Pre-existing diabetes significantly increases the risk of graft failure and mortality following renal transplantation

Pretransplant Diabetes Mellitus and Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that kidney transplantation is affected by pretransplant comorbidities. However, their impacts on mortality and graft loss remain inconsistent. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to collect data from multiple studies to analyze the impact of pretransplant diabetes mellitus on kidney transplant outcomes.

METHOD

We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. All-cause mortality and graft loss were compared between patients with pretransplant diabetes mellitus and patients without pretransplant diabetes mellitus. The impact of pretransplant diabetes mellitus was assessed using pooled hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULT

This meta-analysis included 103,983 kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus and 271,667 kidney transplant recipients without diabetes mellitus. All-cause mortality was 68% (HR:1.68, 95% CI 1.65-1.71, P < .01) greater in patients with pretransplant diabetes mellitus than in patients without diabetes mellitus. Additionally, graft loss was 11% (HR:1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15, P < .01) greater in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients. The heterogeneity in the 2 analyses was very significant and meta-regression was used to determine the source of heterogeneity. Unfortunately, it was not found in the analysis of all-cause mortality. However, in the analysis of graft loss, sample size and median age at transplantation may be sources of high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of mortality and graft loss. However, due to significant heterogeneity and insufficient evidence, further studies are still needed to support our conclusions.

GLP-1 Agonism for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions Across the Research Spectrum

Purpose of Review

Diabetes is the most common cause of kidney disease in individuals that receive a kidney transplant, and those without pre-existing diabetes are at greater risk of developing diabetes following kidney transplant. A class of diabetes treatment medications called glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) has seen recent widespread use for people with diabetes or obesity, with efficacy for improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced risk of cardiovascular events. Given these benefits, and indications for use that often co-occur in kidney transplant recipients, use of GLP-1RAs warrants consideration in this population. Therefore, we sought to review the current literature to better understand the mechanisms of action, clinical application, and person-centred considerations of GLP-1RAs in kidney transplant recipients.

Sources of Information

Original articles were identified between December 2023 and July 2024 from electronic databases including the Ovid MEDLINE database, PubMed, and Google Scholar using terms "kidney transplant," "GLP-1," "glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist," and "diabetes."

Methods

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to explore the relationship between GLP-1RAs and kidney transplant recipients. We reviewed the current state of evidence across the research disciplines of basic or fundamental science, clinical and health services research, and person-centred equity science, and highlighted important knowledge gaps that offer opportunities for future research.

Key Findings

Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the benefit of GLP-1RAs in people with and without diabetic kidney disease, including decreased risk of cardiovascular events. However, there is a paucity of high-quality randomized controlled trials and observational studies analyzing use of GLP-1RAs in kidney transplant recipients. Evidence of benefit in this population is therefore limited to small studies or inferred from research conducted in nontransplant populations. Growing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies may elucidate renoprotective mechanisms of GLP-1RAs and remove barriers to application of these drugs in the transplant recipient population. Individuals who are female, non-white, have lower socioeconomic status, and live in rural communities are at greater risk of diabetes and have lower uptake of GLP-1RAs. There is a need for clinical trials across diverse kidney transplant populations to estimate the efficacy of GLP-1RAs on important health outcomes.

Limitations

The search strategy for this narrative review may not have been sensitive to identify all relevant articles. Our search was limited to English language articles.

Is There a Two-Way Risk between Decreased Testosterone Levels and the Progression and Prognosis of Chronic Kidney Disease? A Cohort Study Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Database

PURPOSE

The causal relationship between the incidence and prognosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and serum testosterone levels in patients is not yet fully understood. This study aims to use the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a large-scale nationally representative sample, to investigate the relationship between CKD and testosterone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included six NHANES cycles for linear regression analysis, verified by multiple imputation methods. Stratified analysis and subgroup analysis were used to demonstrate the stability of CKD's effect on testosterone. Furthermore, we used Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests to evaluate differences in survival rates between CKD male patients with low and normal levels of testosterone.

RESULTS

From a total of 71,163 subjects, the cohort selected 28,663 eligible participants. Results showed that CKD patients had testosterone levels 28.423 ng/mL (24.762, 32.083) lower than non-CKD patients. The results of multiple imputations (β=27.700, 95% confidence interval: 23.427, 31.974) were consistent with those of linear regression analysis, and the numerical match was good. Stratified regression analysis, and subgroup analysis results showed that CKD had a significant impact on testosterone at different dimensions. Kaplan-Meier plots showed significantly reduced survival rates in low testosterone CKD male patients (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this big data analysis suggest that there may be a two-way risk between low levels of testosterone and CKD. The testosterone levels of CKD patients were significantly lower than those of the non-CKD population, and CKD patients with low testosterone levels had poorer prognoses. These results suggest that correcting testosterone levels in a timely manner can have preventive and therapeutic effects on the progression of CKD.

Graft survival and delayed graft function with normothermic regional perfusion and rapid recovery after circulatory death in kidney transplantation: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

A shortage of kidney grafts has led to the implementation of various strategies, including donations after circulatory death. The in situ normothermic regional perfusion technique has been introduced to improve graft quality by reducing warm ischemia times. However, there is limited evidence available on its mid- and long-term outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the incidence of delayed graft function, graft function, and survival at three years among three groups: brain death donors, rapid recovery, and normothermic regional perfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a cohort of kidney transplantations was conducted at a single referral center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Univariate and multivariate regression models and propensity score matching analysis were performed to compare recipient-related, transplantation procedure-related, donor-related, and kidney function variables.

