Evaluation of mechanisms behind elevated energy expenditure in cancer patients with solid tumours

Unraveling the lost balance: Adrenergic dysfunction in cancer cachexia

Cancer cachexia, characterized by muscle wasting and widespread inflammation, poses a significant challenge for patients with cancer, profoundly impacting both their quality of life and treatment management. However, existing treatment modalities remain very limited, accentuating the necessity for innovative therapeutic interventions. Many recent studies demonstrated that changes in autonomic balance is a key driver of cancer cachexia. This review consolidates research findings from investigations into autonomic dysfunction across cancer cachexia, spanning animal models and patient cohorts. Moreover, we explore therapeutic strategies involving adrenergic receptor modulation through receptor blockers and agonists. Mechanisms underlying adrenergic hyperactivity in cardiac and adipose tissues, influencing tissue remodeling, are also examined. Looking ahead, we present a perspective for future research that delves into autonomic dysregulation in cancer cachexia. This comprehensive review highlights the urgency of advancing research to unveil innovative avenues for combatting cancer cachexia and improving patient well-being.

Cancer cachexia: Pathophysiology and association with cancer-related pain

Cachexia is a syndrome of unintentional body weight loss and muscle wasting occurring in 30% of all cancer patients. Patients with cancers most commonly leading to brain metastases have a risk for cachexia development between 20 and 80%. Cachexia causes severe weakness and fatigue and negatively impacts quality and length of life. The negative energy balance in cachectic patients is most often caused by a combination of increased energy expenditure and decreased energy intake. Basal metabolic rate may be elevated due to tumor secreted factors and a systemic inflammatory response leading to inefficiency in energy production pathways and increased energy demand by the tumor and host tissues. A growing body of research explores physiological and molecular mechanisms of metabolic dysregulation in cachexia. However, decreased energy intake and physical functioning also remain important contributors to cachexia pathogenesis. Pain associated with metastatic malignancy is significantly associated with inflammation, thus making inflammation a common link between cancer pain and cachexia. Pain may also influence appetite and food intake and exacerbate fatigue and functional decline, potentially contributing to cachexia severity. Cancer pain and cachexia often occur simultaneously; however, causal relationships remain to be established. Appropriate assessment and treatment of pain in advanced cancer patients may positively impact nutrition status and physical functioning, slowing the progression of cachexia and improving quality and length of life for patients.

Cardiac Remodeling in Cancer-Induced Cachexia: Functional, Structural, and Metabolic Contributors

Cancer cachexia is a syndrome of progressive weight loss and muscle wasting occurring in many advanced cancer patients. Cachexia significantly impairs quality of life and increases mortality. Cardiac atrophy and dysfunction have been observed in patients with cachexia, which may contribute to cachexia pathophysiology. However, relative to skeletal muscle, little research has been carried out to understand the mechanisms of cardiomyopathy in cachexia. Here, we review what is known clinically about the cardiac changes occurring in cachexia, followed by further discussion of underlying physiological and molecular mechanisms contributing to cachexia-induced cardiomyopathy. Impaired cardiac contractility and relaxation may be explained by a complex interplay of significant heart muscle atrophy and metabolic remodeling, including mitochondrial dysfunction. Because cardiac muscle has fundamental differences compared to skeletal muscle, understanding cardiac-specific effects of cachexia may bring light to unique therapeutic targets and ultimately improve clinical management for patients with cancer cachexia.

The prognostic effect of hemoglobin on patients with cancer cachexia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the influence of hemoglobin on cancer cachexia and to determine whether hemoglobin affects the prognosis or quality of life of patients with cancer cachexia and whether these effects are caused by an interaction between hemoglobin and other factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a multicenter cohort of 2715 patients with cancer cachexia diagnosed from June 2012 to December 2019. The primary outcomes and measures were overall survival (OS) time and all-cause mortality. The association between hemoglobin and all-cause mortality was evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) and the restricted cubic spline model with a two-sided p-value. Optimal stratification was used to determine the threshold value. We also evaluated the cross-classification of hemoglobin and each variable with survival.

