Risankizumab treatment in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study

Nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus: Updates on diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory diseases of the nail, including nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus, are associated with significant disease burden and have a negative impact on quality of life. Diagnosis is often delayed, especially when patients present without cutaneous findings. Therefore, recognizing clinical signs and symptoms of inflammatory nail diseases, and initiating timely and appropriate treatment, is of utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE

We review recent studies on diagnostic techniques, discuss severity grading and scoring systems, and describe consensus treatment recommendations for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

METHODS

An updated literature review was performed using the PubMed database on studies assessing diagnostic techniques or treatment modalities for nail psoriasis and nail lichen planus.

RESULTS

Recent studies on diagnostic techniques for inflammatory nail disease have focused on use of dermoscopy, capillaroscopy, and ultrasound modalities. Treatment of these conditions is dichotomized into involvement of few (≤3) or many (>3) nails. Recent psoriatic therapeutics studied for nail outcomes include brodalumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab, deucravacitinib, and bimekizumab, while emerging treatments for nail lichen planus include JAK inhibitors and intralesional platelet rich plasma injections.

CONCLUSIONS

We emphasize the need for increased awareness and expanded management strategies for inflammatory nail diseases to improve patient outcomes.

Durability and long-term outcomes of biologic therapies in psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Significant advances in psoriasis treatment have taken place since the introduction of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the first class of biologics approved and at that time greatly improved psoriasis treatment. However, newer biologics, directed to interleukin(IL)-23/IL-17 pathways central to psoriasis pathogenesis, have improved complete or nearly complete clearance rates and are characterized by an excellent safety profile.Real-world setting experiences have generally confirmed the results of clinical trials, but real-world data regarding newer biologics is relatively scarce.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an extensive review of real-world survival of biologic treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

There is growing and consistent evidence of higher drug survival of IL-23 inhibitors, possibly due to their favorable efficacy and safety profiles, dosing convenience and persistence of response despite treatment interruption; eventual confirmation of their potential role as modifiers of the natural history of psoriasis might provide additional reasons for therapeutic persistence of this class of biologics.

Risankizumab for the Treatment of the Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis During a 24-Week Period: Real-Life Experience

Introduction

Several authors have reported their experiences in real-world clinical practice, confirming the therapeutic efficacy of risankizumab in plaque psoriasis. We aimed to reflect our experience with risankizumab treatment in patients with psoriasis.

Materials and Methods

Patients who presented to the dermatology outpatient clinics of two tertiary care centers between November 2021 and August 2022, diagnosed with psoriasis and treated with risankizumab, constituted the target population. Data including gender, age, weight, type of psoriasis, affected body sites, disease duration, previous treatments, duration of risankizumab treatment, psoriasis area and severity index scores, comorbidities, the reasons for drug discontinuation, adverse effects, and the patients' naïve or non-naïve status were obtained from electronic patient folders.

Results

Overall, 120 cases were included. While 73 (60.8%) cases were male, 47 (39.2%) were female. Eighty-six (68.3%) of all cases were biologic non-naive. A total of 49 patients (40.8%) had comorbidities. No significant correlations existed between biologic-naïve or non-naïve status, comorbidity status, and the PASI 75-90-100 responses.

Conclusion

Risankizumab is an effective treatment option for both biologic naive or non-naive patients with or without comorbidities. However, long-term studies, including more extensive patient series, are needed to validate its efficacy and safety in real-life clinical settings.

Development of a Deep Eutectic Solvent-Assisted Kaempferol Hydrogel: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Psoriasis-like Skin Inflammation

Psoriasis is an incurable inflammatory skin disease that is mediated by the immune system. Although kaempferol has been known for its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties, its therapeutic effectiveness is often limited due to its poor water solubility and low bioavailability. To address these challenges, we developed a promising kaempferol hydrogel (DK-pGEL) using Pluronic F127 and a deep eutectic solvent (DES) with varying concentrations of kaempferol. In this study, we first evaluated the rheological properties and viscosity of the DK-pGEL hydrogel. The G' of DK-pGEL (∼14 kPa) hydrogels was significantly lower than the control group (∼30 kPa) at 37 °C. The DK-pGEL hydrogel exhibited ideal fluidity and viscosity at 37 °C, as demonstrated by its shear-thinning behavior. Moreover, the DK-pGEL hydrogel showed controlled release characteristics with a drug release of 97.43 ± 5.37 μg/mL over 60 h. Furthermore, in vitro antioxidant experiments revealed that DK-pGEL exhibited significant radical scavenging ability against the DPPH-radical (96.27 ± 0.37%), ABTS-radical (98.11 ± 0.79%), hydroxyl-radical (66.36 ± 1.01%), and superoxide-radical (90.52 ± 0.79%) at a concentration of 250 μg/mL kaempferol. Additionally, DK-pGEL exhibited notable cellular antioxidant effects by inhibiting reactive oxygen species generation. Cell viability assays (CCK8) and live/dead cell assays were conducted to assess the cytotoxicity of DK-pGEL. The results showed that DK-pGEL could effectively inhibit HaCaT cell proliferation without causing significant cytotoxicity. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of DK-pGEL, an imiquimod (IMQ)-induced mouse model of psoriasis-like lesions was employed. Remarkably, the DK-pGEL hydrogel could significantly reduce the psoriasis area and severity index score, improve the histopathology induced by IMQ, and downregulate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17A) in the skin tissue. These findings demonstrate that the DES-assisted kaempferol hydrogel holds promise as a topical drug delivery system for psoriasis treatment.