RESULTS

A total of 327 patients were included, with 256 kidneys from brain death donors, 52 kidneys from rapid recovery, and 19 patients from normothermic regional perfusion. After propensity score matching, univariate and multivariate analyses showed a higher incidence of delayed graft function in the rapid recovery group compared to the others (OR: 2.39 CI95%: 1.19, 4.77) with a longer hospital stay (median 11, 15 and 10 days, respectively). However, no differences in 1- and 3-year graft function and survival were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Normothermic regional perfusion offers advantages over rapid recovery, with a reduced incidence of delayed graft function and a shorter hospital stay. However, no differences in mid-term graft function and survival were found.

The impact of diabetes and hypertension on renal allograft survival- A single center study

Background

To determine the impact of pre-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM) and post-transplant hypertension (HT) at 1 year on renal allograft survival in all adult first kidney-only (FKO) transplant recipients at a single transplant center in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all adult FKO transplant procedures at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital transplant unit between 1966 and 2013.

Results

During the stipulated timeframe, 1685 adult FKO transplant procedures were performed. Of these, 84.1% were from deceased donors (n = 1413/1685). The prevalence of pre-transplant DM transplant recipients with no missing or incomplete records was 6.5% (n = 107/1625). Of the total cohort of 1685 adult FKO transplant recipients, 63.6% of those with no missing data survived to 1 year (n = 1072/1685). The prevalence of HT at 1-year post-transplant was 53.6% (n = 503/1072). HT at 1-year post-transplant, even after adjusted survival analysis, proved a significant risk factor for renal allograft loss (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.94) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, after adjusted survival analysis, the risk of renal allograft loss within the pre-transplant DM group was significantly higher (p = 0.043; hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.58).

Conclusions

This study identified pre-transplantation diabetes mellitus and post-transplantation HT as significant risk factors for graft loss within the population assessed in this region of the world. These factors could potentially be used as independent predictors of renal graft survival.

Comorbid Conditions in Kidney Transplantation: Outcome Analysis at King Abdulaziz Medical City

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is most commonly performed for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and provides the best chance for a cure. The surgery is shown to be beneficial to a patient's quality of life after transplantation in multiple studies. But graft failure is a serious consequence that might happen. The term graft failure refers to the failure of a transplanted kidney to function properly. There are various reasons why this can happen, such as rejection, infection, or medication complications.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study of comorbid conditions in patients who underwent renal transplantation at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) between 2016 and 2022. Data were collected by chart review using the BestCare system. The data collected included patients' demographics, comorbidities, calculated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surgery-related data, laboratory data, and the outcome of transplantation. The categorical data were presented using percentages and frequencies, while the numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used for inferential statistics to find the association between categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 669 patients were included in the current study. Of these, 422 (63.1%) were men, and the mean age was 44 years. The incidence of graft failure within one year at KAMC was found to be 1.2% (eight cases). Regarding the CCI and its association with graft failure within one year, 37 (5.5%) patients had a myocardial infarction (MI) and 17 (2.5%) had congestive heart failure; however, no patients with MI or congestive heart failure experienced graft failure, and no significant association was found between MI or congestive heart failure and graft failure (p-value = 1.000 for both). A total of 417 (62.3%) patients had no or diet-controlled diabetes, 122 (18.2%) had uncomplicated diabetes mellitus (DM), and 130 (19.4%) had end-organ damage. DM and graft failure were not significantly associated (p-value = 1.000). A total of 286 (42.8%) patients had ESRD of unknown etiology, 109 (16.3%) patients had ESRD caused by diabetic nephropathy, and 100 (14.9%) had ESRD resulting from hypertension, apart from other causes.

CONCLUSION

Most patients were found to have ESRD of unknown etiology and the most frequently reported known risk factor for ESRD and subsequent transplantation was found to be diabetic nephropathy, followed by hypertension.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor or Standard Triple Therapy: 24-month Post Hoc Analysis From TRANSFORM Study

BACKGROUND

The comparative impact of everolimus (EVR)-based regimens versus standard of care (mycophenolic acid+standard calcineurin inhibitor [MPA+sCNI]) on cardiovascular outcomes in de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is poorly understood. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in KTRs receiving EVR+reduced CNI (rCNI) or MPA+sCNI from the TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen study was evaluated.

METHODS

The incidence of MACE was determined for all randomized patients receiving at least 1 dose of the study drug. Factors associated with MACEs were determined by logistic regression. Risk of MACE out to 3 y post-study was calculated using the Patient Outcome in Renal Transplantation equation.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 81 of 1014 (8.0%; EVR+rCNI) versus 89 of 1012 (8.8%; MPA+sCNI) KTRs (risk ratio, 0.91 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.21]). The incidence of circulatory death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or angina was similar between the arms. Incidence of MACE was similar between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI arms with a higher incidence in prespecified risk groups: older age, pretransplant diabetes (15.1% versus 15.9%), statin use (8.5% versus 10.8%), and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (Month 2 estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 versus >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; odds ratio, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.02-4.86]; P = 0.044), respectively. Predicted risk of MACE within 3 y of follow-up did not differ between the treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were similar between de novo KTRs receiving EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI. EVR+rCNI is a viable alternative to the current standard of care in KTRs.

Changes in glucose metabolism among recipients with diabetes 1 year after kidney transplant: a multicenter 1-year prospective study

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a common and crucial metabolic complication in kidney transplantation. It is necessary to analyze the course of glucose metabolism in patients who already have diabetes after receiving a transplant. In this study, we investigated the changes in glucose metabolism after transplantation, and a detailed analysis was performed on some patients whose glycemic status improved.

