Clinical impact of preformed donor-specific denatured class I HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation

Specificity of HLA monoclonal antibodies and their use to determine HLA expression on lymphocytes and peripheral blood stem cells

HLA Class I and II expression are known to differ locus-to-locus, however, HLA expression on the cell-surface is frequently reported as the total amount of HLA Class I or II antigens. This is despite evidence that indicates the differential expression of HLA can influence patient outcomes post-transplantation. Although numerous commercially available HLA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) exist to characterize HLA expression, there is currently a lack of detailed information regarding their reactivities to HLA specificities. The specificities of locus-specific HLA mAbs (nine Class I and four Class II mAbs) were evaluated by two solid-phase Luminex single antigen bead assays. The reactivity patterns of these mAbs were then confirmed by flow cytometry using lymphocytes and PBSCs (peripheral blood stem cells). Out of the 13 HLA mAbs tested, only four (one Class I and three Class II mAbs) displayed intra-locus reactivity without also reacting to inter-locus specificities. Epitope analysis revealed the presence of shared epitopes across numerous HLA loci, explaining much of the observed inter-locus reactivity. The specificity of the HLA mAbs seen in solid-phase assays was confirmed against PBSCs and lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Using this method, we observed differences in the cell surface expression of HLA-C, HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP between PBSCs and lymphocytes. Our results emphasize the need to characterize the reactivity patterns of HLA mAbs using solid-phase assays before their use on cells. Through understanding the reactivity of these HLA mAbs, the cellular expression of HLA can be more accurately assessed in downstream assays.

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-HLA-Cw and Anti-HLA-DP Antibodies on Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Given the risk of rejection, the presence of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) contraindicates transplantation in most allocation systems. However, HLA-Cw and -DP DSA escape this censorship. We performed a multicentric observational study, in which the objective was to determinate risk factors of acute antibody-mediated rejection (aABMR) in recipients transplanted with preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA. Between 2010 and 2019, 183 patients were transplanted with a preformed isolated Cw- or DP-DSA (92 Cw-DSA; 91 DP-DSA). At 2 years, the incidence of aABMR was 12% in the Cw-DSA group, versus 28% in the DP-DSA group. Using multivariable Cox regression model, the presence of a preformed DP-DSA was associated with an increased risk of aABMR (HR = 2.32 [1.21-4.45 (p = 0.001)]) compared with Cw-DSA. We also observed a significant association between the DSA's MFI on the day of transplant and the risk of aABMR (HR = 1.09 [1.08-1.18], p = 0.032), whatever the DSA was. Interaction term analysis found an increased risk of aABMR in the DP-DSA group compared with Cw-DSA, but only for MFI below 3,000. These results may plead for taking these antibodies into account in the allocation algorithms, in the same way as other DSA.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Virtual crossmatching and epitope analysis in kidney transplantation: What the physician involved in kidney transplantation should know?

Solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay for detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and high-resolution HLA typing have enabled tremendous progress in virtual crossmatch (VXM) technology in recent years. However, misinterpretation of the SAB assay may result in detrimental consequences after kidney transplantation. Meanwhile, epitope analysis could be an effective method to estimate immunizing eplets, which may provide ancillary information for better understanding of the SAB assay. To perform epitope analysis appropriately, it is necessary to understand the basic principles related to histocompatibility testing and the characteristics of the SAB assay. Therefore, knowledge of the properties and limitations of the SAB assay is critical. In this review, we aim to describe the fundamental concepts regarding immunobiological assessment, including HLA, anti-HLA antibodies, and SAB assay, and explain epitope analysis using examples.

Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation

(1) Calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) is a measure of sensitization based on unacceptable antigens (UAs). Determination of UAs based on single-antigen bead assays at allele or antigen levels may be inappropriate. We aimed to introduce eplets for better assessment of sensitization; (2) 900 recipients and 1427 donors were enrolled for candidate or donor pools, respectively. Eplets were from the HLA Epitope Registry. UAs were determined by anti-HLA antibodies identified using LIFECODES Single Antigen (LSA) kits. CPRA values were calculated using a simplified method of donor filtering; (3) HLA antigens containing all eplets of an HLA antigen in LSA kits (LSA antigen) were defined as eplet-predicted (EP) antigens, the reactivity of which could be predicted by that LSA antigen. High reactivity concordance was found between LSA and EP antigens. More HLA antigens were covered by EP antigens in the population than LSA antigens. CPRA values at the EP level were higher than at the allele level and lower than at the antigen level. The EP antigens facilitated UA determination for non-LSA antigens and avoided acute rejection; (4) UA determination using EP antigens can lead to more accurate assessment of sensitization, enabling a high probability of compatible organs and a low risk of adverse outcomes.

Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of graft failure. While donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of AMR, not all patients with DSAs develop rejection, suggesting that the characteristics of alloantibodies determining their pathogenicity remain undefined. Using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific antibodies as a model, we apply systems serology tools to investigate qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc-glycosylation patterns and FcγR-binding properties. Levels of afucosylated anti-A2 antibodies are elevated in seropositive patients, especially those with AMR, suggesting potential cytotoxicity via FcγRIII-mediated mechanisms. Afucosylation of both glycoengineered monoclonal and naturally glycovariant polyclonal serum IgG specific to HLA-A2 drives potentiated binding to, slower dissociation from, and enhanced signaling through FcγRIII, a receptor widely expressed on innate effector cells, and greater cytotoxicity against HLA-A2+ cells mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Collectively, these results suggest that afucosylated DSA may be a biomarker of AMR and contribute to pathogenesis.

Highly sensitised patients awaiting deceased donor renal transplants are disadvantaged by the presence of denatured HLA antibody detected in routine HLA antibody testing

Luminex Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays used to detect HLA antibodies may artificially increase sensitisation in highly sensitised patients. The presence of denatured HLA (dHLA) within the assay enables antibodies specific to cryptic HLA epitopes to bind, such antibodies are not clinically relevant. We sought to exclude dHLA reactivity in a cohort of very highly sensitised patients (HSP), calculated reaction frequency (cRF) 95-100%, and determine the effect upon sensitisation. Such patients have limited access to suitable donors and small changes in their HLA antibody profile, particularly where their cRF is 100%, can increase their opportunity of a transplant. We determined the presence of dHLA by aligning antibody reactivity which did not correspond to known HLA class I epitope mismatches with the results of assays modified to detect class I dHLA. 130 class I dHLA reactions were identified within 11 HSP, all of whom had clear sensitising events. cRF was corrected for dHLA, mean cRF 98.2% (93-100) pre and 95.5% (87-100) post correction (P = 0.0156). An increase in the number of predicted compatible donors (p = 0.0078) after dHLA correction was demonstrated. Two manufacturers SAB assays were used. A reduction of patients with 100% cRF was observed for both manufactures. dHLA is contributing to sensitisation in HSP and is detrimental to their chances of receiving a compatible transplant. The observed dHLA reactivity varied according to kit manufacturers (P = 0.0001), this is potentially a useful finding for laboratories wishing to discriminate between nHLA and dHLA, but without the resources required to regularly perform dHLA assay and epitope analyses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Stratifying the humoral risk of candidates to a solid organ transplantation: a proposal of the ENGAGE working group

Detection of circulating antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, which corresponds to the current definition of 'sensitized patient', has been shown to have a severe impact on both access to transplantation and, if the anti-HLA antibodies are specific to the selected donor, survival of the graft. However, not all donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are equally harmful to the graft and progress in the understanding of humoral memory has led to the conclusion that absence of DSA at transplantation does not rule out the possibility that the patient has a preformed cellular humoral memory against the graft (thereby defining a category of DSA-negative sensitized recipients). Technological progress has led to the generation of new assays that offer unprecedented precision in exploring the different layers (serological and cellular) of alloimmune humoral memory. Based on this recent knowledge, the EuropeaN Guidelines for the mAnagement of Graft rEcipients (ENGAGE) working group to propose an updated definition of sensitization in candidates for solid organ transplantation - one that moves away from the current binary division towards a definition based on homogenous strata with similar humoral risk.

