Efficacy and safety of bexarotene combined with psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA) compared with PUVA treatment alone in stage IB-IIA mycosis fungoides: final results from the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force phase III randomized clinical trial 21011 (NCT00

Experience With Bexarotene to Treat Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: A Study of the Spanish Working Group of Cutaneous Lymphomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bexarotene has been approved to treat advanced stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) since 1999. However, very few data have been published on its long-term safety and efficacy profile. The aim of this study is to determine the tolerability to bexarotene and outcomes by collecting the 2nd largest case series to date on its long-term use vs CTCL.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a multicenter retrospective review of 216 patients with mycosis fungoides (174), or Sézary syndrome (42) on a 10-year course of bexarotene alone or in combination with other therapies at 19 tertiary referral teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 133 men (62%) and 83 women (38%) were included, with a mean age of 63.5 year (27-95). A total of 45% were on bexarotene monotherapy for the entire study period, 22% started on bexarotene but eventually received an additional therapy, 13% were on another treatment but eventually received bexarotene while the remaining 20% received a combination therapy since the beginning. The median course of treatment was 20.78 months (1-114); and the overall response rate, 70.3%. Complete and partial response rates were achieved in 26% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, being the most common toxicities hypertriglyceridemia (79%), hypercholesterolemia (71%), and hypothyroidism (52%). No treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms bexarotene is a safe and effective therapy for the long-term treatment of CTCL.

Experience With Bexarotene to Treat Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: A Study of the Spanish Working Group of Cutaneous Lymphomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bexarotene has been approved to treat advanced stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) since 1999. However, very few data have been published on its long-term safety and efficacy profile. The aim of this study is to determine the tolerability to bexarotene and outcomes by collecting the 2nd largest case series to date on its long-term use vs CTCL.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a multicenter retrospective review of 216 patients with mycosis fungoides (174), or Sézary syndrome (42) on a 10-year course of bexarotene alone or in combination with other therapies at 19 tertiary referral teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 133 men (62%) and 83 women (38%) were included, with a mean age of 63.5 year (27-95). A total of 45% were on bexarotene monotherapy for the entire study period, 22% started on bexarotene but eventually received an additional therapy, 13% were on another treatment but eventually received bexarotene while the remaining 20% received a combination therapy since the beginning. The median course of treatment was 20.78 months (1-114); and the overall response rate, 70.3%. Complete and partial response rates were achieved in 26% and 45% of the patients, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, being the most common toxicities hypertriglyceridemia (79%), hypercholesterolemia (71%), and hypothyroidism (52%). No treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms bexarotene is a safe and effective therapy for the long-term treatment of CTCL.

Skin-directed therapy and biologic response modifiers in mycosis fungoides

The most common and widespread type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is mycosis fungoides (MF), and it has a multiphasic clinical and biological course, with early stages being indolent for many years and later stages being faster and more aggressive. The clinical stage has a significant impact on the management and course of treatment: in the early stages, skin-directed therapies (SDT) plus/or biologic response modifiers (BRM); in the later stages, radiotherapy and/or systemic therapies. Even though national and international societies and groups periodically update their clinical recommendations, there is still no universally accepted approach. This paper reviews and discusses the various SDT and BRM options, either separately or in combination.

What Is New in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on updates in prognosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL).

RECENT FINDINGS

Cohort studies indicate imaging may be necessary in early-stage CTCL. Risk factors for progression of CTCL have been identified. Interactions between malignant cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the skin microbiome advance the understanding of pathogenesis and tumor cell dissemination. Studies support a hypothesis of circulating malignant tumor cells. MicroRNA (miR) influence tumor progression and prognosis; the IL22-STAT3-CCL20 cascade may be a novel target. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-31 cytokines are relevant for pruritus and could be targets for therapeutic interventions. Systemic therapies, such as JAK inhibitors, targeted antibodies, and checkpoint inhibitors, show promise in advanced stages. Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides a potential curative option for patients. Further investigations of prognosis and translational research are necessary to improve stratification of patients for treatment.

Phototherapy combined with systemic agents for mycosis fungoides

The choice of tactics for managing a patient with mycosis fungoides is determined by the stage of the disease. In the early stages of mycosis fungoides, a treatment approach using external therapy and various ultraviolet irradiation spectra (UVB-311 nm and PUVA therapy) is preferable. With insufficient efficiency and / or short remissions in some patients, it is possible to use combined methods in the early stages: PUVA therapy or UVB-311 nm therapy. in combination with systemic therapy, including interferon (IFN) 2b preparations, methotrexate and retinoids. The results of original studies demonstrate an increase in the overall response rate when combining PUVA therapy with IFN- or retinoids in patients with stages IB-IIB. The effectiveness of combined treatment regimens using UVB-311 nm remains insufficiently studied.

The Use of Retinoids for the Prevention and Treatment of Skin Cancers: An Updated Review

Retinoids are natural and synthetic vitamin A derivatives that are effective for the prevention and the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). NMSCs constitute a heterogenous group of non-melanocyte-derived skin cancers that impose substantial burdens on patients and healthcare systems. They include entities such as basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (collectively called keratinocyte carcinomas), cutaneous lymphomas and Kaposi’s sarcoma among others. The retinoid signaling pathway plays influential roles in skin physiology and pathology. These compounds regulate diverse biological processes within the skin, including proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis and immune regulation. Collectively, retinoids can suppress skin carcinogenesis. Both topical and systemic retinoids have been investigated in clinical trials as NMSC prophylactics and treatments. Desirable efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials have prompted health regulatory bodies to approve the use of retinoids for NMSC management. Acceptable off-label uses of these compounds as drugs for skin cancers are also described. This review is a comprehensive outline on the biochemistry of retinoids, their activities in the skin, their effects on cancer cells and their adoption in clinical practice.

Treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides with oral bexarotene and phototherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, for which no standard treatment exists.