Methods

The multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted between 1 April 2016 and 31 September 2018. Adult patients (aged 20 to 65 years) who received kidney allografts from living or deceased donors were included. Seventy-four subjects with pre-transplant diabetes were followed up for 1 year after kidney transplantation. Diabetes remission was defined as the results of the oral glucose tolerance test performed one year after transplantation and the presence or absence of diabetes medications. After 1-year post-transplant, 74 recipients were divided into the persistent diabetes group (n = 58) and the remission group (n = 16). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify clinical factors associated with diabetes remission.

Results

Of 74 recipients, 16 (21.6%) showed diabetes remission after 1-year post-transplant. The homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance numerically increased in both groups throughout the first year after transplantation and significantly increased in the persistent diabetes group. The insulinogenic index (IGI₃₀) value significantly increased only in the remission group, and the IGI₃₀ value remained low in the persistent diabetes group. In univariate analysis, younger age, newly diagnosed diabetes before transplantation, low baseline hemoglobin A1c, and high baseline IGI₃₀ were significantly associated with remission of diabetes. After multivariate analysis, only newly diagnosed diabetes before transplantation and IGI₃₀ at baseline were associated with remission of diabetes (34.00 [1.192-969.84], P = 0.039, and 17.625 [1.412-220.001], P = 0.026, respectively).

Conclusion

In conclusion, some kidney recipients with pre-transplant diabetes have diabetes remission 1 year after transplantation. Our prospective study revealed that preserved insulin secretory function and newly diagnosed diabetes at the time of kidney transplantation were favorable factors for which glucose metabolism did not worsen or improve 1 year after kidney transplantation.

Whole-Organ Pancreas and Islets Transplantations in UK: An Overview and Future Directions

Whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations are two therapeutic options to treat type 1 diabetic patients resistant to optimised medical treatment in whom severe complications develop. Selection of the best option for β-cell replacement depends on several factors such as kidney function, patient comorbidities, and treatment goals. For a patient with end-stage kidney disease, the treatment of choice is often a simultaneous transplant of the pancreas and kidney (SPK). However, it remains a major surgical procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities and therefore it is important to select those who will benefit from it. Additionally, in view of the organ shortage, new strategies to improve outcomes and reduce immune reactions have been developed, including dynamic organ perfusion technologies, pancreas bioengineering, and stem cell therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and future directions of whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations.

Long-term prolonged-release tacrolimus outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation: The Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation study-II

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the 10-year efficacy and safety of a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressive regimen on longer-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Data from Japanese living donor kidney transplant recipients (n = 410) maintained on continuous prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression from 2009-2013 were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.9 years.

RESULTS

A prolonged-release, tacrolimus-based combination regimen provided death-censored graft failure and all-cause death rates at 10 years of 7.0% and 6.8%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, acute and chronic rejection and 'throughout' (new-onset plus preexisting) diabetes mellitus were risk factors for death-censored graft failure. Recipient age ≥ 65 years, throughout diabetes mellitus and malignancy were common risk factors for all-cause death. Throughout diabetes mellitus was the most common risk factor for both death-censored graft failure and all-cause death. Additional analyses showed 10-year cumulative rates of death-censored graft failure were 14.0% and 5.4% for recipients with or without preexisting diabetes mellitus, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.009). All-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in the preexisting and non-diabetes mellitus groups, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world, retrospective, living donor kidney transplantation study, a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive combination regimen provided 10-year death-censored graft failure rates of 14.0% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively; Similarly, 10-year all-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively. To our knowledge, the data in this study are the first to provide 10-year transplant outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients under prolonged-release tacrolimus-based regimen.

Impact of previous REnal TRansplantation on the mid-term renal Outcome after CARdiac surgery: the RETROCAR trial

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a higher risk of cardiac surgery-associated AKI (CSA-AKI). A relationship has been strongly suggested between AKI and poor long-term graft survival. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of on-pump cardiac surgery on the 1-year renal allograft survival rate.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 37 RTRs and 56 non-RTRs who underwent cardiac surgery between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. They were matched according to age, sex, preoperative glomerular function, diabetes and type of surgery. The primary composite outcome was renal survival, defined as patient survival without the requirement for permanent dialysis or new kidney transplantation at 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The renal survival rate was significantly lower in the RTR group than in the non-RTR group [81% versus 96%; odds ratio 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.82), P = .03]. The proportion of patients who returned to permanent dialysis was higher in the RTR group than in the non-RTR group (12% versus 0%; P = .02). The proportion of patients with severe AKI was also higher in the RTR group. At 1 year after surgery, serum creatinine level, glomerular filtration rate and all-cause mortality rates were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a functional renal allograft have a low 1-year renal allograft survival rate after cardiac surgery with CPB. In addition, these patients have significant risks of AKI and acute kidney disease after open-heart surgery.

