Misdiagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

New chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/Guillain-Barré syndrome guidelines - impact on clinical practise

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is no diagnostic biomarker that can reliably detect Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Diagnosis relies upon integrating key clinical characteristics and relevant supportive data. Consequently, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common. Diagnostic criteria have proven valuable resources to improve diagnosis, but are underutilized during routine clinical care.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2021, the EAN/PNS CIDP criteria was published, and were followed by the EAN/PNS GBS criteria in 2023. Both guidelines utilized GRADE methodology to formulate evidence-based recommendations that are intended to be used by adult and paediatric clinicians across diverse care settings to optimize diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes during routine clinical care.

SUMMARY

The EAN/PNS GBS and CIDP criteria detail specific clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory features that raise diagnostic confidence, and call attention to diagnostic mimics. The sensitivity of EAN/PNS and other modern criteria to detect GBS and CIDP is high, but utilization during clinical practice is low. Complexity is one factor limiting widespread application. Strategies are needed to optimize criteria adoption during routine clinical care such that GBS and CIDP diagnosis can be achieved with greater speed and accuracy.

Evaluation of diagnostic yield of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria for CIDP

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

It is unclear whether the revised European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria (EAN/PNS 2021 criteria) improved the diagnostic yield for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) compared with the previous version. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria and the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society 2010 diagnostic criteria (EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria), with a specific focus on the electrodiagnostic criteria.

METHODS

Data of patients with clinically suspected CIDP who exhibited objective treatment response, and of those with chronic axonal neuropathies, obtained between 2009 and 2021, were extracted retrospectively from our database. Patients who underwent nerve conduction studies in at least unilateral upper and lower extremities were enrolled. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the EAN/PNS 2021 and EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients with clinically suspected CIDP and 36 patients with chronic axonal neuropathies were enrolled. When considering the "possible CIDP" category, the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria showed lower sensitivity than the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria (78% vs. 93%, p < .05), whereas its specificity was higher (78% vs. 61%, p < .05). The lower sensitivity was caused mainly by the failure to fulfill the sensory nerve conduction criteria. The revised definition of abnormal temporal dispersion of the tibial nerve contributed markedly to the improved specificity.

DISCUSSION

To improve the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria, increasing the number of tested sensory nerves may be necessary.

Quantitative magnetic resonance neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A longitudinal study over 6 years

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) for the longitudinal assessment of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Prospective examination of twelve CIDP patients by neurological assessment, MRN, and nerve conduction studies in 2016 and 6 years later in 2022. Imaging parameters were compared with matched healthy controls and correlated with clinical and electrophysiological markers. The MRN protocol included T2-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), T2 relaxometry, and magnetization transfer imaging (MTI).

RESULTS

Nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) was increased in CIDP patients compared to controls (plexus: p = 0.003; sciatic nerve: p < 0.001). Over 6 years, nerve CSA decreased in CIDP patients, most pronounced at the lumbosacral plexus (p = 0.015). Longitudinally, changes in CSA correlated with changes in the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment validated overall disability sum score (INCAT/ODSS) (p = 0.006). High initial nerve CSA was inversely correlated with changes in the INCAT/ODSS over 6 years (p < 0.05). The DTI parameter fractional anisotropy (FA) showed robust correlations with electrodiagnostic testing both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (p < 0.05). MTI as a newly added imaging technique revealed a significantly reduced magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) in CIDP patients (p < 0.01), suggesting underlying changes in macromolecular tissue composition, and correlated significantly with electrophysiological parameters of demyelination (p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

This study provides evidence that changes in nerve CSA and FA reflect the clinical and electrophysiological course of CIDP patients. Initial nerve hypertrophy might predict a rather benign course or better therapy response.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: Current Therapeutic Approaches and Future Outlooks

