Exercise haemodynamics and maximal exercise capacity during beta-adrenoceptor blockade in normotensive and hypertensive subjects

Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade Effects on Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are increasingly prescribed while the effects of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade on cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET)-derived parameters remain under-studied.

METHODS

Twenty-one young healthy adults repeated three CPET at the same time with an interval of 7 days between each test. The tests were performed 3 h after a random, double-blind, cross-over single-dose intake of placebo, 2.5 mg or 5.0 mg bisoprolol, a cardio-selective beta1-adrenoreceptor antagonist. Gas exchange, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured at rest and during cyclo-ergometric incremental CPET.

RESULTS

Maximal workload and VO₂max were unaffected by the treatment, with maximal respiratory exchange ratio > 1.15 in all tests. A beta-blocker dose-dependent effect reduced resting and maximal BP and HR and the chronotropic response to exercise, evaluated by the HR/VO₂ slope (placebo: 2.9 ± 0.4 beat/ml/kg; 2.5 mg bisoprolol: 2.4 ± 0.5 beat/ml/kg; 5.0 mg bisoprolol: 2.3 ± 0.4 beat/ml/kg, p < 0.001). Ventilation efficiency measured by the VE/VCO₂ slope and the ventilatory equivalent for CO₂ at the ventilatory threshold were not affected by beta1-receptor blockade. Post-exercise chronotropic recovery measured after 1 min was enhanced under beta1-blocker (placebo: 26 ± 7 bpm; 2.5 mg bisoprolol: 32 ± 6 bpm; 5.0 mg bisoprolol: 33 ± 6 bpm, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest that a single dose of bisoprolol does not affect metabolism, respiratory response and exercise capacity. However, beta-adrenergic blockade dose dependently reduces exercise hemodynamic response by lowering BP and the chronotropic response.

Anti-arrhythmic therapy in athletes

The spectrum of arrhythmias that may be encountered in athletes ranges from isolated ectopic beats to ventricular tachycardia, usually in the context of a structurally normal heart. Anti-arrhythmic therapy in these individuals may be particularly challenging because of the young age, the hypervagotonic state, the desire to maintain a high physical performance, the reluctance to take medications and the need to avoid molecules included in the list of prohibited drugs of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Furthermore, the possible serious adverse effects of anti-arrhythmic drugs should be balanced against the benign nature of arrhythmias in patients with no underlying heart disease. The review summarizes the most common arrhythmias of athletes and the possible therapeutic options, including anti-arrhythmic drugs and non-pharmacological interventions. Eligibility criteria according to current guidelines are also addressed.

Rational use of antihypertensive medications in children

Hypertension has traditionally been regarded as an uncommon diagnosis in childhood and adolescence; however, there is compelling evidence to suggest that its prevalence is on the rise, particularly in those with obesity. As a result, pediatricians increasingly are asked to evaluate and manage patients with elevated blood pressure. An increased emphasis on conducting drug trials in children over the last 15 years has yielded important advances with respect to evidence-based data regarding the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive medications in children and adolescents. Unfortunately, data to definitively guide selection of initial agents is lacking. This article will present guidelines for the appropriate use of antihypertensive medications in the pediatric population, including the rational approach to selecting an appropriate medication with respect to pathophysiology, putative benefit, and likelihood for side effects.

Differential effects of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists on central and peripheral blood pressure at rest and during exercise

BACKGROUND

Differential effects of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (beta-ARB) on central and peripheral blood pressure may relate to change in heart rate and/or vasodilator tone and thus be exaggerated during exercise.

AIMS

To examine acute effects of selective and nonselective beta-ARB on central and peripheral blood pressure, cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance during exercise.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers (n= 20, 18 men, 19-54 years) received propranolol 80 mg, bisoprolol 20 mg, and placebo 1 h before bicycle ergometry (50, 75 and 100 W each for 3 min) in a randomized, cross-over study. Cardiac output was determined by pulmonary uptake of soluble and inert gas tracers (InnoCor, Innovision). Central systolic blood pressure (SBP) was determined from the late systolic shoulder of the digital artery pressure waveform (Finometer, Finopres).

RESULTS

At rest, both beta-ARB reduced brachial but not central SBP (compared with placebo). During exercise, beta-ARB reduced brachial SBP (reductions of 19.9 +/- 4.3 mmHg and 23.2 +/- 2.7 mmHg for propranolol and bisoprolol, respectively, at 100 W, each P < 0.0001) but not central SBP. The difference between peripheral and central SBP was reduced, relative to that during placebo, by 21.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval 8.8, 34.1) and 26.4 mmHg (18.1, 34.8) for propranolol and bisoprolol, respectively, at 100 W (each P < 0.01). There was no significant effect of beta-ARB on diastolic blood pressure or peripheral vascular resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reducing brachial blood pressure, acute beta-adrenoreceptor blockade in man at rest and during exercise does not reduce central blood pressure.

