L1 (1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one) for oral iron chelation in patients with beta-thalassaemia major

Oral deferiprone for iron chelation in people with thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Thalassaemia major is a genetic disease characterised by a reduced ability to produce haemoglobin. Management of the resulting anaemia is through red blood cell transfusions.Repeated transfusions result in an excessive accumulation of iron in the body (iron overload), removal of which is achieved through iron chelation therapy. A commonly used iron chelator, deferiprone, has been found to be pharmacologically efficacious. However, important questions exist about the efficacy and safety of deferiprone compared to another iron chelator, desferrioxamine.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise data from trials on the clinical efficacy and safety of deferiprone and to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of deferiprone with desferrioxamine for thalassaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies trials Register and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), LILACS and other international medical databases, plus registers of ongoing trials and the Transfusion Evidence Library (www.transfusionevidencelibrary.com). We also contacted the manufacturers of deferiprone and desferrioxamine.All searches were updated to 05 March 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing deferiprone with another iron chelator; or comparing two schedules or doses of deferiprone, in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trials for risk of bias and extracted data. Missing data were requested from the original investigators.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 17 trials involving 1061 participants (range 13 to 213 participants per trial) were included. Of these, 16 trials compared either deferiprone alone with desferrioxamine alone, or a combined therapy of deferiprone and desferrioxamine with either deferiprone alone or desferrioxamine alone; one compared different schedules of deferiprone. There was little consistency between outcomes and limited information to fully assess the risk of bias of most of the included trials.Four trials reported mortality; each reported the death of one individual receiving deferiprone with or without desferrioxamine. One trial reported five further deaths in patients who withdrew from randomised treatment (deferiprone with or without desferrioxamine) and switched to desferrioxamine alone. Seven trials reported cardiac function or liver fibrosis as measures of end organ damage.Earlier trials measuring the cardiac iron load indirectly by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2* signal had suggested deferiprone may reduce cardiac iron more quickly than desferrioxamine. However, a meta-analysis of two trials suggested that left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly reduced in patients who received desferrioxamine alone compared with combination therapy.  One trial, which planned five years of follow up, was stopped early due to the beneficial effects of combined treatment compared with deferiprone alone in terms of serum ferritin levels reduction.The results of this and three other trials suggest an advantage of combined therapy over monotherapy to reduce iron stores as measured by serum ferritin. There is, however, no conclusive or consistent evidence for the improved efficacy of combined deferiprone and desferrioxamine therapy over monotherapy from direct or indirect measures of liver iron. Both deferiprone and desferrioxamine produce a significant reduction in iron stores in transfusion-dependent, iron-overloaded people. There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to suggest that either has a greater reduction of clinically significant end organ damage.Evidence of adverse events were observed in all treatment groups. Occurrence of any adverse event was significantly more likely with deferiprone than desferrioxamine in one trial, RR 2.24 (95% CI 1.19 to 4.23). Meta-analysis of a further two trials showed a significant increased risk of adverse events associated with combined deferiprone and desferrioxamine compared with desferrioxamine alone, RR 3.04 (95% CI 1.18 to 7.83). The most commonly reported adverse event was joint pain, which occurred significantly more frequently in patients receiving deferiprone than desferrioxamine, RR 2.64 (95% CI 1.21 to 5.77). Other common adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances as well as neutropenia or leucopenia, or both.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of data from randomised controlled trials, there is no evidence to suggest the need for a change in current treatment recommendations; namely that deferiprone is indicated for treating iron overload in people with thalassaemia major when desferrioxamine is contraindicated or inadequate. Intensified desferrioxamine treatment (by either subcutaneous or intravenous route) or use of other oral iron chelators, or both, remains the established treatment to reverse cardiac dysfunction due to iron overload. Indeed, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently only gave support for deferiprone to be used as a last resort for treating iron overload in thalassaemia, myelodysplasia and sickle cell disease. However, there is evidence that adverse events are increased in patients treated with deferiprone compared with desferrioxamine and in patients treated with combined deferiprone and desferrioxamine compared with desferrioxamine alone. There is an urgent need for adequately-powered, high-quality trials comparing the overall clinical efficacy and long-term outcome of deferiprone with desferrioxamine.

Desferrioxamine mesylate for managing transfusional iron overload in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Thalassaemia major is a genetic disease characterised by a reduced ability to produce haemoglobin. Management of the resulting anaemia is through red blood cell transfusions.Repeated transfusions result in an excessive accumulation of iron in the body (iron overload), removal of which is achieved through iron chelation therapy. Desferrioxamine mesylate (desferrioxamine) is one of the most widely used iron chelators. Substantial data have shown the beneficial effects of desferrioxamine, although adherence to desferrioxamine therapy is a challenge. Alternative oral iron chelators, deferiprone and deferasirox, are now commonly used. Important questions exist about whether desferrioxamine, as monotherapy or in combination with an oral iron chelator, is the best treatment for iron chelation therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness (dose and method of administration) of desferrioxamine in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.To summarise data from trials on the clinical efficacy and safety of desferrioxamine for thalassaemia and to compare these with deferiprone and deferasirox.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), LILACS and other international medical databases, plus ongoing trials registers and the Transfusion Evidence Library (www.transfusionevidencelibrary.com). All searches were updated to 5 March 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing desferrioxamine with placebo, with another iron chelator, or comparing two schedules or doses of desferrioxamine, in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Six authors working independently were involved in trial quality assessment and data extraction. For one trial, investigators supplied additional data upon request.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 22 trials involving 2187 participants (range 11 to 586 people) were included. These trials included eight comparisons between desferrioxamine alone and deferiprone alone; five comparisons between desferrioxamine combined with deferiprone and deferiprone alone; eight comparisons between desferrioxamine alone and desferrioxamine combined with deferiprone; two comparisons of desferrioxamine with deferasirox; and two comparisons of different routes of desferrioxamine administration (bolus versus continuous infusion). Overall, few trials measured the same or long-term outcomes. Seven trials reported cardiac function or liver fibrosis as measures of end organ damage; none of these included a comparison with deferasirox.Five trials reported a total of seven deaths; three in patients who received desferrioxamine alone, two in patients who received desferrioxamine and deferiprone. A further death occurred in a patient who received deferiprone in another who received deferasirox alone. One trial reported five further deaths in patients who withdrew from randomised treatment (deferiprone with or without desferrioxamine) and switched to desferrioxamine alone.One trial planned five years of follow up but was stopped early due to the beneficial effects of a reduction in serum ferritin levels in those receiving combined desferrioxamine and deferiprone treatment compared with deferiprone alone. The results of this and three other trials suggest an advantage of combined therapy with desferrioxamine and deferiprone over monotherapy to reduce iron stores as measured by serum ferritin. There is, however, no evidence for the improved efficacy of combined desferrioxamine and deferiprone therapy against monotherapy from direct or indirect measures of liver iron.Earlier trials measuring the cardiac iron load indirectly by measurement of the magnetic resonance imaging T2* signal had suggested deferiprone may reduce cardiac iron more quickly than desferrioxamine. However, meta-analysis of two trials showed a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction in patients who received desferrioxamine alone compared with those who received combination therapy using desferrioxamine with deferiprone.Adverse events were recorded by 18 trials. These occurred with all treatments, but were significantly less likely with desferrioxamine than deferiprone in one trial, relative risk 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.84) and significantly less likely with desferrioxamine alone than desferrioxamine combined with deferiprone in two other trials, relative risk 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.84). In particular, four studies reported permanent treatment withdrawal due to adverse events from deferiprone; only one of these reported permanent withdrawals associated with desferrioxamine. Adverse events also occurred at a higher frequency in patients who received deferasirox than desferrioxamine in one trial. Eight trials reported local adverse reactions at the site of desferrioxamine infusion including pain and swelling. Adverse events associated with deferiprone included joint pain, gastrointestinal disturbance, increases in liver enzymes and neutropenia; adverse events associated with deferasirox comprised increases in liver enzymes and renal impairment. Regular monitoring of white cell counts has been recommended for deferiprone and monitoring of liver and renal function for deferasirox.In summary, desferrioxamine and the oral iron chelators deferiprone and deferasirox produce significant reductions in iron stores in transfusion-dependent, iron-overloaded people. There is no evidence from randomised clinical trials to suggest that any one of these has a greater reduction of clinically significant end organ damage, although in two trials, combination therapy with desferrioxamine and deferiprone showed a greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction than desferrioxamine used alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Desferrioxamine is the recommended first-line therapy for iron overload in people with thalassaemia major and deferiprone or deferasirox are indicated for treating iron overload when desferrioxamine is contraindicated or inadequate. Oral deferasirox has been licensed for use in children aged over six years who receive frequent blood transfusions and in children aged two to five years who receive infrequent blood transfusions. In the absence of randomised controlled trials with long-term follow up, there is no compelling evidence to change this conclusion.Worsening iron deposition in the myocardium in patients receiving desferrioxamine alone would suggest a change of therapy by intensification of desferrioxamine treatment or the use of desferrioxamine and deferiprone combination therapy.Adverse events are increased in patients treated with deferiprone compared with desferrioxamine and in patients treated with combined deferiprone and desferrioxamine compared with desferrioxamine alone. People treated with all chelators must be kept under close medical supervision and treatment with deferiprone or deferasirox requires regular monitoring of neutrophil counts or renal function respectively. There is an urgent need for adequately-powered, high-quality trials comparing the overall clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes of deferiprone, deferasirox and desferrioxamine.

