Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications

Beta-band power modulation in the human amygdala differentiates between go/no-go responses in an arm-reaching task

Objective. Traditionally known for its involvement in emotional processing, the amygdala's involvement in motor control remains relatively unexplored, with sparse investigations into the neural mechanisms governing amygdaloid motor movement and inhibition. This study aimed to characterize the amygdaloid beta-band (13-30 Hz) power between 'Go' and 'No-go' trials of an arm-reaching task.Approach. Ten participants with drug-resistant epilepsy implanted with stereoelectroencephalographic (SEEG) electrodes in the amygdala were enrolled in this study. SEEG data was recorded throughout discrete phases of a direct reach Go/No-go task, during which participants reached a touchscreen monitor or withheld movement based on a colored cue. Multitaper power analysis along with Wilcoxon signed-rank and Yates-correctedZtests were used to assess significant modulations of beta power between the Response and fixation (baseline) phases in the 'Go' and 'No-go' conditions.Main results. In the 'Go' condition, nine out of the ten participants showed a significant decrease in relative beta-band power during the Response phase (p⩽ 0.0499). In the 'No-go' condition, eight out of the ten participants presented a statistically significant increase in relative beta-band power during the response phase (p⩽ 0.0494). Four out of the eight participants with electrodes in the contralateral hemisphere and seven out of the eight participants with electrodes in the ipsilateral hemisphere presented significant modulation in beta-band power in both the 'Go' and 'No-go' conditions. At the group level, no significant differences were found between the contralateral and ipsilateral sides or between genders.Significance.This study reports beta-band power modulation in the human amygdala during voluntary movement in the setting of motor execution and inhibition. This finding supplements prior research in various brain regions associating beta-band power with motor control. The distinct beta-power modulation observed between these response conditions suggests involvement of amygdaloid oscillations in differentiating between motor inhibition and execution.

The Value of SINO Robot and Angio Render Technology for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

 Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes are implanted using a variety of stereotactic technologies to treat refractory epilepsy. The value of the SINO robot for SEEG electrode implantation is not yet defined. The aim of the current study was to assess the value of the SINO robot in conjunction with Angio Render technology for SEEG electrode implantation and to assess its efficacy.

METHODS

 Between June 2018 and October 2020, 58 patients underwent SEEG electrode implantation to resect or ablate their epileptogenic zone (EZ). The SINO robot and the Angio Render technology was used to guide the electrodes and visualize the individual vasculature in a three-dimensional (3D) fashion. The 3D view functionality was used to increase the safety and accuracy of the electrode implantation, and for reducing the risk of hemorrhage by avoiding blood vessels.

RESULTS

 In this study, 634 SEEG electrodes were implanted in 58 patients, with a mean of 10.92 (range: 5-18) leads per patient. The mean entry point localization error (EPLE) was 0.94 ± 0.23 mm (range: 0.39-1.63 mm), and the mean target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.49 ± 0.37 mm (range: 0.80-2.78 mm). The mean operating time per lead (MOTPL) was 6. 18 ± 1.80 minutes (range: 3.02-14.61 minutes). The mean depth of electrodes was 56.96 ± 3.62 mm (range: 27.23-124.85 mm). At a follow-up of at least 1 year, in total, 81.57% (47/58) patients achieved an Engel class I seizure freedom. There were two patients with asymptomatic intracerebral hematomas following SEEG electrode placement, with no late complications or mortality in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

 The SINO robot in conjunction with Angio Render technology-in SEEG electrode implantation is safe and accurate in mitigating the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy.

Depth versus surface: A critical review of subdural and depth electrodes in intracranial electroencephalographic studies

Intracranial electroencephalographic (IEEG) recording, using subdural electrodes (SDEs) and stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), plays a pivotal role in localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ). SDEs, employed for superficial cortical seizure foci localization, provide information on two-dimensional seizure onset and propagation. In contrast, SEEG, with its three-dimensional sampling, allows exploration of deep brain structures, sulcal folds, and bihemispheric networks. SEEG offers the advantages of fewer complications, better tolerability, and coverage of sulci. Although both modalities allow electrical stimulation, SDE mapping can tessellate cortical gyri, providing the opportunity for a tailored resection. With SEEG, both superficial gyri and deep sulci can be stimulated, and there is a lower risk of afterdischarges and stimulation-induced seizures. Most systematic reviews and meta-analyses have addressed the comparative effectiveness of SDEs and SEEG in localizing the EZ and achieving seizure freedom, although discrepancies persist in the literature. The combination of SDEs and SEEG could potentially overcome the limitations inherent to each technique individually, better delineating seizure foci. This review describes the strengths and limitations of SDE and SEEG recordings, highlighting their unique indications in seizure localization, as evidenced by recent publications. Addressing controversies in the perceived usefulness of the two techniques offers insights that can aid in selecting the most suitable IEEG in clinical practice.

The United States Stereotactic EEG Survey: Current Practice and Future Opportunities

PURPOSE

Stereotactic EEG (SEEG) is being increasingly used in the intracranial evaluation of refractory epilepsy in the United States. A 2022 survey of SEEG practices among National Association of Epilepsy Centers tertiary referral (NAEC level IV) centers found largely similar practices across institutions. However, a few significant differences were noted in technical and patient care practice, and in the level of SEEG background training. In the year since publication, we review the identified challenges facing SEEG practice and suggest specific corrective action.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic EEG has rapidly become the principal method for intracranial EEG monitoring in epilepsy surgery centers in the United States. The rate of adoption of SEEG is currently higher than the growth of invasive monitoring overall. Most report similar indications for SEEG, although significant variability exists in personnel expertise and technical and patient care practice. Consensus statements, guidelines, and review of postgraduate training curricula are urgently needed to benchmark SEEG practice and develop appropriate skillsets in the next generation of practitioners in the United States.

Evaluation of Utility of Invasive Electroencephalography for Definitive Surgery in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

When noninvasive tests are unable to define the epileptogenic zone in patients, intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) is a method of localizing the epileptogenic zone. Compared with noninvasive evaluations, it offers more precise information about patterns of epileptiform activity, which results in useful diagnostic information that supports surgical decision-making. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the utility of iEEG for definitive surgery for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Online databases such as PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched for MeSH terms and free-text keywords. The ROBINS I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions) critical appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The prevalence from different studies was pooled together using the inverse variance heterogeneity method. Egger's regression analysis and funnel plot were used to evaluate publication bias. The systematic review included 18 studies, and the meta-analysis included 10 studies to estimate the prevalence of seizure freedom (Engel class I) in patients undergoing surgery after iEEG. A total of 526 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 10 years. The overall pooled estimate of the prevalence of seizure freedom (Engel class I) for patients undergoing surgery after iEEG was 53% (95% confidence interval, 44%-62%). The results additionally demonstrated that 12 studies had a moderate risk of bias and 6 had a low risk. Future studies are crucial to enhance our understanding of iEEG to guide patient choices and unravel their implications.

In Search of a Common Language: The Standardized Electrode Nomenclature for Stereoelectroencephalography Applications

PURPOSE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is widely performed on individuals with medically refractory epilepsy for whom invasive seizure localization is desired. Despite increasing adoption in many centers across the world, no standardized electrode naming convention exists, generating confusion among both clinical and research teams.

METHODS

We have developed a novel nomenclature, named the Standardized Electrode Nomenclature for SEEG Applications system. Concise, unique, informative, and unambiguous labels provide information about entry point, deep targets, and relationships between electrodes. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated by comparing original electrode names from 10 randomly sampled cases (including 136 electrodes) with those prospectively assigned by four additional blinded raters.

RESULTS

The Standardized Electrode Nomenclature for SEEG Application system was prospectively implemented in 40 consecutive patients undergoing SEEG monitoring at our institution, creating unique electrode names in all cases, and facilitating implantation design, SEEG recording and mapping interpretation, and treatment planning among neurosurgeons, neurologists, and neurophysiologists. The inter-rater percent agreement for electrode names among two neurosurgeons, two epilepsy neurologists, and one neurosurgical fellow was 97.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This standardized naming convention, Standardized Electrode Nomenclature for SEEG Application, provides a simple, concise, reproducible, and informative method for specifying the target(s) and relative position of each SEEG electrode in each patient, allowing for successful sharing of information in both the clinical and research settings. General adoption of this nomenclature could pave the way for improved communication and collaboration between institutions.

