Efficacy and inhibitor development in previously treated patients with haemophilia A switched to a B domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII

ssODN-Mediated In-Frame Deletion with CRISPR/Cas9 Restores FVIII Function in Hemophilia A-Patient-Derived iPSCs and ECs

Given that the cDNA of F8 is too large to be packaged into adeno-associated virus (AAV) capsids, gene transfer of some versions of B-domain-deleted F8 (BDD-F8) for hemophilia A (HA) treatment has been attempted with promising results. Here, we describe an efficient gene correction via single-stranded-oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN)-mediated in-frame deletion within the B domain of F8 with CRISPR/Cas9 in HA-patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (HA-iPSCs). The expression and activity of FVIII was restored in corrected HA-iPSC-derived induced endothelial progenitor cells (C-iEPCs) in vitro and in vivo. The bleeding phenotype was rescued in HA mice after C-iEPC infusion. Our results demonstrate an efficient approach for in situ gene correction via introduction of a tiny deletion using ssODN and CRISPR/Cas9 to reframe the F8 transcript and restore FVIII function in HA-iPSC-derived EPCs with potential clinical impact in HA gene therapy. For the first time, we demonstrated in vitro and in vivo the FVIII function that is encoded by the endogenous F8 gene with a partially deleted B domain. This work also suggests an applicable strategy for genetic correction of other gene frameshift mutations.

Safety of recombinant coagulation factors in treating hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, new FVIII/IX concentrates have been developed for the treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A/B. Significant progress has been achieved regarding their half-life, but the old issue of immunogenicity and new concerns about safety need to be addressed.

AREAS COVERED

After the implementation of virucidal methods, both plasma-derived and recombinant clotting factor concentrates achieved a very safe profile. The development of anti-FVIII antibodies is the major adverse event of replacement therapy with both FVIII concentrates. Furthermore, the new extended half-life concentrates, protein fused or pegylated, raised some concerns about their side effects.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of hemophilia A with inhibitors by induction of immunotolerance and using by-passing concentrates, improved the quality of life of patients but did not allow them to have a life expectancy like that of patients without inhibitors. The new humanized monoclonal antibody (MAb) ACE910, mimicking FVIII function, seems to be able to reduce the bleedings of hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. The post-marketing surveillance will clarify if the adverse events observed during the phase III clinical trials and compassionate use were due to the association with a Prothrombin activated complex concentrate or to the prothrombotic effect of the drug itself.

Factor VIII products and inhibitor development in previously treated patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia A: a systematic review

Essentials Data on product-related immunogenicity in previously treated haemophilia A patients is scarce. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all currently available evidence was conducted. The overall incidence rate was 2.06 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval: 1.06-4.01). Some recombinant factor VIII products were associated with increased immunogenicity.

SUMMARY

Background Patients with severe hemophilia A who have been treated extensively with factor VIII products have a low but potentially serious risk of inhibitor development. It is unknown why these patients develop inhibitors, and data on product-related immunogenicity are scarce. Aims To summarize the currently available evidence on the relationship between inhibitor development and recombinant FVIII product type in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. Methods Longitudinal studies were included that reported on de novo inhibitor formation in patients with baseline FVIII activity levels of < 0.02 IU mL-1 who had been treated with FVIII for at least 50 days. Pooled incidence rates of inhibitor development according to product types were calculated with a random intercept Poisson regression model. Results Forty-one independent cohorts were included; 39 patients developed de novo inhibitors during 19 157 person-years of observation. The overall incidence rate was 2.06 per 1000 person-years, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.06-4.01. According to product type, the pooled incidence rates were 0.99 (95% CI 0.37-2.70) per 1000 person-years for patients treated with Advate, 5.86 (95% CI 0.25-134.92) per 1000 person-years for those treated with Kogenate/Helixate, 1.35 (95% CI 0.66-2.77) per 1000 person-years for those treated with Kogenate FS/Helixate NexGen, 12.05 (95% CI 1.53-94.78) per 1000 person-years for those treated with Refacto, and 4.64 (95% CI 0.82-26.43) per 1000 person-years for those treated with Refacto AF. Conclusion These results suggest that some products may be associated with increased immunogenicity. However, the low incidence of inhibitors in PTPs and the differences in study design may cause significant variation in estimates of risk.