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a treatable autoimmune disorder, for which different treatment options are available. Current first-line evidence-based therapies for CIDP include intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids and plasma exchanges. Despite lack of evidence, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used in circumstances of refractoriness and, more debatably, of perceived overdependence on first-line therapies. Rituximab is currently the object of a randomized controlled trial for CIDP. Based on case series, and although rarely considered, haematopoietic autologous stem cell transplants may be effective in refractory disease, with low mortality and high remission rates. A new therapeutic option has appeared with efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, recently shown to significantly lower relapse rate versus placebo, after withdrawal from previous immunotherapy. Other neonatal Fc receptor blockers, nipocalimab and batoclimab, are under study. The C1 complement-inhibitor SAR445088, acting in the proximal portion of the classical complement system, is currently the subject of a new study in treatment-responsive, refractory and treatment-naïve subjects. Finally, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, which exert anti-B cell effects, may represent another future research avenue. The widening of the therapeutic armamentarium enhances the need for improved evaluation of treatment effects and reliable biomarkers in CIDP.

Transforming medicine: artificial intelligence integration in the peripheral nervous system

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone remarkable advancements, exerting a significant influence across a multitude of fields. One area that has particularly garnered attention and witnessed substantial progress is its integration into the realm of the nervous system. This article provides a comprehensive examination of AI's applications within the peripheral nervous system, with a specific focus on AI-enhanced diagnostics for peripheral nervous system disorders, AI-driven pain management, advancements in neuroprosthetics, and the development of neural network models. By illuminating these facets, we unveil the burgeoning opportunities for revolutionary medical interventions and the enhancement of human capabilities, thus paving the way for a future in which AI becomes an integral component of our nervous system's interface.

Clinical relevance of distinguishing autoimmune nodopathies from CIDP: longitudinal assessment in a large cohort

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine treatment response and whether it is associated with antibody titre change in patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) previously diagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and to compare clinical features and treatment response between AN and CIDP.

METHODS

Serum IgG antibodies to neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) were detected with cell-based assays in patients diagnosed with CIDP. Clinical improvement was determined using the modified Rankin scale, need for alternative and/or additional treatments and assessment of the treating neurologist.

RESULTS

We studied 401 patients diagnosed with CIDP and identified 21 patients with AN (10 anti-NF155, 6 anti-CNTN1, 4 anti-CASPR1 and 1 anti-NF155/anti-CASPR1 double positive). In patients with AN ataxia (68% vs 28%, p=0.001), cranial nerve involvement (34% vs 11%, p=0.012) and autonomic symptoms (47% vs 22%, p=0.025) were more frequently reported; patients with AN improved less often after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (39% vs 80%, p=0.002) and required additional/alternative treatments more frequently (84% vs 34%, p<0.001), compared with patients with CIDP. Antibody titres decreased or became negative in patients improving on treatment. Treatment withdrawal was associated with a titre increase and clinical deterioration in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing CIDP from AN is important, as patients with AN need a different treatment approach. Improvement and relapses were associated with changes in antibody titres, supporting the pathogenicity of these antibodies.

Molecular, Electrophysiological, and Ultrasonographic Differences in Selected Immune-Mediated Neuropathies with Therapeutic Implications

The spectrum of immune-mediated neuropathies is broad and the different subtypes are still being researched. With the numerous subtypes of immune-mediated neuropathies, establishing the appropriate diagnosis in normal clinical practice is challenging. The treatment of these disorders is also troublesome. The authors have undertaken a literature review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The molecular, electrophysiological and ultrasound features of these autoimmune polyneuropathies are analyzed, highlighting the differences in diagnosis and ultimately treatment. The immune dysfunction can lead to damage to the peripheral nervous system. In practice, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by autoimmunity to proteins located in the node of Ranvier or myelin components of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. The electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor characterizing separate subgroups of treatment-naive motor neuropathies, including multifocal CIDP (synonyms: multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block), which differs from multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) in both responses to treatment modalities and electrophysiological features. Ultrasound is a reliable method for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, particularly when alternative diagnostic examinations yield inconclusive results. In overall terms, the management of these disorders includes immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the development of more disease-specific immunotherapies should expand the therapeutic possibilities for these debilitating diseases.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

Compound muscle action potential duration ratio for differentiation between Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and CIDP

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the utility of the proximal to distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) duration ratio to distinguish between demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) compared with nerve ultrasound.

