Interaction between vigabatrin and phenytoin

The Pharmacology and Toxicology of Third-Generation Anticonvulsant Drugs

Epilepsy is a neurologic disorder affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide, or about 0.7% of the population [1]. Thus, the use of anticonvulsant drugs in the treatment of epilepsy is common and widespread. There are three generations of anticonvulsant drugs, categorized by the year in which they were developed and released. The aim of this review is to discuss the pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and adverse events of the third generation of anticonvulsant drugs. Where available, overdose data will be included. The pharmacokinetic properties of third-generation anticonvulsant drugs include relatively fewer drug-drug interactions, as well as several unique and life-threatening adverse events. Overdose data are limited, so thorough review of adverse events and knowledge of drug mechanism will guide expectant management of future overdose cases. Reporting of these cases as they occur will be necessary to further clarify toxicity of these drugs.

The Impact of Anti-Epileptic Drugs on Growth and Bone Metabolism

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder worldwide and anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are always the first choice for treatment. However, more than 50% of patients with epilepsy who take AEDs have reported bone abnormalities. Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes are induced by AEDs, especially the classical AEDs, such as benzodiazepines (BZDs), carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PT), phenobarbital (PB), and valproic acid (VPA). The induction of CYP450 isoenzymes may cause vitamin D deficiency, hypocalcemia, increased fracture risks, and altered bone turnover, leading to impaired bone mineral density (BMD). Newer AEDs, such as levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), gabapentin (GP), and vigabatrin (VB) have broader spectra, and are safer and better tolerated than the classical AEDs. The effects of AEDs on bone health are controversial. This review focuses on the impact of AEDs on growth and bone metabolism and emphasizes the need for caution and timely withdrawal of these medications to avoid serious disabilities.

The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians

The literature on inducers in epilepsy and bipolar disorder is seriously contaminated by false negative findings. This is part i of a comprehensive review on antiepileptic drug (AED) inducers using both mechanistic pharmacological and evidence-based medicine to provide practical recommendations to neurologists and psychiatrists concerning how to control for them. Carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin, are clinically relevant AED inducers; correction factors were calculated for studied induced drugs. These correction factors are rough simplifications for orienting clinicians, since there is great variability in the population regarding inductive effects. As new information is published, the correction factors may need to be modified. Some of the correction factors are so high that the drugs (e.g., bupropion, quetiapine or lurasidone) should not co-prescribed with potent inducers. Clobazam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate, vigabatrin and valproic acid are grouped as mild inducers which may (i)be inducers only in high doses; (ii)frequently combine with inhibitory properties; and (iii)take months to reach maximum effects or de-induction, definitively longer than the potent inducers. Potent inducers, definitively, and mild inducers, possibly, have relevant effects in the endogenous metabolism of (i)sexual hormones, (ii) vitamin D, (iii)thyroid hormones, (iv)lipid metabolism, and (v)folic acid.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of the anti-epileptic drug substance vigabatrin: focus on transporter interactions

Drug transporters in various tissues, such as intestine, kidney, liver and brain, are recognized as important mediators of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drug substances. This review gives a current status on the transporter(s) mediating the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of the anti-epileptic drug substance vigabatrin. For orally administered drugs, like vigabatrin, the absorption from the intestine is a prerequisite for the bioavailability. Therefore, transporter(s) involved in the intestinal absorption of vigabatrin in vitro and in vivo are discussed in detail. Special focus is on the contribution of the proton-coupled amino acid transporter 1 (PAT1) for intestinal vigabatrin absorption. Furthermore, the review gives an overview of the pharmacokinetic parameters of vigabatrin across different species and drug–food and drug–drug interactions involving vigabatrin.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions during treatment with vigabatrin

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions take place when one drug interacts with another at the level of metabolism, absorption or excretion. Pharmacodynamic interactions take place at the level of receptor sites, where they may have additive or potentiating effects. Vigabatrin is relatively free of pharmacokinetic interactions, and though it is associated with about a 20% decrease in serum levels of concomitantly administered phenytoin, the reduction is of little clinical significance. The mechanism underlying this effect is unknown. Because vigabatrin increases GABA-mediated inhibition in the brain (an action that is believed to account for its anticonvulsant effects), it might be expected to potentiate the CNS effects of benzodiazepines and alcohol. However, very sensitive eye movement studies have failed to detect any evidence of such an interaction. Overall, vigabatrin appears to be remarkably free of drug interactions. As a result, it is easier to use in clinical practice than older anti-epilepsy agents. Perhaps the most important finding of the interaction studies with vigabatrin is that there is no need for patients receiving the drug to be told to avoid alcohol.

Treatment of refractory complex partial seizures: role of vigabatrin

Vigabatrin (VGB) is an antiepileptic drug that was designed to inhibit GABA-transaminase, and increase levels of gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. VGB has demonstrated efficacy as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug for refractory complex partial seizures (CPS) and for infantile spasms (IS). This review focuses on its use for complex partial seizures. Although VGB is well tolerated, there have been significant safety concerns about intramyelinic edema and visual field defects. VGB is associated with a risk of developing bilateral concentric visual field defects. Therefore, the use of VGB for complex partial seizures should be limited to those patients with seizures refractory to other treatments. Patients must have baseline and follow-up monitoring of visual fields, early assessment of its efficacy, and ongoing evaluation of the benefits and risks of VGB therapy.

