Efficacy and safety of imeglimin add-on to insulin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (TIMES 3): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial with a 36-week open-label extension period

Differences in imeglimin response in subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by data-driven cluster analysis: A post-hoc analysis of imeglimin clinical trial data

AIM

To explore differences in imeglimin response among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patient clusters using data-driven cluster analysis.

METHODS

Data-driven cluster analysis (non-hierarchical k-means clustering) was performed on randomized, double-blind, imeglimin monotherapy and adjunctive (to insulin) therapy trials based on four baseline variables: (1) disease duration; (2) body mass index (BMI); (3) HbA1c; and (4a) homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) (monotherapy trials) or (4b) insulin total daily dose (adjunctive trial).

RESULTS

Four clusters were identified with distinct clinical characteristics in both monotherapy (1-4) and adjunctive therapy (I-IV) trials; clusters 1 and I had lower values across all four indices versus the overall population, clusters 2 and II had a longer diabetes duration, cluster 3 had higher baseline BMI and HOMA-β, and cluster III had higher baseline BMI and insulin total daily dose, while clusters 4 and IV had higher baseline HbA1c. Between-group differences in HbA1c change (95% confidence interval) and effect size (ES) at week 24 varied considerably by cluster (cluster 1: -0.82 [-1.00, -0.63], ES = 1.47; cluster 2: -0.64 [-0.89, -0.39], ES = 1.18; cluster 3: -0.86 [-1.38, -0.33], ES = 0.84; cluster 4: -1.27 [-1.73, -0.82], ES = 1.44). For imeglimin adjunctive therapy, HbA1c improvements were significant versus placebo at week 16, excluding cluster III (cluster I: -0.63 [-0.95, -0.31], ES = 0.88; cluster II: -0.66 [-1.02, -0.30], ES = 1.13; cluster III: -0.31 [-0.73, 0.11], ES = 0.46; cluster IV: -0.82 [-1.29, -0.35], ES = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in imeglimin response were observed among T2D patient clusters. Patient stratification may help with selection of those most probable to respond to imeglimin.

Real-world effectiveness of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective longitudinal study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To examine the real-world effects of imeglimin on glycemic control and other metabolic factors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted based on a chart review. We recruited patients with T2DM who took imeglimin continuously for at least 3 months. Data on various metabolic parameters were collected at the first prescription of imeglimin and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of imeglimin. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.

RESULTS

68 patients were eligible for this study. HbA1c decreased by 0.7 % at 3 months, 1.1 % at 6 months and 1.0 % by 12 months after the initiation of imeglimin. The decreases in HbA1c were observed regardless of age, gender, body mass index, duration of diabetes, renal function and concomitant use of hypoglycemic agents. There were also significant decreases in body weight, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-HDL-C during imeglimin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report showing the long-term effects of imeglimin in a real-world setting. We confirmed the glucose-lowering effects of imeglimin. Furthermore, favorable effects of imeglimin on body weight and serum lipids were also suggested.

Gluco-regulation & type 2 diabetes: entrenched misconceptions updated to new governing principles for gold standard management

Our understanding of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has evolved dramatically. Advances have upended entrenched dogmas pertaining to the onset and progression of T2D, beliefs that have prevailed from the early era of diabetes research-and continue to populate our medical textbooks and continuing medical education materials. This review article highlights key insights that lend new governing principles for gold standard management of T2D. From the historical context upon which old beliefs arose to new findings, this article outlines evidence and perspectives on beta cell function, the underlying defects in glucoregulation, the remediable nature of T2D, and, the rationale supporting the shift to complication-centric prescribing. Practical approaches translate this rectified understanding of T2D into strategies that fill gaps in current management practices of prediabetes through late type 2 diabetes.

Exploring new mechanisms of Imeglimin in diabetes treatment: Amelioration of mitochondrial dysfunction

With the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), it has become critical to identify effective treatment strategies. In recent years, the novel oral hypoglycaemic drug Imeglimin has attracted much attention in the field of diabetes treatment. The mechanisms of its therapeutic action are complex and are not yet fully understood by current research. Current evidence suggests that pancreatic β-cells, liver, and skeletal muscle are the main organs in which Imeglimin lowers blood glucose levels and that it acts mainly by targeting mitochondrial function, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, enhancing insulin sensitivity, promoting pancreatic β-cell function, and regulating energy metabolism. There is growing evidence that the drug also has a potentially volatile role in the treatment of diabetic complications, including metabolic cardiomyopathy, diabetic vasculopathy, and diabetic neuroinflammation. According to available clinical studies, its efficacy and safety profile are more evident than other hypoglycaemic agents, and it has synergistic effects when combined with other antidiabetic drugs, and also has potential in the treatment of T2DM-related complications. This review aims to shed light on the latest research progress in the treatment of T2DM with Imeglimin, thereby providing clinicians and researchers with the latest insights into Imeglimin as a viable option for the treatment of T2DM.