The Voyage of SEEG

SUMMARY

It took 50 years for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to cross the Atlantic. Conceived and designed before the advent of computers and modern technology, this method turned out to be perfectly suited to brain imaging and modern video and electrophysiological tools. It eventually benefited from robotics and signal processing. However, a critical step remains accurate electrode implantation, which is based on individual patients' noninvasive phase I data. A limiting factor, especially in MRI-negative cases, is a thorough perictal and postictal clinical testing for ensuring meaningful electroclinical correlations. Adapted epilepsy monitoring units' architecture and specific technicians and nurses training are required to improve the granularity of information needed to generate valid hypotheses on localization. SEEG interpretation is based on a knowledge base in neural networks, cognitive/behavioral neuroscience, and electrophysiology quite distinct from electroencephalography. Tailored to the needs of focal epilepsy complexity exploration, SEEG does not fit well with simplification. Specific teaching and development of clinical research inside the epilepsy monitoring units will help to flatten the team learning curve and to build knowledge base from shared clinical experience.

Accuracy of Boltless Frame-Based Stereo-Electroencephalography Electrode Implantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Boltless implantation of stereo-electroencephalography electrode is a useful alternative especially when anchor bolt is not available such as in country with limited resources or is less appropriate such as placement in patients with thin skull or at the occiput area, despite some drawbacks including potential dislodgement. While the accuracy of implantation using anchor bolt is well-studied, data on boltless implantation remain scarce. This study aimed to reveal the accuracy, permissible error for actual placement of electrodes within the grey matter, and delayed electrode dislodgement in boltless implantation.

METHODS

A total of 120 electrodes were implanted in 15 patients using a Leksell Stereotactic G Frame with each electrode fixed on the scalp using sutures. Target point error was defined as the Euclidean distance between the planned target and the electrode tip on immediate postimplantation computed tomography. Similarly, delayed dislodgement was defined as the Euclidean distance between the electrode tips on immediate postimplantation computed tomography and delayed MRI. The factors affecting accuracy were evaluated using multiple linear regression. The permissible error was defined as the largest target point error that allows the maximum number of planned gray matter electrode contacts to be actually placed within the gray matter as intended.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) target point error was 2.6 (1.7-3.5) mm, and the permissible error was 3.2 mm. The delayed dislodgement, with a median (IQR) of 2.2 (1.4-3.3) mm, was dependent on temporal muscle penetration (P = 5.0 × 10-4), scalp thickness (P < 5.1 × 10-3), and insertion angle (P = 3.4 × 10-3).

CONCLUSION

Boltless implantation of stereo-electroencephalography electrode offers an accuracy comparable to those using anchor bolt. During the planning of boltless implantation, target points should be placed within 3.2 mm from the gray-white matter junction and a possible delayed dislodgement of 2.2 mm should be considered.

A navigated, robot-driven laser craniotomy tool for frameless depth electrode implantation. An in-vivo recovery animal study

Objectives: We recently introduced a frameless, navigated, robot-driven laser tool for depth electrode implantation as an alternative to frame-based procedures. This method has only been used in cadaver and non-recovery studies. This is the first study to test the robot-driven laser tool in an in vivo recovery animal study. Methods: A preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan was conducted to plan trajectories in sheep specimens. Burr hole craniotomies were performed using a frameless, navigated, robot-driven laser tool. Depth electrodes were implanted after cut-through detection was confirmed. The electrodes were cut at the skin level postoperatively. Postoperative imaging was performed to verify accuracy. Histopathological analysis was performed on the bone, dura, and cortex samples. Results: Fourteen depth electrodes were implanted in two sheep specimens. Anesthetic protocols did not show any intraoperative irregularities. One sheep was euthanized on the same day of the procedure while the other sheep remained alive for 1 week without neurological deficits. Postoperative MRI and CT showed no intracerebral bleeding, infarction, or unintended damage. The average bone thickness was 6.2 mm (range 4.1-8.0 mm). The angulation of the planned trajectories varied from 65.5° to 87.4°. The deviation of the entry point performed by the frameless laser beam ranged from 0.27 mm to 2.24 mm. The histopathological analysis did not reveal any damage associated with the laser beam. Conclusion: The novel robot-driven laser craniotomy tool showed promising results in this first in vivo recovery study. These findings indicate that laser craniotomies can be performed safely and that cut-through detection is reliable.

Complications of Intracranial Multimodal Monitoring for Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intracranial multimodal monitoring (iMMM) is increasingly used for neurocritical care. However, concerns arise regarding iMMM invasiveness considering limited evidence in its clinical significance and safety profile. We conducted a synthesis of evidence regarding complications associated with iMMM to delineate its safety profile. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021225951) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies guidelines to retrieve evidence from studies reporting iMMM use in humans that mention related complications. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots. The primary outcomes were iMMM complications. The secondary outcomes were putative risk factors. Of the 366 screened articles, 60 met the initial criteria and were further assessed by full-text reading. We included 22 studies involving 1206 patients and 1434 iMMM placements. Most investigators used a bolt system (85.9%) and a three-lumen device (68.8%), mainly inserting iMMM into the most injured hemisphere (77.9%). A total of 54 postoperative intracranial hemorrhages (pooled rate of 4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-10%; I2 86%, p < 0.01 [random-effects model]) was reported, along with 46 misplacements (pooled rate of 6%; 95% CI 1-12%; I2 78%, p < 0.01) and 16 central nervous system infections (pooled rate of 0.43%; 95% CI 0-2%; I2 64%, p < 0.01). We found 6 system breakings, 18 intracranial bone fragments, and 5 cases of pneumocephalus. Currently, iMMM systems present a similar safety profile as intracranial devices commonly used in neurocritical care. Long-term outcomes of prospective studies will complete the benefit-risk assessment of iMMM in neurocritical care. Consensus-based reporting guidelines on iMMM use are needed to bolster future collaborative efforts.

De novo cerebral pseudoaneurysm formation: a rare delayed complication of stereotactic electroencephalography in children

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rare complication of cerebral pseudoaneurysm formation following stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) lead implantation in children.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all pediatric patients undergoing sEEG procedures between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Cases of pseudoaneurysm were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

Cerebral pseudoaneurysms were identified in two of 58 total cases and 610 implanted electrodes. One lesion was detected 1 year after sEEG explantation and required craniotomy and clipping. The other was detected 3 months post-explantation and underwent coil embolization. Neither patient had any neurologic deficits associated with the pseudoaneurysm before or after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoaneurysm formation post-sEEG explantation is rare and likely underreported. Routine, post-explantation/treatment imaging is warranted to detect this rare but potentially lethal complication.

Mapping the Central Sulcus Extraoperatively Using Stereoelectroencephalography: A New Application of an Established Method

PURPOSE

Central sulcus localization is undertaken intraoperatively with subdural electrodes through a phase reversal technique using somatosensory evoked potentials from sensorimotor cortices. Extraoperative central sulcus localization using stereoelectroencephalography has not been described previously.

METHODS

Six pediatric patients (aged 12-18 years, 50% females) were investigated with stereoelectroencephalography. Peripheral median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were performed while recording somatosensory evoked potentials from stereoelectroencephalography electrodes.

RESULTS

Central sulcus was successfully localized by this novel method, and this was further supplemented by cortical stimulation data.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of somatosensory evoked potentials gained using stereoelectroencephalography in primary motor and sensory cortices. This can further supplement other data for safe surgical resection in the eloquent cortex.

Feasibility and safety of stereoelectroencephalography in young children

PURPOSE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a diagnostic surgery that implants electrodes to identify areas of epileptic onset in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). SEEG is effective in identifying the epileptic zone; however, placement of electrodes in very young children has been considered contraindicated due to skull thinness. The goal of this study was to evaluate if SEEG is safe and accurate in young children with thin skulls.

METHODS

Four children under the age of two years old with DRE underwent SEEG to locate the region of seizure onset. Presurgical planning and placement of electrodes were performed using ROSA One Brain. Preoperative electrode plans were merged with postoperative CT scans to determine accuracy. Euclidean distance between the planned and actual trajectories was calculated using a 3D coordinate system at both the entry and target points for each electrode.