OBJECTIVES

To provide evidence-based recommendations for adult patients with early-stage MF treated with oral bexarotene and phototherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted utilizing studies identified via Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2020 to evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse events of oral bexarotene and phototherapy.

RESULTS

Of 645 abstracts retrieved, 17 full-text articles with 143 subjects were included for analysis. There were nine case reports, five retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies, and one randomized controlled trial. Most subjects were men (24.48%) with stage IB disease (54.4%), and the mean age at presentation was 63. One patient had folliculotropic disease. The retrospective studies' analysis included 67 subjects and indicated that the partial response was 40.36% (95% CI 18.24 to 64.92), complete response was 34.06% (95% CI 10.73 to 62.56), and overall response was 64.48% (95% CI 48.56 to 78.89). Side effects from bexarotene were hypertriglyceridemia (54%), hypothyroidism (50%), and hypercholesterolemia (46%). Similar results were noted in the prospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature consists mostly of uncontrolled studies which suggest that combination therapy with oral bexarotene and phototherapy is a therapeutic option. Future randomized control studies with longer follow-up and standardized definitions of treatment responses and dosages are needed to support the development of evidence-based approaches for the treatment of early-stage MF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Bexarotene and Photo(Chemo)Therapy Combination Therapy and Bexarotene Monotherapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Introduction

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a chronic condition with low malignancy. The combined use of therapeutic agents and photo(chemo)therapy is widely applied for the treatment of CTCL. The efficacy and safety of bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy were previously confirmed in Japanese patients with CTCL. The efficacy and safety of the bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy was compared with bexarotene monotherapy in Japanese patients with CTCL.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, two-parallel-group, active-control specified clinical study in Japanese patients diagnosed with CTCL carried out over 8 weeks with a study extension conducted at two institutions. This study was registered in Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180094).

Results

In the combination therapy group, 22 subjects received oral bexarotene (300 mg/m² body surface area) once daily, followed by bath-psoralen and ultraviolet (UV) A or narrowband UVB. In the monotherapy group, 24 subjects received oral bexarotene (300 mg/m²) once daily. The efficacy analysis using the modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool, which included 39 patients, showed a response rate of 81.0% (17/21) in the combination therapy group and 83.3% (15/18) in the monotherapy group. No statistically significant difference was detected between groups. In the combination therapy group, four subjects showed a complete clinical response or complete response, and subjects with a partial response exhibited a high rate of skin lesion resolution, significantly better than in the monotherapy group. In the safety analysis, which included 46 treated subjects (22 in the combination therapy group and 24 in the monotherapy group), no adverse events or adverse drug reactions were reported in either group.

Conclusion

Both bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy and bexarotene monotherapy were therapeutically effective in Japanese patients with CTCL and well tolerated. Combination therapy led to a higher skin lesion resolution rate and greater therapeutic effects compared with monotherapy.

Trial Registration

jRCTs041180094.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00655-0.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bexarotene monotherapy compared with bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy in Japanese patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The study was a randomized, open-label, two-parallel-group, active-control specified clinical study in patients diagnosed with CTCL performed over an 8-week period with a study extension conducted in two institutions. In the combination therapy group, bexarotene (300 mg/m² body surface area) was administered orally once daily to 22 subjects, followed by treatment with bath-psoralen and ultraviolet A (bath-PUVA) or narrowband UVB. In the bexarotene monotherapy group, bexarotene (300 mg/m²) was administered orally once daily to 24 subjects. Efficacy was assessed using the modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool. Among the 39 subjects analyzed for treatment efficacy, the response rate of the combination therapy group was 81.0% (17/21) and that of the monotherapy group was 83.3% (15/18). Differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant. Of the 21 subjects in the combination therapy group, 4 had a complete clinical response or complete response, and those with a partial response showed a higher skin lesion resolution rate than in the monotherapy group. The safety analysis revealed no reports of adverse events or adverse drug reactions among the 46 treated subjects (combination therapy group = 22; monotherapy group = 24). Thus, both bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy and bexarotene monotherapy were therapeutically effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with CTCL. Patients receiving the combined therapy, however, showed a higher rate of skin lesion resolution.

Low Dose Oral Alitretinoin With Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for Chronic Hand Dermatitis

Background

Chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) is difficult to treat and has high individual and societal burdens. Phototherapy and oral alitretinoin are safe monotherapies for CHD, but their combination has not been assessed.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of low dose oral alitretinoin combined with phototherapy versus high dose oral alitretinoin for CHD refractory to topical corticosteroids.

Methods

This retrospective study of adult patients with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy compared low dose oral alitretinoin (10 mg three times weekly) combined with narrowband ultraviolet B therapy (three times weekly; LDA-UVB) to high dose oral alitretinoin (30 mg daily; HDA) for 16 weeks. Outcomes were improvement in disease severity measured by the Physician’s Global Assessment and quality of life measured with the Dermatology Life Quality Index.

Results

The mean age of the study population (n = 64) was 41.25 years and 57.8% were male. Both cohorts experienced improvements in disease severity and quality of life after 16 weeks, however, significantly more participants who received LDA-UVB (n = 21/33, 63.6%) achieved “clear” or “almost clear” assessments compared to those who received HDA (n = 12/31, 38.7%; P < .05). Adverse effects were significantly more prevalent in the HDA group (P < .0001) and included headache, elevated cholesterol, and dry lips.

Conclusions

The combination of low dose oral alitretinoin with narrowband-UVB therapy was more effective and had fewer adverse effects compared to high dose oral alitretinoin for participants with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy.

