Characterisation of agonist signalling profiles and agonist-dependent antagonism at PACAP-responsive receptors: Implications for drug discovery

PACAP38-induced migraine attacks are independent of CGRP signaling: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38) are key pathogenic drivers of migraine. While CGRP has become the target of several mechanism-based therapies, less is known about PACAP38 signaling in migraine pathogenesis. Previous studies suggest that PACAP38 can modulate CGRP release, but it might also induce migraine attacks via CGRP-independent mechanisms. Whether PACAP38 signaling is independent of and parallel to CGRP signaling has implications for future therapeutic strategies. Here, we aimed to ascertain whether PACAP-38 can mediate migraine attacks independently of CGRP signaling by assessing the ability of eptinezumab to prevent PACAP38-induced migraine attacks.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we randomly allocated adults with migraine without aura to receive either an intravenous infusion of 300-mg eptinezumab or matching placebo (isotonic saline) over 30 min. Two hours post-infusion, all participants were administered PACAP38 intravenously at 10 pmol/kg/min for 20 min. The primary endpoint was the incidence of migraine attacks during the 24-hour observational period post-infusion of eptinezumab or placebo. Key secondary endpoints included between-group differences in incidence of headache, and area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores, diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial skin blood flow.

RESULTS

A total of 38 participants were enrolled and completed the study. No difference was observed in the incidence of PACAP38-induced migraine attacks between the eptinezumab (10 [53%] of 19) and placebo (12 [63%] of 19) groups (Fisher's exact test: P = 0.74). Headache of any intensity was reported by 15 (79%) participants in the eptinezumab group, compared with 16 (84%) participants in the placebo group (Fisher's exact test: P > 0.99). The AUC for headache intensity scores did not differ between the two groups during the first 12 h post-infusion of PACAP38 (Mann-Whitney U-test: P = 0.96). No differences were observed in AUC between the eptinezumab and placebo groups with respect to changes in STA diameter and facial skin blood flow (P > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PACAP38 may mediate its signaling independently of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Therapies targeting PACAP signaling are thus a promising new avenue for treating migraine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05635604. Registered on November 15 2022.

PACAP regulates neuroendocrine and behavioral stress responses via CRF-containing neurons of the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide widely distributed in the brain including the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) implying a regulatory role in stress function. Recent evidence indicates that one of the main targets of PACAP within the PVN are corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neurons, which are key regulators of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. However, the neural correlates that mediate PACAP effects on stress function are not fully understood. In the present study, we characterized the neuronal mechanism by which PACAP regulates neuroendocrine and behavioral stress responses in rats. We found that intracerebroventricular administration of PACAP increased the swim stress-induced c-Fos expression in distinct brain areas of the stress and anxiety circuitry including the parvocellular part of the PVN and changed behavioral stress coping during forced swimming to a more passive coping style (i.e., indicated by increased floating and reduced struggling behavior). Subsequently, PACAP administration directly into the PVN mimicked these behavioral effects and potentiated the plasma ACTH response to forced swim stress suggesting an excitatory role of PACAP on HPA stress axis reactivity. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis revealed a considerable portion of stress-activated CRF neurons in the medial parvocellular part of the PVN that co-localized PAC1 receptors suggesting that PACAP-induced effects on stress function are likely mediated directly by activation of CRF neurons in the PVN. Thus, these findings suggest that the PVN may represent one of the key areas where PACAP regulates the neuroendocrine and behavioral stress response.

