1
|
Bosch X, Mota Gomes T, Montori-Palacin E, Moreno P, López-Soto A. Time to Diagnosis and Presenting Symptoms of Patients Diagnosed With Cancer Through Emergency and Nonemergency Routes: A Large Retrospective Study From a High-Volume Center. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300567. [PMID: 38457754 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The symptoms with which a patient with cancer presents and the route taken to diagnosis (emergency v nonemergency) may affect the speed with which the diagnosis of cancer is made, thereby affecting outcomes. We examined time to diagnosis by symptom for cancers diagnosed through emergency and nonemergency routes (NERs). METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with 10 solid cancers at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona between March 2013 and June 2023. Cancers were diagnosed through emergency presentation and admission (inpatient emergency route [IER]), emergency presentation and outpatient referral (outpatient emergency route [OER]), and primary care presentation and outpatient referral (NER). We assessed the effect of diagnostic routes on intervals to diagnosis for 19 cancer symptoms. RESULTS A total of 5,174 and 1,607 patients were diagnosed with cancer through emergency routes and NERs, respectively. Over 85% of patients presenting with alarm (localizing) symptoms such as hematuria through emergency routes were diagnosed with the expected cancer, whereas those with nonlocalizing symptoms such as abdominal pain had a more heterogeneous cancer-site composition. Median intervals were shorter for alarm than nonlocalizing symptoms and tended to be shorter in IERs than OERs. However, for most symptoms, intervals in both routes were invariably shorter than in the NER. For example, diagnostic intervals for hematuria and abdominal pain were 3 and 5 days shorter in IERs than OERs, but they were 5-8 and 17-22 days shorter than in the NER, respectively. CONCLUSION For patients with alarm symptoms, intervals were shorter than for those with nonlocalizing symptoms and, for most symptoms, intervals were shorter when patients were evaluated by emergency routes rather than NERs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tiago Mota Gomes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabet Montori-Palacin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Moreno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alfonso López-Soto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ginsburg O, Vanderpuye V, Beddoe AM, Bhoo-Pathy N, Bray F, Caduff C, Florez N, Fadhil I, Hammad N, Heidari S, Kataria I, Kumar S, Liebermann E, Moodley J, Mutebi M, Mukherji D, Nugent R, So WKW, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Unger-Saldaña K, Allman G, Bhimani J, Bourlon MT, Eala MAB, Hovmand PS, Kong YC, Menon S, Taylor CD, Soerjomataram I. Women, power, and cancer: a Lancet Commission. Lancet 2023; 402:2113-2166. [PMID: 37774725 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01701-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Centre for Global Health, US National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Carlo Caduff
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Shirin Heidari
- GENDRO, Geneva, Switzerland; Gender Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ishu Kataria
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, New Delhi, India
| | - Somesh Kumar
- Jhpiego India, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Liebermann
- University of Rhode Island College of Nursing, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, and SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Clemenceau Medical Center Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rachel Nugent
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Winnie K W So
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Gavin Allman
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jenna Bhimani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - María T Bourlon
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Michelle A B Eala
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yek-Ching Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sonia Menon
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Whitfield E, White B, Denaxas S, Barclay ME, Renzi C, Lyratzopoulos G. A taxonomy of early diagnosis research to guide study design and funding prioritisation. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1527-1534. [PMID: 37794179 PMCID: PMC10645731 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02450-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Researchers and research funders aiming to improve diagnosis seek to identify if, when, where, and how earlier diagnosis is possible. This has led to the propagation of research studies using a wide range of methodologies and data sources to explore diagnostic processes. Many such studies use electronic health record data and focus on cancer diagnosis. Based on this literature, we propose a taxonomy to guide the design and support the synthesis of early diagnosis research, focusing on five key questions: Do healthcare use patterns suggest earlier diagnosis could be possible? How does the diagnostic process begin? How do patients progress from presentation to diagnosis? How long does the diagnostic process take? Could anything have been done differently to reach the correct diagnosis sooner? We define families of diagnostic research study designs addressing each of these questions and appraise their unique or complementary contributions and limitations. We identify three further questions on relationships between the families and their relevance for examining patient group inequalities, supported with examples from the cancer literature. Although exemplified through cancer as a disease model, we recognise the framework is also applicable to non-neoplastic disease. The proposed framework can guide future study design and research funding prioritisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Whitfield
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
- Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Becky White
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Matthew E Barclay
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Cristina Renzi
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Achan J, Kasujja FX, Opito R, Wabinga H, Orach CG, Mwaka AD. Factors associated with diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals among breast cancer patients attending care at the Uganda Cancer Institute: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19701-19713. [PMID: 37787090 PMCID: PMC10587984 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most breast cancer (BC) patients in Uganda are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and experience poor outcomes. This study examined the diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals and factors associated with these intervals among BC patients attending care at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). METHODS This was a cross-sectional, facility-based study. Data were collected using structured questionnaire administered by trained research assistants and analyzed using STATA version 14.0. Modified Poisson regressions models were used to determine the strength of associations between independent variables and diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals. RESULTS The mean age (±SD) of the 401 participants was 47.1 ± 11.7 years. Four in 10 participants had stage III (41.9%; n = 168) and over a third (34.7%; n = 140) stage IV cancers. The median interval from first consultation to diagnosis, i.e. diagnostic interval (DI) was 5.6 months (IQR: 1.5-17.0), while the median interval from histological diagnosis to start of chemotherapy, i.e. pre-treatment interval (PTI) was 1.7 months (IQR: 0.7-4.5). Majority (85%, n = 341) of participants were diagnosed at ≥3 months from first consultation with clinicians. Participants with tertiary education and those who lived within 100-199 km from the UCI were about four times and twice more likely to be diagnosed early (DI <3 months from first consultation) ([aPR = 3.88; 95% CI: 1.15-13.0] and [aPR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.06-4.55]), respectively. About half (48.3%; n = 176) of participants started chemotherapy within 1 month of cancer diagnosis. Patients who lived more than 300 km from the UCI were less likely to start chemotherapy within 1 month of histology diagnosis of cancer. [Correction added on October 17, 2023 after first online publication. The term ', i.e.' has been included in the results section in this version.] CONCLUSION: Majority of breast cancer patients are diagnosed late and in advanced stages. There is need to promote all efforts toward timely diagnosis when cancers are still in early stages by identifying factors responsible for prolonged diagnostic intervals among breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Achan
- Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
| | - Francis Xavier Kasujja
- Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
| | - Ronald Opito
- Department of Public Health, School of Health SciencesSoroti UniversitySorotiUganda
| | - Henry Wabinga
- Department of Pathology, School of Biomedical SciencesCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
| | - Christopher Garimoi Orach
- Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public HealthCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
| | - Amos Deogratius Mwaka
- Department of Medicine, School of MedicineCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineGulu UniversityGuluUganda
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bosch X, Montori-Palacin E, Calvo J, Carbonell I, Naval-Álvarez J, Moreno P, López-Soto A. Time intervals and previous primary care consultations in the pathway to emergency cancer diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 86:102445. [PMID: 37651939 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time intervals and number of prior consultations in primary care (PC) are recognised metrics of diagnostic timeliness of cancer and are interrelated. However, whether and how the two measures correlate with each other in the emergency diagnostic pathway is unknown. We investigated the association between the number of prereferral consultations and the length of intervals from PC presentation to cancer diagnosis following emergency referral to hospital. METHODS Patients were eligible if they first consulted in PC and were diagnosed with cancer following emergency or nonemergency referral to hospital. We analysed for differences in PC and diagnostic intervals and number of consultations between emergency and nonemergency presenters and determined their associations by cancer type. Differences in presenting symptoms and stage at diagnosis between populations and according to number of consultations were also examined. RESULTS There were 796 emergency and 865 nonemergency presenters with comparable sociodemographic and comorbidity data. Correlation analysis in emergency presenters revealed a strong positive association between number of consultations and intervals for seven of 13 different cancers, including cancers characterised by high proportions of > 3 consultations and long intervals (pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer) and vice versa for others (e.g., endometrial, cervical, or oesophageal cancer). Additionally, emergency presenters with > 3 consultations were more likely than those with 1-2 to report nonspecific symptoms (60 vs. 40%, respectively) and to be diagnosed at a later stage. CONCLUSION System level interventions are needed to reduce unnecessary delays in the emergency diagnostic pathway, particularly in cancer patients with multiple prereferral consultations. The findings also suggest opportunities to reduce the proportion of emergency diagnoses by targeting symptomatic individuals pre-presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Elisabet Montori-Palacin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Calvo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Carbonell
