Onset and duration of inhibition of ipratropium bromide nasal spray on methacholine-induced nasal secretions

[Symptoms, causes, and treatment options of geriatric nose]

With increasing age, structures of the internal and external nose change. Many elderly patients complain about rhinitis with nasal obstruction, endonasal crusting, epistaxis, intermittent rhinorrhea, and olfactory disorders. These symptoms are mainly caused by atrophy of the mucosa and the olfactory epithelium, but may also be an expression of drug side effects. Additionally, there are changes in the shape of the nose (continuous growth, altered elasticity of supporting structures) and in the dermis, which may develop tumors due to its sun-exposed position. These multiple internal and external changes of the nose can be summarized by the collective term "aging nose," whose treatment options are complex. These range from conservative (nasal care, medication changes, hemostatic measures) to surgical lines of therapy (septorhinoplasty, tumor excision, vascular ligation) and will require further scientific study in the future.

Rhinitis 2020: A practice parameter update

This comprehensive practice parameter for allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) provides updated guidance on diagnosis, assessment, selection of monotherapy and combination pharmacologic options, and allergen immunotherapy for AR. Newer information about local AR is reviewed. Cough is emphasized as a common symptom in both AR and NAR. Food allergy testing is not recommended in the routine evaluation of rhinitis. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) remain the preferred monotherapy for persistent AR, but additional studies support the additive benefit of combination treatment with INCS and intranasal antihistamines in both AR and NAR. Either intranasal antihistamines or INCS may be offered as first-line monotherapy for NAR. Montelukast should only be used for AR if there has been an inadequate response or intolerance to alternative therapies. Depot parenteral corticosteroids are not recommended for treatment of AR due to potential risks. While intranasal decongestants generally should be limited to short-term use to prevent rebound congestion, in limited circumstances, patients receiving regimens that include an INCS may be offered, in addition, an intranasal decongestant for up to 4 weeks. Neither acupuncture nor herbal products have adequate studies to support their use for AR. Oral decongestants should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy. Recommendations for use of subcutaneous and sublingual tablet allergen immunotherapy in AR are provided. Algorithms based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion are provided to guide in the selection of pharmacologic options for intermittent and persistent AR and NAR.

Subchronic toxicity and toxicokinetics of long-term intranasal administration of bencycloquidium bromide: a 91-day study in dogs

The subchronic toxicity and toxicokinetics of Bencycloquidium bromide (BCQB) were evaluated after 91-day intranasal administration in dogs at daily dose levels of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg. Following repeated exposure to medium- or high-dose of BCQB, apparent changes were observed in the levels of blood glucose, creatinine or blood urea nitrogen in both male and female dogs. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of BCQB was considered to be 2.5 mg/kg/day under the present study conditions. There were no significant gender differences in most indexes of subchronic toxicity throughout the experimental period with the exception of food consumption and body weight, or in the parameters of plasma toxicokinetics after either single-dose or repeated administrations of BCQB at each dosage. In dog, BCQB did not accumulate in blood plasma, while much higher concentrations of BCQB residues were found in most tissues examined (especially the kidney) following 91-day repeated exposure relative to a single dose. In all tissues except the reproductive organs, BCQB concentrations reverted to low levels by 2 weeks post-dosing. The results indicate that blood glucose levels and renal function should be closely monitored when BCQB is used in long-term therapy.

Anticholinergic drugs in nonallergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The parasympathetic nervous system contributes to the pathophysiology of multiple forms of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Stimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system leads to glandular activation, which produces watery secretions. In excess, these secretions discharge from the anterior Nares and produce the symptom of watery anterior rhinorrhea.

METHOD

Review of literature.

RESULTS

Treatment with topical, intranasal anticholinergic drugs inhibits activation of the nasal mucosal glands and is effective in reducing the watery secretions associated with parasympathetic stimulation of the glands with little, if any, effect on the symptoms of congestion and sneezing. In general, these drugs have no systemic adverse effects, but can cause crusting and local irritation.

CONCLUSION

Anticholinergic drugs are useful for the treatment of anterior rhinorrhea associated with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.

The effect of ipratropium nasal spray on bronchial methacholine challenge

PURPOSES

To determine the effect ipratropium bromide nasal spray has on methacholine challenge testing for airway hyperresponsiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten subjects with known airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine who had been clinically stable in the preceding 2 months participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Methacholine challenge testing was conducted on successive days: day 1 after pretreatment with aqueous 0.03% nasal ipratropium, and day 2 with normal saline solution placebo.

RESULTS

The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was higher after nasal ipratropium than after saline solution placebo (2.1 mg/mL vs 1.6 mg/mL, p = 0.02). This difference is equal to approximately one-half concentration difference, probably within the limits of reproducibility of the test.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with nasal ipratropium results in a small increase in PC20. Although this difference achieves statistical significance, it is probably not clinically significant.

