CCL11-induced eosinophils inhibit the formation of blood vessels and cause tumor necrosis

Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Predicts the Efficacy of Avelumab in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Enrolled in the MALVA Study (Meet-URO 25)

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been described to be associated with outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in several tumor types, but less is known about its role of in the response to avelumab in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). Thus, we reported outcomes by NER of aUC patients treated with avelumab as maintenance after initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy and enrolled in the Maintenance with AVeLumAb ([MALVA] in advanced urothelial neoplasms in response to first-line chemotherapy: an observational retrospective study) study (Meet-URO 25).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Median NER at baseline and after 3 cycles of avelumab were calculated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by NER were reported.

RESULTS

At the cutoff date (April 15, 2023), a total of 109 patients were included. The median NER was 28.05 at baseline and 24.46 after 3 cycles of avelumab, respectively. Median PFS was not reached for patients with baseline NER less than the median (

CONCLUSION

NER Collapse

Key Words

• Biomarker
• Eosinophilia
• Predictive factors
• Prognostic factors

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
• Male
• Female
• Aged
• Retrospective Studies
• Middle Aged
• Neutrophils
• Aged, 80 and over
• Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
• Prognosis
• Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
• Treatment Outcome
• Progression-Free Survival
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
• Adult

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Elisabetta Gambale Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Marco Maruzzo Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
Carlo Messina Ospedale Arnas Civico, Clinical Oncology, Palermo, Italy
Irene De Gennaro Aquino Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Ismaela Anna Vascotto Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Virginia Rossi Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Davide Bimbatti Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
Nicolò Cavasin Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
Marco Messina Ospedale Arnas Civico, Clinical Oncology, Palermo, Italy
Alessia Mennitto University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Division of Oncology, Novara, Italy
Sara Elena Rebuzzi Ospedale San Paolo, Medical Oncology Unit, Savona, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Cecilia Nasso Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santa Corona, 17027 Pietra Ligure, Italy
Chiara Mercinelli Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Medical Oncology Unit 2, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRRCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
Brigida Anna Maiorano Department of Medical Oncology, IRRCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo
Martina Fanelli University Hospital of Udine, Department of Oncology, Udine, Italy
Mariella Sorarù Ospedale di Camposampiero, U.O. Oncologia, Camposampiero, Italy
Federico Scolari Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Marinella Micol Mela Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Luca Galli Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Medical Oncology Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
Alessia Salfi Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Medical Oncology Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
Mimma Rizzo Oncologia Medica Universitaria Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari
Silvia Puglisi IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
Valentina Orlando Department of Oncology, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy
Giuseppe Fornarini IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
Alessandro Rametta Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
Patrizia Giannatempo Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan, Italy
Linda Cerbone Department of Medical Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
Laura Doni Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Giandomenico Roviello Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139 Florence, Italy
Serena Pillozzi Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy
Lorenzo Antonuzzo Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy

Collapse

Exploring CCL11 in breast cancer: unraveling its anticancer potential and immune modulatory effects involving the Akt-S6 signaling

BACKGROUND

CCL11, a chemokine known for recruiting immune cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME), has an unclear role in the context of its expression, patient prognosis, and the presence of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TILs) in breast cancer.

METHODS

The expression of CCL11 in invasive breast cancer (BRCA) was analyzed using TCGA database. Survival curve and Cox regression analysis determined the potential of CCL11 as an independent prognostic indicator. GSEA performed functional analysis on genes related to CCL11. CIBERSORT algorithm quantified the infiltration level of immune cells with varying CCL11 expression. Lastly, the correlation between CCL11 expression and anticancer drug sensitivity was examined. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR confirmed CCL11 expression in clinical tissue samples. The anti-tumor efficacy of CCL11 was investigated using CCK-8, plate formation, transwell assay, and Western blot.

RESULTS

CCL11 expression was elevated in BRCA tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was longer in patients with high expression of CCL11. Enrichment and co-expression analyses revealed CCL11's association with numerous immune-related signaling pathways and genes. Validation studies confirmed high CCL11 expression in breast cancer tissues. In vitro experiments substantiated CCL11's anticancer effects in BRCA.