Induction of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1α) in rat kidneys by iron chelation with the hydroxypyridinone, CP94

Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1α) is a master regulator of tissue adaptive responses to hypoxia whose stability is controlled by an iron containing prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) protein. A catalytic redox cycle in the PHD's iron center that results in the formation of a ferryl (Fe(+4)) intermediate has been reported to be responsible for the hydroxylation and subsequent degradation of HIF-1α under normoxia. We show that induction of HIF-1α in rat kidneys can be achieved by iron reduction by the hydroxypyridin-4 one (CP94), an iron chelator administered intraperitoneally in rats. The extent of HIF protein stabilization as well as the expression of HIF target genes, including erythropoietin (EPO), in kidney tissues was comparable to those induced by known inhibitors of the PHD enzyme, such as desferrioxamine (DFO) and cobalt chloride (CoCl(2)). In human kidney cells and in vitro PHD activity assay, we were able to show that the HIF-1α protein can be stabilized by addition of CP94. This appears to inactivate PHD; and thus prevents the hydroxylation of HIF-1α. In conclusion, we have identified the inhibition of iron-binding pocket of PHD as an underlying mechanism of HIF induction in vivo and in vitro by a bidentate hydroxypyridinone.

Regression of Myocardial Dysfunction After Switching from Desferrioxamine to Deferiprone Therapy in β-Thalassemia Major Patients

This study tries to compare the cardioprotective effects of the desferrioxamine (DFO) and deferiprone (L1) therapies on thalassemia major patients. We enrolled nine patients with thalassemia major complicated by some degree of myocardial dysfunction. These patients, recipients of >10 years of DFO injection therapy, were switched from DFO to L1. Echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic, diastolic and global functions, were assessed regularly every 6 months. Mean values of each parameter for the DFO and L1 treatment periods were compared using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Global cardiac function improved significantly. Myocardial dysfunction in patients with thalassemia major can be reversed by regular use of the oral iron chelator L1.

Oral deferiprone for iron chelation in people with thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Thalassaemia major is a genetic disease characterised by a reduced ability to produce haemoglobin. Management of the resulting anaemia is through transfusions of red blood cells. Repeated transfusions result in excessive accumulation of iron in the body (iron overload), removal of which is achieved through iron chelation therapy. A commonly used iron chelator, deferiprone, has been found to be pharmacologically efficacious. However, important questions exist about the efficacy and safety of deferiprone compared to another iron chelator, desferrioxamine.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise data from trials on the clinical efficacy and safety of deferiprone and to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of deferiprone for thalassaemia with desferrioxamine.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, ZETOC, Current Controlled Trials and bibliographies of relevant publications. We contacted the manufacturers of deferiprone and desferrioxamine. Most recent searches: June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing deferiprone with another iron chelator; or comparing two schedules of deferiprone, in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Missing data were requested from the original investigators.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials involving 398 people (range 10 to 144 people) were included. Nine trials compared deferiprone with desferrioxamine or a combination of deferiprone and desferrioxamine and one compared different schedules of deferiprone. There was little consistency between outcomes and little information to fully assess the methodological quality of most of the included trials. No trial reported long-term outcomes (mortality and end organ damage). There was no consistent effect on reduction of iron overload between all treatment comparisons, with the exception of urinary iron excretion in comparisons of deferiprone with desferrioxamine. An increase in iron excretion levels favoured deferiprone in one trial and desferrioxamine in three trials, even though measurement of urinary iron excretion underestimates total iron excretion by desferrioxamine.Adverse events were recorded in trials comparing deferiprone with desferrioxamine. There was evidence of adverse events in all treatment groups. Adverse events in one trial were significantly more likely with deferiprone than desferrioxamine, relative risk 2.24 (95% confidence interval 1.19 to 4.23).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no reason to change current treatment recommendations, namely deferiprone is indicated for treating iron overload in people with thalassaemia major when desferrioxamine is contraindicated or inadequate. However, there is an urgent need for adequately-powered, high quality trials comparing the overall clinical efficacy and long-term outcome of deferiprone with desferrioxamine.

Recent acquisitions in the management of iron overload

Chronically transfused patients develop iron overload, which leads to organ damage and ultimately to death. The introduction of the iron-chelating agent desferrioxamine mesylate dramatically improved the life expectancy of these patients. However, the very demanding nature of this treatment (subcutaneous, continuous infusion via a battery-operated portable pump) has been the motivation for attempts to develop alternative forms of treatment that would facilitate the patients' compliance. In this review, we describe the most important advances in iron-chelation therapy.

Benefits and risks of deferiprone in iron overload in Thalassaemia and other conditions: comparison of epidemiological and therapeutic aspects with deferoxamine

