Twenty-year trends in benzodiazepine dispensing in the Australian population

Mother's little helper turned a foe: Alprazolam use, misuse, and abuse

Benzodiazepines are effective in managing anxiety and related disorders when used properly (short-term). Their inappropriate use, however, carries significant risks, involving amnesia, rebound insomnia, rebound anxiety, depression, dependence, abuse, addiction, and an intense and exceedingly prolonged withdrawal, among other complications. Benzodiazepines also amplify the effects of opioids and, consequently, have been implicated in approximately 30 % of opioid overdose deaths. Despite their unfavorable profile, sharp increases in medical and non-medical use of benzodiazepines have been steadily reported worldwide. Alprazolam (Xanax®), a potent, short-acting benzodiazepine, is among the most prescribed and abused anxiolytics in the United States. This medication is commonly co-abused with opioids, increasing the likelihood for oversedation, overdose, and death. Notwithstanding these risks, it is surprising that research investigating how benzodiazepines, such as alprazolam, interact with opioids is severely lacking in clinical and preclinical settings. This review therefore aims to present our current knowledge of benzodiazepine use and misuse, with an emphasis on alprazolam when data is available, and particularly in populations at higher risk for developing substance use disorders. Additionally, the potential mechanism(s) surrounding tolerance, dependence and abuse liability are discussed. Despite their popularity, our understanding of how benzodiazepines and opioids interact is less than adequate. Therefore, it is now more important than ever to understand the short- and long-term consequences of benzodiazepine/alprazolam use.

Assessing Decision Fatigue in General Practitioners' Prescribing Decisions Using the Australian BEACH Data Set

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) make numerous care decisions throughout their workdays. Extended periods of decision making can result in decision fatigue, a gradual shift toward decisions that are less cognitively effortful. This study examines whether observed patterns in GPs' prescribing decisions are consistent with the decision fatigue phenomenon. We hypothesized that the likelihood of prescribing frequently overprescribed medications (antibiotics, benzodiazepines, opioids; less effortful to prescribe) will increase and the likelihood of prescribing frequently underprescribed medications (statins, osteoporosis medications; more effortful to prescribe) will decrease over the workday.

METHODS

This study used nationally representative primary care data on GP-patient encounters from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program from Australia. The association between prescribing decisions and order of patient encounters over a GP's workday was assessed with generalized linear mixed models accounting for clustering and adjusting for patient, provider, and encounter characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 262,456 encounters recorded by 2,909 GPs, the odds of prescribing antibiotics significantly increased by 8.7% with 15 additional patient encounters (odds ratio [OR] = 1.087; confidence interval [CI] = 1.059-1.116). The odds of prescribing decreased significantly with 15 additional patient encounters by 6.3% for benzodiazepines (OR = 0.937; CI = 0.893-0.983), 21.9% for statins (OR = 0.791; CI = 0.753-0.831), and 25.0% for osteoporosis medications (OR = 0.750; CI = 0.690-0.814). No significant effects were observed for opioids. All findings were replicated in confirmatory analyses except the effect of benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs were increasingly likely to prescribe antibiotics and were less likely to prescribe statins and osteoporosis medications as the workday wore on, which was consistent with decision fatigue. There was no convincing evidence of decision fatigue effects in the prescribing of opioids or benzodiazepines. These findings establish decision fatigue as a promising target for optimizing prescribing behavior.

HIGHLIGHTS

We found that as general practitioners progress through their workday, they become more likely to prescribe antibiotics that are reportedly overprescribed and less likely to prescribe statins and osteoporosis medications that are reportedly underprescribed.This change in decision making over time is consistent with the decision fatigue phenomenon. Decision fatigue occurs when we make many decisions without taking a rest break. As we make those decisions, we become gradually more likely to make decisions that are less difficult.The findings of this study show that decision fatigue is a possible target for improving guideline-compliant prescribing of pharmacologic medications.

Medications and cognitive risk in Aboriginal primary care: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are ageing with high rates of comorbidity, yet little is known about suboptimal prescribing in this population.

AIM

The prevalence of potentially suboptimal prescribing and associated risk factors were investigated among older patients attending primary care through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs).

METHODS

Medical records of 420 systematically selected patients aged ≥50 years attending urban, rural and remote health services were audited. Polypharmacy (≥ 5 prescribed medications), potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) as per Beers Criteria and anticholinergic burden (ACB) were estimated and associated risk factors were explored with logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of polypharmacy, PIMs and ACB score ≥3 was 43%, 18% and 12% respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, polypharmacy was less likely in rural (odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.77) compared to urban patients, and more likely in those with heart disease (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62-4.25), atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.08-16.81), hypertension (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.34-3.44), diabetes (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.69-4.39) or depression (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.19-3.06). PIMs were more frequent in females (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.03-3.42) and less frequent in rural (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85) and remote (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.29-1.18) patients. Factors associated with PIMs were kidney disease (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.37-4.92), urinary incontinence (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.02-8.83), depression (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.50-4.77), heavy alcohol use (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.39-5.75) and subjective cognitive concerns (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.31-5.52). High ACB was less common in rural (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.03-0.34) and remote (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.25-1.04) patients and more common in those with kidney disease (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.50-6.30) or depression (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.70-6.47).

CONCLUSION

Associations between potentially suboptimal prescribing and depression or cognitive concerns highlight the importance of considering medication review and deprescribing for these patients.

Minor tranquillizers for short-term treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Unspecific symptoms of anxiety and distress are frequently encountered in patients in both general practice and acute psychiatric services. Minor tranquillizers may be a treatment option when non-pharmacological interventions are insufficient or unavailable. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis of the evidence for short-term (1-4 weeks) pharmacological treatment of newly onset symptoms of anxiety and distress. We searched the PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases and extracted data following a predefined hierarchy of outcomes. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE). We included 34 randomized trials comprising a total of 7044 patients with adjustment disorders or anxiety spectrum disorders. The network meta-analysis showed that regarding the critical outcome symptoms of anxiety within 1-4 weeks benzodiazepines (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.40), quetiapine (SMD - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.90 to - 0.13) and pregabalin (SMD - 0.58, 95% CI - 0.87 to - 0.28) all performed better than placebo with no statistically significant difference between the drugs. Data on other important outcomes were inconsistently reported. Adverse effects varied, but overall, it was uncertain whether adverse effects differed between interventions. The evidence regarding the risk of dependence was uncertain, but dependence may be a concern in susceptible individuals even with short-term treatment. Overall, the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was rated as low to very low across outcomes. Despite the limitations in the evidence, the results of this review can inform treatment guidelines, supporting clinicians in the choice of minor tranquillizer in this prevalent and help-seeking, clinically heterogeneous population.

New users of anxiolytics and sedatives in Sweden-Drug type, doses, prescribers' characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity in more than 750,000 patients

OBJECTIVES

Anxiety and sleep disorders are common in the population and anxiolytics and sedatives are widely used. Our aim was to describe the drug utilization of new users of anxiolytics and sedatives in adults including type of drug, doses, prescribers' characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity.

METHODS

A register-based cohort study of new users (18-64 years) of anxiolytics and sedatives in 2015-2019, free of any such drug 5 years prior to inclusion. The individuals were linked to national registers on dispensed drugs and recorded diagnoses.

RESULTS

In total, 764,432 new users of anxiolytics and sedatives were identified, which corresponds to an incidence of 26/1000 inhabitants and year. The proportion of new users of benzodiazepines (including both anxiolytics and sedatives) decreased, whereas the proportion of sedative antihistamines and melatonin increased. The most common drug dispensed was hydroxizin (33%) followed by benzodiazepine related drugs (zopiclone and zolpidem; 20%), propiomazine (14%) and benzodiazepines (13%). The majority (68%) of the prescriptions were from primary care. Most new users were prescribed 1-30DDDs and 52% among women and 49% among men were dispensed their drug only once during the first year. Half of the new users had a previous comorbid psychiatric disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings are well reflecting the recommendations in national guidelines.

[Private Prescriptions In East And West Germany - A Secondary Data Analysis]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs are prescribed to a considerable extent as private prescription also for persons insured by a statutory health insurance (SHI), with formerly large differences between East and West Germany. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these differences still exist today.

METHOD

This secondary data analysis used anonymized prescription data from general practitioners (GPs), community neurologists, and psychiatrists. SHI-insured patients with at least one prescription for a benzodiazepine or Z-substance between 2014 and 2020 were included. Differences between East and West Germany in the proportion of private prescriptions were the central outcome. Multiple regression analyses were performed to test whether the factors region (eastern vs. western Germany) and specialist group (GPs vs. neurologists/psychiatrists) were statistically significant predictors of the proportion of private prescriptions - taking into account the age and gender composition of patients in a practice.

