Effects of propranolol and pindolol on plasma lignocaine clearance in man

Neurohormonal activation in heart failure after acute myocardial infarction treated with beta-receptor antagonists

BACKGROUND

Few studies have described how neurohormonal activation is influenced by treatment with beta-receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. The aims were to describe neurohormonal activity in relation to other variables and to investigate treatment effects of a beta(1) receptor-antagonist compared to a partial beta(1) receptor-agonist.

METHODS

Double-blind, randomized comparison of metoprolol 50-100 mg b.i.d. (n=74), and xamoterol 100-200 mg b.i.d (n=67). Catecholamines, neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity (NPY-LI), renin activity, and N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (N-ANF) were measured in venous plasma before discharge and after 3 months. Clinical and echocardiographic variables were assessed.

RESULTS

N-ANF showed the closest correlations to clinical and echocardiographic measures of heart failure severity, e.g. NYHA functional class, furosemide dose, exercise tolerance, systolic and diastolic function. Plasma norepinephrine, dopamine and renin activity decreased after 3 months on both treatments, in contrast to a small increase in NPY-LI which was greater (by 3.9 pmol/l, 95% CI 1.2-6.6) in the metoprolol group. N-ANF increased on metoprolol, and decreased on xamoterol (difference: 408 pmol/l, 95% CI 209-607). Increase above median of NPY-LI (>25.2 pmol/l, odds ratio 2.8, P=0.0050) and N-ANF (>1043 pmol/l, odds ratio 2.8, P=0.0055) were related to long term (mean follow-up 6.8 years) cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased neurohormonal activity, reflecting both the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system, was found 3 months after an acute myocardial infarction with heart failure treated with beta-receptor antagonists. The small increase in NPY-LI may suggest increased sympathetic activity or reduced clearance from plasma. The observed changes of N-ANF may be explained by changes in cardiac preload, renal function, and differences in beta-receptor mediated inhibition of atrial release of N-ANF. NPY-LI, and N-ANF at discharge were related to long term cardiovascular mortality.

Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: interactions associated with local anesthetics, sedatives and anxiolytics. Part IV of a series

BACKGROUND

This article is the fourth in a five-part series based on a 1998 International Association for Dental Research symposium entitled "Adverse Drug Interactions in Dentistry: Separating the Myths From the Facts." The symposium evaluated the significance of various drug interactions associated with dental therapeutics.

METHODS

Local anesthesia and preoperative oral sedative/anxiolytic therapy often are indicated for routine oral surgery and restorative dentistry. The author conducted a literature review of the drug interactions associated with the use of local anesthetics and sedatives. The quality of the information used to document these interactions and the severity of the possible adverse outcome were assessed using a significance rating scale for dental drug interactions.

RESULTS

Many of the frequently described drug interactions were found to be poorly documented in the dental and medical literature. Others were determined not to be relevant to current dental practice. The use of local anesthetics, sedatives or anxiolytic agents in combination with other central nervous system depressant agents or in combination with drugs that inhibit their metabolism was associated with a few serious adverse drug interactions or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The adverse drug interactions associated with the use of local anesthetics and oral sedative/anxiolytic agents in general practice vary in significance. An understanding of possible adverse drug interactions in dentistry may help practitioners avoid and prevent these complications.

beta-blockers. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The clinician prescribing beta-blockers for his or her patients is faced with an often difficult situation. There are many beta-blockers, each with its own pharmacological profile. Patients are often taking multiple medications, thus increasing the risk of both anticipated and unexpected drug interactions. Reports of drug interactions are frequently anecdotal. The prescriber may not be aware of the patient's other medications or lifestyle habits. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions involving beta-blockers are documented in the literature, but these studies often examine small numbers of patients. For these reasons, it is difficult for the practitioner to distill guidelines for the administration of beta-blockers in conjunction with other medication. In general, beta-blockers are well tolerated, and symptomatic drug interactions are relatively infrequent. It is incumbent upon the clinical practitioner to have knowledge of his or her patient's drug profile and to be aware of the various drug interactions as well as each patient's unique pathophysiological profile when prescribing any medication, including beta-blockers. beta-Blockers may interact with a large number of commonly prescribed drugs, including antihypertensive and antianginal drugs, inotropic agents, anti-arrhythmics, NSAIDs, psychotropic drugs, anti-ulcer medications, anaesthetics, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, warfarin, oral hypoglycaemics and rifampicin (rifampin).

Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide

Since most of the toxicity associated with class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs is dose-related, this review examines adverse effects seen in both therapeutic practice and accidental or premeditated overdose. Toxicity is very common with these agents and can be life-threatening. A high percentage of patients must discontinue therapy because of adverse effects. Mexiletine and tocainide are structural analogues of lignocaine (lidocaine) and toxicity is similar with all 3 drugs. With gradual intoxication (the most common form) central nervous system effects such as lightheadedness, dizziness, drowsiness and confusion are seen first. Seizures and respiratory arrest can occur. Cardiovascular toxicity is manifested by progressive heart block, reduced cardiac contraction, hypotension and asystole. Both mexiletine and tocainide may have proarrhythmic effects. Gastrointestinal toxicity is also common. Shock, hypotension, cardiac failure and beta-blocker therapy reduce lignocaine clearance and enhance the risk of intoxication during routine therapy. Both lignocaine and mexiletine elimination is impaired in severe liver disease while tocainide clearance is reduced in renal failure. Management of toxicity is largely supportive and symptomatic. Lignocaine infusion must be discontinued and decontamination of the gut in the case of oral preparations is recommended. Serious intoxication requires intensive care unit admission. Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion may be helpful in serious lignocaine and tocainide poisoning. In institutions where extracorporeal circulatory assistance is available, massive lignocaine poisoning has been successfully treated with this intervention. In the therapeutic setting serious toxicity can be prevented by close clinical surveillance and appropriate dose reduction in patients with reduced drug clearance. Because of the large interindividual variation in lignocaine pharmacokinetic parameters, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended if results can be reported quickly. Mexiletine and tocainide have stereoselective metabolism and assays do not distinguish the more active isomers. Therapeutic drug monitoring is less useful in this situation.

Effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on hormonal responses during continuous and intermittent exercise

The modifying effect on exercise performance and neuroendocrine response of the nonselective beta blocker timolol (10 mg b.i.d. for 5 days) and the beta 1-selective beta blocker metoprolol (100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days) was studied. The hormones studied were growth hormone, prolactin, cortisol, renin, epinephrine, dopamine, and norepinephrine. The response was studied during short-term maximal dynamic exercise, using two different exercise protocols; continuous (n = 11) and intermittent (n = 9) bicycle ergometry, in normal healthy young men. Accumulated work on placebo was nearly identical in the two studies, but was significantly reduced by 10.4% and 6.6% with timolol and by 4.7% and 6.7% with metoprolol, during continuous and intermittent exercise, respectively. During continuous exercise, accumulated work was 5.8% lower (p less than 0.05) with timolol than with metoprolol. The hormonal plasma concentrations of all hormones except renin were higher during continuous exercise than during intermittent exercise. Beta blockade had no effect on baseline hormonal levels, but the response was markedly changed during exercise. Maximum epinephrine, cortisol, and prolactin responses increased after beta blockade; dopamine remained nearly unchanged; while the renin responses were attenuated. Norepinephrine concentrations were slightly increased during continuous exercise by beta blockade and rose in direct proportion to the increase in workload. During intermittent exercise, maximum norepinephrine levels were significantly reduced by beta blockade compared with placebo. Thus the effect of beta 1-selective and nonselective beta receptor blockade on circulating hormones does not seem to explain the reduced exercise capacity following beta blockade.

The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Lignocaine (lidocaine) and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are widely used after acute myocardial infarction. The therapeutic value of these agents depends on the achievement and maintenance of safe and effective plasma concentrations. Lignocaine pharmacokinetics after acute myocardial infarction (MI) are controlled by a number of variables. The single most important is left ventricular function, which affects both volume of distribution and plasma clearance. Other major factors include bodyweight, age, hepatic function, the presence of obesity, and concomitant drug therapy. Lignocaine is extensively bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, a plasma protein which is also an acute phase reactant. Increases in alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentration occur after an acute MI, decreasing the free fraction of lignocaine in the plasma and consequently decreasing total plasma lignocaine clearance without altering the clearance of non-protein-bound lignocaine. Complex changes in lignocaine disposition occur with long term infusions, and therefore early discontinuation of lignocaine infusions (within 24 hours) should be undertaken whenever possible. Because the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia declines rapidly after the onset of an acute MI, lignocaine therapy can be rationally discontinued within 24 hours in most patients. Lignocaine has a narrow toxic/therapeutic index, so that pharmacokinetic factors are critical in dose selection. In contrast, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists' adverse effects are more related to the presence of predisposing conditions (such as asthma, heart failure, bradyarrhythmias, etc.) than to plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetics of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are important to help assure therapeutic efficacy, to provide information about the anticipated time course of drug action, and to predict the possible role of ancillary drug effects (such as direct membrane action) and loss of cardioselectivity. Lipid solubility is the main determinant of the pharmacokinetic properties of a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. Lipid-soluble agents like propranolol and metoprolol are well absorbed orally, and undergo rapid hepatic metabolism, with important presystemic clearance and a short plasma half-life. Water-soluble drugs like sotalol, atenolol, and nadolol are less well absorbed, and are eliminated more slowly by renal excretion. Clinical assessment of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism is more valuable than plasma concentration determinations in evaluating the adequacy of the dose of a particular beta-adrenoceptor antagonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacologic aspects of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in beta-blocking drugs