CONCLUSION

CCL11 expression correlates with immune cell infiltration in breast cancer, indicating its potential as a prognostic biomarker for BRCA.

Assessing serum cytokine profiles in inflammatory breast cancer patients using Luminex® technology

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), accounts for the majority of deaths associated with breast tumors. Because this form is aggressive from its appearance and has a strong metastatic potential. The majority of patients are not diagnosed until late stages, highlighting the need for the development of novel diagnostic biomarkers. Immune mediators may affect IBC progression and metastasis installation.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Analysis of serum proteins to identify a panel of prognostic biomarkers for IBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum levels of 65 analytes were determined in IBC and Non-IBC patients with the ProcartaPlex Human Immune Monitoring 65-Plex Panel.

RESULTS

Fifteen analytes: 5 cytokines (IL-8, IL-16, IL-21, IL-22 and MIF), 7 chemokines (Eotaxin, eotaxin-3, Fractalkine, IP-10, MIP-1α, MIP-1β and SDF-1α), One growth factors (FGF-2) and 2 soluble receptors (TNFRII and Tweak); were significantly differentially expressed between the two groups. ROC curves showed that twelve of them (IL-8, IL-16, IL-21, IL-22, MIF, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, SDF-1α, TNFRII, FGF-2, Eotaxin-3, and Fractalkine) had AUC values greater than 0.70 and thus had potential clinical utility. Moreover, seven cytokines: IL-8, IL-16, MIF, Eotaxin-3, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and CD-30 are positively associated with patients who developed distant metastasis. Ten analytes: Eotaxin-3, Fractalkine, IL-16, IL-1α, IL-22, IL-8, MIF, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNFRII are positively associated with patients who had Lymph-Nodes invasion.

CONCLUSION

This study has uncovered a set of 8 analytes (Eotaxin-3, Fractalkine, IL-16, IL-8, IL-22, MIF, MIP-1α, MIP-1β) that can be used as biomarkers of IBC, and can be utilized for early detection of IBC, preventing metastasis and lymph-Nodes invasion.

Eosinophils in the tumor microenvironment: implications for cancer immunotherapy

Despite being an integral part of the immune response in the tumor microenvironment (TME), few studies have mechanistically elucidated eosinophil functions in cancer outcomes. Eosinophils are a minor population of granulocytes that are mostly explored in asthma and allergic disorders. Their influence on primary and metastatic tumors, however, has recently come to light. Eosinophils' diverse armamentarium of mediators and receptors allows them to participate in innate and adaptive immunity, such as type 1 and type 2 immunity, and shape TME and tumor outcomes. Based on TME cells and cytokines, activated eosinophils drive other immune cells to ultimately promote or suppress tumor growth. Discovering exactly what conditions determine the pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic role of eosinophils allows us to take advantage of these signals and devise novel strategies to target cancer cells. Here, we first revisit eosinophil biology and differentiation as recognizing eosinophil mediators is crucial to their function in homeostatic and pathological conditions as well as tumor outcome. The bulk of our paper discusses eosinophil interactions with tumor cells, immune cells-including T cells, plasma cells, natural killer (NK) cells-and gut microbiota. Eosinophil mediators, such as IL-5, IL-33, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and CCL11 also determine eosinophil behavior toward tumor cells. We then examine the implications of these findings for cancer immunotherapy approaches, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Eosinophils synergize with CAR T cells and ICB therapy to augment immunotherapies.

Baseline Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Is Associated with Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment selection and clinical care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in an expanding treatment landscape. We report baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratios (NER) in patients with mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and their association with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with mRCC treated with CPIs at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2020 in the United States of America (USA). Demographics, disease characteristics, and laboratory data, including complete blood counts (CBC) were described at the initiation of CPIs. Clinical outcomes were measured as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit (CB) associated with baseline lab values.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included with a median follow-up time of 25.4 months. Patients with baseline NER were categorized into high or low subgroups; high group was defined as NER >49.2 and low group was defined as NER <49.2 with 25% of patients in the high NER group. Univariate analyses (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) identified decreased overall survival (OS) associated with elevated NER. In MVA, patients with a high baseline NER group had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.68 (95%CI, 1.01-2.82, P = .048) for OS; however, there was no significant difference between groups for PFS. Clinical benefit was seen in 47.3% of patients with low baseline NER and 40% with high NER.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that elevated baseline NER may be associated with worse clinical outcomes in mRCC. Although results require further validation, NER is a feasible biomarker in patients with CPI-treated mRCC.

