Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a network meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase selective inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Although previous studies have confirmed that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a black box warning for all JAKs. Therefore, it is necessary for us to further pay attention to their safety. Method: The medical literature data bases were searched from database creation until August 26, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with JAK1-selective inhibitors (upadacitinib and abrocitinib) were included. Results: In this meta-analysis, which included 12 studies (one of which reported two outcomes), we collected data at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Almost all results showed that JAK1-selective inhibitors were more efficacious than controls and had an onset of action at week 2. There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events, leading to discontinuation, whereas, for treatment-associated adverse events, the JAK1-selective inhibitors were higher than the control group (RR 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.21]; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Overall, the treatment of atopic dermatitis with JAK1-selective inhibitors has a rapid onset of action. However, we need to be aware of the treatment-associated adverse events, more studies need to be conducted to provide better decisions on clinical medications for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Safety and Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Smoke: a 2-Year Real-Life Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that significantly impairs the quality of life. Recent advancements in systemic therapies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, offer very effective new treatment options. However, concerns regarding potential adverse events, including cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk, have emerged from clinical studies and call for further real-life investigations. This has highlighted the need to establish specific risk categories, such as tobacco smokers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, in patients who smoke with moderate-to-severe AD over a 2-year treatment period, comparing outcomes with patients who do not smoke.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted across 12 dermatology departments in Italy, including 375 patients treated with upadacitinib. The presence and intensity of smoking habits as well as effectiveness scores and safety data were collected.

RESULTS

Patients who smoke accounted for 36.8% of the sample. Two thromboembolic events in patients who do not smoke were recorded in the 2-year (median follow up of 52.6 weeks) observation period. The most common adverse event was acneiform eruption (12.4% of patients after 104 weeks). No significant differences related to safety emerged regarding the presence or absence of a smoking habit. Drug survival was very high with no differences between the two cohorts (83.5% after 104 weeks for patients who smoke).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in presence of tobacco smoke, with no significant differences in safety or effectiveness compared with patients who do not smoke.

Comparative Real-World Analysis of Baseline Demographic Characteristics and Comorbidities in Atopic Dermatitis Patients Initiating Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors

Background: Systemic advanced therapies, including biologic drugs and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have revolutionized atopic dermatitis management. The increasing number of available options for such complex diseases demands careful treatment selection for each patient, considering numerous variables. Comparative analyses of these treatment modalities in the real world are still limited. Only a faithful basal characterization would enable posterior meaningful and accurate comparisons of the efficacy and safety profiles of these groups of drugs. This communication focuses on describing and comparing the baseline demographics and comorbidities of patients with atopic dermatitis currently treated with biologic therapies versus JAK inhibitors in our setting. Methods: We conducted an observational, descriptive, and ambispective study across three hospitals covering a population of over 500,000 inhabitants from January 2019 to December 2024. Baseline demographic data, anthropometric measures, lifestyle factors, cardiovascular risk factors, and comorbidities were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Additionally, basal severity and effectivity over time have also been compared. Results: A total of 150 patients were analyzed. A total of 102 had received biological therapies (dupilumab or tralokinumab), whereas 48 patients had received JAK inhibitors (upadacitinib, baricitinib, or abrocitinib). Ages ranged from 11 to 76 years. The overall cohort had a mean age of 35.87 ± 14.37 years and a male predominance (male-to-female ratio 1.63:1). Hypertension was more prevalent in the JAK inhibitors group (p = 0.0175), yet other cardiovascular risk factors, body measurements, atopic and non-atopic comorbidities, and disease severity were comparable across both groups. Conclusions: This study helped to characterize the baseline characteristics of patients treated with advanced systemic therapies in a real-world clinical setting. It pointed to just slight differences between the profiles of patients treated with biologics versus JAK inhibitors. This homogeneity in baseline characteristics sets the ground for further future comparisons of treatment outcomes in this cohort as potential confounding factors related to group imbalances are minimized.

Lebrikizumab vs Other Systemic Monotherapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Network Meta-analysis of Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the short-term efficacy of lebrikizumab to other biologic and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapies approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents.

METHODS

The NMA included randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy phase 2 and 3 trials of biologics (lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], dupilumab 300 mg Q2W, and tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W) and JAK inhibitors (abrocitinib 100/200 mg daily, baricitinib 2/4 mg daily, and upadacitinib 15/30 mg daily) at approved doses. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement, an Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1), and a ≥ 4-point improvement in pruritus/itch numeric rating scale score at 12 weeks (abrocitinib) or 16 weeks (other treatments). Itch was also assessed at week 4. A Bayesian NMA employing baseline risk-adjusted random effects models was used to estimate treatment differences.

RESULTS

Twenty-two monotherapy studies involving 8531 patients were included in the NMA. By week 12/16, lebrikizumab had superior odds of achieving IGA 0/1 and itch improvement compared to baricitinib and tralokinumab; similar odds to dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib 15 mg; and inferior odds to upadacitinib 30 mg. Additionally, lebrikizumab had a higher probability of improving EASI than baricitinib 2 mg; similar probability to baricitinib 4 mg, tralokinumab, dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib 15 mg; and lower probability than upadacitinib 30 mg daily. At week 4, lebrikizumab had superior odds of improving itch compared to tralokinumab; similar odds to baricitinib, dupilumab, and abrocitinib 100 mg; and inferior odds to abrocitinib 200 mg and upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Among biologics, lebrikizumab was comparable to dupilumab and superior to tralokinumab in improving response rates at week 16. Upadacitinib 30 mg was the only JAK inhibitor with superior response rates compared to lebrikizumab.

Comparative efficacy of biologics and small molecule drugs in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2-18 years: A 12-16 week network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) predominantly manifests before age five, with significant phenotype variations across age groups. Despite increasing systemic treatments for pediatric AD, head-to-head comparisons in network meta-analyses focused on children are scarce.

METHODS

Through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to March 2024, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD in children aged 2-18 years. From 900 screened articles, 8 RCTs (n = 2636) met inclusion criteria, comparing dupilumab, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib versus placebo with standard care. Primary outcome was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at 12-16 weeks.

RESULTS

Upadacitinib demonstrated highest efficacy at both 30 mg (risk difference [RD] 0.62 [0.53, 0.71]) and 15 mg (RD 0.52 [0.42, 0.62]). Dupilumab (weight-based dosing with corticosteroids; RD 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]), abrocitinib (200 mg; RD 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]; 100 mg; RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), and baricitinib (4 mg; RD 0.21 [0.06, 0.35]) also showed significant efficacy over placebo.

