β-Blocker withdrawal is preferable for accurate interpretation of the aldosterone-renin ratio in chronically treated hypertension

Steroidomics-Based Screening for Primary Aldosteronism: Impact of antihypertensive Drugs

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is complicated by the need to withdraw antihypertensive medications that interfere with test results, particularly renin. This study examined whether machine learning-based steroid-probability scores offer a renin measurement-independent approach for testing less prone to interference than the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR).

METHODS

This prospective multicenter cohort study involved the use of plasma steroidomics and the ARR in 839 patients tested for PA, including 190 with and 578 without PA (71 indeterminate). Receiver operating characteristic curves for steroid-probability scores and the ARR were examined with and without interfering medications. Impacts of individual medications on plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, steroid-probability scores, renin, and ARRs were examined by multivariable and paired analyses in patients with and without PA.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significant impact of interfering antihypertensive medications on the diagnostic performance of the ARR and minimal impact on steroid-probability scores. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists increased plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol in patients without PA and resulted in false-positive test results for steroid-probability scores and false-negative results for the ARR. Diuretics increased aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and steroid-probability scores in patients without PA, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased aldosterone, steroid-probability scores, and ARRs. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers had negligible impact on mineralocorticoids and steroid-probability scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Among antihypertensive drugs that impact plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists stood out as a cause of false-positive results for derived steroid-probability scores. Other antihypertensives have minimal or no impact, an advantage for use of steroid-probability scores over the ARR when those medications cannot be withdrawn.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017084; Unique identifier: DRKS00017084.

How should anti-hypertensive medications be adjusted before screening for primary aldosteronism?

Anti-hypertensive medications may affect plasma renin activity and/or plasma aldosterone concentration, misleading the interpretation of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio when screening for primary aldosteronism. The Task Force of Taiwan PA recommends that, when necessary, using α-adrenergic receptor blocking agents, centrally acting α-adrenergic agonists, and/or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers should be considered to control blood pressure before screening for PA. We recommend temporarily holding β-adrenergic receptor blocking agents, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and all diuretics before screening for PA. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the recommendations.

Treating Primary Aldosteronism-Induced Hypertension: Novel Approaches and Future Outlooks

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared with blood pressure-matched cases of primary hypertension. Current limitations in patient care stem from delayed recognition of the condition, limited access to key diagnostic procedures, and lack of a definitive therapy option for nonsurgical candidates. However, several recent advances have the potential to address these barriers to optimal care. From a diagnostic perspective, machine-learning algorithms have shown promise in the prediction of PA subtypes, while the development of noninvasive alternatives to adrenal vein sampling (including molecular positron emission tomography imaging) has made accurate localization of functioning adrenal nodules possible. In parallel, more selective approaches to targeting the causative aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma/nodule (APA/APN) have emerged with the advent of partial adrenalectomy or precision ablation. Additionally, the development of novel pharmacological agents may help to mitigate off-target effects of aldosterone and improve clinical efficacy and outcomes. Here, we consider how each of these innovations might change our approach to the patient with PA, to allow more tailored investigation and treatment plans, with corresponding improvement in clinical outcomes and resource utilization, for this highly prevalent disorder.

Screening for primary aldosteronism on and off interfering medications

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether antihypertensives will affect diagnostic accuracy of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) to an extent that is clinically relevant.

METHODS

Confirmatory tests were used to confirm or exclude PA diagnosis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity of ARR performance in different conditions were calculated.

RESULTS

208 PA and 78 essential hypertension (EH), and 125 PA and 206 EH patients, were included in the retrospective and prospective cohort, respectively. AUC of ARR on interfering medications was comparable to ARR off interfering medications (retrospective: 0.82 vs. 0.87, p = 0.20; prospective: 0.78 vs. 0.84, p = 0.07). At a threshold of 20 pg/μIU, the sensitivity of ARR on interfering medications was lower (11.1-23.2%) while the specificity was higher (10.2-15.2%) than ARR off interfering medications. However, when the ARR threshold on interfering medications was lowered to 10 pg/μIU, both the sensitivity (retrospective: 0.91 vs. 0.90, p = 0.61; prospective: 0.86 vs. 0.82, p = 0.39) and specificity (retrospective: 0.49 vs. 0.59, p = 0.20; prospective: 0.58 vs. 0.66, p = 0.10) were comparable to the ARR threshold off interfering medications.

CONCLUSION

Using ARR to screen for PA whilst taking interfering antihypertensive drugs is feasible in most cases, but the ARR threshold needs to be reduced.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04991961.