Hemophilia gene therapy comes of age

Concurrent with the development of recombinant factor replacement products, the characterization of the F9 and F8 genes over 3 decades ago allowed for the development of recombinant factor products and made the hemophilias a target disease for gene transfer. The progress of hemophilia gene therapy has been announced in 3 American Society of Hematology scientific plenary sessions, including the first "cure" in a large animal model of hemophilia B in 1998, first in human sustained vector-derived factor IX activity in 2011, and our clinical trial results reporting sustained vector-derived factor IX activity well into the mild or normal range in 2016. This progression to clinically meaningful success combined with numerous ongoing recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-mediated hemophilia gene transfer clinical trials suggest that the goal of gene therapy to alter the paradigm of hemophilia care may soon be realized. Although several novel therapeutics have recently emerged for hemophilia, gene therapy is unique in its potential for a one-time disease-altering, or even curative, treatment. This review will focus on the prior progress and current clinical trial investigation of rAAV-mediated gene transfer for hemophilia A and B.

Hemophilia gene therapy comes of age

Concurrent with the development of recombinant factor replacement products, the characterization of the F9 and F8 genes over 3 decades ago allowed for the development of recombinant factor products and made the hemophilias a target disease for gene transfer. The progress of hemophilia gene therapy has been announced in 3 American Society of Hematology scientific plenary sessions, including the first "cure" in a large animal model of hemophilia B in 1998, first in human sustained vector-derived factor IX activity in 2011, and our clinical trial results reporting sustained vector-derived factor IX activity well into the mild or normal range in 2016. This progression to clinically meaningful success combined with numerous ongoing recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-mediated hemophilia gene transfer clinical trials suggest that the goal of gene therapy to alter the paradigm of hemophilia care may soon be realized. Although several novel therapeutics have recently emerged for hemophilia, gene therapy is unique in its potential for a one-time disease-altering, or even curative, treatment. This review will focus on the prior progress and current clinical trial investigation of rAAV-mediated gene transfer for hemophilia A and B.

Gene Therapy for Hemophilia

The best currently available treatments for hemophilia A and B (factor VIII or factor IX deficiency, respectively) require frequent intravenous infusion of highly expensive proteins that have short half-lives. Factor levels follow a saw-tooth pattern that is seldom in the normal range and falls so low that breakthrough bleeding occurs. Most hemophiliacs worldwide do not have access to even this level of care. In stark contrast, gene therapy holds out the hope of a cure by inducing continuous endogenous expression of factor VIII or factor IX following transfer of a functional gene to replace the hemophilic patient's own defective gene.

Natural history and clinical characteristics of inhibitors in previously treated haemophilia A patients: a case series

BACKGROUND

Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in haemophilia A treatment. The assessment of risk for inhibitor formation in new or modified factor concentrates is traditionally performed in previously treated patients (PTPs). However, evidence on risk factors for and natural history of inhibitors has been generated mostly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). The purpose of this study was to examine cases of de novo inhibitors in PTPs reported in the scientific literature and to the EUropean HAemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) programme, and explore determinants and course of inhibitor development.

METHODS

We used a case series study design and developed a case report form to collect patient level data; including detection, inhibitor course, treatment, factor VIII products used and events that may trigger inhibitor development (surgery, vaccination, immune disorders, malignancy, product switch).

RESULTS

We identified 19 publications that reported 38 inhibitor cases and 45 cases from 31 EUHASS centres. Individual patient data were collected for 55/83 (66%) inhibitor cases out of 12 330 patients. The median (range) peak inhibitor titre was 4.4 (0.5-135.0), the proportion of transient inhibitors was 33% and only two cases of 12 undergoing immune tolerance induction failed this treatment. In the two months before inhibitor development, surgery was reported in nine (22%) cases, and high intensity treatment periods reported in seven (17%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

By studying the largest cohort of inhibitor development in PTPs assembled to date, we showed that inhibitor development in PTPs, is on average, a milder event than in PUPs.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: past, present and future