CONCLUSION

This analysis establishes a hierarchy of effectiveness among systemic therapies for pediatric AD, with upadacitinib showing highest efficacy. However, the predominance of adolescent data emphasizes the need for age-stratified studies in younger children and long-term safety assessments.

Switching From Dupilumab to Tralokinumab or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Cases of Ocular and/or Facial Adverse Events in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) may discontinue dupilumab owing to dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events (DOAEs) or dupilumab-induced facial redness (DFR).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate DOAE and DFR outcomes after switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 106 patients discontinuing dupilumab because of DOAEs and/or DFR. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with resolution of adverse events or improvement between dupilumab discontinuation (M0) and 3 to 6 months of tralokinumab or JAKi (M3-M6) treatment; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with controlled AD defined by Investigator's Global Assessment scores of 0/1 at M3 to M6.

RESULTS

Proportions of patients with DOAE (92% vs 72%; P = .0244) and DFR (85% vs 33%; P = .0006) resolution or improvement were higher with JAKi than with tralokinumab. Proportions of patients reaching an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1 increased from M0-M3 through M6 (22% vs 42%; P = .0067) in the JAKi group and remained similar (32% vs 35%) in the tralokinumab group. However, 57% discontinued the new treatment after 8 months on average, mainly owing to lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Janus kinase inhibitor appears to be more efficient than tralokinumab in managing dupilumab-induced AE; however, both strategies may fail to control AD.

Abrocitinib-associated adverse events: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease. Janus kinase (JAK) modulates cytokines involved in AD pathophysiology, and JAK inhibitors have emerged as effective pharmacotherapeutic remedies for AD. Abrocitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of JAK1, is indicated for the management of moderate-to-severe AD. The current study evaluated the adverse events (AEs) associated with abrocitinib in a real-world setting.

METHODS

To quantify the signals of abrocitinib-associated AEs, we used the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for this pharmacovigilance study with two established pharmacovigilance methods.

RESULTS

A total of 1071 AEs of abrocitinib were investigated as the primary suspected from the FAERS to detect and characterize relevant safety signals. The analysis revealed 85 signals for abrocitinib. The most common AE for abrocitinib was drug ineffective. The signal strength of eczema herpeticum was 515.87 (277.80-957.98) and 510.59 (5148.65) and exhibited the highest strength for abrocitinib. Rare AEs such as aggravated condition, pruritus, and hypersensitivity were not listed on the label, and attention to these AEs is required.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the AE signals may provide support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of abrocitinib.

Biologics and small molecules: the re-evolution in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents. Current state of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenetic mechanisms has expanded, and now it is recognized that Th2 immune axis dysregulation is pivotal to AD pathogenesis. The advent of biological drugs and small molecules has marked a revolution in the treatment of AD. Dupilumab, targeting IL-4 and IL-13, has been the first to demonstrate efficacy in treating moderate to severe AD by modulating type-2 inflammation pathways. Increasing knowledge of different immune axis and cytokines has fueled the development of new biologics and small molecules. JAK inhibitors, which target the JAK-STAT pathway, involved in cytokine signaling, represent a promising novel therapeutic strategy, enlarging the treatment options for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

AREAS COVERED

This comprehensive review aims to provide an updated and critical overview of the drugs currently in use and under investigation for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in children and adolescents, along with addressing the unmet needs and future research perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologics and small molecules offer the promise to enlarge the arsenal options for the treatment of AD. Since the patients' response to biologics depends on AD pheno-endotype, choosing the right biologic is crucial for ensuring therapy success.

An evaluation of the recently approved drugs for treating atopic dermatitis in the context of their safety and efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The present paper aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib in treating mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases were utilized to search articles published during the years 2015-2024. The review was limited to randomized controlled studies that measured specific outcomes for safety and efficacy aspects, including adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) to evaluate safety and Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) or improvement of at least 75% of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) to evaluate efficacy.

RESULTS

The review included 17 articles in the analysis. The safety odds ratios (ORs) among participants using crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib were 1.14, 95% CI [0.97-1.36], 1.18, 95% CI [0.84-1.67], and 0.72, 95% CI [0.55-0.94], respectively, when compared to control groups. The three studied topical AD treatments were found to be significantly more effective compared to control groups (crisaborole, OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.51-2.10], delgocitinib, OR = 6.34, 95% CI [3.57-11.27], and ruxolitinib, OR = 7.30, 95% CI [5.10-10.44]).

CONCLUSION

Delgocitinib and ruxolitinib demonstrated favorable safety and effectiveness profiles across various age cohorts, whereas crisaborole raised concerns over its safety and efficacy, particularly in children.

Resolution of Chronic Inflammation, Restoration of Epigenetic Disturbances and Correction of Dysbiosis as an Adjunctive Approach to the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with multifactorial and unclear pathogenesis. Its development is characterized by two key elements: epigenetic dysregulation of molecular pathways involved in AD pathogenesis and disrupted skin and gut microbiota (dysbiosis) that jointly trigger and maintain chronic inflammation, a core AD characteristic. Current data suggest that failed inflammation resolution is the main pathogenic mechanism underlying AD development. Inflammation resolution is provided by specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) derived from dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids acting through cognate receptors. SPM levels are reduced in AD patients. Administration of SPMs or their stable, small-molecule mimetics and receptor agonists, as well as supplementation with probiotics/prebiotics, demonstrate beneficial effects in AD animal models. Epidrugs, compounds capable of restoring disrupted epigenetic mechanisms associated with the disease, improve impaired skin barrier function in AD models. Based on these findings, we propose a novel, multilevel AD treatment strategy aimed at resolving chronic inflammation by application of SPM mimetics and receptor agonists, probiotics/prebiotics, and epi-drugs. This approach can be used in conjunction with current AD therapy, resulting in AD alleviation.

Arctiin Alleviates Atopic Dermatitis Against Inflammation and Pyroptosis Through Suppressing TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB and NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD Signaling Pathways

Purpose

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent skin condition worldwide. The immune response plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD. Arctiin (ARC), a natural lignan, has been extensively investigated because of its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties. However, the impact of ARC on AD remains uncertain. Therefore, this study investigated the therapeutic effects of ARC in AD.

Methods

AD-like lesions were induced in mice by applying 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). The efficacy of ARC in AD was assessed by measuring skin lesion scores and thickness, pathological observation, and serum IgE concentrations. The expression of relevant proteins and genes in the back skin of the mice was assessed. Moreover, the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB and NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD signaling pathways were assessed in HaCaT cells stimulated with TNF-α and IFN-γ.

