Comparison between rush immunotherapy with a standardized allergen and an alum adjuved pyridine extracted material in grass pollen allergy

Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Vidian Neurectomy on Bronchial Asthma Outcomes in Patients with Coexisting Refractory Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma

Background The prevalence of both allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma is high throughout the world; their mutual influence on each other has been documented in many studies. However, studies regarding surgical intervention are limited. Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of endoscopic vidian neurectomy on bronchial asthma outcomes in patients with coexisting refractory allergic rhinitis and asthma. Methods A total of 109 patients with moderate to severe persistent intractable allergic rhinitis and mild/moderate asthma were allocated to the bilateral endoscopic vidian neurectomy group (group 1) or conservative medication group (group 2) according to the patients' self-selection. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, Visual Analog Scale, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Total Asthma Symptom Score, and medication scores were evaluated at six months, one year, and three years after undergoing the initial treatments. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which triggers of asthma attacks were associated with improved asthma outcomes in patients. Results Ninety-five patients were followed up for at least three years. Postoperative scores of Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale were significantly lower than preoperative scores during follow-up in group 1 and were significantly lower than those of group 2. Postoperative scores of Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at the three follow-up time points were higher than the preoperative scores in group 1. The Total Asthma Symptom Score was not significantly decreased in group 1. The medication scores for allergic rhinitis and asthma were gradually reduced after surgery. At the end of the follow-up, the improvement rates for allergic rhinitis and asthma were 90.6% and 45.3%, respectively. Asthma outcomes were significantly improved by controlling rhinitis symptoms in patients whose asthma attacks were induced by "rhinitis onset" or "weather change." Conclusion Controlling allergic rhinitis symptoms by bilateral endoscopic vidian neurectomy can significantly improve asthma outcomes in patients whose asthma attacks are induced by rhinitis onset and/or cold air.

Accelerated immunotherapy schedules

Rush and cluster immunotherapy schedules are accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules. A cluster immunotherapy schedule involves the patient receiving several allergen injections (generally 2-4) sequentially in a single day of treatment on nonconsecutive days. The maintenance dose is generally reached in 4-8 weeks. In rush immunotherapy protocols, higher doses are administered at 15- to 60-min intervals over a 1- to 3-day period until the maintenance dose is achieved. This review will serve as an update for accelerated immunotherapy schedules. The review will include recent investigations demonstrating the safety of cluster schedules in atopic dermatitis, pediatric patients, and inhalant allergen mixtures and an accelerated protocol utilizing an infusion pump for allergen delivery. There has also been further elucidation on the immunological changes which occur during accelerated immunotherapy. Finally, new studies analyzing systemic reaction risk factors are discussed.

Injection allergen immunotherapy for asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergen specific immunotherapy has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance to outright dismissal. With increasing interest in new allergen preparations and methods of delivery, we updated the systematic review of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register up to 2005, Dissertation Abstracts and Current Contents.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials using various forms of allergen specific immunotherapy to treat asthma and reporting at least one clinical outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion. Two authors independently performed quality assessment of studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-eight trials were included (13 new trials). There were 42 trials of immunotherapy for house mite allergy; 27 pollen allergy trials; 10 animal dander allergy trials; two Cladosporium mould allergy, two latex and six trials looking at multiple allergens. Concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only 16 of these trials. Significant heterogeneity was present in a number of comparisons. Overall, there was a significant reduction in asthma symptoms and medication, and improvement in bronchial hyper-reactivity following immunotherapy. There was a significant improvement in asthma symptom scores (standardised mean difference -0.59, 95% confidence interval -0.83 to -0.35) and it would have been necessary to treat three patients (95% CI 3 to 5) with immunotherapy to avoid one deterioration in asthma symptoms. Overall it would have been necessary to treat four patients (95% CI 3 to 6) with immunotherapy to avoid one requiring increased medication. Allergen immunotherapy significantly reduced allergen specific bronchial hyper-reactivity, with some reduction in non-specific bronchial hyper-reactivity as well. There was no consistent effect on lung function. If 16 patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a local adverse reaction. If nine patients were treated with immunotherapy, one would be expected to develop a systemic reaction (of any severity).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy reduces asthma symptoms and use of asthma medications and improves bronchial hyper-reactivity. One trial found that the size of the benefit is possibly comparable to inhaled steroids. The possibility of local or systemic adverse effects (such as anaphylaxis) must be considered.

