1
|
Punjala SR, Ibrahim M, Phillips BL, Stojanovic J, Kessaris N, Shaw O, Dorling A, Mamode N. Characteristics of Early Antibody Mediated Rejection in Antibody Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12942. [PMID: 39040870 PMCID: PMC11261346 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) may be an only option for highly sensitized patients. Severe form of early antibody mediated rejection (AMR) adversely affects graft survival after AIT. The aim of this study was to identify individuals at risk of AMR. We analyzed 213 living donor AITs performed at our center. Among 120 ABOi, 58 HLAi and 35 DSA + FCXM-negative cases, the rates of early AMR were 6%, 31%, and 9%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for graft loss, early AMR had a HR of 3.28 (p < 0.001). The HLAi group had worse death-censored graft survival (p = 0.003). In the HLAi group, Patients with aggressive variant AMR (AAMR) had greater percentage of C3d complement fixing DSA, higher baseline class I and total DSA MFI levels and B-cell FCXM RMF. C1q and C3d complement fixing DSA and strong positivity of baseline B- or T-cell FXCM as predictors of AAMR had 100% sensitivity. Early AMR is of significant clinical concern in AIT as it results in poor graft survival and is not well described in literature. An aggressive variant is characterized by massive rise in DSA levels at rejection. Baseline DSA, C1q, and C3d and baseline FCXM values can be used to risk-stratify candidates for AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Rithin Punjala
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Lyle Phillips
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Stojanovic
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Shaw
- Clinical Transplantation Lab, Viapath, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Negi S, Rutman AK, Saw CL, Paraskevas S, Tchervenkov J. Pretransplant, Th17 dominant alloreactivity in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2024; 3:1336563. [PMID: 38993777 PMCID: PMC11235243 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1336563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Sensitization to donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules prior to transplantation is a significant risk factor for delayed access to transplantation and to long-term outcomes. Memory T cells and their cytokines play a pivotal role in shaping immune responses, thereby increasing the risk of allograft rejection among highly sensitized patients. This study aims to elucidate the precise contribution of different CD4+ memory T cell subsets to alloreactivity in highly sensitized (HS) kidney transplant recipients. Methods and results Stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with various polyclonal stimulating agents to assess non-specific immune responses revealed that HS patients exhibit elevated immune reactivity even before kidney transplantation, compared to non-sensitized (NS) patients. HS patients' PBMC displayed higher frequencies of CD4+ T cells expressing IFNγ, IL4, IL6, IL17A, and TNFα and secreted relatively higher levels of IL17A and IL21 upon stimulation with PMA/ionomycin. Additionally, PBMC from HS patients stimulated with T cell stimulating agent phytohemagglutinin (PHA) exhibited elevated expression levels of IFNγ, IL4 and, IL21. On the other hand, stimulation with a combination of resiquimod (R848) and IL2 for the activation of memory B cells demonstrated higher expression of IL17A, TNFα and IL21, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR. A mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) assay, employing third-party donor antigen presenting cells (APCs), was implemented to evaluate the direct alloreactive response. HS patients demonstrated notably higher frequencies of CD4+ T cells expressing IL4, IL6 and IL17A. Interestingly, APCs expressing recall HLA antigens triggered a stronger Th17 response compared to APCs lacking recall HLA antigens in sensitized patients. Furthermore, donor APCs induced higher activation of effector memory T cells in HS patients as compared to NS patients. Conclusion These results provide an assessment of pretransplant alloreactive T cell subsets in highly sensitized patients and emphasize the significance of Th17 cells in alloimmune responses. These findings hold promise for the development of treatment strategies tailored to sensitized kidney transplant recipients, with potential clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarita Negi
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Human Islet Transplantation Laboratory, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Chee Loong Saw
- HLA Laboratory, Division of Hematology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Steven Paraskevas
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Human Islet Transplantation Laboratory, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of General Surgery and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean Tchervenkov
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of General Surgery and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agrawal A, Balakrishnan S, Gandhi MJ, Alexander MP, Cornell L, Bentall AJ, Kukla A, Stegall M, Schinstock CA. Highly Sensitized Candidates Remain at Risk for Microvascular Inflammation Even When Donor-specific Antibody Is Avoided: A Matched Cohort Study. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00718. [PMID: 38578704 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a key feature of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) among patients with HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA), but MVI at AMR thresholds (Banff glomerulitis [g] + peritubular capillaritis [ptc] score ≥ 2) without DSA has been increasingly recognized. We aimed to determine the incidence of MVI among highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients without DSA. METHODS We performed a single-center, retrospective, matched cohort study comparing outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with cPRA ≥90% with preexisting DSA (n = 49), cPRA ≥90% without preexisting DSA (n = 47), and matched controls with cPRA = 0 without preexisting DSA (n = 49). Controls were matched by age, donor type, and transplant date. Indication and surveillance biopsies combined with annual de novo DSA screening were obtained. RESULTS Kidney transplant recipients with a cPRA ≥90% and no evidence of preexisting or de novo DSA had a higher incidence of MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis ≥ 2) than patients with cPRA = 0 [35% (17/49) versus 12% (6/49), P = 0.0003] over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 5 (4-6) y posttransplant. Among this cPRA ≥90% group without DSA, MVI persisted in 54% of cases on follow-up biopsy (7/13), and 24% (4/13) of cases developed transplant glomerulopathy (Banff cg score > 0). CONCLUSIONS Highly sensitized transplant recipients have a high incidence of persistent and progressive MVI, even without DSA. The mechanisms underlying these histologic features needs to be elucidated, but this information is important to consider when making decisions about transplantation among highly sensitized individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amogh Agrawal
- Department of Transplant Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Manish J Gandhi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mariam P Alexander
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lynn Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Andrew J Bentall
- Department of Transplant Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hypertension and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Transplant Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Division of Hypertension and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark Stegall
- Department of Transplant Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carrie A Schinstock
- Department of Transplant Surgery, William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:104-120. [PMID: 38088373 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%. RECENT FINDINGS Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization. SUMMARY Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lan JH. Assessment of Novel Therapeutics to Improve Access to Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in a Shifting Clinical Landscape. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:259-260. [PMID: 38303118 PMCID: PMC10962892 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James H Lan
- British Columbia Provincial Immunology Laboratory, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Division of Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vincenti F, Bestard O, Brar A, Cruzado JM, Seron D, Gaber AO, Ali N, Tambur AR, Lee H, Abbadessa G, Paul JA, Dudek M, Siegel RJ, Torija A, Semiond D, Lépine L, Ternes N, Montgomery RA, Stegall M. Isatuximab Monotherapy for Desensitization in Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:347-360. [PMID: 38147137 PMCID: PMC10914196 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT There is no standardized desensitization regimen for kidney transplant candidates. CD38, expressed by plasma cells, could be targeted for desensitization to deplete plasma cells producing alloantibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Few studies and case reports are available regarding the use of CD38 antibodies for desensitization in patients awaiting kidney transplant. This study shows that isatuximab, a CD38-targeting therapy, was well tolerated in kidney transplant candidates, with a durable decrease in anti-HLA antibodies and partial desensitization activity. The short treatment period and long follow-up of this study allowed for the understanding of the mechanism and timing for any antibody rebound. Isatuximab could be further investigated as an option for adjunct therapy to existing desensitization for patients on the kidney transplant waitlist. BACKGROUND Patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥80.00%, particularly those with cPRA ≥99.90%, are considered highly sensitized and underserved by the Kidney Allocation System. Desensitization removes circulating reactive antibodies and/or suppresses antibody production to increase the chances of a negative crossmatch. CD38 is expressed highly on plasma cells, thus is a potential target for desensitization. METHODS This was an open-label single-arm phase 1/2 study investigating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of isatuximab in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. There were two cohorts, cohorts A and B, which enrolled cPRA ≥99.90% and 80.00% to <99.90%, respectively. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (12 cohort A, 11 cohort B) received isatuximab 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks then every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Isatuximab was well tolerated with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles that indicated similar exposure to multiple myeloma trials. It resulted in decreases in CD38 + plasmablasts, plasma cells, and NK cells and significant reductions in HLA-specific IgG-producing memory B cells. Overall response rate, on the basis of a predefined composite desensitization end point, was 83.3% and 81.8% in cohorts A and B. Most responders had decreases in anti-HLA antibodies that were maintained for 26 weeks after the last dose. Overall, cPRA values were minimally affected, however, with only 9/23 patients (39%) having cPRA decreases to target levels. By study cutoff (median follow-up of 68 weeks), six patients received transplant offers, of which four were accepted. CONCLUSIONS In this open-label trial, isatuximab was well tolerated and resulted in a durable decrease in anti-HLA antibodies with partial desensitization activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04294459 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Vincenti