Deferiprone is the only orally active iron-chelating drug to be used therapeutically in conditions of transfusional iron overload. It is an orphan drug designed and developed primarily by academic initiatives for the treatment of iron overload in thalassaemia, which is endemic in the Mediterranean, Middle East and South East Asia and is considered an orphan disease in the European Union and North America. Deferiprone has been used in several other iron or other metal imbalance conditions and has prospects of wider clinical applications. Deferiprone has high affinity for iron and interacts with almost all the iron pools at the molecular, cellular, tissue and organ levels. Doses of 50-120 mg/kg/day appear to be effective in bringing patients to negative iron balance. It increases urinary iron excretion, which mainly depends on the iron load of patients and the dose of the drug. It decreases serum ferritin levels and reduces the liver and heart iron content in the majority of chronically transfused iron loaded patients at doses >80 mg/kg/day. It is metabolised to a glucuronide conjugate and cleared through the urine in the metabolised and a non-metabolised form, usually of a 3 deferiprone: 1 iron complex, which gives the characteristic red colour urine. Peak serum levels of deferiprone are observed within 1 hour of its oral administration and clearance from blood is within 6 hours. There is variation among patients in iron excretion, the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of deferiprone. Deferiprone has been used in more than 7500 patients aged from 2-85 years in >50 countries, in some cases daily for >14 years. All the adverse effects of deferiprone are considered reversible, controllable and manageable. These include agranulocytosis with frequency of about 0.6%, neutropenia 6%, musculoskeletal and joint pains 15%, gastrointestinal complains 6% and zinc deficiency 1%. Discontinuation of the drug is recommended for patients developing agranulocytosis. Deferiprone is of similar therapeutic index to subcutaneous deferoxamine but is more effective in iron removal from the heart, which is the target organ of iron toxicity and mortality in iron-loaded thalassaemia patients. Deferiprone is much less expensive to produce than deferoxamine. Combination therapy of deferoxamine and deferiprone has been used in patients not complying with subcutaneous deferoxamine or experiencing toxicity or not excreting sufficient amounts of iron with use of either drug alone. New oral iron-chelating drugs are being developed, but even if successful these are likely to be more expensive than deferiprone and are not likely to become available in the next 5-8 years. About 25% of treated thalassaemia patients in Europe and more than 50% in India are using deferiprone. For most thalassaemia patients worldwide who are not at present receiving any form of chelation therapy the choice is between deferiprone and fatal iron toxicity.

Safety monitoring of cardiac and hepatic systems in beta-thalassemia patients with chelating treatment in Taiwan

We conducted a prospective 3-yr clinical study comparing deferiprone (L1) with desferrioxamine (DFX). The therapeutic efficacy and potential side-effects on cardiac and/or hepatic systems of thalassemia patients were assessed by left ventricular ejection fraction, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and biochemical parameters. In both groups, levels of serum ferritin decreased significantly, and the hepatic function improved notably. Besides decrement of iron, no marked pathohistological changes were observed in the liver biopsies. These results indicated that for patients who failed to respond to DFX treatment, the use of L1 to remove excess iron deposition is recommended.

Monitoring long-term efficacy of iron chelation therapy by deferiprone and desferrioxamine in patients with beta-thalassaemia major: application of SQUID biomagnetic liver susceptometry

In this non-randomized prospective study, liver and spleen iron concentrations were monitored annually over a 4-year period by non-invasive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device biomagnetometry in 54 beta-thalassaemia major patients (age, 7-22 years) receiving treatment with deferiprone (75 mg/kg/d). Median liver iron concentrations increased significantly from 1456 to 2029 and 2449 microg/g(liver) at baseline, after 2.0 and 3.2 years respectively. Another group of 51 thalassaemic patients (aged 4-34 years) who received desferrioxamine s.c. for 1.9 years increased their liver iron concentration from 1076 to 1260 microg/g(liver). Taking into account the increase of the daily iron input from transfusions of 3.6 mg/d, caused by weight gain in 67% of the patients treated with deferiprone, a larger total body iron elimination rate was achieved after 2 years than at baseline. A negative ferritin change was observed in 51% of the patients. In 15 non-splenectomized patients, liver iron significantly increased from 1260 to 1937 microg/g(liver) (P < 0.01), but serum ferritin remained stable at 2100 microg/l, as did the spleen iron concentration at 1200 microg/g(spleen). A two-compartment model may predict an average chelation efficacy for desferrioxamine and deferiprone, with a saturation effect of the latter, for a certain chelation and transfusion regimen by a single liver iron quantification.

Multidentate pyridinones inhibit the metabolism of nontransferrin-bound iron by hepatocytes and hepatoma cells

The therapeutic effect of iron (Fe) chelators on the potentially toxic plasma pool of nontransferrin-bound iron (NTBI), often present in Fe overload diseases and in some cancer patients during chemotherapy, is of considerable interest. In the present investigation, several multidentate pyridinones were synthesized and compared with their bidentate analogue, deferiprone (DFP; L1, orally active) and desferrioxamine (DFO; hexadentate; orally inactive) for their effect on the metabolism of NTBI in the rat hepatocyte and a hepatoma cell line (McArdle 7777, Q7). Hepatoma cells took up much less NTBI than the hepatocytes (< 10%). All the chelators inhibited NTBI uptake (80-98%) much more than they increased mobilization of Fe from cells prelabelled with NTBI (5-20%). The hexadentate pyridinone, N,N,N-tris(3-hydroxy-1-methyl-2(1H)-pyridinone-4-carboxaminoethyl)amine showed comparable activity to DFO and DFP. There was no apparent correlation between Fe status, Fe uptake and chelator activity in hepatocytes, suggesting that NTBI transport is not regulated by cellular Fe levels. The intracellular distribution of iron taken up as NTBI changed in the presence of chelators suggesting that the chelators may act intracellularly as well as at the cell membrane. In conclusion (a) rat hepatocytes have a much greater capacity to take up NTBI than the rat hepatoma cell line (Q7), (b) all chelators bind NTBI much more effectively during the uptake phase than in the mobilization of Fe which has been stored from NTBI and (c) while DFP is the most active chelator, other multidentate pyridinones have potential in the treatment of Fe overload, particularly at lower, more readily clinically available concentrations, and during cancer chemotherapy, by removing plasma NTBI.

Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Despite the introduction of the parenteral iron chelator desferrioxamine more than 30 years ago, 50% of patients with thalassaemia major die before the age of 35 years, predominantly from iron-induced heart failure. The only alternative treatment is oral deferiprone, but its long-term efficacy on myocardial iron concentrations is unknown.

METHODS

We compared myocardial iron content and cardiac function in 15 patients receiving long-term deferiprone treatment with 30 matched thalassaemia major controls who were on long-term treatment with desferrioxamine. Myocardial iron concentrations were measured by a new magnetic-resonance T2* technique, which shows values inversely related to tissue iron concentration.

FINDINGS

The deferiprone group had significantly less myocardial iron (median 34.0 ms vs 11.4 ms, p=0.02) and higher ejection fractions (mean 70% [SD 6.5] vs 63% [6.9], p=0.004) than the desferrioxamine controls. Excess myocardial iron (T2* <20 ms) was less common in the deferiprone group than in the desferrioxamine controls (four [27%] vs 20 [67%], p=0.025), as was severe (T2* <10 ms) iron overload (one [7%] vs 11 [37%], p=0.04). The odds ratio for excess myocardial iron in the desferrioxamine controls versus the deferiprone group was 5.5 (95% CI 1.2-28.8).

INTERPRETATION

Conventional chelation treatment with subcutaneous desferrioxamine does not prevent excess cardiac iron deposition in two-thirds of patients with thalassaemia major, placing them at risk of heart failure and its complications. Oral deferiprone is more effective than desferrioxamine in removal of myocardial iron.

Orally active iron chelators

In patients with transfusion-dependent anemias, iron accumulation is fatal in the absence of chelating therapy. Extended survival, free of most complications of iron overload is observed in patients treated with early, adequate parenteral deferoxamine. Despite its success in prevention and treatment of iron toxicity, the expense and inconvenience of this therapy have stimulated a continued quest for an effective chelating agent that is orally active. Unfortunately, studies emerging over the last five years have confirmed that the most widely administered orally active agent, deferiprone (L1; 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydropyrid-4-one) may be harmfully ineffective in many patients: 18-65% of patients in six studies which obtained hepatic irons after long term deferiprone treatment had body iron exceeding the threshold for cardiac disease and premature death. The impact of deferiprone on cardiac and liver disease must be evaluated further, while the association between deferiprone and accelerated hepatic fibrosis still awaits refutation in large prospective trials. In view of the striking therapeutic successes of deferoxamine over the past 20 years, administration of deferiprone outside the setting of prospective clinical trials may need to be reconsidered. Meanwhile, an orally active iron chelator of demonstrated safety and effectiveness remains an objective for development for transfused patients.

