1
|
Jolidon V, Eicher M, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Aebi S, Anchisi S, Bettini A, Chalandon Y, Dietrich PY, Duchosal MA, Dürr D, Peters S, von Moos R, Wicki A, Arditi C. Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 39119752 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients' overall rating of cancer care. METHODS Data from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient-centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables. RESULTS Overall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were "professionals worked well together" (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and "tests were not repeated" (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, "offered support for symptoms during treatment" (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by "hospital staff ensured available home support" (OR, 1.99), "offered to see health professional for concerns" (OR, 1.91), "treatment options were explained" (OR, 1.75), and "involved in treatment decisions as desired" (OR, 1.68). CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Jolidon
- Unisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
- Unisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Aebi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sandro Anchisi
- Oncology Service, Hospital Center of Valais Romand, Hôpital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Adrienne Bettini
- Oncology Service, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Yves Chalandon
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Yves Dietrich
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michel A Duchosal
- Service of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Donat Dürr
- Department of Oncology, Zuger Kantonsspital, Baar, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roger von Moos
- Medical Oncology/Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Wicki
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Arditi
- Unisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Breton M, Gaboury I, Lamoureux-Lamarche C, Deslauriers V, Beaulieu C, Martin É, Berbiche D. Factors associated with patients' experience of access to their multidisciplinary primary health care clinic: A multilevel analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage 2024. [PMID: 39073160 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding patients' experiences accessing primary health care (PHC) is necessary to improve service organisation. This study aims to examine individual, organisational, and contextual factors associated with patients' experience of accessing the multidisciplinary PHC clinic to which they are attached. METHODS This cross-sectional study builds on survey data collected in multidisciplinary PHC clinics located in 14 regions in the province of Quebec (Canada). Between September 2022 and June 2023, an online questionnaire was sent to patients with an email contact and attached to a family physician. Two patient-reported experience measures were assessed: (1) difficulty obtaining an appointment with their regular family physician or nurse practitioner and (2) perceived unmet healthcare needs. A self-reported online questionnaire based on the advanced access model was also sent to PHC professionals and administrative staff to assess the use of advanced access strategies in their practice. Multilevel logistic regression models were fit. Stratified analyses were conducted according to the number of consultations received. FINDINGS In total, 122,397 patients and 847 family physicians, 97 nurse practitioners and 347 administrative staff nested into 104 clinics answered the survey. In the overall sample, having a chronic disorder was the only individual factor associated with the patient experience of access. Organizational factors including estimation of demand and supply, use of a referral algorithm, and strategies to optimise consultations were associated with a better access experience. Patients from medium size clinics compared to small clinics had better experiences of care for both outcomes. Stratified analysis indicated similar results for patients who consulted at the clinic 1-5 times in the last 12 months as observed in the overall sample. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that enhancing organizational processes can improve patients' access experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mylaine Breton
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Lamoureux-Lamarche
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Véronique Deslauriers
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christine Beaulieu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Élisabeth Martin
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Djamal Berbiche
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Université De Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
- Centre De Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ge X, Chappell P, Ledger J, Bakhai M, Clarke GM. The Use of Online Consultation Systems and Patient Experience of Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the General Practice Patient Survey. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51272. [PMID: 39058543 PMCID: PMC11316161 DOI: 10.2196/51272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NHS England encourages the use of online consultation (OC) systems alongside traditional access methods for patients to contact their general practice online and for practices to manage workflow. Access is a key driver of patients' primary care experience. The use of online technology and patient experience vary by sociodemographic characteristics. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the association between OC system use and patient experience of primary care in English general practice and how that varies by OC system model and practice sociodemographic characteristics (rurality, deprivation, age, and ethnicity). METHODS We categorized practices as "low-use" or "high-use" according to the volume of patient-initiated contacts made via the OC system. We considered practices using one of 2 OC systems with distinct designs and implementation models-shorter "free text" input with an embedded single workflow OC system (FT practices) and longer "mixed text" input with variation in implemented workflow OC system (MT practices). We used 2022 General Practice Patient Survey data to capture 4 dimensions of patient experience-overall experience, experience of making an appointment, continuity of care, and use of self-care before making an appointment. We used logistic regression at the practice level to explore the association between OC system use and patient experience, including interaction terms to assess sociodemographic variation. RESULTS We included 287,194 responses from 2423 MT and 170 FT practices. The proportions of patients reporting positive experiences at MT and FT practices were similar or better than practices nationally, except at high-use MT practices. At high-use MT practices, patients were 19.8% (odds ratio [OR] 0.802, 95% CI 0.782-0.823) less likely to report a good overall experience; 24.5% (OR 0.755, 95% CI 0.738-0.773) less likely to report a good experience of making an appointment; and 18.9% (OR 0.811, 95% CI 0.792-0.83) less likely to see their preferred general practitioner; but 27.8% (OR 1.278, 95% CI 1.249-1.308) more likely to use self-care, compared with low-use MT practices. Opposite trends were seen at FT practices. Sociodemographic inequalities in patient experience were generally lower at high-use than low-use practices; for example, gaps in overall experience between practices with the most and fewest White patients decreased by 2.7 percentage points at MT practices and 6.4 percentage points at FT practices. Trends suggested greater improvements in experience for traditionally underserved groups-patients from urban and deprived areas, younger patients, and non-White patients. CONCLUSIONS An OC system with shorter free text input and an integrated single workflow can enhance patient experience and reduce sociodemographic inequalities. Variation in patient experience between practices with different sociodemographic characteristics and OC systems underscores the importance of tailored design and implementation. Generalizing results across different OC systems is difficult due to variations in how they are integrated into practice workflows and communicated to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochen Ge
- Improvement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom
- NHS England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Chappell
- Improvement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom
- NHS England, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Geraldine M Clarke
- Improvement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schofield I, Jacklin B. Client and employee engagement measures predict resignations of veterinary support staff: An analysis of UK companion animal practice data. Vet Rec 2024; 195:e4268. [PMID: 38852995 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.4268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify factors associated with veterinary support staff resigning from UK companion animal veterinary practices. METHODS Cross-sectional employment data from support staff working across a group of veterinary practices on 31 December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. The support staff were categorised as those who remained at, or resigned from, their practice over the following 12-month period. The proposed risk factors for future resignations were analysed using multivariable binary logistic regression modelling. RESULTS In total, 398 of 2068 (19.2%) veterinary support staff resigned during the study period. Factors associated with greater odds of future resignations included lower staff engagement (employee net promoter score; odds ratio [OR] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.00; p < 0.001), lower client practice engagement (net promoter score; OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-1.00; p = 0.012), shorter tenure (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.95; p < 0.001), recent parental leave (OR = 2.37; 95% CI 1.38-4.07; p = 0.002) and younger age (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1.00; p = 0.017). LIMITATIONS Data were collected retrospectively and were not recorded for research purposes. CONCLUSIONS Employee and client net promoter scores are important predictors of resignations and could be useful tools for managers. Recent parental leave is a predictor of support staff attrition, and 'return to work' interventions may present an opportunity to improve retention.
Collapse
|
5
|
Weatherall A, Grattan F. A Conversation Analytic Study of Calls to Medical Reception for Doctor's Appointments. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 39:1532-1542. [PMID: 37303156 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2222462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A call to medical reception is regularly an entry point into primary health care services. Telephone-mediated interactions between patients and receptionists have been found to temper demand for doctor's appointments and influence patient satisfaction ratings; yet little is known about what exactly happens to produce those effects. The present study asks how medical receptionists respond to telephone-mediated appointment requests. Audio recordings of 18 calls between receptionists and patients at a New Zealand University health care practice were collected, transcribed and examined in detail using conversation analysis. The findings reveal the complexity of telephone-mediated medical receptionist work which involves multiple engagements involving the caller and the on-line booking systems. The work has clinical components and evidence was found of receptionists' orientations to the potential urgency of callers' problems and how a triaging process was initiated. Overall, this study shows medical receptionists do skillful communicative work granting patient requests or progressing relevant courses of action in a clinically responsible way, thus delivering a valuable and unrecognized aspect of health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fiona Grattan
- School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vought V, Vought R, Herzog A, Habiel MM. Application of Patient Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Glaucoma Care. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2024; 7:316-322. [PMID: 38103732 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients utilize online physician reviews to decide between and rate ophthalmologists. Sentiment analysis allows for better understanding of patient experiences. In this study, Valence Aware Dictionary sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) and word frequency analysis of glaucoma specialist Healthgrades reviews were used to determine factors prioritized by patients. DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS N/A. METHODS Written reviews and Star ratings of glaucoma specialists listed under the Physicians Payments Sunshine Acts were obtained, and demographic information was collected. Valence Aware Dictionary sEntiment Reasoner produced Negative, Neutral, Positive, and Compound scores of reviews, and these were stratified by demographic variables. Word frequency review was applied to determine popular words and phrases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Star ratings, VADER Compound score of written reviews, and highest word frequencies. RESULTS A total of 203 glaucoma specialists and 3531 written reviews were assessed. Glaucoma specialists had an average of 4.26/5 stars, with a mean of 30 ratings per physician on Healthgrades. Most physicians (86%) had overall Positive written reviews (VADER = 0.74), indicating high patient satisfaction. Specialists who were women or had fewer years of practice had higher Compound and Star scores than their respective male and senior counterparts, with statistical significance observed between junior and senior physician Stars (P < 0.001). Repeated words pertaining to the surgery, staff, wait times, and questions were common overall and among the most positive and most negative reviews. CONCLUSIONS Glaucoma specialist patients value nonclinical factors, such as appointment setting and nonphysician health-care staff members, in their written reviews. Thus, factors beyond clinical outcomes are influential in the overall patient experience and should be considered to improve health-care delivery. These results can also advise ophthalmologists on factors that patients prioritize when evaluating physicians, which influences the decisions of other patients seeking glaucoma care. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Vought
- Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Rita Vought
- Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Ava Herzog
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York
| | - Miriam M Habiel
- Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sandall J, Fernandez Turienzo C, Devane D, Soltani H, Gillespie P, Gates S, Jones LV, Shennan AH, Rayment-Jones H. Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD004667. [PMID: 38597126 PMCID: PMC11005019 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Midwives are primary providers of care for childbearing women globally and there is a need to establish whether there are differences in effectiveness between midwife continuity of care models and other models of care. This is an update of a review published in 2016. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of midwife continuity of care models with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (17 August 2022), as well as the reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA All published and unpublished trials in which pregnant women are randomly allocated to midwife continuity of care models or other models of care during pregnancy and birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion criteria, scientific integrity, and risk of bias, and carried out data extraction and entry. Primary outcomes were spontaneous vaginal birth, caesarean section, regional anaesthesia, intact perineum, fetal loss after 24 weeks gestation, preterm birth, and neonatal death. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 17 studies involving 18,533 randomised women. We assessed all studies as being at low risk of scientific integrity/trustworthiness concerns. Studies were conducted in Australia, Canada, China, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. The majority of the included studies did not include women at high risk of complications. There are three ongoing studies targeting disadvantaged women. Primary outcomes Based on control group risks observed in the studies, midwife continuity of care models, as compared to other models of care, likely increase spontaneous vaginal birth from 66% to 70% (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.07; 15 studies, 17,864 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), likelyreduce caesarean sections from 16% to 15% (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99; 16 studies, 18,037 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and likely result in little to no difference in intact perineum (29% in other care models and 31% in midwife continuity of care models, average RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.12; 12 studies, 14,268 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may belittle or no difference in preterm birth (< 37 weeks) (6% under both care models, average RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.16; 10 studies, 13,850 participants; low-certainty evidence). We arevery uncertain about the effect of midwife continuity of care models on regional analgesia (average RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.92; 15 studies, 17,754 participants, very low-certainty evidence), fetal loss at or after 24 weeks gestation (average RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.13; 12 studies, 16,122 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and neonatal death (average RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.71; 10 studies, 14,718 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes When compared to other models of care, midwife continuity of care models likely reduce instrumental vaginal birth (forceps/vacuum) from 14% to 13% (average RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; 14 studies, 17,769 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduceepisiotomy 23% to 19% (average RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91; 15 studies, 17,839 participants; low-certainty evidence). When compared to other models of care, midwife continuity of care models likelyresult in little to no difference inpostpartum haemorrhage (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.03; 11 studies, 14,407 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and admission to special care nursery/neonatal intensive care unit (average RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03; 13 studies, 16,260 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in induction of labour (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00; 14 studies, 17,666 participants; low-certainty evidence), breastfeeding initiation (average RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; 8 studies, 8575 participants; low-certainty evidence), and birth weight less than 2500 g (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.08; 9 studies, 12,420 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of midwife continuity of care models compared to other models of care onthird or fourth-degree tear (average RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.49; 7 studies, 9437 participants; very low-certainty evidence), maternal readmission within 28 days (average RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.96; 1 study, 1195 participants; very low-certainty evidence), attendance at birth by a known midwife (average RR 9.13, 95% CI 5.87 to 14.21; 11 studies, 9273 participants; very low-certainty evidence), Apgar score less than or equal to seven at five minutes (average RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24; 13 studies, 12,806 participants; very low-certainty evidence) andfetal loss before 24 weeks gestation (average RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.01; 12 studies, 15,913 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No maternal deaths were reported across three studies. Although the observed risk of adverse events was similar between midwifery continuity of care models and other models, our confidence in the findings was limited. Our confidence in the findings was lowered by possible risks of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of some estimates. There were no available data for the outcomes: maternal health status, neonatal readmission within 28 days, infant health status, and birth weight of 4000 g or more. Maternal experiences and cost implications are described narratively. Women receiving care from midwife continuity of care models, as opposed to other care models, generally reported more positive experiences during pregnancy, labour, and postpartum. Cost savings were noted in the antenatal and intrapartum periods in midwife continuity of care models. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Women receiving midwife continuity of care models were less likely to experience a caesarean section and instrumental birth, and may be less likely to experience episiotomy. They were more likely to experience spontaneous vaginal birth and report a positive experience. The certainty of some findings varies due to possible risks of bias, inconsistencies, and imprecision of some estimates. Future research should focus on the impact on women with social risk factors, and those at higher risk of complications, and implementation and scaling up of midwife continuity of care models, with emphasis on low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cristina Fernandez Turienzo
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hora Soltani
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paddy Gillespie
- Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, School of Business and Economics, Institute for Lifecourse and Society, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Simon Gates
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Leanne V Jones
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew H Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah Rayment-Jones
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cohen E, Lindman I. Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:195-200. [PMID: 38189945 PMCID: PMC10851828 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2299119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP). DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden. SUBJECTS Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October-December 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP. RESULTS The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years (p < .0001). Regarding accessibility, 67% of the patients reported having access to their RGP 'always/most of the time or a lot of the time' and 62% reported seeing their RGP at last visit. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, this study showed that the majority of patients value CoC in terms of importance of having an RGP. Older patients were more likely to have a preference for a certain GP. Two-third of the patients succeeded in seeing their RGP always or a lot of the time. The results in this study provide evidence that CoC is important for most patients, regardless of age and gender.Key pointsPrevious studies have showed that continuity of care (CoC) is important regarding mortality and morbidity. In primary care, there is a current debate regarding CoC, accessibility and the strive for CoC. This study showed that the majority of patients, regardless of age and gender, value CoC and consider it being important. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding age, where patients above 65 years old thought it was more important to have a regular general practitioner and more often had a preference for a certain GP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebba Cohen
- Säröledens Familjeläkare, Billdal, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jones J, Cruddas M, Simpson A, Meade N, Pushparajah D, Peter M, Hunter A. Factors affecting overall care experience for people living with rare conditions in the UK: exploratory analysis of a quantitative patient experience survey. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:77. [PMID: 38373961 PMCID: PMC10877794 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although individually rare, collectively, rare conditions are common and affect a large number of people and are often chronic, life threatening and affect multiple body systems; the majority of them have no effective treatment. The literature has identified many specific challenges for those living with rare conditions, however, we do not know which of these in combination are most likely to impact how someone rates their overall experience of care. The aim of this study is to do further exploratory analysis of the Genetic Alliance UK 2020 Rare Experience survey data to identify which variables are most strongly associated with respondents' overall care experience. RESULTS There were strong associations between most of the selected survey variables and the overall rated experience of care variable. In the multiple linear regression only nine variables remained in the best fit model: 'Trust and confidence in hospital staff involved in ongoing care'; 'Satisfaction with information provided by healthcare professionals-following diagnosis'; 'The professionals providing care work as a team'; 'Feel care is coordinated effectively'; 'The timing and frequency of appointments are convenient for the patient/carer/family'; 'Whether or not there is a specific healthcare professional to ask questions of about the rare/undiagnosed condition'; 'Experience of searching for a diagnosis'; 'Knowledge of whether there is a specialist centre for the condition'; and 'Number of different clinics attend for the condition'. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate the challenges that play the largest part in explaining the varied experiences with rare disease healthcare in the UK for our survey respondents. These challenges should be further investigated with a broader sample of people affected by rare conditions, ideally through the implementation of a comprehensive national rare condition patient registry. Our findings highlight an important potential gap in the Framework, 'trust and confidence in healthcare professionals'; further research is required to fully understand the foundations of trust and confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Jones
- Genetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Road, London, E17 6DS, UK.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Marie Cruddas
- Genetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Road, London, E17 6DS, UK
| | - Amy Simpson
- Institute of Public Care, Oxford Brookes University, Harcourt Hill Campus, Oxford, OX2 9AT, UK
| | - Nick Meade
- Genetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Road, London, E17 6DS, UK
| | - Daphnee Pushparajah
- ALEXION PHARMA UK LTD, 3 Furzeground Way, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UB11 1EZ, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 5, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK
| | - Amy Hunter
- Genetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Road, London, E17 6DS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Edwards PJ, Sellers GM, Leach I, Holt L, Ridd MJ, Payne RA, Barnes RK. Ideas, concerns, expectations, and effects on life (ICEE) in GP consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations. BJGP Open 2023; 7:BJGPO.2023.0008. [PMID: 37277172 PMCID: PMC11176686 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eliciting patients' ideas, concerns, expectations, and whether a problem has an 'effect' on their life (ICEE), is a widely recommended communication technique. However, it is not known how frequently ICEE components are raised in UK GP consultations. AIM To assess the frequency of ICEE in routine GP consultations with adult patients and explore variables associated with ICEE. DESIGN & SETTING An observational study was undertaken. It involved secondary analysis of a pre-existing archive of video-recorded, face-to-face GP consultations in the UK. METHOD Observational coding of 92 consultations took place. Associations were assessed using binomial and ordered logistic regression. RESULTS Most consultations included at least one ICEE component (90.2%). The most common ICEE component per consultation was patient ideas (79.3%), followed by concerns (55.4%), expectations (51.1%), and then effects on life (42.4%). For all ICEE components patients more commonly initiated the ICEE dialogue, and in only three consultations (3.3%) did GPs directly ask patients about their expectations. Problems that were acute (odds ratio [OR] 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36 to 6.53, P = 0.007) or assessed by GPs aged ≥50 years (OR 2.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.13, P = 0.030) were associated with more ICEE components. Problems assessed later in the consultation (OR 0.60 per problem order increase, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.87, P = 0.007) by patients aged ≥75 years (OR 0.40, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.98, P = 0.046) and from the most deprived cohort (OR 0.39, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.92, P = 0.032) were associated with fewer ICEE components. Patient ideas were associated with more patients being 'very satisfied' post-consultation (OR 10.74, 95% CI = 1.60 to 72.0, P = 0.014) and the opposite was true of concerns (OR 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.86, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION ICEE components were associated with patient satisfaction and demographic variables. Further research is required to assess if the way ICEE are communicated affects these associations and other potential confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Edwards
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Grace M Sellers
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Isabel Leach
- University of Sheffield Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lydia Holt
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew J Ridd
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rupert A Payne
- Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rebecca K Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Willer F, Chua D, Ball L. Patient aggression towards receptionists in general practice: a systematic review. Fam Med Community Health 2023; 11:e002171. [PMID: 37414572 PMCID: PMC10335458 DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE General practice receptionists provide an essential function in the healthcare system but routinely encounter acts of incivility and aggression from patients, including hostility, abuse and violence. This study was conducted to summarise what is known about patient-initiated aggression towards general practice receptionists, including impacts on reception staff and existing mitigation strategies. DESIGN Systematic review with convergent integrated synthesis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies published at any time in English that examine patient aggression experiences of reception staff in primary care settings. INFORMATION SOURCES Searches of five major databases were performed (CINAHL Complete, Scopus, PubMed, Healthcare Administration Database and Google Scholar) to August 2022. RESULTS Twenty studies of various designs were included, ranging from the late 1970s to 2022 and originating from five OECD countries. Twelve were assessed as high quality using a validated checklist. Reviewed articles represented 4107 participants; 21.5% were general practice receptionists. All studies reported that displays of aggression towards receptionists by patients were a frequent and routine occurrence in general practice, particularly verbal abuse such as shouting, cursing, accusations of malicious behaviour and use of racist, ablest and sexist insults. Although infrequent, physical violence was widely reported. Inefficient appointment scheduling systems, delayed access to doctors and prescription denial appeared common precipitators. Receptionists adapted their behaviour and demeanour to placate and please patients to avoid escalation of patient frustrations at the cost of their own well-being and clinic productivity. Training in patient aggression management increased receptionist confidence and appeared to decrease negative sequalae. Coordinated support for general practice reception staff who had experienced patient aggression was generally lacking, with a small proportion receiving professional counselling. CONCLUSIONS Patient aggression towards reception staff is a serious workplace safety concern for general practices and negatively affects healthcare sector function more broadly. Receptionists in general practice deserve evidence-based measures to improve their working conditions and well-being for their own benefit and that of the community. REGISTRATION Pre-registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/42p85).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Willer
- Centre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Chua
- Centre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lauren Ball
- Centre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xie W, Liu J, Huang Y, Xi X. Capturing What Matters with Patients' Bypass Behavior? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:591-604. [PMID: 36919186 PMCID: PMC10008354 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s395928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, bypassing is becoming increasingly prevalent. Such behavior, as going directly to upper-level health-care facilities without a primary care provider (PCP) referral when facing non-critical diseases, contrasts to "expanding the role of PCPs as the first-contact of care", may cause unneglectable damage to the healthcare system and people's physical health. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between patient experience in primary health-care clinics (PHCs) and their bypass behavior. METHODS A cross-sectional study was designed for data collection. From July 2021 to August 2021, we conducted a questionnaire survey nationally. Fifty-three investigators were dispatched to 212 pre-chosen PHCs, around which 1060 interviewees were selected to gather information, using a convenience sampling. The primary independent variable was scores measured by Chinese Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT-C) to quantify patients' experience at PHCs. The dependent variable was a binary variable measured by a self-developed instrument to identify whether participants actually practiced bypassing. Covariates were well-screened determinants of patients' bypass behavior including socio-demographic factors, policy factors, and health-care suppliers. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the association of patients' experience with their bypass behavior. FINDINGS A total of 928 qualified questionnaires were obtained. The first contact dimension (OR 0.961 [95% CI 0.934 to 0.988], P = 0.005) and continuity dimension (OR 1.034 [95% CI 1.000 to 1.068], P = 0.047) of patients' experience were significantly associated with patients' bypass behavior (P < 0.05). In addition, age (OR 1.072, [95% CI 1.015-1.132], P = 0.013) and gender (OR 2.044, [95% CI 1.139-3.670], P = 0.017) also made a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION Enhancement in patient experience at PHCs may help reduce their bypass behavior. Specifically, efforts are needed to improve primary care accessibility and utilization. The positive correlation between bypassing rates and continuity scores may require more attention on strengthening PCPs' technical quality besides the quality of interpersonal interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenwen Xie
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy & Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiayuan Liu
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy & Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuankai Huang
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy & Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Xi
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy & Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Xiaoyu Xi, Email
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Achstetter K, Köppen J, Hengel P, Blümel M, Busse R. Drivers of patient perceptions of health system responsiveness in Germany. Int J Health Plann Manage 2022; 37 Suppl 1:166-186. [PMID: 36184993 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health system responsiveness (HSR)-the ability of a health system to meet the non-medical legitimate expectations of patients-is a key to patient-centred health systems. Although responsiveness is essential to provide equitable and accountable health care, little is known about patient-side drivers of HSR. This study aims to narrow this gap. METHODS A survey among 20,000 Germans with substitutive private health insurance included questions on HSR and patient characteristics such as health literacy (HL), experienced discrimination, and sociodemographic information. Survey data were linked to patient-level claims data. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association between HSR and patient characteristics. RESULTS The sample (age 54.0 ± 16.1; 60.5% male) contains 2951 respondents with outpatient physician care in the past year. Of the nine HSR items, eight are rated as (very) good (74.4%-94.3%), except for coordination between providers (60.2%). Patient characteristics highly influence HSR: patients with high HL, for instance, are more likely to assess responsiveness as (very) good (e.g., clear explanations from physicians: OR 4.17). Poor assessment of responsiveness is seen among users who experienced discrimination. CONCLUSION This study revealed new associations between HSR and patient characteristics. Incorporating this knowledge in practice would help strengthen patient-centred health services by considering patient experiences and expectations. This highlights that HSR can be used as a tool to evaluate and promote patient-centred health services. Future research should investigate additional drivers of HSR, both on the patient and the provider sides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Achstetter
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Köppen
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Hengel
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miriam Blümel
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard Busse
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Centre for Health Economics Research, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE, Johnson NL, Wirtz E, Ralston JD, Rosland AM, Nelson K, Sayre G. My Goals Are Not Their Goals: Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of Patient-Centered Care for Patients with Multimorbidity. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:4189-4196. [PMID: 35606644 PMCID: PMC9126696 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07533-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered care reflecting patient preferences and needs is integral to high-quality care. Individualized care is important for psychosocially complex or high-risk patients with multiple chronic conditions (i.e., multimorbidity), given greater potential risks of interventions and reduced benefits. These patients are increasingly prevalent in primary care. Few studies have examined provision of patient-centered care from the clinician perspective, particularly from primary care physicians serving in integrated, patient-centered medical home settings within the US Veterans Health Administration. OBJECTIVE We sought to clarify facilitators and barriers perceived by primary care physicians in the Veterans Health Administration to delivering patient-centered care for high-risk or complex patients with multimorbidity. DESIGN We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews from April to July 2020 among physicians across 20 clinical sites. Findings were analyzed with deductive content analysis based on conceptual models of patient-centeredness and hierarchical factors affecting care delivery. PARTICIPANTS Of 23 physicians interviewed, most were female (n = 14/23, 61%), serving in hospital-affiliated outpatient clinics (n = 14/23, 61%). Participants had a mean of 21 (SD = 11.3) years of experience. KEY RESULTS Facilitators included the following: effective physician-patient communication to individualize care, prioritize among multiple needs, and elicit goals to improve patient engagement; access to care, enabled by interdisciplinary teams, and dictating personalized care planning; effortful but worthwhile care coordination and continuity; meeting complex needs through effective teamwork; and integrating medical and non-medical care aspects in recognition of patients' psychosocial contexts. Barriers included the following: intra- and interpersonal (e.g., perceived patient reluctance to engage in care); organizational (e.g., limited encounter time); and community or policy impediments (e.g., state decisional capacity laws) to patient-centered care. CONCLUSIONS Physicians perceived individual physician-patient interactions were the greatest facilitators or barriers to patient-centered care. Efforts to increase primary care patient-centeredness for complex or high-risk patients with multimorbidity could focus on targeting physician-patient communication and reducing interpersonal conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linnaea Schuttner
- Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
| | - Stacey Hockett Sherlock
- Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, USA.,Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Carol E Simons
- Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nicole L Johnson
- Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, USA
| | - Elizabeth Wirtz
- Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, USA
| | - James D Ralston
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA.,Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, USA
| | - Ann-Marie Rosland
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Karin Nelson
- Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - George Sayre
- Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Murphy M, Salisbury C, Scott A, Sollazzi-Davies L, Wong G. The person-based development and realist evaluation of a pre-consultation form for GP consultations. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:19. [PMID: 37601950 PMCID: PMC7614962 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13249.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Use of telephone, video and e-consultations is increasing. These can make consultations more transactional, potentially missing patients' concerns. This study aimed to develop a complex intervention to address patients' concerns more comprehensively in general practice and test the feasibility of this in a cluster-randomised framework.The complex intervention used two technologies: a patient-completed pre-consultation form used at consultation opening and a doctor-provided summary report provided at consultation closure. This paper reports on the development and realist evaluation of the pre-consultation questionnaire. Methods A person-based approach was used to develop the pre-consultation form. An online questionnaire system was designed to allow patient self-completion of a form which could be shared with GPs. This was tested with 45 patients in three rounds, with iterative adjustments made based on feedback after each round.Subsequently, an intervention incorporating the pre-consultation form with the summary report was then tested in a cluster-randomised framework with 30 patients per practice in six practices: four randomised to intervention, and two to control. An embedded realist evaluation was carried out. The main feasibility study results are reported elsewhere. Results Intervention Development: 15 patients were recruited per practice. Twelve patients, six GPs and three administrators were interviewed and 32 changes were made iteratively in three rounds. Recruitment rates (proportion of patients responding to the text) increased from 15% in round one to 50% in round three.Realist evaluation: The pre-consultation form was most useful for people comfortable with technology and with hidden concerns or anxiety about the consultation. It resulted in more issues being discussed and support provided, more effective use of time and greater patient satisfaction. Conclusions The person-based approach was successful. The pre-consultation form uncovers more depth and improves satisfaction in certain consultations and patients. Technological improvements are required before this could be rolled out more widely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Murphy
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Anne Scott
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | | | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Measuring continuity of care in general practice: a comparison of two methods using routinely collected data. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e773-e779. [PMID: 35995578 PMCID: PMC9423043 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite well-documented clinical benefits of longitudinal doctor–patient continuity in primary care, continuity rates have declined. Assessment by practices or health commissioners is rarely undertaken. Aim Using the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) score this study set out to measure continuity across 126 practices in the mobile, multi-ethnic population of East London, comparing these scores with the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) responses to questions on GP continuity. Design and setting A retrospective, cross-sectional study in all 126 practices in three East London boroughs. Method The study population included patients who consulted three or more times between January 2017 and December 2018. Anonymised demographic and consultation data from the electronic health record were linked to results from Question 10 (‘seeing the doctor you prefer’) of the 2019 GPPS. Results The mean UPC score for all 126 practices was 0.52 (range 0.32 to 0.93). There was a strong correlation between practice UPC scores measured in the 2 years to December 2018 and responses to the 2019 GPPS Question 10, Pearson’s r correlation coefficient, 0.62. Smaller practices had higher scores. Multilevel analysis showed higher continuity for patients ≥65 years compared with children and younger adults (β coefficient 0.082, 95% confidence interval = 0.080 to 0.084) and for females compared with males. Conclusion It is possible to measure continuity across all practices in a local health economy. Regular review of practice continuity rates can be used to support efforts to increase continuity within practice teams. In turn this is likely to have a positive effect on clinical outcomes and on satisfaction for both patients and doctors.