Aldosterone, Renin, and Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratio Variability in Screening for Primary Aldosteronism

CONTEXT

The plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), renin, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) are used to screen for primary aldosteronism (PA). Substantial intra-individual variability of PAC and ARR using plasma renin activity in the context of usual antihypertensive therapy has been described, but there is no data on ARR variability calculated using direct renin concentration (DRC).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the intra-individual variability of PAC, DRC, and ARR in the absence of interfering medications in patients with and without PA.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Hypertensive patients referred for investigation of PA, with at least 2 ARR measurements while off interfering medications.

SETTING

Endocrine hypertension service of a tertiary center, from May 2017 to July 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PAC, DRC, and ARR variability was calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) and percent difference (PD).

RESULTS

Analysis of 223 patients (55% female, median age 52 years), including 162 with confirmed PA, demonstrated high variability with a sample CV of 22-25% in the PAC and sample CV of 41% to 42% in the DRC and ARR in both the PA and non-PA groups. The degree of variability was substantially higher than the assays' analytical CV. Sixty-two patients (38%) with PA had at least one ARR below 70 pmol/L:mU/L (2.4 ng/dL:mU/L), a cut-off for first-line screening of PA.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant intra-individual variability in PAC, DRC, and hence ARR occurs in a large proportion of patients being investigated for PA. These findings support the need for at least 2 ARR before PA is excluded or further investigated.

Image-based computer modeling assessment of microwave ablation for treatment of adrenal tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of delivering microwave ablation for targeted treatment of aldosterone producing adenomas using image-based computational models.

METHODS

We curated an anonymized dataset of diagnostic ¹¹C-metomidate PET/CT images of 14 patients with aldosterone producing adenomas (APA). A semi-automated approach was developed to segment the APA, adrenal gland, and adjacent organs within 2 cm of the APA boundary. The segmented volumes were used to implement patient-specific 3D electromagnetic-bioheat transfer models of microwave ablation with a 2.45 GHz directional microwave ablation applicator. Ablation profiles were quantitatively assessed based on the extent of the APA target encompassed by an ablative thermal dose, while limiting thermal damage to the adjacent normal adrenal tissue and sensitive critical structures.

RESULTS

Across the 14 patients, adrenal tumor volumes ranged between 393 mm³ and 2,395 mm³. On average, 70% of the adrenal tumor volumes received an ablative thermal dose of 240CEM43, while limiting thermal damage to non-target structures, and thermally sparing 83.5-96.4% of normal adrenal gland. Average ablation duration was 293 s (range: 60-600 s). Simulations indicated coverage of the APA with an ablative dose was limited when the axis of the ablation applicator was not well aligned with the major axis of the targeted APA.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-based computational models demonstrate the potential for delivering microwave ablation to APA targets within the adrenal gland, while limiting thermal damage to surrounding non-target structures.

Losartan prevents bladder fibrosis and protects renal function in rat with neurogenic paralysis bladder

AIMS

To investigate the effect of losartan on preventing bladder fibrosis and protecting renal function in rats with neurogenic paralysis bladder (NPB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were assigned to the transecting spinal nerves group (TSNG), transecting spinal nerves + losartan group (LSTG), and control group (CG). On Day 32 postsurgery, bladder capacity (BC), bladder compliance (ΔC), bladder leakage pressure (P_ves.leak ) of TSNG and LSTG while BC, ΔC, and bladder threshold pressure (P_ves.thre ) of CG were measured by cystometry in each cohort. Renal function and the expression quantity of Angiotensin Ⅱ (Ang II) in blood were detected, in addition Ang II, Ang II Type 1 receptor (AT1), transformation growth factor β1 (TGFβ1), Collagen Ⅲ, and collagen fibrin in the bladder tissue were detected too.

RESULTS

ΔC in TSNG and LSTG decreased significantly compared to the CG. P_ves.leak in TSNG and LSTG were significantly higher than P_ves.thre in CG. Renal function of both TSNG and LSTG decreased significantly compared with the CG, but renal function in LSTG was better than in TSNG. Ang Ⅱ in blood and bladder tissue in TSNG and LSTG increased significantly compared with CG. AT1 was expressed in the bladder tissue of all rats. The TGFβ1, Collagen Ⅲ, and collagen fibrin expression level increased significantly in TSNG compared with LSTG and CG, while these levels were not significantly different between CG and LSTG.

CONCLUSION

Losartan might prevent NPB fibrosis by stopping the upregulated signaling of Ang II/AT1/TGFβ1 and consequently may reduce kidney damage from occurring.