Comparison between deferoxamine and deferiprone (L1) in iron-loaded thalassemia patients

INTRODUCTION

Iron-chelating therapy with deferoxamine in patients with thalassemia major has dramatically improved the prognosis of this disease. However, the limitations of this treatment have stimulated the design of alternative orally active iron chelators.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of, and compliance with, oral deferiprone (L1), and deferoxamine, in thalassemia major patients.

METHODS

All patients were followed up in one center in Lebanon. Sixteen patients were on L1 (75 mg/kg/d), and 40 patients on subcutaneous deferoxamine (20-50 mg/kg/d). Serum ferritin level, urinary iron excretion (UIE) and side effects were monitored over a two year period.

RESULTS

Patients on L1 had an initial serum ferritin concentration of 3663+/-566 microg/l (mean+/-SEM), that dropped to 2599+/-314 at 6 months (p<0.02; paired t-test), and stabilised at that level over the 24 months follow up. Patients on deferoxamine had an initial mean serum ferritin concentration of 3480+/-417 (NS compared to the L1 group), which dropped gradually to 3143+/-417 (p<0.05) and 2819+/-292 (p<0.02) at 6 and 24 months, respectively. The most common adverse reactions associated with L1 were arthralgia and nausea, but they did not necessitate stopping the drug.

CONCLUSION

L1 had comparable efficacy as deferoxamine with minimal side effects and better compliance. Provided long term side effects are not encountered, L1 seems to be a valuable alternative iron chelator for patients unable or unwilling to use deferoxamine effectively.

Transfusional iron overload and chelation therapy with deferoxamine and deferiprone (L1)

Iron is essential for all living organisms. Under normal conditions there is no regulatory and rapid iron excretion in humans and body iron levels are mainly regulated from the absorption of iron from the gut. Regular blood transfusions in thalassaemia and other chronic refractory anaemias can result in excessive iron deposition in tissues and organs. This excess iron is toxic, resulting in tissue and organ damage and unless it is removed it can be fatal to those chronically transfused. Iron removal in transfusional iron overload is achieved using chelation therapy with the chelating drugs deferoxamine (DF) and deferiprone (L1). Effective chelation therapy in chronically transfused patients can only be achieved if iron chelators can remove sufficient amounts of iron, equivalent to those accumulated in the body from transfusions, maintaining body iron load at a non-toxic level. In order to maintain a negative iron balance, both chelating drugs have to be administered almost daily and at high doses. This form of administration also requires that a chelator has low toxicity, good compliance and low cost. DF has been a life-saving drug for thousands of patients in the last 40 years. It is mostly administered by subcutaneous infusion (40-60 mg/kg, 8-12 h, 5 days per week), is effective in iron removal and has low toxicity. However, less than 10% of the patients requiring iron chelation therapy worldwide are able to receive DF because of its high cost, low compliance and in some cases toxicity. In the last 10 years we have witnessed the emergence of oral chelation therapy, which could potentially change the prognosis of all transfusional iron-loaded patients. The only clinically available oral iron chelator is L1, which has so far been taken by over 6000 patients worldwide, in some cases daily for over 10 years, with very promising results. L1 was able to bring patients to a negative iron balance at doses of 50-120 mg/kg/day. It increases urinary iron excretion, decreases serum ferritin levels and reduces liver iron in the majority of chronically transfused iron-loaded patients. Despite earlier concerns of possible increased risk of toxicity, all the toxic side effects of L1 are currently considered reversible, controllable and manageable. These include agranulocytosis (0.6%), musculoskeletal and joint pains (15%), gastrointestinal complaints (6%) and zinc deficiency (1%). The incidence of these toxic side effects could in general be reduced by using lower doses of L1 or combination therapy with DF. Combination therapy could also benefit patients experiencing toxicity with DF and those not responding to either chelator alone. The overall efficacy and toxicity of L1 is comparable to that of DF in both animals and humans. Despite the steady progress in iron chelation therapy with DF and L1, further investigations are required for optimising their use in patients by selecting improved dose protocols, by minimising their toxicity and by identifying new applications in other diseases of iron imbalance.

New trends in the treatment of beta-thalassemia

Thalassemia is the world's most common hereditary disease, and is a paradigm of monogenic genetic diseases. Because of increased population mobility, the disease is found today throughout the world, even in places far from the tropical areas in which it arose. Therapy of thalassemia has in the past been confined to transfusion and chelation. Recently, novel modes of therapy have been developed for thalassemia, based on the pathophysiology and molecular pathology of the disease, both of which have been extensively studied. This review will discuss the therapeutic modalities currently in use for the supportive treatment of thalassemia, both those that are standard therapy and those that are in clinical trials. We will include transfusion, chelation (intravenous and oral), antioxidants and various inducers of fetal hemoglobin (hydroxyurea, erythropoietin, butyrates, hemin). Most of the newer therapies are suitable primarily for thalassemia intermedia patients. In addition, the treatment modalities currently in use for the curative treatment of thalassemia major will be discussed, including bone marrow transplantation in its various forms. Experimental therapeutic methods, such as intrauterine bone marrow transplantation and gene therapy, are included. Physicians caring for thalassemia patients have an increasing variety of treatment options available. Future clinical studies will determine the place of newer agents and modalities in improving the quality of life as well as the life expectancy of thalassemia patients.

Safety profile of the oral iron chelator deferiprone: a multicentre study

In previous trials, the orally active iron chelator deferiprone (L1) has been associated with sporadic agranulocytosis, milder forms of neutropenia and other side-effects. To determine the incidence of these events, we performed a multicentre prospective study of the chelator. Blood counts were performed weekly, and confirmed neutropenia mandated discontinuation of therapy. Among 187 patients with thalassaemia major, the incidence of agranulocytosis (neutrophils < 0.5 x 109/l) was 0.6/100 patient-years, and the incidence of milder forms of neutropenia (neutrophils 0.5-1.5 x 109/l) was 5.4/100 patient-years. All cases of neutropenia resolved after interruption of therapy. Neutropenia occurred predominantly in non-splenectomized patients. Nausea and/or vomiting occurred early in therapy, was usually transient and caused discontinuation of deferiprone in three patients. Mild to moderate joint pain and/or swelling did not require permanent cessation of deferiprone and occurred more commonly in patients with higher ferritin levels. Mean alanine transaminase (ALT) levels rose during therapy. Increased ALT levels were generally transient and occurred more commonly in patients with hepatitis C. Persistent changes in immunological studies were infrequent, although sporadic abnormalities occurred commonly. Mean zinc levels decreased during therapy. Ferritin levels did not change in the overall group but decreased in those patients with baseline levels > 2500 microgram/l. This study characterized the safety profile of deferiprone, and, under the specific conditions of monitoring, demonstrated that agranulocytosis is less common than previously predicted.