Survival After Simultaneous Pancreas‐Kidney Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: The Critical Role of Early Pancreas Allograft Function

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) carries about a 7%–22% risk of technical failure, but the impact of early pancreas allograft loss on subsequent kidney graft and patient survival is not well-defined. We examined national transplant registry data for type 1 diabetic patients who received SPK between 2000 and 2021. Associations of transplant type (i.e., SPK, deceased‐donor kidney transplant [DDKA], living‐donor kidney transplant [LDKA]) with kidney graft failure and patient survival were estimated by multivariable inverse probability of treatment-weighted accelerated failure-time models. Compared to SPK recipients with a functioning pancreas graft 3 months posttransplant (SPK,P+), LDKA had 18% (Time Ratio [TR] 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70–0.95) less graft survival time and 18% (TR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.68–0.97) less patient survival time, DDKA had 23% (TR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.68–0.87) less graft survival time and 29% (TR 0.71, 95%CI: 0.62–0.81) less patient survival time, and SPK with early pancreas graft loss had 34% (TR 0.66, 95%CI: 0.56–0.78) less graft survival time and 34% (TR 0.66, 95%CI: 0.55–0.79) less patient survival time. In conclusion, SPK,P+ recipients have better kidney allograft and patient survival compared with LDKA and DDKA. Early pancreas graft failure results in inferior kidney and patient survival time compared to kidney transplant alone.

The Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitor in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not been investigated in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetes. We evaluated the impact of SGLT2i in a multicenter cohort of diabetic KTRs.

METHODS

A total of 2083 KTRs with diabetes were enrolled from 6 transplant centers in Korea. Among them, 226 (10.8%) patients were prescribed SGLT2i for >90 d. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and serum creatinine doubling. An acute dip in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 10% was surveyed after SGLT2i use.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 62.9 ± 42.2 mo, the SGLT2i group had a lower risk of primary composite outcome than the control group in the multivariate and propensity score-matched models (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.78; P = 0.006 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.85; P = 0.013, respectively). Multivariate analyses consistently showed a decreased risk of DCGF and serum creatinine doubling in the SGLT2i group. The overall eGFR remained stable without the initial dip after SGLT2i use. A minority (15.6%) of the SGLT2i users showed acute eGFR dip during the first month, but the eGFR recovered thereafter. The risk factors for the eGFR dip were time from transplantation to SGLT2i usage and mean tacrolimus trough level.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i improved a composite of all-cause mortality, DCGF, or serum creatinine doubling in KTRs. SGLT2i can be used safely and have beneficial effects on preserving graft function in diabetic KTRs.

Cardiometabolic and Kidney Protection in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Diabetes: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Summary of Clinical Trials

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Preexisting diabetes is highly prevalent in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and the development of posttransplant diabetes is common because of a number of transplant-specific risk factors such as the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive medications and posttransplant weight gain. The presence of pretransplant and posttransplant diabetes in KTR significantly and variably affect the risk of graft failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death. Among the many available therapies for diabetes, there are little data to determine the glucose-lowering agent(s) of choice in KTR. Furthermore, despite the high burden of graft loss and CVD among KTR with diabetes, evidence for strategies offering cardiovascular and kidney protection is lacking. Recent accumulating evidence convincingly shows glucose-independent cardiorenal protective effects in non-KTR with glucose-lowering agents, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Therefore, our aim was to review cardiorenal protective strategies, including the evidence, mechanisms, and rationale for the use of these glucose-lowering agents in KTR with diabetes.

Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Renal Transplant Patients With Diabetes: A Brief Review of the Current Literature

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a novel class of oral hypoglycemic agents commonly prescribed in type 2 diabetes (T2D). They have been shown to slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy and improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk individuals, although major cardiovascular and renal outcome clinical trials have excluded renal transplant patients. The aim of this review was to determine the outcomes and safety with use of SGLT2 inhibitors in renal transplant patients with diabetes. We conducted a review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series and case reports that assessed use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients post-renal transplant with either pre-existing T2D or new-onset diabetes after transplant. The outcomes assessed included blood pressure, renal allograft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate), proteinuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio), glycemic control, body weight and adverse effects. A total of 9 studies, which included 144 patients, were reviewed. SGLT2 inhibitor use in renal transplant patients demonstrates either a small or nonsignificant reduction in blood pressure and results in overall stable renal allograft function. It also results in modest improvement in glycemic control as well as weight reduction. The incidence of adverse effects is low and reversible, as reported in previous nontransplant clinical trials. Overall, our findings suggest beneficial outcomes with no significant adverse effects or complications with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in renal transplant patients with diabetes; however, these findings are based on small trials, and thus well-designed trials in this population are warranted.

Recent advances in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation

A common challenge in managing kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or diabetes mellitus (DM) newly diagnosed after transplantation, in addition to known pre-existing DM. PTDM is an important risk factor for post-transplant cardiovascular (CV) disease, which adversely affects patient survival and quality of life. CV disease in KTR may manifest as ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and/or left ventricular hypertrophy. Available therapies for PTDM include most agents currently used to treat type 2 diabetes. More recently, the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) has cautiously extended to KTR with PTDM, even though KTR are typically excluded from large general population clinical trials. Initial evidence from observational studies seems to indicate that SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and DPP4i may be safe and effective for glycemic control in KTR, but their benefit in reducing CV events in this otherwise high-risk population remains unproven. These newer drugs must still be used with care due to the increased propensity of KTR for intravascular volume depletion and acute kidney injury due to diarrhea and their single-kidney status, pre-existing burden of peripheral vascular disease, urinary tract infections due to immunosuppression and a surgically altered urinary tract, erythrocytosis from calcineurin inhibitors, and reduced kidney function from acute or chronic rejection.