The Effect of Antihypertensive Medications on Testing for Primary Aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a potentially curable form of secondary hypertension caused by excessive renin-independent aldosterone secretion, leading to increased target organ damage and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of PA requires measuring renin and aldosterone to calculate the aldosterone-to-renin ratio, followed by confirmatory tests to demonstrate renin-independent aldosterone secretion and/or PA subtype differentiation. Various antihypertensive drug classes interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis and hence evaluation for PA should ideally be performed off-drugs. This is, however, often precluded by the risks related to suboptimal control of blood pressure and serum potassium level in the evaluation period. In the present review, we summarized the evidence regarding the effect of various antihypertensive drug classes on biochemical testing for PA, and critically appraised the issue whether and which antihypertensive medications should be withdrawn or, conversely, might be continued in patients evaluated for PA. The least interfering drugs are calcium antagonists, alpha-blockers, hydralazine, and possibly moxonidine. If necessary, the testing may also be attempted during treatment with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers but renin and aldosterone measurements must be interpreted in the context of known effects of these drugs on these parameters. Views are evolving on the feasibility of testing during treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, as these drugs are now increasingly considered acceptable in specific patient subsets, particularly in those with severe hypokalemia and/or poor blood pressure control on alternative treatment.

The effect of medication on the aldosterone-to-renin ratio. A critical review of the literature

The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a common screening test for primary aldosteronism in hypertensives. However, patients often use medications that could confound the ARR and, thereby, reduce the interpretability of the test. Since it is not always feasible to stop such medication, several drugs that are supposedly neutral with respect to the ARR have been recommended as alternative treatment. The objective of the present review is to explore whether sufficient evidence exists to justify the recommendations. To this end, we performed a systematic PubMed and Cochrane literature search regarding medications that may influence the ARR. Our review revealed that many commonly prescribed antihypertensives seem to have significant effects on renin, aldosterone, and resulting ARR values. However, the magnitude of these effects is poorly quantifiable with the present level of research. We conclude that several medications can affect the ARR. Not taking this into account could lead to misinterpretation of the ARR. Therefore, standardization of the medications used during ARR measurement is advisable for a reliable and accurate interpretation. Further research is needed to ascertain how to best optimize these medications.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Decrease the Rates of Positive Screening for Primary Aldosteronism

OBJECTIVE

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are effective in patients with resistant hypertension and/or primary aldosteronism (PA). Screening for PA should ideally be conducted after stopping medications that might interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but this is challenging in patients with recalcitrant hypertension or hypokalemia. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the impact of MRAs on PA screening in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hypertension who had plasma aldosterone and renin measurements before and after MRA use in a tertiary referral center, over 19 years.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients, 91 with PA, were included and followed for up to 18 months. Overall, both plasma renin and aldosterone increased after MRA initiation (from median, interquartile range: 0.5 [0.1, 0.8] to 1.2 [0.6, 4.8] ng/mL/hour and from 19.1 [12.9, 27.7] to 26.4 [17.1, 42.3] ng/dL, respectively; P<.0001 for both), while the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) decreased from 40.3 (18.5, 102.7) to 23.1 (8.6, 58.7) ng/dL per ng/mL/hour (P<.0001). Similar changes occurred irrespective of the MRA treatment duration and other antihypertensives used. Positive PA screening abrogation after MRA initiation was found in 45/94 (48%) patients. Conversely, 17% of patients had positive PA screening only after MRA treatment, mostly due to correction of hypokalemia. An initially positive screening test was more likely altered by high MRA doses and more likely persistent in patients with confirmed PA or taking beta-blockers.

CONCLUSION

MRAs commonly reduce ARR and the proportion of positive PA screening results. When PA is suspected, screening should be repeated off MRAs.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; ARR = aldosterone/renin ratio; DRC = direct renin concentration; MRA = mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; PA = primary aldosteronism; PAC = plasma aldosterone concentration; PRA = plasma renin activity; RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Flash glucose monitoring system was applied to cortisol treatment for a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and 17α-hydroxylase deficiency

BACKGROUND

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) with 17α-hydroxylase deficiency is a rare disease; patients often require lifetime cortisol treatment. In this case report, we presented a patient with CAH and 17α-hydroxylase deficiency, who was previously misdiagnosed as having primary aldosteronism. Furthermore, the flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) was used to ascertain a suitable cortisol therapeutic regimen for this patient.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 29-year-old woman presented with sex dysgenesis, hypertension and hypokalaemia. She had been diagnosed with primary aldosteronism at a local hospital. The re-measured aldosterone level in our hospital was below the normal range after antihypertensive medication adjustment, suggesting that the primary aldosteronism was a misdiagnosis. The patient was finally diagnosed as having CAH with 17α-hydroxylase deficiency according to the endocrine profile, adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test, and genetic analysis. Then, the patient was recommended cortisol treatment, during which the endocrine profile, blood pressure, plasma potassium level, and blood glucose level were observed to ascertain a suitable dosage. The FGMS was used to monitor blood glucose level, which indicated that the patient's glucose metabolism was maintained normally under the final treatment dosage.