Vigabatrin

Refractory epilepsies such as infantile spasms (IS) and complex partial seizures (CPS) can have a severe negative impact on the neurological integrity and quality of life of affected patients, in addition to drastically increasing their risk of premature mortality. Early identification of potentially effective pharmacotherapy agents is important. Vigabatrin has been shown to be a generally well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug (AED) in a wide variety of seizure types affecting both children and adults, particularly those with IS and CPS. A bilateral, concentric constriction of the peripheral visual field characterizes the visual field defect (VFD) associated with vigabatrin, well characterized by numerous studies. This peripheral VFD presents in 30-50% of patients with exposure of several years; however, most of these patients are asymptomatic. In well-controlled studies, the earliest onset in patients with CPS is 11 months and at 5 months in infants, with average onsets being more than 5 years and 1 year, respectively. Patients with a peripheral VFD retain an average 65 degrees of lateral vision (normal, 90 degrees). The fact that many patients never develop the vigabatrin-related peripheral VFD, despite long-term exposure at high doses, may support the hypothesis that the injury is an idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction (as opposed to a strict dose- or duration-dependent toxicity). Effective testing methods are available to aid in the early detection and management of the peripheral VFD. This article discusses issues of importance to clinical decision-making in the use of vigabatrin to assist the physician and patient in assessing the benefits of vigabatrin therapy and understanding the potential risks of the VFD and uncontrolled seizures.

Management of Focal-Onset Seizures

Focal-onset seizures are manifestations of abnormal epileptic firing of brain cells in a localised area or areas of the brain. The diagnosis of focal-onset seizures initially entails an EEG, a detailed history from the patient and eyewitnesses, as well as computer tomographic or, preferably, magnetic resonance imaging scans. Video EEG to record ictal events may be necessary to establish the correct diagnosis. Focal seizures are classified according to the International Classification of Epileptic Seizures and International Classification of Epilepsies and Epilepsy Syndromes. It is important to try to decide how the seizure event fits into this system in order to successfully evaluate and optimise treatment, as well as to give detailed information to the patient about their seizures and prognosis. Once the decision to treat the seizures has been made, the physician must choose which medication is the most appropriate to begin with. Carbamazepine, phenytoin or valproic acid (sodium valproate) are often rated as first-line drugs, but factors such as adverse-effect profiles, age, possibility of pregnancy, and concomitant diseases and medication also need to be considered. Most of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) appear to have good efficacy and better tolerability than the older agents, but evidence to support their superiority is scarce and has led to conflicting advice in several guidelines. Among the newer AEDs, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate and oxcarbazepine have obtained monotherapy indication in many countries. The higher costs of the newer AEDs may inhibit their wider use, especially in poorer countries.

Pharmacological and behavioral characteristics of interactions between vigabatrin and conventional antiepileptic drugs in pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice: an isobolographic analysis

To characterize the anticonvulsant effects and types of interactions exerted by mixtures of vigabatrin (VGB) and conventional antiepileptic drugs (valproate (VPA), ethosuximide (ESM), phenobarbital (PB), and clonazepam (CZP)) in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures in mice, the isobolographic analysis for three fixed-ratio combinations of 1 : 3, 1 : 1, and 3 : 1 was used. The adverse-effect profile of the combinations tested, at the doses corresponding to their median effective doses (ED(50)) at the fixed-ratio of 1 : 1 against PTZ-induced seizures, was determined by the chimney (motor performance), step-through passive avoidance (long-term memory), pain threshold (pain sensitivity), and Y-maze (general explorative locomotor activity) tests in mice. Additionally, the observed isobolographic interactions were verified in terms of a pharmacokinetic interaction existence. VGB combined with PB or ESM exerted supra-additive (synergistic) interactions against the clonic phase of PTZ-induced seizures, which was associated with the increment of PB or ESM concentrations in the brains of examined animals. The remaining combinations tested (ie VGB+VPA and VGB+CZP) occurred additive in the PTZ test, which was associated with no significant changes in the brain concentrations of VPA and CZP. None of the examined combinations exerted motor impairment in the chimney test in mice. In the standard variant of passive avoidance task (current of 0.6 mA; 2 s of stimulus duration), the combinations of VGB+CZP and VGB+VPA significantly affected long-term memory in mice. Moreover, VGB in a dose-dependent manner lengthened the latency to the first pain reaction in the pain threshold test in mice. The modified variant of step-through passive avoidance task (current of 0.6 mA; stimulus duration based on the latency from the pain threshold test) revealed no significant changes in the long-term memory of animals for the combinations of VGB+VPA and VGB+CZP; so the observed effects in the standard variant of passive avoidance task were a result of the antinociceptive effects produced by VGB. In the Y-maze test, VGB also, in a dose-dependent manner, increased the general explorative locomotor activity of the animals tested. Similarly, the total number of arm entries in the Y-maze was significantly increased for the combinations of VGB+CZP and VGB+ESM, but not for VGB+PB and VGB+VPA. The application of VGB in combination with PB, ESM, CZP, and VPA suppressed the clonic phase of PTZ-induced seizures, having no harmful or deleterious effects on behavioral functioning of the animals tested, which might be advantageous in further clinical practice.

The Effects of Vigabatrin on Rat Liver Antioxidant Status

The anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin was developed as an inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase, and its ability to increase inhibition in the central nervous system led to its testing in an animal model. In animal models chronic use of vigabatrin is associated with irreversible myelin vacuolation. Antioxidant drugs change the antioxidant capacity of the body. Oxidative stress of the body increased when valproic acid and carbamazepine were used chronically. To assess whether vigabatrin may affect protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation, glutathione, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) levels were studied in the livers of 57 rat fetuses after administration of vigabatrin to the mothers (19 in the first week of pregnancy, 20 in the second week, and 18 in the third week) and in 19 control rat fetuses without vigabatrin. We compared the results of administration of vigabatrin in each group with the controls. Rat fetus protein oxidation in group I (0.686 nmol/mg protein) and group II (0.723 nmol/mg protein) was higher than in the control group (0.388 nmol/mg protein). Lipid peroxidation (0.209, 0.224, 0.253 nmol/mg protein, respectively) and GPx levels (345.4, 329.0, 283.2 nmol/mg protein, respectively) of groups I, II, and III were higher than in the control group (0.104, 167.2 nmol/mg protein, respectively). GST in group II (79.2 nmol/mg protein) and group III (77.8 nmol/mg protein) were not different from that in the control group (78 nmol/mg protein). It was found that vigabatrin affected all the parameters that were studied, especially in group I, which was given the drug in the first week of pregnancy.