Safety and efficacy of bexarotene for Japanese patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: Real-world experience from post-marketing surveillance

To establish real-world evidence about the safety and efficacy of bexarotene for Japanese patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, we conducted a nationwide cohort study using data from post-marketing surveillance for bexarotene treatment. In total, 294 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma were identified between June 2016 and June 2018. Of these, 267 patients were included as the safety analysis set. Of the 267 patients, 175 were included in the efficacy analysis set. Of these, 139 patients had mycosis fungoides, including 46 with early stage disease and 93 with advanced stage disease. Among the 139 patients with mycosis fungoides, the objective response rate was 46.8%. A significant difference in objective response rate was detected between patients who started with bexarotene at 300 mg/m² (61.6%) and patients who started with bexarotene at less than 300 mg/m² (22.6%, p < 0.001). Of the 139 patients with mycosis fungoides, 92 were treated with a combination of bexarotene plus photo(chemo)therapy. A significant difference in objective response rate was seen between bexarotene with a combination of photo(chemo)therapy (57.6%) and bexarotene without a combination of photo(chemo)therapy (25.5%, p < 0.001). Starting bexarotene at 300 mg/m² and combination with photo(chemo)therapy were detected as independent factors influencing response. Common treatment-related adverse events included hypothyroidism (85.8%), hypertriglyceridemia (68.5%), hypercholesterolemia (43.8%), and neutropenia (21.3%). Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and neutropenia occurred more frequently in patients who started with bexarotene at 300 mg/m² than patients who started with bexarotene at less than 300 mg/m² (hypertriglyceridemia, 76.4% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.001; hypercholesterolemia, 49.0% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.045; neutropenia, 28.0% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.002; respectively). The present study indicates that starting bexarotene at 300 mg/m² and combination of photo(chemo)therapy offer a promising efficacy for the treatment of patients with mycosis fungoides. Efficacy of low-dose bexarotene plus photo(chemo)therapy should be evaluated in future.

Cutaneous T cell lymphoma

Primary cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas that present in the skin with no evidence of extracutaneous disease at the time of diagnosis. CTCL subtypes demonstrate a variety of clinical, histological, and molecular features, and can follow an indolent or a very aggressive course. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are not yet entirely understood. The pathophysiology of CTCL is complex and a single initiating factor has not yet been identified. Diagnosis is based on clinicopathological correlation and requires an interdisciplinary team. Treatment decision is made based on short-term and long-term goals. Therapy options comprise skin-directed therapies, such as topical steroids or phototherapy, and systemic therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies or chemotherapy. So far, the only curative treatment approach is allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Novel therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells, monoclonal antibodies or small molecules, are being investigated in clinical trials. Patients with CTCL have reduced quality of life and a lack of effective treatment options. Further research is needed to better identify the underlying mechanisms of CTCL development and course as well as to better tailor treatment strategies to individual patients.

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: focus on the current treatment scenario

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders, characterized by infiltration of the skin by mature malignant T cells. Mycosis fungoides is the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, accounting for more than 60% of cases. Mycosis fungoides in the early-stage is generally an indolent disease, progressing slowly from some patches or plaques to more widespread skin involvement. However, 20% to 25% of patients progress to advanced stages, with the development of skin tumors, extracutaneous spread and poor prognosis. Treatment modalities can be divided into two groups: skin-directed therapies and systemic therapies. Therapies targeting the skin include topical agents, phototherapy and radiotherapy. Systemic therapies include biological response modifiers, immunotherapies and chemotherapeutic agents. For early-stage mycosis fungoides, skin-directed therapies are preferred, to control the disease, improve symptoms and quality of life. When refractory or in advanced-stage disease, systemic treatment is necessary. In this article, the authors present a compilation of current treatment options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: An Integrative Review of the Pathophysiology, Molecular Drivers, and Targeted Therapy

Simple Summary

In the last few years, the field of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas has experienced major advances. In the context of an active translational and clinical research field, next-generation sequencing data have boosted our understanding of the main molecular mechanisms that govern the biology of these entities, thus enabling the development of novel tools for diagnosis and specific therapy. Here, we focus on mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome; we review essential aspects of their pathophysiology, provide a rational mechanistic interpretation of the genomic data, and discuss the current and upcoming therapies, including the potential crosstalk between genomic alterations and the microenvironment, offering opportunities for targeted therapies.

Abstract

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases that affect the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) account for the majority of these lesions and have recently been the focus of extensive translational research. This review describes and discusses the main pathobiological manifestations of MF/SS, the molecular and clinical features currently used for diagnosis and staging, and the different therapies already approved or under development. Furthermore, we highlight and discuss the main findings illuminating key molecular mechanisms that can act as drivers for the development and progression of MF/SS. These seem to make up an orchestrated constellation of genomic and environmental alterations generated around deregulated T-cell receptor (TCR)/phospholipase C, gamma 1, (PLCG1) and Janus kinase/ signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) activities that do indeed provide us with novel opportunities for diagnosis and therapy.

A deep dive into UV-based phototherapy: Mechanisms of action and emerging molecular targets in inflammation and cancer

UV-based phototherapy (including psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), UVB and UVA1) has a long, successful history in the management of numerous cutaneous disorders. Photoresponsive diseases are etiologically diverse, but most involve disturbances in local (and occasionally systemic) inflammatory cells and/or abnormalities in keratinocytes that trigger inflammation. UV-based phototherapy works by regulating the inflammatory component and inducing apoptosis of pathogenic cells. This results in a fascinating and complex network of simultaneous events-immediate transcriptional changes in keratinocytes, immune cells, and pigment cells; the emergence of apoptotic bodies; and the trafficking of antigen-presenting cells in skin-that quickly transform the microenvironment of UV-exposed skin. Molecular elements in this system of UV recognition and response include chromophores, metabolic byproducts, innate immune receptors, neurotransmitters and mediators such as chemokines and cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and platelet activating factor (PAF) and PAF-like molecules that simultaneously shape the immunomodulatory effects of UV and their interplay with the microbiota of the skin and beyond. Phototherapy's key effects-proapoptotic, immunomodulatory, antipruritic, antifibrotic, propigmentary, and pro-prebiotic-promote clinical improvement in various skin diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (AD), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), vitiligo, scleroderma, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) as well as prevention of polymorphic light eruption (PLE). As understanding of phototherapy improves, new therapies (UV- and non-UV-based) are being developed that will modify regulatory T-cells (Treg), interact with (resident) memory T-cells and /or utilize agonists and antagonists as well as antibodies targeting soluble molecules such as cytokines and chemokines, transcription factors, and a variety of membrane-associated receptors.