After numerous preclinical studies demonstrated consistent success in large and small animal models, gene therapy has finally seen initial signs of clinically meaningful success. In a landmark study, Nathwani and colleagues reported sustained factor (F)IX expression in individuals with severe hemophilia B following adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated in vivo FIX gene transfer. As the next possible treatment-changing paradigm in hemophilia care, gene therapy may provide patients with sufficient hemostatic improvement to achieve the World Federation of Hemophilia's aspirational goal of "integration of opportunities in all aspects of life… equivalent to someone without a bleeding disorder." Although promising momentum supports the potential of gene therapy to replace protein-based therapeutics for hemophilia, several obstacles remain. The largest challenges appear to be overcoming the cellular immune responses to the AAV capsid; preexisting AAV neutralizing antibodies, which immediately exclude approximately 50% of the target population; and the ability to scale-up vector manufacturing for widespread applicability. Additional obstacles specific to hemophilia A (HA) include designing a vector cassette to accommodate a larger cDNA; avoiding development of inhibitory antibodies; and, perhaps the greatest difficulty to overcome, ensuring adequate expression efficiency. This review discusses the relevance of gene therapy to the hemophilia disease state, previous research progress, the current landscape of clinical trials, and considerations for promoting the future availability of gene therapy for hemophilia.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in children with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic factor replacement, which prevents hemarthroses and thereby reduces the musculoskeletal disease burden in children with hemophilia A, requires frequent intravenous infusions (three to four times weekly).

OBJECTIVE

Kids A-LONG was a phase 3 open-label study evaluating the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a longer-acting factor, recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A (endogenous FVIII level of < 1 IU dL(-1) [< 1%]).

METHODS

The study enrolled 71 subjects. The starting rFVIIIFc regimen was twice-weekly prophylaxis (Day 1, 25 IU kg(-1) ; Day 4, 50 IU kg(-1) ); dose (≤ 80 IU kg(-1) ) and dosing interval (≥ 2 days) were adjusted as needed. A subset of subjects had sequential pharmacokinetic evaluations of FVIII and rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and number of infusions required to control a bleed.

RESULTS

No subject developed an inhibitor to rFVIIIFc. Adverse events were typical of a pediatric hemophilic population. The rFVIIIFc half-life was prolonged relative to that of FVIII, consistent with observations in adults and adolescents. The median ABR was 1.96 overall, and 0.00 for spontaneous bleeds; 46.4% of subjects reported no bleeding episodes on study. Ninety-three per cent of bleeding episodes were controlled with one to two infusions. The median average weekly rFVIIIFc prophylactic dose was 88.11 IU kg(-1) . At study end, 62 of 69 subjects (90%) were infusing twice weekly. Among subjects who had been previously receiving FVIII prophylaxis, 74% reduced their dosing frequency with rFVIIIFc.

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly infusions with rFVIIIFc were well tolerated and yielded low bleeding rates in children with severe hemophilia A.

Profile of efraloctocog alfa and its potential in the treatment of hemophilia A

Hemophilia care has improved dramatically over the past 50 years, evolving from plasma concentrates, to purified plasma proteins, to recombinant clotting factors. These collective developments allowed for home delivery of on-demand and prophylactic treatment, resulting in the reduction of hemophilia morbidity and mortality and improved quality of life. Although efficacious in treating bleeding, conventional factor products’ half-lives require frequent venipuncture, which remains a significant burden to patients. Despite the remarkable advances in hemophilia care, no improvements have, until now, been made to the pharmacokinetic properties of factor products. Multiple strategies have more recently been employed to generate novel bioengineered products that, with great hope, represent the next wave of progress in hemophilia care. The use of these products will undoubtedly raise important discussion about choosing conventional factor over new long-acting factor products. Incorporation of these therapies into clinical care is accompanied by unanswered safety questions that will likely be evaluated only in postmarketing surveillance analysis. Further, these products may change current treatment paradigms with unclear cost repercussions and feasibility. This paper will review efraloctocog alfa (FVIII-Fc) and its role in the treatment of hemophilia A.

Switching treatments in haemophilia: is there a risk of inhibitor development?

