A comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in adult asthma

Pharmacological Basis of Differences in Dose Response, Dose Equivalence, and Duration of Action of Inhaled Corticosteroids

INTRODUCTION

Asthma treatment guidelines classify inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens as low, medium, or high dose. However, efficacy and safety are not independently assessed accordingly. Moreover, differences in ICS duration of action are not considered when a dose regimen is selected. We investigated the efficacy and safety implications of these limitations for available ICS molecules.

METHODS

Published pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters were used, alongside physiological and pharmacological principles, to estimate the efficacy and safety of available ICS molecules. Extent and duration of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) occupancy in the lung (efficacy) and cortisol suppression (systemic exposure and safety) were estimated.

RESULTS

Some ICS regimens (e.g., fluticasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and ciclesonide) rank high for efficacy but low for systemic exposure, contrary to how ICS dose equivalence is currently viewed. Differences in dose-response relationships for efficacy and systemic exposure were unique for each ICS regimen and reflected in their therapeutic indices. Notably, even low doses of most ICSs can generate high GR occupancy (≥ 90%) across the entire dose interval at steady state, which may explain previously reported difficulties in obtaining dose responses within the clinical dose range and observations that most clinical benefit typically occurs at low doses. The estimated post dose duration of lung GR occupancy for ICS molecules was categorized as 4-6 h (short), 14-16 h (medium), 25-40 h (long), or > 80 h (ultra-long), suggesting potentially large differences in anti-inflammatory duration of action.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting where there may be poor adherence to prescribed therapy, our findings suggest a significant therapeutic advantage for longer-acting ICS molecules in patients with asthma.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids relative to fluticasone propionate: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Many trials have been published comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatments in asthma. However, mixed results necessitate the summarization of available evidence to aid in decision-making. Areas covered: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) with other ICS including beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) and ciclesonide (CIC). PubMed was searched and 54 RCTs that fit pre-determined criteria were included. Endpoints evaluated included lung function, asthma symptom control, exacerbation frequency, reliever use, quality of life and steroid-related side effects. Expert commentary: Across all studies, FP was associated with either more favorable or at least similar efficacy and safety, in comparison with BDP or BUD. This observation may be related to FP's higher relative potency and almost negligible oral bioavailability. FP was comparable to CIC for efficacy. However, CIC appeared to have a smaller impact on cortisol levels than FP, which is likely due to CIC's incomplete conversion to active metabolite (des-CIC) and the lower potency of des-CIC compared with FP. Although there were no significant differences in evaluated outcomes after treatment with different ICS in the majority of studies, some observed differences could be explained by their respective pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties.

Short-term safety and tolerability of double-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of asthma exacerbations in patients receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretidetrade mark or Advair((R))) is low. However, when asthma control deteriorates, clinicians may instruct patients to double the dose of their inhaled corticosteroid medication for a short period. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a period of 2 weeks in subjects with persistent asthma is safe and well tolerated.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in primary-care centres. Adults with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of >/=70% predicted were stratified to receive a single dose of Seretidetrade mark 50mug/100mug, 50mug/250mug or 50mug/500mug twice daily from a Diskustrade mark inhaler for a 4-week run-in period, dependent on the dose of inhaled corticosteroid on entry. Subjects were then randomised to receive either an extra inhalation of the same dose of Seretidetrade mark received during the run-in (double dose) or an inhalation of matching placebo (single dose) for 14 days in a 2 : 1 ratio. Subjects were asked to record any adverse events, morning and evening heart rate (HR), peak flow and relief medication use in daily record cards. The primary endpoint was tremor as perceived by the subject. Clinic evaluations included HR, 12-lead ECG, and potassium and glucose levels.

RESULTS

110 and 208 subjects received single- and double-dose Seretidetrade mark, respectively. Only one subject experienced tremor. This was classified as mild and occurred in a subject receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark (50mug/100mug). There was no difference between the treatment groups in the incidence of tremor (difference <1%; 95% CI -6, 8). Other salmeterol-related adverse events (palpitations, muscle cramps and headache) and fluticasone propionate-related events (oral candidiasis and hoarseness) occurred in a similar percentage of subjects in each treatment group. The treatment differences for morning and evening HR measurements showed small differences between the two groups (<2 beats/min). The adjusted mean treatment difference (double dose - single dose) in morning HR was 1.1 beats/min (95% CI 0.2, 2.0) and evening HR was 0.9 beats/min (95% CI 0.1, 1.7). Seven percent of subjects receiving single-dose Seretidetrade mark and 8% receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark had a QTc change from baseline in the interval 30-59 msec. No increases above 59 msec were seen in either group. There were no clinically significant changes from baseline for potassium levels. Two percent of subjects in the single dose and <1% in the double-dose group had a change from a non-clinically significant baseline blood glucose assessment to a clinically significant abnormality at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In circumstances in which a physician may be considering doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a short period of time in adult asthmatics, this study demonstrates that doubling the dose for a period of 2 weeks is safe and well tolerated.

A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation

In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 μg daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler^®, and budesonide (BUD) 1600 μg daily, administered using the Turbuhaler^®, in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 μg daily and BUD 1600 μg daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 μg daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 μg daily.

Fluticasone versus beclomethasone or budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2007) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-one studies (14,602 participants) representing 74 randomised comparisons met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was fair. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater end of treatment FEV1 (0.04 litres (95% CI 0 to 0.07 litres), end of treatment and change in morning PEF, but not change in FEV1 or evening PEF. This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. FP led to fewer symptoms and less rescue medication use. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in morning PEF, evening PEF, and FEV1 over BDP or BUD. The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There were no significant differences incidence of hoarseness, pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing sore throat and when given at the same daily dose leads to increased hoarseness. There are concerns about adrenal suppression with Fluticasone given to children at doses greater than 400 mcg/day, but the randomised trials included in this review did not provide sufficient data to address this issue.