Role of Cytokines and Chemokines in Angiogenesis in a Tumor Context

Simple Summary

Tumor growth in solid cancers requires adequate nutrient and oxygen supply, provided by blood vessels created by angiogenesis. Numerous studies have demonstrated that this mechanism plays a crucial role in cancer development and appears to be a well-defined hallmark of cancer. This process is carefully regulated, notably by cytokines with pro-angiogenic or anti-angiogenic features. In this review, we will discuss the role of cytokines in the modulation of angiogenesis. In addition, we will summarize the therapeutic approaches based on cytokine modulation and their clinical approval.

Abstract

During carcinogenesis, tumors set various mechanisms to help support their development. Angiogenesis is a crucial process for cancer development as it drives the creation of blood vessels within the tumor. These newly formed blood vessels insure the supply of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor, helping its growth. The main factors that regulate angiogenesis are the five members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family. Angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer and has been the target of new therapies this past few years. However, angiogenesis is a complex phenomenon with many redundancy pathways that ensure its maintenance. In this review, we will first describe the consecutive steps forming angiogenesis, as well as its classical regulators. We will then discuss how the cytokines and chemokines present in the tumor microenvironment can induce or block angiogenesis. Finally, we will focus on the therapeutic arsenal targeting angiogenesis in cancer and the challenges they have to overcome.

Histamine in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Current status and new perspectives

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally and its incidence and mortality are rapidly increasing worldwide. The dynamic interaction of immune cells and tumor cells determines the clinical outcome of cancer. Immunotherapy comes to the forefront of cancer treatments, resulting in impressive and durable responses but only in a fraction of patients. Thus, understanding the characteristics and profiles of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a necessary step to move forward in the design of new immunomodulatory strategies that can boost the immune system to fight cancer. Histamine produces a complex and fine-tuned regulation of the phenotype and functions of the different immune cells, participating in multiple regulatory responses of the innate and adaptive immunity. Considering the important actions of histamine-producing immune cells in the TME, in this review we first address the most important immunomodulatory roles of histamine and histamine receptors in the context of cancer development and progression. In addition, this review highlights the current progress and foundational developments in the field of cancer immunotherapy in combination with histamine and pharmacological compounds targeting histamine receptors.

Peripheral blood eosinophilia may be a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background

Eosinophils have been traditionally associated with the initiation and propagation of inflammatory responses, particularly in allergic diseases and helminth infections. More recently, an association between eosinophils and cancer has been the focus of several studies, but controversial results have emerged. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of peripheral blood eosinophilia in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immunotherapy (IO). We also evaluated the impact of peripheral eosinophilia on the occurrence of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs).

Methods

Advanced NSCLC patients under IO were included in a retrospective single-center study. Peripheral blood eosinophilia was defined by a count greater than 500/µL. Patients were analyzed for eosinophil counts, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

A total of 121 NSCLC patients receiving IO were included. Thirty-three (27.3%) patients presented peripheral blood eosinophilia during treatment. Patients with peripheral eosinophilia presented more frequently non-progression as best overall response to IO (83.3% vs. 58.1%, P=0.014), higher median OS (26.6 vs. 9.5 months, P=0.022) and higher median PFS (13.8 vs. 4.6 months, P=0.013). IrAEs were more common in patients with peripheral eosinophilia (66.7% vs. 36.4%, P=0.003).

Conclusions

This study suggests that peripheral blood eosinophilia may predict better outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving IO, despite being associated with an increased risk of irAEs. According to our findings eosinophils may be involved in immune response against tumor. Routine eosinophils count assessment may be an additional prognostic tool in NSCLC patients receiving IO.

