Sleep apnoea patients have higher mortality when confronting sepsis

Lower respiratory tract infections among newly diagnosed sleep apnea patients

BACKGROUND

Sleep apnea is associated with chronic comorbidities and acute complications. Existing data suggest that sleep apnea may predispose to an increased risk and severity of respiratory tract infections.

METHODS

We investigated the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections in the first and second year before and after diagnosis of sleep apnea in a Finnish nationwide, population-based, retrospective case-control study based on linking data from the national health care registers for primary and secondary care from 2015-2019. Controls were matched for age, sex, hospital district, and multimorbidity status. We furthermore analysed the independent effect of comorbidities and other patient characteristics on the risk of lower respiratory tract infections, and their recurrence.

RESULTS

Sleep apnea patients had a higher incidence of lower respiratory tract infections than their matched controls within one year before (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.57) and one year after (hazard ratio1.39, 95% confidence interval1.22-1.58) diagnosis of sleep apnea. However, we found no difference in the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections within the second year before or after diagnosis of sleep apnea in comparison with matched controls. In sleep apnea, history of lower respiratory tract infection prior to sleep apnea, multimorbidity, COPD, asthma, and age greater than 65 years increased the risk of incident and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep apnea patients are at increased risk of being diagnosed with a lower respiratory tract infection within but not beyond one year before and after diagnosis of sleep apnea. Among sleep apnea patients, chronic comorbidities had a significant impact on the risk of lower respiratory tract infections and their recurrence.

GOODNIGHT, SLEEP TIGHT, DON'T LET THE MICROBES BITE: A REVIEW OF SLEEP AND ITS EFFECTS ON SEPSIS AND INFLAMMATION

ABSTRACT

Sleep is a restorative biological process that is crucial for health and homeostasis. However, patient sleep is frequently interrupted in the hospital environment, particularly within the intensive care unit. Suboptimal sleep may alter the immune response and make patients more vulnerable to infection and sepsis. In addition, hospitalized patients with sepsis experience altered sleep relative to patients without infectious disease, suggesting a bidirectional interplay. Preclinical studies have generated complementary findings, and together, these studies have expanded our mechanistic understanding. This review article summarizes clinical and preclinical studies describing how sleep affects inflammation and the host's susceptibility to infection. We also highlight potential strategies to reverse the detrimental effects of sleep interruption in the intensive care unit.

Sepsis triggered oxidative stress-inflammatory axis: the pathobiology of reprogramming in the normal sleep-wake cycle

In individuals with sepsis-related neurodegenerative illness, sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance are common. The alteration in genomic expression linked with the immune-directed oxidative stress-inflammatory axis is thought to cause these individuals' abnormal sleep. On the other hand, sleep is linked to normal brain activity through common neurotransmitter systems and regulatory mechanisms. Ailments (ranging from cognitive to metabolic abnormalities) are seldom related to aberrant sleep that is made worse by sleep disturbance, which throws off the body's sleep-wake cycle. PubMed/Springer link /Public library of science/ScienceDirect/ Mendeley/Medline and Google Scholar were used to find possibly relevant studies. For the literature search, many keywords were considered, both individually and in combination. 'Sepsis,' 'Epidemiology of sepsis,' 'Sepsis-related hyper inflammation,' 'Relationship of sepsis-associated clock gene expression and relationship of inflammation with the reprogramming of genetic alterations' were some of the key terms utilized in the literature search. Our main objective is to understand better how traumatic infections during sepsis affect CNS processes, particularly sleep, by investigating the pathobiology of circadian reprogramming associated with immune-directed oxidative stress-inflammatory pathway responsive gene expression and sleep-wake behaviour in this study.

Sleep Apnea and Risk of Influenza-Associated Severe Acute Respiratory Infection: Real-World Evidence

PURPOSE

We executed the presented retrospective cohort study with the purpose of probing the risk of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) following influenza in patients with sleep apnea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We executed this real-world study by gathering Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) data. From a database containing 1 million individuals sampled at random from the NHIRD, we identified all patients aged 20 years or older with a sleep apnea diagnosis between 1997 and 2013 as the study group. We established a comparison cohort of individuals without sleep apnea by randomly matching patients with respect to monthly income, gender, urbanization level, and age at a 1:4 ratio. Follow-up was performed until death or the end of 2015 for both groups. We determined the study outcome to be the occurrence of influenza-associated SARI.