Evidence-based selection of inhaled corticosteroid for treatment of chronic asthma

Published literature relevant to comparison of various inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) was reviewed. Marked heterogeneity was found in the reported results. The efficacy and side effects of ICSs depend on their formulation, dosing and device used, and the subjects' age, severity of asthma, and inhaler technique. All these factors have not been included uniformly in most study designs. Notwithstanding this limitation, it appears that fluticasone is generally very effective and safe in low-to-medium doses and may be used for most patients. Budesonide is the only Pregnancy Category B ICSs, all others being Category C, and it is available as nebulizer suspension suitable for use in children over 6 months of age. Budesonide, also available as dry powder inhaler, and beclomethasone, available as metered-dose inhaler, are equal in efficacy, and side effects and may be chosen according to the patient's ability to handle the device. Flunisolide causes fewer side effects but is also relatively less effective. Triamcinolone is generally less effective and causes more side effects than most of the other ICSs. Mometasone may be preferred if once-daily dosing is desired. Ciclesonide has been found highly effective in once-daily dose and without side effects even in high doses. Further studies comparing it with other ICSs over longer periods of use will determine its place in treatment of chronic asthma.

A comparison of the relative growth velocities with budesonide and fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

There have been no previous large, well-designed direct comparisons of the effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on growth in children. This randomised, double-blind study compared the effects on growth of FP and BUD in children aged 6-9 years with persistent asthma. Following a 6-month run-in period (without inhaled corticosteroids), patients with normal growth velocity were randomised to 12 months' treatment with FP 100 micro g bd (n=114) or BUD 200 micro g bd (n=119). Growth velocity was determined by stadiometric height measurement. Lung function, asthma symptoms and use of relief medication were also assessed. Annualised mean growth velocity during run-in was comparable in the two groups (FP: 5.9 cm/yr; BUD: 6.0 cm/yr). During the treatment period, adjusted mean growth velocity was significantly higher in the FP than the BUD group (5.5 cm/yr vs 4.6 cm/yr; P<0.001). Asthma control improved similarly in both treatment groups. Bone mineral density and overnight urinary cortisol:creatinine ratios were similar in the two groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported among 3% of FP-treated children, compared with 2% for BUD. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that FP for childhood asthma has significantly less impact on childhood growth velocity than a therapeutically equivalent dose of BUD.

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.

Inhaled fluticasone versus inhaled beclomethasone or inhaled budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2004) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty six studies (12, 119 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater FEV1 (0.14 litres, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.22), morning PEF (11.10 L/min, 95%CI 3.12 to 19.09 L/min) and evening PEF (9.31 L/min, 95%CI 5.12 to 13.5 L/min). This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. Symptoms and rescue medication use were widely reported but few trials provided sufficient data for analysis. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in am PEF (9.58 L/min (95% CI 5.20 to 13.97)), pm PEF (7.41 L/min (95% CI 2.61 to 12.22)), and FEV1 (0.09 L (0.02 to 0.17)). The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There was an increase in the incidence of hoarseness, but no significant difference in pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing hoarseness when given at the same daily dose. Future studies should attempt to establish the relative efficacy of inhaled steroids delivered with CFC-free propellants.

Biological availability of inhaled fluticasone propionate in horses

Healthy horses received aerosolised, intranasal or oral doses of 3 mg of fluticasone propionate evenly divided over morning and evening treatments for seven days. The bioavailability of the drug was determined in terms of the suppression of the endogenous cortisol concentrations in the horses during the period of treatment. The horses which received the aerosolised drug had significantly lower concentrations of endogenous cortisol on days 5 and 8 than the horses which received aerosolised placebo. The horses which received nasal and oral doses of fluticasone propionate showed no significant changes in their endogenous cortisol concentrations.

Adrenal function as assessed by low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone test before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate

Low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) tests (0.5 microg/L 73 m2) were done before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate in 12 patients 33-77 years old who had mild-to-severe asthma to compare the effects of these drugs on adrenal function. Low-dose ACTH tests were performed after the subjects had received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (200-900 microg/day) for at least 12 wk. Treatment was then switched to inhaled fluticasone propionate (200-600 microg/day) for at least 12 wk, and a second low-dose ACTH test was done. Pulmonary function was assessed on the basis of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, % of predicted value). After switching treatment, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid decreased by about 40%. Basal serum cortisol and ACTH levels were similar with both treatments. The adrenal response, as assessed by incremental rise in the serum cortisol level (peak minus basal) after ACTH challenge, improved significantly (5.6-7.9 microg/dL, p < 0.01) after switching to fluticasone. All three patients who had lower serum cortisol levels during beclomethasone treatment than during fluticasone treatment showed improvement in both the peak cortisol level and the incremental rise in cortisol. Mean morning and evening PEFRs significantly increased after switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone (morning: 71.2 to 76.0%, p < 0.01; evening: 67.3 to 72.1%, both p < 0.05). The diurnal variation of PEFR significantly decreased from 10.9% to 8.3% after switching treatment (p < 0.01). We conclude that switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone reduces the risk of adrenal dysfunction associated with inhaled steroids and improves pulmonary function.

Comparison of once- and twice-daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data regarding the efficacy of once- versus twice-daily administration of flutica-sone propionate.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluticasone propionate powder 200 microg/d administered as a once- or twice-daily dosage regimen in patients who were currently being treated with bronchodilators only (BD patients) and in patients who required inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance treatment of asthma (ICS patients).

METHODS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following inhaled treatments through the Diskus device (Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks: fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily (FP100BID) or 200 microg once daily (FP200QD) or placebo.

RESULTS

BD patients treated with FP100BID, FP200QD, and placebo had mean increases in FEV(1) from baseline to end point of 0. 49 L, 0.37 L, and 0.21 L, respectively (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.05, FP200QD vs placebo). ICS patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in FEV(1) of 0.27 L and 0.11 L, respectively, compared with a decrease in FEV(1) of -0.08 L with placebo (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.023, FP200QD vs placebo). BD patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline to end point of 31 L/min and 27 L/min, respectively, compared with a 1 L/min increase in patients treated with placebo. ICS patients treated with FP100BID had a mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (from baseline to end point) of 18 L/min compared with mean decreases of -3 L/min and -12 L/min in the FP200QD and placebo groups, respectively. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (26% and 48%, in BD and ICS patients, respectively) than from fluticasone propionate (7%-9% [BID-QD] and 18%-32% [BID-QD], in BD and ICS patients, respectively) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria.