CC Chemokines in a Tumor: A Review of Pro-Cancer and Anti-Cancer Properties of the Ligands of Receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR4

CC chemokines, a subfamily of 27 chemotactic cytokines, are a component of intercellular communication, which is crucial for the functioning of the tumor microenvironment. Although many individual chemokines have been well researched, there has been no comprehensive review presenting the role of all known human CC chemokines in the hallmarks of cancer, and this paper aims at filling this gap. The first part of this review discusses the importance of CCL1, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL18, CCL19, CCL20, CCL21, CCL25, CCL27, and CCL28 in cancer. Here, we discuss the significance of CCL2 (MCP-1), CCL7, CCL8, CCL11, CCL13, CCL14, CCL15, CCL16, CCL17, CCL22, CCL23, CCL24, and CCL26. The presentation of each chemokine includes its physiological function and then the role in tumor, including proliferation, drug resistance, migration, invasion, and organ-specific metastasis of tumor cells, as well as the effects on angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. We also discuss the effects of each CC chemokine on the recruitment of cancer-associated cells to the tumor niche (eosinophils, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN), regulatory T cells (T_reg)). On the other hand, we also present the anti-cancer properties of CC chemokines, consisting in the recruitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL).

The impact of cytokine change after hepatitis C virus clearance by direct antiviral agents on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

De novo and early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been observed in clinical practice after direct antiviral agents (DAA) treatment. The study aims to investigate the change of cytokines and growth factors after hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance by DAAs and their impact on the risk of HCC development.

METHODS

The chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with or without HCC who received DAA treatment were prospectively enrolled. The cytokines and growth factors were measured using Bio-Plex Pro™ Human Cytokine 27-plex Assay before and 12 weeks off DAA treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were enrolled for final analysis. There were 11 males (29.7%) and 26 females (70.3%). The mean age was 67.39 ± 10.48 years. 11 (29.7%) patients were HCV-related HCC patients. The HCV genotype included genotype 2 in 26 patients and genotype 1b in 10 patients, and genotype 6 in 1. Among them, 35 (94.6%) patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). Two patients with HCC failed to DAA treatment. In HCV-related HCC patients, serum IP-10 level significantly declined after HCV clearance, but no difference in five growth factors including G-CSF, GM-CSF, basic FGF, PDGF-BB, and VEGF. Several cytokines including IP-10 significantly declined after HCV clearance in CHC patients.

CONCLUSION

This study showed only serum IP-10 level, a risk factor of HCC, was significantly declined after HCV clearance and no change in the markers of growth factors in HCV-related HCC patients, suggesting no promotion of HCC using DAA treatment for HCV-related HCC patients.

CCL18 in the Progression of Cancer

A neoplastic tumor consists of cancer cells that interact with each other and non-cancerous cells that support the development of the cancer. One such cell are tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). These cells secrete many chemokines into the tumor microenvironment, including especially a large amount of CCL18. This chemokine is a marker of the M2 macrophage subset; this is the reason why an increase in the production of CCL18 is associated with the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment and an important element of cancer immune evasion. Consequently, elevated levels of CCL18 in the serum and the tumor are connected with a worse prognosis for the patient. This paper shows the importance of CCL18 in neoplastic processes. It includes a description of the signal transduction from PITPNM3 in CCL18-dependent migration, invasion, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) cancer cells. The importance of CCL18 in angiogenesis has also been described. The paper also describes the effect of CCL18 on the recruitment to the cancer niche and the functioning of cells such as TAMs, regulatory T cells (T_reg), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADCs). The last part of the paper describes the possibility of using CCL18 as a therapeutic target during anti-cancer therapy.