A review of allergen-specific immunotherapy in human and veterinary medicine

This article reviews allergen-specific immunotherapy in human and veterinary medicine. Current hypotheses of possible mechanisms of actions are outlined. Indications, success rates, adverse effects and factors influencing outcome of therapy are discussed in humans, dogs, cats and horses.

Do skin prick and conjunctival provocation tests predict symptom severity in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis?

BACKGROUND

In the investigation of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR), quantitative skin and conjunctival allergen challenge tests are used to measure individual allergen sensitivity. These tests are reproducible and relate well to prevalence but their relationship to symptom severity is less well established.

OBJECTIVE

We wished to determine if quantitative skin prick tests (QSPT) and conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs) using a single grass pollen allergen extract are reproducible and predict symptom severity in SAR.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 91 participants in a previously published randomized placebo controlled study of low dosage allergen immunotherapy who were randomized to receive placebo treatment. We examined the relationship between pre-seasonal QSPT, CPT and SAR symptoms.

RESULTS

We found a high level of reproducibility when repeated measures were compared for both the QSPT (P < 0.001) and the CPT (P < 0.001) and moderate correlation (0.49) between the standard skin prick test (SPT) and the QSPT (P < 0.001). We found weak negative correlation (-0.27) between the QSPT and the CPT (P < 0.001). We found no correlation between seasonal symptom, use of rescue medication or quality of life (QOL) scores and pre-seasonal QSPT or CPT. Conclusion In the assessment of seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis, quantitative skin and conjunctival allergen challenge tests are strongly reproducible, although there is no correlation between these tests and seasonal symptom, use of rescue medication or QOL scores.

Accelerated immunotherapy schedules: review of efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive evaluation of accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules in terms of adverse reactions and clinical efficacy.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed studies and review articles were selected from the PubMed database for articles published in the years 1976 to 2006 using the following keywords: rush, cluster immunotherapy in combination with allergic rhinitis, asthma, Hymenoptera, and imported fire ant.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they provided safety and efficacy information on accelerated allergen immunotherapy schedules. Most of the studies reviewed were double-blind, placebo controlled, but some open-observational studies were included if they provided immunotherapy safety or other information the author thought was relevant.

RESULTS

A wide range of systemic reactions were reported in the literature with inhalant allergens: ranging from 27% to 100% of the patients in rush immunotherapy studies and 0% to 79% of patients in the cluster studies. Predictors of systemic reactions with rush immunotherapy were forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted and a high degree of skin test reactivity. Premedication clearly reduces the risk of systemic reactions with rush immunotherapy, but the effect on cluster schedules was not as clear.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules in selected patients may provide a rapid alternative to conventional build-up schedules without a significant increase in risk.

Grass pollen immunotherapy as an effective therapy for childhood seasonal allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) for childhood seasonal allergic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of SIT with Alutard SQ grass pollen (Phleum pratense Alutard SQ; ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark) in children with seasonal allergic asthma.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of grass pollen SIT over 2 pollen seasons was performed. Children (3-16 years) with a history of seasonal allergic asthma sensitized to grass pollen (P pratense) and requiring at least 200 microg of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent per day were enrolled. Subjects with symptomatic asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis outside the grass pollen season were excluded. The primary outcome measure was a combined asthma symptom-medication score during the second pollen season. Secondary outcome measures included end-point titration skin prick testing and conjunctival and bronchial provocation testing to allergen, sputum eosinophilia, exhaled nitric oxide, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine subjects were enrolled. Thirty-five subjects provided data for analysis. The use of SIT was associated with a substantial reduction in asthma symptom-medication score compared with that after placebo (P = .04). There were also significant reductions in cutaneous (P = .002), conjunctival (P = .02), and bronchial (P = .01) reactivity to allergen after SIT compared with that after placebo. The 2 groups had similar levels of airway inflammation, despite a trend toward less inhaled steroid use in the active group. No serious adverse events were reported, and no subjects withdrew because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The study has shown that SIT is effective and well tolerated in children with seasonal allergic asthma to grass pollen.