RESULTS

Sixty-three electrodes were placed among four patients. Mean skull thickness at electrode entry sites was 2.34 mm. The mean difference between the planned and actual entry points was 1.12 mm, and the mean difference between the planned and actual target points was 1.73 mm. No significant correlation was observed between planned and actual target points and skull thickness (Pearson R =  - 0.170). No perioperative or postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SEEG can be safe and accurate in children under two years of age despite thin skulls. SEEG should be considered for young children with DRE, and age and skull thickness are not definite contraindications to the surgery.

Seizure freedom without seizure medication following stereoelectroencephalography implantation: a case report of drug-resistant post-traumatic epilepsy

Achieving seizure freedom following failure of several antiseizure medications (ASMs) is rare, with the likelihood of achieving further control decreasing with each successive ASM trial. When cases of drug-resistant epilepsy arise, a diagnostic procedure known as stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) can be used to identify epileptogenic zones (EZ) within the brain. After localization of these zones, they can be targeted for future surgical intervention. Here, we describe a case of complete seizure freedom off medication after sEEG without resection or other therapeutic intervention. In 2017, a 36-year-old right-handed male presented with drug-resistant epilepsy stemming from prior traumatic brain injury. Due to ongoing seizures, in 2020 a robotic-assisted sEEG electrode placement procedure was employed to localize the seizure onset zone. During sEEG monitoring, a single event was captured where the patient had dysarthric speech, left arm dystonic flexion, and difficulty responding to questioning. Notably, this event had no sEEG correlate, suggesting seizure occurrence in a region not monitored by implanted electrodes, which prompted the placement of scalp electrodes following this event. However, no further clinical events consistent with seizure were provoked through the remainder of recording. Following the 13-day admission, the patient chose to self-discontinue all seizure medications and has remained seizure free as of October 2023, more than 3.5 years later. While sEEG is considered a relatively safe procedure for seizure localization in drug resistant epilepsy, the possibility of microlesions created by sEEG depth electrodes remains largely unexplored. Further evaluation should be performed into potential tissue injury produced by depth electrode insertion.

Validation and Safety Profile of a Novel, Noninvasive Fiducial Attachment for Stereotactic Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography: A Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We developed, tested, and validated a novel, noninvasive, Leksell G frame-based fiducial attachment, for use in stereotactic registration for stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). Use of the device increased the number of fixed reference points available for registration, while obviating the need for additional scalp incisions. We report here on our experience and safety profile of using the device.

METHODS

We collected registration data using the fiducial device across 25 adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy consecutively undergoing robotic-guided sEEG for invasive epilepsy monitoring, treated between May 2022 and July 2023. ROSA One Brain was used for trajectory planning and electrode implantation. Postoperative clinical and radiographic data were computed and quantified, including mean registration error for all patients. Entry point, target point (TP), and angular errors were measured. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients for error were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent robotic-guided sEEG implantation (11 patients, bilateral; 10 patients, left unilateral; 4 patients, right). The mean number of electrodes per patient was 18 ± 3. The average mean registration error was 0.77 ± 0.11 mm. All patients were implanted with Ad-Tech depth electrodes. No clinically relevant complications were reported. Analysis of trajectory error was performed on 446 electrodes. The median entry point error was 1.03 mm (IQR 0.69-1.54). The median TP error was 2.26 mm (IQR 1.63-2.93). The mean angular error was 0.03 radians (IQR 0.02-0.05). There was no significant correlation between root mean square error and lead error. Root mean square error did not appreciably change over time, nor were there any significant changes in average angular, entry point, or TP error metrics.

CONCLUSION

A novel, noninvasive, Leksell G frame-based fiducial attachment was developed, tested, and validated, facilitating O-arm-based stereotactic registration for sEEG. This simple innovation maintained an excellent accuracy and safety profile for sEEG procedures in epilepsy patients, with the added advantages of providing additional reference points for stereotactic registration, without requiring additional scalp incisions.

The Association Between Trajectory-Skull Angle and Accuracy of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relationship between trajectory-skull angle and stereoelectroencephalography electrode implantation accuracy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients, aiming to guide clinical electrode placement and enhance surgical precision and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records and surgical characteristics of 32 consecutive patients diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy, who underwent stereoelectroencephalography procedures at our center from June 2020 to June 2023. To evaluate the accuracy of electrode implantation, we utilized preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans fused with SinoPlan software-planned trajectories. Entry radial error and target vector error were assessed as measurements of electrode implantation accuracy.

RESULTS

After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant positive correlation between trajectory-skull angle and entry radial error (β = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03, P < 0.001). Likewise, a significant positive correlation existed between trajectory-skull angle and target vector error in all three models (β = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.04, P < 0.001). Additionally, a U-shaped relationship between trajectory-skull angle and target vector error was identified using smooth curve fitting. This U-shaped pattern persisted in both frame-based and robot-guided stereotactic techniques. According to the two-piecewise linear regression model, the inflection points were 9° in the frame-based group and 16° in the robot-guided group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes a significant positive linear correlation between trajectory-skull angle and entry radial error, along with a distinctive U-shaped pattern in the relationship between trajectory-skull angle and target vector error. Our findings suggest that trajectory-skull angles of 9° (frame-based) and 16° (robot-guided) may optimize the accuracy of target vector error.

Frame-based versus robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an effective presurgical invasive evaluation for drug-resistant epilepsies. The introduction of robotic devices provides a simplified, accurate, and safe alternative to the conventional SEEG technique. We report our institutional experience with robot-assisted SEEG and compare its in vivo accuracy, operation efficiency, and safety with the more traditional SEEG workflow.

METHODS

All patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy who underwent SEEG depth electrode implantation between 2014 and 2022 were included in this study. Technical advancements of the robot-assisted technique are described. Analyses of patient demographics, electrode implantation accuracy, operation time, and procedure-related complications were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six patients underwent 167 SEEG procedures. The first 141 procedures were performed using a conventional approach involving a Leksell stereotactic system, and the last 26 procedures were robot-assisted. Among the 1726 depth electrodes that were inserted, the median entry point localization error was as follows: conventional (1.0 mm; range, 0.1-33.5 mm) and robot-assisted (1.1 mm; range, 0-4.8 mm) (P = 0.17). The median target point localization error was as follows: conventional (2.8 mm; range, 0.1-49 mm) and robot-assisted (1.8 mm; range, 0-30.3 mm) (P < 0.001). The median operation time was significantly reduced with the robot-assisted workflow (90 min vs. 77.5 min; P < 0.01). Total complication rates were as follows: conventional (17.7%) and robot-assisted (11.5%) (P = 0.57). Major complication rates were 3.5% and 7.7% (P = 0.77), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG is a safe and highly accurate method that provides essential guidance for epilepsy surgery. Implementing SEEG in conjunction with multimodal planning systems and robotic devices can further increase safety margin, surgical efficiency, and accuracy.

Endovascular electroencephalography (eEEG) can detect the laterality of epileptogenic foci as accurately as subdural electrodes

Background

Traditional brain activity monitoring via scalp electroencephalography (EEG) offers limited resolution and is susceptible to artifacts. Endovascular electroencephalography (eEEG) emerged in the 1990s. Despite early successes and potential for detecting epileptiform activity, eEEG has remained clinically unutilized. This study aimed to further test the capabilities of eEEG in detecting lateralized epileptic discharges in animal models. We hypothesized that eEEG would be able to detect lateralization. The purpose of this study was to measure epileptiform discharges with eEEG in animal models with lateralization in epileptogenicity.

Materials and methods

We inserted eEEG electrodes into the transverse sinuses of three pigs, and subdural electrodes (SDs) on the surfaces of the left and right hemispheres. We induced epileptogenicity with penicillin in the left brain of pigs F00001 and F00003, and in the right brain of pig F00002. The resulting epileptiform discharges were measured by eEEG electrodes placed in the left and right transverse sinuses, and conducted comparisons with epileptiform discharges from SDs. We also had 12 neurological physicians interpret measurement results from eEEG alone and determine the side (left or right) of epileptogenicity.