Management Strategies for Pediatric Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Spotlight on Biologics

Although psoriasis onset has been reported at any ages, in up to one-third of cases, it begins during childhood, with an estimated prevalence of about 2% in pediatric population. The management of moderate-to-severe forms of childhood psoriasis may represent a challenge for dermatologists, especially for parents' concerns about the need of systemic treatments. However, a prompt safe and effective treatment is mandatory in these patients, due to the significative impact that psoriasis may have on their quality of life, with well-known consequences on psychological health of both patients and caregivers. Due to the relatively frequent parents' refusal of systemic treatments, probably due to the fear of eventual adverse events, difficulties of oral or injective route, the management of moderate-to-severe forms still represents a challenge. Herein, we report a narrative review, aiming to resume the systemic treatments for pediatric psoriasis, focusing on the use of biologics and small molecules in the pediatric ages. The most widely used therapeutic strategies today for the pediatric population with moderate-severe psoriasis are traditional systemic therapies, while more innovative drugs such as biologics and small molecules now represent a somewhat unexplored but certainly promising field for unresponsive patients.

Real-world data show high efficacy of IL23 inhibitors guselkumab and risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis and difficult-to-treat areas

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are chronic inflammatory skin and joint diseases requiring effective therapies. Although clinical studies have shown the efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors, real-world data are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective Greek study enrolling patients with psoriatic arthritis and moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis being treated at our multidisciplinary psoriasis outpatient clinic. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of IL-23 inhibitors guselkumab and risankizumab. Additionally, we sought to determine the clinical characteristics affecting treatment response. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at week 24.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (55.9% male, 69.5% early onset) with a mean age of 51.7 years were included. Twenty-four patients (40.7%) had a concomitant psoriatic arthritis. Obesity was the main comorbidity (49.2%) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31.3 kg/m2 . Additional comorbidities were hypertension (44.1%), dyslipidemia (32.2%), and diabetes (18.6%). Only eight patients (13.6%) were naïve to previous systemic treatments, whereas 40 patients (67.8%) were bio-experienced. A statistically significant improvement of aPASI and DAPSA was demonstrated after 4, 16, and 24 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). IL23 blockers were also efficacious in difficult-to-treat areas. Clinical outcome was affected from previous treatment with biologics. Treatment response was the same between guselkumab and risankizumab (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This real-world study confirms the efficacy and safety of guselkumab and risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis reported from clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Nail Psoriasis Targeted Therapies: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Nail changes are frequent clinical findings in patients with cutaneous psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, often causing significant impairments in quality of life. Numerous targeted therapies have been previously studied for treatment of nail psoriasis, however, newer agents have not been captured in prior systematic reviews. With over 25 new studies published since 2020, the landscape of nail psoriasis systemic treatments is rapidly evolving, warranting analysis of recently approved therapies.

METHODS

An updated systematic review of all PubMed and OVID database studies assessing efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for nail psoriasis was performed, with the goal of incorporating clinical data of recent trials and newer agents, namely brodalumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies reporting at least one of the nail psoriasis clinical appearance outcomes (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index, modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index).

RESULTS

A total of 68 studies on 15 nail psoriasis targeted therapeutic agents were included. Biological agents and small molecule inhibitors included TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab), IL-17 inhibitors (ixekizumab, brodalumab, secukinumab), IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab), PDE-4 inhibitors (apremilast), and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib). These agents all demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nail outcome scores, compared with placebo or with baseline values, at weeks 10-16 and weeks 20-26, with some studies assessing efficacy up to week 60. Safety data for these agents were acceptable and consistent with known safety profiles within these timepoints, with nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions, headache, and diarrhea being the most reported adverse events. Specifically, the newer agents, brodalumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, showed promising outcomes for treatment of nail psoriasis on the basis of current data.