Imeglimin attenuates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by restoring mitochondrial functions in macrophages

Imeglimin is a novel oral antidiabetic drug for treating type 2 diabetes. However, the effect of imeglimin on NLRP3 inflammasome activation has not been investigated yet. Here, we aimed to investigate whether imeglimin reduces LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in THP-1 macrophages and examine the associated underlying mechanisms. We analyzed the mRNA and protein expression levels of NLRP3 inflammasome components and IL-1β secretion. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening were measured by flow cytometry. Imeglimin inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production in LPS-stimulated THP-1-derived macrophages. In addition, imeglimin reduced LPS-induced mitochondrial ROS production and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. Furthermore, imeglimin restored the mitochondrial function by modulating mitochondrial membrane depolarization and mPTP opening. We demonstrated for the first time that imeglimin reduces LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation by inhibiting mPTP opening in THP-1 macrophages. These results suggest that imeglimin could be a promising new anti-inflammatory agent for treating diabetic complications.

Factors contributing to the clinical effectiveness of imeglimin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the effect of patient characteristics on imeglimin effectiveness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week, double-blind studies of imeglimin monotherapy in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the proportion of responders (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0%) and sustained responders (i.e., achieved and maintained response) in the imeglimin 1,000 mg twice daily group calculated at each visit. Patient factors significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with response were explored through multivariate logistic regression. Subgroup analyses compared the efficacy of imeglimin in patients with a HbA1c improvement less than or equal to -0.3% (early responders) versus greater than -0.3% (early non-responders) at week 4.

RESULTS

A total of 38.0% of imeglimin-treated patients and 7.2% of placebo-treated patients were responders (P < 0.001, number needed to treat = 4). The proportion of sustained responders at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 was 10.6, 19.0, 24.0, 25.7 and 29.1%, respectively (>70% of responders at each visit). Improvements in HbA1c and fasting glucose were significantly greater in early responders versus early non-responders from week 4; between-group differences remained significant to week 24. Older age (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14; P < 0.001); treatment-naïve status vs previous treatment (odds ratio 3.70, 95% confidence interval 1.55-8.82; P = 0.003), and lower baseline HbA1c (odds ratio 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.16; P < 0.001) predicted response.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving imeglimin 1,000 mg twice daily monotherapy were responders versus placebo. Most (>70%) were sustained responders, suggesting that response is fairly predictable. Older age, treatment-naïve status and early treatment response significantly predicted imeglimin effectiveness.

Imeglimin: the New Kid on the Block

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to collect all the data regarding imeglimin and present it as one of the options for managing diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is a new drug that has recently been approved as an oral anti-diabetic drug, either as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs including insulin, with modest HbA1c reduction, and a fairly safe profile. Imeglimin was first approved in 2021 in Japan and China and is available in India from October 2022. Imeglimin is the first compound in a new class of oral anti-diabetic medications known as "glimins" that include a tetrahydrotriazine ring. Glimins act by amplifying glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and preserving β-cell mass, leading to augmented insulin secretion. Furthermore, It also intensifies insulin action by inhibiting of hepatic glucose output and recovery of altered insulin signalling in both hepatocytes (liver) and myocytes (skeletal muscle). This is a unique mode of action than has been demonstrated to be distinct from other classes of drugs, as it targets both insulin secretion and insulin resistance by correcting the mitochondrial dysfunction. Imeglimin has been studied in various phase III trials which have equivocally shown it to be effective in lowering glucose levels and improving pancreatic function and its recommended dose set at 1000 mg bid.