Antimicrobial Neuropeptides and Their Receptors: Immunoregulator and Therapeutic Targets for Immune Disorders

The interaction between the neuroendocrine system and the immune system plays a key role in the onset and progression of various diseases. Neuropeptides, recognized as common biochemical mediators of communication between these systems, are receiving increasing attention because of their potential therapeutic applications in immune-related disorders. Additionally, many neuropeptides share significant similarities with antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and evidence shows that these antimicrobial neuropeptides are directly involved in innate immunity. This review examines 10 antimicrobial neuropeptides, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), ghrelin, adrenomedullin (AM), neuropeptide Y (NPY), urocortin II (UCN II), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and catestatin (CST). Their expression characteristics and the immunomodulatory mechanisms mediated by their specific receptors are summarized, along with potential drugs targeting these receptors. Future studies should focus on further investigating antimicrobial neuropeptides and advancing the development of related drugs in preclinical and/or clinical studies to improve the treatment of immune-related diseases.

fMRI Insights into Visual Cortex Dysfunction as a Biomarker for Migraine with Aura

Migraine with aura (MwA) is a common and severely disabling neurological disorder, characterised by transient yet recurrent visual disturbances, including scintillating scotomas, flickering photopsias, and complex geometric patterns. These episodic visual phenomena significantly compromise daily functioning, productivity, and overall quality of life. Despite extensive research, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain only partially understood. Cortical spreading depression (CSD), a propagating wave of neuronal and glial depolarisation, has been identified as a central process in MwA. This phenomenon is triggered by ion channel dysfunction, leading to elevated intracellular calcium levels and excessive glutamate release, which contribute to widespread cortical hyperexcitability. Genetic studies, particularly involving the CACNA gene family, further implicate dysregulation of calcium channels in the pathogenesis of MwA. Recent advances in neuroimaging, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have provided critical insights into the neurophysiology of MwA. These results support the central role of CSD as a basic mechanism behind MwA and imply that cortical dysfunction endures beyond brief episodes, possibly due to chronic neuronal dysregulation or hyperexcitability. The visual cortex of MwA patients exhibits activation patterns in comparison to other neuroimaging studies, supporting the possibility that it is a disease-specific biomarker. Its distinctive sensory and cognitive characteristics are influenced by a complex interplay of cortical, vascular, and genetic factors, demonstrating the multifactorial nature of MwA. We now know much more about the pathophysiology of MwA thanks to the combination of molecular and genetic research with sophisticated neuroimaging techniques like arterial spin labelling (ASL) and fMRI. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge and analyse molecular and neurophysiological targets, providing a foundation for developing targeted therapies to modulate cortical excitability, restore neural network stability, and alleviate the burden of migraine with aura. The most important and impactful research in our field has been the focus of this review, which highlights important developments and their contributions to the knowledge and treatment of migraine with aura.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide signalling as a therapeutic target in migraine

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder that affects more than one billion people worldwide. The clinical presentation is characterized by recurrent headache attacks, which are often accompanied by photophobia, phonophobia, nausea and vomiting. Although the pathogenesis of migraine remains incompletely understood, mounting evidence suggests that specific signalling molecules are involved in the initiation and modulation of migraine attacks. These signalling molecules include pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), a vasoactive peptide that is known to induce migraine attacks when administered by intravenous infusion to people with migraine. Discoveries linking PACAP to migraine pathogenesis have led to the development of drugs that target PACAP signalling, and a phase II trial has provided evidence that a monoclonal antibody against PACAP is effective for migraine prevention. In this Review, we explore the molecular and cellular mechanisms of PACAP signalling, shedding light on its role in the trigeminovascular system and migraine pathogenesis. We then discuss emerging therapeutic strategies that target PACAP signalling for the treatment of migraine and consider the research needed to translate the current knowledge into a treatment for migraine in the clinic.

Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Migraine is a common disabling conditions which, globally, affects 15.2% of the population. It is the second cause of health loss in terms of years lived with disability, the first among women. Despite being so common, it is poorly recognised and too often undertreated. Specialty centres and neurologists with specific expertise on headache disorders have the knowledge to provide specific care: however, those who do not regularly treat patients with migraine will benefit from a synopsis on the most relevant and updated information about this condition. This paper presents a comprehensive view on the hallmarks of migraine, from genetics and diagnostic markers, up to treatments and societal impact, and reports the elements that identify migraine specific features.