Trends in the effects of pre-transplant diabetes on mortality and cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

It is not clear whether survival in kidney transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes has improved over the past decades. We compared the rates of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after renal transplantation in patients with and without pre-transplant diabetes. Furthermore, we investigated whether transplant era and recipient age affected the association between diabetes status and adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 691 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 1994 and 2016 at a single tertiary center. We compared the incidences of post-transplant mortality and four-point MACE in patients with and without pre-transplant diabetes using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model, and assessed the interactions between diabetes status and transplant era and recipient age.

RESULTS

Of 691 kidney recipients, 143 (20.7%) had pre-transplant diabetes. The mean follow-up duration was 94.5 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with pre-transplant diabetes had higher incidences of post-transplant mortality and four-point MACE compared with those without pre-transplant diabetes (log-rank test, P < 0.001 for both). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, pre-transplant diabetes was associated with an increased risk of post-transplant mortality and four-point MACE (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.44, P = 0.034; and hazard ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.00, P = 0.043, respectively). The associations between pre-transplant diabetes status and all-cause mortality and four-point MACE were not affected by transplant era or recipient age.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant diabetes remains a significant risk factor for mortality and four-point MACE in kidney transplant recipients.

Current Pharmacological Intervention and Medical Management for Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

pre-existing diabetes and PTDM in kidney transplant recipients: how to handle immunosuppression

INTRODUCTION

Preexisting diabetes (PD) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common and severe comorbidities posttransplantation. The immunosuppressive regimens are modifiable risk factors.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed Pubmed and Cochrane database and we summarize the mechanisms and impacts of available immunosuppressive treatments on the risk of PD and PTDM. We also assess the possible management of these drugs to improve glycemic parameters while considering risks inherent in transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

PD i) increases the risk of sepsis, ii) is an independent risk factor for infection-related mortality, and iii) increases acute rejection risk. Regarding PTDM development i) immunosuppressive strategies without corticosteroids significantly reduce the risk but the price may be a higher incidence of rejection; ii) minimization or rapid withdrawal of steroids are two valuable approaches; iii) the diabetogenic role of calcineurin inhibitors(CNIs) is also well-described and is more important for tacrolimus than for cyclosporine. Reducing tacrolimus-exposure may improve glycemic parameters but also has a higher risk of rejection. PTDM risk is higher in patients that receive sirolimus compared to mycophenolate mofetil. Finally, conversion from CNIs to belatacept may offer the best benefits to PTDM-recipients in terms of glycemic parameters, graft and patient-outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin as an adjunct to insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom

AIMS

To assess the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, as an adjunct to insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) inadequately controlled by insulin alone in the UK setting.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare dapagliflozin (5 mg or 10 mg) added to insulin versus insulin monotherapy (standard of care) over a lifetime horizon. Treatment efficacy and safety data were obtained from 52-week results of the DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2 trials and a network meta-analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors in T1DM. Direct healthcare costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from a UK payer perspective and discounted at 3.5% annually, using the Cardiff T1DM Model. Sensitivity analyses assessed uncertainty in estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Dapagliflozin 5 mg was associated with gains of 0.23 life-years and 0.42 QALYs, at an additional cost of £4240 per person; corresponding to an ICER of £10 143 versus standard of care. For dapagliflozin 10 mg, incremental life-years, QALYs and costs were 0.24, 0.49 and £2964, respectively; corresponding to an ICER of £6103 versus standard of care. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ICER estimates fell below £20 000/QALY in 78% to 90% of simulations. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to changes in baseline patient characteristics and treatment effects on glycated haemoglobin; however, ICERs remained below £20 000.

CONCLUSIONS

At cost-effectiveness thresholds conventionally applied in the UK, dapagliflozin as an adjunct to insulin appears to be a cost-effective treatment option for people with T1DM inadequately controlled by insulin alone.

Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control in Patients with Kidney Transplants: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Canada

Background:

Kidney transplant immunosuppressive medications are known to impair glucose metabolism, causing worsened glycemic control in patients with pre-transplant diabetes mellitus (PrTDM) and new onset of diabetes after transplant (NODAT).

Objectives:

To determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of both PrTDM and NODAT patients.

Design:

This is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting:

The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Participant:

A total of 132 adult (>18 years) kidney transplant patients from 2013 to 2015 were retrospectively followed 3 years post-transplant.

Measurements:

Patient characteristics, transplant information, pre- and post-transplant HbA1C and random glucose, follow-up appointments, complications, and readmissions.

Methods:

We looked at the prevalence of poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) in the PrTDM group before and after transplant and compared the prevalence, follow-up appointments, and rate of complications and readmission rates in both the PrTDM and NODAT groups. We determined the risk factors of developing poor glycemic control in PrTDM patients and NODAT. Student t-test was used to compare means, chi-squared test was used to compare percentages, and univariate analysis to determine risk factors was performed by logistical regression.

Results:

A total of 42 patients (31.8%) had PrTDM and 12 patients (13.3%) developed NODAT. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) was more prevalent in the PrTDM (76.4%) patients compared to those with NODAT (16.7%; P < .01). PrTDM patients were more likely to receive follow-up with an endocrinologist (P < .01) and diabetes nurse (P < .01) compared to those with NODAT. There were no differences in the complication and readmission rates for PrTDM and NODAT patients. Receiving a transplant from a deceased donor was associated with having poor glycemic control, odds ratio (OR) = 3.34, confidence interval (CI = 1.08, 10.4), P = .04. Both patient age, OR = 1.07, CI (1.02, 1.3), P < .01, and peritoneal dialysis prior to transplant, OR = 4.57, CI (1.28, 16.3), P = .02, were associated with NODAT.