The efficacy of oral deferiprone in acute iron poisoning

Due to its high cost and need for parenteral administration, the standard iron chelator deferoxamine is not used in many individuals with acute and chronic iron poisoning worldwide. Deferiprone is the first oral iron chelator to be shown to be effective in chronically iron overloaded thalassemia patients. Its efficacy, by oral administration, in acute iron poisoning has not been tested. Our objective was to determine whether orally administered deferiprone can reduce the mortality of rats following acute, toxic, oral doses of iron. Rats were administered 612 mg/kg elemental iron orally, corresponding to LD50 in the species tested. Two other groups received the same oral dose of iron followed by oral deferiprone: 800 mg/kg and 800 mg/kg, followed by another dose of 800 mg/kg 2 hours later. Coadministration of 800 mg/kg deferiprone with the iron decreased mortality from 30% to 6.6% after 2 hours (P = .02), from 40% to 16.6% after 12 hours (P = .04), and from 53.3% to 20% after 24 hours (P = 0.007). Mortality was also significantly decreased among animals coadministrated 2 repeated doses of deferiprone of 800 mg/kg with iron, to 0%, 9%, and 18%, and 2, 12, and 24 hours postdrug administration, respectively (P = .04, .05, .04, respectively). Histologically, there was a dose-dependent decrease in iron accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract. Orally administered deferiprone can decrease morbidity and mortality caused by acute iron overdose in rats. Oral deferiprone holds promise in the treatment of iron poisoning in humans.

Deferiprone: a review of its clinical potential in iron overload in beta-thalassaemia major and other transfusion-dependent diseases

Patients with beta-thalassaemia and other transfusion-dependent diseases develop iron overload from chronic blood transfusions and require regular iron chelation to prevent potentially fatal iron-related complications. The only iron chelator currently widely available is deferoxamine, which is expensive and requires prolonged subcutaneous infusion 3 to 7 times per week or daily intramuscular injections. Moreover, some patients are unable to tolerate deferoxamine and compliance with the drug is poor in many patients. Deferiprone is the most extensively studied oral iron chelator to date. Non-comparative clinical studies mostly in patients with beta-thalassaemia have demonstrated that deferiprone 75 to 100 mg/kg/day can reduce iron burden in regularly transfused iron-overloaded patients. Serum ferritin levels are generally reduced in patients with very high pretreatment levels and are frequently maintained within an acceptable range in those who are already adequately chelated. Deferiprone is not effective in all patients (some of whom show increases in serum ferritin and/or liver iron content, particularly during long term therapy). This may reflect factors such as suboptimal dosage and/or severe degree of iron overload at baseline in some instances. Although few long term comparative data are available, deferiprone at the recommended dosage of 75 mg/kg/day appears to be less effective than deferoxamine; however, compliance is superior with deferiprone, which may partly compensate for this. Deferiprone has additive, or possibly synergistic, effects on iron excretion when combined with deferoxamine. The optimum dosage and long term efficacy of deferiprone, and its effects on survival and progression of iron-related organ damage, remain to be established. The most important adverse effects in deferiprone-treated patients are arthropathy and neutropenia/agranulocytosis. Other adverse events include gastrointestinal disturbances, ALT elevation, development of antinuclear antibodies and zinc deficiency. With deferiprone, adverse effects occur mostly in heavily iron-loaded patients, whereas with deferoxamine adverse effects occur predominantly when body iron burden is lower.

CONCLUSION

Deferiprone is the most promising oral iron chelator under development at present. Further studies are required to determine the best way to use this new drug. Although it appears to be less effective than deferoxamine at the recommended dosage and there are concerns regarding its tolerability, it may nevertheless offer a therapeutic alternative in the management of patients unable or unwilling to receive the latter drug. Deferipone also shows promise as an adjunct to deferoxamine therapy in patients with insufficient response and may prove useful as a maintenance treatment to interpose between treatments.

An investigation into variability in the therapeutic response to deferiprone in patients with thalassemia major

Data suggest a large variability in the effectiveness of the orally active iron chelator, deferiprone, in inducing a sustained decrease in body iron to concentrations compatible with the avoidance of complications from iron overload. We analyzed 19 patients with thalassemia major who were undergoing long-term therapy with deferiprone (75 mg/kg/day every 8 hours). In seven of the 19 patients, hepatic iron concentration had been reduced or maintained at less than 7 mg/g of dry weight liver tissue, associated with no evidence of iron-induced toxicity (group A). In the remaining 12, hepatic iron concentration had either stabilized at higher than 7 mg/g of dry weight liver tissue, or increased to such concentrations during therapy with deferiprone (group B). We studied in these patients determinants that may explain such variability, including initial hepatic iron concentrations, compliance, transfusion index, pharmacokinetic characteristics of deferiprone, and plasma vitamin C status. Patients in group B showed significantly decreased plasma vitamin C concentrations compared with those in group A, who demonstrated normal levels (0.04 mg/dl [0.04-0.19 mg/dl] and 0.62 mg/day [0.44-1.05 mg/day], respectively; p = 0.02). A significant difference in apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) had developed between the groups over time, with a higher Vd/F in group B (1.66 [0.681, group A] and 3.16 [0.811, group B]; p = 0.006). Group B had started with hepatic iron concentrations that were significantly higher than those of group A, a difference that became more pronounced over time. In the initial analysis, serum ferritin concentrations were also higher in group B. The two groups did not differ in the remaining factors. The initial hepatic iron concentrations predicted the slope of change in this value. Regression analysis suggested that patients with initial hepatic iron concentration of less than or equal to 7.22 mg/g of dry weight liver tissue are unlikely to further decrease while taking deferiprone 75 mg/kg/day. Vitamin C deficiency developed in patients in group B over time. Vitamin C is an important biologic cofactor that plays a role in the distribution of iron. The trend of increase in Vd/F of deferiprone over time may imply a compartment shift of iron stores to one less accessed by deferiprone. This study confirmed the effectiveness of deferiprone in heavily iron-loaded patients and provided evidence that its effectiveness decreases in proportion to liver iron load.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of iron-chelation therapy with deferiprone for thalassemia major

BACKGROUND

Deferiprone is an orally active iron-chelating agent that is being evaluated as a treatment for iron overload in thalassemia major. Studies in an animal model showed that prolonged treatment is associated with a decline in the effectiveness of deferiprone and exacerbation of hepatic fibrosis.

METHODS

Hepatic iron stores were determined yearly by chemical analysis of liver-biopsy specimens, magnetic susceptometry, or both. Three hepatopathologists who were unaware of the patients' clinical status, the time at which the specimens were obtained, and the iron content of the specimens examined 72 biopsy specimens from 19 patients treated with deferiprone for more than one year. For comparison, 48 liver-biopsy specimens obtained from 20 patients treated with parenteral deferoxamine for more than one year were similarly reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients treated with deferiprone, 18 had received the drug continuously for a mean (+/-SE) of 4.6+/-0.3 years. At the final analysis, 7 of the 18 had hepatic iron concentrations of at least 80 micromol per gram of liver, wet weight (the value above which there is an increased risk of cardiac disease and early death in patients with thalassemia major). Of 19 patients in whom multiple biopsies were performed over a period of more than one year, 14 could be evaluated for progression of hepatic fibrosis; of the 20 deferoxamine-treated patients, 12 could be evaluated for progression. Five deferiprone-treated patients had progression of fibrosis, as compared with none of those given deferoxamine (P=0.04). By the life-table method, we estimated that the median time to progression of fibrosis was 3.2 years in deferiprone-treated patients. After adjustment for the initial hepatic iron concentration, the estimated odds of progression of fibrosis increased by a factor of 5.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 29.6) with each additional year of deferiprone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Deferiprone does not adequately control body iron burden in patients with thalassemia and may worsen hepatic fibrosis.

Thalassaemia: clinical management

Advances in the management of thalassaemia major have greatly improved the prognosis for patients with this disease. In countries able to afford programmes of regular transfusion and iron-chelating therapy, survival to the fourth decade is now common, and most complications associated with the primary disease are now infrequently observed. This situation stands in contrast to that in emerging countries, where the widespread implementation of these expensive treatment regimens is still awaited. This review will focus on recent advances in the treatment of thalassaemia and briefly review the progress in experimental approaches to treatment of this disorder.