CONCLUSION

The efficacies of FP100BID and FP200QD were comparable with regard to improvement in pulmonary function and asthma stability in BD patients. In ICS patients, asthma control was maintained with FP200QD, whereas FP100BID provided greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma stability.

Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect.

Measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in patients with asthma treated with inhaled glucocorticoids: clinical and research implications

In asthmatic patients treated with inhaled glucocorticoids there may be a risk of suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function. The aim of the present study was to review peer-refereed data on HPA function in asthmatic patients taking inhaled glucocorticoids, and to discuss the value of HPA function measures in clinical practice and research. There is no evidence that inhaled glucocorticoids in recommended doses cause clinically significant HPA insufficiency. If sensitive measures of basal adrenal activity are used, however, dose-related suppressive effects with specific drugs and application systems can be detected. In adults, fluticasone propionate appears to be more potent than budesonide or triamcinolone acetonide in suppressing measures of basal adrenal activity. Measures of basal adrenal activity are useful in clinical trials that assess and compare systemic activity of specific drugs, application devices, and administration regimens, but have no place in the management of asthma.

A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for the treatment of persistent asthma. Comparative clinical studies evaluating 2 or more doses of these agents are few.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (88 micrograms twice daily and 220 micrograms twice daily) with 2 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (168 micrograms twice daily and 336 micrograms twice daily) in subjects with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Eligible subjects were using daily inhaled corticosteroids and had an FEV1 of 45% to 80% of predicted value. Clinic visits, including spirometry, were conducted every 1 to 2 weeks. Subjects recorded symptoms, use of albuterol, and peak expiratory flows on daily diary cards.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate treatment resulted in significantly (P </=.034) greater improvements in objective pulmonary function parameters than did beclomethasone dipropionate treatment and significantly greater reductions in daily albuterol use (P </=.010) and asthma symptoms (P </=.027). Both low-dose (88 micrograms twice daily) and medium-dose (220 micrograms twice daily) fluticasone propionate significantly increased FEV1 compared with higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (P =. 006). Low-dose and medium-dose fluticasone propionate improved FEV1 by 0.31 L (14%) and 0.36 L (15%), respectively, compared with improvements of 0.18 L (8%) and 0.21 L (9%) with low-dose and medium-dose beclomethasone dipropionate. The adverse event profiles were similar for both medications.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate provides greater asthma control at roughly half the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with a comparable adverse event profile.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its therapeutic efficacy at dosages < or = 500 microg/day in adults and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma

Fluticasone propionate is a corticosteroid with comparatively high receptor affinity and topical activity. Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day provided effective corticosteroid maintenance treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma in randomised, controlled clinical studies of 4 to 24 weeks in duration. Dosages of 50 to 250 microg twice daily produced consistent improvement in spirometric measures of lung function, reduced the frequency of as-needed beta2-agonist bronchodilator use, asthma symptom scores and night-time wakenings, and prevented asthma exacerbations compared with placebo. Fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily provided significantly greater improvements in lung function than nedocromil 4 mg 4 times daily, theophylline (5 to 15 mg/L) or zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. Health-related quality of life improved significantly with fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily, but not zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily or placebo. In comparative trials in which fluticasone propionate was given at half the dosage of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily produced equivalent or greater improvement in spirometric parameters and equivalent reductions in the use of as-needed beta2-agonists than beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide. Fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily was generally more effective than triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in two 24-week trials. The combination of inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =250 plus salmeterol < or =50 microg twice daily allowed for the use of lower dosages of the inhaled corticosteroid. The incidence of adverse events in patients receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate 50 to 250 microg twice daily was similar to that in beclomethasone dipropionate 168 to 500 microg twice daily and budesonide 100 to 600 microg twice daily recipients and greater than that in recipients of triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in comparative trials. The incidence of oral candidiasis was < or =8% in patients treated with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily or other agents. There was no evidence of clinically significant hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily in comparative trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is an effective antiinflammatory therapy for mild to moderate asthma in adolescents and adults. The drug is more effective than nedocromil, theophylline or zafirlukast and is at least as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids administered at twice the fluticasone propionate dosage. The addition of inhaled salmeterol allows the use of lower maintenance dosages of fluticasone propionate. The drug is well tolerated and there is no evidence of a clinically significant effect of this dosage on HPA axis function. Hence, fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is a particularly suitable agent for patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Two first-line therapies in the treatment of mild asthma: use of peak flow variability as a predictor of effectiveness

BACKGROUND

New drug evaluations in patients with mild asthma are sometimes complicated by enrollment of patients whose disease is too mild to show improvement with therapy. A peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability criterion may help to more clearly define a mild asthmatic population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily) and cromolyn sodium (1600 microg four times daily) compared with placebo as first-line therapy for mild asthma using a retrospective analysis, which stratified patients by PEF variability (<10% or > or =10%).

STUDY DESIGN

Symptomatic patients (daytime asthma symptoms score > or =8) were randomized to 13 weeks of treatment in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 287) were nonsmokers (age > or =12 years) with reversible airway disease, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 55% of predicted, and previous treatment with beta2-agonist or theophylline only. Assessments included changes from baseline to endpoint in daytime and nocturnal asthma symptoms, beta2-agonist use, PEF, and FEV1. Response to treatment was assessed by predetermined diary card and FEV1 criteria. Safety was determined from adverse events and laboratory test results.

RESULTS

No significant treatment effects were seen across efficacy measures for patients with PEF variability < 10%. For patients with PEF variability > or = 10%, both active treatments significantly (P < .05) decreased the daytime asthma symptoms score, nighttime awakenings, and beta2-agonist use, and increased morning PEF and FEV1 compared with placebo. Response to diary card criteria was 70% and 75% for zafirlukast and cromolyn, respectively; response to FEV1 criteria was 47% for both treatments. All treatments were tolerated well by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Zafirlukast and cromolyn are effective first-line therapies for mild asthma, with both therapies producing greater benefits in patients whose PEF variability was > or = 10%. In prospective trials to evaluate therapies in patients with mild asthma, it may be worthwhile to include PEF variability with a 10% cutoff either as an inclusion criteria or as a tool for subset analysis.

