Treatment with corticosteroids and the risk of anastomotic leakage following lower gastrointestinal surgery: a literature survey

Use of the Staple Line Reinforcement Tool to Reduce the Rate and Completely Avoid Anastomotic Leakage in Functional End-to-End Anastomosis

Background In our hospital, anastomotic leakage (AL) is observed in approximately 2% of functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) cases annually. It is also usually observed at the staple line of the entry hole closure in several reoperation cases. This study aimed to investigate whether AL would occur in FEEA using a new staple line reinforcement tool, ECHELON ENDOPATH® Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) (Ethicon, Raritan, NJ, USA). Methods A total of 380 patients (400 anastomoses performed from September 2021, when SLR use began, to the end of February 2024) were compared retrospectively, with a total of 459 patients (469 anastomoses performed from April 2019 to August 2021), the same period before SLR was initiated. In the SLR group, ECHELON FLEX® (Ethicon) 60 mm and GST® system (Ethicon) cartridges were used as stapling devices. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results No AL was observed in the SLR group, with a significant difference between the SLR and non-SLR groups (p=0.0021). By anastomotic organ, the AL rate significantly decreased for small intestine-colon anastomosis (p=0.023), but there was no significant difference in small intestine-small intestine anastomosis (p=0.061) or colon-colon anastomosis (p=0.35) between groups. Conclusion Reinforcing the staple line using SLR in FEEA may reduce the AL rate. Although AL has not been observed, we will continue to investigate its causes should it occur in the future.

Targeting Diverse Wounds and Scars: Recent Innovative Bio-design of Microneedle Patch for Comprehensive Management

Wounds and the subsequent formation of scars constitute a unified and complex phased process. Effective treatment is crucial; however, the diverse therapeutic approaches for different wounds and scars, as well as varying treatment needs at different stages, present significant challenges in selecting appropriate interventions. Microneedle patch (MNP), as a novel minimally invasive transdermal drug delivery system, has the potential for integrated and programmed treatment of various diseases and has shown promising applications in different types of wounds and scars. In this comprehensive review, the latest applications and biotechnological innovations of MNPs in these fields are thoroughly explored, summarizing their powerful abilities to accelerate healing, inhibit scar formation, and manage related symptoms. Moreover, potential applications in various scenarios are discussed. Additionally, the side effects, manufacturing processes, and material selection to explore the clinical translational potential are investigated. This groundwork can provide a theoretical basis and serve as a catalyst for future innovations in the pursuit of favorable therapeutic options for skin tissue regeneration.

Tube Stoma for the Management of Ileocolic Anastomotic Leak in a Patient With Metastatic Colon Cancer

This case involves a 53-year-old male who was diagnosed with stenotic ascending colon cancer and peritoneal metastatic deposits. He was initially planned for cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC), along with resection of the primary tumor in the form of right hemicolectomy. Intraoperatively, the disease was found to be more extensive than anticipated. Consequently, the plan was modified to include debulking right hemicolectomy with hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis and extensive peritoneal procedures. Postoperatively, he experienced an anastomotic leak, leading to another laparotomy. However, due to anatomical challenges, creating a stoma was considered unsafe. Therefore, innovative interventions were performed, including controlling the anastomotic defect with a 30Fr Foley catheter without disrupting the anastomosis. A collaborative effort from various medical teams facilitated the patient's discharge home after an extended stay in the critical care unit (CCU).

Endoscopic management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery in a Moroccan center: A case series and literature review

Endoscopic management has become an alternate treatment to a revision surgery for colorectal fistulas. Eight patients who were treated by endoscopy for postoperative anastomotic leakage to colorectal cancer were included. A univariate analysis was carried out to determine the predictive factors of success. All our patients were treated using metallic clips. The primary efficiency of this technique was 50%. In a univariate analysis, the size of the fistula and its distance from the anal margin had an influence on the efficiency of the endoscopic treatment, which was not the case for either the surgical technique or the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. This endoscopic treatment is effective and represents a more secure alternative than revision surgery. In our study, the use of metallic clips showed a 50% success rate, going up to 100% for the group of patients with a fistula ostium of a size ⩽1 cm, proving the necessity of using this technique.

Effects of the preoperative use and dosage of steroids on postoperative complications of gastric cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of preoperative steroid administration, including dosage, on complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 2019 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

RESULTS

Among the total 764 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, 17 were on steroid medication preoperatively (SD group) and 747 were not (ND group). The hemoglobin, serum albumin levels, and respiratory functions were significantly lower in the SD group than in the ND group. The incidence of postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (C-D) ≥ 2 was significantly greater in the SD group than in the ND group (64.7% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001). Intra-abdominal infection (35.2% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (11.8% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001) occurred more frequently in the SD group than in the ND group. On multiple logistic regression analysis for C-D ≥ 3 postoperative complications, the odds ratio for oral steroid use ≥ 5 mg per day as prednisolone had the highest value, of 13.0 (95% confidence interval 2.46-76.2, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative oral steroid use was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Furthermore, the complication rate appears to increase as the oral steroid dosage is increased.

Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Despite significant improvements in surgical technique, postoperative complications still occur in a fair percentage of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The most feared complication is anastomotic leakage. It negatively affects short-term prognosis, with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality, higher hospitalization time and costs. Moreover, it may require further surgery with the creation of a permanent or temporary stoma. While there is no doubt about the negative impact of anastomotic dehiscence on the short-term prognosis of patients operated on for CRC, still under discussion is its impact on the long-term prognosis. Some authors have described an association between leakage and reduced overall survival, disease-free survival, and increased recurrence, while other Authors have found no real impact of dehiscence on long term prognosis. The purpose of this paper is to review all the literature about the impact of anastomotic dehiscence on long-term prognosis after CRC surgery. The main risk factors of leakage and early detection markers are also summarized.

Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for complex colorectal lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated favorable safety results; however, large studies representing a generalizable estimation of adverse events (AEs) are lacking. Our aim was to provide further insight in AEs after eFTR.

METHODS

Data from all registered eFTR procedures in the German and Dutch colorectal full-thickness resection device registries between July 2015 and March 2021 were collected. Safety outcomes included immediate and late AEs.

