 10.33160/yam.2024.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
Background Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon. In advanced cases, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) alone is not curative, and recurrence and metastasis are likely to occur. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is an evidence-based treatment. However, the optimal number of AC cycles is not clear. This multicenter study investigated the number of cycles required for the beneficial effects of AC in Japanese patients with UTUC. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with UTUC and underwent RNU at our hospital and affiliated hospitals from January 2010 to September 2020 were included in the study. Patients with pathological T3 or higher or lymph node metastasis were observed or given AC, and their responses were compared. The AC regimens included gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin. Patients were also classified into two groups: the observation and two cycles of AC group and the three to four cycles of AC group. The survival curves for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results Of the 133 patients enrolled in the study, 24 received 2 cycles of AC, 37 received 3-4 cycles, and 72 were observed only. The 5-year RFS was 67.1% for the 3-4 cycles of AC group and 41.7% for the observation and two cycles of AC group. The 5-year CSS was 72.2% for the 3-4 cycles of AC group and 35.9% for the observation and two cycles of AC group. RFS and CSS were significantly longer in the 3-4 cycles of AC group compared to the observation and 2 cycles group (P = 0.048 and P = 0.005 respectively). Conclusion AC prolonged RFS and CSS in the real-world setting. However, at least three cycles of AC are required to achieve beneficial effects in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Yumioka
- Department of Urology, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Matsue 690-8506, Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Kuniyasu Muraoka
- Department of Urology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori 680-0901, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Oono
- Department of Urology, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Matsue 690-8506, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Isoyama
- Department of Urology, Yonago Medical Center, Yonago 683-0006, Japan
| | | | - Koji Ono
- Department of Urology, Tottori Red Cross Hospital, Tottori 680-8517, Japan
| | - Takehiro Sejima
- Department of Urology, Matsue City Hospital, Matsue 690-8509, Japan
| | | | - Katsuya Hikita
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Masashi Honda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang NW, Huang YH, Sung WW, Chen SL. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with or without Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1831. [PMID: 38610596 PMCID: PMC11012329 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The incidence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uniquely high in kidney transplant (KT) recipients in Taiwan. The evidence of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in UTUC is contradictory. We have sought to determine whether AC is associated with potential benefits related to locally advanced UTUC after KT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 134 patients with locally advanced UTUC (at least stage T2) and patients who were administrated AC after unilateral or bilateral nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision. Of these 134 patients, 57 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We used 23 KT and 34 non-KT locally advanced UTUC patients for comparison. Results: The mean follow-up time was 52.35 ± 34.56 and 64.71 ± 42.29 months for the KT and non-KT groups, respectively. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 45.7% vs. 70.2% and 62.8% vs. 77.6%, for the KT and non-KT groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the log rank test revealed significant differences in the DFS and OS rates between the two groups, p = 0.015 and 0.036. The influence of chemotherapy on graft kidney function was mild. Only three in the KT group and two in the non-KT group developed > grade 2 nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggested that KT patients with locally advanced UTUC who had been administered AC after surgery presented worse OS and DFS than non-KT patients. KT patients tolerated the AC course well, and their nephrotoxicity levels were mild and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Wen Chang
- Department of Urology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (N.-W.C.); (W.-W.S.)
| | - Yu-Hui Huang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Wei Sung
- Department of Urology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (N.-W.C.); (W.-W.S.)
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Sung-Lang Chen
- Department of Urology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan; (N.-W.C.); (W.-W.S.)
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang M, Zhang J, Wei D, Yu T, Chen Z, Liu X, Zhu H. Inflammatory markers predict survival in patients with postoperative urothelial carcinoma receiving tislelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) adjuvant therapy. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:196. [PMID: 38347460 PMCID: PMC10860305 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11969-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the management of urothelial carcinoma, patient selection for immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), is important for treatment efficacy. Inflammatory markers are useful for predicting treatment outcomes and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aims to retrospectively explore the associations between inflammatory markers and outcomes in patients with postoperative urothelial carcinoma undergoing tislelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) adjuvant therapy. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 133 patients with postoperative urothelial carcinoma who received tislelizumab adjuvant therapy at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from April 2020 to August 2023. The prognostic effects of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox regression models. The correlation between inflammatory markers and the onset of irAEs was analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS NLR < 5 and MLR < 0.31 were significantly associated with better outcomes compared to NLR >5 and MLR >0.31, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that an NLR < 5 was independently associated with better DFS and OS. However, there was no significant effect on the DFS and OS between PLR < 135 and PLR >135. Patients who experienced irAEs had longer DFS and OS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that irAEs were an independent prognostic risk factor for DFS and OS. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of irAEs among different NLR, PLR, and MLR groups. CONCLUSION In patients with postoperative urothelial carcinoma receiving tislelizumab adjuvant therapy, the assessment of NLR and MLR before treatment may serve as valuable predictive markers of clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Yang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jingwen Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Dongqun Wei
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Tianyi Yu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liao PF, Wang PY, Peng TR. Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9940-9952. [PMID: 37999142 PMCID: PMC10670843 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Methods: A literature search was conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and was limited to the English literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to July 2022 were considered for inclusion. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAE). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the PD-L1 expression status, and the differences between first- and second-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were estimated. Results: We included five RCTs comprising 3584 patients in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy did not significantly prolong OS [hazard ratios (HR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00] or PFS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.32). However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy significantly improved both OS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96) and PFS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that in mUC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 5%, treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not reduce the risk of death. Safety analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not significantly increase the incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Conclusions: The results show that use of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone as first-line treatment is similar to chemotherapy in terms of both survival and response rates. However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy has a significant benefit in terms of PFS or OS. Nonetheless, more RCTs are warranted to evaluate efficiency and safety in the combination regimen of chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tzu-Rong Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 23142, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hongda Z, Kang L, Ng CF, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Gontero P, Baard J, Yildiz O, Teoh JYC. Impact of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Containing Chemotherapy Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study. Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:217-226. [PMID: 38993186 PMCID: PMC11181833 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence regarding perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and personalized surveillance strategies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy affects the oncological outcomes of advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The CROES-UTUC registry is an observational, international, multi-center study on patients diagnosed with UTUC. Patient and disease characteristics from 2380 patients with UTUC were collected, and finally 738 patients were included in this analysis. The primary outcome of this study was recurrence-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed by stratifying patients according to the treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 738 patients were included in this analysis, and 59 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), including 50 patients who received gemcitabine. A propensity score matching was performed, including 50 patients who received gemcitabine containing treatment and 50 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurrence occurred in 34.0% of patients. The recurrence rate in the AC group was 22.0%, which was significantly lower than the non-AC group (46.0%). Kaplan-Meier analyses also showed that AC was associated with a lower likelihood of tumor recurrence (p = 0.047). However, AC was not significantly associated with a higher overall survival (OS) (p = 0.908) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.979). Upon multivariate Cox regression analysis, AC was associated with a lower risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0.297, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION The present study confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine containing chemotherapy could decrease the risk of tumor recurrence in patients with locally advanced UTUC following nephroureterectomy. However, more studies are need to draw a clearer image of the value of this treatment method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Hongda
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Liu Kang
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Paolo Gontero
- University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ozcan Yildiz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu L, Zhong W, Li C, Hong P, Xia K, Lin R, Cheng S, Wang B, Yang M, Chen J, Ma L, Li X, Zhou L, Huang J, Lin T. The tumour-associated stroma correlates with poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from a multicenter real-world study (TSU-01 Study). Br J Cancer 2023; 128:310-320. [PMID: 36396819 PMCID: PMC9902452 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02049-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this real-world study, we aimed to elucidate the predictive value of tumour-associated stroma for clinical prognostic and therapeutic response in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing the clinicopathologic characteristics of 1015 UTUC patients through a nationwide multicenter analysis. METHODS The tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) was assessed based on tissue sections stained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and patients were further stratified into stroma-high (>50% stroma) and stroma-low group (≤50% stroma). Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression hazard analysis were conducted to assess the survival outcomes of UTUC patients. Bioinformatics analysis and immunostaining analysis were applied to portray the tumour microenvironment (TME). RESULTS Stroma-high UTUC was significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes and inferior chemotherapeutic responsiveness. Our established nomogram achieved a high prognostic accuracy in predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in both of the discovery cohort (area under the curve [AUC] 0.663 and 0.712) and the validation cohort (AUC 0.741 and 0.747). Moreover, stroma-high UTUC was correlated with immunoevasive TME accompanied by increased cancer-associated fibroblasts, tumour-associated macrophages and, conspicuously a cluster of highly exhausted CD8+ T cells. CONCLUSION Our results showed stroma-high UTUC was associated with an inferior prognosis and an immunoevasive TME with exhausted CD8+ T cells in UTUC patients. Our TSR-based nomogram could be used to refine prognosis and inform treatment decisions of patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Longhao Xu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wenlong Zhong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Chenchen Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Peng Hong
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Kun Xia
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, P. R. China
| | - Rongcheng Lin
- Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, P. R. China
| | - Sida Cheng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Meng Yang
- Department of Urology, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated with Kunming Medical University, Kunming, P. R. China
| | - Junyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lulin Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Tianxin Lin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cinque A, Capasso A, Vago R, Floris M, Lee MW, Minnei R, Trevisani F. MicroRNA Signatures in the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Scenario: Ready for the Game Changer? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:2602. [PMID: 35269744 PMCID: PMC8910117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a minor subgroup of malignancies arising in the urothelium of the renal pelvis or ureter. The estimated annual incidence is around 2 cases per 100,000 people, with a mean age at diagnosis of 73 years. UTUC is more frequently diagnosed in an invasive or metastatic stage. However, even though the incidence of UTUC is not high, UTUC tends to be aggressive and rapidly progressing with a poor prognosis in some patients. A significant challenge in UTUC is ensuring accurate and timely diagnosis, which is complicated by the non-specific nature of symptoms seen at the onset of disease. Moreover, there is a lack of biomarkers capable of identifying the early presence of the malignancy and guide-tailored medical treatment. However, the growing understanding of the molecular biology underlying UTUC has led to the discovery of promising new biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, there is a class of small non-coding RNA biomarkers known as microRNAs (miRNAs) that are particularly promising. In this review, we will analyze the main characteristics of UTUC and focus on microRNAs as possible novel tools that could enter clinical practice in order to optimize the current diagnostic and prognostic algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Cinque
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Medical Oncology Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Riccardo Vago
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery,, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Floris
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Michael W. Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medical Education, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Roberto Minnei
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Unit of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lin CY, Weng HY, Tai TY, Wu HC, Chen WC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tsai CY, Wu WC, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen IHA, Chen YT, Lin WY, Wu CC, Tsai YC, Lee HY, Li WM. Clinical Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (pT3-T4): Real-World Data from the Taiwan Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration Group. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020226. [PMID: 35207714 PMCID: PMC8877034 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. We aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced UTUC (pT3-T4) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2108 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group between 1988 and 2018. Comprehensive clinical features, pathological characteristics, and survival outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 533 patients with advanced UTUC included, 161 (30.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of overall death (hazard ratio (HR), 0.599; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.419–0.857; p = 0.005), cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.391–0.914; p = 0.018), and cancer recurrence (HR, 0.456; 95% CI, 0.310–0.673; p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better five-year OS (64% vs. 50%, p = 0.002), CSS (70% vs. 62%, p = 0.043), and DFS (60% vs. 48%, p = 0.002) rates compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy after RNU had significant therapeutic benefits on OS, CSS, and DFS in advanced UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung-Yu Lin
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
| | - Han-Yu Weng
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan; (H.-Y.W.); (T.-Y.T.)
| | - Ta-Yao Tai
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan; (H.-Y.W.); (T.-Y.T.)
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (H.-C.W.); (W.-C.C.)
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin 651, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (H.-C.W.); (W.-C.C.)
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (C.-H.C.); (C.-Y.H.)
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (C.-H.C.); (C.-Y.H.)
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan; (C.-W.L.); (C.-C.Y.)
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan; (C.-W.L.); (C.-C.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan; (C.-Y.T.); (W.-C.W.)
- Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 111, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan; (C.-Y.T.); (W.-C.W.)
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan; (Y.-H.J.); (Y.-K.L.)
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan; (Y.-H.J.); (Y.-K.L.)
