Keloid: Genetic susceptibility and contributions of genetics and epigenetics to its pathogenesis

Update on the Pathogenesis of Keloid Formation

Keloids are abnormal skin growths occurring in a significant portion of the global population. Despite their pervasiveness, the underlying pathophysiology of this scarring process is yet to be fully understood. In this review article, we delve into the current literature on the pathophysiological mechanisms of keloids. We take a top-down approach, first looking at host factors such as genetics and endocrine factors and then taking a more granular approach describing specific control factors such as germline keloid predisposition variants, epigenetics and transcriptomics, inflammatory and immune dysregulation, and the role of profibrotic and angiogenic cell signaling pathways. We then discuss current knowledge gaps, propose further research avenues, and explore potential future treatment options considering our increased understanding of keloid pathogenesis.

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy combined with cross-punch technique for the treatment of keloid

OBJECTIVE

Keloids are characterized by abnormal activation of fibroblasts and excessive collagen deposition. Keloids are notoriously difficult to treat effectively due to their high recurrence rate after therapy. Our study explored the use of the punch technique in conjunction with photodynamic therapy, a novel approach that may swiftly reduce keloid volume, promote collagen remodeling, mitigate inflammation and enhance the wound healing process.

METHODS

In our study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 47 keloid patients who were treated with cross-punch technique combined with photodynamic therapy (punch+PDT group), compared them with a control group of 42 patients who received cross-punch therapy alone (punch group). The visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring system, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire and the subjective scoring of patients were implemented to assess the improvement rate at baseline (month 0) and 12-month follow-up (month 12).

RESULTS

The results demonstrated significant enhancements in both VAS scores and DLQI scores on month 12 when compared with those on month 0. Notably, the subjective scoring indicated a marked difference, with 93.62 % of patients in the punch+PDT group and 59.52 % in the punch group reporting good or excellent improvement.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the punch+PDT group had a significant improvement rate than those in the punch group.

The diagnostic value and associated molecular mechanism study for fibroblast-related mitochondrial genes on keloid

PURPOSE

This study aims to reveal the mechanism of fibroblast-related mitochondrial genes on keloid formation and explore promising signature genes for keloid diagnosis.

METHOD

The distribution of fibroblasts between the keloid sample and control sample based on three keloid datasets, followed by the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) investigation and associated enrichment analysis. Then, hub genes were explored based on DEGs, mitochondrial genes from an online database, as well as fibroblast-related genes that were revealed by WCGNA. Subsequently, signature genes were screened through machine learning, and their diagnostic value was validated by nomogram. Moreover, the targeted drugs and related transcriptional regulation of these genes were analyzed. Finally, the verification analysis was performed on signature genes using qPCR analysis.

RESULT

A total of totally 329 DEGs were revealed based on three datasets, followed by enrichment analysis. WGCNA revealed a total of 258 fibroblast-related genes, which were primarily assembled in functions like muscle tissue development. By using machine learning, we screened four signature genes (ACSF2, ALDH1B1, OCIAD2, and SIRT4) based on eight hub genes (fibroblast-related mitochondrial genes). Nomogram and validation analyses confirmed the well-diagnostic performance of these four genes in keloid. Immune infiltration and drug correlation analyses showed that SIRT4 was significantly associated with immune cell type 2 T helper cells and molecular drug cyclosporin. All these findings provided new perspectives for the clinical diagnosis and therapy of keloid.

CONCLUSION

The fibroblast-related mitochondrial genes including SIRT4, OCIAD2, ALDH1B1, and ACSF2 were novel signature genes for keloid diagnosis, offering novel targets and strategies for diagnosis and therapy of keloid.

Comprehensive Insights into Keloid Pathogenesis and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies

Keloid scars, characterized by abnormal fibroproliferation and excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) production that extends beyond the original wound, often cause pruritus, pain, and hyperpigmentation, significantly impacting the quality of life. Keloid pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, immune response dysregulation, and aberrant wound-healing processes. Central molecular pathways such as TGF-β/Smad and JAK/STAT are important in keloid formation by sustaining fibroblast activation and ECM deposition. Conventional treatments, including surgical excision, radiation, laser therapies, and intralesional injections, yield variable success but are limited by high recurrence rates and potential adverse effects. Emerging therapies targeting specific immune pathways, small molecule inhibitors, RNA interference, and mesenchymal stem cells show promise in disrupting the underlying mechanisms of keloid pathogenesis, potentially offering more effective and lasting treatment outcomes. Despite advancements, further research is essential to fully elucidate the precise mechanisms of keloid formation and to develop targeted therapies. Ongoing clinical trials and research efforts are vital for translating these scientific insights into practical treatments that can markedly enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by keloid scars.