MAIN RESULTS

The most relevant hallmark of migraine is that it has common and individual features together. Besides the known clinical manifestations, migraine presentation is heterogeneous with regard to frequency of attacks, presence of aura, response to therapy, associated comorbidities or other symptoms, which likely reflect migraine heterogeneous genetic and molecular basis. The amount of therapies for acute and for prophylactic treatment is really wide, and one of the difficulties is with finding the best treatment for the single patient. In addition to this, patients carry out different daily life activities, and might show lifestyle habits which are not entirely adequate to manage migraine day by day. Education will be more and more important as a strategy of brain health promotion, because this will enable reducing the amount of subjects needing specialty care, thus leaving it to those who require it in reason of refractory condition or presence of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing the hallmarks of migraine and the features of single patients enables prescribing specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Medical research on headaches today particularly suffers from the syndrome of single-disease approach, but it is important to have a cross-sectional and joint vision with other close specialties, in order to treat our patients with a comprehensive approach that a heterogeneous condition like migraine requires.

Tirzepatide, GIP(1-42) and GIP(1-30) display unique signaling profiles at two common GIP receptor variants, E354 and Q354

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are prevalent metabolic disorders affecting millions of individuals worldwide. A new effective therapeutic drug called tirzepatide for the treatment of obesity and T2D is a dual agonist of the GIP receptor and GLP-1 receptor. Tirzepatide is clinically more effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists but the reasons why are not well understood. Tirzepatide reportedly stimulates the GIP receptor more potently than the GLP-1 receptor. However, tirzepatide signaling has not been thoroughly investigated at the E354 (wildtype) or Q354 (E354Q) GIP receptor variants. The E354Q variant is associated increased risk of T2D and lower body mass index. To better understand GIP receptor signaling we characterized the activity of endogenous agonists and tirzepatide at both GIP receptor variants. Using Cos7 cells we examined wildtype and E354Q GIP receptor signaling, analyzing cAMP and IP1 accumulation as well as AKT, ERK1/2 and CREB phosphorylation. GIP(1-42) and GIP(1-30)NH2 displayed equipotent effects on these pathways excluding CREB phosphorylation where GIP(1-30)NH2 was more potent than GIP(1-42) at the E354Q GIP receptor. Tirzepatide favored cAMP signaling at both variants. These findings indicate that tirzepatide is a biased agonist towards Gαs signaling and suggests it equally activates the wildtype and E354Q GIP receptor variants. We also observed differences between the pharmacology of the GIP receptor variants with endogenous peptides, which may help to explain differences in phenotype. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of GIP receptor signaling, and will aid development of therapies combating T2D and obesity.

A Monoclonal Antibody to PACAP for Migraine Prevention

BACKGROUND

Targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a new avenue for treating migraine. The efficacy and safety of intravenous Lu AG09222, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the PACAP ligand, for migraine prevention are unclear.

METHODS

In a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adult participants (18 to 65 years of age) with migraine for whom two to four previous preventive treatments had failed to provide a benefit. The trial included a 4-week treatment period and an 8-week follow-up period. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1:2 ratio to receive a single-dose baseline infusion of 750 mg of Lu AG09222, 100 mg of Lu AG09222, or placebo. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in the number of migraine days per month, during weeks 1 through 4, in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group as compared with the placebo group.

RESULTS

Of 237 participants enrolled, 97 received 750 mg of Lu AG09222, 46 received 100 mg of Lu AG09222, and 94 received placebo. The mean number of baseline migraine days per month was 16.7 in the overall population, and the mean change from baseline over weeks 1 through 4 was -6.2 days in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group, as compared with -4.2 days in the placebo group (difference, -2.0 days; 95% confidence interval, -3.8 to -0.3; P = 0.02). Adverse events with a higher incidence in the Lu AG09222 750-mg group than in the placebo group during the 12-week observation period included coronavirus disease 2019 (7% vs. 3%), nasopharyngitis (7% vs. 4%), and fatigue (5% vs. 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a phase 2 trial, a single intravenous infusion of 750 mg of Lu AG09222 showed superiority over placebo in reducing migraine frequency over the subsequent 4 weeks. (Funded by H. Lundbeck; HOPE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05133323.).