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei 106, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan;
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan;
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan;
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan;
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei 105, Taiwan;
| | - Wei-Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi 613, Taiwan;
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi 613, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Center for Liquid Biopsy and Cohort Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung 900, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu WJ, Luo HL, Chen TS. The cancer behavior and current treatment strategy for upper urinary tract cancer. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_58_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
|
12
|
Mizuno T, Kamai T, Tsuzuki T, Nishihara D, Kijima T, Arai K, Yoshida KI. Elevated expression of B7 homolog 4 is associated with disease progression in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 71:565-578. [PMID: 34275008 PMCID: PMC8854319 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03011-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background B7 homolog 4 (B7-H4) is a negative regulator of immune responses, but its immunoregulatory role in the tumor microenvironment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. Methods We measured the immunohistochemical expression of B7-H4, CD8 and T cell intracellular antigen 1 (TIA-1), a marker of activated CD8, in 133 patients with UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy. We also studied the relationship between B7-H4, CD8 and TIA-1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics. Results B7-H4 was mainly expressed on the surface in tumor cells, while CD8 and TIA-1 were often expressed in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Elevated expression of B7-H4 in tumor cells was associated with a poorer histological grade, higher pT stage, regional lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, poorer response of recurrent metastatic lesions to systemic chemotherapy and shorter overall survival. Expression of CD-8 or TIA-1 alone did not correlate directly with clinicopathological characteristics, but among the patients with higher B7-H4 expression in the primary tumors, those with higher CD8 or TIA-1 expression had a better response to systemic chemotherapy, and longer survival, than these with lower CD8 or TIA-1 expression. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that higher expression of B7-H4 was associated with shorter overall survival. Conclusions These findings suggest that B7-H4 expression in the tumor microenvironment influences the progression of UTUC through cancer immunity and metabolic activity. Tumor cell-associated B7-H4 might be a potential target for cancer immunotherapies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00262-021-03011-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Takao Kamai
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
| | - Daisaku Nishihara
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Toshiki Kijima
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Kyoko Arai
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichiro Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Mibu, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, Bamias A, Lebret T, Shariat SF, Park SH, Ye D, Agerbaek M, Enting D, McDermott R, Gajate P, Peer A, Milowsky MI, Nosov A, Neif Antonio J, Tupikowski K, Toms L, Fischer BS, Qureshi A, Collette S, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Broughton E, Zardavas D, Koon HB, Galsky MD. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:2102-2114. [PMID: 34077643 PMCID: PMC8215888 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2034442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 519] [Impact Index Per Article: 129.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean F Bajorin
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Michael Schenker
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Thierry Lebret
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dingwei Ye
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Mads Agerbaek
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Deborah Enting
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Ray McDermott
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Pablo Gajate
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Avivit Peer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Alexander Nosov
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - João Neif Antonio
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Krzysztof Tupikowski
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Laurence Toms
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Bruce S Fischer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Anila Qureshi
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Sandra Collette
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Edward Broughton
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dimitrios Zardavas
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Henry B Koon
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ni K, Wang Z, Yu S, Zheng J, Li G. Camrelizumab monotherapy leading to partial remission for relapsed upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: a case report. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:1821-1826. [PMID: 33968671 PMCID: PMC8100841 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignant disease, and while locally advanced non-metastatic UTUC can be cured by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), this procedure leaves patients at high risk of relapse and death from cancer. Though the FDA has currently approved five agents for the systemic immunotherapy treatment of urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients, the effect of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent UTUC still lacks specific evidence. Camrelizumab is a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor which has been approved for the treatment of recurrent or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in China and have achieved improvement in a verity of solid tumors with manageable safety profile. We herein report a case of an 80-year-old woman diagnosed with localized UTUC (pT4N0M0) for which she underwent RNU but relapsed after 2 months. As the toxic effects of chemotherapy were intolerable for the patient, she received the PD-1 inhibitor Camrelizumab as a salvage treatment to stop tumor growth. The tumor shrank and the patient achieved partial response (PR) after eight cycles but progressed after 14 cycles. Based on the current evidence, our case indicated that Camrelizumab is a promising agent in treating locally advanced and recurrent UTUC patients with poor performance status and imparted renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangxin Ni
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenghui Wang
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shicheng Yu
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jintong Zheng
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gonghui Li
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Afferi L, Abufaraj M, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Xylinas E, Seisen T, Roupret M, Lonati C, DE LA Taille A, Peyronnet B, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Mari A, Krajewski W, Alvarez-Maestro M, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, Chlosta P, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Simone G, Ornaghi PI, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Matsumoto K, Karakiewicz PI, Mordasini L, Mattei A, Shariat SF, Moschini M. A comparison of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:49-56. [PMID: 33439575 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.04127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with the concomitant excision of the distal ureter and bladder cuff is the current standard of care for the treatment of muscle invasive and/or high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In small uncontrolled studies, laparoscopic RNU has been suggested to be associated with better perioperative outcomes compared to open RNU. The aim of our study was to compare the perioperative oncological and functional outcomes of open RNU versus laparoscopic RNU after adjusting for preoperative baseline patient-related characteristics. METHODS We evaluated a multi-institutional retrospective database composed by 1512 patients diagnosed with UTUC and treated with open or laparoscopic RNU between 1990 and 2016. Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, as well as postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 and 90 days from surgery. A 1:1 propensity score matching estimated using logistic regression with the teffects psmatch function of STATA 13® (caliper 0.2, no replacement; StataCorp LLC; College Station, TX, USA) was performed using preoperative parameters such as: age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score. RESULTS Overall, 1007 (66.6%) patients were treated with open and 505 (33.4%) with laparoscopic RNU. Open RNU resulted into shorter median operative time (180 vs. 230 min, P<0.001) and longer median hospital stay (10 vs. 7 days, P<0.001) in comparison to laparoscopic RNU. No statistically significant difference was identified for the other variables of interest (all P>0.05). At multivariable linear regression after propensity score matching adjusted for lymph node dissection and year of surgery, laparoscopic RNU resulted in longer operative time (coefficient 43.6, 95% CI 27.9-59.3, P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (coefficient -1.27, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.3, P=0.01) compared to open RNU, but the risk of other perioperative complications remained similar between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic RNU is associated with shorter hospital stay, but longer operative time in comparison to open RNU. Otherwise, there were no differences in other perioperative outcomes between these surgical modalities even after propensity score matching. The choice to offer laparoscopic or open RNU in the treatment of UTUC should not be based on concerns of different safety outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland -
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology Bichat Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), University of Paris6, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), University of Paris6, Paris, France
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alexandre DE LA Taille
- Department of Urology, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Hopital Pontchaillou (CHU) Rennes, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Eiji Kikuchi