CONCLUSION

Numerous targeted therapies have shown significant efficacy in improving nail findings in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Data from head-to-head trials have shown greater efficacy of ixekizumab over adalimumab and ustekinumab, as well as brodalumab over ustekinumab, while prior meta-analyses have demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab and tofacitinib to other included agents at various assessed timepoints. Further studies on the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents, as well as randomized controlled trials involving comparison with placebo arms, are needed to fully analyze differences in efficacy of newer agents compared with previously established therapies.

JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for the treatment of steroid-induced rosacea: case series

Background

Steroid-induced rosacea is a severe withdrawal reaction which can occur after the frequent and excessive topical use of steroids on the face. The Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling pathway is involved in many biological processes and may play a role in the development of steroid-induced rosacea.

Objective

To observe the efficacy and safety of the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib in the treatment of steroid-induced rosacea.

Methods

Four Chinese female patients were treated with orally-administered abrocitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor with a good safety profile, for steroid-induced rosacea.

Results

Abrocitinib treatment resulted in improved skin condition and lowered Dermatology Life Quality Index scores in each of the four patients. No discomfort was reported and no adverse effects were observed.

Conclusion

The JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib is a promising potential treatment for steroid-induced rosacea.

Survey of topical exposure concerns for patients and caregivers dealing with atopic dermatitis

Background

Despite the recent expansion of treatment options in atopic dermatitis (AD), most management responsibilities fall on the patient and/or caregivers. Disease control often requires vigilance about and avoidance of common exposures, however the concerns for patients and caregivers living with AD have not been well enumerated.

Methods

An IRB approved survey was distributed to the public to evaluate the patient and caregiver concerns for topical exposures and potential triggers.

Results

323 people accessed the link to the survey with 259 providing response to at least one section of questions (response rate 80.2%). Results indicated that temperature and other weather related changes were the most common trigger. Nearly all respondents avoided at least one topical ingredient, with fragrances being the most common. Steroid exposure was common, however respondents expressed concerns about overall steroid exposure.

Conclusions

Our results attempt to enumerate the daily topical exposure concerns for patients and caregivers living with AD. While our online survey is both limited and without mechanistic insights, our results provide insight to providers by highlighting the role of temperature in AD symptoms; identifying commonly perceived triggers; indicating the value of provider insight for topical product selection; and indicating that no specific aspect of topical corticosteroid exposure may alleviate the general steroid concerns for patients or caregivers.

Biologics for the Management of Erythrodermic Psoriasis: An Updated Review

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a severe and rare variant of psoriasis (less than 3% of cases), characterized by generalized scaling and erythema affecting more than 90% of body surface area. Several systemic symptoms can be present in patients with EP such as lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, fever, fatigue, dehydration, serum electrolyte disturbances, and tachycardia making this condition a possible life-threatening disease, particularly if appropriate treatments are not performed. In this scenario, effective and safe therapies are required. Unfortunately, the rarity of EP makes head-to-head Phase III trials challenging, leading to the lack of established guidelines for its management. Globally, conventional systemic drugs such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, and retinoids often have contraindications linked to patients' comorbidities and have not shown a high profile of efficacy and safety. Recently, the development of biologic drugs including anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-interleukin 12-23, 23, and 17 has revealed favorable results for the management of plaque psoriasis, making them also a possible therapeutic option for EP disease. However, their use in EP is still off-label. The aim of our study was to review current literature on the use of biologic drugs for the treatment of EPs in order to offer a wide perspective on their possible application in EP management.

Safety of IL-23 p19 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Narrative Review

The approved biologics targeting interleukin (IL)-23 p19 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, have generally favorable safety profiles. The aim of the current review is to describe in detail the safety of these selective inhibitors. A literature search was performed using PubMed from inception to 1 November 2022, to identify clinical trials and real-world evidence publications using the keywords "guselkumab," "tildrakizumab," and "risankizumab." Overall, the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with IL-23 p19 inhibitors in clinical trials were nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infections. Rates of serious AEs and AEs of interest, including serious infections, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancies excluding NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events, and serious hypersensitivity reactions, were not increased with long-term use in clinical trials. Selectively targeting IL-23 p19 was also not associated with elevated risk of opportunistic infections, tuberculosis reactivation, oral candidiasis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Results from real-world studies were similar, supporting the safe long-term use of these biologics in a wider population of patients with psoriasis, including older patients, patients for whom multiple biologics failed, and those with comorbidities such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and psoriatic arthritis. This review is limited by the lack of direct comparisons among therapeutic agents due to differences among study designs and safety data reporting methods. In conclusion, the favorable safety profiles of IL-23 p19 inhibitors support their long-term use in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Nail Psoriasis: An Updated Review of Currently Available Systemic Treatments