Nasal hyperreactivity to methacholine measured by acoustic rhinometry in asymptomatic allergic and perennial nonallergic rhinitis

This study was carried out to assess nasal response to different doses of methacholine and to evaluate the diagnostic possibilities of this test. Thirty-seven patients with allergic rhinitis induced by pollen (out of season), 16 with nonallergic rhinitis, and 25 normal subjects were evaluated. After provocation with saline, increasing doses of methacholine, ranging from 0.5 to 16 mg/mL, were applied. Nasal obstruction was assessed by acoustic rhinometry 10 minutes after each dose, the minimum cross-sectional area and the nasal volume in both fossae were obtained. Ipratropium bromide was applied after the last dose of methacholine to evaluate reversibility. After methacholine challenge with 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL there was a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.05) in nasal area and volume in a dose-dependent manner in patients with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in comparison with controls. A ROC (receiver-operating characteristic) analysis showed that a decrease in nasal volume > or = 20% at methacholine concentration of 2 mg/mL is able to predict the presence of rhinitis (positive predicted value 93%, negative predicted value 79%) in 75% of subjects. The clinical relevance of this finding suggests that patients with symptomatic nonallergic rhinitis or even asymptomatic patients with allergic rhinitis out of pollen season present a nasal hyperreactivity to methacholine, and that a decrease of nasal volume > 20% by acoustic rhinometry after challenge with methacholine at 2 mg/mL is able to discriminate these patients from normal subjects. This method seems to be a suitable tool in the diagnosis of rhinitis.

Ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% and beclomethasone nasal spray alone and in combination for the treatment of rhinorrhea in perennial rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Perennial rhinitis is a common condition that affects up to 10% to 20% of the population. Multiple agents are frequently administered since no single agent provides complete relief. Studies assessing the benefit/risk of combined therapy are important especially for newly approved agents such as ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03%, a topical anticholinergic agent, approved specifically for the treatment of rhinorrhea in allergic and non-allergic perennial rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the combined use of ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% (42 microg per nostril tid) and beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray (84 microg per nostril bid) against that of either active agent alone for the treatment of rhinorrhea.

DESIGN

Multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, randomized active- and placebo-controlled, parallel trial.

SETTING

Allergist and general practitioner clinical practices.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-three patients with perennial rhinitis (279 allergic and 274 non-allergic), 8 to 75 years of age, who had at least a mild degree of severity of rhinorrhea for a minimum of 2 hours per day during the 1 week screening period as well as congestion or sneezing also of at least mild severity.

INTERVENTION

Either (1) ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% (42 microg per nostril tid) plus beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray (84 microg per nostril bid), (2) ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% (42 microg per nostril tid) alone, (3) beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray (84 microg per nostril bid) alone, or (4) vehicle [matching placebo nasal spray for the ipratropium bromide (2 sprays per nostril tid)] or beclomethasone dipropionate (2 sprays per nostril bid).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Severity and duration of rhinorrhea, and patient and physician global assessment of control of rhinorrhea.

RESULTS

Ipratropium bromide nasal spray plus beclomethasone nasal spray was more effective than either active agent alone or vehicle in reducing the average severity and duration of rhinorrhea during 4 weeks of treatment. The advantage of ipratropium bromide plus beclomethasone nasal spray was evident by the first day of combined treatment and continued throughout the 2-week treatment period. Ipratropium bromide nasal spray had a faster onset of action during the first week of treatment and reduced the duration of rhinorrhea more than beclomethasone. Beclomethasone nasal spray was more effective in reducing the severity of congestion and sneezing than ipratropium. In patients who had not responded well to a nasal steroid prior to participation in the study based on a questionnaire administered at screening, ipratropium bromide was as effective in the steroid non-responders as steroid responders, whereas beclomethasone was more effective in steroid responders. Combined active therapy was well tolerated with no increase in adverse events over that seen previously with ipratropium bromide or beclomethasone nasal spray alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of ipratropium bromide nasal spray with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray is more effective than either active agent for the treatment of rhinorrhea, and does not result in a potentiation of adverse drug reactions. Ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% alone should be considered in patients for whom rhinorrhea is the primary symptom, and its use in combination with a nasal steroid should be considered in patients where rhinorrhea is one of the predominant symptoms, or in patients with rhinorrhea not fully responsive to other therapy.

Ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% provides additional relief from rhinorrhea when combined with terfenadine in perennial rhinitis patients; a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial

Medical treatment of perennial rhinitis is aimed at providing symptomatic relief of individual symptoms. Multiple agents are administered when no single agent provides complete relief. Studies assessing the benefit/risk of combined therapy are important, especially for newly available agents such as ipratropium bromide nasal spray, a topical anticholinergic agent approved for the treatment of rhinorrhea in allergic and nonallergic perennial rhinitis. The objective was to determine whether the combined use of ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% (42 mcg per nostril) administered three times daily with a nonsedating antihistamine (terfenadine, 60 mg administered twice daily) is safe and provides greater clinical benefit than use of the placebo nasal spray plus terfenadine. Our method was a multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, crossover trial of 205 patients with perennial rhinitis (114 allergic and 91 nonallergic), 18 to 75 years of age, who had clinically significant rhinorrhea. After a 1-week run-in period, patients were treated for 2 weeks with one of the two treatment regimens, followed by a 1-week washout period, and then were treated for another 2 weeks with the other treatment regimen. Daily diary symptoms scores of rhinorrhea, congestion, and sneezing were obtained, as well as biweekly patient and physician global assessments of treatment effectiveness of each of the nasal symptoms. Ipratropium bromide nasal spray plus terfenadine was more effective than vehicle plus terfenadine in reducing the average severity (38% versus 28%) and duration (46% versus 30%) of rhinorrhea during the 2 weeks of treatment from baseline (p < 0.05). The advantage of ipratropium bromide nasal spray plus terfenadine was evident by the second day of treatment and continued throughout the 2-week treatment period. Of patients who responded more to one treatment than another, 69% responded to ipratropium bromide nasal spray plus terfenadine, compared to 31% to vehicle plus terfenadine (p < 0.05). Both physicians and patients rated control of rhinorrhea and sneezing by ipratropium bromide nasal spray plus terfenadine as superior to vehicle plus terfenadine (p < 0.05). The symptom of congestion was controlled equally well by both treatments. Combined active therapy was well tolerated with no increase in adverse events over that seen previously with ipratropium bromide nasal spray alone. The combination of ipratropium bromide nasal spray with terfenadine is more effective than vehicle plus terfenadine for the treatment of rhinorrhea, and does not result in a potentiation of adverse drug reactions.

Ion composition of airway surface liquid of patients with cystic fibrosis as compared with normal and disease-control subjects

To test whether a major contribution of airways epithelial ion transport to lung defense reflects the regulation of airway surface liquid (ASL) ionic composition, we measured ASL composition using the filter paper technique. On nasal surfaces, the Cl- concentration (approximately 125 meq/liter) was similar to plasma, but the Na+ concentration (approximately 110 meq/liter) was below plasma, and K+ concentration (approximately 30 meq/liter) above plasma. The resting ASL osmolarity [2(Na+ + K+); 277 meq/liter] approximated isotonicity. There were no detectable differences between cystic fibrosis (CF) and normal subjects. In the lower airways, the Na+ concentrations were 80-85 meq/liter, K+ levels approximately 15 meq/liter, and Cl- concentrations 75-80 meq/liter. Measurements of Na+ activity with Na(+)-selective electrodes and osmolality with freezing point depression yielded values consistent with the monovalent cation measurements. Like the nasal surfaces, no differences in cations were detected between CF, normal, or chronic bronchitis subjects. The tracheobronchial ASL hypotonicity was hypothesized to reflect collection-induced gland secretion, a speculation consistent with observations in which induction of nasal gland secretion produced hypotonic secretions. We conclude that there are no significant differences in ASL ion concentrations between CF, normal, and chronic bronchitis subjects and, because ASL ion concentrations exceed values consistent with defensin activity, the failure of CF lung defense may reflect predominantly factors other than salt-dependent defensins.

Ipratropium nasal spray in children with perennial rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium nasal spray and placebo administered twice each day for 4 weeks in pediatric patients with perennial rhinitis who had rhinorrhea as a major complaint.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study. Patients aged 6 to 18 years with symptoms of perennial nonallergic (PNAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) were randomized to receive ipratropium (42 micrograms per nostril) or placebo nasal spray, double-blind, twice each day for 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated by nasal symptoms, especially anterior rhinorrhea, and quality of life. Previous caregivers for rhinitis and medications used in the past were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were empanelled, 162 with PAR, 40 with PNAR; of these 151 with mild-severe rhinorrhea were evaluated for efficacy. Treatment with ipratropium reduced symptoms of rhinorrhea primarily in patients with PNAR. In patients with PAR this response was less pronounced, and was seen as a modest decrease in the severity of rhinorrhea noted in the first 2 weeks of treatment. Quality of life assessments confirmed that rhinorrhea was bothersome to these pediatric patients, and suggested that treatment with ipratropium nasal spray was associated with an improvement, especially in the patients with PNAR. There were few adverse events; these were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipratropium nasal spray 0.03% administered at a dose of 42 micrograms/nostril bid is a safe and effective new therapy for control of anterior rhinorrhea in pediatric patients with PNAR. Twice daily administration is adequate for patients with PNAR, but patients with PAR might benefit from more frequent administration (e.g., tid).