METHODS

Thirty-nine demyelinating CMT patients and 19 CIDP patients underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) and nerve ultrasound. NCS parameters including CMAP duration ratio calculated by dividing the value at the proximal site by that at the distal site and nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) measured by ultrasound were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each parameter were analysed.

RESULTS

CMT patients showed a significantly lower CMAP duration ratio than CIDP patients (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) value of the CMAP duration ratio exceeded 0.95 when CMT was considered "positive", and a cut-off value of 1.13 resulted in high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (84.6 and 100 % for median nerve, 97.4 and 85.7 % for ulnar nerve, respectively), whereas the AUC value of nerve CSA ranged from 0.70 to 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

The CMAP duration ratio could effectively distinguish between demyelinating CMT and CIDP.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adding the CMAP duration ratio to a routine NCS may improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of demyelinating CMT.

Tips in navigating the diagnostic complexities of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) includes important revisions to the previous 2010 guideline. This article highlights the new criteria and recommendations for the differential diagnosis of CIDP. In the revised guideline, the CIDP spectrum has been modified to include typical CIDP and four well-characterized CIDP variants, namely distal, multifocal/focal, motor and sensory CIDP, replacing the term 'atypical' CIDP. To improve the diagnosis of CIDP, the revised guideline attempts to improve the specificity of the diagnostic criteria for typical CIDP and the four CIDP variants. Specific clinical and electrodiagnostic (including both motor and sensory conduction) criteria are provided for typical CIDP and each of the CIDP variants. The levels of diagnostic certainty have been changed to CIDP and possible CIDP, with the removal of probable CIDP (due to the lack of difference in the accuracy of the electrodiagnostic criteria for probable CIDP) and definite CIDP (due to the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis). If the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria allow only for a diagnosis of possible CIDP, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound, nerve magnetic resonance imaging, objective treatment response, and nerve biopsy can be used as supportive criteria to upgrade the diagnosis to CIDP. Although the revised guideline needs to be validated and its strengths and weaknesses assessed, using the guideline will likely improve the accuracy of diagnosis of CIDP and variants of CIDP, and aid in distinguishing CIDP from conditions with similar features.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the 2021 EAN/PNS and 2010 EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) with those of the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS).

METHODS

Sensitivity and specificity of the two sets of criteria were evaluated in 330 patients with CIDP and 166 axonal peripheral neuropathy controls. Comparison of the utility of nerve conduction studies with different number of nerves examined and of the sensitivity and specificity of the two criteria in typical CIDP and its variants were assessed.

RESULTS

EFNS/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 92% for possible CIDP and 85% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 83% for possible CIDP and 74% for CIDP. Using supportive criteria, the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS criteria for possible CIDP increased to 85% and that of CIDP to 77%, remaining lower than that of the EFNS/PNS criteria. Specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria was 68% for possible CIDP and 84% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a specificity of 88% for possible CIDP and 98% for CIDP. More extended studies increased the sensitivity of both sets of criteria by 4%-7% but reduced their specificity by 2%-3%. The EFNS/PNS criteria were more sensitive for the diagnosis of typical CIDP while the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific for the diagnosis of distal and sensory CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific but less sensitive than the EFNS/PNS criteria. With the EAN/PNS criteria, more extended nerve conduction studies are recommended to obtain an acceptable sensitivity while maintaining a high specificity.