The possession of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) by a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug results in a number of different pharmacologic properties. Most profound are the central hemodynamic effects. A drug with a significant degree of ISA results in less of a decrease in heart rate at rest and cardiac output, and, at least partly because of this, less of a decrease in peripheral blood flow. If prevailing sympathetic tone is low enough (e.g., during sleep) and the degree of ISA is sufficient, an increase in heart rate may be seen from an ISA-possessing drug. If the drug possesses beta 2 ISA, then a peripheral vasodilation action from stimulation of beta 2 vasodilator receptors may also be relevant. If high levels of exercise and full dosages of the drugs are used, a beta-blocking drug with ISA produces less of a decrease in heart rate. In asthmatic subjects, the modest beta-stimulant action on bronchial smooth muscle is not important, as these patients are potentially sensitive to any receptor blockade. Isoprenaline responses are inhibited to a similar degree compared with inhibition of exercise tachycardia, by nonselective drugs with and without ISA, whereas beta 1 selective agents produce much less inhibition of isoprenaline-induced tachycardia. A drug with ISA "down regulates" beta receptors; thus, when the drug is withdrawn there is no post-beta-blocking drug hypersensitivity in contrast to agents without ISA. There is evidence that ISA results in less of a disturbance in certain metabolic processes, particularly lipid metabolism and the metabolism of liver-metabolized drugs.

Prophylactic lidocaine in the early phase of suspected myocardial infarction

Four hundred two patients with suspected myocardial infarction seen within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms entered a double-blind randomized trial of lidocaine vs placebo. During the 1 hour after administration of the drug the incidence of ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia among the 204 patients with acute myocardial infarction was low, 1.5%. Lidocaine, given in a 300 mg dose intramuscularly followed by 100 mg intravenously, did not prevent sustained ventricular tachycardia, although there was a significant reduction in the number of patients with warning arrhythmias between 15 and 45 minutes after the administration of lidocaine (p less than 0.05). The average plasma lidocaine level 10 minutes after administration for patients without a myocardial infarction was significantly higher than that for patients with an acute infarction. The mean plasma lidocaine level of patients on beta-blocking agents was no different from that in patients not on beta blocking agents. During the 1-hour study period, the incidence of central nervous system side effects was significantly greater in the lidocaine group, hypotension occurred in 11 patients, nine of whom had received lidocaine, and four patients died from asystole, three of whom had had lidocaine. We cannot advocate the administration of lidocaine prophylactically in the early hours of suspected myocardial infarction.

The role of beta blockade, with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, in preserving compromised left ventricular function in patients with ischemic heart disease

To determine if intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) is associated with a hemodynamic advantage over non-ISA beta blockade, 17 patients with ischemic heart disease underwent resting echocardiography and symptom-limited stress radionuclide angiography on three occasions: control, pindolol (with ISA), 10 mg twice a day, and propranolol, 40 mg four times a day, in a nonrandomized design. In six patients with normal resting ejection fraction (EF) (mean = 57 +/- 4%), neither drug was associated with a significant hemodynamic improvement over control. In 11 patients with reduced resting EF (mean = 37 +/- 9%), pindolol was associated with a higher EF and peak velocity of circumferential fiber shortening at rest compared with propranolol but not control. On maximal exertion, pindolol was associated with a higher EF than that during control but was similar to propranolol. These observed beneficial effects on pindolol appear primarily to be related to the partial beta agonist activity which this agent possesses.

The impairment of lignocaine clearance by propranolol--major contribution from enzyme inhibition

To account for a 40% lowering of the systemic clearance of lignocaine by propranolol treatment it has been proposed that propranolol reduces liver blood flow by 25% and causes a 50% decrease in the intrinsic clearance of lignocaine by enzyme inhibition. In theory, the contribution of direct enzyme inhibition is best evaluated using oral administration of lignocaine when models of hepatic drug clearance predict that propranolol could increase the AUCpo of lignocaine by 100-140%. This hypothesis was tested in six healthy men who received 200 mg lignocaine HCl X H2O orally with and without propranolol pre-treatment (80 mg twice daily for 3 days). Propranolol treatment increased the mean plasma AUCpo of lignocaine by 113 +/- 58 s.d.% (P less than 0.005); it increased the peak plasma lignocaine concentration by 79 +/- 50 s.d.% (P less than 0.025) and it prolonged the elimination half-life of lignocaine by 20 +/- 13 s.d.% (P less than 0.05). Propranolol treatment lowered indocyanine green clearance by 11 +/- 15 s.d.%, but this change was not significant statistically. These experimental results are in accord with the theoretical predictions suggesting that propranolol lowers the systemic clearance of lignocaine mainly by direct inhibition of its metabolism rather than by a lowering of the hepatic blood flow.