RESULTS

Among the 2715 participants diagnosed with cancer cachexia, 1592 (58.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 58.8 (11.7) years. The optimal cutoff point for hemoglobin as a predictor of cancer cachexia mortality was 140 g/L for males and 101 g/L for females in our research. The decrease in hemoglobin was positively correlated with all-cause mortality. These associations were consistent across cancer subtypes. In the multivariable analysis, after adjusting for sex, age, TNM stage, tumor type, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, Karnofsky performance status score, and other factors, patients diagnosed with cancer cachexia who had low hemoglobin levels were more likely to have a worse prognosis (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.51).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that the proposed hemoglobin cutoff point would be valuable for prognostic prediction in patients with cancer cachexia, especially for long-term prognosis.

A hypothetical method for controlling highly glycolytic cancers and metastases

Most proliferating cancer cells and cancer-associated tumor stroma have an upregulated glucose energy demand in relation to normal cells. Cancer cells are further less metabolically flexible than normal cells. They can therefore not survive metabolic stress as well as normal cells can. Metabolic deprivation thus provides a potential therapeutic window. Unfortunately, current glucose blockers have toxicity problems. An alternative way to reduce a cancer patient's blood glucose (BG), for a short-term period to very low levels, without the concomitant toxicity, is hypothesized in this paper. In vitro tests have shown that short-term BG deprivation to 2 mmol/L for 180 min is an effective cancer treatment. This level of hypoglycaemia can be maintained in vivo with a combination of very low-dose insulin and the suppression of the glucose counter-regulation system. Such suppression can be safely achieved by the infusion of somatostatin and a combination of both α and β-blockers. The proposed short-term in vivo method, was shown to be non-toxic and safe for non-cancer patients. The next step is to test the effect of the proposed method on cancer patients. It is also suggested to incorporate well-known, long-term BG deprivation treatments to achieve maximum effect.

Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)-Propranolol as an anti-cancer agent

Propranolol (PRO) is a well-known and widely used non-selective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist (beta-blocker), with a range of actions which are of interest in an oncological context. PRO displays effects on cellular proliferation and invasion, on the immune system, on the angiogenic cascade, and on tumour cell sensitivity to existing treatments. Both pre-clinical and clinical evidence of these effects, in multiple cancer types, is assessed and summarised and relevant mechanisms of action outlined. In particular there is evidence that PRO is effective at multiple points in the metastatic cascade, particularly in the context of the post-surgical wound response. Based on this evidence the case is made for further clinical investigation of the anticancer effects of PRO, particularly in combination with other agents. A number of trials are on-going, in different treatment settings for various cancers.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment in cancer cachexia: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

There are no established treatments for cachexia. Recently it has been suggested that the evidence for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) treatment is sufficient to support its regular clinical use. Primary objective in this systematic review was to assess efficacy and safety of NSAID treatment in improving body weight and muscle mass in patients with cancer cachexia. Secondary objectives were to assess whether this treatment could improve other cachexia domains such as anorexia and food intake, catabolic drive and function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature review of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central register of controlled trials database was carried out using both text words and MeSH/EMTREE terms.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included; all but two trials showed either improvement or stabilization in weight or lean body mass. Seven studies were without a comparator. Studies are generally small and a few are methodologically flawed, often due to multiple outcomes with excess risk of false positives.

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs may improve weight in cancer patients with cachexia, and there is some evidence on effect on physical performance, self-reported quality of life and inflammatory parameters. Evidence is too frail to recommend NSAID for cachexia outside clinical trials. This is supported by the known side effects of NSAIDs, even though the reviewed literature report almost negligible toxicity.

Effects by daily long term provision of ghrelin to unselected weight-losing cancer patients: a randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND

The short-term provision of ghrelin to patients with cancer indicates that there may be benefits from long-term provision of ghrelin for the palliative treatment of weight-losing cancer patients. This hypothesis was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study.

METHODS

Weight-losing cancer patients with solid gastrointestinal tumors were randomized to receive either high-dose ghrelin treatment (13 microg/kg daily; n = 17 patients) or low-dose ghrelin treatment (0.7 microg/kg daily; n = 14 patients) for 8 weeks as a once-daily, subcutaneous injections. Appetite was scored on a visual analog scale; and food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body composition (dual x-ray absorpitometry) were measured before the start of treatment and during follow-up. Serum levels of ghrelin, insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1, growth hormone (GH), triglycerides, free fatty acids, and glucose were measured. Health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression were assessed by using standardized methods (the 36-item Short Form Health Survey and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Physical activity, rest, and sleep were measured by using a multisensor body monitor.