Application of the 2021 EAN/PNS criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of new criteria of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of fulfilment of EAN/PNS 2021 criteria on 120 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of 'suspected CIDP' and objective treatment response, attending University Hospitals Birmingham, UK. Specificity was evaluated versus 100 consecutive controls.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of EAN/PNS criteria for 'CIDP' was 83.3%. The sensitivity for 'CIDP' or 'possible CIDP' was 93.3%. Specificity was of 94% for 'CIDP' and 79% for 'CIDP' or 'possible CIDP'. No sensitivity/specificity differences were ascertained with previous versions ('CIDP': sensitivity: 83.3% vs 81.3%, p=0.74, specificity: 94% vs 96.1%, p=0.38, respectively; 'CIDP' or 'possible CIDP': sensitivity: 93.3% vs 96.7%, p=0.25 and specificity: 79% vs 69.2 %, p=0.09, respectively). F-wave prolongation, proximal and distal temporal dispersion were the most likely parameters to contribute to false positives, whereas distal motor latency was the least likely. No impact of sensory electrophysiology could be ascertained. 'Typical CIDP' represented 79% of the CIDP cohort. The largest component of the 'variant CIDP' group was represented by focal/multifocal forms (14%). With new criteria, 6.7% of the cohort did not meet requirements, among whom the majority (75%) had paranodopathy or chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP).

DISCUSSION

The sensitivity and specificity of new EAN/PNS criteria for CIDP is equivalent to that of previous versions. The exclusion of paranodopathies and CISP from the CIDP spectrum impacts on management of a non-negligible proportion of treatment-responsive patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): mechanisms of action and clinical and genetic considerations

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune peripheral nerve disorder that is characterized by subacute onset, progressive or relapsing weakness, and sensory deficits. Proven treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids, and plasma exchange. This review focuses on the mechanisms of action, pharmacodynamics, genetic variations, and disease characteristics that can affect the efficacy of IVIg.

AREAS COVERED

The proposed mechanisms of action of IVIg that can mediate its therapeutic effects are reviewed. These include anti-idiotypic interactions, inhibition of neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn), anti-complement activity, upregulation of inhibitory FcγRIIB receptors, and downregulation of macrophage activation or co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules. Clinical and genetic factors that can affect the therapeutic response include misdiagnosis, degree of axonal damage, pharmacokinetic variability, and genetic variations.

EXPERT OPINION

The mechanisms of action of IVIg in CIDP and their relative contribution to its efficacy are subject of ongoing investigation. Studies in other autoimmune neurological conditions, in addition, highlight the role of key immunopathological pathways and factors that are likely to be affected. Further investigation into the pathogenesis of CIDP and the mechanisms of action of IVIg may lead to the development of improved diagnostics, better utilization of IVIg, and more targeted and effective therapies.

Prevalence of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy in two regions of Australia

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Immune-mediated neuropathies such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) produce significant disability and often require maintenance treatment. There is a paucity of epidemiological data on these conditions in Australia.

METHODS

We undertook a prevalence study of CIDP and MMN in North Queensland and Tasmania, coinciding with a national census. Diagnoses were classified against the diagnostic criteria of the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society. Case ascertainment was undertaken via multiple methods, including survey of local neurologists across public and private clinics, search of neurophysiology, neurology and hospital databases, search of admitted hospital database collections using ICD codes and through immunoglobulin therapy prescription lists.

RESULTS

The crude prevalence of CIDP was 5.00 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.79-6.62) and the crude prevalence of MMN was 1.33 per 100,000 (95% CI 0.78-2.27). Prevalence was also investigated using National Blood Authority numbers of cases prescribed immunoglobulin therapy, indicating a CIDP prevalence of 5.72 per 100,000 (95% CI 4.41-7.43) and MMN prevalence of 1.94 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.24-3.03). There was no significant difference between these numbers and those calculated through access of patient records locally. There was no significant difference in prevalence between Tasmania and North Queensland for any category.

DISCUSSION

This study updates the prevalence of CIDP and MMN in Australia. Understanding the distribution of CIDP and MMN patients and their need for treatment is essential for future resource planning and to enable monitoring and coordination of therapies such as immunoglobulin.

Contemporary challenges in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research, multiple inter-related diagnostic and management challenges remain for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed on diagnosis and treatment in CIDP. The clinical features and disease course were evaluated. Investigative techniques, including electrophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuropathology, imaging and neuroimmunology, were considered in relation to technical aspects, sensitivity, specificity, availability and cost. Available evidenced-based treatments and those with possible efficacy despite lack of evidence, were considered, as well as current methods for evaluation of treatment effects.