RESULTS

Of 1892 procedures, the overall AE rate was 11.3% (213/1892). No AE-related mortality occurred. Perforations occurred in 2.5% (47/1892) of all AEs, 57.4% (27/47) of immediate AEs, and 42.6% (20/47) of delayed AEs. Successful endoscopic closure was achieved in 29.8% of cases (13 immediate and 1 delayed), and antibiotic treatment was sufficient in 4.3% (2 delayed). The appendicitis rate for appendiceal lesions was 9.9% (13/131), and 46.2% (6/13) could be treated conservatively. The severe AE rate requiring surgery was 2.2% (42/1892), including delayed perforations in .9% (17/1892) and immediate perforations in .7% (13/1892). Delayed perforations occurred between days 1 and 10 (median, 2) after eFTR, and 58.8% (10/17) were located on the left side. Other severe AEs were appendicitis (.4%, 7/1892), luminal stenosis (.1%, 2/1892), delayed bleeding (.1%, 1/1892), pain after eFTR close to the dentate line (.1%, 1/1892), and grasper entrapment in the clip (.1%, 1/1892).

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal eFTR is a safe procedure with a low risk for severe AEs in everyday practice and without AE-related mortality. These results further support the position of eFTR as an established minimally invasive technique for complex colorectal lesions.

ECCO Topical Review: Roadmap to Optimal Peri-Operative Care in IBD

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimize outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of IBD healthcare providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation, and immediate postoperative care.

CONCLUSION

Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most severe complications following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Indeed, leaks that may occur after any type of intestinal anastomosis are commonly associated with a higher reoperation rate and an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. At first, our review aims to identify specific preoperative, intraoperative and perioperative factors that eventually lead to the development of anastomotic dehiscence based on the current literature. We will also investigate the role of several biomarkers in predicting the presence of ALs following colorectal surgery. Despite significant improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a high index of suspicion of this complication, the incidence of AL remained stable during the last decades. Thus, gaining a better knowledge of the risk factors that influence the AL rates may help identify high-risk surgical patients requiring more intensive perioperative surveillance. Furthermore, prompt diagnosis of this severe complication may help improve patient survival. To date, several studies have identified predictive biomarkers of ALs, which are most commonly associated with the inflammatory response to colorectal surgery. Interestingly, early diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of this complication may offer a significant opportunity to guide clinical judgement and decision-making.

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) in Patients with Melanoma: Surgical Considerations by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC)

Exciting advances in melanoma systemic therapies have presented the opportunity for surgical oncologists and their multidisciplinary colleagues to test the neoadjuvant systemic treatment approach in high-risk, resectable metastatic melanomas. Here we describe the state of the science of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for melanoma, focusing on the surgical aspects and the key role of the surgical oncologist in this treatment paradigm. This paper summarizes the past decade of developments in melanoma treatment and the current evidence for NAST in stage III melanoma specifically. Issues of surgical relevance are discussed, including the risk of progression on NAST prior to surgery. Technical aspects, such as the definition of resectability for melanoma and the extent and scope of routine surgery are presented. Other important issues, such as the utility of radiographic response evaluation and method of pathologic response evaluation, are addressed. Surgical complications and perioperative management of NAST related adverse events are considered. The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium has the goal of harmonizing NAST trials in melanoma to facilitate rapid advances with new approaches, and facilitating the comparison of results across trials evaluating different treatment regimens. Our ultimate goals are to provide definitive proof of the safety and efficacy of NAST in melanoma, sufficient for NAST to become an acceptable standard of care, and to leverage this platform to allow more personalized, biomarker-driven, tailored approaches to subsequent treatment and surveillance.

Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery

The safety of colorectal surgery for oncological disease is steadily improving, but anastomotic leakage is still the most feared and devastating complication from both a surgical and oncological point of view. Anastomotic leakage affects the outcome of the surgery, increases the times and costs of hospitalization, and worsens the prognosis in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. Anastomotic leakage has a wide range of clinical features ranging from radiological only finding to peritonitis and sepsis with multi-organ failure. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been identified as early predictors of anastomotic leakage starting from postoperative day 2-3, but abdominal-pelvic computed tomography scan is still the gold standard for the diagnosis. Several treatments can be adopted for anastomotic leakage. However, there is not a universally accepted flowchart for the management, which should be individualized based on patient's general condition, anastomotic defect size and location, indication for primary resection and presence of the proximal stoma. Non-operative management is usually preferred in patients who underwent proximal faecal diversion at the initial operation. Laparoscopy can be attempted after minimal invasive surgery and can reduce surgical stress in patients allowing a definitive treatment. Reoperation for sepsis control is rarely necessary in those patients who already have a diverting stoma at the time of the leak, especially in extraperitoneal anastomoses. In patients without a stoma who do not require abdominal reoperation for a contained pelvic leak, there are several treatment options, including laparoscopic diverting ileostomy combined with trans-anal anastomotic tube drainage, percutaneous drainage or recently developed endoscopic procedures, such as stent or clip placement or endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy. We describe the current approaches to treat this complication, as well as the clinical tests necessary to diagnose and provide an effective therapy.

Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) is an important treatment approach for rectal cancer. The relationship, however, between nRT and postoperative complications is still controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate such concerns.

Methods

The electronic literature from 1983 to 2021 was searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Postoperative complications after nRT were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated by the random-effects model. Statistical analysis was conducted by Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14.

Results

A total of 23,723 patients from 49 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that nRT increased the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) compared to upfront surgery (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41; p=0.004). Subgroup analysis suggested that both long-course (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40; p=0.02) and short-course radiotherapy (OR = 1.25, 95% CI, 1.02-1.53; p=0.04) increased the incidence of AL. In addition, nRT was the main risk factor for wound infection and pelvic abscess. The pooled data in randomized controlled trials, however, indicated that nRT was not associated with AL (OR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.82-1.26; p=0.91).

Conclusions

nRT may increase the risk of AL, wound infection, and pelvic abscess compared to upfront surgery among patients with rectal cancer.

Surgical management in immunosuppressed patients with sigmoid diverticulitis, still a challenge: a single-center observational study

PURPOSE

The question of whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients should be offered elective sigmoidectomy following a single episode of diverticulitis is controversial. We intended to examine the perioperative outcome of IS and immunocompetent (IC) patients after sigmoid resection.