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Naval-Álvarez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Moreno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alfonso López-Soto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drosdowsky A, Lamb KE, Karahalios A, Bergin RJ, Milley K, Boyd L, IJzerman MJ, Emery JD. The effect of time before diagnosis and treatment on colorectal cancer outcomes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:993-1006. [PMID: 37528204 PMCID: PMC10491798 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02377-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate existing evidence on the relationship between diagnostic and treatment intervals and outcomes for colorectal cancer. METHODS Four databases were searched for English language articles assessing the role of time before initial treatment in colorectal cancer on any outcome, including stage and survival. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion and data were synthesised narratively. A dose-response meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between treatment interval and survival. RESULTS One hundred and thirty papers were included in the systematic review, eight were included in the meta-analysis. Forty-five different intervals were considered in the time from first symptom to treatment. The most common finding was of no association between the length of intervals on any outcome. The dose-response meta-analysis showed a U-shaped association between the treatment interval and overall survival with the nadir at 45 days. CONCLUSION The review found inconsistent, but mostly a lack of, association between interval length and colorectal cancer outcomes, but study design and quality were heterogeneous. Meta-analysis suggests survival becomes increasingly poorer for those commencing treatment more than 45 days after diagnosis. REGISTRATION This review was registered, and the protocol is available, in PROSPERO, the international database of systematic reviews, with the registration ID CRD42021255864.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Karen E Lamb
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Amalia Karahalios
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Bergin
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristi Milley
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucy Boyd
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maxwell S, Pearce C, Kynn M, Anderson LA, Weller D, Murchie P. The impact of rurality on patient experience and diagnostic pathway intervals in Scotland's cancer patients: Further results from a national cancer diagnosis audit. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 86:102414. [PMID: 37499334 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Scotland 17 % of the population reside rurally and previous research has demonstrated worse cancer outcomes in this group. The underlying reason for this is unclear. This study aims to determine whether patient presenting factors, GP consultation factors or the diagnostic pathways differ between urban and rural patients within Scotland. METHODS This study combined two Scottish National Cancer Diagnosis Audits. Participating GPs collected data on the diagnostic pathway from primary to secondary care for cancer patients diagnosed during the audit period. Using the Scottish Government Urban Rural Classification, patients were designated as rural or urban dwellers and compared in descriptive analyses. Key cancer intervals (primary, diagnostic, secondary and treatment interval) were compared between urban and rural dwellers with an additional adjusted analysis for the main cancer sites. RESULTS A total of 4309 cancer diagnoses were included in the study; 22 % were in patients from rural locations. Rural patients had significantly more consultations and investigations prior to referral than their urban counterparts. There was no difference in prolonged cancer pathways between the two groups except in lung cancer patients where rural patients had a significantly increased odds of a diagnostic interval of >90 days. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest differences in the interaction between patients and GPs prior to referral in urban and rural settings. However, this does not appear to lead to prolonged patient pathways, except in lung cancer. Further research is needed to determine whether this delay is clinically significant and contributing to poorer outcomes in Scottish rural dwellers with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Maxwell
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom
| | - Clara Pearce
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Kynn
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley WA 6102, Australia
| | - Lesley Ann Anderson
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom
| | - David Weller
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Murchie
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Woznitza N, Ghimire B, Devaraj A, Janes SM, Piper K, Rowe S, Bhowmik A, Hayes N, Togher D, Arumalla N, Skyllberg E, Au-Yong ITH, Geary S, George B, Sheard S, Ellis S, Shah Z, Maughn S, Duffy SW, Baldwin D. Impact of radiographer immediate reporting of X-rays of the chest from general practice on the lung cancer pathway (radioX): a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2023; 78:890-894. [PMID: 36351688 PMCID: PMC10447363 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway recommends rapid progression from abnormal chest X-rays (CXRs) to CT. The impact of the more rapid reporting on the whole pathway is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of immediate reporting of CXRs requested by primary care by radiographers on the time to diagnosis of lung cancer. METHOD People referred for CXR from primary care to a single acute district general hospital in London attended sessions that were prerandomised to either immediate radiographer (IR) reporting or standard radiographer (SR) reporting within 24 hours. CXRs were subsequently reported by radiologists blind to the radiographer reports to test the reliability of the radiographer report. Radiographer and local radiologist discordant cases were reviewed by thoracic radiologists, blinded to reporter. RESULTS 8682 CXRs were performed between 21 June 2017 and 4 August 2018, 4096 (47.2%) for IR and 4586 (52.8%) for SR. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 49, with 27 (55.1%) for IR. The median time from CXR to diagnosis of lung cancer for IR was 32 days (IQR 19, 70) compared with 63 days (IQR 29, 78) for SR (p=0.03).8258 CXRs (95.1%) were reported by both radiographers and local radiologists. In the 1361 (16.5%) with discordance, the reviewing thoracic radiologists were equally likely to agree with local radiologist and radiographer reports. CONCLUSIONS Immediate reporting of CXRs from primary care reduces time to diagnosis of lung cancer by half, likely due to rapid progress to CT. Radiographer reports are comparable to local radiologist reports for accuracy. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN21818068. Registered on 20 June 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Woznitza
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
- Radiology Department, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bhagabati Ghimire
- College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Anand Devaraj
- Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sam M Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
| | - Keith Piper
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Susan Rowe
- Radiology Department, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angshu Bhowmik
- Respiratory Medicine, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natasha Hayes
- Radiology Department, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Togher
- Radiology Department, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Radiology, Epsom and Saint Helier Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nikita Arumalla
- Respiratory Medicine, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Rheumatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Erik Skyllberg
- Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Iain T H Au-Yong
- Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Susan Geary
- Radiology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-In-Ashfield, UK
| | - Bindu George
- Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Sheard
- Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Zoheb Shah
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Sue Maughn
- NHS England and NHS Improvement London, London, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - David Baldwin
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marzo-Castillejo M, Vela-Vallespín C, Mascort Roca J, Guiriguet Capdevila C, Codern-Bové N, Borras JM. [Health professionals' perspective about women's experiences during the diagnostic process of ovarian cancer in Catalonia: Qualitative study]. Aten Primaria 2023; 55:102619. [PMID: 37043975 PMCID: PMC10119712 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify missed opportunities in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (OC) in the public health system of Catalonia, through the analysis of the perceptions of health professionals on the stories's experiences of OC patients. DESIGN Qualitative exploratory-descriptive study, with two focus groups. SETTING Primary Care, November 2017. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-four professionals based on theoretical sampling: 21 family doctors, 8 professionals from sexual and reproductive health centres and 5 hospital gynaecologists. METHODS Participants discussed the different diagnostic pathways for women with OC through the presentation of flowcharts which were developed with three storie's and experiences of OC patients. RESULTS Three themes with various sub-themes were identified as follow: a)lack of cancer diagnostic suspicion (lack of knowledge of symptoms of OC, anamnesis and physical examination overlooked, fragmentation of patient's care and bias and prejudice); b)difficulties in activating the diagnostic process (limited access to tests, unequal accessibility to gynaecology and lack of follow-up); and c)absence of fast-track referral system. CONCLUSIONS The results offer insight into the difficulties of early diagnosis of OC in our setting. We believe that their identification will allow the development of strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy and quality of care for women with OC in our setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
- Unitat Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS); Institut d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAPJGol), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | - Carmen Vela-Vallespín
- CAP Riu Nord i Riu Sud, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona; Unitat Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Nord, Institut d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAPJGol), Mataró, Barcelona, España
| | - Juanjo Mascort Roca
- CAP Florida Sud, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona; Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Carolina Guiriguet Capdevila
- Sistema d'Informació dels Serveis d'Atenció Primària (SISAP), Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Núria Codern-Bové
- Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona; Universitat Autònoma Barcelona. ÀreaQ (Evaluation and Qualitative Research), Barcelona, España
| | - Josep M Borras
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Barcelona; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaswani S, Kuhner C, Xu J, Dickman E, Becker K, Drapkin J, Turchiano M. Establishing a rapid assessment service for patients with suspected malignancies for expedited outpatient management. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 70:66-69. [PMID: 37210975 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 11% of new cancer diagnoses occur in the emergency department. Historically, these diagnoses disproportionately affect underserved patient populations and are associated with poor outcomes. This is an observational study of the Rapid Assessment Service (RAS) program, which aims to provide timely outpatient follow-up and facilitate a diagnosis for patients discharged from the emergency department with suspected malignancies. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of 176 patients who were discharged from the emergency department with RAS clinic follow up between February 2020 and March 2022. We manually chart reviewed 176 records in order to determine the average time to RAS clinic appointment, average time to diagnosis, and the final diagnosis based on biopsy. RESULTS 163 of 176 patients (93%) discharged to RAS received reliable follow-up care. 62 of the 176 patients (35%) followed up in the RAS clinic with a mean of 4.6 days. 46 of the 62 patients (74%) who followed up in the RAS clinic were ultimately diagnosed with a new cancer, with a mean time to diagnosis of 13.5 days. The leading new cancer diagnoses included: lung, ovarian, hematologic, head and neck, and renal cancers. CONCLUSIONS Creating a Rapid Assessment Service facilitated an expedited oncologic work-up and diagnosis in an outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabena Vaswani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Christopher Kuhner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jason Xu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Eitan Dickman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Becker