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Laboratory, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amarpali Brar
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Josep M. Cruzado
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Seron
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Nicole Ali
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Anat R. Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | - Ruby J. Siegel
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alba Torija
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Laboratory, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Robert A. Montgomery
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Mark Stegall
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Valentin MO, Crespo M, Fernandez C, Muro M, Vega R, Palou E, Ruiz JC, Diekman F, Padilla M, Mancebo E, Perez I, Andres A, Ontañon J, Dominguez-Gil B. Improving the Access of Highly Sensitized Patients to Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors: The Spanish PATHI Program With Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch. Transplantation 2024; 108:787-801. [PMID: 37867239 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2015, the Spanish National Transplant Organization developed a prioritization system (Program for Access to Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients [PATHI]) to increase transplant options for patients with calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRAs) ≥98%, based on virtual crossmatch. We describe the experience with the implementation of PATHI and assess its efficacy. METHODS PATHI registry was used to collect characteristics of donors and patients between June 15, 2015, and March 1, 2018. One-year graft and patient survival and acute rejection were also measured. A Cox model was used to identify factors related to patient death and graft loss and logistical regression for those associated with rejection. RESULTS One thousand eighty-nine patients were included, and 272 (25%) were transplanted. Transplant rate by cPRA was 54.9%, 40.5%, and 12.8% in patients with cPRA98%, cPRA99%, and cPRA100%, respectively. One-year patient survival was 92.5%. Recipient age ≥60, time under dialysis >7 y, and delayed graft function were mortality risk factors. One-year graft survival was 88.7%. The factor related to graft loss was delayed graft function. The rejection rate was 22%. Factors related to rejection were sex, older recipients, and posttransplant donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS A prioritization approach increases transplant options for highly sensitized patients with appropriate short-term postransplant outcomes. Along with other programs, PATHI may inspire other countries to adopt strategies to meet transplant needs of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria O Valentin
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital De Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Constantino Fernandez
- Nephrology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Manuel Muro
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rocio Vega
- Transplant Coordination Department, Organización Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekman
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Padilla
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Esther Mancebo
- Immunology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Perez
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amado Andres
- Nephrology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Ontañon
- Immunology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Beatriz Dominguez-Gil
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Puliyanda DP, Jordan SC. Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14694. [PMID: 38400645 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechu P Puliyanda
- Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
DeLaura I, Zikos J, Anwar IJ, Yoon J, Ladowski J, Jackson A, Van Rompay K, Magnani D, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. The impact of IdeS (imlifidase) on allo-specific, xeno-reactive, and protective antibodies in a sensitized rhesus macaque model. Xenotransplantation 2024; 31:e12833. [PMID: 37864433 PMCID: PMC10999173 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highly sensitized patients face many barriers to kidney transplantation, including higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection after HLA-incompatible transplant. IdeS, an endopeptidase that cleaves IgG nonspecifically, has been trialed as desensitization prior to kidney transplant, and successfully cleaves donor-specific antibody (DSA), albeit with rebound. METHODS IdeS was generated and tested (2 mg/kg, IV) in two naïve and four allosensitized nonhuman primates (NHP). Peripheral blood samples were collected at regular intervals following IdeS administration. Total IgG, total IgM, and anti-CMV antibodies were quantified with ELISA, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) and anti-pig antibodies were evaluated using flow cytometric crossmatch. B cell populations were assessed using flow cytometry. RESULTS IdeS successfully cleaved rhesus IgG in vitro. In allosensitized NHP, robust reduction of total, DSA, anti-pig, and anti-CMV IgG was observed within one day following IdeS administration. Rapid rebound of all IgG antibody populations was observed, with antibody levels returning to baseline around day 14 post-infusion. Total IgM level was not affected by IdeS. Interestingly, a comparable reduction in antibody populations was observed after the second dose of IdeS. However, we have not observed any significant modulation of B cell subpopulations after IdeS. CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated efficacy of IdeS in the allosensitized NHP in IgG with various specificities, mirroring antibody kinetics in human patients. The efficacy of IdeS on preexisting anti-pig antibodies may be useful in clinical xenotransplantation. However, given the limitation of IdeS on its durability as a monotherapy, optimization of IdeS with other agents targeting the humoral response is further needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Joanna Zikos
- MassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA, 02126, USA
| | - Imran J. Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Joseph Ladowski
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Annette Jackson
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Koen Van Rompay
- California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Diogo Magnani
- MassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, MA, 02126, USA
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Z, Markmann C, Yu M, Agarwal D, Rostami S, Wang W, Liu C, Zhao H, Ochoa T, Parvathaneni K, Xu X, Li E, Gonzalez V, Khadka R, Hoffmann J, Knox JJ, Scholler J, Marcellus B, Allman D, Fraietta JA, Samelson-Jones B, Milone MC, Monos D, Garfall AL, Naji A, Bhoj VG. Immunotherapy targeting B cells and long-lived plasma cells effectively eliminates pre-existing donor-specific allo-antibodies. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101336. [PMID: 38118406 PMCID: PMC10772570 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Pre-existing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allo-antibodies constitute a major barrier to transplantation. Current desensitization approaches fail due to ineffective depletion of allo-specific memory B cells (Bmems) and long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs). We evaluate the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) to eliminate allo-antibodies in a skin pre-sensitized murine model of islet allo-transplantation. We find that treatment of allo-sensitized hosts with CAR T cells targeting Bmems and LLPCs eliminates donor-specific allo-antibodies (DSAs) and mitigates hyperacute rejection of subsequent islet allografts. We then assess the clinical efficacy of the CAR T therapy for desensitization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with pre-existing HLA allo-antibodies who were treated with the combination of CART-BCMA and CART-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03549442) and observe clinically meaningful allo-antibody reduction. These findings provide logical rationale for clinical evaluation of CAR T-based immunotherapy in highly sensitized candidates to promote successful transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China
| | - Caroline Markmann
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ming Yu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Divyansh Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Susan Rostami
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Chengyang Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Huiwu Zhao
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Trini Ochoa
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kalpana Parvathaneni
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Xiaoming Xu
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Eric Li
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Vanessa Gonzalez
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roman Khadka
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jennifer Hoffmann
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - James J Knox
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John Scholler
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brooke Marcellus
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Immunogenetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David Allman
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joseph A Fraietta
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin Samelson-Jones
- Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael C Milone
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dimitri Monos
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Immunogenetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alfred L Garfall
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ali Naji
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Vijay G Bhoj