EXPERT OPINION

CIDP remains a clinical diagnosis, supported first and foremost by electrophysiology. Other investigative techniques have limited impact. Most patients with CIDP respond to available first-line treatments and immunosuppression may be efficacious in those who do not. Consideration of the natural history and of the high reported remission rate, of under-recognised associated disabling features, of treatment administration modalities and assessment methods, require enhanced attention.

Nerve Ultrasound Distinguishes Non-Inflammatory Axonal Polyneuropathy From Inflammatory Polyneuropathy With Secondary Axonal Damage

Introduction

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) may have a similar clinical and electrophysiological presentation to non-inflammatory axonal polyneuropathies (NIAPs) when secondary axonal damage occurs. We aimed to investigate if nerve ultrasound can help to differentiate CIDP with additional secondary axonal damage from NIAP.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves measured by ultrasound at six suitable nerve sites was compared in 95 patients with CIDP and 82 patients with NIAP. We developed the adjusted Bochum ultrasound score (aBUS) ranging from 0 to 6 resulting from the number of sites with enlarged CSA (median, ulnar, radial, and sural nerve).

Results

The mean CSA of patients with CIDP was enlarged at all six nerve sites compared with the mean CSA of patients with NIAP. A total of 21 patients with CIDP did not meet 2010 electrophysiological diagnostic criteria (European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline, EFNS/PNS criteria) for CIDP at examination timepoint but only in further follow-up, while 25 patients with NIAP fulfilled electrophysiological EFNS/PNS criteria for CIDP as “possible” or “probable” CIDP. To increase diagnostic power, we included aBUS measured by ultrasound in patients classified as “possible” or “probable” resulting in an improved specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 59%, compared to a specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria alone of 60% and sensitivity of 78%.

Conclusion

Using nerve ultrasound and the aBUS as a complementary method to distinguish CIDP from NIAP in case of secondary axonal damage can facilitate the diagnosis of CIDP.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: Five New Things

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), while rare and heterogeneous, is one of the most common immune mediated neuropathies. CIDP, however, especially CIDP variants, can be difficult to diagnose. (1) There is no gold standard testing for CIDP, and, while a few specific disease-associated antibodies have been described, these are absent in the majority of patients. Furthermore, many experts consider the presence of these antibodies to be indicative of a separate disease. (2) Ultimately, CIDP remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Mimics are ruled out either by history or additional ancillary testing. Following experts’ guidelines on the diagnosis of CIDP increases significantly the accuracy of diagnosis. On a different note, while most patients with CIDP respond well to treatment, some may not tolerate therapy, and other may be refractory to first line treatments. In this review, we discuss 5 new things related to CIDP: 1) the updated European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) CIDP guidelines, 2) the expansion of the Chronic Immune Sensory Polyradiculopathy (CISP) spectrum, 3) updates in therapy for CIDP, 4) antibodies testing, serum neurofilament light chain and their role, and 5) disorders that can mimic CIDP.

Atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: recent advances on classification, diagnosis, and pathogenesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been an intense debate in literature regarding the definition of the individual variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), their possible pathogenetic mechanisms, and impact in the diagnosis of CIDP.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2021 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) guidelines revised the definition of the individual CIDP variants and implemented their diagnostic criteria. Diagnosis of atypical CIDP is challenging and misdiagnosis is frequent, leading to diagnostic delay and consequent greater accumulation of disability and treatment dependency. Recent studies suggest that patients with typical CIDP have an antibody-mediated mechanism of neuropathy whereas in those with Lewis--Sumner syndrome (LSS) neuropathy is preferentially mediated by macrophages and T cells.

SUMMARY

Although the validity of the 2021 EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria for atypical CIDP is unknown, they will hopefully lead to greater uniformity in the selection of patients to be enrolled in future studies and to a greater diagnostic accuracy. New data are emerging on the possible pathological mechanisms of individual variants and this could result in the discovery of specific diagnostic biomarkers and new therapies.