Collapse
|
17
|
Anhang Price R, Bradley MA, Ye F, Schlang D, DeYoreo M, Cleary PD, Elliott MN, Montemayor CK, Timmer M, Tolpadi A, Teno JM. Reliable and Valid Survey-Based Measures to Assess Quality of Care in Home-Based Serious Illness Programs. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:864-872. [PMID: 34936490 PMCID: PMC9145570 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is a pressing need for standardized measures to assess the quality of home-based serious illness care. Currently, there are no validated quality measures that are specific to home-based serious illness programs (SIPs) and the unique needs of their patients. Objective: To develop and evaluate standardized survey-based measures of serious illness care experiences for assessing and comparing quality of home-based serious illness care programs. Methods: From October 2019 through January 2020, we administered a survey to patients who received care from 32 home-based SIPs across the United States. Using the 2263 survey responses, we assessed item performance and constructed composite measures via factor analysis, evaluated item-scale correlations, estimated reliability, and examined validity by regressing overall ratings and willingness to recommend care on each composite. Results: The overall survey response rate was 36%. Confirmatory factor analyses supported five composite quality measures: Communication, Care Coordination, Help for Symptoms, Planning for Care, and Support for Family and Friends. Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, indicating adequate internal consistency in assessing their underlying constructs. Interprogram reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 at 100 completed surveys per measure, meeting common standards for distinguishing between programs' performance. Together, the composites explained 45% of the variance in patients' overall care ratings. Communication, Care Coordination, and Planning for Care were the strongest predictors of overall ratings. Conclusion: Our analyses provide evidence of the feasibility, reliability, and validity of proposed survey-based measures to assess the quality of home-based serious illness care from the perspective of patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Anhang Price
- RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
- Address correspondence to: Rebecca Anhang Price, PhD, RAND Corporation, 1200 S Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | | | - Feifei Ye
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Paul D. Cleary
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joan M. Teno
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yin S, Hu M, Chen W. Quality Perceptions and Choice of Public Health Facilities: A Mediation Effect Analysis of Outpatient Experience in Rural China. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2089-2102. [PMID: 35983546 PMCID: PMC9381010 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s370805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Outpatients have choices of providers in the hierarchical health service delivery system of China. Understanding how quality perceptions and outpatient experience affect the choice of health facility would help inform decisions about priorities for action aimed at guiding the use of primary care. This study examines how quality perceptions of outpatient service affect the facility level choice in rural China. METHODS Household surveys were conducted in 2011, 2012 and 2015 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. We selected 968 respondents as the study sample, who had at least two outpatient visits to the public health facilities during each survey period. Prior quality perceptions of the outpatient service at the village clinics, township centers, and county hospitals were reported on an 8-item Quality Indicator questionnaire. Experienced quality perception from the first outpatient visit was also reported. The outcome of interest was outpatients' facility level choices. We used regression and mediation analysis to explore whether and how outpatient experience at a specific health facility would mediate the relationship between prior quality perceptions and the facility level choice. RESULTS Overall, the quality perception was positively and significantly associated with outpatients' staying at the same or lower levels of care (β=0.265, P=0.007). This effect was fully mediated by experienced quality perception (z=2.985, P=0.003). The indirect effect was significant for three particular dimensions, including quality perceptions of the environment (β=0.075, P=0.025), doctor-patient communication (β=0.065, P=0.022), and physician ability (β=0.062, P=0.021). CONCLUSION Outpatient quality perceptions-especially positive perceptions regarding environment, doctor-patient communication, and physician ability-could contribute to minimizing upward referral via improvement in outpatient experience. Policymakers and health care providers may need to therefore optimize outpatient experience as they push to develop a more locally responsive primary care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Yin
- Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Research Department I, Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Hu
- Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Wen Chen; Min Hu, The Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, No. 187 Box, 138 Yixueyuan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13818325486; +86 17717031079, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hotel housekeepers and occupational health: experiences and perceived risks. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022; 34:e29. [DOI: 10.35371/aoem.2022.34.e29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
20
|
O'Reilly D, Brady AM, Bryant-Lukosius D, Varley J, Daly L, Cotter P, Elliot N, Lehane E, Fleming S, Savage E, Hegarty J, Drennan J. Patient-reported experiences of consultation with an advanced nurse practitioner: Factor structure and reliability analysis of the patient enablement and satisfaction survey. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77:4279-4289. [PMID: 34449917 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to analyse the psychometric properties of a patient-reported-experience measure, the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey (PESS), when used to evaluate the care provided by Advanced Nurse Practitioners (ANPs) in terms of factor structure and internal consistency. The PESS is a 20-item, patient-completed data collection tool that was originally developed to measure patient experience and enablement following consultation with nurses in general practice. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey; validity and reliability analysis. METHODS The sample in this study consisted of 178 patients who consulted with 26 ANPs working in four different specialities. Data were collected between June and December 2019. An exploratory factor analysis of the PESS was conducted to determine convergent validity which was supported by parallel analysis and the traditional Kaiser criterion. The internal consistency of individual PESS items was determined via Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, the Average Variance Extracted tests and item-subscale/total score correlations. RESULTS A three-factor structure (PESS-ANP) was found through exploratory factor analysis and this was supported by parallel analysis, the traditional Kaiser criterion and the percentage of variance explained criterion. A high degree of internal consistency was reported across all factors. One question was omitted from the analysis ('Overall Satisfaction') following the identification of problematic cross-loadings. The three factor solution was identified as: patient satisfaction, quality of care provision and patient enablement. CONCLUSION The findings of this study propose a three-factor model that is sufficiently reliable for analysing the experience and enablement of patients following consultation with an ANP. IMPACT Increasingly, patient-reported experience measures are being used to evaluate patients' experience of receiving care from a healthcare professional. The PESS was identified to be reliable in evaluating the experience of patients who receive care from an ANP while a three-factor structure was proposed that can capture specific attributes of this care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David O'Reilly
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Brady
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jarlath Varley
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Daly
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patrick Cotter
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Naomi Elliot
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Elaine Lehane
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sandra Fleming
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eileen Savage
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Josephine Hegarty
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jonathan Drennan
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hook H, Woolley J. A Consideration of Professionalism for Dental Professionals. Prim Dent J 2021; 10:69-72. [PMID: 34353153 DOI: 10.1177/20501684211012587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Professionalism is an ubiquitous word in dentistry. Whilst we often feel we have an innate understanding of it, there is no single clear definition as to what professionalism in dentistry really means. Therefore, how can we truly comprehend what is expected of us? This article aims to explore current literature regarding professionalism and provide some clarity as to what this means with regards to dentistry in the United Kingdom. Guidance from the General Dental Council's (GDC) document Preparing for Practice1 breaks professionalism into four categories: (1) patients and the public, (2) ethical and legal, (3) teamwork, and (4) development of self and others. Investigation into each of these categories alongside the GDC's most recent study Professionalism: A Mixed-Methods Research Study2 enables an unambiguous view of professionalism in dentistry from the GDC's perspective. Whilst the GDC's Preparing for Practice and Professionalism: A Mixed-Methods Research Study are good starting points in improving our understanding of professionalism, it is still very much open to interpretation by the individual, owing to lack of a clear-cut definition. Overall, professionalism remains a vague and poorly defined concept in dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Hook
- West Devon and Cornwall Dental Foundation Training Scheme, UK
| | - Julian Woolley
- Oral and Maxillofacial Senior House Officer, Frimley Park NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhong A, Davie S, Wang R, Kiran T. Understanding disparities in primary care patient experience. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2021; 67:e178-e187. [PMID: 34261726 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6707e178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand disparities in primary care patient experience. DESIGN A serial cross-sectional study was conducted to understand disparities in patient experience at 2 time points (2014 and 2016). Disparities related to age, gender, neighbourhood income, and self-rated health were explored using 3 analytic approaches: stratification, logistic regression, and relative comparison across multiple demographic variables. SETTING A multisite family health team in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS Patients in the family medicine practice who completed e-mail surveys in 2014 (n = 1171, 19% response rate) and 2016 (n = 1823, 15% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported access (timely access when sick, access after hours) and patient-centredness (opportunity to ask questions, involvement in care decisions, enough time with provider). RESULTS Performance for all measures improved between 2014 and 2016, with the greatest absolute improvement seen in access after hours (61% in 2014; 75% in 2016). Patients residing in low-income neighbourhoods reported worse patient experiences than those in high-income neighbourhoods did, as did patients with poor versus excellent self-rated health, even after adjustment for other variables. For example, in 2016, 60% of patients residing in low-income neighbourhoods reported timely access when sick versus 70% in high-income neighbourhoods (adjusted odds ratio of 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95); 60% of patients with poor or fair self-rated health reported timely access when sick versus 72% with excellent self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio of 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84). Comparing across demographic groups, patients with excellent self-rated health and poor or fair self-rated health reported the best and worst experiences, respectively, for all measures. In 2016, the average disparity between subgroups was largest for access after hours. CONCLUSION In this setting, patient experience was worse for patients in lower-income neighbourhoods and those with poor or fair self-rated health. Access after hours demonstrated the greatest overall absolute improvement but also the greatest widening of disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrina Zhong
- Medical student in the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University in London, Ont, at the time of writing
| | - Sam Davie
- Quality Improvement and Decision Support Specialist in the Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont, at the time of writing
| | - Ri Wang
- Analyst at the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael's Hospital
| | - Tara Kiran
- Vice-Chair of Quality and Innovation in the DFCM at the University of Toronto, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Medicine and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto, Scientist in the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital, a staff physician in the DFCM at St Michael's Hospital, and, at the time of writing, was Embedded Clinician Researcher at Health Quality Ontario (now Ontario Health)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Saunders CL, Flynn S, Massou E, Lyratzopoulos G, Abel G, Burt J. Sociodemographic inequalities in patients' experiences of primary care: an analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2011 and 2017. J Health Serv Res Policy 2021; 26:198-207. [PMID: 33517786 PMCID: PMC8182330 DOI: 10.1177/1355819620986814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Younger people, minority ethnic groups, sexual minorities and people of lower socioeconomic status report poorer experiences of primary care. In light of NHS ambitions to reduce unwarranted variations in care, we aimed to investigate whether inequalities in patient experience of primary care changed between 2011 and 2017, using data from the General Practice Patient Survey in England. METHODS We considered inequalities in relation to age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, sexual orientation and geographical region across five dimensions of patient experience: overall experience, doctor communication, nurse communication, access and continuity of care. We used linear regression to explore whether the magnitude of inequalities changed between 2011 and 2017, using mixed models to assess changes within practices and models without accounting for practice to assess national trends. RESULTS We included 5,241,408 responses over 11 survey waves from 2011-2017. There was evidence that inequalities changed over time (p < 0.05 for 27/30 models), but the direction and magnitude of changes varied. Changes in gaps in experience ranged from a 1.6 percentage point increase for experience of access among sexual minorities, to a 5.6 percentage point decrease for continuity, where experience worsened for older ages. Inequalities in access in relation to socio-economic status remained reasonably stable for individuals attending the same GP practice; nationally inequalities in access increased 2.1 percentage points (p < 0.0001) between respondents living in more/less deprived areas, suggesting access is declining fastest in practices in more deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS There have been few substantial changes in inequalities in patient experience of primary care between 2011 and 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine L Saunders