Background

Nail psoriasis (NP) has a prevalence that ranges from 10 to 82% among patients with psoriasis (PsO) and is one of the most common difficult to treat site of psoriasis. We performed a thorough review of the literature, exploring evidence regarding all available NP systemic treatments, describing also in detail NP dedicated clinical trials.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase prior to February 2023 using a combination of the terms "nail" AND "psoriasis" AND "systemic therapy" AND/OR "systemic treatment". A total of 47 original studies and case reports were reviewed in this article.

Results

Systemic therapies should be considered when the disorder involves more than 3 nails, has extensive skin and joint involvement, and has a significant impact on QoL, due to their best long-term efficacy. In detail, conventional and biologic systemic drugs demonstrated efficacy in recent trials, including acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine, apremilast, adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, bimekizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab.

Conclusion

Several therapies have demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of NP; however, the choice of treatment depends not only on the severity of the nail involvement, but also on whether PsA is present, the patient's comorbidities other than PsA, previous treatment history, and the patient's drug preferences.

Adverse events of guselkumab in the real world: emerging signals to target preventive strategies from the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab is an IL-23 inhibitor widely used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Our study aimed to characterize the profile of adverse events (AEs) associated with guselkumab from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

METHODS

Disproportionality analysis including the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms were used to assess the signals of guselkumab related AE.

RESULTS

A total of 22,950,014 reports were collected from the FAERS database, of which 24,312 reports regarding guselkumab as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs were identified. AEs induced by guselkumab were distributed in 27 organ systems. In this study, 205 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) that matched four algorithms simultaneously were obtained for analysis. Unexpected significant AEs such as onychomadesis, malignant melanoma in situ, endometrial cancer, and erectile dysfunction were observed.

CONCLUSION

The clinical observed AEs, along with potential new AE signals associated with guselkumab were identified based on the analysis of FAERS data, which could provide valuable evidence for clinical monitoring, risk identification, and further safety studies of identification.

Use of Biological Therapies for the Management of Pustular Psoriasis: A New Era?

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe and rare form of psoriasis, being a potentially life-threatening condition, characterized by recurring episodes or flares of widespread cutaneous erythema with macroscopic sterile pustules. An irregular innate immune response is linked to GPP, which is considered an auto-inflammatory disorder, while innate and adaptive immunopathogenic responses are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. In consequence, different cytokine cascades have been suggested to be mainly involved in the pathogenesis of each different psoriasis form, with the interleukin (IL)23/IL17 axis implied in plaque psoriasis, and the IL36 pathway in the GPP. As regards GPP treatment, conventional systemic drugs available for plaque psoriasis are usually used as the first-line treatment option. However, contraindications and adverse events often limit the use of these therapies. In this scenario, biologic drugs may represent a promising treatment option. To date, even if 12 different biologics have been approved for plaque psoriasis, none of these is approved for GPP where they are employed off-label. Recently, spesolimab, an anti-IL36 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been recently approved for GPP. The purpose of this article is to assess the current literature about the use of biological therapies for the treatment of GPP to establish the basis for a shared GPP management algorithm.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 2-Year Real-Life Retrospective Study

Risankizumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL23 and has been recently approved by the EMA and the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. Its efficacy and safety have been reported by clinical trials and real-life studies. However, even if long-term data from trials have already been reported (up to 172 weeks), data on long-term real-life experiences are still limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term (2 years) efficacy and safety of risankizumab for psoriasis management in a real-life setting. A monocentric retrospective study was performed, enrolling 168 patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis who were undergoing treatment with risankizumab. Psoriasis severity and safety outcomes were evaluated at each follow-up visit (week 16, week 28, week 52, week 88, week 104). A statistically significant reduction of psoriasis severity scores was reported from week 16 and was maintained up to week 104. Moreover, interesting results in terms of safety have been collected, without any serious adverse events registered. Our long-term real-life monocentric retrospective study confirmed the efficacy and safety of risankizumab up to 104 weeks of treatment. However, further studies are required to confirm our results and to increase available data to establish the best evidence-based biologic selection algorithm.