- Department of Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jefferson Drapkin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Michael Turchiano
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Olesen TB, Rasmussen TR, Jakobsen E, Engberg H, Hilberg O, Møller H, Jensen JW, Jensen H. Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 85:102373. [PMID: 37172520 PMCID: PMC10123358 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the number of lung cancers diagnosed, the quality of care and the socio-economic and clinical characteristics among patients with lung cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years. METHODS We included all patients ≥ 18 years old diagnosed with lung cancer from 01 January 2018 to 31 August 2021 as registered in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Using a generalised linear model, we estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the associations between the pandemic and socioeconomic and clinical factors, and indicators of quality. RESULTS We included 18,113 patients with lung cancer (82.0% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)), which was similar to the preceding years, although a decline in NSCLC cases occurred during the first lockdown period in 2020. No difference in distribution of income or educational level was observed. No difference was observed in the quality of treatment - as measured by curative intent, proportion of patients resected or who died within 90 days of diagnosis. CONCLUSION Using nationwide population-based data, our study reassuringly shows no adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, socio-economic characteristics nor quality of treatment of lung cancer, as compared to the preceding years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Bech Olesen
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Denmark
| | - Torben Riis Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Erik Jakobsen
- Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henriette Engberg
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Denmark
| | - Ole Hilberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Møller
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Denmark
| | - Jens Winther Jensen
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Denmark
| | - Henry Jensen
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Drosdowsky A, Lamb KE, Bergin RJ, Boyd L, Milley K, IJzerman MJ, Emery JD. A systematic review of methodological considerations in time to diagnosis and treatment in colorectal cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 83:102323. [PMID: 36701982 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Research focusing on timely diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer is necessary to improve outcomes for people with cancer. Previous attempts to consolidate research on time to diagnosis and treatment have noted varied methodological approaches and quality, limiting the comparability of findings. This systematic review was conducted to comprehensively assess the scope of methodological issues in this field and provide recommendations for future research. Eligible articles had to assess the role of any interval up to treatment, on any outcome in colorectal cancer, in English, with no limits on publication time. Four databases were searched (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, EMCARE and PsycInfo). Papers were screened by two independent reviewers using a two-stage process of title and abstract followed by full text review. In total, 130 papers were included and had data extracted on specific methodological and statistical features. Several methodological problems were identified across the evidence base. Common issues included arbitrary categorisation of intervals (n = 107, 83%), no adjustment for potential confounders (n = 65, 50%), and lack of justification for included covariates where there was adjustment (n = 40 of 65 papers that performed an adjusted analysis, 62%). Many articles introduced epidemiological biases such as immortal time bias (n = 37 of 80 papers that used survival as an outcome, 46%) and confounding by indication (n = 73, 56%), as well as other biases arising from inclusion of factors outside of their temporal sequence. However, determination of the full extent of these problems was hampered by insufficient reporting. Recommendations include avoiding artificial categorisation of intervals, ensuring bias has not been introduced due to out-of-sequence use of key events and increased use of theoretical frameworks to detect and reduce bias. The development of reporting guidelines and domain-specific risk of bias tools may aid in ensuring future research can reliably contribute to recommendations regarding optimal timing and strengthen the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Karen E Lamb
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Bergin
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lucy Boyd
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Kristi Milley
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zigman Suchsland M, Kowalski L, Burkhardt HA, Prado MG, Kessler LG, Yetisgen M, Au MA, Stephens KA, Farjah F, Schleyer AM, Walter FM, Neal RD, Lybarger K, Thompson CA, Achkar MA, Sarma EA, Turner G, Thompson M. How Timely Is Diagnosis of Lung Cancer? Cohort Study of Individuals with Lung Cancer Presenting in Ambulatory Care in the United States. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235756. [PMID: 36497238 PMCID: PMC9740627 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of lung cancer in ambulatory settings is often challenging due to non-specific clinical presentation, but there are currently no clinical quality measures (CQMs) in the United States used to identify areas for practice improvement in diagnosis. We describe the pre-diagnostic time intervals among a retrospective cohort of 711 patients identified with primary lung cancer from 2012-2019 from ambulatory care clinics in Seattle, Washington USA. Electronic health record data were extracted for two years prior to diagnosis, and Natural Language Processing (NLP) applied to identify symptoms/signs from free text clinical fields. Time points were defined for initial symptomatic presentation, chest imaging, specialist consultation, diagnostic confirmation, and treatment initiation. Median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for intervals spanning these time points. The mean age of the cohort was 67.3 years, 54.1% had Stage III or IV disease and the majority were diagnosed after clinical presentation (94.5%) rather than screening (5.5%). Median intervals from first recorded symptoms/signs to diagnosis was 570 days (IQR 273-691), from chest CT or chest X-ray imaging to diagnosis 43 days (IQR 11-240), specialist consultation to diagnosis 72 days (IQR 13-456), and from diagnosis to treatment initiation 7 days (IQR 0-36). Symptoms/signs associated with lung cancer can be identified over a year prior to diagnosis using NLP, highlighting the need for CQMs to improve timeliness of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lesleigh Kowalski
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Hannah A. Burkhardt
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Maria G. Prado
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Larry G. Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Meliha Yetisgen
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Maggie A. Au
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Kari A. Stephens
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Farhood Farjah
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - Fiona M. Walter
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Richard D. Neal
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Kevin Lybarger
- Department of Information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22039, USA
| | - Caroline A. Thompson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
| | - Morhaf Al Achkar
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Sarma
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Grace Turner
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Matthew Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bosch X, Montori‐Palacin E, Martínez‐Ferrer R, Aldea A, Moreno P, López‐Soto A. Time intervals in the care pathway to cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large retrospective study from a high-volume center. Int J Cancer 2022; 152:384-395. [PMID: 36053784 PMCID: PMC9539134 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Despite extensive research on cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence on the impact on prediagnostic time intervals is lacking. To better understand how COVID-19 changed the pathway to diagnosis of cancer, we examined the length of intervals from symptom onset to diagnosis for 13 common cancer types with known clinical stage over 1-year nonpandemic period (March 2019 to March 2020; N = 844) and three biannual COVID periods (March 2020 to September 2021; N = 1172). We analyzed the patient interval (from first symptoms to presentation to a physician), the primary care/emergency department interval (from presentation with relevant symptoms to a primary care or emergency department physician to referral to a hospital-based diagnosis center) and the hospital interval (from referral to diagnosis). Compared to nonpandemic data, there were significant changes across COVID periods. The pandemic mostly impacted patient intervals for cancers diagnosed over the first 6 months after onset in March 2020. Overall median patient intervals were longest in the early COVID period (39 [IQR 22-64] days) and shortest in the nonpandemic period (20 [IQR 13-30] days; Kruskal-Wallis test [χ2 ], P < .0001). Differences in clinical stage between periods were relevant, with cancers from the mid-period (September 2020 to March 2021) showing the most advanced stage. A shift to later stage was plausibly a result of delayed intervals in the early COVID period. Since intervals are eventually relevant to prognosis, our results provide a baseline against which the impact of improvement strategies to minimize the negative outcomes of COVID-19-associated cancer delays can be assessed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Villarroel Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elisabet Montori‐Palacin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Hospital Plató Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| | - Rosa Martínez‐Ferrer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Hospital Plató Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| | - Anna Aldea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Villarroel Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| | - Pedro Moreno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Villarroel Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| | - Alfonso López‐Soto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB)University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain,Campus Villarroel Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain,Campus Hospital Plató Medical CenterBarcelonaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jarbøl DE, Hyldig N, Möller S, Wehberg S, Rasmussen S, Balasubramaniam K, Haastrup PF, Søndergaard J, Rubin KH. Can National Registries Contribute to Predict the Risk of Cancer? The Cancer Risk Assessment Model (CRAM). Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153823. [PMID: 35954486 PMCID: PMC9367495 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Early identification of individuals with an increased risk of cancer is an important challenge. Danish administrative registers may be useful in this respect because they cover the entire population and include comprehensive and consistently coded long-term data. We aimed to develop a predictive model based on Danish administrative registers to facilitate the automated identification of individuals at risk of any type of cancer. In addition to age, almost all the included factors contributed statistically significantly, but also only marginally, to the prediction models, which means that we have not overlooked obvious information available in the register. Future prediction studies should focus on specific cancer types where more precise risk estimations might be expected. It is our ultimate ambition that an effective model can be used at the point of care, integrated into electronic patient record systems to alert physicians of patients at a high risk of cancer. Abstract Purpose: To develop a predictive model based on Danish administrative registers to facilitate automated identification of individuals at risk of any type of cancer. Methods: A nationwide register-based cohort study covering all individuals in Denmark aged +20 years. The outcome was all-type cancer during 2017 excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Diagnoses, medication, and contact with general practitioners in the exposure period (2007–2016) were considered for the predictive model. We applied backward selection to all variables by logistic regression to develop a risk model for cancer. We applied the models to the validation cohort, calculated the receiver operating characteristic curves, and estimated the corresponding areas under the curve (AUC). Results: The study population consisted of 4.2 million persons; 32,447 (0.76%) were diagnosed with cancer in 2017. We identified 39 predictive risk factors in women and 42 in men, with age above 30 as the strongest predictor for cancer. Testing the model for cancer risk showed modest accuracy, with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81–0.82) for men and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74–0.75) for women. Conclusion: We have developed and tested a model for identifying the individual risk of cancer through the use of administrative data. The models need to be further investigated before being applied to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorte E. Jarbøl