Outlines of the Japanese guidelines for the management of primary cutaneous lymphomas 2020

Since the publication of the Japanese "Guidelines for the management of cutaneous lymphomas" in 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms and the WHO-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas were updated and a number of novel systemic drugs for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma had been approved in Japan. In 2020, we revised the Japanese guidelines for the management of cutaneous lymphomas with consideration of the recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology and classification of cutaneous lymphomas together with the update of treatment strategies reflecting the advent of novel drugs. In addition to a brief explanation of epidemiology, diagnosis, staging system, prognosis and management of each subtype of cutaneous lymphomas, the recommendations for nine clinical questions regarding treatment options that can vary even among experts are also described. A systematic review process and determination of recommendations in answer to each clinical question have been performed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation scheme by a multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of dermatologists, a hematologist and a radiation oncologist. In this article, we present the outlines of the revised Japanese "Guidelines for the management of cutaneous lymphomas".

Monotherapy and combination therapy with acitretin for mycosis fungoides: results of a retrospective, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Retinoids have long been used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. However, data on acitretin use for mycosis fungoides (MF) are very limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate treatment outcomes of acitretin in patients with MF attending three academic referral centres in different regions of Greece.

METHODS

Data on effectiveness, safety and drug survival of acitretin as monotherapy or as adjuvant regimen were collected in a multicentre, register-based, retrospective study.

RESULTS

Overall, 128 patients (64.8% male; mean age at MF diagnosis 59.7 years) were included. Folliculotropic MF was present in 24 (18.8%) cases. Most patients (n = 118; 92.2%) had early-stage disease (≤IIA) at acitretin initiation. In all, 28 (21.9%) patients received acitretin monotherapy, while 100 (78.1%) subjects on acitretin concomitantly received phototherapy (n = 65; 50.8%) or topical steroids (n = 27; 21.1%). Acitretin was given as a first-line agent in 73 (57%) cases. A 77.3% overall response rate was noted: 44.5% and 32.8% for complete and partial responses, respectively. Acitretin was more effective as first-line than as a subsequent agent (P = 0.008). A trend towards better response was observed in the combination arm compared to patients receiving acitretin alone (P = 0.056). Median time to best response was 6.9 months (IQR 4.4-9.4); median duration of response was 23.7 months (IQR 11.9-35.4). Overall, the mean length of all treatment patterns was 569 days (SD 718.8). Therapy was discontinued in 5 (3.9%) cases due to drug intolerance. Adverse effects were recorded in 62 (48.4%) cases with dyslipidaemia (n = 31; 24.2%), xerosis (n = 24; 18.6%) and hair loss (n = 10; 7.8%) being the most commonly recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Acitretin, either alone or as adjuvant, showed a stable long-term effectiveness in this cohort, especially when used in the first-line setting. This RAR-selective agonist may serve as an attractive option for treatment of MF and should be further evaluated.

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.

Efficacy outcomes in phase 2 and phase 3 randomized controlled trials in rheumatology

Phase 3 trials are the mainstay of drug development across medicine but have often not met expectations set by preceding phase 2 studies. A systematic meta-analysis evaluated all randomized controlled, double-blind trials investigating targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Primary outcomes of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses were compared by mixed-model logistic regression, including exploration of potential determinants of efficacy overestimation. In rheumatoid arthritis, phase 2 trial outcomes systematically overestimated subsequent phase 3 results (odds ratio comparing ACR20 in phase 2 versus phase 3: 1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.57, P < 0.001). Data for psoriatic arthritis trials were similar, but not statistically significant (odds ratio comparing ACR20 in phase 2 versus phase 3: 1.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.94, P = 0.09). Differences in inclusion criteria largely explained the observed differences in efficacy findings. Our findings have implications for all stakeholders in new therapeutic development and testing, as well as potential ethical implications.

Case series of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas treated with bexarotene-based therapy

Bexarotene is useful for both early and advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and is sometimes applied to ultraviolet-tolerant early CTCL patients as one of the first-line therapies in the real world. However, continuous administration of bexarotene is sometimes difficult because of its adverse events (AE). Development of an appropriate protocol for bexarotene that can induce a consistent response for CTCL without severe AE (SAE) is needed. We retrospectively investigated 29 Japanese cases of CTCL and evaluated the efficacy of treatment and incident ratios of all AE and SAE. Objective response rate (ORR) for the overall cohort was 65.5%. ORR of the 300 mg/m² cohort (conventional dose) was 76.2%, while that of the 150-300 mg/body (low dose) with narrowband ultraviolet B light (NBUVB) cohort was 37.5%. Mean event-free survival was 10.0 months for all patients, 6.7 months for the bexarotene conventional-dose cohort and 19.1 months for the low-dose with NBUVB cohort. The incident ratio of total SAE for all patients was 20.7%. The incident ratio of total SAE was 23.8% for the conventional-dose cohort and 12.5% for the low-dose with NBUVB cohort. Our present study suggests that low-dose bexarotene plus NBUVB therapy is well-tolerated and could be one of the optimal therapies for advanced CTCL.