Anticonvulsant and antiretroviral interactions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical significance of interactions between anticonvulsant and antiretroviral agents and provide recommendations regarding their concurrent use.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search (1966 to April 2003) was conducted using individual anticonvulsant and antiretroviral drug names and the following key search terms: anticonvulsant, antiepileptic, antiretroviral, protease inhibitor, and pharmacokinetic. Abstracts from scientific meetings that pertained to drug interactions were manually reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified by the PubMed search were examined. Articles and abstracts from scientific meetings with relevant information were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Six case reports were identified that describe interactions between anticonvulsant agents and protease inhibitors. In several reports, carbamazepine serum concentrations increased by approximately two- to threefold with concurrent ritonavir, resulting in carbamazepine-related toxicity. Carbamazepine was also associated with loss of viral suppression when combined with indinavir. Phenytoin serum concentrations were decreased with nelfinavir in a patient who developed recurrent seizures. The effect of ritonavir on phenytoin was variable; a 30% reduction in phenytoin serum concentration occurred in one patient, while no apparent change was observed in another. Interactions with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors are poorly characterized because existing data involve concurrent protease inhibitor therapy. The utility of newer anticonvulsant agents is explored. Experience with newer anticonvulsant agents in 2 patients at our site is also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data exist regarding interactions between anticonvulsant and antiretroviral agents. Valproic acid and newer anticonvulsant agents may provide useful alternatives to first-generation agents. Clinicians need to be diligent when monitoring for anticonvulsant-antiretroviral interactions because of the potential for toxicity, loss of seizure control, and incomplete viral suppression.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs

There are two types of interactions between drugs, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic. For antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic interactions are the most notable type, but pharmacodynamic interactions involving reciprocal potentiation of pharmacological effects at the site of action are also important. By far the most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those involving cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in hepatic metabolism. Among old generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone induce the activity of several enzymes involved in drug metabolism, leading to decreased plasma concentration and reduced pharmacological effect of drugs, which are substrates of the same enzymes (eg, tiagabine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate). In contrast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide do not induce the metabolism of other AEDs. Interactions involving enzyme inhibition include the increase in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and phenobarbital caused by valproic acid. Among AEDs, the least potential interaction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.

Effect of vigabatrin on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a possible interaction between vigabatrin and carbamazepine in epileptic patients.

METHODS

Steady-state serum concentrations of carbamazepine with and without vigabatrin were compared. The study group consisted of 15 patients (eight females, seven males, and mean age 31 +/- 12 years), with refractory partial epilepsy. They received vigabatrin as add-on therapy. Patients received carbamazepine monotherapy for at least 6 months and the carbamazepine-vigabatrin combination for at least 3 months. Blood samples were obtained in the morning, before the first daily dose and the carbamazepine plasma concentrations were analysed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (TDx System).

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in mean carbamazepine daily dose. Mean trough concentrations were 7.9 +/- 1.4 microg/mL with carbamazepine alone, and 6.5 +/- 2.0 microg/mL with carbamazepine-vigabatrin association (P < 0.03). The mean values of pharmacokinetic parameters were: level/dose ratio (L/D) = 0.59 +/- 0.20 vs. 0.45 +/- 0.15 (P < 0.05) and plasma clearance (Cl) = 78.5 +/- 25.8 vs. 105.8 +/- 38.9 mL/h/kg (P < 0.05), with carbamazepine alone and carbamazepine-vigabatrin combination, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Vigabatrin produced a statistically significant increase in the plasma clearance of carbamazepine when the two drugs were given simultaneously.

Effect of vigabatrin and gabapentin on phenytoin pharmacokinetics in the dog

This study was aimed at investigating whether or not the kinetics of intravenously administered phenytoin (PT) was altered by oral administration of vigabatrin (VGB) or gabapentin (GBP). A daily dose of PT (12 mgkg(-1)i.v.) was given to a group of five beagle dogs for a period of 1 week. On day eight, plasma samples were serially collected over 24 h, after administration of the PT dose. PT administration was continued, along with supplementary oral VGB (60 mgkg(-1)) for another week and then plasma samples were collected for analysis of PT levels. The same protocol was followed for the PT (12 mgkg(-1), i.v.)-GBP (300 mg caps., p.o.) study on a separate group (n= 5) of dogs. Orally administered GBP did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of parenteral PT. However VGB markedly changed the drug's kinetics, as evidenced by a 31% (P= 0.015) reduction in total body clearance (CL) and an increase of over 45% in half-life (t(1/2)), (P= 0.013) and area under the plasma PT concentration-time curve (AUC), (P= 0.044). GBP does not appear to have any pharmacokinetic interaction with PT, while coadministration of VGB and PT results in a marked reduction in systemic clearance of the latter in the dog.