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, University of Texas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cheng S, Zhong W, Xia K, Hong P, Lin R, Wang B, Li X, Chen J, Liu Z, Zhang H, Liu C, Ye L, Ma L, Lin T, Li X, Huang J, Zhou L. Prognostic role of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study (TSU-02 study). Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1861737. [PMID: 33489471 PMCID: PMC7801121 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2020.1861737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) exhibits high recurrence and metastasis rates even after radical nephroureterectomy. Adjuvant immunotherapy can be a reasonable option, and a simple, low-cost, and effective biomarker is further needed. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) has been demonstrated as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in various tumor types, but not yet in locally advanced UTUC. In this multicenter, real-world and retrospective study, we tried to investigate the prognostic role of sTIL and its correlation with the PD-L1/PD-1/CD8 axis by reviewing the clinicopathologic variables of 398 locally advanced UTUC patients at four high-volume Chinese medical centers. sTIL density was evaluated with standardized methodology on H&E sections, and patients were stratified by the cutoff of sTIL (50%). Results showed that high sTIL indicated improved survival (CSS, p = .022; RFS, p = .015; DFS, p = .004), and was an independent predictor of better CSS (HR, 0.577; 95% CI, 0.391–0.851; p = .006), RFS (HR, 0.613; 95% CI 0.406–0.925; p = .020) and DFS (HR, 0.609; 95% CI, 0.447–0.829; p = .002). A strongly positive correlation between sTIL density and the expression level of PD-1/PD-L1/CD8 axis was observed. We also found that aristolochic acid (AA) exposure was associated with increased sTIL and elevated PD-L1 expression, indicating that AA-related UTUC might be a distinct subgroup with unique tumor microenvironment characteristics. Our results show that sTIL can be an easily acquired biomarker for prognostic stratification in locally advanced UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sida Cheng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlong Zhong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kun Xia
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Hong
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rongcheng Lin
- Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Junyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zining Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Hongxian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Liefu Ye
- Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Lulin Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianxin Lin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Selection, Administration and Description of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Therapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Barton GJ, Tan WP, Inman BA. The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3168-3190. [PMID: 33457289 PMCID: PMC7807352 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The nephroureterectomy (NU) is the standard of care for invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and has been around for well over one hundred years. Since then new operative techniques have emerged, new technologies have developed, and the surgery continues to evolve and grow. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques, as well as present the literature surrounding current areas of debate surrounding the NU, including the lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract, management of UTUC involvement with the adrenals and caval thrombi, surgical management of the distal ureter, the use of intravesical chemotherapy as well as perioperative systemic chemotherapy, as well as various outcome measures. Although much has been studied about the NU, there still is a dearth of level 1 evidence and the field would benefit from further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Barton
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brant A Inman
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Luo Y, Feng B, Wei D, Han Y, Li M, Zhao J, Lin Y, Hou Z, Jiang Y. Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy improves the survival outcome of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17674. [PMID: 33077839 PMCID: PMC7572393 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74940-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This prospective randomized comparative trial study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) used in combination in high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients with cardiovascular comorbidity. Based on the inclusion criteria of high-risk UTUC in EAU guidelines (updated in 2014), all eligible patients treated in our hospital from January 2014 to March 2018 were included, and cases with late disease, renal dysfunction, severe cardiopulmonary disease or other malignant tumors were excluded. The cases were randomized into two groups based on treatment regimen. Multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the influencing factors of survival outcome in the enrolled patients. The Cox proportional-hazards model and the Kaplan–Meier method were employed to assess progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). In addition, the potential adverse effects of chemotherapy were actively monitored. A total of 176 high-risk UTUC individuals with cardiovascular comorbidity were enrolled and evaluated in this study. Median follow-up durations were 30 months (range 6–54) in the RNU (n = 82) group and 36 months (range 6–54) in the RNU + ACT (n = 94) group. Multivariable analysis indicated that peri-operative cardiovascular events risk grade was independent prognostic factor for OS. Tumor size was independent prognostic factor for PFS and CSS. BMI and lymphovacular invasion were significant predictors of PFS. Clinical stage, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade were significant predictors of PFS, OS and CSS in these patients. Especially, chemotherapy was helpful in improving PFS [P < 0.001, HR = 6.327 (5.115–7.793)], OS [P = 0.013, HR = 2.336 (1.956–2.883)] and CSS [P = 0.008, HR = 3.073 (2.533–3.738)]. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that the oncologic outcomes of RNU treated high-risk UTUC patients were improved much significantly by ACT, including PFS [P = 0.0033, HR = 3.78 (3.13–4.55)], OS [P = 0.0397, HR = 1.39 (1.01–1.75)] and CSS [P = 0.0255, HR = 1.26 (1.07–1.45)]. Further analysis of the lymph node positive subgroup showed that the median time of oncologic events was enhanced in RNU + ACT treated individuals in comparison with the RNU group, including PFS (11.4 months vs. 31.9 months, P = 0.0018), OS (26.8 months vs. 36.3 months, P = 0.0255) and CSS (28.2 months vs. 39.3 months, P = 0.0197). In the T3/4 cohort, significantly increased median PFS (13.9 months vs. 36.3 months, P = 0.0217), OS (20.6 months vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.0183) and CSS (21.9 months vs. 38.4 months, P = 0.0226) were obtained in the combination group. Additionally, no severe adverse events (over grade 4) associated with chemotherapy were detected in the RNU + ACT group. In conclusion, ACT after radical surgery has statistically significant therapeutic effects on PFS, OS and CSS in high-risk UTUC patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Luo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
| | - Bingfu Feng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Dechao Wei
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yili Han
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingchuan Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahui Zhao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunhua Lin
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhu Hou
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongguang Jiang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Anzhenli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stage Migration for Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:e184-e192. [PMID: 33153919 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) account for 5% to 10% of urothelial cancers. The phenomenon of stage migration in tumors has been evident with increased use and higher resolution of cross-sectional imaging. Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed trends in stage at presentation and overall survival for UTUCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed UTUCs in the renal pelvis or ureter from 2004 to 2016. Pathologic tumor stage data were available for 71.3% of patients and clinical tumor staging were available for 28.7% of patients. Five-year overall survival was analyzed comparing patients between 2004-2007 and 2008-2011. Tumor stage was categorized as early (0-1), intermediate (2-3), or late (4) for survival analyses. Linear regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were utilized. RESULTS A total of 37,210 renal pelvic and 23,200 ureteral origin UTUC cases were evaluated. Stage migration toward stage 0 and stage 4 was observed. There was a significant increase in proportion of stage 0 Ta/Tis (22.8%-33.4%, R2 = 0.86, P < .001) and stage 4 (22.3%-26.4%, R2 = 0.57, P = .003) disease for renal pelvic tumors, and a significant decrease in stages 1, 2, and 3. For UTUCs of ureteral origin, diagnosis at stage 0 Ta/Tis (37.6%-44.7%, R2 = 0.53, P = .005) and stage 4 (10.9%-14.6%, R2 = 0.63, P = .001) increased significantly, with significant reductions in stage 1 and 2. There was no difference in 5-year overall survival for ureteral or renal pelvic UTUCs for patients during 2004-2007 versus 2008-2011 when stratified by early, intermediate, or late stage. CONCLUSION There is a stage migration toward stage 0 and stage 4 disease for UTUC. Five-year survival data from 2004 to 2011 remained stable across early, intermediate, and late stage groups.
Collapse
|
22
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
[Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma]. Urologe A 2020; 59:1265-1274. [PMID: 32936335 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01323-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare entity. The incidence in Germany is approximately 2/100,000 with a ratio between women and men of 1:2.5. Most clinical signs are nonspecific, which is why early diagnosis is rarely successful. Computed tomography urography in combination with diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is currently the gold standard in the diagnostics of UTUC. Regarding surgical treatment, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with resection of a bladder cuff remains the method of choice, although the radical approach is developing towards laparoscopic/robotic or endourological procedures with preservation of kidney tissue. Due to the high recurrence rate (22-47%) of urothelial carcinoma inside the bladder, close follow-up after RNU is mandatory.