Limitations:

Our study was limited by our small sample size. We also could not account for any diabetes screening performed outside of our center or follow-up appointments with family physicians or community endocrinologists.

Conclusion:

Poor glycemic control is common in the kidney transplant population. Glycemic targets for patients with PrTDM are not being met in our center and our study highlights the gap in the literature focusing on the prevalence and outcomes of poor glycemic control in these patients. Closer follow-up and attention may be needed for those who are at risk for worse glycemic control, which include older patients, those who received a deceased donor kidney, and/or prior peritoneal dialysis.

Predictors of Early and Late Mortality in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Older kidney patients with chronic kidney disease benefit significantly from kidney transplantation. However, these older transplant recipients have greater mortality after transplantation than younger transplant recipients. Understanding the impact of comorbidities on post-transplant mortality can improve risk stratification and patient selection.

METHODS

A single-center analysis of 3105 kidney transplant recipients was performed over a 12-year period. Comorbidities associated with death were evaluated in older and younger transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The 2 most important factors associated with increased mortality in the first 100 days after transplant were recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted odds ratios, 3.29 and 5.80, respectively), with no statistically significant impact of recipient comorbidities. In the later post-transplant period (after the first 100 days), recipient age ≥60 and receipt of deceased donor organs (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] of 2.14 and 2.29, respectively) remained predictors of mortality. We also found that donor age ≥60 and the recipient having cardiovascular disease and diabetes were independent predictors of increased mortality. There was a statistically significant interaction between diabetes and heart disease and recipient age ≥60, with a lesser impact on late mortality in older patients compared to younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that comorbidities have a larger impact later after transplantation, with less effect on older recipients. These observations suggest that certain comorbid conditions should be evaluated differently in older patients compared to younger ones.

Effect of post-transplant glycemic control on long-term clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with diabetic nephropathy: A multicenter cohort study in Korea

PURPOSE

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end stage renal disease. The number of kidney transplantation (KT) due to diabetic nephropathy is increasing and there is debate on glycemic control after KT. In this study, we used a multi-center database to determine the relationship between post-transplant glycemic control and the outcomes of KT in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetic nephropathy from three tertiary hospitals to analyze the association between post-transplant glycemic control and the clinical outcomes of graft failure, including patient death and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). We assessed time-averaged glucose level and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for 36 months after KT.

RESULTS

Among 3,538 KTRs, a total of 476 patients received kidney transplantation because of diabetic nephropathy. Mean time-averaged glucose and HbA1c levels were 147 ± 46 mg/dl and 7.7 ± 1.5%, respectively. Patients with diabetic nephropathy had poor graft and patient survival rate compared with non-diabetic nephropathy. Among KTRs with diabetic nephropathy, the highest quartile of time-averaged glucose was related to poor graft outcomes and the 3rd quartile of time-averaged HbA1c was associated with significantly better graft outcomes than the 1st, 2nd or 4th quartiles. There were no significant differences in the risk of BPAR across the 4 quartiles of glucose and HbA1c.

CONCLUSIONS

Strict glycemic control before KT might not be related to successful outcomes but poor glycemic control after KT is associated with poor graft outcomes. There was no significant relationship between pre- or post-transplant glycemic control and BPAR.

Cytolytic Induction Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

Determine the impact of cytolytic versus IL-2 receptor antibody (IL-2RA) induction on acute rejection, graft loss and death in African-American (AA) kidney transplant (KTX) recipients.

BACKGROUND

AAs are underrepresented in clinical trials in transplantation; thus, there is controversy regarding the optimal choice of perioperative antibody induction in KTX to improve outcomes.

METHODS

National cohort study using US transplant registry data from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2009 in adult solitary AA KTX recipients, with at least 5 years of follow-up. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were utilized to assess the outcomes of acute rejection, graft loss, and mortality, with interaction terms to assess effect modification.

RESULTS

Twenty-five thousand eighty-four adult AAs receiving solitary KTX were included, 16,927 (67.5%) received cytolytic induction and 8157 (32.5%) received IL-2RA induction. After adjustment for recipient sociodemographics, donor, and transplant characteristics, the use of cytolytic induction therapy reduced the risk of acute rejection by 32% (OR 0.68, 0.62-0.75), graft loss by 9% (HR 0.91, 0.86-0.97), and death by 12% (HR 0.88, 0.83-0.94). There were a number of significant effect modifiers, including public insurance, panel reactive antibody, delayed graft function, and steroid withdrawal; in these groups, cytolytic induction substantially improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that cytolytic induction therapy, as compared with IL-2RA, reduces the risk of rejection, graft loss, and death in adult AA KTX recipients, particularly in those who are sensitized, receive public insurance, develop delayed graft function, or undergo steroid withdrawal.

Pre-existing diabetes is a risk factor for increased rates of cellular rejection after kidney transplantation: an observational cohort study

AIM

To investigate whether people with diabetes have an elevated risk of kidney allograft rejection in a well characterized clinical cohort in the setting of contemporary immunosuppression.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all kidney allograft recipients at a single centre between 2007 and 2015, linking clinical, biochemical and histopathological data from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 1140 kidney transplant recipients. The median follow-up was 4.4 years post-transplantation, and 117 of the kidney transplant recipients (10.2%) had diabetes at time of transplantation. Kidney allograft recipients with vs without diabetes were older (53 vs 45 years; P<0.001) and more likely to be non-white (41.0% vs 26.4%; P=0.001). Kidney allograft recipients with vs without diabetes had a higher risk of cellular rejection (19.7% vs 12.4%; P=0.024), but not of antibody-mediated rejection (3.4% vs 3.7%; P=0.564). Graft function and risk of death-censored graft loss were similar in the two groups, but kidney allograft recipients with diabetes had a higher risk of death and overall graft loss than those without diabetes. In a Cox regression model of non-modifiable risk factors at time of transplantation, diabetes was found to be an independent risk factor for cellular rejection (hazard ratio 1.445, 95% CI 1.023-1.945; P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney allograft recipients with diabetes at transplantation should be counselled regarding their increased risk of cellular rejection but reassured regarding the lack of any adverse impact on short-to-medium term allograft function or survival.