Patients with haemophilia A (and their physicians) may be reluctant to switch factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, often due to concerns about increasing the risk of inhibitors; this reluctance to switch may contribute to patients missing the clinical benefits provided by the arrival of new factor VIII products. This topic was explored at the Eleventh Zürich Haemophilia Forum. Clinical scenarios for which product switching may be cause for concern were discussed; when there is a clinical need, there are no absolute contraindications to switching, but some patients (e.g. previously untreated patients and those undergoing elective surgery) may require more careful consideration. Both patient and physician surveys indicate that the reluctance to switch, and the fear of inhibitor development, does not appear to be evidence based. The evaluation of more recent data did not support previous studies suggesting that particular products (e.g. recombinant vs. plasma-derived and full length vs. B-domain modified) may be associated with increased risk. In addition, data from three national product switches showed that switching was not associated with increased inhibitor risk, but highlighted the need for regular inhibitor testing and for a centralised, unbiased database of inhibitor incidence. To conclude, current evidence does not suggest that switching products significantly influences inhibitor development.

Efficacy and safety of a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in patients on vitamin K antagonists presenting with major bleeding: a randomized, plasma-controlled, phase IIIb study

BACKGROUND

Patients experiencing major bleeding while taking vitamin K antagonists require rapid vitamin K antagonist reversal. We performed a prospective clinical trial to compare nonactivated 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) with plasma for urgent vitamin K antagonist reversal.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this phase IIIb, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, nonsurgical patients were randomized to 4F-PCC (containing coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X and proteins C and S) or plasma. Primary analyses examined whether 4F-PCC was noninferior to plasma for the coprimary end points of 24-hour hemostatic efficacy from start of infusion and international normalized ratio correction (≤1.3) at 0.5 hour after end of infusion. The intention-to-treat efficacy population comprised 202 patients (4F-PCC, n=98; plasma, n=104). Median (range) baseline international normalized ratio was 3.90 (1.8-20.0) for the 4F-PCC group and 3.60 (1.9-38.9) for the plasma group. Effective hemostasis was achieved in 72.4% of patients receiving 4F-PCC versus 65.4% receiving plasma, demonstrating noninferiority (difference, 7.1% [95% confidence interval, -5.8 to 19.9]). Rapid international normalized ratio reduction was achieved in 62.2% of patients receiving 4F-PCC versus 9.6% receiving plasma, demonstrating 4F-PCC superiority (difference, 52.6% [95% confidence interval, 39.4 to 65.9]). Assessed coagulation factors were higher in the 4F-PCC group than in the plasma group from 0.5 to 3 hours after infusion start (P<0.02). The safety profile (adverse events, serious adverse events, thromboembolic events, and deaths) was similar between groups; 66 of 103 (4F-PCC group) and 71 of 109 (plasma group) patients experienced ≥1 adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

4F-PCC is an effective alternative to plasma for urgent reversal of vitamin K antagonist therapy in major bleeding events, as demonstrated by clinical assessments of bleeding and laboratory measurements of international normalized ratio and factor levels.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00708435.

Therapeutic levels of FVIII following a single peripheral vein administration of rAAV vector encoding a novel human factor VIII variant

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors encoding human factor VIII (hFVIII) were systematically evaluated for hemophilia A (HA) gene therapy. A 5.7-kb rAAV-expression cassette (rAAV-HLP-codop-hFVIII-N6) containing a codon-optimized hFVIII cDNA in which a 226 amino acid (aa) B-domain spacer replaced the entire B domain and a hybrid liver-specific promoter (HLP) mediated 10-fold higher hFVIII levels in mice compared with non-codon-optimized variants. A further twofold improvement in potency was achieved by replacing the 226-aa N6 spacer with a novel 17-aa peptide (V3) in which 6 glycosylation triplets from the B domain were juxtaposed. The resulting 5.2-kb rAAV-HLP-codop-hFVIII-V3 cassette was more efficiently packaged within AAV virions and mediated supraphysiologic hFVIII expression (732 ± 162% of normal) in HA knock-out mice following administration of 2 × 10(12) vector genomes/kg, a vector dose shown to be safe in subjects with hemophilia B. Stable hFVIII expression at 15 ± 4% of normal was observed at this dose in a nonhuman primate. hFVIII expression above 100% was observed in 3 macaques that received a higher dose of either this vector or the N6 variant. These animals developed neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies that were abrogated with transient immunosuppression. Therefore, rAAV-HLP-codop-hFVIII-V3 substantially improves the prospects of effective HA gene therapy.