The effects of long term use of inhaled corticosteroids on linear growth, adrenal function and bone mineral density in children

In this study we aimed to investigate the long term effects of inhaled steroids on linear growth, adrenal function and bone mineral density. Thirty children with moderate asthma were randomly divided into two groups. Fifteen children (8 boys, 7 girls mean age; 10.6 +/- 2.1) were treated with budesonide (group 1), and 15 (9 boys, 6 girls, mean age; 9.6 +/- 2.4). with fluticasone propionate (group 2). Control group included 30 children. Anthropometric assessment, symptom and medication scores, pulmonary functions, bone mineral density, serum and urine cortisol levels and ACTH stimulation test were evaluated at the beginning of the study and after one year period. Symptom and medication scores, pulmonary functions improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05). The mean annual growth was similar in group 1 and 2 and control group. Bone mineral density was comparable with control group at the beginning of the study and after one year. Mean serum cortisol level diminished at the end of the therapy but no significant differences were found between the initial and end values in respect to urine cortisol levels and cortisol/creatinine ratio. Of three groups ACTH stimulation test revealed that there were no significant difference between study and control groups. In conclusion, although we did not observed any side effects of inhaled corticosteroids we suggest that children treated with inhaled corticosteroids for a long time should be followed closely with respect to side effects.

Clinical practice guidelines and specific antigen immunotherapy

Allergy immunotherapy is a safe, effective treatment modality in selected patients. The length of therapy and the wide variety of patient sensitivities make it difficult to develop and test evidence-based guidelines in all areas of immunotherapy. A review of techniques and the evidence supporting them is provided in this article.

Allergen immunotherapy for asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergen specific immunotherapy has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance to outright dismissal. With increasing interest in new allergen preparations and new methods of delivery, it was time to conduct another systematic review of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register up to June 2001, MEDLINE, Dissertation Abstracts, Current Contents and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials using various forms of allergen specific immunotherapy to treat asthma and reporting at least one clinical outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment of studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-five trials were included (52 of 54 previously included trials and 23 new trials). A total of 3,506 participants (3,188 with asthma) were involved. There were 36 trials of immunotherapy for house mite allergy; 20 pollen allergy trials; ten animal dander allergy trials; two Cladosporium mould allergy, one latex and six trials looking at multiple allergens. Concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only 15 of these trials. Significant heterogeneity was present in a number of comparisons. Overall, there was a significant reduction in asthma symptoms and medication and improvement in bronchial hyper-reactivity following immunotherapy. There was a significant improvement in asthma symptom scores (standardised mean difference -0.72, 95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.33) and it would have been necessary to treat 4 (95%CI 3 to 5) patients with immunotherapy to avoid one deterioration in asthma symptoms. Overall it would have been necessary to treat 5 (95%CI 4 to 6) patients with immunotherapy to avoid one requiring increased medication. Allergen immunotherapy significantly reduced allergen specific bronchial hyper-reactivity, with some reduction in non-specific bronchial hyper-reactivity as well. There was no consistent effect on lung function.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy reduces asthma symptoms and use of asthma medications and improves bronchial hyper-reactivity. One trial found that the size of the benefit is possibly comparable to inhaled steroids. The possibility of adverse effects (such as anaphylaxis) must be considered.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XXIV): allergen-specific immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) has been used for years to treat dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD) and humans with atopic diseases. The efficacy of ASIT has been well documented for humans with respiratory atopic diseases and stinging insect allergy, but its effectiveness seems more controversial for patients with AD. In spite of insufficient evidence derived from randomized controlled trials, multiple open studies and a large body of clinical observations suggest that ASIT is effective in controlling the clinical signs of dogs with AD. As a result of the scarcity of evidence from controlled trials, the true efficacy of ASIT, and the optimal protocols for allergen dose and frequency of injection are currently unknown. Allergen-specific immunotherapy nevertheless may be included in the treatment of canine AD because of its potential advantages and limited disadvantages compared to other forms of therapy. There is no evidence, however, for the preference of any specific treatment protocol. The predictive value of historical, clinical and immunologic features related to the efficacy of ASIT in dogs with AD are discussed in this paper. Adverse reactions, and the requirements for monitoring of patients receiving ASIT, then are reviewed and detailed. Finally, this review highlights aspects of ASIT where further research and controlled studies are needed.

Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine

BACKGROUND

The effect of H1-blockers may differ depending on the target organ.

OBJECTIVE

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to compare the effect of a 7-day treatment with loratadine (10 mg daily) or cetirizine (10 mg daily) on nasal challenge with grass pollen grains and skin tests with allergen or histamine.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled, but the analysis was carried out on 23. Nasal challenge was carried out by using 5-fold increasing numbers of pollen grains. Skin prick tests were done with serial concentrations of allergens and 1 concentration of histamine. Patients were tested in a cross-over design, with each treatment being administered for the previous 7 days and with a 2-week washout period.

RESULTS

By comparison with placebo, loratadine and cetirizine increased significantly the threshold number of pollen grains required to induce a positive nasal challenge (P <.001). There was no difference between loratadine and cetirizine. Skin test responses to allergen were significantly reduced by loratadine and cetirizine by comparison with placebo. Skin test responses to histamine were significantly decreased by the 2 H1-blockers, but they were more profoundly decreased by cetirizine than by loratadine.

CONCLUSIONS

Both H1-blockers reduced similarly allergen-induced skin test and nasal challenge responses. Cetirizine was more effective on histamine skin test responses.

Changes in skin-test reactivity do not correlate with clinical efficacy of H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis

New-generation H1-blockers may possess antiallergic properties, and their effect may differ, depending on the target organ. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was carried out during the pollen season to compare the clinical effect on nasal and conjunctival symptoms of astemizole (10 mg o.d.) and loratadine (10 mg o.d.) with their effect on skin-test reactivity to allergen and histamine. Thirty-eight patients (12-56 years of age) were studied. Nasal and ocular symptoms were recorded daily from days 4 to 7. Skin prick tests with serial concentrations of allergens and one concentration of histamine were carried out before and at the end of the 7-day treatment period. Parallel-line bioassay, analysis of variance, and covariance were used to analyze skin test data. Loratadine and astemizole significantly decreased symptoms from baseline (P < 0.004 and P < 0.006). Skin-test reactivity to allergen and histamine was more profoundly decreased by astemizole than loratadine. The histamine covariant was more important in the allergen effect of astemizole than in that of loratadine. Two H1-blockers having the same clinical effect on nasal and ocular symptoms during the pollen season have totally different effects on skin-test reactivity. Skin-test reactivity to allergen or histamine is not predictive of the clinical efficacy of H1-blockers during seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Allergy immunotherapy

Specific immunotherapy for allergy has been used for over eight decades. Despite this history, controversy continues over techniques, indications, and the eventual outcomes. This article reviews immunotherapy techniques available to the various practitioners of allergy care. Safety recommendations, indications for therapy, and available measurements for outcomes are also discussed.

Rush immunotherapy with house dust extract in patients with mild extrinsic asthma

Rush immunotherapy (RIT) with house dust extract was given to 15 patients with mild extrinsic or mixed asthma. Every patient was strongly positive for IgE on the radioimmunosorbent test and sensitive to house dust extract on the scratch skin test. Nine patients were positive on the bronchial provocation test to house dust extract and 6 could not be examined. All patients did not drop out and got to house dust extract solution 10(-1) within 1 week. The symptom-medication scores decreased significantly after RIT. During RIT 1 patient developed a mild asthmatic attack and 3 patients developed generalized skin reaction. Eight weeks later, the threshold for house dust-provoked bronchoconstriction increased in 9 patients, but did not in 3 patients. The blood eosinophil count and blood histamine level significantly decreased. We conclude that RIT is able to raise antigen concentrations for a short periods and effective but not risky for mild asthma.