CONCLUSION

The misdiagnosis might have been because of the effects of the antihypertension medications on aldosterone and renin levels. The final dosage of cortisol treatment achieved a normal endocrine profile, while maintaining the homeostasis of blood glucose level, plasma potassium level and blood pressure. FGMS may be an effective method to ascertain a suitable cortisol therapeutic regimen for patients with CAH and 17α-hydroxylase deficiency.

The aldosterone to renin ratio in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: Promises and challenges

The complexity of evaluating patients for secondary treatable causes of hypertension is underappreciated. Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most prevalent cause of secondary hypertension (3%-32% of hypertensive patients). The recent endocrine society clinical practice guideline (ESCPG), "The Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Case Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment", differs from the previous version in the explicit recognition of PA as a major public health issue. Despite this, PA is underdiagnosed. The guidelines call on physicians to substantially ramp up the screening of hypertensive patients at risk of PA. Further, it recommends the plasma aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR), as the test of choice for screening for PA. However, the ARR is a highly variable test with reported diagnostic sensitivities and specificities ranging from 66% to 100% and 61% to 100%, respectively. Variability of the ARR can be attributed to the high degree of within-subject variation, differences in sampling protocols, laboratory assays, reporting units, the effect of medications and the population characteristics used to establish the decision thresholds. These factors render the possibility of false positive and false negative results-which have the potential to adversely impact patients. The limitations and caveats to the use of the ARR necessitate an effective clinic-laboratory interface, with specialist physician and clinical scientist collaboration for ARR result interpretation. Improvement in the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the ARR is predicated on harmonisation of pretesting patient preparation criteria, knowledge of the analytical methods used to derive the ratio and the method-specific threshold for PA.

11 C-Metomidate PET/CT is a useful adjunct for lateralization of primary aldosteronism in routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical practice experience of ¹¹ C-Metomidate PET/CT as an adjunct to adrenal vein sampling (AVS) in the lateralization of aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) in primary aldosteronism (PA).

CONTEXT

Accurate lateralization of APA in the setting of PA offers the potential for surgical cure and improved long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Challenges associated with AVS, the current gold standard lateralization modality, mean that only a small proportion of potentially eligible patients currently make it through to surgery. This has prompted consideration of alternative strategies for lateralization, including the application of novel molecular PET tracers such as ¹¹ C-Metomidate.

DESIGN

Clinical Service Evaluation/Retrospective audit.

PATIENTS

Fifteen individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of PA, undergoing lateralization with ¹¹ C-Metomidate PET/CT prior to final clinical decision on surgical vs medical management.

MEASUREMENTS

All patients underwent screening aldosterone renin ratio (ARR), followed by confirmatory testing with the seated saline infusion test, according to Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines. Adrenal glands were imaged using dedicated adrenal CT. ¹¹ C-Metomidate PET/CT was undertaken due to equivocal or failed AVS. Management outcomes were assessed by longitudinal measurement of blood pressure, ARR, number of hypertensive medications following adrenalectomy or institution of medical therapy.

RESULTS

We describe the individual lateralization and clinical outcomes for 15 patients with PA.

CONCLUSION

¹¹ C-Metomidate PET/CT in conjunction with adrenal CT and AVS provided useful information which aided clinical decision-making for PA within a multidisciplinary hypertension clinic.

Associations between glycaemic control and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Introduction

Hyperglycaemia increases succinate concentrations and succinate receptor activation in the kidney resulting in renin release. The aim of our study was to determine if there is an association between glycaemic control as evidenced by glycated haemoglobin values and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Galway University Hospitals between December 2014 and March 2015. Participants ( n = 66) were identified following interrogation of the electronic database for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Baseline clinical demographics, aldosterone, plasma renin activity, direct renin concentration, urea and electrolytes, glycated haemoglobin, cholesterol, urine sodium and albumin creatinine ratio were recorded.