Risankizumab Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis-A Multi-Center, Long-Term, Real-Life Study from Poland

The present multi-center, long-term, real-life study made an attempt to assess the efficacy of risankizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The study comprised 185 patients from 10 Polish dermatologic departments undergoing risankizumab treatment. The disease severity was measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) before the start of the risankizumab treatment and next at the defined timepoints, i.e., 4, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 96 weeks of treatment. The percentage of patients achieving PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as the PASI percentage decrease at the defined timepoints were calculated, and correlations with clinical characteristics and therapeutic effect were analyzed. The number of patients evaluated at the defined timepoints was: 136, 145, 100, 93, 62, and 22 at 4, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 96 weeks of treatment, respectively. At 4, 16, 28, 40, 52 and 96 weeks, the PASI90 response was achieved in 13.2%, 81.4%, 87.0%, 86.0%, 88.7% and 81.8% of patients, whereas the PASI100 response was achieved in 2.9%, 53.1%, 67.0%, 68.8%, 71.0% and 68.2% of patients, respectively. Our study revealed a significant negative correlation between a decrease in the PASI and the presence of psoriatic arthritis as well as the patient's age and duration of psoriasis at several timepoints throughout the observation period.

Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Patient with Chronic HBV Infection

The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. However, safety concerns still remain, particularly on patient affected by opportunistic infections. In this scenario, the safety of biologic drugs in patient with HBV infection is debated. Globally, screening for hepatitis before starting biological treatment is mandatory as well as a referral to an infectivologist and eventual prophylactic management should be evaluated case by case, also considering risk factors. On the one hand, the use of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor seems to increase the risk of HBV reactivation, conversely, the use of recently approved classes of biologics [anti-interleukin (IL) 17 and anti-IL23] seems to have a lower risk of HBV reactivation. However, the evidence on the safety of anti-IL23 drugs in patients affected by HBV is scant, particularly for patients undergoing treatment with tildrakizumab. Herein, we report the first case of a female patient affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis, successfully treated with tildrakizumab without reporting hepatitis reactivation. Even if limited, our case seems to confirm available evidence about the safety of anti-IL23, particularly tildrakizumab, on patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis.

The Impact of Treatment with IL-17/IL-23 Inhibitors on Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis and/or Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review

Accumulating evidence considers psoriasis a systemic inflammatory disorder that is associated with comorbidities such as psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. Although the precise pathogenetic links between psoriasis and atherosclerosis warrants further investigation, it is believed that chronic systemic inflammation along with the T helper (Th)-1 and Th17 polarization are associated with endothelial dysfunction and subsequent acceleration of atherosclerosis. Considering the above, several studies have evaluated if optimal control of the inflammation in psoriasis by inhibiting interleukins targeting the Interleukin (IL)-23/Th17 axis could subsequently reduce the atherosclerotic process during anti-psoriatic treatment by using a variety of surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. This systematic review summarizes current knowledge on the pathogenetic mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of atherosclerosis in the context of psoriasis and provides a systematic review of the literature on the impact of treatment with biologics targeting the IL-23/Th17 axis on subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with plaque psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis.

Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, and Secukinumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of the Real-Life Experience

To date, adalimumab (ADA) is the only biotechnology drug approved for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), an inflammatory skin condition. However, it quickly became apparent that the efficacy of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. In our review, we highlighted the current evidence from literature on the use of biologics in HS in a real-life setting, particularly adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. Data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs in HS management have been analyzed. Even if the results are promising, more studies are needed. In our opinion, the armamentarium of drugs for HS management is increasing, and treatment will be based on a tailored-tail approach, minimizing the risk of adverse events. In this context, we want to point out the reported effectiveness and safety data concerning adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab as well as ixekizumab.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part I: focus on pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis management is challenging, especially in pediatric age for different factors. The introduction of biologic drugs and oral small molecules (OSM) revolutionized the armamentarium of available weapons in psoriasis treatment. Despite the use of these drugs in adult patients has been widely investigated, pediatric patients have often been unconsidered in clinical trials and real-life studies. However, the high efficacy and speed of action, the safety profile and the ease-to-use administration make these innovative drugs an invaluable therapeutic opportunity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this manuscript is to perform a review of the current literature examining data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs and OSM for the management of psoriasis in pediatric patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review based on currently available evidence suggests biologics and OSM as an ideal treatment option for pediatric patients, with an excellent profile in terms of efficacy and safety as compared to traditional systemic drugs.

Bimekizumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Biological treatments deeply changed the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. Among the available biological therapies, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and bimekizumab represent one of the most rapid and effective biologic classes available for psoriasis. Bimekizumab, the latest available IL-17 inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody that acts by neutralizing both IL-17A and IL-17F, showing a unique mechanism of action differing from ixekizumab and secukinumab (selective IL17A inhibitor), as well as brodalumab (antagonist of IL17 receptor).