RESULTS

Treatment groups were comparable at inclusion. Appetite scores were increased significantly by high-dose ghrelin analyzed both on an intent-to-treat basis and according to the protocol. High-dose ghrelin reduced the loss of whole body fat (P < .04) and serum GH (P < .05). There was a trend for high-dose ghrelin to improve energy balance (P < .07; per protocol). Otherwise, no statistically significant differences in outcome variables were observed between the high-dose and low-dose groups. Adverse effects were not observed by high-dose ghrelin, such as serum levels of tumor markers (cancer antigen 125 [CA 125], carcinoembryonic antigen, and CA 19-9).

CONCLUSIONS

The current results suggested that daily, long-term provision of ghrelin to weight-losing cancer patients with solid tumors supports host metabolism, improves appetite, and attenuates catabolism.

Insulin treatment in cancer cachexia: effects on survival, metabolism, and physical functioning

PURPOSE

The present study was designed to evaluate whether daily insulin treatment for weight-losing cancer patients attenuates the progression of cancer cachexia and improves metabolism and physical functioning in palliative care.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred and thirty-eight unselected patients with mainly advanced gastrointestinal malignancy were randomized to receive insulin (0.11 +/- 0.05 units/kg/d) plus best available palliative support [anti-inflammatory treatment (indomethacin), prevention of anemia (recombinant erythropoietin), and specialized nutritional care (oral supplements + home parenteral nutrition)] according to individual needs. Control patients received the best available palliative support according to the same principles. Health-related quality of life, food intake, resting energy expenditure, body composition, exercise capacity, metabolic efficiency during exercise, and spontaneous daily physical activity as well as blood tests were evaluated during follow-up (30-824 days) according to intention to treat.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics at randomizations were almost identical in study and control groups. Insulin treatment for 193 +/- 139 days (mean +/- SD) significantly stimulated carbohydrate intake, decreased serum-free fatty acids, increased whole body fat, particularly in trunk and leg compartments, whereas fat-free lean tissue mass was unaffected. Insulin treatment improved metabolic efficiency during exercise, but did not increase maximum exercise capacity and spontaneous physical activity. Tumor markers in blood (CEA, CA-125, CA 19-9) did not indicate the stimulation of tumor growth by insulin; a conclusion also supported by improved survival of insulin-treated patients (P<0.03).

CONCLUSION

Insulin is a significant metabolic treatment in multimodal palliation of weight-losing cancer patients.

Common symptoms in advanced cancer

The key points of this article are anorexia and cachexia are: A major cause of cancer deaths. Several drugs are available to treat anorexia and cachexia. Dyspnea in cancer usually is caused by several factors. Treatment consists of reversing underlying causes, empiric bronchodilators, cortico-steroids--and in the terminally ill patients-opioids, benzodiazepines,and chlorpromazine. Delirium is associated with advanced cancer. Empiric treatment with neuroleptics while evaluating for reversible causes is a reasonable approach to management. Nausea and vomiting are caused by extra-abdominal factors (drugs,electrolyte abnormalities, central nervous system metastases) or intra-abdominal factors (gastroparesis, ileus, gastric outlet obstruction, bowel obstruction). The pattern of nausea and vomiting differs depending upon whether the cause is extra- or intra-abdominal. Reversible causes should be sought and empiric metoclopramide or haloperidol should be initiated. Fatigue may be caused by anemia, depression, endocrine abnormalities,or electrolyte disturbances that should be treated before using empiric methylphenidate. Constipation should be treated with laxatives and stool softeners. Both should start with the first opioid dose.

Effects of recombinant erythropoietin in palliative treatment of unselected cancer patients

PURPOSE

The purpose is to evaluate relationships between objectively assessed exercise capacity and subjectively assessed scoring of physical functioning and well-being after erythropoietin treatment in cancer patients on palliative care.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Unselected cancer patients (n = 108) who experienced progressive cachexia were randomized to receive either anti-inflammatory treatment alone (indomethacin) or recombinant erythropoietin plus indomethacin to prevent the appearance of disease-induced anemia and thereby protect patients' exercise capacity. Follow-up investigations of nutritional status, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 were compared.