Can B-domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies

BACKGROUND

As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVES

A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full-length recombinant FVIII (FL-rFVIII) and B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD-rFVIII).

METHODS

Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL-rFVIII or BDD-rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between-group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63-1.88%. The corresponding rate for high-titer de novo inhibitors [> 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01-0.57%). Exposure to BDD-rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12-24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high-titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17-53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL-rFVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.

Inhibitors in previously treated patients: a review of the literature

Previously treated patients are the first patients to receive novel factor VIII products during clinical investigations under the rationale that a product with increased antigenicity is more likely to be detected in this population because of a low baseline risk of inhibitor formation compared with previously untreated patients. As clinical investigations of factor products are not typically randomized comparisons, the rate of new inhibitor formation in a clinical trial is compared with the expected rates based on prior reports. The published experience of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) informs the number of new inhibitors per cohort that are acceptable in a clinical trial. However, a single acceptable limit of new inhibitors fails to recognize the heterogeneity of inhibitors and their variable impact on clinical care. This review will discuss the published literature on epidemiology and clinical characteristics of inhibitors and possible risk factors for formation in PTPs.

Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor VIII:C (ReFacto) in adult HIV-negative and HIV-positive haemophilia patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore possible differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of recombinant factor VIII:C (ReFacto - ReFacto ) in HIV+ vs. HIV- patients and also differences in the chromogenic substrate bioassay (CHS) and one-stage clotting (OSC) methods.

METHODS

Twenty-eight haemophilia A adults (20 HIV- and eight HIV+) were assayed with both the CHS and OSC methods. An average of two and six samples were collected per patient for HIV-/+, respectively, after one, and occasionally two more, prophylactic doses (mean 2,003 IU; range 1,000-4,300 IU). The observations were analysed with the mixed-effects (population) compartmental PK modelling package NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effects modelling) and the FOCE (first-order conditional estimation) method. Base modelling was performed independently for the CHS and OSC bioassays for comparison, and covariate models and simulation tests were done only for the commonly used OSC bioassay. The final covariate model was validated using the bootstrap method. Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate the expected probability of exceeding 20%, 40% or 60% of normal factor VIII:C in plasma after a single dose, corresponding to required levels for preventing mild, moderate and life-threatening haemorrhages.

RESULTS

One-compartment base-model population PK parameters were [mean parameter (interpatient variability %)] for CHS: clearance (CL) = 2.56 dl h(-1) (33.2%); volume of distribution (V) = 34.8 dl (12.8%); and for OSC: CL = 3.83 dl h(-1) (47.8%), V = 53.7 dl (22.4%). The volumes differed significantly between the CHS and OSC methods (p < 0.0001), and variabilities were higher for OSC. Nevertheless, the empirical half-lives (t(1/2) = l n (2) x V/CL) were similar for CHS and OSC, [(mean +/- standard deviation (SD)], 9.5 +/- 3 h and 10.2 +/- 4 h, respectively. In covariate modelling with the OSC-derived model, HIV status (VIR) was a significant categorical predictor (p < 0.005) for V. The final covariate models with OSC were for CL = 3.93 + 0.09 x (WT-75) and for V = 48.6 x (1 + 0.36 x VIR) + 0.55 x (WT-75); therefore, V for the typical HIV+ patient was 36% higher than for the HIV- patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HIV- and HIV+ patients showed 100% success with the 20% threshold at doses >20 IU/kg. HIV- patients receiving >50 IU/kg had a 100% expected chance of success for all thresholds. HIV+ patients for moderate or life-threatening haemorrhage treatment need 10 IU/kg more than the HIV- patient equivalent to have the same probability of success.