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to evaluate the safety profile of bimekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab have been reported by several phase II and III clinical trials, even in a longer-term period. Moreover, clinical trials also showed bimekizumab to have significantly higher efficacy compared to other biological classes, including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, and even to another IL-17 inhibitor, secukinumab. Although numerous biologics are currently available for psoriasis, some patients may result resistant to other treatments and/or experience psoriatic flares during or after treatment withdrawal. In this scenario, bimekizumab may represent an additional valuable alternative for patients with moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis.

Efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for psoriasis in pediatric and geriatric populations. Part II: focus on elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis is becoming a frequent concern in geriatric age due to the higher risk to develop treatment adverse events, logistic issues, vulnerability to immune-related diseases and cancer, presence of comorbidities and the risk of drug interactions. In this context, traditional systemic treatments are often contraindicated, and biologic drugs and small molecules seem to be a valuable option. However, data on their effectiveness and safety in elderly patients are scant.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to analyze the current literature in order to point out data on the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and small molecules for the management of psoriasis in elderly patients in order to put the basis for universally shared treatment algorithm following available evidence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the literature research.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Our review suggests biologics and small molecules as an effective and safe option for the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis in elderly patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Deucravacitinib for the Management of Psoriasis: A Review of the Current Literature

Psoriasis management may be challenging, particularly for moderate-to-severe forms of the disease. Indeed, conventional systemic treatments are often avoided for contraindications or the risk of adverse events as well as phototherapy is often limited by logistic concerns. Despite the development of biological drugs and small molecules revolutionized the treatment options showing promising results in terms of safety and effectiveness, some limitations remain. Thus, there is still a need for new therapies that are always welcome in order to tailor the treatment to the patient and to have a higher level of performance, especially in order to maintain long-term effectiveness. In this scenario, deucravacitinib, an oral small molecule which selectively inhibits Tyrosine Kinase 2, may represent a promising weapon in psoriasis management. The aim of our manuscript is to review the current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib for the management of psoriasis.

Bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy for psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease prone to recurrence. Some studies indicated that bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy had been proposed as a treatment strategy for psoriasis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of this combination therapy in reducing the severity of disease in patients with psoriasis.

Methods

The following electronic databases were searched for articles from January 1, 2000 to March 1, 2022: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP database), Wan-Fang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The language was not restricted while performing the search. The quality of articles was evaluated using Rev. Man 5.4 software (provided by the Cochrane Collaboration), comparing bloodletting cupping combined with conventional measures therapy to conventional measures treatments. The studies obtained randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bloodletting cupping combined with conventional standard treatment for treating psoriasis. Two trained researchers (Xiaoyu Ma and Jiaming He) independently reviewed the literature, extracted data based on exclusion and inclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of the included studies. We estimated the aggregate data using a random effects model.

Findings

We identified 164 studies. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The primary outcome indicator was the total number of effective individuals. Secondary outcomes included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), adverse effects, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Compared with conventional treatments, bloodletting cupping combined with conventional medicine yielded an improved total effective number of persons (RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.07 to 1.22, p < 0.00001), PASI (MD = -1.11, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.82, p < 0.00001) and DLQI scores (MD = -0.99, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.59, p < 0.0001). We found no significant difference in adverse reactions (RR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.46 to 1.90, p = 0.85). The heterogeneity test showed the total effective numbers (p < 0.00001, I ² = 43%) and PASI (p < 0.00001, I ² = 44%) and DLQI scores (p < 0.00001, I ² = 0%).

Interpretation

Bloodletting cupping combined with conventional treatment can achieve the ideal treatment for psoriasis. However, the combined treatment in psoriasis needs to be further evaluated in high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes to enable future studies in clinical use.

Safety and Efficacy of Covid-19 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Biological Treatments for Psoriasis

The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis, shifting treatment goals to higher treatment outcomes and less frequent safety issues. The outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a worldwide challenge, strongly affecting lifestyle, global economy, and overall health. Among the strategies adopted to contain the spreading of the infection, vaccination is the main one. In this context, the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines raised several doubts about their effectiveness and safety in patients undergoing therapy with biological for psoriasis. Even if molecular and cellular mechanisms by which COVID-19 vaccines lead to psoriasis development have not yet been fully elucidated, vaccination itself can trigger the release of interleukin (IL)-6, interferon (IFN) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α by T-helper (Th)1/Th17 cells. All these cytokines are involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients undergoing treatment with biologics, in order to clarify any concerns.