Results

Three pigs were evaluated for epileptiform discharge detection using eEEG: F00001 (7 months old, 14.0 kg), F00002 (8 months old, 15.6 kg), and F00003 (8 months old, 14.4 kg). The eEEG readings were compared with results from SDs, showing significant alignment across all subjects (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV) were as follows: F00001 had 0.93 and 0.96, F00002 had 0.99 and 1.00, and F00003 had 0.98 and 0.99. Even though one of the neurological physicians got all sides incorrect, all other assessments were correct. Upon post-experimental dissection, no abnormalities were observed in the brain tissue or in the vascular damage at the site where the eEEG was placed, based on pathological evaluation.

Conclusion

With eEEG, lateralization can be determined with high sensitivity (>0.93) and PPV (>0.95) that appear equivalent to those of subdural EEG in the three pigs. This lateralization was also discernible by neurological physicians on visual inspection.

Usefulness of Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA®) Device for Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficiency and safety of using the Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA®) device (Zimmer Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a literature search was carried out. Overall, 855 nonduplicate relevant articles were determined, and 15 of them were selected for analysis. The benefits of the ROSA® device use in terms of electrode placement accuracy, as well as operative time length, perioperative complications, and seizure outcomes, were evaluated. Studies that were included reported on a total of 11,257 SEEG electrode implantations. The limited number of comparative studies hindered the comprehensive evaluation of the electrode implantation accuracy. Compared with frame-based or navigation-assisted techniques, ROSA®-assisted SEEG electrode implantation provided significant benefits for reduction of both overall operative time (mean difference [MD], -63.45 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] from -88.73 to -38.17 min; P < 0.00001) and operative time per implanted electrode (MD, -8.79 min; 95% CI from -14.37 to -3.21 min; P = 0.002). No significant differences existed in perioperative complications and seizure outcomes after the application of the ROSA® device and other techniques for electrode implantation. To conclude, the available evidence shows that the ROSA® device is an effective and safe surgical tool for trajectory-guided SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, offering benefits for saving operative time and neither increasing the risk of perioperative complications nor negatively impacting seizure outcomes.

Comparison of 2 Robotic Systems for Pediatric Stereoelectroencephalography Implantation

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) remains critical in guiding epilepsy surgery. Robot-assisted techniques have shown promise in improving SEEG implantation outcomes but have not been directly compared. In this single-institution series, we compared ROSA and Stealth AutoGuide robots in pediatric SEEG implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 21 sequential pediatric SEEG implantations consisting of 6 ROSA and 15 AutoGuide procedures. We determined mean operative time, time per electrode, root mean square (RMS) registration error, and surgical complications. Three-dimensional radial distances were calculated between each electrode's measured entry and target points with respective errors from the planned trajectory line.

RESULTS

Mean overall/per electrode operating time was 73.5/7.5 minutes for ROSA and 126.1/10.9 minutes for AutoGuide (P = 0.030 overall, P = 0.082 per electrode). Mean RMS registration error was 0.77 mm (0.55-0.93 mm) for ROSA and 0.6 mm (0.2-1.0 mm) for AutoGuide (P = 0.26). No procedures experienced complications. The mean radial (entry point error was 1.23 ± 0.11 mm for ROSA and 2.65 ± 0.12 mm for AutoGuide (P < 0.001), while the mean radial target point error was 1.86 ± 0.15 mm for ROSA and 3.25 ± 0.16 mm for AutoGuide (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall operative time was greater for AutoGuide procedures, although there was no statistically significant difference in time per electrode. Both systems are highly accurate with no significant RMS error difference. While the ROSA robot yielded significantly lower entry and target point errors, both robots are safe and reliable for deep electrode insertion in pediatric epilepsy.

Safety, Accuracy, and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Stereo Electroencephalography in Children of Different Ages

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Aimed to investigate the safety, accuracy, and efficacy of stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) in children of various ages, with particular emphasis on those younger than 3 years. There is limited guidance regarding whether SEEG can conducted on very young children.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between July 2018 and August 2022. It involved 88 patients who underwent 99 robot-assisted SEEG procedures at our center. The patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their age at the time of the robot-assisted SEEG procedures: group 1 (3 years and younger, n = 28), group 2 (age 3-6 years, n = 27), and group 3 (older than 6 years, n = 44). Clinical data, SEEG demographics, complications, and seizure outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 675 electrodes were implanted, with an average of 6.82 ± 3.47 (2.00-16.00) electrodes per patient (P = .052). The average target point error for the 675 electrodes was 1.93 ± 1.11 mm, and the average entry point error was 1.30 ± 0.97 mm (P = .536 and P = .549, respectively). The overall percentage of complications was 6.06% (P = .879). No severe or long-term neurologic impairment was observed. Of the total 99 procedures included in this study, 78 were admitted for epilepsy surgery for the first time, while 9 patients were treated twice and 1 patient was treated 3 times. There were 21 radiofrequency thermocoagulation and 78 second-stage resective procedures performed after SEEG. There was no statistically significant difference in Engel class I outcomes among the patients who underwent SEEG in the 3 age groups (P = .621).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted SEEG were demonstrated to be safe, accurate, and efficient across different age groups of children. This technique is suitable for children younger than 3 years who have indications for SEEG placement.

Learning Curve in Robotic Stereoelectroencephalography: Single Platform Experience

BACKGROUND

Learning curve, training, and cost impede widespread implementation of new technology. Neurosurgical robotic technology introduces challenges to visuospatial reasoning and requires the acquisition of new fine motor skills. Studies detailing operative workflow, learning curve, and patient outcomes are needed to describe the utility and cost-effectiveness of new robotic technology.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of pediatric patients who underwent robotic stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) with the Medtronic Stealth Autoguide. Workflow, total operative time, and time per electrode were evaluated alongside target accuracy assessed via error measurements and root sum square. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes related to sEEG were also assessed.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted sEEG was performed in 12 pediatric patients. Comparison of cases over time demonstrated a mean operative time of 363.3 ± 109.5 minutes for the first 6 cases and 256.3 ± 59.1 minutes for the second 6 cases, with reduced operative time per electrode (P = 0.037). Mean entry point error, target point error, and depth point error were 1.82 ± 0.77 mm, 2.26 ± 0.71 mm, and 1.27 ± 0.53 mm, respectively, with mean root sum square of 3.23 ± 0.97 mm. Error measurements between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography found computed tomography angiography to be more accurate with significant differences in mean entry point error (P = 0.043) and mean target point error (P = 0.035). The epileptogenic zone was identified in 11 patients, with therapeutic surgeries following in 9 patients, of whom 78% achieved an Engel class I.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated institutional workflow evolution and learning curve for the Autoguide in pediatric sEEG, resulting in reduced operative times and increased accuracy over a small number of cases. The platform may seamlessly and quickly be incorporated into clinical practice, and the provided workflow can facilitate a smooth transition.

Brain abscess - A rare confounding factor for diagnosis of post-traumatic epilepsy after lateral fluid-percussion injury

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of brain abscesses as a confounding factor for the diagnosis of post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) in a rat model of lateral fluid-percussion-induced (FPI) traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 583 rats from 3 study cohorts collected over 2009-2022 in a single laboratory. The rats had undergone sham-operation or TBI using lateral FPI. Rats were implanted with epidural and/or intracerebral electrodes for electroencephalogram recordings. Brains were processed for histology to screen for abscess(es). In abscess cases, (a) unfolded cortical maps were constructed to assess the cortical location and area of the abscess, (b) the abscess tissue was Gram stained to determine the presence of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, and (c) immunostaining was performed to detect infiltrating neutrophils, T-lymphocytes, and glial cells as tissue biomarkers of inflammation. In vivo and/or ex vivo magnetic resonance images available from a subcohort of animals were reviewed to evaluate the presence of abscesses. Plasma samples available from a subcohort of rats were used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to determine the levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as a circulating biomarker for gram-negative bacteria.

RESULTS

Brain abscesses were detected in 2.6% (15/583) of the rats (6 sham, 9 TBI). In histology, brain abscesses were characterized as vascularized encapsulated lesions filled with neutrophils and surrounded by microglia/macrophages and astrocytes. The abscesses were mainly located under the screw electrodes, support screws, or craniectomy. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 60% (9/15) of rats with an abscess (4 sham, 5 TBI). Of these, 67% (6/9) had seizure clusters. The average seizure frequency in abscess cases was 0.436 ± 0.281 seizures/d. Plasma LPS levels were comparable between rats with and without abscesses (p > 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although rare, a brain abscess is a potential confounding factor for epilepsy diagnosis in animal models of structural epilepsies following brain surgery and electrode implantation, particularly if seizures occur in sham-operated experimental controls and/or in clusters.