RESULTS

Effective treatment by erythropoietin on top of basal whole body anti-inflammatory treatment was confirmed and indicated by time course changes of biochemical, physiologic, and nutritional objectives, whereas individual self-reported scoring of physical functioning and general health did not indicate a clear-cut effectiveness, particularly at moderately subnormal hemoglobin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between objective and subjective self-reported measures may be either fundamental or indicate scoring limitations for evaluation of therapeutic results. Present results demonstrate a clinical benefit of erythropoietin treatment in cancer patients with subnormal to normal hemoglobin levels, whereas the patients' own subjective scoring was insufficient to sense such improvements. The discrepancy may be either fundamental or methodological but emphasizes the importance to document therapeutic outcome in both subjective and objective perspectives in palliative care of cancer patients.

Energy balance in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

Weight gain is a common problem amongst women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. We undertook a study to determine the causes of this weight gain. Prospective measurements of body mass and composition (skinfolds, bioelectrical impedance, total body potassium), energy balance (resting energy expenditure dietary intake, and physical activity), were determined in 17 women during and in the 6 months after commencing adjuvant chemotherapy. Women gained significant amounts of weight (5.0 +/- 3.8; p < 0.01) and body fat (7.1 kg +/- 4.5; p < 0.01) over the year. Waist circumference (5.1 +/- 4.5 cm; p < 0.01) and abdominal skinfold (16.2 +/- 10 mm; p < 0.01) were also increased but there was a decline in fat free mass (FFM); 1.7 +/- 2.5 kg. Women due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a greater resting energy expenditure (REE) compared with healthy subjects (n = 21); 100.5 +/- 8.0% Harris Benedict compared to 94.5 +/- 8.4% Harris Benedict (p = 0.05). REE declined by 3% during adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05), and remained depressed until at least 3 months posttreatment. There were no significant changes in dietary intake or physical activity over the year. Failure of women to reduce their energy intake to compensate for the decreased energy requirement may account for some of the weight gain. Treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy causes gain of body fat because of reduced energy expenditure, and the failure of women to reduce their energy intake to compensate for the decline in energy requirement during and in the 6 months posttreatment. Since weight gain impacts on survival, patients should be counselled to reduce energy intake and exercise during and after adjuvant treatment.

Palliative nutritional intervention in addition to cyclooxygenase and erythropoietin treatment for patients with malignant disease: Effects on survival, metabolism, and function

BACKGROUND

The role of nutrition in the palliative treatment of patients with malignancy-related cachexia is unclear. The goal of the current study was to determine whether specialized, nutrition-focused patient care could improve integrated whole-body metabolism and functional outcome in unselected weight-losing patients with malignant disease who were receiving systemic antiinflammatory (cyclooxygenase [COX]-inhibitory) treatment along with erythropoietin (EPO) support.

METHODS

Three hundred nine patients with malignant disease who experienced progressive cachexia due to solid tumors (primarily gastrointestinal lesions) were randomized to receive a COX inhibitor (indomethacin, 50 mg twice daily) and EPO (15-40,000 units per week) along with specialized, nutrition-focused patient care (oral nutritional support and home total parenteral nutrition [TPN]) provided on a patient-by-patient basis to attenuate inflammation, prevent anemia, and improve nutritional status. Control patients received the same indomethacin and EPO doses that study patients received without the added nutritional support. All patients were treated and followed until death. Biochemical assays (blood, liver, kidney, and thyroid), nutritional state assessment (food intake and body composition), and exercise testing with simultaneous measurement of whole-body respiratory gas exchange before and during exercise were performed before the start of treatment and then at regular intervals during the treatment period (every 2-30 months after treatment initiation). Statistical analyses were performed on 'intention-to-treat' and 'as-treated' bases.