Injections Site Reactions and Biologics for Psoriasis: A Questionnaire Based Real Life Study

Background

Biologic selection for psoriasis treatment should take into account numerous factors including injection site reactions (ISRs) such as swelling at the injection site, pain, burning, erythema, all possibly reducing patient adherence.

Methods

A 6-months observational real life study was performed involving psoriasis patients. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, moderate-to-severe psoriasis diagnosis since at least 1 year, patients being on biologic treatment for psoriasis ≥ 6 months. A 14-item questionnaire was administered to all patients enrolled to assess whether the patient ever experienced ISRs after the injection of the biologic drug.

Results

234 patients were included: 32.5% received an anti-TNF-alpha drug, 9.4% received anti-IL12/23, 32.5% received an anti-IL17, 25.6% received an anti-IL23. 51.2% of study population reported at least one symptom related to ISR. 35.9% of patients experienced pain, 31.6% swelling, 28.2% burning sensation and 17.9% erythema. 3.4% of the surveyed population experienced anxiety or fear of the biologic injection due to ISRs symptoms. The greater incidence of pain was registered in anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17 groups (47.4% and 42.1%, p<0.01). Ixekizumab proved to be the drug with the highest rate of patients experiencing pain (72.2%), burning (77.7%) and swelling (83.3%). No patients reported biologics discontinuation or delay for ISRs symptoms.

Conclusion

Our study highlighted that each different class of biologics for psoriasis was linked to ISRs. These events are more frequently reported with anti-TNF-alpha and anti-IL17.

Tildrakizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from 52 Weeks Real-Life Retrospective Study

Background

Tildrakizumab, an anti-IL-23, showed promising efficacy and safety profiles in two randomized clinical-trials (reSURFACE-1 and reSURFACE-2), comparing tildrakizumab superiority to placebo and etanercept. Due to its recent availability in clinical-practice, real-life data are still limited.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in a real-world-practice in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods

A 52-week observational retrospective study enrolled patients suffering from moderate-to-severe plaque-psoriasis, starting tildrakizumab treatment.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Mean PASI showed a significant reduction at each follow-up (p<0.001), reducing from 13.5±5.9 at baseline, 2.8±3.8 at week-28, resulting stable up to week-52. High rates of patients reached both PASI90 and PASI100 responses at both week 16 (PASI90: 52.4%, PASI100: 33.3%) and week 28 (PASI90: 76.1%, PASI100: 61.9%), maintaining these up to week 52 (PASI90: 73.8%, PASI100: 59.5%). The impact of treatment on patient's quality of life has been evaluated with DLQI, which showed a significant reduction during follow-ups.

Conclusion

Our data confirm tildrakizumab as an effective and generally safe treatment for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with high rates of both PASI90 and PASI100 responses, and very few reported adverse events, up to 52 weeks of follow-up.

The Role of Teledermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review

Teledermatology represented one of the most important and useful tools during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Indeed, due to the severe restriction, and to reduce the spread of the infection, different measures were applied among different countries and hospitals to ensure a continuity of care for patients. In this scenario, teledermatology played a central role, especially in the management of patients suffering from chronic inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the role of teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze main strengths and limitations of this tool, as well as to provide future perspectives in clinical applications.

Risankizumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Survival in the Mid-Term (52 Weeks) in Real Clinical Practice in Andalusia, Spain, According to the Therapeutic Goals of the Spanish Psoriatic Guidelines

Introduction. Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) type that binds selectively, and with high affinity, to the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), resulting in the inhibition of inflammation and clinical symptoms associated with psoriasis. Its introduction has managed to increase the levels of efficacy and safety (improving upon those previously presented by the anti-IL-23 class). Material and methods. Retrospective analysis of a multicenter, observational study of real clinical practice, including patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in treatment with risankizumab. This cross-sectional analysis includes information on patients from May 2020 to June 2022. A total of six tertiary hospitals in Andalusia (Spain) participated in this study. Analyses were performed “as observed” using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0 for Windows. Results. Regarding the percentage of patients who reached PASI 90 or PASI 100 at week 52, 92.5% achieved the therapeutic goal of PASI 90, and 78.5% reached PASI 100. When analyzing the results by absolute PASI, we found that 78.5% (n = 33) obtained PASI 0, 85.7% (n = 36) obtained PASI ≤ 1, and all patients achieved PASI ≤ 3 (disease control). Discussion. Risankizumab has shown promising results in the control of psoriasis in the long-term, with a high percentage of patients (>80%) maintaining PASI 90 and PASI 100 up to 52 weeks of treatment. No abnormal safety findings have been reported, and risankizumab appears to be a solid treatment in the different scenarios analyzed.