Boltless nylon-suture technique for stereotactic electroencephalography as a safe, effective alternative when the anchor bolt is inappropriate

BACKGROUND

The use of anchor bolts to secure electrodes to the skull can be difficult in some clinical situations. Herein, we present the boltless technique to secure electrodes to the scalp using nylon sutures to overcome the problems associated with anchor bolts. We investigated the safety, accuracy errors, and patient-related and operative factors affecting errors in the boltless technique.

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective series analyzed 103 electrodes placed in 12 patients. The target-point localization error (TPLE), entry-point localization error (EPLE), radial error (RE), and depth error (DE) of the electrodes were calculated.

RESULTS

The median of the mean operative time per electrode was 9.3 min. The median TPLE, EPLE, RE, and absolute DE value were 4.1 mm, 1.6 mm, 2.7 mm, and 1.9 mm, respectively. Positive correlations were observed between the preoperative scalp thickness, mean operative time per electrode, EPLE, RE, and the absolute value of DE versus TPLE (r = .228, p = .02; r = .678, p = .015; r = .228, p = .02; r = .445, p < .01; r = .630, p < .01, respectively), and electrode approach angle versus EPLE (r = .213, p = .031). Multivariate analysis revealed that the absolute value of DE had the strongest influence on the TPLE, followed by RE and preoperative scalp thickness, respectively (β = .938, .544, .060, respectively, p < .001). No complications related to SEEG insertion and monitoring were encountered.

CONCLUSION

The boltless technique using our unique planning and technical method is a safe, effective, and low-cost alternative in cases where anchor bolts are contraindicated.

[Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring]

Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.

RESULTS

There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (p=0.005), insular (p=0.040) and occipital (p=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (p=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.

Stereoelectroencephalography: a review of complications and outcomes in a new Australian centre

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of refractory focal epilepsy requires preoperative localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). To augment noninvasive studies, stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is being increasingly adopted as a form of intracranial monitoring.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the rate of complications for patients undergoing SEEG and to report the success of SEEG with regard to EZ detection and seizure outcome following definitive surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort design investigated all cases of SEEG at our institution. Surgical, anaesthetic and medical complications with subsequent epilepsy surgery and seizure outcome data were extracted from medical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between both the number of electrodes per patient and the duration of SEEG recording with the rate of complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with 66 implantations were included. Headache was the most common complication (n = 54, 82%). There were no major surgical or medical complications. Two anaesthetic complications occurred. EZ localisation was successful in 63 cases (95%). Curative intent surgery was performed in 39 patients (59%) and 23 patients achieved an Engel class I outcome (59% of those undergoing surgery). The number of electrodes and duration of recording were not associated with complications.

CONCLUSIONS

No patients in our series experienced major surgical or medical complications and we have highlighted the challenges associated with neuroanaesthesia in SEEG. Our complication rates and seizure outcomes are equivalent to published literature indicating that this technique can be successfully established in newer centres using careful case selection. Standardised reporting of SEEG complications should be adopted.

Use of Compressed Sensing Accelerated, Low-Velocity Encoded, Isotropic Resolution, Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for SEEG Electrode Implantation

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the feasibility of using compressed sensing accelerated, low-velocity encoded, isotropic resolution phase contrast (CLIP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for avascular trajectory planning of stereoelectroencephalography.

METHODS

Ten healthy subjects (1 woman and 9 men; age, 33.6 ± 9.0 years) and 20 consecutive patients (12 female patients; age, 22 ± 13.6 years) were enrolled in the present study. The healthy subjects underwent CLIP-MRA, and 3 other phase contrast MRA protocols with conventional parallel imaging (PI) acceleration, including low resolution with twofold PI (PI2), high resolution (HR) with fivefold PI (PI5), and HR-PI2. The patients underwent CLIP-MRA and computed tomography angiography (CTA). The image qualities were evaluated. The numbers and locations of trajectory-vessel conflict detected using CLIP-MRA were noted.

RESULTS

With similar scan durations, CLIP-MRA achieved higher spatial resolution compared with low resolution with PI2 and detected significantly more branches compared with HR-PI5. With the same spatial resolution, the signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios of CLIP-MRA were higher than those with HR-PI2 with a shorter scan duration. For the 12 adult patients (10 female patients; 28.8 ± 12.7 years), CLIP-MRA had better signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios than CTA. The trajectory had required modification for 14 of the 20 patients (70%), with a proportion of trajectory modification of 10.7% (23 of 215 electrodes). The middle meningeal artery, cortical vessel, and skull vessel were the main vessels with conflict (n = 11, n = 7, and n = 5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, CLIP-MRA provided a clear cortical vascular display noninvasively without intravascular contrast and radiation. The middle meningeal artery and diploic and emissary veins were the main conflict vessels and could be clearly displayed using CLIP-MRA but not CTA.

Identification of epileptic networks with graph convolutional network incorporating oscillatory activities and evoked synaptic responses

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) offers unique neural data from in-depth brain structures with fine temporal resolutions to better investigate the origin of epileptic brain activities. Although oscillatory patterns from different frequency bands and functional connectivity computed from the SEEG datasets are employed to study the epileptic zones, direct electrical stimulation-evoked electrophysiological recordings of synaptic responses, namely cortical-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs), from the same SEEG electrodes are not explored for the localization of epileptic zones. Here we proposed a two-stream model with unsupervised learning and graph convolutional network tailored to the SEEG and CCEP datasets in individual patients to perform localization of epileptic zones. We compared our localization results with the clinically marked electrode sites determined for surgical resections. Our model had good classification capability when compared to other state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, based on our prediction results we performed group-level brain-area mapping analysis for temporal, frontal and parietal epilepsy patients and found that epileptic and non-epileptic brain networks were distinct in patients with different types of focal epilepsy. Our unsupervised data-driven model provides personalized localization analysis for the epileptic zones. The epileptic and non-epileptic brain areas disclosed by the prediction model provide novel insights into the network-level pathological characteristics of epilepsy.

Neuroimaging of Brain Tumor Surgery and Epilepsy

To make the best clinical judgements, surgeons need to integrate information acquired via multimodal imaging [...].

High frequency oscillations in relation to interictal spikes in predicting postsurgical seizure freedom

We evaluate whether interictal spikes, epileptiform HFOs and their co-occurrence (Spike + HFO) were included in the resection area with respect to seizure outcome. We also characterise the relationship between high frequency oscillations (HFOs) and propagating spikes. We analysed intracranial EEG of 20 patients that underwent resective epilepsy surgery. The co-occurrence of ripples and fast ripples was considered an HFO event; the co-occurrence of an interictal spike and HFO was considered a Spike + HFO event. HFO distribution and spike onset were compared in cases of spike propagation. Accuracy in predicting seizure outcome was 85% for HFO, 60% for Spikes, and 79% for Spike + HFO. Sensitivity was 57% for HFO, 71% for Spikes and 67% for Spikes + HFO. Specificity was 100% for HFO, 54% for Spikes and 85% for Spikes + HFO. In 2/2 patients with spike propagation, the spike onset included the HFO area. Combining interictal spikes with HFO had comparable accuracy to HFO. In patients with propagating spikes, HFO rate was maximal at the onset of spike propagation.

SEEG-based epileptic seizure network modeling and analysis for pre-surgery evaluation

Stereo-electroencephalography is a minimally invasive technique for patients with refractory epilepsy pursuing surgery to reduce or control seizures. Electrodes are implanted based on pre-surgery evaluations and can collect deep brain activities for surgery decisions. This paper presents a methodology to analyze stereo-electroencephalography and assist clinicians by recommending the optimal surgical option and target areas for focal epilepsy patients. A seizure network (graph) model is proposed to characterize the spatial distribution and temporal changes of ictal events. The network nodes and edges correspond to specific epileptogenic regions and propagation/impact pathways (weighted by directed transfer function), respectively. We then employ a K-means clustering strategy to group nodes into a few clusters, from which the target surgical areas can be identified. Ten patients with different types of focal seizures were thoroughly analyzed. Promising consistency between results of our method's recommendations, clinical decisions and surgery outcomes were observed.