Efficacy and safety of bexarotene combined with photo(chemo)therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a chronic condition with low malignancy. International treatment guidelines for CTCL are widely followed in Europe and the USA. Combination therapy with therapeutic agents for CTCL and phototherapy is effective on the basis of European data. The efficacy and safety of combination therapy for Japanese CTCL patients are not established. We investigated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with photo(chemo)therapy and bexarotene in Japanese CTCL patients. Twenty‐five patients received daily oral bexarotene (300 mg/m² body surface), followed by bath‐psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV)‐A (PUVA) or narrowband UV‐B. Treatment results were evaluated using the modified Severity‐Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) and the Physician Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) up to week 24. Safety was also assessed. Twenty‐four weeks after initiating treatment, the total response rate was 80.0% (mSWAT) and 84.0% (PGA). Response rates did not differ when stratified by disease stage. Number of days (mean ± standard deviation) for time to response, duration of response and time to progression determined by the mSWAT were 20.7 ± 9.62, 117.0 ± 43.0 and 163.6 ± 28.8, respectively. T‐helper 2 chemokine levels in patients at stage IIA or more decreased significantly at weeks 12 and 24. All patients experienced adverse events and adverse drug reactions. Serious adverse drug reactions included sepsis, anemia and congestive cardiac insufficiency (n = 1 each). Other adverse drug reactions were of mild to moderate severity. Combination therapy with bexarotene and PUVA was safe and effective in Japanese CTCL patients.

Skin colonization by circulating neoplastic clones in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a mature T-cell lymphoma currently thought to develop primarily in the skin by a clonal expansion of a transformed, resident memory T cell. However, this concept does not explain the key characteristics of MF, such as the debut with multiple, widespread skin lesions or inability of skin-directed therapies to provide cure. The testable inference of the mature T-cell theory is the clonality of MF with respect to all rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR) genes. Here, we used a whole-exome sequencing approach to detect and quantify TCR-α, β, and γ clonotypes in tumor cell clusters microdissected from MF lesions. This method allowed us to calculate the tumor cell fraction of the sample and therefore an unequivocal identification of the TCR clonotypes as neoplastic. Analysis of TCR sequences from 29 patients with MF stage I to IV proved the existence of multiple T-cell clones within the tumor cell fraction, with a considerable variation between patients and between lesions from the same patient (median, 11 clones; range, 2-80 clones/sample). We have also detected multiple neoplastic clones in the peripheral blood in all examined patients. Based on these findings, we propose that circulating neoplastic T-cell clones continuously replenish the lesions of MF, thus increasing their heterogeneity by a mechanism analogous to the consecutive tumor seeding. We hypothesize that circulating neoplastic clones might be a promising target for therapy and could be exploited as a potential biomarker in MF.

Cost of early-stage mycosis fungoides treatments in Spain

AIM

To identify the most common therapeutic options for the treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides in Spain, quantify their associated healthcare resource use and costs.

METHODS

After reviewing the literature, a panel of 6 Spanish clinical dermatologists validated the treatments and healthcare resource use through a structured questionnaire. Individual responses were collected, analyzed and presented into a face-to-face meeting in order to reach a consensus. Cost categories considered were: drug acquisition and administration, photo/radiotherapy session and maintenance, clinical follow-up visits and laboratory tests. Costs were expressed in euros from 2018. The Spanish National Health System perspective was considered, taking into account direct health costs and time horizons of 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Costs for the skin-directed treatments (SDT) assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months, were: Topical carmustine [€6,593.36, €19,780.09 and €27,592.78]; Phototherapy with psoralens and ultraviolet A light (PUVA) [€1,098.68, €2,999.99 and €3,187.60]; Narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy [€1,657.47, €4,842.10 and €4,842.10]; Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) [€6,796.45, €7,913.34 and €7,913.34]. Cost for topical corticosteroids, being considered an adjuvant option, were €17.16, €51.49 and €102.97. Costs for the assessed systemic treatments alone or in combination with SDT at 1, 3 and 6 months, were: Systemic retinoids [€2,026.03, €5,206.63 and €7,426.42]; Systemic retinoids + PUVA phototherapy [€3,066.50, €8,271.26 and €10,046.58]; Interferon alfa + PUVA phototherapy [€1,541.09, €5,167.57 and €6,404.55].

CONCLUSION

According to the Spanish clinical practice, phototherapies in monotherapy were the treatments with the lowest associated costs regardless of the time horizon considered. TSEBT turned out as the treatment with the highest associated costs when considering 1 month. However, while considering 3 and 6 months the treatment with the highest associated costs was topical carmustine. The results of this analysis may provide critical information to measure the disease burden, to detect unmet medical needs and to advocate towards better treatments for this rare disease.

Comparison of Narrowband UV-B With Psoralen-UV-A Phototherapy for Patients With Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Phototherapy is one of the mainstays of treatment for early mycosis fungoides (MF). The most common modalities are psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) and narrowband UV-B (NBUVB).

Objective

To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of PUVA vs NBUVB in early-stage MF.

Data Sources

A systematic review was performed by searching Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness from inception to March 30, 2018. UV A, PUVA, mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, UV B, and UVB were used as either key words or MeSH terms.

Study Selection

Studies of cohorts with histologically confirmed early-stage MF, defined as stages IA, IB, and IIA, that compared PUVA vs NBUVB, had at least 10 patients in each comparator group, and reported outcomes of response to therapy. Exclusion criteria were studies with patients with stage IIB or higher MF, pediatric patients, fewer than 10 in each comparator group, noncomparative studies, case reports, and abstract studies.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as effect size.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were complete response rate, partial response rate, disease recurrence, and adverse effects, including erythema, nausea, pruritus, phototoxic effects, dyspepsia, and pain.

Results

Seven studies were included with a total of 778 patients (405 of 724 [55.9%] men; mean age, 52 years); 527 were treated with PUVA and 251 with NBUVB. Most of the included studies were of poor to moderate quality. Any response was found in 479 of the 527 (90.9%) patients treated with PUVA vs 220 of 251 (87.6%) treated with NBUVB (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.84-2.34; P = .20). Complete response was found in 389 of 527 (73.8%) patients who received PUVA vs 156 of 251 (62.2%) who received NBUVB, which was statistically significant (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.02-2.76; P = .04). Partial response was similar (90 of 501 [18.0%] vs 64 of 233 [27.5%]; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.04; P = .07). No significant difference was found between PUVA and NBUVB in terms of adverse effects of erythema (38 of 527 [7.2%] vs 17 of 251 [6.7%]; P = .54), nausea (10 of 527 [1.9%] vs 3 of 251 [1.2%]; P = .72), pruritus (2 of 527 [0.4%] vs 4 of 251 [1.7%]; P = .26), phototoxic effects (7 of 527 [1.4%] vs 2 of 251 [0.9%]; P = .72), dyspepsia (6 of 527 [1.2%] vs 0 of 251 [0%]; P = .59), or pain (0 of 527 [0%] vs 2 of 251 [0.9%]; P = .50).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that PUVA is a potential alternative to NBUVB in the management of early-stage MF. These findings have implications for clinicians involved in the management of early-stage MF.