Chronic beta-blockade does not influence muscle power output during high-intensity exercise of short-duration

Patients receiving beta-receptor antagonists for the treatment of hypertension frequently complain of impaired exercise tolerance. To determine whether these medications impair skeletal muscle contractile function, we measured isokinetic muscle function in ten healthy male cyclists receiving nebivolol (N), atenolol (A), propranolol (P) and the calcium channel antagonist diltiazem (D). The subjects performed standardized tests of muscle power on an isokinetic cycle ergometer following subacute ingestion of N, A, P, D and placebo (PL) in a double blind crossover trial. Subjects exercised maximally for 10 s at 90, 110, 120, 130 and 150 rpm with 2-min rest between sessions. Thereafter, they performed a 30-s fatigue test at 120 rpm. Resting heart rate was decreased 13.4%, 21.9% and 14.6% by N, A and P, respectively (P < 0.05 vs PL). Resting systolic blood pressure was decreased 6.7% by A only (P < 0.05 vs PL). Peak power, average power and work done was not different among treatment groups at any crank velocity, nor was there any difference in total work done or rate of work decline in the 30-s test. We concluded from our study that peak isokinetic muscle power during maximal exercise of short duration is not affected by beta-blockade or the calcium antagonist diltiazem. Fatigue during beta-receptor antagonism would not appear therefore to be due to changes in the ability of skeletal muscle to produce peak power output during exercise of short duration.

Exercise tolerance with nebivolol and atenolol

Patients treated with beta-blocking agents often complain of fatigue during exercise. Exercise capacity is decreased under this condition. Nebivolol is a new beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a particular hemodynamic profile, which might be due to an ancillary property. Five milligrams once daily seems the optimal dose for antihypertensive treatment. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, the effects of nebivolol on maximal and endurance exercise capacity are compared with those of atenolol in healthy volunteers. The hemodynamic and metabolic effects during exercise are also studied. Nebivolol 5 mg once daily and atenolol 100 mg once daily decrease blood pressure at rest similarly. At these dosages nebivolol shows a smaller decrease in heart rate than atenolol. During exercise, the rise in systolic blood pressure and heart rate is less depressed with nebivolol than with atenolol. In contrast to atenolol, nebivolol does not decrease maximal and endurance exercise capacity, and does not increase perceived exertion significantly. Changes in hemodynamics influence maximal exercise capacity. Since nebivolol has less effect on exercise hemodynamics than atenolol, this might explain why maximal work capacity is not changed during nebivolol. During endurance exercise metabolic effects are thought to be more important. Under nebivolol glycerol and NEFA production is less depressed during exercise and might explain the preserved endurance capacity. These data suggest less beta blockade during nebivolol than during atenolol at the dosages used in this study. In conclusion, at a dose known to be antihypertensive, nebivolol does not alter exercise capacity significantly in healthy volunteers.

Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography

We have evaluated Sramek's method of impedance cardiography as a non-invasive way of detecting the cardiovascular effects of drugs. We made cardiovascular measurements using the method during passive tilting and exercise 2 h after the oral administration of atenolol (50 and 100 mg), propranolol (40 and 80 mg), pindolol (5 and 10 mg), and placebo in seven separate studies involving eight healthy male volunteers. Equivalent doses of the pure antagonists atenolol (beta 1) and propranolol (beta 1, beta 2) produced similar reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac index, and increases in stroke volume and total peripheral resistance, particularly during exercise. In contrast the partial agonist pindolol produced increases in heart rate and cardiac index, and reductions in peripheral resistance at rest. During passive tilting and exercise pindolol reduced heart rate, but cardiac output and total peripheral resistance were unchanged except at the highest levels of exercise. The similar cardiovascular effects of atenolol and propranolol, but differing effects of pindolol, are consistent with reports using other methods of measurement. This suggests that impedance cardiography may have a place in the non-invasive assessment of the cardiovascular effects of drugs.

Exercise performance during captopril and atenolol treatment in hypertensive patients

1. Maximal aerobic exercise capacity, submaximal endurance exercise performance, and exercise haemodynamics have been studied in sixteen patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension during treatment with captopril and atenolol. 2. Administration of atenolol (1 x 100 mg day-1) or captopril (1 x 100 mg day-1) for 6 weeks resulted in similar supine and erect systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Heart rate was significantly lower during atenolol treatment. 3. Exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly lower during atenolol than during captopril treatment, exercise diastolic blood pressure (at 100W) did not differ significantly. With atenolol exercise cardiac output was significantly lower and exercise stroke volume significantly higher than with captopril. 4. Maximal work rate, maximal oxygen consumption and maximal heart rate were significantly lower during atenolol than during captopril treatment (respectively 6%, 8% and 25%). Maximal respiratory exchange ratio and lactate concentration did not differ. 5. No statistically significant difference in submaximal endurance time between atenolol and captopril was found. Endurance time was reduced by 19% during atenolol and by 13% during captopril as compared with placebo. No difference in rating of perceived exertion between atenolol and captopril was present. 6. The results indicate that atenolol will reduce blood pressure during exercise more effectively than captopril in patients with hypertension. The limitation of submaximal endurance exercise performance by both agents is of similar magnitude. This may be regarded as an unwanted side effect in certain physically active patients with hypertension.