METHODS

A single institutional cohort study was conducted, including all surgically treated patients with sigmoid diverticulitis between 2004 and 2021. IS and IC patients were further subdivided into emergency and elective cases. Morbidity and mortality in both groups and factors influencing surgical outcome were examined using uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were included in the final analysis. Emergency surgery was performed on 98 patients while 183 patients underwent elective sigmoid resection. Emergency sigmoidectomy demonstrates significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates in IS patients as compared to IC patients (81.81% vs. 42.1%; p = 0.001, respectively 27.27% vs. 3.94%; p = 0.004), while major morbidity and mortality was similar in both groups in the elective setting (IS: 23.52% vs. IC: 13.85%; p = 0.488, respectively IS: 5.88% vs. IC: 0%; p = 1). On multivariate regression analysis for major postoperative morbidity, ASA score [OR 1.837; (95% CI 1.166-2.894); p = 0.009] and emergency surgery under immunosuppression [OR 3.065; (95% CI 1.128-8.326); p = 0.028] were significant. In-hospital mortality was significantly related to age [OR 1.139; (95% CI 1.012-1.282); p = 0.031], preoperative CRP count [OR 1.137; (95% CI 1.028-1.259); p = 0.013], and immunosuppression [OR 35.246; (95% CI 1.923-646.176), p = 0.016] on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients demonstrates higher efficacy and safety when compared to sigmoid resection in the emergency setting.

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer

Anastomotic leak (AL) represents one of the most detrimental complications after colorectal surgery. The patient-related factors and surgery-related factors leading to AL have been identified in previous studies. Through early identification and timely adjustment of risk factors, preventive measures can be taken to reduce potential AL. However, there are still many problems associated with AL. The debate about preventive measures such as preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), intraoperative drainage, and surgical scope also continues. Recently, the gut microbiota has received more attention due to its important role in various diseases. Although the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota on AL have not been validated completely, new strategies that manipulate intrinsic mechanisms are expected to prevent and treat AL. Moreover, laboratory examinations for AL prediction and methods for blood perfusion assessment are likely to be promoted in clinical practice. This review outlines possible risk factors for AL and suggests some preventive measures in terms of patient, surgery, and gut microbiota.

Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery

Anastomotic leakage is a potentially severe complication occurring after colorectal surgery and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, permanent stoma formation, and cancer recurrence. Multiple risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, and these can allow for better prevention and an earlier diagnosis of this significant complication. There are nonmodifiable factors such as male gender, comorbidities and distance of tumor from anal verge, and modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption, obesity, preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative use of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Perioperative blood transfusion was shown to be an important risk factor for anastomotic failure. Recent studies on the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery found no statistical difference in anastomotic leakage rate compared with open surgery. A diverting stoma at the time of primary surgery does not appear to reduce the leak rate but may reduce its clinical consequences and the need for additional surgery if anastomotic leakage does occur. It is still debatable if preoperative bowel preparation should be used, especially for left colon and rectal resections, but studies have shown similar incidence of postoperative leak rate.

Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak

Anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding the impact of anastomotic leaks and their risk factors can help the surgeon avoid any modifiable pitfalls. The diagnosis of an anastomotic leak can be elusive but can be discerned by the patient's global clinical assessment, adjunctive laboratory data and radiological assessment. The use of inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin have recently gained traction as harbingers for a leak. A CT scan and/or a water soluble contrast study can further elucidate the location and severity of a leak. Further intervention is then individualized on the spectrum of simple observation with resolution or surgical intervention.

Perioperative Use of Glucocorticoids and Intraoperative Hypotension May Affect the Incidence of Postoperative Infection in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

In patients undergoing surgical resection for gastric cancer, postoperative complications—in particular, postoperative infections—remain an important problem and can result in delayed recovery and increased postoperative mortality.

Objective

To investigate the association between perioperative anesthesia management and postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A single-center study performed from April 1, 2015, to June 30, 2018, at Peking University Cancer Hospital.

Patients

Patients who underwent resection for gastric cancer.

Main Outcome Measures

Demographic information, perioperative data (including anesthesia-related data, surgery-related data, and cancer diagnosis), and information on postoperative recovery were recorded. The primary outcome was incidence of postoperative infection; the secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. The associations between perioperative factors and postoperative infectious complications were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models and the classification tree method.

Results

A total of 880 patients were included in the study; of these, 111 (12.6%) had postoperative infectious complications during hospitalization, including 78 surgical site infections and 62 remote infections. After correction for confounding factors on logistic multivariable analysis, perioperative use of glucocorticoids was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative infection (hazard ratio 0.968, 95% confidence interval 0.939 to 0.997, P=0.029), and intraoperative systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for >10 min was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative infection (hazard ratio 2.112, 95% confidence interval 1.174 to 3.801, P=0.013). In addition, older age, preoperative hypoproteinemia, and total gastrectomy were identified as independent predictors of postoperative infection.

Conclusion

For patients with gastric cancer, perioperative use of glucocorticoids and avoiding intraoperative hypotension may decrease the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

Colorectal: Management of Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery

The complications encountered in colorectal surgery can be categorized into early and late. The most consequential early complication is anastomotic leak, which can be managed with percutaneous drainage or reoperation, depending on the patient's clinical status. Other early complications include anastomotic bleeding, surgical site infection, ileus, postoperative urinary retention, and stoma-related complications. Most stoma-related complications can be managed without reoperation. Late complications, such as bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and anastomotic stricture, are usually managed expectantly and should be discussed in the preoperative setting. There is growing interest in prevention of postoperative outcomes with preoperative nutritional supplementation and prehabilitation.

Acute abdomen in the immunocompromised patient: WSES, SIS-E, WSIS, AAST, and GAIS guidelines

Immunocompromised patients are a heterogeneous and diffuse category frequently presenting to the emergency department with acute surgical diseases. Diagnosis and treatment in immunocompromised patients are often complex and must be multidisciplinary. Misdiagnosis of an acute surgical disease may be followed by increased morbidity and mortality. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of surgical disease occur; these patients may seek medical assistance late because their symptoms are often ambiguous. Also, they develop unique surgical problems that do not affect the general population. Management of this population must be multidisciplinary.This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Surgical Infection Society Europe (SIS-E), World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), and Global Alliance for Infection in Surgery (GAIS) joined guidelines about the management of acute abdomen in immunocompromised patients.