Collapse
|
24
|
Moschini M, Zamboni S, Afferi L, Pradere B, Abufaraj M, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Roupret M, De la Taille A, Simeone C, Mattei A, Mathieu R, Bensalah K, Wirth MP, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gallina A, Simone G, Gallucci M, Di Bona C, Marra G, Mari A, Di Trapani E, Alvarez Maestro M, Krajewski W, Shariat SF, Xylinas E, Baumeister P. Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Arab J Urol 2020; 19:31-36. [PMID: 33763246 PMCID: PMC7954493 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1817720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. Patients and methods We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. Results In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence (P = 0.08), CSM (P = 0.1) or OM (P = 0.9). Conclusion Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. Abbreviations ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Francois Rabelais University, Tours, France
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre De la Taille
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP) CHU Mondor, Faculté De Médecine, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Urology, Rennes University Hospital (France), Rennes, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Urology, Rennes University Hospital (France), Rennes, France
| | - Manfred Peter Wirth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bona
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ettore Di Trapani
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Motol Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu Z, Huang J, Li X, Huang C, Ye Y, Zhang J, Liu Z. The effectiveness of chemotherapy for patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas: An inverse probability of treatment weighting comparison using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5756-5766. [PMID: 32585775 PMCID: PMC7433845 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Unlike the established evidence to use chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, presently there are insufficient data to inform a recommendation on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treatment. The prognosis for patients with stage T4 and positive lymph nodes is poor; however, primary tumors in the renal pelvis are associated with favorable prognoses compared to those located in the ureter. Our study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas (RPUC) who have relative favorable prognosis. Methods Patients with pT3N0M0 tumors who underwent radical nephroureterectomy combined with bladder cuff excision between 2005 and 2014 and registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were eligible for inclusion (n = 939). Baseline characteristics between the chemotherapy and observation groups were controlled for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)‐adjusted analysis. Results After the IPTW‐adjusted analysis, the 5‐year IPTW‐adjusted rates of overall survival (OS) for the chemotherapy and observation groups were 53.1% and 44.9%, respectively. The IPTW‐adjusted Kaplan‐Meier curves suggested that chemotherapy was associated with increased OS compared with observation (P = .028). In the IPTW‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, chemotherapy was associated with favorable survival benefits compared with observation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.52‐0.92, P = .031), and this was maintained after bootstrapping (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49‐0.93). Chemotherapy had a protective effect on OS benefits, which were found in a majority of the results of the subgroup analysis and were consistent with the main results (all P‐interactions > 0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy may provide significant OS benefits for patients with pT3N0M0 RPUC. The results of our study could strengthen the evidence for using adjuvant chemotherapy in this rare group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zefu Liu
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jialing Huang
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaowen Huang
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinxin Zhang
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhouwei Liu
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 498] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pape L, Richter J, Dunst J. [Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:837-840. [PMID: 32561938 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01640-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Feldstr. 21, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhang L, Wu B, Zha Z, Zhao H, Yuan J, Feng Y. The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:487. [PMID: 32391257 PMCID: PMC7189418 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81–1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| | - Zhenlei Zha
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| | - Hu Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| | - Yejun Feng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Afferi L, Moschini M, Mattei A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R. Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (the POUT Trial): A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2020; 78:289-290. [PMID: 32359702 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhai TS, Jin L, Feng LM, Zhou Z, Liu X, Liu H, Ma WG, Lu JY, Chen W, Yao XD, Ye L. Perioperative Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Undergoing Nephroureterectomy: A Population-Based Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:481. [PMID: 32373518 PMCID: PMC7186446 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the stage-specific impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods: Overall, 7,278 UTUC patients treated with NU from 2004 to 2015 were identified within the SEER database. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to elucidate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to test the impact of chemotherapy on survival rates, after stratifying according to pathological stage. Results: Chemotherapy was performed in 17.3% of patients and in 5.7, 11.5, 25.4, and 51.3% of patients with, respectively, pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 disease (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, perioperative chemotherapy was associated with a lower OS in pT2 patients and a lower CSS in pT1 disease (both P < 0.05), while predisposed to a higher OS in pT3 and pT4 patients (both P < 0.01). Moreover, perioperative chemotherapy was prone to a higher OS or CSS in pN+ disease compared to no chemotherapy (both P < 0.01). Conclusion: Perioperative chemotherapy was more frequently performed in locally advanced UTUC patients. The beneficial effect of chemotherapy on OS was evident in pT3/pT4 and pN+ patients. In addition, a clear CSS benefit was observed in patients who received chemotherapy for pN+ UTUC, while perioperative chemotherapy may reduce CSS for pT1 and OS for pT2 patients following NU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Shuai Zhai
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Jin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Ming Feng
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Tacheng, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Guo Ma
- Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China.,Department of Urology, Tongxin People's Hospital, Wuzhong, China
| | - Jing-Yi Lu
- Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Tacheng, China
| | - Xu-Dong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Ye
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Birtle A, Johnson M, Chester J, Jones R, Dolling D, Bryan RT, Harris C, Winterbottom A, Blacker A, Catto JWF, Chakraborti P, Donovan JL, Elliott PA, French A, Jagdev S, Jenkins B, Keeley FX, Kockelbergh R, Powles T, Wagstaff J, Wilson C, Todd R, Lewis R, Hall E. Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395:1268-1277. [PMID: 32145825 PMCID: PMC7181180 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30415-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UTUCs) are rare, with poorer stage-for-stage prognosis than urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder. No international consensus exists on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with UTUCs after nephroureterectomy with curative intent. The POUT (Peri-Operative chemotherapy versus sUrveillance in upper Tract urothelial cancer) trial aimed to assess the efficacy of systemic platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with UTUCs. METHODS We did a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial at 71 hospitals in the UK. We recruited patients with UTUC after nephroureterectomy staged as either pT2-T4 pN0-N3 M0 or pTany N1-3 M0. We randomly allocated participants centrally (1:1) to either surveillance or four 21-day cycles of chemotherapy, using a minimisation algorithm with a random element. Chemotherapy was either cisplatin (70 mg/m2) or carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]4·5/AUC5, for glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min only) administered intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) administered intravenously on days 1 and 8; chemotherapy was initiated within 90 days of surgery. Follow-up included standard cystoscopic, radiological, and clinical assessments. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival analysed by intention to treat with a Peto-Haybittle stopping rule for (in)efficacy. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01993979. A preplanned interim analysis met the efficacy criterion for early closure after recruitment of 261 participants. FINDINGS Between June 19, 2012, and Nov 8, 2017, we enrolled 261 participants from 57 of 71 open study sites. 132 patients were assigned chemotherapy and 129 surveillance. One participant allocated chemotherapy withdrew consent for data use after randomisation and was excluded from analyses. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·45, 95% CI 0·30-0·68; p=0·0001) at a median follow-up of 30·3 months (IQR 18·0-47·5). 3-year event-free estimates were 71% (95% CI 61-78) and 46% (36-56) for chemotherapy and surveillance, respectively. 55 (44%) of 126 participants who started chemotherapy had acute grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events, which accorded with frequently reported events for the chemotherapy regimen. Five (4%) of 129 patients managed by surveillance had acute grade 3 or worse emergent adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION Gemcitabine-platinum combination chemotherapy initiated within 90 days after nephroureterectomy significantly improved disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy should be considered a new standard of care after nephroureterectomy for this patient population. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Mark Johnson
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | | | | | - David Dolling
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Winterbottom
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Fight Bladder Cancer, Chinnor, UK
| | - Anthony Blacker
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Ann French
- Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southend, UK
| | | | - Benjamin Jenkins
