Cosmetic preservative labelling on the Thai market

Cosmetic preservative labelling in philippine products in accordance with philippine regulations

BACKGROUND

Preservatives are usually added to a wide array of consumer products to prevent growth of microbes and to prevent product destabilization and degradation. However, many of these preservatives are common skin sensitizers and may cause allergic contact dermatitis. The amount of preservatives may vary per country or region according to their respective legislation, and may be reported in differences in prevalence rates of contact dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine and identify preservatives in consumer products in accordance with Philippine legislation. To verify the accuracy of the list of ingredients of Philippine cosmetic products as legislated by the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drug Administration.

METHODS

A total of 65 commonly used Philippine consumer products ranging from liquid facial and body washes, bar soaps, laundry detergents, feminine hygiene washes and wipes, shampoos and conditioners, sunblock, and moisturizers were selected. Ingredients noted on labels were documented. Products were subsequently investigated chemically for the presence of either methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and formaldehyde.

RESULTS

The preservatives most commonly used in cosmetic products in the Philippine market are: methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI), methylisothiazolinone (MI), and/or formaldehyde. In accordance with Philippine legislation, almost all products provided a detailed ingredient list as printed on the packaging. Measurements of MCI/MI ranged from less than 1 ppm to 16 ppm, and MI only ranged from less than 1 ppm to 66 ppm, whereas formaldehyde was noted to range from less than 2.5 ppm to greater than 40 ppm in the products tested. Most products are manufactured by international brands with a few products being manufactured locally.

CONCLUSIONS

The preservatives found in cosmetic products were MCI, MI and formaldehyde. There were discrepancies found in the preservatives and labelling of these products, with a majority of investigated Philippine products labelled inaccurately with varying concentrations of preservatives. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The development of dual-function solid-phase method as extraction and a decomposition reaction media for the determination of a formaldehyde releaser, imidazolidinyl urea, in cosmetics

In this study, we present a simple method to determine imidazolidinyl urea (IU) in cosmetics using a solid phase as both a decomposition field and an extraction phase. IU is difficult to quantify because it is a mixture of allantoin-formaldehyde condensation products that are easily decomposed to release formaldehyde. In our method, IU is decomposed to allantoin and 1-[4-(hydroxymethyl)-2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl]urea (4-HU) on an aminopropyl-bonded silica solid phase. Subsequent high-performance liquid chromatography enables quantification of the resulting allantoin and 4-HU. The quantified value was converted to the total allantoin amount on the basis of molecular weight, and the calculated value was compared with that of an IU reference standard to determine the contents. The calibration curves of the decomposed IU as allantoin and 4-HU were both linear over an IU solution concentration range from 0.05 to 0.65% (w/v). The recoveries from lotion, body soap, and conditioners, which contained 0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.6% (w/w) of IU, respectively, ranged from 88.2 to 107.5%. The relative standard deviation values for the recovery tests of six replicates ranged from 1.03 to 6.97%. The intra-laboratory precisions for the lotion and conditioner A containing 0.3% IU were 3.02 and 4.94%, respectively. This method was well validated and would be helpful in determining IU in cosmetic samples.

Ultraviolet filter, fragrance and preservative allergens in New Zealand sunscreens

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Allergic contact dermatitis, photoallergic contact dermatitis and irritant reactions to sunscreens are common reasons for dermatology consultation. Patch testing for contact allergy relies on up-to-date knowledge of allergen exposures. The aim of this study was to investigate contact allergens and photoallergens in sunscreens commercially sold on the shelves of supermarkets and pharmacies in New Zealand.

METHODS

A comprehensive market data review of suppliers' websites was performed from March to August 2019 to obtain a list of the commonly sold sunscreens in our region. Ingredients were collated and analysed according to International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI) names. Ultraviolet (UV) filters, preservatives and fragrances were included for analysis. Place of sale and cost of sunscreens were also recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-five sunscreens were analysed: 36% sold in supermarkets, 43% in pharmacies and the remainder available in both. The most frequent UV filters were butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (contained in 70% of products) followed by octocrylene (63%) and homosalate (50%). The common photoallergen benzophenone 3 was found in 19% of products. Phenoxyethanol was the most common preservative (68%) followed by disodium EDTA (30%) and propylparaben (26%). Two sunscreens contained methylisothiazolinone. Sixty-one per cent contained at least one fragrance, the most frequent being limonene (17%) and linalool (13%). There was an average of 1.1 New Zealand baseline series allergens per product (range 0 to 6, standard deviation 1.27).