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cody EM, Varnell C, Lazear D, VandenHeuvel K, Flores FX, Woodle ES, Hooper DK. Carfilzomib-based antibody mediated rejection therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14534. [PMID: 37132092 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the evidence for proteasome-inhibitor (PI) based antibody mediated rejection (AMR) therapy has been with the first-generation PI bortezomib. Results have demonstrated encouraging efficacy for early AMR with lesser efficacy for late AMR. Unfortunately, bortezomib is associated with dose-limiting adverse effects in some patients. We report use of the second generation proteosome inhibitor carfilzomib for AMR treatment in two pediatric patients with a kidney transplant. METHODS The clinical data on two patients who experienced dose limiting toxicities from bortezomib were collected along with their short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS A two-year-old female with simultaneous AMR, multiple de novo DSAs (DR53 MFI 3900, DQ9 MFI 6600, DR15 2200, DR51 MFI 1900) and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) completed three carfilzomib cycles and experienced stage 1 acute kidney injury after the first two cycles. At 1 year follow up, all DSAs resolved, and her kidney function returned to baseline without recurrence. A 17-year-old female also developed AMR with multiple de novo DSAs (DQ5 MFI 9900, DQ6 MFI 9800, DQA*01 MFI 9900). She completed two carfilzomib cycles, which were associated with acute kidney injury. She had resolution of rejection on biopsy and decreased but persistent DSAs on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Carfilzomib treatment for bortezomib-refractory rejection and/or bortezomib toxicity may provide DSA elimination or reduction, but also appears to be associated with nephrotoxicity. Clinical development of carfilzomib for AMR will require a better understanding of efficacy and development of approaches to mitigate nephrotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M Cody
- Divison of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Charles Varnell
- Divison of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Danielle Lazear
- Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Katherine VandenHeuvel
- Division of Pathology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Francisco X Flores
- Divison of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - David K Hooper
- Divison of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dudreuilh C, Basu S, Shaw O, Burton H, Mamode N, Harris F, Tree T, Nedyalko P, Terranova-Barberio M, Lombardi G, Scottà C, Dorling A. Highly sensitised individuals present a distinct Treg signature compared to unsensitised individuals on haemodialysis. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 2:1165320. [PMID: 38993845 PMCID: PMC11235238 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1165320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Highly sensitised (HS) patients represent up to 30% of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. When they are transplanted, they have a high risk of acute/chronic rejection and long-term allograft loss. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25hiCD127lo) are T cells involved in the suppression of immune alloresponses. A particular subset, called T follicular regulatory T cells (Tfr, CXCR5+Bcl-6+), is involved in regulating interactions between T effectors and B cells within the germinal centre and can be found in peripheral blood. Therefore, we wanted to identify specific subsets of Tregs in the peripheral blood of HS individuals. Methods We recruited prospectively healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 9), non-sensitised patients on haemodialysis (HD) (n = 9) and HS individuals, all of whom were on haemodialysis (n = 15). Results We compared the Treg phenotypes of HV, HD and HS. HS patients had more CD161+ Tregs (p = 0.02) and more CD45RA-CCR7- T effectors (Teffs) (p = 0.04, memory Teffs able to home to the germinal centre) compared to HVs. HS patients had more Bcl-6+ Tregs (p < 0.05), fewer Th1-like Tregs, more Th2-like Tregs (p < 0.001) and more CD161+ (p < 0.05) Tregs compared to HD patients. This population has been described to be highly suppressive. HD had a deficiency in a Th17-like CD161+ effector Treg cluster (cluster iii., CCR6+CCR4+CXCR3- CD39+CD15s+ICOS-CCR7-CD161+) (p < 0.05). Discussion This is the first study presenting a deep Treg phenotype in HS patients. We confirmed that HS patients had more of a Th17-like CD161+ effector Treg from population III (CD4+CD25hiCD127loCD45RA-) compared to non-sensitised patients on HD. The clinical relevance of this highly suppressive Tregs population remains to be determined in the context of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Dudreuilh
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Basu
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - O. Shaw
- Synnovis Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - H. Burton
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - N. Mamode
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - F. Harris
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T. Tree
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - P. Nedyalko
- NIHR Guy’s and St Thomas’ Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - M. Terranova-Barberio
- NIHR Guy’s and St Thomas’ Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. Lombardi
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C. Scottà
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang Y, Hu A, Lin Y, Cao Y, Muller S, Wong G, Yang JYH. simKAP: simulation framework for the kidney allocation process with decision making model. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16367. [PMID: 37773250 PMCID: PMC10541869 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41162-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ shortage is a major barrier in transplantation and rules guarding organ allocation decisions should be robust, transparent, ethical and fair. Whilst numerous allocation strategies have been proposed, it is often unrealistic to evaluate all of them in real-life settings. Hence, the capability of conducting simulations prior to deployment is important. Here, we developed a kidney allocation simulation framework (simKAP) that aims to evaluate the allocation process and the complex clinical decision-making process of organ acceptance in kidney transplantation. Our findings have shown that incorporation of both the clinical decision-making and a dynamic wait-listing process resulted in the best agreement between the actual and simulated data in almost all scenarios. Additionally, several hypothetical risk-based allocation strategies were generated, and we found that these strategies improved recipients' long-term post-transplant patient survival and reduced wait time for transplantation. The importance of simKAP lies in its ability for policymakers in any transplant community to evaluate any proposed allocation algorithm using in-silico simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunwei Zhang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Hu
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Law School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yingxin Lin
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yue Cao
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Samuel Muller
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jean Yee Hwa Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, F07- Carslaw Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Couzi L, Malvezzi P, Amrouche L, Anglicheau D, Blancho G, Caillard S, Freist M, Guidicelli GL, Kamar N, Lefaucheur C, Mariat C, Koenig A, Noble J, Thaunat O, Thierry A, Taupin JL, Bertrand D. Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11244. [PMID: 37448448 PMCID: PMC10336835 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Couzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS-UMR 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Marine Freist
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux, Le Puy-en-Velay, France
| | | | - Nassim Kamar
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Christophe Mariat
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Johan Noble
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | - Antoine Thierry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Manook M, Olaso D, Anwar IJ, Yoon J, Delaura I, Bae Y, Moris D, Shaw B, Song M, Farris AB, Jackson A, Kwun J, Knechtle S. Desensitization and belatacept-based maintenance therapy in pregnancy-sensitized monkeys receiving a kidney transplant. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadg1448. [PMID: 37205758 PMCID: PMC10198638 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Among sensitized patients awaiting a transplant, females are disproportionately represented, partly because of pregnancy-induced sensitization. Using female NHPs sensitized by pregnancy alone, we examined the efficacy of costimulation blockade and proteasome inhibition for desensitization. Three animals received no desensitization (control), and seven animals received weekly carfilzomib (27 mg/m2) and belatacept (20 mg/kg) before kidney transplantation. All animals received renal allografts from crossmatch-positive/maximally MHC-mismatched donors. Controls and three desensitized animals received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Four desensitized animals received additional belatacept with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Multiparous females had less circulating donor-specific antibody when compared to skin-sensitized males before transplantation. While females receiving desensitization showed only a marginal survival benefit over control females (MST = 11 days versus 63 days), additional belatacept to posttransplant maintenance significantly prolonged graft survival (MST > 164 days) and suppressed posttransplant DSA and circulating follicular helper T-like cells. This combination of therapies demonstrates great potential to reduce antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Danae Olaso
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Imran J. Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Isabel Delaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Brian Shaw