Costimulatory Effect of Rough Calcium Phosphate Coating and Blood Mononuclear Cells on Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro as a Model of In Vivo Tissue Repair

Calcium phosphate (CaP) materials do not always induce ectopic vascularization and bone formation; the reasons remain unclear, and there are active discussions of potential roles for post-implantation hematoma, circulating immune and stem cells, and pericytes, but studies on adipose-derived stem cells (AMSCs) in this context are lacking. The rough (average surface roughness R_a = 2-5 µm) scaffold-like CaP coating deposited on pure titanium plates by the microarc oxidation method was used to investigate its subcutaneous vascularization in CBA/CaLac mice and in vitro effect on cellular and molecular crosstalk between human blood mononuclear cells (hBMNCs) and AMSCs (hAMSCs). Postoperative hematoma development on the CaP surface lasting 1-3 weeks may play a key role in the microvessel elongation and invasion into the CaP relief at the end of the 3rd week of injury and BMNC migration required for enhanced wound healing in mice. Satisfactory osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation but poor adipogenic differentiation of hAMSCs on the rough CaP surface were detected in vitro by differential cell staining. The fractions of CD73⁺ (62%), CD90⁺ (0.24%), and CD105⁺ (0.41%) BMNCs may be a source of autologous circulating stem/progenitor cells for the subcutis reparation, but allogenic hBMNC participation is mainly related to the effects of CD4⁺ T cells co-stimulated with CaP coating on the in vitro recruitment of hAMSCs, their secretion of angiogenic and osteomodulatory molecules, and the increase in osteogenic features within the period of in vivo vascularization. Cellular and molecular crosstalk between BMNCs and AMSCs is a model of effective subcutis repair. Rough CaP surface enhanced angio- and osteogenic signaling between cells. We believe that preconditioning and/or co-transplantation of hAMSCs with hBMNCs may broaden their potential in applications related to post-implantation tissue repair and bone bioengineering caused by microarc CaP coating.

A new dawn for eosinophils in the tumour microenvironment

Eosinophils are evolutionarily conserved, pleotropic cells that display key effector functions in allergic diseases, such as asthma. Nonetheless, eosinophils infiltrate multiple tumours and are equipped to regulate tumour progression either directly by interacting with tumour cells or indirectly by shaping the tumour microenvironment (TME). Eosinophils can readily respond to diverse stimuli and are capable of synthesizing and secreting a large range of molecules, including unique granule proteins that can potentially kill tumour cells. Alternatively, they can secrete pro-angiogenic and matrix-remodelling soluble mediators that could promote tumour growth. Herein, we aim to comprehensively outline basic eosinophil biology that is directly related to their activity in the TME. We discuss the mechanisms of eosinophil homing to the TME and examine their diverse pro-tumorigenic and antitumorigenic functions. Finally, we present emerging data regarding eosinophils as predictive biomarkers and effector cells in immunotherapy, especially in response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy, and highlight outstanding questions for future basic and clinical cancer research.

CCL11 increases the proportion of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells and the production of IL‑2 and TGF‑β by CD4+ T cells via the STAT5 signaling pathway

CD4⁺ regulatory T (Treg) cells are associated with immune tolerance and antitumor immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role and molecular mechanism of C-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CCL11) in the regulation of Treg cells from patients with breast cancer (BC) and healthy individuals in vitro, and from tumor-bearing mice in vivo. CD4⁺ T cells isolated from patients with BC or healthy individuals were incubated with anti-CCL11 neutralizing antibodies or recombinant human CCL11 protein, in the presence or absence of a STAT5 inhibitor. The serum CCL11 level and proportion of Treg cells characterized as CD4⁺CD25⁺forkhead box P3⁺ (Foxp3) among the CD4⁺ T cells in patients with BC and healthy individuals were analyzed by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively. CCL11, C-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3), Foxp3, phosphorylated-STAT5 and STAT5 expression levels were determined by western blotting. The serum CCL11 level and the proportion of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells were significantly increased in patients with BC compared with healthy individuals. CCL11 blockade reduced the proportion of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, the expression of CCR3 and Foxp3, and the level of STAT5 activation in tumor-associated CD4⁺ T cells, in a dose-dependent manner. CCL11 blockade also reduced the proportion of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells and the serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in tumor-bearing mice. The recombinant human CCL11 protein increased the proportion of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells, the expression of CCR3 and Foxp3, and the release of IL-2 and TGF-β1 in non-tumor-associated CD4⁺ T cells via the STAT5 signaling pathway. The results of the present study may aid in identifying therapeutics that could further modulate the immune system during BC.