RESULTS

From 867 practices, 2,200,446 prescriptions for Z-substances, benzodiazepine anxiolytics, and benzodiazepine hypnotics/sedatives were evaluated. More than 38% of these prescriptions were issued as private prescriptions: 53.6% in eastern Germany and 34.8% in western Germany. For Z-substances, the proportion of private prescriptions was particularly high (70.7% in eastern and 43.0% in western Germany). GPs issued private prescriptions far more frequently than neurologists and psychiatrists. The proportion of private prescriptions increased during the study period, comparatively strongly in the western states (from 33% to 39%) and slightly in the eastern states (from 53% to 54%). In the multivariate model, practice area (east/west) and specialist group were similarly strong predictors of the extent of private prescriptions, especially for Z-substances.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to a general alignment in life expectancy, morbidity risks, and health behaviour in East and West Germany, there is, despite convergence, still a significant difference in the proportion of private prescriptions for benzodiazepines and especially for Z-substances between the two regions. The groups of physicians who mainly prescribe these substances, namely neurologists and psychiatrists, on the one hand, and GPs, on the other, also differ considerably in the proportion of their private prescriptions for these substances.

Global trends in the consumption of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in 67 countries and regions from 2008 to 2018: a sales data analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To investigate the trends in the consumption of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs at global, regional, and national levels from 2008 to 2018, across 67 countries and regions.

METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study investigated the consumption of BZDs and Z-drugs analyzed by global pharmaceutical sales data from the IQVIA-Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System database between 2008 and 2018. Consumption was measured in defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID). The global, regional, and national trends were estimated using linear mixed models. Additional analyses were conducted by grouping countries by income level. The association between consumption and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the prevalence of different medical conditions was explored in univariable linear models.

RESULTS

BZD consumption decreased annually by -1.88% (95% CI: -2.27%, -1.48%), and Z-drugs increased by + 3.28% (+2.55%, +4.01%). In 2008, the top ten countries for BZD and Z-drug consumption were all European, ranging from 63.69 to 128.24 DDD/TID. Very low levels were found in Russia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, French West Africa, and the Philippines, with DDD/TID < 1. The consumption in high-income countries was much higher than in middle-income countries. The results showed that increased consumption of BZDs and Z-drugs was statistically associated (p < 0.05) with higher GDP and increased prevalence of anxiety, self-harm, neurological disorders, chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct differences in consumption and trends of BZDs and Z-drugs were found across different countries and regions. Further exploration is needed to understand the association and safety of the use of BZDs and Z-drugs in patients with comorbidities.

Case Report: High doses of Zolpidem and QT interval lengthening: Is there a relationship? A case series

Zolpidem is indicated in cases of severe insomnia in adults and, as for BDZs, its assumption should be limited to short periods under close medical supervision. Since several drugs cause corrected QT interval (QTc) elongation, the authors investigated whether high daily doses of Zolpidem could cause QTc elongation. The study was conducted in the Addiction Medicine Unit of the G.B. Rossi University Hospital in Verona. The data were collected from hospitalizations carried out between January 2015 and February 2020 and refer to a total of 74 patients, 38 males and 36 females, who were treated for detoxification from high doses of Zolpidem with the "Verona Detox Approach With Flumazenil." One patient out of 74 had QTc elongation (479 ms). The patient was male and took a daily dose of 50 mg of Zolpidem; he did not take concomitant therapies that could cause QTc lengthening. He had no electrolyte alterations, no contemporary or previous intake of barbiturates, heroin, cocaine, THC, alcohol, NMDA or nicotine which could cause an elongation of the QTc interval. The present study highlights the low risk of QTc elongation due to high dosages of Zolpidem; however, if, on one hand, we can affirm that Zolpidem is a safe drug, on the other, the widespread use of high dosages of this drug for prolonged periods of time is problematic and worrying.

Long-term benzodiazepines and z-drug prescribing in Australian general practice between 2011 and 2018: A national study

Despite reducing benzodiazepine prescribing, benzodiazepine-involving deaths have substantially increased in Australia. This study aimed to explore patterns in long-term prescribing of medications (benzodiazepine and z-drugs [BZD]) used for sleep-issues/insomnia in Australia to better understand these changes. Open cohort study using de-identified electronic health records of 1 414 593 adult patients regularly attending 404 Australian general practices from 2011 to 2018 (MedicineInsight). We used logistic regression adjusted for patient and practice characteristics to; (1) estimate long-term BZD prescribing prevalence (≥3 prescriptions in 6 months) and the associated sociodemographic factors, and (2) Poisson regression to compute annual changes in prescribing rates. Long-term BZD prescribing changed from 4.4% in 2011 to 5.8% in 2015, remaining relatively stable until 2018 (annual increase +2.5% [95% CI +2.0%;+3.0%]). Long-term BZD prescribing in any year was up to six times more likely in elderly rather than in younger patients and 30%-43% more prevalent in females, or patients living in or attending a practice located in more disadvantaged areas. The increase was more pronounced among males, adults aged 35-49 years, and individuals living in advantaged areas. The median duration among incident cases decreased from 1183 to 322 days between 2011 and 2017, and was up to 197 days longer among elderly females than males. Despite a slight increase and recent stability in long-term BZD prescribing, the higher rates and durations among elderly patients, women, or those living in more disadvantaged areas are concerning and highlights the need for interventions that reduce the potential harms of long-term BZD use in vulnerable groups.

Benzodiazepine high-doses: The need for an accurate definition

OBJECTIVES

A clear definition of what we understand of high-dose misuse or of a 'markedly increased dose' (as stated by the DSM-5) is important and past definitions may be inadequate. The aim of this review is to describe the different definitions used and to test these definitions for their accuracy.

METHODS

A narrative PubMed literature review was conducted based on articles published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2020 describing benzodiazepines (in MeSH Terms or MeSH Major Topic) and high-dose (or high-dosage). Specific definitions were applied to a population sample to show how definitions affect high-dose benzodiazepine prevalence.

RESULTS

Multiples of an equivalent-diazepam dose or of the World Health Organization 'defined daily dosage' were used more frequently than the overstep of the recommended maximum therapeutic dosage as a cut-off point.

CONCLUSION

High-dose use is rare but the prevalence in the general population varies among studies, mainly due to different definitions, making both clinical and epidemiological comparisons between studies difficult. Defining a high-dose user as a person who takes at least a higher dose than the maximum usual therapeutic dose over a defined period of time therefore appears to be clinically more consistent.

Subgrouping time-dependent prescribing patterns of first-onset major depressive episodes by psychotropics dissection

BACKGROUND

Subgrouping patients with major depressive disorder is a promising solution for the issue of heterogeneity. However, the link between available subtypes and distinct pathological mechanisms is weak and yields disappointing results in clinical application.

AIM

To develop a novel approach for classification of patients with time-dependent prescription patterns at first onset in real-world settings.

METHODS

Drug-naive patients experiencing their first major depressive episode (n = 105) participated in this study. Psychotropic agents prescribed in the first 24 mo following disease onset were recorded monthly and categorized as antidepressants, augmentation agents, and hypnosedatives. Monthly cumulative doses of agents in each category were converted into relevant equivalents. Four parameters were used to summarize the time-dependent prescription patterns for each psychotropic load: Stability, amount, frequency, and the time trend of monthly prescriptions. A K-means cluster analysis was used to derive subgroups of participants based on these input parameters of psychotropic agents across 24 mo. Clinical validity of the resulting data-driven clusters was compared using relevant severity indicators.

RESULTS

Four distinct clusters were derived from K-means analysis, which matches experts’ consent: "Short-term antidepressants use", "long-term antidepressants use", "long-term antidepressants and sedatives use", and "long-term antidepressants, sedatives, and augmentation use". At the first 2 years of disease course, the four clusters differed on the number of antidepressants used at adequate dosage and duration, frequency of outpatient service use, and number of psychiatric admissions. After the first 2 years following disease onset, depression severity was differed in the four subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested a new approach to optimize the subgrouping of patients with major depressive disorder, which may assist future etiological and treatment response studies.

Trends in the prescription of drugs used for insomnia: an open-cohort study in Australian general practice, 2011-2018

BACKGROUND

Despite an increase in the prevalence of sleep problems, few studies have investigated changes in the prescribing of drugs that are often used to manage insomnia.

AIM

To explore changes in the pattern of benzodiazepine (BZD), Z-drug (zolpidem, zopiclone), and non-BZD prescriptions.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Open-cohort study comprising 1 773 525 patients (55 903 294 consultations) who attended one of 404 Australian general practices at least three times in two consecutive years between 2011 and 2018.