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Mingqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dudreuilh C, Jarvis P, Beadle N, Pilecka I, Shaw O, Gardner L, Scottà C, Mamode N, Game DS, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Lombardi G, Learoyd A, Douiri A, Dorling A. Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:117. [PMID: 37118685 PMCID: PMC10140710 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chronic rejection, and a shorter graft survival compared to non-highly sensitised patients. Current standard immunosuppression protocols do not adequately suppress memory responses, and so alternative strategies are needed. Autologous polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be safe in transplant settings and could be a potential alternative to modulate memory immune alloresponses. METHODS The aim of this trial is to determine whether adoptive transfer of autologous Tregs into HLA sensitised patients can suppress memory T and B cell responses against specific HLA antigens. This is a two-part, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial, comprising an observational phase (Part 1) aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to HLA (Pure HLA Proteins) followed by an interventional phase (Part 2). The first 9 patients identified as being eligible in Part 1 will undergo baseline immune monitoring for 2 months to inform statistical analysis of the primary endpoint. Part 2 is an adaptive, open labelled trial based on Simon's two-stage design, with 21 patients receiving Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs to a dose of 5-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight. The primary EP is suppression of in vitro memory responses for 2 months post-infusion. 12 patients will receive treatment in stage 1 of Part 2, and 9 patients will receive treatment in stage 2 of Part 2 if ≥ 50% patients pass the primary EP in stage 1. DISCUSSION This is a prospective study aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to Pure HLA Proteins and determine baseline variation in these patterns of response. Part 2 will be an adaptive phase IIa clinical trial with 21 patients receiving a single infusion of GMP-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs in two stages. It remains to be demonstrated that modulating memory alloresponses clinically using Treg therapy is achievable. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT Number: 2021-001,664-23. REC Number: 21/SC/0253. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582152.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dudreuilh
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - P Jarvis
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Beadle
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - I Pilecka
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - O Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust, London, UK
| | - L Gardner
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Scottà
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Mamode
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - D S Game
- Department of Transplantation, Guys and St, Thomas's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - A Sanchez-Fueyo
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College London University and King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Lombardi
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Learoyd
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Douiri
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Dorling
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maldonado AQ, Bradbrook K, Sjöholm K, Kjellman C, Lee J, Stewart D. The real unmet need: A multifactorial approach for identifying sensitized kidney candidates with low access to transplant. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14946. [PMID: 36841966 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At the start of 2020, the kidney waiting list consisted of 2526 candidates with a calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) of 99.9% or greater, a cohort demonstrated in published research to have meaningfully lower than average access to transplantation even under the revised kidney allocation system (KAS). METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of US kidney registrations using data from the OPTN [Reference (https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/about-data/)]. The period-prevalent study cohort consisted of US kidney-alone registrations who waited at least 1 day between April 1, 2016, when HLA DQ-Alpha and DP-Beta unacceptable antigen data became available in OPTN data collection, to December 31, 2019. Poisson rate regression was used to model deceased donor kidney transplant rates per active year waiting and using an offset term to account for differential at-risk periods. Median time to transplant was estimated for each IRR group using the Kaplan-Meier method. Sensitivity analyses were included to address geographic variation in supply-to-demand ratios and differences in dialysis time or waiting time. RESULTS In this study, we found 1597 additional sensitized (CPRA 50-<99.9%) candidates with meaningfully lower than average access to transplant when simultaneously taking into account CPRA and other factors. In combination with CPRA, candidate blood type, Estimated Post-Transplant Survival Score (EPTS), and presence of other antibody specificities beyond those in the current, 5-locus CPRA were found to influence the likelihood of transplant. CONCLUSION In total, this suggests approximately 4100 sensitized candidates are on the waiting list who represent a community of disadvantaged patients who may benefit from progressive therapies and interventions to facilitate incompatible transplantation. Though associated with higher risks, such interventions may nevertheless be more attractive than remaining on dialysis with the associated accumulation of mortality risk over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Darren Stewart
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,NYU Langone Transplant Institute, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stewart D, Mupfudze T, Klassen D. Does anybody really know what (the kidney median waiting) time is? Am J Transplant 2023; 23:223-231. [PMID: 36695688 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The median waiting time (MWT) to deceased donor kidney transplant is of interest to patients, clinicians, and the media but remains elusive due to both methodological and philosophical challenges. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from January 2003 to March 2022 to estimate MWTs using various methods and timescales, applied overall, by era, and by candidate demographics. After rising for a decade, the overall MWT fell to 5.19 years between 2015 and 2018 and declined again to 4.05 years (April 2021 to March 2022), based on the Kaplan-Meier method applied to period-prevalent cohorts. MWTs differed markedly by blood type, donor service area, and pediatric vs adult status, but to a lesser degree by race/ethnicity. Choice of methodology affected the magnitude of these differences. Instead of waiting years for an answer, reliable kidney MWT estimates can be obtained shortly after a policy is implemented using the period-prevalent Kaplan-Meier approach, a theoretical but useful construct for which we found no evidence of bias compared with using incident cohorts. We recommend this method be used complementary to the competing risks approach, under which MWT is often inestimable, to fill the present information void concerning the seemingly simple question of how long it takes to get a kidney transplant in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Klassen
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, United Network for Organ Sharing
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tambur AR, Audry B, Glotz D, Jacquelinet C. Improving equity in kidney transplant allocation policies through a novel genetic metric: The Matched Donor Potential. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:45-54. [PMID: 36695620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The demand for donors' kidneys continues to increase amid a shortage of available donors. Managing policies to thoughtfully allocate this scarce resource is a complex process. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been shown to prolong graft survival, its relative contribution to allocation schemes is empirically compromised owing to competing priorities. We explored using a new metric, Matched Donor Potential (MDP), to facilitate improved HLA matching while promoting equity. We interrogated all active kidney waitlist patients (N = 164 427), their corresponding unacceptable antigen files, and all effective donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017). Cause-specific hazard functions were evaluated to assess the potential impact of the MDP metric on deceased donor transplant access rates for all candidates. Access was affected by ethnicity, blood group type, and calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA). Importantly, we show that access to transplantation is influenced by the patient's own HLA makeup regardless of their ethnicity and by the HLA makeup of effective donors. The MDP metric demonstrates a high association with access to transplantation. Adjusting Cox models to include this new metric resulted in improved access to kidney transplantation for waitlist candidates of minority heritage while significantly promoting HLA matching. Thus, the MDP metric accounts for balanced, equitable organ allocation algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | | | - Denis Glotz
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Effect of Maintaining Immunosuppression After Kidney Allograft Failure on Mortality and Retransplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 9:e1415. [DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
22
|
Anwar IJ, Ezekian B, DeLaura I, Manook M, Schroder P, Yoon J, Curfman V, Branum E, Messina J, Harnois M, Permar SR, Farris AB, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Addition of interleukin-6 receptor blockade to carfilzomib-based desensitization in a highly sensitized nonhuman primate model. Am J Transplant 2022; 22 Suppl 4:1-11. [PMID: 36239200 PMCID: PMC9722597 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Sensitized patients, those who had prior exposure to foreign human leukocyte antigens, are transplanted at lower rates due to challenges in finding suitable organs. Desensitization strategies have permitted highly sensitized patients to undergo kidney transplantation, albeit with higher rates of rejection. This study assesses targeting plasma cell and interleukin (IL)-6 receptor for desensitization in a sensitized nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model. All animals were sensitized using two sequential skin transplants from maximally major histocompatibility complex-mismatched donors. Carfilzomib (CFZ)/tocilizumab (TCZ) desensitization (N = 6) successfully decreased donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers and prevented the expansion of B cells compared to CFZ monotherapy (N = 3). Dual desensitization further delayed, but did not prevent humoral rebound, as evidenced by a delayed increase in post-kidney transplant DSA titers. Accordingly, CFZ/TCZ desensitization conferred a significant survival advantage over CFZ monotherapy. A trend toward increased T follicular helper cells was also observed in the dual therapy group along the same timeline as an increase in DSA and subsequent graft loss. Cytomegalovirus reactivation also occurred in the CFZ/TCZ group but was prevented with ganciclovir prophylaxis. In accordance with prior studies of CFZ-based dual desensitization strategies, the addition of IL-6 receptor blockade resulted in desensitization with further suppression of posttransplant humoral response compared to CFZ monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran J Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Paul Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Verna Curfman