Pharmacology of PACAP and VIP receptors in the spinal cord highlights the importance of the PAC1 receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The spinal cord is a key structure involved in the transmission and modulation of pain. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), are expressed in the spinal cord. These peptides activate G protein-coupled receptors (PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2) that could provide targets for the development of novel pain treatments. However, it is not clear which of these receptors are expressed within the spinal cord and how these receptors signal.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Dissociated rat spinal cord cultures were used to examine agonist and antagonist receptor pharmacology. Signalling profiles were determined for five signalling pathways. The expression of different PACAP and VIP receptors was then investigated in mouse, rat and human spinal cords using immunoblotting and immunofluorescence.

KEY RESULTS

PACAP, but not VIP, potently stimulated cAMP, IP1 accumulation and ERK and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) but not Akt phosphorylation in spinal cord cultures. Signalling was antagonised by M65 and PACAP6-38. PACAP-27 was more effectively antagonised than either PACAP-38 or VIP. The patterns of PAC1 and VPAC2 receptor-like immunoreactivity appeared to be distinct in the spinal cord.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The pharmacological profile in the spinal cord suggested that a PAC1 receptor is the major functional receptor subtype present and thus likely mediates the nociceptive effects of the PACAP family of peptides in the spinal cord. However, the potential expression of both PAC1 and VPAC2 receptors in the spinal cord highlights that these receptors may play differential roles and are both possible therapeutic targets.

β-Arrestin-independent endosomal cAMP signaling by a polypeptide hormone GPCR

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiate a second phase of stimulatory heterotrimeric G protein (Gs)-coupled cAMP signaling after endocytosis. The prevailing current view is that the endosomal signal is inherently β-arrestin-dependent because β-arrestin is necessary for receptor internalization and, for some GPCRs, to prolong the endosomal signal. Here we revise this view by showing that the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 (VIPR1), a secretin-family polypeptide hormone receptor, does not require β-arrestin to internalize or to generate an endosomal signal. β-Arrestin instead resolves the plasma membrane and endosomal signaling phases into sequential cAMP peaks by desensitizing the plasma membrane phase without affecting the endosomal phase. This appears to occur through the formation of functionally distinct VIPR1-β-arrestin complexes at each location that differ in their phosphorylation dependence. We conclude that endosomal GPCR signaling can occur in the absence of β-arrestin and that β-arrestin sculpts the spatiotemporal profile of cellular GPCR-G protein signaling through location-specific remodeling of GPCR-β-arrestin complexes.

Potential treatment targets for migraine: emerging options and future prospects

Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the recent approval of several calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapies, many people with migraine do not achieve satisfactory headache improvement with currently available therapies and there continues to be an unmet need for effective and tolerable migraine-specific treatments. Exploring additional targets that have compelling evidence for their involvement in modulating migraine pathways is therefore imperative. Potential new therapies for migraine include pathways involved in nociception, regulation of homoeostasis, modulation of vasodilation, and reward circuits. Animal and human studies show that these targets are expressed in regions of the CNS and peripheral nervous system that are involved in pain processing, indicating that these targets might be regarded as promising for the discovery of new migraine therapies. Future studies will require assessment of whether targets are suitable for therapeutic modulation, including assessment of specificity, affinity, solubility, stability, efficacy, and safety.