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rachel Todd
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hwang EC, Sathianathen NJ, Jung JH, Kim MH, Narayan V, Hwang JE, Spiess PE, Dahm P. Perioperative systemic chemo-immunotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Hippokratia 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eu Chang Hwang
- Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital; Department of Urology; Hwasun Korea, South
| | | | - Jae Hung Jung
- Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine; Department of Urology; 20 Ilsan-ro Wonju Gangwon Korea, South 26426
| | - Myung Ha Kim
- Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine; Yonsei Wonju Medical Library; Wonju Korea, South
| | - Vikram Narayan
- University of Minnesota; Department of Urology; Minneapolis Minnesota USA
| | - Jun Eul Hwang
- Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital; Department of Hematology-Oncology; Hwasun Korea, South
| | | | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System; Urology Section; One Veterans Drive Mail Code 112D Minneapolis Minnesota USA 55417
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Rouprêt M, Necchi A, Moschini M, Shariat SF. Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1037-1054. [PMID: 32206939 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the available literature regarding the oncologic effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and locally advanced UTUC. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases in November 2019, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that compared patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who underwent surgery alone. Subgroup meta-analyses were also performed for studies that investigated only locally advanced UTUC. Overall, 36 studies were included in the review of which 22 studies and 15,378 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with higher rates of pathological downstaging (pDS) (RR 6.48, 95% CI 2.05-20.44, p = 0.001) and pathological complete response (RR 18.46, 95% CI 3.34-99.24, p = 0.001); and this was also proven in a subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated pDS in locally advanced UTUC (RR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0-5.07, p < 0.001). The association of NAC with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also statistically significant in all patients and in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, p < 0.001), which continued to be true for the patients with locally advanced UTUC. The association of AC with OS was only significant in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Perioperative chemotherapy might provide better survival outcomes in patients with clinically non-metastatic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to have promising results, although high level of evidence is still lacking. Despite the low level, the body of evidence suggests a need for multimodal therapy of invasive UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Luo HL, Ohyama C, Hatakeyama S, Wang HJ, Yoneyama T, Yang WC, Chuang YC, Chen YT, Lee WC, Cheng YT, Kang CH, Chiang PH. Unusual presentation of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan: Direct comparison from Taiwan-Japan UTUC Collaboration Cohort. Int J Urol 2020; 27:327-332. [PMID: 32100370 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To carry out a comparison of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma characteristics and behavior between patients in Taiwan and Japan. METHODS A Taiwan urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cohort was obtained from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and a Japan urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cohort from Hirosaki University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Those who received perioperative chemotherapy were excluded. Finally, 765 patients in the Taiwan cohort and 325 in the Japan cohort were analyzed. The end-point of this study was to study the natural course of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma within 5 years between these two groups. RESULTS The main finding was that urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients in Taiwan were younger (P < 0.001), more were women (P < 0.001), with low-stage disease (P < 0.001), with more chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001), with less smoking history (P < 0.001), with more bladder cancer history (P = 0.002), with more multifocal (P < 0.001) and less high-grade disease (P = 0.015), as well as less lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) and more squamous differentiation (P < 0.001). However, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no racial difference in oncologic outcome, such as intravesical recurrence, systemic recurrence or cancer-specific death in primary and propensity-matched cohorts. Bladder cancer history was found to be the most important factor predicting intravesical recurrences, whereas stage was strongly associated with systemic recurrence and cancer specific mortality. CONCLUSIONS The clinical characteristics of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan are significantly different from those of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Japan. However, there is no racial difference in stage-specific oncologic outcome after standard nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.,Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.,Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Wen Chou Yang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yao Chi Chuang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen Ta Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei Chin Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Tso Cheng
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih Hsiung Kang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po Hui Chiang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Matsunaga T, Komura K, Hashimoto T, Muraoka R, Satake N, Tsutsumi T, Tsujino T, Yoshikawa Y, Takai T, Minami K, Taniguchi K, Tanaka T, Uehara H, Hirano H, Nomi H, Ibuki N, Takahara K, Inamoto T, Ohno Y, Azuma H. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma harboring pathologic vascular invasion: a propensity score-matched analysis of multi-institutional cohort. World J Urol 2020; 38:3183-3190. [PMID: 32065276 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03118-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) offers survival benefit is still controversial. To explore the impact of AC on overall survival (OS) of cN0M0 UTUC patients, we conducted a propensity score-matched analysis using the regression model, including pathologic features such as lymphatic and vascular invasion. METHODS A multi-institutional cohort of 413 UTUC patient record was used. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias by potential confounding factors for survival, including pathologic features from the specimen of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were identified as pair-matched groups (49 patients in RNU and 49 patients in RNU + AC). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that a 5-year OS rate of 72.7% for patients treated with RNU + AC was significantly higher than 51.6% for those treated with RNU (p = 0.0156). On multivariate analysis, pathologic vascular invasion (HR 3.41, 95% CI 1.24-10.66, p = 0.0166) and administration of AC (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, p = 0.0438) still remained as the significant predictors for OS. In patients with pathologic vascular invasion (51 of 98 patients), a significantly longer OS in RNU + AC groups was observed (median OS of 30 and 70 months in RNU and RNU + AC groups, respectively: p = 0.0432), whereas there was no significant difference in the OS between RNU (median OS: not reached) and RNU + AC (median OS: not reached) groups in patients without the invasion (p = 0.4549). CONCLUSION The result indicates a significant benefit for OS by the administration of AC, and pathologic vascular invasion in the specimen of RNU could help the patient selection to better predict the effect of AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohisa Matsunaga
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. .,Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. .,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. .,Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Ryu Muraoka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Naoya Satake
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tsutsumi
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Takuya Tsujino
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Yuki Yoshikawa
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Takai
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Koichiro Minami
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kohei Taniguchi
- Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Tomohito Tanaka
- Translational Research Program, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Uehara
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Hajime Hirano
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Hayahito Nomi
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Naokazu Ibuki
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Takahara
- Department of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Yoshio Ohno
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kang M, Yoo H, Kim K, Sung SH, Jeon HG, Park SH, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeong BC. Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Stage Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: Competing Risk Analysis after Propensity Score-Matching. J Cancer 2019; 10:6896-6902. [PMID: 31839824 PMCID: PMC6909941 DOI: 10.7150/jca.34103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACH) influences cancer-specific mortality, bladder cancer-specific mortality, and other-cause mortality in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) through the use of competing risk analysis. Methods: Among 785 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU from 1994 through 2015, we analyzed 338 individuals with locally advanced UTUC (pathologic T3-T4 and/or positive lymph nodes) without distant metastases. Patients were classified into two groups according to receipt of ACH. We performed a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis between the ACH and no ACH group. The study endpoints were UTUC- and other cause-specific survivals. The association of potential risk factors with outcome was tested with the Fine and Gray regression model. Results: During a median follow-up duration of 31.5 months, rates of UTUC- and other cause-mortalities were 32.9% (n = 79) and 8.7% (n = 21), respectively. Of note, there were no significant differences in overall survival between the observation and ACH groups according to the competing risks of death (UTUC and other causes of death). Multivariate analysis showed that only older age at surgery (≥ 65 years; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.73), multifocality (HR = 1.74), and tumor size (HR = 1.92) remained as poor predictors of UTUC-specific survival. Additionally, positive surgical margin was only identified as independent predictor of other causes of death (HR = 4.23). Conclusion: In summary, postoperative chemotherapy failed to improve UTUC- and other cause-specific survival rates, based on competing risk analysis after propensity score-matching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University