RESULTS

Home TPN was provided to approximately 50% of the study patients without severe complications. Over the entire observation period, rhEPO prevented the development of anemia in both study patients and control patients. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed an improvement in energy balance for nutritionally supported patients (P < 0.03); no other significant differences in outcome between study patients and control patients were observed. As-treated analysis demonstrated that patients receiving nutrition experienced prolonged survival (P < 0.01), which was accompanied by improved energy balance (P < 0.001), increasing body fat (P < 0.05), and a greater maximum exercise capacity (P < 0.04). A trend toward increased metabolic efficiency at maximum exercise (P < 0.06) for study patients relative to control patients also was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study strongly support that nutrition is a limiting factor influencing survival and that nutritional support protects integrated metabolism and metabolic function in patients with progressive cachexia secondary to malignant disease.

New drugs for the anorexia-cachexia syndrome

Anorexia and cachexia accompany advancing cancer to a greater extent than any other symptom. Cachexia alone causes 22% of cancer deaths. The pathophysiology of cachexia is distinctly different from that of starvation. Resting energy expenditures are elevated, and abnormal intermediary metabolism, proteolysis, and lipolysis occur independently of caloric intake. A facilatative interaction between catecholamines, prostaglandins, and inflammatory cytokines is responsible for cachexia. Successful treatment requires reduction of energy expenditures, reversal of anorexia, and correction of abnormal intermediary metabolism, lipolysis, and proteolysis. Multiple appetite stimulants can be used in combination. Several new potentially useful biologic agents have been tested in animal tumor models. Several of the anticachectic agents have demonstrated in vivo or in vitro antitumor activity. The biologic and clinical activity of each drug is reviewed herein, and potentially useful combinations are listed.

Basal metabolic rate in children with a solid tumour

OBJECTIVE

To study the level of and changes in basal metabolic rate (BMR) in children with a solid tumour at diagnosis and during treatment in order to provide a more accurate estimate of energy requirements for nutritional support.

DESIGN

An observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care at the Centre for Paediatric Oncology, University Hospital Nijmegen.

SUBJECTS

Thirteen patients were recruited from a population of patients visiting the University Hospital Nijmegen for treatment. All patients asked to participate took part in and completed the study.

INTERVENTION

BMR was measured by indirect calorimetry, under stringent, standardised conditions, for 20 min and on three different occasions in all patients. Continuous breath gas analysis using a mouthpiece was performed. Weight, height and skinfold measurements were performed before each measurement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BMR was expressed as percentage of the estimated reference value, according to the Schofield formulas based on age, weight and sex, and in kJ (kcal) per kg of fat-free mass.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, the BMR was higher than the estimated reference BMR in all patients and 44% of the patients were considered hypermetabolic. Mean BMR (as percentage of reference) was significantly increased (11.6% (s.d. 6.7%); P=0.001), but decreased during treatment in 12 of the 13 patients (mean decrease 12.7% (s.d. 3.9%); P<0.0001). Furthermore, a significant negative correlation (P=-0.67; P=0.01) was found between the change in BMR and tumour response.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the BMR of children with a solid tumour is increased at diagnosis and possibly during the first phase of oncologic treatment. This may be important when determining energy requirements for nutritional support.

Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas

Malnutrition in cancer patients results from multifactorial events and is associated with an alteration of quality of life and a reduced survival. A simple nutritional assessment program and early counselling by a dietitian are essential to guide nutritional support and to alert the physician to the need for enteral (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN). A daily intake of 20-35 kcal/kg, with a balanced contribution of glucose and lipids, and of 0.2-0.35 g nitrogen/kg is recommended both for EN and PN, with an adequate provision of electrolytes, trace elements and vitamins. EN, always preferable for patients with an intact digestive tract, and PN are both safe and effective methods of administering nutrients. The general results in clinical practice suggest no tumor growth during nutritional support. The indiscriminate use of conventional EN and PN is not indicated in well-nourished cancer patients or in patients with mild malnutrition. EN or PN is not clinically efficacious for patients treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, unless there are prolonged periods of GI toxicity, as in the case of bone marrow transplant patients. Severely malnourished cancer patients undergoing major visceral surgery may benefit from perioperative nutritional support, preferably via enteral access. Nutritional support in palliative care should be based on the potential risks and benefits of EN and PN, and on the patient's and family's wishes. Research is currently directed toward the impact of nutritional pharmacology on the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Glutamine-supplemented PN is probably beneficial in bone marrow transplant patients. Immune diets are likely to reduce the rate of infectious complications and the length of hospital stay after GI surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of such novel approaches in specific populations of cancer patients, and should also address the question of the overall cost-benefit ratio of nutritional pharmacology, and the effect of nutritional support on length and quality of life.