CONCLUSION

Common allergens including those with high sensitising potential were frequently found in New Zealand sunscreen. Knowledge of ingredients used by manufacturers is useful in dermatological assessment of skin contact reactions.

Controversy around parabens: Alternative strategies for preservative use in cosmetics and personal care products

Parabens usage as preservatives in cosmetics and personal care products have been debated among scientists and consumers. Parabens are easy to production, effective and cheap, but its safety status remains controversial. Other popular cosmetics preservatives are formaldehyde, triclosan, methylisothiazolinone, methylchloroisothiazolinone, phenoxyethanol, benzyl alcohol and sodium benzoate. Although their high antimicrobial effectiveness, they also exhibit some adverse health effects. Lately, scientists have shown that natural substances such as essential oils and plant extracts present antimicrobial potential. However, their use in cosmetic is a challenge. The present review article is a comprehensive summary of the available methods to prevent microbial contamination of cosmetics and personal care products, which can allow reducing the use of parabens in these products.

Risk communication for labeling all ingredients in consumer products

The labeling of all ingredients contained in consumer products has been requested by consumers concerned regarding their safety. Consequently, regulatory agencies have set guidelines for industries on how to provide safety information regarding the ingredients in their products. However, discordant opinions were raised from stakeholders, resulting in the formation of a risk communication forum among industries, regulatory agencies, consumer groups, and academia. There are several methods that might be utilized to provide ingredient information to consumers: (1) listing all ingredients on the label of products, (2) providing major ingredients on the label of products, (3) presenting all ingredients on the websites of each manufacturer, and (4) listing major ingredients on the label of products and the remainder of ingredients (not on the label) on the websites. Each method might have its own advantages and disadvantages with respect to providing the information regarding the names of the ingredients used in consumer products to the consumers. A continuous risk communication forum might be an effective tool to facilitate an improved understanding of chemical information, toxicological science, regulatory guidelines, labeling methods, and consumers' concern. This study suggests that risk communication efforts may be helpful and a good opportunity for stakeholders to exchange opinions and reach a harmonious conclusion on labeling of consumer products ingredients.

Skin irritation potential of cosmetic preservatives: An exposure-relevant study

BACKGROUND

Preservatives represent one of the main causes of skin irritation and contact allergies.

AIMS

To comprehensively evaluate the skin irritation potential of phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, propylparaben, imidazolidinyl urea, and DMDM hydantoin under regulatory acceptable concentrations.

METHODS

A patch test and repeated open application test (ROAT) were applied to evaluate skin irritation in vivo. In vitro alternative methods consisting of the keratinocyte cytotoxicity assay, red blood cell (RBC) test, and hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) were performed to elucidate the mechanism of preservative-induced irritation responses.

RESULTS

The patch test showed that all test substances showed a weak erythema response. Propylparaben had the highest occlusive irritancy potential in the patch test, owing to damage to the cell membrane. The two formaldehyde releasers showed noticeable skin irritation potential in the ROAT through their cytotoxicity to keratinocytes, while a visible response was observed after applying phenoxyethanol and the two parabens. No filtration was noticed in the in vivo tests, which might be attributed to the failure of subcutaneous vessel alteration by the preservatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used cosmetic preservatives have minor skin irritation potential with mild erythema reaction under practical use, especially formaldehyde releasers and propylparaben.