Enzyme induction and inhibition by new antiepileptic drugs: a review of human studies

The aim of this paper is to review a number of new antiepileptic agents (i.e. felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide) for their inducing and/or inhibitory properties in humans, mainly considering the interactions where they are involved as the cause rather than the object of such interactions. Two aspects have been particularly taken into account: the changes or absence of changes in plasma/serum concentrations of concomitant drugs and the direct or indirect evidence of induction, inhibition or lack of effect on the six major human hepatic CYP isozymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4), as well as on other CYP isozymes or enzyme systems. Felbamate clearly affects the pharmacokinetics of a number of drugs, generally increasing but also decreasing their concentrations. It induces enzymes such as CYP3A4 and inhibits enzymes such as CYP2C19 and those of the beta-oxidation pathway. Topiramate is not devoid of potential interaction properties: it decreases the plasma concentrations of ethinylestradiol, induces CYP3A4 and inhibits CYP2C19. For oxcarbazepine, no inhibitory, only inductive effects have been observed thus far. Felbamate. topiramate and oxcarbazepine may induce the metabolism of steroidal oral contraceptives. In this respect, tiagabine has been studied at a rather low dose. Pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction seems to exist between lamotrigine and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine appears to be a weak inducer of UGTs, whereas induction of CYP3A4 seems improbable as the compound does not change the concentrations of oral contraceptives or the urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol. Zonisamide has very peculiar pharmacokinetics and an extensive metabolism. Additional information on its enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties would be necessary, as data so far collected on its effect on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are conflicting. Gabapentin, vigabatrin and in particular levetiracetam appear to be devoid of significant enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties.

Newer anticonvulsants: comparative review of drug interactions and adverse effects

The tolerability and drug interaction profiles of 6 new anticonvulsants: oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine and topiramate, are reviewed. In general, these new anticonvulsants are well tolerated and drug interaction problems are minor with the exception of the risk of failure of oral contraceptives during treatment with oxcarbazepine or topiramate. In this review, the clinical implications of the tolerability of these drugs are discussed for different patient groups. The choice of which new anticonvulsant for which patient depends upon individual factors, in particular, seizure type, tolerability and practical administration factors. Treating elderly patients may be complicated by an increased sensitivity to adverse effects as these patients very often receive polytherapy for accompanying diseases. Drugs with very simple pharmacokinetic properties may be preferred in this group. Women of childbearing age face specific problems related to the epilepsy and to treatment with anticonvulsants. These include impaired fertility, failure of oral contraceptives and the risk of birth defects. Some new anticonvulsants may be suggested in preference to classical drugs to avoid these problems, but the human experience with newer anticonvulsants is still limited and, therefore, so is knowledge of the risk of congenital malformations in the offspring of mothers taking anticonvulsants. Psychiatric and behavioural changes frequently complicate treatment of patients with mental retardation. Some of the new anticonvulsants, in particular those affecting the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system such as vigabatrin, seem to exacerbate this problem and should be used with caution in these patients.

Effect of vigabatrin and gabapentin on phynytoin pharmacokinetics in the dog

The study was aimed at investigating whether or not the kinetics of intravenously administered phenytoin (PT) was altered by oral administration of vigabatrin (VGB) or gabapentin (GBP). A group of five beagle dogs were given a daily dose of PT (12 mg/kg, i.v.) for a period of 1 week. On day 8, plasma samples were serially collected over 24 hr. after administration of the PT dose. PT administration was continued with oral supplementary dose of VGB (60 mg/kg) for another week and then plasma samples were collected for analysis of PT levels. The same protocol was followed for the PT (12 mg/kg, i.v.)-GBP (300 mg caps., p.o.) study on a separate group (n = 5) of dogs. Orally administered GBP did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of parental PT. VGB, however markedly changed the drug's kinetics as evidenced by a 31% (P = 0.015) reduction in total body clearance (CL) and increase of over 45% in half-life (t1/2), (P = 0.013) and area under the plasma PT concentration-time curve (AUC), (P = 0.044). GBP does not appear to have any pharmacokinetic interaction with PT, while coadministration of VGB and PT results in marked reduction in systemic clearance of the latter in the dog.

Effect of vigabatrin addition on carbamazepine blood serum levels in patients with epilepsy

Because vigabatrin (VGB) is not metabolized by liver enzymes and does not bind with serum proteins, there is little theoretical chance of it interacting with other antiepileptic drugs. However, our observations have shown that if VGB is added to carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy, some patients respond with adverse, toxic symptoms suggesting possible carbamazepine-vigabatrin interaction. This article presents the results of a study of 66 epileptic patients (27 women and 39 men), age 10-66 years (mean, 28.2 years), with focal seizure onset with or without secondary generalization. In these patients, in addition to CBZ therapy with an average dose of 16.7 mg/kg per day (8.6-26.8), VGB, average dose 31.1 mg/kg per day (7.1-57.9), was added. CBZ concentration was measured twice: prior to VGB introduction and 5-12 weeks after the final dose of VGB was reached. In our study 69.7% of patients responded to VGB addition with a significant increase (by at least 10%) in CBZ concentration. A correlation between the value of the increase and the initial level of CBZ prior to VGB addition was found also. Correlational analysis (Pearson's r) revealed a negative correlation between CBZ concentration and increased concentration after VGB addition (r = -0.47, df = 64, P < 0.001). This negative correlation means that if the initial CBZ level is lower, its concentration value after VGB addition is higher.