RESULTS

We enrolled 6508 and 26,032 patients into the study and comparison groups, respectively. A significantly higher cumulative incidence of influenza-associated SARI was discovered in the study group (p < 0.001). In our multivariate analysis, sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and coronary artery disease were independent risk factors for influenza-associated SARI. The hazard ratio of sleep apnea for influenza-associated SARI was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.26-3.10) after adjustment for all comorbidities, gender, age, monthly income, and urbanization level.

CONCLUSION

Sleep apnea increased the risk of influenza-associated SARI. We suggest that physicians be cautious about the development of severe influenza illness in patients with sleep apnea. Vaccination and early oseltamivir administration should be actively considered in this group of patients.

Very-Short-Term Sleep Deprivation Slows Early Recovery of Lymphocytes in Septic Patients

Sleep plays an important role in immune function. However, the effects of very-short-term sleep deprivation on the early recovery of immune function after sepsis remain unclear. This study was conducted in the intensive care unit to investigate the effects of 2 consecutive days of sleep deprivation (SD) on lymphocyte recovery over the following few days in septic patients who were recovering from a critical illness. The patients' self-reports of sleep quality was assessed using the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire at 0 and 24 h after inclusion. The demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were collected and compared between the good sleep group and poor sleep group. We found that 2 consecutive days of SD decreased the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and ALC recovery at 3 days after SD. Furthermore, post-septic poor sleep decreased the plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) immediately after 2 consecutive days of SD. The ANP levels at 24 h after inclusion were positively correlated with ALC recovery, the number of CD3⁺ T cells, or the number of CD3⁺ CD4⁺ cells in the peripheral blood on day 5 after inclusion. Our data suggested that very-short-term poor sleep quality could slow down lymphocyte recovery over the following few days in septic patients who were recovering from a critical illness. Our results underscore the significance of very-short-term SD on serious negative effects on the immune function. Therefore, it is suggested that continuous SD or several short-term SD with short intervals should be avoided in septic patients.

Poor-sleep is associated with slow recovery from lymphopenia and an increased need for ICU care in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

Sleep is known to play an important role in immune function. However, the effects of sleep quality during hospitalization for COVID-19 remain unclear. This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted to investigate the effects of sleep quality on recovery from lymphopenia and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the West District of Wuhan Union Hospital between January 25 and March 15, 2020. The Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire (RCSQ) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were used to assess sleep quality. The epidemiological, demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were collected from electronic medical records and compared between the good-sleep group and poor-sleep group. In all, 135 patients (60 in good-sleep group and 75 in poor-sleep group) were included in this study. There were no significant between-group differences regarding demographic and baseline characteristics, as well as laboratory parameters upon admission and in-hospital treatment. Compared with patients in the good-sleep group, patients in the poor-sleep group had lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (day 14: median, 1.10 vs 1.32, P = 0.0055; day 21: median, 1.18 vs 1.48, P = 0.0034) and its reduced recovery rate (day 14: median, 56.91 vs 69.40, P = 0.0255; day 21: median, 61.40 vs 111.47, P = 0.0003), as well as increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; day 14: median, 3.17 vs 2.44, P = 0.0284; day 21: median, 2.73 vs 2.23, P = 0.0092) and its associated deterioration rate (day 14: median, -39.65 vs -61.09, P = 0.0155; day 21: median, -51.40% vs -75.43, P = 0.0003). Nine [12.0%] patients in the poor-sleep group required ICU care (P = 0.0151); meanwhile, none of the patients in good-sleep group required ICU care. Patients in the poor-sleep group had increased duration of hospital stay (33.0 [23.0-47.0] days vs 25.0 [20.5-36.5] days, P = 0.0116) compared to those in the good-sleep group. An increased incidence of hospital-acquired infection (seven [9.3%] vs one [1.7%]) was observed in the poor-sleep group compared to the good-sleep group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.1316). In conclusion, poor sleep quality during hospitalization in COVID-19 patients with lymphopenia is associated with a slow recovery from lymphopenia and an increased need for ICU care.