Identification and Analysis of Immune Microenvironment-Related Genes for Keloid Risk Prediction and Their Effects on Keloid Proliferation and Migration

Keloid is a kind of proliferative scar with continuous growth, no restriction and easy recurrence, which cannot be cured and bring serious physical injury and psychological burden to patients. The main reason is that the pathological mechanism is not clear. Therefore, this project is expected to reveal the immune microenvironment-related genes and their functions in keloid progression, and provide effective targets for the treatment of keloid. Firstly, 8 kinds of immune infiltrating cells and 19 potential characteristic genes were identified by immune infiltration analysis, ssGSEA, LASSO regression (glmnet algorithm and lars algorithm) and WGCNA, indicating that keloid was closely related to the changes of immune microenvironment. Then, 4 pathological biomarkers of keloid (MAPK1, PTPRC, STAT3 and IL1R1) were identified by differentially analysis, univariate analysis, LASSO regression (lars algorithm), support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-REF) algorithm, multivariate logical regression analysis and six machine learning algorithms. Based on the 4 feature genes, the risk prediction model and nomogram were constructed. Calibration curve and ROC analysis (AUC = 0.930) showed that the model had reliable clinical value. Subsequently, consistent cluster analysis was used to find that there were 2 immune microenvironment subsets in keloid patients, of which subgroup II was immune subgroup. Multiple independent datasets and RT-qPCR showed that the expression trend of the 4 genes was consistent with the analysis. Cell gain-loss experiment confirmed that 4 genes regulated the proliferation and migration of keloid cells. The above data shows that MAPK1, PTPRC, STAT3 and IL1R1 may be personalized therapeutic targets for keloid patients.

Effects of miR-214 on adenosine A2A receptor and carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles on the function of keloid fibroblasts and their mechanisms

This work prepared and investigated the impact of carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles (MC-NPs) on the proliferative capability of keloid fibroblasts (KFBs) while analyzing the mechanistic roles of miR-214 and adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) in fibroblasts within hypertrophic scars. MC-NPs were synthesized through ion cross-linking, were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and laser particle size scattering. The influence of MC-NPs on the proliferation capacity of KFBs was assessed using the MTT method. Changes in the expression levels of miR-214 and A2AR in KFBs, normal skin fibroblasts (NFBs), hypertrophic scar tissue, and normal skin tissue were analyzed. KFBs were categorized into anti-miR-214, anti-miR-NC, miR-214 mimics, miR-NC, si-A2AR, si-con, anti-miR-214+ si-con, and anti-miR-214+ si-A2AR groups. Bioinformatics target prediction was conducted to explore the interaction between miR-214 and A2AR. Real-time quantitative PCR and immunoblotting (WB) were employed to detect the expression levels of miR-214, A2AR, apoptotic protein Bax, and TGF-β in different cells. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and flow cytometry were employed to assess cell proliferation activity and apoptosis. The results indicated that MC-NPs exhibited spherical particles with an average diameter of 236.47 ± 4.98 nm. The cell OD value in the MC-NPs group was lower than that in KFBs (P < 0.05). The mRNA levels of miR-214 in KFBs and hypertrophic scar tissue were lower than those in NFBs and normal tissue (P < 0.001), while the mRNA and protein levels of A2AR were significantly elevated (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group and anti-miR-NC, the anti-miR-214 group showed significantly increased cell OD values and Bcl-2 protein expression (P < 0.001), decreased levels of apoptotic gene Bax protein, TGF-β gene mRNA, and protein expression (P < 0.001). Continuous complementary binding sites were identified between miR-214 and A2AR. Compared to the control group, the si-A2AR group exhibited a significant decrease in A2AR gene mRNA and protein expression levels (P < 0.001), reduced cell viability (P < 0.001), increased apoptosis rate (P < 0.001), and a significant elevation in TGF-β protein expression (P < 0.001). miR-214 targetedly regulated the expression of A2AR, inducing changes in TGF-β content, promoting the proliferation of keloid fibroblasts, and inhibiting cell apoptosis.

Identification of inflammation-related biomarkers in keloids

Background

The relationship between inflammation-related genes (IRGs) and keloid disease (KD) is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to identify a new set of inflammation-related biomarkers in KD.

Methods

GSE145725 and GSE7890 datasets were used in this study. A list of 3026 IRGs was obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database. Differentially expressed inflammation-related genes (DEGs) were obtained by taking the intersection of DEGs between KD and control samples and the list of IRGs. Candidate genes were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Candidate genes with consistent expression differences between KD and control in both GSE145725 and GSE7890 datasets were screened as biomarkers. An alignment diagram was constructed and validated, and in silico immune infiltration analysis and drug prediction were performed. Finally, RT-qPCR was performed on KD samples to analyze the expression of the identified biomarkers.