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic drugs

Because pharmacokinetics is a major determinant of the magnitude and duration of pharmacologic response, understanding the kinetic properties of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is essential for the correct use of these compounds in clinical practice. After oral administration, absorption is rapid and relatively efficient for the new AEDs, the most notable exception being gabapentin, whose bioavailability decreases with increasing dosage. None of the new AEDs is extensively bound to plasma proteins except for tiagabine, which is over 95% protein-bound. The route of elimination differs to an important extent from one compound to another, and elimination half-lives range from over 30 h for zonisamide to 5-7 h for gabapentin. For all drugs that are metabolized, half-life is shortened and clearance is increased when patients receive concomitant enzyme-inducing agents such as barbiturates, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine metabolism is markedly inhibited by valproic acid, and felbamate may increase the serum levels of most other AEDs. Felbamate, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine may also reduce the efficacy of the contraceptive pill by stimulating its metabolism.

Vigabatrin: a novel therapy for seizure disorders

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of vigabatrin and its role in the management of seizure disorders.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of English-language literature from January 1993 through January 1999 was conducted using vigabatrin as a search term to identify pertinent studies and review articles. Additional studies were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature. The manufacturer provided postmarketing surveillance data. Priority was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

FINDINGS

Vigabatrin is a selective and irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid transaminase. In controlled clinical trials of vigabatrin add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures, 24-67% of patients achieved a < or =50% reduction in seizure frequency. Data from two comparative trials with carbamazepine monotherapy indicate that vigabatrin monotherapy reduces the frequency of partial seizures in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Vigabatrin also controls infantile spasms, particularly those associated with tuberous sclerosis. Vigabatrin is more effective in patients with partial seizures than in those with generalized seizures. The drug is generally well tolerated. Headache and drowsiness were the most common adverse effects observed in controlled clinical trials; visual field defects, psychiatric reactions, and hyperactivity also have been reported. There are no known clinically significant drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigabatrin improves seizure control as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures and may produce therapeutic benefits in the treatment of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin is generally well tolerated, with a convenient administration schedule, a lack of known significant drug interactions, and no need for routine monitoring of plasma concentrations.

Vigabatrin

Vigabatrin (VGB) is a structural analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), which produces its antiepileptic effect by irreversibly inhibiting the degradative enzyme GABA-transaminase. This produces an increase in central nervous system (CNS) GABA levels. VGB is among the few antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that was synthesized with a specific targeted mechanism in mind and was subsequently demonstrated to function by that mechanism. Tiagabine, a GABA reuptake blocker, is the only other "designer drug" among the currently available AEDs. Therefore, VGB is among the few AEDs for which the mechanism of action is well understood. Recently, safety issues have been raised with regard to the use of vigabatrin. This article reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of VGB.

Metabolism of carbamazepine by CYP3A6: a model for in vitro drug interactions studies

Carbamazepine (CBZ) is widely used in the treatment of epilepsy. The drug is principally metabolized by CYPs to 10, 11-epoxy carbamazepine (CBZ-E) but this metabolite more toxic than the parent drug, does possess anticonvulsant properties. In humans, CYP3A4, CYP2C8 and CYP1A2 have been shown to be implicated in CBZ biotransformation. Our purpose was to establish an experimental model to determine the interaction of CBZ with other antiepileptic drugs. We first identified the CYP isoforms that metabolized CBZ in rabbit. We used liver microsomes from rabbit treated with various compounds known to induce principally some CYPs subfamilies. Having tested all the compounds we demonstrated that only the animals treated with CYP3A inducers were able to metabolize CBZ strongly. The CBZ biotransformation was inhibited by anti CYP3A antibodies. All the CYP3A subfamily substrates specifically decrease CBZ-E formation. In our experiment we did not observe any inhibition with CYP2C substrate. These data provide evidence that in rabbit the CYP3A subfamily is primarily involved in CBZ metabolism. Using this model we investigated the interaction of CBZ with phenobarbital, phenytoin, ethosuccimide, primidone, progabide, vigabatrin and lamotrigine.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of vigabatrin on in vivo parameters of hepatic microsomal enzyme induction and on the kinetics of steroid oral contraceptives in healthy female volunteers

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine whether vigabatrin affects in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and the pharmacokinetics of steroid oral contraceptives in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Under double-blind conditions, 13 female healthy volunteers received, in random order and with a washout interval of > or = 4 weeks, two oral 4-week treatments with vigabatrin (VGB) (maintenance dosage, 3,000 mg daily) and placebo, respectively. The clearance and half-life of antipyrine (a broad marker of drug oxidation capacity), the urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol (a selective marker of cytochrome CYP3A-mediated oxidation), and the activity of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (a nonspecific index of microsomal enzyme activity) were determined after 3 weeks of each treatment. The single-dose kinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms levonorgestrel were also determined after 3 weeks of treatment by specific radioimmunologic assays.

RESULTS

VGB treatment had no influence on antipyrine clearance (28 +/- 5.6 vs. 30 +/- 4.5 ml/h/kg on placebo), antipyrine half-life (15.5 +/- 3.5 vs. 14.1 +/- 2.1 h), urinary 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion (488 +/- 164 vs. 470 +/- 228 nmol/ day), 6-beta-hydroxycortisol-to-cortisol concentration ratio (6.8 +/- 3.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 3.1) and serum gamma-glutamyltransferase activity (12 +/- 3 vs. 11 +/- 3 IU/L). No difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between VGB and placebo sessions were found for ethinyl estradiol (half-life, 12.5 +/- 3.2 vs. 13.9 +/- 3.2 h; AUC, 874 +/- 301 vs. 939 +/- 272 ng/ L/h) and levonorgestrel (half-life, 17.7 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.1 +/- 9.8 h; AUC, 27.5 +/- 9.6 vs. 30.0 +/- 12.0 micrograms/L/h). Two subjects, however, showed a 50 and a 39% reduction in ethinyl estradiol AUC during VGB treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

At therapeutic dosages, VGB did not modify in vivo indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity and did not interfere significantly with the CYP3A-mediated metabolism of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Based on these data, VGB is unlikely to affect consistently the efficacy of steroid oral contraceptives or interact pharmacokinetically with drugs that are eliminated mainly by oxidative pathways, particularly those involving cytochrome CYP3A.