Evaluation of Low-Dose, Low-Frequency Oral Psoralen-UV-A Treatment With or Without Maintenance on Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) photochemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for skin-limited, early-stage mycosis fungoides capable of producing high initial complete response (CR) rates. However, much remains unknown about PUVA's therapeutic mechanisms, optimal duration and frequency of treatment, dose escalation, or use as maintenance therapy.

Objectives

To evaluate low-dose, low-frequency PUVA, and whether maintenance treatment extends disease-free remission in patients with mycosis fungoides.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective randomized clinical trial with defined PUVA dosing regimen was carried out in 5 centers (Graz, Vienna, Hietzing, Innsbruck, and Salzburg) across Austria. Patients with stage IA to IIA mycosis fungoides (n = 27) were enrolled in the study beginning March 13, 2013, with the last patient enrolled March 21, 2016. These patients were treated with oral 8-methoxypsoralen followed by UV-A exposure 2 times per week for 12 to 24 weeks until CR. Patients with CR were randomized to PUVA maintenance for 9 months (14 total exposures) or no maintenance. The study was conducted from April 27, 2012, to July 27, 2018. Data analysis of the primary end point was of the intention-to-treat population, and the secondary end point analysis was of the evaluable population.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Efficacy of the PUVA regimen was determined by the rate of CR as defined by a modified severity-weighted assessment tool (mSWAT) score reduction to 0. Levels of proinflammatory molecules in serum and histologic features and percentage of clonal T cells in skin were assessed to search for biomarkers of clinical response.

Results

In 27 patients with mycosis fungoides, 19 (70%) were male with mean (range) age 61 (30-80) years. At baseline, patients with CR had a mean (range) mSWAT score of 18.6 (1-66) compared with 16.8 (3-46) in patients with partial response. The 12- to 24-week PUVA induction regimen reduced the mSWAT score in all patients and led to CR in 19 (70%) of 27 patients and a low mean cumulative UV-A dose of 78.5 J/cm2. The subsequent standardized 9-month PUVA maintenance phase prolonged median (range) disease-free remission from 4 (1-20) months to 15 (1-54) months (P = .02). High density of histologic infiltrate and high percentage of clonal TCR sequences in skin biopsy specimens at baseline were inversely associated with therapeutic response. No severe adverse effects were seen during the PUVA induction or maintenance phase.

Conclusions and Relevance

This proof-of-concept study identifies potential biomarkers for therapeutic response to PUVA in mycosis fungoides; it also demonstrates that low-dose, low-frequency PUVA appears to be highly effective, and maintenance treatment may extend disease-free remission.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01686594.

Cutaneous Lymphomas

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are the second most common form of extra-nodal lymphomas. They have special characteristics compared with other lymphomas. They are most frequently of T-cell origin and they generally have a much more indolent course than lymphomas of similar histology in other locations. Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous lymphoma. Primary cutaneous lymphomas remain confined to the skin for a long time. Skin-directed therapies are the main treatments; systemic treatments are not very effective for the skin lesions. Skin-directed therapies used for the early and thin lesions are topical corticosteroids, phototherapy and topical retinoids and, for the more widespread or thick lesions, topical nitrogen mustard and radiation. Radiation therapy is highly effective and is indicated in virtually all cases of localised disease. Radiation therapy may be given to the whole skin surface, so-called total skin electron beam therapy. However, if the disease spreads to other organs, systemic treatments are indicated, often combined with skin-directed therapies. Conventional cytotoxic therapy is less effective in cutaneous lymphomas. The commonly used therapies, such as interferon, enhanced anti-tumour immunity and the recent advances in immune therapies may improve our treatments for cutaneous lymphomas.

Kutane Lymphome

Kutane Lymphome (cutaneous lymphomas: CL) umfassen die Gruppe der kutanen T-Zell-Lymphome (cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: CTCL), kutanen B-Zell-Lymphome (cutaneous B-cell lymphomas: CBCL) und die sog. hämatodermischen Neoplasien (HN). CL gehören zur Gruppe der Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome (NHL) und stellen in der Subgruppe der extranodalen NHL die zweithäufigste Gruppe hinter den gastrointestinalen Lymphomen dar (Jaffe et al. 2009). Man unterscheidet zwischen primären und sekundären CL. Primäre CL haben ihren Ursprung in der Haut und bleiben in der Regel darauf auch längere Zeit beschränkt, während sekundäre CL kutane Manifestationen von primär nodalen oder extranodalen Lymphomen darstellen (Willemze 2005). Die primären CL unterscheiden sich hinsichtlich klinischem Verlauf, Therapieoptionen und Prognose erheblich von nodalen und extrakutanen Lymphomen. So zeigen z. B. die primär kutanen CD30+-T-Zell-Lymphome einen gutartigen Verlauf, wogegen die nodalen Varianten als aggressiv eingestuft werden. Da die CL zumeist weniger aggressiv sind, werden sie auch weniger aggressiv behandelt.

Phototherapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas arising in the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common variant, is characterised by clonal proliferation of skin residing malignant T-cells. Initially appearing with erythematous patches and plaques it follows a chronic course with progression to cutaneous tumours and extracutaneous involvement in some patients. Phototherapy with ultraviolet A radiation combined with 8-methoxypsoralen (PUVA) and with narrow-band ultraviolet B radiation (NB-UVB) are among the first line options for the treatment of MF and can induce remission in most patients. Sézary syndrome (SS) is a rare and more aggressive CTCL variant with generalized skin involvement. Patients with SS and with erythroderma from MF can benefit from treatment with extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) where peripheral blood is exposed to PUVA. Phototherapy can be safely combined with systemic agents, most notably interferon-alpha and retinoids. Another photoresponsive CTCL variant is lymphomatoid papulosis (LP), a CD30+ lymphoproliferative disease characterised by chronically recurring papules. The disease responds favourably to PUVA but low dose methotrexate might be preferred for long term disease control. Recently updated treatment guidelines have been published to provide evidence-based algorithms for the stage-oriented treatment of MF, SS and LP. Areas of uncertainty are treatment schedules that are currently not optimised for CTCL, the use of phototherapy for maintenance, and the value of ultraviolet A1 radiation, excimer lasers, and photodynamic therapy.

Management Strategies for Mycosis Fungoides in India

Mycosis fungoides is the most common primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The approach to diagnosis and further follow-up is outlined. Evidence for interventions is based classically on a Tumor Node Metastasis Blood TNMB “stage-based” approach. The treatment options in India are limited. The options as per risk stratification and prognostic index are discussed. Early stages and low-risk patients can be managed with expectant policy or skin-directed therapies including topical steroids and phototherapy; intermediate-risk patients can be opted for interferons or retinoids or low dose methotrexate along with radiotherapy including total skin electron beam therapy while high-risk patients are managed most often with single agent or multiagent palliative chemotherapy. Patients who are intermediate- or high-risk need management by a multispecialty team at tertiary care centers.

Small-molecule inhibitors of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3 related kinase (ATR) sensitize lymphoma cells to UVA radiation

BACKGROUND

Psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) photochemotherapy is a combination treatment used for inflammatory and neoplastic skin diseases such as mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). However, 30% of MF patients do not respond sufficiently to PUVA and require more aggressive therapies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this project was to investigate whether inhibition of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3 related kinase (ATR) may enhance efficacy of phototherapy.

METHODS

CTCL cell lines (MyLa2000, SeAx and Mac2a) served as in vitro cell models. ATR and Chk1 were inhibited by small molecule antagonists VE-821, VE-822 or Chir-124, or by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Cell cycle and viability were assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Small molecule inhibitors of ATR and Chk1 potently sensitized all cell lines to PUVA and, importantly, also to UVA, which by itself did not cause apoptotic response. VE-821/2 blocked ATR pathway activation and released the cells from the G2/M block caused by UVA and PUVA, but did not affect apoptosis caused by other chemotherapeutics (etoposide, gemcitabine, doxorubicine) or by hydrogen peroxide. Knockdown of ATR and Chk1 with siRNA also blocked the ATR pathway and released the cells from G2/M block but did not sensitize the cells to UVA as observed with the small molecule inhibitors. The latter suggested that the synergism between VE-821/2 or Chir-124 and UVA was not solely caused by specific blocking of ATR kinase but also ATR-independent photosensitization. This hypothesis was further verified by administrating VE-821/2 or Chir-124 before and after UVA irradiation, as well as comparing their activity with other ATR and Chk1 inhibitors (AZD6738 and MK8776). We found that only VE-821/2 and Chir-124 kinase inhibitors had synergistic effect with UVA, and only if applied before treatment with UVA.

CONCLUSION

Small molecule ATR and Chk1 inhibitors potently sensitize lymphoma cells to UVA radiation and induce a prominent apoptotic response. Interestingly, this effect is due to the dual (kinase inhibiting and photosensitizing) mode of action of these compounds.

How I treat mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma variant and is closely related to a rare leukemic variant, Sézary syndrome (SS). MF patients at risk of disease progression can now be identified and an international consortium has been established to address the prognostic relevance of specific biologic factors and define a prognostic index. There are a lack of randomized clinical trial data in MF/SS and evidence is based on a traditional “stage-based” approach; treatment of early-stage disease (IA-IIA) involves skin directed therapies which include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy (psoralen with UVA or UVB), topical chemotherapy, topical bexarotene, and radiotherapy including total skin electron beam therapy. Systemic approaches are used for refractory early-stage and advanced-stage disease (IIB-IV) and include bexarotene, interferon α, extracorporeal photopheresis, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and antibody therapies such as alemtuzumab, systemic chemotherapy, and allogeneic transplantation. However, despite the number of biologic agents available, the treatment of advanced-stage disease still represents an unmet medical need with short duration of responses. Encouragingly, randomized phase 3 trials are assessing novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin and the anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab. A broader understanding of the biology of MF/SS will hopefully identify more effective targeted therapies.

STAT3/5-Dependent IL9 Overexpression Contributes to Neoplastic Cell Survival in Mycosis Fungoides

PURPOSE

Sustained inflammation is a key feature of mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Resident IL9-producing T cells have been found in skin infections and certain inflammatory skin diseases, but their role in MF is currently unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed lesional skin from patients with MF for the expression of IL9 and its regulators. To determine which cells were producing IL9, high-throughput sequencing was used to identify malignant clones and Vb-specific antibodies were employed to visualize malignant cells in histologic preparations. To explore the mechanism of IL9 secretion, we knocked down STAT3/5 and IRF4 by siRNA transfection in CTCL cell lines receiving psoralen+UVA (PUVA) ± anti-IL9 antibody. To further examine the role of IL9 in tumor development, the EL-4 T-cell lymphoma model was used in C57BL/6 mice.

RESULTS

Malignant and reactive T cells produce IL9 in lesional skin. Expression of the Th9 transcription factor IRF4 in malignant cells was heterogeneous, whereas reactive T cells expressed it uniformly. PUVA or UVB phototherapy diminished the frequencies of IL9- and IL9r-positive cells, as well as STAT3/5a and IRF4 expression in lesional skin. IL9 production was regulated by STAT3/5 and silencing of STAT5 or blockade of IL9 with neutralizing antibodies potentiated cell death after PUVA treatment in vitro IL9-depleted mice exhibited a reduction of tumor growth, higher frequencies of regulatory T cells, and activated CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IL9 and its regulators are promising new targets for therapy development in mycosis fungoides. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3328-39. ©2016 AACR.