PACAP-38 related modulation of the cranial parasympathetic projection: A novel mechanism and therapeutic target in severe primary headache

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little is known of how cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS) in cluster headache and migraine may contribute to their severe headache phenotype. This strong association suggests the involvement of the cranial parasympathetic efferent pathway. To investigate its contribution, we studied the role of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), a potent sensory and parasympathetic neuropeptide, in modulating pre- and post-ganglionic cranial parasympathetic projection neurons, and their influence on headache-related trigeminal-autonomic responses.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Using PACAP-38 and PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists, electrophysiological, behavioural and facial neurovascular-blood flow was measured in rats to probe trigeminal- and parasympathetic-neuronal, periorbital thresholds and cranial-autonomic outcomes, as they relate to primary headaches.

KEY RESULTS

Sumatriptan attenuated the development of PACAP-38 mediated activation and sensitization of trigeminocervical neurons and related periorbital allodynia. PACAP-38 also caused activation and enhanced responses of dural-responsive pre-ganglionic pontine-superior salivatory parasympathetic neurons. Further, the PACAP-38 responsive receptor antagonists dissected a role of VPAC1 and PAC1 receptors in attenuating cranial-autonomic and trigeminal-neuronal responses to activation of the cranial parasympathetic projection, which requires post-ganglionic parasympathetic neurotransmission.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Given the prevailing view that sumatriptan acts to some degree via a peripheral mechanism, our data support that PACAP-38 mediated receptor activation modulates headache-related cranial-autonomic and trigeminovascular responses via peripheral and central components of the cranial parasympathetic projection. This provides a mechanistic rationale for the association of CAS with more severe headache phenotypes in cluster headache and migraine, and supports the cranial parasympathetic projection as a potential novel locus for treatment by selectively targeting PACAP-38 or PACAP-38 responsive VPAC1 /PAC1 receptors.

From CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and Beyond: Unraveling the Next Chapters in Migraine Treatment

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that can be debilitating for individuals and society. Current research focuses on finding effective analgesics and management strategies for migraines by targeting specific receptors and neuropeptides. Nonetheless, newly approved calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have a 50% responder rate ranging from 27 to 71.0%, whereas CGRP receptor inhibitors have a 50% responder rate ranging from 56 to 71%. To address the need for novel therapeutic targets, researchers are exploring the potential of another secretin family peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), as a ground-breaking treatment avenue for migraine. Preclinical models have revealed how PACAP affects the trigeminal system, which is implicated in headache disorders. Clinical studies have demonstrated the significance of PACAP in migraine pathophysiology; however, a few clinical trials remain inconclusive: the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 1 receptor mAb, AMG 301 showed no benefit for migraine prevention, while the PACAP ligand mAb, Lu AG09222 significantly reduced the number of monthly migraine days over placebo in a phase 2 clinical trial. Meanwhile, another secretin family peptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is gaining interest as a potential new target. In light of recent advances in PACAP research, we emphasize the potential of PACAP as a promising target for migraine treatment, highlighting the significance of exploring PACAP as a member of the antimigraine armamentarium, especially for patients who do not respond to or contraindicated to anti-CGRP therapies. By updating our knowledge of PACAP and its unique contribution to migraine pathophysiology, we can pave the way for reinforcing PACAP and other secretin peptides, including VIP, as a novel treatment option for migraines.

Constitutive and conditional deletion reveals distinct phenotypes driven by developmental versus neurotransmitter actions of the neuropeptide PACAP