Systemic reactions to specific immunotherapy in children with respiratory allergy: a prospective study

The aim of this multi-centre prospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of systemic reactions to specific immunotherapy in children with allergic asthma and or rhinitis. One thousand and fifty-six children (653 boys and 403 girls), median age 8.5 years, were enrolled in this three-year prospective study. All the children were treated with injections of the following allergenic extracts: 689 of house dust mite, 291 of grass, 109 of Parietaria, 13 of Alternaria, 6 of Artemisia and 11 of Olea. Among 1056 treated children, 41 (3.7%) had systemic reactions: 40 children (3.7%) experienced mild symptoms such as asthma and/or urticaria, and only one shock (0.08%). A total of 47,247 injections were administered, and the rate of systemic reactions, according to the number of total injections was only 0.08%. According to the allergenic extract, systemic reactions occurred in 29/689 children (4.2%) treated with house dust mites extract (0.09% of the injections), in 9/291 children (3.1%) treated with grass extract (0.07% of the injections) and in 3/109 children (2.8%) treated with Parietaria extract (0.06% of the injections). The prevalence of systemic reactions was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the children treated with house dust mite extract in comparison with those treated with pollen extracts. All the systemic reactions appeared within 30 minutes following the administration of the extract and occurred in 37/41 cases (90.2%) with the same dose, previously tolerated. Most reactions were mild, and were readily controlled by immediate emergency treatment. There was no need for hospitalization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Safety considerations in assessing the role of immunotherapy in allergic disorders

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is accepted as an effective treatment of allergic diseases when high quality extracts are used. However, this form of treatment can cause untoward reactions among which systemic reactions are the most severe. Although life-threatening reactions are rare and deaths exceptionally reported, SIT should be prescribed by allergists to patients with well defined characteristics, and administered with care by (or under the close supervision of) physicians trained to deal rapidly with the reactions. Reactions with standardised extracts occur mostly during the dose increase phase but they can be prevented using adapted schedules and premedication. During maintenance injections or when vial batches are changed, standardised extracts of known shelf-life usually result in a low rate of systemic reactions. Patients with asthma are more prone to develop systemic reactions, and allergens should not be administered to patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) under 70% of predicted or in those who have unstable or symptomatic asthma. Systemic reactions may be observed with all allergens and allergenic preparations although it appears that high molecular weight extracts may be safer.

Clinical and immunological effects of immunotherapy with alum-absorbed grass allergoid in grass-pollen-induced hay fever

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy was conducted in 19 patients with grass-pollen hay fever to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a formalinized depot grass allergoid. The patients were assessed before and during IT by clinical (symptom-medication scores during the grass- pollen season, specific nasal and skin reactivity) and immunological (specific IgE, IgG, IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies) parameters. High doses of grass allergoid, corresponding to a cumulative pre-seasonal dosage of 46,050 PNU, were administered, with only one systemic reaction. The actively treated patients had significantly lower symptom-medication scores than placebo (p less than 0.01) during the month of May and showed a significant decrease in specific skin (p less than 0.01) and nasal (p less than 0.05) reactivity, and a significant early increase in specific IgE (p less than 0.01), IgG (p less than 0.0005), IgG1 (p less than 0.001) and IgG4 (p less than 0.05), with a subsequent decrease of IgE and IgG1. No differences were detected in any of these parameters in the placebo group. A correlation was found between high IgG4/IgG1 ratio and the specific skin reactivity decrease (r = 0.691, p less than 0.05), whereas a high IgG4/IgG1 ratio was associated with higher symptom-medication scores (r = 0.654, p less than 0.05). Possible explanations of these apparent discrepancies are proposed.