| | - Heejin Yoo
- Statistics and Data Center, Samsung Medical Center
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Statistics and Data Center, Samsung Medical Center
| | - Si Hyun Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| | - Han Yong Choi
- Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Urol 2019; 203:690-698. [PMID: 31702432 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy of high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma are scant. In this multi-institution, prospective, phase II trial we investigated pathological complete responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma in whom nephroureterectomy was planned were assigned to 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles of accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin in those with baseline creatinine clearance greater than 50 ml per minute or gemcitabine and carboplatin in those with creatinine clearance 30 to 50 ml per minute or less. The study primary end point was a pathological complete response (ypT0N0). The accrual goal was 30 patients per arm. An 18% pathological complete response was considered worth further study while a 4% pathological complete response would not have justified pursuing this regimen. With 28 eligible patients per arm success was defined as 3 or more pathological complete responses (10.7%) in a given arm. Secondary end points included safety, renal function and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS A total of 30 patients enrolled in the accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin arm from 2015 to 2017. Six patients enrolled in the gemcitabine and carboplatin arm, which closed due to poor accrual. Of the 29 patients eligible for accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, including 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 65 years (range 40 to 84), 80% completed all planned treatments, 3 (10.3%) achieved ypT0N0 and 1 achieved ypT0Nx for a pathological complete response in 13.8% (90% CI 4.9-28.8). In 1 patient receiving accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin nephroureterectomy was deferred due to grade 4 sepsis. The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 23% in the accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin arm with no grade 5 event. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma and creatinine clearance greater than 50 ml per minute was safe and demonstrated predefined activity with a 14% pathological complete response rate. Final pathological stage ypT1 or less in more than 60% of patients is encouraging. Together the results of this prospective trial support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients with high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
|
40
|
Urothelial Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter: Does Location Make a Difference? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 18:45-49.e1. [PMID: 31786118 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data on outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) arising from the renal pelvis (RPUC) versus UTUC arising from the ureter (UUC). The published literature is conflicting, and there is no consensus on patient prognosis based on disease location. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and survival outcomes based on location of primary tumor using a large national registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2016 for patients with localized (cN0M0) UTUC. Patients were stratified based on location of tumor. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. We also performed exploratory analyses based on tumor stage. RESULTS We identified 11,922 patients who underwent surgical treatment. The median follow-up was 32.1 months. Patients with RPUC presented with higher tumor stage and grade. Patients with UUC were treated with less radical nephroureterectomy (56.4% vs. 84.3%; P < .01). IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated higher median overall survival for RPUC versus UUC (71.1 vs. 66.8 months, respectively; P = .01). This benefit was consistent across tumor stage subgroups, reaching statistical significance in patients with T1 disease. On multivariable analysis, ureteral location of tumor was a predictor of worse survival. CONCLUSION Patients with UUC were found to be treated with less radical surgery and to have worse survival than those with RPUC. These patients may suffer from poor initial staging and suboptimal treatments. Further studies are needed to evaluate potential biological differences of UTUC based on tumor location.
Collapse
|
41
|
Song SH, Ye CH, Lee S, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE, Oh JJ. Association between lymphovascular invasion and oncologic outcomes among upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:2863-2870. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-03020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
42
|
Kim M, Kim JK, Lee J, Kim YS, Lee JL, Kwak C, Jeong CW, Byun SS, Lee SC, Ohyama C, Arai Y, Ahn H. Adjuvant Treatments for Advanced Stage, Non-metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:819-827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
43
|
Murakami Y, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Hirayama T, Utsunomiya T, Koguchi D, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Taoka Y, Irie A, Iwamura M. Impact of histologic variants on the oncological outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract cancers treated with radical surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:1412-1418. [PMID: 31197556 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01486-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No definitive evidence exists regarding the clinical significance of histologic variants (HV) in upper urinary tract cancer. We investigated the impact of HV on prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract cancer following radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients with upper urinary tract cancer who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals from 1990 to 2015. Patients with distant metastatic disease prior to surgery and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded, leaving 441 eligible patients. Patients were classified into two groups: pure urothelial carcinoma (UC) and HV. The clinicopathological variables of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots and proportional Cox hazard ratios (HR) to compare the oncological outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS HV included 37 patients (8%). Compared with the pure UC patients, HV patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; RFS p = 0.0002, CSS p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for RFS revealed HV were independent predictors (HR 1.92; p = 0.026), but the association did not remain significant for CSS. There was no significant difference in CSS between the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group and the non-AC group for all HV patients, except in patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status where the AC group had significantly favorable CSS. CONCLUSIONS HV in upper urinary tract cancer are independent predictors for RFS, but not for CSS. AC improved CSS for HV patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, 2-8-18 Hashimoto, Midori-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5188, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, 1-13-12, Minami-machi, Higashiyamato, Tokyo, 207-0014, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, 18-1 Sakuradai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0314, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Song W, Jeong JY, Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM, Sung HH. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for patients with pT3NanyM0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 66:12-17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
45
|
Jung H, Giusti G, Fajkovic H, Herrmann T, Jones R, Straub M, Baard J, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment. World J Urol 2019; 37:2279-2287. [PMID: 31123852 PMCID: PMC6825640 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02811-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide an overview of treatment modalities for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods In accordance with the standards for a scoping review, data presentation and discussion at the Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, 6–7 September 2018, consensus was reached on the latest and most important treatment recommendations for UTUC. Using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, publications were selected based on quality, clinical relevance, and level of evidence. Results Kidney-sparing surgery should be attempted for low-grade UTUC. Radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is first option for high-grade disease. Post-operative bladder instillation of chemotherapy should be offered after RNU to reduce intravesical recurrence rate. Identification of tumor grade and stage is crucial when selecting treatment. Ureteroscopic management of low-grade and non-invasive UTUC achieves disease-free survival similar to that offered by radical nephroureterectomy but seems to be a risk factor for intravesical recurrence. Lymphadenectomy appears important for high-risk disease, although the therapeutic benefit needs further validation. There is little evidence supporting use of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C as monotherapy and adjuvant treatment in UTUC. A randomized clinical trial has indicated that platin-based chemotherapy for invasive UTUC improves disease-free survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered standard care for ≥ T2 N0–3M0 disease. Conclusions Risk stratification assessment is feasible and mandatory in UTUC. Identification of tumor grade and stage is essential for optimal treatment selection. Kidney-sparing surgery should be offered in low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in high-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Jung
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland UK