How we treat a hemophilia A patient with a factor VIII inhibitor

The most significant complication of treatment in patients with hemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies that inhibit factor VIII activity. In the presence of inhibitory antibodies, replacement of the missing clotting factor by infusion of factor VIII becomes less effective. Once replacement therapy is ineffective, acute management of bleeding requires agents that bypass factor VIII activity. Long-term management consists of eradicating the inhibitor through immune tolerance. Despite success in the treatment of acute bleeding and inhibitor eradication, there remains an inability to predict or prevent inhibitor formation. Ideally, prediction and ultimately prevention will come with an improved understanding of how patient-specific and treatment-related factors work together to influence anti–factor VIII antibody production.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of recombinant factor VIII (REFACTO�) in patients with haemophilia A: interim data from a postmarketing surveillance study in Germany and Austria

An open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study conducted in Germany and Austria with recombinant factor VIII (REFACTO) has enrolled 217 patients (mean age 26.3 years) from 38 haemophilia centres during the first 4.8 years. Most patients (188/217; 86.6%) had severe to moderately severe haemophilia A, of whom 153 completed sufficient diary information for the main efficacy analysis. These 153 patients experienced a median of 6.6 (interquartile range 1.4-18.6) bleeding episodes per year. Patients treated with prophylaxis experienced a median of 4.4 (1.1-9.3) bleeds per year, while patients treated on-demand experienced a median of 22.8 (11.3-29.0) bleeds per year. Overall, most physicians (41/43 [95.3%]) were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with the efficacy of REFACTO in the treatment of bleeding episodes. A total of 137 non-serious adverse events have been reported in 52/217 patients (24.0%) to date. In addition, 129 serious adverse events in 87 patients (40%) were reported, including 41 cases of 'less than expected therapeutic effect' (LETE). Of these, 39 LETE cases were reported in one centre; however, patients in this centre experienced considerably fewer bleeding episodes per year than patients outside this centre. Overall, six patients (2.8%) have developed de novo inhibitors, three of which were considered high titre. Four of these patients were at high risk (0-50 exposure days [ED]) of inhibitor formation, one was at intermediate risk (51-100 ED) and one was at low risk (>100 ED). These results emphasize the benefit of postmarketing surveillance and, overall, this study confirms the efficacy, safety and tolerability of REFACTO in the treatment of patients with haemophilia A.

Should hemophilia treaters switch to albumin-free recombinant factor VIII concentrates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the albumin-free recombinant factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of hemophilia A.

RECENT FINDINGS

The third-generation recombinant factor VIII product Advate has been found to be safe and effective in treating bleeding associated with hemophilia A.

SUMMARY

Multiple issues must be considered when selecting a factor VIII concentrate for patients with hemophilia A including efficacy, availability, risk of transmission of infectious agents, risk of inhibitor development and cost. Third-generation recombinant factor VIII concentrates have been shown to be safe and effective. A theoretical improvement in risk of infectious agent transmission has been achieved by production of the products without human or animal plasma proteins. Controversy exists, however, with regard to a higher risk of inhibitor development with recombinant products. The higher cost of Advate can also potentially play a role in product choice. Overall every patient and their family must be presented with the advantages and disadvantages of all factor VIII concentrates, and be allowed to make an informed decision about which product to use for treatment.

Epidemiology of inhibitor formation with recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

This article reviews the epidemiology of inhibitor formation in patients receiving recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement therapy for haemophilia A. Data from pivotal trial programmes, post-marketing surveillance studies, and pharmacovigilance studies for all available rFVIII products were reviewed. To date, no comparative studies have been performed, and in the non-comparative studies, there were differences in the patient population enrolled and study design (including the number of patient exposure days). In the absence of comparative clinical trials, it is not possible to make comparisons between inhibitor data for the various rFVIII products. This review of the epidemiological data shows that across the pivotal trial programmes for rFVIII products, the observed incidence of inhibitors was in the range of 15-32% in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and 0.9-2.9% in previously treated patients (PTPs). High-titre inhibitors (peak >5 BU) were detected in 10-16% of PUPs and 0-2.3% of PTPs. Several initiatives proposed to help standardize collection and interpretation of inhibitor data for patients receiving rFVIII treatment are described. Such standardization would help to clarify the epidemiology of inhibitor formation across FVIII treatments.