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Correspondence:
| | - Nana Hyldig
- OPEN—Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- OPEN—Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sonja Wehberg
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Sanne Rasmussen
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Peter F. Haastrup
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Katrine H. Rubin
- OPEN—Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hall H, Tocock A, Burdett S, Fisher D, Ricketts WM, Robson J, Round T, Gorolay S, MacArthur E, Chung D, Janes SM, Peake MD, Navani N. Association between time-to-treatment and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax 2022; 77:762-768. [PMID: 34404753 PMCID: PMC9340041 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National targets for timely diagnosis and management of a potential cancer are driven in part by the perceived risk of disease progression during avoidable delays. However, it is unclear to what extent time-to-treatment impacts prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with previous reviews reporting mixed or apparently paradoxical associations. This systematic review focuses on potential confounders in order to identify particular patient groups which may benefit most from timely delivery of care. METHODS Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for publications between January 2012 and October 2020, correlating timeliness in secondary care pathways to patient outcomes. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; ID 99239). Prespecified factors (demographics, performance status, histology, stage and treatment) are examined through narrative synthesis. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles were included. All but two were observational. Timely care was generally associated with a worse prognosis in those with advanced stage disease (6/8 studies) but with better outcomes for patients with early-stage disease treated surgically (9/12 studies). In one study, patients with squamous cell carcinoma referred for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy benefited more from timely care, compared with patients with adenocarcinoma. One randomised controlled trial supported timeliness as being advantageous in those with stage I-IIIA disease. CONCLUSION There are limitations to the available evidence, but observed trends suggest timeliness to be of particular importance in surgical candidates. In more advanced disease, survival trends are likely outweighed by symptom burden, performance status or clinical urgency dictating timeliness of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hall
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, UCL, London, UK
| | - Adam Tocock
- Barts Health Knowledge and Library Services, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Fisher
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - John Robson
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Round
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarita Gorolay
- XX Place Health Centre, London Borough of Tower Hamlets, London, UK
| | - Emma MacArthur
- Centre for Cancer Outcomes, North Central and North East London Cancer Alliances, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna Chung
- Centre for Cancer Outcomes, North Central and North East London Cancer Alliances, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sam M Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, UCL, London, UK
| | - Michael D Peake
- Centre for Cancer Outcomes, North Central and North East London Cancer Alliances, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Neal Navani
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, UCL, London, UK
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li L, Wang M, Yang H, Li Y, Huang X, Guo J, Liu Z. Fisetin Inhibits Trypsin Activity and Suppresses the Growth of Colorectal Cancer in Vitro and in Vivo. Nat Prod Commun 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/1934578x221115511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumor with high incidence and bad prognosis. Therapies, which are more safe and effective, are urgently needed. Trypsin is proved to be crucial to cancer proliferation and migration, therefore, it is possible to control cancers by modulating its activity. Fisetin is a flavone with trypsin inhibition properties that was screened from more than 45 compounds derived from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). However, the effects and mechanisms of fisetin on CRC have not been well investigated. In this study, we evaluated the effects of fisetin on 2 different CRC cell lines. Fisetin remarkably inhibited CRC cell proliferation and migration, as well as induced cell apoptosis and Go/G1 phase arrest in a dose-dependent manner. Mechanistic studies revealed that these effects were mediated partially through signaling pathways involving cell cycle regulators p21, p27, cyclinD1, and NF kappa B (NF-κB) p65. Administration of fisetin also significantly suppressed the tumor growth in tumor-bearing NOD/Shi-scid-IL2R gamma (null) (NOG) mice that had been inoculated with human HCT116 cells. Fisetin at the given dosage did not induce significant acute or chronic toxicity in rats. These data provide a potential therapeutic strategy for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Li
- Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Wang
- Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongyan Yang
- School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, China
| | | | | | - Jialiang Guo
- Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vela-Vallespín C, Manchon-Walsh P, Aliste L, Borras JM, Marzo-Castillejo M. Prehospital care for ovarian cancer in Catalonia: could we do better in primary care? Retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060499. [PMID: 35868821 PMCID: PMC9316044 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of prehospital factors (diagnostic pathways, first presentation to healthcare services, intervals, participation in primary care) on 1-year and 5-year survival in people with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). DESIGN Retrospective quasi-population-based cohort study. SETTING Catalan Integrated Public Healthcare System. PARTICIPANTS People with EOC who underwent surgery with a curative intent in public Catalan hospitals between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES Data from primary and secondary care clinical histories and care processes in the 18 months leading up to confirmation (signs and symptoms at presentation, diagnosis pathways, referrals, diagnosis interval) of the EOC diagnosis (stage, histology type, treatment). Diagnostic process intervals were based on the Aarhus statement. 1-year and 5-year survival analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Of the 513 patients included in the cohort, 67.2% initially consulted their family physician, while 36.4% were diagnosed through emergency services. In the Cox models, survival was influenced by advanced stage at 1 year (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.23 to 12.02) and 5 years (HR 5.36, 95% CI 3.07 to 9.36), as was the type of treatment received, although this association was attenuated over follow-up. Age became significant at 5 years of follow-up. After adjusting for age, adjusted morbidity groups, stage at diagnosis and treatment, 5-year survival was better in patients presenting with gynaecological bleeding (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79). Survival was not associated with a starting point involving primary care (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.09), diagnostic pathways involving referral to elective gynaecological care from non-general practitioners (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26), or self-presentation to emergency services (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.31). CONCLUSIONS Survival in EOC is not associated with diagnostic pathways or prehospital healthcare, but it is influenced by stage at diagnosis, administration of primary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy and patient age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Vela-Vallespín
- Primary Health Care Center Riu Nord i Riu Sud, Catalan Institute of Health, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain
- Research Support Unit Metropolitana Nord, University Institute for Primary Health Care Research (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Catalan Health Institut, Mataró, Spain
| | - Paula Manchon-Walsh
- Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Luisa Aliste
- Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Josep M Borras
- Catalonian Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
- Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
- Research Support Unit Metropolitana Sud, University Institute for Primary Health Care Research (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Catalan Health Institut, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li H, Huang B. <em>miR-19a</em> targeting <em>CLCA4</em> to regulate the proliferation, migration, and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Eur J Histochem 2022; 66. [PMID: 35266369 PMCID: PMC8958453 DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2022.3381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of miR-19a in colorectal cancer (CRC), a devastating disease with high mortality and morbidity, remains controversial. In the present study, we show that the level of miR-19a is significantly higher in clinical CRC tissue samples than in paracancerous tissue samples, and significantly higher in CRC cells lines HT29, SW480, and CaCO2 than in the normal human colon mucosal epithelial cell line NCM460. miR-19a mimics and inhibitors were synthesized and validated. Overexpression of miR-19a mimics significantly promoted, while miR-19a inhibitors inhibited, the proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion of SW480 and CaCO2 CRC cells. Furthermore, mRNA and protein levels of chloride channel accessory 4 (CLCA4) were lower in CRC cells and tissues. Bioinformatics and a luciferase reporter assay confirmed that CLCA4 was a miR-19a target. Further, miR-19a inhibition increased CLCA4 expression. The inhibitory effect of miR-19a on cell growth, survival, migration, and invasion was reversed by knockdown of CLCA4 expression. The data demonstrated that the miR-19a/CLCA4 axis modulates phospho-activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in CRC cells. In conclusion, our results revealed that miR-19a overexpression decreases CLCA4 levels to promote CRC oncogenesis, suggesting that miR-19a inhibitors have potential applications for future therapeutic of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiwen Li
- Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou; Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou.