Systemic administration of the iron chelator deferiprone attenuates subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cerebral vasospasm in the rabbit

OBJECTIVE

Iron catalyzed generation of injurious free radicals has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The present study assessed the effects of the iron chelator deferiprone on cerebral vasospasm in an in vivo rabbit model of SAH.

METHODS

Twenty-four rabbits were assigned to three groups as follows: SAH plus placebo (n = 8), SAH plus deferiprone (n = 8), or control plus placebo (n = 8). Deferiprone was administered to an additional group of three rabbits that were not subjected to SAH. Drug administration was initiated 8 hours after SAH was induced and was repeated at 8-hour intervals. The animals were killed using perfusion-fixation 48 hours after SAH. Cross-sectional areas of basilar artery histological sections were measured by an investigator blinded to the treatment groups.

RESULTS

In placebo-treated animals, the average luminal cross-sectional area of the basilar artery was reduced by 54% after SAH compared to controls (i.e., from 0.272 to 0.125 mm2). The vasospastic response after SAH was attenuated significantly in animals treated with deferiprone (0.208 mm2, representing a 24% reduction).

CONCLUSION

Previous experimental studies suggested that iron chelation can be effective in attenuating cerebral vasospasm after SAH. Deferiprone is a recently developed iron chelator that has been extensively evaluated for the treatment of patients requiring chronic blood transfusions. The present study demonstrates that deferiprone is effective in attenuating experimental cerebral vasospasm. Because of its stability, lipophilicity, and ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, deferiprone represents an attractive candidate for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm.

Protoporphyria Induced by the Orally Active Iron Chelator 1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one in C57BL/10ScSn Mice

Administration in the drinking water of the orally-active iron chelator 1,2-diethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (CP94) to C57BL/10ScSn mice caused the development of hepatic protoporphyria. This was detected after 1 week and continued as long as the chelator was given (15 weeks). The more hydrophilic 1,2-dimethyl- and 1-hydroxyethyl,2-ethyl-analogues (CP20 and CP102) were also tested, but they were both inactive in inducing accumulation of protoporphyrin in the liver. Restriction of in vivo iron supply for ferrochelatase seemed a likely mode of action, but an approximately 30% decrease in activity of this enzyme was also observed when measured in vitro. Extracts of livers from mice given CP20, CP94, and CP102 showed no potential to inhibit mouse ferrochelatase, in contrast to the findings with an extract from mice treated with the known porphyrogenic chemical 4-ethyl - 3 , 5 - diethoxycarbonyl - 2 , 6 - dimethyl - 1 , 4 - dihydropyridine, -indicating that ferrochelatase inhibition did not occur by the formation of an N-ethyl-protoporphyrin derived from metabolism by cytochrome P450. CP20, CP94, CP102, and CP117 (the pivoyl ester of CP102) all caused significant depression of the levels of ferritin-iron and total nonheme iron, but only CP94 caused the significant accumulation of protoporphyrin. Protoporphyria did not occur with iron overloaded C57BL/10ScSn mice or in SWR mice that had elevated basal iron status. Although the protoporphyrin had only a small effect on the total levels of the hemoprotein cytochrome P450 in C57BL/10ScSn mice, the activity of the CYP2B isoforms of cytochrome P450 was actually induced in both strains. The results show that CP94 could cause protoporphyria in individuals of low iron status, perhaps through specifically targeting particular iron pools available to ferrochelatase and by concomitantly stimulating heme synthesis.

Oral iron chelation with deferiprone

Deferiprone is the most widely studied oral iron chelator and, at present, the only one shown to be effective in achieving negative iron balance in long-term clinical trials for chronic iron overload. Because of its adverse effects (e.g., agranulocytosis and arthropathy) its use is presently restricted to clinical trials and to countries where desferrioxamine is unavailable. Deferiprone was licensed for clinical use in India in 1995. Clinical trials are in progress in many centers worldwide that will provide further information on the long-term effectiveness of deferiprone as well as on the incidence of serious adverse effects in patients with iron overload. Trials of combined use of deferiprone and desferrioxamine are also in progress. In the meantime, deferiprone is an acceptable alternative for patients who cannot use desferrioxamine because of serious adverse effects, lack of compliance, or unavailability. Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in the agranulocytosis and arthropathy associated with deferiprone is still needed, as are methods to predict individual susceptibility to these adverse effects and ways of preventing them. In addition, new indications for iron-chelating therapy are continuously being explored.

Structure of 5-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyl-1-methylpyrid-4-one and 13C NMR relaxation studies of its gadolinium(III) complex

In order to further elucidate the properties and biological behavior of 5-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyl-1-methylpyrid-4-one (M1), its X-ray structure has been determined, and the ability of its gadolinium complex to enhance the relaxation of 13C nuclei has been examined. X-ray analysis using Mo K alpha radiation shows that M1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a complex intermolecular array of hydrogen bonding. No water molecules were present within the unit cell. Gd(M1)2NO3 x 3H2O has been prepared and found to be very soluble in water. The effect of low concentrations of Gd(III) on enhancing the 13C relaxation times of M1 was examined. Trace amounts of Gd(NO3)3 x 6H2O resulted in significant decreases in the relaxation time of certain carbon atoms relative to the control measurements, and these data indicate that carbon atoms which bear donor atoms for Gd(III) undergo a significantly greater relaxation than the other carbons. The water solubility and hydrophilic character of this complex suggest that it may prove useful for the determination of metal binding sites on peptides and oligonucleotides.

Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of 1-(2'-hydroxy-ethyl)- and 1-(3'-hydroxypropyl)-2-ethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-ones in the rat

The urinary recovery (p.o.) and pharmacokinetics (i.v. and p.o.) of two compounds from the 1-hydroxyalkyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one series. 1-(2'-hydroxyethyl)-2-ethyl-3-hydroxypyridine-4-one (CP102) and 1-(3'-hydroxypropyl)-2-ethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (CP106) were studied in the rat. The pharmacokinetics of the 1-carboxyethyl metabolite (CP110) of CP106 was also studied (i.v.). CP102 was not metabolised to any considerable extent with 68.4 +/- 12.2% of the administered dose recovered unchanged in rat urine. In contrast, CP106 undergoes extensive phase I metabolism to form the 1-carboxyalkyl metabolite which accounted for 56.4 +/- 11% of the administered dose with 22.0 +/- 1.0% as unchanged drug. Intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of CP102 and CP106 were studied in the rat at 450 mumols/kg. The AUCs of CP102 and CP106 after bolus i.v. infusion were 458 +/- 38 and 171 +/- 20 mumols/l.h. The AUC values after bolus oral administration were 318 +/- 46 and 77 +/- 18 mumols/l.h, respectively, with corresponding bioavailabilities (F) of 0.69 and 0.45. The Cmax of CP102 and CP106 were 142 +/- 25 and 70 +/- 15 mumols/l with Tmax values of 0.75 +/- 0.15 and 0.50 +/- 0.10 h, respectively. The CL, MRT and Vdss of CP102 was 1.00 +/- 0.09 l/kg/h, 0.92 +/- 0.04 h and 0.91 +/- 0.05 l/kg, respectively. The corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters for CP106 were 2.64 +/- 0.20 l/kg/h, 0.42 +/- 0.12 h and 1.12 +/- 0.26 l/kg, respectively. Renal clearance (CLR) of CP102 and CP106 were 1.00 +/- 0.18 l/kg and 1.27 +/- 0.31 l/kg respectively. The pharmacokinetics of CP110, which was conducted by the i.v. route only at a dose of 450 mumols/kg, had an AUC of 289 +/- 46 mumols/l.h, CL of 1.56 +/- 0.29 l/kg/h, MRT of 0.25 +/- 0.09 h and Vdss of 0.40 +/- 0.13 l/kg, respectively.