METHOD

Data were extracted from MedicineInsight, a database of 662 general practices in Australia. Prescription rates per 1000 consultations, the proportion of repeat prescriptions above recommendations, and the proportion of prescriptions for patients with a recent (within 2 years) recorded diagnosis of insomnia were analysed using adjusted regression models.

RESULTS

Rates of BZD, Z-drug, and non-BZD prescriptions were 56.6, 4.4, and 15.5 per 1000 consultations in 2011 and 41.8, 3.5, and 21.5 per 1000 consultations in 2018, respectively. Over the whole study period, temazepam represented 25.3% of the prescriptions and diazepam 21.9%. All BZD and zolpidem prescriptions declined over the whole study period (annual change varying from -1.4% to -10.8%), but non-BZD and zopiclone prescriptions increased in the same period (annual change 5.0% to 22.6%). Repeat prescriptions that exceeded recommended levels remained at <10% for all medications, except melatonin (64.5%), zolpidem (63.3%), zopiclone (31.4%), and alprazolam (13.3%). In 2018, >50% of Z-drug and melatonin prescriptions were for patients with insomnia. There was an annual increase of 0.8-5.9% in the proportion of prescriptions associated with a recently recorded diagnosis of insomnia.

CONCLUSION

Overall, BZD prescriptions in Australia declined between 2011 and 2018. However, the prescription of some of these drugs increased for patients with a recently recorded diagnosis of insomnia. This is concerning because of the potential adverse effects of these medications and the risk of dependence.

Time trends in pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder: Results from the AMSP Pharmacovigilance Program from 2001-2017

BACKGROUND

Currently available data on the prescription practice among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) reflect the outpatient setting. This is the first study to provide information on time trends of psychotropic drug utilization in psychiatric inpatients.

METHOD

Data stems from German-speaking psychiatric hospitals collected by the program "Drug Safety in Psychiatry" (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie, AMSP) between 2001 and 2017. 44,418 psychiatric inpatients with MDD were included. Time trends in drug utilization were analyzed by comparing the first (2001-2003) and last time point (2015-2017) using risk ratios (RR).

RESULTS

Antidepressant drugs (ADD) were the most used psychotropic drug class with utilization decreasing slightly from 2001-2003 (89.7%) to 2015-2017 (85.5%). Use of tricyclic ADDs showed the greatest decline (RR 0.35), while use of selective serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (RR 1.72) and "other ADDs" increased the most. Use of antipsychotic drugs (APD), especially second-generation antipsychotic drugs (RR 1.46), increased. Use of tranquilizing (RR 0.71) and hypnotic drugs (RR 0.43) both decreased. Most patients were treated with more than one psychotropic drug, most often ADD + APD, which was utilized more often in 2015-2017 (51.1%) than in 2001-2003 (45.1%; RR 1.13). Combination of two ADDs increased from 2001-2003 (24.5%) to 2015-2017 (33.0%; RR 1.35).

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design does not allow conclusions to be drawn about causal relationship of findings. Further, only certain clinical and sociodemographic data was available.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of MDD has shown significant changes from 2001 to 2017.

Metabolic diversity as a reason for unsuccessful detoxification from benzodiazepines: the rationale for serum BZD concentration monitoring

PURPOSE

Many harms secondary to benzodiazepine (BZD) dependence force users towards detoxification treatment. However, even strongly motivated patients tolerate the process badly or experience early relapse. The detoxification procedure has not yet been standardized. The objective of this paper is to examine the hypothesis that faulty detoxification routines may have caused some failures.

METHODS

The detoxification approaches found in the literature were compared stage by stage. The review was used to identify possible common, across-the-board systematic errors.

RESULTS

The presented literature review confirms that the widespread divergence in the BZD metabolism rate is effectively neglected during detoxification routines. Without laboratory measurements, these differences, additionally interfered with by auxiliary drugs, undermine not only the scheduled but even the symptom-driven procedures. An initial substitution with a long-acting BZD, although recommended, may lead to over-accumulation. This excess, varying between patients and incompatible with the current tapering stage, may lead to repeated overestimation of the patient's adjustments to reduced doses. Consequently, the patient's good clinical presentation at withdrawal, resulting in a conclusion of detoxification, may actually reflect a persistently high serum BZD concentration. The low-concentration stage, if shifted past the end of treatment, exposes patients to unexpected, unassisted withdrawal crises. With laboratory feedback, these crises, unlike the symptoms related to deficient re-adaptation mechanisms, could be prevented. Moreover, by minimizing the high-concentration phase, time can be saved for properly assisted low-concentration challenges.

CONCLUSION

A customized detoxification procedure driven not only by the intensity of withdrawal symptoms but also by serum BZD monitoring may prevent some failures. As the standard regimen, it would make detoxification from BZDs more reliable and effective.

A national study on prescribed medicine use in Australia on a typical day

PURPOSE

To describe Australians' prescribed medicine use on a typical day (September 25, 2018).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using nationally representative dispensing claims data using the Australian Government Department of Human Services random 10% sample of all Australians eligible for prescription medicines subsidised through the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Our main outcome measures were the number and proportion of people using at least one prescribed medicine and the specific medicine groups and classes on the day. We estimated the proportion of Australians using these medicines using the mid-year Australian population as the denominator. We quantified multiple medicine use by calculating the number and proportion of people experiencing polypharmacy (the use of 5 or more unique medicines) and hyper-polypharmacy (the use of 10 or more unique medicines).

RESULTS

We found that 9.0 million Australians used at least one PBS medicine on September 25, 2018; equating to 27.5 million medicines in use across Australia. "Cardiovascular system", "nervous system" and "alimentary tract and metabolism" medicines comprised the top three medicine groups. Over 1.8 million people experienced polypharmacy on the day, accounting for 13.6 million dispensed medicines. 1 022 590 (45%) people aged ≥70 years old experienced polypharmacy and 188 930 (8%) experienced hyper-polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of polypharmacy were high, particularly in the people most susceptible to polypharmacy-related harm. Strategies to optimise the risk-benefit ratio of medicines and to reduce polypharmacy through "choosing wisely" and "de-prescribing" in this age group are needed. Australia's national data provides a benchmark to inform global medicine utilisation practices.

Fatal intentional drowning in Australia: A systematic literature review of rates and risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Unintentional drowning deaths are only part of the drowning profile, with little attention being paid to intentional drowning in Australia. Strategies for the prevention of intentional drowning deaths are likely to be different from unintentional. Quality documentation, analysis and dissemination of intentional deaths data is crucial for developing appropriate strategies for prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic literature review to investigate the mortality rates and risk factors of intentional drowning deaths in Australia.

METHODS

A systematic search guided by PRISMA was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Scopus, Google Scholar, and BioMed Central databases to locate relevant original research articles published between 2007 and 2018.

RESULTS

Ten papers reporting the mortality rates and risk factors of intentional drowning deaths in Australia published between 2007 and 2018, with study periods of the included articles spanning from 1907 to 2012, were reviewed. Most studies investigated suicidal drowning deaths in Australia, none reported homicidal drowning deaths. The downward trend of fatal suicide drowning was identified in Australia. The annual rate of intentional drowning between 1994 and 2012 can be inferred from eight studies, ranging from 0.06 to 0.21 for nation-wide mortality rates. The highest annual state-wide mortality rate was identified in the state of Queensland, ranging from 0.02 to 0.11 per 100,000 individuals. Of four studies examining the risk factors of fatal intentional drowning in Australia, being of older age groups, being female, and the presence of substance use were identified as important factors for suicidal drowning deaths. The national-scale proportion of suicide drowning in Australia, ranging from 2% to 3% of all intentional self-harm deaths, was also identified.

CONCLUSION

Limited publications reporting the mortality rates and risk factors of intentional drowning deaths in Australia were identified. Being of older age groups and being female were recognised as factors for suicide drowning deaths, and psychoactive substances were widely identified amongst cases. Future research on improving death reporting systems and the legal framework for medico-legal death investigation, along with the investigation of the risk factors of intentional drowning, are required to inform the planning, implementation, and evaluation of prevention interventions for intentional drowning deaths in Australia.

Potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use in Australian adults: A population-based study (2014-2017)

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Inappropriate benzodiazepine use continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to characterise the initiation of new benzodiazepine treatment episodes in Australia and identify correlates of potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using dispensing claims from a 10% sample of Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme eligible Australians (2014-2017). Our cohort comprised adults initiating a new benzodiazepine treatment; we defined potentially inappropriate use as ≥3 benzodiazepine dispensing over any continuous 90-day period in the year following initiation. We examined characteristics associated with potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

People initiating a new benzodiazepine treatment episode (n = 276 765) were more frequently female (59.1%) and <65 years of age (73.6%). In the 90 days prior to initiating benzodiazepine, people were commonly dispensed antidepressants (26.5%), opioid analgesics (17.6%) and antipsychotics (4.7%). In the first year after initiation, 20 938 (9.5%) people experienced 'potentially inappropriate use'. Having a greater initial quantity of benzodiazepine dispensed [odds ratio (OR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.12 per 10 defined daily doses increase], dispensing of antipsychotics (OR 3.00, 95% CI 2.86-3.15) and >5 unique medicines (OR 2.54, 95% CI 2.44-2.64; vs. ≤5 unique medicines) in the 90 days prior to initiation were associated with potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Approximately, 1 in 10 people who initiated benzodiazepines were using it beyond the guideline recommended period. We identified factors at the time of initiation associated with potentially inappropriate use; clinicians should consider these before prescribing benzodiazepines and initiate conversations about alternative therapy when necessary.

Alprazolam use among a sample of Australians who inject drugs: Trends up to six years post regulatory changes

INTRODUCTION

Alprazolam is a high potency triazolobenzodiazepine that is associated with a disproportionate amount of harm compared to other benzodiazepines. In Australia, amid growing concerns of extra-medical use and harms, alprazolam was up-scheduled from Schedule 4 (prescription only) to Schedule 8 (controlled drug) on 1 February 2014, with further restrictions introduced on 1 February 2017. This study aims to examine the impact of these regulatory changes among cross-sectional samples of people who inject drugs (PWID), from 2011-2019.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the 2011-2019 Illicit Drug Reporting System, comprising cross-sectional samples of PWID recruited annually from Australian capital cities (approximately ~900 per year).

RESULTS

By 2019, the proportion of PWID who reported past six-month use of non-prescribed (17%) and prescribed (4%) alprazolam had halved compared to 2011 (39% and 13%, respectively), with no evidence of an increase in use of other sedative substances. Following the up-scheduling of alprazolam in 2014, there was an increase in the median last price paid for 2 mg of diverted alprazolam ($5AUD pre-rescheduling versus $7AUD post rescheduling), with 61% of those able to answer reporting that diverted alprazolam had become 'more difficult' to obtain post versus pre-rescheduling. The correlates associated with non-prescribed alprazolam use remained relatively consistent pre- and post-regulatory change, with past-month criminal activity, past six-month opioid agonist therapy and past six-month use of non-prescribed other benzodiazepines associated with non-prescribed alprazolam use in both the 2013 and 2018 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Regulatory changes appear to have resulted in sustained reductions in alprazolam use amongst our annual cross-sectional sentinel samples of PWID, although a considerable minority (17%) continued to report non-prescribed use in 2019. To achieve further reductions in non-prescribed use and associated harms, these regulatory changes need to be coupled with other interventions, such as direct consumer engagement and harm reduction messaging. Our findings suggest that people receiving opioid agonist therapy remain a key target population for such interventions.

[Not Available]

BACKGROUND

The use of controlled substances, especially opioids, is a public health concern. Canada is the country with the second greatest opioid use in the world. The use of these substances is associated with problems of misuse, as evidenced by North America's opioid crisis.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyze usage patterns for controlled substances in a health care facility from 2003/04 to 2017/18, and to propose a tool for monitoring the use of controlled substances in this setting.

METHOD

In this retrospective descriptive study, usage data for all controlled substances were extracted from the institution's supply management software for the period April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2018. The data are presented according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification in terms of number of Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 1000 inpatient-days, using the DDD values proposed by the World Health Organization. Only descriptive statistics were determined.

RESULTS

During the last 15 years, use of controlled substances at the study facility dropped by 43% (min. 739 and max. 1292 DDD/1000 inpatient-days per year). From 2003/04 to 2017/18, the main therapeutic classes consumed (in decreasing order) were opioids, hypnotics and sedatives, anxiolytics, and general anesthetics. The main opioid molecules consumed in 2017/18 were hydromorphone and injectable morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective descriptive study showed a decrease in the consumption of controlled substances in the study facility from 2003/04 to 2017/18. It also demonstrated the feasibility of developing a tool for monitoring the use of controlled substances in a health care facility. This approach could be implemented at a larger scale to foster comparisons between facilities.

Benzodiazepines use in Morocco: A nation wide consumption database study between 2004 and 2017

Although information exists regarding the rate of benzodiazepines (BZDs) use in different countries, little information is available concerning the BZDs consumption in Morocco. To describe prescription rate in Morocco, a retrospective descriptive analysis of BZDs and their agonists use with the instituteIQIVIA database was performed during the period 2004-2017. The obtained data provide a dynamic approach to total BZDs consumption using an annual collection of sales data in Morocco and were expressed in terms of daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day. Data analysis showed that the major BZDs sold in Morocco were Alprazolam, Bromazepam, Nordazepam, Lorazepam, Parazepam, Diazepam and two benzodiazepine agonists, Zolpidem and Zopiclone. The Bromazepam was the molecule the most consumed during 2004-2016. In 2017, Alprazolam was the most consumed followed by Bromazepam, Nordazepam, Zolpidem, Lorazepam, Parazepam, Diazepam, Dipotassium clorazepate, Dipotassium Clorazypate and Zopiclone with 0.94, 0.91, 0.6, 0.55, 0.45, 0.32, 0.18, 0.18, 0.07 and 0.05 daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day respectively. The total amount consumed each year for all BZDs and their agonists in Morocco was 2.69, 2.77, 3, 3.17, 3.32, 3.54, 3.61, 3.81, 4.06, 4.30, 4.06, 3.94, 3.78 and 3.66 daily defined doses/ 1000 inhabitants / day, respectively during 2004-2017. To our knowledge, this is the first study that describes the consumption of BZDs and their agonists (Zolpidem, Zopiclone) in Morocco. This data may help the analytical toxicology laboratory and health organizations operating in the field of analytical biochemistry to develop specific BZDs quantification and detection methods needed for the Moroccan population.

Long-term use of hypnotics: Analysis of trends and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic insomnia are prone to long-term use of hypnotics. Reported risk factors include aging, female sex, and comorbid psychiatric disorders. However, most previous studies have been cross-sectional cohort studies.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical service payment data for 330,000 people to determine the duration of prescription of hypnotics and the risk factors for long-term use. We followed up 3981 patients (2382 M, 1599 F, age 40.3 ± 12.4 years) who were prescribed hypnotics for the first time between April 2005 and March 2008.

RESULTS

Of these 3981 patients, 59.6% were prescribed hypnotics for only 1 month, 11.3% were prescribed hypnotics for 2 consecutive months, and 10.1% of patients continued receiving prescriptions for the entire 12-month observation period. In multiple logistic time-dependent Cox analyses, use of antidepressants, mean dose of hypnotics, and advanced age were significantly associated with long-term use of hypnotics (p < 0.01). In an analysis of the association between long-term use of hypnotics and prescribed dosage, high monthly dose, advanced age, and department of first visit were significantly associated with long-term use (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These clinical indicators may be effective for early identification of patients with insomnia who are at high risk of developing physical dependence on hypnotics.

The Effect of Methylphenidate on Reed Scaling in Benzodiazepine Poisoning: A Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine is one of the most important causes of substance abuse and intoxication throughout the world and Iran.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to determine the role of stimulants in reversing CNS level in acute Benzodiazepine poisoning patients who were hospitalized at referral poison center.

METHOD

This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial study on 32 cases with pure acute Benzodiazepine poisoning from March 2016 to February 2017. Diagnosis of pure acute poisoning was based on history, and laboratory confirmation. We gathered the demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, hospitalization and outcome. Participants were randomized into two groups: Methylphenidate Group (MPH) and Placebo Group (PBO).

RESULTS

The randomized sample consisted of 32 participants who were predominately female (83%). The majority of the PBO group and the MPH group reported improvement in their consciousness with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .005). Paired sample t-test analyses on Reed Scale data revealed an increase in the probability of improvement during the trial for the MPH group compared to the PBO group. Furthermore, the HCo3 (bicarbonate) level has a significant p-value with respect to age groups (p = .02). None of our cases required either the ICU facility or intubation.

CONCLUSION

Our study provided the MPH superiority over PBO in reversing CNS symptoms in loss of consciousness in acute BZD poisoned patients. Thus, this trial provides concrete evidence that improvement in consciousness levels (Reed Scale rated) among those patients receiving MPH was associated with a methylphenidate use.