The role of stress and the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension and ischemic heart disease: advantages of therapy with beta-receptor blockers

Human and animal studies link social and environmental factors to hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Job stress and undesirable life events may precede the development of raised blood pressure. Hypertension and ischemic heart disease vanquished many of the survivors of the seige of Leningrad. Specific behavior patterns of some patients with ischemic heart disease and the psychological ambience of others with hypertension have been associated with raised neural tone as reflected by levels of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine. Sympathoneural hypertonicity is a factor in left ventricular hypertrophy and the latter has been a prophet for sudden cardiac death. Sympathoadrenal surges may contribute to both reduced coronary reserve in hypertensives and increased vulnerability to ventricular dysrhythmia. The "coronary epidemic" of our modern times appears related in part to outdated survival mechanisms, not suitable to human behavior in our urban milieu. Beta receptor blocking agents are effective antidotes providing protection from adrenomedullary overdrive and even perhaps, modification of that behavior. Stress and the sympathetic nervous system are important co-conspirators in hypertension and sudden cardiac death.

Effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of lignocaine

In theory, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists could lower the clearance of free lignocaine in three ways (a) by decreasing hepatic blood flow, (b) by competing for plasma binding sites or (c) by inhibiting the enzymes responsible for metabolising lignocaine. The first mechanism has been demonstrated for propranolol and is probably common to all agents lacking intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. The second mechanism is discounted by data showing that propranolol, one of the more highly bound beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, does not alter the free fraction of lignocaine in plasma. In vitro studies support the third mechanism for the more lipid-soluble beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, as does the fact that observed decreases in the clearance of lignocaine in vivo are generally greater than the anticipated maximum lowering of hepatic blood flow.

How intrinsic sympathomimetic activity modulates the haemodynamic responses to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. A clue to the nature of their antihypertensive mechanism

1 A survey has been made of the literature on acute and long-term haemodynamic effects of ten different β-adrenoceptor antagonists.

The β-adrenoceptor blockers are: pindolol, practolol, alprenolol, oxprenolol, acebutolol, penbutolol, metoprolol, atenolol, propranolol and timolol. The total numbers of patients included in this review are 396 patients in 41 acute studies and 410 patients in 36 long-term studies.

2 The effects of β-adrenoceptor blockers on the concentrations of plasma noradrenaline have also been reviewed. Ten studies including 110 patients on non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers and eight studies including 116 patients on pindolol are presented.

3 In the acute studies (i.e. 15-90 min) arterial pressure was lowered by 1-7% and in the long-term studies (i.e. 3 days-5 years) by 6-17%.

4 The degree of cardio-depression induced by the various β-adrenoceptor blockers was inversely correlated with their pharmacologically defined quantity of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) both in acute and in long-term studies.

5 In the acute studies the increments in peripheral vascular resistance were directly correlated with the degree of cardio-depression. This suggests that a fall in arterial pressure immediately after administration of a β-adrenoceptor blocker is prevented by increased vasoconstrictor nerve activity mediated through the arterial baroreflex.

6 The compensatory response of vascular resistance to cardio-depression was similar for β₁-selective and non-selective blockers, thereby indicating that extra-junctional vascular β-receptors are relatively unimportant for maintaining basal vascular tone.

7 In the long-term studies the correlation between changes in cardiac output and changes in vascular resistance was shifted to a lower level of vascular resistance. This means that the onset of blood pressure reduction during β-adrenoceptor blockade was associated with a fall in vascular resistance at any level of cardiac output. Thus vascular resistance was higher during treatment with a non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blocker than during treatment with an ISA-β-adrenoceptor blocker.

8 The level of vascular resistance ultimately attained during treatment with the various β-adrenoceptor blockers appears to be inversely related to their effects on plasma renin activity.

9 The concentration of noradrenaline in plasma rose by approximately 30% during treatment with non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers and fell by more than 30% after pindolol.

10 There is evidence that under propranolol, which reduces cardiac output and hepatic blood flow, the plasma noradrenaline clearance is diminished. Since noradrenaline is mainly cleared from the circulation by the lungs and by the liver, and since pindolol has no effect on cardiac output and hepatic blood flow, one may expect the plasma noradrenaline clearance not to be diminished by pindolol.

11 The reported effects of β-adrenoceptor blockers on plasma noradrenaline may indicate that the release of neurotransmitter is diminished, but in the case of non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers this effect is not reflected by a decreased concentration of noradrenaline in plasma, because its clearance is also reduced.

12 The hypotensive effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers appears to be independent of blockade of postjunctional cardiac-β-receptors, juxtaglomerular-β-receptors and extrajunctional vascular β-receptors. This indicates that blockade of β-receptors at other sites (i.e. centrally and/or prejunctionally) is more important.