Immediate adverse reactions to immunotherapy in allergy

We report our experience of adverse reactions to immunotherapy (IT) in patients with insect venom allergy and inhalant respiratory allergy. Adverse reactions included large local reactions, generalized cutaneous reactions or systemic reactions. Among 87 patients treated for venom allergy, 43% had adverse reactions during the course of IT, averaging 2.5 reactions per patient and per course of IT. Nine had systemic reactions, of which 7 required adrenaline administration. Among 52 patients treated with inhalant allergen extracts, 40% had adverse reactions averaging 3 reactions per patient per course of treatment. Ten patients had systemic reactions but only 2 required adrenaline administration. There was no difference between the rate of adverse reactions in the venom and the inhalant treatment groups. IT has an inherent risk which has to be weighed against its benefits.

Differences in clinical and immunologic reactivity of patients allergic to grass pollens and to multiple-pollen species. II. Efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, specific immunotherapy with standardized extracts

The IgE response of patients only allergic to grass pollens differs from response of patients allergic to multiple-pollen species. The IgE immunoblots to orchard-grass pollens confirmed that polysensitized patients had more proteins revealed than patients only allergic to grass pollens. To determine if both groups of patients present a different response toward specific immunotherapy (IT), a double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 70 patients. Patients receiving the active treatment had a rush IT with either a standardized orchard grass-pollen extract or with a standardized mixed-pollen extract prepared, depending on the sensitivity of the patients. The maintenance dose was defined as that dose effective in grass-pollen IT in previous experiments. The same equipotent maintenance dose was administered for all pollen species. Symptom-medication scores during the pollen season and nasal challenge with orchard grass-pollen grains demonstrated that grass pollen-allergic patients had a significantly improved efficacy by comparison to placebo treatment, whereas polysensitized patients had a nonsignificant improvement. Serum grass-pollen IgG was significantly increased after IT in both treated groups. This study demonstrate that the response toward specific IT differs in patients only allergic to grass pollens by comparison to polysensitized patients.

Immunotherapy in allergic respiratory diseases

Much more work is needed to specify the correct indications for immunotherapy in respiratory allergic diseases. Immunotherapy with pollen and mite extracts has shown some clinical efficacy versus placebo in controlled studies in allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. However, controlled studies comparing the cost, the risk factors and the efficacy of immunotherapy versus treatment with antihistaminic drugs, bronchodilators and topical steroids are needed. Additional studies are needed to established the place of immunotherapy in animal danders and mould allergy. In any case, before initiating immunotherapy in respiratory allergy the following questions must be answered: is there sufficient evidence of a close relationship between symptoms and allergen exposure? is it possible to achieve efficient allergen avoidance? is simple drug treatment no sufficient? is there evidence in the literature of effectiveness of IT for this allergen? is the patient able to comply with a long and constraining treatment?

Pathophysiology and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Therapeutic approaches to seasonal allergic rhinitis are reviewed in this paper. Pharmacotherapeutic approaches include nonsedative antihistamines, anti-allergic drugs, vasoconstrictors, anticholinergic agents and topical corticosteroids. The choice of treatment depends upon its relative efficacy and safety. Although effective, immunotherapy has been seriously questioned in recent years owing to the occurrence of possibly serious side-effects. Antihistamines are safe and effective for treatment of histamine-mediated symptoms of itching, sneezing and rhinorrhoea. The newer compounds do not cause sedation. For nasal symptoms, topical anti-allergic drugs are not as effective as other treatments. Topical vasoconstrictors are often used, though they cause side-effects when the treatment is prolonged. Anticholinergic drugs are safe and effective for rhinorrhea. Corticosteroids are highly effective for most symptoms, but their administration by oral or parenteral routes cannot be recommended because of side-effects. Topical corticosteroids inactivated by hepatic first pass metabolism are favoured as they are highly effective and safe. Their mechanism of action is not completely understood, but they act through both an anti-inflammatory effect and an anti-allergic activity decreasing mediator release. These drugs are the most effective in the treatment of nasal obstruction because of their anti-inflammatory effect. They are usually administered in response to symptoms, but in the future, it is likely that they will be used prophylactically before the pollen season in order to decrease the priming effect.