Evidence for Roux-en-Y Pancreatic Duct Drainage Versus Standard Anastomosis in Pancreatic Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic transplantation is usually performed simultaneously with renal transplantation in the setting of end-stage nephropathy and type 1 diabetes. Surgical methods for dealing with exocrine secretions include bladder drainage, direct duodenojejunostomy and Roux-en-Y (ReY) enteric drainage. Roux-en-Y may confer an advantage over duodenojejunostomy because it distances enteric content from the transplant duodenal anastomosis. We examined the effect of enteric drainage method on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the UK transplant registry on 2172 consecutive pancreatic transplants. Early graft loss was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included return to theater, length of inpatient stay, readmission with pancreatitis, graft survival, and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no protective effect of ReY drainage (early graft loss, 4.6% vs 3.1%, P = 0.30; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.52; P = 0.91). There was a significant association between ReY and return to theater, reflecting either the technique or indication for ReY (multivariate odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.06; P < 0.01). The effect of transplant center on graft survival was assessed and adjusted for.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of a protective benefit of ReY drainage over duodenojejunostomy, but there was an increased risk of return to theater.

A case of sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with mixed tissue connected disease: A case report

Introduction

Patients with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) have higher rates of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) than the general population. PAH is a risk for perioperative respiratory and heart failure, and marked edema of colonic stoma after sigmoidectomy. We report a case of sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer in a patient with PAH associated with MCTD for whom perioperative treatment was planned to control pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), and a surgical strategy to avoid complications attributable to PAH and MCTD was employed.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old woman with sigmoid cancer and severe PAH associated with MCTD underwent surgery. We controlled PAH by using intravenous epoprostenol. We selected open surgery without laparoscopy and Hartmann's operation. After surgery, severe perioperative complications were not detected, and the patient discharged from hospital 17 days after the operation.

Discussion

During surgery under general anesthesia, the mortality rate of PAH is high because of heart and respiratory failure. We planned to switch the PAH treatment from an oral agent to intravenous epoprostenol only in the preoperative period, and selected open surgery. We ligated the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) below the branch of LCA to avoid marked edema of stoma. Consequently, we could avoid severe intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Controlling PAP using epoprostenol, open surgery, stoma and the ligation level for the IMA and IMV preventing are important to avoid perioperative complications of sigmoid colon cancer complicated by severe PAH.

•

The patient with PAH complicated by MCTD underwent Hartman’s operation for sigmoid colon cancer.

•

Control of PAH by epoprostenol preoperatively is important to prevent perioperative cardiac complications.

•

The level of ligation of the IMA and the LCA is important to avoid severe edema of stoma.

Visceral Fat and Anastomotic Leakage After Colon Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

Visceral fat is considered a risk for postoperative complications in colon cancer surgery. However, the association with anastomotic leakage as the most worrisome complication is not clear mainly because of underpowered studies.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of visceral fat as a continuous variable on anastomotic leakage in a large cohort of colon cancer resections.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study used data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit of the years 2011 through 2014 from 8 Dutch teaching hospitals. Visceral fat was assessed on the routine preoperative abdominal CT scan.

PATIENTS

A total of 2370 patients underwent colon cancer resection with primary anastomosis. There were 2011 patients operated electively and 359 in an emergency setting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect of visceral fat on anastomotic leakage after multivariable analysis was measured.

RESULTS

Visceral fat was associated with anastomotic leakage in the elective colon resection group (n = 2011) but not in emergency colon resections (n = 359). Significant confounding was found for type of resection, BMI, and sex. The association of male sex and BMI as previously reported risk factors for anastomotic leakage was explained by visceral fat.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective character and missing clinical data of known risk factors for anastomotic leakage, like smoking history and certain medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent association of visceral fat with anastomotic leakage was confined to the elective colon cancer resection group. The previously reported associations of male sex and BMI with anastomotic leakage were explained by visceral fat. Visceral fat-associated comorbidities did not influence anastomotic leakage, suggesting that its effect on colon anastomotic healing is local rather than systemic. Future risk analysis for anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery should contain visceral fat values and consider subgroup differences. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396.

ADIPOSIDAD VISCERAL Y FUGA ANASTOMTICA EN CASOS DE RESECCIN DE CNCER DE COLON

ANTECEDENTES:La acumulación de grasa visceral se considera como un factor de riesgo en caso de complicaciones postoperatorias de cirugía de cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la asociación con la fuga anastomótica como la complicación más preocupante no está clara principalmente debido a los estudios de bajo impacto disponibles.OBJETIVO:Analizar el efecto de la adiposidad visceral como una variable contínua sobre la fuga anastomótica en una gran cohorte de resecciones de cáncer de colon.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte multicéntrico retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Se utilizaron los datos de la Auditoría Colorrectal Quirúrgica Holandesa entre los años 2011 y 2014 en 8 hospitales de enseñanza de los Paises bajos. La grasa visceral fué evaluada por medio de la tomografía computada abdominal preoperatoria de rutina.PACIENTES:Un total de 2370 pacientes fueron sometidos a resección de cáncer de colon con anastomosis primaria. 2011 pacientes fueron operados electivamente y 359 en situación de emergencia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El efecto de la adiposidad visceral en la fuga anastomótica después del análisis multivariable.RESULTADOS:La grasa visceral se asoció con la fuga anastomótica en el grupo de resección electiva de colon (n = 2011) pero no en las resecciones de emergencia (n = 359). Se encontraron factores de confusión significativos para el tipo de resección, el índice de masa corporal y el género. La adiposidad visceral explica la asociación del género masculino y el índice de masa corporal como factores de riesgo reportados previamente en los casos de fugas anastomóticas.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo del estudio y la falta de datos clínicos de factores de riesgo conocidos para la fuga anastomótica, como los antecedentes de tabaquismo y el consumo de ciertos medicamentos.CONCLUSIONES:La asociación independiente de la adiposidad visceral con la fuga anastomótica se limitó al grupo de resección electiva por cáncer de colon. Las asociaciones previamente reportadas de género masculino e índice de masa corporal con fuga anastomótica se explicaron por la grasa visceral. Las comorbilidades asociadas a la grasa visceral no influyeron en la fuga anastomótica, lo que sugiere que la cicatrisación anastomótica obedece más a un factor local que a un factor sistémico. Un análisis de riesgos previsibles para fugas anastomóticas en casos de resección de cáncer de colon deben involucrar los valores de la adiposidad visceral y considerar las diferencias entre subgrupos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Surgical treatment for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a risk factor analysis