- Senior Research Associate, Department of Public Health and
Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Flynn
- MPhil Student, Department of Public Health and Primary Care,
University of Cambridge, UK; Resident Physician, Department of Medicine,
University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Efthalia Massou
- Research Associate, Department of Public Health and Primary
Care, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Professor of Cancer Epidemiology, Epidemiology of Cancer
Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO), Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health,
Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London,
UK
| | - Gary Abel
- Associate Professor, University of Exeter Medical School
(Primary Care), University of Exeter, UK
| | - Jenni Burt
- Senior Social Scientist, The Healthcare Improvement Studies
(THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, UK *These authors (CLS and SF)
contributed equally to this work
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stephens AR, Potter JW, Tyser AR, Kazmers NH. Evaluating the impact of social deprivation on Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey Scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:167. [PMID: 34147118 PMCID: PMC8214262 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01639-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Social deprivation has been shown to affect access to health care services, and influences outcomes for a variety of physical and psychological conditions. However, the impact on patient satisfaction remains less clear. The objective of this study was to determine if social deprivation is an independent predictor of patient satisfaction, as measured by the Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS). Methods We retrospectively reviewed unique new adult patient (≥ 18 years of age) seen at a tertiary academic hospital and rural/urban outreach hospitals/clinics between January 2014 and December 2017. Satisfaction was defined a priori as achieving a score above the 33rd percentile. The 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to determine social deprivation (lower score signifies less social deprivation). Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to determine the impact of ADI on PGOMPS total and provider sub-scores while controlling for variables previously shown to impact scores (wait time, patient age, sex, race, specialty type, provider type, and insurance status). Results Univariate analysis of PGOMPS total scores revealed a 4% decrease in odds of patient satisfaction per decile increase in ADI (p < 0.001). Patients within the most deprived quartile were significantly less likely to report satisfaction compared to the least deprived quartile (OR 0.79, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the odds of achieving satisfaction decreased 2% for each decile increase in ADI on the Total Score (p < 0.001), independent of other variables previously shown to impact scores. For PGOMPS Provider Sub-Score, univariate analysis showed that patients in the lowest ADI quartile were significantly less likely be satisfied, as compared to the least deprived quartile (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.70–0.86; p < 0.001). A 5% decrease in a patient being satisfied was observed for each decile increase in ADI (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.94–0.96; p < 0.001). Conclusions Social deprivation was an independent predictor of outpatient visit dissatisfaction, as measured by the Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey. These results necessitate consideration when developing health care delivery policies that serve to minimize inequalities between patients of differing socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Stephens
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30N 1900E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Jared W Potter
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Andrew R Tyser
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Nikolas H Kazmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shah AM, Yan X, Tariq S, Ali M. What patients like or dislike in physicians: Analyzing drivers of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction using a digital topic modeling approach. Inf Process Manag 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
26
|
Quigley DD, Reynolds K, Dellva S, Price RA. Examining the Business Case for Patient Experience: A Systematic Review. J Healthc Manag 2021; 66:200-224. [PMID: 33960966 PMCID: PMC11087015 DOI: 10.1097/jhm-d-20-00207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hospitals, physician groups, and other healthcare providers are investing in improved patient care experiences. Prior reviews have concluded that better patient care experiences are associated with less healthcare utilization and better adherence to recommended prevention and treatment, clinical outcomes, and patient safety within hospitals. No comprehensive review has examined the business case for investing in patient experiences. This article reviews the literature on associations between patient experience-measured from the perspective of patients and families-and business outcomes, including patient allegiance and retention, complaints, lawsuits, provider job satisfaction, and profitability. We searched U.S. English-language peer-reviewed articles from January 1990 to July 2019. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and undertook a full-text review of 564 articles, yielding the inclusion of 40 articles. Our review found that patients with positive care experiences are more likely to return to the same hospital and ambulatory settings for future healthcare needs, retain their health plan, and voice fewer complaints. Associations between patient experiences and profitability or provider job satisfaction were limited/mixed. This suggests that providers can pursue better patient care experiences for the intrinsic value to patients, while also recognizing it is good for intermediate business outcomes: specifically increased recommendations, better patient retention, and fewer complaints. Nursing and physician care, broadly defined, are the only specific aspects of patient experience consistently associated with retention, with evidence pointing to communication and trust as parts of care linked to the intent to return. These aspects of patient experience are also the largest contributors to the overall ratings of a provider or facility.
Collapse
|
27
|
Changes in patient experience associated with growth and collaboration in general practice: observational study using data from the UK GP Patient Survey. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e906-e915. [PMID: 33139333 PMCID: PMC7643819 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x713429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For the last few years, English general practices — which are, traditionally, small — have been encouraged to serve larger populations of registered patients by merging or collaborating with each other. Meanwhile, patient surveys have suggested that continuity of care and access to care are worsening. Aim To explore whether increasing the size of the practice population and working collaboratively are linked to changes in continuity of care or access to care. Design and setting This observational study in English general practice used data on patient experience, practice size, and collaborative working. Data were drawn from the English GP Patient Survey, NHS Digital, and from a previous study. Method The main outcome measures were the proportions of patients at practice level reporting positive experiences of both access and relationship continuity of care in the GP Patient Survey. Changes in proportions between 2013 and 2018 among practices that had grown and those that had, roughly, stayed the same size were compared, as were patients’ experiences, categorised by whether or not practices were working in close collaborations in 2018. Results Practices that had grown in population size had a greater fall in continuity of care (by 6.6%, 95% confidence interval = 4.3% to 8.9%), than practices that had roughly stayed the same size, after controlling for other factors. Differences in falls in access to care were smaller (4.3% difference for being able to get through easily on the telephone; 1.5% for being able to get an appointment; 0.9% in satisfaction with opening hours), but were statistically significant. Practices collaborating closely with others had marginally worse continuity of care than those not working in collaboration, and no differences in access. Conclusion Larger general practice size in England may be associated with slightly poorer continuity of care and may not improve patient access. Close collaborative working did not have any demonstrable effect on patient experience.
Collapse
|
28
|
Chiou SJ, Lee LH, Lee PC, Lin KC. Better Self-report Health Status and Provider-Patient Communication in Dental Service Can Improve the Patient Experience: A Cross-year Comparison from the NHI Survey. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:1569-1575. [PMID: 31423836 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1652390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Several factors, including healthcare outcomes and quality, influence patients' expectations of healthcare services. Currently, as patients have more understanding about dental care services, patient satisfaction is essential for continually improving the services being provided. The purpose of this study is to analyze the multiyear annual National Health Insurance (NHI) patient experience survey in Taiwan to explore the factors associated with the satisfaction rate from 2012-2016. This study used the annual NHI survey to explore patients' experiences of receiving medical service in dental care from 2012 to 2016. There were over 40 major items in the survey each year; however, we only selected suitable items that followed the Andersen model. We ran a logistics regression testing the relationship between the covariates and the items related to satisfaction in outcomes in different years. Patients who received health education from a provider in most time, self-reported better health status, felt that cost of care was not expensive, did not wait too long for counseling time and found it easy to make an appointment, had two to ten times greater satisfaction in outcomes compared with those who did not (OR: 1.83-10.06). Individuals working in the healthcare industry should implement communication strategies to improve patients' experience in the care process by including easy-to-understand explanations or sharing decision-making with patients. Furthermore, in patient experience surveys in dental care, less attention should be paid to whether patients can provide meaningful quality measures and more attention to ways in which patient experiences can be improved. This can be achieved by providing easy-to-understand explanations, giving patients an opportunity to express their concerns, and by sharing decision-making with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shang-Jyh Chiou
- Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
| | - Li-Hui Lee
- Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
| | - Pei-Chen Lee
- Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
| | - Kuan-Chia Lin
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gomez-Cano M, Fletcher E, Campbell JL, Elliott M, Burt J, Abel G. Role of practices and Clinical Commissioning Groups in measures of patient experience: analysis of routine data. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 30:173-175. [PMID: 33109702 PMCID: PMC7841486 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Fletcher
- Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - John L Campbell
- Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marc Elliott
- RAND Health, RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Jenni Burt
- THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Gary Abel
- Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mohamoud G, Mash R. Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) 2020; 62:e1-e12. [PMID: 33179953 PMCID: PMC8378061 DOI: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of service delivery in primary care (PC) is an important determinant of clinical outcomes. The patients' perspective is one significant predictor of this quality. Little is known of the quality of such service delivery in the private sector in Kenya. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of service delivery in private sector, PC clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey by using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire in 378 randomly selected patients from 13 PC clinics. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS Overall, 76% were below 45 years, 74% employed and 73% without chronic diseases. Majority (97%) were happy to see the general practitioner (GP) again, 99% were satisfied with their consultation and 83% likely to recommend the GP to others. Participants (97%) found in receptionist helpful and the majority were happy with the opening hours (73%) and waiting times (85%). Although 84% thought appointments were important, only 48% felt this was easy to make, and only 44% were able to access a particular GP on the same day. Overall satisfaction was higher in employed (98%) versus those unemployed (95%), studying (93%) or retired (94%) (p 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients reported a high quality of service delivery. Utilisation was skewed towards younger, employed adults, without chronic conditions, suggesting that PC was not fully comprehensive. Services were easily accessible, although with little expectation of relational continuity. Further studies should continue to evaluate the quality of service delivery from other perspectives and tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulnaz Mohamoud
- Department of Family Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; and, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ochal M, Romaszko M, Glińska-Lewczuk K, Gromadziński L, Romaszko J. Assessment of the Consultation Rate with General Practitioners in the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E7710. [PMID: 33105612 PMCID: PMC7659926 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected the functioning of healthcare systems (HSs) in a way that was difficult to foresee earlier. It quickened the introduction of e-medicine, and changed the manner and number of services provided in the open medical setting. Aim: To assess variations in the consultation rate of patients in primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in consecutive months of the pandemic. Method: Data collected from two PHCs located in Olsztyn (Poland) were analyzed retrospectively. Collectively, these two centers provide care for approximately 20,000 inhabitants and perform approximately 100,000 medical services annually. The analysis was based on data covering the period April-July of the years 2010-2020, consisting in total of 337,510 medical services records. Results: A large, statistically significant decrease in the consultation rate (consultation rate understood as the number of individuals seeking consultation in relation to the number of people under care in a given time period) was revealed in each age group in the initial phase of the pandemic. In consecutive months, the approximated consultation rate achieved mean long-term values. Conclusions. The largest reduction in the consultation rate was revealed in the youngest age group, with the smallest occurring in the oldest. In the group of patients older than 65 years of age, the consultation rate after 3 months of the pandemic was the same as before the outbreak. Variations in the consultation rate were independent of the epidemiological situation. During the study, we observed an increased level of the administrative and paperwork activities carried out by PHC physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Ochal
- Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland; (M.O.); (M.R.)