Neuropeptides may exert trophic effects during development, and then neurotransmitter roles in the developed nervous system. One way to associate peptide-deficiency phenotypes with either role is first to assess potential phenotypes in so-called constitutive knockout mice, and then proceed to specify, regionally and temporally, where and when neuropeptide expression is required to prevent these phenotypes. We have previously demonstrated that the well-known constellation of behavioral and metabolic phenotypes associated with constitutive pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) knockout mice are accompanied by transcriptomic alterations of two types: those that distinguish the PACAP-null phenotype from wild-type (WT) in otherwise quiescent mice (cPRGs), and gene induction that occurs in response to acute environmental perturbation in WT mice that do not occur in knockout mice (aPRGs). Comparing constitutive PACAP knockout mice to a variety of temporally and regionally specific PACAP knockouts, we show that the prominent hyperlocomotor phenotype is a consequence of early loss of PACAP expression, is associated with Fos overexpression in hippocampus and basal ganglia, and that a thermoregulatory effect previously shown to be mediated by PACAP-expressing neurons of medial preoptic hypothalamus is independent of PACAP expression in those neurons in adult mice. In contrast, PACAP dependence of weight loss/hypophagia triggered by restraint stress, seen in constitutive PACAP knockout mice, is phenocopied in mice in which PACAP is deleted after neuronal differentiation. Our results imply that PACAP has a prominent role as a trophic factor early in development determining global central nervous system characteristics, and in addition a second, discrete set of functions as a neurotransmitter in the fully developed nervous system that support physiological and psychological responses to stress.

Calcitonin/PAC1 receptor splice variants: a blind spot in migraine research

The neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and their receptors are linked to migraine neurobiology. Recent antimigraine therapeutics targeting the signaling of these neuropeptides are effective; however, some patients respond suboptimally, indicating an incomplete understanding of migraine pathophysiology. The CGRP- and PACAP-responsive receptors can be differentially spliced. It is known that receptor splice variants can have different pathophysiological effects in other receptor-mediated pain pathways. Despite considerable knowledge on the structural and pharmacological differences of the CGRP- and PACAP-responsive receptor splice variants and their expression in migraine-relevant tissues, their role in migraine is rarely considered. Here we shine a spotlight on the calcitonin and PACAP (PAC1) receptor splice variants and examine what implications they may have for drug activity and design.

Circulating PACAP levels are associated with increased amygdala-default mode network resting-state connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder

The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) system is implicated in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related amygdala-mediated arousal and threat reactivity. PTSD is characterized by increased amygdala reactivity to threat and, more recently, aberrant intrinsic connectivity of the amygdala with large-scale resting state networks, specifically the default mode network (DMN). While the influence of PACAP on amygdala reactivity has been described, its association with intrinsic amygdala connectivity remains unknown. To fill this gap, we examined functional connectivity of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in eighty-nine trauma-exposed adults (69 female) screened for PTSD symptoms to examine the association between blood-borne (circulating) PACAP levels and amygdala-DMN connectivity. Higher circulating PACAP levels were associated with increased amygdala connectivity with posterior DMN regions, including the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus (PCC/Precun) and left angular gyrus (lANG). Consistent with prior work, this effect was seen in female, but not male, participants and the centromedial, but not basolateral, subregions of the amygdala. Clinical association analyses linked amygdala-PCC/Precun connectivity to anxious arousal symptoms, specifically exaggerated startle response. Taken together, our findings converge with previously demonstrated effects of PACAP on amygdala activity in PTSD-related processes and offer novel evidence for an association between PACAP and intrinsic amygdala connectivity patterns in PTSD. Moreover, these data provide preliminary evidence to motivate future work ascertaining the sex- and subregion-specificity of these effects. Such findings may enable novel mechanistic insights into neural circuit dysfunction in PTSD and how the PACAP system confers risk through a disruption of intrinsic resting-state network dynamics.

PACAP6-38 improves nitroglycerin-induced central sensitization by modulating synaptic plasticity at the trigeminal nucleus caudalis in a male rat model of chronic migraine

AIMS

Chronic migraine (CM) is a common neurological disorder with complex pathogenesis. Evidence suggests that pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) induces migraine-like attacks and may be potential a new target for migraine treatment, but the therapeutic results of targeting PACAP and its receptors are not uniform. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the regulatory effect of PACAP type I receptor (PAC1R) antagonist, PACAP6-38, on nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced central sensitization in a CM model.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats received repeated injections of NTG to construct a CM model. Mechanical and thermal thresholds were measured using Von Frey filaments and hot plate tests. C-Fos expression was measured by western blotting and immunofluorescence staining to assess the central sensitization. PACAP6-38 was intracerebrally injected into the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC), and then the changes in c-Fos, the synaptic-associated proteins, phospho-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2), phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (p-CREB) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were detected. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Golgi-Cox staining were used to observe the ultrastructure of synapses and dendritic structures of TNC neurons.