Detection of antibodies to denatured human leucocyte antigen molecules by single antigen Luminex

The anti-HLA antibody detection has been improved in sensitivity and specificity with solid-phase antigen bead (SAB) assays based on Luminex. However, false positive results due to denatured HLA (dHLA) may arise after single antigen test. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the two Luminex technology-based anti-HLA detection kits available in the market in showing undesired anti-HLA antibody results. A prospective cohort was assessed for anti-HLA antibodies with single antigen A manufacturer (AM) kit and a comparison cohort with single antigen B manufacturer (BM) kit. A total of 11 out of 90 patients in a prospective cohort presented monospecific HLA-I antibodies with AM, and 5 out of 11 confirmed monospecific reaction with BM. Despite the confirmation of monospecific reaction with both manufacturers, 80% were assigned as dHLA reaction by specific crossmatch. Further comparative cohorts detected four out of six monospecific reactions with BM that were confirmed as possible dHLA reactions. A positive SAB test should rule out a reaction against a dHLA molecule, thus avoidance of prolonged waitlist periods or misattribution of anti-HLA reactions after transplantation.

Clinical relevance of donor-specific antibodies directed at HLA-C: A long road to acceptance

In solid organ transplantation (SOT), the clinical relevance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) directed at anti-HLA-A, -B, -DR and -DQ antigens is largely recognized while it is still a matter of debate for DSA directed at HLA-C. In this review, we summarize the peculiarities of HLA-C among class I HLA antigens as well as their immunogenicity, which underlie the clinical relevance of HLA-C locus and anti-HLA-C DSA in SOT. Many factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the HLA-C gene and HLA-C protein, explain its lower expression in comparison with HLA-A and -B. This lower expression can explain the apparent lower immunogenicity of HLA-C leading to a lower prevalence and strength of anti-HLA-C antibodies. Nevertheless, HLA-C antigens are truly immunogenic and preformed anti-HLA-C DSA are clinically relevant. Indeed, anti-HLA-C DSA are able to bind donor cells and to activate the complement pathway both ex vivo and in vivo. In line with this, numerous clinical studies now show that preformed DSA directed at native HLA-C molecules induce poorer graft outcomes. We then plead for the inclusion of HLA-C in all transplant allocation systems and we propose a strategy to cope with anti-HLA-C DSA in SOT. Beyond SOT, anti-HLA-C antibodies generate a growing interest in the allo-HCT, transfusion and obstetrics fields, while new concepts such as the role of the "missing-self" in solid organ rejection places HLA-C as an inescapable actor in transplant tolerance.

Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation

Anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti-HLA-Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti-denatured and anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA-Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty-three (31.6%) were anti-denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti-HLA-Cw donor-specific antibodies. Those with anti-native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections (P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival (P = .04). Patients with anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events (P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti-native HLA-Cw eplets (P = .0001). Anti-native but not anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA.

Enhancing Natural Killer and CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Anticancer Cytotoxicity and Proliferation of CD8+ T Cells with HLA-E Monospecific Monoclonal Antibodies

Cytotoxic NK/CD8+ T cells interact with MHC-I ligands on tumor cells through either activating or inhibiting receptors. One of the inhibitory receptors is CD94/NKG2A. The NK/CD8+ T cell cytotoxic capability is lost when tumor-associated human leukocyte antigen, HLA-E, binds the CD94/NKG2A receptor, resulting in tumor progression and reduced survival. Failure of cancer patients to respond to natural killer (NK) cell therapies could be due to HLA-E overexpression in tumor tissues. Preventing the inhibitory receptor-ligand interaction by either receptor- or ligand-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is an innovative passive immunotherapeutic strategy for cancer. Since receptors and ligands can be monomeric or homo- or heterodimeric proteins, the efficacy of mAbs may rely on their ability to distinguish monospecific (private) functional epitopes from nonfunctional common (public) epitopes. We developed monospecific anti-HLA-E mAbs (e.g., TFL-033) that recognize only HLA-E-specific epitopes, but not epitopes shared with other HLA class-I loci as occurs with currently available polyreactive anti-HLA-E mAbs. Interestingly the amino acid sequences in the α1 and α2 helices of HLA-E, critical for the recognition of the mAb TFL-033, are strikingly the same sequences recognized by the CD94/NKG2A inhibitory receptors on NK/CD8+ cells. Such monospecific mAbs can block the CD94/NKG2A interaction with HLA-E to restore NK cell and CD8+ anticancer cell cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the HLA-E monospecific mAbs significantly promoted the proliferation of the CD4-/CD8+ T cells. These monospecific mAbs are also invaluable for the specific demonstration of HLA-E on tumor biopsies, potentially indicating those tumors most likely to respond to such therapy. Thus, they can be used to enhance passive immunotherapy once phased preclinical studies and clinical trials are completed. On principle, we postulate that NK cell passive immunotherapy should capitalize on both of these features of monospecific HLA-E mAbs, that is, the specific determination HLA-E expression on a particular tumor and the enhancement of NK cell/CD8+ cytotoxicity if HLA-E positive.