Guidelines for phototherapy of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: A consensus statement of the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet light (UVL) is a long established treatment for mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Treatments have traditionally included broadband, narrowband ultraviolet B light (UVB) and psoralen plus ultraviolet A light photochemotherapy (PUVA), but more recently, treatment options have expanded to include UVA1 and excimer laser. UVL is used either as monotherapy or as an adjuvant to systemic therapy, demonstrating efficacy in many cases that equal or surpass systemic medications. Despite its utility and duration of use, the current practice of using UVL guidelines for psoriasis to treat patients with MF/SS is problematic because the goals of prolonging survival and preventing disease progression are unique to CTCL compared to psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop separate guidelines for phototherapy for MF/SS for both clinical practice and for clinical trials.

METHODS

Literature review and cutaneous lymphoma expert consensus group recommendations.

RESULTS

This paper reviews the published literature for UVB and UVA/PUVA in MF/SS and suggests practical standardized guidelines for their use.

LIMITATIONS

New standardization of phototherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines should allow the comparison of results with phototherapy in MF/SS across different stages of patients, centers, and in combination with other agents in practice and in clinical trials.

Recent advances in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a heterogeneous group of skin-homing T-cell neoplasms, which represent approximately 75% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas. Currently available drug therapies, when effective, simply control disease and the only option for curing CTCL is stem cell transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last year, there has been an incredible effort made to improve the understanding and treatment of CTCL. Recent findings indicate that epigenetic aberrations are integral to active disease. Furthermore, multiple tumor-derived immunological factors have also been shown to inhibit viability, proliferation, and cytokine production of nonmalignant T cells. Several novel targeted therapies show great potential, most promising being antibody drug conjugates targeting surface markers such as CD30 in some CTCL subtypes. Additional attractive targets involve the global modulation of epigenetic markers such as demethylation agents or HDAC inhibitors, either as single agents or in combination therapies.

SUMMARY

This is a concise review of recent advances in the field of CTCL with special focus on research articles over the preceding year.

Treatment of localized mycosis fungoides with digital UV photochemotherapy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Photochemochemotherapy with 8-methoxypsoralen and UV-A light (PUVA) is a well-established treatment for mycosis fungoides (MF), although evidence for this therapy by means of prospective studies is scarce. However, long-term risks of PUVA are premature skin aging and development of nonmelanoma skin cancer. We therefore evaluated a device for targeted UV therapy, which reduces irradiation of unaffected skin in MF patients.

METHODS

Ten patients with patch- or plaque-type MF affecting less than 10% body surface area were included in a prospective study. A total of 14 lesions were treated with cream PUVA using the digital phototherapy device skintrek(®) PT3.

RESULTS

Seven of ten patients showed response to treatment. Complete clinical remission was achieved in four of ten patients (complete remission of seven of fourteen treated lesions) after an average of 13.4 weeks and an average cumulative UV dose of 42.6 J/cm(2) in a mean of 31.2 treatment sessions. Adverse events were rare and of mild severity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first prospective trial demonstrating efficacy and safety of cream PUVA in MF patients. As healthy adjacent skin remains unaffected, the potential to reduce the carcinogenic risk of PUVA treatment makes this new method a promising therapeutic option for localized MF.

The Role of Systemic Retinoids in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Retinoids are natural and synthetic vitamin A analogs with effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. They have significant activity in hematologic malignancies and have been studied extensively in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Retinoids bind to nuclear receptors and exert their effects through moderation of gene expression. Retinoic acid receptor and retinoic X receptor exert regulatory activity in vivo, binding to distinct ligands. Studies investigating systemic retinoids as monotherapy and in combination with other agents active against cutaneous lymphoma are reviewed. Side effects associated with retinoids include teratogenicity, dyslipidemias, and hypothyroidism, which should be carefully monitored in patients receiving treatment.

The utility of bexarotene in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is an umbrella term that encompasses a group of neoplasms that have atypical T-lymphocytes in the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of CTCL and Sézary syndrome (SS) is the leukemic form. Treatment for CTCL is dependent on the stage of disease and response to previous therapy. Therapy is divided into skin-directed treatment, which tends to be first line for early-stage disease, and systemic therapy, which is reserved for refractory CTCL. Bexarotene is a rexinoid and was licensed in Europe in 2002 for use in patients with advanced disease that have been refractory to a previous systemic treatment. We review the use of bexarotene as monotherapy and in combination with other treatments.

Retinoic acid receptors: from molecular mechanisms to cancer therapy

Retinoic acid (RA), the major bioactive metabolite of retinol or vitamin A, induces a spectrum of pleiotropic effects in cell growth and differentiation that are relevant for embryonic development and adult physiology. The RA activity is mediated primarily by members of the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) subfamily, namely RARα, RARβ and RARγ, which belong to the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily of transcription factors. RARs form heterodimers with members of the retinoid X receptor (RXR) subfamily and act as ligand-regulated transcription factors through binding specific RA response elements (RAREs) located in target genes promoters. RARs also have non-genomic effects and activate kinase signaling pathways, which fine-tune the transcription of the RA target genes. The disruption of RA signaling pathways is thought to underlie the etiology of a number of hematological and non-hematological malignancies, including leukemias, skin cancer, head/neck cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, glioblastoma and neuroblastoma. Of note, RA and its derivatives (retinoids) are employed as potential chemotherapeutic or chemopreventive agents because of their differentiation, anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, and anti-oxidant effects. In humans, retinoids reverse premalignant epithelial lesions, induce the differentiation of myeloid normal and leukemic cells, and prevent lung, liver, and breast cancer. Here, we provide an overview of the biochemical and molecular mechanisms that regulate the RA and retinoid signaling pathways. Moreover, mechanisms through which deregulation of RA signaling pathways ultimately impact on cancer are examined. Finally, the therapeutic effects of retinoids are reported.