Results

A total of 889 DEGs were identified from the GSE145725 dataset, 169 of which were IRGs. Three candidate genes (TRIM32, LPAR1 and FOXF1) were identified by the LASSO regression analysis, and expression validation analysis suggested that FOXF1 and LPAR1 were down-regulated in KD samples and TRIM32 was up-regulated. All three candidate genes had consistent changes in expression in both the GSE145725 and GSE7890 datasets. An alignment diagram was constructed to predict KD. Effector memory CD4 T cells, T follicular helper cell, Myeloid derived suppressor cell, activated dendritic cell, Immature dendritic cell and Monocyte were differentially expressed between the KD and control group. Sixty-seven compounds that may act on FOXF1, 108 compounds that may act on LPAR1 and 56 compounds that may act on TRIM32 were predicted. Finally, RT-qPCR showed that the expression of LPAR1 was significantly lower in KD samples compared to normal samples whereas TRIM32 was significantly higher, while there was no difference in the expression of FOXF1.

Conclusion

This study provides a new perspective to study the relationship between IRGs and KD.

Indocyanine green based photodynamic therapy for keloids: Fundamental investigation and clinical improvement

BACKGROUND

Keloid, a prevalent pathological skin lesion, presents significant challenges in terms of treatment efficacy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), an increasingly popular adjuvant treatment, has shown significant potential in the management of various disorders, including cancer. However, the therapeutic potential of indocyanine green-mediated photodynamic therapy (ICG-PDT) for keloids has not yet been demonstrated.

METHODS

In this study, we divided the experimental groups into control group, Photothermal Therapy group, Photodynamic Therapy group, and Combined Therapy group. The in vitro investigation aimed to optimize the clinical application of PDT for keloid treatment by elucidating its underlying mechanism. Subsequently, on this basis, we endeavored to manage a clinical case of keloid by employing surgical intervention in conjunction with modified ICG-PDT.

RESULTS

Our investigation revealed an unexpected outcome that ICG-PDT maximally inhibited the cellular activity and migration of keloid fibroblasts only when photodynamic mechanism took effect. Additionally, the induction of autophagy and apoptosis, as well as the inhibition of collagen synthesis, were particularly evident in this experimental group. Furthermore, the above therapeutic effect could be achieved at remarkably low drug concentrations. Building upon the aforementioned experimental findings, we successfully optimized the treatment modality for the latest case and obtained a more favorable treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated the mechanism of ICG-PDT treatment and optimized the in vivo treatment regimen, demonstrating the significant therapeutic potential of ICG-PDT treatment in clinical keloid treatment.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Keloid: Method Summary and Effect Evaluation

Keloid is a prevalent skin disorder characterized by the abnormal growth of keloid tissue, which usually occurs following wound healing or surgical incisions. It typically progresses through several stages: the inflammatory stage, the proliferative stage, collagen remodeling, and ultimately the formation of keloid. This review aims to summarize the diagnostic and therapeutic methods for keloid, and evaluate their effectiveness. The diagnosis of keloid is usually based on medical history and clinical manifestations such as pain, itching, erythema, and induration. Other commonly used diagnostic methods include tissue biopsy and ultrasound examination. Various treatment options for keloid exist, including physical therapy, medication, surgical treatment, and radiation therapy. Physical therapy includes pressure therapy, laser therapy, such as silicone sheets, elastic bandages, and laser irradiation. Medication treatment mainly involves the application of topical medications or intralesional injections, such as topical corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, and others. Radiation therapy can be administered using applicators and superficial radiation therapy, among other methods. The treatment outcomes of keloid vary from person to person and recurrence is common. Therefore, a comprehensive treatment approach may be the most effective strategy. Individualized treatment plans should consider factors such as the patient's age, gender, medical history, and the severity of the condition. In conclusion, the diagnosis and treatment of keloid require consideration of multiple factors and the implementation of individualized treatment plans. Future research should focus on identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of keloid in order to develop more effective treatment methods.

Scars

Wound healing occurs as a response to disruption of the epidermis and dermis. It is an intricate and well-orchestrated response with the goal to restore skin integrity and function. However, in hundreds of millions of patients, skin wound healing results in abnormal scarring, including keloid lesions or hypertrophic scarring. Although the underlying mechanisms of hypertrophic scars and keloid lesions are not well defined, evidence suggests that the changes in the extracellular matrix are perpetuated by ongoing inflammation in susceptible individuals, resulting in a fibrotic phenotype. The lesions then become established, with ongoing deposition of excess disordered collagen. Not only can abnormal scarring be debilitating and painful, it can also cause functional impairment and profound changes in appearance, thereby substantially affecting patients' lives. Despite the vast demand on patient health and the medical society, very little progress has been made in the care of patients with abnormal scarring. To improve the outcome of pathological scarring, standardized and innovative approaches are required.