Methylchloroisothiazolinone and/or Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergies in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Methylchloroisothiazolinone, in combination with methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), and MI alone are common preservatives. The incidences of MCI/MI and MI-alone contact allergies have risen markedly worldwide, leading to changes in their use in products.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine the incidences of positive patch test reactions and factors associated with MCI and/or MI contact allergies during the recent decade in Thailand.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent patch testing at Siriraj Hospital from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of positive reactions, histories, and clinical data of MCI/MI and MI-alone contact allergy patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 2789 patients undergoing patch testing, most were female (76.1%). The mean ± SD age was 42.7 ± 15.7 years. Positive reactions to MCI/MI increased from 2009 to 2016 before declining. The MCI/MI contact allergy was most common in females, middle-aged patients, and those with metal allergy histories, with the hands and arms being the predominant sites. However, MI-alone contact allergy was more common in males and mainly at the trunk. Its incidence significantly declined for the last 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidences of MCI/MI and MI-alone contact allergies began to decline because the Food and Drug Administration Thailand regulations restricted their use. The risk factors for the allergies reported in this study provide important information for patient care.

Improvement in histology, enzymatic activity, and redox state of the liver following administration of Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark oil in rats with established hepatotoxicity

Formaldehyde (FA) is an environmentally-available pollutant. Since the liver acts as a detoxifier in the human body, it is the first and most affected organ in individuals exposed to higher-than-normal amounts of FA. FA mainly alters oxidant/antioxidant status and initiates oxidative stress, and by means, causes functional damage to the liver. Thus, it is important to identify natural bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties in order to be used as food additives. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) is a popular flavor and also a medicinal plant with a variety of beneficial effects. In the present original study, cinnamon essential oil (CEO) has been administrated at doses of 10, 20, and 100 mg/kg, orally, to hepatotoxicity rat models caused by FA (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Liver enzymes and its histology were assessed and oxidative stress biomarkers in the liver tissue were also examined. CEO administration caused a significant increase in superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase and a prominent decrease in nitric oxide levels in the liver tissue. Also, in serum samples, CEO significantly reduced the elevated amounts of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. When assessed histologically, portal area and central vein fibrosis alongside with the hepatocytes' hypereosinophilia and swelling, focal inflammation, and necrotic areas were found to be prominently decreased in the CEO group. In conclusion, our study suggested that the CEO may have the potential for being used against FA-induced hepatotoxicity.

Associated factors of widespread pattern of dermatitis among patch test population: 12-Year retrospective study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Widespread dermatitis is often associated with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Multiple factors influence this widespread pattern of dermatitis. We aim to study the associated factors in patch-tested patients who presented with widespread pattern of dermatitis.

METHOD

This retrospective, case-control study was conducted on patients with dermatitis who were patch tested during January 2005 to December 2016. The demographic data, patient and family histories, diagnoses, and patch test findings were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 3201 included patients, 645 (20.2%) had widespread pattern of dermatitis. Being male, age >60, and history of either atopic dermatitis (AD) or metal allergy were significantly associated with the widespread dermatitis pattern. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that preservatives were the significant offending allergens, especially methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), and methylisothiazolinone (MI) alone.

CONCLUSION

Widespread pattern of dermatitis is associated with gender, age, underlying atopic dermatitis and a history of metal allergy. Preservatives are the significant offending allergens of widespread dermatitis, especially MCI/MI, and MI alone. A thorough history taking and patch testing, including preservatives, are necessary to determine the cause of widespread pattern of dermatitis.

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Contact allergy is common, affecting 27% of the general population in Europe. Original publications, including case reports, published since 2016 (inclusive) were identified with the aim of collating a full review of current problems in the field. To this end, a literature search employing methods of systematic reviewing was performed in the Medline^® and Web of Science™ databases on 28 January 2018, using the search terms (“contact sensitization” or “contact allergy”). Of 446 non-duplicate publications identified by above search, 147 were excluded based on scrutiny of title, abstract and key words. Of the remaining 299 examined in full text, 291 were deemed appropriate for inclusion, and main findings were summarised in topic sections. In conclusion, diverse sources of exposures to chemicals of widely-differing types and structures, continue to induce sensitisation in man and may result in allergic contact dermatitis. Many of the chemicals are “evergreen” but others are “newcomers”. Vigilance and proper investigation (patch testing) are required to detect and inform of the presence of these haptens to which our populations remain exposed.