Implications of intracranial hemorrhage associated with stereo-EEG

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a known complication during stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) however true rates remain unknown. We provide a comprehensive review of ICH during sEEG regardless of clinical symptoms. Secondly, we analyzed sEEG recordings to identify electrographic correlates of ICH.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing sEEG between January 2016 and April 2022 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester. We reviewed medical records and imaging studies to identify ICH. We analyzed ICH by type, electrode trajectories, timing, sEEG findings and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were a total of 201 sEEG implants, of which 23 (11%) cases or 0.9% electrodes implanted had evidence of ICH. The majority of affected patients (82%) were either asymptomatic or had mild clinical neurological manifestations. In 90% of patients who proceeded with surgical treatments, outcomes were favorable. The most common sEEG finding in contacts in proximity of ICH was either focal slowing with interictal discharges or focal electrographic seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

ICH associated with sEEG is likely under-reported in literature. We present electroencephalographic correlates of ICH that may aid identification of ICH in the course of performing sEEG monitoring.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data provides clinically relevant information on potential risks and outcomes of ICH. Furthermore, our findings aid identification of ICH during sEEG.

Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency: methodology, results, complications and stereotactic application accuracy in pediatric hypothalamic hamartomas

Objective

We aimed to investigate the methodology, results, complications and stereotactic application accuracy of electrode implantation and its explanatory variables in stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-RFTC) for pediatric hypothalamic hamartoma.

Methods

Children with hypothalamic hamartoma who underwent robot-assisted SEEG-RFTC between December 2017 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The methodology, seizure outcome, complications, in vivo accuracy of electrode implantation and its explanatory variables were analyzed.

Results

A total of 161 electrodes were implanted in 28 patients with 30 surgeries. Nine electrodes not following the planned trajectories due to intraoperative replanning were excluded, and the entry point and target point errors of 152 electrodes were statistically analyzed. The median entry point error was 0.87 mm (interquartile range, 0.50-1.41 mm), and the median target point error was 2.74 mm (interquartile range, 2.01-3.63 mm). Multifactor analysis showed that whether the electrode was bent (b = 2.16, p < 0.001), the length of the intracranial electrode (b = 0.02, p = 0.049), and the entry point error (b = 0.337, p = 0.017) had statistically significant effects on the target error. During follow-up (mean duration 31 months), 27 of 30 (90%) procedures were seizure-free. The implantation-related complication rate was 2.6% (4/152), and the major complication rate in all procedures was 6.7% (2/30).

Conclusion

Robot-assisted SEEG-RFTC is a safe, effective and accurate procedure for pediatric hypothalamic hamartoma. Explanatory variables significantly associated with the target point localization error at multivariate analysis include whether the intracranial electrode is bent, the intracranial electrode length and the entry point error.

Neuropathologic changes associated with stereoelectroencephalography depth electrode placement

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to detail the neuropathologic changes resulting from the surgical placement of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) leads in an initial small group of epilepsy cases and to raise awareness of this iatrogenic pathology, especially to those medical providers who specialize in the care of epilepsy patients.

METHODS

Five consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy resection surgery following SEEG monitoring at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center were included in our report. Resection specimens were examined grossly and entirely submitted for microscopic evaluation by a neuropathologist. Seizure-related pathologies, as well as histologic changes related to SEEG electrode placement, were documented.

RESULTS

The patient cohort included two females and three males, with an age range of 9 to 47 years. Neuropathologic examination revealed one or more seizure-related pathologies in each patient's resection specimen. In addition, all brain resection specimens showed multiple microinfarcts, which appeared to correlate with the placement and size of SEEG electrodes. Patchy leptomeningeal chronic inflammation was also seen in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG electrode placement is an effective procedure for determining epileptogenic regions and guiding subsequent resection surgeries in medically refractory epilepsy. Multiple microinfarcts and chronic inflammation are commonly seen in brain resection specimens following SEEG electrode insertion, but studies detailing these iatrogenic histopathologic changes are lacking. The clinical significance and long-term implications of multiple small foci of electrode-induced injury that remain in the patient's brain after resection of the epileptogenic focus are unknown and may provide a welcome area for future study.

Robotic-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety, Outcomes, and Precision in Refractory Epilepsy Patients

Robotic assistance in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) holds promising potential for enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and safety during electrode placement and surgical procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration, delves into the latest advancements and implications of robotic systems in SEEG, while meticulously evaluating outcomes and safety measures. Among 855 patients suffering from medication-refractory epilepsy who underwent SEEG in 29 studies, averaging 24.6 years in age, the most prevalent robots employed were robotic surgical assistant (ROSA) (450 patients), Neuromate (207), Sinovation (140), and ISys1 (58). A total of 8,184 electrodes were successfully implanted, with an average operative time of 157.2 minutes per procedure and 15.1 minutes per electrode, resulting in an overall mean operative time of 157.7 minutes across all studies. Notably, the mean target point error (TPE) stood at 2.13 mm, the mean entry point error (EPE) at 1.48 mm, and postoperative complications occurred in 7.69% of robotically assisted (RA) SEEG cases (60), with 85% of these complications being asymptomatic. This comprehensive analysis underscores the safety and efficacy of RA-SEEG in patients with medication-refractory epilepsy, characterized by low complication rates, reduced operative time, and precise electrode placement, supporting its widespread adoption in clinical practice, with no discernible differences noted among the various robotic systems.

Neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery: A comparison of stereo electroencephalography and subdural electrodes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We analyzed the association of neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery with the intracranial electrode type (stereo electroencephalography [SEEG] and subdural electrodes [SDE]), and electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) of speech/language.

METHODS

Drug-resistant epilepsy patients who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation before and 1 year after epilepsy surgery were included. SEEG and SDE subgroups were matched by age, handedness, operated hemisphere, and seizure freedom. Postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes (adjusted for presurgical scores) and reliable change indices were analyzed as functions of electrode type and ESM.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients aged 6-29 years were included with similar surgical resection/ablation volumes in the SEEG and SDE subgroups. Most of the neuropsychological outcomes were comparable between SEEG and SDE subgroups; however, Working Memory and Processing Speed were significantly improved in the SEEG subgroup. Undergoing language ESM was associated with significant improvements in Spelling, Letter-Word Identification, Vocabulary, Verbal Comprehension, Verbal Learning, and Story Memory scores, but a decline in Calculation scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial evaluations with SEEG and SDE are comparable in terms of long-term postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes. Our data suggest that SEEG may be associated with improvements in working memory and processing speed, representing cognitive domains served by spatially distributed networks. Our study also supports wider use of language ESM before epilepsy surgery, preferably using other language tasks in addition to visual naming. Rather than the type of electrode, postsurgical neuropsychological outcomes are driven by whether language ESM was performed or not, with beneficial effects of language mapping.

Drug-resistant epilepsy in children with hemophilia: how can we do it surgically?

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy can occur in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) caused by hemophilia, there is a paucity of literature reporting the surgical treatment of these patients because of the high risk of bleeding and comprehensive management such as factor replacement during the period of perioperation.

METHODS

The data of 216 children with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent surgically treatment in the Pediatric Epilepsy Center of the Capital Institute of Paediatrics were retrospectively reviewed. Seizure response and procedure complications were evaluated. Two cases children with hemophilia underwent surgical treatment at 29 months (case 1) and 6 years of age (case 2) were identified and followed up.

RESULTS

Both children have achieved seizure free without complications such as bleeding or infection after 28 months (case 1) and 21 months (case 2) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

For children with drug-resistant epilepsy associated with hemophilia, surgery that meets certain conditions can improve the prognosis safely and effectively.

Has recording of seizures become obsolete?

Some patients with medically intractable epilepsy are considered for surgical treatment. In some surgical candidates, the investigation includes the placement of intracerebral electrodes and long-term monitoring to find the region of seizure onset. This region is the primary determinant of the surgical resection but about one-third of patients are not offered surgery after electrode implantation and among those operated only about 55% are seizure free after five years. This paper discusses why the primary reliance on the seizure onset maybe suboptimal and may be in part responsible for the relatively low surgical success rate. It also proposes to consider some interictal markers that may have advantages over seizure onset and may be easier to obtain.