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Li Y, Fang D, Bao Z, He A, Guan B, He S, Zhan Y, Gong Y, Li X, Zhou L. High aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with localized upper tract urothelial cancer: a propensity score-matched study in a large Chinese center. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:2635-2648. [PMID: 31114222 PMCID: PMC6489587 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s193771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (AST/ALT) ratio in a large Chinese cohort surgically treated for localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Methods: Data of 908 consecutive patients with localized UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were retrospectively evaluated. The endpoints of prognosis were progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) after RNU. We compared these endpoints according to the AST/ALT ratio before and after 1:1 PSM. The independent predictors for PFS, CSS and OS were also analyzed. Results: A high AST/ALT ratio was correlated with unfavorable factors, including elderly age, female gender, history of coronary disease, alcohol and tobacco consumption, lower body mass index, and larger tumor volume. Before PSM, the Kaplan–Meier curves showed significantly poorer survival outcomes in PFS, CSS, and OS (all P<0.001) for patients with high AST/ALT ratios. After PSM, the high AST/ALT ratio group also had significantly inferior survival outcomes in terms of PFS, OS and CSS (all P<0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analyses revealed that the AST/ALT ratio was an independent predictor for PFS, CSS and OS before PSM (PFS hazard ratio [HR] 1.454, P=0.001; CSS HR 2.577, P<0.001; OS HR 1.925, P<0.001) and after PSM (PFS HR 1.711, P<0.001; CSS HR 2.588, P<0.001; OS HR 1.957, P<0.001). Conclusion: The preoperative AST/ALT ratio can be a convenient and useful prognostic biomarker for patients with localized UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengqing Bao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Anbang He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Bao Guan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Yonghao Zhan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China.,National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Similar to bladder cancer, more than 95% tumors of the upper urinary tract are urothelial carcinoma. At initial diagnosis approximately 60% of the tumors are already invasive. In case of distant metastasis (M+) there is no benefit of radical nephroureterectomy. In those cases, systemic therapy is indicated. OBJECTIVES The aim of this article is to present a systematic overview of different therapies in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). RESULTS Currently there are insufficient data upon which the recommendations for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic UTUC can be based. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the gold standard in first-line treatment of metastatic UTUC. Due to a lower toxicity compared to MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin), gemcitabine and cisplatin have become standard. However, carboplatin-based chemotherapies should not be considered interchangeable. Immunomodulatory therapies using checkpoint inhibition, particularly with antibodies directed against PD-1 (programmed cell death 1), PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) or CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen-4) have shown significant antitumor activity with tolerable safety profiles and durable responses in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In those patients, unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, good response rates have been reported in case of a positive PD-L1 status. However, preliminary data of the KEYNOTE-361 and IMvigor130 studies showed a reduced survival in case of low PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
|
48
|
Zeng S, Dai L, Yang J, Gao X, Yu X, Ren Q, Wang K, Xu J, Yang Z, Yang B, Wang H, Yang Q, Ye H, Hou J, Pan Y, Zhang Z, Weng Z, Sun Y, Xu C. Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:290.e17-290.e24. [PMID: 30630733 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create multivariable models with readily available clinicopathologic variables for predicting the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed as UTUC and underwent radical nephroureterectomy in 2 high volumes, tertiary care centers. A total of 445 patients and 227 patients met the inclusion criteria were included for constructing the prediction model and external validation, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze independent risk factors, and nomogram and calibration curve were constructed by R project. RESULTS The median follow-up for the development and external validation cohorts were 33.5 and 32.5 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis detected older age (≥65 years), with concurrent bladder cancer at diagnosis, with both ureter and renal pelvic tumor, lymphovascular invasion, urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation, higher pathological grade and stage, and positive lymph node were significantly associated with poorer outcome of UTUC. The c-index of the nomogram with these above-mentioned independent risk factors to predict the cancer specific survival was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84) and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.59-0.87) for the development cohort and external validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We developed and externally validated a novel and accurate nomogram with readily available clinicopathological information for predicting the cancer specific survival of UTUC. This nomogram could help clinicians stratify patients with UTUC into different risk groups with distinct prognosis by the total scores obtained from the prediction tool, thus facilitate decision-making and clinical trial designing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxiong Zeng
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Lihe Dai
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Xiaomin Gao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Xiaowen Yu
- Department of Geriatrics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Qian Ren
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Kaijian Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Jinshan Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Zeyu Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Huiqing Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Qing Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Huamao Ye
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Jianguo Hou
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yue Pan
- Department of Urology, The First Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China
| | - Zhensheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Zhiliang Weng
- Department of Urology, The First Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China
| | - Yinghao Sun
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China.
| | - Chuanliang Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nazzani S, Preisser F, Mazzone E, Tian Z, Mistretta FA, Shariat SF, Soulières D, Saad F, Montanari E, Luzzago S, Briganti A, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Survival effect of perioperative systemic chemotherapy on overall mortality in locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. World J Urol 2018; 37:1329-1337. [PMID: 30298285 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2516-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the potential survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (CHT) in patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU) for non-metastatic locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2014), we identified 1286 patients with T3 or T4, N 0-3 M0 UTUC. Kaplan-Meier plots, as well as multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) relying on inverse probability after treatment weighting (IPTW) and landmark analyses, were used to test the effect of CHT vs no CHT on overall mortality (OM) in the overall population (n =1286), as well as after stratification according to lymph node invasion (LNI). RESULTS Overall, 37.4% patients received CHT. The CHT rate was higher with LNI (62.2% vs 35.2%, p < 0.001). In MCRMs, testing for OM in the overall population, CHT was associated with lower rates of OM (HR 0.71, CI 0.58-0.87; p = 0.001). Similarly, in MCRMs testing for OM in patients with LNI, CHT achieved independent predictor status for lower OM (HR 0.61, CI 0.48-0.78; p < 0.001). Conversely, in MCRMs testing for OM in patients without LNI, no CHT effect was recorded (HR 0.72, CI 0.52-1.01; p = 0.05). All results were confirmed after IPTW adjustment and in landmark analyses. CONCLUSIONS Our results represent a contemporary North American report indicating lower OM after CHT for patients with locally advanced non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma, specifically in patients with T3-T4, N1-N3, M0 disease. Validation of the current and of the previous study is required within a randomized prospective design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Nazzani
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. .,Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Corso San Gottardo 12, Milano MI, Italy.
| | - Felix Preisser
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Denis Soulières
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Academic Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Corso San Gottardo 12, Milano MI, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Necchi A, Pond GR, Moschini M, Plimack ER, Niegisch G, Yu EY, Bamias A, Agarwal N, Vaishampayan U, Theodore C, Sridhar SS, Rosenberg JE, Bellmunt J, Gallina A, Colombo R, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Galsky MD. Development of a Prediction Tool for Exclusive Locoregional Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 17:7-14.e3. [PMID: 30292628 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited information is available about the pattern of relapse after perioperative chemotherapy with radical cystectomy (RC) vs. RC alone in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 1082 patients of the Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium database, treated from February 1990 to December 2013 at 27 centers in the United States, Europe, Israel, and Canada, were collected. Locoregional relapse was defined as any pelvic lymph node or soft tissue-only recurrences. Cumulative incidence methods were used to estimate time to locoregional relapse (TTRL). Cox regression analyses were performed and a nomogram for 12-month locoregional relapse-free survival (RFS) was developed. The nomogram was applied to an external data set (n = 1021). RESULTS A total of 517 patients (47.8%) developed a relapse: 177 (16.4%) exclusive locoregional relapse. In multivariable analyses, perioperative chemotherapy was associated with longer TTRL (P < .001). Other factors were nonurothelial histology (P = .013), pT-stage (P < .001), and surgical margins (P < .001). The concordance index of the model was 0.681 (95% bootstrapped confidence interval, 0.666-0.716). Risk group categories were obtained according to nomogram tertiles. Despite, overall, observed locoregional RFS in the validation cohort exceeding predicted results, for high-risk patients (80 points or less, lowest nomogram tertile) observed 12-month RFS was similar between development and validation cohorts (60.1% and 66.6%). The study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION In the largest study, to our knowledge, that analyzed locoregional recurrences after RC, we propose a risk prediction tool for exclusive locoregional failures that might be suitable for clinical studies. Patients best suited for adjuvant radiotherapy might be those within the lowest nomogram tertile. Prospective trials are needed to validate findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Gunter Niegisch
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical faculty, Department of Urology, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Andrea Gallina
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|