| | - Małgorzata Romaszko
- Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland; (M.O.); (M.R.)
| | - Katarzyna Glińska-Lewczuk
- Department of Water Resources, Climatology and Environmental Management, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland;
| | - Leszek Gromadziński
- Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland;
| | - Jerzy Romaszko
- Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland; (M.O.); (M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gomez-Cano M, Lyratzopoulos G, Abel GA. Patient Experience Drivers of Overall Satisfaction With Care in Cancer Patients: Evidence From Responders to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey. J Patient Exp 2020; 7:758-765. [PMID: 33294612 PMCID: PMC7705845 DOI: 10.1177/2374373519889435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveys collecting patient experience data often contain a large number of items covering a wide range of experiences. Knowing which areas to prioritize for improvements efforts can be difficult. OBJECTIVE To examine which aspects of care experience are the key drivers of overall satisfaction with cancer care. METHODS Secondary analysis of the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between overall satisfaction and 10 core questions covering aspects of experience applicable to all patients. Supplementary analyses examined a further 16 questions applying only to patients in certain groups or on specific treatment pathways. RESULTS Of 68 340 included patients, 58 697 (86%) rated overall satisfaction highly (8 or more out of 10). The strongest predictors of overall satisfaction across all models were responses to 2 questions on experience of care administration and care coordination (odds ratio [OR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [95% CI = 2.05-2.17, P < .0001; OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.97-2.09, P < .0001, respectively, per 1 standard deviation change). CONCLUSION Focusing improvement efforts on care administration and coordination has potential to improve overall satisfaction with oncological care across diverse patient groups/care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayam Gomez-Cano
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang H, Wang W, Haggerty J, Schuster T. Predictors of patient satisfaction and outpatient health services in China: evidence from the WHO SAGE survey. Fam Pract 2020; 37:465-472. [PMID: 32064515 PMCID: PMC7474531 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction is an essential indicator in medical practise and research. To monitor the health and well-being of adult populations and the ageing process, the World Health Organization (WHO) has initiated the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), compiling longitudinal information in six countries including China as one major data source. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify potential predictors for patient satisfaction based on the 2007-10 WHO SAGE China survey. METHODS Data were analysed using random forests (RFs) and ordinal logistic regression models based on 5774 responses to predict overall patient satisfaction on their most recent outpatient health services visit over the last 12 months. Potential predictor variables included access to care, costs of care, quality of care, socio-demographic and health care characteristics and health service features. Increase of the mean-squared error (incMSE) due to variable removal was used to assess relative importance of the model variables for accurately predicting patient satisfaction. RESULTS The survey data suggest low frequency of dissatisfaction with outpatient services in China (1.8%). Self-reported treatment outcome of the respective visit of a care facility demonstrated to be the strongest predictor for patient satisfaction (incMSE +15%), followed by patient-rated communication (incMSE +2.0%), and then income, waiting time, residency and patient age. Individual patient satisfaction in the survey population was predicted with 74% accuracy using either logistic regression or RF. CONCLUSIONS Patients' perceived outcomes of health care visits and patient communication with health care professionals are the most important variables associated with patient satisfaction in outpatient health services settings in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Wenhua Wang
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jeannie Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Tibor Schuster
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Murphy M, Salisbury C. Relational continuity and patients' perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e676-e683. [PMID: 32784221 PMCID: PMC7425201 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x712349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the benefits of relational continuity of care, particularly for patients with multimorbidity, the traditional model of continuity is changing. Revisiting what patients with ongoing problems want from relational continuity could encourage initiatives to achieve these within a modern healthcare system. AIM To examine the attributes of GPs that patients with long-term conditions value most, and which attributes patients believe are facilitated by relational continuity. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative study in UK general practice. METHOD A thematic analysis was carried out, based on secondary analysis of interviews with 25 patients with long-term conditions that were originally conducted to inform a patient-reported outcome measure for primary care. RESULTS Patients with long-term conditions wanted their GPs to be clinically competent, to examine, listen to, care for, and take time with them, irrespective of whether they have seen them before. They believed that relational continuity facilitates a GP knowing their history, giving consistent advice, taking responsibility and action, and trusting and respecting them. Patients acknowledged practical difficulties and safety issues in achieving the first three of these without relational continuity. However, patients felt that GPs should trust and respect them even when continuity was not possible. CONCLUSION Policy initiatives promoting continuity with a GP or healthcare team should continue. Many patients see continuity as a safety issue. When patients experience relationship discontinuity, they often feel that they are not taken seriously or believed by their GP. GPs should therefore consistently seek to visibly demonstrate trust in their patients, particularly when they have not seen them before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Murphy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Communication in high risk ante-natal consultations: a direct observational study of interactions between patients and obstetricians. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:493. [PMID: 32854633 PMCID: PMC7450934 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03015-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective communication is crucial to any doctor-patient consultation, not least in pregnancy where the outcome affects more than one person. While higher levels of patient participation and shared decision making are recognised as desirable, there is little agreement on how best to achieve this. Most previous research in this area is based on reported data such as interviews or surveys and there is a need for more fine-grained analysis of authentic interaction. This study aimed to identify the discourse characteristics and patterns that exemplify effective communication practices in a high-risk ante-natal clinic. Methods We video-recorded 20 consultations in a high-risk ante-natal clinic in a large New Zealand city with patients attending for the first time. Post-consultation interviews were conducted with the 20 patients and 13 obstetricians involved. Discourse analysis of the transcripts and videos of the consultations was conducted, in conjunction with thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Results Most patients reported high quality communication and high levels of satisfaction; the detailed consultation analysis revealed a range of features likely to have contributed. On the clinician side, these included clear explanations, acknowledgement of the patient’s experience, consideration of patient wishes, and realistic and honest answers to patient questions. On the patient side, these included a high level of engagement with technical aspects of events and procedures, and appropriate questioning of obstetricians. Conclusions This study has demonstrated the utility of combining direct observation of consultations with data from patient experience interviews to identify specific features of effective communication in routine obstetric ante-natal care. The findings are relevant to improvements needed in obstetric communication identified in the literature, especially in relation to handling psychosocial issues and conveying empathy, and may be useful to inform communication training for obstetricians. The presence of the unborn child may provide an added incentive for parents to develop their own health literacy and to be an active participant in the consultation on behalf of their child. The findings of this study can lay the groundwork for further, more detailed analysis of communication in ante-natal consultations.