Controlling Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: Room for Improvement

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness with great impact on long-term outcome after liver transplantation (LT). Despite this, the current level of glycemic control and quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions that are being provided to liver transplant recipients with diabetes have not yet been assessed.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study that included 344 liver transplant recipients and examined the level of glycemic control and its associated factors, as well as the quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (21.8%) suffered from diabetes before transplantation, and 82 (23.8%) developed diabetes mellitus after transplantation. Adequate glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) was achieved in 66.7% of the patients. Forty-eight percent of patients underwent regular screening for retinopathy, 47.1% for nephropathy, 4.5% for neuropathy, and 5.7% for foot ulcers. Diabetes was associated with higher frequency of cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia both before and after LT. Multivariate analysis revealed association between poor glycemic control and arterial hypertension, presence of diabetes before transplantation, elevated GGT, and insulin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycemic control was inadequate in 33.3% of LT recipients with diabetes, and screening protocols for diabetes-associated conditions did not meet the standards for medical care set by the American Diabetes Association in any of the participating centers. Consequently, this study reveals a clear deficiency in the quality of diabetes care provided to patients after LT and, hence, we predict that future progress in this area will have a significant impact on medium-term to long-term outcome of these patients.

The Health Economic Value of Changes in Glycaemic Control, Weight and Rates of Hypoglycaemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

AIMS

Therapy-related consequences of treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), such as weight gain and hypoglycaemia, act as a barrier to attaining optimal glycaemic control, indirectly influencing the incidence of vascular complications and associated morbidity and mortality. This study quantifies the individual and combined contribution of changes in hypoglycaemia frequency, weight and HbA1c to predicted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) within a T1DM population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe the Cardiff Type 1 Diabetes (CT1DM) Model, originally informed by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and updated with the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study and Swedish National Diabetes Registry for microvascular and cardiovascular complications respectively. We report model validation results and the QALY impact of HbA1c, weight and hypoglycaemia changes.

RESULTS

Validation results demonstrated coefficients of determination for clinical endpoints of R2 = 0.863 (internal R2 = 0.999; external R2 = 0.823), costs R2 = 0.980 and QALYs R2 = 0.951. Achieving and maintaining a 1% HbA1c reduction was estimated to provide 0.61 additional discounted QALYs. Weight changes of ±1kg, ±2kg or ±3kg led to discounted QALY changes of ±0.03, ±0.07 and ±0.10 respectively, while modifying hypoglycaemia frequency by -10%, -20% or -30% resulted in changes of -0.05, -0.11 and -0.17. The differences in discounted costs, life-years and QALYs associated with HbA1c 6% versus 10% were -£19,037, 2.49 and 2.35 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a model updated with contemporary epidemiological data, this study presents an outcome-focused perspective to assessing the health economic consequences of differing levels of glycaemic control in T1DM with and without weight and hypoglycaemia effects.

Superior outcomes of kidney transplantation compared with dialysis: An optimal matched analysis of a national population-based cohort study between 2005 and 2008 in Korea

Data regarding kidney transplantation (KT) and dialysis outcomes are rare in Asian populations. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with KT using claims data from the Korean national public health insurance program. Among the 35,418 adult patients with incident dialysis treated between 2005 and 2008 in Korea, 1539 underwent KT. An optimal balanced risk set matching was attempted to compare the transplant group with the control group in terms of the overall survival and major adverse cardiac event-free survival. Before matching, the dialysis group was older and had more comorbidities. After matching, there were no differences in age, sex, dialysis modalities, or comorbidities. Patient survival was significantly better in the transplant group than in the matched control group (P < 0.001). In addition, the transplant group showed better major adverse cardiac event-free survival than the dialysis group (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.75). Korean patients with incident dialysis who underwent long-term dialysis had significantly more cardiovascular events and higher all-cause mortality rates than those who underwent KT. Thus, KT should be more actively recommended in Korean populations.

Single-centre study of 628 adult, primary kidney transplant recipients showing no unfavourable effect of new-onset diabetes after transplant

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

To better understand the implications of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), we used our prospectively followed cohort of 628 adult primary kidney transplant recipients to determine the prognostic impact of pretransplant diabetes and NODAT.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of all participants in four randomised immunosuppression trials performed at our centre since May 2000. For each cause-specific hazard analysed, Cox stepwise regression was used to determine a multivariable model of significant baseline predictors; the multivariable influence of having pretransplant diabetes and NODAT (t) (the latter defined as a zero-one, time-dependent covariate) was subsequently tested. Similar analyses of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 36 and 60 months post transplant were performed using stepwise linear regression. Finally, a repeated measures analysis of mean HbA1c as a function of diabetes category (pretransplant diabetes vs NODAT) and randomised trial (first to fourth) was performed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 56 months post transplant. Patients with pretransplant diabetes comprised 23.4% (147/628), and 22.5% (108/481) of the remaining patients developed NODAT. Pretransplant diabetes had no prognostic influence on first biopsy-proven acute rejection and death-censored graft failure hazard rates, nor on eGFR, but was associated with significantly higher rates of death with a functioning graft (DWFG) (p = 0.003), DWFG due to a cardiovascular event (p = 0.005) and infection that required hospitalisation (p = 0.03). NODAT (t) had no unfavourable impact on any of these hazard rates nor on eGFR, with actuarial freedom from DWFG remaining at over 90% among patients in pre- and post-NODAT states at 72 months post transplant/NODAT. Mean HbA1c for patients in the first to fourth randomised trials, averaged across diabetes category, decreased by trial (7.28%, 6.92%, 6.87% and 6.64% [56.1, 52.1, 51.6 and 49.1 mmol/mol], respectively; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Less-than-expected post-NODAT risk for graft loss and death may exist in the current climate of tighter glucose monitoring post transplant.