RESULTS

The results showed that PACAP and PAC1R expression were significantly raised in the TNC after repeated NTG injections. Additionally, PACAP6-38 treatment alleviated nociceptive sensitization, inhibited NTG-induced overexpression of c-Fos and synaptic-associated proteins in the TNC of CM rat, restored aberrant synaptic structures. Furthermore, the expression of ERK/CREB/BDNF pathway was depressed by PACAP6-38.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that abnormal synaptic structure in the TNC of CM, which could be reversed by inhibition of PAC1R via down-regulating the ERK/CREB/BDNF signaling pathway. PACAP6-38 improves NTG-induced central sensitization by regulating synaptic plasticity in the TNC of CM rat, which may provide new insights into the treatments targeting PACAP/PAC1R in migraine.

Shared and independent roles of CGRP and PACAP in migraine pathophysiology

The neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) have emerged as mediators of migraine pathogenesis. Both are vasodilatory peptides that can cause migraine-like attacks when infused into people and migraine-like symptoms when injected into rodents. In this narrative review, we compare the similarities and differences between the peptides in both their clinical and preclinical migraine actions. A notable clinical difference is that PACAP, but not CGRP, causes premonitory-like symptoms in patients. Both peptides are found in distinct, but overlapping areas relevant to migraine, most notably with the prevalence of CGRP in trigeminal ganglia and PACAP in sphenopalatine ganglia. In rodents, the two peptides share activities, including vasodilation, neurogenic inflammation, and nociception. Most strikingly, CGRP and PACAP cause similar migraine-like symptoms in rodents that are manifested as light aversion and tactile allodynia. Yet, the peptides appear to act by independent mechanisms possibly by distinct intracellular signaling pathways. The complexity of these signaling pathways is magnified by the existence of multiple CGRP and PACAP receptors that may contribute to migraine pathogenesis. Based on these differences, we suggest PACAP and its receptors provide a rich set of targets to complement and augment the current CGRP-based migraine therapeutics.

Novel Fluorescently Labeled PACAP and VIP Highlight Differences between Peptide Internalization and Receptor Pharmacology

The related peptides pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have diverse biological functions in peripheral tissues and the central nervous system. Therefore, these peptides and their three receptors represent potential drug targets for several conditions, including neurological and pain-related disorders. However, very little is known about how these peptides regulate their receptors through processes such as internalization. Therefore, we developed tools to study receptor regulation through the synthesis of fluorescently labeled analogues of PACAP-38, PACAP-27, and VIP using copper-mediated 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of the Cy5 fluorophore. The functionality of Cy5-labeled peptides at their receptors was confirmed in cAMP accumulation assays. Internalization of the Cy5-labeled peptides was then examined and quantified at two distinct PAC₁ receptor splice variants, VPAC₁ and VPAC₂ receptors in transfected cells. All labeled peptides were functional, exhibiting comparable cAMP pharmacology to their unlabeled counterparts and underwent internalization in a time-dependent manner. Temporal differences in the internalization profiles were observed between Cy5-labeled peptides at the PAC_1n, PAC_1s, VPAC₁, and VPAC₂ receptors. Interestingly, the pattern of Cy5-labeled peptide activity differed for cAMP accumulation and internalization, indicating that these peptides differentially stimulate cAMP accumulation and internalization and therefore display biased agonism. This novel insight into PACAP-responsive receptor signaling and internalization may provide a unique avenue for future therapeutic development. The fluorescently labeled PACAP and VIP peptides described herein, which we validated as tools to study receptor internalization, will have utility across a broad range of applications and provide greater insight into this receptor family.