| | - Bo Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Datta SS, Fraser L, Burnell M, Nasreen S, Ghosh M, Ojha A, Saha T, Mukhopadhyay A, Lanceley A, Menon U. Association of adult attachment with delays in accessing specialist care in women with ovarian cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2022; 40:491-505. [PMID: 35112658 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2025510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advanced stage at diagnosis and delayed presentation are common in ovarian cancer (OC). The objective of the current study was to explore the association of adult attachment pattern with delays in accessing specialist oncology care in patients with OC. METHODS A cross-sectional structured interview study of patients with OC presenting to an Indian cancer center was undertaken. Consenting patients completed Experiences of Close Relationships-Relationship Style questionnaire (ECR-RS) and Medical Outcome Survey-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS). Multivariate linear regression with "time to presentation to cancer specialist" as the dependent variable was undertaken. RESULTS In all, 132 of 155 (85%) patients with OC who were invited were interviewed. An increased ECR-RS attachment anxiety score (P = .01) and being part of a multigenerational extended household (P = .04) were both independently associated with delay in presentation to a cancer specialist. There was no association between delay in presentation and social support. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with OC, adult attachment may contribute to delays in presentation. It may be important for the cancer symptom awareness efforts in primary care to include educating physicians on recognizing and interacting with patients with insecure attachment styles. The association of delays in presentation for women with OC living in multigenerational extended households needs more indepth exploration. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2022.2025510 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumitra Shankar Datta
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India.,MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Fraser
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shazia Nasreen
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Manisha Ghosh
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Aparupa Ojha
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Tania Saha
- Department of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Asima Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Anne Lanceley
- UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
White B, Renzi C, Rafiq M, Abel GA, Jensen H, Lyratzopoulos G. Does changing healthcare use signal opportunities for earlier detection of cancer? A review of studies using information from electronic patient records. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 76:102072. [PMID: 34876377 PMCID: PMC8785122 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been proposed that changes in healthcare use before cancer diagnosis could signal opportunities for quicker detection, but systematic appreciation of such evidence is lacking. We reviewed studies examining pre-diagnostic changes in healthcare utilisation (e.g. rates of GP or hospital consultations, prescriptions or diagnostic tests) among patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer. METHODS We identified studies through Pubmed searches complemented by expert elicitation. We extracted information on the earliest time point when diagnosis could have been possible for at least some cancers, together with variation in the length of such 'diagnostic windows' by tumour and patient characteristics. RESULTS Across twenty-eight studies, changes in healthcare use were observable at least six months pre-diagnosis for many common cancers, and potentially even earlier for colorectal cancer, multiple myeloma and brain tumours. Early changes were also identified for brain and colon cancer sub-sites. CONCLUSION Changing healthcare utilisation patterns before diagnosis indicate that future improvements in diagnostic technologies or services could help to shorten diagnostic intervals for cancer. There is greatest potential for quicker diagnosis for certain cancer types and patient groups, which can inform priorities for the development of decision support tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky White
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC)), University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Cristina Renzi
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC)), University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Meena Rafiq
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC)), University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Henry Jensen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC)), University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Malagón T, Yong JHE, Tope P, Miller WH, Franco EL. Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada. Int J Cancer 2021; 150:1244-1254. [PMID: 34843106 PMCID: PMC9015510 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The COVID‐19 pandemic has affected cancer care worldwide. This study aimed to estimate the long‐term impacts of cancer care disruptions on cancer mortality in Canada using a microsimulation model. The model simulates cancer incidence and survival using cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival data from the Canadian Cancer Registry. We modeled reported declines in cancer diagnoses and treatments recorded in provincial administrative datasets in March 2020 to June 2021. Based on the literature, we assumed that diagnostic and treatment delays lead to a 6% higher rate of cancer death per 4‐week delay. After June 2021, we assessed scenarios where cancer treatment capacity returned to prepandemic levels, or to 10% higher or lower than prepandemic levels. Results are the median predictions of 10 stochastic simulations. The model predicts that cancer care disruptions during the COVID‐19 pandemic could lead to 21 247 (2.0%) more cancer deaths in Canada in 2020 to 2030, assuming treatment capacity is recovered to 2019 prepandemic levels in 2021. This represents 355 172 life years lost expected due to pandemic‐related diagnostic and treatment delays. The largest number of expected excess cancer deaths was predicted for breast, lung and colorectal cancers, and in the provinces of Ontario, Québec and British Columbia. Diagnostic and treatment capacity in 2021 onward highly influenced the number of cancer deaths over the next decade. Cancer care disruptions during the COVID‐19 pandemic could lead to significant life loss; however, most of these could be mitigated by increasing diagnostic and treatment capacity in the short‐term to address the service backlog.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talía Malagón
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean H E Yong
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Parker Tope
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wilson H Miller
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Walsh RL, Lofters A, Moineddin R, Krzyzanowska M, Grunfeld E. Primary Care Continuity and Wait Times to Receiving Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using CanIMPACT Data. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:4786-4804. [PMID: 34898582 PMCID: PMC8628668 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Wait times to chemotherapy are associated with morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients; however, it is unclear how primary care physician (PCP) continuity impacts these wait times, or whether this association is different in immigrants, who experience cancer care inequities. We assessed the association between PCP continuity and the contact-to-chemotherapy interval (wait time from when a patient first presents to healthcare to the first day of receiving breast cancer chemotherapy), with a specific look at the immigrant population. (2) Methods: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of women who were diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer in Ontario who received surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. We used quantile regression at the median and 90th percentile to quantify the effect of PCP continuity on the contact-to-chemotherapy interval, performing a separate analysis on the immigrant population. (3) Results: Among 12,781 breast cancer patients, including 1706 immigrants, the median contact-to-chemotherapy interval (126 days) was 3.21 days shorter (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–5.96) in symptom-detected patients with low PCP continuity, 10.68 days shorter (95% CI 5.36–16.00) in symptom-detected patients with no baseline PCP visits and 17.43 days longer (95% CI 0.90–34.76) in screen-detected immigrants with low PCP continuity compared to the same groups with high PCP continuity. (4) Conclusions: Higher PCP continuity was not associated with a change in the contact-to-chemotherapy interval for most of our study population, but was associated with a marginally longer interval in our symptom-detected population and a shorter contact-to-chemotherapy interval in screen-detected immigrants. This highlights the importance of PCP continuity among immigrants with positive screening results. Additionally, having no PCP visits at baseline was associated with a shorter contact-to-chemotherapy interval in symptom-detected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Lin Walsh
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada; (A.L.); (R.M.); (E.G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada; (A.L.); (R.M.); (E.G.)
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada; (A.L.); (R.M.); (E.G.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Monika Krzyzanowska
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada;
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada; (A.L.); (R.M.); (E.G.)
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Petersen GS, Laursen SGW, Jensen H, Maindal HT, Pedersen AF, Vedsted P, Virgilsen LF. Patients' health literacy is associated with timely diagnosis of cancer-A cross-sectional study in Denmark. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 31:e13532. [PMID: 34704640 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Timely diagnosis of cancer is important for prognosis. Patients' health literacy (HL) may impact differences of diagnostic delays. Thus, we aim to explore the association between HL and diagnostic intervals in cancer. METHODS Questionnaire data were obtained from patients with cancer diagnosed in 2016 and their general practitioner (n = 3890). The primary care interval (PCI) and the diagnostic interval (DI) were calculated using dates from national registries and questionnaires. A long PCI and DI were defined as ≥75th percentile. HL was assessed using scales from the Health Literacy Questionnaire: engaging with healthcare providers (scale 6:Engagement, n = 3008), navigating in healthcare (scale 7:Navigation, n = 2827) and understanding health information (scale 9:Knowledge, n = 3002). Low HL was defined as a score ≤3. RESULTS Low HL was reported by 12.2% (Engagement), 27.0% (Navigation) and 9.3% (Knowledge) of the patients and associated with a long PCI after adjustment of socio-economic factors: Engagement (prevalence rate ratio [PRR] 1.27 [95% CI 1.01-1.60]), Navigation (PRR 1.41 [95% CI 1.10-1.80]) and Knowledge (PRR 1.32 [95% CI 1.03-1.68]). No association was found between HL and DI. CONCLUSION HL may interfere with the diagnostic processes in general practice. Efforts to manage low HL include GPs' awareness of patients' ability to explain and respond to bodily changes and use of corresponding safety-netting strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Henry Jensen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Anette F Pedersen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Line Flytkjaer Virgilsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lynch C, Reguilon I, Langer DL, Lane D, De P, Wong WL, Mckiddie F, Ross A, Shack L, Win T, Marshall C, Revheim ME, Danckert B, Butler J, Dizdarevic S, Louzado C, Mcgivern C, Hazlett A, Chew C, O'connell M, Harrison S. A comparative analysis: international variation in PET-CT service provision in oncology-an International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership study. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6030987. [PMID: 33306102 PMCID: PMC7896108 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore differences in position emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) service provision internationally to further understand the impact variation may have upon cancer services. To identify areas of further exploration for researchers and policymakers to optimize PET-CT services and improve the quality of cancer services. Design Comparative analysis using data based on pre-defined PET-CT service metrics from PET-CT stakeholders across seven countries. This was further informed via document analysis of clinical indication guidance and expert consensus through round-table discussions of relevant PET-CT stakeholders. Descriptive comparative analyses were produced on use, capacity and indication guidance for PET-CT services between jurisdictions. Setting PET-CT services across 21 jurisdictions in seven countries (Australia, Denmark, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the UK). Participants None. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) None. Results PET-CT service provision has grown over the period 2006–2017, but scale of increase in capacity and demand is variable. Clinical indication guidance varied across countries, particularly for small-cell lung cancer staging and the specific acknowledgement of gastric cancer within oesophagogastric cancers. There is limited and inconsistent data capture, coding, accessibility and availability of PET-CT activity across countries studied. Conclusions Variation in PET-CT scanner quantity, acquisition over time and guidance upon use exists internationally. There is a lack of routinely captured and accessible PET-CT data across the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership countries due to inconsistent data definitions, data linkage issues, uncertain coverage of data and lack of specific coding. This is a barrier in improving the quality of PET-CT services globally. There needs to be greater, richer data capture of diagnostic and staging tools to facilitate learning of best practice and optimize cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lynch