Collapse
|
36
|
Hirpa M, Woreta T, Addis H, Kebede S. What matters to patients? A timely question for value-based care. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227845. [PMID: 32644993 PMCID: PMC7347201 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our healthcare system is moving towards patient-centered and value-based care models that prioritize health outcomes that matter to patients. However, little is known about what aspects of care patients would prioritize when presented with choices of desirable attributes and whether these patient priorities differ based on certain demographics. OBJECTIVE To assess patients' priorities for a range of attributes in ambulatory care consultations across five key health service delivery domains and determine potential associations between patient priorities and certain demographic profiles. METHODS Using a What Matters to You survey patients ranked in order of importance various choices related to five health service domains (patient-physician relationship, personal responsibility, test/procedures, medications, and cost). Subjects were selected from two Johns Hopkins affiliated primary care clinics and a third gastroenterology subspecialty clinic over a period of 11 months. We calculated the percentage of respondents who selected each quality as their top 1-3 choice. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined demographic characteristics associated with patient priorities. RESULTS Humanistic qualities of physicians, leading a healthy lifestyle, shared decision making (SDM) for medications and tests/procedures as well as knowledge about insurance coverage were the most frequently ranked choices. Privately insured and more educated patients were less likely to rank humanistic qualities highly. Those with younger age, higher educational attainment and private insurance had higher odds of ranking healthy lifestyle as a top choice. Those with more education had higher odds of ranking SDM as a top choice. CONCLUSIONS Identifying what matters most to patients is useful as we move towards patient-centered and Value Based Care Models. Our findings suggest that patients have priorities on qualities they value across key health service domains. Multiple factors including patient demographics can be predictors of these priorities. Elucidating these preferences is a challenging but a valuable step in the right direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meron Hirpa
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tinsay Woreta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hilena Addis
- Clinical Research Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sosena Kebede
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians – Remington, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bjerkeli PJ, Skoglund I, Holmgren K. Does early identification of high work related stress affect pharmacological treatment of primary care patients? - analysis of Swedish pharmacy dispensing data in a randomised control study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:70. [PMID: 32334516 PMCID: PMC7183611 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01140-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The study is part of a randomised controlled trial with the overall aim to evaluate if use of the Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ), combined with feedback at consultation, can be used by healthcare professionals in primary health care to prevent sickness absence. The specific aim of the present study was to investigate whether there were differences in pharmacy dispensing of prescription medications between the intervention group and the control group. Methods The study was a randomized controlled trial. Non-sick-listed employed women and men, aged 18 to 64 years, seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were eligible participants. The intervention included early identification of work-related stress by the WSQ, general practitioner (GP) training and GP feedback at consultation. Pharmacy dispensing data from the Swedish Prescription Drug Register for a period of 12 months following the intervention was used. Primary outcomes were the number of different medications used, type of medication and number of prescribing clinics. Data was analysed using Mann Whitney U tests and chi-square tests. Results The study population included 271 individuals (132 in the intervention group and 139 in the control group). The number of different medications used per individual did not differ significantly between the control group (median 4.0) and the intervention group (median 4.0, p-value 0.076). The proportion of individuals who collected more than 10 different medications was higher in the control group than in the intervention group (15.8% versus 4.5%, p = 0.002). In addition, the proportion of individuals filling prescriptions issued from more than three different clinics was higher in the control group than in the intervention group (17.3% versus 6.8%, p = 0.007). Conclusion Systematic use of the WSQ combined with training of GPs and feedback at consultation may affect certain aspects of pharmacological treatment in primary health care patients. In this randomised control trial, analysis of pharmacy dispensing data show that patients in the intervention group had less polypharmacy and filled prescriptions issued from a smaller number of different clinics. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernilla J Bjerkeli
- School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, PO Box 408, SE-521 28, Skövde, Sweden.
| | - Ingmarie Skoglund
- Department of Primary Health Care, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 454, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden, Sweden.,The Research and Development Department, Region Västra Götaland, Södra Älvsborg, Borås, Sweden
| | - Kristina Holmgren
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 455, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e13830. [PMID: 32012063 PMCID: PMC7055794 DOI: 10.2196/13830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Customer-oriented health care management and patient satisfaction have become important for physicians to attract patients in an increasingly competitive environment. Satisfaction influences patients' choice of physician and leads to higher patient retention and higher willingness to engage in positive word of mouth. In addition, higher satisfaction has positive effects on patients' willingness to follow the advice given by the physician. In recent years, physician-rating websites (PRWs) have emerged in the health care sector and are increasingly used by patients. Patients' usage includes either posting an evaluation to provide feedback to others about their own experience with a physician or reading evaluations of other patients before choosing a physician. The emergence of PRWs offers new avenues to analyze patient satisfaction and its key drivers. PRW data enable both satisfaction analyses and implications on the level of the individual physician as well as satisfaction analyses and implications on an overall level. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify linear and nonlinear effects of patients' perceived quality of physician appointment service attributes on the overall evaluation measures that are published on PRWs. METHODS We analyzed large-scale survey data from a German PRW containing 84,680 surveys of patients rating a total of 7038 physicians on 24 service attributes and 4 overall evaluation measures. Elasticities are estimated from regression models with perceived attribute quality as explanatory variables and overall evaluation measures as dependent variables. Depending on the magnitude of the elasticity, service attributes are classified into 3 categories: attributes with diminishing, constant, or increasing returns to overall evaluation. RESULTS The proposed approach revealed new insights into what patients value when visiting physicians and what they take for granted. Improvements in the physicians' pleasantness and friendliness have increasing returns to the publicly available overall evaluation (b=1.26). The practices' cleanliness (b=1.05) and the communication behavior of a physician during a visit (b level between .97 and 1.03) have constant returns. Indiscretion in the waiting rooms, extended waiting times, and a lack of modernity of the medical equipment (b level between .46 and .59) have the strongest diminishing returns to overall evaluation. CONCLUSIONS The categorization of the service attributes supports physicians in identifying potential for improvements and prioritizing resource allocation to improve the publicly available overall evaluation ratings on PRWs. Thus, the study contributes to patient-centered health care management and, furthermore, promotes the utility of PRWs through large-scale data analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Bidmon
- Department of Marketing and International Management, Alpen-Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria
| | - Ossama Elshiewy
- Department of Business Administration, Marketing and Consumer Behavior, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Ralf Terlutter
- Department of Marketing and International Management, Alpen-Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Austria
| | - Yasemin Boztug
- Department of Business Administration, Marketing and Consumer Behavior, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Joseph J, Sicoutris C, Raper SE. Communication Skills Training for Surgical Inpatient Advanced Practice Providers in an Academic Health-Care System. J Patient Exp 2020; 7:42-48. [PMID: 32128370 PMCID: PMC7036690 DOI: 10.1177/2374373518809011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good communication skills enhance the patient experience, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE A course was developed by an interdisciplinary team (surgeon, nurse practitioner, and nurse MBA) for advanced practice providers (APPs) working for the department of surgery-a mix of practice and hospital-employed professionals-to enhance communications skills in an inpatient setting. METHODS Current concepts on provider-patient communication were discussed. Participants also asked to view and critique a video "provider-patient communication gone wrong" scenario. Lastly, participants were provided with techniques for improving provider-patient communication. The participants assessed the course. Provider communication scores were tracked from quarter 1, Fiscal Year 2014 to quarter 4 Fiscal Year 2017. RESULTS Of 110 eligible APPs, 95 (86%) attended the course. The anonymous survey response rate was 90% (86/95). Participants expressed satisfaction with the course content confirmed by Likert score weighted averages of >4.6/5 in all 8 domains. Communication scores increased with time. CONCLUSION An interdisciplinary course aimed at enhancing provider-patient communication skills was well-received by the APP participants. The course was part of ongoing system-wide efforts to improve patient experiences, satisfaction, and outcomes. Continuing education in communication continues to play a key role in improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johncy Joseph
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Corinna Sicoutris
- Department of Nursing, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven E Raper
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lai C, Sceats LA, Qiu W, Park KT, Morris AM, Kin C. Patient decision-making in severe inflammatory bowel disease: the need for improved communication of treatment options and preferences. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:1406-1414. [PMID: 31295766 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and their physicians must navigate ever-increasing options for treatment. The aim of this study was to elucidate the key drivers of treatment decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS We conducted qualitative semi-structured in-person interviews of 20 adult patients undergoing treatment for inflammatory bowel disease at an academic medical centre who either recently initiated biologic therapy or underwent an operation or surgical evaluation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, iteratively coded, and discussed to consensus by five researchers. We used thematic analysis to explore factors influencing decision-making. RESULTS Four major themes emerged as key drivers of treatment decision-making: perceived clinical state and disease severity, the patient-physician relationship, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about treatment options, and social isolation and stigma. Patients described experiencing a clinical turning point as the impetus for proceeding with a previously undesired treatment such as infusion medication or surgery. Patients reported delays in care or diagnosis, inadequate communication with their physicians, and lack of control over their disease management. Patients often stated that they considered surgery to be the treatment of last resort, which further compounded the complexity of making treatment decisions. CONCLUSION Patients described multiple barriers to making informed and collaborative decisions about treatment, especially when considering surgical options. Our study reveals a need for more comprehensive communication between the patient and their physician about the range of medical and surgical treatment options. We recommend a patient-centred approach toward the decision-making process that accounts for patient decision-making preferences, causes of social stress, and clinical status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lai
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - L A Sceats
- Department of Surgery, S-SPIRE Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - W Qiu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - K T Park
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - A M Morris
- Department of Surgery, S-SPIRE Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - C Kin
- Department of Surgery, S-SPIRE Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Holmgren K, Hensing G, Bültmann U, Hadzibajramovic E, Larsson MEH. Does early identification of work-related stress, combined with feedback at GP-consultation, prevent sick leave in the following 12 months? a randomized controlled trial in primary health care. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1110. [PMID: 31412832 PMCID: PMC6694585 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7452-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Experiencing work-related stress constitutes an obvious risk for becoming sick-listed. In primary health care, no established method to early identify, advise and treat people with work-related stress exists. The aim was to evaluate if the use of the Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) brief intervention, including feedback from the general practitioner (GP), had an impact on the level of sickness absence. Method/design In total 271 (intervention group, n = 132, control group, n = 139) non-sick-listed employed women and men, aged 18 to 64 years, who had mental and physical health complaints and sought care at primary health care centers participated in this two-armed randomized controlled trial. The main outcomes were the number of registered sick leave days and episodes, and time to first sick leave during the 12-months follow-up. The intervention included early identification of work-related stress by the WSQ, GP awareness supported by a brief training session, patients’ self-reflection by WSQ completion, GP feedback at consultation, and initiation of preventive measures. Results The mean days registered for the WSQ intervention group and the control group were 39 and 45 gross days respectively, and 31 and 39 net days respectively (ns). No statistical significant difference for the number of sick leave episodes or time to first day of sick leave episode were found between the groups. Conclusions The WSQ brief intervention combined with feedback and suggestions of measures at patient–GP-consultation was not proven effective in preventing sick leave in the following 12 months compared to treatment as usual. More research is needed on methods to early identify, advise and treat people with work-related stress in primary health care, and on how and when GPs and other professionals in primary health care can be trained to understand this risk of sick leave due to work-related stress, on how to prevent it, and on how to advise and treat employees at risk. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Holmgren
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - G Hensing
- Section for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - U Bültmann
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Hadzibajramovic
- Institute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Health Metrics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M E H Larsson
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Närhälsan Research and Development, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Development of primary care assessment tool-adult version in Tibet: implication for low- and middle-income countries. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e94. [PMID: 32800017 PMCID: PMC6609993 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To conduct advanced psychometric analysis of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) in Tibet and identify avenues for metric performance improvement. Background: Measuring progress toward high-performing primary health care can contribute to the achievement of sustainable development goals. The adult version of PCAT is an instrument for measuring patient experience, with key elements of primary care. It has been extensively used and validated internationally. However, only little information is available regarding its psychometric properties obtained based on advanced analysis. Methods: We used data collected from 1386 primary care users in two prefectures in Tibet. First, iterative confirmatory factor analysis examined the fit of the primary care construct in the original tool. Then item response theory analysis evaluated how well the questions and individual response options perform at different levels of patient experience. Finally, multiple logistic regression modeling examined the predicative validity of primary care domains against patient satisfaction. Findings: A best final structure for the PCAT-Tibetan includes 7 domains and 27 items. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests good fit for a unidimensional model for items within each domain but doesn’t support a unidimensional model for the entire instrument with all domains. Non-parametric and parametric item response theory analysis models show that for most items, the favorable response option (4 = definitely) is overwhelmingly endorsed, the discriminability parameter is over 1, and the difficulty parameters are all negative, suggesting that the items are most sensitive and specific for patients with poor primary care experience. Ongoing care is the strongest predictor of patient satisfaction. These findings suggest the need for some principles in adapting the tool to different health system contexts, more items measuring excellent primary care experience, and update of the four-point response options.