Accuracy of Depth Electrodes is Not Time-Dependent in Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography in a Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is steadily supplanting traditional frameless and frame-based modalities for minimally invasive depth electrode placement in epilepsy workup. Accuracy rates similar to gold-standard frame-based techniques have been achieved, with improved operative efficiency. Limitations in cranial fixation and placement of trajectories in pediatric patients are believed to contribute to a time-dependent accumulation of stereotactic error. Thus, we aim to study the impact of time as a marker of cumulative stereotactic error during robotic sEEG.

METHODS

All patients between October 2018 and June 2022 who underwent robotic sEEG were included. Radial errors at entry and target points as well as depth and Euclidean distance errors were collected for each electrode, excluding those with errors over 10 mm. Target point errors were standardized by planned trajectory length. ANOVA and error rates over time were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 539 trajectories. Number of electrodes placed ranged from 6 to 22. Average root mean squared error was 0.45 ± 0.12 mm. Average entry, target, depth, and Euclidean distance errors were 1.12 ± 0.41 mm, 1.46 ± 0.44 mm, -1.06 ± 1.43 mm, and 3.01 ± 0.71 mm, respectively. There was no significant increased error with each sequential electrode placed (entry error P -value = .54, target error P -value = .13, depth error P -value = .22, Euclidean distance P -value = .27).

CONCLUSION

No decremental accuracy over time was observed. This may be secondary to our workflow which prioritizes oblique and longer trajectories first and then into less error-prone trajectories. Further study on the effect of level of training may reveal a novel difference in error rates.

Towards hippocampal navigation for brain-computer interfaces

Automatic wheelchairs directly controlled by brain activity could provide autonomy to severely paralyzed individuals. Current approaches mostly rely on non-invasive measures of brain activity and translate individual commands into wheelchair movements. For example, an imagined movement of the right hand would steer the wheelchair to the right. No research has investigated decoding higher-order cognitive processes to accomplish wheelchair control. We envision an invasive neural prosthetic that could provide input for wheelchair control by decoding navigational intent from hippocampal signals. Navigation has been extensively investigated in hippocampal recordings, but not for the development of neural prostheses. Here we show that it is possible to train a decoder to classify virtual-movement speeds from hippocampal signals recorded during a virtual-navigation task. These results represent the first step toward exploring the feasibility of an invasive hippocampal BCI for wheelchair control.

Resective epilepsy surgery in a limited-resource settings: A cohort from a multi-disciplinary epilepsy team in a developing country

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary pre-surgical evaluation is vital for epilepsy surgery decision and outcomes. Resective epilepsy surgery with assisted monitoring is currently a standard treatment for focal drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). In resource-limited countries, lack of epilepsy surgery center is a huge challenge. We presented and illustrated how to create a multidisciplinary protocol with resource-limited settings in a developing country and epilepsy surgery outcome using brain mapping and monitoring techniques for ensuring satisfactory resection.

METHODS

We created multicentric incomplete but complementary units covering all epilepsy-related sub-specialties and covering a wide geographical area in our country. Then, we conducted a prospective and multicentric study with low resource settings on patients with focal DRE, who underwent resective epilepsy surgery and were followed up for at least 12 months and were evaluated for postoperative seizure outcome and complications if present. Preoperative comprehensive clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and radiological evaluations were performed by multidisciplinary epilepsy team. Intraoperative brain mapping including awake craniotomy and direct stimulation techniques, neurophysiological monitoring, and electrocorticography was carried out during surgical resection.

RESULTS

The study included 47 patients (18 females and 29 males) with mean age 20.4 ± 10.02 years. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients were temporal epilepsy while 25 (53.2%) were extra-temporal epilepsy. The epilepsy surgery outcome at the last follow up was Engel Class I (seizure free) in 35 (74.5%), Class II (almost seizure free) in 8 (17%), Class III (worthwhile improvement) in 3 (6.4%), and Class IV (no worthwhile improvement) in 1 patient (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

With low resource settings and lack of single fully equipped epilepsy center, favorable outcomes after resective surgery in patients with focal DRE could be achieved using careful presurgical multidisciplinary selection, especially with using intraoperative brain mapping and electrocorticography techniques.

Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy

Rationale

Insular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved localization is balanced by implantation risk in this vascularly rich anatomic region. We review both safety and pre-implantation factors involved in insular electrode placement across four years at an academic medical center.

Methods

Presurgical data, operative reports, and invasive EEG summaries were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring on the insula from 2016 through 2019. EEG reports were reviewed to record the presence of insula ictal and interictal involvement. We recorded which presurgical findings suggested insular involvement (insula lesion on MRI, insula changes on PET/SPECT/scalp EEG, characteristic semiology, or history of failed anterior temporal lobectomy). The likelihood of pre-sEEG insular onset was categorized as low suspicion if no presurgical findings were present ("rule out"), moderate suspicion if one finding was present, and high suspicion if two or more findings were present.

Results

76 patients received 189 insular electrodes as part of their implantation strategy for 79 surgical cases. Seven patients (8.9%) had insular ictal onset. One clinically significant complication (left hemiparesis) occurred in a patient with moderate suspicion for insular onset. There were 38 low suspicion cases, 36 moderate suspicion cases, and 5 high suspicion cases for pre-sEEG insula ictal onset. Two low suspicion (5.3%), three moderate suspicion (8.6%), and two high suspicion (40%) cases had insular ictal onset.

Conclusions

The insula can safely receive sEEG. Having two or more presurgical factors indicating insular onset is a strong, albeit incomplete, predictor of insular seizure onset. Using pre-implantation clinical findings can offer clinicians predictive value for targeting the insula during invasive EEG monitoring.

Use of the Globus ExcelsiusGPS System for Robotic Stereoelectroencephalography: An Initial Experience

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a critical tool used in the identification of epileptogenic zones. Although stereotactic frame-based SEEG procedures have been performed traditionally, newer robotic-assisted SEEG procedures have become increasingly common. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy, efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot (Globus Medica, Audubon, PA) in SEEG procedures.

METHODS

Five consecutive adult patients with drug resistant epilepsy were identified as SEEG candidates via a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery committee. Preoperative scans were merged onto the robot to plan electrode placement. With the use of a camera system, dynamic reference base, and surveillance markers, the robotic arm was used to establish the trajectory of the electrodes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were merged onto the preoperatively planned trajectory and the radial, depth, and entry errors were calculated. Fiducial registration error was calculated for 4 cases to determine error between the patient and intraoperative CT merge.

RESULTS

A total of 59 electrodes were placed. The mean age at surgery was 41.6 ± 15.1 years. Mean operating room time, anesthesia time, and surgical time was 301.6 ± 44.4 min, 261.6 ± 50.2 min, and 155.8 ± 48.8 min, respectively. The overall mean depth, radial, and entry errors were 2.5 ± 1.9 mm, 1.9 ± 1.5 mm, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Mean fiducial registration error retrospectively calculated for 4 of 5 cases was 0.13 ± 0.04 mm. There were no perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial performance of the ExcelsiusGPS robotic system yielded comparable results to other systems currently in use for adult SEEG procedures.

Electrode Tip Shift During the Stereotactic Electroencephalography Evaluation Period with Boltless Suture Fixation

BACKGROUND

Electrodes for stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) are typically fixed to the skull with anchor bolts. When anchor bolts are unavailable, electrodes have to be fixed using other methods, carrying the possibility of electrode shift. This study, therefore, evaluated the characteristics of electrode tip shift during SEEG monitoring in patients with electrodes fixed using the suture technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients who underwent SEEG implantation with suture fixation and evaluated the tip shift distance (TSD) of electrodes. Possible influences evaluated included: 1) implantation period, 2) lobe of entry, 3) unilateral or bilateral implantation, 4) electrode length, 5) skull thickness, and 6) scalp thickness difference.