Results

ARC effectively alleviated AD-like dermatitis induced by DNCB in mice, reducing the skin thickness, mast cell infiltration in skin tissue, and serum total IgE levels. In addition, the expression of IL-1β and the mRNA transcription of TSLP and IFN-γ were downregulated. ARC also suppressed the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway, and molecular docking confirmed that ARC had exceptional binding properties with TLR4. Moreover, ARC ameliorated pyroptosis by inhibiting the activation of the nod-like receptor protein-3/Caspase-1/GSDMD cascade.

Conclusion

ARC has remarkable anti-AD effects by inhibiting inflammation and pyroptosis through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB and NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD signaling pathways. This suggests that ARC has potential as a new drug candidate for treating AD, which provides a novel approach to the clinical management of AD.

Evolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis after switching dupilumab to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors (RESO-ADOC study)

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials and real-life data have reported an increased incidence of conjunctivitis in patients treated with dupilumab for their atopic dermatitis (AD). Although mostly mild in severity, in some cases conjunctivitis will appear or increase after dupilumab initiation, which can lead to dupilumab discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To describe the characteristics of patients developing conjunctivitis requiring discontinuation of dupilumab; and (2) to analyse the factors associated with a complete conjunctivitis improvement after dupilumab discontinuation and a switch to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study that included all patients with AD treated with dupilumab who developed conjunctivitis leading to dupilumab discontinuation and switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors in daily practice. Data on patients, their AD and conjunctivitis were analysed at the inclusion visit (corresponding to discontinuation of dupilumab and the institution of new AD treatment), at visit 2 (3-6 months after inclusion) and at visit 3 (corresponding to the last medical visit).

RESULTS

After multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a complete resolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis at visit 2 and/or visit 3 were conjunctivitis duration (OR 8.98, 95% CI 1.47-55) (p = 0.018), personal history of asthma (OR 10.66, 95% CI 1.82-62.63) (p = 0.009) and switching from dupilumab to Janus kinase inhibitors (OR 17.11, 95% CI 2.94-99.66) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon, severe dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis is more frequent in daily life compared to its incidence in the dupilumab pivotal trials. In these cases, our study suggests that a rapid switch to another molecule, particularly a Janus kinase inhibitor, should be considered.

The therapeutic effect of 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-3-acetyl-rac-glycerol on chemically induced atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease worldwide. However, it is still urgent to develop innovative treatments that can effectively manage refractory patients with unpredictable chronic disease courses. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-3-acetyl-rac-glycerol (PLAG) as a novel agent for AD treatment using a human-like mouse model of AD. PLAG significantly improved 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)-induced AD skin lesions compared to those in mice treated with DNCB alone. PLAG substantially modulated the AD-induced infiltration of monocytes and eosinophils into skin lesions and humoral systemic responses involving immunoglobulin E (IgE), interleukin (IL)-4, and IL-13, restoring them to a normal state. Next, we compared the therapeutic efficacy of PLAG and abrocitinib for severe AD treatment. PLAG exhibited a significant therapeutic effect on AD skin lesions compared to abrocitinib. Unlike abrocitinib, PLAG significantly reduced AD-induced eosinophil infiltration to a level similar to that observed in untreated negative controls. Notably, both PLAG and abrocitinib downregulated IgE, IL-4, and IL-13 in a similar pattern, reaching levels similar to those in the untreated negative controls. Our findings strongly suggest that PLAG may serve as a therapeutic agent for AD with an efficacy comparable to that of abrocitinib.

Advanced Systemic Treatments in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Key Learnings from Physicians Practicing in Nine Asian Countries and Territories

INTRODUCTION

Rapid progress made in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years and the differences in patient journey between Asian and non-Asian populations call for a review of current atopic dermatitis landscape in Asia.

METHODS

A roundtable meeting with nine regional dermatological experts was held in June 2023 to discuss the optimal management approaches for moderate-to-severe AD, focusing on the use of advanced therapies.

RESULTS

Disease burden on patients' quality of life, treatment adherence, and financial constraints were identified as major concerns when managing patients with moderate-to-severe AD in parts of Asia. It was agreed that the Hanifin and Rajka's criteria or the UK Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis can be used to guide the clinical diagnosis of AD. Meanwhile, patient-reported outcome scales including the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool can be used alongside depression monitoring scales to monitor treatment outcomes in patients with AD, allowing a better understanding for individualized treatment. When managing moderate-to-severe AD, phototherapy should be attempted after failure with topical treatments, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and, subsequently, biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors. Systemic corticosteroids can be used as short-term therapy for acute flares. Although these advanced treatments are known to be effective, physicians have to take into consideration safety concerns and limitations when prescribing these treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatments in AD have evolved and its management varies country by country. Unique challenges across Asian countries necessitate a different management approach in Asian patients with AD.

Off-Label Uses of Abrocitinib: Review of Emerging Therapeutic Applications beyond Atopic Dermatitis

Abrocitinib, an oral small-molecule Janus Kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, is primarily approved for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents aged 12 and older. This review examines the emerging off-label uses of Abrocitinib. We identified 37 papers reporting on the use of Abrocitinib in various conditions other than AD. The most commonly reported uses were for vitiligo, prurigo nodularis, and hand eczema, with 12 cases each. There were also 10 cases of lichen sclerosus and chronic pruritus of unknown origin and 5 cases each of pityriasis rubra pilaris alopecia areata. Additionally, erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and steroid-induced rosacea were reported in four cases each. Other conditions treated with Abrocitinib were noted, but these mostly had only one or two reported cases. Interestingly, out of the 103 patients reviewed, all studies reported favorable clinical outcomes and satisfactory results, with the exception of one isolated case where Abrocitinib was used to treat erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.

RESULTS

Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.

Atopic Dermatitis in Early Childhood and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scandinavian Birth Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between early-life atopic manifestations and later risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), for which prospective data are scarce.