Different doses of imeglimin for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

A new medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) called imeglimin can target all three organs involved in the pathogenesis of DM, namely the liver, skeletal muscles, and pancreas. This research seeks to examine the most efficacious and safe dose of imeglimin for the management of T2DM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using particular keywords, we searched the CENTRAL, Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for pertinent literature. The results of continuous variables were pooled into the mean difference (MD) and dichotomous variables into odds ratio (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Our pooled analysis revealed that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily [MD -0.90% p < 0.00001] and 1500 mg twice daily [MD -0.84% p = 0.0003] as monotherapy was associated with a higher reduction in the HbA1c compared to placebo. This superiority was still maintained when given as combination therapy. Regrettably, there was an observed escalation in gastrointestinal AEs as the dosage of imeglimin was raised, despite the absence of a corresponding improvement in its efficacy in decreasing HbA1c levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily may offer the most optimum therapeutic effects for glycemic control without compromising its safety profiles.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of imeglimin, a novel oral antihyperglycemic agent, administered as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parallel-group randomized controlled trials comparing imeglimin with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. Risk ratios or weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. The primary outcome for efficacy was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes included other efficacy-related outcomes, specific adverse events, and changes in body weight and lipid parameters.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (n = 1,655) were included. When analyzed by dose, there was a significant difference in glycated hemoglobin (%) between imeglimin monotherapy and placebo at doses >1,000 mg twice daily (1,000 mg: studies N = 3, patients n = 517, WMD = -0.714, P < 0.001; 1,500 mg: N = 5, n = 448, WMD = -0.531, P = 0.020; 2,000 mg: N = 1, n = 149, WMD = -0.450, P = 0.005). Imeglimin adjunctive therapy significantly improved glycated hemoglobin over placebo at doses of 1,000 mg (N = 1, n = 214, WMD = -0.600, P < 0.001) and 1,500 mg (N = 2, n = 324, WMD = -0.576, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome showed that imeglimin was effective regardless of chronic kidney disease category, with studies carried out in Japan and in patients with lower body mass index showing a trend toward improved imeglimin efficacy. There were no significant differences between imeglimin and placebo in the risk of all-cause discontinuation and the proportion of patients who presented with at least one adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Imeglimin is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy.

Imeglimin: A Clinical Pharmacology Review

Imeglimin (PXL008, EMD-387008, Twymeeg®) is a first-in-class novel oral hypoglycemic agent, launched in Japan, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its mechanism of action targets mitochondrial bioenergetics to ameliorate insulin resistance and to enhance β-cell function. This review summarizes the properties underlying the pharmacokinetic profile of imeglimin, a small cationic drug belonging to the tetrahydrotriazine chemical class, with a complex mechanism of absorption involving an active transport through organic cation transporters (OCTs). Imeglimin absorption decreases when dose increases due to the saturation of the active uptake transport. Post absorption, imeglimin is rapidly and primarily distributed to organs and tissues, and has a half-life ranging from 9.03 to 20.2 h. Plasma protein binding of imeglimin is low, which explains the rapid distribution to the organs observed in all species. Imeglimin is excreted unchanged in urine, indicating a low extent of metabolism. Imeglimin is a substrate of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) 2-K and a substrate and inhibitor of OCT1, OCT2, and MATE1. Clinical drug-drug interaction studies confirmed the absence of relevant clinical interaction with substrates or inhibitors of these transporters. Overall, the drug-drug interaction potential of imeglimin is low. Its pharmacokinetics profile has also been characterized in special populations, showing no influence of mild and moderate hepatic impairment but an impact of renal function on imeglimin renal clearance. Dosage adjustment is thus required in moderately and severely renally impaired patients. Imeglimin pharmacokinetics was shown to be insensitive to ethnicity and food intake and to have no effect on QTcF interval.

Effect of patient characteristics on the efficacy and safety of imeglimin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post-hoc analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Substantial variability in demographic and clinical characteristics exists among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which may impact treatment. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of imeglimin 1,000 mg twice daily (BID) monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients according to demographic and clinical characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from two placebo-controlled, 24 week, randomized, double-blind studies in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Outcomes (least squares mean [LSM] change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24, and safety) were analyzed according to subgroups based on demographics, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The difference in LSM change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was statistically significant for imeglimin vs placebo in all patient subgroups analyzed (P < 0.05 each), including demographics (age, body mass index), clinical characteristics (duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage, and prior medication use) and comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidemia, risk of hepatic fibrosis and liver function parameter status). A statistically significant separation from placebo in HbA1c was observed at week 4 and maintained through week 24. No new safety concerns were identified with imeglimin in any patient subpopulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of imeglimin was demonstrated across patient subgroups, irrespective of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Our findings confirm the efficacy and safety of imeglimin across a broad spectrum of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Comparative evaluation of clinical glycemic control markers treated with imeglimin and its effect on erythrocytes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol of a single-arm, open-label, prospective, exploratory trial