Unlawful dispensing practice of diazepam: a simulated client approach in community pharmacies in the north-west of Dar-es-Salaam region, Tanzania

Background

The use of psychotropic substances is controlled in most parts of the world due to their potential of abuse and addiction. Diazepam is one of the psychotropic substances which can be dispensed in community pharmacies in Tanzania. As per good dispensing practices and pharmacy laws, diazepam in the community pharmacies should strictly be stored in a controlled box and dispensed only by prescription. However, to our understanding little had been reported on availability and dispensing practices of diazepam in Tanzania.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study which involved 178 randomly selected registered community pharmacies in Kinondoni district was conducted from January to March 2018. Simulated client approach was used to assess the availability and dispensers practice about dispensing of diazepam. Location of pharmacies was categorized as being at the centre or periphery of the Kinondoni district. Chi-squared test was used for the analysis of categorical data using SPSS version 23. The p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Result

The total of 178 community pharmacies were visited, the majority of the dispensers (89.1%) encountered were female. Most (69.1%) of the studied pharmacies were located at the centre of Kinondoni district. Diazepam was available in 91% of community pharmacies and 70% of dispensers issued diazepam without prescription.

Conclusion

Diazepam was available in most of the community pharmacies in Kinondoni district, and the majority of the dispensers dispensed diazepam without prescription. This calls for the regulatory authorities to be more vigilant on the availability of diazepam and enhance the provision of ethical pharmacy practice in the community pharmacies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4421-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Consumo do benzodiazepínico clonazepam (Rivotril®) no estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2009-2013: estudo ecológico

Resumo O objetivo do estudo é estimar a prevalência do uso de clonazepam no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Estudo ecológico e descritivo do consumo de clonazepam (2009-2013), com dados do Sistema Nacional de Gerenciamento de Produtos Controlados da Anvisa. O consumo foi medido pela Dose Diária Definida, com indicadores por população total e com 18 anos e mais utilizando a DDD padronizada de 8mg (anticonvulsivante) e a de 1mg (hipnosedativo). Os Municípios da Região Metropolitana foram agrupados segundo os Índices de Desenvolvimento Humano (IDH) e de GINI, submetidos à análise de conglomerados e apresentados segundo o consumo de clonazepam. No Estado do RJ, o consumo entre 2009 e 2013 aumentou de 0,35 para 1,97 DDD/1000 habitantes. Os valores são maiores para os indivíduos acima de 18 anos. Empregando-se 1mg ao invés de 8mg, chega-se a 21 DDD/1000 habitantes acima de 18 anos, em 2013. Rio de Janeiro e Niterói, com os maiores IDH, apresentaram em 2013 os maiores consumos, 3,38 e 4,52 DDD, respectivamente. Os dados sugerem que até 2% da população adulta é usuária de clonazepam, possivelmente como hipnosedativo. Deve-se atentar para o uso ampliado e fora de indicações terapêuticas, dados o potencial de abuso e as reações adversas ao clonazepam.

The relative lethal toxicity of pharmaceutical and illicit substances: A 16-year study of the Greater Newcastle Hunter Area, Australia

AIMS

We aim to calculate 2 metrics of relative lethal toxicity; the fatal toxicity index (FTI; number of deaths per year of a daily dose) and the case fatality (CF; number of deaths per overdose) with a focus on opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and illicit drugs.

METHODS

This descriptive cohort study used the Australian National Coronial Information System (NCIS) to identify a population of individuals with drug-associated deaths in the Greater Newcastle Hunter Area between January 2002 and December 2016. This was combined with Australian medicine dispensing data and corresponding data from the Hunter Area Toxicology Service to calculate FTI and CF.

RESULTS

There were 444 drug-related deaths and 21,296 overdoses during the study period. FTI and CF were well correlated (Spearman's rho 0.64, P < .001). Of the classes of interest, opioids had the highest FTI (40.3 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.2-45.4 deaths per 100 years of use at the defined daily dose or deaths/DDD/100 years) and CF (12.4% 95%CI 11.0-13.9). Fentanyl, methadone and morphine had the highest relative fatal toxicity within this class. Tricyclic antidepressants had the highest relative fatal toxicity of all antidepressants (FTI 14.5 95%CI 9.7-19.3 deaths/DDD/100 years and CF 7.1% [95%CI 4.8-9.3]) and benzodiazepines appeared to be more associated with multiple agent deaths than single. Of the illicit drugs, heroin had the highest CF (26.4%, 95%CI 19.1-33.7).

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of relative lethal toxicity is useful to prescribers and medicines and public health policy makers in restricting access to more toxic drugs and may also assist coroners in determining cause of death.

Benzodiazepine usage and patient preference for alternative therapies: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prevalence of chronic benzodiazepine use in primary care settings remains high despite clear evidence of adverse health outcomes resulting from long-term use and the availability of effective alternative behavioural therapies. Eliciting factors influencing past or current usage experience of benzodiazepine users and their future behavioural intention regarding discontinuation or alternative behavioural therapy adoption could be useful in developing informed strategies facilitating successful benzodiazepine withdrawal in long-term users. The aim of this study was to identify patient factors influencing their current long-term benzodiazepine use, past withdrawal attempt, and future intention to trial safer alternative behavioural therapies. Additionally, the study also aimed to explore patients' preference for information sources on behavioural therapies.

METHODS

Point of purchase surveys were conducted with patients obtaining benzodiazepines from selected pharmacies across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Survey items included the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-specific), questions about patient's sociodemographic characteristics, as well as their views about long-term benzodiazepine use and behavioural therapies.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were recruited from 12 pharmacies across New South Wales (NSW). The surveys were conducted from November 2016 to July 2017. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 54.3 (±16.7) with a range of 23 to 86 years, and 67% of the participants had been using the benzodiazepine for at least 1 year. Lower-education levels, stronger beliefs about the necessity of use, and lower concerns about ongoing benzodiazepine use were significantly associated with prolonged use. Sixty-four percent of the participants were not interested in behavioural therapies, and there was a significant relationship between the participants' future preference for behavioural therapies and their concerns about the potential adverse effects of benzodiazepines. A majority of the participants rated general practitioners (GPs) as their first choice and pharmacists as the second choice for discussing behavioural therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific individual sociodemographic characteristics of benzodiazepine users and their medication-related beliefs influence their current benzodiazepine usage and future intention to trial behavioural therapies as an alternative to their benzodiazepines. Based on the reported preferences of benzodiazepine users in this study, developing and evaluating GP-pharmacist collaborative services to improve the uptake of behavioural therapies as an alternative to benzodiazepines can be recommended.

The impact of in hospital patient-education intervention on older people's attitudes and intention to have their benzodiazepines deprescribed: a feasibility study

Background

Long-term benzodiazepine use in the older population is common and is associated with significant harm. The provision of a patient-educational booklet during hospitalization may encourage patients to discuss review and possible deprescribing of benzodiazepine therapy with their health professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and effect of a patient empowerment intervention in hospital inpatients on patient initiation of a discussion about deprescribing benzodiazepines versus usual care.

Methods

A feasibility interventional study using a patient-empowerment education intervention was conducted at a Sydney teaching hospital. Patients aged ⩾ 65 years, prescribed a benzodiazepine, and able to provide consent were invited to participate in the study. Participants were randomly allocated to intervention or control group (1:1). Intervention participants received the patient-empowerment booklet and control received usual care. All participants received 1-month follow-up phone interviews to assess medication and attitudinal changes.

Results

A total of 42 participants were recruited (20 intervention and 22 control). The average age was 71.5 (interquartile range: 69.0-80.3) and 54.8% were females. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between intervention and control groups (p > 0.05). At baseline, 65.0% of participants (53.0% intervention, 86.0% control) were not concerned about the potential benzodiazepine side effects. Twenty-nine participants (15 intervention and 14 control) completed 1-month follow up; 22 participants (11 intervention and 11 control) were discharged on the benzodiazepine. Among these, 13 (59.1%) had ceased benzodiazepine at 1-month follow up [46.2% (n = 6) intervention; 53.8% (n = 7) control]. In the intervention group, 33.3% (n = 5) of participants had initiated a discussion with their doctor or pharmacist about stopping the benzodiazepine compared with 35.7% (n = 5) in the control group.

Conclusion

Cessation of benzodiazepines 1 month following discharge was common. Future larger studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of providing a patient-empowerment booklet on reducing benzodiazepine use and other potentially inappropriate medications.