PURPOSE

While surgery is an effective treatment for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), it can be difficult, because affected patients are usually in a poor general condition. The present study investigated the risk factors of postoperative complications after surgery for SSP.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients with SSP who underwent surgery from January 2006 to March 2018 were investigated. Clinical data were reviewed, and a multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (95%) were males, and the median patient age was 72 years. Underlying lung diseases were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 58 patients (65.9%), interstitial pneumonia in 26 (29.5%), and others in 4 (4.5%). Postoperative complications developed in 21 patients (24%). Hospital mortality/prolonged length of stay occurred in 6 patients (7%). A multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative performance status (performance status 0-2 vs. 3, hazard ratio: 6.570, 95% confidence interval: 1.980-21.800) was an independent predictor of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for SSP contributed to early chest tube removal and favorable outcomes. However, rare fatal events occurred, and the patient performance status was a risk factor for postoperative complications. A careful evaluation of each patient's performance status is needed to determine the need for surgical intervention for SSP.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in the Colorectum: Results From the German Colonic FTRD Registry

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a powerful option for resection of colorectal lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection. The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) allows clip-assisted EFTR with a single-step technique. We report on results of a large nationwide FTRD registry.

METHODS

The "German colonic FTRD registry" was created to further assess efficacy and safety of the FTRD System after approval in Europe. Data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-five centers contributed 1,178 colorectal FTRD procedures. Indications for EFTR were difficult adenomas (67.1%), early carcinomas (18.4%), subepithelial tumors (6.8%), and diagnostic EFTR (1.3%). Mean lesion size was 15 × 15 mm and most lesions were pretreated endoscopically (54.1%). Technical success was 88.2% and R0 resection was achieved in 80.0%. R0 resection was significantly higher for subepithelial tumor compared with that for other lesions. No difference in R0 resection was found for smaller vs larger lesions or for colonic vs rectal procedures. Adverse events occurred in 12.1% (3.1% major events and 2.0% required surgical treatment). Endoscopic follow-up was available in 58.0% and showed residual/recurrent lesions in 13.5%, which could be managed endoscopically in most cases (77.2%).

DISCUSSION

To date, this is the largest study of colorectal EFTR using the FTRD System. The study demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety for "difficult-to-resect" colorectal lesions and confirms results of previous studies in a large "real-world" setting. Further studies are needed to compare EFTR with other advanced resection techniques and evaluate long-term outcome.

Steroids and Postoperative Complications in IBD

Corticosteroids are frequently used in the management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Although they can be very useful, their potential adverse effects have to be kept in mind. One of the situations in which these drugs should be avoided, if possible, is the perioperative setting. If a patient reaches surgery while on steroids, surgical complications will be more likely to occur, both infectious and non-infectious. Attention should be paid to this fact, within a multidisciplinary approach, that also takes into account other factors, such as nutrition.

Operative management of colonic diverticular disease in the setting of immunosuppression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressed patients with diverticular disease are at higher risk of postoperative complications, however reported rates have varied. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were included if they compared immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

RESULTS

From 204 citations, 11 studies with 2,977 immunosuppressed patients and 780,630 immunocompetent patients were included. Mortality was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for emergent surgery (RR 1.91, 95%CI 1.24-2.95, p < 0.01), but not elective surgery (RR 1.70, 95%CI 0.14-20.47, p = 0.68). Morbidity was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for elective surgery (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.02-4.65, p = 0.04), but not emergent surgery (RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.68-2.90, p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased consideration for elective operation may preclude the need for emergent surgery and the associated increase in postoperative mortality.

Laparoscopic two-stage operation for rectal cancer with refractory obstructive colitis after kidney transplantation: a case report

Background

Although obstructive colitis with colon cancer is not a rare disease, most cases can be improved with conservative therapy. We report a case of a patient who underwent a laparoscopic two-stage operation for rectal cancer with refractory obstructive colitis after kidney transplantation.

Case presentation

The patient was a 71-year-old man taking immunosuppressants who had previously undergone right living kidney transplantation for chronic nephritis. He presented to hospital complaining of abdominal pain and was diagnosed as having rectal cancer with obstructive colitis. Although conservative therapy by fasting was continued for 5 weeks, his obstructive colitis did not improve. Therefore, we decided to perform a two-stage operation. First, we performed a laparoscopic Hartmann’s operation. It took 6 months for his obstructive colitis to improve after this operation, and then we performed a laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis. There were no postoperative complications in either operation.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic two-stage operation could be one of the operative options to reduce postoperative complications in patients with comorbidities such as taking immunosuppressants.

Management of Biological Therapy Before Elective Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgeries

Increasing uptake of biologic therapy has contributed to declining surgical rates for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant number of patients on biologic therapy will go on to require surgery. The literature is conflicted with regard to the preoperative management of biologic therapy before urgent or elective IBD surgery. This article reviews the available data on postoperative complications following preoperative treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy, anti-integrin therapy, and anti-interleukin therapy.

Diverting Ostomy: For Whom, When, What, Where, and Why

Fecal diversion is an important tool in the surgical armamentarium. There is much controversy regarding which clinical scenarios warrant diversion. Throughout this article, we have analyzed the most recent literature and discussed the most common applications for the use of a diverting stoma. These include construction of diverting ileostomy or colostomy, ostomy for low colorectal/coloanal anastomosis, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticular disease, and obstructing colorectal cancer. We conclude the following: diverting loop ileostomy is preferred to loop colostomy, an ostomy should be used for a pelvic anastomosis < 5 to 6 cm including coloanal anastomosis and ileo-anal-pouch anastomosis, severe perianal Crohn's disease frequently requires diversion, a primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy in the setting of diverticular perforation is safe, and a diverting stoma can be used as a bridge to primary resection in the setting of an obstructing malignancy.

Operative Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Colorectal Surgery

Anastomotic leak is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery. Although surgical techniques have improved over time, anastomotic leak is still a reality in colorectal surgery with rates ranging from as low as 1% for low-risk anastomoses, such as enteroenteric or ileocolic, to 19% for high-risk coloanal anastomoses. There are many varied risk factors for anastomotic leak. However, many of the risk factors have not been definitively proven in high-quality studies. Presumably, risk factors are cumulative and every effort should be made to optimize modifiable risk factors in the perioperative period. Treatment of anastomotic leak should start with the determination of patient stability followed by resuscitation and diagnostic imaging or operative exploration. Operative findings will dictate surgical approach with the goal of controlling sepsis and stabilizing the patient. If nonoperative treatment is undertaken, close patient monitoring is necessary to ensure control of sepsis and that intervention is undertaken if the clinical picture changes. Early intervention at each stage is key to decreasing the morbidity of anastomotic leak.

Perioperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in the setting of chronic steroid use: an MBSAQIP database analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic steroids are a treatment option for many chronic diseases but predispose patients to both weight gain and surgical complications. They therefore represent a unique interface between obesity, chronic disease, and surgical risk. As the benefits of bariatric surgery for controlling metabolic disease become more apparent, patients with chronic illnesses on corticosteroids are increasingly being referred for surgery despite an unclear safety profile. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database represents the largest bariatric-specific clinical data set for comparing outcomes in this complex patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes following bariatric surgery in the setting of chronic steroid/immunosuppression.

SETTING

University Hospital, United States.

METHODS

Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program MBSAQIP database, we identified patients on chronic corticosteroids who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastric bypass in 2015 or 2016. Unmatched as well as propensity-score and case-controlled matched cohort analyses were performed of patients on corticosteroid therapy compared with those without.

RESULTS

Of the 302,140 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastric bypass in 2015-2016, a total of 4947 (1.63%) were on chronic steroids/immunosuppressive drugs. Patients using steroids were older with significantly higher rates of co-morbid conditions. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, reoperation, readmission, bleeding, leak, and infectious complications were significantly higher in steroid users; however, in a propensity and case-control matched analysis of 8710 patients and 6598 patients, respectively, steroids were not found to be independent risk factors for poorer outcomes except for an increased rate of leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, steroid use does not independently predict poorer outcomes among bariatric surgery patients except for an increased leak rate. With appropriate patient selection based on associated co-morbid factors, primary bariatric surgery is safe in patients using corticosteroids, with an acceptable 30-day postoperative risk profile.

Progress in prevention and treatment of anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and its morbidity and mortality both rank third among all malignant tumors in China. Rectal cancer accounts for 60%-70% of cases of CRC. With the in-depth study of the pathogenesis of CRC and the mechanism of tumor metastasis, and the improvement of surgical techniques and methods, anal sphincter surgery for middle and low rectal cancer is increasing gradually. Although the quality of life of the patients improves significantly after anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer, anastomotic leakage is still one of the most common and serious complications. Studies show that the incidence of anastomotic leakage after surgery for low rectal cancer is 3%-21%, and the death rate is up to 3%. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of patients and analysis of risk factors before operation is of great significant for reducing the potential risk of anastomotic leakage and choosing surgical approach and appropriate preventive measures to prevent and reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. In this paper, we summarize the recent research on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in order to help other clinicians reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage in clinical practice.

Full-Thickness Resection Device for Complex Colorectal Lesions in High-Risk Patients as a Last-Resort Endoscopic Treatment: Initial Clinical Experience and Review of the Current Literature

The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is a novel endoscopic device approved for the resection of colorectal lesions. This case-series describes the device and its use in high-risk patients with colorectal lesions and provides an overview of the potential indications in recently published data.

Between December 2014 and September 2015, 3 patients underwent endoscopic full thickness resection using the FTRD for colorectal lesions: 1 case for a T1 adenocarcinoma in the region of a surgical anastomosis after recto-sigmoidectomy, 1 case for a non-lifting colonic adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in an 89-year old patient and 1 for a recurrent adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in a young patient with ulcerative rectocolitis who was under immunosuppression after renal transplantation. Both technical and clinical success rates were achieved in all cases. The size of removed lesions ranged from 9 to 30 mm.

Overall, the most frequent indication in the literature has been for lifting or non-lifting adenoma, submucosal tumors, neuroendocrin tumors, incomplete endoscopic resection (R1) or T1 carcinoma.

Colorectal FTRD is a feasible technique for the treatment of colorectal lesions and represents a minimally invasive alternative for either surgical or conventional endoscopic resection strategies.

Effect of Perioperative Dexamethasone and Different NSAIDs on Anastomotic Leak Risk: A Propensity Score Analysis

Background

Perioperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with risk of anastomotic leak (AL). However, concomitant use of other drugs could infer a bias in risk assessment. Thus, we aimed to interrogate the risk of AL associated with NSAIDs and steroids used perioperatively.

Methods

This study includes a consecutive series of patients having surgery involving an intestinal anastomosis from Jan 2007 to Dec 2009. Data records included demographic, perioperative, and surgical characteristics; AL rates; and use of NSAIDs and steroids. Risk of leak were estimated using unadjusted and multivariable (propensity score)-adjusted logistic regression models and reported as odds ratios (ORs).

Results

A total of 376 patients underwent 428 operations of which 67 (15.7 %) had AL. With no medication receivers as reference, the OR for leak when adjusted for age, sex, and propensity score was 1.07 (p = 0.92) for ketorolac, 1.63 (p = 0.31) for diclofenac and 0.41 (p = 0.19) for dexamethasone. Risk was increased for malignancy (OR 1.88, p = 0.023), use of a vasopressor (OR 2.52, p = 0.007), blood transfusions (OR 1.93, p = 0.026), and regular use of steroids (OR 7.57, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

Other factors than perioperative drugs are crucial for risk of AL. Perioperative dexamethasone was associated with a nonsignificant reduced risk of AL.

The Role of Temporary Fecal Diversion

The use of temporary fecal diversion is of great importance to tenuous anastomosis, immunosuppressed patient, or actively infected patient. Its use protects newly constructed intestinal anastomoses from being the culprit of pelvic sepsis or systemic illness. Thus, potential morbidity and mortality can be averted. However, its appropriate or optimal use is often debated. We herein discuss the evidence for when to best use a diverting stoma for colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal anastomoses. We also discuss the importance of considering a temporary diverting stoma in the setting of high-dose immunosuppression (e.g., transplant patients or inflammatory bowel disease), active infection, or upon creation of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a loop ileostomy versus colostomy for temporary diversion of fecal contents.