STUDY DESIGN

The population-based All Babies in Southeast Sweden (ABIS) and Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child (MoBa) cohorts follow children from birth (ABIS 1997-1999; MoBa 2000-2009) to the end of 2021. Based on validated questionnaires, parents prospectively reported information on asthma, food-related allergic symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis by age 3. IBD was defined by ≥ 2 diagnostic records in the national health registries. Cox regression estimated hazard ratios adjusted (aHRs) for parental IBD, atopy, education level, smoking habits, and national origin. Cohort-specific estimates were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We compiled data on 83 311 children (ABIS, n = 9041; MoBa, n = 74 270). In over 1 174 756 person-years of follow-up, 301 participants were diagnosed with IBD. Children with atopic dermatitis at age 3 had an increased risk of IBD (pooled aHR = 1.46 [95% CI = 1.13-1.88]), Crohn's disease (pooled aHR = 1.53 [95%CI = 1.04-2.26]), and ulcerative colitis (pooled aHR = 1.78 [95%CI = 1.15-2.75]). Conversely, any atopic manifestation by age 3 was not associated with IBD (pooled aHR = 1.20 [95%CI = 0.95-1.52]), nor were analyses specifically focused on early-life food-related allergic symptoms, asthma, and allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

While atopic manifestations in early childhood were overall not associated with IBD, children with atopic dermatitis specifically were at increased risk of developing IBD, suggesting shared etiologic traits; these findings might be useful in identifying at-risk individuals for IBD.

Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Meta-Analysis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder. Topical corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy in mild AD, whereas the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib is approved in the United States, Europe, and other countries for treating moderate-severe AD in adults and children over 12 years old whose disease is not adequately controlled with other systemic drugs, including biologics. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate to severe AD were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a significant proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI 75) (R.R. = 3.86; 95% CI = 3.12 to 4.78, p < 0.00001), EASI 100 (R.R. = 13.09; 95% CI = 7.40 to 23.17, p < 0.00001), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Score (WP-NRS) response (R.R. = 4.44; 95% CI = 3.72 to 5.29, p< 0.00001), and validated Investigator's Global Assessment (v-IGA) (RR = 5.96; 95% CI = 4.79 to 7.41, p < 0. 00001) in the upadacitinib arm compared to the placebo arm. Moreover, the pooled analysis also suggested that treatment-emergent adverse events (TAEs) were relatively higher with upadacitinib than with placebo, but were mild and easily manageable (R.R. = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.23, p<0.00001). This meta-analysis showed that upadacitinib had a significant beneficial effect and tolerable adverse effect profile in patients with moderate and severe AD. Dose regimens of 15 mg and 30 mg seemed to have similar benefits. However, further trials are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety profile.

Are peptidomimetics the compounds of choice for developing new modulators of the JAK-STAT pathway?

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play critical roles in a wide range of biological processes including the dysregulation of cellular pathways leading to the loss of cell function, which in turn leads to diseases. The dysfunction of several signaling pathways is linked to the insurgence of pathological processes such as inflammation, cancer development and neurodegeneration. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel chemical modulators of dysregulated PPIs to drive progress in targeted therapies. Several PPIs have been targeted by bioactive compounds, and, often, to properly cover interacting protein regions and improve the biological activities of modulators, a particular focus concerns the employment of macrocycles as proteomimetics. Indeed, for their physicochemical properties, they occupy an intermediate space between small organic molecules and macromolecular proteins and are prominent in the drug discovery process. Peptide macrocycles can modulate fundamental biological mechanisms and here we will focus on peptidomimetics active on the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathways.

Disease burden, clinical management and unmet treatment need of patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis; consensus statements, insights and practices from CERTADE (Central/Eastern EU, Russia, Turkiye AD Experts) Delphi panel

Background

There is limited insight into the current disease burden and everyday clinical management of moderate-to- severe AD in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Turkiye. Therefore, this study aimed to get information-driven insights regarding the current disease burden and clinical management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD with common and differentiating aspects of the patient journey and establish a consensus.

Methods

In this modified 2-round Delphi panel, 133 questions were asked in total to 27 dermatologists. A consensus was achieved when 70% of the panel members strongly agreed or agreed (or strongly disagreed or disagreed) with an item. Statements with <40% agreement dropped from the Delphi rounds and were not repeated.

Results

The results state that AD has a significant impact on the quality of life for both patients and their families with social and economic consequences in these countries. While there were significant dissimilarities regarding the current treatment approach by preference order and treatment duration among participants, there was also a high percentage of consensus on literature and guideline-based statements. Current topical therapies and the immune response modifiers were not found to be sufficient by panelists to cover the therapeutic needs of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Moreover, panelists highlighted the significant burden of adverse events with the off-label use of currently available immunosuppressants.

Conclusions

These results underlined that there is a significant disease burden with an unmet treatment need for patients with moderate-to-severe AD in Poland, Czechia, Russia, and Turkiye.

Treatment of atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib: adcare single center experience

Introduction

The role of upadacitinib in the management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis seems promising, but more data on its efficacy and safety are needed. This study endeavors to assess the practical impact and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, focusing on analyzing patient responses to the treatment.

Methods

In this study, adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis received upadacitinib at daily doses of 15 mg or 30 mg, as prescribed by their attending physicians. The therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib was meticulously assessed using established clinical metrics. Simultaneously, a comprehensive safety assessment was conducted through monthly monitoring, including the evaluation of potential effects of upadacitinib intake on hepatic function, lipid profile, and hematopoiesis using the pertinent laboratory tests.

Results

Sixteen participants were enrolled in the study. At 1month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score to 18.8 points, which further increased to 24 points at the 4-month mark. Additionally, 9 participants (56%) demonstrated an EASI-50 response after 1 month of treatment, with this response increasing to 9 participants (90%) after 4 months. Furthermore, enhanced therapeutic responses were observed at 4 months, with 6 patients (38%) achieving an EASI-75 response at 1month and 8 patients (80%) achieving this milestone at the 4-month follow-up. This study highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective treatment option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. While it demonstrates improved symptom management, close monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly infections and the known risks of Janus kinase inhibitors, is essential. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib.

Potential Aspects of the Use of Cytokines in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an abnormal inflammatory response in the skin to food, environmental IgE, or non-IgE allergens. This disease belongs to a group of inflammatory diseases that affect both children and adults. In highly developed countries, AD is diagnosed twice as often in children than in adults, which may possibly be connected to increased urbanization. The immune system's pathomechanisms of AD involve humoral mechanisms with IgE, cellular T lymphocytes, dendritic cells occurring in the dermis, Langerhans cells occurring in the epidermis, and other cells infiltrating the site of inflammation (eosinophils, macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils, and basophils). Cytokines are small proteins that affect the interaction and communication between cells. This review characterizes cytokines and potential aspects of the treatment of atopic dermatitis, as well as new strategies that are currently being developed, including targeting cytokines and their receptors.

Implementation of regulatory guidance for JAK inhibitors use in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An international appropriateness study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified.

METHODS

A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice.