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Evelyn Branum
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Julia Messina
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Melissa Harnois
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Sallie R. Permar
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Low Incidence of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection after HLA Desensitization in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12121993. [PMID: 36556358 PMCID: PMC9781496 DOI: 10.3390/life12121993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Desensitization allows the performance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible transplants. However, the incidence of acute rejection (AR) is high. This study aims to analyze the incidence of AR after transplantation with HLA-incompatible living donors in patients who underwent desensitization. Patients were immunosuppressed with tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid derivatives, and steroids after being desensitized with rituximab, plasma exchange, and/or immunoadsorption with specific cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins. A negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity or flow cytometry crossmatch and a donor-specific antibody titer < 1000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were used to determine desensitization efficacy. A total of 36 patients underwent desensitization, and 27 (75%) were transplanted. After a follow-up of 58 ± 58 months (Min−Max: 0.13−169.5), five episodes of AR occurred: two antibody-mediated and three T-cell-mediated. No differences were found in baseline calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRA), class I or II MFI, number of antibodies, or Relative Intensity Scale (RIS) between AR and non-AR patients. Patients with antibody-mediated AR had higher cPRA (NS), MFI class I (p = 0.07) and class II (p = 0.006), and RIS (p = 0.01). The two patients with antibody-mediated AR and one patient with T-cell-mediated AR lost their grafts. In conclusion, the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection after desensitization was 7.4%, which occurred early post-transplantation in patients with high MFI and was associated with early graft loss.
Collapse
|
24
|
Durlik M. New approach to desensitization in solid organ transplantation-imlifidase. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2022; 1:951360. [PMID: 38994389 PMCID: PMC11235339 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2022.951360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes is a recombinant cysteine protease of S. pyogenes produced in Escherichia coli that cleaves all four human subclasses of IgG with strict specificity. The proteolytic activity on IgG molecules prevents the occurrence of IgG-mediated antibody-dependent, cellular cytotoxicity and complement-mediated cytotoxicity, two processes that are critical for antibody rejection. The results from phase II studies demonstrated that desensitization with imlifidase represents a therapeutic strategy that can operationalize desensitization, allowing life-saving transplants from deceased donors (DD) and living donors (LD) to proceed in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates with low risk of hyperacute rejection. Its action onset is rapid, allowing kidney transplantation from a deceased donor. Disadvantages of imlifidase include a quick reappearance of DSAs, which poses a risk of antibody-mediated rejection, the quick development of anti-Ides antibodies, which rules out repeated use of imlifidase and its IgG-degrading potential, limiting the use of therapeutic antibodies. Imlifdase received conditional approval on 26 August 2020 in the EU for desensitization treatment of highly sensitized adult kidney transplant patients with positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Durlik
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tambur AR, Schinstock C. Clinical utility of serial serum dilutions for HLA antibody interpretation. HLA 2022; 100:457-468. [PMID: 35986896 PMCID: PMC9804468 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) testing has increased the sensitivity and specificity of accurately identifying HLA antibodies, in support of all organ transplantation. However, as described in manufacturers' recommendation, the output of the assay, using mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) units, is only semi-quantitative. Therefore, the ability to use MFI values to compare between different assays, to accurately guide clinical practice, or be used as an endpoint measure in clinical trials, is limited. To improve potential quantification, one must circumvent inherent limitations of SAB assays such as interference and saturation phenomena. In this review, we discuss how measurement of pre-transplant serum dilutions can be used to determine unacceptable antigens for wait-listing, determine the likelihood for successful HLA antibody reduction with desensitization, and compare degree of HLA (in)compatibility among various living donors. We also discuss how serum dilutions are optimal for measuring and comparing the efficacy of antibody depletion therapies for desensitization or antibody mediated rejection treatment post-transplant. Historically, one of the main criticisms for the use of serum dilutions and titer has been the potential labor and cost associated with additional testing. Here, we show how only one or two dilutions can add major value in most circumstances. In summary, the practical use of serum dilutions and titer determination are important methods that can be used before and after transplantation of all organs to quantify antibody accurately and reliably in routine practice and in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R. Tambur
- Fienberg School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant CenterNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Internal MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bockermann R, Järnum S, Runström A, Lorant T, Winstedt L, Palmqvist N, Kjellman C. Imlifidase-generated Single-cleaved IgG: Implications for Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1485-1496. [PMID: 34966107 PMCID: PMC9213077 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imlifidase is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-specific protease conditionally approved in the EU for desensitization in highly sensitized crossmatch positive kidney transplant patients. Imlifidase efficiently cleaves both heavy chains of IgG in a 2-step process. However, low levels of the intermediate cleavage product, single-cleaved IgG (scIgG), may persist in the circulation. The study objective was to investigate Fc-mediated effector functions of scIgG and its potential impact on common clinical immunologic assays used to assess transplant eligibility. METHODS Imlifidase-generated scIgG, obtained by in vitro cleavage of HLA-sensitized patient serum or selected antibodies, was investigated in different complement- and FcγR-dependent assays and models, including clinical tests used to evaluate HLA-specific antibodies. RESULTS ScIgG had significantly reduced Fc-mediated effector function compared with intact IgG, although some degree of activity in complement- and FcγR-dependent models was still detectable. A preparation of concentrated scIgG generated from a highly HLA-sensitized individual gave rise to a positive signal in the anti-HLA IgG LABScreen, which uses anti-Fc detection, but was entirely negative in the C1qScreen. The same high-concentration HLA-binding scIgG preparation also generated positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity responses against 80%-100% of donor T and B cells, although follow-up titrations demonstrated a much lower intrinsic activity than for intact anti-HLA IgG. CONCLUSIONS ScIgG has a significantly reduced capacity to mediate Fc-dependent effector functions. However, remaining HLA-reactive scIgG in plasma after imlifidase treatment can cause positive assay results equivalent to intact IgG in clinical assays. Therefore, complete IgG cleavage after imlifidase treatment is essential to allow correct decision-making in relation to transplant eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Transplantation Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Anwar IJ, DeLaura IF, Gao Q, Ladowski J, Jackson AM, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Harnessing the B Cell Response in Kidney Transplantation - Current State and Future Directions. Front Immunol 2022; 13:903068. [PMID: 35757745 PMCID: PMC9223638 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite dramatic improvement in kidney transplantation outcomes over the last decades due to advent of modern immunosuppressive agents, long-term outcomes remain poor. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), a B cell driven process, accounts for the majority of chronic graft failures. There are currently no FDA-approved regimens for ABMR; however, several clinical trials are currently on-going. In this review, we present current mechanisms of B cell response in kidney transplantation, the clinical impact of sensitization and ABMR, the B cell response under current immunosuppressive regimens, and ongoing clinical trials for ABMR and desensitization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Phillpott M, Daga S, Higgins R, Lowe D, Krishnan N, Zehnder D, Briggs D, Khovanova N. Dynamic Behaviour of Donor Specific Antibodies in the Early Period Following HLA Incompatible Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10128. [PMID: 35516975 PMCID: PMC9062976 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, monitoring donor-specific antibodies (DSA) plays a crucial role in providing appropriate treatment and increases kidney survival times. This work aimed to determine if early post-transplant DSA dynamics inform graft outcome over and above other predictive factors. Eighty-eight cases were classified by unsupervised machine learning into five distinct DSA response groups: no response, fast modulation, slow modulation, rise to sustained and sustained. Fast modulation dynamics gave an 80% rate for early acute rejection, whereas the sustained group was associated with the lowest rejection rates (19%). In complete contrast, the five-year graft failure was lowest in the modulation groups (4–7%) and highest in the sustained groups (25–31%). Multivariable analysis showed that a higher pre-treatment DSA level, male gender and absence of early acute rejection were strongly associated with a sustained DSA response. The modulation group had excellent five-year outcomes despite higher rates of early rejection episodes. This work further develops an understanding of post-transplant DSA dynamics and their influence on graft survival following HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason Phillpott
- School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Sunil Daga