Newer therapeutic agents for asthma

The past decade has seen significant advances in the available treatments for asthma. These include longer-acting bronchodilating agents, high topical potency inhaled corticosteroids, and agents that interfere with leukotriene production or action. Table 3 summarizes the clinical effects of the newer therapeutic agents reviewed. Experimental therapies for the steroid-dependent patient have also been discussed. Although clinical trials to date have established many of these as effective in asthma, the results of ongoing, large, multicenter studies investigating the relative merits of these therapies, alone and in combination, will further clarify how to maximize the utility of these agents in the treatment of asthma.

The addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate versus increasing the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma. Salmeterol Study Group

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines define inhaled corticosteroids such as fluticasone propionate (FP) as the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding salmeterol therapy to patients who remain symptomatic while receiving FP as compared with increasing the dose of FP.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind study conducted over 24-weeks, 437 patients aged 12 years and older and receiving FP 88 microg twice daily for 2 to 4 weeks were randomly assigned to receive either salmeterol (42 microg twice daily) or FP 220 microg twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was morning peak expiratory flow. Secondary measures included FEV1, symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

The addition of salmeterol resulted in significantly greater improvements in lung function and symptom control as compared with increasing the dose of FP. Over weeks 1 to 24, morning peak expiratory flow was increased by 47 L/min from baseline with salmeterol treatment as compared with 24 L/min with FP 220 microg twice daily (P < .001) while the percent of symptom-free days increased from baseline by 26% of days as compared with 10% of days (P < .001). The adverse event profiles were similar between groups and fewer exacerbations were reported with salmeterol treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of salmeterol therapy to patients who remain symptomatic while using a low dose of FP was clinically and statistically superior to increasing the dose of FP.

Establishing a therapeutic index for the inhaled corticosteroids: part I. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison of the inhaled corticosteroids

The inhaled corticosteroids contain physicochemical differences that alter both glucocorticoid receptor-binding characteristics and the pharmacokinetic variables of these drugs. Differences in receptor-binding affinity translate into differences in potency for different drugs. Differences in pharmacokinetics, however, determine the topical effect to systemic effect ratio, or the "pulmonary targeting" of the drug. Beneficial pharmacokinetic properties that may improve pulmonary targeting include low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, and slow absorption from the lung. Delivery devices can produce clinically significant differences in topical activity by altering the dose deposited in the lung and, for orally absorbed drugs, the amount deposited in the oropharynx and swallowed. Clinical trials have confirmed that differences in potency or drug delivery of 2-fold or more can be detected in patients with asthma. However, because of the relatively flat nature of the dose-response curve for morning peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the trials must be adequately powered and well controlled. The use of bronchial provocation measures are problematic because of the prolonged lag time for response. Study design flaws can lead to misinterpretation of results. Clinical studies have indicated the following relative potency differences: fluticasone propionate > budesonide = beclomethasone dipropionate > triamcinolone acetonide = flunisolide. Current evidence suggests that potency differences can be overcome by giving larger doses of the less potent drug. However, because of these potency differences, studies of systemic effects should not be done in isolation of adequate topical activity studies to define the pulmonary targeting of the drugs.

Risk-benefit assessment of fluticasone propionate in the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

BENEFITS

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a new topical corticosteroid spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. FP has been shown to be effective for the treatment of adult and pediatric asthma, even at rather low doses (25 microg twice daily [b.i.d.]); many studies in asthma have shown clinical efficacy of fluticasone at half the dose of the comparison steroid (such as beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP] or budesonide [BUD]). However, exact dose comparisons cannot be made because dose-ranging comparison studies have not been done. Studies in allergic rhinitis in children and adults have shown good efficacy in FP-treated patients at a dose of 200 microg once daily (o.d.), intranasally. In summary, FP is effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.

RISKS

FP has minimal systemic activity because the portion of drug that is swallowed is not absorbed from the gut. Thus, the amount available for systemic activity is only that which is absorbed through the nasal mucosa (in the treatment of rhinitis) or through the alveoli of the lungs (in the treatment of asthma). When laboratory assays of adrenal function or bone formation are measured, FP and other inhaled corticosteroids can be shown to cause suppression of these markers, especially at high doses. There have been no consistent reports of clinical adrenal suppression or osteoporosis caused by FP. In summary, the risk-benefit ratio of FP at the usual doses (therapeutic ratio) is very favorable. High doses may show evidence of suppression of the hypothalamic pituitary axis as measured by in vitro tests, but evidence of corresponding clinical adverse effects is lacking.

Efficacy of chlorofluorocarbon-free beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms day-1 delivered as an extrafine aerosol in adults with moderate asthma

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been reformulated in a chlorofluorocarbon-free propellant, hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA), resulting in an extrafine aerosol which gives improved drug delivery to the airways. The objective of this 6 week, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HFA-BDP 400 micrograms day-1 in 256 adult patients with moderate asthma. This is a lower daily dose than that recommended for existing BDP inhalers in current treatment guidelines for moderate asthma (NIH publication 95-3659). Another objective was to evaluate whether delivering the 400 micrograms dose as four actuations of 50 micrograms twice daily (HFA-BDP 50 micrograms) provided equivalent asthma control to delivering the dose as two actuations of 100 micrograms twice daily (HFA-BDP 100 micrograms) without the use of a spacer or holding chamber. Both active treatments produced a significant change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), which was significantly larger than that in the placebo group (P < or = 0.017) throughout the study. The mean changes from baseline in morning PEF at weeks 5-6 were 47.0 l min-1 in the combined HFA-BDP group and 16.5 l min-1 in the HFA-placebo group. The two dose strengths were statistically equivalent (P = 0.017 for equivalence testing). The active treatments also produced significant improvements compared with placebo in evening PEF, forced expiratory volume in the first second, forced expiratory flow over 25-75% of vital capacity, sleep disturbance scores and daily beta-agonist use. The study medication was well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events. The results from this study demonstrate that a daily dose of 400 micrograms HFA-BDP (given in 50 micrograms and 100 micrograms strengths) provides dose proportionality and effective control in patients with moderate asthma.