PAC1, VPAC1, and VPAC2 Receptor Expression in Rat and Human Trigeminal Ganglia: Characterization of PACAP-Responsive Receptor Antibodies

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide expressed in the trigeminal ganglia (TG). The TG conducts nociceptive signals in the head and may play roles in migraine. PACAP infusion provokes headaches in healthy individuals and migraine-like attacks in patients; however, it is not clear whether targeting this system could be therapeutically efficacious. To effectively target the PACAP system, an understanding of PACAP receptor distribution is required. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize commercially available antibodies and use these to detect PACAP-responsive receptors in the TG. Antibodies were initially validated in receptor transfected cell models and then used to explore receptor expression in rat and human TG. Antibodies were identified that could detect PACAP-responsive receptors, including the first antibody to differentiate between the PAC_1n and PAC_1s receptor splice variants. PAC₁, VPAC₁, and VPAC₂ receptor-like immunoreactivity were observed in subpopulations of both neuronal and glial-like cells in the TG. In this study, PAC₁, VPAC₁, and VPAC₂ receptors were detected in the TG, suggesting they are all potential targets to treat migraine. These antibodies may be useful tools to help elucidate PACAP-responsive receptor expression in tissues. However, most antibodies exhibited limitations, requiring the use of multiple methodologies and the careful inclusion of controls.

Targeting VIP and PACAP Receptor Signaling: New Insights into Designing Drugs for the PACAP Subfamily of Receptors

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Peptide (PACAP) and Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP) are neuropeptides involved in a diverse array of physiological and pathological processes through activating the PACAP subfamily of class B1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): VIP receptor 1 (VPAC1R), VIP receptor 2 (VPAC2R), and PACAP type I receptor (PAC1R). VIP and PACAP share nearly 70% amino acid sequence identity, while their receptors PAC1R, VPAC1R, and VPAC2R share 60% homology in the transmembrane regions of the receptor. PACAP binds with high affinity to all three receptors, while VIP binds with high affinity to VPAC1R and VPAC2R, and has a thousand-fold lower affinity for PAC1R compared to PACAP. Due to the wide distribution of VIP and PACAP receptors in the body, potential therapeutic applications of drugs targeting these receptors, as well as expected undesired side effects, are numerous. Designing selective therapeutics targeting these receptors remains challenging due to their structural similarities. This review discusses recent discoveries on the molecular mechanisms involved in the selectivity and signaling of the PACAP subfamily of receptors, and future considerations for therapeutic targeting.

Signal Transduction by VIP and PACAP Receptors

Homeostasis of the human immune system is regulated by many cellular components, including two neuropeptides, VIP and PACAP, primary stimuli for three class B G protein-coupled receptors, VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) regulate intestinal motility and secretion and influence the functioning of the endocrine and immune systems. Inhibition of VIP and PACAP receptors is an emerging concept for new pharmacotherapies for chronic inflammation and cancer, while activation of their receptors provides neuroprotection. A small number of known active compounds for these receptors still impose limitations on their use in therapeutics. Recent cryo-EM structures of VPAC1 and PAC1 receptors in their agonist-bound active state have provided insights regarding their mechanism of activation. Here, we describe major molecular switches of VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 that may act as triggers for receptor activation and compare them with similar non-covalent interactions changing upon activation that were observed for other GPCRs. Interhelical interactions in VIP and PACAP receptors that are important for agonist binding and/or activation provide a molecular basis for the design of novel selective drugs demonstrating anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and neuroprotective effects. The impact of genetic variants of VIP, PACAP, and their receptors on signalling mediated by endogenous agonists is also described. This sequence diversity resulting from gene splicing has a significant impact on agonist selectivity and potency as well as on the signalling properties of VIP and PACAP receptors.