- St James's University Hospital, LTHT NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.,Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.,NIHR Leeds In-Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Higgins
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - David Lowe
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nithya Krishnan
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Zehnder
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.,North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Trust, Carlisle, Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - David Briggs
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Khovanova
- School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vo AA, Huang E, Ammerman N, Toyoda M, Ge S, Haas M, Zhang X, Peng A, Najjar R, Williamson S, Myers C, Sethi S, Lim K, Choi J, Gillespie M, Tang J, Jordan SC. Clazakizumab for desensitization in highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1133-1144. [PMID: 34910841 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Alloantibodies are a significant barrier to successful transplantation. While desensitization has emerged, efficacy is limited. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of inflammation and immune cell activation. Persistent IL-6 production increases the risk for alloantibody production. Here we report our experience with clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From March 2018 to September 2020, 20 HS patients were enrolled in an open label pilot study to assess safety and limited efficacy of clazakizumab desensitization. Patients received PLEX, IVIg, and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly X6. If transplanted, graft function, pathology, HLA antibodies and regulatory immune cells were monitored. Transplanted patients received standard immunosuppression and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly posttransplant. Clazakizumab was well tolerated and associated with significant reductions in class I and class II antibodies allowing 18 of 20 patients to receive transplants with no DSA rebound in most. Significant increases in Treg and Breg cells were seen posttransplant. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in three patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was 58 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 . Clazakizumab was generally safe and associated with significant reductions in HLA alloantibodies and high transplant rates for highly-sensitized patients. However, confirmation of efficacy for desensitization requires assessment in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Edmund Huang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Noriko Ammerman
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mieko Toyoda
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shili Ge
- Department of Transplant Immunology and Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Department of HLA & Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alice Peng
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Reiad Najjar
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Summer Williamson
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Catherine Myers
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Supreet Sethi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kathlyn Lim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jua Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew Gillespie
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jacqueline Tang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huang E, Maldonado AQ, Kjellman C, Jordan SC. Imlifidase for the treatment of anti-HLA antibody-mediated processes in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:691-697. [PMID: 34467625 PMCID: PMC9293130 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (Imlifidase, Hansa Biopharma) is a novel agent that cleaves all four human subclasses of IgG and has therapeutic potential for HLA desensitization in kidney transplantation and antibody-mediated rejection. Data from clinical trials in kidney transplantation demonstrated rapid degradation of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies facilitating HLA-incompatible transplantation, which led to conditional approval of imlifidase by the European Medicines Agency for desensitization in kidney transplant recipients of a deceased donor with a positive cross match. Important considerations arising from the early experiences with imilfidase on kinetics of donor-specific antibodies after administration, timing of complementary therapeutic monoclonal or polyclonal IgG antibodies, and interference with cross match assays should be recognized as imlifidase emerges as a therapeutic agent for clinical transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyTransplant Immunotherapy ProgramCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyTransplant Immunotherapy ProgramCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Battle RK, Rennie TJW, Phelan PJ, Abel AA, McConnell S, Turner DM. Highly sensitised patients awaiting deceased donor renal transplants are disadvantaged by the presence of denatured HLA antibody detected in routine HLA antibody testing. HLA 2022; 100:24-36. [PMID: 35150076 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Luminex Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays used to detect HLA antibodies may artificially increase sensitisation in highly sensitised patients. The presence of denatured HLA (dHLA) within the assay enables antibodies specific to cryptic HLA epitopes to bind, such antibodies are not clinically relevant. We sought to exclude dHLA reactivity in a cohort of very highly sensitised patients (HSP), calculated reaction frequency (cRF) 95-100%, and determine the effect upon sensitisation. Such patients have limited access to suitable donors and small changes in their HLA antibody profile, particularly where their cRF is 100%, can increase their opportunity of a transplant. We determined the presence of dHLA by aligning antibody reactivity which did not correspond to known HLA class I epitope mismatches with the results of assays modified to detect class I dHLA. 130 class I dHLA reactions were identified within 11 HSP, all of whom had clear sensitising events. cRF was corrected for dHLA, mean cRF 98.2% (93-100) pre and 95.5% (87-100) post correction (P = 0.0156). An increase in the number of predicted compatible donors (p = 0.0078) after dHLA correction was demonstrated. Two manufacturers SAB assays were used. A reduction of patients with 100% cRF was observed for both manufactures. dHLA is contributing to sensitisation in HSP and is detrimental to their chances of receiving a compatible transplant. The observed dHLA reactivity varied according to kit manufacturers (P = 0.0001), this is potentially a useful finding for laboratories wishing to discriminate between nHLA and dHLA, but without the resources required to regularly perform dHLA assay and epitope analyses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard K Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United States
| | | | - Paul J Phelan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United States
| | - Angela A Abel
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United States
| | - Sylvia McConnell
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United States
| | - David M Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kjellman C, Maldonado AQ, Sjöholm K, Lonze BE, Montgomery RA, Runström A, Lorant T, Desai NM, Legendre C, Lundgren T, von Zur Mühlen B, Vo AA, Olsson H, Jordan SC. Outcomes at 3 years posttransplant in imlifidase-desensitized kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3907-3918. [PMID: 34236770 PMCID: PMC9290474 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase is a cysteine proteinase which specifically cleaves IgG, inhibiting Fc-mediated effector function within hours of administration. Imlifidase converts a positive crossmatch to a potential donor (T cell, B cell, or both), to negative, enabling transplantation to occur between previously HLA incompatible donor-recipient pairs. To date, 39 crossmatch positive patients received imlifidase prior to a kidney transplant in four single-arm, open-label, phase 2 studies. At 3 years, for patients who were AMR+ compared to AMR-, death-censored allograft survival was 93% vs 77%, patient survival was 85% vs 94%, and mean eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs 61 ml/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. The incidence of AMR was 38% with most episodes occurring within the first month post-transplantation. Sub-analysis of patients deemed highly sensitized with cPRA ≥ 99.9%, and unlikely to be transplanted who received crossmatch-positive, deceased donor transplants had similar rates of patient survival, graft survival, and eGFR but a higher rate of AMR. These data demonstrate that outcomes and safety up to 3 years in recipients of imlifidase-enabled allografts is comparable to outcomes in other highly sensitized patients undergoing HLA-incompatible transplantation. Thus, imlifidase is a potent option to facilitate transplantation among patients who have a significant immunologic barrier to successful kidney transplantation. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790437), EudraCT Number: 2016-002064-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Department of Surgical SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | | | | | - Torbjörn Lundgren
- Department of Transplantation SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | | | - Ashley A. Vo
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterComprehensive Transplant CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterComprehensive Transplant CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schinstock CA, Tambur AR. Apples, oranges, and anything in between: In search of the best desensitization therapy. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3825-3826. [PMID: 34416097 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sethi S, Ammerman N, Vo A, Jordan SC. Approach to Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates and a Positive Crossmatch. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:587-595. [PMID: 35367027 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation offers survival benefit compared with ongoing dialysis. There have been considerable advances in the last decade to allow for increased access to transplant for the HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. These include increased priority in the kidney allocation system, kidney paired donation, and novel desensitization strategies. A better understanding of the role of B cells, plasma cells, and complement and inflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of HLA antibody-mediated allograft injury has led to the use of novel therapeutics for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Here we discuss current approaches to kidney transplantation in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.