Beta-adrenoceptor activity and resting energy metabolism in weight losing cancer patients

This study was aimed at comparing the blocking of beta-adrenoceptor activity to changes in the resting energy metabolism of 10 cancer patients with progressive weight loss due to solid malignant tumours. Resting energy expenditure (REE) as well as whole body carbohydrate and fat oxidation were investigated and related to plasma substrate levels (glucose, glycerol, free fatty acids (FFA)) before and after 5 days of oral administration of specific beta1 receptor blocker (atenolol, 50 mg/day) and non-specific beta1,beta2-adrenoceptor (propranolol, 80 mg/day) blockade. The administration order of the drugs was random, and a 3-day washout period was used in all individuals between the provision of the first and the second drug in order to minimise the risk of carry-over effects. Resting measurements in the morning after an overnight fast were performed by indirect calorimetry. Atenolol treatment reduced REE by 77+/-14 kcal/day and propranolol by 48+/-13 kcal/day, respectively (P<0.05 versus pretreatment values). Whole body oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production were decreased similarly by both atenolol and propranolol treatment (P<0.05). Carbohydrate oxidation was increased by atenolol and decreased by propranolol, whilst fat oxidation was decreased by atenolol and unchanged by propranolol. The decrease in REE, accounting for the decline in heart rate, was significantly more pronounced following treatment with propranolol compared with atenolol (P<0.05). Atenolol and propranolol had no effect on blood glucose, plasma glycerol and FFA. We conclude that wastage in cancer patients is in part explained by increased beta(1) and beta(2)-adrenoceptor activity, in part secondary to elevated cardiovascular activity as a result of anaemia, loss of cardiac contractile capacity and altered host metabolism.

Intralipid infusion combined with propranolol administration has favorable metabolic effects in elderly malnourished cancer patients

Previous studies have shown that an elevated basal metabolic rate (BMR) is present in elderly malnourished cancer patients. A possible dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system needs to be demonstrated. In aged weight-losing cancer patients (n = 40), aged non-weight-losing cancer patients (n = 30), and aged weight-losing noncancer patients (n = 18), the baseline BMR and heart rate variability were studied. Aged weight-losing cancer patients (n = 40) underwent bioimpedance analysis, ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring with analysis of heart rate variability, and determination of the BMR. Then, the patients received infusion of Intralipid (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) without and with propranolol (6 days of 40 mg twice daily) administration. At baseline, a simple correlation between the BMR and the low-frequency component (LF) (r = .42, P < .006) and LF to high-frequency (HF) ratio (r = .51, P < .001) was found. After propranolol administration, the percent decline in the BMR was significantly correlated with the percent decline in the LF (r = .39, P < .01) and LF/HF ratio (r = .53, P < .001). The percent decline in the BMR was not correlated with the HF (r = .13, P < .34) or the plasma noradrenaline concentration (r = .21, P < .20) at any time. With regard to the BMR and substrate oxidation, 6-day propranolol administration plus Intralipid infusion produced the strongest decline in the BMR. This study demonstrates that autonomic nervous system dysfunction occurs and is responsible for the elevated BMR in elderly cancer patients, propranolol administration rectifies the autonomic dysfunction, and Intralipid infusion combined with propranolol administration is useful for enhancing the daily caloric intake without a strong increase in energy expenditure.

Preservation of macronutrient preferences in cancer anorexia

Indirect evidence suggests that cancer anorexia is associated with specific aversions to macronutrients. To investigate this, patients with cancer anorexia and hospitalized control subjects devised 3-day menus comprising foods that they wished to eat. These foods were then provided for 3 days and the intakes of each food carefully measured. As expected, patients with cancer anorexia consumed substantially less energy than hospitalized control subjects (6.0 +/- 0.9 MJ vs 9.5 +/- 0.5 MJ, P < 0.001). However, macronutrient composition was consistently maintained in the patients with cancer anorexia. These data argue against cancer anorexia representing a state of macronutrient aversion.