Collapse
|
43
|
Pham TM, Abel GA, Gomez-Cano M, Lyratzopoulos G. Predictors of Postal or Online Response Mode and Associations With Patient Experience and Satisfaction in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11855. [PMID: 31045503 PMCID: PMC6521193 DOI: 10.2196/11855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient experience surveys are important tools for improving the quality of cancer services, but the representativeness of responders is a concern. Increasingly, patient surveys that traditionally used postal questionnaires are incorporating an online response option. However, the characteristics and experience ratings of online responders are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine predictors of postal or online response mode, and associations with patient experience in the (English) Cancer Patient Experience Survey. METHODS We analyzed data from 71,186 patients with cancer recently treated in National Health Service hospitals who responded to the Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015. Using logistic regression, we explored patient characteristics associated with greater probability of online response and whether, after adjustment for patient characteristics, the online response was associated with a more or less critical evaluation of cancer care compared to the postal response. RESULTS Of the 63,134 patients included in the analysis, 4635 (7.34%) responded online. In an adjusted analysis, male (women vs men: odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.54), younger (<55 vs 65-74 years: OR 3.49, 95% CI 3.21-3.80), least deprived (most vs least deprived quintile: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.64), and nonwhite (nonwhite vs white ethnic group: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.24-1.51) patients were more likely to respond online. Compared to postal responders, after adjustment for patient characteristics, online responders had a higher likelihood of reporting an overall satisfied experience of care (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.32). For 34 of 49 other items, online responders more frequently reported a less than positive experience of care (8 reached statistical significance), and the associations were positive for the remaining 15 of 49 items (2 reached statistical significance). CONCLUSIONS In the context of a national survey of patients with cancer, online and postal responders tend to differ in their characteristics and rating of satisfaction. Associations between online response and reported experience were generally small and mostly nonsignificant, but with a tendency toward less than positive ratings, although not consistently. Whether the observed associations between response mode and reported experience were causal needs to be examined using experimental survey designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tra My Pham
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Mayam Gomez-Cano
- University of Exeter Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Afriyie SO, Kong Y, Danso PO, Ibn Musah AA, Akomeah MO. Do corporate governance mechanisms and internal control systems matter in reducing mortality rates? Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 34:744-760. [PMID: 30657198 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Internal controls are critical to guarding an institution against fraud, error, and devastation. They are effective tools for preventing losses and achieving organizational goals. However, internal control mechanisms need to be relevant, because the organization cannot comprehend the effectiveness of the system if they are out-of-touch with the operation. Health care control practices are not exceptionally different from what pertains in other industries. The health care organizations require effective corporate governance mechanisms to uphold their operations and performances. These practices assist health care organizations to exhume cynical practices that generate unproductive results and also factors militating against the hospital's goals or objectives. This study revealed that practices such as enhanced Board diligence, Health Professionals on board, financial prudence, and effective communication have the tendency of reducing mortality, if well executed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yusheng Kong
- School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Patrick Obeng Danso
- School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Ball SL, Newbould J, Corbett J, Exley J, Pitchforth E, Roland M. Qualitative study of patient views on a 'telephone-first' approach in general practice in England: speaking to the GP by telephone before making face-to-face appointments. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e026197. [PMID: 30598491 PMCID: PMC6318515 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand patients' views on a 'telephone-first' approach, in which all appointment requests in general practice are followed by a telephone call from the general practitioner (GP). DESIGN Qualitative interviews with patients and carers. SETTING Twelve general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS 43 patients, including 30 women, nine aged over 75 years, four parents of young children, five carers, five patients with hearing impairment and two whose first language was not English. RESULTS Patients expressed varied views, often strongly held, ranging from enthusiasm for to hostility towards the 'telephone-first' approach. The new system suited some patients, avoiding the need to come into the surgery but was problematic for others, for example, when it was difficult for someone working in an open plan office to take a call-back. A substantial proportion of negative comments were about the operation of the scheme itself rather than the principles behind it, for example, difficulty getting through on the phone or being unable to schedule when the GP would phone back. Some practices were able to operate the scheme in a way that met their patients' needs better than others and practices varied significantly in how they had implemented the approach. CONCLUSIONS The 'telephone-first' approach appears to work well for some patients, but others find it much less acceptable. Some of the reported problems related to how the approach had been implemented rather than the 'telephone-first' approach in principle and suggests there may be potential for some of the challenges experienced by patients to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Ball
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Newbould
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennie Corbett
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Josephine Exley
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emma Pitchforth
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, UK
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Roland
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hemadeh R, Hammoud R, Kdouh O, Jaber T, Ammar L. Patient satisfaction with primary healthcare services in Lebanon. Int J Health Plann Manage 2018; 34:e423-e435. [PMID: 30259563 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reorienting the model of care towards preventive services is integral to successfully move towards a people-centered healthcare system. Patient satisfaction is an essential component of people-centered care and an important quality of care indicator. In its efforts to strengthen primary healthcare, the Ministry of Public Health in Lebanon assessed patient satisfaction with services offered at primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) and explored the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient characteristics and accreditation. METHODOLOGY The study followed a cross-sectional design. A survey was administered through phone calls with 1313 patients receiving services as part of a benefits package provided by 59 PHCCs. The survey collected data on patients' sociodemographic characteristics, perceptions, and satisfaction. RESULTS Overall, 96.66% of surveyed patients reported being either satisfied (60.23%) or very satisfied (36.43%) with the services provided at the PHCCs. Patients' perceptions of patient-provider communication, healthcare provider competency, and health education quality constituted strong predictors for satisfaction. However, facilities' accreditation status was not associated with satisfaction with PHC services. CONCLUSION Patient satisfaction with primary healthcare services in Lebanon was remarkably high. Findings highlighted the need for quality improvement particularly in health education and the alignment of accreditation standards with patient needs and expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randa Hemadeh
- Primary Healthcare Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rawan Hammoud
- Primary Healthcare Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ola Kdouh
- Primary Healthcare Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tarek Jaber
- Primary Healthcare Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Lea Ammar
- Primary Healthcare Department, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Weinhold I, Gurtner S. Rural - urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care. Soc Sci Med 2018; 212:76-85. [PMID: 30025382 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In light of the rising regional inequalities in primary care provider supply, to ensure equitable access is a pressing issue in health policy. Most policy approaches fall short in considering the patient perspective when defining shortage areas. As a consequence, implementations of new service delivery models might fail to be responsive to patients' expectations. To explore regional differences in the relative importance of structure and process attributes as drivers of patient satisfaction with local primary care, we collected data from residents of three objectively well-supplied urban and six objectively worse-supplied rural areas in Germany and tested a multi-group structural equation model. The results suggest that the relative importance of care attributes is different among the regional conditions rural and urban. Regardless of regional constraints, the strongest determinants of satisfaction are not related to structural aspects but are concerned with the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. A lack of available choices and a higher tolerance in terms of distances provide possible explanations for the results. The high importance rural residents attribute to the interpersonal relation should not be neglected in the re-organization of traditional service delivery in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Weinhold
- Technische Universität Dresden, Centre for Health Economics c/o Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Gurtner
- Bern University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Corporate Development, Brückenstr. 73, 3005, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pond D, Mate K, Stocks N, Gunn J, Disler P, Magin P, Marley J, Paterson N, Horton G, Goode S, Weaver N, Brodaty H. Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021125. [PMID: 30121596 PMCID: PMC6104761 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Test effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners (GPs) on quality of life and depression outcomes for patients. DESIGN Double-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING General practices in Australia between 2007 and 2010. PARTICIPANTS General practices were randomly allocated to the waitlist (n=37) or intervention (n=66) group, in a ratio of 1:2. A total of 2030 (1478 intervention; 552 waitlist) community-dwelling participants aged 75 years or older were recruited via 168 GPs (113 intervention; 55 waitlist). INTERVENTIONS A practice-based academic detailing intervention led by a peer educator that included: (1) training in use of the GP assessment of cognition dementia screening instrument; (2) training in diagnosis and management based on Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Dementia Guidelines; (3) addressing GPs' barriers to dementia diagnosis; and (4) a business case outlining a cost-effective dementia assessment approach. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were patient quality of life and depression; secondary outcome measures were: (1) sensitivity and specificity of GP identification of dementia; (2) referral to medical specialists and/or support services; (3) patient satisfaction with care; and (4) carer quality of life, depression and satisfaction with care. RESULTS The educational intervention had no significant effect on patient quality of life or depression scores after 12 months. There were however improvements in secondary outcome measures including sensitivity of GP judgement of dementia (p=0.002; OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.92 to 18.73), satisfaction with GP communication for all patients (p=0.024; mean difference 2.1, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.93) and for patients with dementia (p=0.007; mean difference 7.44, 95% CI 2.02 to 12.86) and enablement of carers (p=0.0185; mean difference 24.77, 95% CI 4.15 to 45.40). CONCLUSION Practice-based academic detailing did not improve patient quality of life or depression scores but did improve detection of dementia in primary care and patient satisfaction with GP communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12607000117415; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Mate
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nigel Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Disler
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Parker Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Marley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nerida Paterson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graeme Horton
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Goode
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natasha Weaver
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration and the Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Anhang Price R, Stucky B, Parast L, Elliott MN, Haas A, Bradley M, Teno JM. Development of Valid and Reliable Measures of Patient and Family Experiences of Hospice Care for Public Reporting. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:924-932. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian Stucky
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Santa Fe, New Mexico
| | | | | | - Ann Haas
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joan M. Teno
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|