Increased alloreactive and autoreactive antihuman leucocyte antigen antibodies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disproportionately affect women during and following childbearing years. Antihuman leucocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibody responses are common in healthy parous women, and as these diseases are both linked with HLA and immune dysregulation, we sought to evaluate anti-HLA antibodies in RA and SLE.

Methods

Anti-HLA antibodies were measured among parous SLE cases (n=224), parous RA cases (n=202) and healthy parous controls (n=239) and compared with each other as well as with nulliparous female and male controls. Antibody specificities were identified and compared against subject HLA types to determine autoreactivity versus alloreactivity. The association of anti-HLA antibodies with clinical outcomes was evaluated.

Results

Levels and frequencies of anti-HLA antibodies were significantly higher among parous females with SLE (52%) or RA (46%) compared with controls (26%), and anti-HLA antibodies were also found among nulliparous females and males with SLE and RA. Autoreactive anti-HLA antibodies were observed among SLE and RA antibody-positive subjects, but not healthy controls, with the highest frequency of autoreactive anti-HLA antibodies found in the SLE subjects. Higher levels of anti-HLA antibodies were associated with nephritis among the nulliparous SLE cases (p<0.01). The presence of anti-class I HLA antibodies was associated with younger age at diagnosis among both the RA and SLE nulliparous cases.

Conclusions

Both autoreactive and alloreactive anti-HLA antibodies were found at high levels in RA and SLE subjects. These occurred even in the absence of alloexposure, particularly among SLE subjects and may be linked with disease severity.

Effect of Preformed or De Novo Anti-HLA Antibodies on Function and Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Donor-specific antibodies (DSA), directed against human leucocyte antigens (HLA), are associated with increased risk for graft rejection in kidney transplantation. Anti-HLA antibodies detection by Luminex™ present high sensitivity and accuracy, but its interpretation after transplantation is not completely clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of anti-HLA antibodies, preformed or de novo, on renal function, graft survival, and incidence of antibody-mediated acute rejection (AMR). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort of 86 kidney transplant recipients was divided into 3 groups according to the presence of anti-HLA antibodies before transplantation: donor-specific antibodies (DSA+, n=15), non-DSA (non-DSA, n=39), and negative pre-transplant panel reactive antibodies (PRA) that became positive after transplantation (PRA-, n=22). Forty-nine recipients with negative PRA pre- and post-transplantation were excluded. Antibody specificity and intensity of fluorescence (MFI) and their relationship with renal function, proteinuria, AMR, and graft failure were evaluated. RESULTS Among patients who completed 1 year of follow-up, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or proteinuria. AMR incidence was 9.5% in the DSA group, 2.3% in the non-DSA group, and 9.1% in the PRA- group. There was no correlation between fluorescence intensity and/or antibodies class (I or II) with increased risk of AMR. Thirteen grafts failed within 1 year post-transplant, there were 9 deaths due to infection, and only 1 due to AMR (PRA- group, DSA de novo at 3 months). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previous reports, we did not find a correlation between incidence of AMR and MFI intensity in this series.

Conformational Variants of the Individual HLA-I Antigens on Luminex Single Antigen Beads Used in Monitoring HLA Antibodies: Problems and Solutions

BACKGROUND

Single antigen beads (SAB) are used for monitoring HLA antibodies in pretransplant and posttransplant patients despite the discrepancy between virtual and actual crossmatch results and transplant outcomes. This discrepancy can be attributed to the presence of conformational variants of HLA-I on SAB, assessment of which would increase the concordance between SAB and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) results, thus enabling improved organ accessibility for the waiting list patients and a better prediction of antibody-mediated rejection.