Hospital outcomes in non-surgical patients identified at risk for OSA

BACKGROUND

In-hospital respiratory outcomes of non-surgical patients with undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), particularly those with significant comorbidities are not well defined. Undiagnosed and untreated OSA may be associated with increased cardiopulmonary morbidity.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Evaluate respiratory failure outcomes in patients identified as at-risk for OSA by the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted using electronic health records at a large health system. The BQ was administered at admission to screen for OSA to medical-service patients under the age of 80 years old meeting the following health system criteria: (1) BMI greater than 30; (2) any of the following comorbid diagnoses: hypertension, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, arrhythmia, cerebrovascular event/stroke, or diabetes. Patients with known OSA or undergoing surgery were excluded. Patients were classified as high-risk or low-risk for OSA based on the BQ score as follows: low-risk (0 or 1 category with a positive score on the BQ); high-risk (2 or more categories with a positive score on BQ). The primary outcome was respiratory failure during index hospital stay defined by any of the following: orders for conventional ventilation or intubation; at least two instances of oxygen saturation less than 88% by pulse oximetry; at least two instances of respiratory rate over 30 breaths per minute; and any orders placed for non-invasive mechanical ventilation without a previous diagnosis of sleep apnea. Propensity scores were used to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Records of 15,253 patients were assessed. There were no significant differences in the composite outcome of respiratory failure by risk of OSA (high risk: 11%, low risk: 10%, p = 0.55). When respiratory failure was defined as need for ventilation, more patients in the low-risk group experienced invasive mechanical ventilation (high-risk: 1.8% vs. low-risk: 2.3%, p = 0.041). Mortality was decreased in patients at high-risk for OSA (0.86%) vs. low risk for OSA (1.53%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective studies are needed to understand the contribution of undiagnosed OSA to in-hospital respiratory outcomes.

Impact of Intermittent Hypoxia on Sepsis Outcomes in a Murine Model

Sleep apnea has been associated with a variety of diseases, but its impact on sepsis outcome remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of intermittent hypoxia [IH]–the principal feature of sleep apnea–on murine sepsis. 5-week-old male C57BL6 mice were assigned to groups receiving severe IH (O2 fluctuating from room air to an O2 nadir of 5.7% with a cycle length of 90 seconds), mild IH (room air to 12%, 4 minutes/cycle), or room air for 3 weeks. Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture and survival was monitored. Sepsis severity was evaluated by murine sepsis scores, blood bacterial load, plasma tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α]/interleukin-6 [IL-6] levels and histopathology of vital organs. Compared with normoxic controls, mice subjected to severe IH had earlier mortality, a lower leukocyte count, higher blood bacterial load, higher plasma TNF-α and IL-6 levels, more severe inflammatory changes in the lung, spleen and small intestine. Mice subjected to mild IH did not differ from normoxic controls, except a higher IL-6 level after sepsis induced. The adverse impact of severe IH was reversed following a 10-day normoxic recovery. In conclusion, severe IH, not mild IH, contributed to poorer outcomes in a murine sepsis model.

Incidence and risk of atrial fibrillation in sleep-disordered breathing without coexistent systemic disease

BACKGROUND

Although the link between sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, a population-based longitudinal cohort study was lacking. The goal of the present study was to investigate the AF risk carried by SDB, using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2000 to 2001, a total of 579,521 patients who had no history of cardiac arrhythmias or significant comorbidities were identified. Among them, 4,082 subjects with the diagnosis of SDB were selected as the study group, and the remaining 575,439 subjects constituted the control group. The study endpoint was the occurrence of new-onset AF. During a follow-up of 9.2±2.0 years, there were 4,023 patients (0.7%) experiencing new-onset AF. The occurrence rate of AF was higher in patients with SDB compared to those without it (1.3% vs. 0.7%, P<0.001). The AF incidences were 1.38 and 0.76 per 1,000 person-years for patients with and without SDB, respectively. After anadjustment for age and sex, SDB was a significant risk factor of AF with a hazard ratio of 1.536. The AF risk increased with increasing clinical severity of SDB, represented by the requirement of continuous positive airway pressure use.

CONCLUSIONS

SDB itself, without the coexistence of other systemic diseases, was a risk factor of AF.