Involvement of prostaglandins in cachexia induced by T-cell leukemia in the rat

We have previously demonstrated that experimentally induced T-cell leukemia in the rat results in a rapid and severe cachexia. This weight loss is largely due to a reduction in food intake, but is also accompanied by inappropriately high rates of energy expenditure. Increases in resting oxygen consumption (VO2) of 25% to 35% above the levels of pair-fed animals were observed over the period of weight loss. The present study investigated the possible involvement of prostaglandins in the cachexia induced by T-cell leukemia in the rat. Acute systemic injection of the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors (indomethacin 1 mg/kg or flurbiprofen 1 mg/kg intraperitoneally [IP]) significantly reduced (by 14% and 10%, respectively) the increase in metabolic rate and also reversed the elevated body temperature of leukemic animals. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of indomethacin (0.2 mg/kg) had only modest effects on the increase in temperature or hypermetabolism of leukemic animals. Long-term daily injection of indomethacin or flurbiprofen (1 mg/kg/d IP) had no significant effect on food intake or body weight of leukemic animals, and neither treatment significantly affected disease status. Indomethacin significantly reduced the decline in epididymal fat pad weight of leukemic animals. These data indicate that prostaglandins, produced peripherally, are involved in the acute hypermetabolism associated with T-cell leukemia, but have little or no effect on the hypophagia or body weight loss of leukemic rats.

Inhibition of lipolysis and muscle protein degradation by EPA in cancer cachexia

Depletion of muscle and adipose tissue in cancer cachexia appears to arise not only from decreased food intake but also from the production of catabolic factors by certain tumours. Experiments with the cachexia-inducing MAC16 tumour in mice showed that when part of the carbohydrate calories were replaced by fish oil, host body weight loss was inhibited. The effect occurred without an alteration of either the total calorie consumption or nitrogen intake. Instead, one of the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), was found directly to inhibit tumour-induced lipolysis. The effect was structurally specific, as two related PUFA, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), were without effect. The antilipolytic effect of EPA arose from an inhibition of the elevation of cyclic AMP in adipocytes in response to the lipid mobilizing factor. The increased protein degradation in the skeletal muscle of cachectic animals was also inhibited by EPA. This effect was due to the inhibition of the rise in muscle prostaglandin E2 in response to a tumour-produced proteolytic factor by EPA. Thus, reversal of cachexia by EPA in this mouse model results from its capacity to interfere with tumour-produced catabolic factors. Similar factors have been detected in human cancer cachexia.

Mechanisms of cachexia induced by T-cell leukemia in the rat

Body wasting (cachexia) is a common feature of cancer and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms underlying cachexia are largely unknown, and studies in experimental animals have focused mainly on solid tumors. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to quantify and investigate cachexia in experimentally induced T-cell leukemia in the rat. Induction of leukemia by serial passage (injection of cervical lymph node suspension) resulted in a rapid increase in white blood cell (WBC count, hypertrophy of the spleen (by day 11), and severe morbidity within 17 to 18 days. Body weight gain and food intake declined steadily in leukemic animals from day 12, although weight loss was significantly greater in pair-fed, nonleukemic animals. However, leukemic rats had a lower body fat content and higher water content than pair-fed animals on day 18, so the measurement of body weight significantly underestimated the severity of cachexia. Resting oxygen consumption (VO2), measured during the light phase, declined in pair-fed animals from day 13, but was elevated in leukemic rats on days 12 to 18 by 25% (P < .05, one-way ANOVA) compared with pair-fed rats and by 7% (P < .05, one-way ANOVA) relative to free-feeding controls. Hypermetabolism was associated with an increase in brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity (74% and 89%, respectively, P < .05, one-way ANOVA) in leukemic rats compared with control and pair-fed groups. Effects of leukemia on VO2 and BAT were prevented by administration of the adrenergic antagonist, propranolol. These results indicate that T-cell leukemia in the rat results in rapid and severe cachexia, which is largely due to marked hypophagia, but is also accompanied by inappropriately high rates of energy expenditure that are mediated by sympathetic activation of BAT thermogenesis.