Results

There was a significant positive linear correlation between glycated haemoglobin and renin (both plasma renin activity [ P = 0.002] and direct renin concentration [ P = 0.008]) and between serum creatinine and aldosterone measured using both radioimmunoassay ( P = 0.008) and immunochemiluminometric assay ( P = 0.008). A significant negative linear correlation was demonstrated between serum sodium and plasma renin activity ( P = 0.005) and direct renin concentration ( P = 0.015) and between estimated glomerular filtration rate and aldosterone measured using radioimmunoassay ( P = 0.02) and immunochemiluminometric assay ( P = 0.016). A significant negative linear correlation existed between urine sodium and plasma renin activity ( P = 0.04) and aldosterone measured using radioimmunoassay ( P = 0.045).

Conclusions

There is a direct positive association between glycaemic control and renin. We advocate for renin measurement to be part of the diabetologist's armamentarium to assess, guide and optimize therapeutic strategies in patients with diabetes.

Screening for primary aldosteronism using the newly developed IDS-iSYS® automated assay system

BACKGROUND

The recommended approach to screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in at-risk populations is to determine the ratio of aldosterone concentration (serum (SAC)/plasma (PAC)) to renin measured in plasma as activity (PRA) or concentration (DRC). However, lack of assay standardisation mandates the need for method-specific decision thresholds and clinical validation in the local population.

AIM

The study objective was to establish method-specific aldosterone: renin ratio (ARR) cut-offs for PA in men and women using the IDS-iSYS® assay system (IDS plc).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study design was used. PAC and DRC were measured immunochemically in ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma on the IDS-iSYS® instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 437 subjects (218 men, 219 women) were recruited including: healthy normotensive volunteers (n=266) and women taking the oral contraceptive pill (OCP; n=15); patients with essential hypertension (EH; n=128); confirmed PA (n=16); adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC; n=3); Addison's disease (AD; n=4) and phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL; n=5). In this population, an ARR cut-off at >37.4 pmol/mIU provided 100% diagnostic sensitivity, 96% specificity and positive likelihood ratio for PA of 23:1. When the ARR decision threshold was stratified according to gender, a cut-off of >26.1 pmol/mIU in men and >113.6 pmol/mIU in women resulted in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that decision thresholds for PA should not only be method-specific but also gender-specific. However, given the small number of PA patients (n=16), particularly women (n=4), further validation through a prospective study with a larger PA cohort is required before the thresholds presented here could be recommended for routine clinical use.

Hypertension: The role of biochemistry in the diagnosis and management

Hypertension is defined as a persistently elevated blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg. It is an important treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, with a high prevalence in the general population. The most common cause, essential hypertension, is a widespread disease - however, secondary hypertension is under investigated and under diagnosed. Collectively, hypertension is referred to as a "silent killer" - frequently it displays no overt symptomatology. It is a leading risk factor for death and disability globally, with >40% of persons aged over 25 having hypertension. A vast spectrum of conditions result in hypertension spanning essential through resistant, to patients with an overt endocrine cause. A significant number of patients with hypertension have multiple cardiovascular risk factors at the time of presentation. Both routine and specialised biochemical investigations are paramount for the evaluation of these patients and their subsequent management. Biochemical testing serves to identify those hypertensive individuals who are at higher risk on the basis of evidence of dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment, or target organ damage and to exclude identifiable causes of hypertension. The main target of biochemical testing is the identification of patients with a specific and treatable aetiology of hypertension. Information gleaned from biochemical investigation is used to risk stratify patients and tailor the type and intensity of subsequent management and treatment. We review the approach to the biochemical investigation of patients presenting with hypertension and propose a diagnostic algorithm for work-up.

SFE/SFHTA/AFCE Consensus on Primary Aldosteronism, part 2: First diagnostic steps

In patients with suspected primary aldosteronism (PA), the first diagnostic step, screening, must have high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is used because it has higher sensitivity and lower variability than other measures (serum potassium, plasma aldosterone, urinary aldosterone). ARR is calculated from the plasma aldosterone (PA) and plasma renin activity (PRA) or direct plasma renin (DR) values. These measurements must be taken under standard conditions: in the morning, more than 2hours after awakening, in sitting position after 5 to 15minutes, with normal dietary salt intake, normal serum potassium level and without antihypertensive drugs significantly interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. To rule out ARR elevation due to very low renin values, ARR screening is applied only if aldosterone is>240pmol/l (90pg/ml); DR values<5mIU/l are assimilated to 5mIU/l and PRA values<0.2ng/ml/h to 0.2ng/ml/h. We propose threshold ARR values depending on the units used and a conversion factor (pg to mIU) for DR. If ARR exceeds threshold, PA should be suspected and exploration continued. If ARR is below threshold or if plasma aldosterone is<240pmol/l (90pg/ml) on two measurements, diagnosis of PA is excluded.