Collapse
|
36
|
Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10163656. [PMID: 34441950 PMCID: PMC8396983 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Imlifidase Shows Promise for the Most Disadvantaged Sensitized Transplant Candidates. Transplantation 2021; 105:1660-1661. [PMID: 33093402 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
Jordan SC, Legendre C, Desai NM, Lorant T, Bengtsson M, Lonze BE, Vo AA, Runström A, Laxmyr L, Sjöholm K, Schiött Å, Sonesson E, Wood K, Winstedt L, Kjellman C, Montgomery RA. Imlifidase Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive, Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of an International Phase 2 Trial (Highdes). Transplantation 2021; 105:1808-1817. [PMID: 33093408 PMCID: PMC8294837 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highly HLA sensitized patients have limited access to life-saving kidney transplantation because of a paucity of immunologically suitable donors. Imlifidase is a cysteine protease that cleaves IgG leading to a rapid decrease in antibody level and inhibition of IgG-mediated injury. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of imlifidase in converting a positive crossmatch test to negative, allowing highly sensitized patients to be transplanted with a living or deceased donor kidney. METHODS This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at 5 transplant centers, evaluated the ability of imlifidase to create a negative crossmatch test within 24 h. Secondary endpoints included postimlifidase donor-specific antibody levels compared with predose levels, renal function, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. Safety endpoints included adverse events and immunogenicity profile. RESULTS Of the transplanted patients, 89.5% demonstrated conversion of baseline positive crossmatch to negative within 24 h after imlifidase treatment. Donor-specific antibodies most often rebounded 3-14 d postimlifidase dose, with substantial interpatient variability. Patient survival was 100% with graft survival of 88.9% at 6 mo. With this, 38.9% had early biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection with onset 2-19 d posttransplantation. Serum IgG levels began to normalize after ~3-7 d posttransplantation. Antidrug antibody levels were consistent with previous studies. Seven adverse events in 6 patients were classified as possibly or probably related to treatment and were mild-moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS Imlifidase was well tolerated, converted positive crossmatches to negative, and enabled patients with a median calculated panel-reactive antibody of 99.83% to undergo kidney transplantation resulting in good kidney function and graft survival at 6 mo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tomas Lorant
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Hansa Biopharma AB, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kumar V, Locke JE. New Perspectives on Desensitization in the Current Era - An Overview. Front Immunol 2021; 12:696467. [PMID: 34394089 PMCID: PMC8363260 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Blood group and tissue incompatibilities remain significant barriers to achieving transplantation. Although no patient should be labeled “un-transplantable” due to blood group or tissue incompatibility, all candidates should be provided with individualized and realistic counseling regarding their anticipated wait times for deceased donor or kidney paired donation matching, with early referral to expert centers for desensitization when needed. Vital is the careful selection of patients whose health status is such that desensitizing treatment is less likely to cause serious harm and whose anti-HLA antibody status is such that treatment is likely to accomplish the goal of increasing organ offers with an acceptable final crossmatch. Exciting new developments have re-energized the interest and scope of desensitization in the times ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineeta Kumar
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jayme E Locke
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Huang E, Jordan SC. Rationalizing Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Candidates. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00329-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
41
|
Measuring human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies: beyond a binary decision. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 25:529-535. [PMID: 33055530 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Accurate measurement of human leukocyte antigen antibodies is critical for making clinical decisions treating patients awaiting transplantation or monitoring them post transplantation. Single antigen bead assay results are given as Mean Fluorescence Intensity, falling short of providing the required quantitative measure. RECENT FINDINGS Titration studies were shown to circumvent the limitation of target-saturation that affect interpretation of single antigen bead assays especially in highly sensitized patients with strong antibodies. In fact, titration information can serve to measure efficacy of antibody removal during pretransplant desensitization using plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin (PP/IVIg) approaches. Moreover, recent studies indicate that knowing the donor-specific antibody titer has prognostic value that can guide PP/IVIg desensitization treatments. Newer data demonstrates an additional layer of information obtained by titration studies allowing to stratify patients with very high cPRA (>99%) based on the strength of the antibodies present, rather than the breadth. This data can thereby identify patients that are more likely to benefit from desensitization approaches on the transplant wait-list. SUMMARY Titration studies have a prognostic value with regards to quantifying antibody strength. Obtaining this information does not require performing the complete set of dilutions. In fact, performing two to three specific dilutions can provide relevant information while maintaining practical cost.