Exercise performance and beta-adrenergic blockade in patients with complete heart block treated with ventricular inhibited pacing

The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade (propranolol) on exercise performance was studied in 15 patients (12 men and 3 women, mean age 70 years) with complete heart block treated with a ventricular-inhibited pacemaker (VVI). In a double-blind procedure, the patients were randomly given either 0.1 mg/kg of propranolol or saline solution i.v. before a first exercise test and vice versa before a second test. The interval between the tests was 24 hours. Nine patients were in sinus rhythm, 4 patients had atrial flutter, and 2 others had atrial fibrillation. The exercise capacity was on an average 11% lower with propranolol than with placebo (p less than 0.001). The most marked reductions (20 and 33%) were found in the two patients with atrial fibrillation. The atrial rate in patients with sinus rhythm was significantly lower with propranolol than placebo both at rest (68 vs. 83 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and at maximal work load (91 vs. 141 beats/min, p less than 0.001). The present findings show that beta blockade has negative effects on exercise capacity in patients with complete heart block treated with VVI pacemakers. This finding should be considered in the selection of drug treatment in patients with fixed rate pacing and concomitant hypertension and/or ischemic heart disease.

Role of the Frank-Starling mechanism in maintaining cardiac output during increasing levels of treadmill exercise in beta-blocked normal men

To determine the effects of beta blockade on hemodynamics during increasing levels of treadmill exercise, 10 healthy volunteers were studied after 1 week of placebo, and then after 1 week of treatment with oral propranolol, 80 mg twice daily, or dilevalol, 400 mg once daily. The study was randomized and double-blind, with a crossover sequence. Hemodynamics were measured by CO2 rebreathing at rest and at 25, 50, 75 and 100% of VO2 max. After placebo, cardiac output increased from 5.8 +/- 2.1 (rest), to 19.4 +/- 6.4 liters/min (100% VO2 max), mainly due to an increase in heart rate from 84 +/- 6 to 169 +/- 15 beats/min. Stroke volume increased from 70 +/- 27 (rest), to 137 +/- 65 ml (25% VO2 max), and then leveled off to 116 +/- 41 at 100% VO2 max. After both beta blockers, exercise cardiac output was maintained at 100% VO2 max: 20.1 +/- 9.3 liters/min with propranolol and 19.1 +/- 8.6 with dilevalol. However, a significant reduction versus placebo values was observed for cardiac output at 25% VO2 max, from 13.7 +/- 5.9 during placebo, to 9.4 +/- 2.5 during propranolol, and to 9.6 +/- 2.3 during dilevalol (both p less than 0.01 vs placebo). Maintenance of cardiac output with both beta blockers at higher levels of exercise came from an increased stroke volume (p less than 0.05 vs placebo), while heart rate (in beats/min) was greatly reduced (propranolol 61.6 +/- 9.4 rest, 90.1 +/- 10.7 at 100% VO2 max; dilevalol 70.8 +/- 6.4 rest, 99.2 +/- 11.8 at 100% VO2 max, p less than 0.01 vs placebo for each).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and exercise. An update

Blockade of beta-adrenoceptors interferes with haemodynamic and metabolic adaptations and ion balance during dynamic exercise. After administration of a beta-blocker exercise heart rate is reduced. Exercise cardiac output and blood pressure are reduced also, but to a lesser extent than heart rate. At submaximal exercise intensities blood flow to the active skeletal muscle is also reduced. The availability of non-esterified fatty acids for energy production is decreased, due to inhibition of beta-adrenoceptor-mediated adipose tissue lipolysis, and possibly also of intramuscular triglyceride breakdown. During submaximal exercise muscle glycogenolysis is unaffected, but there are indications that the maximal glycogenolytic rate at high exercise intensities is decreased. In normally fed subjects plasma glucose concentration is maintained at a normal level during submaximal endurance exercise after beta-blocker administration, although lower glucose concentrations are found in fasting subjects and during high intensity exercise after beta-blocker administration. Plasma lactate concentrations tend to be somewhat lower after beta-blocker administration while plasma potassium concentration during exercise is increased. beta-Blocker administration may also interfere with thermoregulation during prolonged exercise. Maximal aerobic exercise capacity is reduced in normotensive and probably also in hypertensive subjects after beta-blocker administration. Submaximal endurance performance is impaired to a much more important extent in both groups of subjects. In patients with coronary artery disease, on the other hand, symptom-limited exercise capacity is improved during beta-blocker treatment. Studies on trainability during beta-blocker treatment show inconsistent results in healthy subjects, although the majority of studies suggest a similar training-induced increase in VO2max during placebo and beta-blocker treatment. In patients with coronary artery disease the training effects are also similar in patients treated with beta-blockers and those without. The negative effects of beta-blockers on maximal and especially submaximal exercise capacity should be considered when prescribing beta-blockers to physically active hypertensive patients. The negative influence is shared by all types of beta-blockers, although the impairment of submaximal exercise capacity is more pronounced with non-selective than with beta 1-selective beta-blockers. beta-Blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity have similar effects during exercise to those without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.