Sympathetic discharge to mesenteric organs and the liver. Evidence for substantial mesenteric organ norepinephrine spillover

This study using sampling of blood from the portal vein, in addition to arterial and hepatic sites, to estimate separately spillovers of norepinephrine from mesenteric organs and the liver in seven patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Conventional measurements in arterial and hepatic venous plasma provided a measure of net hepatomesenteric NE spillover (403 pmol/ml) that indicated a 13% contribution of these organs to total body spillover of NE into systemic plasma (3,071+/-518 pmol/min). The net hepatomesenteric spillover of NE into systemic plasma was much lower than the spillover of NE from mesenteric organs into portal venous plasma (1,684+/-418 pmol/min). This and the hepatic spillover of NE into systemic plasma (212+/-72 pmol/min) indicated a considerable combined spillover of NE from hepatomesenteric organs (1,896+/-455 pmol/min). The sum of the latter estimate with the difference between total body and net hepatomesenteric NE spillovers provided an adjusted total body spillover of NE into both systemic and portal venous plasma (4,564+/-902 pmol/min). Mesenteric organs made a 37% contribution, and the liver made a 5% contribution to the adjusted total body spillover of NE. Thus, a substantial proportion of total body sympathetic outflow is directed towards mesenteric organs; this is obscured by efficient hepatic extraction of NE (86+/-6%) when measurements are restricted to arterial and hepatic venous plasma.

Anorexia during acute and chronic disease

Anorexia is associated with disorders of all systems. Anorexia represents a consistent clinical manifestation during acute and chronic pathophysiological processes (infection, inflammation, injury, toxins, immunological reactions, malignancy and necrosis). Anorexia during disease can be beneficial or deleterious depending on the timing and duration. Temporary anorexia during acute disease may be beneficial to an organism since a restriction in the intake of micro- and macro-nutrients will inhibit bacterial growth. Long-term anorexia during chronic disease, however, is deleterious to an organism and may be associated with cachexia, which can ultimately result in death. Various mechanisms participate in the anorexia observed during disease, including cytokine action. Anorexia induced by cytokines is proposed to involve modulation of hypothalamic-feeding associated sites, prostaglandin-dependent mechanisms, modifications of neurotransmitter systems, gastrointestinal, metabolic, and endocrine factors. In addition, the anorexia-cachexia syndrome is multifactorial and may involve chronic pain, depression or anxiety, hypogeusia and hyposmia, chronic nausea, early satiety, malfunction of the gastrointestinal system, metabolic alterations, cytokine action, production of other anorexigenic substances and/or iatrogenic causes (chemotherapy, radiotherapy). Cachexia may result not only from anorexia and a decreased caloric intake, but also from malabsorption and losses from the body (ulcers, hemorrhage, effusions), or a change in body metabolism. Research has focused on potential interventions to modify anorexia during disease and the anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Nutritional modifications and the use of specific steroids (such as megestrol acetate) are being tested in the clinical setting. Understanding the specific mechanisms responsible for anorexia during disease as well as their interactions is essential to develop interventions for the control of anorexia (during a critical time in a specific disease), and to devise less toxic immunotherapeutic regimens using cytokines.

Pathophysiology of cancer cachexia

Patients with advanced cancer and cachexia typically demonstrate modestly increased rates of energy expenditure in the presence of diminished food intake due to anorexia and to gastrointestinal disturbances. Rates of glucose production by the liver, gluconeogenesis and glycolysis to lactate (Cori cycle) are increased, fat mobilisation and oxidation are accelerated. There is a redistribution of body proteins away from muscle towards visceral proteins, resulting in marked muscle protein loss. Cancer cachexia differs from simple starvation and demonstrates metabolic similarities to sepsis or polytrauma. The metabolic response in the patient with cancer is largely due to mediators released by the tumour or by the host; recently the role of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and -6 (IL-6) and interferon gamma (INF gamma) has been emphasized. Catabolic hormones such as glucocorticoids and adrenaline have also been implicated. Cytokines have the potential to reproduce experimentally the clinical syndrome of cancer cachexia. There is evidence of increased production of several of them in certain types of cancer. There are overlapping activities of the cytokines TNF alpha, IL-1, IFN gamma and IL-6. The contribution of each of them to cancer cachexia remains unclear. Inhibition of cytokine activity using specific antibodies in cancer-bearing experimental animals demonstrated partial prevention of cachexia. A positive feedback between macrophage-derived IL-1 and tumour-derived IL-6 has been demonstrated recently in experimental cancer cachexia. Cytokines may support tumour growth by acting as growth factors.