Immunotherapy with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. IV. Systemic reactions according to the immunotherapy schedule

Specific immunotherapy with standardized extracts can induce systemic reactions (SRs), possibly increased by a rush immunotherapy (RIT) protocol. A prospective study in 1152 mite-allergic patients (3 to 63 years of age) examined the incidence of SRs during an RIT or a step protocol. All patients received the same standardized extract of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus with the same maintenance dose. In the first group, 290 patients had an RIT protocol without any preventive measure. In a second group, the prevention of SRs during RIT was attempted by pretreating 160 patients with methylprednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), ketotifen (2 mg/day), and theophylline (10 mg/kg/day). In a third group (479 patients), the same pretreatment was associated with preventive measures and with FEV1 results and the occurrence of large local reactions. A fourth group consisted of 223 patients who received a step protocol with the same pretreatment and preventive measures. The incidence of SRs per patient was 36.2% with RIT alone, 16.2% when the pretreatment was added, and 7.2% when pretreatment and preventive measures were used. Patients receiving the step protocol had 5.4% SRs. Adrenaline had to be used from 10.0%, 4.6%, 0.2%, and 0.2%, respectively. No reaction started 45 minutes or later after the last injection. Children younger than 5 years of age had a significantly greater number of SR.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass-pollen allergoids. IV. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of two dosages of a high-molecular-weight allergoid

Specific immunotherapy is still widely used in grass-pollen allergy, but its side effects may limit its use. We tested the safety and efficacy of a formalinized high-molecular-weight allergoid prepared from a mixed grass-pollen extract with two injection schedules in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eighteen patients received placebo, 19 received the low-dose schedule (maximal dose: 2000 PNU) and 20 received the high-dose schedule (maximal dose: 10,000 PNU). Only one patient presented a systemic reaction of moderate severity for a dose of 1200 PNU. Before the onset of the pollen season, patients had a nasal challenge with orchard grass-pollen grains, a skin test titration, and the titration of serum-specific IgG. Both groups of patients presented a significant reduction in nasal and skin sensitivities and a significant increase in IgG compared to placebo. Symptoms and medications for rhinitis and asthma were studied during the season, and both groups receiving allergoids had a significant reduction of symptom-medication scores for nasal and bronchial symptoms. There was a highly significant correlation between nasal symptom-medication scores during the season and the results of nasal challenges. High-molecular-weight allergoids are safe and effective.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled rush immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract

Specific immunotherapy is ineffective with unstandardized mold extracts. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 24 patients (5 to 56 years of age) only allergic to Alternaria. The extract was standardized by isoelectric focusing, crossed immunoelectrophoresis, crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis, RAST inhibition, and skin tests and contained allergen Alternaria major allergen a I and antigen B. Thirteen patients received the active treatment, and 11 received the placebo. Immunotherapy was started by a 2-day rush protocol; maintenance injections were administered for 1 year. The patient's self-evaluation of the treatment was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower in the placebo-treated group. Global symptom-medication scores, including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis, were significantly (p less than 0.005) lower in the actively treated group. Nasal challenges with Alternaria extract were performed before immunotherapy and after 1 year of treatment. There was no difference in the placebo-treated group and a significantly (p less than 0.01) increased mean provocative dose in the actively treated group. Skin tests were significantly reduced in the actively treated group. Specific IgG increased significantly in the actively treated group and were stable in the placebo-treated group. There was a significant correlation between nasal challenges and nasal symptom-medication scores (p less than 0.03) or the patient's self-evaluation of efficacy (p less than 0.05). This study demonstrated that patients only sensitized to Alternaria benefit from specific immunotherapy with a standardized Alternaria extract.