The Association Between the Sedative Loads and Clinical Severity Indicators in the First-Onset Major Depressive Disorder

Background: High sedative use in a major depressive episode may imply specific clinical features. This study aims to examine the correlation between sedative use and clinical severity indicators in the initial treatment phase of first-onset major depressive disorder. Methods: A study cohort in the first episode of major depressive disorder was used to conduct pharmacological dissection. All participants had at least a 2-year follow-up period with a complete treatment record. The defined daily dose of antidepressants and augmentation agents were calculated as the antidepressant load and augmentation load, respectively. Sedative use, which was calculated as the equivalent dosage of lorazepam, were defined as the sedative load. These psychotropic loads were measured monthly and the averaged psychotropic loads for each day were obtained. Results: A total of 106 individuals (75.5% female) were included. The mean duration of disease course in participants was 5.5 ± 3.5 years. In the multiple regression analysis, after controlling for other classes of psychotropics and comorbid anxiety disorders, the sedative load independently correlated with higher number of antidepressants used, higher number of antidepressant used with an adequate dose and duration, more psychiatric emergency and outpatient visits within 2 years of disease onset. Conclusion: High loading of sedatives correlated with several indicators of clinical severity in major depressive disorder. The sedative load may be used as a specifier to identify subgroups in patients with major depressive disorder.

Benzodiazepine use risk: Understanding patient specific risk perceptions and medication beliefs

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed psychotropic medications. These medications have the potential to cause alertness impairing effects and their prolonged use is associated with serious adverse effects. Despite the listed adverse health outcomes and provision of warnings, many benzodiazepine users tend to ignore the safety information and use them inappropriately.

OBJECTIVE

To elicit the risk perceptions of benzodiazepine users and explore the association of risk perceptions with their socio-demographic factors or medication use profiles (e.g. past withdrawal attempt, length of use and future willingness to try behavioural alternatives).

METHODS

Point of purchase surveys were conducted with patients who were supplied benzodiazepines from selected pharmacies across New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Survey items included questions about patient's demographic characteristics, their past attempt for withdrawing benzodiazepines and their future intention to consider alternative behavioural therapies. The validated Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire (BMQ-specific) and a customised scale assessing risk perception were included in the survey. Data obtained from the surveys were entered into the IBM SPSS package (Version 22.0) and subjected to descriptive, correlational and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (67% female, a mean age of 54.3) obtaining benzodiazepines from 12 pharmacies were recruited for the survey. Participant's beliefs regarding potential side effects of benzodiazepines and their level of education were significantly associated with their risk perception scores. While the overall risk perception scores did not influence patient's previous attempts to withdraw benzodiazepines, the risk perception score about immediate effects of benzodiazepines (within 3-4 h of consumption) was a predictor of preference for behavioural therapies. Eighty-three percent (n = 62) of the participants believed that pharmacists can play a key role in improving risk perceptions of consumers around benzodiazepine use.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual patient characteristics and their beliefs about medications significantly influence their perception of risk about benzodiazepine use. The findings of this study suggest that pharmacist support can be utilized in effective risk communication, promoting the safe use of benzodiazepines and in facilitating the uptake of relevant behavioural interventions as alternatives to benzodiazepines.

[Use and misuse of benzodiazepines out of France]

Among 8 countries included in the report of ANSM, France is second behind Spain, when defined daily doses (DDD) are considered. Few studies, recent and based on representative samples of population, investigated the use of benzodiazepines in other countries and data are limited to compare France and other countries. In most countries, the use of benzodiazepines increases with age and is more frequent in women than in men. Variations of benzodiazepines use that were observed in other countries are similar to those observed in France, with a slight decrease but persistent high levels of use. In most countries, the long-term use of benzodiazepines is stable over time even though simple use decreases.

Translating Benzodiazepine Utilization Data into Meaningful Population Exposure: Integration of Two Metrics for Improved Reporting

Drug utilization research on benzodiazepines remains important for measuring trends in consumption within and across borders over time for the sake of monitoring prescribing patterns and identifying potential population safety concerns. The defined daily dose (DDD) system by the World Health Organization (WHO) remains the internationally accepted standard for measuring drug consumption; however, beyond consumption, DDD-based results are difficult to interpret when individual agents are compared with one another or are pooled into a total class-based estimate. The diazepam milligram equivalent (DME) system provides approximate conversions between benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (i.e. zopiclone, zolpidem, zaleplon) based on their pharmacologic potency. Despite this, conversion of total dispensed benzodiazepine quantities into DME values retains diazepam milligrams as the total unit of measurement, which is also impractical for population-level interpretation. In this paper, we propose the use of an integrated DME-DDD metric to obviate the limitations encountered when the component metrics are used in isolation. Through a case example, we demonstrate significant change in results between the DDD and DME-DDD method. Unlike the DDD method, the integrated DME-DDD metric offers estimation of population pharmacologic exposure, and enables superior interpretation of drug utilization results, especially for drug class summary reporting.

Changes in Australian Early-Career General Practitioners' Benzodiazepine Prescribing: a Longitudinal Analysis

BACKGROUND

Australian and international guidelines recommend benzodiazepines and related drugs (hereafter "benzodiazepines") as second-line, short-term medications only. Most benzodiazepines are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs; family physicians). Australian GP registrars ("trainees" or "residents" participating in a post-hospital training, apprenticeship-like, practice-based vocational training program), like senior GPs, prescribe benzodiazepines at high rates. Education within a training program, and experience in general practice, would be expected to reduce benzodiazepine prescribing.

OBJECTIVE

To establish if registrars' prescribing of benzodiazepines decreases with time within a GP training program DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training multi-site cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Registrars of five of Australia's 17 Regional Training Providers. Analyses were restricted to patients ≥ 16 years.

MAIN MEASURES

The main outcome factor was prescription of a benzodiazepine. Conditional logistic regression was used, with registrar included as a fixed effect, to assess within-registrar changes in benzodiazepine-prescribing rates. The "time" predictor variable was "training term" (6-month duration Terms 1-4). To contextualize these "within-registrar" changes, a mixed effects logistic regression model was used, including a random effect for registrar, to assess within-program changes in benzodiazepine-prescribing rates over time. The "time" predictor variable was "year" (2010-2015).

KEY RESULTS

Over 12 terms of data collection, 2010-2015, 1161 registrars (response rate 96%) provided data on 136,809 face-to-face office-based consultations. Two thousand six hundred thirty-two benzodiazepines were prescribed (for 1.2% of all problems managed). In the multivariable model, there was a significant reduction in within-program benzodiazepine prescribing over time (year) (p = < 0.001, OR = 0.94, CI = 0.90, 0.97). However, there was no significant change in 'within-registrar' prescribing over time (registrar Term) (p = 0.92, OR = 1.00 [95% CI = 0.94-1.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a welcome temporal trend for reductions in overall benzodiazepine prescribing from 2010 to 2015, there is still room for improvement and our findings suggest a lack of effect of specific GP vocational training program education and, thus, an opportunity for targeted education.

Trends in the long-term use of benzodiazepine anxiolytics and hypnotics: A national register study for 2006 to 2014

PURPOSE

Long-term benzodiazepine (BZD) treatment continues to be a debated topic. Because individual BZDs have different clinical profiles, we assessed the nationwide trends of long-term BZD use at active substance level during years 2006 to 2014.

METHODS

This study covered all reimbursed BZD purchases (n = 408 572-521 823 annually) for adults recorded in the Finnish Prescription Register. We assessed long-term use (annual cumulative purchase of ≥180 defined daily doses) in general, and at active substance level with the most commonly used BZD anxiolytics (oxazepam, diazepam, alprazolam, and clonazepam for nonepilepsy indications) and hypnotics (zopiclone, zolpidem, and temazepam) included. The persistence rates for each substance were assessed separately.

RESULTS

The prevalence of long-term BZD use among Finnish adults declined significantly from 5.3% to 3.6%, during years 2006 to 2014. Despite this decline, there was a significant increase in the long-term use of clonazepam for nonepilepsy indications and zolpidem (28.0% and 17.5%, respectively). Long-term use was common in the aged population, as well as among the users of hypnotics or clonazepam. Persistent use of 9 consecutive calendar years varied between 7.5% for incident alprazolam users and 21.0% for incident clonazepam users.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a declining trend in long-term BZD use, but the decline was not uniform between the substances-the long-term use of clonazepam and zolpidem even increased. Follow-up research is needed to assess whether the decline in BZD use is accompanied by an increased use of other types of anxiolytic or hypnotic drugs or other forms of treatment.

Benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing in Ireland: analysis of national prescribing trends from 2005 to 2015

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine prescribing trends for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs to General Medical Services (GMS) patients in Ireland.

METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional analysis of the national pharmacy claims database was conducted for GMS patients aged ≥16 years from 2005 to 2015. Prescribing rates per 1000 eligible GMS population were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Negative binomial regression was used to determine longitudinal trends and compare prescribing rates across years, gender and age groups. Duration of supply and rates of concomitant benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing were determined. Age (16-44, 45-64, ≥65 years) and gender trends were investigated.

RESULTS

Benzodiazepine prescribing rates decreased significantly from 225.92/1000 population (95% CI 224.94-226.89) in 2005 to 166.07/1000 population (95% CI 165.38-166.75) in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Z-drug prescribing rates increased significantly from 95.36/1000 population (95% CI 94.73-96.00) in 2005 to 109.11/1000 population (95% CI 108.56-109.67) in 2015 (P = 0.048). Approximately one-third of individuals dispensed either benzodiazepines or Z-drugs were receiving long-term prescriptions (>90 days). The proportion of those receiving >1 benzodiazepine and/or Z-drug concomitantly increased from 11.9% in 2005 to 15.3% in 2015. Benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing rates were highest for older women (≥65 years) throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Benzodiazepine prescribing to the GMS population in Ireland decreased significantly from 2005 to 2015, and was coupled with significant increases in Z-drug prescribing. The study shows that benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing is common in this population, with high proportions of individuals receiving long-term prescriptions. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce potentially inappropriate long-term prescribing and use of these medications in Ireland.

Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users

BACKGROUND

Prolonged treatment with benzodiazepines is common practice despite clinical recommendations of short-term use. Benzodiazepines are used by approximately 4% of the general population, with increased prevalence in psychiatric populations and the elderly. After long-term use it is often difficult to discontinue benzodiazepines due to psychological and physiological dependence. This review investigated if pharmacological interventions can facilitate benzodiazepine tapering.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions to facilitate discontinuation of chronic benzodiazepine use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases up to October 2017: Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group's Specialised Register of Trials, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ISI Web of Science. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO ICTRP, and ISRCTN registry, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological treatment versus placebo or no intervention or versus another pharmacological intervention in adults who had been treated with benzodiazepines for at least two months and/or fulfilled criteria for benzodiazepine dependence (any criteria).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 trials (involving 2543 participants), but we could only extract data from 35 trials with 2295 participants. Many different interventions were studied, and no single intervention was assessed in more than four trials. We extracted data on 18 different comparisons. The risk of bias was high in all trials but one. Trial Sequential Analysis showed imprecision for all comparisons.For benzodiazepine discontinuation, we found a potential benefit of valproate at end of intervention (1 study, 27 participants; risk ratio (RR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 6.03; very low-quality evidence) and of tricyclic antidepressants at longest follow-up (1 study, 47 participants; RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.82; low-quality evidence).We found potentially positive effects on benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms of pregabalin (1 study, 106 participants; mean difference (MD) -3.10 points, 95% CI -3.51 to -2.69; very low-quality evidence), captodiame (1 study, 81 participants; MD -1.00 points, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.87; very low-quality evidence), paroxetine (2 studies, 99 participants; MD -3.57 points, 95% CI -5.34 to -1.80; very low-quality evidence), tricyclic antidepressants (1 study, 38 participants; MD -19.78 points, 95% CI -20.25 to -19.31; very low-quality evidence), and flumazenil (3 studies, 58 participants; standardised mean difference -0.95, 95% CI -1.71 to -0.19; very low-quality evidence) at end of intervention. However, the positive effect of paroxetine on benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms did not persist until longest follow-up (1 study, 54 participants; MD -0.13 points, 95% CI -4.03 to 3.77; very low-quality evidence).The following pharmacological interventions reduced symptoms of anxiety at end of intervention: carbamazepine (1 study, 36 participants; MD -6.00 points, 95% CI -9.58 to -2.42; very low-quality evidence), pregabalin (1 study, 106 participants; MD -4.80 points, 95% CI -5.28 to -4.32; very low-quality evidence), captodiame (1 study, 81 participants; MD -5.70 points, 95% CI -6.05 to -5.35; very low-quality evidence), paroxetine (2 studies, 99 participants; MD -6.75 points, 95% CI -9.64 to -3.86; very low-quality evidence), and flumazenil (1 study, 18 participants; MD -1.30 points, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.32; very low-quality evidence).Two pharmacological treatments seemed to reduce the proportion of participants that relapsed to benzodiazepine use: valproate (1 study, 27 participants; RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.90; very low-quality evidence) and cyamemazine (1 study, 124 participants; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.78; very low-quality evidence). Alpidem decreased the proportion of participants with benzodiazepine discontinuation (1 study, 25 participants; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 2.3 participants; low-quality evidence) and increased the occurrence of withdrawal syndrome (1 study, 145 participants; RR 4.86, 95% CI 1.12 to 21.14; NNTH 5.9 participants; low-quality evidence). Likewise, magnesium aspartate decreased the proportion of participants discontinuing benzodiazepines (1 study, 144 participants; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96; NNTH 5.8; very low-quality evidence).Generally, adverse events were insufficiently reported. Specifically, one of the flumazenil trials was discontinued due to severe panic reactions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the low or very low quality of the evidence for the reported outcomes, and the small number of trials identified with a limited number of participants for each comparison, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions regarding pharmacological interventions to facilitate benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users. Due to poor reporting, adverse events could not be reliably assessed across trials. More randomised controlled trials are required with less risk of systematic errors ('bias') and of random errors ('play of chance') and better and full reporting of patient-centred and long-term clinical outcomes. Such trials ought to be conducted independently of industry involvement.

Benzodiazepine prescription in Ontario residents aged 65 and over: a population-based study from 1998 to 2013

BACKGROUND

Although commonly used in anxiety and insomnia, recent guidelines recommend caution when prescribing benzodiazepines in the elderly. Here we examined rates of benzodiazepine prescribing to older adults in Ontario, Canada from 1998 to 2013 and impact of legislation that made prescribing regulations more strict.

METHOD

Annual benzodiazepine prescription rates for Ontario residents aged 65 and over were examined using the Ontario Drug Benefit database which captures all publicly funded prescriptions. Since most drugs, including benzodiazepines, are funded for residents aged ⩾65, data are essentially population-based. Weighted least squares regression methods were used to examine trends in prescribing rates (all benzodiazepines, anxiolytics, hypnotics, short- and long-acting drugs and individual drugs) from 1998 to 2013 for all Ontario residents aged ⩾65 and by sex and 5-year age bands. Impact on monthly prescribing rates of legislative changes (November 2011) which aimed to promote appropriate prescribing and dispensing practices for controlled substances, including requiring prescribers to record specified information, was assessed by constructing an interrupted time-series model.

RESULTS

Benzodiazepines were prescribed to 23.2% of the 1,412,638 Ontario residents aged ⩾65 in 1998, declining to 14.9% of 2,057,899 residents aged ⩾65 in 2013 (p < 0.001 for trend). Rates were significantly greater throughout in older age bands (p < 0.001) and 1.54-1.62 times greater in females than males (p < 0.001). Lorazepam was the most prescribed benzodiazepine throughout, but rates declined from 11.4% in 1998 to 8.5% in 2013. Diazepam rates fell from 2.3% to 0.7%. However, clonazepam prescription rates increased until 2011, 1.7-fold overall. After the November 2011 legal changes, downward shifts were observed in total benzodiazepine prescription rates and for each drug individually. The step function, conditional on covariates, suggested benzodiazepine rates after November 2011 were 2.89 per 1000 (p < 0.001) below rates observed previously, representing a relative reduction of 4.8% compared to the year before the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Benzodiazepine prescribing rates declined markedly in this population from 1998 to 2013. Targeted legislation may have reduced rates, but the effect, although statistically significant, was small.

Benzodiazepine Use in Older Adults in the United States, Ontario, and Australia from 2010 to 2016

OBJECTIVES

To detail annual trends in benzodiazepine incidence and prevalence in older adults between 2010 and 2016 in three countries.

DESIGN

Observational multicountry cohort study with harmonized study protocol.

SETTING

The United States (veteran population); Ontario, Canada; and Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

All people aged 65 and older (8,270,000 people).

MEASUREMENTS

Annual incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use stratified according to age group (65-74, 75-84, ≥85) and sex. We performed multiple regression analyses to assess whether rates of incident and prevalent use changed significantly over time.