RESULTS

Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abrocitinib Compared with Other Systemic Treatments for Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Spain

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by itchy, painful, and dry skin. Despite the great number of available therapies, economic evaluations are still needed to provide evidence on their cost efficiency. This research aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor abrocitinib (200 mg) compared with dupilumab (300 mg), tralokinumab (300 mg), baricitinib (2 and 4 mg), and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg) for the treatment of patients with severe AD from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.

METHODS

A hybrid model consisting of a decision tree linked to a Markov model was developed to estimate costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total years in response and incremental cost-per-QALY gained (willingness-to-pay [WTP] threshold: €25,000/QALY). Adults with severe AD entered the decision tree and response (75% reduction in baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index score, EASI-75) was considered at 16 and 52 weeks. After this time, patients entered the Markov model (remainder of the 10-year time horizon), which consisted of three health states: maintenance with active therapy, subsequent treatment, or death. All costs were presented in 2022 euros (€). Additionally, cost per number-needed-to-treat (NNT) was calculated for abrocitinib and dupilumab based on a head-to-head post-hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Abrocitinib 200 mg was dominant (i.e., lower incremental costs and higher incremental benefit) compared with all studied alternatives (dupilumab 300 mg, tralokinumab 300 mg, baricitinib 2 and 4 mg, upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg) with a QALYs gain of 0.49, 0.60, 0.64, 0.43, 0.45, and 0.08, respectively, and per-person costs savings of €22,097, €24,140, €14,825, €7,116, €12,805, and €45,189, respectively. Considering the WTP threshold, abrocitinib was dominant or cost effective compared with all alternatives for most simulations. Additionally, abrocitinib was dominant compared with all alternatives when evaluating the cost effectiveness over a 5-year time horizon. NNT showed that abrocitinib was dominant versus dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study show that abrocitinib is a cost-effective therapy compared with other JAK inhibitors and biological therapies from the Spanish NHS perspective.

A critical evaluation of suitability of tralokinumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adolescents and adults

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, intensely pruritic disease associated with significant patient burden. Recent advancements in AD pathogenesis have expanded its therapeutics pipeline. Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically Interleukin (IL)-13, inhibiting the downstream IL-13 signaling. Phase 3 clinical trials and some real-world studies showed that tralokinumab, as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids, is efficacious and safe in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Similar results were reported in a phase 3 trial in adolescents (aged ≥12 years).

AREAS COVERED

We review the role of IL-13 in AD and discuss the value of tralokinumab for treating moderate-to-severe AD, comparing efficacy and safety results derived from clinical trials and real-life data.

EXPERT OPINION

The role of IL-13 in AD supports a targeted therapeutic approach. Tralokinumab has proven efficacious and well-tolerated in a large proportion of patients confirming its value for treating moderate-to-severe AD from age 12 years onwards; it quickly improves itching and can maintain a high-level of response over time; it can be administered with flexible dosing schedules. Future studies will further clarify the role of IL-13 pathway and which patients would be best suited to tralokinumab, shifting AD treatment into an era of precision medicine.

Safety of Upadacitinib in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Systematic Literature Review of Indirect and Direct Treatment Comparisons of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondylarthritis (nr-axSpA), atopic dermatitis (AD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) pose a substantial burden on patients and their quality of life. Upadacitinib is an orally administered, selective, and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor indicated for seven conditions, but data on its safety versus other active treatments are limited. A systematic literature review of indirect and direct treatment comparisons of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the safety profile of upadacitinib.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for indirect and direct treatment comparisons of RCTs that (1) included licensed upadacitinib dosages; (2) studied any of the seven conditions; (3) reported any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, malignancies, infections or serious infections, and death; and (4) were published between January 2018 and August 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were eligible for inclusion. SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and any AEs were commonly studied. RA was the most studied condition, followed by AD and UC. Most studies (16/25, 64%) reported no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes between upadacitinib and other active treatments (e.g., tumor necrosis factor blockers, interleukin receptor antagonists, integrin receptor antagonists, T cell co-stimulation modulator), or placebo (placebo ± methotrexate or topical corticosteroids). Other studies (9/25, 36%) reported mixed results of no statistically significant difference and either statistically higher (8/25, 32%) or lower rates (1/25, 4%) on upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Most studies suggested that upadacitinib has no statistically significant difference in the studied safety outcomes compared to active treatments or placebo in patients with RA, PsA, AS, AD, UC, and CD. A few studies reported higher rates, but findings were inconsistent with limited interpretation.

Janus-kinase inhibitors in dermatology: A review of their use in psoriasis, vitiligo, systemic lupus erythematosus, hidradenitis suppurativa, dermatomyositis, lichen planus, lichen planopilaris, sarcoidosis and graft-versus-host disease

Recent studies on molecular pathways have elucidated novel therapeutic approaches in inflammatory and autoimmune skin disorders. Specifically, the dysregulation of the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) cascade plays a central role in the pathogenesis of many skin conditions. JAK inhibitors, with their ability to selectively target immune responses, are potential treatment options. Using the National Library of Medicine, we provide a comprehensive review of the use of United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and emerging JAK or tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors in a wide range of dermatologic conditions, including psoriasis, vitiligo, systemic lupus erythematosus, hidradenitis suppurativa, dermatomyositis, lichen planus, lichen planopilaris, sarcoidosis and graft-versus-host disease. In patients with psoriasis, oral deucravacitinib (TYK2 inhibitor) has been approved as a once-daily therapy with demonstrated superiority and efficacy over apremilast and placebo and tolerable safety profiles. In patients with vitiligo, topical ruxolitinib (JAK1 inhibitor) is approved as a twice-daily treatment for repigmentation. The efficacy of several other JAK inhibitors has also been demonstrated in several clinical trials and case studies for systemic lupus erythematosus, hidradenitis suppurativa, dermatomyositis, lichen planus, lichen planopilaris, sarcoidosis and graft-versus-host disease. Further investigations with long-term clinical trials are necessary to confirm their utility in treatment and safety for these diseases.

Costo per NNT di upadacitinib nel trattamento dei pazienti con dermatite atopica da moderata a severa in Italia

Background:

Targeted systemic therapies, including abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib, are new treatments for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We evaluated the efficacy and the costs of these targeted systemic therapies in the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe AD.

Methods:

The clinical efficacy was assessed considering the results of a previous network meta-analysis (NMA). The analysis involved five therapies approved in Italy for the treatment of moderate to severe AD: abrocitinib (ABR), baricitinib (BAR), dupilumab (DUP), tralokinumab (TRA) and upadacitinib (UPA). According to the NMA, the cost of the treatment was based on the number of administrations dispensed at 16 weeks and the clinical efficacy was measured by the number needed to treat (NNT) compared to placebo using the improvement ≥ 75% (EASI-75) or ≥ 90 (EASI-90) from baseline of the eczema area and severity index (EASI). Only the ex-factory price of the targeted systemic therapies was considered. The cost per NNT was adopted as a cost-effectiveness indicator.