Immunotherapy with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. Systemic reactions during the rush protocol in patients suffering from asthma

Specific immunotherapy can induce severe systemic reactions (SRs), especially in patients with asthma. It also appears that potent standardized extracts may be more often involved in the generation of SRs than other extracts. Since these SRs may be potentially life threatening, it is desirable to predict their onset. A prospective study was carried out in 125 mite-allergic subjects with asthma ranging in age from 4 to 57 years to assess the incidence of SRs during a rush immunotherapy (RIT) protocol and maintenance injections and to attempt to predict the onset of the SRs. All patients received the same standardized extract of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus with the same RIT and the same maintenance dose (3000 BU in subjects older than 10 years and 1500 BU in children younger than 10 years). Patients were carefully monitored during the RIT protocol, and possible SRs were followed for up to 2 hours after injections. Patients then received maintenance injections for a mean duration of 18.2 +/- 5.6 months. During maintenance injections, patients were under supervision of a physician for 30 minutes. Within 2 weeks before the RIT, all patients older than 6 years had a pulmonary function test, skin prick test end point with the standardized D. pteronyssinus extract, and RAST. The severity of asthma was examined with the score of Aas. Forty-seven patients had an SR during the RIT protocol: four mild generalized urticaria, 35 asthma exacerbations, and eight anaphylactic shocks. None of the patients had to be admitted to an intensive care unit. Most SRs started within 15 minutes, and none of the SRs started 45 minutes or later after the last injection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass-pollen allergoids. II. Comparison between parameters assessing the efficacy of immunotherapy

Specific immunotherapy is effective in alleviating symptoms in grass pollen-induced rhinitis, but there are no clear data demonstrating a correlation between symptom-medication scores and objective parameters. Twenty-five patients taking part in a double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass pollen-formalinized allergoids were studied. All patients had the same investigations. Symptom-medication scores were significantly (p less than 0.005, Mann-Whitney U test) reduced in the treated group by comparison to the placebo-treated patients. Nasal challenges performed with threefold increasing numbers of orchard grass-pollen grains demonstrated that patients treated with allergoid tolerated a significantly (p less than 0.005, Wilcoxon W test) greater number of grains after treatment, whereas there was no mean difference in the placebo-treated patients. There was a significant (p less than 0.005, Spearman rank-correlation) correlation between nasal challenges and symptom scores during the season. The skin prick test end point was significantly (p less than 0.001, Wilcoxon W test) reduced after treatment in the allergoid-treated group and remained unchanged in the placebo-treated group. There was a significant (p less than 0.001) correlation between the skin prick test end point and symptom scores during the season. Serum grass-pollen IgG titrated by a solid-phase radioimmunoassay with Staphylococcus A protein was significantly (p less than 0.01, Wilcoxon W test) increased after treatment with allergoid, but there was no significant correlation between IgG titer and symptom scores during the season. Serum grass-pollen IgE increased (p less than 0.04, Wilcoxon W test) in the treated group but there was no correlation with symptom scores.

Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. VI. IgE-mediated parameters during a one-year placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with Cladosporium

The IgE-response was evaluated by skin prick test, bronchial provocation test and RAST in a 1-year placebo-controlled double-blind immunotherapy study. Eleven adult asthmatics were treated with a Cladosporium allergen preparation and 11 comparable patients received histamine placebo. The bronchial sensitivity (PC20) decrease greater than 0.5 log step in 8/11 (73%) Cladosporium-treated versus 3/11 (27%) in the placebo group. Corresponding figures for skin prick test sensitivity was 10/11 (91%) and 1/11 (9%) respectively. Circulating IgE showed a temporary boost in the Cladosporium group and then values approaching the pretreatment value. Only minimal and insignificant changes were found in the placebo-treated patients. Changes in IgE-reactivity were not related to allergen dose, clinical efficacy or to the occurrence of side effects. Some interrelation between changes in skin prick test, bronchial provocation test and RAST was found indicating a differentiated effect of immunotherapy on various IgE compartments. In spite of the pathogenetic role of IgE in allergic diseases, changes in IgE-reactivity do not seem directly involved in the mechanisms underlying the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy but might be of importance in a complex interaction with other immunological parameters.