Heat shock protein 70 upregulation is related to HLA-DR expression in bronchial asthma. Effects of inhaled glucocorticoids

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antigen processing determines the production of peptides from antigens - including allergens - and their binding to class II major histocompatibility complex molecules, that stimulate T-cell responses. Heat shock protein (hsp) 70 are recognized to have a role in chaperoning antigenic peptides and in facilitating class II peptide assembly. We studied the HLA-DR and hsp70 expression on BAL cells and bronchial biopsies from asthmatics, as well as the effect of low dose fluticasone propionate treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-three asthmatics and eight normal subjects were selected. In each subject BAL and bronchial biopsies were performed. Eighteen out of 23 asthmatics, underwent the second bronchoscopy after 6 weeks of low dose inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment (250 microg b.d.) in a placebo-controlled double-blind study. BAL fluid and biopsies were processed to evaluate HLA-DR and hsp70 expression by immunochemistry methods.

RESULTS

Hsp70 and HLA-DR upregulation was present on professional and non-professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). In asthmatics, the hsp70 and HLA-DR expression was higher in BAL (hsp70 P<0.001, HLA-DR P<0.001) and bronchial epithelium (hsp70 P<0.001, HLA-DR P<0.001) when compared with controls. We also observed a significant correlation between hsp70 and HLA-DR expression in BAL (P<0.005) and epithelium (P<0.001). Fluticasone propionate treatment down-regulated the hsp70 and HLA-DR expression in BAL (hsp70 P < 0.001, HLA-DR P < 0.05) and bronchial epithelium (hsp70 P < 0.05, HLA-DR P < 0.05). A serial section comparison study showed that CD1a+ cells and macrophages were positive for both hsp70 and HLA-DR in the submucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the hypothesis that hsp70 over-expression implies a potential role for these proteins in antigen processing and/or presentation resulting in an increased activity of APCs, which is essential for the initiation and modulation of the asthmatic immune response in chronic asthma. Fluticasone propionate induces downregulation of HLA-DR and hsp70 molecules thus regulating inflammation by affecting key mechanisms of the allergic response.

Relative safety and efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids

Inhaled corticosteroids are the main treatment for controlling asthma in adults and children. However, there is still some concern over the safety of these drugs when used at high doses and for long periods of time. Hence issues relating to the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids have been extensively researched over the past 5 years. General considerations, such as use of an appropriate dose of inhaled corticosteroid in an appropriate asthma population, are discussed. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate, beclomethasone dipropionate, and budesonide are highlighted, and a systematic review of these studies suggests that fluticasone propionate has a better efficacy:safety therapeutic ratio than either beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide.

Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International COPD Study Group

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD.

METHODS

We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 microg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance.

FINDINGS

51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0.449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0.001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0.001, p=0.048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0.001), forced vital capacity (p<0.001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0.01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0.004 and p=0.016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0.032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration.

INTERPRETATION

Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD.

Safety and efficacy of fluticasone and beclomethasone in moderate to severe asthma. Belgian Multicenter Study Group

There are still some concerns about the safety of high doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS). We compared the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in 306 patients with moderate to severe asthma in a double-blind, multicenter, cross-over study of 12 mo duration. During the 1-mo run-in period, bronchodilators were replaced by salmeterol 50 microg twice daily, increasing morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 28 L/min (p < 0.001) and FEV1 by 6.2% predicted (p < 0.001). At randomization the current ICS was replaced by 500 microg BDP or 250 microg FP in accordance with previously taken 500 microg BDP or 400 microg budesonide (BUD). No significant differences between the two treatments regarding morning plasma cortisol, urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline, FEV1, and PEFR were observed at any time point during the study. Osteocalcin and bone mineral density (BMD) were improved over baseline in the FP group, resulting in higher serum osteocalcin levels (mean difference 0.28 ng/ml; p < 0.001) and higher BMD in the spine (1.0%; p = 0.05), femoral neck (1.6; p < 0.01), and Ward's triangle (3.6%; p = 0.01) as compared with BDP. We conclude that chronic treatment with FP, at half the dose of BDP, results in a similar antiasthma effect but a more favorable safety profile with respect to bone metabolism and mineral density.

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative studies evaluating both efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of asthma. Specifically, comparative clinical trials are evaluated that allow clinicians to determine relative potencies of the various inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

A critical review was performed of the published clinical trials, either as articles or abstracts, comparing the clinical efficacy or systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. No a priori criteria were applied, as this was not a meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

In vitro measures of antiinflammatory activity of corticosteroids consistently demonstrate potency differences among the various corticosteroids. Traditionally, these in vitro measures have been used to develop new corticosteroids with greater topical activity. While no accepted direct measure of antiasthmatic antiinflammatory activity exists, clinical trials using surrogate measures (e.g., forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, symptom control) indicate that in vitro measures provide a relatively accurate assessment of antiasthmatic potency. The relative antiinflammatory potency of the inhaled corticosteroids is in the following rank order. flunisolide = triamcinolone acetonide < beclomethasone dipropionate = budesonide < fluticasone. Studies of systemic activity appear to confirm this relative order of potency. Currently, no evidence exists for greater efficacy for any of the inhaled corticosteroids when administered in their relative equipotent dosages. The preponderance of current data suggests that when administered in equipotent antiinflammatory doses as a metered-dose inhaler plus spacer or as their respective dry-powder inhaler, the existing inhaled corticosteroids have similar risks of producing systemic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery systems can significantly affect both topical and systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. More direct comparative studies between agents are required to firmly establish comparative topical to systemic activity ratios. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the agents are not equipotent on a microgram basis.