A Clinicopathologic Study of Small Intestinal Perforations in Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Series of 3 Patients

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a vascular disorder of unknown etiology characterized by severe asthma, eosinophilia, and granulomatous vasculitis. It is sometimes associated with gastrointestinal lesions, although perforations are uncommon. Corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of patients with EGPA; however, they may impair tissue repair and induce fibrotic changes in the vascular intima, which can lead to vascular occlusion, ischemia, and perforation. The anti-inflammatory properties of corticosteroids may mask symptoms of gastroduodenal ulcers or other intra-abdominal conditions, which can lead to a delay in diagnosis. From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2014, 71 patients underwent surgery for small intestinal perforations. Of these, 4 operations were performed on 3 patients with EGPA who were receiving corticosteroids. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic features of these patients. All 3 patients with EGPA were men, with a mean age of 56 years. The length of resected intestine ranged from 10 to 60 cm. Histopathologic examination revealed ulcers and perforations of the small intestine associated with vasculitis, compatible with EGPA. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Patients with EGPA presenting with abdominal pain must be carefully evaluated for possible intestinal perforation, especially those receiving corticosteroid therapy.

Predictors of Anastomotic Leak in Elderly Patients After Colectomy: Nomogram-Based Assessment From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Program Procedure-Targeted Cohort

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery have increasingly become under scrutiny by accounting for the largest fraction of geriatric postoperative deaths and a significant proportion of all postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine predictors of anastomotic leak in elderly patients undergoing colectomy by creating a novel nomogram for simplistic prediction of anastomotic leak risk in a given patient.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective review.

SETTINGS

The database review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was conducted at a single institution.

PATIENTS

Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective segmental colectomy with an anastomosis at different levels (abdominal or low pelvic) in 2012-2013 were identified from the multi-institutional procedure-targeted database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We constructed a stepwise multiple logistic regression model for anastomotic leak as an outcome; predictors were selected in a stepwise fashion using the Akaike information criterion. The validity of the nomogram was externally tested on elderly patients (≥65 years of age) from the 2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy-targeted database.

RESULTS

A total of 10,392 patients were analyzed, and anastomotic leak occurred in 332 (3.2%). Of the patients who developed anastomotic leak, 192 (57.8%) were men (p < 0.001). Based on unadjusted analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak were ASA score III and IV (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003), smoking history (p = 0.014), weight loss (p = 0.013), previously infected wound (p = 0.005), omitting mechanical bowel preparation (p = 0.005) and/or preoperative oral antibiotic use (p < 0.001), and wounds classified as contaminated or dirty/infected (p = 0.008). Patients who developed anastomotic leak had a longer length of hospital stay (17 vs 7 d; p < 0.001) and operative time (191 vs 162 min; p < 0.001). A multivariate model and nomogram were created.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective nature and short-term follow-up (30 d).

CONCLUSIONS

An accurate prediction of anastomotic leak affecting morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery using the proposed nomogram may facilitate decision making in elderly patients for healthcare providers.

Corticosteroid use and mortality risk in patients with perforated colonic diverticular disease: a population-based cohort study

Background

Corticosteroids are a potential risk factor for mortality in patients with perforated diverticular disease, due to blinding of disease severity, hampered wound healing or adrenal insufficiency. We examined mortality in corticosteroid users and non-users among patients with perforated diverticular disease.

Methods

A cohort study based on medical databases including all patients ≥18 years in Denmark (source population 5 289 261 inhabitants) admitted to a hospital with incident perforated diverticular disease between 2005 and 2013. 7-day, 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality risks in corticosteroid users and non-users were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and compared with Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities.

Results

The study included 4640 patients with perforated diverticular disease. Of these, 3743 (80.7%) had not used corticosteroids in the year before admission and 725 (15.6%) had been exposed to systemic corticosteroid treatment. The remaining 172 patients had been exposed to either inhaled or intestinal acting corticosteroid therapy. Mortality risk in non-users was 4.4% after 7 days and 15.6% after 1 year. This risk was doubled for corticosteroid users who filled their last prescription during the 90 days before admission, with mortality risks ranging from 14.2% after 7 days to 47.6% after 1 year. 1-year mortality risk was even higher for corticosteroid users with a first filled prescription ≤90 days before admission: 52.5%.

Conclusions

Corticosteroid use was associated with clearly increased mortality risk after perforated diverticular disease. Thus, use of corticosteroids should be regarded as an important clinical prognostic factor for mortality in patients with this condition.

Acute toxicity and surgical complications after preoperative (chemo)radiation therapy for rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Preoperative therapy reduces local recurrences and may facilitate surgery in rectal cancer patients. However, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) this treatment is often withheld due to the perceived risk of excessive side-effects, even though evidence is limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of preoperative therapy on acute toxicity and post-operative complications in IBD patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

The Dutch pathology registry (PALGA) was searched for patients with IBD and rectal cancer treated between January 1991 and May 2010. Histopathology and clinical charts were reviewed to confirm IBD diagnosis and evaluate clinical and pathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Out of 161 patients, 66 received preoperative therapy (41%), including short-course radiation therapy (SC-RT), long course radiation therapy (LC-RT), and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in 32, 13, and 21 patients respectively. Grade≥3 acute toxicity occurred in 0 patients (0.0%), 1 patient (7.7%), and 6 patients (28.6%) respectively (p=0.004). Systemic corticosteroids were used by 10.5% of patients at time of treatment. Grade≥3 post-operative 30-day complication rate (28.1% overall) was not associated with type of preoperative therapy.

CONCLUSION

Results did not show excessive rates of toxicity or post-operative complications and support the use of standard preoperative therapies for rectal cancer (especially SC-RT) in IBD patients with relatively indolent disease. Caution is warranted in patients with active IBD, since the exact impact of active bowel inflammation could not be determined retrospectively. Prospective studies should investigate the influence of active IBD on acute and late toxicity in patients receiving pelvic irradiation.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients

AIM

A large, prospectively collected, clinical database was analysed to determine the various pre- and intra-operative factors affecting anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal surgery.

METHOD

Data on 17 518 patients having a colorectal resection with anastomosis, taken from the 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, were included in the study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify risk-adjusted predictive factors for AL. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and confidence intervals were reported at the 95% level.

RESULTS

The AL rate was 3.9% (687/17 518). Younger patients, male gender and an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of ≥ 3 (P < 0.001), smoking (P = 0.001), diabetes (P = 0.035), a preoperative serum albumin level of < 4 g/dl (P = 0.030), elective rectal cancer surgery (P = 0.024), emergency colectomy for bleeding (P = 0.013) and splenic flexure mobilization (P = 0.043) were associated with an increased risk of AL. Preoperative oral antibiotics (P < 0.001), right hemicolectomy (open or laparoscopic) and laparoscopic partial colectomy were associated with a reduced risk of AL compared with the entire group. Body mass index, preoperative chemotherapy, emergency surgery and mechanical bowel preparation were not related to AL.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to most studies, younger age was found to be an independent risk factor for AL. The risk for AL was lower with laparoscopic partial colectomy and open or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Preoperative oral antibiotic preparation significantly reduces the risk of AL and should be incorporated as a standard protocol.

Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most devastating complications after rectal cancer surgery. The double stapling technique has greatly facilitated intestinal reconstruction especially for anastomosis after low anterior resection (LAR). Risk factor analyses for AL after open LAR have been widely reported. However, a few studies have analyzed the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR. Laparoscopic rectal surgery provides an excellent operative field in a narrow pelvic space, and enables total mesorectal excision surgery and preservation of the autonomic nervous system with greater precision. However, rectal transection using a laparoscopic linear stapler is relatively difficult compared with open surgery because of the width and limited performance of the linear stapler. Moreover, laparoscopic LAR exhibits a different postoperative course compared with open LAR, which suggests that the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR may also differ from those after open LAR. In this review, we will discuss the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic LAR.

Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak

The aim of this article is to present strategies for preventing and managing the failure of the surgical restoration of intestinal continuity. Despite improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, anastomotic leaks still occur, and with them occur increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and costs. Due to the devastating consequences for patients with failed anastomoses, there have been a myriad of materials and techniques used by surgeons to create better intestinal anastomoses. We will also discuss the management strategies for anastomotic leak when they do inevitably occur.

Perioperative Considerations in Crohn Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is medically and surgically complex. Numerous patient- and disease-oriented factors must be considered in treating patients with IBD, including nutritional replenishment/support, effect of immunosuppressive medications, extent of resection, and use of proximal diversion. Perioperative planning and optimization of the patient is imperative to ensuring favorable outcomes and limiting morbidity. These perioperative considerations in Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis are reviewed here.

Preadmission glucocorticoid use and anastomotic leakage after colon and rectal cancer resections: a Danish cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether preadmission glucocorticoid use increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after colon and rectal cancer resections.

DESIGN

A population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Denmark (2001-2011).

PARTICIPANTS

We identified patients who had undergone a primary anastomosis after a colorectal cancer resection by linking medical registries. Participants who filled their most recent glucocorticoid prescription ≤90, 91-365 and >365 days before their surgery date were categorised as current, recent and former users, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We calculated 30-day absolute risk of anastomotic leakage and computed ORs using logistic regression models with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 18,190 patients with colon cancer, anastomotic leakage occurred in 1184 (6.5%). Glucocorticoid use overall was not associated with an increased risk of leakage (6.4% vs 6.9% among never-users; OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.23). Categories of oral, inhaled or intestinal-acting glucocorticoids did not greatly affect risk of leakage. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 695 (13.2%) of 5284 patients with rectal cancer. Glucocorticoid use overall slightly increased risk of leakage (14.6% vs 12.8% among never-users; OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.72). Results did not differ significantly within glucocorticoid categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Preadmission glucocorticoids modestly increased the risk of anastomotic leakage mainly after rectal cancer resection. However, absolute risk differences were small and the clinical impact of glucocorticoid use may therefore be limited.

Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) represents a dreaded complication following colorectal surgery, with a prevalence of 1-19 per cent. There remains a lack of consensus regarding factors that may predispose to AL and the relative risks associated with them. The objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature, focusing on the role of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the development of colorectal ALs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify adjustable and non-adjustable preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the pathogenesis of AL. Additionally, a severity grading system was proposed to guide treatment.

RESULTS

Of 1707 papers screened, 451 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the review. Significant preoperative risk factors were: male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade above II, renal disease, co-morbidity and history of radiotherapy. Tumour-related factors were: distal site, size larger than 3 cm, advanced stage, emergency surgery and metastatic disease. Adjustable risk factors were: smoking, obesity, poor nutrition, alcohol excess, immunosuppressants and bevacizumab. Intraoperative risk factors were: blood loss/transfusion and duration of surgery more than 4 h. Stomas lessen the consequences but not the prevalence of AL. In the postoperative period, CT is the most commonly used imaging tool, with or without rectal contrast, and a C-reactive protein level exceeding 150 mg/l on day 3-5 is the most sensitive biochemical marker. A five-level classification system for AL severity and appropriate management is presented.

CONCLUSION

Specific risk factors and their potential correction or indications for stoma were identified. An AL severity score is proposed to aid clinical decision-making.

Pharmacological interventions for improved colonic anastomotic healing: A meta-analysis

AIM: To identify pharmaceuticals for the prophylaxis of anastomotic leakage (AL), we systematically reviewed studies on anastomosis repair after colorectal surgery.

METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles published between January 1975 and December 2012. We included studies in English with the primary purpose of promoting healing of anastomoses made in the colon or rectum under uncomplicated conditions. We excluded studies on adverse events from interventions, nutritional interventions or in situ physical supporting biomaterials. The primary outcome was biomechanical strength or AL. We performed meta-analyses on therapeutic agents investigated by three or more independent research groups using the same outcome. The DerSimonian-Laird method for random effects was applied with P < 0.05.

RESULTS: Of the 56 different therapeutic agents assessed, 7 met our inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The prostacyclin analog iloprost increased the weighted mean of the early bursting pressure of colonic anastomoses in male rats by 60 mmHg (95%CI: 30-89) vs the controls, and the immunosuppressant tacrolimus increased this value by 29 mmHg (95%CI: 4-53) vs the controls. Erythropoietin showed an enhancement of bursting pressure by 45 mmHg (95%CI: 14-76). The anabolic compound growth hormone augmented the anastomotic strength by 21 mmHg (95%CI: 7-35), possibly via the up-regulation of insulin-like growth factor-1, as this growth factor increased the bursting pressure by 61 mmHg (95%CI: 43-79) via increased collagen deposition. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy increased the bursting pressure by 24 mmHg (95%CI: 13-34). Broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors increased the bursting pressure by 48 mmHg (95%CI: 31-66) on postoperative days 3-4. In the only human study, the AL incidence was not significantly reduced in the 103 colorectal patients treated with aprotinin (11.7%) compared with the 113 placebo-treated patients (9.7%).

CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified only one randomized clinical trial and seven therapeutic agents from pre-clinical models that could be explored further for the prophylaxis of AL after colorectal surgery.