Pharmacokinetics and interaction profile of topiramate: review and comparison with other newer antiepileptic drugs

Standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have a number of pharmacokinetic shortcomings, and AEDs with more favorable profiles would be preferred. The pharmacokinetics and interaction profile of the recently developed AED topiramate (TPM), is reviewed and compared with those of other newer AEDs including lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), vigabatrin (VGB), and oxcarbazepine (OCBZ). Although none of these agents meets all of the criteria of the "ideal" AED from the pharmacokinetic standpoint, a number of these drugs, including TPM, have desirable properties that distinguish them from the older AEDs and should contribute to their clinical utility.

Overview of the safety of newer antiepileptic drugs

Standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are associated with a wide variety of acute and chronic adverse events and with many interactions with each other and with non-AEDs that complicate patient management. The safety and interaction profiles of the newer AEDs have also been intensively studied. Safety data are available for six of the newer AEDs, lamotrigine (LTG), vigabatrin (VGB), gabapentin (GBP), tiagabine (TGB), felbamate (FBM), and topiramate (TPM). The potential for the most recently developed AEDs for producing rare idiosyncratic reactions cannot be ascertained until additional patient exposures have been reported from careful postmarketing surveillance.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs. Clinical considerations

Antiepileptic drug interactions represent a common clinical problem which has been compounded by the introduction of many new compounds in recent years. Most pharmacokinetic interactions involve the modification of drug metabolism; the propensity of antiepileptic drugs to interact depends on their metabolic characteristics and action on drug metabolic enzymes. Phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone and carbamazepine are potent inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP), epoxide hydrolase and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) enzyme systems; oxcarbazepine is a weak inducer of CYP enzymes, probably acting on a few specific isoforms only. All stimulate the rate of metabolism and the clearance of the drugs which are catabolised by the induced enzymes. Valproic acid (valproate sodium) inhibits to different extents many hepatic enzyme system activities involved in drug metabolism and is able to significantly displace drugs from plasma albumin. Felbamate is an inhibitor of some specific CYP isoforms and mitochondrial beta-oxidation, whereas it is a weak inducer of other enzyme systems. Topiramate is an inducer of specific CYP isoforms and an inhibitor of other isoforms. Ethosuximide, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin and possibly zonisamide and tiagabine have no significant effect on hepatic drug metabolism. Apart from vigabatrin and gabapentin, which are mainly eliminated unchanged by the renal route, all other antiepileptic drugs are metabolised wholly or in part by hepatic enzymes and their disposition may be altered by metabolic changes. Some interactions are clinically unremarkable and some need only careful clinical monitoring, but others require prompt dosage adjustment. From a practical point of view, if valproic acid is added to lamotrigine or phenobarbital therapy, or if felbamate is added to phenobarbital, phenytoin or valproic acid therapy, a significant rise in plasma concentrations of the first drug is expected with a corresponding increase in clinical effects. In these cases a concomitant reduction of the dosage of the first drug is recommended to avoid toxicity. Conversely, if a strong inducer is added to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproic acid or ethosuximide monotherapy, a significant decrease in their plasma concentrations is expected within days or weeks, with a possible reduction in efficacy. In these cases a dosage increase of the first drug may be required.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of the new antiepileptic drugs

Therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs is associated with a wide range of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. In particular, enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition and displacement from protein binding may result in important changes in serum concentrations of antiepileptics. Relevant interactions have also been described for some new antiepileptics. Felbamate increases serum concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid (sodium valproate). On the other hand, it reduces concentrations of carbamazepine and increases concentrations of its metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Concentrations of felbamate itself are reduced by phenytoin and carbamazepine. Concentrations of lamotrigine are considerably increased by valproic acid and decreased by phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone). Vigabatrin reduces serum concentrations of phenytoin by approximately 20%. On the other hand, some new antiepileptics have the important advantage of not interfering with the metabolism of other antiepileptics; this is the case for gabapentin, lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and vigabatrin are independent of concomitant drugs. These aspects are especially important as, until now, new antiepileptics have been most often utilised as add-on therapy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer antiepileptic drugs. Lamotrigine, vigabatrin, gabapentin and oxcarbazepine

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the 4 antiepileptic drugs lamotrigine, vigabatrin, gabapentin and oxcarbazepine have been reviewed in this paper. All the drugs have linear kinetics and reliable absorption, although the saturation of transport across the gut may occur at high doses with gabapentin. All the drugs can be conveniently given as a twice daily dosage apart from gabapentin, which has a short half-life and a midday dose is needed. Unlike many of the older drugs, lamotrigine, vigabatrin and gabapentin have a predominantly renal excretion and are not metabolised through the cytochrome P450 system. They do not induce their own metabolism or that of other commonly used anticonvulsants. Similarly, clinically important interactions with other major classes of drugs metabolised this way, such as anticoagulants or steroid hormones, do not occur. Oxcarbazepine, however, can cause oral contraceptive pill failure. Oxcarbazepine is immediately metabolised to a hydroxy metabolite and could be considered a prodrug. It appears to have fewer pharmacokinetic interactions than carbamazepine. Valproic acid (sodium valproate) inhibits the glucuronidation of lamotrigine and increases its half-life; when used together, dosage modification of lamotrigine is needed to avoid toxicity.