Background: Imeglimin is a novel type 2 diabetes (T2D) drug that is expected to improve mitochondrial function. In its phase 3 clinical trials in Japanese patients with T2D, the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decrease following imeglimin administration was slow, reaching a plateau after 20-24 weeks of treatment. In general, the erythrocyte lifespan may be a factor when HbA1c shows an abnormal value. Therefore, this study will comparatively evaluate HbA1c and other markers of glycemic control in patients with T2D after imeglimin administration and also examine the effects of imeglimin on erythrocytes. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, prospective, exploratory study is designed to evaluate the divergence between HbA1c and glycoalbumin (GA) or 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) and the glycemic reduction rate in 30 patients with T2D with inadequate glycemic control when imeglimin 2,000 mg is administered for 6 months. In addition, we will examine the effect on erythrocytes, the presumed cause of this divergence. We will measure sustained glycemic variability using flash glucose monitoring and examine the relationship between changes in these indices and HbA1c. Moreover, because prolonged erythrocyte lifespan is a possible cause of falsely high HbA1c levels, erythrocyte lifespan, erythrocyte deformability, and hemoglobin concentration will be evaluated as effects of imeglimin on erythrocytes. Furthermore, if imeglimin has an ameliorative effect on erythrocyte deformability, it may improve peripheral arterial disease; thus, we will also evaluate the toe-brachial pressure index, a measure of this effect. Discussion: In this study, if imeglimin administration results in diverging rates of hypoglycemic effect between HbA1c and GA or 1,5-AG and prolongs erythrocyte lifespan, GA and 1,5-AG, rather than HbA1c, will be considered appropriate measures of the hypoglycemic effect in the early stages of imeglimin administration. If imeglimin improves erythrocyte deformability, it may also be a new treatment strategy for peripheral arterial disease, a chronic complication of T2D. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was scientifically and ethically reviewed and approved by the Certified Clinical Research Review Board of Toho University (approval number: THU22002). The study protocol was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) in December 2022 (jRCTs031220489).

Glucose-Lowering Effects of Imeglimin and Its Possible Beneficial Effects on Diabetic Complications

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a prominent pathological feature of type 2 diabetes, which contributes to β-cell mass reduction and insulin resistance. Imeglimin is a novel oral hypoglycemic agent with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. Imeglimin reduces reactive oxygen species production, improves mitochondrial function and integrity, and also improves the structure and function of endoplasmic reticulum (ER), changes which enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and inhibit the apoptosis of β-cells, leading to β-cell mass preservation. Further, imeglimin inhibits hepatic glucose production and ameliorates insulin sensitivity. Clinical trials into the effects of imeglimin monotherapy and combination therapy exhibited an excellent hypoglycemic efficacy and safety profile in type 2 diabetic patients. Mitochondrial impairment is closely associated with endothelial dysfunction, which is a very early event in atherosclerosis. Imeglimin improved endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes via both glycemic control-dependent and -independent mechanisms. In experimental animals, imeglimin improved cardiac and kidney function via an improvement in mitochondrial and ER function or/and an improvement in endothelial function. Furthermore, imeglimin reduced ischemia-induced brain damage. In addition to glucose-lowering effects, imeglimin can be a useful therapeutic option for diabetic complications in type 2 diabetic patients.

Development of Imeglimin Electrospun Nanofibers as a Potential Buccal Antidiabetic Therapeutic Approach

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been growing worldwide; hence, safe and effective antidiabetics are critically warranted. Recently, imeglimin, a novel tetrahydrotriazene compound, has been approved for use in T2D patients in Japan. It has shown promising glucose-lowering properties by improving pancreatic beta-cell function and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Nevertheless, it has several drawbacks, including suboptimal oral absorption and gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort. Therefore, this study aimed to fabricate a novel formulation of imeglimin loaded into electrospun nanofibers to be delivered through the buccal cavity to overcome the current GI-related adverse events and to provide a convenient route of administration. The fabricated nanofibers were characterized for diameter, drug-loading (DL), disintegration, and drug release profiles. The data demonstrated that the imeglimin nanofibers had a diameter of 361 ± 54 nm and DL of 23.5 ± 0.2 μg/mg of fibers. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) data confirmed the solid dispersion of imeglimin, favoring drug solubility, and release with improved bioavailability. The rate of drug-loaded nanofibers disintegration was recorded at 2 ± 1 s, indicating the rapid disintegration ability of this dosage form and its suitability for buccal delivery, with a complete drug release after 30 min. The findings of this study suggest that the developed imeglimin nanofibers have the potential to be given via the buccal route, thereby achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes and improving patient compliance.