- International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, 2 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Irene Reguilon
- International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, 2 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.,Brand & Strategy, eConsult Health Ltd, 46-48 East Street, Surrey, KT17 1HQ, UK
| | - Deanna L Langer
- Cancer Imaging, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
| | - Damon Lane
- Radiology, Pacific Radiology, 123 Victoria Street, Christchurch Central, Christchurch 8013, New Zealand
| | - Prithwish De
- Surveillance and Cancer Registry, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
| | - Wai-Lup Wong
- Nuclear Medicine, Mount Vernon Hospital, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Fergus Mckiddie
- Nuclear Medicine and PET Department, NHS Grampian, 2 Eday Road, Aberdeen AB15 6RE, UK
| | - Andrew Ross
- Dalhousie Medical School, Dalhousie University, 6299 South Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Lorraine Shack
- Surveillance and Reporting, Alberta Health Services (Cancer Control Alberta), 10030-107 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3E4, Canada
| | - Thida Win
- General and Respiratory Medicine, Lister Hospital, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK
| | - Christopher Marshall
- Wales Research and Diagnostic PET Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff University School of Medicine Health Park, Cardiff, CF14, 4XN, UK
| | - Mona-Eliszabeth Revheim
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway
| | - Bolette Danckert
- Research Centre, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - John Butler
- International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, 2 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.,Gynaecology Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Sabina Dizdarevic
- Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Kemptown, Brighton, BN2 1ES, United Kingdom and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex and Brighton, London Road, Brighton, BN1 4GE, UK
| | - Cheryl Louzado
- Strategy Implementation Planning & Partner Relations, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King St, Toronto, ON M5H 1J8, Canada
| | - Canice Mcgivern
- Department of Regional Medical Physics, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 83 Shankill Road, Belfast, BT13 1FD, UK
| | - Anne Hazlett
- Department of Regional Medical Physics, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, 83 Shankill Road, Belfast, BT13 1FD, UK
| | - Cindy Chew
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Martin O'connell
- Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, DO7 R2WY, Ireland
| | - Samantha Harrison
- International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, 2 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jessen NH, Jensen H, Falborg AZ, Glerup H, Gronbaek H, Vedsted P. Abdominal investigations in the year preceding a diagnosis of abdominal cancer: A register-based cohort study in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 72:101926. [PMID: 33689927 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 11,500 abdominal cancers are yearly diagnosed in Denmark. Nevertheless, little is known about which investigations the patients undergo before a diagnosis of abdominal cancer. We aimed to investigate the frequency and timing of selected diagnostic investigations during the year preceding an abdominal cancer diagnosis. METHODS We conducted a nationwide registry-based cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with a first-time abdominal cancer in 2014-2018. We included the following cancer types: oesophageal, gastric, colon, rectal, liver, gall bladder/biliary tract, pancreatic, endometrial, ovarian, kidney, and bladder cancer. Investigations of interest were transvaginal ultrasound, abdominal ultrasound, colonoscopy, gastroscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, cystoscopy, hysteroscopy, abdominal computed tomography and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging. Generalised linear models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios to enable comparison of monthly rates of investigations. RESULTS All types of investigations were performed, with varying frequency, across the 11 abdominal cancer types in the year preceding the diagnosis. Increased use of investigations revealed that the timing of the onset differed for the different abdominal cancers, with increases seen 2-6 months before the diagnosis. Abdominal ultrasound, colonoscopy and computed tomography were the investigations with the earliest increase. CONCLUSION In the year before a diagnosis of an abdominal cancer, some patients appear to undergo investigations typically used to detect another cancer type. This indicates that a window of opportunity exists to diagnose some abdominal cancers at an earlier time point. Future studies should explore an alternative clinical pathway to promote earlier diagnosis of abdominal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Holt Jessen
- Research Center for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Henry Jensen
- Research Center for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alina Zalounina Falborg
- Research Center for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henning Glerup
- University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Henning Gronbaek
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Center for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark; University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Degeling K, Baxter NN, Emery J, Jenkins MA, Franchini F, Gibbs P, Mann GB, McArthur G, Solomon BJ, IJzerman MJ. An inverse stage-shift model to estimate the excess mortality and health economic impact of delayed access to cancer services due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 17:359-367. [PMID: 33567163 PMCID: PMC8014813 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Decreased cancer incidence and reported changes to clinical management indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to develop and apply a flexible model to estimate the impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment on survival outcomes and healthcare costs based on a shift in the disease stage at treatment initiation. METHODS A model was developed and made publicly available to estimate population-level health economic outcomes by extrapolating and weighing stage-specific outcomes by the distribution of stages at treatment initiation. It was applied to estimate the impact of 3- and 6-month delays based on Australian data for stage I breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer patients, and for T1 melanoma. Two approaches were explored to estimate stage shifts following a delay: (a) based on the relation between time to treatment initiation and overall survival (breast, colorectal, and lung cancer), and (b) based on the tumor growth rate (melanoma). RESULTS Using a conservative once-off 3-month delay and considering only shifts from stage I/T1 to stage II/T2, 88 excess deaths and $12 million excess healthcare costs were predicted in Australia over 5 years for all patients diagnosed in 2020. For a 6-month delay, excess mortality and healthcare costs were 349 deaths and $46 million over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS The health and economic impacts of delays in treatment initiation cause an imminent policy concern. More accurate individual patient data on shifts in stage of disease during and after the COVID-19 pandemic are critical for further analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Degeling
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fanny Franchini
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Grant McArthur
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Solomon
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Virgilsen LF, Jensen H, Pedersen AF, Zalounina Falborg A, Vedsted P. Patient's worry about cancer and the general practitioner's suspicion of cancer or serious illness: A population-based study in Denmark. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13411. [PMID: 33511723 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A general practitioner's (GP's) suspicion of cancer is important to ensure early diagnosis of cancer. This study aimed to investigate the association between patients' cancer worry and GP's suspicion of cancer or serious illness. METHODS This population-based study was based on Danish register and questionnaire data from 4,175 incident cancer patients diagnosed in 2010 or 2016 and their GPs. The association between the patient's worry about cancer and their GP's suspicion of cancer or serious illness was estimated by generalised linear models with log link for the Poisson family and presented in prevalence rate ratios (PRR). RESULTS For 6 in 10 of the cases, the first consultation was categorised by absence of both or either patient worry or GP suspicion. When patients worried about cancer, the GPs were more likely to suspect cancer or serious illness in patients (PRR=1.26, (95%CI: 1.20-1.34)). For all levels of patient worry and most pronounced among very worried patients, GPs less often suspected cancer or serious illness in patients who presented with an ´intermediate´ or ´hard´ to diagnose cancer. CONCLUSION GPs were more likely to suspect cancer or serious illness in patients who worried about cancer at the first presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Flytkjaer Virgilsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Henry Jensen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Anette Fischer Pedersen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Alina Zalounina Falborg
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koo MM, Unger-Saldaña K, Mwaka AD, Corbex M, Ginsburg O, Walter FM, Calanzani N, Moodley J, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Conceptual Framework to Guide Early Diagnosis Programs for Symptomatic Cancer as Part of Global Cancer Control. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:35-45. [PMID: 33405957 PMCID: PMC8081530 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosing cancer earlier can enable timely treatment and optimize outcomes. Worldwide, national cancer control plans increasingly encompass early diagnosis programs for symptomatic patients, commonly comprising awareness campaigns to encourage prompt help-seeking for possible cancer symptoms and health system policies to support prompt diagnostic assessment and access to treatment. By their nature, early diagnosis programs involve complex public health interventions aiming to address unmet health needs by acting on patient, clinical, and system factors. However, there is uncertainty regarding how to optimize the design and evaluation of such interventions. We propose that decisions about early diagnosis programs should consider four interrelated components: first, the conduct of a needs assessment (based on cancer-site-specific statistics) to identify the cancers that may benefit most from early diagnosis in the target population; second, the consideration of symptom epidemiology to inform prioritization within an intervention; third, the identification of factors influencing prompt help-seeking at individual and system level to support the design and evaluation of interventions; and finally, the evaluation of factors influencing the health systems' capacity to promptly assess patients. This conceptual framework can be used by public health researchers and policy makers to identify the greatest evidence gaps and guide the design and evaluation of local early diagnosis programs as part of broader cancer control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjoung Monica Koo