Collapse
|
42
|
Joher N, Matignon M, Grimbert P. HLA Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation: Anti-CD38 to Across the Immunological Barriers. Front Immunol 2021; 12:688301. [PMID: 34093594 PMCID: PMC8173048 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.688301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in the potential solid organ transplant recipient's blood is one of the main barriers to access to a transplantation. The HLA sensitization is associated with longer waitlist time, antibody mediated rejection and transplant lost leading to increased recipient's morbidity and mortality. However, solid organ transplantation across the HLA immunological barriers have been reported in recipients who were highly sensitized to HLA using desensitization protocols. These desensitization regimens are focused on the reduction of circulating HLA antibodies. Despite those strategies improve rates of transplantation, it remains several limitations including persistent high rejection rate and worse long-term outcomes when compare with non-sensitized recipient population. Currently, interest is growing in the development of new desensitization approaches which, beyond targeting antibodies, would be based on the modulation of alloimmune pathways. Plasma cells appears as an interesting target given their critical role in antibody production. In the last decade, CD38-targeting immunotherapies, such as daratumumab, have been recognized as a key component in the treatment of myeloma by inducing an important plasma cell depletion. This review focuses on an emerging concept based on targeting CD38 to desensitize in the field of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizar Joher
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Henri Mondor, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (Innovative Therapy for Immune Disorders), Créteil, France.,Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale INSERM U955, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale IMRB, Équipe 21, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schinstock C, Tambur A, Stegall M. Current Approaches to Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:686271. [PMID: 34046044 PMCID: PMC8144637 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Major advancements in the development of HLA antibody detection techniques and our understanding of the outcomes of solid organ transplant in the context of HLA antibody have occurred since the relevance of sensitization was first recognized nearly 50 years ago. Additionally, kidney paired donation programs (KPD) have become widespread, deceased donor allocation policies have changed, and several new therapeutic options have become available with promise to reduce HLA antibody. In this overview we aim to provide thoughtful guidance about when desensitization in kidney transplantation should be considered taking into account the outcomes of HLA incompatible transplantation. Novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future study will also be discussed. While most of our understanding about desensitization comes from studying kidney transplant candidates and recipients, many of the concepts discussed can be easily applied to desensitization in all of solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Schinstock
- William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Anat Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Mark Stegall
- William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Imlifidase as a Potential Treatment for Antibody-Mediated Rejection. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00327-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
45
|
Puttarajappa CM, Schinstock CA, Wu CM, Leca N, Kumar V, Vasudev BS, Hariharan S. KDOQI US Commentary on the 2020 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77:833-856. [PMID: 33745779 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of patients for kidney transplant candidacy is a comprehensive process that involves a detailed assessment of medical and surgical issues, psychosocial factors, and patients' physical and cognitive abilities with an aim of balancing the benefits of transplantation and potential risks of surgery and long-term immunosuppression. There is considerable variability among transplant centers in their approach to evaluation and decision-making regarding transplant candidacy. The 2020 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Guidelines Outcome) clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and management of candidates for kidney transplantation provides practice recommendations that can serve as a useful reference guide to transplant professionals. The guideline, covering a broad range of topics, was developed by an international group of experts from transplant and nephrology through a review of literature published until May 2019. A work group of US transplant nephrologists convened by NKF-KDOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Quality Initiative) chose key topics for this commentary with a goal of presenting a broad discussion to the US transplant community. Each section of this article has a summary of the key KDIGO guideline recommendations, followed by a brief commentary on the recommendations, their clinical utility, and potential implementation challenges. The KDOQI work group agrees broadly with the KDIGO recommendations but also recognizes and highlights the decision-making challenges that arise from lack of high-quality evidence and the need to balance equity with utility of organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan M Puttarajappa
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Carrie A Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Christine M Wu
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Brahm S Vasudev
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tambur AR, Schinstock C, Maguire C, Lowe D, Smith B, Stegall M. Estimating alloantibody levels in highly sensitized renal allograft candidates: Using serial dilutions to demonstrate a treatment effect in clinical trials. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1278-1284. [PMID: 33078553 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Small reductions in calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) are associated with increased kidney transplantation in 100% cPRA patients. However, the high level of antibody in these patients is such that desensitization may reduce antibody but not cPRA, thus the cPRA change on undiluted serum with desensitization is an insensitive measure of effectiveness. We evaluated cPRA reduction, calculated per antibody titer, as a desensitization trial endpoint. To accomplish this, two serum samples from 20 kidney transplant candidates with cPRA ≥99.9% (100%) were obtained and serially diluted in triplicate to determine the titer of individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities. CPRA was computed per dilution to identify the titer at which cPRA drops below 98%. Inter- and intra-assay variability and changes overtime were determined. The dilution needed to reach a cPRA <98% was within 1 titer for replicates from the same sample, with 90% (36/40) concordance. This indicates that only changes >2 titers can be deemed clinically meaningful. The median (IQR) titer difference was 0 (0-1) from baseline to follow-up within 12 months. The cPRA per titer also risk-stratified candidates for trial inclusion. In conclusion, determining the cPRA per titer is a reliable approach to simplify complex antibody data and an ideal endpoint for desensitization trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David Lowe
- One Lambda, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Manook M, Johnson R, Robb M, Burnapp L, Fuggle SV, Mamode N. Changing patterns of clinical decision making: are falling numbers of antibody incompatible transplants related to the increasing success of the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme? A national cohort study. Transpl Int 2020; 34:153-162. [PMID: 33095917 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Antibody incompatibility is a barrier to living kidney transplantation; antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) is an accepted treatment modality, albeit higher risk. This study aims to determine changes to clinical decision making and access to AIT in the UK. An electronic survey was sent to all UK renal transplant centres (n = 24), in 2014, and again in 2018. Questions focused on entry & duration in the UKLKSS for HLA and ABO-incompatible pairs, Can and provision of direct AIT transplantation within those centres. Between 2014 & 2018, the duration recommended for patients in the UKLKSS increased. In 2014, 34.8% of centres reported leaving HLA-i pairs in the UKLKSS indefinitely, or reviewing on a case by case basis, by 2018 this increased to 61%. Centres offering direct HLA-i transplantation reduced from 58% to 37%. For low titre (1:8) ABO-i recipients, 66% of centres recommended at least 9 months (3 matching runs) in the UKLKSS scheme in 2018, compared to 47% in 2014, 50% fewer units consider direct ABO-i transplantation for unsuccessful pairs with high ABO titres (>1:512). Over time, clinicians appear to be facilitating more conservative management of AIT patients, potentially limiting access to living donor transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Manook
- Renal and Transplant Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Robb
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Susan V Fuggle
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Bristol, UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Renal and Transplant Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schroder PM, Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Ezekian B, Yoon J, Choi AY, Manook M, Barbas A, Leopardi F, Song M, Farris AB, Collins B, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Preoperative carfilzomib and lulizumab based desensitization prolongs graft survival in a sensitized non-human primate model. Kidney Int 2020; 99:161-172. [PMID: 32898569 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Sensitized patients are difficult to transplant due to pre-formed anti-donor immunity. We have previously reported successful desensitization using carfilzomib and belatacept in a non-human primate (NHP) model. Here we evaluated selective blockade of the co-stimulatory signal (CD28-B7) with Lulizumab, which preserves the co-inhibitory signal (CTLA4-B7). Five maximally MHC-mismatched pairs of NHPs were sensitized to each other with two sequential skin transplants. Individuals from each pair were randomized to either desensitization with once-weekly Carfilzomib (27mg/m2 IV) and Lulizumab (12.5mg/kg SC) over four weeks, or no desensitization (Control). NHPs then underwent life-sustaining kidney transplantation from their previous skin donor. Rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin was used as induction therapy and immunosuppression maintained with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone. Desensitized subjects demonstrated a significant reduction in donor-specific antibody, follicular helper T cells (CD4+PD-1+ICOS+), and proliferating B cells (CD20+Ki67+) in the lymph nodes. Interestingly, regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25+CD127lo) frequency was maintained after desensitization in addition to increased frequency of naïve CD4 T cells (CCR7+CD45RA+) and naïve B cells (IgD+CD27-CD20+) in circulation. This was associated with significant prolongation in graft survival (MST = 5.8 ± 4.0 vs. 64.8 ± 36.3; p<0.05) and lower antibody-mediated rejection scores compared to control animals. However, all desensitized animals eventually developed AMR and graft failure. Desensitization with CFZ and Lulizumab improves allograft survival in allosensitized NHPs, by transient control of the germinal center and shifting of the immune system to a more naive phenotype. This regimen may translate into clinical practice to improve outcomes of highly sensitized transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Barbas
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frank Leopardi
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mingqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Bradley Collins
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sharif A, Montgomery RA. Regulating the risk-reward trade-off in transplantation. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2282-2283. [PMID: 32243681 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan Sharif
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|