Blood transfusion in beta thalassaemia major

Conventional treatment of beta thalassaemia major is based on regular blood transfusion from early childhood. Maximum effectiveness of transfusion therapy depends on the following. (1) Availability of safe blood. Donation programmes should aim at retaining repeat donors, who carry decreased risk of transmitting blood-borne infections. Donors should be screened with laboratory tests performed to the highest possible standard of quality. Selection of safe donors can be improved by the adoption of questionnaires containing direct questions on risk factors for transfusion transmissible infections. (2) Use of good quality red blood cells, which should be leucodepleted, preferably by filtration, that can be carried out at the bedside. (3) Regular evaluation of blood transfusion indices, including mean level of haemoglobin maintained, annual blood requirement, daily haemoglobin fall, mean transfusion interval, transfusion reaction rate. This can be assisted by the use of a computerized patient record. (4) Maintenance of a permanent record of the patient's blood group genotype (including at least Rh, Kell, Kidd and Duffy systems) and any red cell antibodies that develop. This is mandatory to ensure optimal survival of transfused red cells. (5) Continuous monitoring of transfusion transmissible infections. (6) Vaccination against hepatitis B of all suitable patients. (7) Intensive iron chelation. This should be done by regular subcutaneous administration of desferrioxamine B. Oral chelators, which are currently under laboratory and clinical evaluation, are not yet available for general use.

Liver iron stores in patients with secondary haemosiderosis under iron chelation therapy with deferoxamine or deferiprone

Total body iron stores including liver and spleen iron were assessed by non-invasive SQUID biomagnetometry. The liver iron concentration was measured in groups of patients with beta-thalassaemia major or other posttransfusional siderosis under treatment with the oral iron chelator deferiprone (n = 19) and/or with parenteral deferoxamine (n = 33). An interquartile range for liver iron concentrations of 1680-4470 micrograms/g liver was found in these patients. In both groups a poor correlation between liver iron and serum ferritin values was observed. Repeated measurements of liver and spleen iron concentrations as well as determination of liver and spleen volume by sonography were performed in six patients under continuous deferiprone treatment for 3-15 months. In this group detailed information was obtained on the whole body iron store (5-36g) and the iron excretion rates (14-34 mg/d) for each patient. As indicated by decreasing liver iron concentrations, five out of six subjects showed a negative iron balance (2-13 mg/d). Conventional measurements of both serum ferritin and urine iron excretion gave fluctuating results, thus being only of limited use in the control of iron depletion therapy. The non-invasive biomagnetic liver iron quantification is a precise and clinically verified technique which offers more direct information on the long-term efficacy of an iron depletion therapy than the hitherto used methods. This technique may be of use in the clinical evaluation of new oral iron chelators.

Results of long-term deferiprone (L1) therapy: a report by the International Study Group on Oral Iron Chelators

This report updates the combined experience of four centres involved in the long-term treatment of transfusional iron overload in 84 patients with the oral iron chelator deferiprone (L1) over 167 patient-years. The source of L1 was variable, including two university research laboratories and three pharmaceutical firms. Compliance was rated as excellent in 48%, intermediate in 36%, and poor in 16% of patients. On a mean L1 dose of 73-81 mg/kg/d, urinary iron excretion was stable, at around 0.5 mg/kg/d, with no indication of a diminishing response with time. Serum ferritin showed a very steady decrease with time from an initial mean +/- 1 SD of 4207 +/- 3118 to 1779 +/- 1154 micrograms/l after 48 months (P < 0.001). 17 patients abandoned L1 therapy. Major complications of L1 requiring permanent discontinuation of treatment included agranulocytosis (three), severe nausea (four), arthritis (two) and persistent liver dysfunction (one). The remaining patients abandoned treatment because of low compliance (three) and conditions unrelated to L1 toxicity (four). Lesser complications permitting continued L1 treatment included transient mild neutropenia (four), zinc deficiency (12), transient increase in liver enzymes (37), moderate nausea (three) and arthropathy (17). There was no treatment-related mortality. Although the complications associated with L1 treatment are significant and require close monitoring, they do not preclude effective long-term therapy in the vast majority of patients. Further well-controlled prospective studies of L1 are required in order to enable proper judgement of its suitability for general long-term clinical use.

Inhibition of iron toxicity in rat and human hepatocyte cultures by the hydroxypyridin-4-ones CP20 and CP94

The protective effect of the hydroxypyridin-4-ones (CP20 and CP94) was studied on iron-loaded rat and human hepatocytes; desferrioxamine B was used as a chelator reference. Iron load was achieved by addition of 5 up to 50 microM iron citrate to the culture medium. One day after iron treatment, an increase in lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and malondialdehyde extracellular concentrations was measured in rat and human hepatocyte cultures. This enzyme release and the increase in free extracellular malondialdehyde were observed with 5 microM iron and high levels were obtained with 50 microM. The bidentate chelators CP20 and CP94 (150 microM) appeared to be as effective as the hexadentate chelator desferrioxamine (50 microM) in the protection of rat and human hepatocytes against the toxic effect of iron load achieved by culturing the cells for 1 day in the presence of 50 microM iron citrate. In rat and human hepatocytes cultured for 1 day in the presence of 1 microM 55Fe-50 microM iron citrate plus CP20, CP94 or desferrioxamine B, a decrease of iron uptake by the cells was observed. When the hepatocytes were cultured for 1 day in the presence of 1 microM 55Fe-50 microM iron citrate and then for a further day in the presence of CP20, CP94 or desferrioxamine B but not iron, the chelators decreased the intracellular iron level, indicating their iron releasing effect from the loaded cells. The observed effects of the hydroxypyridin-4-ones CP20 and CP94 were as potent as the effect of desferrioxamine B. This study presents new data favoring the potential clinical interest of this new class of chelating agents in the treatment of human iron overload.

Iron-chelation therapy with oral deferiprone in patients with thalassemia major

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the orally active iron chelator deferiprone (1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-pyridin-4-one) is efficacious in the treatment of iron overload in patients with thalassemia major, we conducted a prospective trial of deferiprone in 21 patients unable or unwilling to use standard chelation therapy with parenteral deferoxamine.

METHODS

Hepatic iron stores were determined yearly by chemical analysis of liver-biopsy specimens or magnetic-susceptibility measurements. Detailed clinical and laboratory studies were used to monitor safety and compliance.

RESULTS

The patients received deferiprone therapy for a mean (+/-SE) of 3.1 +/- 0.3 years. Ten patients in whom previous chelation therapy with deferoxamine had been ineffective had initial hepatic iron concentrations of at least 80 mumol per gram of liver, wet weight -- values associated with complications of iron overload. Hepatic iron concentrations decreased in all 10 patients, from 125.3 +/- 11.5 to 60.3 +/- 9.6 mumol per gram (P < 0.005), with values that were less than 80 mumol per gram in 8 of the 10 patients (P < 0.005). In all 11 patients in whom deferoxamine therapy had previously been effective, deferiprone maintained hepatic iron concentrations below 80 mumol of iron per gram.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral deferiprone induces sustained decreases in body iron to concentrations compatible with the avoidance of complications from iron overload. The risk of agranulocytosis associated with deferiprone may restrict its administration to patients who are unable or unwilling to use deferoxamine.