Cutaneous Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Review of the Current Literature

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented a new worldwide challenge, strongly impacting on the global economy, overall health and lifestyle. Since then, several strategies have been adopted to contain the widespread of infection. Among these, vaccination is currently the most important measure to fight against the pandemic. However, several concerns such as slower-than-hoped-for rollout, the hurried approval with limited data, the mechanism of action (in particular mRNA-based), and the uncertain duration of protection they afforded were initially raised. Moreover, even if cutaneous reactions have been rarely reported in clinical trials, global mass vaccination showed several dermatologic reactions not initially recognized, leaving dermatologists to decide how to diagnose and treat them. In this scenario, dermatologists should be ready to promptly recognize these clinical manifestations. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to review current literature on cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly inflammatory dermatological diseases, in order to help clinicians to better understand these dermatological conditions and to provide an extensive overview of all the vaccine-related skin manifestations.

Real-world effectiveness of anti-interleukin-23 antibodies in chronic plaque-type psoriasis of patients from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA)

With the introduction of the latest class of biologic drugs targeting interleukin (IL)-23p19, three new, highly effective drugs can be used for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. However, poorer skin improvement as well as higher rates of serious adverse events have been reported for patients under real-world conditions (outside clinical trials). This accounts especially for patients who have already been treated with biologic drugs. We therefore aimed to determine effectiveness and safety of IL-23p19 inhibitors in real-world patients by analysing data from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA) in this observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Data for 197 patients (52.3% biologic-non-naïve), who were treated with anti-IL-23p19 antibodies (127 guselkumab, 55 risankizumab and 15 tildrakizumab) for at least 3 months, were eligible for analysis. In general, biologic-non-naïve patients displayed a less favourable response to anti-IL-23 treatment as compared to biologic-naïve patients. However, after correction for previous biologic exposure, few differences in PASI improvement were detected among biologic-naïve and -non-naïve patients treated with different IL-23p19 inhibitors. This indicates that treatment effectiveness is not related to the class of the previously administered therapy in biologic-non-naïve patients. Therefore, IL-23p19 inhibitors represent a promising treatment alternative for patients who have not responded to previous biologics. However, as with other biologic agents (including IL-17 inhibitors), we did not observe an entirely satisfactory treatment response (i.e. PASI < 3 and/or PASI 75) to anti-IL-23 treatment in one out of four to five patients. Adverse events (mainly non-severe infections) were observed in 23 (11.7%) patients with no major differences regarding the administered IL-23 inhibitor or previous biologic exposure.

Towards Personalized Medicine in Psoriasis: Current Progress

Although innovative targeted therapies have positively revolutionized psoriasis treatment shifting treatment goals to complete or almost complete skin clearance, primary or secondary lack of efficacy is still possible. Hence, identifying robust biomarkers that reflect the various clinical psoriasis phenotypes would allow stratify patients in subgroups or endotypes, and tailor treatments according to the characteristics of each individual (precision medicine). To sum up the current progress in personalized medicine for psoriasis, we performed a review on the available evidence on biomarkers predictive of response to psoriasis treatments, with focus on phototherapy and systemic agents. Relevant literature published in English was searched for using the following databases from the last five years up to March 20, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, EBSCO, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library. Currently, more evidence exists towards biologicals, as justified by the huge health care costs as compared to phototherapy or conventional systemic drugs. Among them, most of the studies focused on anti-TNF and IL12/23, with still few on IL17 (mainly secukinumab). The most discussed biomarker gene is the HLA-C*02:06 status that has been shown to be associated with psoriasis, and also differential response to biologicals. Although its positivity is associated with great response to MTX, debatable results were retrieved concerning both anti-TNF and IL12/23 while it seems not to affect secukinumab response. Personalized treatment in psoriasis would provide excellent outcome minimizing the risk of side effects. To date, although several candidates were proposed and assessed, the scarcity and heterogeneity of the results do not allow the identification of the gold-standard biomarker per each treatment. Anyway, the creation of a more comprehensive panel would be more reliable for the treatment decision process.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Psoriasis: A Review of the Real-World Evidence

Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, represent the latest class of biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Since their approval numerous real-life studies were published on anti-IL-23 use in routine clinical practice. Indeed, real-life data are important to improve the dermatological decision-making process, including patients who are typically excluded from clinical trials, such as subjects suffering from several comorbidities, subjects on polypharmacy, as well as multifailure patients. Herein, we performed a comprehensive literature review about real-life data available on guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Real-life data of anti-IL-23 seem to confirm the promising results of IL-23 shown by clinical trials, highlighting the efficacy and safety profiles of this new class of biologics also in clinical practice.