Efficacy and safety of imeglimin in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Imeglimin is a novel new oral compound recently approved for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D) in India. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of imeglimin in people with T2D in the approved dose of 1000 mg twice daily (BID).

METHODS

We systematically searched the database of PubMed until December 20, 2022, and retrieved all published double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) conducted with imeglimin 1000 mg BID, using appropriate keywords and MeSH terms. A meta-analysis was conducted to study the HbA1c lowering effect of imeglimin 1000 mg BID in people with T2D using the Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software Version 3, Biostat Inc. Englewood, NJ, USA.

RESULTS

Of the seven Phase 2 studies and three Phase 3 studies conducted so far, only three published double-blind RCTs have reported the efficacy and safety of imeglimin 1000 mg BID against the placebo. Our meta-analysis using the random-effects model from two monotherapy studies (n = 360) showed imeglimin 1000 mg BID reduce HbA1c significantly (Δ -0.9%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -1.1 to -0.74%; P < 0.0001) against the placebo, without any heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The pooled meta-analysis from all three RCTs (n = 574) found a significant reduction in HbA1c with imeglimin 1000 mg BID (Δ -0.79%; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.59%; P < 0.0001) compared to placebo with high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found a significant HbA1c lowering effect of imeglimin in people with T2D with an acceptable tolerability profile. Still, larger and longer studies are needed.

[Pharmacological profile and clinical efficacy of imeglimin hydrochloride (TWYMEEG®Tablets), the orally drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus with the first dual mode of action in the world]

Imeglimin hydrochloride (imeglimin) is an orally drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus, which was approved in Japan for the first in the world, with dual mode of actions: pancreatic action means amplifying glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in pancreatic β-cells, and extrapancreatic action means improving insulin sensitivity by which gluconeogenesis suppresses in hepatocytes and glucose uptake increases in skeletal muscles. Although the molecular target of imeglimin is still unknown, imeglimin exerts some of its actions through modulation of the mitochondrial function. In pancreatic islets, imeglimin enhanced adenosine triphosphate and Ca²⁺ under high-glucose conditions. Furthermore, imeglimin induced the synthesis of oxidized form nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) via the 'salvage pathway', and NAD⁺ metabolites may contribute to the increase in intracellular Ca²⁺. The in vivo studies indicated that imeglimin enhanced the sensitivity to insulin and modulated the mitochondrial function (restoring the deficient Complex III activity, decreasing Complex I activity and reactive oxygen species production), which contribute to the improvement of glucose metabolism in hepatocytes and skeletal muscles. In clinical trials, imeglimin's dual effects were demonstrated in foreign type 2 diabetic patients who received 1500 mg bid, which is different from the domestic approved dose. Imeglimin has been shown to evidence of statistically significant glucose lowering, a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile in patients with type 2 diabetes by monotherapy and combination therapy with 1,000 mg bid in four Japanese trials. Since imeglimin has dual effects, it may have shown a newly effective option, regardless of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetic patients.

Add-on imeglimin versus metformin dose escalation regarding glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor plus low-dose metformin: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (MEGMI study)

INTRODUCTION

Imeglimin is a novel anti-hyperglycemic drug that improves both insulin resistance and insulin secretion. The effects of imeglimin on glycemic control were confirmed in phase III clinical trials, but little is known about its effectiveness in daily clinical practice settings, especially compared with metformin. Therefore, we aim to clarify the efficacy of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) being treated with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor plus low-dose metformin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label, parallel-group trial. Seventy participants with T2D treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor plus metformin (500-1000 mg/day) for more than 12 weeks and a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 52-85 mmol/mol (7.0%-9.9%) will be randomized to receive add-on imeglimin 1000 mg two times per day or metformin dose escalation for 24 weeks. Biochemical analyses and physical assessments will be performed at baseline and at the end of the study, and adverse events will be recorded. The primary endpoint is the change in HbA1c after 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints comprise the changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, body weight, abdominal circumference, and other laboratory parameters; the relationship between improvements of biological parameters including glycemic control and patient background characteristics; and side effects.

RESULTS

This study will reveal new insights into the incorporation of imeglimin into the diabetes treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

This will be the first randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of adding imeglimin versus metformin dose escalation on glycemic control in patients with T2D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCT1011220005.

Phase 2 trial with imeglimin in patients with Type 2 diabetes indicates effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 18-week monotherapy with imeglimin on glucose tolerance and on insulin secretion/sensitivity in type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients.