RESULTS

A total of 50 electrodes in 7 patients were evaluated. TSD was 1.4 ± 2.0 mm (mean ± standard deviation). Implantation period was 8.1 ± 2.2 days. Entry lobe was frontal for 28 electrodes and temporal for 22 electrodes. Implantation was bilateral for 25 electrodes and unilateral for 25 electrodes. Electrode length was 45.4 ± 14.3 mm. Skull thickness was 6.0 ± 3.7 mm. Scalp thickness difference was -1.5 ± 2.1 mm, which was found greater in temporal lobe entry compared with frontal lobe entry. According to univariate analyses, neither implantation period nor electrode length correlated with TSD. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only greater scalp thickness difference correlated significantly with greater TSD (P = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater scalp thickness difference correlated with greater TSD. Surgeons need to consider the degree of scalp thickness difference and electrode shift when using suture fixation, especially with temporal lobe entry.

Alteration of Excitation/Inhibition Imbalance in the Hippocampus and Amygdala of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Patients Treated with Acute Vagus Nerve Stimulation

An imbalance between excitation (E) and inhibition (I) in the brain has been identified as a key pathophysiology of epilepsy over the years. The hippocampus and amygdala in the limbic system play a crucial role in the initiation and conduction of epileptic seizures and are often referred to as the transfer station and amplifier of seizure activities. Existing animal and imaging studies reveal that the hippocampus and amygdala, which are significant parts of the vagal afferent network, can be modulated in order to generate an antiepileptic effect. Using stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) data, we examined the E/I imbalance in the hippocampus and amygdala of ten drug-resistant epilepsy children treated with acute vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) by estimating the 1/f power slope of hippocampal and amygdala signals in the range of 1-80 Hz. While the change in the 1/f power slope from VNS-BASE varied between different stimulation amplitudes and brain regions, it was more prominent in the hippocampal region. In the hippocampal region, we found a flatter 1/f power slope during VNS-ON in patients with good responsiveness to VNS under the optimal stimulation amplitude, indicating that the E/I imbalance in the region was improved. There was no obvious change in 1/f power slope for VNS poor responders. For VNS non-responders, the 1/f power slope slightly increased when the stimulation was applied. Overall, this study implies that the regulation of E/I imbalance in the epileptic brain, especially in the hippocampal region, may be an acute intracranial effect of VNS.

Safety profile of subdural and depth electrode implantations in invasive EEG exploration of drug-resistant focal epilepsy

PURPOSE

To analyze the safety profile of subdural and depth electrode implantation in a large monocentric cohort of patients of all ages undergoing intracranial EEG exploration because of drug resistant focal epilepsy diagnosed and implanted by a constant team of epileptologists and neurosurgeons.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 452 implantations in 420 patients undergoing invasive presurgical evaluation at the Freiburg Epilepsy Center from 1999 to 2019 (n = 160 subdural electrodes, n = 156 depth electrodes and n = 136 combination of both approaches). Complications were classified as hemorrhage with or without clinical manifestations, infection-associated and other complications. Furthermore, possible risk factors (age, duration of invasive monitoring, number of electrode contacts used) and changes in complication rates during the study period were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most frequent complications in both implantation groups were hemorrhages. Subdural electrode explorations caused significantly more symptomatic hemorrhages and required more operative interventions (SDE 9.9%, DE 0.3%, p < 0.05). Hemorrhage risk was higher for grids with 64 contacts than for smaller grids (p < 0.05). The infection rate was very low (0,2%). A transient neurological deficit occurred in 8.8% of all implantations and persisted for at least 3 months in 1.3%. Transient, but not persistent neurological deficits were more common in patients with implanted subdural electrodes than in the depth electrode group.

CONCLUSION

The use of subdural electrodes was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhage and transient neurological symptoms. However persistent deficits were rare with either approach, demonstrating that intracranial investigations using either subdural electrodes or depth electrodes carry acceptable risks in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Trans-Interhemispheric Stereoelectroencephalography Depth Electrode Placement for Mesial Frontal Lobe Explorations in Medically Refractory Epilepsy: A Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established and safe methodology for extra-operative invasive monitoring in patients with medical refractory epilepsy. SEEG has several advantages such as the ability to record deep cortical structures, mapping the epileptogenic zone in a three-dimensional manner, and analyze bihemispheric regions without the need for bilateral craniotomies. In patients with bilateral hemispheric hypotheses, especially the mesial surface of frontal lobes, bilateral lead placement is compulsory to further define and localize the epileptogenic zone. In this particular cohort of patients, bilateral monitoring may be accomplished from a single entry point using trans-interhemispheric placement of the electrodes. The use of trans-interhemispheric monitoring offers several advantages including sparing the need for additional leads.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that, given the lack of the falx as a limiting structure in the ventral and mesial frontal lobe regions, trans-interhemispheric SEEG placement is feasible and a potential benefit for the SEEG method.

METHODS

We report on 6 patients who underwent bilateral monitoring using trans-interhemispheric SEEG lead placement and discuss the operative technique.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent trans-interhemispheric monitoring, with a median of 3 leads per patient (19 total). Trajectory error was minimal (<0.3 mm), and operating room time was comparable with that in previous reports. All leads were placed without adverse events, mislocalization, electrode hemorrhages, or any other complications. All patients had successful localization of the epileptogenic zone.

CONCLUSION

Trans-interhemispheric SEEG to monitor the mesial wall of frontal lobe regions is technically feasible. No adverse events were observed, suggesting a favorable safety profile.

Stereoelectroencephalography Implantation Using Frameless Neuronavigation and Varioguide: Prospective Analysis of Accuracy and Safety in a Case Series of 11 Patients

BACKGROUND

Stereoencephalography (SEEG) is becoming a widespread diagnostic procedure for drug-resistant epilepsy investigation. Techniques include frame-based and robot-assisted implantation, and more recently, frameless neuronavigated systems (FNSs). Despite its recent use, the accuracy and safety of FNS are still under investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess in a prospective study the accuracy and safety of a specific FNS use for SEEG implantation.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent SEEG implantation using FNS (Varioguide [Brainlab]) were included in this study. Data were collected prospectively and included demographic data, postoperative complications, functional results, and implantation characteristics (i.e., duration and number of electrodes). Further analysis included accuracy at entry point and target using measurements of the euclidean distance between planned and actual trajectories.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent SEEG-FNS implantation from May 2019 to March 2020. One patient did not undergo surgery because of a bleeding disorder. The mean target deviation was 4.06 mm, and mean entry point deviation was 4.2 mm, with insular electrodes significantly more deviated. Results excluding insular electrodes showed a mean target deviation of 3.66 mm and a mean entry point deviation of 3.77 mm. No severe complications occurred; a few mild to moderate adverse events were reported (1 superficial infection, 1 seizure cluster, and 3 transient neurologic impairments). The mean implantation duration by electrodes was 18.5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of depth electrodes for SEEG using FNS seems to be safe, but larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results. Accuracy is sufficient for noninsular trajectories but warrant caution for insular trajectories with statistically significantly less accuracy.

Sevoflurane-induced high-frequency oscillations, effective connectivity and intraoperative classification of epileptic brain areas

OBJECTIVE

To determine how sevoflurane anesthesia modulates intraoperative epilepsy biomarkers on electrocorticography, including high-frequency oscillation (HFO) effective connectivity (EC), and to investigate their relation to epileptogenicity and anatomical white matter.

METHODS

We studied eight pediatric drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who achieved seizure control after invasive monitoring and resective surgery. We visualized spatial distributions of the electrocorticography biomarkers at an oxygen baseline, three time-points while sevoflurane was increasing, and at a plateau of 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. HFO EC was combined with diffusion-weighted imaging, in dynamic tractography.

RESULTS

Intraoperative HFO EC diffusely increased as a function of sevoflurane concentration, although most in epileptogenic sites (defined as those included in the resection); their ability to classify epileptogenicity was optimized at sevoflurane 2 MAC. HFO EC could be visualized on major white matter tracts, as a function of sevoflurane level.

CONCLUSIONS

The results strengthened the hypothesis that sevoflurane-activated HFO biomarkers may help intraoperatively localize the epileptogenic zone.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results help characterize how HFOs at non-epileptogenic and epileptogenic networks respond to sevoflurane. It may be warranted to establish a normative HFO atlas incorporating the modifying effects of sevoflurane and major white matter pathways, as critical reference in epilepsy presurgical evaluation.