Results:

At 16 weeks, the cost per NNT based on EASI-75 was lower for UPA 15 mg (€ 6,384.00) compared to BAR 4 mg (€ 11,619.73) and 2 mg (€ 14,524.66), ABR 100 mg (€ 16,265.22), DUP 300 mg (€ 16,115.04) and TRA 300 mg (€ 31,710.24). UPA 15 (€ 8,512.00) also showed the lower cost per NNT based on EASI-90 at 16 weeks compared to BAR 4 mg (€ 14,788.75) and 2 mg (€ 20,862.70), ABR 100 mg (€ 25,922.69), DUP 300 mg (€ 25,992.00) and TRA 300 mg (€ 41,067.36).

Conclusions:

The findings show that upadacitinib is the most cost-effective option (cost per NNT) for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD systemic treatments.

METHODS

For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and GREAT databases from inception to November 29, 2022, for randomized trials addressing systemic treatments and phototherapy for AD. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e5sna).

RESULTS

The 149 included trials (28,686 patients with moderate-to-severe AD) evaluated 75 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, high-dose upadacitinib was among the most effective for 5 of 6 patient-important outcomes; high-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib were among the most effective for 2 outcomes. These Janus kinase inhibitors were among the most harmful in increasing adverse events. With high-certainty evidence, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab were of intermediate effectiveness and among the safest, modestly increasing conjunctivitis. Low-dose baricitinib was among the least effective. Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, phototherapy, and many novel agents are less certain.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with moderate-to-severe AD, high-certainty evidence demonstrates that high-dose upadacitinib is among the most effective in addressing multiple patient-important outcomes, but also is among the most harmful. High-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib are effective, but also among the most harmful. Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab are of intermediate effectiveness and have favorable safety.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.

Material and methods

We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).

Results

Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.

Effectiveness of switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-world clinical practice in Japan

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disease with severe pruritus. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, upadacitinib, baricitinib, and abrocitinib, are systemic treatments for AD. The outcomes of switching from one JAK inhibitor to another have not been examined.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the outcomes of switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg, showing insufficient response or adverse events, were switched to treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg. We evaluated total eczema area and severity index (EASI), EASI at head and neck, trunk, upper, or lower limbs, EASI of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification, and peak pruritus numerical-rating scale (PP-NRS) at baseline (start of baricitinib), weeks 0 (time of switching), and 4 and 12 after switching.

RESULTS

Total EASI, EASI at each anatomical site, EASI of each clinical sign, and PP-NRS were markedly reduced at weeks 4 or 12 compared to week 0. Achievement rates of more than 75% or 90% reduction of EASI from baseline significantly improved after switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from baricitinib 4 mg to upadacitinib 30 mg effectively improved rash and pruritus.

Transepidermal Water Loss and T-helper 2 (Th2)-Associated Inflammatory Markers in Two Pediatric Patients During the First Four Weeks of Treatment With the Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor Upadacitinib

Few studies have evaluated the effects of upadacitinib on skin barrier function and T-helper 2 (Th2)-associated inflammatory biomarkers in severe atopic dermatitis (AD). In this study, we followed two pediatric patients with AD who had previously failed to respond to conventional treatment and measured their serum Th2-associated chemokine thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and serine protease inhibitor squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) 2 levels and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) during the first four weeks of upadacitinib treatment. Both patients showed marked clinical improvement and decreased TEWL, blood eosinophil counts, and serum TARC and SCCA2 levels after four weeks of upadacitinib treatment. These findings suggest that upadacitinib attenuates Th2-associated inflammatory markers and promotes skin barrier integrity.

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) implementation roadmap

BACKGROUND

Core outcome sets (COS) are consensus-driven sets of minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials. COS aim to reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting, and selective outcome reporting. Implementing COS into clinical trials is challenging. Guidance to improve COS uptake in dermatology is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a structured practical guide to COS implementation.

METHODS

Members of the Harmonising Outcome Measurement for Eczema (HOME) executive committee developed an expert opinion-based roadmap founded on a combination of a review of the COS implementation literature, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative resources, input from HOME members and experience in COS development and clinical trials.

RESULTS

The data review and input from HOME members was synthesized into themes, which guided roadmap development: (a) barriers and facilitators to COS uptake based on stakeholder awareness/engagement and COS features; and (b) key implementation science principles (assessment-driven, data-centred, priority-based and context-sensitive). The HOME implementation roadmap follows three stages. Firstly, the COS uptake scope and goals need to be defined. Secondly, during COS development, preparation for future implementation is supported by establishing the COS as a credible evidence-informed consensus by applying robust COS development methodology, engaging multiple stakeholders, fostering sustained and global engagement, emphasizing COS ease of use and universal applicability, and providing recommendations on COS use. Thirdly, incorporating completed COS into primary (trials) and secondary (reviews) research is an iterative process starting with mapping COS uptake and stakeholders' attitudes, followed by designing and carrying out targeted implementation projects. Main themes for implementation projects identified at HOME are stakeholder awareness/engagement; universal applicability for different populations; and improving ease-of-use by reducing administrative and study burden. Formal implementation frameworks can be used to identify implementation barriers/facilitators and to design implementation strategies. The effect of these strategies on uptake should be evaluated and implementation plans adjusted accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

COS can improve the quality and applicability of research and, so, clinical practice but can only succeed if used and reported consistently. The HOME implementation roadmap is an extension of the original HOME roadmap for COS development and provides a pragmatic framework to develop COS implementation strategies.

Emerging trends in clinical research on Janus kinase inhibitors for atopic dermatitis treatment

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects millions of people worldwide, characterized by immune function imbalance and impaired epidermal barrier function. It is a complex disorder that involves multiple pathogenic pathways, including the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which plays a critical role in regulating immune and inflammatory responses. The therapeutic potential of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) has garnered significant interest in recent years. AD is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by impaired epidermal barrier function and immune function imbalance, and its pathogenesis is closely associated with dysregulated JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathways. JAKi offer a novel therapeutic approach by selectively inhibiting JAK enzymes, thereby blocking downstream STAT signaling and preventing the expression of cytokines involved in AD pathogenesis. This review will focus on several JAKi including tofacitinib, baricitinib, ruxolitinib and upadacitinib, and provide a comprehensive overview of the latest research on the application of JAKi in AD treatment, including its mechanism of action, clinical trial results and safety profile.

Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: An Updated Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) continues to expand. This network meta-analysis (NMA) updates a previously conducted NMA to include data from the most recent phase 3 trials to assess the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Data from recent phase 3 monotherapy trials of lebrikizumab, ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967), were included in the analyses, along with other eligible phase 3/4 randomized placebo-controlled trials for abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib identified through a systemic literature review in Silverberg et al. (Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 12(5):1181-1196, 2022). The proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement ≥ 90% from baseline (EASI-90), EASI improvement ≥ 75% from baseline (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥ 4), and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline (IGA 0/1) were evaluated using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The updated NMA analyzed 13 unique placebo-controlled trials involving 7105 patients in 32 arms across 6 targeted therapies. Upadacitinib 30 mg was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary timepoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, generally followed by abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg or abrocitinib 100 mg. Baricitinib 2 mg and tralokinumab were generally ranked lower across outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD, especially as new treatments continue to emerge. After incorporating recent placebo-controlled phase 3 data of lebrikizumab, upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, and abrocitinib 200 mg remain the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12-16 weeks of therapy in AD. These updated findings can help healthcare providers when creating a patient's personalized treatment plan.

Comparative Analysis between 3D-Printed Models Designed with Generic and Dental-Specific Software

With the great demand in the market for new dental software, the need has been seen to carry out a precision study for applications in digital dentistry, for which there is no comparative study, and there is a general ignorance regarding their applications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy differences between digital impressions obtained using generic G-CAD (general CAD) and D-CAD (CAD dental) software. Today, there is a difference between the design software used in dentistry and these in common use. Thus, it is necessary to make a comparison of precision software for specific and generic dental use. We hypothesized that there is no significant difference between the software for specific and general dental use.

METHODS

A typodont was digitized with an intraoral scanner and the models obtained were exported in STL format to four different softwares (Autodesk MeshMixer 3.5, Exocad Dental, Blender for dental, and InLAB). The STL files obtained by each software were materialized using a 3D printer. The printed models were scanned and exported in STL files, with which six pairs of groups were formed. The groups were compared using analysis software (3D Geomagic Control X) by superimposing them in the initial alignment order and using the best fit method.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the four analyzed software types; however, group 4, composed of the combination of D-CAD (Blender-InLAB), obtained the highest average (-0.0324 SD = 0.0456), with a higher accuracy compared to the group with the lowest average (group 5, composed of the combination of the Meshmixer and Blender models), a generic software and a specific software (0.1024 SD = 0.0819).

CONCLUSION

Although no evidence of significant difference was found regarding the accuracy of 3D models produced by G-CAD and D-CAD, combinations of groups where specific dental design software was present showed higher accuracy (precision and trueness). The comparison of the 3D graphics obtained with the superimposition of the digital meshes of the printed models performed with the help of the analysis software using the best fit method, replicating the same five reference points for the six groups formed, evidenced a greater tolerance in the groups using D-CAD.

JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors in dermatology

The JAK-STAT signaling pathway mediates important cellular processes such as immune response, carcinogenesis, cell differentiation, division and death. Therefore, drugs that interfere with different JAK-STAT signaling patterns have potential indications for various medical conditions. The main dermatological targets of JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors are inflammatory or autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata; however, several dermatoses are under investigation to expand this list of indications. As JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors should gradually occupy a relevant space in dermatological prescriptions, this review presents the main available drugs, their immunological effects, and their pharmacological characteristics, related to clinical efficacy and safety, aiming to validate the best dermatological practice.

Association of risk of incident acne and treatment with systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic efficacy of systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is well established. However, the associated risk of incident acne, which is a prevalent adverse event in AD patients treated with systemic JAK inhibitors, has yet to be systematically analyzed.

METHODOLOGY

To evaluate the risk of incident acne in AD patients treated with systemic JAK inhibitors, an extensive database search (clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed) was performed to identify publications eligible for inclusion from January 2020 to October 2022. Five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of abrocitinib, four RCTs of upadacitinib, and one RCT of baricitinib, encompassing a total of 7901 participants, were included in the analysis. The risk difference for incident acne between systemic JAK inhibitors and controls was assessed using Review Manager, version 5.3, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis elucidated a significant difference in the risk of incident acne between AD participants receiving 200 mg abrocitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 3.69; 95% CI 1.60-8.48; P < 0.01), 15 mg upadacitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 4.61; 95% CI 2.79-7.62; P < 0.00001), and 30 mg upadacitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 6.82; 95% CI 4.59-10.13; P < 0.00001) compared with controls receiving placebo or dupilumab. In contrast, no significant difference was found in the risk of incident acne between participants receiving 100 mg abrocitinib, 2 mg baricitinib, and 4 mg baricitinib, as compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, there is an increased risk of acne related to systemic JAK inhibitors, particularly with abrocitinib and upadacitinib. For patients predisposed to acne, the balance between the benefits of symptomatic relief from AD and the potential risk of acne may need to be carefully considered. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of the risk profile of systemic JAK inhibitors and has the potential to guide personalized treatment decisions for AD patients.

Treatment of food allergy: Oral immunotherapy, biologics, and beyond

The prevalence of food allergy (FA) has been increasing globally and comes with a heavy burden not just economically, but also on quality of life. Although oral immunotherapy (OIT) is effective at inducing desensitization to food allergens, it has several limitations that weaken its success. Limitations include a long duration of build-up, especially when used for multiple allergens, and a high rate of reported adverse events. Furthermore, OIT may not be effective in all patients. Efforts are underway to identify additional treatment options, either as monotherapy or in combination, to treat FA or enhance the safety and efficacy of OIT. Biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab, which already have US Food and Drug Administration approval for other atopic conditions have been the most studied, but additional biologics and novel strategies are emerging. In this review, we discuss therapeutic strategies including immunoglobulin E inhibitors, immunoglobulin E disruptors, interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 inhibitors, antialarmins, JAK1 and BTK inhibitors, and nanoparticles, and the data surrounding their application in FA and highlighting their potential.