Clinical experience with fluticasone propionate in asthma: a meta-analysis of efficacy and systemic activity compared with budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at half the microgram dose or less

The relative clinical efficacy and systemic effects of different inhaled corticosteroids is controversial. To obtain further information on this matter, the authors have performed meta-analysis of seven trials comparing fluticasone propionate (FP) with budesonide (Bud), and seven trials comparing FP with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) for the treatment of asthma of all severities in adult and paediatric patients. In all cases, the drugs were compared at clinically equivalent doses, i.e. FP was given at half (or less) the microgram dose. The total number of patients was 1980 (1000 treated with FP 200-800 micrograms day-1 and 980 with Bud 400-1600 micrograms day-1), and 1584 patients in the second analysis (780 treated with FP 200-1000 micrograms day-1 and 804 with BDP 400-2000 micrograms day-1). FP significantly improved mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) compared with Bud, with an overall difference of +11 l min-1. Analysis of serum cortisols showed no differences between FP and Bud treatment at low doses, but at higher dosages, and overall, significant differences in favour of FP were observed. In the second meta-analysis, no significant differences in PEFR were observed between FP and BDP in any of the seven individual studies or in the pooled analysis. Analysis of serum cortisols showed a similar trend to the previous analysis, however, no overall difference in serum cortisol results were seen between FP and BDP. In conclusion, the pooled analysis shows that FP at half the dose (or less) is more effective than Bud and as effective as BDP in improving PEFR; in addition, these improvements were achieved with a reduction in cortisol suppression compared with BUD and with no greater degree of cortisol suppression compared with BDP. This demonstrates, in patients with asthma, that FP has an improved efficacy to safety ratio compared with older inhaled corticosteroids.

Is high-dose fluticasone propionate via a metered-dose inhaler and Volumatic as efficacious as nebulized budesonide in adult asthmatics?

The efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate (FP) 2 mg daily via a metered-dose inhaler and Volumatic (Glaxo Wellcome) spacer device was compared with nebulized budesonide (nBUD), 2 and 4 mg daily, in a multi-centre, open-label, cross-over study of adult asthmatics. Patients received, in random order, either 4 weeks of treatment with FP followed by 4 weeks of treatment with nBUD, or vice versa, with an intervening 4 week 'wash-out' period between treatments. Thirty patients completed the study, of whom 24 were evaluable. In terms of the primary efficacy parameter, change in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (l min-1) from baseline to the fourth week of each treatment period, FP was more effective than nBUD [mean difference (FP-nBUD) 21.1 l min-1, P = 0.007, 95% CI (6.5, 35.7)]. Sub-group analysis demonstrated FP to be superior to the 4 mg nBUD [mean treatment difference (FP-nBUD) 42.9 l min-1, P = 0.026, 95% CI (7.1, 78.8)] and at least as efficacious as the 2 mg nBUD sub-group [mean treatment difference (FP-nBUD) 10.2 l min-1, P = 0.211, 95% CI (-6.5, 26.9)]. Furthermore, larger reductions in diurnal variation were observed during FP treatment [mean treatment difference (FP-nBUD) -4.4 percentage points, P = 0.028, 95% CI (-8.4, -0.5)]. There was no significant difference between the treatments for the proportion of symptom-free 24 h periods. Of those expressing a preference, significantly more patients found FP via a metered-dose inhaler and spacer device both easier to administer (78%, P = 0.007) and more convenient to take (76%, P = 0.008) than nebulized budesonide. In addition, cost per patient analysis showed that nebulized budesonide was from 1.7 to 3.5 times more expensive than FP.

Efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in asthma results from topical and not from systemic activity

The objective of this study was to determine whether the therapeutic benefits of inhaled fluticasone propionate are mediated through topical or systemic effects. Two hundred seventy-four patients with asthma receiving beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide during a 2-wk, single-blind, run-in period were randomized to inhaled fluticasone propionate powder 100 or 500 micrograms twice daily, oral fluticasone propionate 20 mg once daily, or placebo during a 6-wk treatment period. Patients receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate had a significantly greater probability of remaining in the study over time compared with patients receiving oral fluticasone propionate or placebo (p = 0.001). FEV1 and PEF rates at end point were significantly higher with inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment regimens than with oral fluticasone propionate (with the exception of PEF rates for inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 micrograms) or placebo treatments (p < or = 0.004). Systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate as assessed by trough plasma concentrations and/or 12-hr plasma concentration area under the curve analyses (AUC12) was higher with the oral fluticasone propionate than with the two inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment groups. The results of this study suggest that the therapeutic benefits of inhaled fluticasone propionate are mediated through topical effects in the lungs and not through systemic effects.

Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid with negligible systemic bioavailability via the oral route, is efficacious in the treatment of asthma when administered via metered-dose inhaler.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate powder in patients with moderate asthma previously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 342 adolescent and adult patients with moderate asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 50% and 80% of predicted] treated previously by beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide. Patients received fluticasone propionate powder 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, 250 micrograms, or placebo via a breath-actuated inhalation device, the Diskhaler, twice daily for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients in the fluticasone propionate groups experienced a mean increase from baseline to endpoint in FEV1 ranging from 0.43 L to 0.47 L. Patients in the placebo group experienced a mean decrease from baseline of 0.22 L (P < .001). The probability of patients remaining in the study over time without developing signs of exacerbating asthma was significantly greater in the fluticasone propionate groups than in the placebo group (P = .001). Asthma symptom scores, supplemental rescue albuterol use, and number of nighttime awakenings due to asthma requiring treatment also improved significantly with all fluticasone propionate treatment regimens compared with placebo (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences at endpoint among the three fluticasone propionate groups. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone propionate powder (50, 100, and 250 micrograms) was well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function in patients with moderate asthma.