METHODS

The study was an 18-week, double-blind clinical trial in T2D subjects previously treated with stable metformin therapy and washed out for 4 weeks. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a 1500 mg bid of imeglimin or placebo. The primary endpoint was the effect of imeglimin vs placebo on changes from baseline to week 18 in glucose tolerance (glucose area under the curve [AUC]) during a 3 h-glucose tolerance test [OGTT]). Secondary endpoints included glycaemic control and calculated indices of insulin secretion and sensitivity.

RESULTS

A total of 59 subjects were randomized, 30 receiving imeglimin and 29 receiving placebo. The study met its primary endpoint. Least squares (LS) mean difference between treatment groups (imeglimin - placebo) for AUC glucose from baseline to week 18 was -429.6 mmol/L·min (p = .001). Two-hour post-dose fasting plasma glucose was significantly decreased with LS mean differences of -1.22 mmol/L (p = .022) and HbA1c was improved with LS mean differences of -0.62% (p = .013). The AUC_0-180min ratio C-peptide/glucose [LS mean differences of 0.041 nmol/mmol (p < .001)] and insulinogenic index were significantly increased by imeglimin treatment. The increase in insulin secretion was associated with an increase in beta-cell glucose sensitivity. Additionally, the insulin sensitivity indices derived from the OGTT Stumvoll (p = .001) and Matsuda (not significant) were improved in the imeglimin group vs placebo. Imeglimin was well tolerated with 26.7% of subjects presenting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event versus 58.6% of subjects in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Results are consistent with a mode of action involving insulin secretion as well as improved insulin sensitivity and further support the potential for imeglimin to improve healthcare in T2D patients.

Imeglimin exerts favorable effects on pancreatic β-cells by improving morphology in mitochondria and increasing the number of insulin granules

Imeglimin is a new anti-diabetic drug commercialized in Japan (Twymeeg®) and has been drawing much attention in diabetes research area as well as in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated the effect of imeglimin on pancreatic β-cells. First, single-dose administration of imeglimin enhanced insulin secretion from β-cells and decreased blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic db/db mice. In addition, single-dose administration of imeglimin significantly augmented insulin secretion in response to glucose from islets isolated from non-diabetic db/m mice. Second, during an oral glucose tolerance test 4-week chronic treatment with imeglimin enhanced insulin secretion and ameliorated glycemic control in diabetic db/db mice. Furthermore, the examination with electron microscope image showed that imeglimin exerted favorable effects on morphology in β-cell mitochondria and substantially increased the number of insulin granules in type 2 diabetic db/db and KK-Ay mice. Finally, imeglimin reduced the percentage of apoptotic β-cell death which was accompanied by reduced expression levels of various genes related to apoptosis and inflammation in β-cells. Taken together, imeglimin directly enhances insulin secretion in response to glucose from β-cells, increases the number of insulin granules, exerts favorable effects on morphology in β-cell mitochondria, and reduces apoptotic β-cell death in type 2 diabetic mice, which finally leads to amelioration of glycemic control.

Pharmacokinetics of Imeglimin in Caucasian and Japanese Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND

Imeglimin is a first-in-class novel oral antidiabetic marketed in Japan as TWYMEEG^® to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its mode of action is distinct from all other anti-hyperglycemic classes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of imeglimin in Caucasian and Japanese healthy individuals.

METHODS

Two randomized placebo-controlled phase 1 clinical studies were conducted in Caucasian subjects after single (250-8000 mg) and multiple (250-2000 mg twice daily) ascending doses and in Japanese subjects after single (500-6000 mg) and multiple (500-2000 mg twice daily) ascending doses. Imeglimin plasma and urine concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

All imeglimin doses achieved maximal concentration between 1 and 3.5 h in Caucasians, and 1.5 and 3 h in Japanese subjects. The elimination half-lives (t_1/2) were dose-independent and means ranged between 9.03 and 20.2 h for Caucasians, and 4.45 and 12 h for Japanese subjects. Dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve decreased with dose in the 250-8000 mg and in the 500-6000 mg dose range in Caucasians and Japanese, respectively, suggesting a dose-dependent but less than dose-proportional effect in imeglimin exposure. Plasma accumulation was minimal following repeated dosing, and food did not affect the pharmacokinetics in either population. Exposures were generally similar between Caucasian and Japanese subjects with less than 20% difference, although there was a tendency for exposures in Japanese to be slightly higher. Imeglimin had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with dose-dependent mild gastrointestinal adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Imeglimin was safe and well tolerated in these two phases 1 studies, with pharmacokinetics comparable between the two populations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

EudraCT 2005-001946-18 and 2014-004679-21.