Dose frequency and dose interval compliance with multiple antiepileptic medications during a controlled clinical trial

Compliance with medication regimens and clinical trial schedules was evaluated during a study of vigabatrin (VGB), an antiepileptic drug (AED). Medication Event Monitors (MEMS, Aprex Corp., Fremont, CA, U.S.A.) were provided to monitor use of VGB and other AEDs administered to 111 patients at 10 sites. MEMS reports showed the number of doses administered daily, times of doses, and intervals between doses. The 66 patients whose data were evaluable took VGB as prescribed (twice daily, b.i.d.) on 89 +/- 7% of days in the clinical trial (mean 189 +/- 63 days). However, only 66 +/- 24% of doses were taken within the 9-15-h dose interval window for twice-daily dosing, a lower rate than that for dose frequency compliance (p < 0.001). Concomitant medications prescribed b.i.d. (n = 66) (86 +/- 11% dose frequency compliance) were taken at lower rates than VGB (p < 0.02). Interval compliance also was lower for concomitant b.i.d. medications (59 +/- 26%) than for VGB (p < 0.01). Dose frequency compliance for thrice-daily (t.i.d.) medications (n = 36) was 80 +/- 18 and 40 +/- 19% for interval compliance (6-10 h) (both p < 0.0001 vs. VGB). Dose frequency compliance for four times daily (q.i.d.) medications (n = 23) was 80 +/- 23 and 33 +/- 18% for interval compliance (4-8 h) (both p < 0.0001 vs. VGB). Patients at eight sites did not use MEMS properly, often for practical reasons, voiding including of data for 93 medications (32%) because of noncompliance with the study design to monitor compliance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reduction of plasma alanine aminotransferase during vigabatrin treatment

In 9 drug-resistant patients with partial seizures treated with vigabatrin, gamma-vinyl GABA (VGB), alanine aminotransaminase (ALAT) activity in plasma was significantly reduced. Comparison of in vitro with in vivo measurements led us to conclude that this reduction is mainly an in vivo phenomenon, perhaps due to cross-enzyme inhibition. The assessment of two biological variables linked with ALAT, glucose and alanine levels under fasting conditions, failed to show any significant metabolic alterations. VGB is an effective drug for partial epilepsy. Our observations do not suggest that reduced ALAT activity is of clinical concern.

New antiepileptic drugs--an explosion of activity

The low therapeutic index of established antiepileptic drugs coupled with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of seizure production has led to the development of a range of new therapeutic agents for the treatment of epilepsy. In this review, the three drugs recently licensed in the UK (vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin) are profiled, together with several of the more promising up-and-coming compounds (oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, stiripentol, remacemide and topiramate). Future avenues for clinical research in the pharmacological management of the epilepsies involve their rational use both singly and in combination.

Vigabatrin

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) was first proposed as a putative inhibitory neurotransmitter by Elliot and van Gelder in 1958. Since then, numerous efforts have been made to find ways to increase GABA at its receptor sites, based on the findings that decreased GABA results in convulsions in animals and that agents enhancing GABA-mediated functions can have antiepileptic effects. However, the relationship between GABA levels and seizures is not simple. Seizures can occur even in the presence of elevated GABA levels. Indeed, it is possible that regional biochemical differences in the brain can be important. The antiepileptic effects of GABA depend on the mechanism whereby GABA-mediated inhibition is enhanced. Since the 1970s, several compounds have been developed that are designed to act in some manner on the GABA system. These compounds affect GABA-mediated inhibition at different levels and appear to have varied effects, depending on their mechanism of action. To date, specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with potential GABA-inhibitory effects have been designed either to have GABA agonist properties, to inhibit GABA catabolism, to inhibit GABA uptake, or to facilitate GABA release or facilitate GABAA receptor activity. Vigabatrin (VGB) was designed specifically to inhibit GABA transaminase and thereby increase the availability of GABA in the brain. Study data and clinical experience over the past 14 years have demonstrated VGB to be an effective AED.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs

We have reviewed the pharmacokinetics of six antiepileptic drugs that are marketed (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, and zonisamide) and six drugs that are undergoing evaluation (levetiracetam, ralitoline, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and topiramate). In addition, we have compared the prodrugs eterobarb and fosphenytoin and the controlled-release formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine with their parent compounds. Finally, we have devised a scoring system to compare the pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs. Using this system, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and topiramate appea to have the most favourable pharmacokinetic profiles, whilst ralitoline and stiripentol have the least favourable.

Vigabatrin: effects on human brain GABA levels by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Vigabatrin (VGB, Sabril) is a new antiepileptic drug used for treatment of partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Many controlled short- and long-term trials have established efficacy as add-on therapy. Side effects have been infrequent. VGB acts as an irreversible substrate for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase that leads to elevated brain GABA levels. Although this mechanism has been confirmed in animals and in cerebrospinal fluid of humans, we report the first study of brain GABA levels using noninvasive nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. GABA elevation in brain closely parallels VGB dosage and reaches concentrations 2-3 times control values at daily dosage of 3 g. This technique offers promising potential to monitor changes induced by VGB as a function of time, dose, and clinical effect.

Phenobarbitone to gabapentin: a guide to 82 years of anti-epileptic drug pharmacokinetic interactions

With the introduction of three new anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in the UK during the past 4 years as adjunctive add-on therapy, the possibility of AED pharmacokinetic interactions has become a relevant consideration. This review highlights the current status of AED interactions with particular emphasis on those interactions that are likely to be frequently experienced or whose outcome is potentially clinically significant.