RESULTS

Over the study period, we observed a significant decrease in incident benzodiazepine use in the United States (2.6% to 1.7%) and Ontario (6.0% to 4.4%) but not Australia (7.0% to 6.7%). We found significant declines in prevalent use in all countries (United States: 9.2% to 7.3%; Ontario: 18.2% to 13.4%; Australia: 20.2% to 16.8%). Although incidence and prevalence increased with age in Ontario and Australia, they decreased with age in the United States. Incidence and prevalence were higher in women in all countries.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with other international studies, there have been small but significant reductions in the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use in older adults in all three countries, with the exception of incidence in Australia, although use remains inappropriately high-particularly in those aged 85 and older-which warrants further attention from clinicians and policy-makers.

Management of Whiplash Associated Disorders in Australian general practice

Background

Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) are common and costly, and are usually managed initially by general practitioners (GPs). How GPs manage WAD is largely unstudied, though there are clinical guidelines. Our aim was to ascertain the rate of management (percentage of encounters) of WAD among patients attending Australian general practice, and to review management of these problems, including imaging, medications and other treatments.

Methods

We analysed data from 2013 to 2016 collected by different random samples of approximately 1000 general practitioners (GPs) per year. Each GP collected data about 100 consecutive consultations for BEACH (Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health), an Australian national study of general practice encounters.

Main outcome measures were: the proportion of encounters involving management of WAD; management including imaging, medications and other treatments given; appropriateness of treatment assessed against published clinical guidelines.

Results

Of 291,100 encounters from 2919 GP participants (a nationally representative sample), WAD were managed at 137 encounters by 124 GPs (0.047%). Management rates were 0.050% (females) and 0.043% (males). For 63 new cases (46%), 19 imaging tests were ordered, most commonly neck/cervical spine x-ray (52.6% of tests for new cases), and neck/cervical spine CT scan (31.6%). One or more medications were prescribed/supplied for 53.3% of WAD. NSAIDs (11.7 per 100 WAD problems) and compound analgesics containing paracetamol and opioids (10.2 per 100 WAD problems) were the commonest medications used by GPs overall. Paracetamol alone was used in 8 per 100 WAD problems. The most frequent clinical/procedural treatments for WAD were physical medicine/rehabilitation (16.1 per 100 WAD problems), counselling (6.6), and general advice/education (5.8).

Conclusions

GPs refer about 30% of new cases for imaging (possibly overutilising imaging), and prescribe a range of drugs, approximately 22% of which are outside clinical guidelines. These findings suggest a need for further education of GPs, including indications for imaging after whiplash injury, identification of those more likely to develop chronic WAD, and medication management guidelines. WAD carry a large personal and economic burden, so the impact of improvements in GP management is potentially significant.

Pattern of psychotropic medication use over two decades in Australian women

OBJECTIVE

Few population-based studies have been used to investigate secular trends in psychotropic medication use. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine psychotropic medication use over time using data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, an on-going, population-based, cohort study of Australian women.

METHODS

Of the 1494 women recruited at Time 1 (1993-1997), self-reported medication use from Time 2 (2004-2008) and/or Time 3 (2011-2014) was available for 889 women. Prevalence of antidepressant/antipsychotic/anxiolytic/sedative/anticonvulsant use by age and cohort strata was calculated using bootstrapping methods. Simultaneous age-cohort patterns were evaluated using logistic regression techniques.

RESULTS

The prevalence of any psychotropic medication use increased from 8.0% (95% confidence interval = [6.3, 9.8]) at Time 1 to 26.0% (95% confidence interval = [22.4, 29.4]) at Time 3, translating to a 4.3-fold increase in the likelihood of psychotropic medication use over the study period (odds ratio = 4.3, 95% confidence interval = [3.2, 5.8], p < 0.001). This increase was driven by the use of antidepressants (odds ratio = 6.4, 95% confidence interval = [4.2, 9.5], p < 0.001) and anticonvulsants (odds ratio = 4.4, 95% confidence interval = [1.8, 11.1]) and modest increases in the use of anxiolytic agents (odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval = [1.1, 3.1]) and sedatives (odds ratio = 1.7, 95% confidence interval = [1.6, 1.9]). The prevalence of any psychotropic medication use increased with increasing age (40-59.9 years: odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval = [1.5, 2.6]; 60-79.9 years: odds ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval = [1.9, 3.5], compared to the 20- to 39.9-year group). Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased dramatically over the study period (odds ratio = 15.3, 95% confidence interval = [7.0, 33.4]).

CONCLUSION

Use of psychotropic medication has increased substantially over the past two decades, especially among older women. Further investigations into the correlates and outcomes of the increased use of psychotropic medications are warranted.

Stories of Hell and Healing: Internet Users' Construction of Benzodiazepine Distress and Withdrawal

Benzodiazepines are a group of drugs used mainly as sedatives, hypnotics, antiepileptics, and muscle relaxants. Consumption is recommended for 2 to 4 weeks only, due to fast onset of dependency and potentially distressing withdrawal symptoms. Few peer-review studies have drawn on the user experiences and language to appreciate firsthand experiences of benzodiazepine withdrawal or discontinuation syndrome. We looked extensively at patient stories of benzodiazepine withdrawal and recovery on Internet support sites and YouTube. Our analysis indicated that users employ rich metaphors to portray the psychologically disturbing and protracted nature of their suffering. We identified seven major themes: hell and isolation, anxiety and depression, alienation, physical distress, anger and remorse, waves and windows, and healing and renewal. By posting success stories, ex-users make known that "healing" can be a long, unpredictable process, but distress does lessen, and recovery can happen.

Trends in utilization of benzodiazepine and Z-drugs in Israel

BACKGROUND

Studies on benzodiazepine (BZDs) as well as Zopiclone and Zolpidem (Z-drugs) utilization are important for estimating the prevalence of medical conditions, providing the basis for pharmacovigilance, and identifying temporal trends of consumption. Such studies that involve the Israeli population have not been conducted yet.

PURPOSE

Identify trends over time in utilization of BZDs and Z-drugs in a nationwide population in Israel.

METHODS

Data on BZD and Z-drugs utilization (for all indications) for the period 2005 to 2013 were obtained from pharmaceutical companies that distribute BZDs in Israel. Prevalence of BZD utilization was reported as defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 inhabitants/day.

RESULTS

The utilization of BZDs and Z-drugs aimed to treat sleeping disorders increased over the period of the study from 10.22 to 22.49 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day. The greatest increases in utilization of drugs established in Israel were observed for brotizolam (83%), zopiclone (59%), and zolpidem (94%). Decreases in use were recorded for lorazepam (14%), diazepam (16%), and oxazepam (27%). Use of hypnotic BZDs appeared to be relatively high, compared with the use of non-BZD hypnotics ("Z-drugs") such as zolpidem or zopiclone. Nationwide stressful conditions did not appear to be reflected in the annual BZD sales.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional BZDs and Z-drugs remained the treatment of choice for sleeping disorders in Israel during the study period. These results are, in certain cases, in contrast to current practice recommendations and guidelines and point at a need in better dissemination of these guidelines among prescribers in Israel.

Psychotropic medication use in Australia, 2007 to 2015: Changes in annual incidence, prevalence and treatment exposure

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in annual patterns of psychotropic medication use in Australia from 2007 to 2015.

METHODS

We used a 10% sample of individual-level nationwide dispensing claims for concessional beneficiaries dispensed psychotropic medications (stratified by class, subclass) to investigate annual trends and changes in the incidence and prevalence of use, median annual duration of exposure, proportion of people with single psychotropic dispensing and median defined daily doses per person dispensed each medicine per year.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there was a 26.1% decrease in the incidence and a 2.6% increase in the prevalence of all psychotropic medicine use. We observed a decrease in the annual incidence and prevalence of antidepressants (11.6% and 16.8%, respectively) but increases in the median annual duration of exposure (7.4%). Amitriptyline had the highest proportion of single dispensings of all antidepressants throughout the study period (26.5% in 2015) and defined daily doses per person dispensed each medicine per year increased by 20% for antidepressants overall. Benzodiazepine use decreased across all measures over the study period apart from long-term use (exposure for >240 days of the year), which in 2015 was 23.6% of those dispensed a benzodiazepine. We observed a relative increase in the incidence and prevalence of antipsychotic use (14.2% and 26.8%, respectively), and haloperidol had the highest proportion of single dispensings of any antipsychotic throughout the study period (47.5% in 2015). We observed a relative increase in the incidence and prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use of 114.0% and 101.8%, respectively, over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Increasing doses and treatment durations of antidepressants warrants further investigation due to concerns about overuse. Single dispensings of amitriptyline and haloperidol may indicate off-label use and long-term use of benzodiazepines remains problematic. Despite increases in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use, prevalence of use is still much lower than the estimated prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the adult population.