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karla Unger-Saldaña
- CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology)–National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Amos D. Mwaka
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center and the Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Fiona M. Walter
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Calanzani
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Women's Health Research Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Greg P. Rubin
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Research Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Price S, Spencer A, Zhang X, Ball S, Lyratzopoulos G, Mujica-Mota R, Stapley S, Ukoumunne OC, Hamilton W. Trends in time to cancer diagnosis around the period of changing national guidance on referral of symptomatic patients: A serial cross-sectional study using UK electronic healthcare records from 2006-17. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 69:101805. [PMID: 32919226 PMCID: PMC7480981 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND UK primary-care referral guidance describes the signs, symptoms, and test results ("features") of undiagnosed cancer. Guidance revision in 2015 liberalised investigation by introducing more low-risk features. We studied adults with cancer whose features were in the 2005 guidance ("Old-NICE") or were introduced in the revision ("New-NICE"). We compared time to diagnosis between the groups, and its trend over 2006-2017. METHODS Clinical Practice Research Datalink records were analysed for adults with incident myeloma, breast, bladder, colorectal, lung, oesophageal, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, stomach or uterine cancers in 1/1/2006-31/12/2017. Cancer-specific features in the year before diagnosis were used to create New-NICE and Old-NICE groups. Diagnostic interval was time between the index feature and diagnosis. Semiparametric varying-coefficient analyses compared diagnostic intervals between New-NICE and Old-NICE groups over 1/1/2006-31/12/2017. RESULTS Over all cancers (N = 83,935), median (interquartile range) Old-NICE diagnostic interval rose over 2006-2017, from 51 (20-132) to 64 (30-148) days, with increases in breast (15 vs 25 days), lung (103 vs 135 days), ovarian (65·5 vs 100 days), prostate (80 vs 93 days) and stomach (72·5 vs 102 days) cancers. Median New-NICE values were consistently longer (99, 40-212 in 2006 vs 103, 42-236 days in 2017) than Old-NICE values over all cancers. After guidance revision, New-NICE diagnostic intervals became shorter than Old-NICE values for colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS Despite improvements for colorectal cancer, scope remains to reduce diagnostic intervals for most cancers. Liberalised investigation requires protecting and enhancing cancer-diagnostic services to avoid their becoming a rate-limiting step in the diagnostic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Price
- University of Exeter Medical School, Room 1.20 College House, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Anne Spencer
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Xiaohui Zhang
- University of Exeter Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Susan Ball
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | | | | | - Sal Stapley
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Obioha C Ukoumunne
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Willie Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
SNORA71A Promotes Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:8284576. [PMID: 33083486 PMCID: PMC7559222 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8284576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) play a crucial role during colorectal cancer (CRC) development. The study of SNORA71A is few, and its role in CRC is unknown. This study focused on screening abnormal snoRNAs in CRC and exploring the role of key snoRNA in CRC. The expression pattern of snoRNAs in 3 CRC and 3 normal colon tissues was detected via small RNA sequencing. The six candidate snoRNAs were identified by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Subsequently, the expression level of SNORA71A was further verified through the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data analysis and qPCR. The CCK8 and transwell assays were used to detect the functional role of SNORA71A in CRC cells. The integrated analysis of snoRNA expression profile indicated that a total 107 snoRNAs were significantly differentially expressed (DE) in CRC tissues compared with normal tissues, including 45 upregulated and 62 downregulated snoRNAs. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the DE snoRNAs were mainly implicated in "detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception of smell" and "sensory perception of smell" in the biological process. The DE snoRNAs were preferentially enriched in "olfactory transduction" and "glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-ganglio series pathway." The expression of SNORA71A was upregulated in CRC tissues and cells. SNORA71A expression showed statistically significant correlations with TNM stage (P = 0.0196) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0189) and can serve as biomarkers for CRC. Importantly, SNORA71A significantly facilitated the CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Our findings indicate that SNORA71A screened by sequencing acted as an oncogene and promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of CRC cells.
Collapse
|
32
|
Koo MM, Lyratzopoulos G, Herbert A, Abel GA, Taylor RM, Barber JA, Gibson F, Whelan J, Fern LA. Association of Self-reported Presenting Symptoms With Timeliness of Help-Seeking Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer in the BRIGHTLIGHT Study. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2015437. [PMID: 32880648 PMCID: PMC7489839 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Evidence regarding the presenting symptoms of cancer in adolescents and young adults can support the development of early diagnosis interventions. Objective To examine common presenting symptoms in adolescents and young adults aged 12 to 24 years who subsequently received a diagnosis of cancer and potential variation in time to help-seeking by presenting symptom. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter study is a cross-sectional analysis of the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study, which was conducted across hospitals in England. Participants included adolescents and young adults aged 12 to 24 years with cancer. Information on 17 prespecified presenting symptoms and the interval between symptom onset and help-seeking (the patient interval) was collected through structured face-to-face interviews and was linked to national cancer registry data. Data analysis was performed from January 2018 to August 2019. Exposures Self-reported presenting symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were frequencies of presenting symptoms and associated symptom signatures by cancer group and the proportion of patients with each presenting symptom whose patient interval was longer than 1 month. Results The study population consisted of 803 adolescents and young adults with valid symptom information (443 male [55%]; 509 [63%] aged 19-24 years; 705 [88%] White). The number of symptoms varied by cancer group: for example, 88 patients with leukemia (86%) presented with 2 or more symptoms, whereas only 9 patients with melanoma (31%) presented with multiple symptoms. In total, 352 unique symptom combinations were reported, with the 10 most frequent combinations accounting for 304 patients (38%). Lump or swelling was reported by more than one-half the patients (419 patients [52%; 95% CI, 49%-56%]). Other common presenting symptoms across all cancers were extreme tiredness (308 patients [38%; 95% CI, 35%-42%]), unexplained pain (281 patients [35%; 95% CI, 32%-38%]), night sweats (192 patients [24%; 95% CI, 21%-27%]), lymphadenopathy (191 patients [24%; 95% CI, 21%-27%]), and weight loss (190 patients [24%; 95% CI, 21%-27%]). The relative frequencies of presenting symptoms also varied by cancer group; some symptoms (such as lump or swelling) were highly prevalent across several cancer groups (seen in >50% of patients with lymphomas, germ cell cancers, carcinomas, bone tumors, and soft-tissue sarcomas). More than 1 in 4 patients (27%) reported a patient interval longer than 1 month; this varied from 6% (1 patient) for fits and seizures to 43% (18 patients) for recurrent infections. Conclusions and Relevance Adolescents and young adults with cancer present with a broad spectrum of symptoms, some of which are shared across cancer types. These findings point to discordant presenting symptom prevalence estimates when information is obtained from patient report vs health records and indicate the need for further symptom epidemiology research in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjoung M. Koo
- Epidemiology of Cancer and Healthcare Outcomes Research Group, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer and Healthcare Outcomes Research Group, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Annie Herbert
- Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Gary A. Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel M. Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife, and Allied Health Professional-led Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie A. Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Faith Gibson
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children’s Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Whelan
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna A. Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang C, Chen Y, Li F, Yang M, Meng F, Zhang Y, Chen W, Wang W. B7-H3 is spliced by SRSF3 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 70:311-321. [PMID: 32719950 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02683-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
B7-H3, an important co-inhibitor, is abnormally highly expressed in a variety of malignancies. The antibodies targeting B7-H3 have exhibited beneficial therapeutic effects in clinical trials. Therefore, discovery of the regulatory factors in B7-H3 expression may provide new strategies for tumor therapy. Here, we investigated the splicing factors involved in the splicing of B7-H3. By individual knockdown of the splicing factors in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells, we found that B7-H3 expression was markedly inhibited by SRSF3 and SRSF8, especially SRSF3. Then we found that both SRSF3 and B7-H3 were highly expressed in CRC tissues. Moreover, high-expression of either SRSF3 or B7-H3 was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of patients. The expression of B7-H3 mRNA and protein were evidently reduced by SRSF3 silence, but were enhanced by overexpression of SRSF3 in both HCT-116 and HCT-8 cells. The results from the RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays demonstrated that SRSF3 protein directly binds to B7-H3 mRNA. In addition, we constructed a minigene recombinant plasmid for expressing B7-H3 exons 3-6. We found that SRSF3 contributed to the retention of B7-H3 exon 4. These findings demonstrate that SRSF3 involves in the splicing of B7-H3 by directly binding to its exon 4 and/or 6. It may provide novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms of B7-H3 expression and potential strategies for the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunxia Zhang
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Yinshuang Chen
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Fuchao Li
- Department of Gerontology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Man Yang
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Fanyi Meng
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Yawen Zhang
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Weichang Chen
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Shizhi Street 188, Suzhou, 215006, China.
| | - Weipeng Wang
- Center for Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Soochow University, Building #1339, Wenjing Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China.