Knemometry, urine cortisol excretion, and measures of the insulin-like growth factor axis and collagen turnover in children treated with inhaled glucocorticosteroids

Correlations between knemometric (lower leg length) growth rates and urine free cortisol excretion, respectively, and serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGF binding protein-3, osteocalcin, carboxy terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PICP), carboxy terminal pryridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I procollagen (ICTP), and amino terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) were investigated in 17 asthmatic children aged 7-14 y during treatment with fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms, and beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 and 800 micrograms/d, taken from dry powder inhalers. The study was a double blind, crossover trial with three active treatment periods and two wash-out periods. All periods were 15 d long. Overnight urine free cortisol/ creatinine x 10(6) did not correlate with knemometric growth rates or any of the serum markers. Significant correlations (Pearson's correlation coefficient, P) between knemometric growth rates and IGF-I (0.41; 0.006), IGFBP-3 (0.35; 0.02), PICP (0.44; 0.003), ICTP (0.35; 0.001), and PIIINP (0.46; 0.002) were found. Compared with fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms, beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 and 800 micrograms, caused significant suppression of lower leg growth rate (F = 12.41; p = 0.002, and F = 23.30; p = 0.0001, respectively) and of urine free cortisol/creatinine x 10(6) (F = 10.52; p = 0.003, and F = 13.74; p = 0.001). Beclomethasone, 800 micrograms, caused suppression of PICP compared with fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms (F = 8.31; p = 0.008), and beclomethasone, 400 micrograms (F = 7.53; p = 0.01). Both low (F = 6.82; p = 0.02) and high (F = 23.35; p = 0.0001) doses of beclomethasone were associated with reduced concentrations of ICTP, the high dose being the most suppressive (F = 4.42; p = 0.05). Beclomethasone 400 (F = 9.75; p = 0.004) and 800 micrograms (F = 23.61; p = 0.0001) resulted in reduced levels of PIIINP. Reduced short-term knemometric growth rates in children treated with inhaled glucocorticosteroids reflect suppressive effects on type I and type III collagen turnover.

Dose-response of inhaled drugs in asthma. An update

The demographic characteristics of patients used in clinical trials (such as the severity of airway obstruction) can significantly influence the results of dose-response studies, emphasising the need to evaluate effects on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Differences in inhaler devices can also influence study outcomes, as for inhaled drugs both airway efficacy and adverse effect profiles are primarily determined by lung deposition and hence bioavailability. Dose-response studies with short- and long-acting beta 2-agonists show an excellent therapeutic ratio at conventional doses used in everyday clinical practice (i.e. 2 to 4 puffs). Dose-related systemic effects of beta 2-agonist occur at higher doses, for salbutamol (albuterol) > 500 micrograms. Fenoterol is a beta 2-agonists with higher intrinsic activity than salbutamol and produces greater systemic effects at higher than conventional doses on a microgram equivalent basis, although even at 4000 micrograms such differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant. No differences between fenoterol and salbutamol have been shown in terms of bronchodilator potency on a microgram equivalent basis. The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol, as a partial agonist, has the potential to attenuate the acute bronchodilator response to a higher activity beta 2-agonist such as salbutamol or fenoterol, although there is no evidence to date on whether this is relevant in the setting of acute asthma. When comparing inhaled corticosteroids, attention should be focused on their respective risk-benefit ratios for antiasthmatic versus systemic activity. In terms of detecting systemic activity, it is important to use sensitive measures, such as urinary cortisol excretion, rather than insensitive parameters, such as a single morning plasma cortisol measurement between 0800h and 1000h. For fluticasone, a greater in vitro potency results in only marginal differences in antiasthmatic efficacy, particularly on the flatter part of the dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children. However, the same enhanced potency translates directly into commensurate differences in systemic adverse effects on the steep part of the systemic dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children, respectively. Furthermore, with repeated twice-daily administration, a longer elimination half-life and prolonged systemic tissue retention due to enhanced lipophilicity will result in greater systemic activity observed at steady-state in long term administration studies. This dissociation of airway and systemic dose-response curves results in a J-shaped curve for benefit: risk ratio, with a watershed area above 1000 microgram/day in adults. This fall in the benefit: risk ratio is likely to be greater for fluticasone than for budesonide or beclomethasone. Further studies are needed to clearly define the dose-response relationships of higher potency steroids such as fluticasone, particularly on the steep part of the curve (for clinical efficacy), using the appropriate back-titration design along with sensitive measures of antiasthmatic and systemic activity.

Fluticasone propionate 1 mg daily and beclomethasone dipropionate 2 mg daily: a comparison over 1 yr

This study was designed primarily to assess the safety and tolerability of fluticasone propionate (FP) 1 mg day-1 by comparison with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 2 mg day-1 over a 12-month study period. Lung function data were also recorded and used to determine whether the potency ratio between the two inhaled corticosteroids observed in previous studies was maintained in the long-term. Two hundred and thirteen patients with an established clinical history of severe chronic asthma and who were currently receiving between 1000 micrograms and 2000 micrograms day-1 of inhaled steroids were randomized to treatment in a ratio of 3:1 for FP:BDP (159 patients FP; 54 patients BDP), both via metered dose inhalers. Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar adverse event profile. No unexpected adverse events were recorded. Most adverse events were related to the patients' asthma, an intercurrent infection or underlying atopy. The incidence of pharmacologically predictable adverse events was equally low in both treatment groups as was the incidence of events suggestive of systemic steroid effect. Mean serum cortisol levels remained within the normal range at all visits for both treatments. At 12 months, however, the mean cortisol levels for the FP group had risen 4% above the baseline value but had dropped 15% below for the BDP group, giving a ratio of FP:BDP of 1.22; P = 0.01; 95% confidence limits (CL) 1.05-1.43. Fluticasone propionate 1 mg day-1 was at least as effective as BDP 2 mg day-1 in improving lung function (PEF, FEV1 and FVC) over this period. Moreover, the difference in FEV1 values at 6 months was significantly greater for the FP group than for the BDP group (P = 0.04; difference = 0.12 1; 95% CL = 0.01, 0.24 1). The difference between treatments in the amount of FEV1 reversibility was also significantly greater for FP at 12 months (difference in treatments = -3%; 95% CL = - 7-0%; P = 0.044). This study supports previous studies and suggests that FP is likely to be of benefit in the long-term treatment of chronic severe asthma.

Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: a dose-ranging study

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate, an inhaled corticosteroid, in adolescents and adults with moderate asthma who were previously taking inhaled corticosteroids. After a 2-week, open-label screening period, a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study was conducted over 12 weeks in 21 outpatient centers throughout the United States. Patients (N = 304) > or = 12 years of age with moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-sympathomimetic bronchodilators were enrolled. Patients were assigned to receive placebo or fluticasone propionate 100, 250, or 500 micrograms twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler without a spacer device. These doses refer to the amount of fluticasone propionate released from the valve of the metered-dose inhaler; the corresponding doses released from the activator of the metered-dose inhaler are 88 micrograms, 220 micrograms, and 440 micrograms, respectively. Between baseline and end point, mean values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased 0.31 L in the placebo group and improved 0.39 L, 0.30 L, and 0.43 L in patients receiving 100-micrograms, 250-micrograms, and 500-micrograms fluticasone propionate, respectively. The differences between placebo and all treatment groups were statistically significant. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (72%) than from fluticasone propionate (13% to 16%) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria. Differences in baseline-to-end point changes in morning peak expiratory flow rate, physician overall assessments and patient-rated assessment of symptoms, and albuterol use for symptom control also significantly favored each fluticasone propionate group over placebo. There were essentially no differences in efficacy among the three fluticasone propionate groups. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8% of placebo-treated patients and 13% to 15% of fluticasone propionate-treated patients; these events were mainly localized to the oropharynx/ larynx. A 12-week course of fluticasone propionate (100, 250, and 500 micrograms twice daily) was well tolerated and more effective than placebo based on maintenance of asthma stability, pulmonary function tests, physician and patient assessments, and rescue bronchodilator use. No dose-related effects were observed with the dosages of fluticasone propionate used in this study.

Comparison of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on direct and indirect measurements of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with stable asthma

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone propionate is a new inhaled corticosteroid with a 2:1 efficacy ratio compared with beclomethasone dipropionate with regard to lung function and symptom scores, without increased systemic activity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this was also the case for bronchial hyperresponsiveness, assessed by both a direct (histamine) and an indirect (ultrasonically nebulised distilled water (UNDW)) provocation test.

METHODS

Fluticasone propionate, 750 micrograms/day, and beclomethasone dipropionate, 1500 micrograms/day, were compared in a randomised, double blind, crossover study consisting of two six week treatment periods, each preceded by a three week single blind placebo period. Twenty one non-smoking asthmatics (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 74.7% predicted, mean PC20histamine 0.36 mg/ml) completed the study.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate improved FEV1, peak flow rates, asthma symptoms, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to the same extent. Both fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate caused an increase in PC20histamine (mean 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.45 to 3.13] and 1.95 [1.07 to 2.84] doubling doses, respectively) and in PD20UNDW (1.12 [0.55 to 1.70] and 1.28 [0.88 to 1.70] doubling doses, respectively). Neither treatment changed morning serum cortisol levels, but fluticasone propionate decreased the number of peripheral blood eosinophils less than beclomethasone dipropionate, indicating smaller systemic effects of fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that fluticasone propionate is as effective as twice the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate on bronchial hyperresponsiveness, assessed by provocation with both histamine and UNDW, without increased systemic activity.

Fluticasone propionate--an update on preclinical and clinical experience

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a novel androstane glucocorticoid with potent anti-inflammatory activity which has been effectively used, intranasally, as therapy for seasonal and allergic perennial rhinitis. When taken by the inhaled route, FP has shown significant therapeutic efficacy in the management of asthma. Fluticasone propionate is a highly lipophilic molecule with good uptake, binding and retention characteristics in human lung tissue. Fluticasone propionate has high glucocorticoid receptor selectivity and affinity, demonstrating rapid receptor association and slow receptor dissociation. In vitro, FP has been shown to potently inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine generation, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced adhesion molecule expression, interleukin-5-induced eosinophilia, mucosal oedema and toluene 2,4-diisocyanate-induced mast cell proliferation, while promoting secretory leucocyte protease inhibitor production and eosinophil apoptosis. In human studies, FP has demonstrated marked vasoconstrictor potency in normal subjects and inhibited antigen-induced mucosal platelet activating factor/eicosanoid production, T lymphocytes and CD25+ cells in patients with rhinitis. Biopsy data from mild asthmatics demonstrate FP-associated reduction in CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD25 cells, with an accompanying reduction in eosinophil and mast cell markers. Clinical studies have evaluated lung function, bronchial reactivity, exacerbation rates and oral corticosteroid-sparing effect. Results show that FP has at least twice the clinical potency of beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide. This appears to be achieved without an accompanying increase in systemic effects, suggesting a therapeutic index which may be higher than other currently available inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma

Fluticasone propionate is an androstane carbothioate glucocorticosteroid with almost twice the topical anti-inflammatory potency of beclomethasone dipropionate. Importantly, it is not appreciably absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. However, the fraction of active drug absorbed from the lungs after inhalation, and therefore total systemic availability, has yet to be determined. Inhaled fluticasone propionate administered at dosages of 1500 micrograms/day for 1 year or 2000 micrograms/day for 6 weeks did not cause clinically significant pituitary-adrenal suppression. Preliminary data from 2 published trials also indicate no significant effect on growth in children. However, wider clinical experience is needed to clarify the effects of long term administration on pituitary-adrenal function, bone metabolism and attainment of adult height in children. In clinical studies, inhaled fluticasone propionate was at least as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide when administered at half the dosage of the comparators in patients with mild to moderate or severe asthma. Limited data suggest that fluticasone propionate also has considerable potential in the management of childhood asthma. In trials of up to 1 year in duration, fluticasone propionate appeared to be well tolerated by both adults and children. Whether an improved tolerability profile compared with other corticosteroids is a major clinical benefit of the extremely low oral bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate requires confirmation. Nevertheless, on the basis of available data from initial clinical trials of mostly limited duration, inhaled fluticasone propionate offers an effective treatment option for the management of asthma, with the potential of an enhanced safety profile.