Outcomes of Foot and Ankle Surgery in Diabetic Patients Who Have Undergone Solid Organ Transplantation

Foot and ankle problems are highly prevalent in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Increased rates of surgical site infections and noninfectious complications, such as malunion, delayed union, nonunion, and hardware failure, have also been more commonly observed in diabetic patients who undergo foot and ankle surgery. DM is a substantial contributor of perioperative morbidity in patients with solid organ transplantation. To the best of our knowledge, postoperative foot and ankle complications have not been studied in a cohort of diabetic patients who previously underwent solid organ transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery in a cohort of diabetic transplant patients and to compare these outcomes with those of diabetic patients without a history of transplantation. We compared the rates of infectious and noninfectious complications after foot and ankle surgery in 28 diabetic transplant patients and 56 diabetic patients without previous transplantation and calculated the odds ratios (OR) for significant findings. The diabetic transplant patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery in the present cohort were not at an increased risk of overall complications (OR 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 2.08, p = .67), infectious complications (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.09 to 3.09, p = .49), or noninfectious complications (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.15, p = .81). Four transplant patients (14.3%) died of non-orthopedic surgery-related events during the follow-up period; however, no deaths occurred in the control group. Diabetic patients with previous solid organ transplantation were not at an increased risk of developing postoperative complications after foot and ankle surgery, despite being immunocompromised. The transplant patients had a greater mortality rate, but their premature death was unrelated to their foot and ankle surgery. Surgeons treating transplant patients can recommend foot and ankle surgery when indicated. However, owing to the increased mortality rate and comorbidities associated with this high-risk group, we recommend preoperative clearance from the transplant team and medical consultations before performing surgery.

Negative impact of underlying non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus nephropathy on long-term allograft survival in kidney transplantation: a 10-year analysis from a single center

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the relationship between underlying nephropathy and long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 678 patients who underwent kidney transplantation (KTx) between 1998 and 2011. Recipients with 13 major nephropathies were evaluated for graft and patient survival, and causes of graft loss.

RESULTS

The best 10-year graft survival rates (100%) were in the patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease, preeclampsia, Alport syndrome, and purpura nephritis. The worst rate (50.8%) was in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus nephropathy (NIDDMN; P = .039). Causes of graft-loss in the NIDDM patients included chronic rejection (6 cases), acute rejection (3 cases), infection (2 cases), and cardiovascular event (2 cases). Significant risk factors for graft loss were donor age (P < .01) and NIDDMN (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Underlying NIDDMN before KTx was a significant risk factor for long-term graft function. Immunologic factors and nonimmunologic factors influenced the long-term outcomes in patients with underlying NIDDMN.

Long-term impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatches combined with expanded criteria donor on allograft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation

The long-term impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches combined with expanded criteria donors (ECD) on clinical outcomes has not been fully evaluated in recipients of deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantations. Of 595 DD renal transplant recipients in our center between 1991 and 2011, 210 recipients (36%) had 0-3 HLA mismatches/standard criteria donor (SCD), 353 (59%) had 4-6 HLA mismatches/SCD or 0-3 HLA mismatches/ECD, and 32 (5%) had 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD. The mortality rate was significantly highest in the patients with 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD (p = 0.040). The most common cause of death in this group was infection (50%). There were no significant differences in overall graft survival and death-censored graft survival. The biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was significantly higher in the 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD group (p = 0.011). Cox-regression multivariate analyses showed that 4-6 HLA mismatches plus ECD (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-10.56) and diabetes (AHR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.50-12.28) were significant predictors of recipient mortality. In conclusion, ≥4 HLA mismatches plus ECD were associated with significantly higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection and mortality compared with other groups undergoing DD kidney transplantation.

Pancreas transplantation: solid organ and islet

Transplantation of the pancreas, either as a solid organ or as isolated islets of Langerhans, is indicated in a small proportion of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes in whom severe complications develop, particularly severe glycemic instability and progressive secondary complications (usually renal failure). The potential to reverse diabetes has to be balanced against the morbidity of long-term immunosuppression. For a patient with renal failure, the treatment of choice is often a simultaneous transplant of the pancreas and kidney (SPK), whereas for a patient with glycemic instability, specifically hypoglycemic unawareness, the choice between a solid organ and an islet transplant has to be individual to the patient. Results of SPK transplantation are comparable to other solid-organ transplants (kidney, liver, heart) and there is evidence of improved quality of life and life expectancy, but the results of solitary pancreas transplantation and islets are inferior with respect to graft survival. There is some evidence of benefit with respect to the progression of secondary diabetic complications in patients with functioning transplants for several years.