METHODS

The conformational variants were examined on HLA-I beads, iBeads, acid-/alkali-treated beads, and T cells using HLA-I monoclonal antibodies (W6/32, TFL-006, and heavy chain (HC)-10).

RESULTS

The affinity of the monoclonal antibodies against HLA-I beads confirmed the presence and heterogeneous density of peptide-associated β2-microglobulin-associated HLA HC (pepA-β2aHC), peptide-free-β2aHC (pepF-β2aHC), and β2-free HC (β2fHC) on every single antigen-coated bead. In contrast, iBeads harbor a high density of pepA-β2aHC, low density of pepF-β2aHC, and are lacking β2fHC. The FCXM analyses confirmed the prevalence of pepA-β2aHC, but not pepF-β2aHC or β2fHC on resting T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The strength of a donor-specific antibody should be assessed with a bead-specific mean fluorescence intensity cutoff based on TFL-006 reactivity against HLA-I beads, and HC-10 against iBeads, where the β2fHC or pepF-β2aHC normalized donor-specific antibody level would reveal the true anti-pepA-β2aHC reactivity associated with positive FCXM.

Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay

This review outlines the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody detection assays and their use in organ transplantation in both antibody screening and crossmatching. The development of sensitive solid phase assays such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, and in particular the bead-based technology has revolutionized this field over the last 10-15 years. This revolution however has created a new paradigm in clinical decision making with respect to the detection of low level pretransplant HLA sensitization and its clinical relevance. The relative sensitivities of the assays used are discussed and the relevance of conflicting inter-assay results. Each assay has its advantages and disadvantages and these are discussed. Over the last decade, the bead-based assay utilizing the Luminex® fluorocytometer instrument has become established as the "gold standard" for HLA antibody testing. However, there are still unresolved issues surrounding this technique, such as the presence of denatured HLA molecules on the beads which reveal cryptic epitopes and the issue of appropriate fluorescence cut off values for positivity. The assay has been modified to detect complement binding (CB) in addition to non-complement binding (NCB) HLA antibodies although the clinical relevance of the CB and NCB IgG isotypes is not fully resolved. The increase sensitivity of the Luminex® bead assay over the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch has permitted the concept of the "virtual crossmatch" whereby the crossmatch is predicted to a high degree of accuracy based on the HLA antibody specificities detected by the solid phase assay. Dialog between clinicians and laboratory staff on an individual patient basis is essential for correct clinical decision making based on HLA antibody results obtained by the various techniques.

Many de novo donor-specific antibodies recognize β2 -microglobulin-free, but not intact HLA heterodimers

Solid‐phase single antigen bead (SAB) assays are standard of care for detection and identification of donor‐specific antibody (DSA) in patients who receive solid organ transplantation (SOT). While several studies have documented the reproducibility and sensitivity of SAB testing for DSA, there are little data available concerning its specificity. This study describes the identification of antibodies to β₂‐microglobulin‐free human leukocyte antigen (β₂‐m‐fHLA) heavy chains on SAB arrays and provides a reassessment of the clinical relevance of DSA testing by this platform. Post‐transplant sera from 55 patients who were positive for de novo donor‐specific antibodies on a SAB solid‐phase immunoassay were tested under denaturing conditions in order to identify antibodies reactive with β₂‐m‐fHLA or native HLA (nHLA). Antibodies to β₂‐m‐fHLA were present in nearly half of patients being monitored in the post‐transplant period. The frequency of antibodies to β₂‐m‐fHLA was similar among DSA and HLA antigens that were irrelevant to the transplant (non‐DSA). Among the seven patients with clinical or pathologic antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), none had antibodies to β₂‐m‐fHLA exclusively; thus, the clinical relevance of β₂‐m‐fHLA is unclear. Our data suggests that SAB testing produces false positive reactions due to the presence of β₂‐m‐fHLA and these can lead to inappropriate assignment of unacceptable antigens during transplant listing and possibly inaccurate identification of DSA in the post‐transplant period.