Factor VIII ectopically targeted to platelets is therapeutic in hemophilia A with high-titer inhibitory antibodies

Inhibitory immune response to exogenously infused factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication in the treatment of hemophilia A. Generation of such inhibitors has the potential to disrupt gene therapy for hemophilia A. We explore what we believe to be a novel approach to overcome this shortcoming. Human B-domain-deleted FVIII (hBDDFVIII) was expressed under the control of the platelet-specific alphaIIb promoter in platelets of hemophilic (FVIIInull) mice to create 2bF8trans mice. The FVIII transgene product was stored in platelets and released at the site of platelet activation. In spite of the lack of FVIII in the plasma of 2bF8trans mice, the bleeding phenotype of FVIIInull mice was corrected. More importantly, the bleeding phenotype was corrected in the presence of high inhibitory antibody titers introduced into the mice by infusion or by spleen cell transfer from recombinant hBDDFVIII-immunized mice. Our results demonstrate that this approach to the targeted expression of FVIII in platelets has the potential to correct hemophilia A, even in the presence of inhibitory immune responses to infused FVIII.

Consideration in Hemophilia Therapy Selection

The risk of pathogen transmission via clotting factor therapies has been reduced over the last two decades through the development of effective and progressively more sensitive pathogen screening and inactivation methods and the introduction of recombinant clotting factors for hemophilia, beginning with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) in 1992. However, new understanding about the potential for transmission of an emerging infectious agent through blood and blood products has renewed concerns about vulnerabilities that remain in plasma-derived and some recombinant clotting therapies that still use plasma components during some stages of the manufacturing process. In the 1980s, patients with hemophilia became "canaries in the coal mine" for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the blood supply. Moving forward, healthcare providers must continue to take a proactive role in educating themselves about new information regarding emerging pathogens and develop approaches to discussing this risk with their patients as part of their therapy selection process.

A postmarketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of ReFactoR (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with haemophilia A

This clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ReFacto (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A over a period of 6 months or 50 exposure days (EDs), whichever occurred first. Sixty patients, 58 previously treated and two previously untreated, were enrolled into this study. This was an open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study in which patients received prophylaxis or on-demand treatment as determined by their doctor. Surgical prophylaxis was evaluated in seven patients requiring elective surgery. Thirty-two patients aged <1 to 66 years (median 19.5) received prophylaxis and 28 patients, aged 1-71 years (median 33.5), received on-demand treatment. The majority of patients had severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 2%): 84.4% in the prophylaxis group and 85.7% in the on-demand group. Prophylaxis with ReFacto was associated with a median of 6.7 bleeds per year (range: 0-37). The investigator's assessment of final outcome for prophylactic treatment was excellent or effective for 93.1% of patients. ReFacto resolved 92.8% of bleeds with one or two infusions. The investigator's assessment was excellent or good for 98.2% of bleeds treated with ReFacto. Haemostasis was achieved for all seven surgical cases and ReFacto gave an excellent or good response for each. The nature and incidence of adverse events was as expected and no new safety concerns emerged. One previously treated patient (PTP) developed a high-titre inhibitor (maximum 75 BU) and one minimally treated patient (MTP) developed a low-titre inhibitor while on the study but eventually achieved high titres (maximum 30 BU) after immune tolerance therapy was initiated with a plasma-derived FVIII product. One previously untreated patient (PUP) developed a transient low-titre inhibitor (0.4 BU). Other serious adverse events (SAEs) were unrelated to study treatment. There were no allergic events. The results of this study are consistent with the previously published ReFacto pivotal studies.

Hemophilia management: optimizing treatment based on patient needs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progress in hemophilia management over the past year has focused on improving understanding of the most common complications of genetic bleeding disorders and building upon available therapeutic strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research continued to link factor VIII structure with immune recognition and inhibitor formation. Clinical regimens of immune tolerance induction confirmed and expanded basic understanding. Barriers to optimal prevention using prophylaxis were explored allowing future refinements to address unmet needs. Outcome tools to assess joint health and overall quality of life were developed and validated. The inclusion of standardized instruments in assessment of outcome will allow meaningful comparison of available therapies. Use and complications of central venous access devices (CVAD), needed to deliver aggressive infusion regimens, were exhaustively reviewed. Finally, continued progress was achieved in development of improved vectors for future gene therapy of the hemophilias.

SUMMARY

A general theme of recent progress in hemophilia management is harmonization in definitions and assessments of complications and outcomes, facilitating more rigorous and ultimately more useful interpretation of laboratory and clinical research.