Acneiform Lesions but not Acne after Treatment with Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Diagnosis and Management of Janus Kinase-acne

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

New molecules for atopic dermatitis treatment beyond biological therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide a summary of current knowledge on new topical and oral non-biological therapies recently approved for Atopic Dermatitis (AD) treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immense research carried out in the last decade has focused on understanding the molecular basis underlying AD and has allowed the development of new targeted drugs. Despite several biologic therapies are approved or in development, other non-biologic targeted therapies (small molecules) have emerged, such as the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors baricitinib, upadacitinib and abrocitinib, expanding the range of therapeutic options. Based on recent available data from head-to-head comparisons and meta-analysis studies, JAK inhibitors showed a faster onset of action and slightly higher efficacy at 16 weeks compared with biologic agents. Concerning topical treatment, presently, corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors are the main therapeutic options, but are not recommended for long-term management due to potential safety issues. Currently, two topical JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and one phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor (difamilast) are approved and have shown good efficacy results and a favorable safety profile.

SUMMARY

These new drugs (systemic and topical) are needed to increase the success of AD treatment, particularly for patients who do not or no longer respond to treatment.

Optimal Use of Jak Inhibitors and Biologics for Atopic Dermatitis on the Basis of the Current Evidence

Recently, Jak inhibitors such as baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib were approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in addition to biologics, including dupilumab, tralokinumab, and nemolizumab. The increase in treatment options can be a benefit to patients with AD. Meanwhile, it could make it difficult for physicians to choose the best treatment among those treatment options. Biologics and Jak inhibitors differ in efficacy, safety, route of administration, and whether or not there is a concern about immunogenicity in addition to the evidence on comorbidities. Among the three Jak inhibitors, the degree of inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription differs in each Jak inhibitor. Therefore, the efficacy and safety profiles of the three Jak inhibitors are different. Physicians who treat patients with AD with Jak inhibitors and biologics need to understand the current evidence and choose the best treatment for individual patients. In this review, we discuss how integrating knowledge of the mechanisms of action of Jak inhibitors and biologics, the potential significant adverse events of these drugs, and the age and comorbidities of the patient can help achieve optimal clinical benefit for patients with moderate-to-severe AD refractory to topical agents.

Atopic Dermatitis and Ulcerative Colitis Successfully Treated with Upadacitinib

Background and Objectives: JAK inhibitors entered current clinical practice as treatment for several immune-related diseases and, recently, for atopic dermatitis. These drugs target the Janus Kinase intracellular cascade, rendering them suitable for treating both Th1 and Th2 immune-mediated responses. Materials and Methods: We report the case of a 36-year-old male patient presenting an overlap of ulcerative colitis, a Th1-related disease, and atopic dermatitis, a Th2-mediated condition. Treatment with upadacitinib was initiated, and laboratory and instrumental follow-ups were carried out for 8 months. Results: The complete and persistent clinical remission of both conditions was observed at a low dose of 15 mg of upadacitinib, even though ulcerative colitis guidelines usually recommend a dosage of 45 mg. No serious adverse responses to therapy were reported. Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be the most suitable management strategy in subjects with coexisting severe conditions mediated by Th1 inflammation, such as ulcerative colitis, and by Th2 cytokines, such as atopic dermatitis.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in real-world practice in Japan

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, a Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, for atopic dermatitis (AD) in real-world practice. From August 2021 to September 2022, 36 patients aged ≥15 years with moderate to severe AD were treated with oral baricitinib 4 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. Baricitinib improved clinical indexes; the percent reduction at weeks 4 and 12 was a median of 69.19% and 69.98% for the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), 84.52% and 76.33% for the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool, and 76.39% and 64.58% for Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Score, respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 was 38.89% and 33.33% at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. The percent reduction of EASI in the head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk was 56.9%, 68.3%, 80.7%, and 62.5% at week 12, respectively, with a significant difference between the head and neck versus the lower limbs. Baricitinib decreased thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, lactate dehydrogenase, and total eosinophil count at week 4. Baseline EASI of the head and neck negatively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 4, while baseline EASI of the lower limbs positively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events included elevation of creatine phosphokinase (11.1%), herpes labialis (5.6%), furuncle (8.3%), and exacerbation of AD (1%), without serious treatment-emergent adverse events. In this real-world study, baricitinib was well tolerated for patients with AD and achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in clinical trials. High baseline EASI of the lower limbs might predict good treatment response at week 12, while high baseline EASI of the head and neck might predict poor treatment response at week 4 in baricitinib treatment for AD.

Defining the temporal relationship between the skin microbiome, immune response and skin barrier function during flare and resolution of atopic dermatitis: protocol of a Danish intervention study

INTRODUCTION

Lesional skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) is often colonised by Staphylococcus aureus and the bacterial abundance increases during a flare. However, the role of S. aureus and the skin microbiome in the pathogenesis of AD, including its influence on the dysfunctional skin barrier and immune response, remains to be elucidated. In this study, the temporal relationship between alterations in the skin barrier function, inflammation and microbiome is examined in adults with AD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This clinical study consists of 81 adult patients with AD, as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, and 41 age and sex-matched controls. The objectives are to examine alterations in the skin microbiome, skin barrier and immune response during (1) an untreated AD flare, (2) an AD flare treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), (3) an AD flare treated with systemic dicloxacillin/placebo and TCS or (4) cutaneous exposure to either autologous S. aureus, staphylococcal enterotoxin B or a vehicle. Skin biopsies, tape strips, skin and nasal swabs are collected and analysed using RNA sequencing, multiplex immunoassays, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA. Blood samples are analysed for filaggrin gene mutations and leucocyte gene expression.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region in Denmark (phases I and II: H-20011047, phases III and IV: H-21079287), the local data protection agency (phases I and II: P-2020-165, phases III and IV: P-2022-250) and the Danish Medicines Agency (phases III and IV: EudraCT 2021-006883-25, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05578482) have approved the studies. Participants will give written informed consent prior to study initiation. The study is conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Outcomes will be presented at national and international conferences and in international peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05578482, EudraCT 2021-006883-2.

Topical and systemic JAK inhibitors in hand eczema - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Hand eczema is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by significant prevalence and impact on patients' Quality of Life (QoL). Because of its complex and diverse clinical picture, HE management requires patient-specific treatment which may constitute a challenge. First described in the 1990s, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK inhibitors) state a group of modern therapeuticals, which exhibit good bioavailability and are well tolerated by patients in both - topical and systemic - routes of administration. They are an immunomodulating small molecules, impacting JAKs' enzymatic activity.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a summary of available data concerning JAK inhibitors' use in HE patients, regarding also clinical trials for the HE treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent studies are introducing JAK inhibitors as an alternative for other topical and systemic therapies in HE patients. Treatment targeting specific immune pathways enables precise management and extends range of potential therapeutic options. Despite early promising results, future studies need to evaluate JAK inhibitors' safety, potential risks and benefits resulting from the treatment, as well as impact of the therapy on patients' QoL.