Glycoprotein M6A upregulation detected by transcriptome analysis controls the proliferation of keloidal fibroblasts

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are fibroproliferative disorders caused by abnormal wound healing. Their exact cause has not been found, but abnormalities during the wound healing process including inflammatory, immune, genetic, and other factors are thought to predispose an individual to excessive scarring. In the present study, we performed transcriptome analysis of established keloid cell lines (KEL FIB), focusing on gene expression analysis and fusion gene detection for the first time. For gene expression analysis, fragments per kilobase per million map read values were calculated, which were validated by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Fusion genes were predicted by transcriptome sequence, and validated by Sanger sequence and G-banding. As a result, GPM6A was shown in the expression analysis to be upregulated in KEL FIB compared with normal fibroblasts. The GPM6A upregulation in KEL FIB was confirmed by real-time PCR, and GPM6A messenger ribonucleic acid expression was consistently significantly elevated in the tissues of hypertrophic scar and keloid compared to normal skin. Immunohistochemistry also revealed that the number of fibroblast-like spindle-shaped cells positive for GPM6A was significantly increased in keloidal tissues. GPM6A inhibition by small interfering ribonucleic acid significantly reduced the number of KEL FIB. On the other hand, although we hypothesized that fusion genes are involved in the pathogenesis of keloids, the transcriptome analysis could not prove the presence of fusion genes in KEL FIB. Taken together, GPM6A upregulation may have an inducible effect on cell proliferation in keloidal fibroblasts. GPM6A can be a novel therapeutic target in hypertrophic scars and keloids. The inflammatory nature may be more prominent in the pathogenesis of keloids, rather than being skin tumors, as proposed by Ogawa et al. Future studies using several cell lines will be required.

UCHL1 aggravates skin fibrosis through an IGF-1-induced Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α pathway in keloid

Keloid is a heterogeneous disease featured by the excessive production of extracellular matrix. It is a great challenge for both clinicians and patients regarding the exaggerated and uncontrolled outgrowth and the therapeutic resistance of the disease. In this study, we verified that UCHL1 was drastically upregulated in keloid fibroblasts. UCHL1 had no effects on cell proliferation and migration, but instead promoted collagen I and α-SMA expression that was inhibited by silencing UCHL1 gene and by adding in LDN-57444, a pharmacological inhibitor for UCHL1 activity as well. The pathological process was mediated by IGF-1 promoted Akt/mTOR/HIF-1α signaling pathway because inhibition of any of them could reduce the expression of collagen I and α-SMA driven by UCHL1 in fibroblasts. Also, we found that UCHL1 expression in keloid fibroblasts was promoted by M2 macrophages via TGF-β1. These findings extend our understanding of the pathogenesis of keloid and provide potential therapeutic targets for the disease.

An updated review of the immunological mechanisms of keloid scars

Keloid is a type of disfiguring pathological scarring unique to human skin. The disorder is characterized by excessive collagen deposition. Immune cell infiltration is a hallmark of both normal and pathological tissue repair. However, the immunopathological mechanisms of keloid remain unclear. Recent studies have uncovered the pivotal role of both innate and adaptive immunity in modulating the aberrant behavior of keloid fibroblasts. Several novel therapeutics attempting to restore regulation of the immune microenvironment have shown variable efficacy. We review the current understanding of keloid immunopathogenesis and highlight the potential roles of immune pathway-specific therapeutics.

Current advances in the selection of adjuvant radiotherapy regimens for keloid

Keloid is a common benign skin tumor in the outpatient department, and patients are often accompanied by itching and pain. Since the pathogenesis is unknown, the effect of single method treatment is unsatisfactory, and therefore the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, comprehensive treatment is mostly used in clinical treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently one of the most effective treatments for keloid. After long-term clinical practice, brachytherapy and electron beam radiotherapy has increasingly become the gold standard of treatment, because brachytherapy provides more focused radiation treatment to focal tissue to significantly reduce recurrence rate, and better preserve normal tissue. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques, more options for the treatment of keloid. Currently, adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely recognized, but there is no consensus on the optimal protocol for adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids. This review provides a review of published treatment options and new radiotherapy techniques for adjuvant radiotherapy of keloids and gives a comprehensive evaluation for clinical treatment.