Pharmacokinetics of the oral iron chelator deferiprone (L1) in patients with iron overload

Single oral dose pharmacokinetics of the iron chelator deferiprone (L1) were studied in 24 patients with chronic iron overload and correlated with 24 h urinary iron excretion (UIE) and creatinine clearance. Absorption of L1 was rapid with a t1/2 of 22.2 +/- 17.7 (mean +/- SD) min. The elimination half-life (elt1/2) of the drug was 91.1 +/- 33.1 min and of its metabolite, L1-glucuronide (L1G) 147.7 +/- 52.0 min. Creatinine clearance of the patients correlated significantly with the elimination t1/2 of L1G (r = -0.79, P = 0.002). There was also a significant correlation between 24 h UIE in the 14 patients studied and L1 versus time area under the curve (AUC) (P = 0.007). The total amount of L1 recovered in urine in 24 h comprised 77.9 +/- 13.3% of the L1 dose. L1 efficiency (the 24 h UIE divided by the amount of iron the oral dose of L1 is capable of binding) in the 14 patients was 3.8 +/- 1.9%. These data show for the first time that the urinary elimination of L1G is influenced by the renal function of the patient. Although no significant accumulation of L1 and L1G will occur in most of the patients if L1 is given more than once daily, in some patients with impaired renal function, L1G may accumulate.

Oral iron-chelating therapy: the L1 experience

L1 is the most widely studied oral iron-chelating drug and at present the only one shown to be effective at causing negative iron balance in long-term clinical trials for thalassemia major and other transfusion-dependent refractory anaemias. Because of side-effects, both in experimental animals and in humans, its development as a widely available pharmaceutical agent has been delayed. However, for the large numbers of transfusion-dependent, iron-overloaded patients who do not use DFX because of poor compliance, adverse effects or unavailability of the drug, L1 may be a suitable alternative for iron chelation. However, its use should be restricted to Ethical Committee approved clinical trials. Patients who are capable of using DFX effectively should be encouraged to continue doing so until an oral iron chelator has been fully established for clinical use. It is hoped that 3-hydroxypyrid-4-one analogues of L1 as well as compounds related to pyridoxal isonicotinyl hydrazone, HBED or hydroxamic acid can be found both orally effective and safe for long-term administration. Current and future trials of L1 could address some of the following issues, beside extending present studies on the efficacy and adverse effects of L1: 1. The effect of administering a reduced dose of L1 (< 75 mg/kg per day) on the incidence of adverse effects and on long-term efficacy. 2. The efficacy and adverse effects of L1 at a low dose in patients with non-transfusional iron overload such as thalassaemia intermedia, primary haemochromatosis and congenital haemolytic anaemias. 3. The effect of combining oral L1 with intravenous or subcutaneous DFX on the incidence of adverse effects and efficacy. 4. Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in agranulocytosis and joint toxicity and finding methods to predict for individual susceptibility to these adverse effects and ways of preventing them.

Critical comparison of novel and existing methods of compliance assessment during a clinical trial of an oral iron chelator

The assessment of compliance is critical in the evaluation of the effectiveness of a new therapeutic agent. Fifteen patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia, many of whom had previously demonstrated erratic compliance with deferoxamine, were enrolled in a clinical trial of a new oral iron chelator, 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1). Their compliance with this medication was estimated by several existing methods and the novel Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). Overall compliance as assessed by the MEMS was 78.5 +/- 13.0% of prescribed doses taken, significantly lower than the corresponding rates calculated by pill counts and diaries (91.5 +/- 9.2% and 94.1 +/- 4.3%, respectively). However, several serious problems were encountered with the MEMS, mostly in the form of incorrect use of the device by the patients. Disclosure of the nature of the MEMS and the compliance monitoring process did not alter the rate of adherence with L1 therapy. Compliance as determined by pill counts did not differ between the 1st and 2nd 6-month periods. Although not reaching statistical significance, a trend towards better L1 compliance occurred in those patients in whom serum ferritin levels decreased. Patients who filled at least 50% of their diaries had significantly better compliance by pill counts than those who completed less than 50% of their diaries (95.9 +/- 4.1% and 86.5 +/- 11.1%, respectively). Steady-state L1 trough concentrations and 24-hour urinary iron excretion did not correlate with L1 compliance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of non-transferrin-bound iron and some hydroxypyridone and hydroxypyrone chelators

The pursuit of orally available Fe(III) chelating agents has resulted in several clinical trials of 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (CP20). Chromatography of this and related Fe chelators on silica-based columns has proven difficult due to unwanted interactions with the stationary phase, including with contaminating Fe bound to silanol groups. By addition of Fe3+ (50 microM ferric ammonium citrate) to an acidified aqueous mobile phase, we have successfully separated a series of hydroxypyridones-including CP20-and the related pyrones maltol and ethylmaltol by HPLC on microBondapak C18. Complexation occurs with these agents even at low pH, and they elute in an order consistent with the partition coefficients of their Fe(III) complexes. By the reverse strategy of adding ethylmaltol to the mobile phase, chelatable Fe was chromatographed and the peak response at 500 nm was linear down to a detection limit below 0.5 microM. This method was applied to pooled serum and to serum spiked with Fe after filtration at 10 kDa cut-off. The direct determination of non-transferrin-bound Fe at micromolar concentrations in serum is possible with this approach.

Synthesis and iron(III) binding properties of 3-hydroxypyrid-4-ones derived from kojic acid

In an attempt to reduce the toxicity of the 3-hydroxypyrid-4-ones, the more hydrophilic derivatives of kojic acid were explored and compared to the standard, 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one, L1. The synthesis and iron(III) binding properties of these chelators are described. Neither these compounds nor the clinically effective 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4 one is able to completely remove all of the iron(III) from the Fe(III)EDTA complex in sodium acetate buffered solutions, when the 3-hydroxypyrid-4-one: Fe(III) ratio is 6:1. The ability of these compounds to enhance the urinary excretion of iron in rats indicates that the behavior of the 3-hydroxypyrid-4-ones derived from kojic acid is comparable to the analogous derivatives of maltol and ethyl maltol. The structure of the iron(III) complex of 3-hydroxy-6-hydroxymethyl-1-methylpyrid-4-one was determined by x-ray diffraction and found to be similar to the previously reported structure of the iron(III) complex of L1.

Results from a phase I clinical trial of HBED

In summary, it has been shown that orally administered HBED causes enhanced excretion of iron in all of the thalassemia major patients studied and that both urinary and stool iron are increased in the process. Increasing the dose from 40 to 80 mg/kg divided t.i.d. caused iron balance to increase from 38% to 50%. While this is significantly less than that expected based on our preclinical studies in animals, the potential usefulness of this chelator has been demonstrated. Efforts to increase its oral bioavailability are now in progress. Lending further support to the effort is the fact that no evidence of toxicity has been observed in the studies performed to date and that negative iron balance was achieved in the one thalassemia intermedia patient studied. The results also reinforce the conclusion that DFO causes the excretion of substantially more iron than would be predicted by an assessment of serum ferritin levels or past compliance with chelation therapy. In patients with thalassemia major, serum ferritin levels relate more to tissue damage than to body iron load. Effective chelation therapy can diminish the former much faster than it can remove storage iron. Hence, in cases of iron overload, aggressive chelation therapy should not be tapered off until a significant reduction in iron excretion can be demonstrated. Routine measurements of urinary iron excretion should now be considered essential in the management of beta-thalassemia. Finally, two more patients with thalassemia intermedia will be studied in an effort to substantiate that net negative iron balance can be achieved in this subgroup of patients. We also plan to study several transfused patients in whom the dose of HBED will be increased to 120 mg/kg divided t.i.d. While the chances of achieving net negative iron balance in these patients seems remote, we hope to further demonstrate the safety of this drug with an eye toward the development of an effective prodrug.