Circulating factors in young blood as potential therapeutic agents for age-related neurodegenerative and neurovascular diseases

Recent animal studies on heterochronic parabiosis (a technique combining the blood circulation of two animals) have revealed that young blood has a powerful rejuvenating effect on brain aging. Circulating factors, especially growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) and C-C motif chemokine 11 (CCL11), may play a key role in this effect, which inspires hope for novel approaches to treating age-related cerebral diseases in humans, such as neurodegenerative and neurovascular diseases. Recently, attempts have begun to translate these astonishing and exciting findings from mice to humans and from bench to bedside. However, increasing reports have shown contradictory data, questioning the capacity of these circulating factors to reverse age-related brain dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the current research on the role of young blood, as well as the circulating factors GDF11 and CCL11, in the aging brain and age-related cerebral diseases. We highlight recent controversies, discuss related challenges and provide a future outlook.

Opposing roles of eosinophils in cancer

Eosinophils are a subset of granulocytes mostly known for their ability to combat parasites and induce allergy. Although they were described to be related to cancer more than 100 years ago, their role in tumors is still undefined. Recent observations revealed that they display regulatory functions towards other immune cell subsets in the tumor microenvironment or direct cytotoxic functions against tumor cells, leading to either antitumor or protumor effects. This paradoxical role of eosinophils was suggested to be dependent on the different factors in the TME. In addition, the clinical relevance of these cells has been recently addressed. In most cases, the accumulation of eosinophils both in the tumor tissue, called tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia, and in the peripheral blood were reported to be prognostic markers for a better outcome of cancer patients. In immunotherapy of cancer, particularly in therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, eosinophils were even shown to be a potential predictive marker for a beneficial clinical response. A better understanding of their role in cancer progression will help to establish them as prognostic and predictive markers and to design strategies for targeting eosinophils.

MicroRNA-342 inhibits tumor growth via targeting chemokine CXCL12 involved in macrophages recruitment/activation

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in initiation, development, progression and metastasis of tumors. MiR-342 has been reported as a tumor suppressor or an onco-miRNA based on functions or expression changes in various types of cancers. However, the biological roles and underlying molecular mechanisms of miR-342 in tumorigenesis remain largely unknown. Here, we found that miR-342 was expressed significantly less in a murine MS-K tumor cell line that showed riched blood vessels. Over-expression of miR-342 in MS-K cells inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, reduced frequency of S phase population in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in vivo. Moreover, increasing miR-342 impeded blood vessels formation and accumulation of macrophages (CD11b⁺ ) in tumors. By bioinformatic analysis and dual-luciferase reporter assays, chemokine CXCL12 was identified as a direct target of miR-342. Restored Cxcl12 expression in MS-K-miR-342 cells could rescue cell proliferation in vitro. In MS-K-miR-342 tumor-infiltrated macrophages, expression of proangiogenic genes (Vegf-A and Thbs1) and M2-subtype macrophage markers (Cd163, Dectin1 and Ym1) was significantly down-regulated compared with controls. Moreover, lower level of Cxcl12 and its receptor Cxcr4 was observed in the macrophages of MS-K-miR-342 tumors, and MS-K-miR-342 derived miR-342, but not endogenous miR-342, might contribute to Cxcl12 suppression in TAM. These results suggest that miR-342 is involved in MS-K tumor growth as a tumor suppressor by targeting chemokine CXCL12.

AllergoOncology: Opposite outcomes of immune tolerance in allergy and cancer

While desired for the cure of allergy, regulatory immune cell subsets and nonclassical Th2-biased inflammatory mediators in the tumour microenvironment can contribute to immune suppression and escape of tumours from immunological detection and clearance. A key aim in the cancer field is therefore to design interventions that can break immunological tolerance and halt cancer progression, whereas on the contrary allergen immunotherapy exactly aims to induce tolerance. In this position paper, we review insights on immune tolerance derived from allergy and from cancer inflammation, focusing on what is known about the roles of key immune cells and mediators. We propose that research in the field of AllergoOncology that aims to delineate these immunological mechanisms with juxtaposed clinical consequences in allergy and cancer may point to novel avenues for therapeutic interventions that stand to benefit both disciplines.