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van Erp NF, Helsper CW, Slottje P, Brandenbarg D, Büchner FL, van Asselt KM, Muris J, Kortekaas MF, Peeters P, de Wit NJ. Time to diagnosis of symptomatic gastric and oesophageal cancer in the Netherlands: Where is the room for improvement? United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:607-620. [PMID: 32250202 PMCID: PMC7268938 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620917804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An efficient diagnostic pathway and early stage diagnosis for cancer patients is widely pursued. This study aims to chart the duration of the diagnostic pathway for patients with symptomatic oesophageal and gastric cancer, to identify factors associated with long duration and to assess the association of duration with tumour stage at diagnosis. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health records of six routine primary care databases covering about 640,000 patients, partly linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Symptomatic patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer (2010–2015) that presented in primary care were included. Duration of four diagnostic intervals was determined: patient interval; first symptoms to primary care consultation, primary care interval; consultation to referral, secondary care interval; referral to diagnosis, and the diagnostic interval; consultation to diagnosis. Characteristics associated with ‘long duration’ (≥P75 duration) were assessed using log-binomial regression. Median durations were stratified for tumour stages. Results Among 312 symptomatic patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer, median durations were: patient interval: 29 days (interquartile interval 15–73), primary care interval: 12 days (interquartile interval 1–43), secondary care interval: 13 days (interquartile interval 6–29) and diagnostic interval: 31 days (11–74). Patient interval duration was comparable for patients with and without alarm symptoms. Absence of cancer-specific alarm symptoms was associated with ‘long duration’ of primary care interval and secondary care interval: relative risk 5.0 (95% confidence interval 2.7–9.1) and 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.3–3.7), respectively. Median diagnostic interval duration for local stage disease was 51 days (interquartile interval 13–135) versus 27 days (interquartile interval 11–71) for advanced stage (p = 0.07). Conclusion In the diagnostic pathway of upper gastrointestinal cancers, the longest interval is the patient interval. Reducing time to diagnosis may be achieved by improving patients’ awareness of alarm symptoms and by diagnostic strategies which better identify cancer patients despite low suspicion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N F van Erp
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C W Helsper
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P Slottje
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Brandenbarg
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - F L Büchner
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - K M van Asselt
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jwm Muris
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M F Kortekaas
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Phm Peeters
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N J de Wit
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Agreement between questionnaires and registry data on routes to diagnosis and milestone dates of the cancer diagnostic pathway. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 65:101690. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
36
|
Overall time interval ("Total diagnostic delay") and mortality in symptomatic oral cancer: A U-shaped association. Oral Oncol 2020; 104:104626. [PMID: 32146387 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact on survival of the total time interval since the first bodily change (sign/symptom) until the start of treatment in symptomatic oral cancer patients. METHODS Retrospective, hospital-based study designed within the "Aarhus Statement" conceptual framework, using the overall interval to treatment of 183 oral cancer patients to analyse their survival rates. RESULTS Overall time interval (T5): 107.1 ± 85.2 days. Overall survival rate: 58.4 (CI: 51.3-66.4%). Recurrence time (median): 724 days (IQR, 223-2963.5). Median survival time: 1744 days (IQR, 479.5-3438). Overall delay (T5) and mortality showed a U-shaped association, where patients with short (24.0-55.5 days) and long T5 intervals (127.5-420 days) had higher mortality than those with medium T5 intervals (55.5-127.5 days). CONCLUSION There is a non-monotonic association between time interval and mortality. Higher mortality rates are linked to shorter and longer time intervals. This may induce underestimation of the association when time intervals are considered dichotomously.
Collapse
|
37
|
Jiao Q, Ren Y, Ariston Gabrie AN, Wang Q, Wang Y, Du L, Liu X, Wang C, Wang YS. Advances of immune checkpoints in colorectal cancer treatment. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 123:109745. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
38
|
Yu G, Li N, Wang W, Niu M, Feng X. p28GANK overexpression is associated with chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 2020; 19:505-512. [PMID: 31897164 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The non-ATPase regulatory subunit 10 of the human 26S proteasome (p28GANK) has been implicated in the tumorigenesis and progression of several types of malignant tumor. The aim of the present study was to detect the expression of p28GANK in ovarian cancer (OC) and investigate its association with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of OC. The expression levels of p28GANK were determined in 114 OC tissue samples and 30 normal ovarian tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. An association was observed between p28GANK overexpression and certain clinicopathological factors, including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P=0.042), residual tumor size (P=0.005) and response to chemotherapy (P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with high expression of p28GANK demonstrated worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates compared with patients with low expression of p28GANK (both P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that overexpression of p28GANK was an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS in patients with OC (P=0.013 and P=0.001, respectively). In summary, the current results indicate that p28GANK may be a predictive marker and a therapeutic target for OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Yu
- Department of Gynecology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, P.R. China.,Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, P.R. China
| | - Na Li
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, P.R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, P.R. China
| | - Ming Niu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoling Feng
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, Abel GA, Elliss-Brookes L, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:73-79. [PMID: 31704137 PMCID: PMC6941215 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30595-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis interventions such as symptom awareness campaigns increasingly form part of global cancer control strategies. However, these strategies will have little impact in improving cancer outcomes if the targeted symptoms represent advanced stage of disease. Therefore, we aimed to examine associations between common presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we analysed population-level data from the English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit 2014 for patients aged 25 years and older with one of 12 types of solid tumours (bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, laryngeal, lung, melanoma, oral or oropharyngeal, ovarian, prostate, rectal, and renal cancer). We considered 20 common presenting symptoms and examined their associations with stage at diagnosis (TNM stage IV vs stage I-III) using logistic regression. For each symptom, we estimated these associations when reported as a single presenting symptom and when reported together with other symptoms. FINDINGS We analysed data for 7997 patients. The proportion of patients diagnosed with stage IV cancer varied substantially by presenting symptom, from 1% (95% CI 1-3; eight of 584 patients) for abnormal mole to 80% (71-87; 84 of 105 patients) for neck lump. Three of the examined symptoms (neck lump, chest pain, and back pain) were consistently associated with increased odds of stage IV cancer, whether reported alone or with other symptoms, whereas the opposite was true for abnormal mole, breast lump, postmenopausal bleeding, and rectal bleeding. For 13 of the 20 symptoms (abnormal mole, breast lump, post-menopausal bleeding, rectal bleeding, lower urinary tract symptoms, haematuria, change in bowel habit, hoarseness, fatigue, abdominal pain, lower abdominal pain, weight loss, and the "any other symptom" category), more than 50% of patients were diagnosed at stages other than stage IV; for 19 of the 20 studied symptoms (all except for neck lump), more than a third of patients were diagnosed at stages other than stage IV. INTERPRETATION Despite specific presenting symptoms being more strongly associated with advanced stage at diagnosis than others, for most symptoms, large proportions of patients are diagnosed at stages other than stage IV. These findings provide support for early diagnosis interventions targeting common cancer symptoms, countering concerns that they might be simply expediting the detection of advanced stage disease. FUNDING UK Department of Health's Policy Research Unit in Cancer Awareness, Screening and Early Diagnosis; and Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjoung Monica Koo
- University College London, London, UK; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
| | - Ruth Swann
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK; Cancer Research UK, London, UK
| | - Sean McPhail
- University College London, London, UK; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Lucy Elliss-Brookes
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Greg P Rubin
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- University College London, London, UK; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Webber C, Flemming JA, Birtwhistle R, Rosenberg M, Groome PA. Colonoscopy resource availability and its association with the colorectal cancer diagnostic interval: A population-based cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 29:e13187. [PMID: 31707733 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is a key resource used to diagnose colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluated the relationship between colonoscopy availability and the length of the CRC diagnostic interval. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of CRC patients diagnosed in Ontario, Canada, in 2008-2012. We used administrative health data to characterise colonoscopist density, private colonoscopy clinic access, distance to the closest colonoscopist and the diagnostic interval, defined as the time from patients' first cancer-related healthcare encounter to their cancer diagnosis date. We used multivariable quantile regression to evaluate the association between colonoscopy availability and the diagnostic interval, modelling the median and 90th percentile. RESULTS The median diagnostic interval was 84 days (90th percentile 323 days). The diagnostic interval was longer in patients residing in areas with lower colonoscopists density or private clinic access (adjusted median difference = 9 and 19 days, respectively), with evidence of effect modification by symptom status. Increased distance to a colonoscopist was associated with a longer diagnostic interval in asymptomatic patients, but a shorter diagnostic interval in symptomatic patients (adjusted median difference = 29 and -25 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that reduced colonoscopy resource availability is associated with longer diagnostic intervals for CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Webber
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Flemming
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Birtwhistle
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Rosenberg
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Department of Geography, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Patti A Groome
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Weller D. Compassion: An essential component of cancer care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13178. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Weller
- Centre for Population Health Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| |
Collapse
|