Antiepileptic drugs in development: prospects for the near future

Among some 14 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), those most extensively tested in humans include felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). All are currently marketed in some but not all countries. Although no large, comparative studies on efficacy have been conducted, all of these new AEDs are effective in adult localization-related epilepsies, and some have activity in specific syndromes. Although these drugs all have some CNS side effects, especially when administered in combination with other AEDs, they also all have low toxicity profiles. The availability of AEDs with different mechanisms of action may facilitate rational polytherapy. FBM is not teratogenic in animals. Half-life of FBM in humans is 11-28 h. Daily FBM dosages are 15-45 mg/kg in children and 2,400-4,800 mg in adults. Side effects include insomnia and anorexia, with weight loss. FBM increases phenytoin (PHT) and valproate (VPA) concentrations, and FBM concentration may be affected by other drugs. It is available in the United States for treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial seizures in adults. GBP is very water soluble. Half-life of GBP in humans is 5-7 h and daily dosages range from 900 to 2,400 mg in adults. Few side effects have been observed. GBP is not metabolized by the liver and has no drug interactions. It is available in the United Kingdom and the United States. LTG has no teratogenicity in animal models. Half-life of LTG in humans depends on co-medication: with enzyme inducers it is 15-24 h, and with VPA it is approximately 60 h. LTG dosages are 100-600 mg/day in adults. LTG is available in Europe. OCBZ is rapidly metabolized to 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (MHD), the active compound. Animal studies have shown similar efficacy but superior toxicity to carbamazepine (CBZ) in animal models. For MHD, half-life ranges from 10 to 15 h in patients. OCBZ dosages range from 300 to 1,800 mg/day. VGB is a potent, irreversible inhibitor of GABA transaminase which elevates GABA levels in the CNS. Daily dosages of 2,000-4,000 mg of VGB are needed in adults. Although intramyelinic edema has developed in rats and dogs, it has not yet presented in other mammals or humans. ZNS is a sulfonamide effective in animal models of epilepsy. Half-life of ZNS is 27-36 h. ZNS daily dosage is 400-600 mg. ZNS has been effective in some cases of Baltic myoclonic epilepsy.

Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.

A risk-benefit assessment of vigabatrin in the treatment of neurological disorders

Vigabatrin was designed to increase the levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain. It does this by replacing GABA as a substrate for the action of the catabolic enzyme GABA-transaminase. As a result of this inhibition, neuronal GABA levels are elevated, resulting in enhanced endogenous GABA transmission. A number of clinical trials assessing the effect of vigabatrin in epilepsy have been completed. Vigabatrin is of proven benefit in partial seizures and secondarily generalised tonic clonic seizures, and it is licensed for use as adjunctive therapy in these conditions in several European countries. It has been shown to be effective in some epilepsy syndromes in children including West's syndrome, infantile spasms and cryptogenic partial seizures. Its effect on primary generalised tonic clonic seizures is variable, while there is considerable evidence that it has a deleterious effect on myoclonic and absence seizures. There have been a few reports of the benefits of vigabatrin in other neurological disorders including tardive dyskinesia, degenerative ataxias and GABA metabolism disorders. The adverse effects associated with vigabatrin are similar to those seen with other anticonvulsants, with a predominance of CNS effects including somnolence, fatigue, irritability, dizziness and headache. Psychiatric symptoms including depression and psychosis are seen in a small number of patients and cause the most problems. These often necessitate discontinuation of vigabatrin, which usually results in resolution of symptoms.

Vigabatrin: clinical evidence supporting rational polytherapy in management of uncontrolled seizures

Monotherapy is the policy for management of patients with epilepsy. With increasing knowledge of the biology of epilepsy and of the modes of action of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), this concept must be reevaluated. When monotherapy fails to control seizures, subsequent treatment should be based on "rational pharmacology," taking into consideration the mode of action of the drugs, to provide improved efficacy with maintained tolerance and ease of administration. Introduction of vigabatrin (VGB) as a new AED calls for just such a reevaluation. VGB is an enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitor of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-transaminase that increases brain and cerebrospinal (CSF) GABA concentrations in animals and humans. It has limited efficacy in the classic animal seizure screening tests, but in many clinical studies has halved the incidence of seizures in approximately 50% of patients, especially those with partial epilepsies. We evaluated the efficacy of VGB in "socially integrated and active outpatients" as a likely subset to demonstrate any advantage of rational polytherapy. The criteria for this evaluation included the effects on seizure frequency, patient tolerability, and cognitive performance in a battery of psychometric tests. Fourteen of the 19 patients (73%) completing the study had > 50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 10 of 19 (52%) had > 70% reduction in seizure frequency. Tolerability appeared good; somnolence was the most frequent adverse event. Three patients complained of a worsening of their seizures, 1 with an increase in frequency and 2 with development of myoclonic jerks not previously reported.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vigabatrin in uncontrolled seizures: Belgian clinical experience. The Belgian Vigabatrin Evaluation Group

The antiepileptic activity of vigabatrin has been established in several double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of this new antiepileptic drug in normal clinical practice rather than in controlled studies. A total of 102 patients (46 females and 56 males, ranging in age from 1 to 62 years) with previously uncontrolled seizures were treated with vigabatrin (0.5-4 g/day) as add-on medication, on an individual patient basis by 39 neurologists, for a mean duration of 235 days (range 30-520 days). Efficacy of vigabatrin was assessed after 3 months of therapy. Sixty-five patients (63.7%) showed a > 50% decrease in seizure frequency, and 12 patients (11.7%) became seizure-free. Thirty-one patients (29.4%) experienced a < 50% decrease or no change in seizure frequency, and 6 patients (5.9%) had an increase in seizure frequency. Adverse events, nearly all of mild severity, were reported in 27 patients (26.5%). These data are remarkably similar to previous placebo-controlled studies and support that vigabatrin is beneficial to a significant number of patients with previously uncontrolled seizures.